Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsProfessional — psychological therapies

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Professional — psychological therapies

MEQ: CBT formulation and treatment plan for panic with agoraphobia

FRANZCP-style MEQ on Clark panic model, five-area formulation, session structure, behavioural experiments, and meds/risk integration for panic with agoraphobia.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
You are the psychiatry registrar in an outpatient clinic. A 29-year-old teacher presents with 8 months of unexpected panic attacks (palpitations, breathlessness, fear of dying). She now avoids trains, shopping centres, and staff meetings. She checks her pulse repeatedly and carries diazepam ‘just in case’ but rarely takes it. PHQ-9 is 11; she drinks two standard drinks most nights ‘to switch off’. No chest pain on exertion; recent ECG and bloods normal. She wants ‘to fix her thinking’ and asks whether she still needs medication. (i) Outline the cognitive model of panic and name two maintaining safety behaviours in this case (5). (ii) Construct a brief CBT cross-sectional formulation using the five-area model (5). (iii) Describe session structure and a behavioural experiment you would design in the first treatment phase (5). (iv) Discuss integrating pharmacotherapy and when CBT is not the priority today (5). (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Cognitive model of panic and safety behaviours (5). Clark’s model: panic is maintained by catastrophic misinterpretation of benign bodily sensations (e.g. palpitations → “I’m dying / heart attack”), which increases anxiety and sensations in a vicious cycle. Safety behaviours prevent disconfirmation of the threat belief. In this case: repeated pulse checking; carrying unused diazepam as a talisman; avoidance of trains/meetings/shopping centres (situational safety via escape/avoidance); possibly alcohol as evening shutdown.[1]

(ii) Five-area formulation (5). Situation: boarding train / staff meeting / shopping centre; noticing heartbeat. Thoughts: “I’m having a heart attack / I’ll collapse / people will see me lose control.” Emotions: panic, fear, shame. Body: palpitations, breathlessness, sweating (normal anxiety physiology misread as danger). Behaviours: leave situation, check pulse, grip diazepam, avoid meetings, evening alcohol. Maintaining cycle: avoidance and checking stop her learning that sensations peak and pass without catastrophe; threat belief stays high.[1][2]

(iii) Session structure and behavioural experiment (5). Structure: bridge/mood-risk check → collaborative agenda → review any homework → active work → specific new homework → summary/feedback. Example experiment: target belief “If my heart races on a train for 10 minutes without checking my pulse or leaving, I will collapse or die.” Prediction: collapse/medical emergency within 10 minutes (rate belief 0–100%). Experiment: brief accompanied interoceptive then in vivo task (e.g. increase heart rate by stair climbing then sit on train one stop without pulse check or diazepam in hand), record outcome, re-rate belief. Emphasise review and learning; homework quality matters for outcome.[1][3]

(iv) Pharmacotherapy and priorities (5). SSRI/SNRI or other guideline-supported agents may be offered based on severity, preference, comorbidity, and access; benzodiazepines as standing “just in case” often become safety behaviours and complicate exposure — plan cautious review rather than reinforce talisman use. Mild–moderate depressive symptoms may improve as panic/avoidance falls; if depression becomes moderate–severe, evidence supports CT/medication pathways depending on context.[4] CBT is not the priority today if acute medical instability, active high suicide risk needing containment, mania, delirium, or severe substance intoxication dominate — stabilise first. Watch therapist drift: do not substitute endless reassurance for exposure and dropping safety behaviours.[5]

References

  1. [1]Clark DM A cognitive approach to panic Behav Res Ther, 1986.PMID 3741311
  2. [2]Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM, Beck AT The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses Clin Psychol Rev, 2006.PMID 16199119
  3. [3]Kazantzis N, Whittington C, Zelencich L, et al. Quantity and Quality of Homework Compliance: A Meta-Analysis of Relations With Outcome in Cognitive Behavior Therapy Behav Ther, 2016.PMID 27816086
  4. [4]DeRubeis RJ, Hollon SD, Amsterdam JD, et al. Cognitive therapy vs medications in the treatment of moderate to severe depression Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2005.PMID 15809408
  5. [5]Mulkens S, de Vos C, de Graaff A, Waller G To deliver or not to deliver cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders: Replication and extension of our understanding of why therapists fail to do what they should do Behav Res Ther, 2018.PMID 29763767