Psych MEQs / SAQs · General adult psychiatry — clinical high risk / attenuated psychosis
Clinical high risk and attenuated psychosis — assessment to stepped care (MEQ)
FRANZCP-style MEQ on clinical high risk: UHR boxes, conversion rates, CAARMS/SIPS, stepped indicated prevention, omega-3 equipoise, and escalation to FEP.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answer
(i) Definition and criteria. Clinical high risk / ultra-high risk is an indicated-risk construct for help-seeking people with subthreshold or briefly frank psychotic phenomena plus clinical need who do not yet meet sustained full-threshold first-episode psychosis. Classic entry groups: attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS), brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS), and genetic/trait vulnerability plus functional decline. This student has attenuated referential ideas and perceptual anomalies with residual insight, functional drop, family history — she may meet APS and also sits near genetic risk + decline elements; confirm duration/frequency on CAARMS (or SIPS).[1]
(ii) Conversion expectations. Meta-analyses show a substantial minority convert over 1–3 years in help-seeking samples; the majority do not. Risk is stratified: BLIPS highest, APS intermediate, genetic-risk-plus-decline lowest. Long-term cohorts show heterogeneous outcomes including remission, persistent attenuated symptoms, and non-psychotic disorders.[2][3]
(iii) Assessment and investigations. Structured history and collateral; MSE with conviction/insight ratings; suicide/violence/vulnerability risk; depression/anxiety comorbidity; cannabis timeline; capacity. Complete CAARMS/SIPS in specialist service. Physical exam; urine drug screen as adjunct; organic tests if red flags. If any antipsychotic later considered, full metabolic panel and ECG baseline first.[1][7]
(iv) Stepped management. Engage; safety plan for passive ideation; treat mood/anxiety as indicated; motivational cannabis reduction; family psychoeducation; CBT-informed therapy for appraisals of anomalous experiences (prevention trial meta-analytic support); school/functional support. Omega-3: Amminger positive signal but NEURAPRO non-replication — equipoise, not mandate. Antipsychotics not routine first-line for pure UHR; consider only with specialist rationale, low dose, monitoring, shared decision. Network meta-analyses caution against claiming a single superior preventive drug.[4][5][6][7]
(v) Monitoring and FEP switch. Early clinical reviews (e.g. 1–4 weekly while unstable); structured recheck at intervals (e.g. 3 months); crisis contacts. Switch to FEP multi-element pathway when symptoms become frank, sustained, insight-lost, or BLIPS stop remitting — then stop debating the risk label and treat as first-episode psychosis.[2][7]
Common errors
- Equating UHR with definite future schizophrenia.
- Starting high-dose long-term antipsychotics by default.
- Ignoring depression, anxiety, suicide risk, and cannabis.
- Forgetting structured tools (CAARMS/SIPS).
- Claiming omega-3 is proven mandatory after NEURAPRO.
- Failing to define the conversion threshold to FEP care. [5][7]
Examiner notes
Full marks require: three UHR boxes, realistic conversion language with stratification, named instruments, stepped plan with CBT and comorbidity care, omega-3 equipoise (Amminger vs NEURAPRO), antipsychotics not first-line, and a crisp FEP escalation rule. [1][3][4][5]
References
- [1]Yung AR, Yuen HP, McGorry PD, et al. Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 2005.PMID 16343296
- [2]Fusar-Poli P, Bonoldi I, Yung AR, et al. Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2012.PMID 22393215
- [3]Fusar-Poli P, Cappucciati M, Borgwardt S, et al. Heterogeneity of Psychosis Risk Within Individuals at Clinical High Risk: A Meta-analytical Stratification JAMA Psychiatry, 2016.PMID 26719911
- [4]van der Gaag M, Smit F, Bechdolf A, et al. Preventing a first episode of psychosis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled prevention trials of 12 month and longer-term follow-ups Schizophr Res, 2013.PMID 23870806
- [5]McGorry PD, Nelson B, Markulev C, et al. Effect of ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Young People at Ultrahigh Risk for Psychotic Disorders: The NEURAPRO Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 27893018
- [6]Amminger GP, Schäfer MR, Papageorgiou K, et al. Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids for indicated prevention of psychotic disorders: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2010.PMID 20124114
- [7]Galletly C, Castle D, Dark F, et al. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the management of schizophrenia and related disorders Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 2016.PMID 27106681