Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsFoundations — cognitive psychology

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Foundations — cognitive psychology

Cognitive psychology applied to depression, panic, and psychosis (MEQ)

FRANZCP/MRCPsych-style MEQ integrating working memory, overgeneral memory, Beck/Clark models, and schizophrenia cognition/social cognition with assessment and intervention.

20 marks25 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 28-year-old with major depression says “I always fail,” cannot recall a single specific success from the past month, and loses multi-step clinic instructions. A second patient has panic with pulse-checking and sitting down “so I don’t die.” A third has schizophrenia with remitted hallucinations but cannot hold a job and misreads neutral faces as hostile. (i) Define working memory (Baddeley) and relate it to the first patient’s instruction failure; contrast Miller vs Cowan capacity teaching points. (ii) Explain overgeneral autobiographical memory and Beck’s cognitive architecture in the first patient. (iii) Apply Clark’s model to the panic patient including safety behaviours. (iv) Map schizophrenia cognitive and social-cognitive domains (Green/MATRICS line) to functional outcome in the third patient. (v) Outline bedside assessment and one intervention target for each case. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Working memory and capacity. Baddeley’s multi-component working memory is a limited-capacity system for temporary storage and manipulation, with a central executive coordinating phonological loop, visuospatial sketchpad, and episodic buffer — not a passive box.[2] Multi-step clinic instructions exceed executive/WM load when depression and rumination compete for resources. Miller’s 7±2 describes approximate chunked immediate-memory limits; Cowan argues pure focus of attention is ~4 when chunking supports are limited — both are examinable refinements, not contradictions.[1][3]

(ii) Overgeneral memory and Beck. “I always fail” without dated episodes exemplifies overgeneral autobiographical memory (category retrieval), common in depression and linked to impaired problem-solving.[11] Beck’s architecture: activated core schemas generate intermediate beliefs and automatic thoughts within the cognitive triad (self/world/future); therapy targets these layers collaboratively.[7][8]

(iii) Clark panic. Interoceptive cues (tachycardia) are catastrophically misinterpreted as impending death/collapse; safety behaviours (sit, check pulse) reduce short-term fear but block disconfirmation, maintaining the belief that disaster was only averted by the safety act.[9]

(iv) Psychosis cognition and function. Residual hallucinations remitted yet work fails: neurocognitive deficits (verbal learning/memory, processing speed, WM, attention — MATRICS-style separable factors) predict real-world function beyond positive symptoms.[12][13] Misreading faces as hostile implicates social cognition (emotion processing, mentalising, attribution, social perception).[14]

(v) Assessment and one target each. Depression: bedside attention/WM, thought record, cue specific memories; target behavioural experiment or cognitive restructuring of triad plus written single-step plans.[2][8][11] Panic: expectancy rating of catastrophe; fade pulse-checking/sitting via graded interoceptive tests that violate predictions.[9] Schizophrenia: screen cognition/function, refer NP/remediation as needed; social cognition training/supported employment; compensatory strategies (written work steps).[12][14]

Common errors

Calling working memory “short-term storage only”; equating Miller and Cowan without the chunking distinction; treating safety behaviours as harmless coping; assuming functional recovery tracks positive symptoms alone; offering only “cheer up” without process targets.[2][9][12]

References

  1. [1]Miller GA The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information Psychol Rev, 1956.PMID 13310704
  2. [2]Baddeley A Working memory: looking back and looking forward Nat Rev Neurosci, 2003.PMID 14523382
  3. [3]Cowan N The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity Behav Brain Sci, 2001.PMID 11515286
  4. [7]Beck AT Thinking and depression. II. Theory and therapy Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1964.PMID 14159256
  5. [8]Beck AT The evolution of the cognitive model of depression and its neurobiological correlates Am J Psychiatry, 2008.PMID 18628348
  6. [9]Clark DM A cognitive approach to panic Behav Res Ther, 1986.PMID 3741311
  7. [11]Williams JM, Barnhofer T, Crane C, et al. Autobiographical memory specificity and emotional disorder Psychol Bull, 2007.PMID 17201573
  8. [12]Green MF What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry, 1996.PMID 8610818
  9. [13]Nuechterlein KH, Barch DM, Gold JM, et al. Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia Schizophr Res, 2004.PMID 15531405
  10. [14]Green MF, Penn DL, Bentall R, et al. Social cognition in schizophrenia: an NIMH workshop on definitions, assessment, and research opportunities Schizophr Bull, 2008.PMID 18184635