Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsPsychopharmacology — ECT and neurostimulation

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Psychopharmacology — ECT and neurostimulation

Planning ECT for severe depression and discussing neurostimulation tiers (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ covering ECT indication, consent/cognition, placement/dosing, anaesthesia interface, continuation, and evidence-tiered alternatives.

20 marks25 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 58-year-old with recurrent unipolar major depression presents with melancholic features, psychotic guilt, marked weight loss, and high suicide intent. Two adequate antidepressant trials (including one with lithium augmentation) failed. She fears 'memory wipe' from ECT. ECG is normal; she has mild GORD; medications include diazepam 10 mg nocte and sodium valproate 500 mg BD started last year for 'mood stability' without a bipolar diagnosis. (i) Justify ECT as the preferred acute somatic treatment and list essential pre-ECT assessments. (ii) Explain capacity/consent principles and how you address cognitive risk honestly. (iii) Propose electrode placement, pulse-width and dosing strategy with rationale. (iv) Outline anaesthesia essentials the psychiatrist must coordinate and peri-ECT medication issues. (v) Detail the continuation plan after index response and when you would consider rTMS, VNS or DBS instead of or after ECT. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Indication and work-up. This is severe melancholic–psychotic depression with nutritional risk and high suicide intent after adequate failed trials — classic acute ECT indication. UK Review Group and modern NEJM reviews support ECT's short-term superiority/efficacy in severe depression. Pre-ECT: full history (cardiac/respiratory/neuro/dental/GORD/pregnancy), MSE and suicide risk, capacity, baseline cognition, FBC/U&E/glucose/ECG, medication reconciliation, anaesthetic review, family engagement. Fasting and aspiration risk from GORD flagged to anaesthesia.[1][5][6]

(ii) Capacity and cognition. Capacity is decision- and time-specific. If she can understand, retain, weigh and communicate a choice about ECT, obtain informed consent covering benefits, anaesthesia, course logistics, common effects, rare serious risks, and cognitive risks including variable retrograde autobiographical memory. If capacity is lacking, use jurisdiction-specific mental health law (do not invent section numbers). Address "memory wipe" myth with Sackeim community data honesty: temporary anterograde effects common; autobiographical risk real and variable; mitigation via placement/pulse-width choices. Risk of untreated illness (suicide, starvation) must be stated.[4][5][6]

(iii) Placement and dosing. Given cognitive fear, start with right unilateral ultrabrief at high suprathreshold dose if service-capable, with low threshold to switch to bitemporal if urgency/non-response. Explain that RUL needs adequate suprathreshold dosing; bilateral is stronger at lower multiples but more cognitive cost (Sackeim). Typical index frequency two to three times weekly; individualise number to trajectory (often around 6–12, not a fixed dogma).[3][5]

(iv) Anaesthesia interface and meds. Induction agent + muscle relaxant + oxygen + bite block + monitoring; cuff technique to observe motor seizure as proxy for cerebral seizure. Review diazepam and valproate — both raise seizure threshold and may impair seizure quality; plan supervised reduction/hold with risk management for withdrawal/seizure risk and mood. Coordinate lithium if later used. Psychiatrist confirms legal status and stimulus plan each session.[5][6]

(v) Continuation and tiers. After response, do not discharge without plan: optimised pharmacotherapy (consider lithium-containing strategies where suitable) and/or continuation ECT because CORE shows high relapse without active prevention. rTMS/iTBS suits ambulatory TRD without this urgency (THREE-D: iTBS non-inferior to 10 Hz, shorter sessions). VNS for chronic multi-year TRD after multiple failures (Aaronson long-horizon data). DBS not routine — BROADEN SCC trial failed primary endpoint; specialist/trial only. CANMAT ranks neurostimulation options by evidence tier.[2][7][8][9][10]

Common errors

  • Offering another low-intensity antidepressant trial while she starves or remains highly suicidal.[5]
  • Promising zero memory risk or refusing to discuss cognitive effects.[4]
  • Choosing RUL at threshold-level dose and calling non-response "ECT failure".[3]
  • Leaving no continuation plan after index remission.[2]
  • Selling DBS as standard next step after one failed drug.[8]

References

  1. [1]UK ECT Review Group Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet, 2003.PMID 12642045
  2. [2]Kellner CH, Knapp RG, Petrides G, et al. Continuation electroconvulsive therapy vs pharmacotherapy for relapse prevention in major depression: a multisite study from the Consortium for Research in Electroconvulsive Therapy (CORE) Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 17146008
  3. [3]Sackeim HA, Prudic J, Nobler MS, et al. Effects of pulse width and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy Brain Stimul, 2008.PMID 19756236
  4. [4]Sackeim HA, Prudic J, Fuller R, et al. The cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy in community settings Neuropsychopharmacology, 2007.PMID 16936712
  5. [5]Espinoza RT, Kellner CH Electroconvulsive Therapy N Engl J Med, 2022.PMID 35172057
  6. [6]Weiss A, Hussain S, Ng B, et al. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists professional practice guidelines for the administration of electroconvulsive therapy Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 2019.PMID 30966782
  7. [7]Blumberger DM, Vila-Rodriguez F, Thorpe KE, et al. Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial Lancet, 2018.PMID 29726344
  8. [8]Holtzheimer PE, Husain MM, Lisanby SH, et al. Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial Lancet Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 28988904
  9. [9]Aaronson ST, Sears P, Ruvuna F, et al. A 5-Year Observational Study of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation or Treatment as Usual Am J Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 28359201
  10. [10]Milev RV, Giacobbe P, Kennedy SH, et al. CANMAT 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 4. Neurostimulation Treatments Can J Psychiatry, 2016.PMID 27486154