Psych MEQs / SAQs · Psychopharmacology — ECT and neurostimulation
Planning ECT for severe depression and discussing neurostimulation tiers (MEQ)
FRANZCP-style MEQ covering ECT indication, consent/cognition, placement/dosing, anaesthesia interface, continuation, and evidence-tiered alternatives.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answer
(i) Indication and work-up. This is severe melancholic–psychotic depression with nutritional risk and high suicide intent after adequate failed trials — classic acute ECT indication. UK Review Group and modern NEJM reviews support ECT's short-term superiority/efficacy in severe depression. Pre-ECT: full history (cardiac/respiratory/neuro/dental/GORD/pregnancy), MSE and suicide risk, capacity, baseline cognition, FBC/U&E/glucose/ECG, medication reconciliation, anaesthetic review, family engagement. Fasting and aspiration risk from GORD flagged to anaesthesia.[1][5][6]
(ii) Capacity and cognition. Capacity is decision- and time-specific. If she can understand, retain, weigh and communicate a choice about ECT, obtain informed consent covering benefits, anaesthesia, course logistics, common effects, rare serious risks, and cognitive risks including variable retrograde autobiographical memory. If capacity is lacking, use jurisdiction-specific mental health law (do not invent section numbers). Address "memory wipe" myth with Sackeim community data honesty: temporary anterograde effects common; autobiographical risk real and variable; mitigation via placement/pulse-width choices. Risk of untreated illness (suicide, starvation) must be stated.[4][5][6]
(iii) Placement and dosing. Given cognitive fear, start with right unilateral ultrabrief at high suprathreshold dose if service-capable, with low threshold to switch to bitemporal if urgency/non-response. Explain that RUL needs adequate suprathreshold dosing; bilateral is stronger at lower multiples but more cognitive cost (Sackeim). Typical index frequency two to three times weekly; individualise number to trajectory (often around 6–12, not a fixed dogma).[3][5]
(iv) Anaesthesia interface and meds. Induction agent + muscle relaxant + oxygen + bite block + monitoring; cuff technique to observe motor seizure as proxy for cerebral seizure. Review diazepam and valproate — both raise seizure threshold and may impair seizure quality; plan supervised reduction/hold with risk management for withdrawal/seizure risk and mood. Coordinate lithium if later used. Psychiatrist confirms legal status and stimulus plan each session.[5][6]
(v) Continuation and tiers. After response, do not discharge without plan: optimised pharmacotherapy (consider lithium-containing strategies where suitable) and/or continuation ECT because CORE shows high relapse without active prevention. rTMS/iTBS suits ambulatory TRD without this urgency (THREE-D: iTBS non-inferior to 10 Hz, shorter sessions). VNS for chronic multi-year TRD after multiple failures (Aaronson long-horizon data). DBS not routine — BROADEN SCC trial failed primary endpoint; specialist/trial only. CANMAT ranks neurostimulation options by evidence tier.[2][7][8][9][10]
Common errors
- Offering another low-intensity antidepressant trial while she starves or remains highly suicidal.[5]
- Promising zero memory risk or refusing to discuss cognitive effects.[4]
- Choosing RUL at threshold-level dose and calling non-response "ECT failure".[3]
- Leaving no continuation plan after index remission.[2]
- Selling DBS as standard next step after one failed drug.[8]
References
- [1]UK ECT Review Group Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet, 2003.PMID 12642045
- [2]Kellner CH, Knapp RG, Petrides G, et al. Continuation electroconvulsive therapy vs pharmacotherapy for relapse prevention in major depression: a multisite study from the Consortium for Research in Electroconvulsive Therapy (CORE) Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 17146008
- [3]Sackeim HA, Prudic J, Nobler MS, et al. Effects of pulse width and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy Brain Stimul, 2008.PMID 19756236
- [4]Sackeim HA, Prudic J, Fuller R, et al. The cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy in community settings Neuropsychopharmacology, 2007.PMID 16936712
- [5]Espinoza RT, Kellner CH Electroconvulsive Therapy N Engl J Med, 2022.PMID 35172057
- [6]Weiss A, Hussain S, Ng B, et al. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists professional practice guidelines for the administration of electroconvulsive therapy Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 2019.PMID 30966782
- [7]Blumberger DM, Vila-Rodriguez F, Thorpe KE, et al. Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial Lancet, 2018.PMID 29726344
- [8]Holtzheimer PE, Husain MM, Lisanby SH, et al. Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial Lancet Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 28988904
- [9]Aaronson ST, Sears P, Ruvuna F, et al. A 5-Year Observational Study of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation or Treatment as Usual Am J Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 28359201
- [10]Milev RV, Giacobbe P, Kennedy SH, et al. CANMAT 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 4. Neurostimulation Treatments Can J Psychiatry, 2016.PMID 27486154