Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsGeneral adult psychiatry

Psych MEQs / SAQs · General adult psychiatry

Functional neurological disorder — diagnosis and MDT care (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ on FND rule-in diagnosis, communication, Physio4FMD/CODES-era treatment, and differentials.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 28-year-old teacher develops sudden right arm weakness and a shaking tremor three days after a minor wrist sprain and a panic attack at work. MRI brain is normal. On examination, power is inconsistent; Hoover's sign is positive on the weak side; the tremor stops when she is asked to copy a rhythm with the left hand and then reappears at the new frequency (entrainment). She is terrified she has multiple sclerosis. She asks if this means she is 'crazy or faking'. (i) State the working diagnosis using modern nosology and justify it with positive clinical features. (ii) Outline how you would explain the diagnosis without pejorative language. (iii) Describe a multidisciplinary management plan including physiotherapy and psychological elements, with named evidence anchors. (iv) List key differentials and red flags that would change your approach. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Diagnosis. Working diagnosis: functional neurological symptom disorder (FND) with mixed motor features (functional weakness and functional tremor), acute episode, with recent physical and panic-related precipitants. Justification is rule-in: internal inconsistency, Hoover's sign, and tremor entrainment/distractibility, not merely a normal MRI. A stressor/panic event supports formulation but is not required for diagnosis. This is not malingering and not “all in the mind” as pejorative dualism.[1][2][7]

(ii) Explanation. Structure: name the condition (FND); state symptoms are real and not invented; explain mechanism in plain language (nervous system “software/function” problem rather than MS-style permanent damage); show how positive signs prove the pathways can still work; emphasise potential for improvement; invite questions; offer written information and a follow-up plan. Explicitly reject “crazy/faking” framing.[3][7]

(iii) MDT plan. (1) Shared diagnostic formulation across neurology/psychiatry. (2) Specialist physiotherapy per Nielsen consensus — education, reduce symptom-focused attention, retraining automatic movement, self-management; cite Physio4FMD as the major phase 3 specialist physio trial context for functional motor disorder. (3) Psychological care for panic, illness threat, and motor reattribution (CBT-informed approaches; for seizure phenotypes, reference LaFrance/CODES evidence base). (4) Treat comorbidity; avoid unnecessary further imaging unless new red flags; occupational support for graded return to work; no disease-modifying psychotropic for core FND motor signs.[4][5][6][7]

(iv) Differentials and red flags. MS and other CNS inflammatory disease, stroke/TIA (if hyperacute vascular features), peripheral nerve injury from sprain, functional overlay on early organic disease, factitious/malingering only with positive evidence of intentional production. Red flags: progressive UMN signs, optic neuritis clues, encephalopathy, fever, sphincter failure, or evolving inconsistency with FND alone — reinvestigate.[1][7]

Common errors

  • Calling this malingering without evidence
  • Using only “normal MRI” as the diagnostic criterion
  • Pejorative language that collapses engagement
  • Omitting physiotherapy as a core motor treatment
  • Inventing a requirement for childhood trauma
[1] [3] [4]

Examiner notes

Reward precise rule-in sign language, non-pejorative communication structure, named physio evidence (Nielsen/Physio4FMD), and dual-pathology vigilance.[2][5][3]

References

  1. [1]Espay AJ, Aybek S, Carson A, et al. Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional Neurological Disorders JAMA Neurol, 2018.PMID 29868890
  2. [2]Daum C, Hubschmid M, Aybek S The value of 'positive' clinical signs for weakness, sensory and gait disorders in conversion disorder: a systematic and narrative review J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2014.PMID 23467417
  3. [3]Stone J, Burton C, Carson A Recognising and explaining functional neurological disorder BMJ, 2020.PMID 33087335
  4. [4]Nielsen G, Stone J, Matthews A, et al. Physiotherapy for functional motor disorders: a consensus recommendation J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2015.PMID 25433033
  5. [5]Nielsen G, Stone J, Lee TC, et al. Specialist physiotherapy for functional motor disorder in England and Scotland (Physio4FMD): a pragmatic, multicentre, phase 3 randomised controlled trial Lancet Neurol, 2024.PMID 38768621
  6. [6]Goldstein LH, Robinson EJ, Mellers JDC, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet Psychiatry, 2020.PMID 32445688
  7. [7]Aybek S, Perez DL Diagnosis and management of functional neurological disorder BMJ, 2022.PMID 35074803