Psych MEQs / SAQs · General adult psychiatry
Functional neurological disorder — diagnosis and MDT care (MEQ)
FRANZCP-style MEQ on FND rule-in diagnosis, communication, Physio4FMD/CODES-era treatment, and differentials.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answer
(i) Diagnosis. Working diagnosis: functional neurological symptom disorder (FND) with mixed motor features (functional weakness and functional tremor), acute episode, with recent physical and panic-related precipitants. Justification is rule-in: internal inconsistency, Hoover's sign, and tremor entrainment/distractibility, not merely a normal MRI. A stressor/panic event supports formulation but is not required for diagnosis. This is not malingering and not “all in the mind” as pejorative dualism.[1][2][7]
(ii) Explanation. Structure: name the condition (FND); state symptoms are real and not invented; explain mechanism in plain language (nervous system “software/function” problem rather than MS-style permanent damage); show how positive signs prove the pathways can still work; emphasise potential for improvement; invite questions; offer written information and a follow-up plan. Explicitly reject “crazy/faking” framing.[3][7]
(iii) MDT plan. (1) Shared diagnostic formulation across neurology/psychiatry. (2) Specialist physiotherapy per Nielsen consensus — education, reduce symptom-focused attention, retraining automatic movement, self-management; cite Physio4FMD as the major phase 3 specialist physio trial context for functional motor disorder. (3) Psychological care for panic, illness threat, and motor reattribution (CBT-informed approaches; for seizure phenotypes, reference LaFrance/CODES evidence base). (4) Treat comorbidity; avoid unnecessary further imaging unless new red flags; occupational support for graded return to work; no disease-modifying psychotropic for core FND motor signs.[4][5][6][7]
(iv) Differentials and red flags. MS and other CNS inflammatory disease, stroke/TIA (if hyperacute vascular features), peripheral nerve injury from sprain, functional overlay on early organic disease, factitious/malingering only with positive evidence of intentional production. Red flags: progressive UMN signs, optic neuritis clues, encephalopathy, fever, sphincter failure, or evolving inconsistency with FND alone — reinvestigate.[1][7]
Common errors
- Calling this malingering without evidence
- Using only “normal MRI” as the diagnostic criterion
- Pejorative language that collapses engagement
- Omitting physiotherapy as a core motor treatment
- Inventing a requirement for childhood trauma
Examiner notes
Reward precise rule-in sign language, non-pejorative communication structure, named physio evidence (Nielsen/Physio4FMD), and dual-pathology vigilance.[2][5][3]
References
- [1]Espay AJ, Aybek S, Carson A, et al. Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional Neurological Disorders JAMA Neurol, 2018.PMID 29868890
- [2]Daum C, Hubschmid M, Aybek S The value of 'positive' clinical signs for weakness, sensory and gait disorders in conversion disorder: a systematic and narrative review J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2014.PMID 23467417
- [3]Stone J, Burton C, Carson A Recognising and explaining functional neurological disorder BMJ, 2020.PMID 33087335
- [4]Nielsen G, Stone J, Matthews A, et al. Physiotherapy for functional motor disorders: a consensus recommendation J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2015.PMID 25433033
- [5]Nielsen G, Stone J, Lee TC, et al. Specialist physiotherapy for functional motor disorder in England and Scotland (Physio4FMD): a pragmatic, multicentre, phase 3 randomised controlled trial Lancet Neurol, 2024.PMID 38768621
- [6]Goldstein LH, Robinson EJ, Mellers JDC, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet Psychiatry, 2020.PMID 32445688
- [7]Aybek S, Perez DL Diagnosis and management of functional neurological disorder BMJ, 2022.PMID 35074803