Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsConsultation-liaison psychiatry

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Consultation-liaison psychiatry

FND in the medical setting — C-L ward MEQ

FRANZCP-style MEQ on hospital FND: rule-in diagnosis, liaison explanation, team language, Physio4FMD/CODES-era pathways, and safety-nets.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
You are the C-L psychiatry registrar. A 29-year-old woman is day 3 on a medical ward after an ED presentation with prolonged shaking and then left arm weakness. CT head was normal. Neurology finds positive Hoover's sign, give-way weakness, and tremor entrainment; they diagnose functional neurological disorder with mixed motor features. Overnight nursing notes call her 'attention-seeking'. She is terrified she has a brain tumour. The medical team asks psychiatry to 'take her because she is functional' and to approve discharge today without follow-up. (i) Define your diagnostic formulation using modern nosology and positive signs. (ii) Outline how you would explain the diagnosis at the bedside and repair pejorative language with staff. (iii) Give an acute-to-discharge C-L management plan including MDT roles and named evidence anchors (physio/psychology). (iv) List red flags and dual-pathology issues that would change your approach. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Formulation. Working diagnosis: functional neurological symptom disorder (FND) with mixed motor features (weakness, tremor) and seizure-like events, acute presentation in the medical setting. Justification is rule-in: Hoover’s sign, give-way, tremor entrainment/internal inconsistency — not merely normal CT. Symptoms are real and involuntary; this is not malingering by default. A stressor/panic context supports formulation but is not required for DSM-5-era diagnosis. Joint neurology–C-L ownership rather than “psych take-over.”[1][3][7]

(ii) Explanation and staff language. Structure bedside explanation: name FND; affirm symptoms are real and not feigned; show how positive signs mean pathways can still work; offer a careful function/software metaphor; give hope and a plan; invite questions; provide written information. With staff: reframe pejorative “attention-seeking” as harmful and inaccurate; model non-stigmatising documentation; align one team story before multi-voice conversations.[2][7][8]

(iii) Acute-to-discharge plan. (1) Shared diagnostic letter. (2) Attack plan: protect, time, calm environment; avoid automatic AED escalation without neurology indication. (3) Specialist physiotherapy per Nielsen consensus; cite Physio4FMD as phase 3 specialist physio context for functional motor disorder. (4) Psychological pathway (CBT-informed; for seizures, LaFrance/CODES evidence base with honest endpoints). (5) Treat mood/anxiety comorbidity if present. (6) Stop non-indicated tests; safety-net red flags. (7) Booked outpatient FND/neuropsychiatry follow-up — do not discharge without a plan.[4][5][6][7][8]

(iv) Red flags / dual pathology. Hyperacute stroke features, progressive UMN signs, encephalopathy, fever, first atypical seizures without adequate epilepsy consideration, sphincter failure, or evolving inconsistency with pure FND — reopen organic work-up. Dual pathology (FND plus epilepsy/MS) remains possible. Capacity and suicide risk still assessed as in any C-L consult.[1][7][8]

Common errors

  • Accepting “psych take-over” without joint neurology ownership
  • Using only normal imaging as the diagnostic criterion
  • Colluding with pejorative staff labels
  • Discharging without explanation, physio/psychology pathway, or safety-net
  • Defaulting to malingering
[1] [2] [7]

References

  1. [1]Espay AJ, Aybek S, Carson A, et al. Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional Neurological Disorders JAMA Neurol, 2018.PMID 29868890
  2. [2]Stone J, Burton C, Carson A Recognising and explaining functional neurological disorder BMJ, 2020.PMID 33087335
  3. [3]Daum C, Hubschmid M, Aybek S The value of 'positive' clinical signs for weakness, sensory and gait disorders in conversion disorder: a systematic and narrative review J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2014.PMID 23467417
  4. [4]Nielsen G, Stone J, Matthews A, et al. Physiotherapy for functional motor disorders: a consensus recommendation J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2015.PMID 25433033
  5. [5]Nielsen G, Stone J, Lee TC, et al. Specialist physiotherapy for functional motor disorder in England and Scotland (Physio4FMD): a pragmatic, multicentre, phase 3 randomised controlled trial Lancet Neurol, 2024.PMID 38768621
  6. [6]Goldstein LH, Robinson EJ, Mellers JDC, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet Psychiatry, 2020.PMID 32445688
  7. [7]Aybek S, Perez DL Diagnosis and management of functional neurological disorder BMJ, 2022.PMID 35074803
  8. [8]Bennett K, Diamond C, Hoeritzauer I, et al. A practical review of functional neurological disorder (FND) for the general physician Clin Med (Lond), 2021.PMID 33479065