Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsPsychopharmacology — ketamine and esketamine

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Psychopharmacology — ketamine and esketamine

Initiating ketamine/esketamine for treatment-resistant depression (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ on TRD entry, esketamine/ketamine protocols, safety monitoring, and ECT comparison.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 42-year-old woman with recurrent MDD has failed adequate trials of sertraline, venlafaxine, and augmentation with quetiapine. Persistent MADRS 34, intermittent passive suicidal ideation without plan, BP 128/78, no aneurysm history, no substance misuse. She asks about 'the ketamine nasal spray' and whether it is safer than ECT. (i) Define TRD entry and justify considering esketamine or IV ketamine. (ii) Outline pre-treatment assessment and absolute/major cardiovascular red flags. (iii) Describe a supervised esketamine induction plan including dose scaffold, observation, oral antidepressant, and driving advice. (iv) Explain expected session adverse effects and how you monitor them. (v) Compare with ECT using ELEKT-D-level nuance and shared decision points. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) TRD and offer. Treatment-resistant depression: inadequate response after at least two adequate antidepressant trials with adherence documented; exclude bipolar, substances, organic depression, under-dosing. She has three lines including augmentation — meets pragmatic TRD threshold for considering rapid-acting options. IV racemic ketamine has RCT support from Zarate onward; esketamine nasal spray has phase 3 TRD evidence with oral antidepressant (TRANSFORM-2 flexible dose). Justify supervised programme access, not informal take-home use.[1][2][4][5]

(ii) Pre-treatment. Confirm diagnosis and failed trials; MSE and suicide risk assessment; substance history; pregnancy test if relevant; baseline BP/HR; cardiovascular history (uncontrolled HTN, aneurysm, AVM, prior ICH are major red flags); capacity/consent; service readiness for observation. Document concurrent oral antidepressant plan.[4][5]

(iii) Esketamine induction scaffold. Supervised clinic dosing commonly 56 or 84 mg nasal; induction often twice weekly for four weeks then weekly/biweekly maintenance; concurrent oral AD; ~2-hour observation with BP checks; no driving until the next day after a dose; crisis plan written. If response achieved, discuss SUSTAIN-1 continuation logic to reduce relapse.[2][3][5]

(iv) Adverse effects. Expect dissociation, dizziness, nausea, sedation, transient BP rise — usually session-limited. Monitor BP pre/post, mental state, and recovery before discharge. Counsel that chronic recreational misuse carries bladder toxicity risk; clinic control reduces diversion.[7]

(v) vs ECT. ELEKT-D: IV ketamine noninferior to ECT in nonpsychotic TRD on primary response endpoint — relevant shared-decision data. ECT still preferred or first-line somatic option in psychotic depression, catatonia, and many perinatal severe cases. Discuss access, cognitive AE of ECT, session burden of both, and patient values without guaranteeing cure.[6][5]

Common errors

  • Labelling TRD after incomplete micro-dose trials.[4][5]
  • Offering unsupervised home nasal spray.[2][5]
  • Ignoring BP monitoring and vascular contraindications.[5][7]
  • Claiming one dose abolishes suicide risk forever.[5]
  • Declaring ECT obsolete after ELEKT-D without population nuance.[6]

References

  1. [1]Zarate CA Jr, Singh JB, Carlson PJ, et al. A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 16894061
  2. [2]Popova V, Daly EJ, Trivedi M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study. Am J Psychiatry, 2019.PMID 31109201
  3. [3]Daly EJ, Trivedi MH, Janik A, et al. Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant Treatment for Relapse Prevention in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 2019.PMID 31166571
  4. [4]Sanacora G, Frye MA, McDonald W, et al. A Consensus Statement on the Use of Ketamine in the Treatment of Mood Disorders. JAMA Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 28249076
  5. [5]McIntyre RS, Rosenblat JD, Nemeroff CB, et al. Synthesizing the Evidence for Ketamine and Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: An International Expert Opinion on the Available Evidence and Implementation. Am J Psychiatry, 2021.PMID 33726522
  6. [6]Anand A, Mathew SJ, Sanacora G, et al. Ketamine versus ECT for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression. N Engl J Med, 2023.PMID 37224232
  7. [7]Short B, Fong J, Galvez V, et al. Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry, 2018.PMID 28757132