Psych MEQs / SAQs · Psychopharmacology — ketamine and esketamine
Initiating ketamine/esketamine for treatment-resistant depression (MEQ)
FRANZCP-style MEQ on TRD entry, esketamine/ketamine protocols, safety monitoring, and ECT comparison.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answer
(i) TRD and offer. Treatment-resistant depression: inadequate response after at least two adequate antidepressant trials with adherence documented; exclude bipolar, substances, organic depression, under-dosing. She has three lines including augmentation — meets pragmatic TRD threshold for considering rapid-acting options. IV racemic ketamine has RCT support from Zarate onward; esketamine nasal spray has phase 3 TRD evidence with oral antidepressant (TRANSFORM-2 flexible dose). Justify supervised programme access, not informal take-home use.[1][2][4][5]
(ii) Pre-treatment. Confirm diagnosis and failed trials; MSE and suicide risk assessment; substance history; pregnancy test if relevant; baseline BP/HR; cardiovascular history (uncontrolled HTN, aneurysm, AVM, prior ICH are major red flags); capacity/consent; service readiness for observation. Document concurrent oral antidepressant plan.[4][5]
(iii) Esketamine induction scaffold. Supervised clinic dosing commonly 56 or 84 mg nasal; induction often twice weekly for four weeks then weekly/biweekly maintenance; concurrent oral AD; ~2-hour observation with BP checks; no driving until the next day after a dose; crisis plan written. If response achieved, discuss SUSTAIN-1 continuation logic to reduce relapse.[2][3][5]
(iv) Adverse effects. Expect dissociation, dizziness, nausea, sedation, transient BP rise — usually session-limited. Monitor BP pre/post, mental state, and recovery before discharge. Counsel that chronic recreational misuse carries bladder toxicity risk; clinic control reduces diversion.[7]
(v) vs ECT. ELEKT-D: IV ketamine noninferior to ECT in nonpsychotic TRD on primary response endpoint — relevant shared-decision data. ECT still preferred or first-line somatic option in psychotic depression, catatonia, and many perinatal severe cases. Discuss access, cognitive AE of ECT, session burden of both, and patient values without guaranteeing cure.[6][5]
Common errors
- Labelling TRD after incomplete micro-dose trials.[4][5]
- Offering unsupervised home nasal spray.[2][5]
- Ignoring BP monitoring and vascular contraindications.[5][7]
- Claiming one dose abolishes suicide risk forever.[5]
- Declaring ECT obsolete after ELEKT-D without population nuance.[6]
References
- [1]Zarate CA Jr, Singh JB, Carlson PJ, et al. A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 16894061
- [2]Popova V, Daly EJ, Trivedi M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study. Am J Psychiatry, 2019.PMID 31109201
- [3]Daly EJ, Trivedi MH, Janik A, et al. Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant Treatment for Relapse Prevention in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 2019.PMID 31166571
- [4]Sanacora G, Frye MA, McDonald W, et al. A Consensus Statement on the Use of Ketamine in the Treatment of Mood Disorders. JAMA Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 28249076
- [5]McIntyre RS, Rosenblat JD, Nemeroff CB, et al. Synthesizing the Evidence for Ketamine and Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: An International Expert Opinion on the Available Evidence and Implementation. Am J Psychiatry, 2021.PMID 33726522
- [6]Anand A, Mathew SJ, Sanacora G, et al. Ketamine versus ECT for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression. N Engl J Med, 2023.PMID 37224232
- [7]Short B, Fong J, Galvez V, et al. Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry, 2018.PMID 28757132