Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsPsychopharmacology — lamotrigine

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Psychopharmacology — lamotrigine

Lamotrigine initiation with valproate and OCP counselling (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ on lamotrigine polarity evidence, valproate-adjusted titration, OCP pharmacokinetics, SJS stop rules, and pregnancy hierarchy.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 28-year-old woman with bipolar I disorder has depression-predominant recurrences. Mania was recently stabilised on sodium valproate. She takes a combined ethinylestradiol oral contraceptive. You plan to add lamotrigine. (i) Justify lamotrigine for her polarity pattern with named evidence. (ii) Write a safe oral titration plan accounting for valproate. (iii) Explain the OCP–lamotrigine interaction and counselling points when she starts or later stops the pill. (iv) List rash red flags and immediate actions. (v) State one pregnancy-related counselling point if she later plans conception. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Polarity and evidence. Depression-predominant bipolar I maintenance is a core lamotrigine niche. Goodwin pooled analysis of two 18-month RCTs supports delay of mood episodes with relatively greater depression-pole protection versus lithium's relative mania-pole strength. Geddes meta-analysis supports a modest acute bipolar depression effect with slow onset. Do not claim acute antimanic monotherapy efficacy.[1][2]

(ii) Titration with valproate. Valproate inhibits lamotrigine metabolism and raises LTG exposure. Use the valproate co-therapy product table: lower start and slower escalation than the monotherapy 25 mg then 50 mg fortnightly scaffold (classically half-rate teaching). Write exact steps from local PI; educate that rushing titration is a rash risk. Review after each step.[3][8]

(iii) OCP interaction. Combined ethinylestradiol contraceptives reduce lamotrigine levels (induced clearance). She is already on an OCP — expect relatively lower LTG exposure than without OCP; individualise target and consider levels if available. If she later stops the pill, LTG levels rise — plan dose review to avoid toxicity. If she switches OCP brands/doses, reassess. This is not the carbamazepine contraceptive-failure lecture, but comprehensive contraception counselling still belongs in bipolar care.[4][5]

(iv) Rash red flags. Progressive widespread rash, blistering, skin pain, mucosal erosions (mouth/eyes/genitals), fever, facial swelling, lymphadenopathy, organ symptoms. Action: stop lamotrigine same day, urgent assessment, SJS/TEN/DRESS pathway as indicated; no rechallenge after confirmed SJS/TEN.[6]

(v) Pregnancy. If planning conception, discuss comparative AED malformation data (EURAP): lamotrigine is generally more favourable than valproate but not risk-free; valproate hierarchy is harsh for pregnancy potential. Clearance rises in pregnancy (levels may fall) and falls postpartum — coordinate perinatal psychiatry and dose/level planning. Shared decision, folate and obstetric pathways as per local standards.[7]

Common errors

  • Using monotherapy titration while on valproate.[3]
  • Ignoring OCP start/stop effects on levels.[4][5]
  • Continuing titration through mucosal rash.[6]
  • Claiming lamotrigine treats acute mania or guarantees zero birth-defect risk.[1][7]

References

  1. [1]Goodwin GM, Bowden CL, Calabrese JR, et al. A pooled analysis of 2 placebo-controlled 18-month trials of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance in bipolar I disorder J Clin Psychiatry, 2004.PMID 15096085
  2. [2]Geddes JR, Calabrese JR, Goodwin GM Lamotrigine for treatment of bipolar depression: independent meta-analysis and meta-regression of individual patient data from five randomised trials Br J Psychiatry, 2009.PMID 19118318
  3. [3]Yuen AW, Land G, Weatherley BC, et al. Sodium valproate acutely inhibits lamotrigine metabolism Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1992.PMID 1524964
  4. [4]Sabers A, Ohman I, Christensen J, et al. Oral contraceptives reduce lamotrigine plasma levels Neurology, 2003.PMID 12939444
  5. [5]Christensen J, Petrenaite V, Atterman J, et al. Oral contraceptives induce lamotrigine metabolism: evidence from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Epilepsia, 2007.PMID 17346247
  6. [6]Guberman AH, Besag FM, Brodie MJ, et al. Lamotrigine-associated rash: risk/benefit considerations in adults and children Epilepsia, 1999.PMID 10403224
  7. [7]Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, et al. Comparative risk of major congenital malformations with eight different antiepileptic drugs: a prospective cohort study of the EURAP registry Lancet Neurol, 2018.PMID 29680205
  8. [8]Messenheimer JA, Guberman AH Rash with lamotrigine: dosing guidelines Epilepsia, 2000.PMID 10756418