Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsFoundations — behavioural science

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Foundations — behavioural science

Learning theory applied to panic and avoidance (MEQ)

FRANZCP/MRCPsych-style MEQ integrating classical/operant learning, extinction/relapse, inhibitory-learning exposure design, and safety limits.

20 marks25 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 29-year-old woman has panic attacks in crowded shops. She leaves immediately when heart racing begins, feels better within minutes, and now avoids malls unless her partner comes and she carries diazepam she never takes. (i) Define classical and operant processes maintaining this presentation, including two-factor avoidance. (ii) Explain extinction using Bouton’s framework and name three relapse phenomena relevant to her treatment. (iii) Outline an inhibitory-learning exposure plan (Craske), including how you handle safety behaviours. (iv) Contrast this with a pure 'habituation until SUDS drops' approach. (v) State two situations where you would defer elective exposure. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Classical and operant / two-factor. Classically, interoceptive and situational cues (crowd, heart racing) have become CSs that elicit fear/panic CRs after pairing with intense panic (US-like event).[9] Operantly, leaving the shop negatively reinforces escape by terminating aversive arousal; partner presence and carrying diazepam act as safety signals. Two-factor theory: classical fear to cues + operant avoidance/escape maintained by anxiety reduction, preventing extinction of the CS.[3][4]

(ii) Extinction (Bouton). Extinction is new inhibitory CS–noUS learning, not erasure of the original CS–US memory; retrieval is context- and time-dependent.[3][4] Relevant relapse phenomena: renewal if she only practices in clinic then returns to the mall alone; spontaneous recovery after a gap in practice; reinstatement after an unexpected panic or stressor US-like event; (bonus) rapid reacquisition if a full panic re-pairs cues quickly.

(iii) Inhibitory-learning exposure plan. Assess risk/medical exclusion; build hierarchy; rate specific expectancies (e.g. probability of collapse/heart attack). Design trials that violate expectancies (stay with heart racing without leaving). Fade safety behaviours: partner distance graded, no talisman benzodiazepine, no pulse-checking. Use variability and multiple contexts (different shops, times, alone). Process learning after trials; add retrieval cues; plan boosters against renewal.[5][6][9]

(iv) Vs habituation-only. Habituation model ends trials when SUDS falls and may keep identical graded steps. Inhibitory learning prioritises expectancy violation and retrieval of safety learning; SUDS drop is neither necessary nor sufficient; variability and context diversity are deliberate.[5][6]

(v) Defer elective exposure. Examples: acute suicide plan/intent needing crisis care; medical instability or uncontrolled arrhythmia concerns requiring medical review; severe intoxication; acute psychosis/mania; inability to consent to the plan. MI-style engagement and stabilisation can proceed, but intense interoceptive/mall exposure waits.[6]

Common errors

Equating extinction with unlearning; treating partner/diazepam as harmless coping; designing only office hierarchy without multi-context work; stopping solely because SUDS remains high despite expectancy violation; ignoring risk gates.[3][6][9]

References

  1. [3]Bouton ME Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction Biol Psychiatry, 2002.PMID 12437938
  2. [4]Bouton ME Context and behavioral processes in extinction Learn Mem, 2004.PMID 15466298
  3. [5]Craske MG, Kircanski K, Zelikowsky M, et al. Optimizing inhibitory learning during exposure therapy Behav Res Ther, 2008.PMID 18005936
  4. [6]Craske MG, Treanor M, Conway CC, et al. Maximizing exposure therapy: an inhibitory learning approach Behav Res Ther, 2014.PMID 24864005
  5. [9]Clark DM A cognitive approach to panic Behav Res Ther, 1986.PMID 3741311