Psych MEQs / SAQs · General adult psychiatry — mood disorders
Major depressive disorder — assessment and stepped management (MEQ)
FRANZCP-style modified essay on moderate-severe recurrent MDD: risk and medical exclusion, differential including bipolar and alcohol, first-line pharmacotherapy with monitoring, psychotherapy, STAR*D sequential logic, and ECT thresholds. FRANZCP-primary, globally tagged.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answer
(i) Assessment priorities. Structure as risk, bipolarity, substances, medical exclusion, MSE, collateral, capacity and social context. Risk: expand item 9 into full assessment — ideation frequency, intent, plan, means (medications, access at home), prior attempts, hopelessness, protective factors (children, work identity, religion), alcohol-related impulsivity. Bipolar screen: elevated/irritable periods, reduced sleep need, grandiosity, risky spending/sex, postpartum mood events, family history of bipolar. Alcohol: quantity, withdrawal risk, contribution to insomnia and mood. Medical: thyroid, anaemia, B12 if indicated, medications, pregnancy status if relevant. Baseline bloods and ECG before antidepressant if indicated by age/cardiac risk/agent choice. Collateral from partner if available. Capacity for treatment decisions; voluntary care preferred if safe.[4][5]
(ii) Working diagnosis and differentials. Working diagnosis: recurrent major depressive disorder, current episode moderate-severe (melancholic-leaning neurovegetative features), with alcohol use disorder comorbidity contributing. Differentials: bipolar depression (must remain active until screen complete); substance-induced depressive disorder (alcohol may fully or partly explain — dual formulation); persistent depressive disorder with superimposed episode; adjustment disorder (too severe/neurovegetative here); medical (hypothyroid etc.); grief (not described). Discriminators: longitudinal mania/hypomania, timeline with alcohol, TSH/labs, psychosis absence/presence.[4]
(iii) Initial management. Collaborative safety plan and means restriction (secure surplus medications; reduce alcohol). Psychoeducation. Offer evidence-based psychotherapy (CBT or IPT) and lifestyle structure (sleep, activity scheduling). Named first-line drug example: sertraline 50 mg orally each morning, review in 1–2 weeks for activation/suicidality and side-effects, titrate toward 100 mg if tolerated and incomplete response, plan 4–6 weeks at therapeutic dose with serial PHQ-9. Monitoring: sexual side-effects, GI symptoms, hyponatraemia risk if older/comorbid, interactions. Address alcohol with motivational work and withdrawal risk assessment. Crisis contacts and early review. Do not stop at a 3-month course if remits — plan maintenance counselling later.[2][4]
(iv) STAR*D sequential logic. Measurement-based care improves systematic dose adjustment. Roughly one-third remit at first-step SSRI; non-remitters move to switch (alternative antidepressant) or augment depending on partial vs non-response and tolerability; further steps include lithium or T3 augmentation and more complex combinations, with diminishing cumulative remission — so avoid random polypharmacy and re-check diagnosis/adherence/substances at each step.[1][2]
(v) ECT threshold. Escalate to ECT if she develops psychotic features, catatonia, life-threatening poor intake, rapidly escalating suicide risk not containable in current setting, or true treatment resistance after adequate trials — ECT is highly effective in severe depressive disorders and is not only a last resort after endless incomplete trials.[3]
Common errors
- Treating PHQ-9 item 9 as a full risk assessment.
- Starting an SSRI without bipolar screen or alcohol plan.
- Declaring failure after 10 days at 25 mg.
- Omitting psychotherapy discussion.
- Inventing Mental Health Act section numbers. [4]
Examiner notes
Full marks require structured risk, bipolar exclusion, a named drug with dose and monitoring, psychotherapy, STAR*D-informed sequencing, and appropriate ECT indications. Vague "start an antidepressant and review" fails. [1]
References
- [1]Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 17074942
- [2]Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 16390886
- [3]UK ECT Review Group Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet, 2003.PMID 12642045
- [4]Malhi GS, Bell E, Bassett D, et al. The 2020 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 2021.PMID 33353391
- [5]Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure J Gen Intern Med, 2001.PMID 11556941