Psych MEQs / SAQs · Professional skills — mental state examination
Structure and interpret a complete Mental State Examination (MEQ)
FRANZCP-style MEQ on complete MSE structure, worked psychosis pattern, organic discriminators, insight, and evidence anchors.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answer
(i) Domains and distinctions. Core domains: appearance; behaviour/attitude/rapport; speech; mood; affect; thought form; thought content; perception; cognition; insight; judgement (local templates may add risk or consciousness). Mood is the patient's subjective emotional state (quote). Affect is observed expression (range, reactivity, congruence, appropriateness, lability). Thought form is how thoughts are linked/expressed (e.g. derailment); thought content is what they are about (e.g. delusions, suicidal ideation).[1][2]
(ii) Concise MSE (illustrative). Appearance: dishevelled, neglected hygiene. Behaviour: pacing, guarded. Speech: rapid, difficult to interrupt. Mood: not clearly stated / may report fear if asked — document actual quote when obtained. Affect: tense, possibly restricted. Thought form: derailment / loosening of associations. Thought content: persecutory delusion (implanted chip / intelligence services). Perception: second-person auditory hallucinations with command/warning content. Cognition: oriented to person/place; attention impaired. Insight: denies illness. Judgement: impaired regarding medical trust/safety; still accepts sandwich and quiet room (partial cooperation).[1][2]
(iii) Organic flags and screens. Red flags: fluctuating attention/consciousness, fever, seizures, focal neurology, new visual hallucinations predominance, first episode/atypical features — trigger medical work-up. MMSE/MoCA are adjuncts to free-text cognition, useful when screening impairment or tracking change; they do not replace delirium assessment or full MSE.[5]
(iv) Insight and capacity. David's model: awareness of illness (absent — 'nothing wrong'); relabelling of symptoms (voices/chip not seen as illness); treatment attitude (mixed — accepts sandwich/room, rejects doctors). Components dissociate. Capacity is decision- and time-specific functional assessment after information disclosure — not identical to insight, though poor insight often impairs appreciation for treatment decisions.[3]
(v) Evidence anchors. Andreasen TLC for reliable thought-language-communication definitions; Nordgaard (and related modern work) that first-rank symptoms are not pathognomonic for schizophrenia; David on multidimensional insight; MoCA as cognitive screen adjunct.[2][3][4][5]
Common errors
Collapsing mood into affect; listing only content without form; calling first-rank symptoms pathognomonic; equating insight with capacity; relying on a single cognitive score; pejorative language; inventing mental health act section numbers.[1][3][4]
References
- [1]Daza C, Mauriziano C, Liberona A, et al. Mapping the Mental Status Examination: Insights from a Scoping Review of Popular Psychiatry Textbooks Acad Psychiatry, 2025.PMID 40495096
- [2]Andreasen NC Thought, language, and communication disorders. I. Clinical assessment, definition of terms, and evaluation of their reliability Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1979.PMID 496551
- [3]David AS Insight and psychosis Br J Psychiatry, 1990.PMID 2207510
- [4]Nordgaard J, Arnfred SM, Handest P, et al. The diagnostic status of first-rank symptoms Schizophr Bull, 2008.PMID 17562695
- [5]Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment J Am Geriatr Soc, 2005.PMID 15817019