Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsAddiction psychiatry — psychosocial interventions

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Addiction psychiatry — psychosocial interventions

Mutual-help linkage and contingency management for stimulant relapse (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ integrating CM protocol design for methamphetamine, secular mutual-help alternatives, ethics of reinforcement, and risk override.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
You are the addiction psychiatry registrar in a community clinic. A 29-year-old man completed 7-day residential detox for methamphetamine three weeks ago. He has relapsed to daily smoking of methamphetamine, dropped out of CBT after two sessions, and says he 'hates religion' so refused AA. He is not opioid-dependent. His partner asks whether 'paying him to stay clean' is unethical. Urine testing is available thrice weekly. (i) Define mutual-help and contingency management and distinguish TSF from AA. (ii) Propose an integrated 12-week plan including CM protocol elements and secular mutual-help. (iii) Answer the partner’s ethics concern with evidence. (iv) List pitfalls that would make CM fail. (v) State disposition if he develops suicidal ideation during early abstinence. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Definitions. Mutual-help programmes are peer-led, usually free, voluntary recovery supports (AA/NA, SMART Recovery, etc.) outside professional case notes. Contingency management is systematic delivery of tangible reinforcers contingent on objectively verified target behaviours (e.g. methamphetamine-negative urine). Twelve-step facilitation is a professional therapy that aims to engage AA/NA — it is not the fellowship itself.[1][2][6]

(ii) 12-week plan. Medical/psychiatric risk screen; thrice-weekly urine (or oral fluid) CM with immediate voucher or prize reinforcement for negative tests, escalating rewards for consecutive negatives, reset after positive, approximately 8–12 weeks intensive phase; re-engage CBT/MI; intensive referral to SMART Recovery (or other secular mutual-help) with scheduled first meeting and follow-up — not a pamphlet; partner/family education; sleep, nutrition, employment supports. Cite Roll multi-site methamphetamine CM and broader CM meta-analyses.[2][3][5]

(iii) Ethics of “paying to stay clean.” CM is not bribery: it is evidence-based operant treatment that rearranges contingencies so abstinence can compete with immediate drug reward. Meta-analyses support efficacy; effects are often large among psychosocial options for abstinence during treatment (Dutra). Frame as time-limited clinical tool with maintenance planning, not unconditional cash.[2][4]

(iv) Failure modes. Delayed rewards; no objective verification; punitive discharge for one positive; no escalation/reset design; no aftercare when CM ends; ignoring transport barriers to thrice-weekly testing; forcing AA language after clear refusal.[2][6]

(v) Suicidality override. Pause incentive focus as the organising frame; urgent risk assessment, safety plan, consider higher intensity/inpatient care, involve supports; continue alliance and substance plan once safe.[6]

Common errors

  • Equating AA with TSF.
  • Replacing all care with mutual-help slogans.
  • Designing CM as end-of-programme bonuses only.
  • Moralising the partner instead of explaining operant evidence.
  • Inventing stimulant agonist doses as first-line. [1][2][3]

Examiner notes

High-scoring answers name Roll, Prendergast/Lussier or Dutra, Cochrane AA/TSF (even if this case is stimulant-focused, for mutual-help literacy), and SMART as secular alternative, with concrete thrice-weekly CM parameters.[1][2][3][4][5]

References

  1. [1]Kelly JF, Humphreys K, Ferri M Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programs for alcohol use disorder Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020.PMID 32159228
  2. [2]Prendergast M, et al. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis Addiction, 2006.PMID 17034434
  3. [3]Roll JM, et al. Contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorders Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 17074952
  4. [4]Dutra L, et al. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders Am J Psychiatry, 2008.PMID 18198270
  5. [5]Zemore SE, et al. A longitudinal study of the comparative efficacy of Women for Sobriety, LifeRing, SMART Recovery, and 12-step groups for those with AUD J Subst Abuse Treat, 2018.PMID 29606223
  6. [6]Humphreys K, et al. Self-help organizations for alcohol and drug problems J Subst Abuse Treat, 2004.PMID 15063905