Psych MEQs / SAQs · Addiction psychiatry — psychosocial interventions
Mutual-help linkage and contingency management for stimulant relapse (MEQ)
FRANZCP-style MEQ integrating CM protocol design for methamphetamine, secular mutual-help alternatives, ethics of reinforcement, and risk override.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answer
(i) Definitions. Mutual-help programmes are peer-led, usually free, voluntary recovery supports (AA/NA, SMART Recovery, etc.) outside professional case notes. Contingency management is systematic delivery of tangible reinforcers contingent on objectively verified target behaviours (e.g. methamphetamine-negative urine). Twelve-step facilitation is a professional therapy that aims to engage AA/NA — it is not the fellowship itself.[1][2][6]
(ii) 12-week plan. Medical/psychiatric risk screen; thrice-weekly urine (or oral fluid) CM with immediate voucher or prize reinforcement for negative tests, escalating rewards for consecutive negatives, reset after positive, approximately 8–12 weeks intensive phase; re-engage CBT/MI; intensive referral to SMART Recovery (or other secular mutual-help) with scheduled first meeting and follow-up — not a pamphlet; partner/family education; sleep, nutrition, employment supports. Cite Roll multi-site methamphetamine CM and broader CM meta-analyses.[2][3][5]
(iii) Ethics of “paying to stay clean.” CM is not bribery: it is evidence-based operant treatment that rearranges contingencies so abstinence can compete with immediate drug reward. Meta-analyses support efficacy; effects are often large among psychosocial options for abstinence during treatment (Dutra). Frame as time-limited clinical tool with maintenance planning, not unconditional cash.[2][4]
(iv) Failure modes. Delayed rewards; no objective verification; punitive discharge for one positive; no escalation/reset design; no aftercare when CM ends; ignoring transport barriers to thrice-weekly testing; forcing AA language after clear refusal.[2][6]
(v) Suicidality override. Pause incentive focus as the organising frame; urgent risk assessment, safety plan, consider higher intensity/inpatient care, involve supports; continue alliance and substance plan once safe.[6]
Common errors
- Equating AA with TSF.
- Replacing all care with mutual-help slogans.
- Designing CM as end-of-programme bonuses only.
- Moralising the partner instead of explaining operant evidence.
- Inventing stimulant agonist doses as first-line. [1][2][3]
Examiner notes
High-scoring answers name Roll, Prendergast/Lussier or Dutra, Cochrane AA/TSF (even if this case is stimulant-focused, for mutual-help literacy), and SMART as secular alternative, with concrete thrice-weekly CM parameters.[1][2][3][4][5]
References
- [1]Kelly JF, Humphreys K, Ferri M Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programs for alcohol use disorder Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020.PMID 32159228
- [2]Prendergast M, et al. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis Addiction, 2006.PMID 17034434
- [3]Roll JM, et al. Contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorders Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 17074952
- [4]Dutra L, et al. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders Am J Psychiatry, 2008.PMID 18198270
- [5]Zemore SE, et al. A longitudinal study of the comparative efficacy of Women for Sobriety, LifeRing, SMART Recovery, and 12-step groups for those with AUD J Subst Abuse Treat, 2018.PMID 29606223
- [6]Humphreys K, et al. Self-help organizations for alcohol and drug problems J Subst Abuse Treat, 2004.PMID 15063905