Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsEmergency psychiatry

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Emergency psychiatry

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome diagnosis and management (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ on NMS: Gurrera-style criteria, differential, stop-and-support care, adjunct evidence, and rechallenge.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 41-year-old man with schizophrenia is day 4 of an inpatient admission for relapse. Olanzapine was increased to 20 mg and he received two doses of IM haloperidol 5 mg for agitation. Over 36 hours he becomes diaphoretic, mute, and rigid. Temperature is 38.9 C then 39.4 C; HR 128 (baseline 78); RR 28 (baseline 14); BP fluctuates from 95/55 to 168/102. CK is 1,860 U/L (ULN 200). Reflexes are reduced. There is no clonus. He is not on serotonergic drugs. (i) Apply international consensus diagnostic thinking and state the working diagnosis with key discriminators from serotonin toxicity and malignant catatonia. (ii) Outline immediate management including what must be stopped. (iii) Discuss the evidence status of bromocriptine, dantrolene, and ECT. (iv) Explain a safe later antipsychotic rechallenge plan if ongoing treatment is essential. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Diagnosis and discriminators. Working diagnosis: neuroleptic malignant syndrome after dopamine antagonist exposure (olanzapine escalation plus IM haloperidol). Map to Gurrera IEC elements: recent antagonist exposure; hyperthermia >38.0 C on at least two occasions; rigidity; mental-status alteration (mute); CK well above 4× ULN (1,860 vs ULN 200); sympathetic lability with large BP swings; tachycardia and tachypnoea well above baseline thresholds (HR ≥25% and RR ≥50% above baseline). Negative infection/metabolic work-up must still be pursued. Versus serotonin toxicity: no serotonergic drugs, bradyreflexia without clonus/hyperreflexia, tempo over days after antipsychotics. Versus malignant catatonia: marked neuroleptic exposure makes NMS primary, but catatonic features (mutism, rigidity) overlap — keep both in mind if course becomes refractory and consider BAP catatonia pathways including benzodiazepines/ECT.[1][2][5]

(ii) Immediate management. Stop all antipsychotics and other dopamine antagonists (including PRN). Medical emergency: ABCDE, external cooling, IV fluids, airway protection, continuous monitoring, serial CK/U&E, investigate infection and other mimics. Benzodiazepines for agitation/catatonic features; do not give more antipsychotic. Escalate HDU/ICU early given autonomic instability and rigidity.[6][1]

(iii) Specific therapies. No large RCTs. Supportive care is universal first-line. Kuhlwilm 2020 case-series synthesis: overall no clear mortality/duration superiority of dantrolene, bromocriptine, or ECT versus supportive care alone, but severe cases showed lower mortality with specific pharmacotherapy or ECT (ECT lowest in that severe subgroup). Practical approach: bromocriptine (e.g. start about 2.5 mg PO/NG two–three times daily, titrate under specialist advice) and/or IV dantrolene (case regimens often ~1–2.5 mg/kg IV) for severe non-resolving NMS; ECT for refractory disease or malignant catatonia overlap.[3][6][5]

(iv) Rechallenge. Only after full resolution (afebrile, rigidity gone, CK normalising). Delay — often at least about two weeks after recovery is cited; longer if depot. Prefer a different agent, start low, titrate slowly, preferably inpatient with temperature/tone/CK monitoring. Rosebush: most can eventually tolerate rechallenge; success tracks time since recovery. Document adverse reaction and contingency plan.[4][6]

Common errors

  • Continuing or escalating antipsychotics for "agitation"
  • Diagnosing serotonin toxicity without serotonergic exposure or hyperexcitability signs
  • Claiming RCT-proven antidotes
  • Same-day rechallenge at prior dose
  • Inventing Mental Health Act section numbers instead of stating least-restrictive emergency principles
[6] [2]

Examiner notes

Full marks require IEC-linked diagnosis, stop-and-support first, honest evidence on adjuncts/ECT, and a delayed careful rechallenge plan. Vague "sedate and observe" fails. [1][3]

References

  1. [1]Gurrera RJ, Caroff SN, Cohen A, et al. An international consensus study of neuroleptic malignant syndrome diagnostic criteria using the Delphi method J Clin Psychiatry, 2011.PMID 21733489
  2. [2]Perry PJ, Wilborn CA Serotonin syndrome vs neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a contrast of causes, diagnoses, and management Ann Clin Psychiatry, 2012.PMID 22563571
  3. [3]Kuhlwilm L, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C, Gahr M, et al. The neuroleptic malignant syndrome-a systematic case series analysis focusing on therapy regimes and outcome Acta Psychiatr Scand, 2020.PMID 32659853
  4. [4]Rosebush PI, Stewart TD, Gelenberg AJ Twenty neuroleptic rechallenges after neuroleptic malignant syndrome in 15 patients J Clin Psychiatry, 1989.PMID 2569457
  5. [5]Rogers JP, Oldham MA, Fricchione G, et al. Evidence-based consensus guidelines for the management of catatonia: Recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology J Psychopharmacol, 2023.PMID 37039129
  6. [6]Pileggi DJ, Cook AM Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome Ann Pharmacother, 2016.PMID 27423483