Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Psych MEQs / SAQsConsultation-liaison psychiatry

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Consultation-liaison psychiatry

Normal pressure hydrocephalus and reversible dementias — MEQ

FRANZCP-style MEQ on iNPH triad, Relkin/DESH pathway, Clarfield reversible-dementia epidemiology, B12/medication review, and shunt counselling.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 78-year-old man is referred to CL psychiatry from orthopaedics after a fall with fractured neck of femur. Nursing staff describe him as 'apathetic and slow'. Collateral from his wife: for 2 years he has walked with short magnetic steps, turned en bloc, and had urinary urgency progressing to occasional incontinence. Memory is 'patchy' but he still recognises family; he is bradyphrenic and struggles with dual tasks. He takes oxybutynin and amitriptyline 25 mg nocte. On the ward day 4 he is attentive (not fluctuating). MoCA is 19/30 with weak executive and attention items. CT head (educational discussion only) is reported as showing ventriculomegaly out of proportion to high-convexity sulcal enlargement. B12 is low; TSH normal. His daughter asks whether this is Alzheimer disease and demands 'the memory tablet', while also asking if a shunt will 'make him completely normal again'. (i) Formulate the working diagnosis and key differentials. (ii) Outline bedside assessment and investigations including prognostic testing for NPH. (iii) Discuss reversible contributors and the evidence limits of the 'reversible dementia' concept (named epidemiology). (iv) Outline management and counselling regarding shunt surgery, risks, and expected domain of improvement. (20 marks)

Model answers

(i) Formulation and differentials (5 marks)

Model answer — formulation

Working diagnosis: probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) phenotype — progressive magnetic gait, urinary urgency/incontinence, frontal–subcortical cognitive impairment, and ventriculomegaly with DESH-type disproportion — presenting with apathy that triggered a CL referral.[1][2][7]

Key differentials: Alzheimer disease (less early gait/urgency), vascular cognitive impairment, atypical parkinsonism/PSP, DLB if hallucinations/RBD emerge, depression-related cognitive impairment, medication toxicity (oxybutynin + amitriptyline anticholinergic burden), B12 deficiency contribution, and delirium if acute fluctuation returns.[6][8]

DSM-5-TR framing if functional independence is lost: major NCD due to another medical condition (NPH), with mixed pathology possible.[1]

(ii) Assessment and investigations (5 marks)

Model answer — assessment

Collateral history of gait timeline, continence, falls, mood/apathy; formal gait exam; MSE focusing on bradyphrenia, executive function, free vs cued recall; MoCA or equivalent; Hellström iNPH scale domains if used locally; falls/driving/financial risk; decision-specific capacity (Appelbaum) for further tests and possible surgery.[6][10]

Investigations: complete metabolic cognitive panel with B12 repletion pathway; medication review; MRI preferred for DESH/ventriculomegaly education and exclusion of mass/SDH; CSF opening pressure in normal range; large-volume CSF tap test or external lumbar drainage with pre/post gait measures as prognostic tests before shunt decision.[1][2][6]

(iii) Reversible contributors and epidemiology (5 marks)

Model answer — reversible dementia concept

Immediate reversible/modifiable factors: replace true B12 deficiency; deprescribe or rationalise anticholinergics (oxybutynin, amitriptyline) if safe alternatives exist; treat depression if present; exclude delirium when fluctuating.[4][8]

Clarfield meta-analysis: potentially reversible causes ~9% of dementia series, but actual partial/full reversal only ~0.6% — so work-up is mandatory but “miracle cure” promises are wrong.[3] Hejl memory-clinic data show higher rates of potentially reversible primary (~19%) and concomitant (~23%) conditions among cognitive referrals, supporting systematic assessment.[4]

(iv) Management and shunt counselling (5 marks)

Model answer — management

Multidisciplinary pathway (neurology/neurosurgery/aged care/physio/CL). Optimise medical factors first. If prognostic CSF testing positive and risks acceptable, counsel for CSF diversion (VP shunt common; LP shunt evidence includes SINPHONI-2).[2][6][9]

Honest expectations: gait most likely to improve; cognition and continence variable; mixed AD/vascular pathology blunts cognitive gains. Risks: infection, overdrainage, subdural collections, obstruction, revision (Toma systematic review context).[5][6] Not routine “Alzheimer tablet” as NPH disease-modifying therapy. Safety: falls prevention, continence care, carer support, capacity-appropriate consent.[6][10]

References

  1. [1]Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, et al. Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus Neurosurgery, 2005.PMID 16160425
  2. [2]Nakajima M, Yamada S, Miyajima M, et al. Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (Third Edition): Endorsed by the Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2021.PMID 33455998
  3. [3]Clarfield AM The decreasing prevalence of reversible dementias: an updated meta-analysis Arch Intern Med, 2003.PMID 14557220
  4. [4]Hejl A, Høgh P, Waldemar G Potentially reversible conditions in 1000 consecutive memory clinic patients J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2002.PMID 12235305
  5. [5]Toma AK, Papadopoulos MC, Stapleton S, et al. Systematic review of the outcome of shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2013.PMID 23975646
  6. [6]Williams MA, Malm J Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Continuum (Minneap Minn), 2016.PMID 27042909
  7. [7]Kito Y, Kazui H, Kubo Y, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus Behav Neurol, 2009.PMID 19996513
  8. [8]Moore E, Mander A, Ames D, et al. Cognitive impairment and vitamin B12: a review Int Psychogeriatr, 2012.PMID 22221769
  9. [9]Kazui H, Miyajima M, Mori E, et al. Lumboperitoneal shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (SINPHONI-2): an open-label randomised trial Lancet Neurol, 2015.PMID 25934242
  10. [10]Appelbaum PS, Grisso T Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment N Engl J Med, 1988.PMID 3200278