Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsEmergency psychiatry — suicide risk

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Emergency psychiatry — suicide risk

Suicide risk assessment and safety planning after overdose (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ on post-overdose suicide risk assessment, safety planning, means restriction, disposition, post-crisis peak risk, and lithium/clozapine anti-suicide evidence.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 28-year-old woman is brought to ED 6 hours after taking 40 × paracetamol 500 mg tablets and half a bottle of wine following a relationship breakdown. She is medically stabilising after N-acetylcysteine. She says she wanted to die at the time but now feels embarrassed and minimises risk. She has one prior overdose 2 years ago. She lives alone, has untreated recurrent depression, and keeps her mother’s leftover amitriptyline at home. (i) Outline your structured suicide risk assessment. (ii) Formulate static, dynamic, and protective factors. (iii) Detail a Stanley-Brown-style safety plan and means restriction steps. (iv) Justify disposition options and the evidence for elevated risk after self-harm and after psychiatric admission. (v) Name one medication with anti-suicide evidence relevant if bipolar spectrum emerges, and one for schizophrenia-spectrum suicidality. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Structured assessment. Engage privately once medically able. Ask directly about ideation, intent at time of overdose and now, planning, preparatory acts, alcohol role, regret vs disappointment at survival, hopelessness, sleep, agitation. Explore depression history, prior attempt details, access to amitriptyline and other means, social supports, reasons for living. MSE with quoted content. Collateral from ex-partner/family/GP if safe and consented. Capacity and legal options if high risk and declining care. Scales (e.g. C-SSRS concepts) may structure enquiry but do not replace formulation.[1][5]

(ii) Formulation factors. Static: prior overdose, recurrent depression history. Dynamic: recent high-lethality attempt with intent to die, alcohol co-ingestion, relationship breakdown, living alone, residual minimisation (may reduce help-seeking), access to TCA stockpile, untreated depression. Protective: now engaging with ED care, some embarrassment/regret (probe carefully), potential to re-engage supports, willingness to discuss plan if alliance built. Formulation: elevated near-term risk driven by recent attempt, means access, isolation, and untreated depression; not reassured by minimisation alone.[5]

(iii) Safety plan and means. Collaborative written Stanley-Brown-style plan: personal warning signs; internal coping; social distraction contacts/places; people to call for help; professionals/local crisis services (jurisdiction-specific numbers); means restriction — remove/lock amitriptyline and other excess meds (pharmacy destruction or trusted third party), limit dispensing, alcohol avoidance during acute phase, environmental safety at home. Reasons for living listed concretely. SPI with follow-up has RCT support versus usual ED care.[1]

(iv) Disposition and peak risk. Options depend on residual intent, insight, supports, and ability to secure means: voluntary or involuntary inpatient if intent remains high or safety at home impossible; intensive crisis/home treatment if supports and means control are robust; only then urgent outpatient with booked review within 24–72 hours. Evidence shows elevated suicide rates after psychiatric hospitalisation and high risk after self-harm presentations — transitions need active aftercare, not passive discharge.[2][5]

(v) Pharmacology. Lithium — meta-analytic evidence for reduced suicide risk in mood disorders if bipolar spectrum/mood disorder indication fits, with standard monitoring.[3] Clozapine — InterSePT evidence for reduced suicidal behaviour in schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder when indicated, with full monitoring.[4]

Common errors

Common errors include accepting minimisation at face value after a serious attempt; using a no-suicide contract as the safety plan; leaving TCAs accessible at home; scale-only discharge without formulation or booked follow-up; and inventing legal section numbers without a jurisdiction label.[1][5]

References

  1. [1]Stanley B, Brown GK, Brenner LA, et al. Comparison of the Safety Planning Intervention With Follow-up vs Usual Care of Suicidal Patients Treated in the Emergency Department JAMA Psychiatry, 2018.PMID 29998307
  2. [2]Chung DT, Ryan CJ, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, et al. Suicide Rates After Discharge From Psychiatric Facilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis JAMA Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 28564699
  3. [3]Cipriani A, Hawton K, Stockton S, et al. Lithium in the prevention of suicide in mood disorders: updated systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ, 2013.PMID 23814104
  4. [4]Meltzer HY, Alphs L, Green AI, et al. Clozapine treatment for suicidality in schizophrenia: International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT) Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2003.PMID 12511175
  5. [5]Large MM, Ryan CJ, Carter G, et al. Can we usefully stratify patients according to suicide risk? BMJ, 2017.PMID 29042363