Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsGeneral adult psychiatry — mood disorders

Psych MEQs / SAQs · General adult psychiatry — mood disorders

Treatment-resistant depression — sequential management (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ on TRD: pseudo-resistance critique, reassessment, adequate trials, lithium/ECT thresholds, psychotherapy and STAR*D sequencing. FRANZCP-primary, globally tagged.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 44-year-old accountant is referred as 'TRD'. She has had 8 months of severe unipolar-appearing depression (PHQ-9 22) with early waking, anhedonia, guilt, and intermittent passive death wishes without a plan. Records show sertraline 50 mg for 12 days then stopped for nausea; venlafaxine XR 75 mg for 3 weeks with partial benefit then lost to follow-up; and quetiapine 25 mg at night for sleep. She drinks a bottle of wine most nights. No structured bipolar screen is documented. TSH is normal. (i) Critique the TRD label and list pseudo-resistance factors present. (ii) Outline your reassessment priorities including risk and bipolar exclusion. (iii) Define an adequate antidepressant trial and propose a measurement-based next pharmacological plan with a named agent, dose, and monitoring. (iv) State when you would augment with lithium (including monitoring) versus escalate to ECT. (v) Outline the role of psychotherapy and STAR*D implications if she remains non-remitted after two true adequate trials. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Critique of the TRD label / pseudo-resistance. This is not established true TRD. Sertraline was subtherapeutic and far too short; venlafaxine XR 75 mg for 3 weeks is inadequate dose/duration for many patients; quetiapine 25 mg is a sleep dose, not an evidence-based antidepressant augmentation trial; heavy alcohol continues; bipolarity is unscreened. TRD requires failure of adequate trials after pseudo-resistance exclusion.[6][5]

(ii) Reassessment priorities. Risk: expand passive ideation into full assessment (intent, plan, means including alcohol and meds, prior attempts, hopelessness, protective factors). Bipolar screen: elated/irritable periods, reduced sleep need, grandiosity, risky behaviour, postpartum events, family history. Substance formulation and withdrawal risk. Medical exclusion already has normal TSH — complete FBC/U&E/LFT, ECG if indicated, pregnancy status if relevant. MSE for psychosis/melancholia/catatonia. Collateral. Capacity and least-restrictive care principles (jurisdiction-specific statutes — do not invent section numbers).[5]

(iii) Adequate trial and next plan. Adequate trial = therapeutic dose for about 4–6 weeks (longer if slow partial response), verified adherence, measured outcome (serial PHQ-9), substances addressed. Example plan after optimisation discussion: venlafaxine XR re-trial with titration toward 150–225 mg orally daily if BP allows, early review for activation/suicidality, serial PHQ-9, alcohol reduction plan; or switch to another evidence-based agent if intolerance. Do not call failure at 75 mg for 3 weeks.[2][5]

(iv) Lithium vs ECT. After two true adequate trials with partial response, lithium augmentation is a guideline- and STAR*D-supported option — start low, target serum level in the augmentation range used locally (commonly around 0.4–0.8 mmol/L individualised), monitor renal/thyroid/levels, educate on toxicity.[3] Escalate earlier to ECT if psychotic features, life-threatening poor intake, catatonia, or uncontainable suicide risk develop — ECT has strong efficacy evidence in severe depression and is not only a last resort after years of incomplete trials.[4]

(v) Psychotherapy and STAR*D. Offer CBT/IPT/behavioural activation in parallel; residual cognitive and interpersonal factors maintain non-remission. STAR*D: roughly one-third remit at first adequate step under measurement-based care; successive steps help some patients with diminishing absolute remission — plan sequence prospectively, re-check diagnosis at each failure, aim for remission not token partial response.[1][2]

Common errors

  • Accepting the referral label "TRD" without critique.
  • Starting lithium or esketamine before an adequate trial exists.
  • Omitting bipolar screen and alcohol plan.
  • Declaring failure after days at low dose.
  • Inventing Mental Health Act section numbers. [5][6]

Examiner notes

Full marks require pseudo-resistance recognition, structured risk/bipolar assessment, a named drug with dose and monitoring, lithium monitoring knowledge, appropriate ECT thresholds, psychotherapy, and STAR*D diminishing-returns logic.[1][4]

References

  1. [1]Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 17074942
  2. [2]Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 16390886
  3. [3]Nierenberg AA, Fava M, Trivedi MH, et al. A comparison of lithium and T(3) augmentation following two failed medication treatments for depression: a STAR*D report Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 16946176
  4. [4]UK ECT Review Group Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet, 2003.PMID 12642045
  5. [5]Malhi GS, Bell E, Bassett D, et al. The 2020 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 2021.PMID 33353391
  6. [6]Gaynes BN, Lux L, Gartlehner G, et al. Defining treatment-resistant depression Depress Anxiety, 2020.PMID 31638723