Psych MEQs / SAQs · General adult psychiatry — mood disorders
Treatment-resistant depression — sequential management (MEQ)
FRANZCP-style MEQ on TRD: pseudo-resistance critique, reassessment, adequate trials, lithium/ECT thresholds, psychotherapy and STAR*D sequencing. FRANZCP-primary, globally tagged.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answer
(i) Critique of the TRD label / pseudo-resistance. This is not established true TRD. Sertraline was subtherapeutic and far too short; venlafaxine XR 75 mg for 3 weeks is inadequate dose/duration for many patients; quetiapine 25 mg is a sleep dose, not an evidence-based antidepressant augmentation trial; heavy alcohol continues; bipolarity is unscreened. TRD requires failure of adequate trials after pseudo-resistance exclusion.[6][5]
(ii) Reassessment priorities. Risk: expand passive ideation into full assessment (intent, plan, means including alcohol and meds, prior attempts, hopelessness, protective factors). Bipolar screen: elated/irritable periods, reduced sleep need, grandiosity, risky behaviour, postpartum events, family history. Substance formulation and withdrawal risk. Medical exclusion already has normal TSH — complete FBC/U&E/LFT, ECG if indicated, pregnancy status if relevant. MSE for psychosis/melancholia/catatonia. Collateral. Capacity and least-restrictive care principles (jurisdiction-specific statutes — do not invent section numbers).[5]
(iii) Adequate trial and next plan. Adequate trial = therapeutic dose for about 4–6 weeks (longer if slow partial response), verified adherence, measured outcome (serial PHQ-9), substances addressed. Example plan after optimisation discussion: venlafaxine XR re-trial with titration toward 150–225 mg orally daily if BP allows, early review for activation/suicidality, serial PHQ-9, alcohol reduction plan; or switch to another evidence-based agent if intolerance. Do not call failure at 75 mg for 3 weeks.[2][5]
(iv) Lithium vs ECT. After two true adequate trials with partial response, lithium augmentation is a guideline- and STAR*D-supported option — start low, target serum level in the augmentation range used locally (commonly around 0.4–0.8 mmol/L individualised), monitor renal/thyroid/levels, educate on toxicity.[3] Escalate earlier to ECT if psychotic features, life-threatening poor intake, catatonia, or uncontainable suicide risk develop — ECT has strong efficacy evidence in severe depression and is not only a last resort after years of incomplete trials.[4]
(v) Psychotherapy and STAR*D. Offer CBT/IPT/behavioural activation in parallel; residual cognitive and interpersonal factors maintain non-remission. STAR*D: roughly one-third remit at first adequate step under measurement-based care; successive steps help some patients with diminishing absolute remission — plan sequence prospectively, re-check diagnosis at each failure, aim for remission not token partial response.[1][2]
Common errors
- Accepting the referral label "TRD" without critique.
- Starting lithium or esketamine before an adequate trial exists.
- Omitting bipolar screen and alcohol plan.
- Declaring failure after days at low dose.
- Inventing Mental Health Act section numbers. [5][6]
Examiner notes
Full marks require pseudo-resistance recognition, structured risk/bipolar assessment, a named drug with dose and monitoring, lithium monitoring knowledge, appropriate ECT thresholds, psychotherapy, and STAR*D diminishing-returns logic.[1][4]
References
- [1]Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 17074942
- [2]Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 16390886
- [3]Nierenberg AA, Fava M, Trivedi MH, et al. A comparison of lithium and T(3) augmentation following two failed medication treatments for depression: a STAR*D report Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 16946176
- [4]UK ECT Review Group Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet, 2003.PMID 12642045
- [5]Malhi GS, Bell E, Bassett D, et al. The 2020 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 2021.PMID 33353391
- [6]Gaynes BN, Lux L, Gartlehner G, et al. Defining treatment-resistant depression Depress Anxiety, 2020.PMID 31638723