Psych Vivas · Psychotherapy
Acceptance and commitment therapy — structured clinical viva
Fellowship viva on ACT psychological flexibility, hexaflex, avoidance/fusion, evidence, CBT comparison, and medication integration.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Interpretation
Reveal interpretation
Markers want a consultant-level account of ACT as third-wave contextual therapy aimed at psychological flexibility, coherent formulation of waiting-for-symptom-elimination as avoidance/fusion, hexaflex processes with techniques, fair evidence (metas + quality caveats), CBT comparison without brand warfare, and combined care rather than forced medication stop.[1][2][3][4]
Viva script
Q1. What is ACT and what is psychological flexibility?
Reveal model points
Third-wave/contextual CBT (Hayes lineage) targeting psychological flexibility: contact the present as a conscious person and change or persist in behaviour when doing so serves valued ends — not primarily erasing private events.[1]
Q2. Name the six hexaflex processes.
Reveal model points
Acceptance; cognitive defusion; present-moment contact; self-as-context; values; committed action.[1]
Q3. Formulate this teacher's stuck pattern.
Reveal model points
Control agenda / experiential avoidance: life (club, friendships) postponed until emptiness and self-criticism disappear — short-term protection, long-term isolation and depression maintenance.[2] Fusion with rules such as "I cannot rejoin until thoughts stop." ACT response: willingness + defusion + values-based committed action (graded return to club) while thoughts may still occur.[1]
Q4. Is ACT "just mindfulness"?
Reveal model points
No. Present-moment skills are one process; ACT also requires acceptance/defusion, self-as-context, values, and committed action. Mindfulness apps alone are not ACT fidelity.[1]
Q5. Evidence landmarks you would name?
Reveal model points
Hayes 2006 process model; Powers 2009 and A-Tjak 2015 metas (benefit vs inactive controls; often comparable to established treatments in several comparisons); Öst 2014 critical update (efficacy with methodological caveats); Bai 2020 depression synthesis; disorder-specific lines (anxiety comparative, OCD Twohig, psychosis Bach/Gaudiano/Shawyer as adjunctive contexts).[1][3][4][5][6]
Q6. Must they stop sertraline?
Reveal model points
Q7. When is ACT not the priority?
Reveal model points
Acute high suicide risk needing containment, mania, delirium, medical emergency, severe intoxication — stabilise first. Also reconsider modality when formulation demands specialised trauma-focused protocols or full DBT programme structures.[1]
References
- [1]Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes Behav Res Ther, 2006.PMID 16300724
- [2]Hayes SC, Wilson KG, Gifford EV, Follette VM, Strosahl K Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment J Consult Clin Psychol, 1996.PMID 8991302
- [3]A-Tjak JG, Davis ML, Morina N, Powers MB, Smits JA, Emmelkamp PM A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems Psychother Psychosom, 2015.PMID 25547522
- [4]Ost LG The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis Behav Res Ther, 2014.PMID 25193001
- [5]Powers MB, Zum Vorde Sive Vording MB, Emmelkamp PM Acceptance and commitment therapy: a meta-analytic review Psychother Psychosom, 2009.PMID 19142046
- [6]Bai Z, Luo S, Zhang L, Wu S, Chi I Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to reduce depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis J Affect Disord, 2020.PMID 31563072