Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych VivasPsychopharmacology — antipsychotics

Psych Vivas · Psychopharmacology — antipsychotics

Antipsychotics — cross-table viva

Fellowship viva on receptor maps, landmark trials, monitoring, LAI, clozapine threshold, and emergency adverse effects.

clinical
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
Examiner places a blank table: pathways vs adverse effects, then asks you to place CATIE, CUtLASS, EUFEST, Leucht NMA, TRRIP and InterSePT in one minute each.

Station structure

Time: 8–10 minutes. Depth: consultant teaching registrar. Expect pathway maps, trial one-liners, and safe prescribing without marketing slogans.[3]

Core questions and model points

  1. Map four dopamine pathways to clinical effects. Mesolimbic efficacy; mesocortical secondary negatives; nigrostriatal EPS; tuberoinfundibular prolactin.[3]

  2. What did CATIE and CUtLASS change? Real-world effectiveness and QoL challenges to blanket SGA superiority; metabolic trade-offs matter.[1][2]

  3. Where does clozapine sit in Leucht NMA and TRRIP? Highest efficacy rank; indicated after two adequate failed trials in TRS framework.[3][4]

  4. InterSePT one-liner. Clozapine reduces suicidality vs olanzapine in high-risk schizophrenia.[5]

  5. Prescribe safely. Baseline metabolic/ECG package; early review; no IM olanzapine + parenteral BZD — safety is part of the same evidence conversation as efficacy.[3]

Pass criteria

  • Pathway–side-effect mapping accurate against standard dopamine pathway teaching.[3]
  • Landmark trial take-home correct (not memorised p-values alone): CATIE/CUtLASS effectiveness realism, Leucht comparative ranking, TRRIP clozapine threshold, InterSePT suicidality.[1][2][3][4][5]
  • TRS → clozapine pathway clear after two adequate trials.[4]
  • Safety monitoring automatic in speech.[3]

References

  1. [1]Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, et al. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia N Engl J Med, 2005.PMID 16172203
  2. [2]Jones PB, Barnes TR, Davies L, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effect on Quality of Life of second- vs first-generation antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1) Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 17015810
  3. [3]Leucht S, Cipriani A, Spineli L, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis Lancet, 2013.PMID 23810019
  4. [4]Howes OD, McCutcheon R, Agid O, et al. Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) Working Group Consensus Guidelines on Diagnosis and Terminology Am J Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 27919182
  5. [5]Meltzer HY, Alphs L, Green AI, et al. Clozapine treatment for suicidality in schizophrenia: International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT) Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2003.PMID 12511175