Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Psych VivasProfessional — complaint management and regulation

Psych Vivas · Professional — complaint management and regulation

Complaint management and professional regulation — structured clinical viva

Fellowship viva covering complaint taxonomy, open disclosure, doctor impact under investigation, recurrent risk, and proportionate escalation.

clinical
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A family complains after a post-discharge suicide. Your registrar is named and becomes suicidal. Another consultant has multiple relationship-domain complaints. Discuss definitions (complaint vs claim vs regulation), why people complain, open disclosure, second-victim support, recurrent-complaint epidemiology (Bismark/PRONE), defensive medicine, and public-protection principles — without inventing statute section numbers.

Interpretation

Reveal interpretation

This viva tests professional dual loyalty: compassionate justice for families and safe support for staff, under public-protection duties.[2][4]

Definitions. Separate complaint (dissatisfaction), claim (civil remedy), and fitness-to-practise/regulatory process (public protection). Map content to clinical, management, and relationship domains.[4]

Why complain. Explanation, accountability, apology, prevention (Vincent). Disclosure gap between patient expectations and physician fear (Gallagher).[3][5]

Immediate pathway. Preserve records; open disclosure of known facts; governance and indemnity; never pressure withdrawal or alter notes.[3][5]

Second victim. Bourne morbidity; Seys second-victim review; assess suicide and fitness; support and restrict duties if unsafe.[2][6]

Recurrent risk. Bismark concentration of recurrent complaints; proactive remediation, not fatalism.[1]

Legal safety. Principles only — no invented section numbers. Regulatory and complaints processes are jurisdiction-specific; quote principles rather than fabricated statutes.[1][2]

Key points

Three tracks

Complaint ≠ claim ≠ FTP finding.

Taxonomy

Clinical / management / relationship.

Dual duty

Truthful family engagement + second-victim support + public protection when thresholds met.
[1] [2] [4]

References

  1. [1]Bismark MM, Spittal MJ, Gurrin LC, et al. Identification of doctors at risk of recurrent complaints: a national study of healthcare complaints in Australia BMJ Qual Saf, 2013.PMID 23576774
  2. [2]Bourne T, Wynants L, Peters M, et al. The impact of complaints procedures on the welfare, health and clinical practise of 7926 doctors in the UK: a cross-sectional survey BMJ Open, 2015.PMID 25592686
  3. [3]Vincent C, Young M, Phillips A Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action Lancet, 1994.PMID 7911925
  4. [4]Reader TW, Gillespie A, Roberts J Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy BMJ Qual Saf, 2014.PMID 24876289
  5. [5]Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Ebers AG, et al. Patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors JAMA, 2003.PMID 12597752
  6. [6]Seys D, Wu AW, Van Gerven E, et al. Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review Eval Health Prof, 2013.PMID 22976126