Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych VivasPsychotherapy

Psych Vivas · Psychotherapy

Couples therapy — structured clinical viva

Fellowship viva on couples therapy models, IBCT/TBCT/EFT, Barbato/Christensen/Powers/Monson evidence, IPV stop rules, and medication integration.

clinical
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
You are the psychiatry registrar. A 38-year-old teacher with major depression and their partner of 8 years present together. They describe a pursue–withdraw cycle: one criticises about ‘emotional distance,’ the other shuts down. PHQ-9 is 15 on sertraline 100 mg with partial benefit. No current physical violence; private screens negative for IPV. They ask whether ‘EFT is better than behavioural couple therapy’ and whether medication must stop for therapy to work. Discuss definition, mechanisms, major models, landmark evidence (distress, depression, SUD, PTSD), safety rules, and combined care.

Interpretation

Reveal interpretation

Markers want dual-client definition, private IPV screening as a non-negotiable, fair comparison of TBCT/IBCT/EFT without brand warfare, evidence stacked for distress and disorder-specific packages, and explicit combined care (sertraline continues) rather than anti-medication ideology.[1][2][4]

Viva script

Q1. What is couples therapy?

Reveal model points

Structured psychological treatment of a dyad aiming to reduce relationship distress and/or improve individual psychiatric outcomes through joint sessions; dual-client frame; not mediation or one-sided individual therapy with a silent partner.[1]

Q2. What mechanisms maintain distress in this pursue–withdraw couple?

Reveal model points

Negative reciprocity and low positive exchange (behavioural frame); polarisation/mutual trap (IBCT); secondary reactive emotions masking attachment fears in a pursue–withdraw cycle (EFT). Depression further reduces intimacy and problem-solving — bidirectional maintenance.[2][7][1]

Q3. Compare TBCT, IBCT, and EFT briefly

Reveal model points

TBCT: behaviour exchange, communication training, problem-solving. IBCT: acceptance strategies (empathic joining, unified detachment) plus selective change. EFT: de-escalate negative cycle, restructure attachment interactions, consolidate bond. All can help; choice by formulation, preference, and therapist competence.[2][7][1]

Q4. Key evidence you would cite

Reveal model points

Overall MFT efficacy syntheses (Shadish).[8] Christensen TBCT vs IBCT RCT and five-year follow-up — both produce large gains; early IBCT edge then convergence; separation still occurs in a substantial minority.[2][3] Cochrane/meta-analytic couple therapy for depression — depressive symptoms improve comparably to individual therapy with relationship benefits.[4] Powers BCT meta-analysis for SUD if alcohol asked.[5] Monson CBCT PTSD RCT if trauma asked.[6] EFT research review for attachment model.[7]

Q5. Medication and safety

Reveal model points

Continue sertraline; optimise if partial response; couple therapy is not a reason to stop antidepressants unsupervised.[4] Private IPV screens already negative — still reassess if control tactics emerge; stop standard conjoint problem-solving if violence becomes active.[1]

Q6. How would you open in CASC plain language?

Reveal model points

Both are clients; the pattern between them is the focus; we will practise safer talking and problem-solving while treating depression with tablets and, if needed, individual sessions; approximate course and measures; check understanding and safety.[1][4]

References

  1. [1]Baucom DH, Shoham V, Mueser KT, Daiuto AD, Stickle TR Empirically supported couple and family interventions for marital distress and adult mental health problems J Consult Clin Psychol, 1998.PMID 9489262
  2. [2]Christensen A, Atkins DC, Berns S, et al. Traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy for significantly and chronically distressed married couples J Consult Clin Psychol, 2004.PMID 15065953
  3. [3]Christensen A, Atkins DC, Baucom B, Yi J Marital status and satisfaction five years following a randomized clinical trial comparing traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy J Consult Clin Psychol, 2010.PMID 20350033
  4. [4]Barbato A, D'Avanzo B, Parabiaghi A Couple therapy for depression Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018.PMID 29882960
  5. [5]Powers MB, Vedel E, Emmelkamp PM Behavioral couples therapy (BCT) for alcohol and drug use disorders: a meta-analysis Clin Psychol Rev, 2008.PMID 18374464
  6. [6]Monson CM, Fredman SJ, Macdonald A, et al. Effect of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy for PTSD: a randomized controlled trial JAMA, 2012.PMID 22893167
  7. [7]Wiebe SA, Johnson SM A Review of the Research in Emotionally Focused Therapy for Couples Fam Process, 2016.PMID 27273169
  8. [8]Shadish WR, Baldwin SA Meta-analysis of MFT interventions J Marital Fam Ther, 2003.PMID 14593694