Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych VivasProfessional — psychological therapies and communication

Psych Vivas · Professional — psychological therapies and communication

Motivational interviewing — structured clinical viva

Motivational interviewing — structured clinical viva

clinical
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
You are the psychiatry registrar in a dual-diagnosis clinic. A 41-year-old woman with bipolar disorder, currently euthymic on lithium, drinks daily and has two recent ED attendances after falls. She says she is 'not ready to stop' but might cut down. The consultant asks you to: define MI and its spirit; demonstrate OARS with example lines; explain change talk (DARN-CAT) and the righting reflex; relate stages of change to MI; summarise MATCH, UKATT, COMBINE, and Cochrane evidence; and outline when MI is insufficient alone.

Opening (definition and spirit)

MI is a collaborative, goal-oriented communication style that strengthens personal motivation and commitment to a specific change by exploring and resolving ambivalence.[1] Spirit PACE: Partnership, Acceptance (worth, accurate empathy, autonomy support, affirmation), Compassion, Evocation. Miller and Rollnick warn against common myths (MI is not a trick, not identical to stages of change, not technique without spirit).[2]

OARS demonstration (case lines)

  • Open: "What would cutting down look like for you in a good week?"
  • Affirm: "Coming after two falls takes courage."
  • Reflect (complex): "You're not ready to stop completely, and you're already thinking a cut-down might protect you."
  • Summary: "Falls scare you, lithium care matters, stopping feels too big right now, cutting down is on the table — what feels like a first step?"
[1] [2]

Prefer reflection-to-question ratio greater than 1 in viva/CASC style.[1]

Change talk and righting reflex

Preparatory DARN (Desire, Ability, Reasons, Need) → mobilising CAT (Commitment, Activation, Taking steps). Commitment language strength predicts outcomes in process research.[6][7] Righting reflex ("you must stop") breeds sustain talk/discord; come alongside ambivalence instead.[1][2]

Stages vs MI

Transtheoretical stages describe readiness trajectories; MI is the method used across stages (e.g. build importance in contemplation; plan in preparation/action).[2][19] Use importance/confidence rulers to choose focus.

Evidence bundle

  • MATCH: MET comparable to longer CBT/TSF for many alcohol outcomes; matching limited.[11]
  • UKATT: MET and network therapy both effective.[13]
  • COMBINE: supports combining pharmacotherapy with behavioural intervention packages including motivational elements.[14]
  • Cochrane: short-term benefit vs no intervention; smaller/uncertain vs other active treatments — claim modestly.[16]

When MI is not enough alone

Medical alcohol work-up and withdrawal risk; lithium toxicity/adherence medical issues; falls safety; driving advice; indicated pharmacotherapy for AUD; compulsory care if risk/capacity thresholds met. MI aids engagement with these, not replacement.[14][16]

Examiner pushbacks

PushbackResponse
"Isn't this just being nice?"Spirit + technical focus on change talk; process meta-analyses support mechanisms.[7]
"She needs tough love"Confrontation often increases sustain talk; evidence favours MI-consistent style for engagement.[1]
"One session cures AUD"Overclaim; effect sizes modest; stepped care required.[16]
[1] [7] [16]

References

  1. [1]Miller WR, Rose GS Toward a theory of motivational interviewing Am Psychol, 2009.PMID 19739882
  2. [2]Miller WR, Rollnick S Ten things that motivational interviewing is not Behav Cogn Psychother, 2009.PMID 19364414
  3. [6]Amrhein PC, Miller WR, Yahne CE, et al. Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes J Consult Clin Psychol, 2003.PMID 14516235
  4. [7]Magill M, Gaume J, Apodaca TR, et al. The technical hypothesis of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of MI's key causal model J Consult Clin Psychol, 2014.PMID 24841862
  5. [11]Project MATCH Research Group Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes J Stud Alcohol, 1997.PMID 8979210
  6. [13]UKATT Research Team Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: findings of the randomised UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT) BMJ, 2005.PMID 16150764
  7. [14]Anton RF, O'Malley SS, Ciraulo DA, et al. Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence: the COMBINE study: a randomized controlled trial JAMA, 2006.PMID 16670409
  8. [16]Schwenker R, Dietrich CE, Hirpa S, et al. Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023.PMID 38084817
  9. [19]Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors Am Psychol, 1992.PMID 1329589