Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych VivasForensic psychiatry — FII / medical child abuse

Psych Vivas · Forensic psychiatry — FII / medical child abuse

Fabricated or induced illness — structured clinical viva

Fellowship viva on FII/MCA/FDIA terminology, safeguarding, assessment, perpetrator psychopathology, ethics of surveillance, and report limits.

clinical
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
You are the psychiatry registrar on the paediatric ward. A 2-year-old has recurrent unexplained apnoeas. Mother is highly medically fluent. Staff note events only when she is alone with the child. Discuss: (1) modern terminology map and why MSBP is imperfect; (2) immediate safety and reporting principles; (3) multi-source assessment structure; (4) perpetrator psychopathology themes from series data; (5) differential including genuine disease and malingering by proxy; (6) covert surveillance ethics; (7) what you will put in a child-protection / family-court opinion and what you will not invent.

Interpretation

Reveal interpretation

Frame. This is a possible induction presentation (apnoeas only with one caregiver). Prioritise child safety and multi-agency process over syndrome labelling. Historical MSBP is imperfect because it glamorizes a psychiatric eponym and can blur child-harm evidence with caregiver motivation; modern FII/MCA/CFI and FDIA separate those frames.[1][2][6][9]

Immediate safety. Medical observation with supervised access; notify local child-protection pathways on reasonable suspicion; assess siblings; senior team coherence; no corridor confrontation.[2][7]

Assessment. Multi-source chronology, symptom–observer matrix, clarify dual-role ethics, caregiver MSE after safety, describe behaviours first.[5]

Perpetrator psychopathology. Series show predominantly female caregivers, healthcare-related occupational themes, high personality and factitious comorbidity—not a single diagnosis. Assessment informs treatability and risk, not the fact of child harm alone.[3][4]

Differential. Genuine cardiorespiratory/neurological disease; anxious parenting; malingering by proxy; FDIA. Keep organic workup open.[2][5]

Covert video. Only lawful multi-agency authorised protocols; high bar; not junior freelance recording.[2][6]

Opinion product. Questions answered: mental state, deception/motivation analysis, comorbidity, recurrence risk for contact, treatment prospects (guarded for entrenched factitious dynamics). Limitations explicit; no invented statutes; no usurping court findings.[5][8]

Escalation questions (examiner probes)

Examiner probes typically stress-test premature labelling, false-accusation risk in complex medical children, father as perpetrator, adult FDIA victims, and whether therapy alone allows unsupervised reunification. High-yield probes include: whether a normal caregiver MSE today excludes FII or FDIA; whether improvement on separation is definitive proof; how process changes if the caregiver is the father; coexistence of real rare metabolic disease with over-anxious parenting; and whether psychotherapy can guarantee zero recurrence for unsupervised reunification.[2][3][7][8]

References

  1. [1]Meadow R Munchausen syndrome by proxy. The hinterland of child abuse Lancet, 1977.PMID 69945
  2. [2]Bass C, Glaser D Early recognition and management of fabricated or induced illness in children Lancet, 2014.PMID 24612863
  3. [3]Yates G, Bass C The perpetrators of medical child abuse (Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy) - A systematic review of 796 cases Child Abuse Negl, 2017.PMID 28750264
  4. [4]Bass C, Jones D Psychopathology of perpetrators of fabricated or induced illness in children: case series Br J Psychiatry, 2011.PMID 21804147
  5. [5]Sanders MJ, Bursch B Forensic assessment of illness falsification, Munchausen by proxy, and factitious disorder, NOS Child Maltreat, 2002.PMID 12020067
  6. [6]Stirling J, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect Beyond Munchausen syndrome by proxy: identification and treatment of child abuse in a medical setting Pediatrics, 2007.PMID 17473106
  7. [7]Tully J, Hopkins O, Smith A, et al. Fabricated or induced illness in children: A guide for Australian health-care practitioners J Paediatr Child Health, 2021.PMID 34310788
  8. [8]Sanders MJ, Bursch B Psychological Treatment of Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another/Munchausen by Proxy Abuse J Clin Psychol Med Settings, 2020.PMID 31089919
  9. [9]Meadow R What is, and what is not, 'Munchausen syndrome by proxy'? Arch Dis Child, 1995.PMID 7618944