Psych Vivas · Foundations — social psychology
Social psychology and group dynamics — structured clinical viva
Social psychology and group dynamics — structured clinical viva
On this page & tools
Target exams
Opening definitions (90 seconds)
Social psychology: influence of actual, imagined, or implied others on thought, feeling, and behaviour. Name the toolkit: attribution and FAE; dissonance/forced compliance; conformity (normative vs informational); obedience; bystander diffusion; social identity; groupthink and polarisation; stigma types.[4][5][3]
Family EE vignette
High EE = criticism, hostility, emotional over-involvement. Blaming controllability attributions fuel criticism; EE predicts relapse (meta-analysis). Intervene with psychoeducation and skills — support carers, do not shame them.[9][11]
Junior and unsafe plan
Distinguish conformity (peer consensus silence), obedience (authority order), and compliance (request without private acceptance). Encourage speak-up / dual challenge; hierarchy is not a moral blank cheque. Milgram and Burger show situational power of authority — ethics demand independent professional judgment.[1][2][5]
Stigma and delayed care
Public vs self vs structural stigma; self-stigma stages; stigma blocks help-seeking. Prefer contact-based anti-stigma over education-only; caution biogenetic-only messages that may increase social distance.[13]
Bystander teaching point
More bystanders can mean less individual helping via diffusion of responsibility. Clinical fix: name roles and a single owner of the next action.[3]
Dissonance one-liner
Insufficient external justification for counter-attitudinal behaviour drives private attitude change (Festinger and Carlsmith $1 vs $20).[4]
Safety and examiner traps
Traps: EE = any emotion; more people always means more help; Milgram excuses unethical orders; education posters alone “fix” stigma; inventing legal sections. Laws are jurisdiction-specific; social psychology informs culture and formulation but does not replace capacity frameworks.[1][3][9][13]
References
- [1]Milgram S Behavioral study of obedience J Abnorm Psychol, 1963.PMID 14049516
- [2]Burger JM Replicating milgram: would people still obey today? Am Psychol, 2009.PMID 19209958
- [3]Darley JM, Latané B Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility J Pers Soc Psychol, 1968.PMID 5645600
- [4]Festinger L, Carlsmith JM Cognitive consequences of forced compliance J Abnorm Psychol, 1959.PMID 13640824
- [5]Levine JM Solomon Asch's legacy for group research Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 1999.PMID 15661682
- [9]Butzlaff RL, Hooley JM Expressed emotion and psychiatric relapse: a meta-analysis Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1998.PMID 9633674
- [11]Barrowclough C, Hooley JM Attributions and expressed emotion: a review Clin Psychol Rev, 2003.PMID 14529701
- [13]Thornicroft G, Mehta N, Clement S, et al. Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination Lancet, 2016.PMID 26410341