Psych Vivas · General adult psychiatry — somatic symptom and related disorders
Somatic symptom disorder — structured clinical viva
Fellowship viva on SSD alliance, criteria pivot, stepped care, CBT evidence, deprescribing risk, and anti-iatrogenesis with medical teams.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Interpretation
Reveal interpretation
This is a systems and alliance problem as much as a diagnostic one. The medical request to “tell him it is psychiatric” risks dualism and rupture. SSD formulation is compatible with keeping red-flag review open. Escalating diazepam/codeine and high utilisation signal iatrogenic and substance risk plus untreated depression/health-anxiety behaviours.[1][2][6]
Expected viva structure
Reveal model structure
1. Engage and validate. Symptoms real; goal is safety, function, and reducing suffering — not proving fakeness. Reflect anger about feeling dismissed.[2]
2. Diagnostic defence. DSM-5 SSD = distressing symptoms + disproportionate thoughts/feelings/behaviours; not defined by normal tests alone; medical disease can coexist. Differentiate IAD, FND, factitious/malingering carefully.[1]
3. Shared medical plan. Document what has been done, red-flag triggers for re-investigation, single coordinating clinician, stop unfocused cascades. This is collaborative C-L, not psychiatric ownership of all bodily symptoms.[2][6]
4. Psychological care. CBT for health anxiety/multi-symptom presentations (Barsky; CHAMP for medical settings); modest effect-size humility (Cochrane).[3][4][5]
5. Medication. Treat depression; deprescribe long-term benzodiazepine where safe; avoid opioid/benzo stack; pharmacological anti-somatoform evidence limited.[7]
6. Disposition. Scheduled outpatient reviews, crisis plan, risk assessment for suicide, GP letter with thresholds.[2][6]
Probe questions and model fragments
Reveal probes
Q: Does a normal MRI exclude serious disease forever?
No. Pattern change and red flags reopen work-up; SSD is not a permanent shield against new pathology.[2]
Q: Name psychological trial evidence.
Barsky CBT for hypochondriasis; Tyrer CHAMP CBT for health anxiety in medical patients; van Dessel Cochrane non-pharmacological synthesis.[3][4][5]
Q: What do you say to the medical team?
Frame both–and care, shared thresholds, and that pejorative “it’s psychiatric” dumps worsen outcomes and utilisation.[2][6]
Q: Medication first-line for “SSD itself”?
No robust first-line anti-somatic drug; treat comorbidity; limited Cochrane pharmacological signals.[7]
Common viva failures
Colluding with dualistic dismissal; closing the organic door permanently; ignoring benzo/opioid iatrogenesis; offering only “reassurance” without CBT structure or care coordination; overcalling factitious disorder to end the consultation.[1][2][6]
References
- [1]Dimsdale JE, Creed F, Escobar J, et al. Somatic symptom disorder: an important change in DSM J Psychosom Res, 2013.PMID 23972410
- [2]Henningsen P, Zipfel S, Herzog W Management of functional somatic syndromes Lancet, 2007.PMID 17368156
- [3]Barsky AJ, Ahern DK Cognitive behavior therapy for hypochondriasis: a randomized controlled trial JAMA, 2004.PMID 15039413
- [4]Tyrer P, Cooper S, Salkovskis P, et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for health anxiety in medical patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial Lancet, 2014.PMID 24139977
- [5]van Dessel N, den Boeft M, van der Wouden JC, et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014.PMID 25362239
- [6]Barsky AJ, Ahern DK, Bauer MR, et al. A randomized trial of treatments for high-utilizing somatizing patients J Gen Intern Med, 2013.PMID 23494213
- [7]Kleinstäuber M, Witthöft M, Steffanowski A, et al. Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014.PMID 25379990