Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Psych VivasGeneral adult psychiatry — somatic symptom and related disorders

Psych Vivas · General adult psychiatry — somatic symptom and related disorders

Somatic symptom disorder — structured clinical viva

Fellowship viva on SSD alliance, criteria pivot, stepped care, CBT evidence, deprescribing risk, and anti-iatrogenesis with medical teams.

clinical
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
You are the psychiatry registrar on a consultation-liaison list. A 45-year-old man with known multi-symptom SSD is admitted after his fifth 'negative' medical work-up this year. The medical team wants you to 'tell him it is psychiatric' and stop further tests. He is furious, believes something is being missed, scores high on PHQ-15, has moderate depression, and takes escalating night-time diazepam plus PRN codeine. Discuss how you will engage him, defend the SSD formulation without dualism, set a collaborative investigation plan, outline stepped psychological and pharmacological care, and address iatrogenic harm.

Interpretation

Reveal interpretation

This is a systems and alliance problem as much as a diagnostic one. The medical request to “tell him it is psychiatric” risks dualism and rupture. SSD formulation is compatible with keeping red-flag review open. Escalating diazepam/codeine and high utilisation signal iatrogenic and substance risk plus untreated depression/health-anxiety behaviours.[1][2][6]

Expected viva structure

Reveal model structure

1. Engage and validate. Symptoms real; goal is safety, function, and reducing suffering — not proving fakeness. Reflect anger about feeling dismissed.[2]

2. Diagnostic defence. DSM-5 SSD = distressing symptoms + disproportionate thoughts/feelings/behaviours; not defined by normal tests alone; medical disease can coexist. Differentiate IAD, FND, factitious/malingering carefully.[1]

3. Shared medical plan. Document what has been done, red-flag triggers for re-investigation, single coordinating clinician, stop unfocused cascades. This is collaborative C-L, not psychiatric ownership of all bodily symptoms.[2][6]

4. Psychological care. CBT for health anxiety/multi-symptom presentations (Barsky; CHAMP for medical settings); modest effect-size humility (Cochrane).[3][4][5]

5. Medication. Treat depression; deprescribe long-term benzodiazepine where safe; avoid opioid/benzo stack; pharmacological anti-somatoform evidence limited.[7]

6. Disposition. Scheduled outpatient reviews, crisis plan, risk assessment for suicide, GP letter with thresholds.[2][6]

Probe questions and model fragments

Reveal probes

Q: Does a normal MRI exclude serious disease forever?
No. Pattern change and red flags reopen work-up; SSD is not a permanent shield against new pathology.[2]

Q: Name psychological trial evidence.
Barsky CBT for hypochondriasis; Tyrer CHAMP CBT for health anxiety in medical patients; van Dessel Cochrane non-pharmacological synthesis.[3][4][5]

Q: What do you say to the medical team?
Frame both–and care, shared thresholds, and that pejorative “it’s psychiatric” dumps worsen outcomes and utilisation.[2][6]

Q: Medication first-line for “SSD itself”?
No robust first-line anti-somatic drug; treat comorbidity; limited Cochrane pharmacological signals.[7]

Common viva failures

Colluding with dualistic dismissal; closing the organic door permanently; ignoring benzo/opioid iatrogenesis; offering only “reassurance” without CBT structure or care coordination; overcalling factitious disorder to end the consultation.[1][2][6]

References

  1. [1]Dimsdale JE, Creed F, Escobar J, et al. Somatic symptom disorder: an important change in DSM J Psychosom Res, 2013.PMID 23972410
  2. [2]Henningsen P, Zipfel S, Herzog W Management of functional somatic syndromes Lancet, 2007.PMID 17368156
  3. [3]Barsky AJ, Ahern DK Cognitive behavior therapy for hypochondriasis: a randomized controlled trial JAMA, 2004.PMID 15039413
  4. [4]Tyrer P, Cooper S, Salkovskis P, et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for health anxiety in medical patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial Lancet, 2014.PMID 24139977
  5. [5]van Dessel N, den Boeft M, van der Wouden JC, et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014.PMID 25362239
  6. [6]Barsky AJ, Ahern DK, Bauer MR, et al. A randomized trial of treatments for high-utilizing somatizing patients J Gen Intern Med, 2013.PMID 23494213
  7. [7]Kleinstäuber M, Witthöft M, Steffanowski A, et al. Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014.PMID 25379990