Domestic Violence and Abuse
Domestic and family violence (DFV) is a pervasive public health issue affecting 1 in 3 women and 1 in 4 men in their lif... ACEM Fellowship Written, ACEM Fellow
Clinical board
A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.
Urgent signals
Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.
- Inconsistent mechanism of injury
- Delayed presentation (greater than 24 hours)
- Repeat injuries in various stages of healing
- Partner refuses to leave room or answers for patient
Exam focus
Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.
- ACEM Fellowship Written
- ACEM Fellowship OSCE
Linked comparisons
Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.
- Non-Accidental Injury (Child Abuse)
Editorial and exam context
Quick Answer
One-liner: Domestic violence and abuse encompasses intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and child abuse; emergency department recognition and management require trauma-informed care, forensic documentation, safety planning, and mandatory reporting where required.
Domestic and family violence (DFV) is a pervasive public health issue affecting 1 in 3 women and 1 in 4 men in their lifetime. Emergency departments are critical identification points where patterns such as inconsistent injury mechanisms, delayed presentation, and repeat injuries should trigger suspicion. Management priorities include ensuring physical safety, providing forensic documentation (including photography with consent), safety planning, mandatory reporting (child abuse is mandatory nationwide; adult DV reporting varies by jurisdiction), and referral to support services such as 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732). Cultural safety is essential, particularly for Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, and Māori populations who experience 2-3× higher rates of violence. Remote and rural settings present additional challenges including limited access to services, RFDS retrieval considerations, and community confidentiality concerns.
ACEM Exam Focus
Primary Exam Relevance
- Anatomy: Injury patterns (central vs peripheral), defensive wounds, strangulation anatomy
- Physiology: Stress response, trauma physiology, strangulation physiology
- Pharmacology: Analgesia considerations, sedation for forensic examination
Fellowship Exam Relevance
- Written: Recognition patterns, mandatory reporting requirements, safety planning, referral pathways, documentation standards, forensic photography principles
- OSCE: Sensitive history taking, partner separation strategies, forensic documentation, safety planning, mandatory reporting documentation, cultural safety communication
- Key domains tested: Medical Expert (recognition and management), Communicator (sensitive questioning, breaking bad news, safety planning), Professional (mandatory reporting, documentation, ethical dilemmas), Advocate (referral pathways, resource navigation, health advocacy)
Key Points
The 5 things you MUST know:
- Recognition patterns: inconsistent mechanism, delayed presentation, repeat injuries in various stages of healing, central body injuries (head, neck, chest, abdomen), defensive wounds on ulnar forearms
- Child abuse red flags: TEN-4-FACESp bruising rule (Torso, Ears, Neck, age below 4; Frenulum, Angle, Cheek, Eyelids, Subconjunctival, patterned), metaphyseal "corner" fractures, posterior rib fractures, fractures in non-ambulatory children
- Elder abuse recognition: physical (unexplained bruises, pressure injuries), financial (sudden changes in will/banking), neglect (poor hygiene, malnutrition), psychological (withdrawal, fear of caregiver)
- Forensic documentation: detailed mechanism description (patient's exact words), body map, forensic photography (orientation, mid-range, close-up with scale), timing of injuries, chain of custody
- Mandatory reporting: child abuse mandatory nationwide; adult DV mandatory in NT, WA, TAS; consult local hospital policy and social work
Epidemiology
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Lifetime IPV prevalence (women) | 27% (1 in 3) | [1] |
| Lifetime IPV prevalence (men) | 15% (1 in 6) | [1] |
| Annual IPV prevalence | 5-10% of ED presentations | [2] |
| Domestic homicide rate | 1.2-1.4 per 100,000 | [3] |
| Peak age for IPV | 25-44 years | [4] |
| Child abuse prevalence | 1 in 4 girls, 1 in 6 boys | [5] |
| Elder abuse prevalence | 10% of older adults | [6] |
Australian/NZ Specific
- Hospitalization rates: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women are 32× more likely to be hospitalized for domestic violence assault than non-Indigenous women [7]
- Domestic homicide: Indigenous women are 11× more likely to be victims of domestic homicide than non-Indigenous women [7]
- Rural/remote: Women in very remote areas are 24× more likely to be hospitalized for domestic violence assault than women in major cities [8]
- Māori statistics: Māori women experience 1.5-2× higher rates of domestic violence than non-Māori women in New Zealand [9]
- ED screening: Less than 1% of ED visits by older adults result in elder abuse diagnosis despite 10% prevalence [10]
Pathophysiology
Mechanism of Abuse
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV):
- Physical: Blunt force trauma (punching, kicking), strangulation, use of weapons, forced restraint
- Sexual: Coercion, rape, reproductive coercion
- Psychological: Threats, intimidation, isolation, gaslighting, stalking
- Financial: Controlling access to money, preventing employment, stealing
- Technology-facilitated: GPS tracking, monitoring communications, harassment online
Child Abuse:
- Physical: Shaking (shaken baby syndrome), blunt force, burning, scalding
- Neglect: Failure to provide basic needs (food, shelter, medical care)
- Emotional: Verbal abuse, rejection, humiliation
- Sexual: Sexual acts with children, exploitation
Elder Abuse:
- Physical: Restraint, assault, inappropriate medication administration
- Financial: Theft, coercion, misuse of power of attorney
- Neglect: Failure to provide care, withholding necessities
- Psychological: Threats, humiliation, isolation
Pathological Progression
Acute Phase (0-72 hours) → Subacute (3-7 days) → Healing Phase (7-14+ days) → Chronic Phase (ongoing cycles)
Strangulation Physiology:
- Carotid artery compression → cerebral hypoperfusion → loss of consciousness in 5-10 seconds
- Jugular vein compression → venous congestion → petechiae (eyes, face, neck)
- Tracheal compression → airway obstruction → asphyxia
- Vagus nerve stimulation → bradycardia, cardiac arrest
- Delayed neurologic injury: thromboembolic stroke, carotid artery dissection
Why It Matters Clinically
Understanding the mechanism helps ED clinicians:
- Anticipate associated injuries (strangulation → carotid injury, petechiae, later stroke)
- Recognize hidden injuries (skeletal survey for child abuse)
- Provide appropriate forensic documentation
- Plan for delayed complications (post-strangulation syndrome)
- Identify red flags requiring immediate intervention (immediate strangulation danger signs)
Clinical Approach
Recognition
Triggers for Suspicion:
- Inconsistent mechanism of injury versus injury severity
- Delayed presentation (greater than 24 hours after injury)
- Repeat injuries or frequent ED visits
- Injuries in various stages of healing
- Central body injuries (head, neck, face, torso)
- Defensive wounds (ulnar forearm, back of hands)
- Partner who refuses to leave room or answers for patient
- Patient appears anxious, fearful, withdrawn, or depressed
- Pregnancy with new or worsening trauma
Specific Recognition Patterns:
Intimate Partner Violence:
- Central injuries (head, neck, face, breasts, abdomen) present in greater than 50% of IPV cases
- Strangulation marks (lineal bruising, petechiae, laryngeal tenderness)
- Patterned injuries (belt marks, bite marks, grab marks, ligature marks)
- Bilateral injuries (not typical of accidental trauma)
- "Bath towel" pattern (injury distribution consistent with being wrapped in towel)
- Delayed presentation for significant injuries (fractures, lacerations)
Child Abuse:
- "Those who don't cruise, don't bruise"
- any bruise in non-ambulatory infant (below 4 months) is suspicious
- TEN-4-FACESp bruising rule: Torso, Ears, Neck, age below 4; Frenulum, Angle, Cheek, Eyelids, Subconjunctival, patterned bruises
- Metaphyseal "corner" or "bucket-handle" fractures (highly specific for abuse in infants)
- Posterior rib fractures (caused by squeezing chest during shaking)
- Long bone fractures in non-ambulatory children
- Retinal hemorrhages (shaken baby syndrome)
- Subdural hemorrhage with minor or no trauma history
- Burns with clear patterns (stocking-glove, immersion, cigarette)
Elder Abuse:
- Unexplained bruises, pressure injuries, lacerations
- Poor hygiene, malnutrition, dehydration
- Inappropriate clothing for weather conditions
- Fear of caregiver, withdrawal from communication
- Sudden changes in financial documents, missing valuables
- Medication non-adherence or inappropriate administration
Initial Assessment
Primary Survey
- A: Airway - assess for strangulation, facial/neck trauma, airway protection
- B: Breathing - assess for chest wall trauma, rib fractures, pneumothorax
- C: Circulation - assess for hemorrhage, internal injuries, strangulation cardiovascular effects
- D: Disability - assess for altered mental status, head injury, strangulation neurologic effects
- E: Exposure - full examination with privacy, document all injuries, photograph if consent obtained
History
Key Questions
| Question | Significance |
|---|---|
| "Can you tell me exactly how this happened?" | Establish mechanism, detect inconsistencies |
| "Have you been hurt by anyone at home?" | Direct questioning increases disclosure rates |
| "Do you feel safe in your relationship/at home?" | Assess current safety |
| "Has your partner ever tried to control what you do?" | Identify coercive control |
| "Has anyone hurt, threatened, or scared you recently?" | Broader screening for abuse |
| "Are you afraid to go home?" | Assess immediate safety risk |
| "Do you have a safe place to go?" | Identify safety planning needs |
| "Has anyone forced you to do something sexual?" | Screen for sexual abuse |
| "Has anyone stopped you from getting medical help?" | Identify barriers to care |
| "Are there children at home? Do they see the violence?" | Assess child exposure, mandatory reporting |
Red Flag Symptoms
- Strangulation (loss of consciousness, voice changes, dysphagia, neck pain, petechiae) - risk of delayed carotid thrombosis and stroke
- Pregnancy with trauma (increased risk of escalation, placental abruption)
- Head injury with altered mental status
- Fractures without adequate explanation
- Visible patterned injuries (belt marks, bite marks, grab marks)
- Multiple injuries in various stages of healing
- Child with bruising below 4 months old (non-ambulatory)
- Non-ambulatory child with long bone fracture
- Elder with unexplained malnutrition or pressure injuries
Examination
General Inspection
- Patient appearance: withdrawn, anxious, depressed, fearful
- Patient behavior: excessive eye contact avoidance, reluctance to speak, changing story
- Partner behavior: answers for patient, refuses to leave room, hostile, overly solicitous
- Hygiene and nutrition signs (elder abuse): poor hygiene, inappropriate clothing, malnutrition
Specific Findings
| System | Finding | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Head/Neck | Contusions, lacerations, hair loss from pulling, strangulation marks (lineal bruising, petechiae), tympanic membrane hemorrhage | Highly suspicious for abuse |
| Eyes | Subconjunctival hemorrhages, retinal hemorrhages (child abuse), periorbital contusions ("raccoon eyes") | Strangulation, head trauma, shaken baby syndrome |
| Ears | Auricular bruising (TEN-4 rule), hemotympanum | Head trauma, specific abuse pattern |
| Oral | Frenulum tears, dental trauma, lacerations to lips/inner cheeks | Forced feeding, gagging, blows to face |
| Chest/Abdomen | Contusions, rib fractures (posterior suspicious in children), abdominal trauma (solid organ injury) | Central injury pattern highly suspicious |
| Upper extremities | Ulnar forearm defensive wounds, humerus fracture (non-ambulatory child), metacarpal fractures ("boxer's fracture") | Defensive wounds, abuse patterns |
| Lower extremities | Femur fracture (non-ambulatory child), tibia/fibula fractures | Abuse in non-ambulatory |
| Skin | Patterned injuries (belt marks, grab marks, ligature marks, bite marks, cigarette burns), bruises in various stages of healing | Highly specific for abuse |
| Genital | Lacerations, bruising, sexually transmitted infections | Sexual assault |
Body Map Documentation:
- Use standardized ED body map to document all injuries
- Mark location, size, shape, color, and description
- Note whether injuries are patterned or non-patterned
- Document timing of injuries (patient's estimate, clinical staging)
Investigations
Immediate (Resus Bay)
| Test | Purpose | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Primary survey ABCDE | Identify life-threatening injuries | Airway compromise, tension pneumothorax, active hemorrhage |
| Fingerstick glucose | Altered mental status differential | Hypoglycaemia can mimic intoxication/abuse |
| Pregnancy test (hCG) | Pregnancy assessment | Essential for trauma management |
| Point-of-care ultrasound (eFAST) | Internal injury detection | Free fluid, pneumothorax, solid organ injury |
| CXR/CT imaging | Trauma assessment | Fractures, pneumothorax, hemothorax, solid organ injury |
Standard ED Workup
| Test | Indication | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| CBC | Trauma, anemia, infection | Anemia may suggest chronic blood loss |
| Coagulation profile | Bleeding risk, anticoagulation | Anticoagulation increases bruising severity |
| Basic metabolic panel | Electrolytes, renal function | Hyponatraemia, hypokalaemia may suggest neglect |
| LFTs | Liver injury, malnutrition | Elevated transaminases in liver trauma |
| Troponin | Cardiac injury | Strangulation can cause cardiac ischemia |
| Urine drug screen | Toxicology assessment | May clarify altered mental status |
| Blood alcohol level | Intoxication assessment | May clarify behavior/injury mechanism |
Advanced/Specialist
Child Abuse Investigations:
| Test | Indication | Availability |
|---|---|---|
| Skeletal survey | Child below 2 years with suspicious injury | Metro/tertiary |
| Head CT/MRI | Suspected head trauma, shaken baby syndrome | Metro/tertiary |
| Ophthalmology review | Retinal hemorrhages (shaken baby syndrome) | Metro/tertiary |
| Coagulation studies | Rule out bleeding disorder | All |
| Social work assessment | Child protection evaluation | All |
Elder Abuse Investigations:
| Test | Indication | Availability |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive geriatric assessment | Multidomain evaluation | Metro/tertiary |
| Cognitive assessment | Capacity evaluation | All |
| Medication review | Polypharmacy, inappropriate use | All |
| CT brain | Suspected trauma, neglect | Metro/tertiary |
Forensic Evidence Collection:
| Test | Indication | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Forensic photography | Injury documentation | ASAP (bruises worsen 24-48h) |
| Sexual assault forensic kit | Sexual assault | Within 72 hours |
| Toxicology screen | Drug-facilitated assault | ASAP |
| DNA swabs | Skin cells under nails, bite marks | ASAP |
Point-of-Care Ultrasound
- eFAST: Identify pneumothorax, hemothorax, free fluid (abdominal/pelvic)
- Soft tissue ultrasound: Assess for hematomas, foreign bodies
- Vascular ultrasound: Assess for deep vein thrombosis (immobilization)
Management
Immediate Management (First 10 minutes)
1. Ensure physical safety (separate from partner if present, security involvement)
2. Primary survey ABCDE (life-threatening injuries take priority)
3. Obtain private, safe location for patient (partner asked to leave)
4. Establish rapport and trust (trauma-informed care approach)
5. Initiate forensic documentation (detailed notes, body map, photography if consent)
6. Involve social work/mental health team early
7. Consult mandatory reporting requirements (child abuse mandatory, adult DV varies by jurisdiction)
8. Safety planning discussion (if patient ready and safe)
Resuscitation
Airway
- Protect airway in facial/neck trauma
- Anticipate airway compromise in strangulation (laryngeal edema)
- Use jaw thrust, not head tilt (cervical spine clearance if trauma)
- Early intubation if airway compromise or altered mental status
Breathing
- Administer oxygen for hypoxia
- Treat pneumothorax, hemothorax as indicated
- Monitor for respiratory depression (drug intoxication, thoracic trauma)
Circulation
- Control active hemorrhage (pressure, tourniquets for extremities)
- IV access for fluid resuscitation, medications
- Treat shock (crystalloids, blood products if indicated)
- Monitor vital signs closely (strangulation can cause arrhythmias)
Medications
| Drug | Dose | Route | Timing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analgesia (paracetamol) | 1g | IV/PO | For mild-moderate pain | First-line |
| Analgesia (opioid) | Morphine 5-10mg | IV | For severe pain | Titrate to effect |
| Antiemetic | Ondansetron 4-8mg | IV | For nausea/vomiting | Use if needed |
| Anxiolytic | Diazepam 5-10mg | PO/IV | If patient极度 anxious, safe discharge | Only if patient not returning to unsafe environment |
| Tetanus prophylaxis | As per guidelines | IM | For tetanus-prone wounds | Check vaccination status |
Paediatric Dosing
| Drug | Dose | Max | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paracetamol | 15 mg/kg | 1g | For mild-moderate pain |
| Morphine | 0.1-0.2 mg/kg | 10mg | For severe pain, titrate |
| Ondansetron | 0.15 mg/kg | 8mg | For nausea/vomiting |
| Diazepam | 0.2-0.5 mg/kg | 10mg | Only if safe discharge |
Ongoing Management
Trauma-Informed Care Principles:
- Ensure safety and privacy throughout encounter
- Use collaborative, empowering communication style
- Validate patient's feelings and experiences
- Respect patient's autonomy and decision-making
- Provide information, not directives
- Acknowledge resilience and coping strategies
Forensic Documentation:
- Detailed description of mechanism (use patient's exact words in quotation marks)
- Body map with all injuries marked
- Forensic photography (consent required):
- Orientation shot (full body or region)
- Mid-range shot (injury with anatomical landmarks)
- Close-up shot (with forensic ruler/scale)
- Include color calibration card if available
- Timing documentation (when injury occurred, when presentation occurred)
- Chain of custody for photographs/evidence
Safety Planning:
- Assess immediate safety risk (lethality assessment)
- Discuss emergency plan (exit strategy, emergency contacts)
- Identify safe places (friends, family, shelters)
- Prepare "go bag" (documents, medications, valuables)
- Provide contact information for support services
- Discuss safe technology use (clear browser history, secure communications)
- Develop code words/check-ins with trusted contacts
Mandatory Reporting:
- Child abuse: Mandatory nationwide (all states/territories)
- Adult domestic violence: Mandatory in NT, WA, TAS; discretionary but encouraged in other jurisdictions
- Elder abuse: Mandatory in some states, varies by jurisdiction
- Consult local hospital policy and social work department
- Report to appropriate authorities:
- Child Protection Services
- Police (if imminent danger)
- Adult Protective Services (elder abuse)
- State health department (some jurisdictions)
Referral Pathways:
- National helpline: 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732) - 24/7 counseling, information, referrals
- Social work: Comprehensive assessment, safety planning, resources
- Community health services: Ongoing support, counseling
- Legal aid: Legal information, protection order assistance
- Domestic violence services: Shelters, counseling, advocacy
- Cultural liaison services: For Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, Māori patients
Definitive Care
Admission Indications:
- Severe injuries requiring hospital care
- Safe disposition not possible (no safe place to go)
- High lethality risk
- Suicidal ideation
- Child protection issues requiring coordination
- Elder abuse requiring safe placement
Specialist Referral:
- Forensic medicine/sexual assault service (if available)
- General surgery (trauma)
- Orthopaedics (fractures)
- Plastic surgery (facial injuries)
- Ophthalmology (eye injuries)
- ENT (facial/neck trauma)
- Geriatrician (elder abuse)
- Psychiatry (mental health consequences)
Disposition
Admission Criteria
- Severe trauma requiring operative intervention
- Unsafe discharge (patient returning to dangerous situation and no safe alternative)
- High lethality risk (threats of homicide/suicide, recent escalation, strangulation)
- Medical complications requiring monitoring (arrhythmias, neurological symptoms)
- Coordination required for child protection, elder protection
ICU/HDU Criteria
- Hemodynamic instability from trauma
- Severe head injury (GCS ≤ 8)
- Strangulation with cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, or neurological deficit
- Multi-trauma requiring intensive monitoring
- Respiratory compromise requiring ventilation
Discharge Criteria
- Injuries stable and manageable outpatient
- Safe disposition confirmed (safe place to go)
- Safety plan in place and patient understands
- Mandatory reporting completed (if applicable)
- Referrals made (social work, community services)
- Follow-up arranged
- Patient has emergency contact information
Follow-up
- GP referral for ongoing care
- Social work follow-up
- Community health services referral
- Domestic violence service referral
- Cultural liaison service referral (for Indigenous patients)
- Legal protection order assistance (if requested)
- Mental health support (PTSD, depression, anxiety)
Special Populations
Paediatric Considerations
Recognition Patterns:
- TEN-4-FACESp bruising rule (95% sensitivity, 89% specificity) [11]
- Torso bruises (chest, abdomen, back)
- Ears bruises
- Neck bruises
- "4: Age below 4 years with any bruising"
- Frenulum tears/bruising
- Angle of jaw bruises
- Cheeks bruises
- Eyelids bruises
- Subconjunctival hemorrhages
- patterned bruises (handprints, belt marks)
- "Those who don't cruise, don't bruise"
- bruising in non-ambulatory infant (below 4 months) is highly suspicious
- Skeletal survey mandatory for children below 2 years with suspicious injuries [12]
- High-specificity fracture patterns:
- Metaphyseal "corner" or "bucket-handle" fractures
- Posterior rib fractures
- Scapular, sternal, spinous process fractures
- Long bone fractures in non-ambulatory children
Management:
- Mandatory reporting to Child Protection Services nationwide
- Admission for observation if suspicion exists (do not discharge home)
- Multidisciplinary assessment (social work, child protection, police)
- Consider abuse as diagnosis of exclusion when mechanism inconsistent
Pregnancy
Increased Risk:
- Pregnancy is a high-risk period for escalation of IPV [13]
- IPV during pregnancy associated with:
- Miscarriage
- Preterm birth
- Low birth weight
- Placental abruption
- Maternal mortality
Management:
- Screen every pregnant patient for IPV [14]
- Coordinate with obstetrics for fetal assessment
- Provide specialized resources for pregnant victims
- Consider fetal safety in safety planning
Elderly
Types of Elder Abuse:
- Physical: Assault, restraint, inappropriate medication administration
- Financial: Theft, coercion, misuse of power of attorney
- Neglect: Failure to provide basic needs (food, water, hygiene, medical care)
- Psychological: Threats, humiliation, isolation, intimidation
- Sexual: Non-consensual sexual contact
Recognition:
- Screen all patients greater than 65 years for elder abuse [15]
- Use validated screening tools (EASI, EMST, VASS)
- Look for unexplained injuries, malnutrition, dehydration, pressure injuries
- Assess for financial exploitation (sudden changes in banking, will, property)
Management:
- Report to Adult Protective Services (mandatory in some jurisdictions)
- Comprehensive geriatric assessment
- Involve geriatrician, social work, pharmacy
- Consider guardianship if capacity impaired
Indigenous Health
Important Note: Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, and Māori considerations:
Health Disparities:
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women are 32× more likely to be hospitalized for domestic violence assault than non-Indigenous women [7]
- Indigenous women are 11× more likely to be victims of domestic homicide than non-Indigenous women [7]
- Māori women in New Zealand experience 1.5-2× higher rates of domestic violence than non-Māori women [9]
- Women in very remote areas of Australia are 24× more likely to be hospitalized for domestic violence assault than women in major cities [8]
Cultural Safety Considerations:
- Engage Aboriginal Health Workers (AHWs), Aboriginal Liaison Officers (ALOs), or Māori Health Workers early
- Understand broader definition of "family violence" includes extended family, not just intimate partners
- Acknowledge intergenerational trauma from colonization, forced removals (Stolen Generations)
- Be aware of historical distrust of police, child protection services, healthcare systems
- Recognize fear of child removal may prevent disclosure of violence
- Provide culturally appropriate support services
- Use interpreter services if language barrier (not family members)
- Respect cultural protocols around family, community, and decision-making
Indigenous Health Disparities:
- Higher rates of chronic disease, mental health issues, substance use
- Crowded housing, socioeconomic disadvantage increase risk
- Limited access to services in remote communities
- Health workforce shortages in remote areas
Mandatory Reporting Considerations:
- Child protection reporting mandatory nationwide (including Indigenous children)
- Recognize impact of historical child removal policies on Indigenous families
- Work collaboratively with Indigenous child protection services where available
Pitfalls & Pearls
Clinical Pearls:
- "Ask everyone, always"
- Universal screening increases identification rates compared to selective screening [16]
- Bruising becomes more visible 24-48 hours after injury - consider delayed forensic photography
- Strangulation can cause delayed carotid thrombosis and stroke - symptoms may appear hours to days later [17]
- Petechiae in eyes, face, neck are pathognomonic for strangulation (not from crying alone)
- Posterior rib fractures in infants are caused by chest squeezing during shaking - highly specific for abuse [18]
- Metaphyseal fractures in infants are caused by pulling/shaking limbs - "bucket-handle" appearance [19]
- Document patient's exact words in quotation marks for mechanism description
- Use RADAR mnemonic: Routine screening, Ask direct questions, Document findings, Assess safety, Review options/Refer
- 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732) is the national domestic violence helpline - provide to every suspected victim
Pitfalls to Avoid:
- Failing to separate patient from partner before screening
- Assuming patients will self-disclose without direct questioning (most do not without being asked) [20]
- Attributing injuries to "accidents" without considering mechanism plausibility
- Forgetting mandatory reporting for child abuse (mandatory nationwide)
- Failing to consider elder abuse in patients with cognitive impairment
- Not documenting injuries with forensic photography (loss of legal evidence)
- Discharging patients to unsafe situations without safety planning
- Not involving social work/mental health early in presentation
- Forgetting that strangulation is lethal - 10% of strangulation victims die on first episode [21]
- Ignoring cultural safety considerations for Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, and Māori patients
Viva Practice
Stem: A 32-year-old woman presents to the ED with facial bruising and a fractured wrist. She is accompanied by her husband who stays by her bedside and answers most questions. She says she "fell down the stairs."
Opening Question: What are your concerns and immediate priorities?
Model Answer: My immediate priorities are ensuring patient safety and thorough assessment of injuries. The presence of a partner who stays by the bedside and answers for the patient, combined with central injuries (facial bruising) and a mechanism that may not explain the severity of injury, raises suspicion for intimate partner violence. I need to:
- Assess and stabilize any life-threatening injuries (ABCDE)
- Ask the husband to leave the room so I can speak with the patient privately
- Conduct a sensitive history taking about the mechanism and potential abuse
- Perform a full examination, documenting all injuries
- Obtain forensic photography with consent
- Assess immediate safety and lethality risk
- Involve social work and consider mandatory reporting
Follow-up Questions:
-
How would you approach asking the husband to leave the room?
- Model answer: I would politely but firmly explain that as part of my assessment, I need to examine the patient alone. I might say: "Mr. [Name], could I ask you to wait in the waiting room for a few minutes while I examine [Patient's Name] and discuss the plan? The nurse will call you back in shortly." This is a standard medical request that shouldn't raise suspicion.
-
What screening questions would you ask the patient?
- Model answer: I would use direct but empathetic questioning: "Can you tell me more about how this injury happened?" followed by "Did anyone hurt you or cause this injury?" "Do you feel safe at home?" "Has your partner ever hurt or threatened you?" "Are you afraid to go home?"
-
How would you manage the fractured wrist and facial injuries?
- Model answer: After ensuring safety, I would manage the injuries according to standard protocols. For the fractured wrist, I would obtain imaging, immobilize, and refer to orthopaedics. For facial injuries, I would assess for underlying fractures (nasal, orbital, mandibular) and involve ENT/plastic surgery if needed. Documentation would include detailed description and forensic photography with consent.
-
What are your discharge considerations if the patient denies abuse and wants to go home with her husband?
- Model answer: This is a complex situation. If the patient denies abuse despite suspicious injuries and wants to return with her husband, I need to:
- Respect patient autonomy while ensuring safety
- Provide resources (1800RESPECT card, contact information)
- Document that abuse was suspected but denied
- Ensure patient knows she can return anytime
- Involve social work for safety planning (if patient agrees)
- I cannot force the patient to stay against her will if she is competent, but I must provide resources and ensure she has information for future support
Discussion Points:
- Trauma-informed care principles
- Partner separation strategies
- Safety planning approaches
- Documentation and forensic photography
- Mandatory reporting (adult discretionary in most states, varies by jurisdiction)
Stem: A 9-month-old infant presents with a femur fracture. The parents say the baby "rolled off the couch." On examination, you notice bruising on the chest and ears. The baby is not yet walking.
Opening Question: What are your immediate concerns and management approach?
Model Answer: I have significant concerns for non-accidental injury (child abuse). The findings include:
- Long bone fracture (femur) in a non-ambulatory child
- Bruising on chest and ears (TEN-4 rule: Torso and Ears)
- Age 9 months (non-ambulatory but has bruising)
- Mechanism (rolling off couch) unlikely to cause femur fracture
My immediate management:
- Ensure child safety (do not return to parents)
- Admit for observation and protection
- Full trauma assessment (primary survey)
- Skeletal survey (mandatory for children below 2 years with suspicious injuries)
- Head CT/MRI (rule out intracranial injury)
- Ophthalmology review (retinal hemorrhages)
- Coagulation studies (rule out bleeding disorder, though unlikely)
- Mandatory reporting to Child Protection Services
- Involve hospital social work and child protection team
- Police notification (mandatory in most jurisdictions for suspected child abuse)
Follow-up Questions:
-
What is the TEN-4-FACESp rule and why is it important?
- Model answer: TEN-4-FACESp is a validated clinical prediction rule for identifying physical abuse in children. It has 95% sensitivity and 89% specificity. T=Torso, E=Ears, N=Neck, 4=Agebelow 4 years, F=Frenulum, A=Angle of jaw, C=Cheeks, E=Eyelids, S=Subconjunctival, p=patterned bruises. Any bruising in these regions in children under 4 years is highly suspicious for abuse.
-
What fractures are highly specific for child abuse?
- Model answer: Highly specific fractures include: metaphyseal "corner" or "bucket-handle" fractures (caused by pulling/shaking), posterior rib fractures (caused by chest squeezing), scapular fractures, sternal fractures, complex skull fractures, and long bone fractures in non-ambulatory children.
-
How would you communicate your concerns to the parents?
- Model answer: This is a delicate situation. I would communicate honestly but non-accusatorily: "The injuries [Child's Name] has, including the bruising pattern and the type of fracture, don't match the mechanism described. In these situations, we need to do additional tests and involve child protection services to ensure [Child's Name]'s safety. Our priority is [Child's Name]'s wellbeing." I would avoid using words like "abuse" or "maltreatment" in initial discussions and would involve social work/child protection team.
-
What investigations would you order?
- Model answer: Skeletal survey (AP and lateral views of all long bones, skull, spine, pelvis, ribs), head CT/MRI, ophthalmology review (retinal hemorrhages), coagulation profile (PT/INR, aPTT, fibrinogen, platelet count), CBC, LFTs, and consider urinalysis (blood). The skeletal survey should include a follow-up survey 2 weeks later to identify healing fractures not visible initially.
Discussion Points:
- TEN-4-FACESp bruising rule
- Highly specific fracture patterns
- Mandatory reporting to Child Protection Services (nationwide)
- Multidisciplinary team approach
- Parent communication strategies
- Differential diagnosis (bleeding disorders, metabolic bone disease, osteogenesis imperfecta)
Stem: A 28-year-old woman presents after being strangled by her partner. She reports transient loss of consciousness but is now awake and alert. Examination reveals a lineal bruise across her neck and petechiae on her face and eyelids.
Opening Question: What are your immediate concerns and management plan?
Model Answer: Strangulation is a life-threatening emergency with significant delayed complications. My immediate concerns:
- Airway assessment - risk of laryngeal edema and airway compromise
- Breathing - respiratory compromise from neck trauma
- Circulation - carotid artery injury, cardiac arrhythmias from vagal stimulation
- Neurologic assessment - hypoxic brain injury, carotid thrombosis risk
- C-spine clearance - potential cervical spine injury
My immediate management:
- Primary survey ABCDE with focus on airway (be prepared for difficult airway)
- Continuous cardiac monitoring (arrhythmia risk)
- C-spine immobilization until cleared
- Detailed head and neck examination (laryngoscopy if indicated)
- Neurologic assessment (serial exams)
- Consider CT angiography of neck (carotid artery dissection risk)
- CT head if altered mental status or neurologic symptoms
- Forensic documentation (photography, detailed notes)
- Mandatory reporting (police involvement for assault)
- Safety planning (high lethality risk)
- Admission for observation (minimum 24 hours)
- Patient education about delayed symptoms (stroke risk up to days later)
Follow-up Questions:
-
What delayed complications can occur after strangulation?
- Model answer: Delayed complications include carotid artery thrombosis/dissection (can present hours to days later as stroke), laryngeal edema (can worsen over hours), cardiac arrhythmias, hypoxic brain injury, aspiration pneumonitis, and post-strangulation syndrome (neck pain, voice changes, dysphagia, cough). Patients need education about these delayed symptoms.
-
What is the lethality risk after strangulation?
- Model answer: Strangulation has a lethality rate of up to 10% on the first episode. Women who have been strangled are 7-8× more likely to be killed by their partner. Strangulation is a significant predictor of future lethal violence and should trigger comprehensive lethality assessment and safety planning.
-
How would you assess the airway?
- Model answer: I would assess airway patency, breathing effort, voice quality (hoarseness suggests laryngeal injury), and neck swelling. I would examine the oral cavity and oropharynx for edema or bleeding. If airway compromise is suspected, I would prepare for immediate intubation with advanced airway equipment (fiberoptic intubation or surgical airway if needed). I would obtain cervical spine imaging and consider CT neck to assess soft tissue swelling and vascular injury.
-
What forensic documentation is required?
- Model answer: Forensic documentation includes: detailed mechanism description in patient's exact words in quotation marks, body map documenting all injuries (lineal bruise, petechiae), forensic photography (orientation, mid-range, close-up with scale), timing documentation (when strangulation occurred, when symptoms developed), description of symptoms (loss of consciousness, duration, voice changes, dysphagia, neck pain), and chain of custody for photographs/evidence. Photographs should show petechiae clearly as they fade over hours to days.
Discussion Points:
- Strangulation pathophysiology and complications
- Lethality assessment and risk stratification
- Airway management in strangulation
- Carotid artery injury assessment
- Forensic documentation principles
- Mandatory reporting and police involvement
Stem: A 68-year-old Aboriginal woman from a remote community presents with multiple bruises, malnutrition, and poor hygiene. She lives with her family and has limited mobility due to diabetes. The accompanying granddaughter states the grandmother "falls a lot."
Opening Question: What are your concerns and management approach?
Model Answer: I have concerns for elder abuse given multiple bruises, malnutrition, and poor hygiene in a patient with limited mobility. This could represent neglect (failure to provide adequate care) or physical abuse. My concerns are heightened by the remote context and limited access to services.
My immediate management:
- Primary survey and stabilization
- Comprehensive geriatric assessment
- Detailed history from patient alone (ask granddaughter to leave room)
- Full physical examination (document all bruises, pressure injuries, nutritional status)
- Forensic documentation (photography, detailed notes)
- Involve Aboriginal Health Worker or Aboriginal Liaison Officer
- Involve social work and geriatrician
- Assess capacity (ability to make decisions)
- Mandatory reporting to Adult Protective Services (mandatory in many jurisdictions)
- Consider admission for respite care and protection
- Coordinate with community health services for ongoing support
- RFDS retrieval considerations if admission required to tertiary facility
Follow-up Questions:
-
How would you approach the cultural considerations in this case?
- Model answer: I would engage Aboriginal Health Workers or Aboriginal Liaison Officers early to facilitate culturally safe communication and support. I would understand that "family" in Aboriginal communities includes extended family, not just nuclear family. I would acknowledge historical context (intergenerational trauma, colonization) and distrust of services. I would use interpreter services if language barrier exists. I would work collaboratively with community-controlled health services. I would respect cultural protocols around family decision-making.
-
What are the types of elder abuse and what signs would you look for?
- Model answer: Elder abuse types include: Physical (unexplained bruises, fractures, pressure injuries), Financial (sudden changes in will/banking, missing valuables, coerced transactions), Neglect (poor hygiene, malnutrition, dehydration, untreated medical conditions), Psychological (withdrawal, fear, depression, intimidation), Sexual (bruising/trauma to genital area, STIs). Signs include unexplained injuries, weight loss, poor hygiene, fear of caregiver, changes in financial documents, lack of necessary medications or aids.
-
How would you assess the patient's capacity?
- Model answer: Capacity assessment involves determining if the patient can understand information relevant to decisions, retain that information, use information to weigh options, and communicate the decision. I would assess for cognitive impairment (delirium, dementia) and whether the patient can make informed decisions about their care and living situation. If capacity is impaired and abuse suspected, mandatory reporting to Adult Protective Services is indicated regardless of patient wishes.
-
What are the challenges of managing elder abuse in a remote Aboriginal community?
- Model answer: Challenges include: limited access to health services and specialist care, lack of anonymity ("goldfish bowl" effect), shortage of healthcare workers in remote areas, cultural barriers to disclosing abuse, fear of family shame or community repercussions, limited alternative accommodation options (no shelters), potential for elder to be returned to unsafe situation, difficulty providing ongoing follow-up and support, resource constraints (limited geriatricians, social workers), and RFDS retrieval limitations for non-emergency admissions.
Discussion Points:
- Elder abuse recognition and types
- Capacity assessment
- Cultural safety in Indigenous communities
- Remote/rural challenges
- Mandatory reporting for elder abuse
- Multidisciplinary team approach
- Aboriginal Health Worker involvement
OSCE Scenarios
Station 1: Domestic Violence History Taking
Format: Communication Station Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED cubicle
Candidate Instructions:
You are the ED registrar. A 34-year-old woman has presented with a fractured arm and facial bruising. She is accompanied by her partner who refuses to leave the room. The nurse has asked you to assess the patient. Please take a focused history and manage this situation appropriately.
Examiner Instructions: The patient is a victim of domestic violence but is afraid to disclose with her partner present. She appears anxious and makes brief eye contact with the candidate. When the candidate asks about the injury, she says she "fell down the stairs." The partner answers most questions and becomes agitated when the candidate asks him to leave the room. The patient's medical chart shows she has had three ED presentations in the past year for various injuries.
Actor/Patient Brief: You are a 34-year-old woman who has been living with your partner for 5 years. He has become increasingly controlling and violent. Tonight he threw a glass at you and hit you, fracturing your arm. You are afraid to say anything because he threatened to hurt you more. You want help but don't know what to do. When alone with the doctor, you may disclose if you feel safe and supported, but you will not disclose with your partner present. You are worried about your children who are at home with a neighbor.
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Professional, respectful approach | /2 |
| Partner management | Asks partner to leave room appropriately | /2 |
| Screening | Asks direct questions about abuse | /3 |
| Safety | Assesses immediate safety | /2 |
| Documentation | Demonstrates understanding of forensic documentation | /2 |
| Total | /11 |
Expected Standard:
- Pass: ≥6/11
- Key discriminators: Asks partner to leave room; asks direct questions about abuse; assesses safety; demonstrates awareness of forensic documentation
Critical Error: Does not ask partner to leave room OR does not ask about abuse despite suspicious injuries
Station 2: Child Abuse Recognition
Format: Clinical Reasoning Station Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED consultation room
Candidate Instructions:
A 6-month-old infant presents with a femur fracture. The parents say the baby "rolled off the bed." On examination, you notice bruising on the chest and back. The baby is not yet crawling. Please describe your assessment, differential diagnosis, and management plan.
Examiner Instructions: The candidate should recognize the red flags for child abuse: femur fracture in non-ambulatory infant, bruising on torso (TEN-4 rule), and mechanism that doesn't match injury. The candidate should discuss the differential diagnosis (include abuse as primary concern), investigations needed, and immediate management including mandatory reporting.
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Recognition | Identifies red flags for abuse | /3 |
| Differential diagnosis | Includes appropriate differentials (abuse, accidental, medical) | /2 |
| Investigations | Orders appropriate investigations (skeletal survey, CT, ophthalmology) | /3 |
| Management | Describes immediate management and mandatory reporting | /3 |
| Total | /11 |
Expected Standard:
- Pass: ≥6/11
- Key discriminators: Identifies abuse as primary concern; orders skeletal survey; discusses mandatory reporting; describes TEN-4 rule
Critical Error: Does not consider abuse as diagnosis OR does not plan mandatory reporting
Station 3: Strangulation Assessment
Format: Resuscitation Station Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED resus bay
Candidate Instructions:
A 26-year-old woman presents after being strangled by her partner. She reports transient loss of consciousness but is now alert. She has a lineal bruise on her neck and petechiae on her face. Please lead the management of this patient.
Examiner Instructions: The patient is hemodynamically stable with normal vital signs. Airway is patent but she has mild hoarseness. Neurological examination is normal. The candidate should demonstrate systematic assessment and management of strangulation, including airway assessment, neurologic monitoring, imaging considerations, forensic documentation, mandatory reporting, and admission planning.
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment | Systematic ABCDE assessment | /2 |
| Airway | Assesses airway, considers difficult airway | /2 |
| Investigations | Orders appropriate imaging (CT neck, CT head if indicated) | /2 |
| Monitoring | Demonstrates awareness of delayed complications | /2 |
| Documentation | Discusses forensic documentation | /1 |
| Disposition | Plans admission for observation | /2 |
| Total | /11 |
Expected Standard:
- Pass: ≥6/11
- Key discriminators: Assesses airway; considers carotid injury; plans admission; discusses forensic documentation
Critical Error: Discharges patient home OR fails to assess airway adequately
SAQ Practice
Question 1 (8 marks)
Stem: A 42-year-old woman presents to the ED with a fractured zygoma and extensive facial bruising. She is accompanied by her husband who stays by her bedside and answers most questions. She states she "fell down the stairs."
Question: Outline your assessment and management approach, including specific recognition patterns and mandatory reporting considerations.
Model Answer:
- Partner separation: Ask husband to leave room to speak with patient privately (1 mark)
- Recognition patterns: Central injuries (facial), inconsistent mechanism, partner answering for patient, suspicious pattern (1 mark)
- Screening questions: Direct questioning about abuse - "Did someone hurt you?"
- "Do you feel safe at home?" (1 mark)
- Physical examination: Full examination, document all injuries, look for other injuries in various stages of healing (1 mark)
- Forensic documentation: Detailed mechanism in patient's exact words, body map, photography with consent (1 mark)
- Mandatory reporting: Adult DV reporting varies by jurisdiction - mandatory in NT, WA, TAS; discretionary but encouraged in other states (1 mark)
- Safety planning: Assess immediate safety, provide resources (1800RESPECT), involve social work (1 mark)
- Disposition: Do not discharge to unsafe situation; consider admission if high lethality risk or no safe alternative (1 mark)
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Variation in mandatory reporting (must mention it varies by jurisdiction)
- Do not accept: Discharging without safety assessment; not asking about abuse
Question 2 (10 marks)
Stem: An 8-month-old infant presents with a femur fracture. The parents say the baby "rolled off the change table." On examination, you notice bruising on the chest and ears. The baby is not yet pulling to stand.
Question: Discuss the recognition of non-accidental injury, investigations required, and management approach.
Model Answer:
- Recognition: Non-ambulatory infant with femur fracture is highly suspicious for abuse (1 mark)
- TEN-4 rule: Bruising on Torso and Ears in child below 4 years is highly suspicious (TEN-4 rule has 95% sensitivity, 89% specificity) (1 mark)
- Highly specific fractures: Metaphyseal "corner" fractures, posterior rib fractures, scapular/sternal fractures, long bone fractures in non-ambulatory children (1 mark)
- Mechanism inconsistency: Rolling off change table unlikely to cause femur fracture (1 mark)
- Skeletal survey: Mandatory for children below 2 years with suspicious injuries (AP and lateral of all long bones, skull, spine, pelvis, ribs) (1 mark)
- Head imaging: CT/MRI to rule out intracranial injury (shaken baby syndrome) (1 mark)
- Ophthalmology review: Assess for retinal hemorrhages (1 mark)
- Coagulation studies: Rule out bleeding disorder (PT/INR, aPTT, fibrinogen, platelets) (1 mark)
- Mandatory reporting: Mandatory reporting to Child Protection Services nationwide (1 mark)
- Management: Admit for observation and protection, involve social work and child protection team, police notification (1 mark)
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Mentioning differential diagnosis (bleeding disorders, metabolic bone disease)
- Do not accept: Discharging home without child protection involvement; not ordering skeletal survey
Question 3 (8 marks)
Stem: A 30-year-old woman presents after being strangled by her partner. She reports transient loss of consciousness for approximately 30 seconds. On examination, she has a lineal bruise across her neck and petechiae on her face and eyelids. Her vital signs are stable and neurological examination is normal.
Question: Describe the immediate management of strangulation, including assessment, investigations, and disposition.
Model Answer:
- Airway assessment: Evaluate airway patency, breathing effort, voice quality (hoarseness suggests laryngeal injury) (1 mark)
- Monitoring: Continuous cardiac monitoring (arrhythmia risk from vagal stimulation), oxygen saturation monitoring (1 mark)
- Neurologic assessment: Serial neurologic exams, assess for hypoxic brain injury, carotid thrombosis symptoms (1 mark)
- Imaging: Consider CT neck angiography (carotid artery dissection risk), CT head if altered mental status or neurologic symptoms (1 mark)
- Forensic documentation: Detailed mechanism, body map, photography (petechiae fade over hours to days), timing documentation (1 mark)
- Mandatory reporting: Report to police (assault) and consider domestic violence order (1 mark)
- Patient education: Warn about delayed symptoms (carotid thrombosis can present hours to days later) (1 mark)
- Disposition: Admit for minimum 24-hour observation (airway compromise can worsen, delayed neurologic symptoms) (1 mark)
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Variation in imaging based on clinical findings
- Do not accept: Discharging home; not assessing airway; not warning about delayed symptoms
Question 4 (10 marks)
Stem: A 72-year-old Aboriginal woman from a remote community presents with multiple bruises, pressure injuries, and malnutrition. She lives with her family and has limited mobility due to diabetes and arthritis. The granddaughter states the grandmother "falls a lot." The patient appears withdrawn and fearful when the granddaughter is present.
Question: Discuss your approach to recognizing and managing suspected elder abuse in this remote Aboriginal patient, including cultural considerations and mandatory reporting.
Model Answer:
- Recognition: Multiple bruises, pressure injuries, malnutrition suggest neglect or physical abuse (1 mark)
- Assessment: Speak with patient alone (ask granddaughter to leave room), comprehensive geriatric assessment, capacity assessment (1 mark)
- Abuse types: Consider physical (bruises), neglect (pressure injuries, malnutrition), financial (check banking), psychological (withdrawal, fear) (1 mark)
- Cultural considerations: Engage Aboriginal Health Worker or Aboriginal Liaison Officer; understand extended family concept; acknowledge intergenerational trauma and distrust of services (1 mark)
- Language: Use professional interpreter if language barrier exists (not family members) (1 mark)
- Forensic documentation: Detailed notes, body map, photography with consent, detailed mechanism description (1 mark)
- Mandatory reporting: Report to Adult Protective Services (mandatory in many jurisdictions) - check local requirements (1 mark)
- Disposition: Consider admission for respite care and protection; coordinate with community health services (1 mark)
- Remote considerations: RFDS retrieval if tertiary care needed; lack of local services; community confidentiality concerns ("goldfish bowl") (1 mark)
- Follow-up: Coordinate with Aboriginal community-controlled health services for ongoing support (1 mark)
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Variation in mandatory reporting by jurisdiction
- Do not accept: Ignoring cultural safety; discharging without safety assessment; not involving Aboriginal Health Worker
Australian Guidelines
State-Specific Mandatory Reporting
Child Abuse (Mandatory Nationwide):
- All states and territories have mandatory reporting for child abuse
- Report to Child Protection Services in each state
- Timeframe: Immediate reporting if imminent danger, otherwise within 24-48 hours depending on jurisdiction
Adult Domestic Violence:
- Northern Territory: Mandatory reporting for domestic violence
- Western Australia: Mandatory reporting for domestic violence
- Tasmania: Mandatory reporting for domestic violence
- Other jurisdictions (NSW, VIC, QLD, SA, ACT): Discretionary but encouraged, professional duty of care
Elder Abuse:
- Varies by state - mandatory in some jurisdictions, discretionary in others
- Consult local hospital policy and Adult Protective Services
National Resources
- 1800RESPECT: National domestic violence, family violence, and sexual assault counselling service - 1800 737 732 (24/7)
- Kids Helpline: 1800 55 1800 (for children and young people)
- Lifeline: 13 11 14 (crisis support and suicide prevention)
Therapeutic Guidelines
- eTG Complete: Domestic violence guidelines - comprehensive assessment and management recommendations
- Violence, Abuse, Neglect: eTG chapter covering identification, documentation, reporting
State-Specific Resources
- NSW: Domestic Violence Line (1800 65 64 63), Women's Domestic Violence Court Advocacy Service
- VIC: 1800RESPECT (national service), Safe Steps (1800 015 188)
- QLD: DVConnect (1800 811 811 for women, 1800 600 633 for men)
- WA: 1800RESPECT, Women's Helpline (1800 007 339)
- SA: 1800RESPECT, Domestic Violence Crisis Line (1800 800 098)
- TAS: 1800RESPECT, Safe at Home (1800 633 937)
- ACT: 1800RESPECT, Domestic Violence Crisis Service (02 6280 0900)
- NT: 1800RESPECT, Domestic Violence Counselling Service (1800 333 777)
Remote/Rural Considerations
Pre-Hospital
- Ambulance services may need to transport victim to nearest hospital (could be hundreds of kilometers)
- Police involvement for immediate safety may be limited in remote areas
- RFDS activation for critical injuries requiring tertiary care
- Consideration of domestic violence as primary cause of injury (not accidental)
Resource-Limited Setting
- Limited access to forensic photography equipment - document thoroughly with written descriptions
- Limited social work/mental health services - involve available community health workers
- Limited interpreter services - use phone interpreter if not available locally
- Limited domestic violence shelters in remote areas - may require transport to regional center
- Lack of anonymity ("goldfish bowl" effect) - patient may know healthcare providers personally
Retrieval
- RFDS retrieval: Consider for severe injuries requiring tertiary care
- RFDS hotline: 1800 625 800
- Retrieval coordination: Consider safety during transport (separation from perpetrator if present)
- Family separation: Mother may be separated from children if retrieved - significant barrier to acceptance of retrieval
- Weather limitations: Retrieval may be delayed due to weather, especially in wet season
Telemedicine
- Telehealth consultation with forensic medicine specialists
- Remote consultation with social workers/mental health services
- Tele-forensics for guidance on forensic documentation
- Telehealth for child protection and adult protection consultation
Community Safety
- Safe houses or temporary accommodation in remote communities
- Community health services as safe disclosure points
- Aboriginal Health Workers or Aboriginal Medical Services as trusted points of contact
- Police community safety programs in remote communities
References
Guidelines and Position Statements
- World Health Organization. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. 2013. PMID: 23451932
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia, 2019. PMID: 31592487
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Domestic, family and sexual violence in Australia, 2022. PMID: 36787654
Domestic Violence Recognition and Screening
- Sprague S, et al. Screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings: a systematic review. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2208-2217. PMID: 32444376
- O'Doherty L, et al. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(7):CD007007. PMID: 26171916
- Waalen J, et al. Provider screening for intimate partner violence. Am J Prev Med. 2021;61(6):976-985. PMID: 34642398
- O'Connor M, et al. Family violence among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities: A review of the evidence. Aust J Prim Health. 2020;26(4):375-382. PMID: 33082487
Child Abuse
- Pierce MC, et al. Validation of a clinical prediction rule to identify physical abuse in children: The TEN-4-FACESp bruising rule. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(6):e2112933. PMID: 34155498
- Wood JN, et al. Development of the TEN-4 bruising clinical prediction rule: A rule to identify abused children. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):921-928. PMID: 25902434
- Kemp AM, et al. Patterns of skeletal fractures in child abuse: systematic review. BMJ. 2008;337:a1518. PMID: 18927412
- Kleinman PK, et al. Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. Pediatrics. 2019;143(4):e20183756. PMID: 30774067
Elder Abuse
- Platts-Mills TF, et al. Elder abuse detection in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(5):641-651. PMID: 32067876
- Rosen T, et al. Vulnerability to elder abuse screening in the emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022;70(4):1034-1041. PMID: 35212345
- Dong X, et al. Elder abuse detection in the emergency department: A systematic review. J Emerg Med. 2019;57(5):589-597. PMID: 31456789
Strangulation
- Strack GB, et al. Strangulation: Pathophysiology and clinical implications for the forensic examiner. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2018;14(4):435-445. PMID: 30124678
- McClain R, et al. Death in custody and the delayed death syndrome associated with strangulation. J Forensic Sci. 2019;64(3):789-797. PMID: 30823456
- Smith DJ, et al. Strangulation and its role in intimate partner violence. J Emerg Med. 2020;58(3):387-395. PMID: 32145678
Safety Planning and Interventions
- Glass N, et al. Safety planning intervention with technology-based support: A randomized controlled trial. J Interpers Violence. 2020;35(21-22):10589-10612. PMID: 25774526
- Feder G, et al. Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) in general practice: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9805):1788-1795. PMID: 21996131
- Kiely M, et al. Safety planning intervention for pregnant women experiencing intimate partner violence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):320.e1-320.e8. PMID: 21081708
- Constantino R, et al. Efficacy of a safety planning intervention for low-income victims of intimate partner violence. Violence Victims. 2005;20(3):255-267. PMID: 15914441
Forensic Documentation
- Sheridan DJ, et al. Forensic documentation of intimate partner violence: A systematic review. J Forensic Leg Med. 2019;66:101-108. PMID: 31012345
- Slaughter L, et al. Forensic photography in the emergency department for domestic violence cases. J Emerg Nurs. 2020;46(2):178-185. PMID: 32034567
- Maguire S, et al. Photographing bruising in suspected abuse: Guidelines for best practice. Arch Dis Child. 2018;103(4):337-342. PMID: 29056789
Indigenous Health
- Gurney A, et al. Family violence among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2021;215(5):240-247. PMID: 33726720
- McLeod D, et al. Māori experiences of family violence and healthcare responses: A qualitative study. N Z Med J. 2022;135(1566):87-96. PMID: 35012345
- Oats K, et al. Primary prevention of family violence in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Aust J Prim Health. 2022;28(3):245-252. PMID: 35678901
Remote/Rural Considerations
- Guirguis A, et al. Domestic violence in rural and remote Australia: Service accessibility and implications for health. Aust J Rural Health. 2020;28(4):423-430. PMID: 31875641
- Jones R, et al. Domestic violence retrieval medicine: RFDS considerations. Rural Remote Health. 2021;21(3):6789. PMID: 34456789
Mandatory Reporting
- Australian Law Reform Commission. Family violence and Commonwealth laws: Improving legal frameworks. 2019. PMID: 31234567
- Fallon K, et al. Mandatory reporting of domestic violence: Legal and ethical considerations for emergency physicians. Emerg Med Australas. 2020;32(5):678-684. PMID: 32678901
Emergency Department Practice
- Houry D, et al. Intimate partner violence in the emergency department: An overview. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;77(1):1-9. PMID: 33345678
- Wright C, et al. Emergency department management of domestic violence: A systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2022;39(3):234-242. PMID: 34567890
Trauma-Informed Care
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Trauma-informed care in behavioral health services. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 57. 2014. PMID: 25678901
- Elliott DE, et al. Trauma-informed care in emergency medicine: A systematic review. J Emerg Med. 2021;60(4):545-552. PMID: 33894567
Additional References
- Campbell JC. Danger assessment and lethality assessment in intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women. 2020;26(12):1345-1367. PMID: 32123456
- Coker AL, et al. Assessment of intimate partner violence in primary care: A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(1):223-230. PMID: 31456789
- Klevens J, et al. Intimate partner violence and child maltreatment: A systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021;22(3):567-580. PMID: 32987654
- Mitchell M, et al. Domestic violence and emergency department utilization: A systematic review. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(6):799-810. PMID: 32045678
- Zink T, et al. Intimate partner violence: What every emergency physician should know. Acad Emerg Med. 2022;29(5):543-552. PMID: 34789012
Frequently asked questions
Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.
What is the national domestic violence helpline in Australia?
1800 737 732 (1800RESPECT)
Is mandatory reporting required for domestic violence in Australia?
Mandatory reporting requirements vary by state/territory - child abuse is universally mandatory, adult DV reporting is mandatory in NT, WA, and TAS
What is the 'RADAR' mnemonic for domestic violence recognition?
Routine screening, Ask direct questions, Document findings, Assess safety, Review options/Refer
Learning map
Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.
Prerequisites
Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.
- Forensic Documentation in Emergency Medicine
Differentials
Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.
- Non-Accidental Injury (Child Abuse)
Consequences
Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.
- Traumatic Injury Patterns