Emergency Medicine
Emergency
High Evidence

Acute Ischemic Stroke - Thrombolysis

Acute ischemic stroke accounts for 87% of all strokes, with mortality of 15-30% at 30 days if untreated. Time is brain –... ACEM Primary Written, ACEM Fellowshi

Updated 24 Jan 2026
70 min read

Clinical board

A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.

Urgent signals

Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.

  • Time from symptom onset greater than 4.5 hours without advanced imaging (excludes IV tPA)
  • Intracranial hemorrhage on CT (absolute contraindication)
  • Blood pressure greater than 185/110 mmHg pre-thrombolysis (relative contraindication)
  • Recent surgery or trauma within 14 days (bleeding risk)

Exam focus

Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.

  • ACEM Primary Written
  • ACEM Fellowship Written
  • ACEM Fellowship OSCE

Linked comparisons

Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.

  • Hemorrhagic Stroke
  • Seizure

Editorial and exam context

ACEM Primary Written
ACEM Fellowship Written
ACEM Fellowship OSCE
Clinical reference article

Quick Answer

One-liner: Acute ischemic stroke is a time-critical neurological emergency where intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) within 4.5 hours improves functional outcomes but carries a 6-7% risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Acute ischemic stroke accounts for 87% of all strokes, with mortality of 15-30% at 30 days if untreated. Time is brain – approximately 1.9 million neurons die per minute during untreated stroke.[1] Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) within 4.5 hours reduces disability and death (NNT 10 for good outcome).[2,3] Rapid assessment with CT brain to exclude hemorrhage, NIHSS scoring, strict blood pressure control (below 185/110 mmHg pre-lysis), and door-to-needle time below 60 minutes are critical. Major contraindications include intracranial hemorrhage, recent major surgery, active bleeding, and coagulopathy.


ACEM Exam Focus

Primary Exam Relevance

  • Anatomy: Circle of Willis, anterior/middle/posterior cerebral artery territories, internal carotid system, vertebrobasilar system, blood-brain barrier
  • Physiology: Cerebral blood flow autoregulation (50-150 mmHg MAP), ischemic cascade (ATP depletion, glutamate excitotoxicity, calcium influx, free radical injury), penumbra vs core infarction
  • Pharmacology: Alteplase mechanism (serine protease, converts plasminogen → plasmin, fibrin-specific), half-life 4-5 minutes, clearance hepatic, adverse effects (hemorrhage, angioedema 1-5%)

Fellowship Exam Relevance

  • Written: NIHSS scoring (0-42 scale), inclusion/exclusion criteria for thrombolysis, time windows (4.5h IV, 6-24h thrombectomy), door-to-needle targets, BP management, antiplatelet/anticoagulant timing post-lysis
  • OSCE: Acute stroke assessment with NIHSS, communicating thrombolysis risks/benefits to patient/family, breaking bad news (large stroke, poor prognosis), stroke code activation and team leadership
  • Key domains tested: Medical Expert (rapid assessment, decision-making), Communicator (consent under time pressure), Leader (coordinating stroke team), Health Advocate (Indigenous stroke disparities)

Key Points

Clinical Pearl

The 5 things you MUST know:

  1. Time windows: 4.5 hours for IV alteplase (standard), up to 9 hours for wake-up stroke with MRI FLAIR-DWI mismatch, up to 24 hours for mechanical thrombectomy with perfusion imaging selection
  2. Alteplase dose: 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg) – 10% IV bolus over 1 minute, 90% infusion over 60 minutes
  3. Blood pressure: Must be below 185/110 mmHg before thrombolysis; maintain below 180/105 mmHg for 24 hours post-lysis (use IV labetalol or hydralazine)
  4. Absolute contraindications: Intracranial hemorrhage on CT, active bleeding, recent stroke/head trauma below 3 months, platelets below 100,000, INR greater than 1.7, blood glucose below 2.7 mmol/L
  5. Door-to-needle target: below 60 minutes from ED arrival to alteplase bolus (best practice below 45 minutes). Each 15-minute delay reduces good outcomes by 4%.[4]

Epidemiology

MetricValueSource
Incidence100 per 100,000/year (Australia)[5]
Ischemic proportion87% of all strokes[6]
Mortality (untreated)15-30% at 30 days[7]
Mortality (thrombolysed)12-17% at 30 days[2,8]
Peak age65-85 years (mean 72 years)[9]
Gender ratioM:F 1.25:1 (higher in men below 75y)[10]
Recurrence risk5% at 1 year, 25% at 5 years[11]
Thrombolysis eligibility5-20% of stroke patients[12,13]

Australian/NZ Specific

  • Australia: 38,000 strokes/year, 56,000 stroke survivors, $5 billion annual cost.[5]
  • Indigenous disparities: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people experience stroke 3-5 years earlier, with 1.6-2.5× higher incidence and worse outcomes.[14,15]
  • Rural access: Only 30% of rural/remote hospitals have 24/7 CT access; telestroke networks critical for thrombolysis decision-making.[16,17]
  • New Zealand: 9,000 strokes/year; Māori have 2× higher stroke incidence and occur 10-15 years earlier than non-Māori.[18]

Pathophysiology

Mechanism

Acute ischemic stroke results from sudden arterial occlusion (thrombotic or embolic), causing focal cerebral hypoperfusion. When cerebral blood flow (CBF) drops below 20 mL/100g/min (normal 50 mL/100g/min), the ischemic cascade is triggered:[19,20]

  1. Energy failure (seconds-minutes): ATP depletion → Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase failure → cellular depolarization
  2. Excitotoxicity (minutes): Glutamate release → NMDA receptor activation → Ca²⁺ influx
  3. Oxidative stress (hours): Free radical production, lipid peroxidation, protein denaturation
  4. Inflammation (hours-days): Microglial activation, cytokine release, blood-brain barrier breakdown
  5. Apoptosis (days-weeks): Programmed cell death in penumbra

Ischemic Penumbra Concept

Core (CBF below 10 mL/100g/min) → Irreversibly infarcted within minutes
    ↓
Penumbra (CBF 10-20 mL/100g/min) → Potentially salvageable for hours
    ↓
Oligemia (CBF 20-40 mL/100g/min) → Functionally impaired but viable

Thrombolytic window: The penumbra survives for 3-6 hours (sometimes longer with good collaterals), providing the therapeutic opportunity. Without reperfusion, the penumbra progresses to infarction at ~2% per minute.[21]

Why It Matters Clinically

  • "Time is brain": Every 15-minute delay in thrombolysis reduces the chance of good outcome by 4%.[4]
  • Alteplase mechanism: Recombinant tPA binds fibrin, converting plasminogen → plasmin locally at the thrombus, dissolving the clot and restoring perfusion.
  • Hemorrhagic transformation risk: Reperfusion injury + blood-brain barrier disruption → 6-7% symptomatic ICH rate with tPA (vs 0.5-1% placebo).[2,22]

Clinical Approach

Recognition

Triggers for stroke code activation:

  • Sudden onset focal neurological deficit (weakness, numbness, speech disturbance, visual loss, ataxia)
  • Symptom onset below 4.5 hours (or last known well below 4.5h, or wake-up stroke with imaging)
  • Patient not bedbound/dependent before stroke (pre-stroke mRS ≤1)

ED Actions:

  1. Activate stroke code immediately upon triage
  2. Notify neurology/stroke team
  3. Direct to resuscitation bay or designated stroke area
  4. Target door-to-CT time below 25 minutes

Initial Assessment

Primary Survey

  • A: Assess airway patency (reduced GCS below 9, bulbar weakness). Secure airway if GCS ≤8 or unable to protect.
  • B: Oxygen saturation (target SpO₂ 94-98%). Avoid supplemental O₂ unless hypoxic (SpO₂ below 94%).[23]
  • C: Establish IV access (×2 large-bore), cardiac monitor, BP (measure bilaterally – aortic dissection differential), ECG (atrial fibrillation in 20-30%).
  • D: Rapid neurological assessment (GCS, pupil reactivity, focal deficits). NIHSS scoring (see below).
  • E: Temperature (fever suggests infection/hemorrhage), blood glucose (hypo/hyperglycemia mimics stroke).

FAST Assessment (Pre-hospital/Triage)

ComponentFindingScore
FaceFacial droop (ask to smile)1
ArmArm drift (hold arms out 10 sec)1
SpeechSlurred or absent speech1
TimeTime of onset (critical!)

FAST ≥1 = 72% sensitivity for stroke.[24]

NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale)

Validated 15-item scale (0-42 points) assessing stroke severity:[25,26]

ScoreSeverityInterpretation
0No stroke symptoms
1-4Minor strokeGood prognosis, low ICH risk
5-15Moderate strokeThrombolysis benefit highest
16-20Moderate-severeConsider thrombectomy
21-42Severe strokeHigh ICH risk, consider thrombectomy

NIHSS components: Level of consciousness (0-3), gaze (0-2), visual fields (0-3), facial palsy (0-3), motor arm/leg (0-4 each), limb ataxia (0-2), sensory (0-2), language (0-3), dysarthria (0-2), extinction/inattention (0-2).

Emergency Medicine NIHSS tips:

  • Practice: NIHSS takes 5-10 minutes initially, below 5 minutes with experience
  • Document baseline NIHSS before thrombolysis (medicolegal)
  • Re-assess NIHSS at 1h, 24h post-thrombolysis (deterioration = hemorrhage until proven otherwise)

History

Key Questions

QuestionSignificance
"When did you last feel completely normal?"Defines "time zero" for thrombolysis window. If wake-up stroke, use "last known well" (when went to bed).
"What were you doing when it started?"Sudden onset = stroke. Gradual onset suggests other (migraine, seizure, tumor).
"Have symptoms worsened, improved, or fluctuated?"Fluctuation suggests TIA, progressive suggests hemorrhage/edema.
"Any recent head trauma, surgery, or bleeding?"Contraindications to thrombolysis.
"Are you on warfarin, NOACs, or antiplatelet agents?"Check INR if on warfarin (INR greater than 1.7 excludes). NOACs timing critical.
"Any history of intracranial hemorrhage, aneurysm, or AVM?"Absolute contraindication to thrombolysis.

Red Flag Symptoms

Red Flag
  • Sudden severe headache (worst ever) → consider subarachnoid hemorrhage or hemorrhagic stroke
  • Reduced consciousness (GCS below 13) → large stroke, posterior circulation, or hemorrhage
  • Seizure at onset → 5-10% of strokes; increases ICH risk post-thrombolysis
  • Neck pain + Horner syndrome → carotid/vertebral dissection
  • Recent cocaine/amphetamine use → hemorrhagic stroke risk, BP crisis

Examination

General Inspection

  • Conscious state (alert, drowsy, comatose)
  • Speech (fluent, non-fluent, mute)
  • Facial asymmetry at rest
  • Body posture (hemiparesis, hemineglect)
  • Respiratory pattern (Cheyne-Stokes suggests brainstem involvement)

Specific Findings

SystemFindingSignificance
CardiovascularAtrial fibrillationCardioembolic source (20-30% of strokes)[27]
Carotid bruitIpsilateral ICA stenosis (embolic source)
BP asymmetry (greater than 20 mmHg)Aortic dissection (rare stroke mimic)
NeurologicalHemiparesis (arm > leg)MCA territory (most common)
Arm = leg weaknessACA or lacunar (internal capsule)
Leg > arm weaknessACA territory
Crossed signs (ipsilateral CN, contralateral limb)Posterior circulation (brainstem)
HemianopiaPosterior circulation or deep MCA
Dysarthria + dysphagiaBulbar (brainstem or bilateral hemisphere)
Ataxia + nystagmus + vertigoPosterior circulation (cerebellar/brainstem)

Investigations

Immediate (Resus Bay) – Target below 25 Minutes

TestPurposeKey Finding
CT brain (non-contrast)Exclude hemorrhage (absolute contraindication), identify early ischemic changesHyperdense MCA sign (thrombus), loss of grey-white differentiation, sulcal effacement, ASPECTS score below 7 suggests large infarct[28]
CT angiography (CTA)Identify large vessel occlusion (LVO) for thrombectomyICA, M1, M2, basilar occlusion → thrombectomy candidate
Blood glucose (POC)Exclude hypoglycemia (stroke mimic)below 2.7 mmol/L excludes thrombolysis; greater than 22.2 mmol/L relative contraindication
ECGIdentify atrial fibrillation, acute MIAF present in 20-30%; concurrent MI rare but possible

Standard ED Workup – During Door-to-Needle Window

TestIndicationInterpretation
FBCPlatelets, hemoglobinPlatelets below 100,000 = contraindication; anemia suggests bleeding risk
Coagulation (INR, aPTT)Anticoagulation statusINR greater than 1.7 = contraindication to tPA. aPTT greater than 40s if on heparin
UECRenal function (for contrast)AKI may affect CTA decision; uremia can mimic stroke
TroponinConcurrent ACSElevated in 10-20% of strokes (demand ischemia or concurrent MI)[29]
HbA1cDiabetes controlChronic hyperglycemia worsens stroke outcomes

Critical bloods timing: DO NOT delay thrombolysis for blood results if clinically appropriate. Many centers give tPA while awaiting INR/platelets if patient not anticoagulated and no bleeding history.[30]

Advanced/Specialist

TestIndicationAvailability
CT perfusion (CTP)Wake-up stroke, greater than 4.5h window, assess penumbraTertiary centers; defines core vs penumbra
MRI brain (DWI/FLAIR)Wake-up stroke (FLAIR-DWI mismatch), posterior fossa, subtle strokeTertiary centers; delays treatment ~30 min
Echocardiogram (TTE/TOE)Cardioembolic source (AF, valve, PFO)Post-acute phase (not in ED)
Carotid Doppler ultrasoundCarotid stenosis assessmentPost-acute; informs secondary prevention

Point-of-Care Ultrasound

POCUS in stroke:

  • Limited role in hyperacute setting (time-critical, CT is gold standard)
  • Possible applications:
    • "Transcranial Doppler (TCD): Detect MCA occlusion (requires expertise, not widely available in ED)"
    • "Cardiac POCUS: Identify LV thrombus, severe LV dysfunction, aortic dissection (if CT unavailable)"
  • Do not delay CT for POCUS

Management

Immediate Management (First 10 Minutes)

1. Activate stroke code (ED arrival → t=0)
2. Airway/breathing: O₂ if SpO₂ below 94%, position head-of-bed 30°
3. IV access ×2, cardiac monitor, continuous BP monitoring
4. Blood glucose POC → treat if below 2.7 mmol/L (50 mL 50% dextrose IV)
5. Bloods: FBC, coagulation, UEC, troponon, lipids, HbA1c
6. Rapid NIHSS assessment (concurrent with investigations)
7. CT brain non-contrast (door-to-CT below 25 minutes)
8. Notify stroke neurologist (for all stroke code activations)
9. Obtain brief history: time last known well, contraindications
10. Check BP – if greater than 185/110 mmHg, start IV antihypertensives NOW (see below)

Goal: Door-to-needle below 60 minutes (ideally below 45 minutes).[31,32]

Blood Pressure Management (CRITICAL)

Pre-Thrombolysis BP Control

Target: BP below 185/110 mmHg before tPA bolus

AgentDoseRouteOnsetNotes
Labetalol (1st line)10-20 mg IV push over 1-2 min; repeat q10min (max 300 mg)IV5 minCombined α/β blocker; avoid in asthma, heart failure
Hydralazine (2nd line)10-20 mg IV push; repeat q20-30minIV10-20 minDirect vasodilator; can cause reflex tachycardia
Nicardipine (3rd line)5 mg/h IV infusion, titrate by 2.5 mg/h q5min (max 15 mg/h)IV infusion5-10 minDihydropyridine CCB; requires infusion pump
GTN (avoid in stroke)NOT recommendedCauses cerebral vasodilation → increased ICP

If BP cannot be reduced to below 185/110 mmHg despite treatment → DO NOT give thrombolysis (hemorrhage risk too high).[33]

Post-Thrombolysis BP Control

Target: BP below 180/105 mmHg for 24 hours post-tPA

  • Monitor BP every 15 minutes for 2 hours, then every 30 minutes for 6 hours, then hourly for 16 hours
  • Use same agents as above (labetalol, nicardipine infusion preferred)
  • If BP greater than 180/105 mmHg despite treatment → CT brain to exclude hemorrhage

Thrombolysis Protocol: Alteplase (tPA)

Inclusion Criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke with measurable neurological deficit (NIHSS ≥1)
  • Symptom onset below 4.5 hours (or last known well below 4.5h)
  • Age ≥18 years
  • CT brain excludes intracranial hemorrhage

Absolute Contraindications[34,35]

Red Flag

NEVER give tPA if:

  • Intracranial hemorrhage on CT (ICH, SAH, subdural, epidural)
  • Ischemic stroke within 3 months
  • Intracranial surgery, serious head trauma, or previous ICH within 3 months
  • Intracranial neoplasm, AVM, or aneurysm (known)
  • Active internal bleeding (GI, GU)
  • Suspected aortic dissection
  • Bleeding diathesis: platelets below 100,000, INR greater than 1.7, aPTT greater than 40s, on NOACs within appropriate timeframe
  • Blood glucose below 2.7 mmol/L (hypoglycemia = stroke mimic)
  • Systolic BP greater than 185 mmHg or diastolic greater than 110 mmHg (uncontrolled despite treatment)

Relative Contraindications (Consider risk-benefit)

  • Minor/rapidly improving stroke symptoms (NIHSS below 4) – many centers still treat if disabling
  • Severe stroke (NIHSS greater than 25) – higher ICH risk but potentially large benefit
  • Major surgery within 14 days
  • GI or GU hemorrhage within 21 days
  • Recent myocardial infarction (within 3 months)
  • Pregnancy (relative; case-by-case decision)
  • Seizure at stroke onset with post-ictal deficit
  • Blood glucose greater than 22.2 mmol/L (suggests poor prognosis)

Alteplase Dosing

Standard dose: 0.9 mg/kg (maximum 90 mg)

Administration:

  1. Calculate dose: Weight (kg) × 0.9 = total dose (mg)
  2. Bolus: 10% of total dose IV push over 1 minute
  3. Infusion: Remaining 90% IV over 60 minutes

Example: 80 kg patient

  • Total dose: 80 × 0.9 = 72 mg
  • Bolus: 7.2 mg IV over 1 min
  • Infusion: 64.8 mg over 60 min (rate: 64.8 mg/h)

Preparation: Alteplase vials typically 50 mg. Reconstitute with sterile water (50 mL = 1 mg/mL).

Post-Thrombolysis Monitoring

Neurological observations:

  • NIHSS every 15 minutes for 2 hours
  • Then every 30 minutes for 6 hours
  • Then hourly for 16 hours

Signs of hemorrhagic transformation (perform urgent CT brain):

  • Worsening NIHSS (≥4 point increase)
  • Severe headache
  • Nausea/vomiting
  • Sudden rise in BP
  • Reduced consciousness

Strict protocols:

  • No antiplatelet or anticoagulation for 24 hours post-tPA
  • No nasogastric tube, urinary catheter, arterial lines for 24 hours (unless essential)
  • No antihypertensives unless BP greater than 180/105 mmHg (permissive hypertension aids perfusion)

Extended Window Thrombolysis

Wake-Up Stroke (Unknown Time of Onset)

WAKE-UP trial protocol:[36]

  • MRI criteria: DWI-FLAIR mismatch (ischemia visible on DWI but not yet on FLAIR suggests below 4.5h)
  • Eligibility: Last known well greater than 4.5h but below 24h, DWI lesion visible, FLAIR negative
  • Evidence: WAKE-UP showed benefit (mRS 0-1 at 90 days: 53% vs 42% placebo, NNT 9)
  • Availability: Tertiary centers with MRI access (not standard in most Australian EDs)

4.5-9 Hour Window

EXTEND/EPITHET trials:[37,38]

  • Imaging: CT perfusion or MRI perfusion showing salvageable penumbra
  • Criteria: Mismatch ratio greater than 1.2, penumbra volume greater than 15 mL, core below 70 mL
  • Evidence: Modest benefit (mRS 0-1: 35% vs 29%, NNT 17)
  • Australian context: Available in major stroke centers (Royal Melbourne, Austin, RPA, etc.)

Mechanical Thrombectomy (Endovascular)

Indications[39,40]

  • Large vessel occlusion (LVO): ICA, M1, M2, basilar artery (on CTA)
  • Time windows:
    • 0-6 hours: All LVO patients (no imaging selection required)
    • 6-24 hours: Selected patients with perfusion imaging (DAWN/DEFUSE-3 criteria)
  • NIHSS typically ≥6 (though lower NIHSS with LVO may benefit)
  • Pre-stroke independence (mRS 0-1)

DAWN criteria (6-24h window):[41]

  • Age ≥80y + NIHSS ≥10 + core below 21 mL, OR
  • Age below 80y + NIHSS ≥10 + core below 31 mL, OR
  • Age below 80y + NIHSS ≥20 + core below 51 mL

Emergency Medicine role:

  • Identify LVO on CTA
  • Activate stroke thrombectomy team (available 24/7 in comprehensive stroke centers)
  • Thrombolysis + thrombectomy: Give IV tPA first if within 4.5h, then transfer for thrombectomy (both treatments are complementary, not exclusive)

Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Timing

If Thrombolysis Given

  • No antiplatelet or anticoagulation for 24 hours post-tPA
  • Perform CT brain at 24 hours to exclude hemorrhage
  • If CT clear → start aspirin 300 mg loading, then 100 mg daily

If Thrombolysis NOT Given

  • Aspirin 300 mg loading dose immediately (give in ED)
  • Continue aspirin 100 mg daily
  • If atrial fibrillation → start anticoagulation at 4-14 days (depending on stroke size/risk)

Supportive Care

InterventionTargetRationale
OxygenSpO₂ 94-98%Avoid hyperoxia (free radical injury)[23]
Temperaturebelow 37.5°CFever worsens outcomes; paracetamol for T greater than 37.5°C[42]
Glucose4-10 mmol/LHyperglycemia worsens infarct size; avoid hypoglycemia[43]
HydrationEuvolemia0.9% saline; avoid hypotonic fluids (cerebral edema risk)
NutritionNBM if dysphagiaSwallow screen before oral intake (aspiration pneumonia risk)
DVT prophylaxisNot in first 24h if tPA givenIntermittent pneumatic compression; LMWH after 24h if no hemorrhage

Disposition

Admission Criteria

ALL stroke patients require hospital admission (stroke unit or ICU/HDU depending on severity).

Stroke Unit Admission

  • All ischemic stroke patients (including TIA with ABCD² ≥4)
  • Benefits: 20% reduction in death/disability with stroke unit care[44]
  • Key elements: Multidisciplinary team (neurology, nursing, PT, OT, speech), continuous monitoring, early mobilization, secondary prevention

ICU/HDU Criteria

  • Reduced consciousness (GCS ≤12)
  • Severe stroke (NIHSS greater than 20)
  • Post-thrombolysis (most centers monitor in HDU for 24h)
  • Airway compromise, aspiration risk
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Large cerebellar stroke (risk of obstructive hydrocephalus)

Discharge Criteria

NO patient with acute stroke should be discharged from ED.

TIA (transient ischemic attack):

  • Symptoms fully resolved
  • ABCD² score below 4 AND
  • No high-risk features (AF, carotid stenosis greater than 50%, crescendo TIAs)
  • Reliable follow-up within 24-48 hours (TIA clinic or neurology)
  • Started on antiplatelet therapy
  • Imaging arranged (CT/MRI, carotid Doppler)

Follow-up

Inpatient phase (3-10 days typical):

  • Daily neurology review
  • Swallow assessment (speech pathology)
  • Physiotherapy, occupational therapy
  • Secondary prevention: statin, antiplatelet/anticoagulation, BP control
  • Carotid imaging (Doppler or CTA) if anterior circulation stroke
  • Echocardiogram if cardioembolic suspected

Post-discharge:

  • Outpatient neurology clinic (4-6 weeks)
  • Stroke rehabilitation program (if residual deficits)
  • GP follow-up (monitor vascular risk factors)
  • Driving assessment (minimum 4 weeks off driving; notify licensing authority in most states)

Special Populations

Paediatric Considerations

  • Rare: Childhood stroke 2-13 per 100,000 per year (different etiologies: sickle cell, congenital heart disease, vasculitis, moyamoya)
  • Thrombolysis: Case-by-case decision; very limited data (off-label use)
  • Dose: Same 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg) if used; however, risk-benefit unclear
  • Consult paediatric neurology urgently

Pregnancy

  • Incidence: 30 per 100,000 pregnancies (highest in peripartum period)
  • Thrombolysis: Relative contraindication (pregnancy category C)
  • Risk-benefit: Consider if life-threatening stroke; case reports show use in 2nd/3rd trimester with successful outcomes[45]
  • Alternatives: Mechanical thrombectomy may be safer (less systemic bleeding risk)
  • Hemorrhage risk: Increased risk of uterine bleeding, placental abruption

Elderly (Age greater than 80 Years)

  • ECASS-3 exclusion: Original 3-4.5h trial excluded age greater than 80y[3]
  • Current evidence: IST-3 trial showed benefit in greater than 80y (modest but present)[46]
  • Recommendation: Age alone is NOT a contraindication to thrombolysis in 0-4.5h window
  • Caution: Higher ICH risk (8-10% vs 6% in younger), but also higher baseline stroke severity

Indigenous Health

Important Note: Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, and Māori considerations:

Epidemiology:

  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians: Stroke incidence 1.6-2.5× higher, occurs 10-15 years earlier (peak age 55-65y vs 70-80y in non-Indigenous)[14,15]
  • Māori New Zealanders: Stroke incidence 2× higher, 15 years earlier onset[18]
  • Risk factors: Higher prevalence of diabetes (3-4×), hypertension, smoking, chronic kidney disease, rheumatic heart disease

Barriers to thrombolysis:

  • Delayed presentation: Longer pre-hospital times (median 6-8h vs 3-4h) due to geographic isolation, transport, cultural factors[47]
  • Lower thrombolysis rates: 5-8% of Indigenous stroke patients receive tPA vs 10-15% non-Indigenous[48]
  • Worse outcomes: Higher 30-day mortality (25% vs 15%), greater disability

Emergency Department actions:

  • Activate stroke code early (don't assume "late presentation")
  • Use interpreter services (Aboriginal Liaison Officers, Māori Health Workers)
  • Cultural safety: Involve family/whānau in decision-making (collective consent model)
  • Address mistrust: Explain risks/benefits clearly, acknowledge historical healthcare disparities
  • Secondary prevention: Link to Aboriginal Medical Services (AMS) or Māori health providers for follow-up

Pitfalls & Pearls

Clinical Pearl

Clinical Pearls:

  • "Last known well" vs "time found": If patient wakes with stroke, "last known well" is when they went to bed (not when they woke). Wake-up strokes can be treated with MRI selection (FLAIR-DWI mismatch).
  • "Stroke mimic" rate is 5-25% in thrombolysis trials (seizure, migraine, functional). Giving tPA to a mimic is generally safe (low bleeding risk in absence of true stroke).[49]
  • Don't wait for INR if patient not anticoagulated: Many centers give tPA based on history alone if no oral anticoagulants and no bleeding history (can check INR concurrently but don't delay).
  • NIHSS 0 doesn't exclude stroke: Subtle posterior circulation strokes (isolated vertigo, diplopia, ataxia) may have NIHSS 0-2 but represent true ischemia.
  • CT can be normal in first 6 hours: Early ischemic changes (loss of grey-white, sulcal effacement) are subtle; absence of CT findings does NOT exclude stroke.
  • Glucose matters: Hypoglycemia below 2.7 mmol/L mimics stroke perfectly. Always check glucose POC before thrombolysis.
  • Permissive hypertension: Don't aggressively lower BP post-stroke UNLESS giving tPA. Target BP below 220/120 mmHg if NOT thrombolysing (cerebral perfusion depends on high BP in acute phase).
Red Flag

Pitfalls to Avoid:

  • "Stroke is too mild to treat": Even NIHSS 2-4 can be disabling (aphasia, hand weakness). Treat if deficit is functionally significant to patient.
  • Delaying thrombolysis for "complete workup": You don't need echocardiogram, carotid Doppler, full hypercoagulable workup before tPA. These can wait. CT brain + bloods + history is sufficient.
  • Using GTN to lower BP: Nitroglycerin causes cerebral vasodilation → increases intracranial pressure → worsens stroke. Use labetalol or hydralazine instead.
  • Giving aspirin before 24h post-tPA: DO NOT give antiplatelet or anticoagulation within 24 hours of thrombolysis (hemorrhage risk). Wait for 24h CT brain to exclude ICH.
  • Dismissing wake-up stroke: "Unknown time" doesn't mean "untreatable." Consider MRI FLAIR-DWI or CT perfusion for extended window treatment.
  • Assuming old stroke on CT means "not a candidate": Old lacunar infarcts or chronic small vessel disease on CT does NOT contraindicate thrombolysis. The contraindication is stroke below 3 months, not remote old strokes.
  • Forgetting NOAC timing: Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban require 48h washout (longer if renal impairment). If last dose below 48h, tPA is contraindicated unless NOAC level testing available.

Viva Practice

Viva Scenario

Stem: A 68-year-old man presents at 11:30 AM with sudden onset right arm weakness and slurred speech. His wife says he was completely normal when they sat down for lunch at 11:00 AM. He has a history of hypertension and takes amlodipine. BP is 192/105 mmHg, HR 88 regular, GCS 15. He has right arm drift and dysarthria. NIHSS is 6.

Opening Question: What are your immediate priorities in managing this patient?

Model Answer: This is a time-critical stroke code activation. My immediate priorities are:

  1. Confirm stroke vs mimic: Rapid focused history and examination – sudden onset, focal deficit, no other explanation (glucose already normal).
  2. Determine thrombolysis eligibility: Time last known well (30 minutes ago = within 4.5h window), exclude contraindications (no recent surgery, bleeding, anticoagulation).
  3. Urgent CT brain non-contrast: Exclude hemorrhage (absolute contraindication). Target door-to-CT below 25 minutes.
  4. Control blood pressure: BP 192/105 is above 185/110 threshold. Give labetalol 10 mg IV push, repeat every 10 minutes to target below 185/110 before thrombolysis.
  5. Bloods: FBC (platelets), coagulation (INR), glucose, UEC – send immediately but don't delay tPA if clinically low-risk.
  6. Calculate tPA dose: Weigh patient, calculate 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg).
  7. Notify stroke team: Neurologist or stroke physician for review/consent discussion.
  8. Target door-to-needle below 60 minutes – ideally below 45 minutes.

Follow-up Questions:

  1. The CT brain shows no acute hemorrhage but there is a hyperdense left MCA sign. What does this mean and does it change management?

    • Model answer: Hyperdense MCA sign indicates acute thrombus in the left MCA (correlates with patient's right-sided deficit). This is an indication for thrombolysis (confirms acute ischemia) and also suggests large vessel occlusion – I would request urgent CTA to assess for mechanical thrombectomy. The hyperdense MCA sign does NOT contraindicate tPA; it supports the diagnosis.
  2. His BP remains 190/108 mmHg after two doses of labetalol. What do you do?

    • Model answer: BP is still above 185/110 threshold. Options: (1) Give third dose of labetalol 20 mg IV, (2) Add hydralazine 10 mg IV, or (3) Start nicardipine infusion at 5 mg/h and titrate. I would give a third labetalol dose and recheck BP in 5 minutes. If still elevated after maximal medical therapy, I cannot give thrombolysis (hemorrhage risk too high). I would then focus on mechanical thrombectomy if CTA shows LVO.
  3. You give thrombolysis at 12:15 PM. At 1:30 PM (75 minutes post-tPA), his GCS drops to 10 and his right arm is now flaccid (NIHSS increased from 6 to 14). What is your immediate action?

    • Model answer: This is neurological deterioration post-thrombolysis – the main concern is hemorrhagic transformation. Immediate actions: (1) Urgent CT brain to exclude ICH, (2) Stop tPA infusion (should be finished by now anyway), (3) Check BP (hypertension can worsen hemorrhage), (4) Send urgent coagulation studies (fibrinogen, INR, aPTT), (5) Notify neurology/neurosurgery urgently. If CT shows large ICH, consider reversal: cryoprecipitate 10 units, tranexamic acid 1g IV, neurosurgical consult for possible decompression.

Discussion Points:

  • Hyperdense MCA sign: Sensitivity 30-50%, specificity greater than 95% for acute thrombus. Also predicts poor tPA response (only 20% recanalization vs 50% for non-visible clot).
  • BP control: Labetalol preferred (combined α/β blockade, rapid onset). Avoid GTN (increases ICP), avoid aggressive lowering (reduces cerebral perfusion).
  • Hemorrhagic transformation: Occurs in 6-7% of tPA patients (symptomatic ICH). Risk factors: large infarct (ASPECTS below 7), severe stroke (NIHSS greater than 20), older age, hyperglycemia, hypertension.
  • NIHSS monitoring: Any increase ≥4 points warrants urgent CT brain.
Viva Scenario

Stem: A 55-year-old woman presents at 7:00 AM with left arm weakness and facial droop. Her husband says she was normal when they went to bed at 11:00 PM but he noticed the weakness when she woke at 6:30 AM. She is otherwise well, no medications. BP 168/92 mmHg, HR 76 regular, GCS 15. NIHSS is 8 (left arm drift, facial palsy, mild dysarthria). CT brain shows no hemorrhage, no acute ischemia visible.

Opening Question: She was last known well 8 hours ago – is she a candidate for thrombolysis?

Model Answer: This is a wake-up stroke with unknown time of onset (last known well 8 hours ago, beyond standard 4.5h window). However, she may still be a candidate for extended window thrombolysis using advanced imaging:

Options:

  1. MRI brain with DWI/FLAIR sequences: If DWI shows acute ischemia but FLAIR is negative ("DWI-FLAIR mismatch"), this suggests stroke onset below 4.5 hours ago. The WAKE-UP trial showed benefit of tPA in this scenario (NNT 9 for good outcome).[36]
  2. CT perfusion: If shows salvageable penumbra (mismatch ratio greater than 1.2, core below 70 mL), could treat up to 9 hours per EXTEND trial.[37]
  3. If no advanced imaging available: She is NOT a candidate for IV thrombolysis. However, if CTA shows large vessel occlusion, she may be eligible for mechanical thrombectomy (DAWN criteria allow treatment up to 24 hours with perfusion imaging).

My management:

  • Contact stroke neurologist urgently to discuss extended window protocols
  • If tertiary center with MRI: Perform MRI DWI/FLAIR now (adds ~20 min to workflow)
  • If MRI not available: CTA to assess for LVO, consider transfer to thrombectomy-capable center
  • If neither imaging available: Antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 300 mg), admit to stroke unit, secondary prevention workup

Follow-up Questions:

  1. The MRI shows DWI hyperintensity in the right MCA territory but the FLAIR sequence is negative. What does this mean?

    • Model answer: DWI-FLAIR mismatch indicates acute ischemia (visible on DWI) that has not yet progressed to T2/FLAIR signal change. FLAIR becomes positive 3-6 hours after onset, so a negative FLAIR suggests stroke onset below 4.5 hours. Per WAKE-UP trial criteria, she is eligible for thrombolysis (0.9 mg/kg alteplase) despite unknown exact time.[36]
  2. If you had no MRI or CT perfusion available, would you give thrombolysis anyway based on clinical suspicion?

    • Model answer: No. Time of onset is a hard stop at 4.5 hours for standard IV thrombolysis. Without imaging to confirm "tissue clock" (DWI-FLAIR mismatch or perfusion mismatch), I cannot assume she is within the window. Giving tPA beyond 4.5h without imaging selection increases hemorrhage risk without proven benefit. I would treat with aspirin, admit, and focus on secondary prevention. If CTA showed LVO, I would transfer for possible thrombectomy (which has a 24h window with imaging selection).
  3. What is the rationale for the DWI-FLAIR mismatch?

    • Model answer: DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging) becomes abnormal within minutes of ischemia (detects cytotoxic edema). FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) takes 3-6 hours to become positive (detects vasogenic edema and blood-brain barrier breakdown). The mismatch between DWI+ and FLAIR- is a surrogate for "tissue clock" suggesting recent onset within the thrombolysis window. This concept was validated in the WAKE-UP trial (2018).

Discussion Points:

  • Wake-up stroke epidemiology: 15-25% of all strokes; often not eligible for thrombolysis historically
  • WAKE-UP trial: 503 patients, DWI-FLAIR mismatch selection, tPA vs placebo; mRS 0-1 at 90 days 53% vs 42% (NNT 9)[36]
  • EXTEND trial: 225 patients, CT/MRI perfusion mismatch, 4.5-9h window; mRS 0-1 at 90 days 35% vs 29% (NNT 17)[37]
  • Availability: MRI not available in most Australian rural/regional EDs; may require transfer to tertiary center (time delay)
  • Thrombectomy window: DAWN/DEFUSE-3 trials extended thrombectomy to 24h using perfusion imaging; always consider LVO + transfer even if IV tPA not possible
Viva Scenario

Stem: A 72-year-old man with atrial fibrillation on apixaban 5 mg BD presents at 3:00 PM with sudden onset right leg weakness and expressive aphasia. His last dose of apixaban was at 8:00 AM (7 hours ago). Time last known well was 2:15 PM (45 minutes ago). BP 178/98 mmHg, HR 88 irregular, GCS 15. NIHSS is 12 (severe aphasia, right leg plegia, right arm drift). CT brain shows no hemorrhage.

Opening Question: He is on a NOAC and took a dose 7 hours ago. Can you give thrombolysis?

Model Answer: This is challenging – he is within the 4.5h window and has a disabling stroke (NIHSS 12), but he is on apixaban (direct factor Xa inhibitor), which is a relative contraindication to thrombolysis.

Key considerations:

  1. Apixaban half-life is ~12 hours (normal renal function). Last dose 7 hours ago means drug level is still therapeutic (not cleared).
  2. Standard recommendation: Wait 48 hours from last NOAC dose before thrombolysis (assumes complete clearance).
  3. However, this is a severe disabling stroke (aphasia + hemiplegia) with early presentation (45 min) – high potential for benefit.

My approach:

  • Check renal function urgently (apixaban clearance is 25% renal; CrCl below 30 prolongs half-life).
  • If available, measure apixaban level (anti-Xa assay): If undetectable or very low (below 30 ng/mL), could consider thrombolysis. If elevated, do NOT give tPA.
  • If no drug level testing: Contact stroke neurologist for shared decision-making. Options:
    1. Do NOT give tPA (standard approach; bleeding risk too high). Proceed to CTA and mechanical thrombectomy if LVO present.
    2. Consider idarucizumab (reversal agent) – but this only works for dabigatran, not apixaban. No reversal agent widely available for apixaban in ED.
    3. Accept higher bleeding risk and give tPA (case reports exist; ~15-20% ICH risk vs 6% standard).[50]

My decision: I would NOT give IV thrombolysis due to recent NOAC dose. I would perform urgent CTA to assess for large vessel occlusion and activate thrombectomy team (mechanical thrombectomy does not require systemic thrombolysis and is safer with anticoagulation on board).

Follow-up Questions:

  1. What if his last apixaban dose was 36 hours ago (missed doses)?

    • Model answer: 36 hours is greater than 3 half-lives (apixaban mostly cleared). I would consider him eligible for thrombolysis (similar to non-anticoagulated patient). I would still check renal function (if CrCl below 30, apixaban half-life is longer) and coagulation (INR, aPTT should be normal). If bloods normal and no bleeding history, I would give tPA.
  2. What if he was on warfarin with INR 1.4?

    • Model answer: INR 1.4 is below the 1.7 threshold, so he is eligible for thrombolysis. Warfarin at subtherapeutic INR is not a contraindication. I would give alteplase 0.9 mg/kg per standard protocol.
  3. What if he was on dabigatran 110 mg BD, last dose 4 hours ago?

    • Model answer: Dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) has a half-life of 12-14 hours. Last dose 4 hours ago means high drug level. However, we have idarucizumab (Praxbind) – a specific reversal agent. I would give idarucizumab 5 g IV (2 × 2.5 g vials as rapid bolus), which reverses dabigatran within 5-10 minutes. Then proceed with thrombolysis. This approach is supported by case series showing safety.[51]

Discussion Points:

  • NOAC half-lives: Apixaban 12h, rivaroxaban 5-9h, dabigatran 12-14h (longer if renal impairment)
  • 48-hour rule: Standard teaching is wait 48h from last NOAC dose (≥4 half-lives = 94% cleared)
  • Reversal agents: Idarucizumab (dabigatran), andexanet alfa (apixaban/rivaroxaban – not widely available in Australia, TGA approved but very expensive ~$15,000/dose)
  • Thrombectomy option: Does NOT require full anticoagulation reversal; safer in anticoagulated patients than IV tPA
  • Shared decision-making: High-risk decisions require discussion with stroke neurologist, patient/family (if time permits)
Viva Scenario

Stem: You are working in a small rural hospital (60 beds, no CT, no neurology). A 58-year-old Aboriginal woman presents at 8:00 PM with sudden onset left arm and leg weakness, dysarthria. She was well until 6:30 PM (90 minutes ago). BP 172/96 mmHg, HR 80 regular, GCS 15. You estimate NIHSS around 8-10 (left hemiparesis, dysarthria). The nearest hospital with CT is 200 km away (2-hour road transfer), but you have access to RFDS (Royal Flying Doctor Service) with ETA 45 minutes for pickup.

Opening Question: How do you manage this patient in a resource-limited rural setting?

Model Answer: This is a time-critical stroke in a remote setting with no CT availability. My priorities are:

  1. Activate retrieval urgently – contact RFDS or road ambulance immediately (time is brain). Given the 2-hour road transfer, I would request RFDS aeromedical retrieval if weather/runway permits (faster, more advanced care).

  2. Telestroke consultation – most Australian states have telestroke networks (e.g., NSW Telestroke, Victorian Telestroke). Contact tertiary stroke center via phone/video for real-time guidance. The neurologist can review patient (via video) and advise on imaging/treatment at receiving hospital.

  3. Stabilize and prepare for transfer:

    • IV access ×2, bloods (FBC, coagulation, UEC, glucose)
    • Cardiac monitor, oxygen if SpO₂ below 94%
    • Measure BP – if greater than 185/110, consider labetalol (in case she becomes thrombolysis candidate on arrival)
    • NBM (aspiration risk, potential for procedures)
    • Glucose POC (exclude hypoglycemia)
  4. Communicate with receiving hospital – notify ED and stroke team of incoming stroke code (ETA, NIHSS, time last known well). Request CT be ready on arrival ("direct to CT" protocol).

  5. Cultural considerations – involve Aboriginal Liaison Officer if available. Ask if she wants family to accompany (important for decision-making). Explain transfer in culturally safe manner.

  6. Documentation – clear handover: time last known well (6:30 PM = critical for thrombolysis window), NIHSS, medications (especially anticoagulants), past medical history.

Target: Arrival at tertiary center by 9:00 PM (2.5h from onset) → CT by 9:10 PM → potential tPA by 9:30 PM (3h from onset).

DO NOT give thrombolysis without CT (even in remote setting, hemorrhage risk too high without imaging).

Follow-up Questions:

  1. The telestroke neurologist says she is a candidate for thrombolysis and asks if you can give tPA in your hospital while awaiting retrieval. You have no CT. What do you say?

    • Model answer: I would decline to give thrombolysis without CT imaging. Excluding intracranial hemorrhage is an absolute requirement before tPA – giving tPA to a patient with hemorrhagic stroke would be catastrophic (expands the bleed). Even if clinical suspicion for ischemic stroke is high (~90%), the 10% risk of hemorrhage is unacceptable. I would expedite transfer to CT-capable center instead. (Note: Some ultra-remote settings in developing countries use "CT-less thrombolysis" protocols, but this is NOT standard of care in Australia.)
  2. She arrives at the tertiary center at 9:00 PM (2.5h from onset). CT shows no hemorrhage. BP is now 192/110. What are your actions?

    • Model answer: BP is above 185/110 threshold – I cannot give tPA until BP is controlled. Immediate actions: (1) Labetalol 10 mg IV push, (2) Recheck BP in 5 minutes, (3) Repeat labetalol 10-20 mg every 10 min until BP below 185/110, (4) Simultaneously prepare tPA dose (weigh patient, calculate 0.9 mg/kg), (5) Obtain verbal consent from patient/family for thrombolysis (risks: 6% bleeding, benefits: 30% better chance of good recovery). As soon as BP below 185/110, give tPA bolus. Time is critical – every 15-minute delay reduces benefit by 4%.
  3. What are the main barriers to thrombolysis for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients in rural Australia?

    • Model answer: Major barriers include:[14,15,47]
      • Geographic isolation: Median distance to CT-capable hospital 150-300 km (vs below 10 km urban)
      • Delayed presentation: Median time to hospital 6-8 hours (vs 3-4h urban) due to transport, awareness, cultural factors
      • Lower thrombolysis rates: 5-8% receive tPA (vs 12-15% non-Indigenous) – mainly due to late arrival
      • System factors: Lack of 24/7 CT in remote hospitals, limited RFDS availability, communication barriers
      • Solutions: Telestroke networks, mobile stroke units (pilot in some cities), culturally safe education campaigns, embedding stroke coordinators in Aboriginal Medical Services

Discussion Points:

  • Telestroke: Videoconference link between rural ED and tertiary stroke neurologist; allows real-time assessment, NIHSS scoring, thrombolysis decision-making. Studies show equivalent outcomes to in-person.[52]
  • RFDS: Retrieval service covering 7.7 million km² of Australia. Stroke is a common retrieval indication. Aircraft equipped with CT capability in some bases (pilot programs).
  • Door-to-CT time in transfers: Goal is transfer time + door-to-CT below 60 min total (same as door-to-needle in urban). Often not achieved in rural settings (median 120-180 min).
  • Mobile stroke units: Ambulances with onboard CT and tPA capacity (operational in Melbourne, Sydney trials). Allow treatment at scene. Not yet available in rural Australia.
  • Cultural safety: Aboriginal patients may prefer family involvement in consent, may have mistrust of healthcare system (historical trauma). Use of Aboriginal Liaison Officers improves communication and reduces "Did Not Wait" rates.

OSCE Scenarios

Station 1: Acute Stroke Assessment and NIHSS Scoring

Format: Examination Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED resuscitation bay

Candidate Instructions:

You are the Emergency Registrar. A 66-year-old man has just arrived by ambulance with sudden onset right-sided weakness and speech difficulty. Symptom onset was 30 minutes ago. The nurses have established IV access and performed vital signs (BP 180/100, HR 88, SpO₂ 97% on room air, GCS 15). Please perform a rapid focused neurological examination, calculate the NIHSS score, and discuss your findings and immediate management plan with the examiner.

Examiner Instructions: The candidate should perform a systematic stroke examination covering the NIHSS domains. The mannequin/actor has:

  • Right facial droop (lower face)
  • Right arm drift (falls to bed within 5 seconds)
  • Right leg drift (mild)
  • Dysarthria (slurred speech)
  • No visual field defect, no gaze palsy, no ataxia, no sensory loss, no neglect

Expected NIHSS score: 5-6 points (facial palsy 1, right arm motor 2, right leg motor 1, dysarthria 1-2).

The candidate should then outline immediate management: stroke code activation, urgent CT brain, bloods, BP control if needed, thrombolysis preparation.

Actor/Patient Brief: You are a 66-year-old man. You were eating breakfast when you suddenly felt your right arm go weak and your speech became slurred. You are alert and oriented but frustrated that your words don't come out clearly. You can follow commands. When asked to hold both arms out, your right arm drifts down. Your right leg is a bit weak but you can move it. Your face feels "droopy" on the right side.

Marking Criteria:

DomainCriterionMarks
ApproachIntroduces self, explains examination, gains consent/1
Systematic approach (NIHSS structure)/1
Level of ConsciousnessAssesses alertness, orientation, follows commands/1
Cranial NervesGaze, visual fields, facial symmetry/1
MotorTests arm drift, leg drift, scores correctly/2
CoordinationAtaxia, dysarthria/1
Language/NeglectSpeech assessment, neglect testing/1
NIHSS ScoreCalculates NIHSS correctly (5-6 points)/1
Management PlanOutlines stroke code, CT, thrombolysis pathway/1
CommunicationClear, efficient, empathetic/1
Total/11

Expected Standard:

  • Pass: ≥6/11
  • Key discriminators: Systematic NIHSS assessment (don't miss domains), correct scoring, clear management plan (stroke code, CT, tPA consideration)

Format: Communication Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED relatives' room

Candidate Instructions:

You are the Emergency Registrar. A 58-year-old woman presented 40 minutes ago with sudden onset left arm weakness and facial droop. CT brain shows no hemorrhage. Her NIHSS is 8. She is a candidate for thrombolysis (alteplase). Her husband is in the relatives' room. Please discuss the diagnosis, explain the treatment options including thrombolysis, and obtain consent. You have 11 minutes.

Examiner Instructions: The candidate should:

  1. Introduce themselves and establish rapport
  2. Explain the diagnosis (stroke) in lay terms
  3. Explain the urgency ("time is brain")
  4. Describe thrombolysis: what it is, how it works, benefits, risks
  5. Discuss alternatives (no thrombolysis – higher disability risk)
  6. Obtain consent (verbal is acceptable given time pressure)
  7. Address husband's concerns
  8. Safety-net (what to expect, monitoring)

Assess communication skills, shared decision-making under time pressure, empathy, clarity.

Actor/Patient Brief: You are the husband of the patient. You are very worried and confused. Your wife was completely well this morning. You don't understand what a stroke is. When the doctor mentions "clot-busting drug," you are concerned about side effects. You ask: "Is this safe?" and "What happens if we don't give it?" You want the best for your wife but are anxious about risks. If the doctor explains clearly and empathetically, you agree to treatment.

Marking Criteria:

DomainCriterionMarks
IntroductionIntroduces self, confirms identity, establishes rapport/1
ExplanationExplains stroke in lay terms (blocked artery, brain damage)/1
UrgencyConveys time-critical nature ("time is brain")/1
Treatment DescriptionDescribes alteplase (clot-busting drug), mechanism, route, duration/1
BenefitsExplains potential benefit (30-40% better chance of recovery)/1
RisksClearly states bleeding risk (6-7% brain bleed, 12-15% mortality)/2
AlternativesDiscusses option of no thrombolysis (higher disability risk)/1
ConsentObtains verbal consent, checks understanding/1
EmpathyAcknowledges anxiety, answers questions, supportive tone/1
Safety-nettingExplains monitoring, what to expect, when to escalate/1
Total/11

Expected Standard:

  • Pass: ≥6/11
  • Key discriminators: Clear explanation of bleeding risk (must mention 6% ICH), conveys urgency without coercion, empathetic approach, obtains consent

Station 3: Post-Thrombolysis Deterioration

Format: Resuscitation Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED resuscitation bay

Candidate Instructions:

You are the Emergency Registrar. A 70-year-old man received alteplase for acute stroke 90 minutes ago (completed infusion 30 minutes ago). His initial NIHSS was 8. The nurse calls you urgently – his GCS has dropped from 15 to 10 and his right arm is now flaccid (was previously weak but moving). Please assess and manage this patient.

Examiner Instructions: This is a hemorrhagic transformation post-thrombolysis scenario. The candidate should:

  1. Recognize neurological deterioration (increased NIHSS, reduced GCS)
  2. Immediately consider ICH as the most likely cause
  3. Perform rapid ABCDE assessment
  4. Order urgent CT brain
  5. Check BP, bloods (coagulation, fibrinogen)
  6. Consider tPA reversal (cryoprecipitate, tranexamic acid)
  7. Notify neurology/neurosurgery urgently

Assess: situation awareness, systematic approach, escalation, teamwork.

Actor/Patient Brief (Nurse): You are the RN caring for the patient. You noticed he became drowsy 10 minutes ago. His GCS was 15, now it's 10 (E3 V3 M4). His right arm was weak but moving earlier; now it's completely flaccid. His BP is 195/105 mmHg (was 160/90 earlier). You are worried. You await the doctor's instructions.

Marking Criteria:

DomainCriterionMarks
Situational AwarenessRecognizes neurological deterioration, suspects ICH/2
ABCDE ApproachSystematic primary survey (airway, breathing, circulation)/1
InvestigationsOrders urgent CT brain (gold standard)/2
Checks BP, bloods (coag, fibrinogen)/1
ManagementConsiders tPA reversal (cryoprecipitate, TXA)/1
Controls BP (labetalol, nicardipine)/1
EscalationNotifies neurology, neurosurgery, ICU/1
Team LeadershipClear instructions to nurse, closed-loop communication/1
SafetyStops further antithrombotics, monitors neuro obs closely/1
Total/11

Expected Standard:

  • Pass: ≥6/11
  • Key discriminators: Recognizes ICH as cause, orders urgent CT brain, escalates appropriately, considers reversal agents

SAQ Practice

Question 1 (8 marks)

Stem: A 62-year-old man presents to the Emergency Department at 3:45 PM with sudden onset right arm weakness and aphasia. His wife states he was completely well when they finished lunch at 3:00 PM (45 minutes ago). He has a history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Medications: amlodipine 10 mg daily, rosuvastatin 20 mg daily. On examination: BP 188/102 mmHg, HR 88 regular, GCS 15. He has right arm drift, expressive aphasia, and right facial droop. NIHSS is 10. CT brain shows no hemorrhage.

Question: Outline your immediate management of this patient, including specific timeframes and interventions. (8 marks)

Model Answer:

  1. Stroke code activation (immediate) – alert stroke team, neurology, radiology (1 mark)
  2. IV access ×2, bloods sent: FBC (platelets), coagulation (INR, aPTT), UEC, glucose, troponin (1 mark)
  3. Blood pressure control: BP 188/102 is above 185/110 threshold. Give labetalol 10 mg IV push over 1-2 minutes, repeat every 10 minutes to target BP below 185/110 mmHg before thrombolysis (1 mark)
  4. CT brain non-contrast: Already done – confirms no hemorrhage (eligible for thrombolysis) (0.5 mark)
  5. CTA (CT angiography): To assess for large vessel occlusion (potential thrombectomy candidate) (0.5 mark)
  6. Thrombolysis consent: Brief discussion with patient/wife about risks (6% ICH) and benefits (30% better functional outcome), obtain verbal consent (1 mark)
  7. Alteplase dose calculation: Weigh patient, calculate 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg). Give 10% as IV bolus over 1 minute, then 90% as infusion over 60 minutes (1 mark)
  8. Target door-to-needle time below 60 minutes (ideally below 45 minutes) – in this case, aim for tPA bolus by 4:30 PM (45 min from arrival) (1 mark)
  9. Post-thrombolysis monitoring: NIHSS every 15 min for 2h, BP every 15 min for 2h, neurological observations, target BP below 180/105 mmHg, no antiplatelet/anticoagulation for 24h (1 mark)

Examiner Notes:

  • Accept alternative BP agents (hydralazine, nicardipine) if labetalol contraindicated
  • Must mention BP threshold 185/110 pre-thrombolysis
  • Must include tPA dose 0.9 mg/kg and administration (bolus + infusion)
  • Do not accept "give aspirin" (contraindicated within 24h of tPA)

Question 2 (6 marks)

Stem: You are working in a rural hospital without CT. A 55-year-old woman presents with sudden onset left-sided weakness (arm and leg) 60 minutes ago. BP 170/95, HR 76, GCS 15, NIHSS estimated 12. The nearest CT-capable hospital is 180 km away (2-hour road transfer). You have access to telestroke consultation and RFDS retrieval.

Question: List six immediate actions you would take to manage this patient. (6 marks)

Model Answer:

  1. Activate RFDS retrieval urgently – request aeromedical transfer to nearest tertiary stroke center with CT and thrombolysis capability (1 mark)
  2. Telestroke consultation – contact state telestroke network (e.g., NSW Telestroke) for real-time neurologist review and guidance via video/phone (1 mark)
  3. IV access ×2, bloods: FBC, coagulation, UEC, glucose (send to receiving hospital or process locally if able) (1 mark)
  4. Stabilize for transfer: Oxygen if SpO₂ below 94%, cardiac monitor, NBM (aspiration risk), position head-of-bed 30°, maintain BP (permissive hypertension unless greater than 220/120) (1 mark)
  5. Notify receiving hospital stroke team – provide handover (time last known well, NIHSS, medical history, medications especially anticoagulants) to allow "direct to CT" protocol on arrival (1 mark)
  6. Cultural considerations (if Indigenous patient) – involve Aboriginal Liaison Officer, ask about family accompaniment, explain transfer in culturally safe manner (1 mark)

Alternative acceptable answers:

  • Document time last known well clearly (critical for thrombolysis decision)
  • Measure blood glucose POC (exclude hypoglycemia)
  • Prepare patient for retrieval (IV fluids, warmth, documentation)

Examiner Notes:

  • Do NOT accept "give thrombolysis without CT" (not standard of care in Australia)
  • Must mention RFDS or road ambulance (retrieval is priority)
  • Telestroke consultation is best practice for rural stroke management
  • Accept either "notify receiving hospital" or "arrange direct-to-CT protocol"

Question 3 (8 marks)

Stem: A 68-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation on apixaban 5 mg BD presents with sudden onset right hemiparesis and dysarthria 2 hours ago. Her last dose of apixaban was 8 hours ago. NIHSS is 14. CT brain shows no hemorrhage. CTA shows left M1 occlusion.

Question: Discuss the implications of her apixaban use for thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. What are your treatment options? (8 marks)

Model Answer:

Implications of apixaban for thrombolysis (3 marks):

  • Apixaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor (NOAC) with half-life ~12 hours; last dose 8h ago means drug level still therapeutic (1 mark)
  • Standard recommendation: Wait 48 hours from last NOAC dose before thrombolysis (allows ≥4 half-lives clearance) (1 mark)
  • In this case, she does NOT meet criteria for IV thrombolysis due to recent apixaban dose (contraindication: on anticoagulation with active drug level) (1 mark)

Implications for mechanical thrombectomy (2 marks):

  • Mechanical thrombectomy does NOT require full anticoagulation reversal (unlike IV tPA) (1 mark)
  • She is a candidate for thrombectomy: M1 occlusion, within 6-hour window (no perfusion imaging needed), NIHSS 14 (severe stroke) (1 mark)

Treatment options (3 marks):

  1. Mechanical thrombectomy without IV tPA (preferred) – proceed directly to angiography suite for endovascular clot retrieval (1 mark)
  2. Check apixaban level (if available via anti-Xa assay) – if undetectable or very low, could consider thrombolysis, but unlikely to be low at 8 hours (0.5 mark)
  3. Reversal with andexanet alfa (specific reversal agent for apixaban/rivaroxaban) – allows subsequent thrombolysis, but not widely available in Australia (TGA approved but very expensive, limited stock) (0.5 mark)
  4. Do NOT give IV tPA without reversal or drug level confirmation – bleeding risk too high (1 mark)

Examiner Notes:

  • Must mention apixaban contraindication to IV tPA at 8 hours
  • Must recognize thrombectomy is still an option (does not require tPA)
  • Accept "idarucizumab" only if candidate specifies it's for dabigatran (does NOT reverse apixaban)
  • Do not accept "give tPA anyway" without mentioning reversal or drug level testing

Question 4 (6 marks)

Stem: A 72-year-old man received alteplase 75 mg (0.9 mg/kg) for acute stroke at 2:00 PM. At 3:30 PM (90 minutes post-tPA), his NIHSS has increased from 8 to 16 and his GCS has dropped to 11. BP is 195/108 mmHg.

Question: List the six most important immediate actions. (6 marks)

Model Answer:

  1. Urgent CT brain non-contrast – to diagnose hemorrhagic transformation (most likely cause of deterioration post-tPA) (1 mark)
  2. Stop any ongoing tPA infusion (should be complete by 90 min, but check pump) – cease any further thrombolytic therapy (1 mark)
  3. Check coagulation studies urgently – INR, aPTT, fibrinogen (tPA depletes fibrinogen; may need replacement) (1 mark)
  4. Control blood pressure – target BP below 160/90 mmHg in setting of suspected ICH (lower than post-ischemic stroke target to reduce hematoma expansion). Use labetalol 10 mg IV or nicardipine infusion (1 mark)
  5. Notify neurology and neurosurgery urgently – for specialist input; possible surgical decompression if large ICH (1 mark)
  6. Prepare for tPA reversal – if CT confirms large ICH: cryoprecipitate 10 units IV (replaces fibrinogen), tranexamic acid 1 g IV (antifibrinolytic), consider platelet transfusion (1 mark)

Alternative acceptable answers:

  • Airway assessment/management (if GCS below 9, consider intubation for airway protection)
  • Transfer to ICU/resuscitation bay (escalate level of care)
  • Repeat NIHSS to quantify deterioration

Examiner Notes:

  • Must mention urgent CT brain (most critical action)
  • Must mention stopping tPA (if still running)
  • Must escalate to neurology/neurosurgery
  • Accept either "cryoprecipitate" or "tranexamic acid" for reversal (1 mark for either)
  • Do not accept "give protamine" (reverses heparin, not tPA)

Australian Guidelines

ARC/ANZCOR

N/A – Stroke thrombolysis is not covered by Australian Resuscitation Council guidelines (ARC/ANZCOR focus on cardiac arrest and resuscitation).

Therapeutic Guidelines

Therapeutic Guidelines: Neurology (2019)[53]

  • Recommends alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg) for acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours
  • Dose: 10% IV bolus over 1 min, 90% infusion over 60 min
  • Pre-treatment BP target: below 185/110 mmHg
  • Post-treatment BP target: below 180/105 mmHg for 24 hours
  • Contraindications: ICH, recent stroke/trauma below 3 months, INR greater than 1.7, platelets below 100,000

National Stroke Foundation (Australia)

Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2017[54]

  • Recommendation 3.1: Alteplase should be administered to eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke who present within 4.5 hours of symptom onset (Grade A, Strong recommendation)
  • Door-to-needle target: ≤60 minutes (best practice ≤45 minutes)
  • Telestroke: Recommended for rural/remote areas to facilitate thrombolysis decision-making
  • Stroke unit care: All stroke patients should be admitted to stroke unit (reduces death/disability by 20%)

State-Specific Protocols

New South Wales (NSW Health)

  • NSW Stroke Services Framework (2021)[55]: Targets 15% thrombolysis rate statewide (currently 10-12%)
  • NSW Telestroke Service: 24/7 video consultation for rural hospitals (launched 2018)
  • Comprehensive stroke centers: RPA, Prince of Wales, Liverpool, John Hunter, Westmead (thrombectomy-capable)

Victoria

  • Victorian Stroke Telemedicine (VST) Program[56]: Connects regional hospitals to Melbourne stroke centers (Alfred, Royal Melbourne, Austin)
  • Code Stroke protocol: Door-to-CT below 25 min, door-to-needle below 60 min
  • Thrombectomy centers: Alfred, Austin, Box Hill, Royal Melbourne, Monash

Queensland

  • Queensland Statewide Stroke Clinical Network: Telestroke covering 15+ regional hospitals
  • Retrieval Service: Queensland Ambulance Service Retrieval (RFDS partnership)

Remote/Rural Considerations

Pre-Hospital

Challenges:

  • Long distances to hospital (median 150-300 km in remote Australia vs below 10 km urban)
  • Delayed recognition (lower stroke awareness in rural populations)
  • Limited ambulance resources (single-crew, volunteer services)
  • Extended transport times (road conditions, weather)

Solutions:

  • FAST education campaigns in rural communities (Face-Arm-Speech-Time)
  • Ambulance pre-notification: Paramedics activate stroke code en route → ED prepares for "direct to CT"
  • Aeromedical retrieval: RFDS or state helicopter services (faster than road for distances greater than 100 km)

Resource-Limited Setting

Rural hospitals without CT:

  • Stabilize patient (IV access, bloods, NBM, BP monitoring)
  • DO NOT give thrombolysis without CT (hemorrhage risk unacceptable)
  • Activate retrieval urgently (road or air)
  • Telestroke consultation (neurologist can guide management remotely)
  • Transfer to nearest CT-capable hospital

Rural hospitals with CT but no neurology:

  • Perform CT brain urgently (exclude hemorrhage)
  • Telestroke consultation for thrombolysis decision
  • Administer tPA if eligible (with neurologist remote supervision)
  • Transfer to tertiary center post-thrombolysis for ongoing stroke unit care

Retrieval

Criteria for retrieval:

  • Any stroke patient within potential thrombolysis window (below 4.5h, or below 24h if LVO suspected)
  • Post-thrombolysis patients (require stroke unit care)
  • Large stroke with risk of deterioration (NIHSS greater than 15, posterior fossa, decreased GCS)
  • Patients requiring thrombectomy (LVO on CTA)

RFDS considerations:

  • Coverage: All of rural/remote Australia (7.7 million km²)
  • Aircraft: King Air, Pilatus PC-12 (pressurized, 400+ km/h cruise)
  • Crew: Doctor, flight nurse, pilot(s)
  • Equipment: Portable ventilator, infusion pumps, drugs (including tPA at some bases)
  • Limitations: Weather-dependent, runway availability, unpressurized cabins (altitude caution for hemorrhagic stroke)

Handover to retrieval team:

  • Time last known well (critical)
  • NIHSS score (baseline and current)
  • Medications (especially anticoagulants)
  • CT findings
  • Thrombolysis given (dose, time, complications)
  • BP control (agents used, current BP)

Telemedicine

Telestroke networks in Australia:[16,52]

  • NSW Telestroke: Connects greater than 20 rural hospitals to RPA, Prince of Wales, Liverpool
  • Victorian Telestroke (VST): Links regional Victoria to Melbourne stroke centers
  • Queensland Statewide Stroke Network: Covers Cairns, Townsville, Mackay, Rockhampton, etc.
  • SA/NT Telestroke: Based at Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • WA Country Health Service: Limited telestroke (mainly phone consults)

Telestroke process:

  1. Rural ED activates telestroke (phone call to hub center)
  2. Hub stroke neurologist joins via video link (secure teleconference)
  3. Neurologist reviews patient (video assessment, NIHSS scoring), views CT images (PACS access)
  4. Neurologist recommends thrombolysis vs transfer vs conservative care
  5. Rural doctor administers tPA under neurologist supervision (if eligible)
  6. Post-tPA monitoring at rural hospital or transfer to hub center (case-dependent)

Evidence: Telestroke achieves equivalent outcomes to in-person stroke care (same tPA rates, similar ICH rates, comparable 90-day mRS).[52]


References

Guidelines

  1. Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2017. Melbourne, Australia. Available from: https://informme.org.au/guidelines
  2. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, et al. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9834):2364-2372. PMID: 22632907
  3. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke (ECASS III). N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317-1329. PMID: 18815396

Key Evidence

  1. Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384(9958):1929-1935. PMID: 25106044
  2. Deloitte Access Economics. The economic impact of stroke in Australia. National Stroke Foundation. 2013.
  3. Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, Davis SM. Stroke. Lancet. 2008;371(9624):1612-1623. PMID: 18468545
  4. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(4):355-369. PMID: 19233729
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581-1587. PMID: 7477192
  6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Stroke and its management in Australia: an update. Cardiovascular disease series no. 37. Cat. no. CVD 61. Canberra: AIHW. 2013.
  7. Appelros P, Stegmayr B, Terént A. Sex differences in stroke epidemiology: a systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1082-1090. PMID: 19211488
  8. Hankey GJ. Long-term outcome after ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16 Suppl 1:14-19. PMID: 12698014
  9. Adeoye O, Hornung R, Khatri P, Kleindorfer D. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator use for ischemic stroke in the United States: a doubling of treatment rates over the course of 5 years. Stroke. 2011;42(7):1952-1955. PMID: 21636821
  10. Cadilhac DA, Purvis T, Kilkenny MF, et al. Evaluation of rural stroke services: does implementation of coordinators and pathways improve care in rural hospitals? Stroke. 2013;44(10):2848-2853. PMID: 23920019

Australian Indigenous Health

  1. Katzenellenbogen JM, Vos T, Somerford P, Begg S, Semmens JB, Codde JP. Burden of stroke in Indigenous Western Australians: a study using data linkage. Stroke. 2011;42(6):1515-1521. PMID: 21493908
  2. Garvey G, Anderson K, Gall A, et al. The fabric of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander wellbeing: a conceptual model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(15):7745. PMID: 34360080
  3. Cadilhac DA, Lannin NA, Anderson CS, et al. Protocol and pilot data for developing a Australian stroke clinical registry. Int J Stroke. 2010;5(3):217-226. PMID: 20536619
  4. Bladin CF, Moloczij N, Ermel S, et al. Victorian Stroke Telemedicine Project: implementation of a new model of translational stroke care for Australia. Intern Med J. 2015;45(9):951-956. PMID: 26059747
  5. Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, Parag V, et al. Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study. Part 1: Gender, stroke types, ethnicity, and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke. Neurology. 2010;75(18):1597-1607. PMID: 21041783

Pathophysiology

  1. Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, Moskowitz MA. Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends Neurosci. 1999;22(9):391-397. PMID: 10441299
  2. Lipton P. Ischemic cell death in brain neurons. Physiol Rev. 1999;79(4):1431-1568. PMID: 10508238
  3. Saver JL. Time is brain—quantified. Stroke. 2006;37(1):263-266. PMID: 16339467
  4. Whiteley WN, Emberson J, Lees KR, et al. Risk of intracerebial haemorrhage with alteplase after acute ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(9):925-933. PMID: 27289487

Clinical Practice

  1. Roffe C, Nevatte T, Sim J, et al. Effect of routine low-dose oxygen supplementation on death and disability in adults with acute stroke: the Stroke Oxygen Study randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(12):1125-1135. PMID: 28973622
  2. Brandler ES, Sharma M, Sinert RH, Levine SR. Prehospital stroke scales in urban environments: a systematic review. Neurology. 2014;82(24):2241-2249. PMID: 24850487
  3. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20(7):864-870. PMID: 2749846
  4. Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, et al. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. Stroke. 1994;25(11):2220-2226. PMID: 7974549
  5. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22(8):983-988. PMID: 1866765
  6. Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Buchan AM. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. Lancet. 2000;355(9216):1670-1674. PMID: 10905241
  7. Anders B, Alonso A, Artemis D, et al. What does elevated high-sensitive troponin I in stroke patients mean: simultaneous neurological and cardiac impairment. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36(1):37-43. PMID: 23920127

Thrombolysis Protocols

  1. Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R, et al. Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet. 2010;375(9727):1695-1703. PMID: 20472172
  2. Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Saver JL, et al. Timeliness of tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy in acute ischemic stroke: patient characteristics, hospital factors, and outcomes associated with door-to-needle times within 60 minutes. Circulation. 2011;123(7):750-758. PMID: 21311083
  3. Meretoja A, Keshtkaran M, Saver JL, et al. Stroke thrombolysis: save a minute, save a day. Stroke. 2014;45(4):1053-1058. PMID: 24627114
  4. Anderson CS, Huang Y, Lindley RI, et al. Intensive blood pressure reduction with intravenous thrombolysis therapy for acute ischaemic stroke (ENCHANTED): an international, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10174):877-888. PMID: 30739745
  5. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344-e418. PMID: 31662037
  6. Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye OM, et al. Scientific rationale for the inclusion and exclusion criteria for intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2016;47(2):581-641. PMID: 26696642

Extended Window

  1. Thomalla G, Simonsen CZ, Boutitie F, et al. MRI-guided thrombolysis for stroke with unknown time of onset (WAKE-UP). N Engl J Med. 2018;379(7):611-622. PMID: 29766770
  2. Ma H, Campbell BCV, Parsons MW, et al. Thrombolysis guided by perfusion imaging up to 9 hours after onset of stroke (EXTEND). N Engl J Med. 2019;380(19):1795-1803. PMID: 31067867
  3. Davis SM, Donnan GA, Parsons MW, et al. Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(4):299-309. PMID: 18296121

Mechanical Thrombectomy

  1. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke (MR CLEAN). N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11-20. PMID: 25517348
  2. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723-1731. PMID: 26898852
  3. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct (DAWN). N Engl J Med. 2018;378(1):11-21. PMID: 29129157

Supportive Care

  1. den Hertog HM, van der Worp HB, van Gemert HM, et al. The Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) In Stroke (PAIS) trial. Stroke. 2009;40(10):3269-3274. PMID: 19661479
  2. Ntaios G, Egli M, Faouzi M, Michel P. J-shaped association between serum glucose and functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2010;41(10):2366-2370. PMID: 20724716
  3. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(9):CD000197. PMID: 24026639

Special Populations

  1. Tversky S, Turgeon RD, Liauw J, et al. Thrombolysis in pregnancy: a systematic review. Thromb Res. 2020;189:1-7. PMID: 32062376
  2. IST-3 collaborative group. The benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (the third international stroke trial [IST-3]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9834):2352-2363. PMID: 22632908

Indigenous Health and Rural

  1. Worthington JM, Gattellari M, Goumas C, Jalaludin B. Decreasing risk of fatal stroke in Indigenous Australians: a comparison with stroke in non-Indigenous Australians 2001-2015. Int J Stroke. 2019;14(7):729-737. PMID: 30654737
  2. You J, Condon JR, Zhao Y, Guthridge SL. Stroke incidence and case-fatality among Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations in the Northern Territory of Australia, 1999-2011. Int J Stroke. 2015;10 Suppl A100:716-722. PMID: 26120807

Stroke Mimics

  1. Tsivgoulis G, Zand R, Katsanos AH, et al. Safety of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke mimics: prospective 5-year study and comprehensive meta-analysis. Stroke. 2015;46(5):1281-1287. PMID: 25791714

NOACs

  1. Seiffge DJ, Werring DJ, Paciaroni M, et al. Timing of anticoagulation after recent ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(1):117-126. PMID: 30509692
  2. Kermer P, Eschenfelder CC, Diener HC, et al. Antagonizing dabigatran by idarucizumab in cases of ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage in Germany—A national case collection. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(4):383-391. PMID: 28569107

Telestroke

  1. Müller-Barna P, Schwamm LH, Haberl RL. Telestroke increases use of acute stroke therapy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25(1):5-10. PMID: 22157106

Australian Guidelines (cont.)

  1. Therapeutic Guidelines Limited. eTG complete [digital]. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2019. https://www.tg.org.au
  2. Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2017. Melbourne, Australia. https://informme.org.au/guidelines
  3. NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation. NSW Stroke Services Framework 2021. Sydney: ACI; 2021.
  4. Bladin CF, Kim J, Bagot KL, et al. Improving acute stroke care in regional hospitals: clinical evaluation of the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine program. Med J Aust. 2020;212(8):371-377. PMID: 32157723

Additional Clinical Scenarios

Posterior Circulation Stroke

Clinical Presentation: Posterior circulation strokes (vertebrobasilar territory) account for 20-25% of ischemic strokes but are easily missed due to non-specific symptoms:

Hallmark features:

  • Vertigo, nausea, vomiting (mimics benign peripheral vertigo)
  • Diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia (brainstem nuclei)
  • Ataxia, limb incoordination (cerebellum)
  • Crossed neurological signs (ipsilateral cranial nerve + contralateral limb weakness)
  • Visual field defects (occipital lobe - homonymous hemianopia)

HINTS exam (Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew): Used to differentiate central (stroke) from peripheral (vestibular neuritis) vertigo:[57]

  • Head Impulse Test: Normal (corrective saccade absent) = central
  • Nystagmus: Direction-changing or vertical = central
  • Test of Skew: Vertical ocular misalignment = central

HINTS sensitivity for stroke: 96-100% (superior to early MRI).[57]

Management considerations:

  • CT brain may be normal in first 24-48 hours (posterior fossa artifact, small infarcts)
  • MRI DWI is gold standard (but delays treatment)
  • Thrombolysis eligibility: Same criteria as anterior circulation
  • Basilar artery occlusion: Thrombectomy up to 24 hours (high mortality without treatment ~80%)
  • Cerebellar stroke: Risk of obstructive hydrocephalus + brainstem compression → neurosurgical decompression

Minor Stroke and TIA

Definitions:

  • TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack): Focal neurological deficit lasting below 24 hours (usually below 1 hour), no infarct on imaging
  • Minor stroke: NIHSS below 5, symptoms may be mild but disabling (e.g., isolated aphasia, hand weakness)

Historical controversy: Early trials excluded NIHSS below 4 ("too mild to treat"). However, 25-30% of "minor" strokes progress to major stroke within 48 hours, and many deficits are functionally disabling.[58]

Current evidence:

  • PRISMS trial (2018): Minor stroke (NIHSS 0-5) randomized to tPA vs aspirin. Trial stopped early for futility (no benefit of tPA).[59]
  • However: Patients with disabling deficits (isolated aphasia, hand weakness affecting occupation) may still benefit.

ACEM approach:

  • Assess functional impact (e.g., teacher with aphasia, surgeon with hand weakness = disabling)
  • If NIHSS below 5 but deficit is disabling → consider thrombolysis (shared decision-making)
  • If NIHSS below 5 and non-disabling (e.g., mild sensory deficit) → aspirin 300 mg, admit, early workup
  • All TIAs with ABCD² ≥4 require hospital admission (high early stroke risk)

ABCD² score (predicts 2-day stroke risk after TIA):[60]

  • Age ≥60 years (1 point)
  • BP ≥140/90 mmHg (1 point)
  • Clinical features: Unilateral weakness (2 points), speech disturbance without weakness (1 point)
  • Duration: ≥60 min (2 points), 10-59 min (1 point)
  • Diabetes (1 point)

Score interpretation:

  • 0-3: Low risk (1% 2-day stroke risk) → outpatient workup
  • 4-5: Moderate risk (4% 2-day stroke risk) → admit 24-48h
  • 6-7: High risk (8% 2-day stroke risk) → admit, urgent imaging, consider dual antiplatelet

Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) Recognition

Why it matters: LVO strokes (ICA, M1, M2, basilar) account for 30-40% of all ischemic strokes but have worse outcomes without thrombectomy. Emergency physicians must recognize LVO to activate thrombectomy pathway.

Clinical clues for LVO:[61,62]

  • Severe stroke: NIHSS ≥6 (sensitivity 90% for LVO)
  • Cortical signs: Aphasia, neglect, gaze preference, hemianopia
  • Dense hemiplegia: Complete arm and leg paralysis (vs. drift)
  • Atrial fibrillation: Cardioembolic source (higher LVO rate)

LVO prediction scales:

RACE scale (Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation):[63]

ItemFindingScore
Facial palsyMild 1, Moderate-severe 20-2
Arm motorDrift 1, Falls 20-2
Leg motorDrift 1, Falls 20-2
Head/gaze deviationPresent1
Aphasia or neglectPresent2

RACE ≥5 = 85% LVO probability (activate thrombectomy team).

CTA findings:

  • Abrupt vessel cutoff (ICA, M1, M2, basilar)
  • Clot length greater than 8 mm (longer clot = lower tPA recanalization rate)
  • Collateral circulation (leptomeningeal vessels) → better outcomes

ED management of LVO:

  1. Give IV tPA if within 4.5h (don't delay for thrombectomy)
  2. Activate thrombectomy team immediately (interventional neuroradiology)
  3. Transfer to comprehensive stroke center if not on-site
  4. Time windows: 0-6h (all LVO), 6-24h (DAWN/DEFUSE-3 criteria with perfusion imaging)

Hemorrhagic Transformation

Definition: Conversion of ischemic infarct to hemorrhagic infarct (bleeding into infarcted tissue).

Types:

  • Hemorrhagic infarction (HI): Petechial hemorrhage, usually asymptomatic
  • Parenchymal hematoma (PH): Large hematoma with mass effect, symptomatic

Incidence:

  • Spontaneous (no thrombolysis): 5-10% of ischemic strokes
  • Post-thrombolysis: 6-7% symptomatic ICH (SICH), 15-20% asymptomatic

Risk factors:[22,64]

  • Large infarct size (ASPECTS below 7)
  • Severe stroke (NIHSS greater than 20)
  • Older age (greater than 80 years)
  • Hyperglycemia (glucose greater than 10 mmol/L)
  • Hypertension (BP greater than 180/105 post-tPA)
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Leukoaraiosis (chronic small vessel disease on CT)
  • Early ischemic changes on CT (greater than 1/3 MCA territory)

Clinical presentation:

  • Sudden neurological deterioration (NIHSS increase ≥4 points)
  • Reduced consciousness (GCS drop)
  • Severe headache
  • Nausea, vomiting
  • Hypertension (BP surge)

Management:

  1. Urgent CT brain (diagnosis)
  2. Stop any antithrombotics (tPA should be finished by time of deterioration)
  3. Reverse tPA effect:
    • Cryoprecipitate 10 units IV (replaces fibrinogen, goal greater than 1.5 g/L)
    • Tranexamic acid 1 g IV (antifibrinolytic)
    • Platelet transfusion 1 unit (if platelets below 100,000 or on antiplatelet)
  4. Blood pressure control: Target SBP below 160 mmHg (INTERACT2 trial)[65] – use labetalol 10 mg IV or nicardipine infusion
  5. Notify neurosurgery: Large hematoma (greater than 30 mL) may require decompression
  6. ICU admission: Close monitoring, repeat CT at 6-12 hours

Prognosis:

  • SICH mortality: 40-60%
  • Survivors: 70% with severe disability (mRS 4-5)

Stroke Mimics

Incidence: 5-25% of patients receiving thrombolysis have stroke mimics (not true ischemic stroke).[49]

Common mimics:[66,67]

  1. Seizure with Todd's paresis (post-ictal weakness): History of seizure, gradual resolution over hours, EEG abnormalities
  2. Hypoglycemia: Blood glucose below 2.7 mmol/L, resolves with dextrose
  3. Migraine with aura: Younger age, gradual onset (vs. sudden), visual symptoms, history of migraines
  4. Functional neurological disorder (conversion disorder): Inconsistent exam, non-anatomic deficits, psychiatric history
  5. Sepsis/metabolic encephalopathy: Delirium, fluctuating consciousness, systemic signs
  6. Brain tumor: Gradual onset over days-weeks, seizure at presentation, CT/MRI shows mass
  7. Hemiplegic migraine: Rare, family history, preceding aura, full resolution
  8. Peripheral vestibulopathy (labyrinthitis): Isolated vertigo/nausea, no focal neuro signs, HINTS-negative

Safety of tPA in stroke mimics:

  • Meta-analysis: SICH rate 0.5% in stroke mimics (vs. 6% in true stroke)[49]
  • Conclusion: Giving tPA to a stroke mimic is generally safe (low bleeding risk without ischemia)
  • Therefore: Do not withhold tPA if clinical suspicion is high, even if diagnosis uncertain

Red flags for mimics:

  • Gradual onset (not sudden)
  • Prior episodes with full resolution (TIAs typically don't recur frequently)
  • Young age (below 50) without vascular risk factors
  • Normal CT and CTA (though early stroke CT can be normal)
  • Blood glucose below 2.7 mmol/L (always check)

Acute Stroke Complications

Cerebral Edema (most common cause of early death in large stroke):[68]

  • Onset: 24-72 hours post-stroke
  • Mechanism: Cytotoxic edema (cell swelling) + vasogenic edema (BBB breakdown)
  • Clinical signs: Worsening GCS, pupil changes (uncal herniation), Cushing reflex (hypertension + bradycardia)
  • CT findings: Midline shift, effaced ventricles, loss of sulci
  • Management:
    • "Osmotherapy: Mannitol 0.5-1 g/kg IV or hypertonic saline 3% 150-250 mL IV"
    • Head-of-bed elevation 30°
    • Avoid hypotonic fluids
    • Decompressive hemicraniectomy (for MCA territory greater than 50% or cerebellar strokes with mass effect)
    • Neurosurgical referral urgent

Aspiration Pneumonia:[69]

  • Incidence: 10-15% of acute stroke patients
  • Risk factors: Dysphagia (present in 50%), reduced GCS, bulbar weakness
  • Prevention: NPO until swallow screen (speech pathology), NGT feeding if unsafe swallow
  • Treatment: Antibiotics (amoxicillin-clavulanate or ceftriaxone + metronidazole)

Seizures:[70]

  • Incidence: 5-10% of acute stroke patients (within 24h)
  • Higher risk: Cortical involvement, hemorrhagic transformation, large infarct
  • Management: Levetiracetam 500-1000 mg IV loading (preferred in stroke; no drug interactions)
  • Prophylaxis: Not routinely recommended (only if seizure occurs)

Venous Thromboembolism (DVT/PE):

  • Incidence: 10% without prophylaxis
  • Prevention: Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) from day 1, LMWH after 24h if no hemorrhage post-tPA
  • Treatment: Therapeutic anticoagulation (but avoid in first 24h post-tPA)

Secondary Stroke Prevention

Antiplatelet Therapy:

  • Loading: Aspirin 300 mg (if no thrombolysis) or 24h post-tPA
  • Maintenance: Aspirin 100 mg daily indefinitely
  • Dual antiplatelet (aspirin + clopidogrel): For minor stroke/TIA (POINT trial)[71] – give for 21 days, then aspirin alone

Anticoagulation (if atrial fibrillation):

  • Timing: Depends on stroke size and bleeding risk[50]
    • "Small stroke (NIHSS below 8): Start at 4-7 days"
    • "Moderate stroke (NIHSS 8-15): Start at 7-10 days"
    • "Large stroke (NIHSS greater than 15): Start at 10-14 days (risk of hemorrhagic transformation)"
  • Agent: NOAC preferred over warfarin (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran – lower ICH risk)

Statin:

  • High-intensity statin for all ischemic stroke patients (atorvastatin 80 mg daily)
  • Reduces recurrent stroke risk by 20%[72]

Blood Pressure:

  • Target below 140/90 mmHg (or below 130/80 if diabetes)[73]
  • Start antihypertensive after acute phase (7-10 days)

Carotid Revascularization:

  • If carotid stenosis greater than 70% ipsilateral to stroke → carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or stenting (CAS)
  • Timing: Within 2 weeks of stroke (early surgery reduces recurrence)[74]

Lifestyle:

  • Smoking cessation (halves recurrence risk)
  • Diabetes control (HbA1c below 7%)
  • Exercise (30 min/day, 5 days/week)
  • Dietary modification (Mediterranean diet)

Quality Improvement and Audit

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR) Metrics:[75,76]

MetricTargetRationale
Thrombolysis rate≥15% of ischemic strokesCurrently 10-12% nationally; gap indicates delays or exclusions
Door-to-CT time≤25 minutesImaging delay is largest bottleneck
Door-to-needle time≤60 minutes (ideally ≤45)Each 15-min delay reduces benefit by 4%
Stroke unit admission≥80% of all strokesStroke unit care reduces death/disability by 20%
Swallow screen≥80% within 24hPrevents aspiration pneumonia
Discharged on antiplatelet≥95%Secondary prevention critical
Discharged on statin≥90%Reduces recurrence by 20%

Barriers to Thrombolysis

Common reasons for ineligibility:[13,77]

  1. Late presentation (greater than 4.5h) – 50-60% of exclusions
    • Solutions: Public awareness campaigns (FAST), ambulance pre-notification
  2. Mild symptoms (NIHSS below 4) – 15-20%
    • Solutions: Assess functional impact, consider disabling deficits
  3. Anticoagulation (INR greater than 1.7, recent NOAC) – 10-15%
    • Solutions: NOAC reversal agents, thrombectomy as alternative
  4. Uncontrolled BP (greater than 185/110) – 5-10%
    • Solutions: Aggressive IV antihypertensives (labetalol, nicardipine)
  5. Recent surgery/trauma – 5%
  6. Patient/family refusal – 2-5%
    • Solutions: Clear communication of risks/benefits, shared decision-making

Code Stroke Protocol Optimization

Best-practice elements:[31,78]

  1. Pre-hospital: Paramedic stroke recognition (FAST), pre-notification to ED, direct transport to comprehensive stroke center (bypass primary stroke centers if thrombectomy candidate)
  2. ED triage: Immediate stroke code activation at triage (don't wait for physician assessment)
  3. "Direct to CT": Bypass ED cubicle, straight to CT scanner
  4. Parallel processing: History, examination, bloods, consent done simultaneously (not sequentially)
  5. Single-call activation: One phone call activates entire team (neurology, radiology, pharmacy, stroke nurse)
  6. Pre-mixed tPA: Pharmacy prepares tPA in advance for all stroke codes (saves 5-10 min)
  7. Bedside stroke team: Neurologist and stroke nurse come to ED (don't wait for consult)
  8. Real-time tracking: Dashboard showing door-to-CT and door-to-needle times (immediate feedback)

Medicolegal Considerations

Common litigation scenarios:[79]

  1. Failure to thrombolyse eligible patient (missed opportunity)
    • Defense: Document why patient was ineligible (contraindications, outside window)
  2. Giving tPA to ineligible patient (causing hemorrhage)
    • Defense: Document informed consent discussion, risks/benefits
  3. Delay in thrombolysis (door-to-needle greater than 90 min)
    • Defense: Document reasons for delay (uncontrolled BP, awaiting labs, family discussion)
  4. Missing stroke diagnosis (discharged as "dizziness" or "migraine")
    • Defense: Document full neurological exam, consider posterior circulation strokes

Documentation essentials:

  • Time last known well (exact time, not "this morning")
  • NIHSS score (baseline before tPA)
  • Contraindications assessed (checklist)
  • Consent discussion (risks: 6% ICH, benefits: 30% better outcome)
  • Door-to-CT and door-to-needle times
  • Post-thrombolysis monitoring (NIHSS, BP, neuro obs)

Explaining Stroke to Patients/Family

Use lay language:

"A stroke happens when a blood clot blocks an artery in the brain, cutting off oxygen. Without oxygen, brain cells start dying within minutes – that's why we call it a 'brain attack,' similar to a heart attack. The good news is we have a clot-busting drug called alteplase that can dissolve the clot and restore blood flow, but we need to give it within 4.5 hours."

Explain "time is brain":

"Every minute that passes, about 2 million brain cells die. That's why we're moving so quickly. The sooner we give the clot-buster, the better your chances of recovering."

Discuss risks honestly:

"The main risk of the clot-busting drug is bleeding in the brain, which happens in about 6 out of 100 people who receive it. If that happens, it can be serious – about half of those patients die or have severe disability. However, without the drug, your chance of being disabled or dying from the stroke is higher – about 30-40%. So while there is a risk, the benefit outweighs it for most people."

Obtain verbal consent:

"Given the time pressure, I need your verbal consent to proceed. Do you understand the risks and benefits? Do you want us to give you the clot-busting drug?"

Patient Handout: After Thrombolysis

What to expect in the next 24 hours:

  • You will be monitored closely in the stroke unit or intensive care
  • We will check your blood pressure every 15 minutes for 2 hours, then every 30 minutes for 6 hours
  • We will perform neurological checks regularly to ensure the treatment is working
  • You may have a headache (common side effect)
  • If you develop severe headache, vomiting, or worsening weakness, tell the nurse immediately (could be bleeding)

What NOT to do for 24 hours:

  • No aspirin or blood-thinning medications (risk of bleeding)
  • No nasogastric tube or urinary catheter unless absolutely necessary
  • No blood pressure medications unless your pressure is very high (greater than 180/105)

After 24 hours:

  • We will do another CT scan to check for bleeding
  • If the scan is clear, we will start aspirin to prevent another stroke
  • You will continue in the stroke unit for rehabilitation (physiotherapy, speech therapy, occupational therapy)

Recovery:

  • Stroke recovery takes weeks to months
  • Most improvement happens in the first 3 months
  • Rehabilitation is key to maximizing recovery
  • You will need to take medications long-term to prevent another stroke (aspirin, statin, blood pressure medication)

ACEM Exam Pearls

High-Yield Facts for Written Exam

Primary Exam (Basic Sciences):

  1. Alteplase mechanism: Serine protease → converts plasminogen to plasmin → cleaves fibrin → dissolves clot. Fibrin-specific (minimal systemic fibrinolysis).
  2. Cerebral blood flow autoregulation: CBF constant at MAP 50-150 mmHg. Below 50 mmHg → ischemia. Above 150 mmHg → cerebral edema.
  3. Ischemic cascade timeline: ATP depletion (seconds) → depolarization (minutes) → glutamate excitotoxicity (minutes-hours) → free radicals (hours) → inflammation (days).
  4. Circle of Willis anatomy: 40% of population has incomplete circle → poor collaterals → worse stroke outcomes.
  5. Blood-brain barrier: Tight junctions between endothelial cells, breakdown in ischemia → vasogenic edema, hemorrhagic transformation.

Fellowship Exam (Clinical):

  1. 4.5-hour window: ECASS-3 trial; NNT 14 for good outcome at 3-4.5h (vs. NNT 10 at 0-3h).
  2. Door-to-needle below 60 minutes: Each 15-min delay reduces good outcome by 4% (Emberson meta-analysis).
  3. BP threshold 185/110: Arbitrary but validated; higher BP → 2× ICH risk post-tPA.
  4. NIHSS greater than 25: Relative contraindication (high ICH risk ~15%), but may still benefit if LVO + thrombectomy.
  5. Hemorrhagic transformation 6-7%: NINDS trial symptomatic ICH rate. Risk factors: NIHSS greater than 20, ASPECTS below 7, glucose greater than 10 mmol/L.
  6. Thrombectomy 24-hour window: DAWN trial; requires perfusion imaging (clinical-core mismatch).
  7. NOAC timing: Wait 48h from last dose for thrombolysis (≥4 half-lives). Idarucizumab reverses dabigatran only.
  8. Wake-up stroke: WAKE-UP trial; DWI-FLAIR mismatch → treat up to 9 hours.
  9. Basilar occlusion: Mortality 80% without treatment; thrombectomy up to 24h.
  10. Aspirin after tPA: Wait 24 hours + repeat CT (exclude ICH) before starting antiplatelet.

Viva Technique Tips

Opening statement structure:

"This is a time-critical stroke code. My immediate priorities are: (1) Exclude hemorrhage with urgent CT brain, (2) Determine thrombolysis eligibility – time last known well, contraindications, (3) Control blood pressure to below 185/110 mmHg, (4) Calculate tPA dose and prepare for administration, with a target door-to-needle time of less than 60 minutes."

When examiner says "The BP is 195/108":

"That's above the 185/110 threshold for thrombolysis. I would give labetalol 10 mg IV push over 1-2 minutes, recheck blood pressure in 5 minutes, and repeat every 10 minutes up to a maximum dose of 300 mg. If blood pressure remains elevated despite maximal medical therapy, I would consider alternative agents like hydralazine 10 mg IV or nicardipine infusion, but ultimately if I cannot reduce blood pressure below 185/110, I cannot give thrombolysis due to the unacceptably high risk of intracranial hemorrhage."

When asked "What are the risks of thrombolysis?":

"The main risk is symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, which occurs in 6-7% of patients who receive alteplase. Of those who develop hemorrhage, approximately half will die or have severe disability. Other risks include systemic bleeding (GI, GU), angioedema in 1-5% (especially in patients on ACE inhibitors), and allergic reactions. However, the benefit outweighs the risk – without thrombolysis, the chance of death or severe disability is approximately 30-40%, whereas with thrombolysis, it's reduced to 20-25%, giving a number-needed-to-treat of about 10 for a good outcome."

OSCE Performance Tips

Stroke assessment station:

  • Start with "ABCDE" (airway, breathing, circulation, disability, exposure) – don't jump to NIHSS without primary survey
  • Verbalize "This is a stroke code, I'm activating the stroke team now"
  • NIHSS: Practice until you can do it in below 5 minutes (examiners time you)
  • Don't forget: Level of consciousness (3 items), gaze, visual fields, facial palsy, arms/legs, ataxia, sensation, language, dysarthria, neglect
  • After NIHSS, state the score and severity (e.g., "NIHSS 8, moderate stroke, eligible for thrombolysis")

Consent discussion station:

  • Introduce, establish rapport ("I know this is scary, but we have a treatment that can help")
  • Use lay language (avoid jargon like "fibrinolysis" – say "clot-busting drug")
  • Mention specific numbers: "6% bleeding risk, 30% better chance of recovery"
  • Address concerns empathetically ("I understand you're worried about side effects – let me explain...")
  • Obtain explicit consent: "Do you agree to proceed?" (Don't assume consent)

Resuscitation station:

  • Lead the team (don't do everything yourself): "Nurse, can you draw bloods please? Radiology, we need urgent CT brain. Pharmacy, prepare alteplase 75 mg."
  • Closed-loop communication: Nurse says "Bloods drawn," you say "Thank you, bloods drawn"
  • Think aloud: "I'm concerned about hemorrhagic transformation given the neurological deterioration, so my priority is urgent CT brain"
  • Escalate appropriately: "I need to call the stroke neurologist and neurosurgery now"

Extended References (Additional Sources)

Posterior Circulation and Vertigo

  1. Kattah JC, Talkad AV, Wang DZ, Hsieh YH, Newman-Toker DE. HINTS to diagnose stroke in the acute vestibular syndrome: three-step bedside oculomotor examination more sensitive than early MRI diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke. 2009;40(11):3504-3510. PMID: 19762709

Minor Stroke and TIA

  1. Fischer U, Baumgartner A, Arnold M, et al. What is a minor stroke? Stroke. 2010;41(4):661-666. PMID: 20185781
  2. Khatri P, Kleindorfer DO, Devlin T, et al. Effect of alteplase vs aspirin on functional outcome for patients with acute ischemic stroke and minor nondisabling neurologic deficits: the PRISMS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(2):156-166. PMID: 29998337
  3. Johnston SC, Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh MN, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):283-292. PMID: 17258668

Large Vessel Occlusion

  1. Hastrup S, Damgaard D, Johnsen SP, Andersen G. Prehospital acute stroke severity scale to predict large artery occlusion: design and comparison with other scales. Stroke. 2016;47(7):1772-1776. PMID: 27197854
  2. Pérez de la Ossa N, Carrera D, Gorchs M, et al. Design and validation of a prehospital stroke scale to predict large arterial occlusion: the rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale. Stroke. 2014;45(1):87-91. PMID: 24281224
  3. Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, et al. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316(12):1279-1288. PMID: 27673305

Hemorrhagic Transformation

  1. Khatri P, Wechsler LR, Broderick JP. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with revascularization therapies. Stroke. 2007;38(2):431-440. PMID: 17234986
  2. Anderson CS, Heeley E, Huang Y, et al. Rapid blood-pressure lowering in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (INTERACT2). N Engl J Med. 2013;368(25):2355-2365. PMID: 23713578

Stroke Mimics

  1. Merino JG, Luby M, Benson RT, et al. Predictors of acute stroke mimics in 8187 patients referred to a stroke service. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22(8):e397-e403. PMID: 23680681
  2. Ali SF, Viswanathan A, Singhal AB, et al. The Precise diagnostic accuracy of stroke symptoms: the CLOTS study. Stroke. 2018;49(11):2587-2593. PMID: 30355166

Complications

  1. Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R. 'Malignant' middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol. 1996;53(4):309-315. PMID: 8929152
  2. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Diamant N, Speechley M, Teasell R. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005;36(12):2756-2763. PMID: 16269630
  3. Beghi E, D'Alessandro R, Beretta S, et al. Incidence and predictors of acute symptomatic seizures after stroke. Neurology. 2011;77(20):1785-1793. PMID: 22013176

Secondary Prevention

  1. Johnston SC, Easton JD, Farrant M, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin in acute ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA (POINT). N Engl J Med. 2018;379(3):215-225. PMID: 29766750
  2. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A 3rd, et al. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack (SPARCL). N Engl J Med. 2006;355(6):549-559. PMID: 16899775
  3. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2014;45(7):2160-2236. PMID: 24788967
  4. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP, Barnett HJM. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet. 2004;363(9413):915-924. PMID: 15043958

Quality Improvement

  1. Cadilhac DA, Kilkenny MF, Longworth M, et al. Meta-analysis of stroke registry data: breaking down the barriers to implementation. Int J Stroke. 2011;6(1):46-51. PMID: 21205239
  2. Andrew NE, Kilkenny MF, Naylor R, et al. Understanding long-term outcomes in survivors of stroke, using the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(8):1032-1038. PMID: 25042605
  3. Demaerschalk BM, Hwang HM, Leung G. US cost burden of ischemic stroke: a systematic literature review. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(7):525-533. PMID: 20645668
  4. Meretoja A, Strbian D, Mustanoja S, Tatlisumak T, Lindsberg PJ, Kaste M. Reducing in-hospital delay to 20 minutes in stroke thrombolysis. Neurology. 2012;79(4):306-313. PMID: 22622858
  5. Brown DL, Barsan WG, Lisabeth LD, Gallery ME, Morgenstern LB. Survey of emergency physicians about recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46(1):56-60. PMID: 15988427

Metrics:

  • Line Count: 1,577 lines
  • PMID Citations: 79 high-quality references

ACEM Exam Coverage:

  • Primary Written (Anatomy: Circle of Willis, cerebral territories, vertebrobasilar system | Physiology: CBF autoregulation, ischemic cascade, penumbra concept | Pharmacology: Alteplase mechanism, half-life, fibrin specificity)
  • Fellowship Written (Time windows, NIHSS scoring, inclusion/exclusion criteria, BP management, anticoagulation timing, LVO recognition, hemorrhagic transformation, stroke mimics)
  • Fellowship OSCE (4 Viva scenarios with comprehensive model answers, 3 OSCE stations with detailed marking criteria, 4 SAQ practice questions with examiner notes)
  • Indigenous Health (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander stroke disparities, Māori health considerations, cultural safety, barriers to thrombolysis, rural access challenges)
  • Remote/Rural (Telestroke networks, RFDS retrieval protocols, resource-limited management, CT-less hospitals, aeromedical considerations)

Target Exam: ACEM Primary Written, ACEM Fellowship Written, ACEM Fellowship OSCE

Frequently asked questions

Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.

What is the time window for IV thrombolysis in stroke?

4.5 hours from symptom onset (or last known well) for standard IV alteplase. Extended windows (up to 9 hours for wake-up stroke with MRI selection, up to 24 hours for mechanical thrombectomy with perfusion imaging).

What is the alteplase dose for acute stroke?

0.9 mg/kg (maximum 90 mg). Give 10% as IV bolus over 1 minute, then 90% as infusion over 60 minutes.

What blood pressure is required before giving thrombolysis?

BP must be below 185/110 mmHg before initiating thrombolysis. Target BP below 180/105 mmHg for first 24 hours post-thrombolysis.

What is the door-to-needle target time?

below 60 minutes from ED arrival to thrombolysis administration. Best practice: below 45 minutes.

Learning map

Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.

Prerequisites

Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.

  • Neurological Assessment
  • CT Head Interpretation

Differentials

Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.

  • Hemorrhagic Stroke
  • Seizure
  • Hypoglycemia

Consequences

Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.

  • Cerebral Edema
  • Intracranial Hemorrhage