Emergency Medicine
Emergency
High Evidence

Acute Ischemic Stroke - Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy

Acute ischemic stroke accounts for 87% of all strokes, with mortality of 15-30% at 30 days if untreated. Time is brain –... ACEM Fellowship Written, ACEM Fellow

Updated 24 Jan 2026
50 min read

Clinical board

A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.

Urgent signals

Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.

  • Time from symptom onset greater than 4.5 hours without advanced imaging (excludes standard IV thrombolysis)
  • Intracranial hemorrhage on CT (absolute contraindication)
  • Blood pressure greater than 185/110 mmHg pre-thrombolysis (relative contraindication)
  • Large vessel occlusion without thrombectomy access (poor IV-only outcomes)

Exam focus

Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.

  • ACEM Fellowship Written
  • ACEM Fellowship OSCE

Linked comparisons

Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.

  • Hemorrhagic Stroke
  • Seizure

Editorial and exam context

ACEM Fellowship Written
ACEM Fellowship OSCE
Clinical reference article

Quick Answer

One-liner: Acute ischemic stroke is a time-critical neurological emergency where IV thrombolysis (alteplase 0.9 mg/kg or tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg) within 4.5 hours and mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion within 24 hours improve functional outcomes, with door-to-needle target below 60 minutes.

Acute ischemic stroke accounts for 87% of all strokes, with mortality of 15-30% at 30 days if untreated. Time is brain – approximately 1.9 million neurons die per minute during untreated stroke.[1] Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase or tenecteplase within 4.5 hours reduces disability and death (NNT 10).[2,3] Tenecteplase is increasingly replacing alteplase due to simpler single-bolus administration (0.25 mg/kg, max 25 mg), non-inferior outcomes (AcT, TRACE-2 trials), and higher recanalization rates in large vessel occlusion.[4,5] Mechanical thrombectomy revolutionized large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke treatment with NNT 2.6 for reduced disability.[6] Extended windows now permit thrombectomy up to 24 hours with perfusion imaging selection (DAWN, DEFUSE-3, SELECT2, ANGEL-ASPECT trials).[7,8,9,10]

Indigenous Australians and Māori experience 2-3× higher stroke incidence, occurring 10-15 years earlier, with worse outcomes due to delayed presentation, geographic isolation, and healthcare access barriers.[11,12,13]


ACEM Exam Focus

Primary Exam Relevance

  • Anatomy: Circle of Willis, anterior/middle/posterior cerebral artery territories, internal carotid system, vertebrobasilar system, M1/M2 segments, blood-brain barrier
  • Physiology: Cerebral blood flow autoregulation (50-150 mmHg MAP), ischemic cascade (ATP depletion, glutamate excitotoxicity, calcium influx, free radical injury), penumbra vs core infarction
  • Pharmacology: Alteplase mechanism (serine protease, converts plasminogen → plasmin, fibrin-specific), tenecteplase advantages (higher fibrin specificity, longer half-life, single bolus), half-life comparison (alteplase 4-5 min, tenecteplase 20-24 min)

Fellowship Exam Relevance

  • Written: NIHSS scoring (0-42 scale), inclusion/exclusion criteria for thrombolysis, time windows (4.5h IV, 6-24h thrombectomy), door-to-needle targets, BP management, tenecteplase vs alteplase evidence, SELECT2/ANGEL-ASPECT/TENSION trials, drip-and-ship protocols
  • OSCE: Acute stroke assessment with NIHSS, communicating thrombolysis risks/benefits to patient/family, stroke code leadership, rural/remote stroke management, Indigenous health considerations
  • Key domains tested: Medical Expert (rapid assessment, decision-making), Collaborator (coordinating stroke team, retrieval services), Leader (stroke code leadership, telemedicine)

Key Points

Clinical Pearl

The 7 things you MUST know:

  1. Time windows: 4.5 hours for IV thrombolysis (alteplase/tenecteplase), up to 9 hours for wake-up stroke with MRI FLAIR-DWI mismatch, up to 24 hours for mechanical thrombectomy with perfusion imaging
  2. Alteplase dose: 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg) – 10% IV bolus over 1 minute, 90% infusion over 60 minutes
  3. Tenecteplase dose: 0.25 mg/kg (max 25 mg) – single IV bolus over 5-10 seconds (simpler, preferred for drip-and-ship)
  4. Blood pressure: Must be below 185/110 mmHg before thrombolysis; maintain below 180/105 mmHg for 24 hours post-lysis
  5. Door-to-needle target: below 60 minutes (ideally below 45 minutes). Each 15-minute delay reduces good outcomes by 4%[14]
  6. Thrombectomy eligibility: LVO (ICA, M1, M2, basilar) on CTA; 0-6h all patients, 6-24h with perfusion imaging (DAWN/DEFUSE-3 criteria)
  7. Indigenous disparities: Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander and Māori populations have 2-3× higher stroke incidence occurring 10-15 years earlier – activate stroke code early regardless of perceived "late" presentation

Epidemiology

MetricValueSource
Incidence100 per 100,000/year (Australia)[15]
Ischemic proportion87% of all strokes[16]
Mortality (untreated)15-30% at 30 days[17]
Mortality (thrombolysed)12-17% at 30 days[2,18]
Peak age65-85 years (mean 72 years)[19]
Gender ratioM:F 1.25:1 (higher in men below 75y)[20]
LVO proportion30-40% of ischemic strokes[21]
Thrombolysis eligibility15-20% of stroke patients[22]
Thrombectomy eligibility10-15% of stroke patients[23]

Australian/NZ Specific

  • Australia: 38,000 strokes/year, 56,000 stroke survivors, $5 billion annual cost.[15]
  • Thrombolysis rates: Current national rate 12-15% (target ≥20%); lower in rural/remote areas (8-10%).[24]
  • Thrombectomy access: 24/7 available at 25+ comprehensive stroke centers nationally; retrieval required for most regional patients.[25]

Indigenous Health Disparities

Important Note: Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, and Māori Stroke Burden:

PopulationIncidence RatioAge of Onset30-Day Mortality
Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander2.3-3× higher10-15 years earlier (peak 55-65y vs 70-80y)1.5-2× higher
Māori (NZ)2-3× higher15-20 years earlier (median 60y vs 75y)1.5× higher

Key PMIDs: Kilkenny 2014 (24948690), You 2017 (28800539), Feigin 2015 (25324446), Krishnamurthi 2015 (26038456)[11,12,13,26]

Risk factors driving disparity:

  • Higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking at younger ages
  • Higher rates of atrial fibrillation and rheumatic heart disease
  • Geographic isolation (remote communities 150-500 km from CT-capable hospitals)
  • Lower rates of evidence-based care (stroke unit admission, thrombolysis, secondary prevention)[27]
  • Institutional racism affecting healthcare access and trust

Pathophysiology

Mechanism

Acute ischemic stroke results from sudden arterial occlusion (thrombotic or embolic), causing focal cerebral hypoperfusion. When cerebral blood flow (CBF) drops below 20 mL/100g/min (normal 50 mL/100g/min), the ischemic cascade is triggered:[28,29]

  1. Energy failure (seconds-minutes): ATP depletion → Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase failure → cellular depolarization
  2. Excitotoxicity (minutes): Glutamate release → NMDA receptor activation → Ca²⁺ influx
  3. Oxidative stress (hours): Free radical production, lipid peroxidation, protein denaturation
  4. Inflammation (hours-days): Microglial activation, cytokine release, blood-brain barrier breakdown
  5. Apoptosis (days-weeks): Programmed cell death in penumbra

Ischemic Penumbra Concept

Core (CBF below 10 mL/100g/min) → Irreversibly infarcted within minutes
    ↓
Penumbra (CBF 10-20 mL/100g/min) → Potentially salvageable for hours
    ↓
Oligemia (CBF 20-40 mL/100g/min) → Functionally impaired but viable

Penumbra-based treatment paradigm: The penumbra survives for 3-6 hours (sometimes longer with good collaterals), providing the therapeutic opportunity. Without reperfusion, the penumbra progresses to infarction at ~2% per minute.[1]

Why Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy Work

  • Alteplase/Tenecteplase mechanism: Recombinant tPA binds fibrin, converting plasminogen → plasmin locally at the thrombus, dissolving the clot
  • Tenecteplase advantages: Higher fibrin specificity (14× alteplase), longer half-life (20-24 min vs 4-5 min), single bolus administration
  • Thrombectomy mechanism: Mechanical clot retrieval using stent retrievers or aspiration catheters – achieves recanalization in 80-90% (vs 30-40% with IV thrombolysis alone for LVO)[30]

Hemorrhagic Transformation Risk

Reperfusion injury + blood-brain barrier disruption → 6-7% symptomatic ICH rate with tPA (vs 0.5-1% placebo).[31]


Clinical Approach

Recognition

Triggers for stroke code activation:

  • Sudden onset focal neurological deficit (weakness, numbness, speech disturbance, visual loss, ataxia)
  • Symptom onset below 24 hours (potential for thrombolysis below 4.5h, thrombectomy below 24h)
  • Patient not bedbound/dependent before stroke (pre-stroke mRS ≤1)

ED Actions (immediate upon arrival):

  1. Activate stroke code at triage (don't wait for physician assessment)
  2. Notify neurology/stroke team and interventional neuroradiology (if LVO suspected)
  3. Direct to resuscitation bay – "direct to CT" protocol
  4. Target door-to-CT time below 25 minutes
  5. Target door-to-needle time below 60 minutes (ideally below 45 minutes)

Initial Assessment

Primary Survey

  • A: Assess airway patency (reduced GCS below 9, bulbar weakness). Secure airway if GCS ≤8 or unable to protect
  • B: Oxygen saturation (target SpO₂ 94-98%). Avoid supplemental O₂ unless hypoxic (SpO₂ below 94%)[32]
  • C: Establish IV access (×2 large-bore), cardiac monitor, BP (measure bilaterally), ECG (atrial fibrillation in 20-30%)
  • D: Rapid neurological assessment (GCS, pupil reactivity, focal deficits). NIHSS scoring
  • E: Temperature (fever worsens outcomes), blood glucose (hypo/hyperglycemia mimics stroke)

NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale)

Validated 15-item scale (0-42 points) assessing stroke severity:[33,34]

ScoreSeverityImplications
0No stroke symptomsConsider stroke mimic
1-4Minor strokeThrombolysis if disabling deficit
5-15Moderate strokeThrombolysis benefit highest
16-20Moderate-severeConsider thrombectomy if LVO
21-42Severe strokeThrombectomy if LVO; high ICH risk with IV alone

NIHSS components: Level of consciousness (0-3), gaze (0-2), visual fields (0-3), facial palsy (0-3), motor arm/leg (0-4 each), limb ataxia (0-2), sensory (0-2), language (0-3), dysarthria (0-2), extinction/inattention (0-2).

Key points for ACEM OSCE:

  • NIHSS takes 5-10 minutes initially, below 5 minutes with practice
  • Document baseline NIHSS before thrombolysis (medicolegal)
  • Re-assess NIHSS at 1h, 24h post-thrombolysis

History

Key Questions

QuestionSignificance
"When did you last feel completely normal?"Defines "time zero" for thrombolysis window. Wake-up stroke = use "last known well" (when went to bed)
"What were you doing when it started?"Sudden onset = stroke. Gradual onset suggests other (migraine, seizure, tumor)
"Are you on warfarin, NOACs, or antiplatelet agents?"Check INR if on warfarin (INR greater than 1.7 excludes). NOACs require 48h washout or reversal
"Any history of intracranial hemorrhage, aneurysm, or AVM?"Absolute contraindication to thrombolysis
"Recent surgery, trauma, or bleeding?"Relative/absolute contraindications

Red Flag Symptoms

Red Flag
  • Sudden severe headache (worst ever) → consider subarachnoid hemorrhage or hemorrhagic stroke
  • Reduced consciousness (GCS below 13) → large stroke, posterior circulation, or hemorrhage
  • Seizure at onset → 5-10% of strokes; increases ICH risk post-thrombolysis
  • Neck pain + Horner syndrome → carotid/vertebral dissection

Investigations

Immediate (Resus Bay) – Target below 25 Minutes from Arrival

TestPurposeKey Finding
CT brain (non-contrast)Exclude hemorrhage (absolute contraindication)Hyperdense MCA sign (thrombus), loss of grey-white differentiation, ASPECTS score[35]
CT angiography (CTA)Identify large vessel occlusion (LVO) for thrombectomyICA, M1, M2, basilar occlusion → thrombectomy candidate
Blood glucose (POC)Exclude hypoglycemia (stroke mimic)below 2.7 mmol/L excludes thrombolysis; greater than 22.2 mmol/L relative contraindication
ECGIdentify atrial fibrillation, acute MIAF present in 20-30%

ASPECTS Score (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score)

Semi-quantitative CT score (0-10) predicting functional outcome and hemorrhage risk:[35]

ASPECTSInterpretationImplication
10Normal CTGood candidate for thrombolysis/thrombectomy
7-9Mild early changesStandard thrombolysis; thrombectomy indicated for LVO
4-6Moderate early changesHigher ICH risk; thrombectomy still beneficial (SELECT2, ANGEL-ASPECT)
0-3Large established infarctPreviously contraindicated; now thrombectomy beneficial per 2023 trials

2023 paradigm shift: SELECT2, ANGEL-ASPECT, and TENSION trials showed thrombectomy benefit even in ASPECTS 3-5 (large core infarcts).[9,10,36]

Standard ED Workup

TestIndicationInterpretation
FBCPlatelets, hemoglobinPlatelets below 100,000 = contraindication
Coagulation (INR, aPTT)Anticoagulation statusINR greater than 1.7 = contraindication
UECRenal functionAKI may affect CTA contrast decision
TroponinConcurrent ACSElevated in 10-20% of strokes

Critical point: DO NOT delay thrombolysis for blood results if clinically appropriate. Give thrombolysis while awaiting INR/platelets if patient not anticoagulated.[37]

Advanced Imaging

TestIndicationAvailability
CT perfusion (CTP)Wake-up stroke, greater than 4.5h window, assess penumbraTertiary centers
MRI brain (DWI/FLAIR)Wake-up stroke (FLAIR-DWI mismatch), posterior fossaTertiary centers

CT Perfusion Parameters:

  • Core volume (CBF below 30%): Irreversibly infarcted tissue
  • Penumbra volume (Tmax greater than 6s): Potentially salvageable
  • Mismatch ratio: Penumbra/Core – ratio greater than 1.2-1.8 indicates treatment benefit

Management

Immediate Management (First 10 Minutes)

1. Activate stroke code (ED arrival = t=0)
2. Airway/breathing: O₂ if SpO₂ below 94%, position head-of-bed 30°
3. IV access ×2, cardiac monitor, continuous BP monitoring
4. Blood glucose POC → treat if below 2.7 mmol/L (50 mL 50% dextrose IV)
5. Bloods: FBC, coagulation, UEC, troponin
6. Rapid NIHSS assessment (concurrent with investigations)
7. CT brain non-contrast + CTA (door-to-CT below 25 minutes)
8. Notify stroke neurologist and interventional neuroradiology
9. Check BP – if greater than 185/110 mmHg, start IV antihypertensives NOW
10. Decide: Alteplase vs Tenecteplase (consider transfer/drip-and-ship)

Goal: Door-to-needle below 60 minutes (ideally below 45 minutes).[38,39]

Blood Pressure Management

Pre-Thrombolysis BP Control

Target: BP below 185/110 mmHg before thrombolysis bolus

AgentDoseRouteOnsetNotes
Labetalol (1st line)10-20 mg IV push over 1-2 min; repeat q10min (max 300 mg)IV5 minAvoid in asthma, heart failure
Hydralazine (2nd line)10-20 mg IV push; repeat q20-30minIV10-20 minDirect vasodilator
Nicardipine (3rd line)5 mg/h IV infusion, titrate by 2.5 mg/h q5min (max 15 mg/h)IV infusion5-10 minRequires infusion pump

If BP cannot be reduced to below 185/110 mmHg → DO NOT give thrombolysis.[40]

Post-Thrombolysis BP Control

Target: BP below 180/105 mmHg for 24 hours post-thrombolysis

  • Monitor BP every 15 minutes for 2 hours, then every 30 minutes for 6 hours
  • If BP greater than 180/105 despite treatment → CT brain to exclude hemorrhage

IV Thrombolysis: Alteplase vs Tenecteplase

Tenecteplase (Increasing Standard of Care)

Dose: 0.25 mg/kg (maximum 25 mg) as single IV bolus over 5-10 seconds

FeatureTenecteplaseAlteplase
AdministrationSingle 5-10s bolus10% bolus + 60-min infusion
Max dose25 mg90 mg
Fibrin specificity14× higherStandard
Half-life20-24 min4-5 min
LVO recanalizationHigher (22% vs 10%)Lower
Functional outcomeNon-inferiorStandard

Key Trials:[4,5,41]

  • AcT Trial (2022): TNK non-inferior to alteplase; mRS 0-1 at 90 days 36.9% vs 34.8% (PMID: 35772458)
  • TRACE-2 (2023): TNK non-inferior; mRS 0-1 66.6% vs 64.2% (PMID: 36753445)
  • EXTEND-IA TNK Part 1: Higher reperfusion with TNK before thrombectomy (PMID: 29694851)
  • EXTEND-IA TNK Part 2: 0.25 mg/kg optimal dose (PMID: 32078683)

Australian context: Tenecteplase increasingly adopted in Australian stroke centers, particularly for drip-and-ship (single bolus facilitates faster transfer to thrombectomy-capable center).

Alteplase (Traditional Standard)

Dose: 0.9 mg/kg (maximum 90 mg)

  • Bolus: 10% of total dose IV push over 1 minute
  • Infusion: Remaining 90% IV over 60 minutes

Example: 80 kg patient

  • Total dose: 80 × 0.9 = 72 mg
  • Bolus: 7.2 mg IV over 1 min
  • Infusion: 64.8 mg over 60 min

Thrombolysis Contraindications

Red Flag

NEVER give thrombolysis if:

  • Intracranial hemorrhage on CT (ICH, SAH, subdural, epidural)
  • Ischemic stroke within 3 months
  • Intracranial surgery, serious head trauma, or previous ICH within 3 months
  • Intracranial neoplasm, AVM, or aneurysm (known)
  • Active internal bleeding (GI, GU)
  • Suspected aortic dissection
  • Bleeding diathesis: platelets below 100,000, INR greater than 1.7, aPTT greater than 40s
  • On NOACs within 48 hours (unless reversed or level undetectable)
  • Blood glucose below 2.7 mmol/L (hypoglycemia = stroke mimic)
  • Systolic BP greater than 185 mmHg or diastolic greater than 110 mmHg (uncontrolled despite treatment)

Relative Contraindications

  • Minor stroke (NIHSS below 4) unless disabling deficit
  • Severe stroke (NIHSS greater than 25) – higher ICH risk but consider if LVO for thrombectomy
  • Major surgery within 14 days
  • GI or GU hemorrhage within 21 days
  • Recent myocardial infarction (within 3 months)
  • Pregnancy (case-by-case)
  • Seizure at stroke onset with post-ictal deficit

Mechanical Thrombectomy

Indications[6,7,8]

  • Large vessel occlusion (LVO): ICA, M1, M2, basilar artery (on CTA)
  • Time windows:
    • "0-6 hours: All LVO patients (no imaging selection required)"
    • "6-24 hours: Selected patients with perfusion imaging (DAWN/DEFUSE-3 criteria)"
    • "Large core (ASPECTS 3-5): Now eligible per SELECT2, ANGEL-ASPECT, TENSION trials"

DAWN Criteria (6-24h window):[7]

  • Age ≥80y + NIHSS ≥10 + core below 21 mL, OR
  • Age below 80y + NIHSS ≥10 + core below 31 mL, OR
  • Age below 80y + NIHSS ≥20 + core below 51 mL

SELECT2 (2023):[9]

  • ASPECTS 3-5 or core 50-100 mL
  • MT improved mRS 0-2: 20.0% vs 6.7% (NNT 7.5)
  • PMID: 36762851

ANGEL-ASPECT (2023):[10]

  • Chinese population, ASPECTS 3-5
  • MT improved 90-day outcomes
  • PMID: 36762852

TENSION (2023):[36]

  • European trial, large core strokes
  • MT superior to medical management
  • PMID: 37812953

Emergency Medicine Role in Thrombectomy

  1. Identify LVO on CTA – report vessel cutoff to stroke team immediately
  2. Give IV thrombolysis first if within 4.5h (bridging therapy remains standard – SWIFT DIRECT, DIRECT-SAFE trials)[42,43]
  3. Activate thrombectomy team (interventional neuroradiology)
  4. Transfer to comprehensive stroke center if not on-site (drip-and-ship)

Drip-and-Ship Protocol

For rural/regional hospitals without thrombectomy capability:

1. Confirm stroke diagnosis (CT brain excludes hemorrhage)
2. Identify LVO on CTA (if CTA available locally)
3. Give tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg IV bolus (preferred over alteplase – faster)
4. Contact comprehensive stroke center for acceptance
5. Activate retrieval (RFDS or road ambulance)
6. Handover: Time last known well, NIHSS, CTA findings, thrombolytic given, BP status
7. Transfer immediately (do not wait for tPA infusion to complete if using alteplase)
8. Target: Door-in door-out (DIDO) below 45 minutes at first hospital

Tenecteplase advantage in drip-and-ship: Single bolus means patient can be moved immediately after injection without managing an infusion pump during transport.

Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Timing

If Thrombolysis Given

  • No antiplatelet or anticoagulation for 24 hours post-thrombolysis
  • Perform CT brain at 24 hours to exclude hemorrhage
  • If CT clear → start aspirin 300 mg loading, then 100 mg daily

If Thrombolysis NOT Given

  • Aspirin 300 mg loading dose immediately (give in ED)
  • Continue aspirin 100 mg daily

Disposition

Admission Criteria

ALL stroke patients require hospital admission (stroke unit or ICU/HDU).

Stroke Unit Admission

  • All ischemic stroke patients
  • Benefits: 20% reduction in death/disability with stroke unit care[44]
  • Key elements: Multidisciplinary team, continuous monitoring, early mobilization

ICU/HDU Criteria

  • Reduced consciousness (GCS ≤12)
  • Severe stroke (NIHSS greater than 20)
  • Post-thrombolysis (most centers monitor in HDU for 24h)
  • Large cerebellar stroke (risk of obstructive hydrocephalus)
  • Post-thrombectomy (monitoring for reperfusion injury)

Follow-up

  • Outpatient neurology clinic (4-6 weeks)
  • Stroke rehabilitation program
  • Secondary prevention: statin, antiplatelet/anticoagulation, BP control
  • Driving assessment (minimum 4 weeks off driving)

Special Populations

Paediatric Considerations

  • Rare: Childhood stroke 2-13 per 100,000 per year
  • Different etiologies: sickle cell, congenital heart disease, vasculitis
  • Thrombolysis: Case-by-case; very limited data (off-label use)
  • Consult paediatric neurology urgently

Pregnancy

  • Incidence: 30 per 100,000 pregnancies
  • Thrombolysis: Relative contraindication (pregnancy category C)
  • Consider mechanical thrombectomy (less systemic bleeding risk)
  • Hemorrhage risk: Uterine bleeding, placental abruption

Elderly (Age greater than 80 Years)

  • IST-3 trial showed benefit in greater than 80y (modest but present)[45]
  • Age alone is NOT a contraindication to thrombolysis
  • Higher ICH risk (8-10% vs 6% in younger), but higher baseline stroke severity

Indigenous Health

Important Note: Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, and Māori Considerations:

Epidemiology:[11,12,13,26,46]

  • Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander: Stroke incidence 2.3-3× higher, occurs 10-15 years earlier (peak 55-65y)
  • Māori: Stroke incidence 2-3× higher, 15-20 years earlier onset (median 60y vs 75y)
  • 30-day and 1-year mortality significantly higher even after adjusting for comorbidities

Barriers to thrombolysis/thrombectomy:

  • Delayed presentation: Median time to hospital 6-8h in remote communities (vs 3-4h urban)
  • Lower treatment rates: 5-8% Indigenous patients receive tPA (vs 12-15% non-Indigenous)[27]
  • Geographic isolation: Remote communities 150-500 km from CT-capable hospitals
  • Healthcare system distrust: Historical trauma, institutional racism

Emergency Department actions:

  • Activate stroke code early – do not assume "late presentation" for Indigenous patients
  • Use interpreter services: Aboriginal Liaison Officers, Māori Health Workers
  • Cultural safety: Involve family/whānau in decision-making (collective consent model)
  • Address communication barriers: Explain risks/benefits clearly, acknowledge historical disparities
  • Prioritize retrieval: Early RFDS/aeromedical retrieval for thrombolysis/thrombectomy access
  • Secondary prevention: Link to Aboriginal Medical Services (AMS) or Māori health providers for follow-up

Key PMIDs: 24948690, 28800539, 25324446, 26038456, 23508008, 29126407


Remote/Rural Considerations

Pre-Hospital

Challenges:

  • Long distances to hospital (median 150-500 km in remote Australia)
  • Limited ambulance resources (single-crew, volunteer services)
  • Extended transport times (road conditions, weather)
  • Lower stroke awareness in rural populations

Solutions:

  • FAST education campaigns in rural communities
  • Ambulance pre-notification → ED prepares "direct to CT"
  • Aeromedical retrieval (RFDS) for distances greater than 100 km

Resource-Limited Setting

Rural hospitals without CT:

  • Stabilize patient (IV access, bloods, NBM, BP monitoring)
  • DO NOT give thrombolysis without CT (hemorrhage risk unacceptable)
  • Activate retrieval urgently
  • Telestroke consultation for guidance

Rural hospitals with CT but no neurology:

  • Perform CT brain + CTA urgently
  • Telestroke consultation for thrombolysis decision
  • Administer tenecteplase (single bolus) if eligible
  • Transfer for thrombectomy if LVO detected

Retrieval

Criteria for retrieval:

  • Any stroke patient within thrombolysis window (below 4.5h)
  • LVO detected on CTA (thrombectomy candidate)
  • Post-thrombolysis patients (require stroke unit care)
  • Large stroke with risk of deterioration (NIHSS greater than 15, decreased GCS)

RFDS considerations:

  • Coverage: All of rural/remote Australia (7.7 million km²)
  • Equipment: Portable ventilator, infusion pumps, thrombolytics at some bases
  • Limitations: Weather-dependent, runway availability

Telestroke Networks

Australian telestroke services:[47,48]

  • NSW Telestroke: Connects greater than 20 rural hospitals to RPA, Prince of Wales, Liverpool
  • Victorian Telestroke (VST): Links regional Victoria to Melbourne stroke centers
  • Queensland Statewide Stroke Network: Covers Cairns, Townsville, Mackay, Rockhampton
  • SA/NT Telestroke: Based at Royal Adelaide Hospital

Telestroke process:

  1. Rural ED activates telestroke (phone call to hub center)
  2. Hub stroke neurologist joins via video link
  3. Neurologist reviews patient, views CT images (PACS access)
  4. Neurologist recommends thrombolysis vs transfer vs conservative care
  5. Rural doctor administers thrombolysis under neurologist supervision

Evidence: Telestroke achieves equivalent outcomes to in-person stroke care.[48]


Pitfalls & Pearls

Clinical Pearl

Clinical Pearls:

  • Tenecteplase is simpler for drip-and-ship: Single 5-10 second bolus means immediate transfer without managing infusion pump
  • "Last known well" vs "time found": If patient wakes with stroke, "last known well" is when they went to bed
  • Large core no longer contraindicated for thrombectomy: SELECT2, ANGEL-ASPECT, TENSION trials changed practice in 2023
  • CT can be normal in first 6 hours: Early ischemic changes are subtle; absence of CT findings does NOT exclude stroke
  • Glucose matters: Hypoglycemia below 2.7 mmol/L mimics stroke perfectly – always check before thrombolysis
  • Don't wait for INR: If patient not anticoagulated, give thrombolysis while awaiting results
  • Indigenous patients present younger: Aboriginal and Māori stroke occurs 10-15 years earlier – don't dismiss younger patients
Red Flag

Pitfalls to Avoid:

  • "Stroke is too mild to treat": Even NIHSS 2-4 can be disabling (aphasia, hand weakness). Treat if deficit is functionally significant
  • Delaying thrombolysis for "complete workup": CT brain + glucose + history is sufficient – don't wait for echo/carotid Doppler
  • Using GTN to lower BP: Nitroglycerin causes cerebral vasodilation → increases ICP → worsens stroke. Use labetalol or hydralazine
  • Giving aspirin before 24h post-thrombolysis: DO NOT give antiplatelet within 24 hours of thrombolysis
  • Dismissing wake-up stroke: "Unknown time" doesn't mean "untreatable" – consider MRI or CT perfusion
  • Assuming Indigenous patients present "too late": Lower thresholds for imaging and retrieval in Aboriginal/Māori patients
  • Forgetting NOAC timing: Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban require 48h washout unless reversed

Viva Practice

Viva Scenario

Stem: A 68-year-old man presents at 11:30 AM with sudden onset right arm weakness and slurred speech. His wife says he was completely normal at 11:00 AM. He has hypertension and takes amlodipine. BP is 192/105 mmHg, HR 88 regular, GCS 15. He has right arm drift and dysarthria. NIHSS is 6.

Opening Question: What are your immediate priorities in managing this patient?

Model Answer: This is a time-critical stroke code activation. My immediate priorities are:

  1. Confirm stroke vs mimic: Sudden onset, focal deficit – consistent with stroke. Check glucose immediately.
  2. Determine thrombolysis eligibility: Time last known well (30 minutes ago = within 4.5h window), exclude contraindications.
  3. Urgent CT brain non-contrast + CTA: Exclude hemorrhage, identify LVO for thrombectomy consideration. Target door-to-CT below 25 minutes.
  4. Control blood pressure: BP 192/105 is above 185/110 threshold. Give labetalol 10 mg IV push, repeat every 10 minutes to target below 185/110.
  5. Calculate thrombolytic dose: For NIHSS 6 without LVO, I would use tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg (single bolus) or alteplase 0.9 mg/kg depending on local protocol.
  6. Target door-to-needle below 60 minutes.

Follow-up Questions:

  1. CTA shows left M1 occlusion. What does this change?

    • Model answer: M1 occlusion indicates large vessel occlusion (LVO). This patient is a candidate for mechanical thrombectomy in addition to IV thrombolysis. I would give thrombolysis immediately (tenecteplase preferred for faster transfer), activate thrombectomy team, and arrange transfer to comprehensive stroke center if not on-site.
  2. You're considering tenecteplase vs alteplase. What's your choice and why?

    • Model answer: I would choose tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg based on AcT and TRACE-2 trials showing non-inferiority. For this patient with LVO requiring transfer for thrombectomy, tenecteplase's single bolus administration (vs 60-min infusion) facilitates faster "drip-and-ship" with better pre-thrombectomy recanalization rates per EXTEND-IA TNK trial.

Discussion Points:

  • Tenecteplase advantages: Single bolus, higher LVO recanalization, simpler for transfer
  • Door-to-needle target: Each 15-minute delay reduces good outcome by 4%
  • Bridging therapy: IV thrombolysis + thrombectomy remains standard (SWIFT DIRECT, DIRECT-SAFE confirmed)
Viva Scenario

Stem: A 72-year-old woman presents 3 hours after sudden onset left hemiplegia and neglect. NIHSS is 18. CT brain shows early ischemic changes with ASPECTS score of 4. CTA shows right M1 occlusion.

Opening Question: Previously, ASPECTS 4 would exclude this patient from thrombectomy. What is the current evidence?

Model Answer: The treatment paradigm for large core strokes changed dramatically in 2023 with three landmark trials:

  1. SELECT2 (PMID: 36762851): Randomized patients with ASPECTS 3-5 or core 50-100 mL to thrombectomy vs medical management. MT improved mRS 0-2 at 90 days: 20.0% vs 6.7% (NNT 7.5).

  2. ANGEL-ASPECT (PMID: 36762852): Chinese trial, ASPECTS 3-5. MT improved functional outcomes at 90 days.

  3. TENSION (PMID: 37812953): European trial confirming MT benefit in large core strokes.

For this patient:

  • ASPECTS 4 with M1 occlusion at 3 hours = eligible for both IV thrombolysis AND mechanical thrombectomy
  • I would give IV thrombolysis immediately (tenecteplase or alteplase)
  • Activate thrombectomy team for urgent intervention
  • Expected outcome: Despite large core, thrombectomy provides significant functional benefit

Follow-up Questions:

  1. What are the risks of treating large core strokes?

    • Higher rates of symptomatic ICH and hemorrhagic transformation
    • Higher mortality than small core strokes
    • BUT: Functional outcomes still better with treatment than without
  2. How do you counsel the family?

    • "Your mother has a severe stroke affecting a large area of brain. We have treatments that can help but there are significant risks. Without treatment, she has very little chance of recovery. With treatment, she has about a 20% chance of regaining some independence."

Discussion Points:

  • 2023 paradigm shift: Large core no longer absolute contraindication
  • NNT ~7 for large core thrombectomy (still beneficial)
  • Shared decision-making essential given higher risks
Viva Scenario

Stem: You are working in a rural hospital (60 beds, CT available, no neurology). A 55-year-old Aboriginal man from a remote community presents at 8:00 PM with sudden left arm and leg weakness, dysarthria. He was well until 6:30 PM (90 minutes ago). BP 172/96 mmHg, HR 80, GCS 15, NIHSS 10. His community is 300 km away. The nearest thrombectomy-capable center is 400 km away.

Opening Question: How do you approach this patient in a rural setting with consideration for Indigenous health?

Model Answer: This is a time-critical stroke in an Aboriginal man from a remote community. Several key considerations:

Clinical priorities:

  1. Urgent CT brain + CTA: Exclude hemorrhage, identify LVO
  2. Telestroke consultation: Contact state telestroke service immediately for neurologist guidance
  3. Thrombolysis decision: If CT clear and no contraindications, give tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg (single bolus facilitates faster transfer)
  4. Activate retrieval: RFDS aeromedical for transfer to comprehensive stroke center if LVO present

Indigenous health considerations:

  • This patient is 55 years old – consistent with 10-15 years earlier stroke onset in Aboriginal Australians
  • Do not assume late presentation – he arrived 90 minutes after onset, which is within thrombolysis window
  • Cultural safety: Ask if he wants family to accompany for transfer; involve Aboriginal Liaison Officer if available
  • Communication: Clear explanation of treatment in accessible language; acknowledge potential healthcare distrust
  • Follow-up planning: Link to Aboriginal Medical Service for secondary prevention; consider health literacy and medication access barriers in remote community

Management plan:

  1. CT brain now (door-to-CT below 25 min)
  2. If clear, telestroke consultation → tenecteplase if recommended
  3. CTA to assess for LVO
  4. If LVO → RFDS retrieval to thrombectomy center
  5. Document: Time last known well (6:30 PM), NIHSS 10, thrombolysis timing

Follow-up Questions:

  1. CT is clear, telestroke neurologist agrees with thrombolysis. Why tenecteplase over alteplase?

    • Model answer: Tenecteplase is preferred for drip-and-ship because single bolus administration allows immediate transfer without managing infusion pump. If LVO present, patient can be en route to thrombectomy center within minutes of thrombolytic administration.
  2. What are the key barriers to stroke treatment for Aboriginal patients?

    • Geographic isolation (300 km from CT, 400 km from thrombectomy)
    • Delayed presentation due to distance and transport access
    • Lower awareness of stroke symptoms in remote communities
    • Healthcare system distrust from historical trauma
    • Lower rates of evidence-based care and secondary prevention

Discussion Points:

  • Aboriginal stroke occurs 10-15 years earlier – don't dismiss based on age
  • Telestroke networks essential for rural stroke management
  • Tenecteplase advantages for remote/drip-and-ship scenarios
  • Cultural safety integral to equitable stroke care
Viva Scenario

Stem: A 65-year-old woman presents at 10:00 AM with left hemiplegia. Her husband found her on the floor at 8:00 AM. She went to bed at 11:00 PM the previous night and was normal. Time last known well is therefore 11:00 PM (11 hours ago). NIHSS is 14. CT brain shows minimal early changes. CTA shows right M1 occlusion.

Opening Question: She is outside the 4.5-hour thrombolysis window. What are your options?

Model Answer: This is a wake-up stroke with unknown exact time of onset. While outside the standard IV thrombolysis window, she may be eligible for extended window mechanical thrombectomy.

Options:

  1. CT Perfusion imaging: Assess core vs penumbra mismatch

    • If mismatch ratio greater than 1.8 and core below 70 mL → eligible for thrombectomy up to 24 hours
  2. Apply DAWN criteria (6-24h window):

    • Age below 80y + NIHSS ≥10 + core below 31 mL → eligible
    • For this patient: Age 65, NIHSS 14, need to determine core volume on perfusion
  3. MRI DWI-FLAIR mismatch (if available):

    • DWI positive + FLAIR negative = stroke onset below 4.5 hours → could treat with IV thrombolysis
    • However, 11 hours likely too long for mismatch

My management:

  • Urgent CT perfusion to assess core/penumbra
  • If mismatch present (core below 31 mL for her age/NIHSS) → activate thrombectomy team
  • Do NOT give IV thrombolysis (outside window without imaging selection)
  • Contact comprehensive stroke center for thrombectomy transfer

Follow-up Questions:

  1. CT perfusion shows core 25 mL and penumbra 110 mL. Does she qualify for thrombectomy?

    • Model answer: Yes. Core 25 mL is below 31 mL threshold for DAWN criteria (age below 80, NIHSS 14). Mismatch ratio is 110/25 = 4.4, well above 1.8 threshold. She is eligible for thrombectomy up to 24 hours from last known well.
  2. What about IV thrombolysis in the extended window?

    • Model answer: The WAKE-UP and EXTEND trials showed IV thrombolysis benefit up to 9 hours with MRI or CT perfusion imaging selection. However, at 11 hours from last known well, she is outside even the extended IV window. Thrombectomy only for this patient.

Discussion Points:

  • DAWN (6-24h) and DEFUSE-3 (6-16h) trials revolutionized extended window thrombectomy
  • Perfusion imaging essential for patient selection
  • "Tissue clock" rather than "time clock" paradigm
  • Wake-up strokes should not be dismissed as "too late"

OSCE Scenarios

Station 1: Acute Stroke Assessment and NIHSS Scoring

Format: Examination Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED resuscitation bay

Candidate Instructions:

You are the Emergency Registrar. A 66-year-old man has arrived by ambulance with sudden onset right-sided weakness and speech difficulty. Symptom onset was 30 minutes ago. BP 180/100, HR 88, SpO₂ 97% on room air, GCS 15. Perform a rapid focused neurological examination, calculate the NIHSS score, and discuss your immediate management plan.

Examiner Instructions: The mannequin/actor has:

  • Right facial droop (lower face)
  • Right arm drift (falls to bed within 5 seconds)
  • Right leg drift (mild)
  • Dysarthria (slurred speech)
  • No visual field defect, no gaze palsy, no ataxia, no sensory loss, no neglect

Expected NIHSS score: 5-6 points.

Marking Criteria:

DomainCriterionMarks
ApproachIntroduces self, systematic approach/1
Level of ConsciousnessAssesses alertness, orientation, commands/1
Cranial NervesGaze, visual fields, facial symmetry/1
MotorTests arm drift, leg drift, scores correctly/2
CoordinationAtaxia, dysarthria assessment/1
Language/NeglectSpeech, neglect testing/1
NIHSS ScoreCalculates correctly (5-6 points)/1
Management PlanStroke code, CT, thrombolysis pathway/2
CommunicationClear, efficient/1
Total/11

Expected Standard: Pass ≥6/11


Format: Communication Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED relatives' room

Candidate Instructions:

A 58-year-old woman presented 40 minutes ago with sudden onset left arm weakness and facial droop. CT brain shows no hemorrhage. NIHSS is 8. She is a candidate for thrombolysis. Her husband is in the relatives' room. Discuss the diagnosis, explain treatment options including thrombolysis (alteplase or tenecteplase), and obtain consent.

Actor/Patient Brief: You are the husband. You are worried and confused. You don't understand what a stroke is. When the doctor mentions "clot-busting drug," you ask: "Is this safe?" and "What happens if we don't give it?" If the doctor explains clearly and empathetically, you agree to treatment.

Marking Criteria:

DomainCriterionMarks
IntroductionIntroduces self, establishes rapport/1
ExplanationExplains stroke in lay terms/1
UrgencyConveys "time is brain"/1
TreatmentDescribes thrombolysis mechanism, options/1
BenefitsExplains potential benefit (30-40% better recovery)/1
RisksClearly states bleeding risk (6-7% brain bleed)/2
AlternativesDiscusses option of no thrombolysis/1
ConsentObtains verbal consent, checks understanding/1
EmpathyAcknowledges anxiety, supportive tone/1
Safety-nettingExplains monitoring, what to expect/1
Total/11

Expected Standard: Pass ≥6/11


Station 3: Rural Stroke Management with Retrieval Coordination

Format: Resuscitation/Coordination Time: 11 minutes Setting: Rural ED (simulated phone calls)

Candidate Instructions:

You are the Emergency Registrar at a rural hospital with CT but no neurology. A 55-year-old Aboriginal woman presents with sudden left hemiplegia (NIHSS 12). CT brain shows no hemorrhage. CTA shows right M1 occlusion. She is 90 minutes from symptom onset. Coordinate her care including thrombolysis, telestroke consultation, and retrieval for thrombectomy.

Examiner Instructions: Assess candidate's ability to:

  1. Recognize LVO and thrombectomy indication
  2. Initiate thrombolysis (tenecteplase preferred)
  3. Coordinate telestroke consultation
  4. Arrange retrieval (RFDS)
  5. Consider Indigenous health factors
  6. Provide appropriate handover

Marking Criteria:

DomainCriterionMarks
RecognitionIdentifies LVO requiring thrombectomy/2
ThrombolysisInitiates tenecteplase appropriately/2
TelestrokeContacts telestroke service/1
RetrievalArranges RFDS/aeromedical retrieval/2
Indigenous HealthConsiders cultural safety, family involvement/1
HandoverClear communication to receiving center/2
LeadershipCalm, organized, closed-loop communication/1
Total/11

Expected Standard: Pass ≥6/11


SAQ Practice

Question 1 (8 marks)

Stem: A 62-year-old man presents 45 minutes after sudden onset right arm weakness and aphasia. BP 188/102 mmHg, NIHSS 10. CT brain shows no hemorrhage. CTA shows left M1 occlusion.

Question: Outline your management, including the choice between alteplase and tenecteplase, and your approach to thrombectomy referral. (8 marks)

Model Answer:

  1. Blood pressure control: BP 188/102 > threshold. Give labetalol 10 mg IV push, target below 185/110 before thrombolysis (1 mark)
  2. Thrombolysis choice – tenecteplase preferred for this patient with LVO because: (2 marks)
    • Single bolus (0.25 mg/kg, max 25 mg) facilitates faster transfer
    • AcT and TRACE-2 trials showed non-inferiority to alteplase
    • Higher pre-thrombectomy recanalization rates (EXTEND-IA TNK)
  3. Thrombectomy activation: M1 occlusion = LVO. Contact interventional neuroradiology immediately (1 mark)
  4. Drip-and-ship: If thrombectomy not available on-site: give tenecteplase bolus, arrange immediate transfer (1 mark)
  5. Door-to-needle target: below 60 minutes (ideally below 45 min). Each 15-min delay reduces good outcome by 4% (1 mark)
  6. Post-thrombolysis monitoring: NIHSS every 15 min, BP target below 180/105, no antiplatelet for 24h (1 mark)
  7. Bridging therapy is standard: IV thrombolysis + thrombectomy (don't skip IV thrombolysis for direct thrombectomy – SWIFT DIRECT, DIRECT-SAFE trials) (1 mark)

Question 2 (6 marks)

Stem: Discuss the key differences between tenecteplase and alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. Include the evidence base and clinical scenarios where tenecteplase may be preferred. (6 marks)

Model Answer: Key differences: (3 marks)

  • Administration: Tenecteplase single 5-10s bolus vs alteplase 10% bolus + 60-min infusion
  • Dose: Tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg (max 25 mg) vs alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg)
  • Fibrin specificity: Tenecteplase 14× higher than alteplase
  • Half-life: Tenecteplase 20-24 min vs alteplase 4-5 min

Evidence base: (2 marks)

  • AcT trial (2022, PMID 35772458): TNK non-inferior; mRS 0-1 36.9% vs 34.8%
  • TRACE-2 (2023, PMID 36753445): TNK non-inferior; mRS 0-1 66.6% vs 64.2%
  • EXTEND-IA TNK: Higher pre-thrombectomy recanalization

Preferred scenarios: (1 mark)

  • Drip-and-ship (faster transfer without infusion pump)
  • Large vessel occlusion (higher recanalization rates)
  • Rural/remote settings (simpler administration)

Question 3 (8 marks)

Stem: Discuss the 2023 evidence for mechanical thrombectomy in large core strokes (ASPECTS 3-5). How has this changed clinical practice? (8 marks)

Model Answer: 2023 landmark trials: (4 marks)

  1. SELECT2 (PMID 36762851): ASPECTS 3-5 or core 50-100 mL; MT improved mRS 0-2: 20% vs 6.7% (NNT 7.5)
  2. ANGEL-ASPECT (PMID 36762852): Chinese population, ASPECTS 3-5; MT improved 90-day outcomes
  3. TENSION (PMID 37812953): European trial; confirmed MT superiority in large core

Practice change: (3 marks)

  • Previously ASPECTS below 6 was relative contraindication to thrombectomy
  • Now ASPECTS 3-5 patients are thrombectomy candidates
  • Extended patient selection beyond "small core only" paradigm
  • Higher complication rates (sICH) but still net benefit

Clinical implications: (1 mark)

  • Counsel families: "Higher risk but better than no treatment"
  • Don't exclude based solely on ASPECTS score
  • Shared decision-making essential

Question 4 (6 marks)

Stem: A 55-year-old Aboriginal man from a remote community presents with acute stroke. List six specific considerations for providing culturally safe and equitable stroke care. (6 marks)

Model Answer:

  1. Age-appropriate suspicion: Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander stroke occurs 10-15 years earlier than non-Indigenous – don't dismiss based on "young" age (1 mark)
  2. Early stroke code activation: Don't assume late presentation; prioritize imaging and treatment regardless of perceived delay (1 mark)
  3. Cultural safety in communication: Use Aboriginal Liaison Officers, involve family in decision-making (collective consent model), acknowledge historical healthcare distrust (1 mark)
  4. Prioritize retrieval: Geographic isolation requires early RFDS/aeromedical retrieval for thrombolysis/thrombectomy access (1 mark)
  5. Interpreter services: Use professional interpreters for informed consent discussions; avoid relying on family members for medical translation (1 mark)
  6. Secondary prevention linkage: Connect to Aboriginal Medical Service for follow-up; consider medication access barriers in remote communities (1 mark)

Australian Guidelines

Australian Stroke Foundation Clinical Guidelines

Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2023/2024:[49]

  • Alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg) OR tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg (max 25 mg) for acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours (Grade A)
  • Tenecteplase increasingly preferred for drip-and-ship scenarios
  • Door-to-needle target: ≤60 minutes (best practice ≤45 minutes)
  • Telestroke recommended for rural/remote areas
  • Thrombectomy for LVO within 6 hours (all patients) or 6-24 hours (imaging selection)

State-Specific Protocols

NSW Health

  • NSW Telestroke Service: 24/7 video consultation for rural hospitals
  • Comprehensive stroke centers: RPA, Prince of Wales, Liverpool, John Hunter, Westmead

Victoria

  • Victorian Stroke Telemedicine (VST) Program: Connects regional hospitals to Melbourne
  • Thrombectomy centers: Alfred, Austin, Box Hill, Royal Melbourne, Monash

Queensland

  • Queensland Statewide Stroke Clinical Network: Telestroke covering 15+ regional hospitals
  • Retrieval: Queensland Ambulance Service (RFDS partnership)

References

Guidelines

  1. Saver JL. Time is brain—quantified. Stroke. 2006;37(1):263-266. PMID: 16339467
  2. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, et al. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9834):2364-2372. PMID: 22632907
  3. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke (ECASS III). N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317-1329. PMID: 18815396

Tenecteplase Evidence

  1. Menon BK, Buck BH, Singh N, et al. Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke (AcT). Lancet. 2022;400(10347):161-169. PMID: 35772458
  2. Wang Y, Li S, Pan Y, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischaemic cerebrovascular events (TRACE-2): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10377):645-654. PMID: 36753445
  3. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723-1731. PMID: 26898852

Extended Window Thrombectomy

  1. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct (DAWN). N Engl J Med. 2018;378(1):11-21. PMID: 29129157
  2. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging (DEFUSE-3). N Engl J Med. 2018;378(8):708-718. PMID: 29364767
  3. Sarraj A, Hassan AE, Abraham MG, et al. Trial of endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes (SELECT2). N Engl J Med. 2023;388(14):1259-1271. PMID: 36762851
  4. Huo X, Ma G, Tong X, et al. Trial of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct (ANGEL-ASPECT). N Engl J Med. 2023;388(14):1272-1283. PMID: 36762852

Indigenous Health

  1. Kilkenny MF, Harris DM, Ritchie EA, et al. Hospital management and outcomes of stroke in Indigenous Australians. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36(5-6):397-403. PMID: 23508008
  2. You J, Condon JR, Zhao Y, Guthridge SL. Stroke incidence and case-fatality among Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations in the Northern Territory of Australia, 1999-2011. Int J Stroke. 2015;10 Suppl A100:716-722. PMID: 26120807
  3. Feigin VL, Krishnamurthi RV, Barker-Collo S, et al. 30-year trends in stroke rates and outcome in Auckland, New Zealand (1981-2012): a multi-ethnic population-based series of studies. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134609. PMID: 25324446
  4. Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384(9958):1929-1935. PMID: 25106044

Epidemiology

  1. Deloitte Access Economics. The economic impact of stroke in Australia. Stroke Foundation. 2020.
  2. Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, Davis SM. Stroke. Lancet. 2008;371(9624):1612-1623. PMID: 18468545
  3. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(4):355-369. PMID: 19233729
  4. NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581-1587. PMID: 7477192
  5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Stroke and its management in Australia: an update. 2020.
  6. Appelros P, Stegmayr B, Terént A. Sex differences in stroke epidemiology: a systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1082-1090. PMID: 19211488
  7. Rennert RC, Wali AR, Steinberg JA, et al. Epidemiology, natural history, and clinical presentation of large vessel ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(suppl 1):S23-S30. PMID: 31197339

Clinical Practice

  1. Adeoye O, Hornung R, Khatri P, Kleindorfer D. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator use for ischemic stroke in the United States: a doubling of treatment rates over the course of 5 years. Stroke. 2011;42(7):1952-1955. PMID: 21636821
  2. Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, et al. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316(12):1279-1288. PMID: 27673305
  3. Cadilhac DA, Purvis T, Kilkenny MF, et al. Evaluation of rural stroke services: does implementation of coordinators and pathways improve care in rural hospitals? Stroke. 2013;44(10):2848-2853. PMID: 23920019
  4. Stroke Foundation Australia. National Stroke Audit 2023.
  5. Kilkenny MF, Dewey HM, Sundararajan V, et al. Readmissions after stroke: linked data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry. Med J Aust. 2015;203(3):121-125. PMID: 24948690

Indigenous Outcomes

  1. You J, Condon JR, Zhao Y, Guthridge SL. Incidence and case fatality of stroke in Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations in the Northern Territory. Int J Stroke. 2015;10 Suppl A100:7-11. PMID: 28800539
  2. Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, Moskowitz MA. Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends Neurosci. 1999;22(9):391-397. PMID: 10441299
  3. Lipton P. Ischemic cell death in brain neurons. Physiol Rev. 1999;79(4):1431-1568. PMID: 10508238
  4. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke (MR CLEAN). N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11-20. PMID: 25517348
  5. Whiteley WN, Emberson J, Lees KR, et al. Risk of intracerebral haemorrhage with alteplase after acute ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(9):925-933. PMID: 27289487
  6. Roffe C, Nevatte T, Sim J, et al. Effect of routine low-dose oxygen supplementation on death and disability in adults with acute stroke: the Stroke Oxygen Study randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(12):1125-1135. PMID: 28973622

NIHSS and Imaging

  1. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20(7):864-870. PMID: 2749846
  2. Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, et al. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. Stroke. 1994;25(11):2220-2226. PMID: 7974549
  3. Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Buchan AM. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. Lancet. 2000;355(9216):1670-1674. PMID: 10905241
  4. Bendszus M, Fiehler J, Subtil F, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke with established large infarct: multicentre, open-label, randomised trial (TENSION). Lancet. 2024;403(10426):382-392. PMID: 37812953

Thrombolysis Protocols

  1. Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye OM, et al. Scientific rationale for the inclusion and exclusion criteria for intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2016;47(2):581-641. PMID: 26696642
  2. Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Saver JL, et al. Timeliness of tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy in acute ischemic stroke: patient characteristics, hospital factors, and outcomes associated with door-to-needle times within 60 minutes. Circulation. 2011;123(7):750-758. PMID: 21311083
  3. Meretoja A, Keshtkaran M, Saver JL, et al. Stroke thrombolysis: save a minute, save a day. Stroke. 2014;45(4):1053-1058. PMID: 24627114
  4. Anderson CS, Huang Y, Lindley RI, et al. Intensive blood pressure reduction with intravenous thrombolysis therapy for acute ischaemic stroke (ENCHANTED): an international, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10174):877-888. PMID: 30739745

EXTEND-IA TNK

  1. Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Churilov L, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase before thrombectomy for ischemic stroke (EXTEND-IA TNK). N Engl J Med. 2018;378(17):1573-1582. PMID: 29694851

Bridging Therapy

  1. Fischer U, Kaesmacher J, Mendes Pereira V, et al. Direct mechanical thrombectomy versus combined intravenous and mechanical thrombectomy in large-artery anterior circulation stroke: a topical review. Stroke. 2017;48(10):2912-2918. PMID: 35810756
  2. Yang P, Zhang Y, Zhang L, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous alteplase in acute stroke (DIRECT-MT). N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):1981-1993. PMID: 35810757
  3. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(9):CD000197. PMID: 24026639
  4. IST-3 collaborative group. The benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (IST-3): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9834):2352-2363. PMID: 22632908
  5. Krishnamurthi RV, Barker-Collo S, Parag V, et al. Stroke incidence by major pathological type and ischemic subtypes in the Auckland Regional Community Stroke studies: changes between 2002 and 2011. Stroke. 2018;49(1):3-10. PMID: 26038456

Telestroke

  1. Bladin CF, Moloczij N, Ermel S, et al. Victorian Stroke Telemedicine Project: implementation of a new model of translational stroke care for Australia. Intern Med J. 2015;45(9):951-956. PMID: 26059747
  2. Bladin CF, Kim J, Bagot KL, et al. Improving acute stroke care in regional hospitals: clinical evaluation of the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine program. Med J Aust. 2020;212(8):371-377. PMID: 32157723
  3. Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management. Melbourne, Australia. 2024. Available from: https://informme.org.au/guidelines

Quality Improvement Metrics

Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR) KPIs

MetricTargetCurrent National Rate
Thrombolysis rate≥20% of ischemic strokes12-15%
Tenecteplase adoptionIncreasing~40% of thrombolysis
Door-to-CT time≤25 minutes30-40 min
Door-to-needle time≤60 minutes50-70 min
Thrombectomy rate≥5% of ischemic strokes3-5%
Stroke unit admission≥80%75%
Indigenous thrombolysis rateEqual to non-Indigenous5-8% (gap exists)

Complications and Their Management

Hemorrhagic Transformation

Definition: Conversion of ischemic infarct to hemorrhagic infarct (bleeding into infarcted tissue).

Types:

  • Hemorrhagic infarction (HI): Petechial hemorrhage, usually asymptomatic
  • Parenchymal hematoma (PH): Large hematoma with mass effect, symptomatic

Incidence:

  • Spontaneous (no thrombolysis): 5-10% of ischemic strokes
  • Post-thrombolysis: 6-7% symptomatic ICH (SICH), 15-20% asymptomatic

Risk factors:

  • Large infarct size (ASPECTS below 7)
  • Severe stroke (NIHSS greater than 20)
  • Older age (greater than 80 years)
  • Hyperglycemia (glucose greater than 10 mmol/L)
  • Hypertension (BP greater than 180/105 post-thrombolysis)
  • Early ischemic changes on CT (greater than 1/3 MCA territory)
  • Atrial fibrillation

Clinical presentation:

  • Sudden neurological deterioration (NIHSS increase ≥4 points)
  • Reduced consciousness (GCS drop)
  • Severe headache
  • Nausea, vomiting
  • Hypertension (BP surge)

Management:

  1. Urgent CT brain (diagnosis)
  2. Stop any antithrombotics
  3. Reverse thrombolytic effect:
    • Cryoprecipitate 10 units IV (replaces fibrinogen, goal greater than 1.5 g/L)
    • Tranexamic acid 1 g IV (antifibrinolytic)
    • Platelet transfusion 1 unit (if platelets below 100,000)
  4. Blood pressure control: Target SBP below 160 mmHg – use labetalol 10 mg IV or nicardipine infusion
  5. Notify neurosurgery: Large hematoma (greater than 30 mL) may require decompression
  6. ICU admission: Close monitoring, repeat CT at 6-12 hours

Prognosis:

  • SICH mortality: 40-60%
  • Survivors: 70% with severe disability (mRS 4-5)

Cerebral Edema

Onset: 24-72 hours post-stroke (most common cause of early death in large stroke)

Mechanism: Cytotoxic edema (cell swelling) + vasogenic edema (BBB breakdown)

Clinical signs:

  • Worsening GCS
  • Pupil changes (uncal herniation)
  • Cushing reflex (hypertension + bradycardia)

CT findings: Midline shift, effaced ventricles, loss of sulci

Management:

  • Osmotherapy: Mannitol 0.5-1 g/kg IV or hypertonic saline 3% 150-250 mL IV
  • Head-of-bed elevation 30°
  • Avoid hypotonic fluids
  • Decompressive hemicraniectomy (for MCA territory greater than 50% or cerebellar strokes with mass effect)
  • Neurosurgical referral urgent

Aspiration Pneumonia

Incidence: 10-15% of acute stroke patients

Risk factors: Dysphagia (present in 50%), reduced GCS, bulbar weakness

Prevention: NPO until swallow screen (speech pathology), NGT feeding if unsafe swallow

Treatment: Antibiotics (amoxicillin-clavulanate or ceftriaxone + metronidazole)

Seizures

Incidence: 5-10% of acute stroke patients (within 24h)

Higher risk: Cortical involvement, hemorrhagic transformation, large infarct

Management: Levetiracetam 500-1000 mg IV loading (preferred in stroke; no drug interactions)

Prophylaxis: Not routinely recommended (only if seizure occurs)

Venous Thromboembolism (DVT/PE)

Incidence: 10% without prophylaxis

Prevention: Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) from day 1, LMWH after 24h if no hemorrhage post-thrombolysis

Treatment: Therapeutic anticoagulation (but avoid in first 24h post-thrombolysis)


Posterior Circulation Stroke

Clinical Presentation

Posterior circulation strokes (vertebrobasilar territory) account for 20-25% of ischemic strokes but are easily missed due to non-specific symptoms.

Hallmark features:

  • Vertigo, nausea, vomiting (mimics benign peripheral vertigo)
  • Diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia (brainstem nuclei)
  • Ataxia, limb incoordination (cerebellum)
  • Crossed neurological signs (ipsilateral cranial nerve + contralateral limb weakness)
  • Visual field defects (occipital lobe - homonymous hemianopia)

HINTS Exam (Head Impulse, Nystagmus, Test of Skew)

Used to differentiate central (stroke) from peripheral (vestibular neuritis) vertigo:

  • Head Impulse Test: Normal (corrective saccade absent) = central
  • Nystagmus: Direction-changing or vertical = central
  • Test of Skew: Vertical ocular misalignment = central

HINTS sensitivity for stroke: 96-100% (superior to early MRI).

Management Considerations

  • CT brain may be normal in first 24-48 hours (posterior fossa artifact, small infarcts)
  • MRI DWI is gold standard (but delays treatment)
  • Thrombolysis eligibility: Same criteria as anterior circulation
  • Basilar artery occlusion: Thrombectomy up to 24 hours (high mortality without treatment ~80%)
  • Cerebellar stroke: Risk of obstructive hydrocephalus + brainstem compression → neurosurgical decompression

Minor Stroke and TIA

Definitions

  • TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack): Focal neurological deficit lasting below 24 hours (usually below 1 hour), no infarct on imaging
  • Minor stroke: NIHSS below 5, symptoms may be mild but disabling (e.g., isolated aphasia, hand weakness)

Current Evidence

  • PRISMS trial (2018): Minor stroke (NIHSS 0-5) randomized to tPA vs aspirin. Trial stopped early for futility
  • However: Patients with disabling deficits (isolated aphasia, hand weakness affecting occupation) may still benefit

ACEM Approach

  • Assess functional impact (e.g., teacher with aphasia, surgeon with hand weakness = disabling)
  • If NIHSS below 5 but deficit is disabling → consider thrombolysis (shared decision-making)
  • If NIHSS below 5 and non-disabling → aspirin 300 mg, admit, early workup
  • All TIAs with ABCD² ≥4 require hospital admission

ABCD² Score (predicts 2-day stroke risk after TIA)

  • Age ≥60 years (1 point)
  • BP ≥140/90 mmHg (1 point)
  • Clinical features: Unilateral weakness (2 points), speech disturbance without weakness (1 point)
  • Duration: ≥60 min (2 points), 10-59 min (1 point)
  • Diabetes (1 point)

Score interpretation:

  • 0-3: Low risk (1% 2-day stroke risk) → outpatient workup
  • 4-5: Moderate risk (4% 2-day stroke risk) → admit 24-48h
  • 6-7: High risk (8% 2-day stroke risk) → admit, urgent imaging, consider dual antiplatelet

Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) Recognition

Why It Matters

LVO strokes (ICA, M1, M2, basilar) account for 30-40% of all ischemic strokes but have worse outcomes without thrombectomy. Emergency physicians must recognize LVO to activate thrombectomy pathway.

Clinical Clues for LVO

  • Severe stroke: NIHSS ≥6 (sensitivity 90% for LVO)
  • Cortical signs: Aphasia, neglect, gaze preference, hemianopia
  • Dense hemiplegia: Complete arm and leg paralysis (vs. drift)
  • Atrial fibrillation: Cardioembolic source (higher LVO rate)

RACE Scale (Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation)

ItemFindingScore
Facial palsyMild 1, Moderate-severe 20-2
Arm motorDrift 1, Falls 20-2
Leg motorDrift 1, Falls 20-2
Head/gaze deviationPresent1
Aphasia or neglectPresent2

RACE ≥5 = 85% LVO probability (activate thrombectomy team).

CTA Findings

  • Abrupt vessel cutoff (ICA, M1, M2, basilar)
  • Clot length greater than 8 mm (longer clot = lower tPA recanalization rate)
  • Collateral circulation (leptomeningeal vessels) → better outcomes

ED Management of LVO

  1. Give IV thrombolysis if within 4.5h (don't delay for thrombectomy)
  2. Activate thrombectomy team immediately (interventional neuroradiology)
  3. Transfer to comprehensive stroke center if not on-site
  4. Time windows: 0-6h (all LVO), 6-24h (DAWN/DEFUSE-3 criteria with perfusion imaging)

Secondary Stroke Prevention

Antiplatelet Therapy

  • Loading: Aspirin 300 mg (if no thrombolysis) or 24h post-thrombolysis
  • Maintenance: Aspirin 100 mg daily indefinitely
  • Dual antiplatelet (aspirin + clopidogrel): For minor stroke/TIA (POINT trial) – give for 21 days, then aspirin alone

Anticoagulation (if atrial fibrillation)

Timing depends on stroke size and bleeding risk:

  • Small stroke (NIHSS below 8): Start at 4-7 days
  • Moderate stroke (NIHSS 8-15): Start at 7-10 days
  • Large stroke (NIHSS greater than 15): Start at 10-14 days (risk of hemorrhagic transformation)
  • Agent: NOAC preferred over warfarin (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran – lower ICH risk)

Statin

  • High-intensity statin for all ischemic stroke patients (atorvastatin 80 mg daily)
  • Reduces recurrent stroke risk by 20%

Blood Pressure

  • Target below 140/90 mmHg (or below 130/80 if diabetes)
  • Start antihypertensive after acute phase (7-10 days)

Carotid Revascularization

  • If carotid stenosis greater than 70% ipsilateral to stroke → carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or stenting (CAS)
  • Timing: Within 2 weeks of stroke (early surgery reduces recurrence)

Lifestyle Modifications

  • Smoking cessation (halves recurrence risk)
  • Diabetes control (HbA1c below 7%)
  • Exercise (30 min/day, 5 days/week)
  • Dietary modification (Mediterranean diet)

Stroke Mimics

Incidence

5-25% of patients receiving thrombolysis have stroke mimics (not true ischemic stroke).

Common Mimics

  1. Seizure with Todd's paresis (post-ictal weakness): History of seizure, gradual resolution over hours
  2. Hypoglycemia: Blood glucose below 2.7 mmol/L, resolves with dextrose
  3. Migraine with aura: Younger age, gradual onset (vs. sudden), visual symptoms, history of migraines
  4. Functional neurological disorder (conversion disorder): Inconsistent exam, non-anatomic deficits
  5. Sepsis/metabolic encephalopathy: Delirium, fluctuating consciousness, systemic signs
  6. Brain tumor: Gradual onset over days-weeks, seizure at presentation
  7. Peripheral vestibulopathy (labyrinthitis): Isolated vertigo/nausea, no focal neuro signs, HINTS-negative

Safety of Thrombolysis in Stroke Mimics

  • Meta-analysis: SICH rate 0.5% in stroke mimics (vs. 6% in true stroke)
  • Conclusion: Giving thrombolysis to a stroke mimic is generally safe (low bleeding risk without ischemia)
  • Therefore: Do not withhold thrombolysis if clinical suspicion is high, even if diagnosis uncertain

Red Flags for Mimics

  • Gradual onset (not sudden)
  • Prior episodes with full resolution
  • Young age (below 50) without vascular risk factors
  • Normal CT and CTA (though early stroke CT can be normal)
  • Blood glucose below 2.7 mmol/L (always check)

NOAC Management in Stroke

General Principles

  • NOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) are relative contraindications to thrombolysis
  • Wait 48 hours from last NOAC dose before thrombolysis (≥4 half-lives = 94% cleared)
  • Mechanical thrombectomy does NOT require full anticoagulation reversal

NOAC Half-Lives

DrugHalf-LifeClearanceNotes
Dabigatran12-14h80% renalLonger if CrCl below 50
Rivaroxaban5-9h65% hepaticTake with food
Apixaban12h25% renalTwice daily dosing
Edoxaban10-14h50% renalOnce daily

Reversal Agents

AgentReversesDoseCost
Idarucizumab (Praxbind)Dabigatran only5 g IV (2 × 2.5 g)~$4,000
Andexanet alfa (Andexxa)Apixaban, rivaroxaban400-800 mg bolus + infusion~$25,000-50,000
4-factor PCCAll NOACs (partial)25-50 units/kg~$2,000-4,000

Decision Algorithm for NOAC Patients

  1. Last dose greater than 48 hours ago → Proceed with thrombolysis (if otherwise eligible)
  2. Last dose 24-48 hours ago:
    • Check renal function (clearance prolonged if CrCl below 30)
    • Consider anti-Xa level (if available) – if undetectable, can proceed
    • Otherwise, defer thrombolysis; proceed to thrombectomy if LVO
  3. Last dose below 24 hours ago:
    • Thrombolysis contraindicated without reversal
    • For dabigatran: Give idarucizumab 5 g IV → then thrombolysis
    • For apixaban/rivaroxaban: Consider andexanet alfa (if available) or proceed to thrombectomy only
  4. Thrombectomy: Safe in anticoagulated patients (mechanical, not systemic therapy)

Explaining Stroke to Patients/Family

Use lay language:

"A stroke happens when a blood clot blocks an artery in the brain, cutting off oxygen. Without oxygen, brain cells start dying within minutes – that's why we call it a 'brain attack,' similar to a heart attack. The good news is we have a clot-busting drug that can dissolve the clot and restore blood flow, but we need to give it within 4.5 hours."

Explain "time is brain":

"Every minute that passes, about 2 million brain cells die. That's why we're moving so quickly. The sooner we give the clot-buster, the better your chances of recovering."

Discuss risks honestly:

"The main risk of the clot-busting drug is bleeding in the brain, which happens in about 6 out of 100 people who receive it. If that happens, it can be serious – about half of those patients die or have severe disability. However, without the drug, your chance of being disabled or dying from the stroke is higher – about 30-40%. So while there is a risk, the benefit outweighs it for most people."

Obtain verbal consent:

"Given the time pressure, I need your verbal consent to proceed. Do you understand the risks and benefits? Do you want us to give you the clot-busting drug?"

After Thrombolysis: Patient Information

What to expect in the next 24 hours:

  • You will be monitored closely in the stroke unit or intensive care
  • We will check your blood pressure every 15 minutes for 2 hours, then every 30 minutes for 6 hours
  • We will perform neurological checks regularly to ensure the treatment is working
  • You may have a headache (common side effect)
  • If you develop severe headache, vomiting, or worsening weakness, tell the nurse immediately (could be bleeding)

What NOT to do for 24 hours:

  • No aspirin or blood-thinning medications (risk of bleeding)
  • No nasogastric tube or urinary catheter unless absolutely necessary
  • No blood pressure medications unless your pressure is very high (greater than 180/105)

After 24 hours:

  • We will do another CT scan to check for bleeding
  • If the scan is clear, we will start aspirin to prevent another stroke
  • You will continue in the stroke unit for rehabilitation

Recovery:

  • Stroke recovery takes weeks to months
  • Most improvement happens in the first 3 months
  • Rehabilitation is key to maximizing recovery
  • You will need to take medications long-term to prevent another stroke

Medicolegal Considerations

Common Litigation Scenarios

  1. Failure to thrombolyse eligible patient (missed opportunity)
    • Defense: Document why patient was ineligible (contraindications, outside window)
  2. Giving thrombolysis to ineligible patient (causing hemorrhage)
    • Defense: Document informed consent discussion, risks/benefits
  3. Delay in thrombolysis (door-to-needle greater than 90 min)
    • Defense: Document reasons for delay (uncontrolled BP, awaiting labs, family discussion)
  4. Missing stroke diagnosis (discharged as "dizziness" or "migraine")
    • Defense: Document full neurological exam, consider posterior circulation strokes

Documentation Essentials

  • Time last known well (exact time, not "this morning")
  • NIHSS score (baseline before thrombolysis)
  • Contraindications assessed (checklist)
  • Consent discussion (risks: 6% ICH, benefits: 30% better outcome)
  • Door-to-CT and door-to-needle times
  • Post-thrombolysis monitoring (NIHSS, BP, neuro obs)

Summary for ACEM Exam

High-Yield Points

  1. Door-to-needle below 60 minutes – each 15-min delay reduces good outcome by 4%
  2. Tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg – single bolus, non-inferior to alteplase, preferred for drip-and-ship
  3. Alteplase 0.9 mg/kg – 10% bolus + 60-min infusion
  4. BP below 185/110 before thrombolysis, below 180/105 for 24 hours after
  5. Thrombectomy for LVO: 0-6h all patients, 6-24h with imaging selection (DAWN/DEFUSE-3)
  6. Large core (ASPECTS 3-5): Now eligible for thrombectomy (SELECT2, ANGEL-ASPECT, TENSION)
  7. Indigenous disparities: 2-3× higher incidence, 10-15 years earlier – don't dismiss younger patients
  8. Drip-and-ship: Give tenecteplase bolus then transfer immediately for thrombectomy
  9. No aspirin for 24 hours post-thrombolysis
  10. Wake-up stroke: Consider MRI DWI-FLAIR or CT perfusion for extended window treatment

Viva Opening Statement Template

"This is a time-critical stroke code. My immediate priorities are: (1) Exclude hemorrhage with urgent CT brain, (2) Determine thrombolysis eligibility – time last known well, contraindications, (3) Control blood pressure to below 185/110 mmHg, (4) Calculate thrombolytic dose and prepare for administration, with a target door-to-needle time of less than 60 minutes. If CTA shows large vessel occlusion, I would simultaneously activate the thrombectomy team."

OSCE Performance Tips

  • Start with "ABCDE" – don't jump to NIHSS without primary survey
  • Verbalize "This is a stroke code, I'm activating the stroke team now"
  • NIHSS: Practice until you can do it in below 5 minutes
  • After NIHSS, state the score and severity (e.g., "NIHSS 8, moderate stroke, eligible for thrombolysis")
  • For consent: Use lay language, mention specific numbers (6% bleeding risk, 30% better chance of recovery)
  • For Indigenous patients: Acknowledge cultural safety, involve family in decision-making

Frequently asked questions

Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.

What is the time window for IV thrombolysis in stroke?

4.5 hours from symptom onset for standard alteplase/tenecteplase. Extended windows: up to 9 hours for wake-up stroke with MRI selection, up to 24 hours for mechanical thrombectomy with perfusion imaging.

What are the doses for alteplase and tenecteplase?

Alteplase: 0.9 mg/kg (max 90 mg), 10% bolus + 60-min infusion. Tenecteplase: 0.25 mg/kg (max 25 mg) single IV bolus.

Who is eligible for mechanical thrombectomy?

Patients with large vessel occlusion (ICA, M1, M2, basilar) on CTA. 0-6 hours: All LVO patients. 6-24 hours: Selected patients meeting DAWN/DEFUSE-3 criteria with perfusion imaging.

Why is tenecteplase preferred in drip-and-ship scenarios?

Tenecteplase is a single 5-10 second bolus (vs 60-min infusion for alteplase), enabling faster treatment and transfer. AcT and TRACE-2 trials showed non-inferiority to alteplase.

Learning map

Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.

Prerequisites

Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.

  • Neurological Assessment
  • CT Head Interpretation

Differentials

Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.

  • Hemorrhagic Stroke
  • Seizure
  • Hypoglycemia

Consequences

Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.

  • Cerebral Edema
  • Intracranial Hemorrhage