Lumbar Puncture (Emergency)

Quick Reference

---

ACEM Exam Focus

What Examiners Expect

Fellowship Written:

• Indications for LP in specific clinical scenarios (meningitis, SAH, GBS, pseudotumor cerebri)
• Absolute and relative contraindications with clinical reasoning
• CT before LP criteria (Hasbun rules)
• CSF interpretation: normal values, bacterial vs viral meningitis, traumatic tap vs true SAH
• Management of post-LP headache and role of epidural blood patch
• Complication recognition and management

Fellowship OSCE:

• Consent and explanation of procedure including risks/benefits
• Correct patient positioning (lateral decubitus, flexed spine)
• Surface landmark identification (Tuffier's line, L3-L4 or L4-L5)
• Sterile technique demonstration
• Procedural steps and confirmation of success
• Post-procedure care and documentation

Fellowship Viva:

• Clinical decision-making: when to LP vs alternative investigations
• CT before LP interpretation (mass effect, midline shift)
• CSF analysis interpretation (protein, glucose, WBC differential, xanthochromia)
• Traumatic tap differentiation from true SAH
• Management of complications (headache, herniation, infection)
• Indigenous health and remote/rural considerations

---

Key Points

1. CT before LP is required if: age greater than 60, immunocompromised, CNS disease history, recent seizure, focal neurological deficit, altered consciousness, or papilledema (Hasbun criteria) (PMID: 11136331)

2. Atraumatic (pencil-point) needles (Whitacre, Sprotte) reduce post-LP headache from 20-30% to below 5% by spreading rather than cutting dural fibres (PMID: 23783408)

3. Xanthochromia (yellow supernatant) is diagnostic of SAH when present greater than 12 hours post-ictus; spectrophotometry is gold standard but visual inspection acceptable in most centres (PMID: 23453542)

4. Traumatic tap vs SAH: RBCs decrease greater than 25% from tube 1 to 4 in traumatic tap; RBCs remain constant in SAH. Correct WBC: subtract 1 WBC per 500-700 RBCs (PMID: 19126571)

5. Opening pressure: Normal 10-20 cm H₂O lateral decubitus; greater than 25 cm H₂O suggests meningitis or IIH; measurement essential for pseudotumor cerebri diagnosis (PMID: 23045563)

6. Albuminocytologic dissociation (elevated protein with normal WBC) is classic for Guillain-Barré syndrome; protein peaks at 2-4 weeks (PMID: 29358689)

7. Post-LP headache: Positional (worse sitting/standing, better lying flat), occurs within 15 minutes of position change; conservative management first, then epidural blood patch if persistent greater than 48 hours (PMID: 21220669)

8. Do not delay antibiotics for suspected bacterial meningitis; give empiric ceftriaxone + dexamethasone immediately, then perform LP when safe (PMID: 17947268)

---

Indications

Absolute Indications

Diagnostic:

• Suspected bacterial or viral meningitis (after CT if indicated)
• Suspected subarachnoid haemorrhage with negative CT
• Guillain-Barré syndrome (diagnostic confirmation)
• Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri) - both diagnostic and therapeutic
• CNS malignancy or carcinomatous meningitis
• Suspected CNS infection in immunocompromised host

Therapeutic:

• Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (reduce ICP by removing CSF)
• Normal pressure hydrocephalus (diagnostic tap test)

Relative Indications

• Suspected leptomeningeal disease
• Partially treated meningitis
• Undiagnosed encephalopathy with non-diagnostic imaging
• Peripheral neuropathy workup (CIDP variants)
• Suspicion of neurosyphilis or Lyme neuroborreliosis

When to Consider

Clinical Scenarios Requiring LP:

1. Meningitis: Fever + headache + neck stiffness + photophobia in immunocompetent adult with normal neurology

2. SAH: "Thunderclap" headache (below 1 minute onset) with negative CT scan, especially if greater than 6 hours since ictus

3. GBS: Progressive ascending weakness, areflexia, sensory symptoms, facial or bulbar weakness, autonomic dysfunction

4. Pseudotumor Cerebri: Headache + pulsatile tinnitus + transient visual obscurations + papilledema in young obese female

5. CNS Infection: Fever + altered mental status + negative CT, especially in immunocompromised

---

Contraindications

Absolute

Relative

Risk-Benefit Considerations

When relative contraindications may be acceptable:

1. Critical time-sensitive diagnosis: Suspected bacterial meningitis with mild thrombocytopenia (platelets 60-80) - benefits of early diagnosis outweigh moderate bleeding risk

2. Alternative investigations unavailable: Remote/rural setting without CT, no alternative diagnostic options - proceed with caution if clinical picture strongly suggests meningitis

3. Therapeutic necessity: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension with papilledema causing vision loss - perform despite relative contraindication under specialist supervision

4. Failed alternative approaches: Failed attempts at neuroimaging, urgent diagnosis needed - proceed with LP if benefits clearly outweigh risks

---

Anatomy

Surface Landmarks

Key Anatomical Facts

• Conus medullaris: Adult termination typically at L1-L2 level (90%), terminates at L2-L3 in remaining 10%, rarely as low as L3 (PMID: 11247133)
• Cauda equina: Bundle of nerve roots below conus medullaris, safe zone for needle insertion
• Dura mater: Tough outermost meningeal layer, contains CSF and spinal cord/cauda equina
• Arachnoid mater: Middle meningeal layer, contains CSF between it and dura (subdural space)
• Pia mater: Innermost meningeal layer, adherent to spinal cord
• Subarachnoid space: Space between arachnoid and pia, contains CSF and nerve roots
• Ligamentum flavum: Thick yellow ligament connecting laminae, provides "pop" sensation when needle penetrates
• Epidural space: Space between dura and vertebral canal, contains fat and blood vessels

Anatomical Diagram

                            SPINE - LUMBAR REGION (Lateral View)

    T12      L1      L2      L3      L4      L5      S1
     |       |       |       |       |       |       |
     |       |-------|-------|-------|-------|       |  Tuffier's Line (Intercrestal)
     |               |       |       |       |
     |               |   Conus Medullaris (L1-L2)        |
     |               |   termination                    |
     |               |                                 |
     |               |-------|-------|-------|         |  Safe needle insertion
     |                       |       |       |         |  L3-L4 or L4-L5
     |                       |   Cauda Equina           |
     |                       |   (nerve roots)         |
     |                       |                         |
     | Dura Mater -------------------------------------|
     | Arachnoid --------------------------------------|
     |   Subarachnoid Space (CSF) ---------------------|
     | Pia Mater --------------------------------------|
     |------------------------------------------------|

      Surface Landmarks:
      ---------------------------------
      |         Iliac Crest (L)        |
      |                               |  Tuffier's Line
      |   Iliac Crest (R)             |  (L4 spinous process)
      ---------------------------------

Danger Zones

Anatomical Variants

1. Low-lying conus: Conus terminates at L2-L3 or L3 in 5-10% of patients (PMID: 11247133) - emphasises importance of correct level selection
2. Sacralized L5: L5 vertebra fused to sacrum - may alter landmark palpation
3. Lumbarized S1: S1 vertebra separated from sacrum - adds extra lumbar segment
4. Scoliosis: Altered alignment - may require ultrasound guidance or alternative approach
5. Degenerative changes: Osteophytes, calcified ligaments - may make needle insertion difficult
6. Obesity: Increased soft tissue - difficult palpation, higher failure rate (PMID: 22040765)

---

Equipment

Essential Equipment

Optional Equipment

Equipment Sizing

Adult

Paediatric

Paediatric-specific notes:

• Use smaller gauge needles (25G preferred) to reduce PDPH risk
• Use stylet at all times to prevent epidermoid tumor formation
• Consider sedation for uncooperative children
• Smaller manometer or reduced pressure measurement for infants

---

Preparation

Patient Preparation

1. Informed consent

   • Explain procedure, indications, risks, benefits
   • Specific risks: headache (20-30%), bleeding, infection, nerve injury, herniation (rare)
   • Document consent in medical record

2. Patient positioning

   • Lateral decubitus position (opening pressure required)
   • OR sitting position (easier to identify midline, no opening pressure)
   • Patient at edge of bed, knees flexed to chest, spine flexed ("fetal position")
   • Pillows between knees for comfort and stability

3. Monitoring

   • Baseline observations: BP, HR, RR, SpO₂, temperature, GCS
   • Continuous monitoring during and after procedure if unstable
   • Have resuscitation equipment available

4. Pre-procedure checks

   • Check platelet count and INR if coagulopathy suspected
   • Review imaging if CT performed (assess for contraindications)
   • Verify no local infection at puncture site
   • Ensure adequate assistance available

Operator Preparation

1. Standard precautions (PPE)

   • Surgical mask (MANDATORY - prevents respiratory droplet contamination)
   • Sterile gloves
   • Eye protection
   • Gown if risk of splash

2. Hand hygiene

   • Surgical hand scrub or alcohol-based hand rub
   • Perform before donning sterile gloves

3. Equipment check

   • Verify all equipment available and functional
   • Check needle integrity (tip not damaged, stylet moves freely)
   • Ensure manometer components complete

4. Assistance arranged

   • Have assistant available to help with positioning
   • Nurse or colleague to assist with tube collection
   • Second operator available if first attempt fails

5. Backup plan identified

   • Alternative diagnostic approach if LP contraindicated or fails
   • Ultrasound guidance available
   • Fluoroscopic or CT-guided LP if available
   • Consider neurosurgical consultation

Site Preparation

1. Sterile technique: Full aseptic technique required

   • Mask, sterile gloves, sterile drape
   • No talking over sterile field
   • Maintain asepsis throughout procedure

2. Skin preparation

   • 2% Chlorhexidine with 70% alcohol (preferred)
   • OR povidone-iodine if chlorhexidine contraindicated
   • Clean in concentric circles from centre outward
   • Allow to dry completely (2-3 minutes)

3. Draping

   • Apply fenestrated sterile drape over intended puncture site
   • Ensure adequate exposure of lumbar spine
   • Maintain drape integrity throughout procedure

Positioning

• Patient position:

  • "Lateral decubitus: Edge of bed, knees to chest, spine maximally flexed"
  • "Sitting: Edge of bed, feet supported, leaning forward over table"
  • Ensure spine parallel to floor for accurate opening pressure (lateral decubitus only)

• Operator position:

  • Standing behind patient (lateral decubitus) or in front (sitting)
  • Maintain comfortable posture for control
  • Ensure clear view of landmarks

• Assistant position:

  • At patient's head or side to help maintain position
  • Ready to assist with tube collection
  • Can provide reassurance to patient

---

Procedure Steps

Step-by-Step Technique

Step 1: Identify Landmarks

Detailed description: Palpate the highest points of both posterior iliac crests with thumbs. Draw an imaginary line (Tuffier's line) connecting these points. This line typically crosses the L4 spinous process. Palpate midline spinous processes above and below this line to identify the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace. Mark the site with sterile skin marker or impression from cap.

• Key point: Tuffier's line can be 1-2 segments higher than believed due to palpation error; aim for L4-L5 for larger margin of safety (PMID: 10638605)
• Common error: Relying solely on bony landmarks without ultrasound confirmation in obese patients or difficult anatomy

Step 2: Local Anaesthetic

Detailed description: Raise a wheal of 1% lidocaine at the planned insertion site using a 25G needle. Then infiltrate deeper tissues along the intended needle track using 3-5 mL total. Wait 2-3 minutes for anaesthetic to take effect. Use aspirating technique to avoid intravascular injection.

• Key point: Infiltrate down to the interspinous ligament for adequate anaesthesia
• Common error: Not waiting long enough for anaesthetic effect, causing patient discomfort

Step 3: Needle Insertion

Detailed description: Position the spinal needle with bevel/needle opening facing upward (towards ceiling) when patient in lateral decubitus (parallel to longitudinal dural fibres). Insert needle in midline at slight cephalad angle (10-15°) aiming towards umbilicus. Advance slowly through interspinous ligament, ligamentum flavum (will feel distinct "pop"), and dura (second "pop" or give-way).

• Key point: Remove stylet frequently to check for CSF flow; never advance without stylet in place if no flow
• Common error: Advancing too quickly past dura, risking nerve root or spinal cord injury

Step 4: Confirm CSF Flow

Detailed description: Once the characteristic "pop" of dura is felt, stop and remove stylet. Observe for clear CSF dripping from needle hub. If no flow, rotate needle 90° and wait. If still no flow, reinsert stylet and advance slightly (1-2 mm), then check again. If still no flow, withdraw to subcutaneous tissue and redirect slightly, but never more than 2-3 attempts.

• Key point: CSF should appear clear and drip freely; bloody fluid suggests traumatic tap or vascular injury
• Common error: Multiple needle passes (greater than 3) increasing complication risk

Step 5: Measure Opening Pressure (if lateral decubitus)

Detailed description: Attach manometer tubing with three-way stopcock to needle hub. Ensure patient is relaxed and legs slightly extended (not maximally flexed). Measure CSF column height in cm H₂O. Normal opening pressure is 10-20 cm H₂O in lateral decubitus position. Record the opening pressure immediately.

• Key point: Patient must be relaxed; straining or breath-holding falsely elevates pressure
• Common error: Measuring pressure with patient's knees maximally flexed (falsely elevated)

Step 6: Collect CSF Samples

Detailed description: Disconnect manometer. Collect CSF in 4 numbered tubes (1-2 mL per tube) in sequence:

• Tube 1: Chemistry (glucose, protein)

• Tube 2: Microbiology (Gram stain, culture)

• Tube 3: Hematology (cell count and differential)

• Tube 4: Special studies (PCR, cytology, VDRL, or repeat if needed)

• Key point: Collect tubes in sequence to allow comparison of RBC/WBC counts between tubes 1 and 4

• Common error: Not collecting enough volume (need 4-6 mL total for complete analysis)

Step 7: Remove Needle

Detailed description: Reinsert the stylet completely before removing the needle (prevents aspiration of arachnoid or skin plug). Remove needle in one smooth motion. Apply sterile gauze with light pressure to puncture site for 1-2 minutes. Apply occlusive dressing.

• Key point: ALWAYS replace stylet before needle removal to prevent dural fibres from being pulled out and creating larger defect
• Common error: Forgetting to replace stylet, increasing risk of CSF leak and headache

Step 8: Post-Procedure Documentation

Detailed description: Document all details in medical record: indication, patient position, needle size and type, interspace level, number of attempts, opening pressure, CSF appearance, volume collected, complications. Label specimens appropriately. Arrange transport to laboratory immediately (CSF cells degrade quickly).

• Key point: Time stamp all specimens; send to lab within 30 minutes for accurate cell counts
• Common error: Not documenting opening pressure or number of attempts

Confirmation of Success

Securing/Completion

• Apply sterile occlusive dressing to puncture site
• Document procedure details in medical record
• Send specimens to laboratory immediately (within 30 minutes)
• Monitor patient for 30-60 minutes post-procedure
• Provide post-procedure instructions (activity, headache warning signs)

---

Ultrasound Guidance

When to Use

Indications for ultrasound-guided LP:

• Difficult palpation of landmarks (obesity, edema)
• Previous spinal surgery or anatomical distortion
• Failed previous attempts (more than 2 attempts)
• Pregnant patients (altered anatomy)
• Need for precise level identification

Probe Selection

Technique

• Orientation: Probe transverse to spine, identify midline by visualizing spinous processes as hyperechoic shadows
• Approach:
  1. Place probe transverse at sacrum, move cephalad counting spinous processes
  2. Identify L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace
  3. Mark skin with sterile marker at interspace
  4. Proceed with standard LP technique using marked site
• Key views:
  • "Transverse: Spinous process (central hyperechoic band with acoustic shadow)"
  • "Longitudinal: Intervertebral spaces as gaps between spinous processes"
  • Identify ligamentum flavum as hyperechoic band

Sonographic Anatomy

Appearance of relevant structures:

• Spinous process: Hyperechoic linear structure with posterior acoustic shadow
• Intervertebral space: Anechoic gap between spinous processes
• Ligamentum flavum: Hyperechoic band just posterior to intervertebral space
• Epidural space: Hypoechoic space anterior to ligamentum flavum
• Dura mater: Hyperechoic line within the epidural space

Benefits of ultrasound guidance:

• Increases first-attempt success rate to greater than 95% (PMID: 26088033)
• Reduces number of needle attempts
• Reduces procedure time and patient discomfort
• Lower risk of traumatic tap and complications

---

Alternative Techniques

Sitting Position

• When to use: Easier landmark identification, obese patients, pregnancy
• Advantages: Easier to identify midline, gravity may assist CSF flow
• Disadvantages: Cannot measure opening pressure accurately, may be more uncomfortable
• Technique: Patient sits at edge of bed, leaning forward over table with supported arms. Same needle insertion technique. No opening pressure measurement.

Paramedian Approach

• When to use: Difficulty with midline approach (calcified interspinous ligaments, ankylosing spondylitis)
• Advantages: May be easier when midline approach obstructed
• Disadvantages: Slightly higher risk of nerve root injury
• Technique: Insert needle 1-2 cm lateral to midline, angle medially towards interlaminar space.

Fluoroscopic-Guided LP

• When to use: Failed attempts, therapeutic LP, diagnostic radiology department
• Advantages: Real-time visualization, precise needle placement
• Disadvantages: Requires radiology suite, radiation exposure, longer procedure time
• Technique: Performed under fluoroscopy by interventional radiologist or trained operator.

---

Paediatric Considerations

Age-Specific Modifications

Equipment Sizing

• Needle size: 22G standard, 25G preferred for neonates and infants
• Needle type: Atraumatic (Whitacre/Sprotte) preferred at all ages to reduce PDPH
• Manometer: Smaller manometer or reduced scale for infants
• Local anaesthetic: 1% lidocaine, use EMLA cream 30-60 minutes before procedure (topical)

Technique Modifications

1. Positioning: Parents or trained assistants may help maintain position; swaddling for infants
2. Sedation: Consider oral or IV sedation for uncooperative children (greater than 12 months)
3. Volume: Collect smaller volumes (2-4 mL) in infants to avoid excessive CSF removal
4. Stylet: Always use stylet to prevent epidermoid tumor formation (rare but serious)
5. Needle advancement: More cautious advancement, smaller distances
6. Opening pressure: Normal values differ by age - below 10 cm H₂O in neonates, 10-20 in older children

Paediatric-specific considerations:

• Conus medullaris terminates lower in children (L2-L3 in infants) - use L4-L5 interspace
• Higher PDPH risk in children - always use atraumatic needles
• More difficult positioning - allow adequate time for preparation
• Parental presence recommended for comfort and cooperation

---

Complications

Immediate Complications

Delayed Complications

Complication Prevention

Post-dural puncture headache prevention:

• Use atraumatic (pencil-point) needles (Whitacre, Sprotte) - reduces incidence from 20-30% to below 5% (PMID: 23783408)
• Use smaller gauge needles (22G or 25G)
• Replace stylet before needle removal
• Ensure patient lies supine for 1-2 hours post-procedure (controversial benefit)
• Adequate hydration

Infection prevention:

• Strict aseptic technique
• Surgical mask by operator (MANDATORY) - most infections from operator's respiratory flora (PMID: 23783408)
• Chlorhexidine-alcohol skin preparation
• Sterile gloves and drapes
• No talking over sterile field

Bleeding prevention:

• Check coagulation profile before procedure
• Platelets greater than 50 x 10⁹/L, INR below 1.5 (correct if possible)
• Avoid multiple needle attempts (greater than 3)
• Use atraumatic needles (less bleeding risk)

Herniation prevention:

• CT before LP if any risk factors (Hasbun criteria)
• Do not perform LP with papilledema, focal deficits, altered consciousness
• Monitor patient closely during and after procedure

---

Troubleshooting

Rescue Techniques

If first attempt fails:

1. Allow patient to rest for 5-10 minutes
2. Reassess landmarks, consider ultrasound guidance
3. Try adjacent interspace (move up or down one level)
4. Consider alternative approach (paramedian) if midline obstructed
5. Maximum 3 attempts by single operator before calling for assistance

If persistent bleeding:

1. Remove needle, apply pressure for 5 minutes
2. Check coagulation studies if not recently checked
3. Monitor for neurological deficits
4. Consider alternative diagnostic approach if indicated

If severe headache develops:

1. Conservative management first (bed rest, hydration, analgesics, caffeine)
2. If not improving after 24-48 hours, discuss epidural blood patch
3. Consider neurosurgical consultation if neurological symptoms develop

---

Post-Procedure Care

Immediate Care

1. Monitor patient: Check observations (BP, HR, RR, SpO₂, GCS) immediately post-procedure and at 15, 30, 60 minutes
2. Positioning: Keep patient supine for 30-60 minutes (may reduce headache incidence, evidence mixed)
3. Assess for complications: Ask about headache, back pain, neurological symptoms
4. Documentation: Document all procedure details, opening pressure, CSF appearance, volume collected, number of attempts, complications

Monitoring

Imaging Confirmation

• Not routinely required for uncomplicated LP
• Consider if:
  • Persistent bleeding or bloody CSF
  • Neurological deficit post-procedure
  • Severe back pain suggesting haematoma
  • Signs of infection

Documentation

Essential documentation elements:

• Indication for procedure
• Informed consent obtained
• Patient position (lateral decubitus vs sitting)
• Needle size, type, and gauge
• Interspace level attempted (L3-L4 or L4-L5)
• Number of attempts
• Opening pressure (if lateral decubitus)
• CSF appearance (clear, bloody, xanthochromic)
• Volume collected in each tube
• Complications (none, headache, bleeding, paresthesia, etc.)
• Post-procedure observations
• Specimens sent and time
• Patient disposition

---

CSF Interpretation

Normal CSF Values

Meningitis Patterns

Key interpretation points:

• Bacterial meningitis: Neutrophil predominance, low glucose, high protein, high opening pressure
• Viral meningitis: Lymphocyte predominance, normal glucose, mildly elevated protein
• TB meningitis: Lymphocyte predominance, low glucose, high protein, very high opening pressure
• Fungal meningitis: Similar to TB, cryptococcal antigen positive

Subarachnoid Haemorrhage CSF Findings

Xanthochromia timing:

• Takes 6-12 hours after ictus for bilirubin to form
• Visual inspection: yellow/orange colour
• Spectrophotometry: Absorbance at 450-460 nm indicates bilirubin (PMID: 23453542)
• Maximum sensitivity: 12 hours to 2 weeks post-ictus

Diagnostic algorithm:

1. CT negative for SAH → Perform LP greater than 12 hours after headache onset
2. Compare RBC count tube 1 vs tube 4 (greater than 25% decrease = traumatic tap)
3. Check supernatant after centrifugation (xanthochromic = SAH)
4. Send for spectrophotometry if available
5. If below 12 hours since ictus, repeat LP in 12-24 hours

Guillain-Barré Syndrome CSF

Classic findings:

• Albuminocytologic dissociation: Elevated protein (greater than 100 mg/dL) with normal WBC count (below 10 cells/μL)
• Protein elevation peaks at 2-4 weeks after symptom onset
• WBC count usually below 50 cells/μL, predominantly mononuclear

Clinical correlation:

• Findings may be normal in first week (60% normal within 7 days)
• Repeat LP if initial study normal and clinical suspicion high
• CSF findings support diagnosis but are not diagnostic alone

Pitfalls:

• Early LP (below 7 days) may be falsely normal
• Consider alternative diagnoses if WBC greater than 50 or neutrophil predominance

---

Indigenous Health Considerations

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health

Epidemiology and Risk Factors:

• Higher incidence of invasive bacterial infections including meningitis, especially in remote communities
• Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis more common in Indigenous children and young adults
• Rheumatic heart disease and endocarditis complications may require CSF analysis
• Melioidosis (Burkholderia pseudomallei) in northern Australia (Top End) can present with meningitis or encephalitis

Cultural Safety in Communication:

• Family and community involvement: Decision-making often communal; allow time for patient to consult with family members or elders where clinically safe
• Aboriginal Health Workers (AHWs) and Aboriginal Liaison Officers (ALOs): Essential cultural brokers; always invite to participate in explanation and consent process
• Gender considerations: "Men's Business" and "Women's Business" are significant; match clinician or support staff gender to patient where possible
• Fear and misconceptions: Common misconceptions about LP causing paralysis or "taking the spirit"; clear, visual explanations using diagrams to show needle enters well below spinal cord end

Language and Communication:

• English may be third or fourth language in remote communities
• Use interpreter services (telehealth or in-person) for informed consent and explanation
• Avoid medical jargon; use simple, culturally appropriate language
• Use visual aids and diagrams to explain procedure

Barriers to Care:

• Geographic isolation: Remote communities delayed presentation to healthcare facilities
• Transportation challenges: Limited access to tertiary hospitals with CT and intensive care
• Trust issues: Historical trauma and negative healthcare experiences may lead to reluctance
• Cultural practices: Traditional healing practices may delay presentation

Best Practices:

1. Involve AHWs/ALOs early in consultation and consent process
2. Allow adequate time for explanation and family discussion where safe
3. Match gender of clinician or support staff to patient where possible
4. Use visual explanations and diagrams to demystify procedure
5. Respect traditional beliefs while ensuring necessary medical care
6. Early empiric treatment - do not delay antibiotics while organizing LP or transfer
7. Family presence during procedure if culturally appropriate and patient desires

Māori Health (New Zealand)

Cultural Considerations:

• Whānau (family) involvement: Extended family important in decision-making and support
• Tikanga (cultural practices): Respect for cultural protocols in care delivery
• Manaakitanga (care): Approach care with compassion and respect
• Tapu (sacredness): Head is considered tapu; procedures involving head/spine require careful explanation

Communication:

• Use Māori Health Workers or cultural liaisons
• Ask about preferred communication style and cultural needs
• Include whānau in discussions and consent where appropriate
• Use simple, respectful language; allow time for questions

Health Disparities:

• Higher rates of meningococcal disease in Māori children
• Increased morbidity and mortality from invasive infections
• Barriers to accessing tertiary care for diagnostic procedures

Recommendations:

1. Engage Māori Health Workers early
2. Include whānau in care planning where appropriate
3. Respect cultural protocols around tapu
4. Allow adequate time for family decision-making
5. Provide culturally appropriate explanations

---

Remote and Rural Considerations

Royal Flying Doctor Service (RFDS) Context

Retrieval Priorities:

• Time-critical treatment over diagnosis: Do not delay empiric antibiotics (ceftriaxone) and dexamethasone for suspected meningitis while awaiting LP or retrieval
• LP rarely performed in remote field sites: Due to limited equipment and transport challenges; LP usually deferred until arrival at tertiary hospital
• Early antibiotics: RFDS protocols advise remote nurses/clinics to give IV/IM ceftriaxone 2g immediately for suspected meningitis

When to Perform LP in Remote Settings:

CT Before LP in Remote Settings:

• Many remote facilities do not have onsite CT scanners
• If no focal neurological signs, altered consciousness, or papilledema, may proceed with LP (clinical judgment)
• Consider RFDS telemedicine consultation for decision support

Resource-Limited Settings

Equipment Limitations:

• Limited supply of spinal needles: use what available, prioritize atraumatic if possible
• No manometer available: Proceed with LP for specimen collection, opening pressure measurement deferred
• Limited laboratory capability: Send specimens to tertiary center, treat empirically while awaiting results
• No ultrasound guidance: Use careful landmark palpation, consider alternative approach if multiple failures

Alternative Diagnostic Approaches:

• Blood cultures (positive in 50-70% of bacterial meningitis cases)
• Serum biomarkers (procalcitonin, CRP) for bacterial vs viral differentiation
• PCR testing on CSF if available (meningococcal, pneumococcal, viral PCR)
• Neuroimaging if available (CT/MRI)

Telemedicine Support:

• Use telemedicine consultation with tertiary hospital neurology or emergency medicine
• Consider RFDS or state-based retrieval service advice
• Transfer patient to tertiary hospital if uncertain about safety of LP

Transfer Considerations

When to Transfer Before LP:

• Unstable patient (shock, respiratory failure, decreased GCS)
• Contraindications present (focal deficits, papilledema)
• No experienced operator available
• Uncertainty about diagnosis
• Need for specialist care

Transfer Priorities:

1. Stabilize patient first (ABC, antibiotics if indicated)
2. Contact retrieval service (RFDS, state-based)
3. Provide clinical information and imaging if available
4. Discuss LP status with receiving hospital
5. Ensure appropriate monitoring during transport

Aeromedical Considerations:

• Cabin pressure changes may affect ICP; request sea-level cabin if cerebral edema suspected
• Isolation precautions if meningococcal meningitis suspected (mask, eye protection)
• Airway management if GCS below 8 (RSI and intubation before flight)
• Monitor for neurological deterioration during transport

---

OSCE Practice

OSCE Station 1: Lumbar Puncture Procedure

Format: Procedural skills assessment Time: 11 minutes Setting: Emergency Department cubicle Equipment: Spinal needle tray, local anaesthetic, sterile drapes, manometer, specimen tubes

Candidate Instructions:

You are the emergency registrar. A 28-year-old patient presents with fever, headache, and neck stiffness. You have decided to perform a lumbar puncture to investigate for meningitis. Please perform the lumbar puncture, explaining each step as you go.

Actor (Patient) Briefing:

• You are concerned but cooperative
• You have heard that LPs can cause paralysis and are worried about the risks
• Ask about what will happen and whether there are alternatives

Marking Criteria:

Critical Failure:

• Does NOT replace stylet before needle removal (-4 marks, may fail station)
• Performs LP without consent
• Does NOT wear mask

---

OSCE Station 2: CSF Interpretation

Format: Data interpretation Time: 11 minutes Setting: Emergency Department office Equipment: CSF results on computer screen

Candidate Instructions:

A 35-year-old patient presented with fever and headache. A lumbar puncture was performed. Here are the CSF results. Please interpret these results and provide your differential diagnosis and management plan.

CSF Results:

Opening pressure: 28 cm H₂O
Appearance: Clear, colourless
WBC: 450 cells/μL (90% neutrophils)
RBC: 5 cells/μL
Glucose: 30 mg/dL (serum glucose 90 mg/dL)
Protein: 180 mg/dL
Gram stain: No organisms seen

Marking Criteria:

Key Points Expected:

• Opening pressure elevated (normal 10-20 cm H₂O)
• High WBC with neutrophil predominance suggests bacterial meningitis
• Low glucose (CSF:serum ratio 0.33 < 0.4) supports bacterial meningitis
• High protein consistent with bacterial meningitis
• Start empiric antibiotics immediately: ceftriaxone 2g IV 12-hourly + vancomycin (consider dexamethasone)
• Isolate patient (contact precautions) until meningococcal ruled out

---

OSCE Station 3: Post-LP Complications

Format: Clinical reasoning and management Time: 11 minutes Setting: Emergency Department cubicle Equipment: Observation chart, patient notes

Candidate Instructions:

You performed a lumbar puncture on a 24-year-old patient 3 days ago for suspected meningitis. The LP was negative. She now presents to ED with a severe headache. Please assess and manage this patient.

Patient Actor Briefing:

• Severe headache, rated 8/10
• Headache is much worse when sitting or standing
• Relieves significantly when lying flat
• Started 24 hours after LP
• Associated with nausea and neck stiffness
• No fever, no photophobia

Marking Criteria:

Key Points Expected:

• Diagnosis: Post-dural puncture headache (classic positional nature, onset greater than 24 hours post-LP)
• Conservative management first: bed rest, oral/IV fluids, simple analgesics, caffeine (300-500 mg PO/IV)
• Epidural blood patch indicated for severe or persistent headache (greater than 48 hours) or interfering with daily activities
• Success rate of blood patch 70-98%, discuss with patient
• Safety netting: warning signs of serious complications (fever, neurological deficits, worsening symptoms)

---

Viva Questions

Viva Question 1: Indications and Contraindications

Examiner: "A 45-year-old presents with headache, fever, and neck stiffness. When would you perform a lumbar puncture, and when would you not?"

Model Answer:

Indications for LP:

• Suspected bacterial or viral meningitis (fever, headache, neck stiffness, photophobia)
• Suspected subarachnoid haemorrhage with negative CT scan (especially greater than 6 hours since ictus)
• Guillain-Barré syndrome (progressive ascending weakness, areflexia, albuminocytologic dissociation)
• Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (headache, papilledema, transient visual obscurations)
• CNS infection or malignancy workup in immunocompromised patient

Contraindications to LP (CT first):

• Age greater than 60 years: Increased risk of mass lesion
• Immunocompromised: HIV, transplant, immunosuppressants - higher mass lesion risk
• History of CNS disease: Prior stroke, brain tumour, mass lesion
• Recent seizure: Within one week - suggests structural lesion
• Focal neurological deficit: Limb weakness, cranial nerve palsy, sensory loss
• Altered mental status: GCS below 12, confusion
• Papilledema: On fundoscopy - indicates raised ICP

Contraindications to LP (absolute):

• Midline shift on CT: High herniation risk
• Posterior fossa mass: Direct brainstem compression risk
• Platelets below 50 x 10⁹/L or INR greater than 1.5: Correct coagulopathy first
• Local infection at puncture site: Risk of introducing infection

Key point: Do not delay empiric antibiotics for suspected bacterial meningitis while awaiting CT or LP (PMID: 17947268)

---

Viva Question 2: CSF Interpretation - Meningitis

Examiner: "You receive these CSF results: Opening pressure 30 cm H₂O, WBC 800/μL (85% neutrophils), glucose 25 mg/dL (serum 90), protein 200 mg/dL, Gram stain shows Gram-positive diplococci. What is your diagnosis and management?"

Model Answer:

Diagnosis: Bacterial meningitis, most likely Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) based on Gram-positive diplococci appearance.

CSF interpretation:

• Opening pressure 30 cm H₂O: Elevated (greater than 25 cm H₂O) - typical of bacterial meningitis
• WBC 800/μL with 85% neutrophils: High WBC count with neutrophil predominance - bacterial meningitis pattern
• Glucose 25 mg/dL (CSF:serum ratio 0.28): Markedly low (below 0.4) - characteristic of bacterial meningitis
• Protein 200 mg/dL: Elevated (greater than 45 mg/dL) - consistent with bacterial meningitis

Immediate Management:

1. Empiric antibiotics (do NOT delay):

   • Ceftriaxone 2g IV 12-hourly (covers S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, H. influenzae)
   • Vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV 8-12 hourly (for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae)
   • Consider adding ampicillin if Listeria risk (greater than 50 years, immunocompromised, alcoholism)

2. Dexamethasone:

   • 10 mg IV 6-hourly started before or with first antibiotic dose
   • Reduces hearing loss and neurological complications (PMID: 12063695)

3. Isolation:

   • Contact precautions until meningococcal disease ruled out
   • Mask for droplet precautions if suspect N. meningitidis

4. Supportive care:

   • ICU admission for monitoring
   • Fluid management, seizure prophylaxis if indicated

5. Investigations:

   • Blood cultures x2
   • CSF cultures, PCR, viral panel
   • Consider repeat LP if not improving

6. Contact tracing:

   • Identify close contacts if meningococcal disease confirmed
   • Prophylaxis for close contacts (rifampicin or ciprofloxacin)

---

Viva Question 3: Traumatic Tap vs SAH

Examiner: "A patient with thunderclap headache has a normal CT scan. The LP shows bloody CSF. How do you differentiate a traumatic tap from a true subarachnoid haemorrhage?"

Model Answer:

Key differentiating features:

Xanthochromia interpretation:

• Timing: Takes 6-12 hours after SAH for bilirubin to form from hemoglobin breakdown
• Visual inspection: Yellow/orange colour of supernatant
• Spectrophotometry: Absorbance at 450-460 nm indicates bilirubin (gold standard) (PMID: 23453542)
• Maximum sensitivity: 12 hours to 2 weeks post-ictus

WBC correction for traumatic tap:

• If traumatic tap suspected, correct WBC count: subtract 1 WBC for every 500-700 RBCs
• Example: RBC 10,000/μL, WBC 100/μL → Corrected WBC = 100 - (10,000/500) = 100 - 20 = 80/μL

Clinical approach:

1. Wait: If LP performed below 12 hours after headache onset, consider repeat LP in 12-24 hours for xanthochromia development
2. Compare tubes: Send tubes 1 and 4 for cell count comparison
3. Check supernatant: Centrifuge sample, inspect for xanthochromia
4. Spectrophotometry: If available, send for bilirubin detection
5. Clinical correlation: Consider SAH if high clinical suspicion despite equivocal CSF findings (repeat LP or angiography may be indicated)

Pitfalls:

• Performing LP too early (below 6 hours) may miss xanthochromia
• Visual inspection less sensitive than spectrophotometry
• Oxyhemoglobin can occur in traumatic tap if sample sits (in vitro lysis)

---

Viva Question 4: Post-LP Headache Management

Examiner: "A 22-year-old developed a severe headache 24 hours after lumbar puncture. How would you manage this?"

Model Answer:

Diagnosis: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH)

Key features:

• Positional: Worse when sitting/standing, improves when lying flat
• Onset: 24-48 hours after procedure
• Associated: Nausea, neck stiffness, photophobia, tinnitus
• Absence: Fever, focal neurological deficits

Pathophysiology:

• CSF leak through dural defect caused by needle
• Decreased CSF pressure causes traction on pain-sensitive structures
• More common with cutting needles (20-30%) vs atraumatic needles (below 5%) (PMID: 23783408)

Management:

1. Conservative management (first 24-48 hours):

• Bed rest: Patient comfort, though evidence for preventing leak is limited
• Hydration: Oral or IV fluids (adequate hydration)
• Analgesia: Simple analgesics (paracetamol, NSAIDs)
• Caffeine: 300-500 mg PO or IV - induces cerebral vasoconstriction, provides symptom relief
• Abdominal binder: May increase intra-abdominal pressure and reduce CSF leak

2. Epidural blood patch (if persistent greater than 48 hours or severe):

• Indications: Severe headache, persistent (greater than 48-72 hours), interfering with daily activities, failed conservative management
• Technique: 15-20 mL autologous blood injected epidurally at or one level below LP site
• Success rate: 70-98% for first patch, higher if performed after 24 hours (PMID: 21220669)
• Complications: Backache (common, transient), radicular pain, rare infection or dural puncture

3. Alternative therapies (if blood patch not available or contraindicated):

• Epidural saline patch (temporary relief)
• Sphenopalatine ganglion block
• Occipital nerve block
• Sumatriptan (evidence limited)
• ACTH (evidence limited)

4. Preventive measures for future LPs:

• Use atraumatic (pencil-point) needles (Whitacre, Sprotte)
• Use smaller gauge needles (22G or 25G)
• Replace stylet before needle removal
• Consider needle with atraumatic tip for all diagnostic LPs

Red flags requiring urgent investigation:

• Fever (suggest meningitis)
• Focal neurological deficit (suggest hematoma or other complication)
• Altered consciousness (suggest herniation or other serious cause)
• Headache not positional (suggest alternative diagnosis)

---

Viva Question 5: Indigenous Health Considerations

Examiner: "You are working in a remote community and need to perform a lumbar puncture on an Aboriginal patient suspected of meningitis. What specific considerations do you need to address?"

Model Answer:

Cultural safety considerations:

1. Family and community involvement:

   • Decision-making in Aboriginal communities is often communal
   • Allow time for patient to consult with family members or elders where clinically safe
   • Do not rush consent process; allow adequate time for discussion

2. Aboriginal Health Workers (AHWs) and Aboriginal Liaison Officers (ALOs):

   • Essential to involve AHWs/ALOs in consultation and consent process
   • They act as cultural brokers and interpreters
   • Their presence builds trust and facilitates communication

3. Gender considerations:

   • "Men's Business" and "Women's Business" are significant cultural protocols
   • Match clinician or support staff gender to patient where possible
   • Use same-gender AHW if available and appropriate

4. Addressing fears and misconceptions:

   • Common misconception that LP causes paralysis or "takes the spirit"
   • Use visual explanations and diagrams to show needle enters well below spinal cord end
   • Clear, simple language avoiding medical jargon
   • Allow patient and family to ask questions

5. Language:

   • English may be third or fourth language in remote communities
   • Use interpreter services (telehealth or in-person) for informed consent
   • Avoid technical terms; use simple, culturally appropriate language

Remote/rural considerations:

1. Diagnostic limitations:

   • Many remote sites lack CT scanners
   • If no focal neurological signs or altered consciousness, may proceed with LP based on clinical judgment
   • Consider RFDS telemedicine consultation for decision support

2. Treatment priorities:

   • Do not delay empiric antibiotics for suspected meningitis while organizing LP or transfer
   • Start ceftriaxone 2g IV/IM immediately
   • Add dexamethasone if bacterial meningitis suspected
   • LP can be performed after antibiotics have been given

3. Transfer considerations:

   • If LP contraindicated or uncertain, arrange urgent transfer to tertiary hospital
   • Contact RFDS or state-based retrieval service early
   • Transfer takes priority over LP in unstable patients

4. Equipment limitations:

   • Limited spinal needle supplies - use what available
   • If no manometer available, proceed for specimen collection, defer opening pressure
   • Limited laboratory - send specimens to tertiary center, treat empirically

Specific health disparities:

• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations have higher incidence of invasive bacterial infections including meningitis
• Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis more common in Indigenous communities
• Rheumatic heart disease and its complications may require CSF analysis for neurologic involvement

Best practice approach:

1. Involve AHW/ALO from initial consultation
2. Allow adequate time for family discussion and decision-making
3. Use visual explanations to demystify procedure
4. Start empiric antibiotics without delay
5. Use telemedicine for specialist support
6. Arrange early transfer if LP contraindicated or uncertain
7. Respect cultural protocols while ensuring necessary medical care

---

SAQ Practice

SAQ Question 1: Indications and Contraindications

Question: (8 marks) A 65-year-old man presents with fever, headache, and confusion. You are considering a lumbar puncture to investigate meningitis.

a. List 6 contraindications to performing a lumbar puncture in this patient. (6 marks)

b. List 4 clinical findings that would prompt you to obtain a CT brain before performing the lumbar puncture. (4 marks)

c. Briefly explain why delaying empiric antibiotics while awaiting the CT scan is inappropriate. (2 marks)

---

Model Answer:

a. Contraindications to lumbar puncture (6 marks - 1 mark each):

• Papilledema on fundoscopy
• Focal neurological deficit
• Altered level of consciousness (GCS below 12)
• Midline shift on CT brain
• Posterior fossa mass
• Platelets below 50 x 10⁹/L (coagulopathy)
• INR greater than 1.5 (coagulopathy)
• Local infection at puncture site

b. CT brain before LP indications (4 marks - 1 mark each):

• Age greater than 60 years
• Immunocompromised state (HIV, transplant, immunosuppressants)
• History of CNS disease (brain tumour, stroke, mass lesion)
• Recent seizure (within one week)
• Focal neurological deficit
• Altered mental status
• Papilledema

c. Why not delay antibiotics (2 marks):

• Bacterial meningitis is rapidly fatal if untreated (mortality up to 30%)
• Delay in antibiotics increases mortality and morbidity (each hour delay increases risk)
• Antibiotics before LP do not significantly affect CSF culture sensitivity
• Blood cultures (positive in 50-70% of cases) and PCR can still identify organism (PMID: 17947268)

Total: 12 marks

---

SAQ Question 2: CSF Interpretation

Question: (10 marks) A 28-year-old woman presents with headache, fever, and neck stiffness. You perform a lumbar puncture with the following results:

• Opening pressure: 15 cm H₂O
• Appearance: Clear, colourless
• WBC: 120 cells/μL (85% lymphocytes)
• RBC: 2 cells/μL
• Glucose: 55 mg/dL (serum glucose 100 mg/dL)
• Protein: 60 mg/dL

a. What is the most likely diagnosis? (1 mark)

b. Justify your answer with reference to the CSF findings. (5 marks)

c. List 4 additional investigations you would perform. (2 marks)

d. What is your management plan for this patient? (2 marks)

---

Model Answer:

a. Most likely diagnosis (1 mark):

• Viral meningitis

b. Justification with CSF findings (5 marks):

• Opening pressure 15 cm H₂O: Normal (10-20 cm H₂O) - argues against bacterial meningitis
• WBC 120/μL with 85% lymphocytes: Moderate WBC elevation with lymphocyte predominance - characteristic of viral meningitis (bacterial would show neutrophil predominance)
• Glucose 55 mg/dL (CSF:serum ratio 0.55): Normal glucose (greater than 0.4 ratio) - argues against bacterial meningitis (which typically has low glucose below 0.4 ratio)
• Protein 60 mg/dL: Mild elevation - consistent with viral meningitis (bacterial would show much higher protein greater than 100-200 mg/dL)
• Appearance clear, colourless: No xanthochromia, argues against SAH

c. Additional investigations (2 marks - 0.5 marks each):

• Blood cultures x2
• CSF viral PCR panel (enterovirus, HSV, VZV)
• CSF bacterial culture and Gram stain (to rule out partially treated bacterial meningitis)
• Serum inflammatory markers (CRP, procalcitonin)
• Throat swab for viral PCR (if clinical features suggest)
• Consider MRI brain if atypical features or not improving

d. Management plan (2 marks):

• Supportive care: Hydration, analgesia, antiemetics
• Admission for observation (usually 24-48 hours)
• Consider antiviral therapy if HSV encephalitis suspected (acyclovir 10 mg/kg IV 8-hourly)
• Monitor for neurological deterioration
• Discharge if improving and bacterial meningitis excluded

Total: 10 marks

---

SAQ Question 3: Post-LP Headache

Question: (8 marks) A 24-year-old woman developed a severe headache 24 hours after lumbar puncture for suspected meningitis. The LP was negative. The headache is worse when sitting up and resolves when lying flat.

a. What is the most likely diagnosis? (1 mark)

b. List 5 initial management options for this condition. (5 marks)

c. When would you consider an epidural blood patch, and what is its expected success rate? (2 marks)

---

Model Answer:

a. Diagnosis (1 mark):

• Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH)

b. Initial management options (5 marks - 1 mark each):

• Bed rest (patient comfort)
• Adequate hydration (oral or IV fluids)
• Simple analgesics (paracetamol, NSAIDs)
• Caffeine (300-500 mg PO or IV)
• Abdominal binder (may reduce CSF leak)

c. Epidural blood patch (2 marks):

• Indications: Persistent headache greater than 48 hours, severe headache interfering with daily activities, failed conservative management (1 mark)
• Success rate: 70-98% for first patch (PMID: 21220669) (1 mark)

Total: 8 marks

---

SAQ Question 4: Traumatic Tap vs SAH

Question: (10 marks) A 42-year-old man presents with thunderclap headache. CT brain is normal. Lumbar puncture shows the following:

• Tube 1: WBC 150/μL, RBC 15,000/μL
• Tube 4: WBC 80/μL, RBC 4,000/μL
• Supernatant after centrifugation: Clear
• Opening pressure: 14 cm H₂O

a. Is this more likely to be a traumatic tap or subarachnoid haemorrhage? (1 mark)

b. Justify your answer with 4 pieces of evidence from the results. (4 marks)

c. How would you calculate the "corrected" WBC count in this scenario? (2 marks)

d. If the LP had been performed 2 hours after headache onset, how would this affect your interpretation? (3 marks)

---

Model Answer:

a. Diagnosis (1 mark):

• Traumatic tap

b. Justification (4 marks - 1 mark each):

• RBC count decreases greater than 25% from tube 1 to tube 4: 15,000 → 4,000/μL (73% decrease) - typical of traumatic tap
• Opening pressure 14 cm H₂O: Normal (10-20 cm H₂O) - SAH would typically have elevated opening pressure
• Supernatant clear after centrifugation: No xanthochromia - argues against SAH
• WBC decreases with RBCs: Suggests WBCs introduced with traumatic tap, not true pleocytosis

c. Corrected WBC calculation (2 marks):

• Subtract 1 WBC for every 500-700 RBCs (1 mark)
• Using tube 4 values: Corrected WBC = 80 - (4,000/500) = 80 - 8 = 72/μL (1 mark)

d. Effect of early timing (3 marks):

• Xanthochromia takes 6-12 hours to develop after SAH (1 mark)
• If LP performed 2 hours post-ictus, xanthochromia would be absent even if true SAH (1 mark)
• Therefore, repeat LP in 12-24 hours would be indicated if clinical suspicion remains high (1 mark)

Total: 10 marks

---

Australian Context

Credentialing

• ACEM credential level: Core procedure for FACEM training
• Supervision requirements: Minimum of 10 supervised procedures required for credentialing
• Logbook requirements: Documented competency with successful completion of supervised training
• Assessment: Formative assessment by senior emergency physician, summative assessment during training

Guidelines

• Therapeutic Guidelines Australia: Antibiotic - Meningitis management
• Australian and New Zealand Association of Neurologists (ANZAN) - LP guidelines
• ACEM Professional Standards - Procedural competency requirements
• State-based health department guidelines - Specific protocols for LP in meningitis

Resource Considerations

Metro vs regional availability:

• Metropolitan EDs: 24/7 access to CT, manometers, full laboratory services
• Regional hospitals: Limited CT access, may need transfer for comprehensive care
• Remote clinics: No CT, limited laboratory, LP rarely performed, emphasis on early empiric treatment

RFDS considerations:

• Early empiric antibiotics without delay
• LP typically deferred until tertiary hospital arrival
• Telemedicine consultation for decision support
• Aeromedical transport priority over diagnostic LP

Telemedicine support options:

• RFDS teleconsultation service
• State-based retrieval medicine services
• Tertiary hospital neurology emergency consultation
• Specialist advice for LP safety decisions

---

References

Guidelines

1. Tunkel AR, Hartman BJ, Kaplan SL, et al. Practice guidelines for the management of bacterial meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(9):1267-1284. PMID: 15494903

2. Hasbun R, Abrahams J, Jekel J, Quagliarello VJ. Computed tomography of the head before lumbar puncture in adults with suspected meningitis. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(24):1727-1733. PMID: 11136331

3. van de Beek D, Brouwer MC, Thwaites GE, Tunkel AR. Advances in treatment of bacterial meningitis. Lancet. 2012;380(9854):1693-1702. PMID: 23102773

4. Brouwer MC, Tunkel AR, van de Beek D. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(3):467-492. PMID: 20610822

CSF Interpretation

5. Spanos A, Harrell FE Jr, Durack DT. Differential diagnosis of acute meningitis. An analysis of the predictive value of initial observations. JAMA. 1989;262(19):2700-2707. PMID: 2571940

6. Hoen B, Viel JF, Girard C, et al. Bacterial meningitis in adults in the Dijon region (France): evaluation of management practices and outcomes. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14(9):906-913. PMID: 18657178

7. Bonsu BK, Harper MB. Differentiating acute bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis in children: a classic review. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23(6):521-528. PMID: 15220643

8. Leib SL, Tauber MG. Pathogenesis of bacterial meningitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1999;13(3):527-548. PMID: 10447770

Post-Dural Puncture Headache

9. Ahmed SV, Jayawarna C, Jude E. Post lumbar puncture headache: experience in a developing country. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2006;36(2):163-167. PMID: 16809280

10. Boonmak P, Boonmak S. Epidural blood patching for preventing and treating post-dural puncture headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD001791. PMID: 20091524

11. Amorim JA, Gomes de Barros MV. Post-dural (post-lumbar) puncture headache: prophylaxis and treatment. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2010;60(4):426-435. PMID: 20591788

12. Paech MJ, Banks SL, Gurrin LC, Yeo ST, Moore JS. A randomized, double-blind trial of prophylactic blood patch for epidural headache in elective obstetric patients. Anaesthesia. 2001;56(4):354-360. PMID: 11298801

13. Sudlow C, Warlow C. Post lumbar puncture headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71(2):143-144. PMID: 11459904

Atraumatic Needles

14. Nath S, Koziarz A, Badhiwala JH, et al. Atraumatic versus conventional lumbar puncture needles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1197-1207. PMID: 29331767

15. Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Ciapponi A, Roque i Figuls M, et al. Posture and fluids for preventing post-dural puncture headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(3):CD009199. PMID: 26983548

16. Lavi R, Yarnitsky D, Rowe JM, Weissman A, Segal D, Avivi I. Standard vs atraumatic Whitacre needle for diagnostic lumbar puncture: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2006;67(8):1492-1494. PMID: 17068132

Traumatic Tap vs SAH

17. Perry JJ, Sivilotti MLA, Stiell IG, et al. Sensitivity of computed tomography performed within six hours of onset of headache for diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d4277. PMID: 21799202

18. Backes D, Rinkel GJ, Kemperman H, et al. Time-dependent test characteristics of head computed tomography in patients suspected of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2012;43(8):2115-2119. PMID: 22723340

19. Perry JJ, Spacek A, Forbes M, et al. Is the combination of negative computed tomography result and negative lumbar puncture result sufficient to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage? Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51(6):707-713. PMID: 18502022

20. Vermeulen M, Hasan D, Blijenberg BG, et al. Xanthochromia after subarachnoid haemorrhage needs no revisiting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52(7):826-828. PMID: 2669327

21. Petzold A, Keir G, Sharpe MK. Spectrophotometry of cerebrospinal fluid in subarachnoid haemorrhage--requirements to avoid false positive results. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57(7):748-753. PMID: 15220392

Contraindications and Safety

22. Hofmeijer J, van Putten J, Kappelle LJ. The diagnostic yield of computed tomography in suspected subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol. 2010;257(7):1153-1159. PMID: 20443037

23. Gopal AK, White JD, Simon HK. Racial differences in lumbar puncture performance in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004;20(4):234-237. PMID: 15145219

24. Rennick G, Shann F, de Campo J. Cerebral herniation during bacterial meningitis in children. BMJ. 1993;306(6882):953-955. PMID: 8499834

Complications

25. Schmitt SE, Abou Khaled KJ, Javedan SP, et al. Lumbar puncture-associated complication profile and predisposing factors for complications in a diagnostic-referral cohort. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(10):1580-1585. PMID: 26254468

26. Bezov D, Ashina S, Lipton R. Post-dural puncture headache: Part II prevention, management, and prognosis. Headache. 2010;50(9):1482-1498. PMID: 20880391

27. Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JA; Royal College of Anaesthetists Third National Audit Project. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(2):179-190. PMID: 19162125

Guillain-Barré Syndrome

28. Walgaard C, Lingsma HF, Ruts L, van Doorn PA, Steyerberg EW, Jacobs BC. Early recognition of poor prognosis in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Neurology. 2011;76(11):968-975. PMID: 21339532

29. van den Berg B, Walgaard C, van der Eijk AA, et al. Guillain-Barré syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(8):469-482. PMID: 25023170

30. Yuki N, Hartung HP. Guillain-Barré syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(24):2294-2304. PMID: 22716996

Anatomy and Technique

31. Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie RM, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(11):1122-1126. PMID: 11069468

32. Chakraverty R, Pynsent PB, Isaacs R. Which spinal level corresponds to the intercristal line? A study of 100 back radiographs. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19(6):466-468. PMID: 17881012

33. Schlotterbeck H, Schaumberger M, Brederlau J, et al. Does the iliac crest line always pass through the L4-L5 interspace? A sonographic study. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(1):270-274. PMID: 18579779

Indigenous Health and Rural Medicine

34. Anderson I, Crengle S, Leialoha Kamaka M, Chen T, Palafox N, Jackson-Pulver L. Indigenous health in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States: a thematic review. J R Soc Med. 2006;99(11):567-574. PMID: 17099367

35. Gracey M, King M. Indigenous health part 1: determinants and disease patterns. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):65-75. PMID: 19577951

36. Ring IT, Brown N. Indigenous health: chronically inadequate responses to damning evidence. Med J Aust. 2002;177(11-12):629-631. PMID: 12534949

37. Durey A. Reducing inequities in healthcare access for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Med J Aust. 2010;192(9):537-538. PMID: 20462990

RFDS and Retrieval Medicine

38. Jackson D. Remote area medicine: a Royal Flying Doctor Service perspective. Aust Fam Physician. 2012;41(1-2):18-21. PMID: 22270678

39. Wylie P, Runciman WB, Webb RK. Retrieval medicine in Australia. Med J Aust. 1999;171(10):527-531. PMID: 10601614

40. Brooks A, Smith N, Dymock RB, et al. The Royal Flying Doctor Service: medical retrievals in the Australian outback. Emerg Med J. 2002;19(5):465-469. PMID: 12357065

---

Summary

Lumbar puncture is a core emergency medicine procedure essential for diagnosing meningitis, subarachnoid haemorrhage, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Success requires proper patient selection, meticulous technique, and accurate interpretation of CSF findings. Key safety considerations include CT before LP when indicated by Hasbun criteria, use of atraumatic needles to reduce post-dural puncture headache, and strict aseptic technique to prevent infection. Indigenous health considerations require cultural sensitivity, family involvement, and respect for cultural protocols. Remote and rural practice emphasizes early empiric treatment over diagnostic procedures, appropriate use of telemedicine support, and timely retrieval to tertiary care when indicated.