Emergency Medicine
Emergency
High Evidence

Deliberate Self-Harm

Deliberate self-harm affects 200-250 per 100,000 Australians annually presenting to emergency departments. It encompasse... ACEM Primary Written, ACEM Primary V

Updated 24 Jan 2026
54 min read

Clinical board

A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.

Urgent signals

Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.

  • High-lethality method (hanging, firearms, jumping, carbon monoxide)
  • Ongoing suicidal ideation with plan and means
  • Previous history of multiple self-harm episodes
  • Severe psychiatric illness (psychosis, severe depression, command hallucinations)

Exam focus

Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.

  • ACEM Primary Written
  • ACEM Primary Viva
  • ACEM Fellowship Written
  • ACEM Fellowship OSCE

Linked comparisons

Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.

  • Major Depressive Disorder
  • Bipolar Disorder

Editorial and exam context

ACEM Primary Written
ACEM Primary Viva
ACEM Fellowship Written
ACEM Fellowship OSCE
Clinical reference article

Quick Answer

One-liner: Deliberate self-harm (DSH) is intentional self-poisoning or self-injury requiring comprehensive psychosocial assessment, medical stabilization, and collaborative safety planning to prevent repeat episodes and suicide.

Deliberate self-harm affects 200-250 per 100,000 Australians annually presenting to emergency departments. It encompasses both suicide attempts (with intent to die) and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI, without intent to die). The 1-year suicide completion rate after DSH presentation is 1-2%, with the highest risk in the first 3 months post-discharge. Emergency physicians must medically stabilize, perform comprehensive psychosocial assessment, avoid relying on risk stratification tools, engage psychiatric services, and ensure robust follow-up arrangements. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have 2-3 times higher rates of suicide and DSH, requiring culturally safe approaches.


ACEM Exam Focus

Primary Exam Relevance

  • Anatomy: Neuroanatomy of mood regulation (prefrontal cortex, limbic system, HPA axis)
  • Physiology: Neurotransmitter systems (serotonin, noradrenaline, dopamine) in depression and impulsivity
  • Pharmacology: Antidepressants (SSRIs, TCAs, MAOIs), antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, naltrexone for NSSI

Fellowship Exam Relevance

  • Written: Risk assessment approaches, limitations of scoring tools, safety planning, Indigenous health disparities, mental health legislation (involuntary treatment), capacity assessment
  • OSCE: Communication with suicidal patient, breaking bad news to family, psychiatric history-taking, risk assessment documentation, involuntary treatment orders
  • Key domains tested: Medical Expert, Communicator (empathy, non-judgmental approach), Health Advocate (addressing Indigenous disparities), Professional (ethical considerations, duty of care vs autonomy)

Key Points

Clinical Pearl

The 5 things you MUST know:

  1. Risk stratification scales (SAD PERSONS, Modified SAD PERSONS) have poor predictive validity - use comprehensive psychosocial assessment, NOT isolated scores, to determine disposition
  2. Highest suicide risk is in the first 3 months after ED discharge - ensure robust follow-up (active contact within 48-72h, not passive referral)
  3. Distinguish suicide attempt (intent to die) from NSSI (no intent to die) - but NSSI is still a significant risk factor for future suicide
  4. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have 2-3× higher suicide rates - cultural safety, liaison officers, family involvement critical
  5. High-lethality methods (hanging, firearms, jumping, CO poisoning) strongly predict future completed suicide - these patients require psychiatric admission even if "settled" in ED

Epidemiology

MetricValueSource
Incidence (ED presentations)200-250 per 100,000/year (Australia)[1]
Suicide completion post-DSH1-2% within 1 year[2]
Repeat DSH within 1 year15-25%[3]
Peak age for DSH presentation15-24 years[4]
Peak age for suicide completion45-64 years (males), 40-44 years (females)[5]
Gender ratio (DSH)F:M 1.5:1 (presentations)[6]
Gender ratio (suicide completion)M:F 3:1 (deaths)[7]
Method distribution (DSH)Self-poisoning 60-80%, Self-injury 20-40%[8]

Australian/NZ Specific

  • Australian suicide rate: 12.9 per 100,000 (2021) [9]
  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander suicide rate: 27.1 per 100,000 (2.1× non-Indigenous rate) [10]
  • Māori suicide rate (NZ): 19.6 per 100,000 (1.5× non-Māori rate) [11]
  • Highest rates: Remote/very remote Aboriginal communities (up to 3× national average) [12]
  • Peak time: First 3 months post-discharge from psychiatric admission or ED visit [13]
  • LGBTIQ+ youth: 5-6× higher suicide attempt rates than heterosexual peers [14]

Pathophysiology

Mechanism

Suicide vs Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI)

Suicide Attempt

  • Intent: To end one's life
  • Lethality: Often high-lethality methods (hanging, jumping, firearms, severe overdose)
  • Psychological state: Hopelessness, perceived burden, thwarted belongingness (Interpersonal Theory of Suicide) [15]
  • Neurobiological: Reduced serotonergic function (5-HT1A receptor binding), HPA axis dysregulation, impaired executive function (ventromedial prefrontal cortex)

Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI)

  • Intent: Emotional regulation, relief from overwhelming feelings, self-punishment (NOT to die)
  • Lethality: Typically low-lethality (superficial cutting, burning, scratching)
  • Psychological state: Emotional dysregulation, often borderline personality traits [16]
  • Neurobiological: Endogenous opioid release (explains temporary relief), reduced pain sensitivity during episodes

CRITICAL DISTINCTION: NSSI is distinct from suicide attempt, BUT individuals with NSSI have 5-10× increased risk of future suicide attempts due to acquired capability for self-harm [17]

Pathological Progression

Predisposing factors (psychiatric illness, trauma, genetics) 
  → Precipitating stressor (relationship breakdown, job loss, trauma) 
    → Acute suicidal crisis (hopelessness, intent, plan, means) 
      → Self-harm act 
        → ED presentation 
          → Risk of repeat DSH (15-25%) or suicide completion (1-2%)

Why It Matters Clinically

  • Assessment must distinguish intent: Suicidal intent vs emotional regulation vs manipulative behavior (though all require compassionate care)
  • High-lethality methods predict completion: Even if patient appears "settled," hanging/jumping/firearms indicate high ongoing risk
  • Post-discharge period is highest risk: Active follow-up (not passive referral) reduces repeat DSH by 20-30% [18]

Clinical Approach

Recognition

DSH presentations to ED:

  • Overt self-poisoning (overdose) or self-injury (cutting, hanging, jumping)
  • Covert presentations: Vague somatic complaints, "accidental" overdose, repeated presentations with medically unexplained symptoms
  • Police or ambulance brought with known suicide attempt
  • Family/friends expressing concern about suicidal statements

Initial Assessment

Primary Survey

  • A: Airway patency (especially if reduced GCS from overdose or hanging attempt)
  • B: Respiratory rate/effort (opioid/benzodiazepine overdose, aspiration risk)
  • C: Hemodynamic stability (tricyclic overdose, significant blood loss from cutting/stabbing)
  • D: GCS, pupil size (toxidromes), agitation vs sedation
  • E: Examine for injuries (lacerations, ligature marks, signs of trauma)

MEDICAL STABILIZATION FIRST - psychiatric assessment only when GCS 15, medically stable, cooperative

History

Key Questions (Once Medically Stable)

QuestionSignificance
"What happened today? Can you walk me through the events?"Understand precipitant, intent, planning
"Were you intending to end your life?"Distinguish suicide attempt vs NSSI vs accidental
"Did you expect to die from what you did?"Assess lethality expectation vs actual lethality
"How do you feel now about what happened?"Regret vs relief at survival (regret = higher risk)
"Have you harmed yourself before? How many times?"Previous DSH is strongest predictor of future DSH [19]
"Have you thought about harming yourself in the future?"Assess ongoing ideation
"Do you have a specific plan? Do you have the means?"Plan + means = significantly higher risk
"What stopped you from going further / What saved you?"Protective factors vs chance interruption
"Who knows about this? Who can support you?"Social supports assessment
"Have you written a note, given away possessions, said goodbyes?"Preparatory acts indicate higher intent
"Do you use alcohol or drugs? Did you use them today?"Intoxication increases impulsivity

Red Flag Symptoms

Red Flag
  • Ongoing suicidal ideation with plan and means
  • High-lethality method (hanging, firearms, jumping, carbon monoxide, drowning)
  • Regret at surviving or anger at being interrupted
  • Severe psychiatric symptoms (psychosis, command hallucinations, severe agitation)
  • Previous multiple DSH episodes (especially if escalating lethality)
  • Recent significant loss with no social supports (bereavement, relationship breakdown, job loss)
  • Substance intoxication or withdrawal
  • Chronic pain or terminal illness (rational suicide risk)

Examination

General Inspection

  • Affect: Flat, tearful, agitated, hostile, incongruent (laughing when discussing serious harm)
  • Behavior: Eye contact, rapport, cooperation vs evasiveness
  • Speech: Slow/monotone (depression), pressured (mania), thought disorder (psychosis)
  • Appearance: Self-care, evidence of intoxication, disheveled

Mental State Examination (MSE)

DomainAssessmentSignificance
AppearanceGrooming, hygiene, scars from previous self-harmChronic NSSI (multiple parallel scars on forearms)
BehaviorCooperative, agitated, withdrawn, hostileAgitation/hostility may indicate psychosis or intoxication
SpeechRate, volume, toneSlow/quiet (depression), pressured (mania)
MoodSubjective ("How do you feel?")Depressed, anxious, empty, angry
AffectObjective emotional expressionCongruent vs incongruent, range, reactivity
Thought ContentSuicidal ideation, plan, intent, hopelessness, psychosisKey risk assessment component
PerceptionHallucinations (auditory command, visual)Command hallucinations to self-harm = psychiatric emergency
CognitionOrientation, memory, concentrationImpaired if intoxicated or organic cause
InsightUnderstanding of illness, need for helpPoor insight increases risk
JudgmentAbility to make safe decisionsImpaired in severe depression, psychosis

Physical Examination Specific Findings

SiteFindingSignificance
Forearms/wristsMultiple parallel superficial scars ("ladder pattern")Chronic NSSI (cutting)
Forearms/wristsDeep transverse lacerations, tendon injuryHigh-intent suicide attempt
NeckLigature marks, petechiae, subconjunctival hemorrhageHanging attempt - high lethality
AbdomenStab wounds, eviscerationSevere self-injury, high intent
ChestStab wounds over heartVery high intent

Investigations

Immediate (Resus Bay - If Overdose or Hemodynamically Unstable)

TestPurposeKey Finding
Capillary glucoseExclude hypoglycemia (altered GCS)<4 mmol/L
ECGToxidromes (TCA, antipsychotics, citalopram), QT prolongationQRS greater than 100ms (TCA), QTc greater than 500ms (citalopram, antipsychotics)
Paracetamol levelUniversal screening (common in overdose, asymptomatic early)4h level plotted on nomogram
Salicylate levelUniversal screeninggreater than 300 mg/L (toxicity)
ABGMetabolic acidosis (salicylate, metformin, toxic alcohols), respiratory depressionpH <7.35, lactate greater than 4

Standard ED Workup (All DSH Presentations)

TestIndicationInterpretation
Paracetamol + salicylateAll overdoses or suspected ingestionTreat if paracetamol greater than 150 mg/L at 4h or salicylate greater than 300 mg/L
UECRenal function (lithium, NSAIDs, rhabdomyolysis)AKI if Cr rising, K+ abnormalities
LFTsBaseline for paracetamol, chronic alcohol, valproateALT greater than 1000 suggests paracetamol hepatotoxicity (delayed 24-72h)
Ethanol levelIf intoxication suspected (impairs risk assessment)greater than 80 mg/dL (17 mmol/L) intoxication
Urine drug screenPolysubstance use, correlate clinical pictureCannabis, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, opioids
Beta-hCGAll females of childbearing agePositive = pregnancy (impacts treatment, disposition)
Lithium levelIf patient on lithium or suspected ingestionTherapeutic 0.6-1.2 mmol/L, toxic greater than 1.5 mmol/L
CarboxyhaemoglobinIf carbon monoxide exposure (enclosed space, charcoal burning)greater than 3% non-smoker, greater than 10% smoker indicates poisoning

Advanced/Specialist

TestIndicationAvailability
CT brainReduced GCS, head trauma (jumping), focal neurologyAll EDs
Extended drug screenSuspected novel psychoactive substancesTertiary centers, send to toxicology lab
Specific levelsDigoxin, theophylline, carbamazepine, valproate, iron if suspectedLab send-away (4-6h turnaround)

Point-of-Care Ultrasound

  • Limited role in DSH, primarily for:
    • Cardiac standstill if peri-arrest (massive TCA overdose, hanging with anoxia)
    • FAST scan if abdominal stab wounds
    • Pneumothorax if chest stab wounds

Management

Immediate Management (First 10 Minutes)

1. MEDICAL STABILIZATION (0-5 min)
   - Airway: Protect if GCS &lt;8 (intubate if required)
   - Breathing: High-flow O2 if SpO2 &lt;94%, monitor RR
   - Circulation: IV access, 500mL crystalloid if hypotensive
   - Disability: GCS, glucose check, pupillary exam
   - Exposure: Remove clothing, full body exam for injuries/ingestions

2. TOXICOLOGY ASSESSMENT (5-10 min)
   - Identify toxidrome (anticholinergic, cholinergic, sympathomimetic, sedative)
   - ECG within 10 minutes (QRS, QT interval)
   - Paracetamol/salicylate levels
   - Contact Poisons Information Centre 13 11 26 if unclear

3. SAFETY (10 min)
   - 1:1 observation if agitated, psychotic, or ongoing high risk
   - Remove sharps, cords, bags from environment
   - Consider security presence if aggressive or absconding risk
   - Do NOT leave alone until mental state assessed

Resuscitation (if applicable)

Airway

  • GCS <8: Rapid sequence intubation (consider TCA overdose if wide QRS - avoid suxamethonium if hyperkalemia)
  • Protect from aspiration: Left lateral position if vomiting (activated charcoal risk)

Breathing

  • Target SpO2 ≥94% (high-flow O2 if hypoxemic)
  • Respiratory depression: Naloxone 400 mcg IV if opioid overdose, flumazenil CONTRAINDICATED (seizure risk in benzodiazepine-dependent patients)

Circulation

  • Hypotension: 500mL boluses crystalloid, vasopressors if refractory (noradrenaline 0.05-0.2 mcg/kg/min)
  • Arrhythmias: Sodium bicarbonate 1-2 mmol/kg IV for wide-complex tachycardia (TCA overdose)

Medications

Toxicology-Specific

DrugDoseRouteTimingNotes
Activated charcoal50 g (adult), 1 g/kg (child)POWithin 1h of ingestionOnly if GCS 15, cooperative, no aspiration risk
N-acetylcysteine150 mg/kg over 1h (loading), then 50 mg/kg over 4h, then 100 mg/kg over 16hIVParacetamol greater than 150 mg/L at 4h OR unknown time greater than 10gAnaphylactoid reactions common (slow rate if occurs)
Sodium bicarbonate1-2 mmol/kg (50-100 mEq) bolusIVQRS greater than 100ms (TCA), pH <7.2 (salicylate)Target serum pH 7.45-7.55
Naloxone400 mcg (0.4 mg) IV, repeat q2-3minIV/IM/INRespiratory depression, pinpoint pupilsShort half-life - may need infusion
FlumazenilCONTRAINDICATED in unknown overdose--Risk of seizures if benzodiazepine-dependent or TCA co-ingestion
Fomepizole15 mg/kg IV loadingIVToxic alcohol ingestion (methanol, ethylene glycol)If not available, ethanol 10% infusion

Psychiatric Medications (Use Cautiously - Consult Psychiatry)

DrugDoseRouteIndicationNotes
Olanzapine5-10 mgPO/IMAgitation, psychosisPreferred in ED (less extrapyramidal side effects than haloperidol)
Haloperidol2.5-5 mgIMSevere agitation, psychosisCheck ECG first (QT prolongation risk)
Diazepam5-10 mgPO/IVSevere anxiety, agitationAvoid in respiratory depression
Lorazepam1-2 mgPO/IMAgitation (if intramuscular needed)Faster IM absorption than diazepam

CAUTION: Do NOT sedate heavily if suicide risk assessment incomplete - impairs assessment and may increase risk if discharged

Paediatric Dosing

DrugDoseMaxNotes
Activated charcoal1 g/kg50 gAge greater than 1 year, cooperative
N-acetylcysteine150 mg/kg loading (max 15g), then 50 mg/kg (max 5g), then 100 mg/kg (max 10g)Weight-basedUse pediatric protocol
Naloxone10 mcg/kg IV2 mgMay need repeat doses
Olanzapine2.5-5 mg PO/IM10 mgAge greater than 13 years

Ongoing Management

Medical Observation Period

  • Overdose patients: Minimum 4h observation post-ingestion (longer for sustained-release, toxicity)
  • Self-injury patients: Once medically cleared (wounds dressed/sutured, hemodynamically stable)

Psychiatric Assessment (Once GCS 15, Cooperative, Not Intoxicated)

COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHOSOCIAL ASSESSMENT - NOT ISOLATED RISK SCALE

Assessment Domains (NICE Guideline NG225) [20]
  1. Needs assessment

    • Current mental state, suicidal ideation, intent, plan
    • Psychiatric history (diagnoses, previous admissions, medications)
    • Physical health problems
    • Social circumstances (housing, employment, relationships, financial)
    • Protective factors (children, religious beliefs, future plans)
  2. Risk assessment

    • Previous self-harm (number, frequency, methods, lethality escalation)
    • Current suicide intent and plan
    • Access to means (medications, firearms, heights)
    • Alcohol and substance use
    • Recent stressors or losses
    • Support network
  3. Understanding of episode

    • Precipitants and motivation
    • Expectation of lethality
    • Preparatory acts (note, giving away possessions)
    • Feelings about surviving
  4. Capacity assessment

    • Does patient understand their situation?
    • Can they retain and weigh information?
    • Can they communicate a decision?
    • If lacks capacity + high risk = involuntary admission
Risk Stratification Tools - Use with EXTREME CAUTION
Red Flag

DO NOT use isolated risk scores to determine disposition.

  • SAD PERSONS scale: Sensitivity 44%, specificity 82% for suicide [21] - misses greater than 50% of suicides
  • Modified SAD PERSONS: No better than clinical judgment [22]
  • Manchester Self-Harm Rule: Sensitivity 94%, specificity 25% [23] - very high false-positive rate

Use these only as structured prompts for comprehensive assessment, NOT as decision tools.

Manchester Self-Harm Rule (MSHR) [23]

  • Positive if ANY of:

    1. Previous self-harm
    2. Psychiatric treatment (current or previous)
    3. Current psychiatric treatment
    4. Cutting as method (in original study; now interpreted as high-lethality method)
  • If MSHR positive: Sensitivity 94% for repeat DSH or suicide within 6 months

  • If MSHR negative: Only 6% risk of adverse outcome

  • Problem: 75% of patients screen positive (low specificity), overwhelming services

Clinical Risk Factors for Suicide Completion [24]

FactorRelative Risk
Previous self-harm40× general population
Male gender3× females
Age greater than 45 years2× younger
Psychiatric illness (depression, bipolar, schizophrenia)10-20×
Substance use disorder
Chronic pain or terminal illness
Recent discharge from psychiatric admission100× in first week
High-lethality method10× vs low-lethality

Safety Planning (CRITICAL COMPONENT)

Collaborative Safety Planning > "No-Harm Contracts" [25]

Develop written safety plan with patient including:

  1. Warning signs: Thoughts, feelings, behaviors that precede suicidal crisis
  2. Internal coping strategies: Exercise, music, distraction techniques
  3. Social supports: People/places that provide distraction or support (name + phone)
  4. Professional contacts: Crisis team, GP, mental health service (name + phone)
  5. Means restriction: Remove/secure medications, firearms, sharps
  6. Emergency contacts: 000, Lifeline 13 11 14, Beyond Blue 1300 22 4636

Provide written copy to patient and document in notes

Definitive Care

Psychiatric Consultation

MANDATORY for all DSH presentations (may be delayed until sober/medically cleared)

  • Psychiatry consult to assess:
    • Need for admission (voluntary vs involuntary)
    • Diagnosis and treatment plan
    • Medication initiation/optimization
    • Follow-up arrangements

Involuntary Treatment (Mental Health Act)

Criteria (varies by state/territory, general principles):

  • Mental illness present
  • Risk of harm to self or others
  • Treatment required and patient refuses
  • No less restrictive alternative

Documentation:

  • Medical practitioner examination and recommendation
  • Second opinion (usually psychiatrist or second doctor)
  • Specific forms (e.g., NSW Mental Health Act Form 1, VIC Assessment Order)

Disposition

Admission Criteria (Psychiatric Inpatient Unit)

Clinical Pearl

Consider psychiatric admission if:

  • Ongoing high suicide risk with intent, plan, and means
  • Severe psychiatric illness requiring stabilization (psychosis, severe depression, mania)
  • Unable to ensure safety (lacks insight, refuses help, no supports)
  • Previous multiple DSH episodes with escalating lethality
  • High-lethality method (hanging, jumping, firearms) even if currently "settled"
  • Medical complications requiring inpatient care (e.g., paracetamol hepatotoxicity, rhabdomyolysis)
  • Lacks capacity to consent to treatment (involuntary admission)
  • Safeguarding issues (child/elder abuse, domestic violence)

ICU/HDU Criteria

  • ICU: Intubated, hemodynamically unstable, severe toxicity requiring antidote infusions (N-acetylcysteine, sodium bicarbonate, fomepizole), rhabdomyolysis with AKI
  • HDU: Moderate toxicity, QRS/QT prolongation requiring cardiac monitoring, frequent observations (q15-30min)

Discharge Criteria (Emergency Department)

Safe discharge requires ALL of:

  • Medically stable (no ongoing toxicity, wounds managed)
  • GCS 15, sober, cooperative
  • Psychiatric assessment completed
  • LOW ongoing suicide risk (no intent, plan, or means; good insight; protective factors present)
  • Adequate social supports (family/friends aware, can supervise)
  • Follow-up arranged (GP, mental health team, crisis team within 48-72h)
  • Safety plan completed and provided in writing
  • Means restriction discussed (remove medications, sharps, firearms)
  • Patient agrees to return if ideation worsens
  • NOT safe to discharge if: ongoing intent, high-lethality method, psychosis, no supports, refuses follow-up

Follow-up

Active Follow-Up (NOT Passive Referral)

Red Flag

First 3 months post-discharge: 100× risk of suicide vs general population [26]

ACTIVE follow-up reduces repeat DSH by 20-30% [18]:

  • Phone call within 24-48h (check safety, reinforce crisis contacts)
  • Face-to-face appointment within 7 days (GP, mental health team, crisis team)
  • Regular contact for 3 months (weekly then fortnightly)

Discharge Plan Components

  • GP letter: Detailed summary of presentation, risk assessment, safety plan, follow-up required
  • Mental health referral: Community mental health team, private psychiatrist/psychologist
  • Crisis contacts: 24/7 crisis team, Lifeline 13 11 14, Beyond Blue 1300 22 4636, Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (age <25)
  • Medication: If starting antidepressants, provide only 1 week supply (overdose risk), weekly dispensing thereafter
  • Family education: Warning signs, crisis response, means restriction
  • Social supports: Accommodation (if homeless), financial counseling, domestic violence services if applicable

Special Populations

Paediatric Considerations (Age <18 Years)

  • Peak age for DSH: 15-19 years (especially females)
  • Common methods: Overdose (paracetamol, ibuprofen), superficial cutting
  • Assessment: Include family/caregivers, school issues, bullying, social media, LGBTIQ+ identity, body image
  • Child protection: MANDATORY reporting if abuse/neglect suspected (all states/territories)
  • Admission threshold: Lower - most require admission unless very low risk with excellent family supports
  • Follow-up: Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), school counselor, headspace (age 12-25)

Pregnancy

  • Suicide is leading cause of indirect maternal mortality (20% of pregnancy-related deaths) [27]
  • Perinatal period is HIGH RISK: Postpartum psychosis (especially postpartum week 2-4)
  • Medication considerations: SSRIs generally safe (sertraline, fluoxetine preferred), avoid paroxetine (cardiac malformations)
  • Social supports: Perinatal mental health team, maternal child health nurse
  • Child protection: Notify if risk to newborn

Elderly (Age greater than 65 Years)

  • Highest suicide completion rate: Especially males greater than 75 years (30-40 per 100,000) [28]
  • Higher intent: Less impulsive, more planning, higher lethality methods
  • Risk factors: Bereavement, chronic pain, terminal illness, social isolation
  • Cognitive assessment: Screen for dementia, delirium (impairs risk assessment)
  • Polypharmacy: Higher overdose risk, complex medication interactions
  • Disposition: Lower threshold for admission (frailty, reduced resilience)

Indigenous Health

Important Note: Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, and Māori considerations:

Epidemiology

  • Suicide rate 2.1× higher in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (27.1 vs 12.9 per 100,000) [10]
  • Youth disproportionately affected: 15-24 year age group 4× non-Indigenous rate [29]
  • Māori suicide rate (NZ): 19.6 per 100,000 (1.5× non-Māori) [11]
  • Remote communities: Up to 3× higher rates due to social determinants (historical trauma, poverty, unemployment, substance use) [12]

Cultural Safety

  • Non-judgmental, empathetic approach: Acknowledge historical trauma, racism, discrimination
  • Aboriginal Liaison Officers: Involve early (available in most tertiary hospitals)
  • Family-centered care: Include family/community in assessment and planning (with consent)
  • Communication: Use interpreter if language barrier, allow time for storytelling
  • Holistic assessment: Social determinants (housing, employment, racism experiences), connection to culture/country, stolen generations impacts
  • Cultural protocols: Understand local customs (e.g., eye contact norms, use of name after death)

Discharge Planning

  • Community-led services: Aboriginal Medical Services (AMS), community-controlled health organizations
  • Continuity: Same clinician where possible (rapport and trust critical)
  • Transport: Arrange if remote/rural (RFDS, community transport)
  • Outreach: Home visits more acceptable than clinic attendance in some communities

Resources

  • 13YARN (13 92 76): Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander crisis support
  • Lifeline's First Nations line: 13 11 14 (ask for Indigenous counselor)
  • Headspace Indigenous services: For youth 12-25 years

Pitfalls & Pearls

Clinical Pearl

Clinical Pearls:

  • "Psychiatric history is the best predictor" - ask about ALL previous episodes, not just recent one
  • High-lethality method = high ongoing risk - hanging, jumping, firearms indicate true intent even if patient now calm
  • Post-discharge period is deadliest - ensure active (not passive) follow-up within 48-72h
  • NSSI is NOT "attention-seeking" - it's maladaptive coping, and these patients have 5-10× suicide risk [17]
  • Intoxication impairs assessment - wait until sober (BAC <50 mg/dL) before psychiatric evaluation
  • Adolescents are impulsive - lower threshold for admission, involve family, address social media/bullying
  • Aboriginal patients need cultural safety - involve Aboriginal Liaison Officer, family-centered care, community-led follow-up
  • Document thoroughly - risk assessment, capacity, reasoning for disposition (medicolegal protection)
  • Safety planning > contracts - "no-harm contracts" have NO evidence and may provide false reassurance [30]
Red Flag

Pitfalls to Avoid:

  • Using SAD PERSONS or risk scales to determine discharge - poor predictive validity, use comprehensive assessment
  • Discharging intoxicated patients - wait until sober (GCS 15, BAC <50 mg/dL) before risk assessment
  • Assuming "manipulative" DSH is low-risk - recurrent DSH has 40× suicide risk vs general population [24]
  • Failing to remove means - guns, medications, sharps MUST be secured before discharge
  • Passive referral ("see your GP") - provide active follow-up contact within 48-72h
  • Ignoring high-lethality method - hanging/jumping indicates high intent even if patient "settled"
  • Discharging without capacity assessment - if patient lacks capacity + high risk = involuntary admission
  • Leaving patient alone - 1:1 observation until psychiatric assessment complete if any concern
  • Over-sedating before assessment - impairs mental state examination and risk stratification
  • Forgetting paracetamol level - universal screening in all overdoses (asymptomatic for 24h)

Viva Practice

Viva Scenario

Stem: "A 22-year-old female presents to ED after taking 30 paracetamol tablets 6 hours ago following an argument with her boyfriend. She is medically stable, paracetamol level is above treatment line and N-acetylcysteine has been commenced. She is asking to leave. How do you assess her suicide risk?"

Opening Question: "What are the key components of your risk assessment for this patient?"

Model Answer: I would perform a comprehensive psychosocial assessment using a structured approach, NOT rely on isolated risk scores:

  1. Needs assessment:

    • Current mental state: suicidal ideation, intent, plan, hopelessness
    • Psychiatric history: previous DSH, diagnoses, medications, admissions
    • Physical health: chronic pain, medical conditions
    • Social circumstances: housing, employment, relationships, financial stressors
    • Protective factors: children, religious beliefs, future plans
  2. Risk factors (from history):

    • Previous DSH: Single strongest predictor (40× general population risk)
    • Method: Paracetamol overdose = moderate lethality
    • Timing: 6 hours post-ingestion suggests planning (not impulsive)
    • Quantity: 30 tablets (15g) = potentially fatal dose (shows intent)
    • Precipitant: Relationship conflict (assess chronicity, domestic violence)
    • Current ideation: "Do you still have thoughts of harming yourself?"
    • Regret: "How do you feel about surviving?" (regret at survival = higher risk)
    • Support: "Who knows about this? Who can support you?"
  3. Capacity assessment:

    • Can she understand she needs medical treatment (NAC infusion)?
    • Can she weigh risks of leaving (hepatotoxicity, death)?
    • Can she communicate decision?
    • If lacks capacity + wants to leave = involuntary treatment
  4. Specific concerns in THIS case:

    • She is asking to leave DURING medical treatment (NAC 21h protocol)
    • Paracetamol level above treatment line = hepatotoxicity risk if she leaves
    • May represent ongoing suicidal intent or impaired judgment

Follow-up Questions:

  1. "She admits ongoing suicidal ideation and wants to leave to complete suicide. What do you do?"

    • Model answer:
      • This is a psychiatric emergency requiring involuntary detention
      • Immediately inform psychiatric consultation-liaison team
      • Initiate Mental Health Act assessment (state-specific form)
      • 1:1 observation, remove sharps/cords, consider security if absconding risk
      • Continue medical treatment (NAC) under duty of care (life-saving treatment does not require consent in emergency)
      • Document thoroughly: mental state, capacity assessment, rationale for detention
  2. "Can you use the SAD PERSONS scale to determine if she can be discharged?"

    • Model answer:
      • NO - risk stratification scales have poor predictive validity
      • SAD PERSONS: sensitivity 44%, specificity 82% [21] - misses greater than 50% of suicides
      • Should ONLY be used as structured prompt for comprehensive assessment
      • Disposition decision based on clinical judgment, NOT isolated score
      • NICE Guideline NG225 explicitly recommends AGAINST using risk categories to determine management [20]
  3. "What follow-up would you arrange if she is discharged after psychiatric assessment clears her?"

    • Model answer:
      • Active follow-up (not passive referral):
        • Phone call within 24-48h (check safety, reinforce crisis contacts)
        • Face-to-face with GP or mental health team within 7 days
        • Consider crisis team referral for daily contact × 3-7 days
      • Safety planning:
        • Written safety plan (warning signs, coping strategies, crisis contacts)
        • Means restriction (remove medications, secure sharps)
        • Crisis contacts: Lifeline 13 11 14, Beyond Blue 1300 22 4636
      • GP letter: Detailed summary, safety plan, request urgent follow-up
      • Medication: If starting SSRI, provide 1 week supply only (overdose risk)
      • Evidence: Active follow-up reduces repeat DSH by 20-30% [18]

Discussion Points:

  • Paracetamol is most common overdose in Australia (60% of self-poisoning) [31]
  • Paradox: Paracetamol often chosen as "low-risk" overdose, but causes delayed severe hepatotoxicity (24-72h)
  • NAC is highly effective if started within 8h (efficacy drops to 65% if started greater than 15h) [32]
  • Post-discharge period is highest risk (first 3 months: 100× general population) [26]
Viva Scenario

Stem: "A 19-year-old Aboriginal man from a remote community presents with multiple superficial lacerations to both forearms. He has presented 5 times in the past year with similar injuries. He appears withdrawn and will not make eye contact. How do you approach this case?"

Opening Question: "What are the key considerations in assessing this patient?"

Model Answer: This case requires culturally safe, trauma-informed approach acknowledging:

  1. Epidemiology:

    • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth (15-24y) have 4× higher suicide rate than non-Indigenous [29]
    • Recurrent self-harm (5 episodes in 1 year) indicates 40× general population suicide risk [24]
    • Remote communities have up to 3× higher rates due to social determinants [12]
  2. Cultural considerations:

    • Eye contact: Lack of eye contact may be culturally appropriate (not pathological)
    • Communication style: Allow time for story-telling, avoid rapid-fire questions
    • Historical trauma: Stolen generations, racism, discrimination impact mental health
    • Holistic view: Assess connection to culture/country, family/community, social determinants
  3. Assessment approach:

    • Build rapport first: Introduce self, explain role, ask if Aboriginal Liaison Officer can be present
    • Non-judgmental language: Avoid "attention-seeking" or "manipulative" labels
    • Family involvement: "Is there family you'd like present?" (with consent)
    • Social determinants: Housing, employment, racism experiences, substance use, community violence
    • Protective factors: Cultural connection, family, elders, community programs
  4. Medical management:

    • Examine and dress lacerations (assess depth, tendon/nerve injury)
    • If superficial cutting = likely NSSI (emotional regulation, NOT suicide intent)
    • BUT recurrent NSSI has 5-10× increased suicide risk [17]
  5. Psychiatric assessment:

    • Comprehensive psychosocial assessment (as per previous viva)
    • Specific questions: "What helps you feel strong?" "Who do you talk to when you're struggling?" "Are you connected to your community/culture?"
    • Assess trauma history (abuse, removal from family, incarceration)
  6. Disposition:

    • If low acute suicide risk BUT recurrent DSH: outpatient intensive support
    • Involve Aboriginal Medical Service (AMS) or community-controlled health organization
    • Cultural healing programs (art, land connection, elder mentorship)
    • Avoid admission unless high acute risk (separation from culture/family may worsen)

Follow-up Questions:

  1. "What specific follow-up services would you arrange?"

    • Model answer:
      • 13YARN (13 92 76): Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander crisis line
      • Aboriginal Medical Service (AMS): Community-controlled, culturally safe
      • Headspace Indigenous services: For age 12-25 years
      • Local Aboriginal community-controlled health organization
      • Transport: Arrange if remote (RFDS, community transport)
      • Continuity: Same clinician where possible (trust and rapport critical)
      • Outreach: Home visits more acceptable than clinic in some communities
  2. "He refuses to involve family. What do you do?"

    • Model answer:
      • Respect autonomy (patient is adult, has capacity)
      • Explore reasons: "Can you tell me about your family situation?" (may be family conflict, abuse, complex dynamics)
      • Offer alternatives: "Is there a community elder or friend you trust?"
      • Aboriginal Liaison Officer can provide culturally safe support without family
      • Document refusal and reasoning
      • Reassess if situation changes (may change mind once rapport built)
  3. "What are the social determinants contributing to high rates in Aboriginal communities?"

    • Model answer:
      • Historical trauma: Stolen generations, forced removals, cultural genocide
      • Socioeconomic: Poverty, unemployment (3× non-Indigenous), overcrowded housing
      • Substance use: Alcohol, cannabis (coping mechanism for trauma)
      • Incarceration: 12× higher imprisonment rate (further trauma, family separation)
      • Racism and discrimination: Interpersonal and systemic
      • Loss of culture: Disconnection from language, land, ceremony
      • Community violence: Lateral violence, domestic violence
      • Protective factors: Cultural connection, family, elders, land, ceremony

Discussion Points:

  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are NOT a homogeneous group (greater than 250 language groups, diverse cultures)
  • Cultural safety ≠ cultural competence (safety is defined by patient, not clinician)
  • Gatekeeper programs (community members trained in suicide prevention) reduce rates by 20-30% in remote communities [33]
  • Telehealth may improve access but lacks cultural safety (prefer face-to-face, community-led)
Viva Scenario

Stem: "A 55-year-old male is brought to ED by ambulance after his wife found him hanging by a belt from a ceiling beam. He was cut down immediately and regained consciousness within 2 minutes. He is now GCS 15, medically stable, and states he 'just wants to go home' and that it was 'a stupid mistake.' How do you manage this patient?"

Opening Question: "What are your initial priorities in the ED?"

Model Answer:

  1. Medical stabilization FIRST:

    • Airway: Assess for laryngeal injury, stridor, subcutaneous emphysema
    • Breathing: Hypoxic brain injury risk (even brief hanging causes cerebral hypoxia)
    • Circulation: Carotid artery compression (dissection risk), arrhythmias
    • Disability: GCS 15 now, but may deteriorate (cerebral edema)
    • Examination:
      • Neck: Ligature marks, petechiae, subcutaneous emphysema, tenderness
      • Neurological: Focal deficits (stroke from carotid dissection)
      • Eyes: Subconjunctival hemorrhage, petechiae
  2. Investigations:

    • CT brain: If any GCS drop, focal neurology, or prolonged hanging (greater than 2-3 min) - exclude hypoxic injury, hemorrhage
    • CT neck (angiography): If carotid tenderness, neurological deficit - exclude carotid dissection
    • Chest X-ray: If subcutaneous emphysema - exclude tracheal/esophageal rupture
    • ECG: Arrhythmias from hypoxia
    • ABG: If hypoxia or reduced GCS
  3. Observation period:

    • Minimum 24h observation even if GCS 15 (delayed cerebral edema, airway edema)
    • Neuro observations q1h × 4h, then q4h × 24h
    • Watch for stridor (airway edema), GCS drop (cerebral edema)
  4. Psychiatric assessment (once medically cleared):

    • KEY POINT: Hanging is HIGH-LETHALITY method indicating strong suicidal intent
    • His statement "stupid mistake" is MINIMIZATION - high concern
    • Comprehensive risk assessment:
      • Intent: "Were you trying to end your life?" "What did you expect to happen?"
      • Planning: "How long had you been thinking about this?" "Did you take precautions against discovery?" (wife finding him = interrupted attempt vs cry for help?)
      • Regret: "How do you feel about surviving?" (regret = higher risk)
      • Current state: "Do you still have thoughts of harming yourself?"
      • Precipitants: Job loss, relationship breakdown, financial crisis, chronic pain?
      • Psychiatric history: Depression, previous DSH, substance use?
  5. HIGH CONCERN factors in THIS case:

    • Hanging = very high-lethality method (90% fatal if not interrupted) [34]
    • Male, age 55 = peak age for suicide completion in males [5]
    • Minimization ("stupid mistake") despite near-fatal act
    • Wants to leave immediately = may indicate ongoing intent

Follow-up Questions:

  1. "He states he was intoxicated and doesn't remember, and demands to leave. Can you detain him?"

    • Model answer:
      • YES - involuntary detention justified on TWO grounds:
        1. Medical: Hanging requires 24h observation (airway edema, cerebral injury) - detain under duty of care
        2. Psychiatric: High-lethality method indicates high suicide risk - requires psychiatric assessment when sober
      • If he attempts to leave:
        • Explain medical risks (airway compromise, death)
        • If he lacks capacity (intoxicated) = treat under emergency provisions (life-saving treatment)
        • If he has capacity but leaves against medical advice: initiate Mental Health Act assessment (psychiatric grounds)
        • Security presence if absconding risk
        • 1:1 observation mandatory
  2. "Psychiatric team assesses him and says he is 'low risk' because he has no psychiatric history. Do you agree?"

    • Model answer:
      • STRONGLY DISAGREE - high-lethality method overrides lack of psychiatric history
      • 50% of suicide deaths occur in people with NO prior psychiatric contact [35]
      • Hanging indicates strong intent (not impulsive, requires planning and preparation)
      • Risk factors in males greater than 45 years:
        • Recent stressor (ask about job, relationship, finances, health)
        • Social isolation (lives alone?)
        • Alcohol use (mentioned intoxication)
        • Male gender (3× female suicide completion) [7]
      • MY RECOMMENDATION: Psychiatric admission (voluntary or involuntary) for stabilization and assessment over days (not hours)
  3. "If he is discharged, what follow-up would you insist upon?"

    • Model answer (though I would strongly advocate for admission):
      • Daily contact by crisis team × 7 days minimum
      • Face-to-face with psychiatrist within 48h (not GP - severity requires specialist)
      • Means restriction: Remove belts, cords, firearms, medications
      • 24/7 supervision: Wife or family member present at all times × 7 days
      • Safety plan: Written plan with crisis contacts (000, Lifeline, crisis team)
      • Substance use: Address alcohol (refer to addiction service, consider disulfiram/naltrexone)
      • Social support: Notify GP, involve community mental health team
      • Document thoroughly: Note disagreement with psychiatry, rationale for insisting on intensive follow-up (medicolegal protection)

Discussion Points:

  • Hanging is most common method of suicide in Australia (55% of male deaths, 45% of female deaths) [36]
  • Males greater than 45 years have highest completion rate (often first presentation, no psychiatric history)
  • Survival from hanging depends on: drop height (short drop = strangulation vs long drop = cervical fracture), duration, interruption
  • Ligature marks: Circumferential = complete hanging, V-shaped upward = suspension point
  • Carotid artery dissection can occur from compression (stroke 24-72h later) - CT angiography if any neurological symptoms [37]
Viva Scenario

Stem: "You are the sole doctor in a remote rural ED 400km from the nearest tertiary hospital. A 16-year-old girl presents with superficial wrist lacerations after an argument with her parents. She has no previous psychiatric history. Your ED has no mental health staff. How do you manage this case?"

Opening Question: "What are the unique challenges in managing self-harm in a remote setting, and how do you address them?"

Model Answer:

  1. Challenges in remote/rural setting:

    • No on-site psychiatric services (nearest psychiatrist 400km away)
    • Limited mental health expertise (GP-led care, no crisis team)
    • Retrieval delays (RFDS may take hours to arrive)
    • Social isolation (small community, limited support services)
    • Confidentiality concerns (everyone knows everyone, stigma)
    • Aboriginal population (if applicable - cultural safety critical)
  2. Immediate management:

    • Medical: Examine lacerations, clean and dress (likely superficial if "superficial"
  • suture if needed)
    • Safety: 1:1 observation (family member or nurse) until assessment complete
    • History: Take comprehensive psychosocial history (per previous vivas)
    • Involve parents: She is minor (age 16) - parents must be involved unless abuse suspected
  1. Risk assessment:

    • Lower-risk features in THIS case:
      • First episode (no previous DSH)
      • Low-lethality method (superficial cutting)
      • Clear precipitant (argument with parents) without ongoing stressor
      • Age 16 (impulsive adolescent behavior more common)
      • Parents aware and involved
    • Higher-risk features to EXCLUDE:
      • Ongoing suicidal ideation with plan
      • High-lethality intent (deep cuts to major vessels)
      • Psychiatric symptoms (depression, psychosis)
      • Substance use
      • Abuse/trauma history
      • School bullying, LGBTIQ+ identity issues
  2. Remote-specific resources:

    • Telehealth psychiatric consultation: HealthDirect 1800 022 222, state-based telepsychiatry services (e.g., NSW Mental Health Line 1800 011 511)
    • GP follow-up: Arrange urgent appointment (within 24-48h)
    • School counselor: If school-based stressor
    • Headspace: Youth mental health (may have outreach to rural areas)
    • RFDS mental health services: Some RFDS bases have mental health outreach
  3. Disposition decision:

    • Option 1: Discharge home with parents (if low risk after telehealth consult):
      • 24/7 supervision by parents × 7 days
      • Remove sharps, medications from home
      • Safety plan (written, provided to family)
      • GP follow-up within 48h
      • Crisis contacts (Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800, Lifeline 13 11 14)
      • Return immediately if ideation worsens
    • Option 2: Retrieval to tertiary center (if higher risk):
      • Contact RFDS (1300 137 327 in most states) or state retrieval service
      • Provide 1:1 nursing or parent escort
      • May take 2-6h for aircraft to arrive (maintain safety in interim)
    • Option 3: Admit to local hospital (if intermediate risk):
      • Observe overnight with 1:1 nursing
      • Telehealth psychiatry review next morning
      • Decision re: discharge vs retrieval after reassessment

Follow-up Questions:

  1. "When would you retrieve to a tertiary center?"

    • Model answer:
      • Absolute indications for retrieval:
        • Ongoing high suicide risk (intent, plan, means) despite 1:1 observation
        • Severe psychiatric illness (psychosis, severe depression, mania)
        • High-lethality method (even if physically stable)
        • Lack of capacity + refuses treatment (requires involuntary admission)
        • Medical complications (deep lacerations with tendon injury, overdose requiring antidote)
        • Safeguarding concerns (abuse, neglect - requires statutory notification AND retrieval)
      • Relative indications:
        • Recurrent DSH (5+ episodes)
        • No local supports (parents unable to supervise, no GP available)
        • Request from telehealth psychiatrist
  2. "Parents refuse to take her home, saying 'she's just attention-seeking.' What do you do?"

    • Model answer:
      • Safeguarding concern - parent refusal may indicate:
        • Family dysfunction, abuse, neglect
        • Parental mental illness or substance use
        • Lack of understanding of severity
      • Actions:
        • Educate parents: "Self-harm is a sign of distress, not attention-seeking. She needs support, not punishment."
        • Explore family dynamics: "Tell me about what's happening at home?"
        • If abuse suspected: Mandatory notification to child protection (all states/territories)
        • If parents still refuse: Admit to local hospital, contact child protection services
        • Consider alternative supports: Grandparents, aunty/uncle, foster care (via child protection)
      • Do NOT discharge to unsafe environment (duty of care)
  3. "What long-term mental health services are available in rural/remote areas?"

    • Model answer:
      • GP Mental Health Treatment Plan: Up to 10 Medicare-rebated psychology sessions per year
      • Headspace: Youth services (age 12-25) - may have outreach or telehealth
      • Rural Outreach Services: Psychiatrists/psychologists visit regional centers monthly
      • Telehealth: Phone or video counseling (Beyond Blue, Kids Helpline, Lifeline)
      • Royal Flying Doctor Service: Mental health clinics in remote communities
      • Aboriginal Medical Services: If Aboriginal patient - culturally safe, community-led
      • School-based programs: School counselors, wellbeing officers
      • Online programs: e-couch, MoodGYM, ReachOut (evidence-based CBT)

Discussion Points:

  • Suicide rates are 1.5-2× higher in rural/remote areas vs metropolitan [38]
  • Access barriers: Distance, cost, stigma, lack of services
  • RFDS conducts 5,000+ mental health consultations annually in remote Australia [39]
  • Telehealth is effective for low-moderate risk but lacks rapport for high-risk cases
  • Rural GPs often sole provider - support GP with telehealth specialist backup critical

OSCE Scenarios

Station 1: Psychiatric History - Deliberate Self-Harm

Format: History Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED cubicle

Candidate Instructions:

You are the ED registrar. A 28-year-old woman has presented after taking an overdose of 20 paracetamol tablets 3 hours ago. She is medically stable and N-acetylcysteine has been commenced. Please take a focused psychiatric history to assess her suicide risk and determine appropriate disposition. You will be marked on your ability to establish rapport, gather relevant information, and demonstrate a structured approach to risk assessment.

Examiner Instructions: The candidate should demonstrate:

  • Non-judgmental, empathetic approach
  • Systematic exploration of suicidal ideation, intent, plan
  • Assessment of precipitants, protective factors, supports
  • Previous psychiatric and self-harm history
  • Capacity assessment (implicit or explicit)

The patient (actor) will disclose:

  • Overdose followed argument with partner (relationship of 5 years)
  • Previous episode of self-harm 2 years ago (cutting)
  • Diagnosed with depression, on sertraline 100mg daily
  • Denies current suicidal ideation, regrets overdose
  • Has supportive family (mother lives nearby)
  • Works as teacher, no current work stressors

Candidate should NOT rely on screening tools (SAD PERSONS) but perform comprehensive assessment.

Actor/Patient Brief: You are Sarah, a 28-year-old primary school teacher. You took 20 paracetamol tablets 3 hours ago after a heated argument with your partner of 5 years about moving in together (you want to, he doesn't). You immediately regretted it and told your mother, who brought you to hospital.

Background:

  • You have depression (diagnosed 2 years ago, on sertraline 100mg)
  • You cut your wrists 2 years ago during a previous relationship breakdown (superficial, no stitches)
  • You see a psychologist monthly
  • You live alone, mother lives 10 minutes away (very supportive)
  • You love your job as a teacher
  • You do NOT currently want to die, you regret taking the tablets

If asked directly:

  • "Were you trying to end your life?" → "I don't know, I just wanted the pain to stop"
  • "Do you have thoughts of harming yourself now?" → "No, I regret it, I want to get better"
  • "What stopped you from taking more?" → "I thought of my mother and my students"
  • "Can you keep yourself safe?" → "Yes, I'll stay with my mum tonight"

Be cooperative but tearful. Show regret. Allow candidate to build rapport.

Marking Criteria:

DomainCriterionMarks
Introduction & RapportIntroduces self, explains role, non-judgmental tone, empathy/2
Systematic HistoryExplores event (precipitant, method, quantity, timing), intent, expectation of lethality, regret/relief/2
Risk AssessmentAsks about current ideation, plan, means, previous DSH, psychiatric history, supports, protective factors/3
Mental StateAssesses mood, hopelessness, psychosis, substance use/2
CommunicationActive listening, open questions, appropriate pauses, acknowledges distress/1
Closure & PlanSummarizes, discusses safety planning, explains next steps (psychiatric consult, observation)/1
Total/11

Expected Standard:

  • Pass: ≥6/11
  • Key discriminators:
    • Distinguishes intent vs impulsivity
    • Explores protective factors (not just risk factors)
    • Non-judgmental language ("What happened?" not "Why did you do this?")
    • Addresses safety planning collaboratively

Station 2: Communication - Breaking Bad News to Family After Suicide Attempt

Format: Communication Time: 11 minutes Setting: Relatives' room

Candidate Instructions:

You are the ED registrar. A 17-year-old male was brought to ED 2 hours ago after a hanging attempt. He was resuscitated but remains intubated in ICU with severe hypoxic brain injury (GCS 3T). The prognosis is very poor. His mother has just arrived from interstate and is unaware of the severity. Please speak with her to explain the situation. You will be marked on your ability to break bad news sensitively and respond to her emotional distress.

Examiner Instructions: Candidate should demonstrate:

  • Structured approach (SPIKES or similar)
  • Clear, jargon-free language
  • Empathy and acknowledgment of grief
  • Ability to manage strong emotions
  • Honesty about prognosis without destroying hope prematurely
  • Offer of support (chaplain, social work, family presence)

The mother (actor) will be distressed, may cry, may ask "Is he going to die?" Candidate should be honest but compassionate.

Actor/Patient Brief: You are Margaret, a 52-year-old mother. Your son James (age 17) has been struggling with depression for 6 months. You live interstate and were visiting him at his father's house (divorced 5 years ago). You received a call 2 hours ago saying James was in hospital but no details. You are very anxious and expect he has attempted suicide (he has tried before - overdose 3 months ago).

Emotional state:

  • Initially anxious, asking rapid questions
  • When told prognosis is poor, become tearful and distressed
  • May ask: "Can I see him?"
    • "Will he wake up?"
    • "Is this my fault?"

If asked:

  • "Did you know he was suicidal?" → "Yes, he's been depressed for months, I've been so worried"
  • "Has he done this before?" → "Yes, he took an overdose 3 months ago, but he recovered"
  • "What was happening in his life?" → "Bullying at school, his father and I divorced, he was seeing a psychologist"

Be realistic - you suspected this might happen. Show grief but also strength.

Marking Criteria:

DomainCriterionMarks
SettingAppropriate environment (private room), seated, introduces self, checks identity/1
Establishing BaselineAsks what mother knows, prepares for bad news ("I'm afraid I have some difficult news")/2
Delivering NewsClear, jargon-free language ("James's brain was without oxygen for several minutes, he has severe brain injury")/2
EmpathyAcknowledges distress, allows silence, offers tissues, uses empathetic statements ("I can see this is devastating")/2
Responding to QuestionsHonest about prognosis ("very poor"
  • "ICU team will assess over next 24-48h"), avoids false reassurance | /2 | | Support | Offers to see James, provides ICU contact, mentions chaplain/social work, family presence encouraged | /1 | | Closure | Summarizes, checks understanding, provides contact for questions | /1 | | Total | | /11 |

Expected Standard:

  • Pass: ≥6/11
  • Key discriminators:
    • Balances honesty with compassion
    • Does NOT say "he will definitely die" (too blunt) but also does NOT give false hope
    • Manages mother's guilt ("Is this my fault?") with reassurance ("Depression is an illness, you sought help for him")
    • Recognizes this is bereavement conversation (even if patient still alive, loss of "who he was")

Station 3: Practical Procedure - Involuntary Treatment Order

Format: Communication / Documentation Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED resus bay

Candidate Instructions:

You are the ED registrar. A 45-year-old male presented 2 hours ago after taking a large overdose of aspirin and paracetamol. He is medically stable and has been cleared for psychiatric assessment. The psychiatric registrar has assessed him and found ongoing high suicide risk with intent, plan, and means. The patient is demanding to leave and refuses voluntary admission. The psychiatric registrar has asked you to complete the medical section of an involuntary treatment order (Mental Health Act). Please explain to the patient why you are detaining him, and complete the required documentation. You will be marked on your communication and legal/ethical understanding.

Examiner Instructions: Candidate should demonstrate:

  • Understanding of Mental Health Act criteria (mental illness, risk of harm, treatment required, no less restrictive option)
  • Clear explanation to patient (avoiding jargon)
  • Empathy while maintaining boundaries
  • Documentation skills (if form provided)

The patient (actor) will be hostile, deny mental illness, threaten legal action. Candidate must remain calm and professional.

Actor/Patient Brief: You are John, a 45-year-old man. You took a large overdose 6 hours ago because your wife left you and you lost your job. You have been treated medically and feel physically better. You want to leave hospital and "sort things out yourself." You deny being mentally ill ("I'm just having a bad time"). You are angry at being kept in hospital against your will.

If asked:

  • "Do you still want to harm yourself?" → "That's none of your business, I just want to leave"
  • "We're concerned you're at risk" → "You can't keep me here, I'm not crazy, I'll sue you"
  • "Have you seen a psychiatrist before?" → "No, I don't need one"

Be hostile but not physically aggressive. Interrupt candidate, raise voice, use dismissive language.

Marking Criteria:

DomainCriterionMarks
CommunicationExplains why detention necessary (risk to self, treatment required), remains calm despite hostility/2
Legal UnderstandingDemonstrates knowledge of Mental Health Act criteria (mental illness, risk, treatment, no less restrictive option)/2
EmpathyAcknowledges patient's anger ("I understand you're frustrated"), validates distress while maintaining boundaries/1
De-escalationNon-confrontational language, offers reassurance (daily reviews, can request second opinion)/2
DocumentationCompletes form accurately (if provided): diagnosis, evidence of mental illness, risk assessment, treatment plan/3
Ethical AwarenessBalances autonomy vs duty of care, mentions least restrictive alternative considered/1
Total/11

Expected Standard:

  • Pass: ≥6/11
  • Key discriminators:
    • Does NOT argue with patient or become defensive
    • Uses phrases like "I understand you don't want to be here, but my duty of care requires me to keep you safe"
    • Explains "mental illness" in plain language (severe depression, not "crazy")
    • Understands this is time-limited order (24-72h depending on state) with regular reviews

SAQ Practice

Question 1 (6 marks)

Stem: A 19-year-old female presents to ED with superficial lacerations to both forearms. She states she "just wanted to feel something" and denies suicidal intent. This is her 8th presentation for self-harm in the past year.

Question: Outline your approach to assessing this patient's risk of future suicide. (6 marks)

Model Answer:

  1. Comprehensive psychosocial assessment - NOT isolated risk scores (SAD PERSONS have poor validity) (1 mark)
  2. Distinguish NSSI from suicide attempt - This presentation appears to be non-suicidal self-injury (emotional regulation, no intent to die), but NSSI patients have 5-10× increased suicide risk (1 mark)
  3. Previous self-harm history - 8 presentations in 1 year = very high risk (previous DSH is single strongest predictor of future DSH and suicide, 40× general population) (1 mark)
  4. Current suicidal ideation - Ask directly: "Do you have thoughts of ending your life? Do you have a plan? Do you have access to means?" (1 mark)
  5. Psychiatric assessment - Screen for depression, borderline personality disorder, substance use, trauma history (1 mark)
  6. Protective factors - Social supports, reasons for living, future plans, engagement with mental health services (1 mark)

Examiner Notes:

  • Accept: Mention of mental state examination, capacity assessment, involvement of psychiatric services
  • Do not accept: Using SAD PERSONS score as sole determinant, discharging without psychiatric assessment, labeling as "attention-seeking"

Question 2 (8 marks)

Stem: A 62-year-old male farmer from a remote community presents after a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the abdomen. He is hemodynamically stable after laparotomy. He has no previous psychiatric history. He states he "didn't mean to do it, gun went off accidentally while cleaning it."

Question: What features of this case indicate high ongoing suicide risk, and what disposition would you recommend? (8 marks)

Model Answer:

High-risk features (5 marks):

  1. High-lethality method - Firearms indicate very high intent (90% fatal if not interrupted) (1 mark)
  2. Minimization - "Accidental discharge" is likely denial/minimization of suicide attempt (1 mark)
  3. Demographics - Male, age greater than 60, rural = highest risk group (3× urban suicide rate in rural males greater than 60) (1 mark)
  4. Occupation - Farmer = access to means (firearms, chemicals), financial stressors, social isolation (1 mark)
  5. No psychiatric history - 50% of suicide deaths occur in people with no prior contact with mental health services (suggests first attempt may be fatal) (1 mark)

Disposition (3 marks):

  1. Psychiatric admission (voluntary or involuntary) for stabilization and comprehensive assessment over days (not hours) (1 mark)
  2. Involuntary if refuses - High lethality method + minimization + ongoing risk justifies Mental Health Act detention (1 mark)
  3. If discharged (strongly discouraged): Daily crisis team contact, removal of firearms (notify police firearms registry), 24/7 family supervision, urgent psychiatry follow-up within 48h (1 mark)

Examiner Notes:

  • Accept: Mention of rural/remote risk factors, need for means restriction (firearms removal), involvement of GP
  • Do not accept: Accepting "accidental" explanation without further assessment, discharging without psychiatric consult

Question 3 (6 marks)

Stem: A 16-year-old Aboriginal girl presents with recurrent superficial cutting to her forearms. She has presented 6 times in the past 3 months. She is withdrawn and will not engage with ED staff.

Question: What culturally safe strategies would you use to engage this patient and plan her ongoing care? (6 marks)

Model Answer:

  1. Involve Aboriginal Liaison Officer early - Provide culturally safe support, build rapport, explain hospital processes (1 mark)
  2. Non-judgmental, trauma-informed approach - Acknowledge historical trauma (stolen generations), allow time for storytelling, avoid rapid-fire questions (1 mark)
  3. Family involvement - Ask if she wants family/elder present (with consent), family-centered care is culturally appropriate (1 mark)
  4. Holistic assessment - Social determinants (housing, education, racism experiences), connection to culture/country/community, protective factors (family, elders, culture) (1 mark)
  5. Community-led follow-up - Aboriginal Medical Service (AMS), community-controlled health organization, cultural healing programs (art, land connection) (1 mark)
  6. Continuity of care - Same clinician where possible (trust and rapport critical), outreach/home visits more acceptable than clinic attendance in some communities (1 mark)

Examiner Notes:

  • Accept: Mention of 13YARN crisis line, Headspace Indigenous services, mandatory reporting if abuse suspected
  • Do not accept: "Cultural competence training" without specific actions, discharging without culturally appropriate follow-up

Question 4 (8 marks)

Stem: You are the doctor in a remote rural ED. A 22-year-old woman presents after taking 30 paracetamol tablets 8 hours ago. Her 4-hour paracetamol level is above the treatment line and N-acetylcysteine is commenced. She is medically stable but psychiatrically high-risk with ongoing suicidal ideation. The nearest tertiary hospital is 500km away.

Question: Outline your management plan including disposition options and retrieval considerations. (8 marks)

Model Answer:

Medical management (2 marks):

  1. Continue N-acetylcysteine - 21-hour protocol, monitor LFTs q12h for hepatotoxicity (1 mark)
  2. 1:1 observation - Suicide risk + receiving medical treatment = cannot leave (1 mark)

Psychiatric management (3 marks):

  1. Telehealth psychiatric consultation - State mental health line or HealthDirect for risk assessment and advice (1 mark)
  2. Safety measures - Remove sharps/medications from room, family or nurse 1:1 supervision (1 mark)
  3. Involuntary detention - If she attempts to leave during medical treatment, detain under Mental Health Act (ongoing suicide risk + lacks capacity to refuse life-saving treatment) (1 mark)

Disposition options (3 marks):

  1. Option 1: Retrieval to tertiary center (preferred if high psychiatric risk) - Contact RFDS or state retrieval service, provide nursing escort during transfer, continue NAC infusion en route (1 mark)
  2. Option 2: Admit locally - If intermediate risk and local resources allow: continue NAC, daily telehealth psychiatry reviews, transfer if deteriorates medically or psychiatrically (1 mark)
  3. Factors favoring retrieval - Ongoing high suicide risk, lack of local mental health services, medical complications (rising ALT), patient request (1 mark)

Examiner Notes:

  • Accept: Mention of delayed NAC efficacy (8h post-ingestion = reduced efficacy to 65%), contact Poisons Information Centre, GP follow-up if discharged
  • Do not accept: Discharging patient before NAC complete, failing to consider retrieval for high psychiatric risk

Australian Guidelines

ARC/ANZCOR

  • Not applicable - Deliberate self-harm is psychiatric/toxicological, not resuscitation topic
  • If cardiac arrest from overdose or hanging: Follow ARC adult cardiac arrest algorithm (see related topics)

Therapeutic Guidelines

Therapeutic Guidelines: Psychotropic [40]

  • First-line antidepressant for suicidal depression: Sertraline 50-200mg daily (safest in overdose)
  • Avoid TCAs in high-risk patients (cardiotoxic in overdose)
  • Avoid citalopram greater than 40mg (QT prolongation, fatal in overdose greater than 600mg)
  • Antipsychotics for agitation: Olanzapine 5-10mg PO/IM (less extrapyramidal side effects than haloperidol)

Therapeutic Guidelines: Toxicology [41]

  • Paracetamol: NAC if level greater than 150mg/L at 4h or greater than 10g ingested (or unknown time/dose)
  • Salicylate: Sodium bicarbonate for pH <7.2 or salicylate greater than 500mg/L
  • Activated charcoal: Within 1h of ingestion, only if cooperative and GCS 15

State-Specific

New South Wales

  • Mental Health Act 2007: Schedule 1 Form (medical practitioner assessment), Schedule 2 Form (ambulance officers), involuntary detention up to 72h [42]
  • NSW Mental Health Line: 1800 011 511 (24/7 telehealth psychiatric consultation)

Victoria

  • Mental Health Act 2014: Assessment Order (up to 24h), Temporary Treatment Order (up to 28 days) [43]
  • Centre for Psychiatric Risk Management (CPRM): 1300 794 991 (psychiatric consultation and bed coordination)

Queensland

  • Mental Health Act 2016: Recommendation for Assessment (up to 6h), Emergency Examination Authority (up to 12h) [44]
  • Mental Health Alcohol and Other Drugs Branch: 1300 642 255 (telehealth)

ACEM Policy

  • ACEM Statement on Mental Health in Emergency Departments (2022): Recommends 24/7 access to psychiatric consultation, dedicated mental health spaces, training in mental health assessment for ED staff [45]

Remote/Rural Considerations

Pre-Hospital

Ambulance Management

  • Scene safety: Remove means (medications, weapons, sharps) before transport
  • Medical stabilization: Airway protection if reduced GCS, IV access, monitor vital signs
  • Mental Health Act: Paramedics can detain under Schedule 2 (NSW) or equivalent if immediate risk
  • Communication: Notify ED of high-risk arrival (prepare 1:1 observation, remove sharps from room)

Police Involvement

  • Welfare check: Police can detain under Mental Health Act if immediate risk to self
  • Firearms: If firearm involved, police must secure weapon and notify firearms registry (patient's license revoked pending psychiatric assessment)
  • Domestic violence: If self-harm in context of family violence, police issue Apprehended Violence Order (AVO)

Resource-Limited Setting

Modified Approach When No Psychiatric Services

  1. Telehealth psychiatric consultation - Mandatory in all rural/remote DSH cases

    • NSW Mental Health Line: 1800 011 511
    • QLD Mental Health Line: 1300 642 255
    • VIC Mental Health Triage: Local area mental health service
    • HealthDirect: 1800 022 222 (after-hours)
  2. GP as primary mental health provider

    • GP Mental Health Treatment Plan: Up to 10 Medicare-rebated psychology sessions
    • Medication: GP can initiate SSRIs (sertraline 50mg daily), avoid TCAs
    • Safety planning: Collaborate with GP for ongoing monitoring
  3. Nursing staff 1:1 observation

    • If no mental health nurses, use general nurses or family member
    • Provide education: Engage patient, watch for absconding, remove sharps
    • Duration: Until psychiatric consult complete (may be hours if waiting for telehealth)
  4. Local supports

    • Community mental health team: If available (visit weekly/fortnightly)
    • Aboriginal Health Worker: If Indigenous patient
    • School counselor: If adolescent patient
    • Church/community groups: Pastoral care (with consent)

Retrieval

RFDS Retrieval Criteria for DSH

Absolute indications:

  • Ongoing high suicide risk + lacks capacity + refuses voluntary admission (requires tertiary psychiatric unit)
  • Medical complications requiring tertiary care (paracetamol hepatotoxicity, ICU-level monitoring)
  • Severe psychiatric illness (psychosis, mania) requiring involuntary admission
  • Safeguarding concerns requiring statutory child protection + tertiary resources

Relative indications:

  • Recurrent DSH with inadequate local supports
  • Request from telehealth psychiatrist
  • Young age (<16 years) with moderate-high risk

RFDS Contacts

  • RFDS Central Operations: 1300 137 327 (NT, SA, QLD)
  • RFDS Western Operations: 1800 625 800 (WA)
  • State retrieval services:
    • "NSW: NSW Ambulance Aeromedical 1300 008 001"
    • "VIC: Air Ambulance Victoria 1300 368 661"
    • "QLD: Retrieval Services Queensland 1300 799 127"

Retrieval Preparation

  • Medical: IV access, continuous ECG/SpO2 if overdose, NAC infusion if paracetamol
  • Psychiatric: 1:1 nursing escort, sedation if required (olanzapine 5-10mg IM, avoid heavy sedation)
  • Documentation: Comprehensive handover (event, investigations, psychiatric assessment, capacity, involuntary order if applicable)
  • Communication: Phone handover to receiving psychiatry team

Transfer Time Considerations

  • Average RFDS response: 1-3h (depends on distance, weather, aircraft availability)
  • Road retrieval: May be faster for distances <200km (1-2h vs 2-3h for aircraft activation + flight)
  • Maintain safety during wait: 1:1 observation, secure room, consider light sedation if agitated

Telemedicine

Telehealth Psychiatric Assessment Quality

  • Advantages: Immediate access to psychiatrist, avoid retrieval delays, cost-effective
  • Limitations: Lacks non-verbal cues, rapport harder to establish, patient may refuse video (feels impersonal)
  • Best practice:
    • Use video (not phone only) if possible
    • ED doctor present during call (continuity, build on telehealth assessment)
    • Provide private space (not open ED area)
    • Allow 30-60min for comprehensive assessment (not rushed)

Post-Discharge Telehealth Follow-Up

  • Evidence: Telehealth CBT is non-inferior to face-to-face for mild-moderate depression [46]
  • Limitations: High-risk patients need face-to-face (rapport, safety assessment, medication monitoring)
  • Hybrid model: Telehealth for weekly check-ins, face-to-face monthly with GP/psychiatrist

References

Guidelines

  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Hospital Morbidity Database. Canberra: AIHW, 2021. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au
  2. Carter G, Page A, Large M, et al. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guideline for the management of deliberate self-harm. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016;50(10):939-1000. PMID: 27650687
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Self-harm: assessment, management and preventing recurrence. NICE Guideline NG225. London: NICE, 2022. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng225

Key Evidence

  1. Geulayov G, Kapur N, Turnbull P, et al. Epidemiology and trends in non-fatal self-harm in three centres in England, 2000-2012: findings from the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e010538. PMID: 27059467
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Causes of Death, Australia, 2021. Canberra: ABS, 2022. Cat no. 3303.0.
  3. Hawton K, Saunders KE, O'Connor RC. Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. Lancet. 2012;379(9834):2373-2382. PMID: 22726518
  4. Möller-Leimkühler AM. The gender gap in suicide and premature death or: why are men so vulnerable? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003;253(1):1-8. PMID: 12664306
  5. Bergen H, Hawton K, Waters K, et al. Epidemiology and trends in non-fatal self-harm in Oxford: update to 2014. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51(9):1303-1312. PMID: 27438799
  6. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Intentional self-harm (suicide) deaths in Australia. Canberra: ABS, 2022. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au
  7. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health performance framework 2020: suicide and self-harm. Canberra: AIHW, 2020. PMID: N/A (grey literature)
  8. Ministry of Health New Zealand. Suicide web tool. Wellington: MOH, 2021. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz
  9. De Leo D, Milner A, Fleischmann A, et al. The WHO START study: suicidal behaviors across different areas of the world. Crisis. 2013;34(3):156-163. PMID: 23261910
  10. Chung DT, Ryan CJ, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, et al. Suicide rates after discharge from psychiatric facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(7):694-702. PMID: 28564699
  11. King M, Semlyen J, Tai SS, et al. A systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual people. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8:70. PMID: 18706118
  12. Van Orden KA, Witte TK, Cukrowicz KC, et al. The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychol Rev. 2010;117(2):575-600. PMID: 20438238
  13. Klonsky ED. The functions of deliberate self-injury: a review of the evidence. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27(2):226-239. PMID: 17014942
  14. Hamza CA, Stewart SL, Willoughby T. Examining the link between nonsuicidal self-injury and suicidal behavior: a review of the literature and an integrated model. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012;32(6):482-495. PMID: 22717336
  15. Milner AJ, Carter G, Pirkis J, et al. Letters, green cards, telephone calls and postcards: systematic and meta-analytic review of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempts and suicide. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;206(3):184-190. PMID: 25733570
  16. Zahl DL, Hawton K. Repetition of deliberate self-harm and subsequent suicide risk: long-term follow-up study of 11,583 patients. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;185:70-75. PMID: 15231558
  17. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. Self-harm: longer-term management. NICE Clinical Guideline 133. London: NICE, 2011. PMID: 22536615
  18. Quinlivan L, Cooper J, Meehan D, et al. Predictive accuracy of risk scales following self-harm: multicentre, prospective cohort study. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;210(6):429-436. PMID: 28428339
  19. Saunders K, Brand F, Lascelles K, et al. The sad truth about the SADD PERSONS scale: an evaluation of its clinical utility in self-harm patients. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(10):796-798. PMID: 23825061
  20. Cooper J, Kapur N, Dunning J, et al. A clinical tool for assessing risk after self-harm. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(4):459-466. PMID: 16997686
  21. Large M, Sharma S, Cannon E, et al. Risk factors for suicide within a year of discharge from psychiatric hospital: a systematic meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45(8):619-628. PMID: 21740345
  22. Stanley B, Brown GK. Safety planning intervention: a brief intervention to mitigate suicide risk. Cogn Behav Pract. 2012;19(2):256-264. PMID: N/A
  23. Appleby L, Shaw J, Amos T, et al. Suicide within 12 months of contact with mental health services: national clinical survey. BMJ. 1999;318(7193):1235-1239. PMID: 10231250
  24. Austin MP, Highet N; Expert Working Group. Mental Health Care in the Perinatal Period: Australian Clinical Practice Guideline. Melbourne: Centre of Perinatal Excellence, 2017. PMID: N/A (guideline)
  25. Conwell Y, Van Orden K, Caine ED. Suicide in older adults. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011;34(2):451-468. PMID: 21536168
  26. Robinson J, Too LS, Pirkis J, et al. Spatial suicide clusters in Australia between 2010 and 2012: a comparison of cluster and non-cluster among young people and adults. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:417. PMID: 27899101
  27. Rudd MD, Mandrusiak M, Joiner TE Jr. The case against no-suicide contracts: the commitment to treatment statement as a practice alternative. J Clin Psychol. 2006;62(2):243-251. PMID: 16342288
  28. Cairns R, Brown JA, Buckley NA. The impact of paracetamol pack size restrictions: make patients safer or just less convenient? Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010;48(7):659-665. PMID: 20704483
  29. Heard KJ. Acetylcysteine for acetaminophen poisoning. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(3):285-292. PMID: 18635433
  30. Tighe J, Shand F, Christensen H. Efficacy of ASIST (Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training) for suicide prevention: systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):535. PMID: 34717599
  31. Gunnell D, Bennewith O, Hawton K, et al. The epidemiology and prevention of suicide by hanging: a systematic review. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(2):433-442. PMID: 15659476
  32. Cavanagh JT, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, et al. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2003;33(3):395-405. PMID: 12701661
  33. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Deaths by suicide over time. Canberra: AIHW, 2021. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au
  34. Rammer L, Gormsen H. Strangulation and death by hanging. In: Forensic Medicine. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1988.
  35. Judd F, Cooper AM, Fraser C, et al. Rural suicide--people or place effects? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006;40(3):208-216. PMID: 16476129
  36. Royal Flying Doctor Service. Annual Report 2020-21. Sydney: RFDS, 2021. Available from: https://www.flyingdoctor.org.au
  37. Therapeutic Guidelines Limited. Psychotropic: Depression. Melbourne: TGL, 2023. Available from: https://tgldcdp.tg.org.au
  38. Therapeutic Guidelines Limited. Toxicology and Toxinology. Melbourne: TGL, 2023. Available from: https://tgldcdp.tg.org.au
  39. NSW Government. Mental Health Act 2007. Sydney: NSW Legislation, 2007. Available from: https://legislation.nsw.gov.au
  40. Victorian Government. Mental Health Act 2014. Melbourne: Victorian Legislation, 2014. Available from: https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au
  41. Queensland Government. Mental Health Act 2016. Brisbane: QLD Legislation, 2016. Available from: https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au
  42. Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. Statement on Mental Health in Emergency Departments. Melbourne: ACEM, 2022. Available from: https://acem.org.au
  43. Berryhill MB, Culmer N, Williams N, et al. Videoconferencing psychotherapy and depression: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(6):435-446. PMID: 30048211

Frequently asked questions

Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.

Should I use the SAD PERSONS scale to determine discharge safety?

No. Risk stratification scales (SAD PERSONS, Modified SAD PERSONS) have poor predictive validity and should NOT be used in isolation to determine disposition. Use comprehensive psychosocial assessment instead.

What distinguishes non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) from suicide attempt?

NSSI is typically low-lethality behavior (cutting, burning) with no intent to die, used as emotional regulation. Suicide attempts involve intent to die. However, NSSI is a risk factor for future suicide.

When can I medically clear a patient for psychiatric assessment?

After medical stabilization, toxicology clearance if overdose, GCS 15, no acute medical complications requiring ongoing treatment, and patient cooperative for assessment.

What are the admission criteria for deliberate self-harm patients?

Ongoing high suicide risk, inability to ensure safety, severe mental illness requiring treatment, lack of social supports, inability to contract for safety, or medical complications requiring inpatient care.

Learning map

Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.

Prerequisites

Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.

  • Mental State Examination

Differentials

Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.

Consequences

Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.