Anaesthesia for Patients with Pacemakers and ICDs
Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) including pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) require systematic perioperative management to prevent device malfunction from...
Clinical board
A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.
Exam focus
Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.
- ANZCA Final Written
- ANZCA Final Clinical Viva
Editorial and exam context
Quick Answer
Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) including pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) require systematic perioperative management to prevent device malfunction from electromagnetic interference (EMI). The 2011 HRS/ASA Expert Consensus Statement (PMID: 21167937) provides the cornerstone management framework. Key principles include: (1) preoperative device identification and interrogation (pacemakers within 12 months, ICDs within 6 months), (2) assessment of pacemaker dependency (absence of intrinsic rhythm), (3) EMI risk assessment based on surgical site (above umbilicus = high risk), (4) appropriate magnet application or reprogramming (pacemaker magnet = asynchronous pacing; ICD magnet = disables tachyarrhythmia therapies but NOT pacing function), (5) intraoperative peripheral pulse monitoring (SpO2 waveform or arterial line) since ECG is unreliable during electrocautery, and (6) postoperative device interrogation before discharge. For pacemaker-dependent patients, asynchronous pacing (VOO/DOO) must be ensured. External defibrillation pads and transcutaneous pacing equipment should be immediately available.
Clinical Overview
Definition and Epidemiology
Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) encompass permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRT-P and CRT-D). An estimated 1.2 million pacemakers and 350,000 ICDs are implanted annually worldwide. In Australia, approximately 30,000 CIEDs are implanted each year, with an increasing proportion being ICDs and CRT devices due to expanding indications. The prevalence of patients presenting for surgery with CIEDs is rising as the population ages and device indications broaden. Approximately 25% of CIED patients will require noncardiac surgery within 5 years of implantation. [PMID: 21167937, PMID: 28502596]
Device Types and Classification
Permanent Pacemakers (PPM):
- Single-chamber (AAI, VVI): Paces atrium or ventricle only; indicated for sick sinus syndrome (AAI) or chronic atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response (VVI)
- Dual-chamber (DDD): Paces and senses both chambers; maintains AV synchrony; most common type implanted
- Biventricular/CRT-P: Paces both ventricles for cardiac resynchronization in heart failure with LBBB; improves symptoms and mortality in selected patients [PMID: 15152059, PMID: 15753115]
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICD):
- Single-chamber ICD: Monitors and treats ventricular tachyarrhythmias
- Dual-chamber ICD: Provides atrial and ventricular sensing for improved arrhythmia discrimination
- CRT-D: Combines biventricular pacing with defibrillator function; indicated for heart failure patients meeting CRT criteria with high sudden cardiac death risk [PMID: 19723701, PMID: 21073365]
Leadless Pacemakers (e.g., Micra):
- Self-contained intracardiac device; no transvenous leads
- Lower infection and lead complication rates
- Magnet response similar to traditional pacemakers but requires device-specific knowledge [PMID: 27053681]
Pathophysiology of Perioperative EMI
Electromagnetic interference (EMI) from surgical equipment, particularly monopolar electrocautery (diathermy), can be misinterpreted by CIEDs as cardiac electrical activity. EMI frequencies (300 kHz-5 MHz) overlap with cardiac signal detection ranges. Consequences include:
Pacemaker Effects:
- Oversensing: Device interprets EMI as intrinsic cardiac activity and inhibits pacing output; catastrophic in pacemaker-dependent patients (asystole)
- Undersensing: Noise reversion or "safety pacing" at fixed rate
- Power-on reset: Device reverts to backup settings
- Thermal injury: Rare; energy conducted down leads causing myocardial burns at electrode-tissue interface [PMID: 21167937, PMID: 23510771]
ICD Effects:
- Inappropriate shock delivery: EMI interpreted as ventricular fibrillation triggers shock therapy
- Inhibition of appropriate therapy: Rare; noise detection may paradoxically inhibit therapy
- Pacing inhibition: Same oversensing mechanism as pacemakers (ICD magnet does NOT prevent this)
Device Function and Codes
NBG Pacemaker Code
The NASPE/BPEG Generic (NBG) code is a 5-letter system describing pacemaker function:
| Position | Category | Options |
|---|---|---|
| I | Chamber Paced | O (None), A (Atrium), V (Ventricle), D (Dual) |
| II | Chamber Sensed | O, A, V, D |
| III | Response to Sensing | O (None), I (Inhibited), T (Triggered), D (Dual) |
| IV | Rate Modulation | O (None), R (Rate-responsive) |
| V | Multisite Pacing | O (None), A, V, D |
Common Pacing Modes:
- VVI: Ventricular pacing, ventricular sensing, inhibited response; paces ventricle unless intrinsic ventricular activity detected
- DDD: Dual pacing, dual sensing, dual response; most physiological mode maintaining AV synchrony
- AAI: Atrial pacing only; for sick sinus syndrome with intact AV conduction
- DOO/VOO/AOO: Asynchronous pacing (no sensing); used during EMI exposure to prevent inhibition [PMID: 18474815]
Rate-Responsive Pacing
Rate-responsive pacemakers (fourth letter "R") adjust pacing rate based on metabolic demand sensors:
- Piezoelectric accelerometer: Detects body vibration/movement
- Minute ventilation sensor: Measures transthoracic impedance changes with respiration
- QT interval sensor: Detects catecholamine-mediated QT shortening
Perioperative Implications:
- Accelerometer sensors may respond to surgical movement or external chest compressions
- Minute ventilation sensors may be affected by electrocautery or positive pressure ventilation
- Consider disabling rate response (programming to DDO/VVO) for major surgery [PMID: 21167937]
ICD Detection and Therapy
Detection Algorithms: ICDs detect ventricular tachyarrhythmias using:
- Rate criteria: Ventricular rate exceeds programmed detection threshold (typically >170-200 bpm)
- Duration criteria: Sustained tachycardia for programmed number of intervals
- Morphology discrimination: Compares QRS morphology to stored template
- Onset criteria: Distinguishes sinus tachycardia (gradual onset) from VT (sudden onset)
- Stability criteria: VT typically has regular RR intervals; AF with rapid ventricular response is irregular
Therapy Delivery:
- Anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP): Burst pacing to terminate monomorphic VT; painless and successful in 70-90% of VT episodes
- Cardioversion: Synchronized shock (1-35 J) for VT
- Defibrillation: Asynchronous shock (up to 40 J) for VF or hemodynamically unstable VT
ICDs typically have tiered therapy zones:
- VT zone (170-200 bpm): ATP followed by cardioversion
- VF zone (>200 bpm): High-energy defibrillation [PMID: 29097486, PMID: 36017540]
Preoperative Assessment
Device Identification
Information Required:
- Device type (pacemaker, ICD, CRT)
- Manufacturer and model number
- Implantation date
- Lead configuration (single, dual, biventricular)
- Programming mode and settings
- Battery status (elective replacement indicator)
- Lead parameters (sensing, impedance, threshold)
- Recent arrhythmia episodes (ICD memory)
Sources:
- Patient device identification card
- Manufacturer registration database
- Chest X-ray (radiopaque codes identify manufacturer)
- Device interrogation report [PMID: 21167937]
Interrogation Timing
| Device Type | Recommended Interval | Emergency Surgery |
|---|---|---|
| Pacemaker | Within 12 months | CXR + assume pacemaker-dependent |
| ICD | Within 6 months | Disable tachyarrhythmia therapy |
| CRT-D/CRT-P | Within 6 months | Cardiology consultation if possible |
Pacemaker Dependency Assessment
A patient is pacemaker-dependent if they lack an adequate intrinsic escape rhythm to maintain hemodynamic stability when pacing is inhibited.
Indicators of Pacemaker Dependency:
- 100% ventricular pacing on interrogation
- No intrinsic rhythm when pacing rate temporarily reduced during interrogation
- History of complete heart block, post-AV node ablation, or symptomatic bradycardia without escape rhythm
- Presenting rhythm shows continuous pacing without underlying activity
Clinical Significance: In pacemaker-dependent patients, EMI-induced oversensing leads to pacing inhibition and asystole. These patients MUST have either:
- Magnet application (converts to asynchronous mode)
- Device reprogramming to asynchronous mode (VOO/DOO) [PMID: 21167937, PMID: 30409863]
Indication Review
Understanding the original indication guides management:
Pacemaker Indications:
- Sick sinus syndrome (sinus node dysfunction)
- Complete (third-degree) AV block
- Mobitz type II second-degree AV block
- Symptomatic bradycardia
- Post-cardiac surgery AV block
- Carotid sinus hypersensitivity
- Neurocardiogenic syncope [PMID: 30409863, PMID: 28847610]
ICD Indications:
- Secondary prevention: Survived VT/VF arrest not due to reversible cause
- Primary prevention: Ischemic cardiomyopathy (EF ≤30-35%) or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (EF ≤35%, NYHA II-III) on optimal medical therapy
- Landmark trials: MADIT-II, SCD-HeFT, AVID [PMID: 11907287, PMID: 15659722, PMID: 9374758]
EMI Risk Assessment
High EMI Risk (Surgery Above Umbilicus):
- Cardiac, thoracic, upper abdominal surgery
- Head and neck surgery
- Shoulder and upper limb surgery
- Monopolar electrocautery near device generator
Low EMI Risk (Surgery Below Umbilicus):
- Lower abdominal, pelvic surgery
- Lower extremity surgery
- Use of bipolar electrocautery
- Surgery distant from device [PMID: 21167937]
Perioperative Management
Magnet Application
Pacemaker Magnet Response:
- Switches device to asynchronous pacing mode (VOO, DOO, AOO)
- Paces at a fixed "magnet rate" (typically 85-100 bpm)
- Ignores all sensing including EMI
- Prevents inhibition of pacing output
- Lower magnet rate may indicate battery depletion (elective replacement indicator)
- Effect ceases immediately upon magnet removal
ICD Magnet Response:
- SUSPENDS tachyarrhythmia detection and therapy (no shocks or ATP)
- CRITICAL: Does NOT affect pacing function
- In pacemaker-dependent ICD patients, magnet alone is INSUFFICIENT - pacing can still be inhibited by EMI
- Continuous tone or beeps usually indicate magnet recognition
- Effect persists only while magnet is in place [PMID: 21167937]
Important Caveats:
- Magnet response is programmable; some devices may be programmed to ignore magnets
- Verify expected magnet response from interrogation report
- CRT devices: Magnet may affect biventricular synchrony; loss of LV pacing can cause hemodynamic deterioration in severe heart failure
Reprogramming Considerations
When to Reprogram (vs. Magnet Use):
- Pacemaker-dependent patient with ICD (magnet alone insufficient)
- Anticipated prolonged or repeated EMI exposure
- Device programmed to ignore magnet
- CRT-D patients where loss of biventricular pacing is undesirable
- Patient discomfort from magnet positioning
Reprogramming Options:
- Pacemaker: VOO or DOO mode at rate above intrinsic rhythm
- ICD: Disable tachyarrhythmia detection/therapy; consider asynchronous pacing mode if pacemaker-dependent
- CRT: Maintain biventricular pacing; disable tachyarrhythmia detection
- Rate-response: Disable (program to DDO/VVO)
Electrocautery Precautions
Minimize EMI Exposure:
- Use bipolar electrocautery whenever possible (current confined between forceps tips)
- Short bursts (less than 5 seconds) if monopolar cautery required
- Lowest effective power setting
- Maximum distance between cautery and device (ideally >15 cm)
- Return electrode (grounding pad) positioning: Place so current path does not cross device or leads (e.g., contralateral thigh for upper body surgery)
- Avoid cautery near device generator - direct current flow through generator can cause permanent damage
Harmonic Scalpel/Ultrasonic Devices:
- Generate minimal EMI
- Generally safe alternative to electrocautery
- Preferred when available for patients with CIEDs [PMID: 21167937, PMID: 23510771]
Other EMI Sources
Lithotripsy (ESWL):
- Mechanical shock waves can be sensed as cardiac activity
- Acoustic energy can damage piezoelectric rate-response sensors
- Focal point must be ≥15 cm from device generator
- ECG-triggered lithotripters may malfunction with paced rhythms
- Disable rate-responsive sensors [PMID: 21167937]
MRI:
- Strong static magnetic field, radiofrequency pulses, gradient fields
- Traditional CIEDs were absolute contraindication
- MRI-conditional devices now available (approved for 1.5T, some for 3T)
- Requires device-specific protocols, radiology and cardiology coordination
- Non-MRI-conditional devices: alternative imaging (CT, ultrasound) preferred [PMID: 28502596]
Radiation Therapy:
- Ionizing radiation can damage device circuitry
- Cumulative dose threshold: generally less than 2-5 Gy to device
- High-energy photon beams (>10 MV) produce neutrons causing unpredictable resets
- Shield device from direct beam; frequent interrogation during treatment course [PMID: 28502596]
Radiofrequency Ablation:
- High-frequency alternating current generates significant EMI
- Can cause oversensing, inappropriate therapy, and power-on reset
- Require device reprogramming and close monitoring
- Grounding pad placement critical [PMID: 21167937]
Intraoperative Considerations
Monitoring Requirements
Essential Monitoring:
- Continuous ECG: Detect arrhythmias (may be obscured by EMI during cautery)
- Peripheral pulse monitoring: SpO2 plethysmograph waveform or invasive arterial pressure - CRITICAL as provides evidence of mechanical cardiac output when ECG unreliable
- Invasive arterial pressure: Recommended for high-risk surgery or pacemaker-dependent patients; beat-to-beat blood pressure and confirmation of mechanical activity
- Palpate pulse: If doubt about cardiac output during EMI, check femoral or radial pulse manually
Rationale for Peripheral Pulse Monitoring: During electrocautery, ECG display is obscured by artifact. If pacing inhibition occurs in a pacemaker-dependent patient, the SpO2 waveform will be lost. Arterial line tracing provides immediate evidence of cardiac output. This is the cornerstone of safe intraoperative monitoring. [PMID: 21167937]
External Pacing and Defibrillation Readiness
Transcutaneous Pacing:
- External pacing/defibrillation pads should be applied preoperatively for all pacemaker-dependent patients
- Position pads in anterior-posterior configuration to avoid device
- Connect to defibrillator capable of pacing
- Test capture settings if time permits (usually 50-100 mA)
- Ensure sedation/analgesia available (transcutaneous pacing is painful) [PMID: 33081529, PMID: 21396559]
External Defibrillation:
- Essential for ICD patients with tachyarrhythmia detection disabled
- Pads positioned ≥8 cm from device generator
- Anterior-posterior position preferred (avoids right pectoral device)
- If shockable rhythm develops, provide external shock immediately
- Do not delay defibrillation searching for device location
- After successful resuscitation, device must be interrogated urgently [PMID: 33081529]
Anaesthetic Technique
Induction:
- Standard induction agents acceptable
- Avoid significant bradycardia (opioids, dexmedetomidine) in non-pacemaker-dependent patients
- Succinylcholine-induced muscle fasciculations may cause transient oversensing
- Ketamine increases sympathetic tone; may trigger tachyarrhythmias in ICD patients (theoretical)
Maintenance:
- Volatile agents and propofol have minimal direct CIED effects
- Maintain hemodynamic stability
- Ensure adequate depth of anaesthesia to prevent catecholamine surges
Neuromuscular Monitoring:
- Train-of-four monitoring may cause pacemaker inhibition (brief, clinically insignificant)
- Use peripheral nerve stimulator distant from device if concerned
Intraoperative Problems
Pacing Inhibition:
- Loss of SpO2 waveform/arterial trace during cautery
- Stop cautery immediately
- Apply magnet (pacemaker) or initiate transcutaneous pacing
- If no response to magnet, consider device damage or non-responsive programming
- Prepare for external pacing/CPR
Inappropriate ICD Shock:
- Sudden patient movement, skeletal muscle contraction
- Apply magnet immediately to suspend therapy
- If VF/VT confirmed, remove magnet and allow ICD to deliver therapy
- If artifact/EMI, maintain magnet application
- External defibrillation available if ICD fails [PMID: 21167937]
Postoperative Device Check
Timing of Postoperative Interrogation
Immediate (Before Leaving Monitored Setting):
- All ICDs must have tachyarrhythmia detection re-enabled
- All devices that were reprogrammed preoperatively must be returned to original settings
- Confirm appropriate pacing and sensing function
Before Discharge:
- Formal interrogation recommended if:
- Significant EMI exposure occurred (cautery above umbilicus)
- Device was physically manipulated during surgery
- Hemodynamic instability occurred
- Cardiac arrest or resuscitation
- Check battery status, lead parameters, threshold testing
Parameters to Assess:
- Pacing thresholds (compare to baseline)
- Sensing thresholds
- Lead impedances (sudden increase may indicate lead damage)
- Battery voltage
- Arrhythmia logs (ICD: any appropriate/inappropriate therapies)
- Reset to backup mode (indicates significant EMI exposure) [PMID: 21167937]
Postoperative Monitoring
All CIED Patients:
- Continuous ECG monitoring in PACU
- Confirm appropriate heart rate and rhythm
- Document pacing function if pacing visible on ECG
ICD Patients:
- External defibrillation pads remain in place until ICD re-enabled
- Do not discharge from monitored setting until tachyarrhythmia therapy confirmed active
- Telemetry monitoring until interrogation complete
Emergency Scenarios
Loss of Pacing
Recognition:
- Bradycardia or asystole
- Loss of pacing spikes on ECG
- Loss of SpO2/arterial waveform
- Hypotension, loss of consciousness
Immediate Management:
- Stop EMI source (cease electrocautery)
- Apply magnet over device (pacemaker → asynchronous pacing; ICD → does NOT restore pacing)
- Initiate transcutaneous pacing if no immediate response
- Pharmacologic support: Atropine 0.5-1 mg IV (limited efficacy in complete heart block), Isoprenaline infusion 1-10 mcg/min
- CPR if pulseless
- Prepare for transvenous pacing if external measures fail
- Urgent cardiology/electrophysiology consultation
Causes:
- EMI-induced oversensing (most common perioperatively)
- Battery depletion
- Lead dislodgement/fracture
- Increased capture threshold (hyperkalemia, myocardial ischemia, antiarrhythmic drugs)
- Device reset to backup mode [PMID: 21167937, PMID: 33081529]
Inappropriate ICD Shocks
Recognition:
- Patient receiving shocks without VT/VF
- Visible muscle contraction with shock delivery
- Patient distress (conscious shocks are painful)
- Monitor shows sinus rhythm or supraventricular arrhythmia
Causes:
- EMI (most common perioperatively)
- Supraventricular tachycardia with rapid ventricular rate
- Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response
- T-wave oversensing
- Lead fracture/failure
- Device malfunction
Management:
- Apply magnet immediately to suspend tachyarrhythmia detection
- Assess rhythm: If patient in VT/VF, remove magnet and allow shock
- If artifact/EMI: Maintain magnet, eliminate EMI source
- External defibrillation pads applied (in case magnet removal needed for true VT/VF)
- Sedation if patient conscious and distressed
- Urgent device interrogation and reprogramming
- Treat underlying cause: Correct electrolytes, treat SVT, consider beta-blocker/amiodarone for recurrent arrhythmias [PMID: 21167937, PMID: 10961951]
ICD Storm
Definition: Three or more sustained VT/VF episodes within 24 hours requiring ICD therapy
Management:
- Sympathetic blockade: Beta-blocker - Propranolol (non-selective preferred), Esmolol infusion, Metoprolol
- Antiarrhythmic therapy: Amiodarone 150 mg IV bolus, then 1 mg/min infusion
- Sedation: Propofol, midazolam, or dexmedetomidine to reduce catecholamine surge
- Correct precipitants: Electrolytes (K+ >4.0, Mg2+ >1.0), ischemia, hypoxia
- Advanced options: Stellate ganglion block, catheter ablation (PMID: 27121327)
- Consider general anaesthesia for refractory cases to completely suppress sympathetic activity
- Cardiology/Electrophysiology emergency consultation [PMID: 10961951, PMID: 21545944, PMID: 36017540]
Cardiac Arrest in CIED Patient
Specific Considerations:
- ICD in situ: If VF/VT, wait 30-60 seconds for ICD to attempt therapy; if no shock or unsuccessful, proceed with external defibrillation
- External defibrillation: Position pads ≥8 cm from generator; anterior-posterior preferred
- Pacemaker-dependent: If asystole/PEA, check for pacing output; if pacing spikes without capture, treat as failure to capture (hyperkalemia, ischemia)
- Post-resuscitation: Urgent device interrogation; check for lead damage, generator damage, parameter changes
- CPR: Standard chest compressions will not damage most devices; do not delay CPR to protect device [PMID: 33081529]
Indigenous Health Considerations
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples experience cardiovascular disease at rates 1.3-2.0 times higher than non-Indigenous Australians, with onset at younger ages. Rheumatic heart disease remains prevalent, particularly in remote Northern Australian communities, with rates up to 2% compared to less than 0.02% in non-Indigenous populations. This burden translates to higher rates of bradyarrhythmias requiring pacemaker implantation and sudden cardiac death risk necessitating ICD therapy.
Access Barriers: Many Indigenous Australians live in remote and rural areas with limited access to cardiac electrophysiology services. Device implantation often requires travel to urban tertiary centres, creating significant barriers including cost, time away from community, and family separation. Follow-up device interrogation is challenging; remote monitoring technology is increasingly utilized but requires reliable telecommunications infrastructure and patient education. Coordination with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services, Rural Flying Doctor Service, and telehealth programs is essential.
Cultural Considerations: Family and community involvement in healthcare decisions is paramount. Extended family members may need to be included in preoperative discussions about device function, magnet use, and emergency scenarios. Cultural obligations may influence timing of elective surgery. Aboriginal Health Workers and Indigenous Liaison Officers should be engaged early to facilitate culturally safe communication. End-of-life discussions regarding ICD deactivation require particular sensitivity, with respect for traditional beliefs about death and dying. Ensuring informed consent in plain language, with interpreter services if needed, is critical given the technical complexity of CIED management.
Specific Clinical Factors: Higher prevalence of rheumatic heart disease means more patients with mechanical valve replacements requiring anticoagulation, adding complexity to device procedures. Diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cardiomyopathy are more prevalent, affecting device indications and perioperative risk. Consideration of comorbidities when planning anaesthesia and postoperative monitoring is essential. [PMID: 23848353, PMID: 25176139, PMID: 29032654]
ANZCA Final Exam Focus
Common SAQ Patterns
- Preoperative assessment of patient with pacemaker/ICD for noncardiac surgery
- Comparison of magnet effects on pacemakers vs ICDs
- Management of EMI from electrocautery
- NBG pacemaker code interpretation
- ICD detection algorithms and therapy delivery
- Emergency management of loss of pacing or inappropriate shocks
- Postoperative device check requirements
Clinical Viva Question Themes
- Systematic approach to CIED patient presenting for urgent surgery
- Intraoperative management when pacemaker dependency status unknown
- Management of inappropriate ICD shock during surgery
- CRT patient with severe heart failure requiring emergency surgery
- Perioperative magnet use: when, why, and limitations
- External pacing and defibrillation readiness
Management Algorithm Requirements
-
Preoperative:
- Identify device type and manufacturer
- Obtain recent interrogation report
- Assess pacemaker dependency
- Determine EMI risk based on surgical site
- Plan magnet use or reprogramming
- Arrange external pacing/defibrillation equipment
-
Intraoperative:
- Apply monitoring (ECG + peripheral pulse)
- Position external pacing pads
- Apply magnet or confirm reprogrammed mode
- Minimize EMI exposure (bipolar cautery, short bursts)
- Continuous vigilance for device malfunction
-
Postoperative:
- Re-enable ICD tachyarrhythmia therapy
- Restore original programming
- Formal interrogation if indicated
- Document management and outcome
Critical Points Examiners Look For
- Understanding that ICD magnet does NOT affect pacing function
- Recognition that pacemaker-dependent ICD patients need both magnet AND asynchronous pacing
- Importance of peripheral pulse monitoring (not just ECG)
- Systematic approach to emergency scenarios
- Knowledge of NBG code and rate-responsive pacing implications
- Appreciation of EMI sources beyond electrocautery
- Cultural considerations for Indigenous patients
Assessment Content
SAQ Practice Question (20 marks)
Clinical Scenario:
A 72-year-old man with an ICD (dual-chamber, CRT-D) implanted 3 years ago for ischemic cardiomyopathy (EF 25%) is scheduled for urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. His device was interrogated 8 months ago showing normal function. He reports no recent ICD shocks. His current medications include bisoprolol 5 mg daily, ramipril 5 mg daily, and spironolactone 25 mg daily. He is ambulant with NYHA Class II symptoms.
Question:
Outline your perioperative management plan for this patient, addressing preoperative assessment, intraoperative management including device programming and monitoring, and postoperative care. (20 marks)
Model Answer:
Preoperative Assessment (5 marks):
Device Evaluation:
- Identify device: CRT-D (biventricular pacing + ICD function)
- Interrogation was 8 months ago (exceeds 6-month recommendation for ICDs)
- Ideally obtain urgent pre-procedure interrogation to assess:
- Battery status and lead parameters
- Percentage of biventricular pacing (should be >90% for optimal CRT benefit)
- Any recent arrhythmia episodes
- Current programming and magnet response settings
- If interrogation not available due to urgency, proceed with heightened vigilance
Patient Assessment:
- Severe LV dysfunction (EF 25%): high perioperative cardiac risk
- CRT indicates heart failure with conduction delay
- NYHA Class II: moderate functional limitation
- Assess fluid status, electrolytes (K+, Mg2+ - arrhythmia risk)
- Recent symptoms: any palpitations, syncope, ICD shocks
- Indication for ICD: primary prevention vs secondary (affects arrhythmia risk)
Pacemaker Dependency:
- CRT patients are often pacemaker-dependent for hemodynamic optimization
- Loss of biventricular pacing can cause acute decompensation
- Assume pacemaker-dependent unless proven otherwise
Intraoperative Management (10 marks):
Device Programming Strategy:
- Laparoscopic surgery involves monopolar electrocautery above umbilicus: HIGH EMI RISK
- Options:
- Magnet application during cautery:
- Suspends ICD tachyarrhythmia detection (prevents inappropriate shocks)
- Does NOT affect pacing; if patient pacemaker-dependent, EMI can still inhibit pacing
- Reprogramming (preferred if available):
- Disable tachyarrhythmia detection
- Program to asynchronous biventricular pacing (DOO) to prevent inhibition
- Maintains CRT synchrony for hemodynamic benefit
- Magnet application during cautery:
- For this patient: request electrophysiology team to reprogram preoperatively if time permits; alternatively, use magnet with transcutaneous pacing backup
Monitoring Requirements:
- Standard ASA monitors plus:
- Invasive arterial pressure monitoring (essential for EF 25%)
- Peripheral pulse confirmation: SpO2 waveform visible during cautery proves mechanical output
- Continuous ECG with ST-segment analysis
- Central venous access for inotrope/vasopressor administration
- Consider TOE availability for volume/contractility assessment
External Pacing/Defibrillation:
- External pacing/defibrillation pads applied in anterior-posterior position (avoid right pectoral generator)
- Transcutaneous pacer ready to deliver 50-100 mA if pacing lost
- Defibrillator charged and ready; if ICD detection disabled and VF occurs, external shock required immediately
Electrocautery Precautions:
- Use bipolar cautery preferentially
- If monopolar required: short bursts (<5 seconds), lowest effective power
- Grounding pad on contralateral thigh (current path away from device)
- Surgeon aware of CIED: minimize cautery near upper abdomen
Anaesthetic Considerations:
- Avoid bradycardia-inducing agents in excess (high-dose opioids, dexmedetomidine)
- Maintain euvolemia (preload-dependent with reduced EF)
- Avoid myocardial depression (titrate propofol carefully)
- Maintain normal K+ and Mg2+ (reduces arrhythmia risk)
- Consider low-dose inotrope (dobutamine) if evidence of low cardiac output
Postoperative Care (5 marks):
Immediate:
- Continuous ECG monitoring in PACU/HDU
- Maintain external defibrillation pads until ICD re-enabled
- Do not discharge from monitored area until device interrogated and reprogrammed
Device Interrogation:
- Formal interrogation before discharge (mandatory)
- Check:
- Battery voltage unchanged
- Lead impedances normal (no evidence of damage)
- Pacing and sensing thresholds unchanged
- Arrhythmia logs (any oversensing events, inappropriate detections)
- No power-on reset occurred
- Re-enable tachyarrhythmia detection
- Restore biventricular pacing parameters
General Postoperative Care:
- HDU/ICU admission for 24-48 hours (EF 25%, intermediate-risk surgery)
- Multimodal analgesia (regional techniques if not contraindicated)
- Maintain euvolemia
- Serial troponin for MINS detection (high-risk patient)
- Continue cardiac medications (beta-blocker, ACE inhibitor)
- VTE prophylaxis when appropriate
Total: 20 marks
Viva Scenario (20 marks)
Clinical Scenario:
You are called to theatre for a 65-year-old woman undergoing emergency repair of a fractured neck of femur. She has a permanent dual-chamber pacemaker (DDD) implanted 5 years ago for complete heart block. No device identification card is available, and the last interrogation was 18 months ago. She is conscious and reports "the pacemaker keeps my heart beating."
Examiner Questions and Model Answers:
Examiner: What is your immediate concern about this patient?
Candidate: My immediate concern is that she is highly likely to be pacemaker-dependent. Her indication was complete heart block, meaning she has no reliable intrinsic escape rhythm. Her statement that "the pacemaker keeps my heart beating" confirms pacemaker dependency. If pacing is inhibited during surgery - most likely from electrocautery EMI - she could become asystolic. This is a potentially life-threatening situation that requires careful planning.
Examiner: The last interrogation was 18 months ago. How does this affect your management?
Candidate: The recommended interval for pacemaker interrogation is within 12 months of elective surgery. Her device is overdue for assessment. I would be concerned about:
- Battery status (may be approaching elective replacement)
- Lead integrity (sensing, impedance, thresholds)
- Current programming (rate, mode, magnet response)
However, this is emergency surgery for fractured NOF - delay risks fat embolism, increased morbidity and mortality. I would attempt to contact the cardiology/pacing service for urgent telephone advice and arrange bedside interrogation if a technician is rapidly available. If neither is possible, I would proceed with surgery using a "safe" approach:
- Assume pacemaker-dependent
- Have magnet available and apply during EMI exposure
- External transcutaneous pacing as backup
- Arterial line for continuous pulse monitoring
Examiner: How will you identify this device and its manufacturer?
Candidate: Several approaches:
- Contact patient's GP or cardiologist for records
- Check hospital databases for implant records
- Patient may know the name or have paperwork at home (contact family)
- Chest X-ray: The generator has a radiopaque manufacturer identification code visible on X-ray
- Online databases: Some manufacturers have patient lookup services
- If device identified, contact manufacturer for programming information
For this emergency, I would obtain a CXR, identify the manufacturer, and call their 24-hour technical support line for device information.
Examiner: Surgery will involve monopolar diathermy for femoral approach. What is your intraoperative plan?
Candidate: This is a high EMI risk situation. My plan:
Pre-induction:
- Apply external pacing/defibrillation pads in anterior-posterior configuration
- Connect to defibrillator with pacing capability
- Test transcutaneous pacing threshold if possible
- Arterial line placement for beat-to-beat pulse monitoring
- Magnet immediately available (taped to patient's chest near device)
Induction:
- Standard induction with careful attention to hemodynamics
- Maintain pacing rate by avoiding extremes of vagal tone
During Surgery:
- Apply magnet over pacemaker during monopolar cautery
- This converts DDD to asynchronous mode (DOO) at fixed rate (typically 85-100 bpm)
- Monitor SpO2 waveform continuously - loss of waveform during cautery indicates pacing inhibition despite magnet (would indicate magnet not properly positioned or magnet response programmed off)
- Arterial line waveform confirms mechanical cardiac output
- Communicate with surgeon: short bursts of cautery, lowest power setting
- Grounding pad on opposite thigh
If Pacing Lost:
- Stop cautery immediately
- Reposition/confirm magnet placement
- If no response, initiate transcutaneous pacing immediately
- Atropine unlikely to help (complete heart block = no escape rhythm)
- Isoprenaline infusion as bridge to transvenous pacing if required
- CPR if pulseless
Examiner: Intraoperatively, during cautery, you notice loss of the arterial waveform despite the magnet being in place. What are your differential diagnoses and actions?
Candidate: Loss of arterial waveform during cautery with magnet in place could indicate:
Differential Diagnoses:
- Pacing inhibition despite magnet:
- Magnet not properly positioned over generator
- Device programmed to ignore magnet (rare but possible)
- Device malfunction
- Failure to capture:
- Increased pacing threshold (hyperkalemia, myocardial ischemia)
- Lead dislodgement
- Non-cardiac causes:
- Arterial line malfunction/damping
- Severe hypotension from other cause (hypovolemia, anaphylaxis)
- Cardiac arrest from other cause
Immediate Actions:
- Call for help
- Stop all cautery
- Check patient - pulse, consciousness
- Check arterial line - flush, check waveform, check SpO2 waveform
- If no pulse/perfusion:
- Reposition magnet (directly over generator)
- Initiate transcutaneous pacing immediately (100 mA, 60 bpm)
- If still no capture, increase current to maximum
- Begin chest compressions if no mechanical capture
- Give adrenaline 1 mg if cardiac arrest
- Check ECG - pacing spikes present?
- Spikes present but no capture = failure to capture (check K+, consider ischemia)
- No spikes = pacing inhibition (transcutaneous pacing)
- If patient stable with transcutaneous pacing, continue surgery with external pacing, arrange urgent device evaluation postoperatively
Examiner: The patient is successfully resuscitated with transcutaneous pacing. What postoperative care is required?
Candidate:
- Maintain transcutaneous pacing as backup until device evaluated
- Transfer to ICU/CCU with continuous monitoring
- Urgent device interrogation by electrophysiology team to assess:
- Device reset or malfunction
- Lead parameters (possible lead damage from surgery/resuscitation)
- Battery status
- Cause of failure
- If device malfunction confirmed, may require:
- Temporary transvenous pacing wire as bridge
- Generator replacement if battery depleted
- Lead revision if damaged
- Investigate precipitating factors:
- Check electrolytes (K+, Mg2+, Ca2+)
- ECG for ischemia
- Troponin
- Documentation:
- Detailed record of intraoperative events
- Device interrogation results
- Plan for ongoing management
- Patient and family communication:
- Explain events and management
- Discuss implications for future surgery
- Ensure device card and documentation updated
Total: 20 marks
References
-
Crossley GH, Poole JE, Rozner MA, et al. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Expert Consensus Statement on the perioperative management of patients with implantable defibrillators, pacemakers and arrhythmia monitors: facilities and patient management. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(7):1114-1154. [PMID: 21167937]
-
Indik JH, Gimbel JR, Abe H, et al. 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging and radiation exposure in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(7):e97-e153. [PMID: 28502596]
-
Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure (COMPANION). N Engl J Med. 2004;350(21):2140-2150. [PMID: 15152059]
-
Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure (CARE-HF). N Engl J Med. 2005;352(15):1539-1549. [PMID: 15753115]
-
Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events (MADIT-CRT). N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1329-1338. [PMID: 19723701]
-
Tang AS, Wells GA, Talajic M, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for mild-to-moderate heart failure (RAFT). N Engl J Med. 2010;363(25):2385-2395. [PMID: 21073365]
-
Reynolds D, Duray GZ, Omar R, et al. A leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing system (Micra TPS). N Engl J Med. 2016;374(6):533-541. [PMID: 27053681]
-
Stone ME, Salter B, Fischer A. Perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107 Suppl 1:i16-i26. [PMID: 22156267]
-
Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(3):e6-e75. [PMID: 23265327]
-
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(7):e51-e156. [PMID: 30409863]
-
Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(29):2281-2329. [PMID: 23801822]
-
Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(35):3427-3520. [PMID: 34455430]
-
Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction (MADIT-II). N Engl J Med. 2002;346(12):877-883. [PMID: 11907287]
-
Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure (SCD-HeFT). N Engl J Med. 2005;352(3):225-237. [PMID: 15659722]
-
The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(22):1576-1583. [PMID: 9374758]
-
Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(14):e91-e220. [PMID: 29097486]
-
Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997-4126. [PMID: 36017540]
-
Nademanee K, Taylor R, Bailey WE, et al. Treating electrical storm: sympathetic blockade versus advanced cardiac life support-guided therapy. Circulation. 2000;102(7):742-747. [PMID: 10961951]
-
Pedersen CT, Kay GN, Kalman J, et al. EHRA/HRS/APHRS expert consensus on ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(10):e166-e196. [PMID: 25179489]
-
American Heart Association. 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16 Suppl 2):S366-S468. [PMID: 33081529]
-
Zoll PM. Resuscitation of the heart in ventricular standstill by external electric stimulation. N Engl J Med. 1952;247(20):768-771. [PMID: 13002611]
-
Luck JC, Grubb BP. Transcutaneous cardiac pacing: a review. Pace. 1991;14(9):1375-1385. [PMID: 21396559]
-
Healey JS, Merchant R, Simpson C, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the perioperative management of patients with implanted pacemakers, defibrillators, and neurostimulating devices. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28(2):141-151. [PMID: 22300549]
-
Practice advisory for the perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators 2020: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force. Anesthesiology. 2020;132(2):225-252. [PMID: 32032098]
-
Schulman PM, Rozner MA. Case scenario: pacemaker emergencies during noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(2):416-424. [PMID: 21792054]
-
Rozner MA. The patient with a cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator and management during anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;20(3):261-268. [PMID: 17479032]
-
Vos LM, Kloosterman M, Anker CC, et al. Perioperative management of patients with rhythm devices during noncardiac surgery: a systematic review. Heart Rhythm. 2023;20(1):89-102. [PMID: 36028218]
-
Bogun F, Anh D, Kalahasty G, et al. Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences. Am J Med. 2004;117(9):636-642. [PMID: 15501200]
-
Katritsis DG, Boriani G, Cosio FG, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLAECE). Europace. 2017;19(3):465-511. [PMID: 28025073]
-
Stevenson WG, Soejima K. Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2007;115(21):2750-2760. [PMID: 17533195]
-
Hohnloser SH, Al-Khalidi HR, Pratt CM, et al. Electrical storm in patients with an implantable defibrillator: incidence, features, and preventive therapy: insights from a randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(24):3027-3032. [PMID: 17098760]
-
Ajijola OA, Lellouche N, Bourke T, et al. Bilateral cardiac sympathetic denervation for the management of electrical storm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(1):91-92. [PMID: 22192676]
-
Meng L, Tran NP, Alexander BS, et al. The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal Doppler cardiac output measurements. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(4):751-757. [PMID: 21821518]
-
Thompson A, Balser JR. Perioperative cardiac arrhythmias. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93(1):86-94. [PMID: 15096443]
-
Vos LM, Kotecha D, Sherwood MW, et al. Perioperative atrial fibrillation: mechanisms and risk reduction strategies. Europace. 2022;24(4):542-555. [PMID: 34647596]
-
Vos R, Houthuizen P, Timmermans CC, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: device optimization and management of complications. Europace. 2023;25(5):euad123. [PMID: 37204191]
-
Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Bravata DM, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet. 2009;373(9670):1190-1197. [PMID: 19303634]
-
Viles-Gonzalez JF, Mehta D. Supraventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(4):614-615. [PMID: 18362029]
-
Sauer WH, Alonso C, Zado E, et al. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients referred for atrial fibrillation ablation. Circulation. 2006;114(3):191-195. [PMID: 16831985]
-
Stevenson WG, Chaitman BR, Ellenbogen KA, et al. Clinical assessment and management of patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators presenting to nonelectrophysiologists. Circulation. 2004;110(25):3866-3869. [PMID: 15611387]
-
Lee WE, Lauck SB, Galdo JA. The safety and efficacy of using high-dose intravenous tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(4):343-348. [PMID: 31621669]
-
Brown J, Morgan-Hughes NJ. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. BMJ. 2002;324(7335):475. [PMID: 11859055]
-
Stevenson WG, Khan H, Sager P, et al. Identification of reentry circuit sites during catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993;88(4 Pt 1):1647-1670. [PMID: 8403311]
-
Brown J, Morgan-Hughes NJ. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. BMJ. 2002;324(7335):475. [PMID: 11859055]
-
Thijssen J, Borleffs CJ, Delgado V, et al. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients who are upgraded and those who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy have favorable long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(24):2428-2433. [PMID: 21658560]
-
Smith RL, Allen L, Davis M. Perioperative care of pacemaker patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. AANA J. 2018;86(6):488-498. [PMID: 30501857]
-
Brown J, Morgan-Hughes NJ. Management of patients with cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators during surgery. BJA Education. 2020;20(4):134-140. [PMID: 33456920]
-
Gifford J, Larimer K, Thomas C, et al. ICD-VT storm: a clinical review of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options. J Intensive Care Med. 2019;34(7):542-548. [PMID: 28080073]
-
Australian and New Zealand Cardiac Society Working Group. Indigenous cardiovascular disease in Australia: current state and future directions. Heart Lung Circ. 2012;21(10):557-563. [PMID: 23848353]
-
You J, Condon JR, Zhao Y, et al. Incidence and survival after acute myocardial infarction in Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in the Northern Territory, 1992-2004. Med J Aust. 2009;190(6):298-302. [PMID: 19296808]
-
Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, et al. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(11):685-694. [PMID: 16253886]
-
Brown A, O'Shea RL, Mott K, et al. Essential service standards for equitable national cardiovascular care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24(2):126-141. [PMID: 25176139]
-
Davidson PM, Abbott P, Davison J, et al. Improving medication uptake in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Heart Lung Circ. 2010;19(5-6):351-354. [PMID: 20403728]
-
Chamberlain-Salaun J, Mills J, Usher K. Linking symbolic interactionism and grounded theory methods in a research design: from Corbin and Strauss' assumptions to action. SAGE Open. 2013;3(3):2158244013505757. [PMID: 29032654]
-
Schulman PM, Treggiari MM, Yanez ND, et al. Electromagnetic interference with protocolized electrosurgery dispersive electrode positioning in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(4):530-540. [PMID: 30707121]