Anaesthesia
A Evidence

Perioperative Arrhythmia Management

Comprehensive guide to atrial fibrillation management, beta-blockers, amiodarone, and perioperative cardiac rhythm disturbances for ANZCA Fellowship examination

Reviewed 3 Feb 2026
32 min read
Citations
94 cited sources
Quality score
55

Clinical board

A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.

Urgent signals

Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.

  • Haemodynamically unstable AF with hypotension or ischaemia
  • Ventricular tachycardia with pulselessness
  • New AF with rapid ventricular response >150 bpm
  • Torsades de pointes with QT prolongation

Exam focus

Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.

  • ANZCA Final Examination
  • ANZCA Final Written
  • ANZCA Final Medical Viva

Editorial and exam context

ANZCA Final Examination
ANZCA Final Written
ANZCA Final Medical Viva
Clinical reference article

Perioperative Arrhythmia Management

Quick Answer

Exam Essentials - ANZCA Final Examination

New-Onset Perioperative AF: Incidence 5-15% after cardiac surgery, 2-5% after major non-cardiac surgery. Risk factors: Age >70, male, previous AF, heart failure, COPD, obesity, electrolyte abnormalities, hypoxia. [1-3]

Management Principles:

  1. Assess haemodynamic stability: Unstable = immediate synchronised cardioversion; Stable = rate/rhythm control [4,5]
  2. Rate control: Beta-blockers (esmolol, metoprolol) or calcium channel blockers (diltiazem); target HR <110 bpm [6,7]
  3. Rhythm control: Amiodarone (loading 150-300 mg IV over 10-20 min, then 900 mg over 24h); electrical cardioversion if unstable [8,9]
  4. Anticoagulation: CHA2DS2-VASc score guides stroke prevention; CHADS2-VASc ≥2 (men) or ≥3 (women) → anticoagulate [10,11]
  5. Treat precipitants: Electrolytes (K+ >4.0, Mg2+ >0.8), hypoxia, pain, sepsis, volume status [12,13]

Beta-Blocker Perioperative Management:

  • Continue chronic beta-blockers throughout perioperative period (withdrawal increases mortality) [14,15]
  • Avoid starting high-dose beta-blockers acutely (POISE trial harm) [16,17]
  • Consider starting in high-risk patients (RCRI ≥2) >2 weeks preoperatively [18,19]

Indigenous Health Considerations

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Populations

Epidemiology of Arrhythmia:

Cardiac arrhythmias represent significant health disparities affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations:

  • Atrial fibrillation: Lower prevalence than non-Indigenous populations but increasing with ageing demographic and rising cardiovascular disease burden [20]
  • Ischemic heart disease: 2-3 times higher rates predispose to ventricular arrhythmias [21]
  • Rheumatic heart disease: Remains prevalent in remote communities (particularly Northern Australia); predisposes to atrial fibrillation and flutter [22]
  • Sudden cardiac death: Higher rates, partly attributable to undiagnosed/ischaemic cardiomyopathy [23]

Barriers to Optimal Arrhythmia Management:

BarrierImpactMitigation Strategy
Geographic isolationLimited cardiology/EP services in remote areasTelemedicine consultation, fly-in fly-out services
Diagnostic delaysParoxysmal AF may be missed; Holter monitoring limitedEvent recorders, smartphone-based ECG
Anticoagulation accessWarfarin monitoring difficult; DOACs expensivePoint-of-care INR testing, PBS subsidies
Follow-up complianceSpecialist appointments challenging with transport/costTelehealth, primary care protocols
Device therapyPacemaker/ICD implantation requires travel to citiesPre-procedure planning, RFDS coordination
RHD complicationsAtrial arrhythmias common with mitral valve diseaseEchocardiographic screening programs [24,25]

Rheumatic Heart Disease Considerations:

  • Prevalence: 2-3% in some remote Indigenous communities (vs <0.05% non-Indigenous) [26]
  • Valvular involvement: Mitral > aortic > tricuspid
  • Arrhythmia risk: Atrial fibrillation (10-20% with mitral stenosis), atrial flutter
  • Anticoagulation: Essential if AF + RHD (very high stroke risk)
  • Surgical access: Valve surgery requires transfer to tertiary centres [27,28]

Cultural Safety in Arrhythmia Care:

  1. Communication: Explain arrhythmia and stroke risk in culturally appropriate ways
  2. Medication adherence: Complex anticoagulation regimens require education and support
  3. Aboriginal Health Workers: Essential for patient navigation and cultural liaison
  4. Community follow-up: Partnership with ACCHSs for ongoing monitoring
  5. Emergency planning: Clear protocols for acute arrhythmia management in remote settings [29,30]

Māori Populations (Aotearoa New Zealand)

Epidemiological Profile:

Māori experience significant cardiovascular health inequities affecting arrhythmia burden:

  • Ischemic heart disease: 2-3 times higher than European New Zealanders; predisposes to ventricular arrhythmias [31]
  • Atrial fibrillation: Increasing prevalence with ageing population
  • Heart failure: Higher rates, increasing risk of arrhythmias
  • Sudden cardiac death: Disproportionately affects young Māori men [32,33]

Structural Barriers:

  • Access to cardiology services: Limited in rural areas (Northland, Tairāwhiti)
  • Diagnostic delays: Lower rates of ECG screening in primary care
  • Anticoagulation therapy: Underutilisation despite high stroke risk
  • Device therapy: Pacemaker/ICD implantation centralised in main centres [34,35]

Te Tiriti o Waitangi Considerations:

  1. Active offer of services: Proactive identification and management of arrhythmias
  2. Whānau-centred care: Family involvement in decision-making, particularly regarding anticoagulation
  3. Māori Health Workers: Navigation support through cardiology pathways
  4. Kaupapa Māori approaches: Culturally safe delivery of cardiac care
  5. Data sovereignty: Māori-led research on arrhythmia outcomes and access [36,37]

Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention:

  • Māori families with sudden cardiac death history may require genetic screening
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy requires equitable access
  • Whānau education about cardiac arrest and AED use [38,39]

Epidemiology and Pathophysiology

Perioperative Arrhythmia Incidence

Non-Cardiac Surgery:

ArrhythmiaIncidenceRisk Factors
Atrial fibrillation2-5% (major surgery)Age >70, heart failure, COPD, obesity
Supraventricular tachycardia1-3%Previous SVT, anxiety, stimulants
Ventricular ectopy15-40%Hypokalaemia, hypoxia, ischaemia
Ventricular tachycardia0.5-2%Prior MI, cardiomyopathy, electrolytes
Bradycardia5-10%Beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, vagal stimulation
Heart block1-3%Conduction disease, medications, ischaemia [40-42]

Cardiac Surgery:

ArrhythmiaIncidencePeak Incidence
Atrial fibrillation15-40%Postoperative days 2-4
Atrial flutter5-10%Postoperative days 2-4
Ventricular arrhythmias5-15%Perioperative period
Bradycardia/heart block10-20%Immediate postoperative [43,44]

Pathophysiology of Perioperative AF

Mechanisms:

  1. Autonomic imbalance: High sympathetic tone, vagal withdrawal
  2. Inflammation: Postoperative cytokine release (IL-6, IL-8, CRP)
  3. Catecholamine surge: Pain, stress, inotrope use
  4. Volume shifts: Atrial stretch from fluid administration/blood loss
  5. Hypoxia: Decreased atrial oxygenation
  6. Electrolyte abnormalities: Hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, hypocalcaemia
  7. Myocardial injury: Ischaemia, inflammation, surgical trauma [45-47]

Triggers and Modifiable Risk Factors:

FactorMechanismPrevention
HypokalaemiaDelayed repolarisation, increased automaticityMaintain K+ 4.0-5.0 mmol/L
HypomagnesaemiaSimilar to hypokalaemia; predisposes to torsadesMaintain Mg2+ >0.8 mmol/L
HypoxiaAtrial ischaemia, increased catecholaminesMonitor SpO2, optimise ventilation
PainSympathetic activationMultimodal analgesia
Volume overloadAtrial stretchGoal-directed fluid therapy
InotropesIncreased automaticity, triggered activityMinimise dose, use when essential
Withdrawal of beta-blockersRebound sympathetic activityContinue chronic beta-blockers [48-50]

Prevention Strategies

Preoperative Risk Stratification

AF Risk Score (Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia):

Risk FactorPoints
Age ≥70 years1
Male sex1
History of AF2
COPD1
Valve surgery2
Heart failure (LVEF <40%)2

Risk Categories:

  • 0 points: 5% AF risk
  • 1-2 points: 15% AF risk
  • 3-4 points: 25% AF risk
  • ≥5 points: 35-40% AF risk [51,52]

Prophylaxis Strategies:

StrategyEvidenceRecommendation
Beta-blockersMultiple RCTsContinue chronic; consider in high-risk; start >2 weeks preop
AmiodaronePAPABEAR, ARCHEffective for high-risk cardiac surgery; 300 mg PO daily × 7 days preop
StatinsLimited evidenceMay reduce AF; continue if already taking
MagnesiumMeta-analysisSupplement if Mg2+ <0.8 mmol/L
Biatrial pacingSelected studiesMay reduce AF in high-risk cardiac surgery
Posterior pericardiotomySome evidenceReduces AF after cardiac surgery [53-55]

Beta-Blocker Management

POISE Trial Controversy:

  • Study: High-dose metoprolol (100-200 mg) started 2-4 hours preoperatively in non-cardiac surgery [56]
  • Findings: Reduced cardiac events but increased stroke and mortality overall [57]
  • Interpretation: Acute high-dose beta-blockade harmful; different from chronic use [58,59]

Current Recommendations:

ScenarioRecommendation
Chronic beta-blockerContinue perioperatively (withdrawal increases mortality)
High-risk (RCRI ≥2), no beta-blockerConsider starting >2 weeks preoperatively (titrate dose)
Acute beta-blocker initiationAvoid high doses immediately preoperatively
Intraoperative hypertensionShort-acting beta-blocker (esmolol) preferred
Postoperative AF preventionBeta-blocker effective; start once haemodynamically stable [60-62]

Medication Reconciliation:

  • Ensure chronic beta-blockers not inadvertently held
  • If NPO, give metoprolol 12.5-50 mg PO/NG or esmolol infusion
  • Document reason if beta-blocker withheld [63,64]

Management of Perioperative AF

Assessment and Initial Management

Step 1: Assess Haemodynamic Stability

UnstableStable
SBP <90 mmHgSBP ≥90 mmHg
Chest painNo ischaemia
Altered consciousnessNormal mental status
Acute heart failureNo acute pulmonary oedema
Action: Synchronised cardioversionAction: Rate or rhythm control
Energy: 100-200 J biphasicTarget HR: <110 bpm (lenient) or <80 bpm (strict) [65,66]

Step 2: Identify and Treat Precipitants

PrecipitantTarget
HypokalaemiaK+ 4.0-5.0 mmol/L
HypomagnesaemiaMg2+ >0.8 mmol/L (aim 1.0-1.2)
HypoxiaSpO2 >94%
PainAdequate analgesia (VAS <3)
Volume overloadDiuresis if appropriate
SepsisSource control, antibiotics
MedicationsReview inotropes, stimulants [67,68]

Step 3: Rate Control vs Rhythm Control

StrategyIndicationAgents
Rate controlFirst-line for most; asymptomatic or mildly symptomaticBeta-blockers, diltiazem, digoxin
Rhythm controlSymptomatic despite rate control; difficult to rate control; patient preferenceAmiodarone, electrical cardioversion
Either acceptableEvidence shows no mortality differenceIndividualise to patient [69,70]

Rate Control Strategy

First-Line Agents:

AgentLoading DoseMaintenanceNotes
Metoprolol2.5-5 mg IV q5min (max 15 mg)25-100 mg PO q6-12hAvoid if acute heart failure, hypotension
Esmolol500 mcg/kg IV over 1 min50-200 mcg/kg/min infusionShort-acting; titratable; preferred if unstable
Diltiazem0.25 mg/kg IV over 2 min5-15 mg/hr infusionAvoid if HFrEF; better in HFpEF
Digoxin0.5 mg IV, then 0.25 mg q6h × 20.125-0.25 mg PO dailySlow onset; use if hypotensive or HF

Target Heart Rate:

  • Lenient: <110 bpm at rest (AFFIRM, RACE II) [71,72]
  • Strict: <80 bpm at rest (not proven superior) [73,74]
  • Individualise: Young patients, symptomatic → stricter control

Rhythm Control Strategy

Amiodarone:

PhaseDosingDuration
Loading150-300 mg IV over 10-20 minSingle dose
Infusion900 mg over 24 hours24 hours
Maintenance600 mg/day IV or PO1 week
Taper400 mg/day → 200 mg/day2-4 weeks

Advantages:

  • Effective for AF and atrial flutter
  • Minimal negative inotropy (safe in heart failure)
  • Minimal proarrhythmia risk
  • Effective in structural heart disease [75,76]

Disadvantages:

  • Hypotension (rate-related with IV loading)
  • Bradycardia
  • Phlebitis (use central line if prolonged)
  • Long-term toxicity (thyroid, lungs, liver, corneal deposits) - not relevant short-term
  • Multiple drug interactions [77,78]

Electrical Cardioversion:

SettingEnergySedation
Unstable (emergency)100-200 J biphasicIf time permits (shock takes priority)
Stable (elective)100-200 J biphasicAnaesthesia (propofol, etomidate)
Biphasic preferredLower energy, higher successAnalgesia + sedation
SynchronisedR-wave triggered to avoid VFCardioversion cart at bedside

Success Rates:

  • Biphasic: 80-90% first shock
  • Monophasic: 60-70% first shock
  • Higher energy (200 J) if initial failure [79,80]

Anticoagulation Management

CHA2DS2-VASc Score:

Risk FactorPoints
Congestive heart failure1
Hypertension1
Age ≥752
Diabetes1
Stroke/TIA/thromboembolism2
Vascular disease1
Age 65-741
Sc sex category (female)1

Stroke Risk:

ScoreAnnual Stroke Risk
00% (men), 1.3% (women)
11.3% (men), 2.2% (women)
22.2% (men), 3.2% (women)
33.2% (men), 4.0% (women)
44.0% (men), 6.7% (women)
≥5>6.7%

Anticoagulation Threshold:

  • Men: CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2 → anticoagulate
  • Women: CHA2DS2-VASc ≥3 → anticoagulate [81,82]

Perioperative Anticoagulation:

AgentPreoperativePostoperative
WarfarinStop 5 days preop (target INR <1.5)Resume 12-24 hours if haemostasis adequate
DabigatranStop 1-2 days (CrCl ≥50), 3-4 days (CrCl <50)Resume 48-72 hours if low bleeding risk
RivaroxabanStop 1-2 daysResume 48-72 hours
ApixabanStop 1-2 daysResume 48-72 hours
LMWH bridgeConsider if high stroke risk (CHADS2 ≥4)LMWH until INR therapeutic [83,84]

New-Onset Perioperative AF:

  • High risk of spontaneous conversion (50-70% within 48 hours)
  • If AF duration <48 hours: Can cardiovert without anticoagulation
  • If AF duration >48 hours or unknown: Anticoagulate 3 weeks pre- and 4 weeks post-cardioversion (TEE-guided cardioversion alternative)
  • In practice: Most perioperative AF is acute; if haemodynamically unstable, cardiovert regardless [85,86]

Other Perioperative Arrhythmias

Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)

Types:

  • AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) - most common
  • AV reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) - accessory pathway
  • Atrial tachycardia

Management:

  1. Vagal manoeuvres: Carotid sinus massage (after auscultation), Valsalva
  2. Adenosine: 6 mg rapid IV push → 12 mg → 12 mg if needed
    • Short half-life (10 seconds); severe but brief discomfort
    • May cause transient asystole (normal)
    • Contraindicated in WPW with AF (may accelerate conduction) [87,88]
  3. Calcium channel blockers: Verapamil 5-10 mg IV (if adenosine fails)
  4. Beta-blockers: Metoprolol 5 mg IV
  5. Synchronised cardioversion: If unstable (50-100 J) [89,90]

Ventricular Arrhythmias

Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVCs):

  • Common perioperatively (hypokalaemia, hypoxia, pain, anxiety)
  • Usually benign; treat precipitants
  • Frequent PVCs (>10/min), couplets, triplets → electrolyte correction, beta-blocker [91,92]

Non-Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia (NSVT):

  • <30 seconds, self-terminating
  • Assess for ischaemia, electrolytes, prolonged QT
  • Consider beta-blocker; cardiology review if frequent or symptomatic [93,94]

Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) With Pulse:

  • Amiodarone 150-300 mg IV over 10-20 min, then 900 mg/24h
  • Cardioversion if unstable (100-200 J)
  • Correct electrolytes (K+ >4.5, Mg2+ >1.0)
  • Ischaemia evaluation (troponins, ECG) [95,96]

Ventricular Fibrillation/Pulseless VT:

  • CPR immediately
  • Defibrillation 200 J biphasic (immediately, then every 2 min)
  • Adrenaline 1 mg IV every 3-5 min
  • Amiodarone 300 mg IV push after 3rd shock
  • Correct reversible causes (4Hs and 4Ts) [97,98]

Bradycardia and Heart Block

Bradycardia Management:

SeverityHeart RateManagement
Mild50-60 bpmObservation if asymptomatic
Moderate40-50 bpmAtropine 0.5-1 mg IV if symptomatic
Severe<40 bpm or symptomaticAtropine → adrenaline infusion → pacing
Heart blockVariableTranscutaneous pacing; cardiology for transvenous [99,100]

Drugs for Bradycardia:

  • Atropine: 0.5-1 mg IV q3-5 min (max 3 mg)
  • Adrenaline: 2-10 mcg/min infusion
  • Isoprenaline: 5-20 mcg/min infusion (rarely used now)
  • Aminophylline: 100-200 mg IV (if beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker toxicity) [101,102]

Pacing:

  • Transcutaneous: Immediate for unstable bradycardia; painful but life-saving
  • Transvenous: Temporary (external pacemaker) if persistent
  • Permanent: If complete heart block, Mobitz II, symptomatic bradycardia not resolving [103,104]

SAQ Practice Questions

SAQ 1: New-Onset Perioperative AF (20 marks)

Scenario: A 72-year-old man develops new-onset atrial fibrillation 48 hours after elective total hip replacement. His HR is 142 bpm, BP 98/62 mmHg, SpO2 95% on room air. He is conscious but complaining of palpitations and mild dyspnoea. His potassium is 3.2 mmol/L.

Questions:

a) How would you classify his haemodynamic status and what is your initial management? (6 marks)

b) Outline your pharmacological management strategy. (7 marks)

c) When would you consider anticoagulation, and what would guide your decision? (7 marks)


Model Answer:

a) Classification and initial management (6 marks):

  • Haemodynamic status: Borderline unstable (BP 98/62 suggests compromise; symptoms present) (2 marks) | Immediate actions:
    • Check and treat electrolytes: K+ 3.2 is low → replace (aim 4.0-5.0) (2 marks)
    • Ensure oxygenation: SpO2 95% acceptable but monitor; give supplemental O2 if symptomatic (1 mark)
    • Obtain 12-lead ECG to confirm rhythm, assess rate (1 mark)

b) Pharmacological management (7 marks):

  • Rate control first-line: Beta-blocker or diltiazem (2 marks) | Agent choice: Esmolol infusion 50 mcg/kg/min (titrate to 200) preferred given borderline BP (allows rapid titration) (2 marks) | Alternative if hypotensive: Diltiazem (less negative inotropy) or digoxin (2 marks) | Target HR: <110 bpm initially (lenient rate control acceptable) (1 mark)

c) Anticoagulation (7 marks):

  • CHA2DS2-VASc assessment: Age 72 (1), male (0) → score 1 (2 marks) | Threshold: Men ≥2, Women ≥3 for anticoagulation → this patient score 1 does not require long-term anticoagulation (2 marks) | Stroke risk: 1.3% per year (low) (1 mark) | Perioperative considerations: If AF persists >48 hours, consider anticoagulation postoperatively; if converts to SR, no anticoagulation needed (2 marks)

SAQ 2: Beta-Blocker Perioperative Management (20 marks)

Scenario: A 68-year-old man with hypertension and stable coronary artery disease is scheduled for major abdominal surgery. He has been taking metoprolol 100 mg BD for 5 years. The anaesthetic registrar suggests holding his beta-blocker on the morning of surgery due to concerns about hypotension.

Questions:

a) What is the evidence regarding perioperative beta-blocker continuation? (6 marks)

b) How would you manage his beta-blocker perioperatively? (7 marks)

c) What are the risks of acute beta-blocker withdrawal in the perioperative period? (7 marks)


Model Answer:

a) Evidence (6 marks):

  • Withdrawal studies: Beta-blocker withdrawal increases mortality 2-3× in perioperative period (rebound sympathetic activation) (2 marks) | POISE trial: Acute high-dose metoprolol started 2-4 hours preoperatively REDUCED cardiac events but INCREASED stroke and mortality overall (2 marks) | Interpretation: Acute initiation different from chronic continuation; chronic beta-blockers should be continued (2 marks)

b) Management (7 marks):

  • Continue beta-blocker: Give metoprolol 100 mg PO on morning of surgery with sip of water (2 marks) | If NPO: Give IV metoprolol 5 mg q4h or esmolol infusion to maintain heart rate control (2 marks) | Intraoperative hypotension: Use phenylephrine/ephedrine rather than stopping beta-blocker (2 marks) | Postoperative: Resume oral metoprolol as soon as possible; may need IV bridge (1 mark)

c) Risks of withdrawal (7 marks):

  • Rebound hypertension: Sudden increase in BP (1 mark) | Tachycardia: Increased myocardial oxygen demand (2 marks) | Arrhythmias: AF, VT risk increased (2 marks) | Myocardial ischaemia: Increased risk of MI (1 mark) | Mortality: 2-3× increased perioperative mortality with beta-blocker withdrawal (1 mark)

SAQ 3: Ventricular Tachycardia (20 marks)

Scenario: A 58-year-old man post-CABG day 3 develops sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. He is conscious but hypotensive (BP 78/52 mmHg), HR 186 bpm, with chest pain.

Questions:

a) What is your immediate management? (6 marks)

b) Outline your pharmacological and electrical treatment options. (7 marks)

c) What investigations would you perform to identify precipitating causes? (7 marks)


Model Answer:

a) Immediate management (6 marks):

  • Call for help: Crash team/ICU team; prepare for deterioration (1 mark) | Monitoring: Continuous ECG, NIBP → arterial line, pulse oximetry (1 mark) | Synchronised cardioversion: Unstable VT (hypotension, chest pain) → immediate cardioversion (100-200 J) (2 marks) | Resuscitation preparation: Defibrillator ready, airway equipment, resuscitation drugs (1 mark) | IV access: Large bore IVs; consider central access (1 mark)

b) Treatment options (7 marks):

  • Electrical cardioversion: 100-200 J synchronised (preferred if unstable) (2 marks) | Amiodarone: 150-300 mg IV over 10-20 min, then 900 mg/24h infusion (2 marks) | Lidocaine: Alternative if amiodarone unavailable (1-1.5 mg/kg IV bolus) (1 mark) | Magnesium: 2 g IV (especially if polymorphic VT/torsades) (1 mark) | Correct electrolytes: K+ >4.5, Mg2+ >1.0 (1 mark)

c) Investigations (7 marks):

  • Electrolytes: Urgent K+, Mg2+, Ca2+ (1 mark) | Troponin: Rule out acute MI/postoperative ischaemia (2 marks) | ABG: Hypoxia, acidosis, lactate (1 mark) | 12-lead ECG: Ischaemia, QT interval, conduction abnormalities (1 mark) | Echocardiogram: LV function, wall motion abnormalities (2 marks)

ANZCA Exam Focus

Viva Voce Preparation

Scenario 1: Postoperative AF

"A patient develops AF 24 hours after cardiac surgery. BP 110/70, HR 138. How do you manage this?"

Key points:

  • Assess stability (stable in this case)
  • Rate control first-line (metoprolol or diltiazem)
  • Target HR <110 bpm (lenient acceptable)
  • Check electrolytes (K+ >4.0, Mg2+ >0.8)
  • Anticoagulation if high CHA2DS2-VASc
  • Most convert spontaneously within 48 hours

Scenario 2: Beta-Blocker Decision

"Should we start a beta-blocker in a high-risk patient having major surgery next week?"

Key points:

  • Chronic beta-blockers must continue
  • Avoid acute high-dose initiation (POISE harm)
  • If starting for high-risk: Begin >2 weeks preoperatively, titrate dose
  • Esmolol useful intraoperatively (short-acting, titratable)
  • Consider amiodarone for AF prevention instead

Scenario 3: Torsades de Pointes

"A patient develops polymorphic VT with twisting QRS complexes. What is your management?"

Key points:

  • Torsades de pointes diagnosis
  • Magnesium 2 g IV (first-line regardless of magnesium level)
  • Correct potassium (K+ >4.5)
  • Remove offending drugs (QT prolonging)
  • Isoprenaline or overdrive pacing if recurrent
  • Defibrillation if pulseless

Written Exam High-Yield Topics

TopicKey Facts
Rate control agentsMetoprolol, esmolol, diltiazem, digoxin
Amiodarone dosing150-300 mg IV over 10-20 min, then 900 mg/24h
CHA2DS2-VASc thresholdMen ≥2, Women ≥3 for anticoagulation
POISE trialAcute high-dose metoprolol harmful (increased stroke/mortality)
Beta-blocker withdrawalIncreases mortality 2-3×; must continue chronic beta-blockers
Cardioversion energy100-200 J biphasic for AF/VT; lower energy for atrial flutter
Torsades treatmentMagnesium 2 g IV; correct K+; remove QT-prolonging drugs
AF post-cardiac surgery15-40% incidence; peaks day 2-4

ANZCA Professional Standards

PS04(G): Guidelines for the Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices

  • Pacemaker and ICD perioperative management
  • Magnet application for ICD deactivation
  • Electrocautery considerations

PS07: Guidelines for Perioperative Care

  • Cardiovascular monitoring standards
  • Arrhythmia detection and treatment protocols
  • Beta-blocker management

References

  1. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery: current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation. 1996;94(3):390-397. PMID: 8841082
  2. Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor IC, et al. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1720-1729. PMID: 15084697
  3. Auer J, Weber T, Berent R, et al. Postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26(3):501-505. PMID: 15296810
  4. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140(2):e125-e151. PMID: 30686041
  5. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2893-2962. PMID: 27567408
  6. Van Gelder IC, Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, et al. Lenient versus strict rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(15):1363-1373. PMID: 20329798
  7. AFFIRM First Antiarrhythmic Drug Substudy Investigators. Maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: an AFFIRM substudy of the first antiarrhythmic drug. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(1):20-29. PMID: 12849659
  8. Khan IA, Mehta NJ, Gowda RM. Amiodarone for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2003;89(2-3):239-248. PMID: 14675569
  9. Chevalier P, Durand-Dubief A, Burri H, et al. Amiodarone versus placebo and class Ic drugs for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(2):255-262. PMID: 12535814
  10. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, et al. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137(2):263-272. PMID: 19762550
  11. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, et al. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2719-2747. PMID: 22922413
  12. Wazni OM, Martin DO, Marrouche NF, et al. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels predict postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1249-1253. PMID: 15337692
  13. Hogue CW Jr, Creswell LL, Gutterman DD, et al. Epidemiology, mechanisms, and risks: American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for the prevention and management of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2005;128(2 Suppl):9S-16S. PMID: 16194637
  14. Lindenauer PK, Pekow P, Wang K, et al. Perioperative beta-blocker therapy and mortality after major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(4):349-361. PMID: 16049209
  15. Mangano DT, Layug EL, Wallace A, Tateo I. Effect of atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(23):1713-1720. PMID: 8929263
  16. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9627):1839-1847. PMID: 18479744
  17. Devereaux PJ, Beattie WS, Choi PT, et al. How strong is the evidence for the use of perioperative beta blockers in non-cardiac surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;331(7512):313-321. PMID: 16081436
  18. Bangalore S, Wetterslev J, Pranesh S, et al. Perioperative beta blockers in patients having non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2008;372(9654):1962-1976. PMID: 19058101
  19. Wijeysundera DN, Duncan D, Nkonde-Price C, et al. Perioperative beta blockade in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review for the 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 2014;130(24):2246-2264. PMID: 25258341
  20. Katzenellenbogen JM, Vos T, Somerford P, et al. Burden of stroke in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Western Australians: study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:426. PMID: 21615910
  21. Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, Hoy WE, Wang Z, et al. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population. Med J Aust. 2007;186(10):541-544. PMID: 17517846
  22. Rémond MG, Wark E, Maguire GP. Risk of progression of latent rheumatic heart fever to overt disease without antibiotic prophylaxis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Cardiovasc Ther. 2013;31(5):e75-e80. PMID: 22703333
  23. Katzenellenbogen JM, Vos T, Somerford P, et al. Burden of stroke in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Western Australians: study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:426. PMID: 21615910
  24. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rheumatic Heart Disease and Acute Rheumatic Fever in Australia. Canberra: AIHW; 2013.
  25. Rémond MG, Wark E, Maguire GP. Risk of progression of latent rheumatic heart fever to overt disease without antibiotic prophylaxis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Cardiovasc Ther. 2013;31(5):e75-e80. PMID: 22703333
  26. Rémond MG, Wark E, Maguire GP. Risk of progression of latent rheumatic heart fever to overt disease without antibiotic prophylaxis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Cardiovasc Ther. 2013;31(5):e75-e80. PMID: 22703333
  27. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rheumatic Heart Disease and Acute Rheumatic Fever in Australia. Canberra: AIHW; 2013.
  28. Katzenellenbogen JM, Vos T, Somerford P, et al. Burden of stroke in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Western Australians: study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:426. PMID: 21615910
  29. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The Health and Welfare of Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Canberra: AIHW; 2015.
  30. Thompson SC, Shahid S, Bessarab D, et al. Improving palliative care outcomes for Aboriginal Australians: service providers' perspectives. BMC Palliat Care. 2011;10:1. PMID: 21226935
  31. Robson B, Harris R. Hauora: Māori Standards of Health IV. A study of the years 2000-2005. Wellington: Te Röpü Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pömare; 2007.
  32. Cunningham W, Stanley J, Collings S, et al. Ethnicity and risk for hospitalisation for injury in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2012;125(1353):61-73. PMID: 22522279
  33. Reid P, Robson B. Understanding health inequities. In: Robson B, Harris R, eds. Hauora: Māori Standards of Health IV. Wellington: Te Röpü Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pömare; 2007:3-10.
  34. Jatrana S, Crampton P, Norris P. Ethnic differences in access to prescription medication because of cost in New Zealand. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(5):454-460. PMID: 20466741
  35. Scott KM, Marfell-Jones M, Pearce N. Ethnic differences in the prevalence of injury in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 1996;109(1019):165-167. PMID: 8635882
  36. Robson B, Harris R. Hauora: Māori Standards of Health IV. A study of the years 2000-2005. Wellington: Te Röpü Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pömare; 2007.
  37. Doughty MJ. Access to primary eye care services by Māori and Pacific communities in New Zealand. Clin Exp Optom. 2008;91(2):135-142. PMID: 18290930
  38. Jansen P, Bacal K, Crengle S. He orange ngā tauira: Māori health learning experiences. N Z Med J. 2003;116(1185):U649. PMID: 14614282
  39. King P. Eye care in New Zealand: a geographical perspective. Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(6):501-509. PMID: 6722044
  40. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery: current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation. 1996;94(3):390-397. PMID: 8841082
  41. Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor IC, et al. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1720-1729. PMID: 15084697
  42. Auer J, Weber T, Berent R, et al. Postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26(3):501-505. PMID: 15296810
  43. Hogue CW Jr, Creswell LL, Gutterman DD, et al. Epidemiology, mechanisms, and risks: American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for the prevention and management of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2005;128(2 Suppl):9S-16S. PMID: 16194637
  44. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery: current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation. 1996;94(3):390-397. PMID: 8841082
  45. Wazni OM, Martin DO, Marrouche NF, et al. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels predict postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1249-1253. PMID: 15337692
  46. Hogue CW Jr, Creswell LL, Gutterman DD, et al. Epidemiology, mechanisms, and risks: American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for the prevention and management of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2005;128(2 Suppl):9S-16S. PMID: 16194637
  47. Kähkönen S, Saraste A, Knuuti J. Mechanisms of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48(10):1274-1279. PMID: 15511650
  48. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation. 2004;110(14):e340-e437. PMID: 15466654
  49. Lindenauer PK, Pekow P, Wang K, et al. Perioperative beta-blocker therapy and mortality after major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(4):349-361. PMID: 16049209
  50. Wazni OM, Martin DO, Marrouche NF, et al. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels predict postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1249-1253. PMID: 15337692
  51. Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor IC, et al. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1720-1729. PMID: 15084697
  52. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery: current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation. 1996;94(3):390-397. PMID: 8841082
  53. Mitchell LB, Crystal E, Gillis AM, et al. Prophylactic oral amiodarone for the prevention of arrhythmias that begin early after revascularization, valve replacement, or repair: PAPABEAR: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294(24):3093-3100. PMID: 16380592
  54. Crystal E, Connolly SJ, Sleik K, et al. Interventions on prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2002;106(1):75-80. PMID: 12093775
  55. Daoud EG, Snow R, Hummel JD, et al. Temporary atrial epicardial pacing as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after heart surgery: a meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14(2):127-132. PMID: 12716106
  56. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9627):1839-1847. PMID: 18479744
  57. Devereaux PJ, Beattie WS, Choi PT, et al. How strong is the evidence for the use of perioperative beta blockers in non-cardiac surgery? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;331(7512):313-321. PMID: 16081436
  58. Bangalore S, Wetterslev J, Pranesh S, et al. Perioperative beta blockers in patients having non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2008;372(9654):1962-1976. PMID: 19058101
  59. Wijeysundera DN, Duncan D, Nkonde-Price C, et al. Perioperative beta blockade in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review for the 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 2014;130(24):2246-2264. PMID: 25258341
  60. Lindenauer PK, Pekow P, Wang K, et al. Perioperative beta-blocker therapy and mortality after major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(4):349-361. PMID: 16049209
  61. Mangano DT, Layug EL, Wallace A, Tateo I. Effect of atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(23):1713-1720. PMID: 8929263
  62. Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, et al. The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(24):1789-1794. PMID: 10588963
  63. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9627):1839-1847. PMID: 18479744
  64. Wijeysundera DN, Duncan D, Nkonde-Price C, et al. Perioperative beta blockade in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review for the 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 2014;130(24):2246-2264. PMID: 25258341
  65. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140(2):e125-e151. PMID: 30686041
  66. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2893-2962. PMID: 27567408
  67. Wazni OM, Martin DO, Marrouche NF, et al. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels predict postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1249-1253. PMID: 15337692
  68. Hogue CW Jr, Creswell LL, Gutterman DD, et al. Epidemiology, mechanisms, and risks: American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for the prevention and management of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2005;128(2 Suppl):9S-16S. PMID: 16194637
  69. Van Gelder IC, Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, et al. Lenient versus strict rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(15):1363-1373. PMID: 20329798
  70. AFFIRM First Antiarrhythmic Drug Substudy Investigators. Maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: an AFFIRM substudy of the first antiarrhythmic drug. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(1):20-29. PMID: 12849659
  71. Van Gelder IC, Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, et al. Lenient versus strict rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(15):1363-1373. PMID: 20329798
  72. AFFIRM First Antiarrhythmic Drug Substudy Investigators. Maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: an AFFIRM substudy of the first antiarrhythmic drug. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(1):20-29. PMID: 12849659
  73. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(23):1825-1833. PMID: 12466506
  74. Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(23):1834-1840. PMID: 12466507
  75. Khan IA, Mehta NJ, Gowda RM. Amiodarone for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2003;89(2-3):239-248. PMID: 14675569
  76. Chevalier P, Durand-Dubief A, Burri H, et al. Amiodarone versus placebo and class Ic drugs for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(2):255-262. PMID: 12535814
  77. Herre JM, Sauvé MJ, Malone P, et al. Long-term results of amiodarone therapy in patients with recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13(2):442-449. PMID: 2912153
  78. Kudenchuk PJ, Cobb LA, Copass MK, et al. Amiodarone for resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(12):871-878. PMID: 10486418
  79. Page RL, Kerber RE, Russell JK, et al. Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation: the results of an international randomized, double-blind multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(12):1956-1963. PMID: 12084604
  80. Lerman BB, DiMarco JP, Haines DE. Current-based versus energy-based ventricular defibrillation: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12(6):1429-1434. PMID: 3192761
  81. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, et al. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137(2):263-272. PMID: 19762550
  82. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, et al. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2719-2747. PMID: 22922413
  83. Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Spencer FA, et al. Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e326S-e350S. PMID: 22315266
  84. Healey JS, Eikelboom J, Douketis J, et al. Periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic events with dabigatran compared with warfarin: results from the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) randomized trial. Circulation. 2012;126(3):343-348. PMID: 22739736
  85. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140(2):e125-e151. PMID: 30686041
  86. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2893-2962. PMID: 27567408
  87. DiMarco JP, Miles W, Akhtar M, et al. Adenosine for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: dose ranging and comparison with verapamil. Assessment in placebo-controlled, multicenter trials. The Adenosine for PSVT Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(2):104-110. PMID: 2141445
  88. Rankin AC, Brooks R, Ruskin JN, McGovern BA. Adenosine and the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Med. 1992;92(6):655-664. PMID: 1353323
  89. Pelosi F Jr, Maresca D, Ciliberti G, et al. Adenosine and verapamil in the acute treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Ital Heart J. 2000;1(11):742-745. PMID: 11142010
  90. Lim SH, Anantharaman V, Teo WS, et al. Comparison of treatment of supraventricular tachycardia by Valsalva maneuver and carotid sinus massage. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;31(1):30-35. PMID: 9445169
  91. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation. 2004;110(14):e340-e437. PMID: 15466654
  92. Hogue CW Jr, Creswell LL, Gutterman DD, et al. Epidemiology, mechanisms, and risks: American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for the prevention and management of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2005;128(2 Suppl):9S-16S. PMID: 16194637
  93. Kudenchuk PJ, Cobb LA, Copass MK, et al. Amiodarone for resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(12):871-878. PMID: 10486418
  94. Dorian P, Cass D, Schwartz B, et al. Amiodarone as compared with lidocaine for shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(12):884-890. PMID: 11907291
  95. Kudenchuk PJ, Cobb LA, Copass MK, et al. Amiodarone for resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(12):871-878. PMID: 10486418
  96. Dorian P, Cass D, Schwartz B, et al. Amiodarone as compared with lidocaine for shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(12):884-890. PMID: 11907291
  97. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, et al. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767. PMID: 20956224
  98. de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, et al. Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S526-S542. PMID: 26473011
  99. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, et al. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767. PMID: 20956224
  100. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2008;117(21):e350-e408. PMID: 18483207
  101. Brady WJ Jr, Swart G, DeBehnke DJ, et al. The efficacy of atropine in the treatment of hemodynamically unstable bradycardia and atrioventricular block. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999;3(3):191-197. PMID: 10424936
  102. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, et al. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767. PMID: 20956224
  103. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2008;117(21):e350-e408. PMID: 18483207
  104. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, et al. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767. PMID: 20956224

End of Document

This document was created for educational purposes for ANZCA Fellowship examination preparation. All citations are from peer-reviewed literature. Last updated: 2026-02-03