Communication Skills in Anaesthesia

Quick Answer

Exam Essentials - ANZCA Professional Skills

Effective communication in anaesthesia extends beyond procedural explanations to encompass difficult conversations, breaking bad news, and critical escalation. The SPIKES protocol provides a structured framework for delivering bad news: Setting, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotions, Strategy.

Breaking Bad News - SPIKES Framework:

• Setting: Private, comfortable environment; ensure privacy
• Perception: Assess patient's understanding and expectations
• Invitation: Determine how much information patient wants
• Knowledge: Provide information in small chunks, clear language
• Emotions: Acknowledge and validate emotional responses (NURSE: Naming, Understanding, Respecting, Supporting, Exploring)
• Strategy: Discuss next steps, plan, and follow-up

Escalation Protocols:

• SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) for structured handover
• CUS (Concerned, Uncomfortable, Safety issue) for graded assertiveness
• Two-Challenge Rule: Raise concern twice, then escalate if unresolved

---

Communication Frameworks

SPIKES Protocol for Breaking Bad News

Developed for oncology, the SPIKES protocol has been validated across medical specialties including anaesthesia for disclosure of adverse events and difficult outcomes.

S - Setting:

• Private, comfortable, quiet environment
• Sit down (conveys unhurried approach)
• Ensure adequate time (or schedule dedicated time)
• Minimize interruptions (silence pager/phone if possible)
• Tissues and water available
• Appropriate support person present if patient wishes

P - Perception:

• Assess patient's current understanding: "What have you been told so far?"
• Explore expectations: "What are you expecting from today's surgery?"
• Identify misconceptions or gaps in knowledge
• Assess emotional state and readiness to hear more

I - Invitation:

• Ask how much detail they want: "Would you like me to explain everything, or would you prefer the main points?"
• Respect patient's preferences for information
• Some patients want full details; others prefer overview
• Check if they want family members present

K - Knowledge:

• Use clear, jargon-free language
• Provide information in small, digestible chunks
• Avoid excessive bluntness while being honest
• Use pauses to allow processing
• Check understanding frequently: "Does that make sense?"
• Use visual aids or written information if helpful

E - Emotions (with NURSE responses):

• Anticipate and allow emotional responses
• Use NURSE statements to respond empathetically:
  • Naming: "I can see this is very upsetting news"
  • Understanding: "This is not what you were expecting"
  • Respecting: "You're asking really important questions"
  • Supporting: "We will support you through this"
  • Exploring: "Tell me more about what worries you most"

S - Strategy and Summary:

• Discuss next steps and options
• Outline plan and timeline
• Identify immediate priorities
• Arrange follow-up meetings
• Provide written information if available
• Exchange contact information for questions

SBAR Communication Tool

S - Situation:

• Identify yourself, role, location
• Concise statement of problem
• Immediate concern or change
• Example: "I am Dr. Smith, the anaesthetist in Theatre 3. Mr. Jones has become hypotensive (BP 70/40) during laparotomy with increasing bleeding."

B - Background:

• Relevant clinical context
• Patient history and comorbidities
• Current treatment and response
• Recent changes or events
• Example: "68-year-old male, ASA III, hypertension, on aspirin. Surgery started 45 minutes ago. Estimated blood loss 800ml so far."

A - Assessment:

• Clinical analysis of situation
• Possible causes or differential
• Severity assessment
• Example: "I suspect ongoing hemorrhage from vascular injury. Patient showing signs of hypovolemic shock."

R - Recommendation:

• Specific request or proposed action
• Clear statement of what you need
• Urgency level
• Example: "I need you to attend urgently to assist with surgical control of bleeding and advise on transfusion strategy."

Graded Assertiveness (CUS Words)

C - Concerned: "I am concerned about the patient's blood pressure."

• Initial polite expression of worry
• Soft approach to raise attention

U - Uncomfortable: "I am uncomfortable proceeding with this level of hypotension."

• Escalated language showing increased worry
• Suggests deviation from safe practice

S - Safety Issue: "This is a safety issue. We need to stop and reassess."

• Strongest statement
• Indicates potential harm
• Triggers immediate response

Two-Challenge Rule

First Challenge:

• Express concern politely but clearly
• Provide rationale
• Allow response and consideration

Second Challenge:

• If first challenge unsuccessful, restate concern more firmly
• Provide additional evidence or rationale
• Propose specific alternative action

Escalation:

• If second challenge unsuccessful, escalate to higher authority
• Use chain of command appropriately
• Document concerns and responses

---

Difficult Conversations

Types of Difficult Conversations in Anaesthesia

Preoperative Conversations:

• Unexpected cancellation of surgery
• Discovery of new high-risk condition
• Inability to provide preferred anaesthetic technique
• Discussion of poor risk-benefit ratio

Intraoperative Conversations:

• Requesting surgical urgency changes
• Advising against proceeding with surgery
• Communicating critical patient deterioration
• Requesting additional resources or personnel

Postoperative Conversations:

• Disclosure of complications or adverse events
• Unexpected ICU admission
• Pain management limitations
• Extended recovery or rehabilitation needs

Family Conversations:

• Updating family during long procedures
• Breaking bad news about complications
• Discussing end-of-life decisions
• Organ donation discussions

Communication Challenges

High-Stress Situations:

• Time pressure reduces communication quality
• Cognitive load impairs message formulation
• Emotions interfere with clear thinking
• Fatigue degrades performance

Strategies:

• Use structured frameworks (SBAR, SPIKES)
• Take brief pause to organize thoughts
• Prioritize key messages
• Verify understanding

Emotional Patients/Families:

• Emotions may block information processing
• Anger, fear, or denial common reactions
• Cultural variations in emotional expression
• Previous negative experiences may influence response

Strategies:

• Allow emotional expression without interruption
• Validate emotions before proceeding
• Offer breaks if overwhelming
• Return to factual information when ready

Language and Cultural Barriers:

• Medical concepts may not translate directly
• Non-verbal communication varies across cultures
• Family hierarchies affect decision-making
• Health literacy varies widely

Strategies:

• Use professional interpreters (not family members)
• Visual aids and teach-back methods
• Cultural liaison officers for complex situations
• Simplified language, avoid jargon

Managing Specific Scenarios

Scenario 1: Unexpected Cancellation

Challenge: Patient fasted, prepared, and expecting surgery must be cancelled due to unexpected ICU bed shortage.

Approach:

1. Preparation:

   • Know reason for cancellation clearly
   • Have alternative plan (rescheduling timeframe)
   • Anticipate questions and concerns

2. The Conversation:

   • Private setting, sit down
   • Acknowledge inconvenience and frustration
   • Clear explanation: "I need to tell you about a change..."
   • Honest reason without unnecessary blame
   • Apology for situation
   • Concrete next steps: "We will reschedule for Tuesday..."
   • Written information if appropriate

3. Follow-up:

   • Ensure rescheduling occurs
   • Address any immediate clinical needs
   • Document conversation

Scenario 2: Intraoperative Complication

Challenge: Significant hemorrhage requiring massive transfusion; need to update waiting family.

Approach:

1. Immediate Communication:

   • Brief, factual update: "There has been some bleeding. The surgical team is controlling it. We will update you again in 30 minutes."
   • Avoid premature speculation
   • Provide timeframe for next update

2. When Situation Stabilized:

   • More detailed explanation
   • Implications for recovery
   • ICU admission if needed
   • Allow questions

3. Documentation:

   • Record all communications with family
   • Times of updates provided
   • Information given

---

Breaking Bad News

Contexts in Anaesthesia

Adverse Events:

• Intraoperative awareness
• Significant complications (cardiac event, stroke)
• Dental or airway injury
• Medication errors
• Equipment failures

Unexpected Findings:

• Severe comorbidity discovered
• Cancer unexpectedly found
• Pregnancy discovered
• Genetic conditions identified

Outcome Discussions:

• Death or brain death
• Permanent disability
• Loss of function or quality of life
• Need for prolonged rehabilitation

Preparation for Breaking Bad News

Before the Conversation:

• Gather all relevant facts
• Know the complete story
• Understand what patient/family already know
• Identify support needs
• Arrange appropriate setting
• Have tissues, water, and privacy
• Ensure adequate time
• Know who should be present

Personal Preparation:

• Manage your own emotions
• Accept that discomfort is normal
• Avoid defensive postures
• Focus on patient's needs, not your own
• Seek peer support after difficult disclosures

The Conversation Process

Opening:

• Prepare them: "I have some difficult news to share with you"
• Establish privacy and time
• Check who they want present
• Sit down, maintain eye contact

Information Delivery:

• Use SPIKES framework
• Clear, simple language
• Small chunks with pauses
• Avoid jargon and euphemisms
• Be honest about uncertainty

Emotional Response:

• Expect and accept emotions
• Silence is okay - allow processing
• Physical presence (appropriate touch if appropriate)
• NURSE responses to emotions
• Do not rush to "fix" emotions

Closing:

• Summarize what was discussed
• Clear next steps
• Written information if available
• How to contact you with questions
• Follow-up plan

Special Circumstances

Disclosure of Error:

• Honest disclosure of what happened
• Distinction between error and complication
• Apology for impact (not necessarily admission of liability)
• Explanation of how will be prevented in future
• Open disclosure process

Cultural Considerations:

• Different cultural norms about death and dying
• Family hierarchies in information sharing
• Beliefs about causation of illness
• Appropriate support people

Language Barriers:

• Professional interpreter essential
• Pre-brief interpreter on content
• Speak directly to patient/family (not interpreter)
• Allow time for translation
• Check understanding

---

Escalation and Assertive Communication

When to Escalate

Patient Safety Concerns:

• Unrecognized deteriorating patient
• Unsafe practice observed
• Equipment or resource deficiencies
• Inadequate staffing for case complexity
• Inability to provide required standard of care

Clinical Disagreements:

• Different opinion on management plan
• Disagreement on urgency or priority
• Concern about appropriateness of care
• Conflict between team members

System Issues:

• Repeated unsafe practices
• Structural barriers to safe care
• Resource allocation concerns
• Policy or protocol violations

Escalation Hierarchy

Within Operating Theatre:

1. Direct communication with involved person
2. Senior colleague in theatre (surgeon, anaesthetist)
3. Theatre coordinator or nurse manager
4. On-call consultant
5. Department head or director

Hospital-Wide:

1. Department senior
2. Clinical director
3. Hospital administration (after hours manager)
4. Patient safety or risk management
5. External agencies (if necessary)

Effective Escalation Communication

Before Escalating:

• Clarify your own concern clearly
• Gather supporting evidence
• Know what you want to achieve
• Consider best person to approach
• Choose appropriate timing

During Escalation:

• SBAR structure for clarity
• Focus on patient safety
• Avoid personal criticism
• Be specific about needed action
• Set timeframe for response

Documentation:

• Record concern raised
• Response received
• Actions agreed
• Follow-up required

Managing Resistance to Escalation

Common Barriers:

• Hierarchy and power dynamics
• Fear of conflict or retaliation
• Time pressure
• Uncertainty about validity of concern
• Previous negative experiences

Overcoming Barriers:

• Frame as patient safety issue
• Use objective data
• Reference protocols or standards
• Escalate through proper channels
• Seek allies if needed

---

Indigenous Health Considerations

Cultural Safety in Communication

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Patients:

Historical Context: Historical healthcare experiences have created understandable mistrust and caution in interactions with medical practitioners. Communication must actively build trust through respect, patience, and cultural humility. The power imbalance in medical settings can be particularly pronounced for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients who have experienced systemic discrimination.

Communication Style Considerations: Direct questioning and rapid-fire interview styles may be culturally inappropriate. Many Aboriginal cultures value indirect communication and storytelling. Building rapport through general conversation before clinical questions may be essential. Silence should be interpreted as reflection rather than lack of understanding.

Kinship and Decision-Making: Healthcare decisions often involve extended family networks. What appears to be "confusion" about consent may actually reflect appropriate consultation with family members. Clinicians should ask: "Who else would you like involved in this discussion?" rather than assuming individual autonomous decision-making is preferred.

Eye Contact and Body Language: In many Aboriginal cultures, direct eye contact with authority figures is considered disrespectful. Lack of eye contact should not be interpreted as evasiveness or lack of engagement. Similarly, standing over a seated patient may be perceived as threatening. Sitting alongside, at the same eye level, demonstrates respect.

Language and Health Literacy: English may be a second, third, or fourth language for many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, particularly in remote areas. Medical jargon is particularly problematic. Use of Aboriginal Health Workers as interpreters and cultural brokers is essential, rather than relying on family members which may compromise confidentiality and accuracy.

Sorry Business and Grief: During Sorry Business, standard communication approaches may be inappropriate. The bereaved may be observing cultural protocols that limit interaction, speech, or decision-making capacity. Healthcare providers must consult with Aboriginal liaison staff about appropriate timing and approach for necessary medical discussions.

Non-Indigenous Clinician Responsibilities:

• Acknowledge traditional owners and country where appropriate
• Use Aboriginal Health Workers as cultural guides
• Recognize own cultural lens and potential biases
• Avoid making assumptions based on appearance
• Respect cultural knowledge as equally valid to medical knowledge

Māori Health Considerations:

Whanaungatanga (Relationships): Communication with Māori patients must acknowledge the centrality of relationships. Taking time to establish personal connection before clinical business is not "wasting time" but essential culturally safe practice. Questions about whānau, where someone is from, and connections are appropriate rapport-building.

Te Reo Māori: Use of te reo greetings and concepts demonstrates respect and cultural safety. Even simple phrases (kia ora, ka kite) signal willingness to engage with Māori culture. Mispronunciation of Māori names should be avoided; ask for correct pronunciation.

Karakia and Cultural Practices: Offering karakia before significant procedures may be appropriate for some Māori patients. Understanding tapu and noa states helps explain why certain practices may be important. Whānau may wish to perform cultural rituals; space and time for these should be accommodated where possible.

Whānau Communication: Information sharing with Māori typically involves whānau. Privacy concerns must be balanced with cultural norms of collective decision-making. Ask the patient: "Who would you like me to include in our discussions?" This respects both autonomy and cultural practice.

Māori Health Workers: Involvement of Māori Health Workers and Kaiawhina in communication ensures cultural safety and accuracy. They can navigate cultural complexities, provide language support, and ensure cultural protocols are observed.

Tikanga in End-of-Life Communication: Discussions about death, advance care planning, and organ donation require understanding of tikanga (customary protocols). Some topics may be tapu and require careful approach with guidance from kaumatua or cultural advisors. The ACC and legal framework may not align with Māori concepts of collective responsibility and whānau care.

---

ANZCA Exam Focus

Common SAQ Topics

Question 1: Communication Frameworks (20 marks)

You are asked to see a 58-year-old man in the preoperative clinic. He is scheduled for major cancer surgery. Recent investigations have revealed metastatic disease that the surgeon has not yet disclosed. The patient asks you, "This is just a straightforward operation, right?"

Outline your approach to this communication challenge.

Model Answer Framework:

Immediate Response (6 marks):

• Do not provide false reassurance
• Acknowledge question without revealing information outside scope
• Suggest discussion with surgeon about extent of disease
• Validate that it's natural to want reassurance

Communication Approach (8 marks):

• Use SPIKES framework adapted for this situation
• Setting: Private, adequate time
• Perception: Explore what he knows/has been told
• Invitation: Let him guide how much he wants to know from you
• Knowledge: Within scope of anaesthesia discussion only
• Emotions: Acknowledge anxiety about surgery
• Strategy: Focus on anaesthetic plan and optimization

Professional Boundaries (4 marks):

• Clarify role as anaesthetist vs. surgeon
• Cannot disclose information outside your scope
• Facilitate conversation with surgeon
• Ensure patient receives comprehensive information

Documentation (2 marks):

• Record conversation accurately
• Note questions asked and responses given
• Document suggestion to speak with surgeon

Question 2: Breaking Bad News (20 marks)

During emergency laparotomy, a patient suffered anaphylaxis requiring prolonged resuscitation. They are now stable in ICU. You need to speak with the family who were told this was a "routine" operation.

Describe your approach to this conversation using a recognized framework.

Model Answer Framework:

SPIKES Framework Application (12 marks):

S - Setting (2 marks): Private room, ensure seating, tissues available, appropriate family members present, adequate time allocated

P - Perception (2 marks): "What have you been told so far?" Assess understanding of expected vs. actual course

I - Invitation (2 marks): Ask how much detail they want; offer to provide updates over time if overwhelming

K - Knowledge (3 marks): Clear, factual explanation without jargon. "There was a serious allergic reaction..." Small chunks with pauses

E - Emotions (2 marks): Anticipate shock, fear, anger. NURSE responses. Allow silence. Validate emotions

S - Strategy/Summary (1 mark): Current status, plan, ICU visiting, next update timeframe, contact information

Additional Considerations (8 marks):

• Disclosure of allergic trigger if identified
• Explanation of anaphylaxis mechanism
• Prognosis (cautious, evidence-based)
• Follow-up plan and support offered
• Offer to answer questions later
• Documentation of conversation

Question 3: Escalation Scenario (20 marks)

You are a junior anaesthetist in theatre. The consultant surgeon is proceeding with a long, complex case. The patient has become increasingly unstable with metabolic acidosis developing. You believe the case should be terminated. The surgeon dismisses your concerns.

Describe your approach to this situation using recognized communication frameworks.

Model Answer Framework:

Structured Approach Using CUS (8 marks):

C - Concerned (2 marks): "I'm concerned about the metabolic acidosis. The lactate is 4.5 and rising."

U - Uncomfortable (2 marks): "I'm uncomfortable continuing surgery with this level of instability. The patient is showing signs of poor perfusion."

S - Safety Issue (2 marks): "This is becoming a safety issue. We need to consider whether continuing is in the patient's best interests."

Two-Challenge Rule (2 marks): Raise concern at least twice with increasing assertiveness. Escalate to senior anaesthetist or theatre coordinator if unresolved.

SBAR Handover (6 marks):

S: "Patient becoming unstable during prolonged surgery"

B: "Initial 4-hour procedure now in hour 6, blood loss 2L, transfusion ongoing"

A: "Metabolic acidosis, rising lactate, concerning for systemic compromise"

R: "Recommend terminating surgery or obtaining senior surgical opinion"

Documentation (4 marks):

• Record concerns raised
• Surgeon's response
• Any actions taken
• If escalation required, document pathway and outcome

Professional Responsibilities (2 marks):

• Patient safety is paramount
• Cannot be compelled to provide unsafe care
• Duty to escalate if concerns not addressed
• Support junior colleagues who raise safety concerns

Viva Scenarios

Scenario 1: Difficult Intraoperative Communication

You are anaesthetizing a patient for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The surgeon is struggling, operating time is extending, and the patient is developing hypercapnia and acidosis. You believe conversion to open surgery is needed.

Examiner Questions:

1. "How would you communicate your concerns to the surgeon?"
2. "If the surgeon dismisses your concerns, how would you escalate?"
3. "What specific clinical findings would you cite?"

Key Points:

• Use CUS words progressively: concerned → uncomfortable → safety issue
• Objective data: PaCO2, pH, peak pressures, surgical time
• Reference guidelines or standards
• Two-challenge rule: raise concern twice, then escalate
• Patient safety as primary concern
• Professional, non-confrontational tone

Scenario 2: Family Communication After Adverse Event

A patient suffered dental damage during intubation. You are speaking with the patient and family postoperatively.

Examiner Questions:

1. "How would you structure this conversation?"
2. "What would you say to acknowledge the impact?"
3. "How would you handle anger or blame?"

Key Points:

• SPIKES framework
• Honest disclosure of what happened
• Apology for outcome (not necessarily liability)
• NURSE responses to anger
• Offer to follow-up and support
• Open disclosure process
• Documentation of conversation

Scenario 3: Cultural Communication Challenge

You need to break bad news to an Aboriginal family about a complication during surgery. The patient's wife is not present; the brother is insisting on being the primary contact.

Examiner Questions:

1. "How would you approach this communication?"
2. "What cultural considerations apply?"
3. "Who should be present for this discussion?"

Key Points:

• Involve Aboriginal Health Worker/Liaison Officer
• Understand kinship structures and decision-making
• May need extended family, not just spouse
• Allow time for cultural consultation
• Respect cultural protocols (Sorry Business if relevant)
• Interpret silence appropriately
• Document cultural considerations

---

Case Studies

Case 1: Breaking Bad News - Intraoperative Death

Scenario: A 72-year-old man suffered a massive myocardial infarction during elective knee replacement. Despite resuscitation efforts, he died in the operating theatre. You need to speak with his wife and adult children in the waiting room.

Approach:

1. Preparation:

   • Ensure all team members informed
   • Have senior surgeon and nurse present
   • Private room arranged
   • Know patient's name and basic details
   • Allow time to compose yourself

2. The Conversation (SPIKES):

   Setting:

   • "Please come with me to a private room"
   • Sit down together
   • Tissues available
   • "I am Dr. [Name], the anaesthetist..."

   Perception:

   • "What have you been told about today's surgery?"
   • "How were you expecting the day to go?"

   Invitation:

   • "I have some very difficult news to share. I will be direct because I respect you and want you to have clear information."

   Knowledge:

   • "During the operation, [Name] suffered a serious heart attack..."
   • "Despite everything we did... he died"
   • Pause. Allow silence.
   • "This happened at [time]. He was not in pain."

   Emotions:

   • Allow emotional expression
   • "I can see this is devastating news"
   • "This is not what any of us expected"
   • Sit with silence

   Strategy:

   • Explain next steps (viewing body, death certificate process)
   • Provide contact information
   • Offer to answer questions now or later
   • Explain support services available

3. Follow-up:

   • Ensure family not alone
   • Notify GP and other relevant clinicians
   • Complete documentation
   • Debrief with team
   • Open disclosure process initiated

Case 2: Escalation in Crisis

Scenario: You are a junior anaesthetist in a regional hospital. A patient is deteriorating post-major surgery. You believe they need ICU care but the bed manager states no beds are available and suggests ward management. You disagree with this plan.

Approach:

1. First Challenge:

   • Use SBAR to explain situation clearly
   • "I am concerned about this patient. They have [specific findings]"
   • "ICU level care is needed because [rationale]"
   • Listen to response

2. Second Challenge (if needed):

   • Escalate language: "I am uncomfortable managing this patient on the ward"
   • "The standard of care requires ICU monitoring"
   • "We need to explore all options for ICU transfer"

3. Escalation:

   • If unresolved: "This is a safety issue. I need to escalate to [senior/consultant/administrator]"
   • Contact on-call ICU consultant directly
   • Consider inter-hospital transfer
   • Document all communications

4. Documentation:

   • Clinical findings supporting ICU need
   • All conversations with bed manager
   • Escalation steps taken
   • Final resolution

Case 3: Communication Breakdown in Theatre

Scenario: A complex spinal surgery is running 3 hours over time. The anaesthetist is concerned about hypothermia, coagulopathy, and fluid overload but has mentioned this only briefly. The surgeon is focused on completing the case. Communication has become strained.

Issues:

• Deteriorating patient status
• Time pressure and fatigue
• Eroding professional relationship
• Safety concerns not adequately conveyed

Resolution:

1. Immediate Pause:

   • "Can we pause for a moment to reassess?"
   • Formal time-out
   • Objectively present concerns

2. Structured Communication:

   • SBAR summary
   • Specific concerns: temperature 34.5°C, INR 1.8, fluid balance +3L
   • Clinical significance explained
   • Options discussed

3. Joint Decision:

   • Options: continue with warming/optimization, terminate and return another day, convert to less invasive approach
   • Shared decision-making
   • Document consensus

4. Prevention:

   • Earlier formal communication
   • Regular updates throughout case
   • Establish communication norms at start
   • Use of checklists and triggers

Case 4: Interpreter Complexity

Scenario: A Vietnamese-speaking patient requires urgent surgery. The family insists on using the patient's daughter (18 years old) as interpreter. The patient is an elderly woman who seems uncomfortable with this arrangement.

Issues:

• Family member as interpreter (conflict of interest, confidentiality)
• Patient's apparent discomfort
• Time pressure (urgent surgery)
• Cultural and generational dynamics

Approach:

1. Professional Interpreter Required:

   • Explain requirement for professional interpreter
   • Phone interpreter services available 24/7
   • In-person interpreter preferred but phone acceptable for urgent cases

2. Family Dynamics:

   • Speak with patient alone if possible through interpreter
   • Assess patient's understanding and preferences
   • Patient may not want family member to know details
   • Cultural expectation vs. individual preference

3. Solution:

   • Use professional interpreter
   • Allow family member to be present if patient wishes
   • Clarify that interpreter is neutral professional
   • Document interpreter used

4. Cultural Sensitivity:

   • Acknowledge family's desire to help
   • Explain legal/ethical requirements
   • Maintain respectful tone
   • Offer family presence as compromise

---

Professional Development

Communication Skills Training

Simulation-Based Training:

• Breaking bad news scenarios
• Difficult family conversations
• Conflict resolution
• Team communication under stress

Workshop Elements:

• Role-play with standardized patients
• Video feedback and debriefing
• Peer observation and feedback
• Repeated practice opportunities

Competency Assessment:

• Structured rating scales (e.g., Calgary-Cambridge Guide)
• Patient feedback surveys
• Peer assessment
• Self-reflection

Maintaining Skills

Regular Practice:

• Every conversation is practice
• Seek feedback from patients and colleagues
• Reflect on challenging conversations
• Learn from debriefings

Continuing Education:

• Communication workshops at conferences
• Online modules and resources
• Literature on health communication
• Interprofessional training opportunities

Peer Support:

• Debrief difficult cases with colleagues
• Share strategies and approaches
• Support each other after traumatic disclosures
• Create culture of communication excellence

Resources and Tools

Calgary-Cambridge Guide: Framework for medical interviews including:

• Initiating the session
• Gathering information
• Building relationship
• Explanation and planning
• Closing the session

** patient Satisfaction Measures:**

• Doctor-patient communication scales
• Patient feedback forms
• Complaint analysis
• Family satisfaction surveys

Organizational Support:

• Communication training programs
• Simulation centers
• Peer support networks
• Cultural liaison services
• Interpreter services

---

References

1. Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, et al. SPIKES - A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: Application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist. 2000;5(4):302-311. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302
2. Buckman R. How to Break Bad News: A Guide for Health Care Professionals. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1992.
3. Phillips ML, Tsao M, Davis-Sandfoss A, et al. Use of simulation-based mastery learning curriculum to improve difficult conversation skills among anesthesiologists: A pilot study. J Educ Perioper Med. 2023;25(3):E710. doi:10.46374/volxxv_issue3_Phillips
4. Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: The critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):i85-i90. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.010033
5. Pian-Smith MC, Simon R, Minehart RD, et al. Teaching residents the two-challenge rule: A simulation-based approach to improve education and safety. Simul Healthc. 2009;4(2):84-91. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31818cffd3
6. Patterson K, Grenny J, McMillan R, et al. Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.
7. ANZCA. Supporting Professionalism and Performance - A Guide for Anaesthetists. Melbourne: ANZCA; 2024.
8. Medical Board of Australia. Good Medical Practice: A Code of Conduct for Doctors in Australia. Melbourne: MBA; 2022.
9. Medical Council of New Zealand. Good Medical Practice. Wellington: MCNZ; 2020.
10. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2021.
11. Health Quality and Safety Commission New Zealand. Open Disclosure. Wellington: HQSC; 2023.
12. Veen EJ, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Leenen LP, et al. Adverse outcomes in surgical patients: Implementation of a nationwide auditing system. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):e30. doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.029751
13. Mazur DJ, Hickam DH. Patients' interpretations of probability terms. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6(3):237-240. doi:10.1007/BF02598180
14. Fallowfield L, Jenkins V. Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. Lancet. 2004;363(9405):312-319. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15392-5
15. Epstein RM, Street RL. Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2007.
16. Silverman J, Kurtz S, Draper J. Skills for Communicating with Patients. 3rd ed. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2013.
17. Levinson W, Gorawara-Bhat R, Lamb J. A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. JAMA. 2000;284(8):1021-1027. doi:10.1001/jama.284.8.1021
18. Moore PM, Rivera Mercado S, Grez Artigues M, Lawrie TA. Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7(7):CD003751. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub4
19. Schofield MJ, Sanson-Fisher R, Halstead S, Redman S. Talking with patients: A pilot test of a communication skills training program for internists. J Cancer Educ. 1991;6(4):245-251.
20. Tricco AC, Antony J, Ivers NM, et al. Quality improvement strategies for end-of-life care in acute care hospitals: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e008821. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008821
21. Smith L, McCulloch M, Henriques D, et al. Breaking bad news to parents: A simulation-based approach to training neonatal and paediatric intensive care staff. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020;6(3):141-147. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000439
22. Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet. Cultural Safety in Health Care. Perth: Edith Cowan University; 2024.
23. Medical Council of New Zealand. Te Whanake: Cultural Competence Standards. Wellington: MCNZ; 2022.
24. Durie M. Whaiora: Māori Health Development. 2nd ed. Auckland: Oxford University Press; 1998.
25. Organ and Tissue Authority. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Engagement Strategy. Canberra: OTA; 2023.
26. Pitama SG, Huria TM, Lacey C. Improving Māori health through clinical assessment: Waikare o te Wai o Puna. N Z Med J. 2014;127(1402):107-119.
27. Burt J, Abel G, Elmore N, et al. Understanding negative feedback from South Asian patients: An experimental vignette study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011189. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011189
28. Järvinen TL, Sihvonen R, Bhandari M, et al. Blinded by the light: How feedback affects decision-making in orthopaedic surgery. Acta Orthop. 2017;88(5):457-461. doi:10.1080/17453674.2017.1357716
29. Reason J. Human error: Models and management. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):768-770. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768
30. Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL. Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: Cross sectional surveys. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):745-749. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.745
31. Pronovost PJ, Thompson DA, Holzmueller CG, et al. Toward learning from patient safety reporting systems. J Crit Care. 2006;21(4):305-315. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.02.003
32. Tamuz M, Giardina TD, Thomas EJ, et al. Rethinking incident reporting at the front line. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(8):699-700. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000315
33. Catchpole KR, de Leval MR, McEwan A, et al. Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: Using Formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17(5):470-478. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2007.02229.x
34. Salas E, Wilson KA, Murphy CE, et al. Communicating, coordinating, and cooperating when lives depend on it: Tips for teamwork. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(6):333-341. doi:10.1016/S1553-7250(08)34044-5
35. Gillespie BM, Gwinner K, Chaboyer W, Fairweather N. Team communication in the operating room: A narrative review to advance research and practice. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66(11):1301-1309. doi:10.1007/s12630-019-01440-2
36. Gisick L, Southwick FS, Wansboro MJ. Tracing the history of SBAR: From military to civilian health care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021;47(12):819-825. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.09.007
37. Pucher PH, Johnston MJ, Aggarwal R, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient handover in surgery: A systematic review. Surgery. 2015;158(1):85-95. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.006
38. Weinger MB, Slagle J, Syeed M. A task analysis comparison of the anaesthesia care process and the cockpit environment. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2001;45(9):640-644. doi:10.1177/154193120104500908
39. Cooper JB, Gaba DM. No myth: Anesthesia is a model for addressing patient safety. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(5):1335-1337. doi:10.1097/00000542-200211000-00033
40. Gaba DM. Crisis resource management and teamwork training in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(1):3-6. doi:10.1093/bja/aeq106
41. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Open Disclosure Standard. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2021.
42. Kurtz S, Silverman J, Benson J, Draper J. Marrying content and process in clinical method teaching: Enhancing the Calgary-Cambridge guides. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):802-809. doi:10.1097/00001888-200308000-00011
43. Street RL Jr, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295-301. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.015
44. Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: A meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826-834. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819a5acc
45. King A, Hoppe RB. Best practice for patient-centered communication: A narrative review. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(3):385-393. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-13-00072.1
46. Finset A. Research on person-centred clinical care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):384-386. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01625.x
47. Back AL, Arnold RM, Baile WF, Tulsky JA, Fryer-Edwards K. Approaching difficult communication tasks in oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(3):164-177. doi:10.3322/canjclin.55.3.164
48. Brown RF, Butow PN, Boyle F, Tattersall MH. Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials: Evaluating the efficacy of doctor communication skills training. Psychooncology. 2007;16(6):507-516. doi:10.1002/pon.1064
49. Clayton JM, Butow PN, Tattersall MH, et al. Fostering coping and nurturing hope when talking with families of terminally ill patients with cancer: A randomized controlled trial of the SCION communication skills training module. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3941-3948. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.48.4548
50. Schofield N, Green C, Redpath P, et al. Communication skills assessment and training in surgical oncology: A scoping review of the literature. J Surg Oncol. 2021;123(2):372-384. doi:10.1002/jso.26325
51. Choudhary A, Gupta V. Communication skills in surgery: A need of the hour. Indian J Surg. 2015;77(2):142-147. doi:10.1007/s12262-013-1012-3
52. Boissy A, Windover AK, Bokar D, et al. Communication skills training for physicians improves patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(7):755-761. doi:10.1007/s11606-016-3597-2
53. Brown JB, Boles M, Mullooly JP, Levinson W. Effect of clinician communication skills training on patient satisfaction. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(11):822-829. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-131-11-199912070-00004
54. Bragard I, Etienne AM, Merckaert I, et al. Efficacy of a communication skills training programme for the management of professional decision-making in oncology: A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(12):1977-1985. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.498
55. ANZCA. PS02(G) Position Statement on Consent and Capacity. Melbourne: ANZCA; 2024.