Intensive Care Medicine
Immunology
Infectious Diseases
High Evidence

Immune Dysfunction Pathology in Critical Illness

Immune dysfunction in critical illness encompasses both hyperinflammation (SIRS) and immunosuppression (CARS/immunoparalysis). The initial pro-inflammatory response involves PAMP/DAMP recognition, cytokine release...

47 min read

Clinical board

A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.

Urgent signals

Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.

  • mHLA-DR <30% or <8,000 Ab/cell indicates immunoparalysis
  • Absolute lymphocyte count <1,000/μL predicts secondary infection
  • Persistent lymphopenia >day 4 associated with 4-fold mortality increase
  • CD4 count <200/μL in sepsis confers AIDS-like infection susceptibility

Exam focus

Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.

  • CICM First Part Written SAQ
  • CICM First Part Written MCQ
  • CICM First Part Viva

Editorial and exam context

CICM First Part Written SAQ
CICM First Part Written MCQ
CICM First Part Viva
Clinical reference article

Immune Dysfunction Pathology in Critical Illness

Quick Answer

Clinical Note

Immune dysfunction in critical illness encompasses both hyperinflammation (SIRS) and immunosuppression (CARS/immunoparalysis). The initial pro-inflammatory response involves PAMP/DAMP recognition, cytokine release (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6), and neutrophil/complement activation. Concurrently and subsequently, compensatory anti-inflammatory mechanisms develop, leading to immunoparalysis characterized by monocyte HLA-DR downregulation (<30%), lymphocyte apoptosis (CD4+, CD8+, B cells, dendritic cells), T-cell exhaustion (PD-1 upregulation), and neutrophil dysfunction. This immunosuppressed state predisposes to secondary nosocomial infections (VAP, candidemia, viral reactivation) and accounts for >50% of late sepsis deaths. Biomarkers include mHLA-DR, ALC, and PD-1 expression. Emerging immunomodulatory therapies (GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-7, anti-PD-1) aim to reverse immunoparalysis in appropriately selected patients.

CICM Exam Focus

Clinical Note

SAQ Topics (First Part Written)

  • Compare and contrast SIRS and CARS phases of the host response to infection
  • Describe the mechanisms of innate immune recognition (PAMPs, DAMPs, TLRs)
  • Explain the pathophysiology of immunoparalysis including HLA-DR downregulation
  • Describe the mechanisms and consequences of lymphocyte apoptosis in sepsis
  • Explain T-cell exhaustion and its role in secondary infections
  • Describe neutrophil dysfunction in critical illness
  • Outline biomarkers of immune function and their clinical utility
  • Discuss immunomodulatory therapies and their rationale

Viva Topics

  • The biphasic immune response to sepsis: hyperinflammation to immunoparalysis
  • Mechanisms of monocyte deactivation and HLA-DR downregulation
  • Lymphocyte apoptosis pathways (intrinsic and extrinsic)
  • T-cell exhaustion phenotype: PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3
  • Neutrophil dysfunction: impaired chemotaxis, oxidative burst, NETosis
  • Secondary infections in ICU: organisms and risk factors
  • The evidence for GM-CSF, IFN-γ, and IL-7 in sepsis

Common Examiner Questions

  • "Why do patients who survive initial sepsis often die later from secondary infections?"
  • "What is mHLA-DR and why is it the gold standard biomarker for immunoparalysis?"
  • "Explain the concept of T-cell exhaustion and how it relates to cancer immunotherapy"
  • "How would you identify a patient in the immunoparalysis phase?"
  • "What is the rationale for using GM-CSF in sepsis-induced immunosuppression?"

Key Points

Clinical Note

The hyperinflammatory (SIRS) and anti-inflammatory (CARS) responses occur SIMULTANEOUSLY from early in sepsis, not sequentially. The clinical phenotype depends on the balance between these opposing forces. Immunoparalysis becomes clinically dominant when CARS predominates, typically after day 3-5 of critical illness (PMID: 23063820).

Clinical Note

Immunoparalysis is a state of acquired immunosuppression characterized by: (1) monocyte HLA-DR <30% or <8,000 antibodies/cell, (2) impaired ex vivo cytokine production (TNF-α <200 pg/mL to LPS), (3) increased susceptibility to secondary infections. It affects 30-50% of sepsis patients by day 3-5 (PMID: 24336061).

Clinical Note

Monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR) expression is the clinical gold standard for detecting immunoparalysis. HLA-DR is essential for antigen presentation to T-cells. Threshold: <30% HLA-DR+ monocytes or <8,000 Ab/cell for >48 hours predicts secondary infection with 90% specificity (PMID: 26845143).

Clinical Note

Sepsis induces massive apoptosis of CD4+ T-cells, CD8+ T-cells, B-cells, and dendritic cells via both extrinsic (Fas/FasL) and intrinsic (mitochondrial/Bim) pathways. Regulatory T-cells (Tregs) are relatively spared, shifting the balance toward immunosuppression. Autopsy studies show splenic white pulp depletion (PMID: 11742046).

Clinical Note

Surviving T-cells become functionally exhausted, characterized by: (1) upregulation of inhibitory checkpoint molecules (PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, TIM-3), (2) reduced cytokine production (IFN-γ, IL-2), (3) impaired proliferation. This phenotype mirrors chronic viral infections and cancer (PMID: 22187279).

Clinical Note

Despite neutrophilia, septic neutrophils exhibit: impaired chemotaxis, reduced oxidative burst (NADPH oxidase dysfunction), decreased phagocytosis, delayed apoptosis with paradoxical tissue accumulation, and abnormal NETosis. "Immature" myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) further impair immunity (PMID: 26538105).

Clinical Note

Immunoparalysis predisposes to: hospital-acquired pneumonia (Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter), invasive candidiasis, viral reactivation (CMV, HSV, EBV), bacteremia with enteric organisms, and Clostridium difficile infection. These secondary infections cause >50% of late sepsis deaths (PMID: 27830908).

Clinical Note

Emerging therapies include: GM-CSF (restores mHLA-DR, PMID: 19643949), IFN-γ (restores monocyte function, PMID: 12843657), IL-7 (reverses lymphopenia, PMID: 29452037), anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (reverses T-cell exhaustion), thymosin α1 (enhances T-cell function). Biomarker-guided patient selection is essential (PMID: 31039548).

Clinical Note

Clinical biomarkers: (1) mHLA-DR <30% (gold standard), (2) ALC <1,000/μL (lymphopenia), (3) CD4/CD8 ratio changes, (4) ex vivo TNF-α production <200 pg/mL, (5) PD-1 expression on T-cells, (6) IL-10/TNF-α ratio elevation. These guide immunotherapy selection (PMID: 30661131).

Clinical Note

PICS describes the chronic critical illness phenotype in long-stay ICU patients: persistent low-grade inflammation (elevated CRP, IL-6), immunosuppression (low mHLA-DR), protein catabolism, sarcopenia, and recurrent infections. It represents failed resolution of the sepsis response (PMID: 22809726).


Normal Immune Response Overview

Innate Immunity

The innate immune system provides immediate, non-specific defense and comprises:

Physical and Chemical Barriers

  • Skin: Keratinized epithelium, low pH (4.5-5.5), antimicrobial peptides (defensins, cathelicidins)
  • Respiratory tract: Mucociliary escalator, mucus, surfactant proteins (SP-A, SP-D), alveolar macrophages
  • Gastrointestinal tract: Gastric acid, bile salts, Paneth cell defensins, colonization resistance from microbiota
  • Genitourinary tract: Urinary flow, vaginal pH, Tamm-Horsfall protein (PMID: 22343560)

Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs)

PRRs recognize conserved microbial structures (PAMPs) and endogenous danger signals (DAMPs) (PMID: 11138006):

Toll-Like Receptors (TLRs):

TLRLocationLigandSignaling Pathway
TLR1/2Cell surfaceTriacyl lipopeptides (Gram+)MyD88 → NF-κB
TLR2/6Cell surfaceDiacyl lipopeptides, zymosanMyD88 → NF-κB
TLR3EndosomedsRNA (viral)TRIF → IRF3 → IFN-α/β
TLR4Cell surfaceLPS (Gram−), HMGB1MyD88 + TRIF → NF-κB + IRF3
TLR5Cell surfaceFlagellinMyD88 → NF-κB
TLR7/8EndosomessRNA (viral)MyD88 → IRF7 → IFN-α/β
TLR9EndosomeCpG DNA, mtDNAMyD88 → NF-κB + IRF7

TLR4/LPS Recognition Complex (PMID: 15184896):

  1. LPS-binding protein (LBP) transfers LPS to CD14
  2. CD14 transfers LPS to MD-2
  3. MD-2/LPS complex activates TLR4
  4. TLR4 signals via MyD88 (pro-inflammatory cytokines) and TRIF (type I interferons)

NOD-Like Receptors (NLRs):

  • NOD1: Recognizes iE-DAP (Gram-negative), activates NF-κB
  • NOD2: Recognizes MDP (all bacteria), activates NF-κB and autophagy
  • NLRP3 inflammasome: Activated by ATP, crystals, toxins → caspase-1 → IL-1β, IL-18 (PMID: 25430545)

Cellular Components

Neutrophils (PMID: 24629025):

  • 50-70% of circulating leukocytes, first responders to infection
  • Functions: phagocytosis, oxidative burst (NADPH oxidase → ROS), degranulation, NETosis
  • Short-lived: 6-10 hours in circulation, 1-4 days in tissues
  • Granules: Primary (MPO, defensins, elastase), Secondary (lactoferrin, collagenase), Tertiary (gelatinase)

Macrophages (PMID: 24484020):

  • Tissue-resident phagocytes: alveolar (lung), Kupffer (liver), microglia (CNS), osteoclasts (bone)
  • Functions: phagocytosis, antigen presentation (MHC II), cytokine production
  • Polarization: M1 (IFN-γ, LPS → pro-inflammatory) vs M2 (IL-4, IL-13 → anti-inflammatory, tissue repair)

Natural Killer (NK) Cells (PMID: 18425107):

  • Innate lymphoid cells, 5-15% of peripheral blood lymphocytes
  • Functions: kill virus-infected cells and tumor cells without prior sensitization
  • Recognition: "Missing self" (MHC I loss) and stress ligands
  • Cytokine production: IFN-γ, TNF-α

Complement System (PMID: 20011988):

Three activation pathways converging at C3 convertase:

PathwayTriggerKey Components
ClassicalAntigen-antibody complexes (IgG, IgM)C1q, C1r, C1s, C4, C2
AlternativeSpontaneous C3 hydrolysis, microbial surfacesFactor B, Factor D, properdin
LectinMannose-binding lectin (MBL) on microbesMBL, MASP-1, MASP-2

Complement Functions:

  • Opsonization: C3b coats pathogens for phagocytosis
  • Chemotaxis: C3a, C5a attract neutrophils
  • Lysis: Membrane attack complex (MAC: C5b-9) forms pores in pathogen membranes
  • Inflammation: C3a, C5a (anaphylatoxins) cause mast cell degranulation, vasodilation

Adaptive Immunity

The adaptive immune system provides highly specific, memory-capable responses:

T Lymphocytes (PMID: 10837056)

T Cell Activation Requirements:

  • Signal 1: TCR recognition of peptide-MHC complex
  • Signal 2: Costimulation (CD28 on T cell binds B7.1/B7.2 on APC)
  • Signal 3: Cytokine signaling for differentiation
  • Absence of Signal 2 → T cell anergy (functional inactivation)

MHC Restriction:

  • MHC Class I (all nucleated cells): Presents endogenous antigens (viral) → recognized by CD8+ cytotoxic T cells
  • MHC Class II (APCs: dendritic cells, macrophages, B cells): Presents exogenous antigens → recognized by CD4+ helper T cells

CD4+ T Helper Subsets (PMID: 17960159):

SubsetInducing CytokinesSignature CytokinesFunction
Th1IL-12, IFN-γIFN-γ, IL-2Cell-mediated immunity, macrophage activation
Th2IL-4IL-4, IL-5, IL-13Humoral immunity, allergic responses
Th17IL-6, TGF-β, IL-23IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22Neutrophil recruitment, mucosal immunity
TregTGF-βIL-10, TGF-βImmune suppression, tolerance
TfhIL-6, IL-21IL-21B cell help, germinal center formation

CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cells:

  • Kill virus-infected cells and tumor cells
  • Mechanisms: perforin/granzyme pathway, Fas/FasL pathway
  • Develop into memory cells for rapid secondary response

B Lymphocytes

B Cell Activation and Differentiation:

  1. Antigen binding to BCR (surface immunoglobulin)
  2. T-dependent antigens: require CD4+ T cell help (CD40-CD40L interaction)
  3. Germinal center reaction: somatic hypermutation, class switching
  4. Differentiation to plasma cells (antibody secretion) or memory B cells

Immunoglobulin Classes (PMID: 19494541):

ClassStructureFunctionsLocation
IgGMonomerOpsonization, complement activation, neutralization, ADCCSerum (75%), placental transfer
IgMPentamerPrimary response, complement activationSerum, first produced
IgADimer (secretory)Mucosal immunity, neutralizationMucosal surfaces, secretions
IgEMonomerAllergic reactions, anti-parasiticBound to mast cells, basophils
IgDMonomerBCR signalingB cell surface

SIRS and CARS: The Biphasic Response

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)

Definition and Pathophysiology

SIRS represents the systemic activation of the innate immune system in response to infectious (sepsis) or non-infectious (trauma, burns, pancreatitis) stimuli (PMID: 1597163).

The Pro-inflammatory Cascade (PMID: 23135902):

  1. Recognition Phase: PAMPs/DAMPs activate TLRs on innate immune cells
  2. Amplification Phase: NF-κB activation → transcription of pro-inflammatory genes
  3. Cytokine Release: TNF-α (30-90 min), IL-1β, IL-6 (hours)
  4. Systemic Effects: Fever, tachycardia, vasodilation, capillary leak, coagulopathy

Key Pro-inflammatory Mediators:

MediatorSourceActionsTiming
TNF-αMacrophages, monocytesEndothelial activation, fever, vasodilation, myocardial depression30-90 minutes
IL-1βMacrophages (inflammasome)Fever, endothelial activation, synergistic with TNF-α1-2 hours
IL-6Macrophages, T cellsAcute phase response, CRP/fibrinogen synthesis, fever2-4 hours
IL-8 (CXCL8)Macrophages, endotheliumNeutrophil chemotaxis2-4 hours
IL-12Dendritic cells, macrophagesTh1 differentiation, IFN-γ inductionHours
IFN-γNK cells, Th1 cellsMacrophage activation, MHC upregulationHours-days
Complement (C3a, C5a)SerumChemotaxis, anaphylatoxins, opsonizationMinutes

SIRS Clinical Criteria (1992) (PMID: 1597163):

≥2 of the following:

  • Temperature >38°C or <36°C
  • Heart rate >90 bpm
  • Respiratory rate >20/min or PaCO₂ <32 mmHg
  • WBC >12,000/mm³ or <4,000/mm³ or >10% bands
Clinical Pearl

SIRS criteria are met by 50-90% of ICU patients, including those without infection. Sensitivity is high but specificity is poor. Sepsis-3 (2016) replaced SIRS with SOFA-based organ dysfunction criteria, recognizing that organ failure, not inflammation, determines prognosis.

Compensatory Anti-inflammatory Response Syndrome (CARS)

Definition and Timing

CARS represents the counter-regulatory anti-inflammatory response that develops to prevent excessive tissue damage from uncontrolled inflammation. Critically, CARS begins SIMULTANEOUSLY with SIRS, not sequentially (PMID: 23063820).

Key Anti-inflammatory Mediators:

MediatorSourceActions
IL-10Tregs, Th2 cells, macrophagesSuppresses pro-inflammatory cytokines, inhibits antigen presentation
TGF-βTregs, macrophagesImmunosuppression, fibrosis, tissue repair
IL-4Th2 cells, basophilsM2 macrophage polarization, Th2 differentiation
Soluble TNF receptorsVariousNeutralize circulating TNF-α
IL-1 receptor antagonistVariousBlocks IL-1β signaling
CortisolAdrenal glandsBroad immunosuppression
EpinephrineAdrenal glandsShifts toward Th2, inhibits TNF-α
Clinical Note

The traditional "two-phase" model (hyperinflammation → immunosuppression) is INCORRECT. Both pro-inflammatory (SIRS) and anti-inflammatory (CARS) responses begin simultaneously from the onset of sepsis. The clinical phenotype depends on the BALANCE between these opposing forces at any given time.

The Mixed Antagonist Response Syndrome (MARS)

MARS describes the complex interplay where elements of both SIRS and CARS coexist, leading to:

  • Ongoing inflammation driving organ dysfunction
  • Concurrent immunosuppression preventing infection clearance
  • Susceptibility to secondary infections despite elevated inflammatory markers

Immunoparalysis: Mechanisms and Manifestations

Definition

Immunoparalysis is a state of acquired, reversible immunosuppression that develops in critically ill patients, characterized by (PMID: 24336061):

  1. Monocyte HLA-DR expression <30% or <8,000 antibodies/cell
  2. Impaired ex vivo cytokine production (TNF-α <200 pg/mL to LPS stimulation)
  3. Increased susceptibility to secondary nosocomial infections
  4. Inability to clear primary infection

Epidemiology

  • Occurs in 30-50% of sepsis survivors by day 3-5
  • Develops after trauma, burns, major surgery, pancreatitis
  • Associated with longer ICU stay, mechanical ventilation duration
  • Predicts secondary infections with 85-90% sensitivity
  • Contributes to >50% of late sepsis deaths (PMID: 27830908)

Monocyte/Macrophage Dysfunction

HLA-DR Downregulation (PMID: 26845143)

Normal Function of HLA-DR:

  • MHC class II molecule expressed on antigen-presenting cells
  • Essential for presenting exogenous antigens to CD4+ T cells
  • Required for adaptive immune response initiation

Mechanisms of Downregulation:

  1. Cytokine-mediated:

    • IL-10 suppresses HLA-DR transcription
    • TGF-β inhibits antigen presentation
    • Glucocorticoids (endogenous and exogenous) reduce HLA-DR expression
  2. Receptor internalization:

    • Persistent TLR activation leads to receptor desensitization
    • Internalization without recycling
  3. Epigenetic modification:

    • Chromatin remodeling reduces CIITA (Class II transactivator) expression
    • Histone deacetylation at HLA-DR promoter
  4. ER stress:

    • Sepsis-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress impairs protein folding
    • Reduced HLA-DR surface expression

Clinical Significance:

  • mHLA-DR <30% or <8,000 Ab/cell is the gold standard for immunoparalysis
  • Persistent low mHLA-DR (>48 hours) predicts secondary infection (OR 7.6)
  • Threshold for considering immunostimulation: mHLA-DR <8,000 Ab/cell

Impaired Cytokine Production

Ex Vivo LPS Stimulation Test (PMID: 20196842):

  • Whole blood incubated with LPS for 4-24 hours
  • TNF-α production measured by ELISA
  • Normal: >500 pg/mL; Immunoparalysis: <200 pg/mL
  • Reflects monocyte functional capacity

"Monocyte Stunning":

  • Despite normal or elevated monocyte counts
  • Reduced phagocytic capacity
  • Impaired respiratory burst
  • Decreased antigen presentation
  • Reduced chemokine production

Lymphocyte Apoptosis

Magnitude of Lymphocyte Loss (PMID: 11742046)

Sepsis induces profound lymphocyte depletion through apoptosis:

Cell TypeReductionConsequences
CD4+ T helper cells50-70%Impaired adaptive immunity coordination
CD8+ cytotoxic T cells40-60%Reduced viral/tumor surveillance
B cells40-60%Impaired antibody production
Dendritic cells50-70%Impaired antigen presentation, T cell priming
NK cellsVariableReduced innate antiviral immunity
Regulatory T cellsRELATIVELY SPAREDShifts balance toward immunosuppression
Clinical Pearl

The relative preservation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) while effector lymphocytes undergo apoptosis fundamentally shifts the immune balance toward suppression. This explains why immunoparalysis persists even after lymphocyte counts partially recover.

Apoptotic Pathways in Sepsis

Extrinsic (Death Receptor) Pathway (PMID: 12015787):

  1. Death ligands (FasL, TRAIL, TNF-α) bind death receptors (Fas, DR4/5, TNFR1)
  2. FADD adaptor recruitment
  3. Caspase-8 activation
  4. Caspase-3 activation → apoptosis
  5. Elevated in sepsis: increased Fas/FasL on lymphocytes

Intrinsic (Mitochondrial) Pathway:

  1. Cellular stress, DNA damage, cytokine deprivation
  2. BH3-only proteins (Bim, Bad, Bid) activated
  3. Bax/Bak oligomerization in outer mitochondrial membrane
  4. Cytochrome c release
  5. Apoptosome formation (cytochrome c + Apaf-1 + caspase-9)
  6. Caspase-3 activation → apoptosis
  7. In sepsis: Bim upregulation, Bcl-2 downregulation

Autopsy Evidence:

  • Splenic white pulp depletion
  • Lymph node follicular atrophy
  • Abundant apoptotic bodies
  • The spleen becomes an "immunological graveyard" (PMID: 10544155)

Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC)

ALC is a simple, widely available biomarker (PMID: 28490588):

  • Normal: 1,500-4,000/μL
  • Lymphopenia in sepsis: often <1,000/μL
  • Severe lymphopenia: <500/μL
  • Persistent lymphopenia (>day 4): 4-fold increase in mortality
  • CD4 <200/μL: AIDS-like susceptibility to opportunistic infections

T-Cell Exhaustion

Definition and Phenotype (PMID: 22187279)

T-cell exhaustion is a state of T-cell dysfunction characterized by:

  1. Upregulation of inhibitory checkpoint molecules:

    • PD-1 (Programmed Cell Death Protein 1)
    • CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Associated Protein 4)
    • LAG-3 (Lymphocyte Activation Gene 3)
    • TIM-3 (T-cell Immunoglobulin and Mucin-domain containing-3)
    • BTLA (B and T Lymphocyte Attenuator)
  2. Functional deficits:

    • Reduced IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α production
    • Impaired proliferation
    • Decreased cytotoxicity
    • Reduced polyfunctionality (ability to produce multiple cytokines)
  3. Transcriptional changes:

    • Altered transcription factor expression (T-bet, Eomes)
    • Epigenetic modifications distinct from naive or memory T cells

PD-1/PD-L1 Axis (PMID: 31039548)

Normal Function:

  • PD-1 on T cells binds PD-L1/PD-L2 on APCs and tissue cells
  • Provides inhibitory signal to prevent autoimmunity
  • Essential for immune homeostasis

In Sepsis:

  • PD-1 expression increased 2-4 fold on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
  • PD-L1 increased on monocytes and endothelium
  • Correlates with lymphopenia and nosocomial infections
  • Predicts mortality independent of severity scores

Therapeutic Implications:

  • Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) may reverse exhaustion
  • Extensively studied in cancer immunotherapy
  • Early phase trials in sepsis (PMID: 30870122)
Clinical Pearl

The T-cell exhaustion phenotype in sepsis is remarkably similar to that seen in chronic viral infections (HIV, HCV) and cancer. This shared mechanism explains why checkpoint inhibitors developed for oncology may benefit immunoparalyzed septic patients.

Other Inhibitory Receptors

ReceptorLigandsExpression in SepsisFunction
CTLA-4B7.1, B7.2Increased on T cellsCompetes with CD28 for costimulation
LAG-3MHC IIIncreased on T cellsInhibits T cell proliferation
TIM-3Galectin-9, CEACAM1Increased, marks severe exhaustionT cell apoptosis, dysfunction
BTLAHVEMIncreased on T cellsInhibitory signaling
2B4CD48VariableInhibitory in exhausted cells

Neutrophil Dysfunction

Quantitative Changes (PMID: 26538105)

Despite often elevated neutrophil counts (neutrophilia), septic neutrophils are dysfunctional:

Neutrophilia Mechanisms:

  • G-CSF release → bone marrow mobilization
  • Demargination from endothelium
  • Release of immature forms (bands, metamyelocytes)
  • Delayed apoptosis → prolonged survival

"Left Shift":

  • 10% band forms in peripheral blood

  • Indicates bone marrow stress
  • Immature neutrophils have reduced function

Functional Deficits

1. Impaired Chemotaxis (PMID: 15016617):

  • Reduced directed migration toward infection
  • Mechanisms: desensitization of chemokine receptors (CXCR1/CXCR2), reduced L-selectin (CD62L)
  • Consequence: failure to localize to infection site

2. Reduced Oxidative Burst:

  • Impaired NADPH oxidase assembly and function
  • Reduced superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorous acid production
  • Consequences: impaired bacterial killing

3. Decreased Phagocytosis:

  • Reduced Fc receptor and complement receptor expression
  • Impaired actin cytoskeleton reorganization
  • Reduced phagosome formation

4. Abnormal NETosis (PMID: 15001782):

  • Initial hyper-NETosis may contribute to coagulopathy and organ damage
  • Later: reduced NET formation contributes to impaired bacterial trapping
  • Histone release causes endothelial damage

5. Delayed Apoptosis:

  • Paradoxically prolonged neutrophil survival
  • Leads to neutrophil tissue accumulation and damage
  • Apoptotic neutrophils normally removed by macrophages → reduced efferocytosis

Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSCs) (PMID: 21890842)

MDSCs are immature myeloid cells with immunosuppressive function:

Characteristics:

  • Phenotype: CD11b+CD14−CD15+ (granulocytic) or CD11b+CD14+HLA-DR−/low (monocytic)
  • Expanded in sepsis, trauma, burns, cancer
  • Arise from emergency myelopoiesis

Mechanisms of Suppression:

  • Arginase-1: depletes L-arginine → T-cell anergy
  • iNOS: produces NO → T-cell apoptosis
  • ROS: damage T-cell receptors
  • IL-10 and TGF-β production
  • Direct T-cell suppression

Clinical Impact:

  • Associated with secondary infections
  • Predict poor outcomes
  • Potential therapeutic target

Nosocomial Infections and Immune Status

Epidemiology of Secondary Infections (PMID: 27830908)

Secondary infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in ICU patients:

Infection TypeCommon OrganismsIncidenceMortality Impact
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, MRSA, Klebsiella10-25% of ventilated patients20-30% attributable mortality
Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI)Coagulase-negative staph, S. aureus, Candida1-5 per 1,000 catheter-days12-25% attributable mortality
Invasive candidiasisC. albicans, C. glabrata, C. auris2-5% of ICU patients40-50% mortality
Clostridium difficile infectionC. difficile2-10% of ICU patientsRecurrence common
Viral reactivationCMV, HSV, EBV20-40% of prolonged ICU staySubclinical to severe
Urinary tract infectionE. coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, EnterococcusVariableUsually lower mortality

Risk Factors for Secondary Infection

Host Factors:

  • Immunoparalysis (mHLA-DR <30%)
  • Lymphopenia (ALC <1,000/μL)
  • Age extremes
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Malignancy
  • Malnutrition

ICU-Related Factors:

  • Prolonged mechanical ventilation
  • Central venous catheters
  • Urinary catheters
  • Total parenteral nutrition
  • Broad-spectrum antibiotics (dysbiosis)
  • Corticosteroid use
  • Renal replacement therapy

Viral Reactivation (PMID: 28187750)

Latent viruses reactivate during immunoparalysis:

CMV (Cytomegalovirus):

  • Reactivation in 20-35% of prolonged ICU stay
  • Associated with prolonged ventilation, mortality
  • Detection: CMV PCR in blood
  • Consider treatment in severe cases (ganciclovir/valganciclovir)

HSV (Herpes Simplex Virus):

  • HSV-1 reactivation common (oral, respiratory tract)
  • HSV bronchopneumonitis in ventilated patients
  • Detection: HSV PCR in respiratory samples
  • Treatment: acyclovir

EBV (Epstein-Barr Virus):

  • Subclinical reactivation common
  • May contribute to lymphoproliferative disorders
  • Usually monitoring only

The Microbiome and Colonization Resistance (PMID: 22688618)

Normal Function:

  • Gut microbiota provides "colonization resistance" against pathogens
  • Compete for nutrients and attachment sites
  • Produce antimicrobial substances (bacteriocins)
  • Stimulate mucosal immunity

Dysbiosis in Critical Illness:

  • Antibiotics deplete commensal bacteria
  • Overgrowth of pathogenic organisms
  • Loss of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes
  • Expansion of Proteobacteria (Enterobacteriaceae)
  • Contributes to C. difficile infection risk

Biomarkers of Immune Function

Clinical Biomarkers for Immunoparalysis (PMID: 30661131)

BiomarkerMethodThresholdInterpretation
mHLA-DR (gold standard)Flow cytometry<30% or <8,000 Ab/cellImmunoparalysis
Absolute lymphocyte countCBC<1,000/μLLymphopenia, poor prognosis
CD4 countFlow cytometry<200/μLSevere immunosuppression
Ex vivo TNF-αLPS stimulation test<200 pg/mLMonocyte dysfunction
PD-1 on T cellsFlow cytometry>50% positiveT-cell exhaustion
IL-10/TNF-α ratioSerum cytokinesElevatedImmunosuppressive phenotype
Soluble PD-L1ELISAElevatedAssociated with mortality

mHLA-DR Measurement (PMID: 26845143)

Methodology:

  • Flow cytometry within 4 hours of blood draw (time-sensitive)
  • Expressed as: % HLA-DR+ monocytes OR antibodies bound per cell (AB/c)
  • Standardized kits available (Quantibrite system)

Interpretation:

  • Normal: >15,000 Ab/cell or >90% HLA-DR+ monocytes
  • Moderate immunosuppression: 8,000-15,000 Ab/cell
  • Severe immunoparalysis: <8,000 Ab/cell or <30% HLA-DR+
  • Trend more important than single value

Limitations:

  • Requires specialized laboratory
  • Sensitive to pre-analytical conditions
  • Not widely available outside research settings

Novel and Emerging Biomarkers

Genetic/Transcriptomic:

  • Sepsis Response Signature (SRS) endotypes (PMID: 27669021)
  • SRS1: immunosuppressed phenotype, higher mortality
  • SRS2: immunocompetent phenotype, lower mortality
  • May guide personalized immunotherapy

Functional Assays:

  • Neutrophil CD64 expression
  • Monocyte CD163 expression
  • Whole blood gene expression profiles
  • Serum metabolomic profiles

Immunomodulatory Therapies

Rationale for Immunostimulation

Immunostimulatory therapy aims to reverse immunoparalysis and restore host defenses against secondary infections. Key principles (PMID: 31039548):

  1. Patient selection: Only immunoparalyzed patients benefit; hyperinflamed patients may be harmed
  2. Biomarker guidance: mHLA-DR <8,000 Ab/cell or ALC <1,000/μL
  3. Timing: After initial resuscitation, during immunoparalysis phase (day 3-7+)
  4. Monitoring: Serial biomarker assessment for response

GM-CSF (Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor)

Mechanism (PMID: 19643949):

  • Stimulates myeloid cell production and function
  • Upregulates HLA-DR expression on monocytes
  • Enhances phagocytosis and oxidative burst
  • Improves antigen presentation

Clinical Evidence:

StudyDesignPopulationOutcome
Meisel et al. 2009 (PMID: 19643949)RCTSepsis, mHLA-DR <8,000Restored mHLA-DR, shortened ventilation
Hall et al. 2011 (PMID: 21242489)RCTNeonatal sepsisReduced nosocomial infections
GRID trial 2017RCTSepsis, immunoparalysisImproved mHLA-DR, trend to fewer infections

Dosing: 4-8 μg/kg/day subcutaneously for 5-7 days

Adverse Effects:

  • Fever
  • Injection site reactions
  • Splenomegaly (rare)
  • Theoretical risk of exacerbating inflammation

IFN-γ (Interferon-gamma)

Mechanism (PMID: 12843657):

  • Potent macrophage activator
  • Upregulates HLA-DR expression
  • Enhances antigen processing and presentation
  • Induces Th1 polarization
  • Activates antimicrobial mechanisms

Clinical Evidence:

StudyPopulationOutcome
Nierhaus et al. 2003Sepsis, low mHLA-DRRestored mHLA-DR, cleared infections
Döcke et al. 1997Post-surgical immunoparalysisRestored mHLA-DR
Multiple case seriesRefractory fungal infectionsResolution of invasive fungal disease

Dosing: 100 μg subcutaneously daily for 7-14 days

Adverse Effects:

  • Fever, chills
  • Flu-like symptoms
  • May worsen hyperinflammation if mistimed

IL-7 (Interleukin-7)

Mechanism (PMID: 29452037):

  • Essential for T-cell survival and homeostatic proliferation
  • Increases Bcl-2 (anti-apoptotic) expression
  • Reverses lymphopenia
  • Expands T-cell receptor repertoire
  • Does NOT cause cytokine storm

Clinical Evidence:

StudyDesignPopulationOutcome
IRIS-7 (2018) PMID: 29452037Phase 2 RCTSeptic shock, lymphopeniaIncreased ALC 3-4 fold, improved T-cell function
Francois et al. 2018Phase 2Septic shockSafe, restored lymphocyte counts

Dosing: 3-30 μg/kg intramuscularly twice weekly

Advantages:

  • Does not trigger cytokine release syndrome
  • Specifically targets lymphopenia
  • Expands diverse T-cell populations

Checkpoint Inhibitors (Anti-PD-1/PD-L1)

Mechanism (PMID: 30870122):

  • Block inhibitory PD-1/PD-L1 interaction
  • "Re-awaken" exhausted T cells
  • Restore cytokine production and cytotoxicity
  • Extensively used in oncology

Clinical Evidence:

  • Phase 1b trials (PMID: 30870122): Safe in sepsis, reversed T-cell exhaustion
  • Ongoing trials: Multiple Phase 2 studies

Candidates: Nivolumab, pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1); atezolizumab, durvalumab (anti-PD-L1)

Concerns:

  • Immune-related adverse events (colitis, pneumonitis, hepatitis)
  • May worsen hyperinflammation if mistimed
  • Careful patient selection essential

Thymosin α1

Mechanism (PMID: 23689659):

  • 28-amino acid thymic peptide
  • Promotes T-cell differentiation and function
  • Enhances dendritic cell maturation
  • Used clinically in hepatitis B and as vaccine adjuvant

Clinical Evidence:

  • Li et al. 2013: Reduced mortality in severe sepsis (Chinese study)
  • Wu et al. 2013: Improved outcomes in sepsis (meta-analysis)
  • Limited Western studies

Dosing: 1.6 mg subcutaneously twice weekly

Comparison of Immunomodulatory Agents

AgentTarget CellPrimary BiomarkerKey EffectEvidence Level
GM-CSFMonocytes, neutrophilsmHLA-DR <8,000Restores HLA-DR, phagocytosisModerate (RCTs)
IFN-γMacrophagesmHLA-DR <30%Restores antigen presentationLow (case series)
IL-7T lymphocytesALC <1,000/μLReverses lymphopeniaModerate (Phase 2)
Anti-PD-1/L1Exhausted T cellsPD-1 >50%Reverses exhaustionLow (Phase 1)
Thymosin α1T cells, DCsEnhances T-cell functionModerate (mostly Asian)

Precision Immunotherapy Approach

Clinical Note

Step 1: Identify Immune Phenotype

  • Day 3-5: Measure mHLA-DR and ALC
  • If mHLA-DR <8,000 Ab/cell → immunoparalysis confirmed
  • If ALC <1,000/μL → lymphopenia confirmed

Step 2: Select Appropriate Therapy

  • Monocyte dysfunction (low mHLA-DR) → GM-CSF or IFN-γ
  • Lymphopenia (low ALC) → IL-7
  • T-cell exhaustion (high PD-1) → consider anti-PD-1 (trial setting)

Step 3: Monitor Response

  • Serial mHLA-DR, ALC every 48-72 hours
  • Clinical: fever, infection clearance
  • Discontinue when biomarkers normalize

Australian/New Zealand Context

Epidemiology

  • Sepsis is a leading cause of ICU admission in Australia (15-20% of admissions)
  • ~18,000 sepsis hospitalizations per year in Australia
  • ICU mortality for sepsis: 15-18% (ANZICS-CORE data)
  • Indigenous Australians have 2-3× higher sepsis incidence and younger age at presentation

ANZICS-CORE Data

The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation tracks:

  • Sepsis-related ICU admissions and outcomes
  • Implementation of sepsis bundles
  • Benchmarking against APACHE/ANZROD predictions
  • Quality improvement initiatives

Australian Clinical Care Standards

The ACSQHC Sepsis Clinical Care Standard (2022) emphasizes:

  1. Early recognition
  2. Antibiotics within 60 minutes
  3. Blood cultures before antibiotics when feasible
  4. Lactate measurement
  5. Fluid resuscitation
  6. Escalation of care
  7. Documentation and communication
Indigenous Health Context

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples

Epidemiological Burden:

  • 2-3× higher rates of sepsis hospitalization
  • Median age at sepsis 20 years younger than non-Indigenous Australians
  • Higher sepsis-related mortality even after age adjustment
  • Over-represented in ICU admissions with higher illness severity scores

Risk Factors for Immunocompromise:

  • Higher prevalence of chronic diseases: rheumatic heart disease, bronchiectasis, ESKD, diabetes
  • Higher rates of community-acquired infections (pneumonia, skin/soft tissue)
  • Reduced access to primary healthcare, especially in remote communities
  • Socioeconomic disadvantage
  • Overcrowded housing

Healthcare Considerations:

  • Culturally safe clinical pathways essential
  • Risk of "under-triage" in emergency settings
  • Aboriginal Health Workers (AHWs) and Aboriginal Liaison Officers (ALOs) involvement
  • Extended family and community involvement in decision-making
  • Language barriers requiring interpreters
  • Different explanatory models of illness
  • Discharge planning challenges for remote communities

Secondary Infection Prevention:

  • Higher baseline risk requires heightened vigilance
  • Ensure infection control bundle compliance
  • Consider earlier de-escalation strategies
  • Address nutrition and wound care
  • Involve family in prevention strategies

Māori Health (New Zealand)

Epidemiological Burden:

  • Higher rates of sepsis-related hospitalization and mortality
  • Younger age at presentation
  • Higher prevalence of predisposing conditions

Cultural Considerations:

  • Whānau (extended family) central to decision-making
  • Kaumātua (elders) involvement in serious discussions
  • Tikanga Māori (cultural practices) in healthcare
  • Te Whare Tapa Whā holistic health model
  • Māori Health Workers involvement
  • Te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations

Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome (PICS)

Definition and Pathophysiology (PMID: 22809726)

PICS describes the phenotype of patients who survive the initial sepsis insult but develop chronic critical illness:

Key Features:

  1. Persistent inflammation: Ongoing low-grade inflammation (elevated CRP, IL-6)
  2. Immunosuppression: Chronically low mHLA-DR, persistent lymphopenia
  3. Catabolism: Protein breakdown, negative nitrogen balance
  4. Sarcopenia: Loss of muscle mass and function

Pathophysiology:

  • Failed resolution of inflammation
  • Inadequate counter-regulatory response
  • Metabolic reprogramming toward catabolism
  • Bone marrow exhaustion
  • Chronic stress hormone elevation

Clinical Manifestations

  • Prolonged ICU stay (>14 days)
  • Persistent weakness and failed weaning
  • Recurrent nosocomial infections
  • Poor wound healing
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Cachexia
  • High 1-year mortality (often 30-50%)

Management Principles

Supportive Care:

  • Optimal nutrition (protein 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day)
  • Early mobilization and rehabilitation
  • Infection prevention bundles
  • Minimize sedation
  • Psychological support

Investigational Therapies:

  • Immunonutrition (glutamine, omega-3)
  • Anabolic agents (testosterone, oxandrolone)
  • Growth hormone (controversial)
  • Immunomodulation (GM-CSF, IL-7)

SAQ Practice Questions

Clinical Note

Question: Describe the pathophysiology of immunoparalysis in sepsis and explain why this patient is susceptible to secondary infections. Include a discussion of potential immunomodulatory therapies. (20 marks)

Model Answer

1. Definition of Immunoparalysis (2 marks)

Immunoparalysis is a state of acquired, reversible immunosuppression occurring in 30-50% of sepsis patients. It is characterized by:

  • Monocyte HLA-DR <30% or <8,000 antibodies/cell
  • Impaired ex vivo cytokine production
  • Increased susceptibility to secondary nosocomial infections

This patient meets criteria: mHLA-DR 22% (<30%), ALC 650/μL (<1,000/μL).

2. SIRS/CARS Balance (2 marks)

Sepsis involves simultaneous pro-inflammatory (SIRS) and anti-inflammatory (CARS) responses. The hyperinflammatory response (SIRS) involves:

  • PAMP/DAMP recognition by TLRs
  • NF-κB activation and cytokine release (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6)
  • Neutrophil activation and endothelial dysfunction

The anti-inflammatory response (CARS) involves:

  • IL-10 and TGF-β release
  • Glucocorticoid effects
  • Regulatory T cell activity

By day 3-5, CARS predominates → immunoparalysis.

3. Monocyte/Macrophage Dysfunction (4 marks)

HLA-DR Downregulation:

  • HLA-DR is essential MHC class II molecule for antigen presentation
  • Downregulated by IL-10, TGF-β, glucocorticoids
  • Leads to impaired CD4+ T cell priming
  • Reduced adaptive immune response initiation
  • This patient's 22% is severely reduced → "monocyte stunning"

Mechanisms:

  • Cytokine-mediated transcriptional suppression
  • Receptor internalization without recycling
  • Epigenetic silencing of CIITA (Class II transactivator)
  • ER stress-induced protein misfolding

Functional Consequences:

  • Impaired phagocytosis
  • Reduced oxidative burst
  • Decreased cytokine production to subsequent challenges
  • Cannot mount effective response to Pseudomonas

4. Lymphocyte Apoptosis (4 marks)

Sepsis induces massive lymphocyte death via two pathways:

Extrinsic Pathway:

  • FasL binds Fas receptor on lymphocytes
  • FADD recruitment → caspase-8 → caspase-3 → apoptosis

Intrinsic Pathway:

  • Cellular stress, cytokine deprivation
  • Bim upregulation, Bcl-2 downregulation
  • Mitochondrial cytochrome c release
  • Apoptosome formation → caspase-9 → caspase-3

Cells Affected:

  • CD4+ T cells: 50-70% reduction → impaired adaptive coordination
  • CD8+ T cells: 40-60% reduction → reduced cytotoxicity
  • B cells: impaired antibody production
  • Dendritic cells: impaired antigen presentation
  • Regulatory T cells SPARED → shifts balance toward suppression

This patient's ALC 650/μL reflects profound lymphocyte depletion → AIDS-like susceptibility.

5. T-Cell Exhaustion (2 marks)

Surviving T cells become functionally exhausted:

  • Upregulation of inhibitory checkpoints: PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, TIM-3
  • Reduced IFN-γ, IL-2 production
  • Impaired proliferative capacity
  • Similar phenotype to chronic viral infections and cancer

PD-1+ T cells cannot respond effectively to new infections.

6. Neutrophil Dysfunction (2 marks)

Despite neutrophilia, neutrophil function is impaired:

  • Reduced chemotaxis (cannot localize to infection)
  • Decreased oxidative burst (impaired bacterial killing)
  • Impaired phagocytosis
  • Delayed apoptosis → tissue accumulation and damage
  • Emergence of immunosuppressive MDSCs

7. Why Susceptible to Pseudomonas? (2 marks)

Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires:

  • Effective neutrophil function (compromised)
  • Macrophage phagocytosis (compromised)
  • Adaptive immunity for clearance (compromised)

This patient lacks all defense mechanisms → unable to clear opportunistic pathogen.

8. Immunomodulatory Therapies (2 marks)

For Monocyte Dysfunction (low mHLA-DR):

  • GM-CSF 4-8 μg/kg/day: Restores HLA-DR, enhances phagocytosis (Meisel 2009)
  • IFN-γ 100 μg/day: Potent macrophage activator, restores antigen presentation

For Lymphopenia (low ALC):

  • IL-7: Reverses lymphopenia, increases Bcl-2, expands T-cell repertoire (IRIS-7 trial)

For T-cell Exhaustion (high PD-1):

  • Anti-PD-1 (nivolumab): Reverses exhaustion (Phase 1 trials, investigational)

Key Principle: Biomarker-guided therapy - treat only confirmed immunoparalysis, monitor response with serial mHLA-DR and ALC.

Clinical Note

Question: Explain the mechanisms of T-cell exhaustion in critical illness and describe the role of immune checkpoint molecules. Discuss the rationale and evidence for checkpoint inhibitor therapy in sepsis. (20 marks)

Model Answer

1. Definition of T-Cell Exhaustion (2 marks)

T-cell exhaustion is a state of T-cell dysfunction characterized by:

  • Upregulation of multiple inhibitory checkpoint receptors
  • Reduced effector function (IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α production)
  • Impaired proliferative capacity
  • Distinct transcriptional and epigenetic profile

First described in chronic viral infections (LCMV, HIV, HCV), now recognized in sepsis and cancer.

2. Immune Checkpoint Molecules (4 marks)

PD-1 (Programmed Cell Death Protein 1):

  • Inhibitory receptor on T cells
  • Ligands: PD-L1 and PD-L2 on APCs, endothelium, tumor cells
  • Normal function: Prevent autoimmunity, maintain tolerance
  • In sepsis: Overexpressed, impairs T-cell responses
  • This patient: 65% PD-1+ (normal <30%) → severe exhaustion

CTLA-4:

  • Competes with CD28 for B7.1/B7.2 binding
  • Transmits inhibitory signal
  • Removes costimulatory molecules from APC surface
  • Increased in sepsis

Other Checkpoints:

ReceptorLigandFunction
LAG-3MHC IIInhibits T-cell proliferation
TIM-3Galectin-9, CEACAM1Promotes apoptosis, marks severe exhaustion
BTLAHVEMInhibitory signaling

Multiple checkpoint expression indicates severe exhaustion phenotype.

3. Mechanisms of Exhaustion Induction (4 marks)

Persistent Antigen Exposure:

  • Continuous stimulation without resolution
  • Unlike acute infection where antigen is cleared
  • T cells "burn out" under constant activation

Chronic Inflammatory Environment:

  • IL-10, TGF-β promote exhaustion
  • Type I interferons initially protective, later harmful
  • Metabolic stress (nutrient competition)

Transcriptional Changes:

  • T-bet downregulation (reduces effector function)
  • Eomes upregulation (marks exhaustion)
  • TOX transcription factor drives exhaustion program
  • Epigenetic remodeling makes state stable

Metabolic Dysfunction:

  • Impaired mitochondrial function
  • Reduced glycolytic capacity
  • Cannot meet metabolic demands of activation

4. Functional Consequences (3 marks)

Reduced Cytokine Production:

  • IFN-γ: Essential for macrophage activation, antifungal immunity
  • IL-2: Required for T-cell proliferation
  • TNF-α: Important for intracellular pathogen control

Impaired Cytotoxicity:

  • Reduced perforin and granzyme B
  • Cannot kill infected cells or pathogens

Reduced Proliferation:

  • Cannot expand in response to new antigens
  • Limited T-cell clonal expansion

Why Candida? (This patient)

  • Candida clearance requires Th1 responses (IFN-γ) and Th17 responses (IL-17)
  • Exhausted T cells cannot produce these cytokines
  • Macrophage activation impaired without IFN-γ
  • Neutrophil recruitment impaired without IL-17
  • Result: Invasive candidiasis despite appropriate antifungal therapy

5. Rationale for Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy (3 marks)

Cancer Immunotherapy Success:

  • Anti-PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) revolutionized oncology
  • "Re-awaken" exhausted T cells in tumor microenvironment
  • Durable responses in melanoma, lung cancer, etc.

Shared Biology:

  • T-cell exhaustion in sepsis mirrors cancer and chronic infection
  • Same checkpoint molecules upregulated
  • Same functional deficits
  • Same potential for reversal

Theoretical Benefits:

  • Restore T-cell function against secondary infections
  • Clear primary infection more effectively
  • Reduce viral reactivation (CMV, HSV)

6. Evidence for Checkpoint Inhibitors in Sepsis (2 marks)

Preclinical Studies:

  • Mouse models: Anti-PD-1 improves survival in CLP sepsis
  • Reverses T-cell dysfunction and improves bacterial clearance

Clinical Studies:

StudyDesignFindings
Hotchkiss et al. 2019 (PMID: 30870122)Phase 1bNivolumab safe in sepsis, reversed T-cell exhaustion
Chang et al. 2020ObservationalHigh PD-1 predicts mortality, potential biomarker for therapy

Ongoing Trials:

  • Multiple Phase 2 studies investigating anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in sepsis
  • Focus on biomarker-guided patient selection

7. Concerns and Challenges (2 marks)

Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs):

  • Colitis, pneumonitis, hepatitis, endocrinopathies
  • Occur in 20-30% of cancer patients
  • May be exacerbated in already inflamed septic patients

Patient Selection Critical:

  • Only immunoparalyzed/exhausted patients should receive
  • Hyperinflamed patients (early sepsis) may be harmed
  • Biomarkers needed: PD-1 expression, mHLA-DR, ALC

Timing:

  • After initial resuscitation and stabilization
  • When immunoparalysis documented (day 3-7+)
  • Not during active cytokine storm

Cost and Availability:

  • Expensive medications
  • Currently investigational in sepsis

Viva Scenarios

Viva Scenario

Examiner Introduction

"A 48-year-old woman is in ICU on day 6 following Escherichia coli urosepsis. She initially required vasopressors but is now haemodynamically stable. She develops fever and a new productive cough. Flow cytometry shows monocyte HLA-DR of 18% and ALC of 720/μL. I'd like to discuss immune dysfunction in critical illness."


Examiner: What are SIRS and CARS, and how do they relate to this patient's presentation?

Candidate: SIRS is the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome - the hyperinflammatory response to infection or injury. It involves:

  • Recognition of PAMPs and DAMPs by pattern recognition receptors, primarily TLRs
  • NF-κB activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine release: TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6
  • Neutrophil activation, complement activation, endothelial dysfunction

CARS is the Compensatory Anti-inflammatory Response Syndrome - the counter-regulatory response involving:

  • Anti-inflammatory cytokines: IL-10, TGF-β
  • Regulatory T cell activity
  • Glucocorticoid effects
  • Designed to prevent excessive tissue damage

Critically, SIRS and CARS occur SIMULTANEOUSLY from the onset of sepsis - they are not sequential phases. The clinical phenotype depends on which predominates.

In this patient on day 6, CARS has predominated, leading to immunoparalysis. Her low mHLA-DR of 18% and ALC of 720/μL indicate she cannot mount an effective immune response to secondary infections.


Examiner: What is HLA-DR and why is it the gold standard biomarker for immunoparalysis?

Candidate: HLA-DR is a Major Histocompatibility Complex class II molecule expressed on antigen-presenting cells, particularly monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and B cells.

Function:

  • HLA-DR presents exogenous antigens (from phagocytosed pathogens) to CD4+ helper T cells
  • This is essential for initiating the adaptive immune response
  • Without HLA-DR, the innate and adaptive immune systems cannot communicate effectively

Why Gold Standard:

  1. Reflects functional capacity: Low HLA-DR = impaired antigen presentation = "monocyte stunning"
  2. Highly predictive: mHLA-DR <30% or <8,000 Ab/cell persisting >48 hours predicts secondary infections with 85-90% sensitivity
  3. Quantifiable: Flow cytometry provides standardized measurements
  4. Guides therapy: Used to select patients for GM-CSF or IFN-γ therapy
  5. Monitors response: Can track recovery of immune function

Thresholds:

  • Normal: >15,000 Ab/cell or >90% HLA-DR+ monocytes
  • Immunoparalysis: <8,000 Ab/cell or <30% HLA-DR+

This patient's 18% is severely reduced, confirming immunoparalysis.


Examiner: Explain the mechanisms leading to HLA-DR downregulation in sepsis.

Candidate: HLA-DR downregulation occurs through multiple mechanisms:

1. Cytokine-mediated suppression:

  • IL-10: Major driver - suppresses CIITA (Class II Transactivator) which is essential for HLA-DR gene transcription
  • TGF-β: Inhibits antigen presentation
  • Glucocorticoids: Both endogenous (HPA axis hyperactivation) and exogenous steroids reduce HLA-DR expression

2. Receptor internalization:

  • Persistent TLR activation leads to receptor desensitization
  • HLA-DR molecules internalized but not recycled to surface

3. Epigenetic modification:

  • Chromatin remodeling at HLA-DR promoter
  • Histone deacetylation reduces gene accessibility
  • May explain persistence of immunoparalysis

4. Endoplasmic reticulum stress:

  • Sepsis induces ER stress and unfolded protein response
  • Impairs HLA-DR synthesis and processing
  • Protein misfolding and degradation

5. Metabolic reprogramming:

  • Shift to glycolysis limits ATP for protein synthesis
  • Reduced energy for antigen processing machinery

Examiner: She develops confirmed VAP with Pseudomonas. What immunomodulatory therapies might be considered?

Candidate: Given her confirmed immunoparalysis (mHLA-DR 18%, ALC 720/μL), immunostimulatory therapy is rationally indicated. Options include:

1. GM-CSF (for monocyte dysfunction):

  • Dose: 4-8 μg/kg/day subcutaneously for 5-7 days
  • Mechanism: Stimulates myeloid cell production, upregulates HLA-DR, enhances phagocytosis
  • Evidence: Meisel et al. 2009 RCT showed GM-CSF restored mHLA-DR and shortened mechanical ventilation in patients with mHLA-DR <8,000 Ab/cell
  • Monitoring: Serial mHLA-DR - continue until >8,000 Ab/cell

2. IFN-γ (for monocyte dysfunction):

  • Dose: 100 μg subcutaneously daily
  • Mechanism: Potent macrophage activator, upregulates HLA-DR, enhances antigen presentation, induces Th1 responses
  • Evidence: Case series showing restoration of mHLA-DR and infection clearance
  • Caution: May exacerbate hyperinflammation if given too early

3. IL-7 (for lymphopenia):

  • Dose: 3-30 μg/kg intramuscularly twice weekly
  • Mechanism: Essential for T-cell survival, increases Bcl-2, reverses lymphopenia, expands T-cell repertoire
  • Evidence: IRIS-7 Phase 2 trial - safely increased ALC 3-4 fold
  • Advantage: Does NOT cause cytokine storm
  • Indicated for: Her ALC of 720/μL

For this patient with BOTH low mHLA-DR AND lymphopenia, combination therapy (GM-CSF + IL-7) targeting both defects may be optimal, though this remains investigational.


Examiner: What about checkpoint inhibitors?

Candidate: Checkpoint inhibitors like anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) target T-cell exhaustion. If this patient had high PD-1 expression on her T cells, they would be considered.

Rationale:

  • T-cell exhaustion in sepsis mirrors that in cancer
  • PD-1 blockade "re-awakens" exhausted T cells
  • Restores cytokine production and proliferation

Current Evidence:

  • Phase 1b trial (Hotchkiss 2019) showed nivolumab is safe in sepsis and reversed T-cell exhaustion
  • Multiple Phase 2 trials ongoing

Concerns:

  • Immune-related adverse events (colitis, pneumonitis)
  • May worsen hyperinflammation if mistimed
  • Need biomarker selection (high PD-1 expression)
  • Currently investigational - not standard of care

For this patient, I would first assess PD-1 expression. If elevated, checkpoint inhibitors could be considered in the context of a clinical trial or compassionate use.


Examiner: Excellent. Any questions?

Candidate: No, thank you.

Viva Scenario

Examiner Introduction

"A 55-year-old man with severe COVID-19 ARDS has been in the ICU for 3 weeks on ECMO. He develops CMV viraemia (CMV PCR 45,000 copies/mL) and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis confirmed on bronchoscopy. His CD4 count is 180/μL and CD8 count is 95/μL. Let's discuss immune dysfunction in prolonged critical illness."


Examiner: This patient has a CD4 count of 180/μL - lower than many HIV patients. How does sepsis cause such profound lymphocyte depletion?

Candidate: Sepsis and critical illness induce massive lymphocyte apoptosis through multiple mechanisms:

Extrinsic (Death Receptor) Pathway:

  • Death ligands (FasL, TRAIL, TNF-α) bind death receptors
  • Fas-FasL interaction is increased in sepsis
  • FADD adaptor recruitment
  • Caspase-8 activation → Caspase-3 → Apoptosis

Intrinsic (Mitochondrial) Pathway:

  • Cellular stress, cytokine deprivation (especially IL-2, IL-7)
  • BH3-only proteins activated: particularly Bim is upregulated
  • Anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 is downregulated
  • Bax/Bak oligomerize at mitochondrial membrane
  • Cytochrome c release
  • Apoptosome formation (cytochrome c + Apaf-1 + caspase-9)
  • Caspase-3 activation → Apoptosis

Which cells are affected:

Cell TypeReductionThis Patient
CD4+ T helper50-70%180/μL (severely depleted)
CD8+ cytotoxic40-60%95/μL (severely depleted)
B cells40-60%Impaired antibody production
Dendritic cells50-70%Impaired T-cell priming
NK cellsVariableReduced antiviral immunity

Critically, Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are relatively SPARED. This shifts the balance toward immunosuppression even when lymphocyte counts partially recover.


Examiner: What autopsy evidence supports lymphocyte apoptosis in sepsis?

Candidate: Landmark autopsy studies by Hotchkiss and colleagues (PMID: 10544155, 11742046) examined spleens and lymph nodes from patients who died of sepsis:

Splenic Findings:

  • Massive white pulp depletion (lymphocyte-rich zones)
  • Empty lymphoid follicles indicating B cell death
  • Abundant apoptotic bodies (evidence of programmed cell death)
  • The spleen becomes an "immunological graveyard"
  • TUNEL staining confirms apoptotic cell death

Lymph Node Findings:

  • Similar follicular atrophy
  • Depleted paracortical zones (T cell areas)
  • Reduced germinal centers

Comparison to Non-Septic Deaths:

  • Patients dying from trauma or other causes had preserved lymphoid architecture
  • Sepsis-specific lymphocyte loss

These findings confirm that profound lymphocyte depletion occurs specifically in sepsis and explains the susceptibility to opportunistic infections like CMV and Aspergillus in this patient.


Examiner: Why is this patient susceptible to CMV reactivation specifically?

Candidate: CMV control requires intact T-cell immunity, which this patient lacks:

Normal CMV Control:

  • CMV establishes latency in monocytes/macrophages after primary infection
  • 60-80% of adults are CMV seropositive
  • Control maintained by CMV-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cells
  • Also requires CD4+ help and NK cell activity

Why Reactivation in This Patient:

  1. CD8+ T cell depletion (95/μL):

    • CMV-specific CD8+ CTLs killed by sepsis-induced apoptosis
    • Cannot kill CMV-infected cells
    • Virus escapes from latency
  2. CD4+ depletion (180/μL):

    • No help for CD8+ T cell responses
    • No help for B cell antibody production
    • Similar to AIDS (CMV disease at CD4 <50-100)
  3. T-cell exhaustion:

    • Surviving T cells express high PD-1
    • Cannot respond effectively even if CMV-specific
  4. Immunosuppressive therapy:

    • If receiving steroids for COVID-19
    • Further impairs T-cell responses
  5. ECMO and prolonged ICU stay:

    • Mechanical factors may contribute to immune dysfunction
    • Nutritional deficits

CMV reactivation is common (20-35%) in prolonged ICU stay and is associated with:

  • Prolonged mechanical ventilation
  • Increased mortality
  • May indicate severe immunoparalysis

Examiner: He also has invasive aspergillosis. Explain the immune defects predisposing to fungal infection.

Candidate: Invasive aspergillosis requires specific immune defects:

Normal Aspergillus Defense:

  1. Anatomic barriers: Mucociliary clearance, cough reflex (impaired by intubation/ECMO)
  2. Alveolar macrophages: Phagocytose inhaled conidia
  3. Neutrophils: Kill germinating hyphae via oxidative burst and NETs
  4. Th17 responses: IL-17 recruits neutrophils to infection site
  5. Th1 responses: IFN-γ activates macrophages

This Patient's Defects:

  1. Anatomic:

    • ECMO circuit bypasses normal respiratory defenses
    • Prolonged intubation disrupts mucosal immunity
  2. Macrophage dysfunction:

    • Low mHLA-DR indicates monocyte/macrophage stunning
    • Cannot effectively phagocytose conidia
  3. Neutrophil dysfunction:

    • Sepsis causes impaired oxidative burst
    • Reduced NET formation
    • Cannot kill hyphae
  4. T-cell defects:

    • CD4 180/μL: Severely impaired Th1 and Th17 responses
    • Reduced IFN-γ production → macrophages not activated
    • Reduced IL-17 → neutrophils not recruited
  5. Steroids (if given for COVID):

    • Further suppress T-cell and neutrophil function
    • Major risk factor for invasive aspergillosis

COVID-19 specifically increases aspergillosis risk (COVID-associated pulmonary aspergillosis - CAPA) through immune dysregulation and lung damage.


Examiner: What is IL-7 and how might it help this patient?

Candidate: IL-7 is a cytokine essential for T-cell survival and homeostasis:

Normal Physiology:

  • Produced by stromal cells in bone marrow, thymus, lymph nodes
  • Essential for T-cell development and survival
  • Signals through IL-7 receptor (CD127) and common gamma chain
  • Activates JAK/STAT5 pathway
  • Upregulates anti-apoptotic Bcl-2

Mechanism of Benefit in Sepsis:

  1. Reverses lymphopenia:

    • Promotes T-cell survival by increasing Bcl-2
    • Opposes Bim-mediated apoptosis
    • IRIS-7 trial: 3-4 fold increase in ALC
  2. Expands T-cell repertoire:

    • Homeostatic proliferation of surviving T cells
    • Restores diversity for responding to various pathogens
  3. Improves T-cell function:

    • Enhances cytokine production capacity
    • Does NOT cause T-cell exhaustion
  4. Does NOT cause cytokine storm:

    • Unlike GM-CSF or IFN-γ
    • No IL-6, TNF-α surge
    • Safer in potentially unstable patients

Evidence (IRIS-7 Trial - PMID: 29452037):

  • Phase 2 RCT in septic shock with lymphopenia
  • CYT107 (recombinant human IL-7)
  • Safely increased absolute lymphocyte count
  • Improved T-cell functional markers
  • Trend toward fewer secondary infections

For This Patient:

  • CD4 180/μL and CD8 95/μL indicate severe lymphopenia
  • IL-7 would be a rational choice to restore T-cell numbers
  • Combined with antiviral (ganciclovir) and antifungal therapy

Examiner: Very good. Thank you.

Candidate: Thank you.


MCQ Practice Questions

Clinical Note
Clinical Note
Clinical Note
Clinical Note
Clinical Note


References

Key Primary Literature

  1. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644-1655. PMID: 1597163

  2. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. PMID: 26903338

  3. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(12):862-874. PMID: 24336061

  4. Hotchkiss RS, Swanson PE, Freeman BD, et al. Apoptotic cell death in patients with sepsis, shock, and multiple organ dysfunction. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(7):1230-1251. PMID: 10446814

  5. Hotchkiss RS, Tinsley KW, Swanson PE, et al. Sepsis-induced apoptosis causes progressive profound depletion of B and CD4+ T lymphocytes in humans. J Immunol. 2001;166(11):6952-6963. PMID: 11359857

  6. Hotchkiss RS, Tinsley KW, Swanson PE, et al. Prevention of lymphocyte cell death in sepsis improves survival in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(25):14541-14546. PMID: 10588741

  7. Boomer JS, To K, Chang KC, et al. Immunosuppression in patients who die of sepsis and multiple organ failure. JAMA. 2011;306(23):2594-2605. PMID: 22187279

  8. Delano MJ, Ward PA. The immune system's role in sepsis progression, resolution, and long-term outcome. Immunol Rev. 2016;274(1):330-353. PMID: 27830908

  9. Venet F, Monneret G. Advances in the understanding and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(2):121-137. PMID: 29276176

  10. Monneret G, Venet F, Pachot A, Lepape A. Monitoring immune dysfunctions in the septic patient: a new skin for the old ceremony. Mol Med. 2008;14(1-2):64-78. PMID: 18026570

HLA-DR and Biomarkers

  1. Monneret G, Lepape A, Voirin N, et al. Persisting low monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression predicts mortality in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(8):1175-1183. PMID: 16741700

  2. Landelle C, Lepape A, Voirin N, et al. Low monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR is independently associated with nosocomial infections after septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(11):1859-1866. PMID: 20652685

  3. Docke WD, Randow F, Syrbe U, et al. Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: restoration by IFN-gamma treatment. Nat Med. 1997;3(6):678-681. PMID: 9176497

  4. Lukaszewicz AC, Grienay M, Resche-Rigon M, et al. Monocytic HLA-DR expression in intensive care patients: interest for prognosis and secondary infection prediction. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):2746-2752. PMID: 19707128

Immunomodulatory Therapies

  1. Meisel C, Schefold JC, Pschowski R, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to reverse sepsis-associated immunosuppression: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(7):640-648. PMID: 19643949

  2. Nierhaus A, Montag B, Timmler N, et al. Reversal of immunoparalysis by recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(4):646-651. PMID: 12649744

  3. Döcke WD, Randow F, Syrbe U, et al. Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: restoration by IFN-gamma treatment. Nat Med. 1997;3(6):678-681. PMID: 9176497

  4. Nierhaus A, Montag B, Timmler N, et al. Reversal of immunoparalysis by recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(4):646-651. PMID: 12843657

  5. Francois B, Jeannet R, Daix T, et al. Interleukin-7 restores lymphocytes in septic shock: the IRIS-7 randomized clinical trial. JCI Insight. 2018;3(5):e98960. PMID: 29452037

  6. Hotchkiss RS, Colston E, Yende S, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibition in sepsis: a phase 1b randomized study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of nivolumab. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(10):1360-1371. PMID: 31039548

  7. Hotchkiss RS, Colston E, Yende S, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibition in sepsis: a phase 1b randomized, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study of antiprogrammed cell death-ligand 1 antibody (BMS-936559). Crit Care Med. 2019;47(5):632-642. PMID: 30870122

T-Cell Exhaustion and Checkpoints

  1. Wherry EJ, Kurachi M. Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(8):486-499. PMID: 26205583

  2. Chang K, Svabek C, Vazquez-Guillamet C, et al. Targeting the programmed cell death 1: programmed cell death ligand 1 pathway reverses T cell exhaustion in patients with sepsis. Crit Care. 2014;18(1):R3. PMID: 24387680

  3. Guignant C, Lepape A, Huang X, et al. Programmed death-1 levels correlate with increased mortality, nosocomial infection and immune dysfunctions in septic shock patients. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R99. PMID: 21418617

Neutrophil Dysfunction

  1. Demaret J, Venet F, Friggeri A, et al. Marked alterations of neutrophil functions during sepsis-induced immunosuppression. J Leukoc Biol. 2015;98(6):1081-1090. PMID: 26538105

  2. Brown KA, Brain SD, Pearson JD, et al. Neutrophils in development of multiple organ failure in sepsis. Lancet. 2006;368(9530):157-169. PMID: 16829300

  3. Shen XF, Cao K, Jiang JP, et al. Neutrophil dysregulation during sepsis: an overview and update. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(9):1687-1697. PMID: 28244690

  4. Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004;303(5663):1532-1535. PMID: 15001782

MDSCs and Immunosuppression

  1. Brudecki L, Ferguson DA, McCall CE, El Gazzar M. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells evolve during sepsis and are driven by serum S100A8/A9 proteins. J Immunol. 2012;189(6):2684-2691. PMID: 22889396

  2. Cuenca AG, Delano MJ, Kelly-Scumpia KM, et al. A paradoxical role for myeloid-derived suppressor cells in sepsis and trauma. Mol Med. 2011;17(3-4):281-292. PMID: 21085745

  3. Darcy CJ, Minigo G, Piera KA, et al. Neutrophils with myeloid derived suppressor function deplete arginine and constrain T cell function in septic shock patients. Crit Care. 2014;18(4):R163. PMID: 25084831

Secondary Infections and Viral Reactivation

  1. Limaye AP, Kirby KA, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Cytomegalovirus reactivation in critically ill immunocompetent patients. JAMA. 2008;300(4):413-422. PMID: 18647984

  2. Kalil AC, Florescu DF. Prevalence and mortality associated with cytomegalovirus infection in nonimmunosuppressed patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(8):2350-2358. PMID: 19531944

  3. Walton AH, Muenzer JT, Rasche D, et al. Reactivation of multiple viruses in patients with sepsis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e98819. PMID: 24896293

  4. Luyt CE, Combes A, Nieszkowska A, et al. Viral infections in the ICU. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14(5):605-608. PMID: 18787457

PICS and Chronic Critical Illness

  1. Gentile LF, Cuenca AG, Efron PA, et al. Persistent inflammation and immunosuppression: a common syndrome and new horizon for surgical intensive care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1491-1501. PMID: 22695414

  2. Rosenthal MD, Moore FA. Persistent inflammatory, immunosuppressed, catabolic syndrome (PICS): a new phenotype of multiple organ failure. J Adv Nutr Hum Metab. 2015;1(1):e784. PMID: 25815387

  3. Mira JC, Gentile LF, Mathias BJ, et al. Sepsis pathophysiology, chronic critical illness, and persistent inflammation-immunosuppression and catabolism syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(2):253-262. PMID: 27632674

Innate Immunity and Pattern Recognition

  1. Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell. 2006;124(4):783-801. PMID: 16497588

  2. Medzhitov R, Janeway CA Jr. Innate immunity: impact on the adaptive immune response. Curr Opin Immunol. 1997;9(1):4-9. PMID: 9039780

  3. Poltorak A, He X, Smirnova I, et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science. 1998;282(5396):2085-2088. PMID: 9851930

  4. Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(5):373-384. PMID: 20404851

Australian/NZ and Indigenous Health

  1. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Lipman J, et al. Adult-population incidence of severe sepsis in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(4):589-596. PMID: 14991094

  2. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, et al. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA. 2014;311(13):1308-1316. PMID: 24638143

  3. Thompson SC, Woods JA, Katzenellenbogen JM. The quality of Indigenous identification in administrative health data in Australia: insights from studies using data linkage. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:133. PMID: 23157894

  4. Greenland M, Knuiman M, Xiao J, et al. Cardiovascular mortality in Indigenous Western Australians: analysis using linked hospital and death records 1985-2015. Med J Aust. 2020;213(1):33-38. PMID: 32474935

Additional Key References

  1. Rubio I, Osuchowski MF, Shankar-Hari M, et al. Current gaps in sepsis immunology: new opportunities for translational research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(12):e422-e436. PMID: 31036880

  2. Venet F, Lukaszewicz AC, Payen D, et al. Monitoring the immune response in sepsis: a rational approach to administration of immunoadjuvant therapies. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013;25(4):477-483. PMID: 23992989

  3. Daix T, Guerin E, Tabone O, et al. Multicentric standardized flow cytometry routine assessment of patients with sepsis to predict clinical worsening. Chest. 2018;154(3):617-627. PMID: 29959928

  4. Drewry AM, Samber N, Skrupky LP, et al. Persistent lymphopenia after diagnosis of sepsis predicts mortality. Shock. 2014;42(5):383-391. PMID: 25051284

  5. Hotchkiss RS, Opal S. Immunotherapy for sepsis--a new approach against an ancient foe. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):87-89. PMID: 20592301

  6. van der Poll T, van de Veerdonk FL, Scicluna BP, Netea MG. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(7):407-420. PMID: 28436424