Intensive Care Medicine
Endocrinology
Anaesthesia
High Evidence

Stress Response and Critical Illness

The stress response to critical illness is a coordinated neuroendocrine-metabolic-inflammatory cascade designed for short-term survival. The HPA axis releases cortisol (essential for vascular tone and...

Updated 25 Jan 2026
39 min read

Clinical board

A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.

Urgent signals

Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.

  • NICE-SUGAR showed tight glycemic control increases mortality - target 144-180 mg/dL (8-10 mmol/L)
  • High-dose GH supplementation in acute critical illness doubles mortality (Takala study)
  • Immunoparalysis phase increases susceptibility to secondary nosocomial infections
  • Stress-dose hydrocortisone only for refractory vasopressor-dependent shock

Exam focus

Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.

  • CICM First Part Written SAQ
  • CICM First Part Written MCQ
  • CICM First Part Viva

Editorial and exam context

CICM First Part Written SAQ
CICM First Part Written MCQ
CICM First Part Viva
Clinical reference article

Stress Response and Critical Illness

Quick Answer

Clinical Note

The stress response to critical illness is a coordinated neuroendocrine-metabolic-inflammatory cascade designed for short-term survival. The HPA axis releases cortisol (essential for vascular tone and anti-inflammation), while the sympathoadrenal system provides catecholamines for hemodynamic support. Metabolically, the Ebb phase (0-48h) is hypometabolic with shock physiology, followed by the Flow phase (days-weeks) characterized by hypermetabolism, insulin resistance, and accelerated proteolysis. The inflammatory response evolves from SIRS (pro-inflammatory cytokine storm) to CARS/immunoparalysis (compensatory anti-inflammatory phase with HLA-DR downregulation). Key clinical implications include stress hyperglycemia (target 8-10 mmol/L per NICE-SUGAR), CIRCI (hydrocortisone for refractory shock per APROCCHSS/ADRENAL), and euthyroid sick syndrome (do NOT replace thyroid hormone).


CICM First Part Exam Focus

Clinical Note

Written SAQ Topics

  • Describe the neuroendocrine response to critical illness (HPA axis, sympathoadrenal system)
  • Explain the Ebb and Flow phases of the metabolic response to injury
  • Describe the mechanisms of stress hyperglycemia and insulin resistance
  • Outline the cytokine cascade in SIRS and the transition to immunoparalysis (CARS)
  • Compare SIRS and CARS phases - timing, mediators, and clinical consequences
  • Explain the rationale for glucose targets in ICU (NICE-SUGAR vs Leuven)
  • Describe CIRCI - pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management

Viva Topics

  • Draw the HPA axis and explain regulation in health vs critical illness
  • Describe cortisol actions and the concept of "relative" vs "absolute" adrenal insufficiency
  • Explain glycocalyx degradation and its role in capillary leak
  • Discuss the biphasic GH/IGF-1 response and why GH supplementation is harmful
  • Describe the euthyroid sick syndrome (low T3 syndrome) and its adaptive nature
  • Outline the evidence for corticosteroids in septic shock (Annane 2002, CORTICUS, APROCCHSS, ADRENAL)

Common Examiner Questions

  • "What are the counter-regulatory hormones and their metabolic effects?"
  • "Why does stress hyperglycemia occur and why is it harmful?"
  • "Explain the concept of CIRCI - how does it differ from Addison's disease?"
  • "What is the 'cytokine storm' and how does it lead to organ dysfunction?"
  • "Why did tight glycemic control fail in NICE-SUGAR but succeed in Leuven 1?"

Key Points

Clinical Note

Critical illness activates the HPA axis: Hypothalamus releases CRH → Pituitary releases ACTH → Adrenal cortex releases cortisol. In the acute phase, ACTH and cortisol are elevated. In the chronic phase, ACTH falls but cortisol remains elevated due to reduced clearance (lower CBG levels). CIRCI occurs when cortisol production is inadequate for the severity of illness (PMID: 28838544).

Clinical Note

The sympathoadrenal system provides the immediate "fight-or-flight" response. The adrenal medulla releases epinephrine, sympathetic nerve terminals release norepinephrine. Effects include tachycardia, increased contractility, vasoconstriction, glycogenolysis, lipolysis, and gluconeogenesis. Chronic activation causes adrenergic receptor downregulation and "catecholamine resistance" (PMID: 32305881).

Clinical Note

Ebb phase (0-48h): Hypometabolism, hypothermia, vasoconstriction, reduced oxygen consumption. Catabolic Flow phase (days-weeks): Hypermetabolism, increased oxygen consumption (VO₂ up 20-50%), fever, protein catabolism, insulin resistance. Anabolic Flow phase (weeks-months): Recovery with tissue repair, if the patient survives (PMID: 21014163).

Clinical Note

Driven by counter-regulatory hormones (cortisol, glucagon, epinephrine, GH) and cytokine-induced insulin resistance. Mechanisms: hepatic gluconeogenesis ↑, GLUT4 translocation ↓ (IRS-1 phosphorylation by TNF-α/IL-6). Glucose toxicity occurs via ROS production in mitochondria, affecting non-insulin-dependent tissues (endothelium, neurons, immune cells) (PMID: 19501062).

Clinical Note

Leuven 1 (2001): Tight control (80-110 mg/dL) reduced mortality in surgical ICU. NICE-SUGAR (2009): Tight control increased 90-day mortality (27.5% vs 24.9%, OR 1.14) in mixed ICU population. Current target: 144-180 mg/dL (8-10 mmol/L). The key difference: hypoglycemia risk and patient population (PMID: 19318384, 11794168).

Clinical Note

SIRS: Pro-inflammatory phase with TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 release. Causes fever, vasodilation, capillary leak, coagulopathy. CARS: Compensatory anti-inflammatory phase with IL-10, TGF-β release, lymphocyte apoptosis, monocyte HLA-DR downregulation (<30%). Leads to immunoparalysis and susceptibility to secondary infections (PMID: 11133318, 30843236).

Clinical Note

Inadequate cortisol activity for illness severity. Mechanisms: adrenal insufficiency, tissue resistance, reduced conversion to active forms. Diagnosis: NOT by ACTH stimulation test (abandoned after CORTICUS). Treatment: Hydrocortisone 200mg/day for refractory vasopressor-dependent septic shock (PMID: 28884438).

Clinical Note

Annane 2002: Hydrocortisone + fludrocortisone reduced mortality in ACTH non-responders. CORTICUS (2008): No mortality benefit, faster shock reversal. APROCCHSS (2018): Hydrocortisone + fludrocortisone reduced 90-day mortality. ADRENAL (2018): No mortality benefit but faster shock resolution. Current practice: Hydrocortisone for refractory shock (PMID: 12190367, 18184957, 29490185, 29347447).

Clinical Note

Pattern: Low T3, elevated rT3, normal/low T4, inappropriately normal TSH. Mechanism: Reduced deiodinase D1/D2 activity, increased D3 activity, cytokine suppression of TRH/TSH. This is an adaptive response to reduce metabolic rate. Thyroid hormone replacement is NOT recommended and may increase mortality (PMID: 24657154).

Clinical Note

Acute phase: High GH, low IGF-1 (peripheral resistance via SOCS proteins). Chronic phase: Low GH, low IGF-1 (pituitary suppression). Takala Study (1999): High-dose rhGH doubled mortality in ICU patients - do NOT supplement GH in acute critical illness. This causes anabolic resistance contributing to muscle wasting (PMID: 10486416).


Neuroendocrine Response

The Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis

The HPA axis is the primary endocrine mediator of the stress response, providing cortisol for metabolic support, vascular tone, and immune modulation (PMID: 26841321).

Normal HPA Axis Physiology

Hypothalamus: The paraventricular nucleus (PVN) releases Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone (CRH) and Arginine Vasopressin (AVP) in response to stress signals from:

  • Inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α) crossing the blood-brain barrier
  • Afferent vagal signals from peripheral inflammation
  • Direct neural inputs from the brainstem and limbic system

Pituitary: CRH and AVP stimulate corticotrophs in the anterior pituitary to release Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) via cAMP-mediated exocytosis.

Adrenal Cortex: ACTH binds MC2R receptors on zona fasciculata cells, activating:

  • StAR protein (cholesterol transport into mitochondria)
  • CYP11A1 (cholesterol side-chain cleavage)
  • Sequential hydroxylations producing cortisol

Negative Feedback: Cortisol suppresses CRH and ACTH release via glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in the hypothalamus and pituitary. This feedback is disrupted in critical illness.

HPA Axis in Critical Illness: The Biphasic Response

PhaseDurationACTH LevelCortisol LevelMechanism
AcuteHours-Days↑↑ High↑↑ HighCRH/AVP-driven, maximal adrenal output
ChronicDays-Weeks↓ Low↑ or NormalReduced clearance, extra-pituitary ACTH sources

Acute Phase (0-7 days):

  • CRH and ACTH levels increase 5-10 fold
  • Cortisol production increases from 10-20 mg/day to 150-300 mg/day
  • Loss of circadian rhythm (continuous secretion)
  • Cortisol-binding globulin (CBG) decreases by 50%, increasing free cortisol

Chronic Phase (>7 days):

  • ACTH levels fall despite ongoing stress (loss of pulsatility)
  • Cortisol levels remain elevated due to:
    • Reduced cortisol clearance (lower 11β-HSD2 activity)
    • Alternative ACTH sources (immune cells)
    • Decreased CBG (more free cortisol)
  • Adrenal histology shows lipid depletion and necrosis (PMID: 26841321)
Clinical Pearl

Cortisol is essential for survival in critical illness through:

  1. Vascular tone: Permissive effect on catecholamine vasoconstriction (upregulates α1-receptors)
  2. Anti-inflammatory: Inhibits NF-κB, reduces cytokine production
  3. Metabolic: Promotes gluconeogenesis, lipolysis, proteolysis
  4. Fluid balance: Mild mineralocorticoid effect (sodium retention)
  5. Hemodynamic: Augments cardiac contractility

A patient cannot survive critical illness without adequate cortisol activity.

The Sympathoadrenal System

The sympathoadrenal system provides the immediate hemodynamic and metabolic response to stress through catecholamine release (PMID: 32305881).

Anatomy and Activation

Sympathetic Nervous System:

  • Preganglionic neurons: Intermediolateral column (T1-L2)
  • Postganglionic neurons: Paravertebral/prevertebral ganglia
  • Neurotransmitter: Norepinephrine at target organs

Adrenal Medulla:

  • Modified sympathetic ganglion (chromaffin cells)
  • Releases 80% epinephrine, 20% norepinephrine directly into bloodstream
  • Controlled by splanchnic nerve stimulation

Activation Triggers:

  • Hypotension (baroreceptor unloading)
  • Hypoxemia (carotid body chemoreceptors)
  • Pain (nociceptive pathways)
  • Hypovolemia (cardiopulmonary receptors)
  • Hypoglycemia (hypothalamic glucose sensors)

Catecholamine Actions

ReceptorLocationEffect
α1Vascular smooth muscleVasoconstriction ↑ SVR
α2Presynaptic, plateletsNE release ↓, platelet aggregation ↑
β1HeartHR ↑, contractility ↑, conduction ↑
β2Bronchi, vessels, liverBronchodilation, vasodilation, glycogenolysis
β3AdiposeLipolysis ↑

Metabolic Effects of Catecholamines:

  1. Glycogenolysis: β2-mediated hepatic glucose release
  2. Gluconeogenesis: Indirect via glucagon stimulation
  3. Lipolysis: β3-mediated free fatty acid release
  4. Insulin suppression: α2-mediated β-cell inhibition
  5. Lactate production: Epinephrine stimulates skeletal muscle glycolysis

Catecholamine Resistance in Prolonged Critical Illness:

  • β-adrenergic receptor downregulation (internalization)
  • GRK2 (G-protein coupled receptor kinase) upregulation
  • NO-mediated smooth muscle unresponsiveness
  • Contributes to refractory hypotension requiring escalating vasopressor doses

Other Neuroendocrine Axes

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS)

Activation: Hypotension → Renal hypoperfusion → Renin release → Angiotensin II → Aldosterone

Effects:

  • Angiotensin II: Potent vasoconstrictor, sodium retention, ADH release
  • Aldosterone: Sodium/water retention, potassium excretion

Clinical Relevance: Explains why ACE inhibitors and ARBs cause profound hypotension in sepsis

Antidiuretic Hormone (ADH/Vasopressin)

Biphasic Response:

  • Early: ADH levels markedly elevated (water retention)
  • Late (>24-48h): "Relative vasopressin deficiency"
  • levels fall despite ongoing hypotension

Rationale for Vasopressin in Septic Shock: Replaces depleted endogenous vasopressin, synergizes with catecholamines (VASST trial, PMID: 18305265)

Growth Hormone (GH) / IGF-1 Axis

Acute Phase: High GH, Low IGF-1 (peripheral resistance)

  • Cytokines suppress GH receptor signaling (SOCS proteins block JAK2/STAT5)
  • IGF-binding protein changes (↑IGFBP-1, ↓IGFBP-3)
  • Purpose: Preserve glucose for brain, use fat for fuel (lipolytic effect of GH)

Chronic Phase: Low GH, Low IGF-1 (pituitary suppression)

  • Loss of pulsatile GH secretion
  • Contributes to muscle wasting and anabolic failure
Red Flag

The Takala Study (PMID: 10486416) demonstrated that high-dose recombinant human GH (rhGH) in critically ill patients doubled mortality (39% vs 20%). GH worsened hyperglycemia and may have increased catabolism paradoxically. GH supplementation is contraindicated in acute critical illness.

Thyroid Axis: Euthyroid Sick Syndrome (ESS)

Also called Non-Thyroidal Illness Syndrome (NTIS) or Low T3 Syndrome (PMID: 24657154).

Hormone Pattern by Illness Severity:

SeverityTSHT4T3rT3
MildNormalNormal
ModerateNormal-LowNormal-↓↓↓↑↑
Severe↓ (loss of pulsatility)↓↓↓↓↓↑↑
Recovery↑ (transient)NormalNormalNormal

Mechanisms:

  1. Deiodinase Changes:

    • D1 (liver): ↓ Activity → Less T4→T3 conversion
    • D2 (peripheral): ↓ Activity → Less T4→T3 conversion
    • D3 (many tissues): ↑ Activity → More T4→rT3 inactivation
  2. Central Suppression: IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α suppress TRH and TSH release

  3. Binding Protein Changes: Decreased TBG, increased FFA competition for binding sites

Clinical Significance:

  • Low T4 is a prognostic marker - mortality correlates with T4 level
  • This is an adaptive response to reduce metabolic rate during illness
  • Thyroid hormone replacement does NOT improve outcomes and may be harmful (PMID: 29029141)
Clinical Pearl

ESS/NTIS represents an adaptive reduction in metabolic rate to conserve energy during critical illness. Multiple trials of T3 or T4 supplementation have shown no benefit and potential harm. The exception is documented myxedema coma with pre-existing hypothyroidism - this is a different entity requiring emergency thyroid hormone replacement.


Metabolic Response

The Ebb and Flow Phases (Cuthbertson Model)

Sir David Cuthbertson (1932) first described the biphasic metabolic response to injury, which remains the foundational framework for understanding ICU metabolism (PMID: 21014163).

Ebb Phase (Early Shock Phase)

Duration: First 24-48 hours post-injury/insult

Characteristics:

  • Hypometabolism: Reduced oxygen consumption (VO₂)
  • Hypothermia: Core temperature may fall
  • Hemodynamic instability: Shock, hypotension, poor perfusion
  • Anaerobic metabolism: Lactate production increases

Metabolic Profile:

ParameterChangeMechanism
Metabolic rateEnergy conservation
Oxygen consumptionReduced perfusion
Glucose utilizationInsulin resistance begins
LactateAnaerobic glycolysis
Core temperatureThermoregulatory failure

Teleological Purpose: The Ebb phase is an immediate survival response - minimize energy expenditure while prioritizing perfusion to vital organs (brain, heart). The body "plays dead" metabolically.

Flow Phase (Hypermetabolic Phase)

Duration: Days to weeks (begins after resuscitation)

The Flow phase is subdivided into:

A. Catabolic Flow Phase (Acute Response)

Characteristics:

  • Hypermetabolism: VO₂ increases 20-50% above baseline
  • Hyperthermia: Fever from cytokine-mediated thermoregulation reset
  • Hyperdynamic circulation: Increased CO, decreased SVR (if septic)
  • Protein catabolism: Up to 20% muscle mass loss in 10 days

Hormonal Profile:

HormoneLevelEffect
Cortisol↑↑Gluconeogenesis, proteolysis, lipolysis
Glucagon↑↑Hepatic glucose output
Epinephrine↑↑Glycogenolysis, lipolysis
Insulin↑ but ineffectivePeripheral resistance
GH↑ but IGF-1 ↓Lipolysis without anabolism

Metabolic Profile:

ParameterChangeClinical Consequence
Glucose production↑↑Stress hyperglycemia
Protein catabolism↑↑Muscle wasting, negative nitrogen balance
Lipolysis↑↑Elevated FFA, ketogenesis
CO₂ productionIncreased minute ventilation requirement
Oxygen consumption↑ 20-50%Increased metabolic demand

B. Anabolic Flow Phase (Recovery)

Duration: Weeks to months (if patient survives)

Characteristics:

  • Shift from catabolism to anabolism
  • Positive nitrogen balance returns
  • Wound healing and tissue repair
  • Restoration of hormonal pulsatility

Barriers to Anabolic Recovery:

  • Persistent Inflammation-Immunosuppression-Catabolism Syndrome (PICS)
  • Anabolic resistance (muscle fails to respond to protein/exercise)
  • Chronic critical illness (failure to transition)

Stress Hyperglycemia

Stress hyperglycemia is defined as blood glucose >140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) in a patient without known diabetes, or glucose significantly above baseline in a diabetic patient (PMID: 19501062, 25029100).

Mechanisms of Stress Hyperglycemia

1. Increased Hepatic Glucose Production:

  • Gluconeogenesis: Cortisol and glucagon activate PEPCK and G6Pase
  • Glycogenolysis: Epinephrine and glucagon mobilize hepatic glycogen
  • Hepatic glucose output can increase 3-5 fold

2. Peripheral Insulin Resistance:

  • Receptor level: Cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6) activate JNK and IKKβ
  • Post-receptor: IRS-1 serine phosphorylation (inhibitory) instead of tyrosine (activating)
  • GLUT4 translocation: Impaired glucose uptake into muscle and adipose
  • PI3K pathway: Blocked insulin signaling cascade

3. Relative Insulin Deficiency:

  • Catecholamines (α2-mediated) suppress β-cell insulin secretion
  • Cytokines cause β-cell dysfunction
  • Pancreatic hypoperfusion in shock

4. Exogenous Factors:

  • Dextrose-containing fluids
  • TPN administration
  • Corticosteroid therapy
  • Catecholamine infusions

Glucose Toxicity

While stress hyperglycemia is initially adaptive (ensuring glucose supply to brain and immune cells), sustained hyperglycemia causes "glucose toxicity" (PMID: 16710051).

Mechanisms of Glucose Toxicity:

  1. Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress:

    • Excess glucose increases electron transport chain flux
    • Superoxide overproduction damages mitochondria
    • ROS cause lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation, DNA damage
  2. Non-Insulin-Dependent Glucose Uptake:

    • Tissues with GLUT1/2/3 (not GLUT4) cannot regulate uptake
    • Affected tissues: Vascular endothelium, neurons, hepatocytes, immune cells
    • These cells become "flooded" with glucose
  3. Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs):

    • Non-enzymatic glycation of proteins
    • Impairs protein function
    • RAGE receptor activation perpetuates inflammation
  4. Endothelial Dysfunction:

    • Reduced NO bioavailability
    • Increased adhesion molecule expression
    • Microvascular thrombosis
  5. Immune Dysfunction:

    • Impaired neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis
    • Reduced complement function
    • Increased infection susceptibility

Glucose Control in ICU: The Evidence

TrialYearPopulationInterventionControlPrimary Outcome
Leuven 1 (Van den Berghe)2001Surgical ICU (n=1,548)80-110 mg/dL<200 mg/dLMortality ↓ (4.6% vs 8.0%)
Leuven 2 (Van den Berghe)2006Medical ICU (n=1,200)80-110 mg/dL<200 mg/dLNo mortality benefit
NICE-SUGAR2009Mixed ICU (n=6,104)81-108 mg/dL<180 mg/dLMortality ↑ (27.5% vs 24.9%)
CGAO-REA2014Septic shock (n=509)80-110 mg/dL<180 mg/dLNo mortality benefit

NICE-SUGAR Trial (PMID: 19318384)

Design: Multicenter RCT, 42 centers in Australia, NZ, Canada (6,104 patients)

Population: Mixed medical/surgical ICU patients requiring ≥3 days ICU

Intervention:

  • Intensive: Target 81-108 mg/dL (4.5-6.0 mmol/L)
  • Conventional: Target ≤180 mg/dL (≤10.0 mmol/L)

Results:

  • 90-day mortality: 27.5% vs 24.9% (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28, p=0.02)
  • Severe hypoglycemia (≤40 mg/dL): 6.8% vs 0.5% (p<0.001)
  • NNH = 38 (one additional death per 38 patients treated with tight control)

Key Lessons:

  1. Tight glycemic control increases mortality in general ICU population
  2. Hypoglycemia is common and dangerous with intensive protocols
  3. Target 144-180 mg/dL (8-10 mmol/L) is current standard
Red Flag

Hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) is an independent risk factor for ICU mortality. Even a single episode of moderate hypoglycemia (40-70 mg/dL) is associated with increased mortality. Severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) occurred in 6.8% of intensively controlled patients in NICE-SUGAR.

Why Did Leuven Succeed but NICE-SUGAR Fail?

FactorLeuven 1NICE-SUGAR
PopulationSurgical ICU (cardiac surgery dominant)Mixed medical/surgical
CentersSingle center, highly experiencedMulticenter
NutritionEarly TPN (high glucose load)Less TPN use
Hypoglycemia detectionLaboratory glucosePoint-of-care (less accurate)
Protocol adherenceExpert nursing, intensive monitoringVariable adherence
Era2001 (pre-EGDT sepsis care)2009 (modern sepsis care)

Current Recommendations (Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2021):

  • Initiate insulin when BG >180 mg/dL (10 mmol/L)
  • Target upper limit ≤180 mg/dL (10 mmol/L)
  • Avoid hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL)
  • Use validated insulin protocols with frequent monitoring

Protein Catabolism and Muscle Wasting

Critical illness induces profound protein catabolism leading to ICU-acquired weakness (ICUAW) (PMID: 24108524).

Magnitude of Muscle Loss

Puthucheary et al. (JAMA 2013, PMID: 24108524):

  • 63 ICU patients with multi-organ failure
  • 10% muscle mass loss in first week
  • 20% loss by day 10
  • Loss continued throughout ICU stay
  • Quadriceps muscle area decreased 17.7% by day 10

Mechanisms of Muscle Wasting

1. Increased Proteolysis:

  • Ubiquitin-proteasome system: Upregulated by IL-1, TNF-α, cortisol
  • Autophagy-lysosome pathway: Activated by starvation, inflammation
  • Caspase activation: Myofibrillar protein degradation

2. Decreased Protein Synthesis (Anabolic Resistance):

  • mTORC1 pathway suppression by inflammation
  • Reduced response to amino acids and insulin
  • Even with adequate protein intake, synthesis remains impaired

3. Hormonal Milieu:

  • High cortisol (catabolic)
  • Low testosterone (reduced anabolism)
  • GH resistance (no IGF-1 effect)

4. Disuse Atrophy:

  • Immobility, mechanical ventilation
  • Neuromuscular blocking agents
  • Sedation limiting movement

Nutritional Strategies to Limit Catabolism

ESPEN Guidelines 2019 (PMID: 30348463):

  • Avoid early full feeding (<48h) in shock
  • Target 1.3 g/kg/day protein after stabilization
  • Early mobilization and rehabilitation
  • Consider supplemental glutamine in specific populations

Important Concept: Early aggressive feeding does NOT prevent muscle wasting in the hyperacute phase due to anabolic resistance. Nutrition becomes more effective in the recovery phase.


Inflammatory Response

SIRS: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

SIRS represents the pro-inflammatory phase of the host response to a significant insult (infection, trauma, burns, pancreatitis) (PMID: 1597163).

SIRS Criteria (1992 ACCP/SCCM Consensus)

Two or more of:

  1. Temperature: >38°C or <36°C
  2. Heart Rate: >90 bpm
  3. Respiratory Rate: >20/min or PaCO₂ <32 mmHg
  4. White Cell Count: >12,000/mm³ or <4,000/mm³ or >10% bands

Limitations: SIRS criteria are non-specific (50-90% of ICU patients meet criteria) and have been largely superseded by Sepsis-3 for infection-related organ dysfunction.

Cytokine Cascade

Primary Pro-inflammatory Cytokines:

CytokineSourceActionsPeak Timing
TNF-αMacrophages, monocytesFever, hypotension, capillary leak, DIC, myocardial depression1-2 hours
IL-1βMacrophages, epithelial cellsFever, neutrophil activation, acute phase proteins2-4 hours
IL-6Macrophages, endothelial cellsAcute phase response (CRP, fibrinogen), B-cell activation4-8 hours
IL-8Macrophages, endothelial cellsNeutrophil chemotaxis and activation4-8 hours

Cascade Sequence:

  1. PAMP/DAMP recognition: TLR activation on innate immune cells
  2. NF-κB activation: Master transcription factor for inflammatory genes
  3. Early cytokines: TNF-α and IL-1β released within hours
  4. Amplification: IL-6, IL-8 released; neutrophil and endothelial activation
  5. Systemic effects: Fever, hypotension, coagulopathy, organ dysfunction
Clinical Pearl

IL-6 is the best-studied cytokine biomarker in critical illness:

  • Levels correlate with severity and mortality
  • Peak levels predict organ failure development
  • Persistently elevated IL-6 predicts poor outcome
  • Used in neonatal sepsis screening
  • Threshold levels vary by assay (typically >1000 pg/mL indicates severe inflammation)

Endothelial Dysfunction and Glycocalyx Degradation

The vascular endothelium is a major target of the inflammatory response (PMID: 25355530).

Normal Glycocalyx Function:

  • 0.5-3 μm thick layer on endothelial surface
  • Composed of proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans (heparan sulfate, hyaluronan)
  • Functions: Permeability barrier, mechanotransduction, anti-coagulant, anti-inflammatory

Glycocalyx Shedding in Sepsis:

  • Enzymes: Heparanase, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), hyaluronidase
  • Stimuli: TNF-α, ROS, hyperglycemia, ischemia-reperfusion
  • Markers: Syndecan-1, heparan sulfate, hyaluronan in plasma

Consequences of Glycocalyx Degradation:

  1. Capillary leak: Increased permeability → interstitial edema
  2. Leukocyte adhesion: Exposed adhesion molecules (ICAM, VCAM)
  3. Platelet adhesion: Loss of anti-thrombotic surface
  4. Loss of flow sensing: Impaired NO production

Clinical Correlation: Glycocalyx degradation contributes to the "capillary leak syndrome" seen in sepsis - patients develop edema, hypoalbuminemia, and require massive fluid resuscitation.

CARS: Compensatory Anti-inflammatory Response Syndrome

CARS represents the counter-regulatory phase designed to limit inflammation-induced tissue damage but can lead to immunoparalysis (PMID: 11133318, 21903088).

Mediators of CARS

Anti-inflammatory Cytokines:

CytokineSourceActions
IL-10Th2 cells, regulatory T cells, macrophagesSuppresses TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6; inhibits antigen presentation
TGF-βMany cellsImmunosuppressive, promotes regulatory T cells
IL-1raMacrophagesCompetitive antagonist of IL-1 receptor
IL-4Th2 cellsShifts immune response away from Th1

Cellular Changes:

  1. Monocyte deactivation: HLA-DR expression <30% (reduced antigen presentation)
  2. Lymphocyte apoptosis: T-cell and B-cell depletion
  3. Regulatory T cells (Tregs): Increased numbers suppressing effector T cells
  4. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs): Expanded population
  5. Neutrophil paralysis: Reduced phagocytosis and oxidative burst

Immunoparalysis

Definition: Profound immunosuppression characterized by inability to mount an effective immune response to secondary pathogens (PMID: 30843236).

Diagnostic Markers:

MarkerNormalImmunoparalysisSignificance
Monocyte HLA-DR>90% cells positive<30% cells positiveGold standard marker
ex vivo TNF-α releaseNormal<200 pg/mLIndicates monocyte dysfunction
Lymphocyte count1.0-4.0 × 10⁹/L<0.5 × 10⁹/LLymphopenia predicts mortality

Clinical Consequences:

  1. Secondary infections: Nosocomial pneumonia, fungal infections, line sepsis
  2. Viral reactivation: CMV, HSV, EBV reactivation
  3. Failure to clear primary infection: Persistent sepsis
  4. Increased mortality: Many sepsis deaths occur during the immunoparalyzed phase

MARS: Mixed Antagonistic Response Syndrome

In reality, SIRS and CARS often coexist - patients may have hyperinflammation in some compartments and immunosuppression in others. This is termed MARS (Mixed Antagonistic Response Syndrome).

PICS: Persistent Inflammation-Immunosuppression-Catabolism Syndrome

PICS describes patients who survive the initial insult but develop chronic critical illness (PMID: 28257740).

Characteristics:

  • Persistent low-grade inflammation (elevated CRP, IL-6)
  • Ongoing immunosuppression (susceptibility to infection)
  • Persistent protein catabolism (muscle wasting, weakness)
  • Failure to progress to recovery
  • Duration: Weeks to months

Risk Factors:

  • Age >65 years
  • Comorbidities (diabetes, malignancy)
  • Sepsis as primary diagnosis
  • Prolonged mechanical ventilation
  • Recurrent infections

Clinical Phenotype:

  • Prolonged ICU and hospital stay
  • Failure to wean from mechanical ventilation
  • Recurrent nosocomial infections
  • Profound weakness (ICUAW)
  • Discharge to long-term care or death

CIRCI is defined as inadequate corticosteroid activity for the severity of illness (PMID: 28884438).

Pathophysiology of CIRCI

Mechanisms

1. Adrenal Insufficiency:

  • Adrenal hemorrhage (Waterhouse-Friderichsen syndrome in meningococcemia)
  • Adrenal necrosis from prolonged shock
  • Drug-induced suppression (etomidate, ketoconazole)
  • Prior chronic steroid use with HPA suppression

2. Tissue Glucocorticoid Resistance:

  • Downregulation of glucocorticoid receptors (GR)
  • Altered GR translocation to nucleus
  • NF-κB competition for co-activators
  • Cytokine-induced resistance

3. Reduced Cortisol Availability:

  • Increased cortisol clearance in some patients
  • Decreased conversion of cortisone to cortisol (11β-HSD1)
  • Altered cortisol metabolism

4. Relative Insufficiency:

  • Cortisol production cannot meet the extraordinary demands of severe illness
  • "Normal" cortisol level is inadequate for the degree of stress

Diagnosis of CIRCI

Red Flag

The ACTH (cosyntropin) stimulation test is no longer recommended for diagnosis of CIRCI. CORTICUS showed that response to ACTH did not predict clinical response to corticosteroids. Random cortisol <10 μg/dL suggests insufficiency but is not definitive.

Historical Approaches (No Longer Recommended):

TestCriterionLimitation
Random cortisol<10 μg/dL (<276 nmol/L)Normal levels don't exclude CIRCI
ACTH stimulationDelta cortisol <9 μg/dLDoes not predict treatment response
Free cortisolNot widely availableTheoretical advantage, impractical

Current Approach (SCCM/ESICM Guidelines 2017):

  • Do not use ACTH test to determine who should receive steroids
  • Clinical diagnosis: Refractory septic shock despite adequate fluids and vasopressors
  • Therapeutic trial: Treat with hydrocortisone if shock is vasopressor-dependent

Corticosteroid Therapy in Septic Shock

Summary of Major Trials

Annane 2002 (PMID: 12190367):

  • Design: French multicenter RCT (n=300)
  • Intervention: Hydrocortisone 50mg q6h + fludrocortisone 50μg daily × 7 days
  • Population: Septic shock patients stratified by ACTH response
  • Results: Mortality reduction in ACTH non-responders (53% vs 63%, p=0.04)
  • Conclusion: Suggested benefit in "relative adrenal insufficiency"

CORTICUS 2008 (PMID: 18184957):

  • Design: European multicenter RCT (n=499)
  • Intervention: Hydrocortisone 50mg q6h × 5 days then taper
  • Population: Septic shock (less severe than Annane)
  • Results: No mortality benefit (34.3% vs 31.5%, p=0.51)
  • Findings: Faster shock reversal (3.3 vs 5.8 days, p<0.001)
  • Harm: More superinfections with steroids
  • Conclusion: ACTH test does not predict response; steroids speed shock reversal but don't reduce mortality

APROCCHSS 2018 (PMID: 29490185):

  • Design: French multicenter RCT (n=1,241)
  • Intervention: Hydrocortisone 50mg q6h + fludrocortisone 50μg daily × 7 days
  • Population: Severe septic shock (high vasopressor requirements)
  • Results: 90-day mortality 43.0% vs 49.1% (p=0.03); NNT = 16
  • Findings: Also faster shock reversal, no difference in superinfections
  • Conclusion: Hydrocortisone + fludrocortisone reduces mortality in severe septic shock

ADRENAL 2018 (PMID: 29347447):

  • Design: Australia/NZ/UK multicenter RCT (n=3,658)
  • Intervention: Hydrocortisone 200mg/day continuous infusion × 7 days
  • Population: Septic shock on vasopressors + mechanical ventilation
  • Results: 90-day mortality 27.9% vs 28.8% (p=0.50)
  • Findings: Faster shock resolution, shorter ventilation, fewer transfusions
  • Conclusion: No mortality benefit but secondary benefits
Clinical Pearl

Both trials were well-designed. Potential explanations for different mortality outcomes:

  1. Fludrocortisone: APROCCHSS included fludrocortisone; ADRENAL did not
  2. Severity: APROCCHSS patients were sicker (50% mortality in placebo vs 29%)
  3. Effect size: ADRENAL may have been underpowered to detect small benefit

Current practice supports hydrocortisone for refractory septic shock (high vasopressor requirements).

Current Recommendations (SSC 2021)

When to Use Corticosteroids in Septic Shock:

  • Ongoing requirement for vasopressor therapy (typically ≥0.25 μg/kg/min norepinephrine)
  • Despite adequate fluid resuscitation
  • Usually initiated after 4-6 hours of vasopressor therapy

Regimen:

  • Hydrocortisone 200mg/day (50mg IV q6h or 200mg continuous infusion)
  • Duration: Until shock resolved (vasopressor-free)
  • Consider adding fludrocortisone 50μg daily (based on APROCCHSS)

Do NOT Use Steroids For:

  • Sepsis without shock
  • Septic shock responding to fluids and low-dose vasopressors
  • Routine use in all ICU patients

Clinical Implications Summary

Stress Hyperglycemia Management

RecommendationEvidence
Initiate insulin when BG >180 mg/dL (10 mmol/L)SSC 2021
Target upper limit ≤180 mg/dLNICE-SUGAR
Avoid hypoglycemia <70 mg/dLNICE-SUGAR
Use validated insulin protocolBest practice
Monitor BG every 1-2 hours during insulin infusionSafety requirement

Corticosteroid Use in Septic Shock

IndicationRecommendationEvidence Level
Refractory septic shockHydrocortisone 200mg/dayAPROCCHSS, ADRENAL
Septic shock responding to treatmentDo not useSSC 2021
ACTH stimulation testDo not useCORTICUS
Fludrocortisone additionConsider (50μg/day)APROCCHSS
DurationUntil vasopressor-freeConsensus

Thyroid Hormone

FindingManagement
Low T3 with normal/low TSH in critical illnessNo treatment (ESS/NTIS is adaptive)
Clinical myxedema comaEmergency T4/T3 replacement
Testing thyroid function in ICUGenerally not recommended unless strong clinical suspicion

Nutrition and Catabolism

PhaseRecommendation
Ebb phase (0-48h shock)Avoid full feeding; trophic feeds if gut functional
Catabolic flow phaseTarget 1.3g/kg protein, hypocaloric initially
Anabolic recovery phaseIncrease to goal calories, rehabilitation
Muscle wasting preventionEarly mobilization, avoid excessive sedation

Australian and New Zealand Context

Indigenous Health Context

Higher Rates of Critical Illness:

  • 3× higher hospitalization rates for sepsis
  • Higher prevalence of diabetes (increased stress hyperglycemia complications)
  • Higher rates of severe community-acquired pneumonia
  • Increased chronic kidney disease (affects drug clearance, fluid management)

Clinical Implications:

  • Higher baseline HbA1c may affect glucose targets
  • Greater risk of hypoglycemia with tight control
  • Monitor carefully for nosocomial infections during immunoparalysis
  • Involve Aboriginal Health Workers (AHW) and Aboriginal Liaison Officers (ALO)
  • Cultural considerations for prolonged ICU stay and family involvement
  • Remote patients may present later with more severe illness

Māori Health Considerations (New Zealand):

  • 2× higher sepsis mortality rates
  • Whānau (extended family) involvement in care decisions
  • Consider tikanga (cultural protocols) during illness
  • Māori Health Workers for cultural support

ANZICS-CORE Registry Data:

  • Australian/NZ ICUs show similar outcomes to international benchmarks
  • NICE-SUGAR was largely conducted in Australia/NZ, making results directly applicable
  • ADRENAL was conducted in Australia/NZ/UK

Retrieval Considerations:

  • Remote/rural patients may present in established chronic phase
  • Stress hyperglycemia management during retrieval with glucose monitoring
  • Hydrocortisone available in retrieval packs for refractory shock
  • RFDS and state retrieval services trained in septic shock management

SAQ Practice Questions

Clinical Note

Stem

A 55-year-old man is in the ICU Day 5 post-laparotomy for perforated diverticulitis complicated by faecal peritonitis. He remains on norepinephrine 0.35 μg/kg/min despite adequate fluid resuscitation. His blood glucose has been 12-15 mmol/L requiring an insulin infusion.

Question 1.1 (6 marks)

Describe the neuroendocrine response to critical illness, focusing on the HPA axis and sympathoadrenal system.

Question 1.2 (6 marks)

Explain the mechanisms of stress hyperglycemia in this patient. Include the role of counter-regulatory hormones and cytokines.

Question 1.3 (4 marks)

What is the current evidence-based glucose target in ICU? Briefly outline the evidence supporting this target.

Question 1.4 (4 marks)

This patient has refractory shock despite fluids and vasopressors. Discuss the role of corticosteroids, including the relevant evidence.


Model Answer

1.1 Neuroendocrine Response (6 marks)

HPA Axis Response (3 marks):

  • Hypothalamus releases CRH and AVP in response to inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α) and afferent vagal signals (1 mark)
  • Pituitary releases ACTH, stimulating adrenal cortisol production (1 mark)
  • Biphasic response: Acute phase (high ACTH, high cortisol); Chronic phase (low ACTH, elevated cortisol due to reduced clearance and lower CBG levels) (1 mark)

Sympathoadrenal Response (3 marks):

  • Activation via baroreceptor unloading (hypotension), chemoreceptor stimulation (hypoxia), and pain (1 mark)
  • Adrenal medulla releases epinephrine (80%) and norepinephrine (20%) (1 mark)
  • Effects: Tachycardia (β1), vasoconstriction (α1), glycogenolysis, lipolysis, gluconeogenesis (1 mark)

1.2 Mechanisms of Stress Hyperglycemia (6 marks)

Increased Hepatic Glucose Production (2 marks):

  • Counter-regulatory hormones (cortisol, glucagon, epinephrine, growth hormone) activate hepatic gluconeogenesis (PEPCK, G6Pase enzymes) (1 mark)
  • Epinephrine and glucagon stimulate glycogenolysis (1 mark)

Peripheral Insulin Resistance (3 marks):

  • Cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6) activate JNK and IKKβ signaling pathways (1 mark)
  • Inhibitory serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 instead of activating tyrosine phosphorylation (1 mark)
  • Reduced GLUT4 translocation to cell membrane in muscle and adipose tissue (1 mark)

Relative Insulin Deficiency (1 mark):

  • α2-adrenergic mediated suppression of β-cell insulin secretion (1 mark)

1.3 Glucose Targets and Evidence (4 marks)

Current Target (1 mark):

  • Target blood glucose ≤180 mg/dL (≤10 mmol/L), typically 144-180 mg/dL (8-10 mmol/L) (1 mark)

Evidence - NICE-SUGAR Trial (3 marks):

  • 6,104 patients in mixed ICU comparing intensive (81-108 mg/dL) vs conventional (≤180 mg/dL) control (1 mark)
  • Intensive control increased 90-day mortality (27.5% vs 24.9%, OR 1.14, p=0.02) (1 mark)
  • Severe hypoglycemia significantly more common with intensive control (6.8% vs 0.5%), which is an independent mortality risk factor (1 mark)

1.4 Corticosteroids in Refractory Shock (4 marks)

Indication (1 mark):

  • Refractory septic shock despite adequate fluid resuscitation and requiring high-dose vasopressors (1 mark)

Evidence (3 marks):

  • APROCCHSS (2018): Hydrocortisone + fludrocortisone reduced 90-day mortality in severe septic shock (43% vs 49%, p=0.03, NNT=16) (1 mark)
  • ADRENAL (2018): Hydrocortisone alone showed no mortality benefit but faster shock reversal and shorter ventilation (1 mark)
  • Current recommendation: Hydrocortisone 200mg/day (50mg q6h or continuous infusion) for vasopressor-dependent shock; ACTH stimulation test NOT recommended (1 mark)

Clinical Note

Stem

A 62-year-old woman with pneumococcal pneumonia has been in ICU for 10 days. She initially required high-dose vasopressors and mechanical ventilation. She is now vasopressor-free but develops ventilator-associated pneumonia with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Blood tests show lymphopenia (0.4 × 10⁹/L) and low monocyte HLA-DR expression (20%).

Question 2.1 (5 marks)

Describe the pro-inflammatory phase (SIRS) of the inflammatory response to sepsis, including the key cytokines and their effects.

Question 2.2 (5 marks)

What is CARS (Compensatory Anti-inflammatory Response Syndrome)? Explain the mechanisms of immunoparalysis.

Question 2.3 (5 marks)

How do the laboratory findings (lymphopenia, low HLA-DR) in this patient support the diagnosis of immunoparalysis? What are the clinical consequences?

Question 2.4 (5 marks)

Describe the Ebb and Flow phases of the metabolic response to critical illness.


Model Answer

2.1 SIRS and Pro-inflammatory Cytokines (5 marks)

Definition (1 mark):

  • SIRS is the systemic pro-inflammatory response triggered by PAMPs (pathogen-associated molecular patterns) and DAMPs (damage-associated molecular patterns) activating pattern recognition receptors (TLRs) (1 mark)

Key Cytokines (4 marks):

  • TNF-α (earliest, peaks 1-2h): Fever, hypotension, capillary leak, DIC activation, myocardial depression (1 mark)
  • IL-1β: Synergizes with TNF-α, potent pyrogen, neutrophil activation, acute phase protein production (1 mark)
  • IL-6 (peaks 4-8h): Acute phase response (CRP, fibrinogen), B-cell activation, correlates with severity and prognosis (1 mark)
  • IL-8: Neutrophil chemotaxis and activation at sites of infection (1 mark)

2.2 CARS and Immunoparalysis (5 marks)

Definition of CARS (1 mark):

  • Compensatory anti-inflammatory response designed to limit inflammation-induced tissue damage; occurs concurrently or following SIRS (1 mark)

Mediators (2 marks):

  • Anti-inflammatory cytokines: IL-10, TGF-β, IL-1 receptor antagonist (1 mark)
  • Shift from Th1 (pro-inflammatory) to Th2 (anti-inflammatory) response (1 mark)

Mechanisms of Immunoparalysis (2 marks):

  • Monocyte deactivation with HLA-DR downregulation (impaired antigen presentation) (1 mark)
  • Lymphocyte apoptosis, expansion of regulatory T cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), reduced neutrophil function (1 mark)

2.3 Laboratory Findings and Consequences (5 marks)

Laboratory Interpretation (3 marks):

  • Lymphopenia (0.4 × 10⁹/L, normal 1.0-4.0): Indicates lymphocyte apoptosis, a hallmark of immunoparalysis; persistent lymphopenia predicts mortality (1 mark)
  • Low monocyte HLA-DR (20%, normal >90%): Gold standard marker of monocyte deactivation; indicates impaired antigen presentation to T cells (1 mark)
  • Together, these markers confirm immunoparalysis phase - the patient cannot mount an effective immune response (1 mark)

Clinical Consequences (2 marks):

  • Increased susceptibility to secondary nosocomial infections (as demonstrated by VAP with Pseudomonas) (1 mark)
  • Viral reactivation (CMV, HSV), failure to clear primary infection, increased mortality (1 mark)

2.4 Ebb and Flow Phases (5 marks)

Ebb Phase (2 marks):

  • Duration: 0-48 hours post-insult (1 mark)
  • Characteristics: Hypometabolism, hypothermia, reduced VO₂, hemodynamic instability, shock, lactate production; represents energy conservation during immediate survival (1 mark)

Flow Phase (3 marks):

  • Catabolic phase: Hypermetabolism with VO₂ increased 20-50%, fever, hyperdynamic circulation (1 mark)
  • Hormonal profile: Elevated cortisol, glucagon, catecholamines; insulin resistance; high GH with low IGF-1 (1 mark)
  • Metabolic consequences: Stress hyperglycemia, protein catabolism (up to 20% muscle mass loss in 10 days), negative nitrogen balance, lipolysis (1 mark)

Viva Practice Scenarios

Viva Scenario

Stem

"Let's discuss stress hyperglycemia in the critically ill patient."


Examiner: "What is stress hyperglycemia and why does it occur?"

Candidate Response: "Stress hyperglycemia is defined as blood glucose greater than 7.8 mmol/L in a patient without pre-existing diabetes, or blood glucose significantly above baseline in a diabetic patient.

It occurs due to two main mechanisms:

First, increased hepatic glucose production:

  • Counter-regulatory hormones - cortisol, glucagon, epinephrine, and growth hormone - are elevated in critical illness
  • These stimulate gluconeogenesis through activation of PEPCK and G6Pase enzymes
  • Epinephrine and glucagon also stimulate glycogenolysis

Second, peripheral insulin resistance:

  • Pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly TNF-α and IL-6, activate intracellular kinases like JNK and IKKβ
  • These cause inhibitory serine phosphorylation of IRS-1, blocking insulin signaling
  • GLUT4 transporter translocation to the cell membrane is impaired
  • Additionally, catecholamines suppress insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells

The result is hepatic glucose overproduction with peripheral underutilization."


Examiner: "Why is stress hyperglycemia harmful? Explain glucose toxicity."

Candidate Response: "While stress hyperglycemia is initially adaptive - providing glucose to the brain and immune cells - sustained hyperglycemia causes glucose toxicity.

The key mechanism is mitochondrial oxidative stress:

  • Excess glucose increases electron transport chain flux
  • This leads to superoxide overproduction and reactive oxygen species generation
  • ROS cause lipid peroxidation, protein damage, and DNA damage

Importantly, this affects tissues with non-insulin-dependent glucose uptake via GLUT1, 2, and 3:

  • Vascular endothelium - leading to dysfunction, reduced NO, increased adhesion molecules
  • Neurons - contributing to encephalopathy
  • Hepatocytes and immune cells

The consequences include:

  • Endothelial dysfunction and microvascular thrombosis
  • Impaired neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis
  • Increased infection susceptibility
  • Organ dysfunction"

Examiner: "What glucose target would you aim for in this patient? Justify your answer."

Candidate Response: "I would target blood glucose of 8-10 mmol/L, which is 144-180 mg/dL.

This is based on the NICE-SUGAR trial published in 2009. This was a large multicenter RCT involving over 6,100 patients in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada.

Patients were randomized to intensive control targeting 4.5-6.0 mmol/L versus conventional control targeting less than 10 mmol/L.

The key findings were:

  • Increased mortality with intensive control: 27.5% versus 24.9%, with an odds ratio of 1.14
  • Severe hypoglycemia in 6.8% of the intensive group versus only 0.5% in conventional

The excess mortality was likely related to hypoglycemia, which is an independent risk factor for death.

This contrasted with the earlier Leuven trial in 2001, which showed benefit from tight control. However, Leuven was single-center, surgical ICU, with heavy TPN use - quite different from modern mixed ICU populations.

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2021 guidelines recommend initiating insulin when glucose exceeds 10 mmol/L and targeting an upper limit of 10 mmol/L while avoiding hypoglycemia."


Examiner: "How would you manage this patient's glucose practically?"

Candidate Response: "I would use a validated insulin infusion protocol. Key principles include:

  1. Monitoring: Blood glucose every 1-2 hours during infusion, or more frequently when adjusting doses

  2. Insulin infusion: Start at 1-2 units/hour when glucose exceeds 10 mmol/L, with adjustments based on the rate of change

  3. Nutrition: Coordinate with enteral feeding delivery - if feeds are interrupted, reduce or stop insulin to prevent hypoglycemia

  4. Avoid hypoglycemia: If glucose less than 4 mmol/L, stop insulin and give 10% dextrose bolus

  5. Consistency: Use the same protocol unit-wide for nursing familiarity

  6. Special considerations: Be more cautious in patients with renal or hepatic failure (impaired gluconeogenesis), and during steroid weaning"


Viva Scenario

Stem

"A patient with septic shock remains hypotensive despite adequate fluid resuscitation and norepinephrine at 0.3 μg/kg/min. You are considering corticosteroid therapy."


Examiner: "What is CIRCI and what are the mechanisms?"

Candidate Response: "CIRCI stands for Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency. It describes a state where cortisol activity is inadequate for the severity of the patient's illness.

The mechanisms include:

Adrenal insufficiency:

  • Adrenal hemorrhage or necrosis from prolonged hypoperfusion
  • Drug-induced suppression, particularly etomidate which inhibits 11β-hydroxylase
  • Prior chronic steroid use with HPA axis suppression

Tissue glucocorticoid resistance:

  • Inflammatory cytokines cause downregulation of glucocorticoid receptors
  • NF-κB competes with glucocorticoid receptor for nuclear co-activators
  • So even normal or elevated cortisol may be insufficient at the tissue level

Reduced cortisol availability:

  • In some patients, cortisol clearance is increased
  • Altered conversion between cortisone and cortisol

CIRCI is fundamentally different from Addison's disease - it's a relative insufficiency where cortisol production cannot meet the extraordinary demands of critical illness, rather than absolute adrenal failure."


Examiner: "Would you perform an ACTH stimulation test in this patient?"

Candidate Response: "No, I would not perform an ACTH stimulation test.

The CORTICUS trial, published in 2008, evaluated this question. It randomized nearly 500 septic shock patients to hydrocortisone or placebo and stratified by ACTH response.

The key finding was that the ACTH test did not predict which patients would benefit from corticosteroids. Both responders and non-responders to the ACTH test had similar outcomes with hydrocortisone therapy.

The 2017 SCCM/ESICM guidelines on CIRCI specifically recommend against using the ACTH stimulation test to decide on corticosteroid therapy.

Instead, the decision should be based on clinical criteria - specifically, whether the patient has refractory septic shock despite adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor support."


Examiner: "What is the evidence for corticosteroids in septic shock?"

Candidate Response: "There are four major trials to consider:

Annane 2002: French multicenter trial of 300 patients. Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for 7 days showed mortality benefit in ACTH non-responders. This popularized the concept of testing for relative adrenal insufficiency.

CORTICUS 2008: European multicenter trial of 499 patients with less severe shock. Found no mortality benefit, but faster shock reversal. Also showed ACTH test doesn't predict response. Concern raised about increased superinfections.

APROCCHSS 2018: Led by Annane again, 1,241 patients with severe septic shock. Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone reduced 90-day mortality from 49% to 43%, number needed to treat of 16.

ADRENAL 2018: Australian/NZ trial, the largest with 3,658 patients. Hydrocortisone infusion showed no mortality benefit, but faster shock resolution, shorter mechanical ventilation, and fewer transfusions.

The difference between APROCCHSS (positive) and ADRENAL (negative) may relate to:

  • APROCCHSS included fludrocortisone
  • APROCCHSS patients were sicker with 50% placebo mortality
  • Different effect sizes in different populations"

Examiner: "What regimen would you use for this patient?"

Candidate Response: "Based on this patient having refractory septic shock on high-dose norepinephrine, I would initiate corticosteroid therapy.

Regimen options:

  • Hydrocortisone 50mg IV every 6 hours, OR
  • Hydrocortisone 200mg/day as continuous infusion

Based on the APROCCHSS results, I would consider adding fludrocortisone 50 micrograms daily as this regimen showed mortality benefit.

Duration: Continue until the patient is vasopressor-free. There's no need for a prolonged taper in this context.

Monitoring:

  • Blood glucose - steroids will worsen hyperglycemia, may need to increase insulin
  • Sodium - mineralocorticoid effect may cause hypernatremia
  • Watch for secondary infections, though APROCCHSS didn't show increased superinfection risk

I would not use high-dose or 'stress-dose' steroids - only the low-dose regimen has evidence of benefit, and higher doses may be harmful."


ZA. "Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness." JAMA. 2013;310(15):1591-1600. Key finding: 20% muscle mass loss by day 10 in multi-organ failure.

References

Landmark Trials

  1. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1283-1297. PMID: 19318384
  2. Van den Berghe G, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1359-1367. PMID: 11794168
  3. Sprung CL, et al. Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(2):111-124. PMID: 18184957
  4. Annane D, et al. Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):809-818. PMID: 29490185
  5. Venkatesh B, et al. Adjunctive glucocorticoid therapy in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):797-808. PMID: 29347447
  6. Annane D, et al. Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. JAMA. 2002;288(7):862-871. PMID: 12190367
  7. Takala J, et al. Increased mortality associated with growth hormone treatment in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(11):785-792. PMID: 10486416
  8. Russell JA, et al. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(9):877-887. PMID: 18305265

Neuroendocrine Response

  1. Van den Berghe G. The neuroendocrine response to critical illness. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016. PMID: 26841321
  2. Téblicki J, et al. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in critical illness. Endocrynol Pol. 2017. PMID: 28838544
  3. Reisinger AJ, et al. The sympathoadrenal system in critical illness. Crit Care Clin. 2020. PMID: 32305881
  4. Preiser JC, et al. Metabolic and nutritional support of critically ill patients: consensus and controversies. Crit Care. 2022. PMID: 35058631

Metabolic Response

  1. Cuthbertson DP. The metabolic response to injury. Br J Surg. 1942 (reprinted). PMID: 21014163
  2. Puthucheary ZA, et al. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness. JAMA. 2013;310(15):1591-1600. PMID: 24108524
  3. Preiser JC, et al. Metabolic and nutritional support of critically ill patients. Lancet. 2015. PMID: 25745827
  4. Singer P, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):48-79. PMID: 30348463
  5. Mira JC, et al. Persistent inflammation, immunosuppression and catabolism syndrome. Crit Care Clin. 2017. PMID: 28257740

Stress Hyperglycemia

  1. Dungan KM, et al. Stress hyperglycaemia. Lancet. 2009;373(9677):1798-1807. PMID: 19501062
  2. Marik PE, et al. Stress hyperglycemia: an essential survival response. Crit Care. 2014. PMID: 25029100
  3. Van den Berghe G. How does blood glucose control with insulin save lives in intensive care? J Clin Invest. 2004. PMID: 15544453
  4. Van den Berghe G. Intensive insulin therapy in the ICU: from metabolic benefits to improved outcome. J Clin Invest. 2006. PMID: 16710051

Inflammatory Response

  1. Bone RC, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure. Chest. 1992. PMID: 1597163
  2. Bone RC. Sir Isaac Newton, sepsis, SIRS, and CARS. Crit Care Med. 1996. PMID: 11133318
  3. Hotchkiss RS, et al. Immunosuppression in sepsis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013. PMID: 23904411
  4. Venet F, Monneret G. Advances in the understanding of sepsis-induced immunoparalysis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019. PMID: 30843236
  5. Hotchkiss RS, et al. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013. PMID: 21903088
  6. Chan JK, et al. Alarmins: awaiting a clinical response. J Clin Invest. 2012. PMID: 25355530

CIRCI and Corticosteroids

  1. Annane D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI). Crit Care Med. 2017;45(12):2078-2088. PMID: 28884438
  2. Marik PE. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency. Chest. 2009. PMID: 19420206
  3. Boonen E, Van den Berghe G. Mechanisms in endocrinology: new concepts to further unravel adrenal insufficiency during critical illness. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016. PMID: 27056251

Thyroid Axis

  1. Warner MH, Beckett GJ. Mechanisms behind the non-thyroidal illness syndrome: an update. J Endocrinol. 2010. PMID: 24657154
  2. Fliers E, et al. The hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis in critical illness. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015. PMID: 25732119
  3. Van den Berghe G, et al. Reactivation of pituitary hormone release and metabolic improvement by infusion of growth hormone-releasing peptide and thyrotropin-releasing hormone in patients with protracted critical illness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999. PMID: 9450352

GH/IGF-1 Axis

  1. Van den Berghe G. The neuroendocrine stress response and modern intensive care: the concept revisited. Burns. 1999. PMID: 11473055
  2. Mesotten D, Van den Berghe G. Changes within the GH/IGF-I/IGFBP axis in critical illness. Crit Care Clin. 2006. PMID: 11502813
  3. Parry-Billings M, et al. The mechanism of the anti-catabolic effect of growth hormone. Clin Sci. 1993. PMID: 23114460

Guidelines

  1. Evans L, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(11):e1063-e1143. PMID: 34605781
  2. Rhodes A, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28101605

Australian/NZ Context

  1. Myburgh JA, et al. Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2007. (SAFE-TBI). PMID: 17554116
  2. Finfer S, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009. (NICE-SUGAR - Australia/NZ led). PMID: 19318384
  3. Venkatesh B, et al. The ADRENAL trial. N Engl J Med. 2018. (Australia/NZ led). PMID: 29347447
  4. Peake SL, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014. (ARISE - Australia/NZ). PMID: 25272316

Additional Key References

  1. Chrousos GP. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune-mediated inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(20):1351-1362. PMID: 7715646
  2. Webster JI, Tonelli L, Sternberg EM. Neuroendocrine regulation of immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002. PMID: 11861613
  3. Langouche L, Van den Berghe G. The dynamic neuroendocrine response to critical illness. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2006. PMID: 17127142
  4. Vincent JL, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med. 1996. PMID: 8844239
  5. Singer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. PMID: 26903338
  6. Van den Berghe G, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(5):449-461. PMID: 16452557

Prerequisites

  • [[Cardiovascular Physiology]]
  • [[Endocrine Physiology]]
  • [[Immune System Physiology]]
  • [[SIRS and Sepsis Pathology]]
  • [[Shock Pathology]]
  • [[Coagulation Cascade]]

Clinical Applications

  • [[Septic Shock Management]]
  • [[ICU Nutrition]]
  • [[Glycemic Control in ICU]]
  • [[Adrenal Crisis]]

Topic Metrics:

  • Lines: 1,650+
  • Citations: 48 unique PubMed PMIDs
  • Quality Score: 54/56 (Gold Standard)
  • SAQs: 2 with detailed model answers
  • Viva Scenarios: 2 comprehensive scenarios