Ventilator Waveform Interpretation

Quick Answer

Ventilator waveform analysis is essential for optimizing mechanical ventilation, detecting patient-ventilator dyssynchrony, and preventing ventilator-induced lung injury. The three primary waveforms—pressure-time, flow-time, and volume-time—provide real-time insight into respiratory mechanics, airway resistance, lung compliance, and patient effort. Mastery of waveform interpretation allows clinicians to identify auto-PEEP (intrinsic PEEP), calculate compliance and resistance, detect dyssynchrony patterns (ineffective triggering, double triggering, flow starvation), and optimize PEEP and tidal volume settings in ARDS.

CICM Exam Focus

CICM Second Part Exam priorities:

• Respiratory mechanics calculations: Static compliance, airway resistance, driving pressure from waveforms
• Auto-PEEP detection: Flow-time and volume-time waveform analysis, end-expiratory hold maneuver
• Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony: Ineffective triggering, double triggering, flow starvation, reverse triggering, breath stacking
• ARDS management: Plateau pressure targets (≤30 cmH₂O), driving pressure (≤15 cmH₂O), stress index
• Loop analysis: Pressure-volume loops (upper/lower inflection points), flow-volume loops (bronchospasm, secretions)
• Troubleshooting: Identifying bronchospasm, secretions, circuit leaks, patient effort
• Lung-protective ventilation: Waveform-guided optimization of tidal volume, PEEP, and inspiratory time

Common CICM viva/SAQ scenarios:

• Calculate compliance and resistance from provided pressure-time waveforms
• Identify auto-PEEP on flow-time tracings
• Diagnose specific dyssynchrony patterns from multi-scalar displays
• Interpret pressure-volume loops to optimize PEEP in ARDS
• Troubleshoot high peak pressures (resistance vs. compliance problems)

Key Points

• Three primary waveforms display pressure, flow, and volume over time; they are interdependent and provide complementary information
• Flow-time curve is most sensitive for detecting auto-PEEP (expiratory flow fails to return to zero) and cycle dyssynchrony
• Pressure-time curve is used to calculate compliance and resistance via inspiratory hold maneuvers (plateau pressure)
• Auto-PEEP is present when expiratory flow does not reach zero before the next breath; measured via end-expiratory hold
• Static compliance (Cstat = Vt / [Pplat - Total PEEP]) normal range 50–80 mL/cmH₂O; decreased in ARDS, pneumonia, pulmonary edema
• Airway resistance (Raw = [Ppeak - Pplat] / Flow) normal below 5 cmH₂O/L/sec; increased in bronchospasm, secretions, ETT obstruction
• Driving pressure (ΔP = Pplat - PEEP) is the strongest predictor of ARDS mortality; target ≤14–15 cmH₂O [1]
• Patient-ventilator asynchrony with Asynchrony Index greater than 10% is associated with increased ICU mortality (32% vs. 15%), prolonged ventilation, and weaning failure [2,3]
• Ineffective triggering appears as pressure dips or flow blips without delivered breaths; common in COPD with high auto-PEEP
• Double triggering (two breaths with minimal expiration) causes breath stacking and increases risk of volutrauma and VILI
• Flow starvation manifests as a concave "scooped" pressure-time curve, indicating inadequate inspiratory flow relative to patient demand
• Reverse triggering occurs when ventilator breaths trigger diaphragmatic contractions, causing entrainment and breath stacking [4]
• P-SILI (patient self-inflicted lung injury) results from vigorous spontaneous efforts generating excessive transpulmonary pressures [5]
• Pressure-volume loops demonstrate compliance changes, recruitment (lower inflection point), and overdistension (upper inflection point)
• Flow-volume loops show "scooping" in bronchospasm and "sawtooth" patterns with airway secretions [6,7]
• Plateau pressure ≤30 cmH₂O is the cornerstone of lung-protective ventilation in ARDS [8]
• Stress index analysis of the pressure-time curve identifies recruitment (concave down) or overdistension (concave up) during inspiration
• Waveform monitoring is critical during prone positioning, recruitment maneuvers, and PEEP titration in ARDS

Clinical Overview

Importance of Waveform Analysis

Ventilator waveforms are the "electrocardiogram of the lungs," providing continuous, non-invasive monitoring of respiratory mechanics and patient-ventilator interaction. They allow bedside clinicians to:

• Diagnose pathophysiological processes (bronchospasm, pulmonary edema, auto-PEEP)
• Optimize ventilator settings to minimize lung injury
• Detect and correct patient-ventilator dyssynchrony
• Guide weaning and extubation readiness

Failure to recognize waveform abnormalities contributes to prolonged mechanical ventilation, increased risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), and worse patient outcomes. [9,10]

The Three Primary Waveforms (Scalars)

Modern ICU ventilators display three time-based scalar waveforms simultaneously:

1. Pressure-Time Curve: Displays airway pressure (cmH₂O) over time
2. Flow-Time Curve: Displays gas flow rate (L/min or L/sec) over time; inspiratory flow is typically positive (above baseline), expiratory flow is negative (below baseline)
3. Volume-Time Curve: Displays delivered tidal volume (mL) over time; represents the integral of the flow-time curve

These waveforms are mathematically linked:

• Volume = ∫ Flow × Time
• Pressure = (Volume / Compliance) + (Resistance × Flow) + PEEP

Loops vs. Scalars

In addition to time-based scalars, ventilators display loops that plot two variables against each other:

• Pressure-Volume (P-V) Loop: Pressure on X-axis, Volume on Y-axis
• Flow-Volume (F-V) Loop: Volume on X-axis, Flow on Y-axis

Loops provide insight into dynamic compliance, hysteresis, and airway obstruction patterns. They are particularly useful for PEEP optimization and detecting bronchospasm. [11]

Epidemiology

Prevalence of Dyssynchrony

Patient-ventilator asynchrony is extremely common in mechanically ventilated patients:

• Prevalence: 25–80% of patients experience some form of asynchrony during mechanical ventilation [12,13]
• Ineffective triggering: Most common form, occurring in 15–40% of patients, particularly those with COPD [14]
• Double triggering: Occurs in 10–15% of patients, more common in ARDS and restrictive lung disease [15]
• Reverse triggering: Increasingly recognized; prevalence 20–30% in sedated patients on controlled ventilation [4]

Impact on Outcomes

High levels of asynchrony (Asynchrony Index greater than 10%) are associated with:

• ICU mortality: 32% vs. 15% in low-asynchrony patients [2]
• Hospital mortality: 43% vs. 20% in low-asynchrony patients [2]
• Prolonged mechanical ventilation: Median duration 7 vs. 4 days [16]
• Weaning failure: Significantly increased failure rates [3]
• Tracheostomy: Higher incidence in high-asynchrony patients [17]

Clusters of asynchronies (prolonged periods of mismatch) are more predictive of mortality than sporadic events. [18]

Pathophysiology

Normal Respiratory Mechanics

The pressure required to deliver a tidal volume (Vt) must overcome two forces:

1. Elastic recoil (compliance): Pressure needed to inflate the lungs and chest wall
2. Resistive forces (resistance): Pressure needed to overcome airway and circuit resistance during gas flow

This relationship is described by the equation of motion:

Ptotal = (Vt / Compliance) + (Resistance × Flow) + PEEP

Where:

• Ptotal: Total airway pressure (Peak Inspiratory Pressure, PIP)
• Compliance: Lung and chest wall compliance (mL/cmH₂O)
• Resistance: Airway resistance (cmH₂O/L/sec)
• Flow: Inspiratory flow rate (L/sec)
• PEEP: Positive end-expiratory pressure (cmH₂O)

Static vs. Dynamic Measurements

Static compliance (Cstat) is measured during zero flow (end-inspiratory hold):

Cstat = Vt / (Pplat - Total PEEP)

• Normal range: 50–80 mL/cmH₂O
• Reflects elastic properties of lung and chest wall
• Decreased in: ARDS, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, atelectasis, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, obesity, ascites

Airway resistance (Raw) is calculated from the pressure difference during active flow:

Raw = (Ppeak - Pplat) / Flow

• Normal range: below 5 cmH₂O/L/sec (or below 10 cmH₂O/L/min)
• Reflects frictional opposition in airways and circuit
• Increased in: Bronchospasm, airway secretions, kinked ETT, small ETT diameter, circuit obstruction

[19,20]

Auto-PEEP (Intrinsic PEEP)

Auto-PEEP occurs when expiratory time is insufficient for complete lung emptying, resulting in air trapping and positive alveolar pressure at end-expiration.

Causes:

• High respiratory rate (short expiratory time)
• High tidal volumes
• Obstructive lung disease (COPD, asthma) with prolonged expiratory time constants
• High minute ventilation demands
• Inadequate inspiratory/expiratory time ratio

Consequences:

• Increased work of breathing (patient must overcome auto-PEEP to trigger ventilator)
• Ineffective triggering and dyssynchrony
• Hemodynamic compromise (reduced venous return)
• Barotrauma risk (dynamic hyperinflation)
• Inaccurate compliance/resistance calculations if not accounted for

[21,22]

Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony Mechanisms

Dyssynchrony arises from mismatch between:

1. Patient's neural respiratory drive (timing, depth, flow demand)
2. Ventilator's mechanical delivery (trigger sensitivity, flow rate, cycling criteria, inspiratory time)

Common mechanisms include:

• Trigger dyssynchrony: Mismatch in breath initiation (ineffective efforts, auto-triggering)
• Flow dyssynchrony: Inadequate flow delivery relative to patient demand (flow starvation)
• Cycle dyssynchrony: Mismatch in breath termination (premature or delayed cycling)
• Reverse triggering: Ventilator breath triggers involuntary diaphragmatic contraction (entrainment) [4]
• Breath stacking: Two breaths delivered without complete exhalation, causing volutrauma [23]

Patient Self-Inflicted Lung Injury (P-SILI)

Vigorous spontaneous breathing efforts in ARDS generate:

• Excessive negative pleural pressure (–20 to –40 cmH₂O)
• Increased transpulmonary pressure (Plung = Pairway - Ppleural)
• Pendelluft phenomenon: Air shifts from non-dependent to dependent lung zones, causing regional overdistension [24]
• Increased transmural vascular pressure: Promotes pulmonary edema

P-SILI can occur even with low tidal volumes if transpulmonary pressure swings are excessive. This is particularly relevant in spontaneously breathing ARDS patients on pressure support ventilation or non-invasive ventilation. [5,25]

Waveform Analysis: Pressure-Time Curve

Normal Pressure-Time Waveform

Volume Control Ventilation (VCV) with constant flow:

• Rapid linear rise in pressure during inspiration
• Peak at end-inspiration (Peak Inspiratory Pressure, PIP)
• If inspiratory hold is applied, pressure drops to a plateau (Plateau Pressure, Pplat)
• Rapid drop to baseline PEEP during exhalation
• Flat baseline at set PEEP level

Pressure Control Ventilation (PCV):

• Rapid rise to set inspiratory pressure (with adjustable rise time)
• Pressure maintained at plateau throughout inspiration
• Pressure drops to PEEP during exhalation

Key Pressure Measurements

Peak Inspiratory Pressure (PIP, Ppeak):

• Maximum pressure during breath delivery
• Reflects total pressure to overcome resistance AND inflate lungs
• Affected by: airway resistance, compliance, flow rate, tidal volume, PEEP

Plateau Pressure (Pplat):

• Pressure measured during end-inspiratory hold (0.5–1.0 second pause at zero flow)
• Reflects static compliance (elastic recoil of lungs and chest wall)
• Target in ARDS: ≤30 cmH₂O to prevent alveolar overdistension [8]
• Only measurable in volume-controlled modes with passive patients

Driving Pressure (ΔP):

• ΔP = Pplat - PEEP
• Represents the pressure gradient across the functional "baby lung" in ARDS
• Target: ≤14–15 cmH₂O
• Strongest independent predictor of ARDS mortality (superior to tidal volume or plateau pressure alone) [1]

Transairway Pressure (ΔPaw):

• ΔPaw = Ppeak - Pplat
• Pressure required to overcome airway resistance during flow
• Normal: below 5–10 cmH₂O
• Increased gap indicates high airway resistance (bronchospasm, secretions, ETT obstruction)

Abnormal Pressure-Time Patterns

High Peak with Normal Plateau (Increased Resistance)

Waveform appearance:

• Ppeak is elevated
• Pplat is normal or mildly elevated
• Wide gap between Ppeak and Pplat (greater than 10–15 cmH₂O)

Causes:

• Bronchospasm (asthma, COPD exacerbation)
• Airway secretions
• Kinked or obstructed endotracheal tube
• Small ETT diameter (high flow through narrow lumen)
• Biting on ETT
• Circuit obstruction (HME filter, water in tubing)

Management:

• Bronchodilators (salbutamol, ipratropium)
• Airway suctioning
• Check ETT position and patency
• Consider larger ETT if chronically high resistance

[26]

High Peak AND High Plateau (Decreased Compliance)

Waveform appearance:

• Both Ppeak and Pplat are elevated
• Normal gap between Ppeak and Pplat (below 5–10 cmH₂O)
• Parallel rise in both pressures

Causes:

• Lung pathology: ARDS, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, atelectasis, pulmonary fibrosis
• Pleural pathology: Tension pneumothorax, large pleural effusion, hemothorax
• Chest wall/abdominal: Obesity, ascites, abdominal compartment syndrome, eschar burns

Management:

• Treat underlying lung pathology (diuresis for pulmonary edema, antibiotics for pneumonia)
• Reduce tidal volume (lung-protective ventilation 6 mL/kg PBW in ARDS)
• Optimize PEEP (recruitment without overdistension)
• Drain pleural effusions/decompress pneumothorax
• Abdominal decompression if compartment syndrome

[27]

Flow Starvation (Concave Pressure Curve)

Waveform appearance:

• During inspiration, the pressure curve has a concave "scooped out" appearance
• Patient is generating additional negative pressure, "sucking" against the ventilator

Cause:

• Inspiratory flow rate is insufficient to meet patient demand
• Patient's neural inspiratory drive exceeds ventilator flow delivery

Management:

• Increase inspiratory flow rate (in volume control)
• Switch to pressure support or pressure control (flow delivery adjusts to patient demand)
• Optimize sedation if excessive respiratory drive
• Ensure trigger sensitivity is appropriate

[28]

Stress Index (P-T Curve Shape Analysis)

The stress index analyzes the curvature of the pressure-time waveform during constant-flow volume control.

Normal (Stress Index = 1): Linear rise (straight line) indicates optimal lung compliance throughout inspiration

Concave down (Stress Index below 1): Indicates recruitment occurring during breath delivery; compliance improves as the breath progresses. Suggests PEEP may be too low (alveoli recruited during breath but collapse at end-expiration).

Concave up (Stress Index greater than 1): Indicates overdistension during breath delivery; compliance worsens as pressure increases. Suggests tidal volume or PEEP is too high, causing alveolar overdistension.

Clinical application: Used to fine-tune PEEP and tidal volume in ARDS to minimize atelectrauma and volutrauma. [29,30]

Waveform Analysis: Flow-Time Curve

Normal Flow-Time Waveform

Volume Control (constant flow):

• Square waveform: Constant positive (inspiratory) flow during inspiration
• Abrupt transition to expiratory flow (negative deflection)
• Exponential decay of expiratory flow back to zero baseline

Pressure Control / Pressure Support:

• Decelerating ramp: Flow starts high and decreases exponentially during inspiration
• Breath cycles off when flow drops to a set percentage (typically 25% of peak flow)
• Expiratory flow returns to zero baseline

Key principle: Expiratory flow MUST return to zero before the next breath begins. Failure to do so indicates auto-PEEP.

Auto-PEEP Detection

Flow-time waveform sign:

• Expiratory flow does not reach zero baseline
• Flow curve is "chopped off" at the start of the next breath
• Indicates incomplete exhalation and air trapping

Volume-time waveform sign:

• Expiratory volume curve does not return to zero baseline
• "Staircase" appearance with progressive volume accumulation

Measurement:

• Perform end-expiratory hold maneuver (occludes expiratory valve at end-expiration)
• Allows trapped air to equilibrate with proximal airway
• Ventilator displays total PEEP (set PEEP + auto-PEEP)
• Auto-PEEP = Total PEEP - Set PEEP

Management:

• Reduce respiratory rate (increase expiratory time)
• Reduce tidal volume (less volume to exhale)
• Increase inspiratory flow (shortens inspiratory time, lengthens expiratory time in VCV)
• Bronchodilators (reduce expiratory time constant in obstructive disease)
• Apply external PEEP to counterbalance auto-PEEP and reduce trigger work (typically 80% of measured auto-PEEP)

[21,31]

Sawtooth Pattern (Secretions)

Waveform appearance:

• Rapid, jagged oscillations superimposed on flow waveform
• "Flutter" or "sawtooth" pattern on expiratory limb (occasionally inspiratory)
• Irregular, high-frequency fluctuations

Cause:

• Thick secretions in large airways or ETT
• Mucus causing turbulent airflow

Management:

• Endotracheal suctioning
• Pattern typically resolves immediately after effective suctioning
• Optimize humidification
• Consider mucolytics (nebulized saline, N-acetylcysteine)

Differential: Cardiogenic oscillations (lower frequency, regular, synchronous with heartbeat) vs. secretions (irregular, higher frequency)

[7,32]

Flow Scalloping (Patient Effort)

Waveform appearance:

• Irregular, "scooped" inspiratory flow pattern
• Flow waveform shows superimposed dips or undulations

Cause:

• Active inspiratory effort by patient
• Patient attempting to "pull" more flow than ventilator is delivering

Clinical significance:

• Indicates patient is awake and making respiratory efforts
• May suggest inadequate sedation, pain, anxiety, or ventilator settings mismatch
• Can progress to flow starvation if demand is not met

Waveform Analysis: Volume-Time Curve

Normal Volume-Time Waveform

• Inspiratory limb: Linear rise from zero to tidal volume
• Plateau: Brief flat segment at peak tidal volume (if inspiratory pause applied)
• Expiratory limb: Exponential decay back to zero baseline
• Baseline returns to zero before next breath

Air Leak Detection

Waveform appearance:

• Expiratory volume is less than inspiratory volume
• Volume curve does not return to zero baseline
• Progressive "drift" upward over multiple breaths

Causes:

• ETT cuff leak: Most common; check cuff pressure (target 20–30 cmH₂O)
• Bronchopleural fistula: Air escaping via chest tube
• Circuit disconnection or leak: Loose connections, cracked tubing

Measurement:

• Calculate leak fraction: (VT inspiratory - VT expiratory) / VT inspiratory × 100%
• Leak greater than 20–30% typically requires intervention

Management:

• Inflate ETT cuff (check cuff pressure)
• Replace ETT if cuff is damaged
• Adjust ventilator settings for bronchopleural fistula (low tidal volume, permissive hypercapnia)

[33]

Air Trapping (Auto-PEEP)

Waveform appearance:

• Expiratory volume curve fails to return to zero baseline
• Next breath starts before full exhalation complete
• "Stacking" or "staircase" pattern

Cause: Same as auto-PEEP on flow-time curve (obstructive disease, short expiratory time)

Management: Increase expiratory time, reduce minute ventilation, bronchodilators

Waveform Analysis: Pressure-Volume Loops

Normal P-V Loop

Inspiratory limb (lower curve):

• Starts at PEEP, rises with increasing pressure as volume is delivered
• Slope represents dynamic compliance

Expiratory limb (upper curve):

• Returns from peak volume to baseline at lower pressures than inspiration
• Demonstrates hysteresis (expiration occurs at lower pressures than inspiration)

Hysteresis area: Space between inspiratory and expiratory limbs

• Represents energy dissipated as heat during breathing
• Wider hysteresis suggests more recruitable lung tissue

Lower Inflection Point (LIP)

• Point on inspiratory limb where compliance suddenly increases (curve steepens)
• Represents the opening pressure where collapsed alveoli begin to recruit
• Historically used to set optimal PEEP (PEEP set just above LIP to prevent repetitive alveolar collapse/reopening)
• However, clinical trials (ALVEOLI, LOV) did not show mortality benefit from LIP-guided PEEP [34]

Upper Inflection Point (UIP)

• Point on inspiratory limb where compliance suddenly decreases (curve flattens, "beaking")
• Represents overdistension: Alveoli are maximally inflated and further pressure causes minimal volume gain
• Indicates that tidal volume or PEEP is excessive
• Risk of volutrauma and VILI

Clinical Application

Increased compliance (loop shifts toward volume axis, becomes steeper):

• Emphysema (loss of elastic recoil)
• Improvement after diuresis (resolving pulmonary edema)

Decreased compliance (loop shifts toward pressure axis, becomes flatter):

• ARDS, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, atelectasis
• Pneumothorax, pleural effusion
• Obesity, ascites

PEEP optimization:

• Increase PEEP until hysteresis minimizes and LIP is "opened"
• Avoid exceeding UIP to prevent overdistension
• Modern approaches favor driving pressure minimization or PEEP/FiO₂ tables over LIP-guided strategies [1,35]

[36]

Waveform Analysis: Flow-Volume Loops

Normal F-V Loop

Inspiratory limb (below baseline):

• Flow starts at zero, rises rapidly to peak inspiratory flow
• Returns to zero at end-inspiration

Expiratory limb (above baseline):

• Flow starts at zero, rapidly reaches peak expiratory flow
• Exponential decay back to zero

Shape is roughly oval or elliptical.

Obstructive Pattern (Bronchospasm)

Waveform appearance:

• Expiratory limb shows a "scooped out" or concave appearance
• Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) is markedly reduced
• Expiratory flow decays very slowly (prolonged exhalation)

Causes:

• Asthma exacerbation
• COPD exacerbation
• Bronchiolitis

Management:

• Bronchodilators (salbutamol, ipratropium)
• Corticosteroids
• Optimize expiratory time

[6,37]

Secretions ("Sawtooth" Pattern)

Waveform appearance:

• Rapid, irregular oscillations on both inspiratory and expiratory limbs
• "Serrated" or "jagged" appearance

Cause: Airway secretions causing turbulent flow

Management: Endotracheal suctioning (pattern resolves immediately after effective suctioning)

Fixed Upper Airway Obstruction

Waveform appearance:

• Flattening of both inspiratory and expiratory limbs ("box-like" appearance)

Causes (uncommon in intubated patients):

• ETT obstruction (kinking, mucus plug)
• Tracheal stenosis (if post-extubation or tracheostomy)

Patient-Ventilator Dyssynchrony Patterns

Ineffective Triggering

Definition: Patient makes an inspiratory effort, but the ventilator fails to deliver a breath.

Waveform signs:

• Pressure-time curve: Small negative deflection (dip) during expiration or baseline
• Flow-time curve: Brief positive deflection (blip) during expiratory phase
• No corresponding tidal volume delivered

Causes:

• High auto-PEEP (patient must generate pressure greater than auto-PEEP to trigger)
• Insensitive trigger settings
• Weak inspiratory effort (neuromuscular weakness, oversedation)
• Leaks in circuit (prevents pressure drop from reaching trigger threshold)

Consequences:

• Increased work of breathing
• Patient fatigue
• Prolonged weaning
• Patient discomfort and agitation

Management:

• Reduce auto-PEEP (see auto-PEEP management)
• Apply external PEEP to counterbalance auto-PEEP (typically 80% of measured auto-PEEP)
• Increase trigger sensitivity (pressure trigger –1 to –2 cmH₂O, flow trigger 1–3 L/min)
• Reduce sedation if oversedated
• Switch to pressure support mode (more responsive to patient effort)

[14,38]

Double Triggering

Definition: Two ventilator breaths are delivered in rapid succession with little to no expiratory time between them.

Waveform signs:

• Flow-time curve: Two consecutive inspiratory flow spikes without complete expiratory flow between them
• Volume-time curve: Stacking of two tidal volumes
• Pressure-time curve: Two pressure peaks in quick succession

Causes:

• Patient's neural inspiratory time (Ti neural) exceeds the ventilator's set inspiratory time (Ti vent)
• Common in volume control with short Ti settings
• High respiratory drive (pain, anxiety, metabolic acidosis, hypoxemia)

Consequences:

• Breath stacking: Delivered tidal volume can be 1.5–2 times the set Vt
• Volutrauma risk: Alveolar overdistension despite "lung-protective" settings
• Increased plateau pressure
• Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony and discomfort

Management:

• Increase ventilator Ti (allow longer inspiratory time)
• Increase inspiratory flow rate (delivers Vt faster, allowing more time for expiration)
• Switch to pressure control or pressure support (Ti adjusts to patient demand)
• Reduce respiratory drive (treat pain, fever, metabolic acidosis; optimize sedation)
• Consider neuromuscular blockade in severe ARDS with refractory double triggering [39]

[15,23]

Flow Dyssynchrony (Flow Starvation)

Definition: The ventilator's inspiratory flow rate is insufficient to meet the patient's flow demand.

Waveform signs:

• Pressure-time curve: Concave "scooped out" appearance during inspiration (patient generates additional negative pressure)
• Flow-time curve: Irregular inspiratory flow with superimposed patient effort

Causes:

• Inspiratory flow rate set too low in volume control (typical setting 40–60 L/min; patient may demand 80–100 L/min)
• High respiratory drive
• Inadequate pressure support level

Consequences:

• Increased work of breathing
• Patient discomfort ("air hunger")
• Agitation and ventilator "fighting"

Management:

• Increase inspiratory flow rate (volume control)
• Increase pressure support level
• Switch to pressure control or pressure support (flow delivery is demand-responsive)

[28]

Premature Cycling

Definition: The ventilator terminates the breath before the patient has finished inhaling.

Waveform signs:

• Pressure support: Abrupt rise in airway pressure at the end of inspiration (patient actively inhaling as ventilator cycles to expiration)
• Flow-time curve: Flow has not decayed to cycling threshold when breath ends

Causes:

• Expiratory trigger (cycling criteria) set too high (e.g., 40–50% of peak flow instead of 25%)
• Common in obstructive lung disease (slow flow decay means breath cycles off early)

Consequences:

• Patient attempts to continue inhaling against closed expiratory valve
• Increased work of breathing
• Double triggering (patient triggers a second breath immediately)

Management:

• Decrease expiratory trigger threshold (cycle at lower percentage of peak flow, e.g., 10–25%)
• Increase inspiratory time (pressure control)

Delayed Cycling

Definition: The ventilator continues to deliver flow after the patient has started to exhale.

Waveform signs:

• Pressure support: Abrupt spike in pressure at end of inspiration (patient actively exhaling against continued inspiratory flow)
• Flow-time curve: Expiratory flow begins before ventilator has cycled off

Causes:

• Expiratory trigger set too low (e.g., 5% of peak flow)
• Excessive inspiratory time in pressure control

Consequences:

• Active exhalation against ventilator
• Increased expiratory muscle work
• Air trapping (exhalation impeded)

Management:

• Increase expiratory trigger threshold (cycle at higher percentage of peak flow, e.g., 40–50%)
• Decrease inspiratory time (pressure control)

Reverse Triggering

Definition: A ventilator-delivered breath (in volume or pressure control) triggers an involuntary diaphragmatic contraction by the patient. This creates a form of neuromechanical coupling where the patient's respiratory centers "follow" the ventilator.

Waveform signs:

• Pressure-time curve: Notch or dip immediately after the ventilator breath begins (diaphragm contracts)
• Flow-time curve: Biphasic inspiratory flow (initial ventilator flow, then additional flow from diaphragmatic contraction)
• Entrainment: Regular 1:1, 1:2, or 1:3 ratio between ventilator breaths and patient efforts

Causes:

• Moderate sedation levels (especially opioids)
• Controlled ventilation modes in partially sedated patients
• Neuroplasticity of respiratory centers ("phase-locking" to mechanical breaths)

Consequences:

• Breath stacking: If patient effort occurs during inspiration, tidal volume increases significantly
• Volutrauma risk: Delivered Vt can exceed 12–15 mL/kg despite "lung-protective" settings
• P-SILI: High transpulmonary pressure from diaphragmatic effort [40]

Management:

• Adjust sedation (paradoxically, either increase or decrease sedation to break entrainment)
• Increase respiratory rate (reduce time for patient efforts between breaths)
• Switch to assist-control or pressure support (give patient more control)
• Neuromuscular blockade if severe and refractory (particularly in early ARDS)

[4,41]

Asynchrony Index (AI)

The Asynchrony Index quantifies the overall burden of dyssynchrony:

AI (%) = (Number of asynchronous breaths / Total respiratory rate) × 100

Classification:

• Low asynchrony: AI below 10%
• High asynchrony: AI ≥10% (associated with worse outcomes)

Clinical significance: AI greater than 10% is independently associated with:

• Increased ICU and hospital mortality [2]
• Prolonged mechanical ventilation [16]
• Weaning failure [3]
• Higher tracheostomy rates [17]

Measurement: Continuous waveform monitoring and analysis (automated or manual breath-by-breath review)

[2,12]

Respiratory Mechanics Calculations

Static Compliance (Cstat)

Formula:

Cstat = Vt / (Pplat - Total PEEP)

Normal range: 50–80 mL/cmH₂O

Requirements:

• Volume control mode with constant flow
• End-inspiratory hold maneuver (0.5–1.0 second)
• Passive patient (no active breathing efforts)

Decreased compliance (below 50 mL/cmH₂O):

• ARDS
• Pneumonia
• Pulmonary edema
• Atelectasis
• Pleural effusion, pneumothorax
• Obesity, ascites, abdominal compartment syndrome

Increased compliance (greater than 80 mL/cmH₂O):

• Emphysema (loss of elastic recoil)

Clinical application:

• Monitor response to recruitment maneuvers, PEEP titration, diuresis
• Calculate driving pressure

[19,42]

Airway Resistance (Raw)

Formula:

Raw = (Ppeak - Pplat) / Flow

Units: cmH₂O/L/sec (convert flow from L/min to L/sec by dividing by 60)

Normal range: below 5 cmH₂O/L/sec (or below 10 cmH₂O/L/min)

Requirements:

• Volume control mode with constant flow
• End-inspiratory hold maneuver to measure Pplat
• Know the set inspiratory flow rate

Example calculation:

• Ppeak = 30 cmH₂O
• Pplat = 20 cmH₂O
• Inspiratory flow = 60 L/min = 1 L/sec
• Raw = (30 - 20) / 1 = 10 cmH₂O/L/sec (elevated)

Increased resistance:

• Bronchospasm (asthma, COPD exacerbation)
• Airway secretions
• Kinked or obstructed ETT
• Small ETT diameter
• Circuit obstruction

Clinical application:

• Differentiate obstructive (high Raw) from restrictive (low Cstat) pathology
• Monitor response to bronchodilators, suctioning

[20,26]

Driving Pressure (ΔP)

Formula:

ΔP = Pplat - PEEP

Alternative formula:

ΔP = Vt / Cstat

Target in ARDS: ≤14–15 cmH₂O

Clinical significance:

• Represents the pressure gradient across the functional "baby lung" (aerated lung tissue)
• Strongest independent predictor of ARDS mortality [1]
• Superior to tidal volume or plateau pressure alone as a predictor of outcome
• Meta-analysis: Each 1 cmH₂O increase in ΔP associated with 3–6% increase in mortality

Clinical application:

• Optimize ventilator settings to minimize ΔP in ARDS:
  • Reduce tidal volume (4–6 mL/kg PBW)
  • Optimize PEEP (balance recruitment vs. overdistension)
  • Consider prone positioning (improves compliance, reduces ΔP)
  • Monitor during PEEP titration (best PEEP = lowest ΔP with acceptable oxygenation)

[1,43]

Auto-PEEP Measurement

Method: End-expiratory hold maneuver

Procedure:

1. Ensure patient is passive (no active breathing)
2. At end-expiration, activate expiratory hold button (occludes expiratory valve)
3. Trapped air equilibrates with proximal airway pressure
4. Ventilator displays Total PEEP (set PEEP + auto-PEEP)
5. Auto-PEEP = Total PEEP - Set PEEP

Normal: Auto-PEEP should be zero (or below 2 cmH₂O)

Elevated auto-PEEP: greater than 5 cmH₂O indicates significant air trapping

Limitations:

• Requires passive patient (patient effort invalidates measurement)
• May underestimate auto-PEEP if there is significant regional heterogeneity (some alveoli may not equilibrate during brief hold)

[21,31]

ARDS and Lung-Protective Ventilation

ARDSNet Protocol Targets

The ARDSNet low tidal volume ventilation trial (ARMA trial, 2000) established the cornerstone of lung-protective ventilation:

Tidal volume: 6 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW)

• PBW (males) = 50 + 0.91 × (height in cm - 152.4)
• PBW (females) = 45.5 + 0.91 × (height in cm - 152.4)

Plateau pressure: ≤30 cmH₂O (primary safety limit)

pH target: 7.30–7.45 (permissive hypercapnia allowed if pH ≥7.30)

Oxygenation target: SpO₂ 88–95% or PaO₂ 55–80 mmHg

PEEP/FiO₂ titration: Use standardized tables to balance recruitment and oxygen toxicity

Outcomes: 22% relative reduction in mortality (39.8% vs. 31.0%, p=0.007) compared to traditional 12 mL/kg ventilation [8]

Driving Pressure as Outcome Predictor

Amato et al. (2015) performed a meta-analysis of 3,562 ARDS patients from 9 RCTs and demonstrated:

• Driving pressure (ΔP) is the ventilator variable most strongly associated with survival
• ΔP had the highest attributable risk for mortality (hazard ratio 1.41 per 7 cmH₂O increase)
• This association held even after controlling for tidal volume and PEEP
• ΔP captures the functional size of the "baby lung" (effective lung compliance)

Clinical implication: Target ΔP ≤14–15 cmH₂O by:

• Reducing tidal volume (to 4 mL/kg if needed)
• Optimizing PEEP (increase PEEP if it improves compliance and reduces ΔP)
• Prone positioning (improves compliance)

[1]

PEEP Titration Strategies

High PEEP vs. Low PEEP trials (ALVEOLI, LOVS, EXPRESS):

• No mortality benefit from high PEEP strategies based on LIP or oxygenation targets
• However, subgroup analysis suggested benefit in moderate-severe ARDS

Modern approaches:

1. ARDSNet PEEP/FiO₂ tables: Standardized combinations to balance oxygenation and PEEP
2. Driving pressure minimization: Titrate PEEP to achieve lowest ΔP while maintaining adequate oxygenation
3. Esophageal pressure-guided PEEP: Target positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (0–10 cmH₂O) to prevent atelectasis without overdistension [44]
4. Recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I): Assess recruitability via pressure-volume curves [45]

Waveform guidance:

• P-V loop: Minimize hysteresis, avoid UIP (beaking)
• Stress index: Avoid concave-up pattern (overdistension)
• Monitor ΔP: Best PEEP = lowest ΔP with acceptable PaO₂/SpO₂

[34,35]

Advanced Waveform Concepts

Transpulmonary Pressure (PL)

Definition: The pressure across the lung parenchyma (alveolar pressure minus pleural pressure)

Formula: PL = Pairway - Ppleural

Measurement: Requires esophageal balloon catheter to estimate pleural pressure (Ppleural ≈ Pesophageal)

Clinical application:

• More accurate assessment of lung stress than airway pressure alone (accounts for chest wall compliance)
• Target end-inspiratory PL: 20–25 cmH₂O (to prevent overdistension)
• Target end-expiratory PL: 0–10 cmH₂O (to prevent atelectasis)

EPVent-2 trial (2019): Esophageal pressure-guided PEEP showed no mortality benefit vs. empirical high PEEP in moderate-severe ARDS, but reduced driving pressure and improved oxygenation in patients with high chest wall elastance (obesity, ascites). [44]

P0.1 (Airway Occlusion Pressure)

Definition: The negative airway pressure generated in the first 100 milliseconds of an occluded inspiratory effort.

Measurement: Ventilator occludes inspiratory valve at end-expiration; patient attempts to inhale against closed valve.

Normal range: –1 to –3 cmH₂O

Interpretation:

• P0.1 > –3.5 cmH₂O: Indicates high respiratory drive (may suggest inadequate ventilator support or excessive work of breathing)
• P0.1 < –1 cmH₂O: Low drive (may indicate readiness for weaning or oversedation)

Clinical application:

• Predict weaning success (low P0.1 suggests low work of breathing)
• Detect excessive respiratory drive (risk of P-SILI)

[46]

Pendelluft Phenomenon

Definition: Redistribution of gas from non-dependent (ventral) to dependent (dorsal) lung regions during spontaneous inspiratory effort, occurring before the ventilator delivers a breath.

Mechanism: Diaphragmatic contraction preferentially expands dependent lung zones, creating a pressure gradient that draws air from non-dependent regions (which are less compliant and have higher alveolar pressure).

Waveform signs:

• Paradoxical volume shift on regional impedance tomography (EIT)
• Not easily visible on standard ventilator waveforms (requires advanced monitoring)

Clinical significance:

• Causes regional overdistension in dependent lung despite "safe" tidal volumes
• Contributes to P-SILI in spontaneously breathing ARDS patients
• Rationale for neuromuscular blockade in early severe ARDS

[24,47]

Troubleshooting with Waveforms

High Peak Inspiratory Pressure Alarm

Step 1: Assess Ppeak and Pplat relationship

Wide gap (Ppeak - Pplat greater than 10 cmH₂O) → Increased airway resistance:

• Check ETT patency (suction, check for kinking/biting)
• Auscultate for bronchospasm (wheezing)
• Administer bronchodilators
• Inspect circuit for water/obstruction

Normal gap (Ppeak - Pplat below 10 cmH₂O) → Decreased lung compliance:

• Auscultate chest (consolidation, absent breath sounds)
• CXR (pneumothorax, consolidation, effusion, pulmonary edema)
• Assess abdomen (compartment syndrome, ascites)
• Reduce tidal volume (lung-protective ventilation)

Step 2: Look at flow-time curve:

• Sawtooth pattern → Secretions (suction)
• Flow not returning to zero → Auto-PEEP (increase expiratory time)

Step 3: Check patient:

• Agitation/fighting ventilator → Optimize sedation/analgesia
• Concave pressure curve (flow starvation) → Increase flow rate or switch to PSV

Sudden Drop in Tidal Volume or Minute Ventilation

Step 1: Assess volume-time curve:

• Volume not returning to zero → Air leak (check ETT cuff pressure, circuit connections)
• Normal curve → Reduced patient effort or ventilator malfunction

Step 2: Assess pressure-time curve:

• Low Ppeak → Leak or disconnection
• Normal Ppeak → Reduced compliance (patient not triggering breaths in assist modes)

Step 3: Check patient:

• Oversedation → Reduce sedation
• Neuromuscular blockade → Check TOF (train-of-four)
• Worsening respiratory mechanics → CXR, assess clinical status

Auto-PEEP Detection and Management

Step 1: Identify on flow-time curve:

• Expiratory flow does not return to zero before next breath

Step 2: Quantify with end-expiratory hold:

• Measure total PEEP
• Calculate auto-PEEP = Total PEEP - Set PEEP

Step 3: Reduce auto-PEEP:

• Reduce respiratory rate (increase expiratory time)
• Reduce tidal volume (less to exhale)
• Increase inspiratory flow (shortens Ti in VCV, lengthens Te)
• Bronchodilators (reduce expiratory time constant)
• Suction secretions

Step 4: Counterbalance with external PEEP (if auto-PEEP persists):

• Apply external PEEP at ~80% of measured auto-PEEP
• Reduces work of triggering without worsening hyperinflation

Dyssynchrony Troubleshooting

Ineffective triggering (pressure dips without breaths):

• Reduce auto-PEEP (see above)
• Apply external PEEP
• Increase trigger sensitivity
• Switch to PSV (more responsive)

Double triggering (breath stacking):

• Increase Ti (allow longer inspiration)
• Increase inspiratory flow (deliver Vt faster)
• Switch to PSV or PCV
• Reduce respiratory drive (treat pain, fever, acidosis)

Flow starvation (concave pressure curve):

• Increase flow rate (VCV)
• Increase pressure support level (PSV)
• Switch to PCV/PSV

Premature cycling (PSV ends too early):

• Decrease expiratory trigger (cycle at lower % of peak flow)

Delayed cycling (PSV ends too late):

• Increase expiratory trigger (cycle at higher % of peak flow)

Reverse triggering (entrainment, breath stacking):

• Adjust sedation (increase or decrease to break entrainment)
• Increase RR
• Switch to assist-control or PSV
• Consider neuromuscular blockade in severe ARDS

CICM Exam Practice

SAQ 1: Respiratory Mechanics Calculation

Question: A 70 kg male patient (height 170 cm) is ventilated in volume control mode with the following settings and measurements:

• Mode: VCV, AC
• Tidal volume: 420 mL
• Respiratory rate: 20/min (total rate 20, no additional breaths)
• PEEP: 10 cmH₂O
• Inspiratory flow: 60 L/min
• FiO₂: 0.6

Measured pressures:

• Peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak): 35 cmH₂O
• Plateau pressure (Pplat): 28 cmH₂O (end-inspiratory hold)
• Total PEEP (end-expiratory hold): 12 cmH₂O

(a) Calculate the static compliance (Cstat). (2 marks)

(b) Calculate the airway resistance (Raw). (2 marks)

(c) Calculate the driving pressure (ΔP). (1 mark)

(d) Calculate the auto-PEEP. (1 mark)

(e) Comment on the predicted body weight tidal volume and appropriateness of current ventilator settings for ARDS. (4 marks)

---

Model Answer:

(a) Static compliance (Cstat) (2 marks):

Cstat = Vt / (Pplat - Total PEEP)

Cstat = 420 mL / (28 - 12) cmH₂O = 420 / 16 = 26.25 mL/cmH₂O

(1 mark for formula, 1 mark for correct answer)

Interpretation: Severely reduced compliance (normal 50–80 mL/cmH₂O), consistent with ARDS.

(b) Airway resistance (Raw) (2 marks):

Raw = (Ppeak - Pplat) / Flow

Flow = 60 L/min = 1 L/sec

Raw = (35 - 28) / 1 = 7 cmH₂O/L/sec

(1 mark for formula, 1 mark for correct answer)

Interpretation: Mildly elevated resistance (normal below 5 cmH₂O/L/sec), may suggest bronchospasm, secretions, or ETT resistance.

(c) Driving pressure (ΔP) (1 mark):

ΔP = Pplat - PEEP

ΔP = 28 - 10 = 18 cmH₂O

(1 mark for correct answer)

Interpretation: Elevated (target ≤14–15 cmH₂O); associated with increased ARDS mortality.

(d) Auto-PEEP (1 mark):

Auto-PEEP = Total PEEP - Set PEEP

Auto-PEEP = 12 - 10 = 2 cmH₂O

(1 mark for correct answer)

Interpretation: Minimal auto-PEEP (acceptable).

(e) Tidal volume and ARDS appropriateness (4 marks):

Predicted body weight (PBW):

• PBW (male) = 50 + 0.91 × (170 - 152.4) = 50 + 16.0 = 66 kg

Current Vt/kg PBW:

• 420 mL / 66 kg = 6.4 mL/kg PBW

Assessment (4 marks total):

• Tidal volume is acceptable (ARDSNet target 6 mL/kg PBW) (1 mark)
• However, plateau pressure 28 cmH₂O is acceptable (target ≤30 cmH₂O) (1 mark)
• Driving pressure 18 cmH₂O is TOO HIGH (target ≤15 cmH₂O); associated with increased mortality (1 mark)
• Recommendations: Reduce tidal volume to 4–5 mL/kg (264–330 mL) to reduce ΔP; reassess PEEP to optimize compliance; consider prone positioning to improve compliance and reduce ΔP (1 mark)

---

SAQ 2: Auto-PEEP and Dyssynchrony

Question: A 65-year-old female with COPD exacerbation is intubated and ventilated. The flow-time waveform is shown below (describe: expiratory flow does not return to zero baseline before next breath begins; inspiratory flow shows irregular scalloping).

(a) What abnormality is evident on the flow-time waveform? (2 marks)

(b) What are the consequences of this abnormality? (3 marks)

(c) How would you quantify this abnormality at the bedside? (2 marks)

(d) Outline your management strategy to address this problem. (3 marks)

---

Model Answer:

(a) Abnormality on flow-time waveform (2 marks):

• Auto-PEEP (intrinsic PEEP): Expiratory flow does not return to zero before the next breath, indicating incomplete exhalation and air trapping (1 mark)
• Ineffective triggering efforts: Irregular scalloping/blips on expiratory flow suggest patient is making inspiratory efforts that are not triggering ventilator breaths (1 mark)

(b) Consequences (3 marks):

1. Increased work of breathing: Patient must generate negative pressure greater than auto-PEEP to overcome threshold and trigger breath (1 mark)
2. Hemodynamic compromise: Increased intrathoracic pressure reduces venous return and cardiac output; risk of hypotension (1 mark)
3. Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony: Ineffective triggering, patient discomfort, agitation, increased sedation requirements; risk of barotrauma from dynamic hyperinflation (1 mark)

(c) Quantification (2 marks):

• Perform end-expiratory hold maneuver: At end-expiration, activate expiratory pause/hold button on ventilator (1 mark)
• Ventilator displays total PEEP; calculate auto-PEEP = Total PEEP - Set PEEP (1 mark)
• (Requires passive patient; active breathing efforts invalidate measurement)

(d) Management strategy (3 marks):

Reduce auto-PEEP (2 marks):

• Reduce respiratory rate to increase expiratory time (0.5 mark)
• Reduce tidal volume to decrease volume requiring exhalation (0.5 mark)
• Increase inspiratory flow rate (in VCV) to shorten inspiratory time and lengthen expiratory time (0.5 mark)
• Bronchodilators (salbutamol, ipratropium) to reduce airway resistance and expiratory time constant in COPD (0.5 mark)

Counterbalance auto-PEEP (1 mark):

• Apply external PEEP at ~80% of measured auto-PEEP to reduce work of triggering without significantly worsening hyperinflation (1 mark)

---

Viva 1: Pressure-Time Waveform Interpretation

Examiner: "I'm showing you a pressure-time waveform from a ventilated patient. The peak pressure is 40 cmH₂O, and the plateau pressure after an inspiratory hold is 22 cmH₂O. PEEP is set at 8 cmH₂O. What does this tell you?"

Expected answer:

"This waveform shows a wide gap between peak and plateau pressure:

• Ppeak - Pplat = 40 - 22 = 18 cmH₂O (normal below 5–10 cmH₂O)
• This indicates increased airway resistance

The plateau pressure of 22 cmH₂O suggests normal lung compliance (not excessively high).

Differential diagnosis for increased resistance:

1. Bronchospasm (asthma, COPD exacerbation, anaphylaxis)
2. Airway secretions or mucus plugging
3. Endotracheal tube problems: kinking, biting, obstruction, or small diameter
4. Circuit obstruction: water in tubing, HME filter obstruction

Next steps:

• Examine the flow-time waveform: Look for "sawtooth" pattern (secretions), prolonged expiratory decay (bronchospasm), or auto-PEEP
• Clinical assessment: Auscultate for wheezing, check ETT position and patency
• Immediate management:
  • Suction ETT to clear secretions
  • Administer bronchodilators (salbutamol nebulizer or MDI)
  • Check and correct ETT position if kinked or malpositioned
  • Consider ETT size if chronically high resistance (may need larger tube)
• Monitor response: Repeat plateau pressure measurement after interventions"

Examiner: "The flow-time curve shows a sawtooth pattern. What does this suggest and what would you do?"

Expected answer:

"A sawtooth pattern on the flow-time waveform suggests thick airway secretions causing turbulent flow. The irregular, high-frequency oscillations are characteristic.

Immediate action: Endotracheal suctioning

• This pattern typically resolves immediately after effective suctioning
• Use sterile technique, pre-oxygenate if needed

Ongoing management:

• Optimize humidification to prevent secretion accumulation
• Adequate hydration
• Consider mucolytics (nebulized saline, N-acetylcysteine)
• Chest physiotherapy if appropriate
• Treat underlying cause (pneumonia, bronchitis)"

---

Viva 2: ARDS Ventilation Strategy

Examiner: "You're managing a 75 kg male (height 175 cm) with severe ARDS. Current settings: VCV, Vt 450 mL, RR 24, PEEP 14 cmH₂O, FiO₂ 0.7. Ppeak is 38 cmH₂O, Pplat is 32 cmH₂O. What concerns do you have?"

Expected answer:

"I have significant concerns about this patient's ventilator settings:

1. Plateau pressure is TOO HIGH:

• Pplat = 32 cmH₂O exceeds the ARDSNet target of ≤30 cmH₂O
• This indicates excessive alveolar distension and increased risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI)

2. Tidal volume may be excessive:

• First, calculate predicted body weight (PBW):
  • PBW (male) = 50 + 0.91 × (175 - 152.4) = 50 + 20.5 = 70.5 kg
• Current Vt/PBW = 450 / 70.5 = 6.4 mL/kg
• This is at the upper limit of lung-protective ventilation (target 4–6 mL/kg)

3. Driving pressure is VERY HIGH:

• ΔP = Pplat - PEEP = 32 - 14 = 18 cmH₂O
• This exceeds the target of ≤14–15 cmH₂O
• Driving pressure is the strongest predictor of ARDS mortality; each 1 cmH₂O increase is associated with 3–6% increased mortality

4. Airway resistance:

• Ppeak - Pplat = 38 - 32 = 6 cmH₂O (acceptable; no significant resistance problem)

Immediate management:

• Reduce tidal volume to 4–5 mL/kg (280–350 mL) to lower Pplat and ΔP
• Reassess PEEP: Perform PEEP titration to optimize recruitment without overdistension (may increase or decrease PEEP depending on compliance response)
• Accept permissive hypercapnia if pH ≥7.20
• Monitor driving pressure: Titrate Vt and PEEP to minimize ΔP
• Consider adjunct therapies: Prone positioning (improves compliance, reduces ΔP), neuromuscular blockade if severe dyssynchrony or refractory hypoxemia
• Waveform monitoring: Assess pressure-volume loops for upper inflection point (overdistension); check stress index for concave-up pattern"

Examiner: "After reducing tidal volume to 300 mL, the Pplat drops to 29 cmH₂O and driving pressure is 15 cmH₂O. The patient is now dyssynchronous with frequent double triggering. What do you see on the waveforms and how do you manage this?"

Expected answer:

"Double triggering appears on waveforms as:

• Flow-time curve: Two consecutive inspiratory flow spikes without complete expiratory flow between them
• Pressure-time curve: Two pressure peaks in rapid succession
• Volume-time curve: Breath stacking with delivered volume approximately 600 mL (2 × 300 mL)

This is concerning because:

• Despite reducing set Vt to 300 mL, the patient is receiving 600 mL per stacked breath (8.5 mL/kg)
• This causes volutrauma and potentially high transpulmonary pressures
• Negates our lung-protective strategy

Causes:

• Patient's neural inspiratory time exceeds ventilator inspiratory time
• High respiratory drive (pain, anxiety, hypoxemia, metabolic acidosis)

Management:

1. Increase ventilator inspiratory time (Ti):

   • Allow longer inspiration to match patient's neural Ti
   • Or increase inspiratory flow (delivers Vt faster, more time for patient effort)

2. Switch to pressure control or pressure support:

   • Ti adjusts dynamically to patient demand
   • Reduces likelihood of double triggering

3. Address underlying causes of high respiratory drive:

   • Optimize analgesia and sedation (treat pain, anxiety)
   • Treat fever, metabolic acidosis
   • Improve oxygenation (PEEP optimization, recruitment, prone positioning)

4. If refractory:

   • Consider neuromuscular blockade (48 hours) in severe ARDS with persistent double triggering despite optimization
   • ACURASYS trial showed mortality benefit in early severe ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ below 150) with NMB for 48 hours
   • Monitor with train-of-four (TOF)

5. Monitor waveforms continuously:

   • Ensure interventions reduce or eliminate double triggering
   • Calculate Asynchrony Index (target below 10%)"

---

OSCE Station 1: Waveform Troubleshooting

Scenario: You are the ICU registrar. A nurse calls you to review a ventilated patient with high-pressure alarms. The ventilator screen shows pressure, flow, and volume waveforms (provide printed waveforms showing high Ppeak 45 cmH₂O, normal Pplat 24 cmH₂O, sawtooth pattern on flow curve).

Task: Interpret the waveforms and manage the situation.

Examiner Guidance / Marking Criteria:

Expected candidate actions:

1. Reviews waveforms systematically
2. Identifies high Ppeak with wide Ppeak-Pplat gap (increased resistance)
3. Recognizes sawtooth pattern (secretions)
4. Performs immediate suctioning
5. Reassesses waveforms and pressures
6. Administers bronchodilators if wheeze present
7. Documents and communicates plan

---

OSCE Station 2: Auto-PEEP Management

Scenario: A 60-year-old with COPD exacerbation is intubated and ventilated. Settings: VCV, Vt 500 mL, RR 22, PEEP 5 cmH₂O, FiO₂ 0.4. The patient is agitated and "fighting the ventilator." Waveforms show expiratory flow not returning to zero, with pressure dips that do not trigger breaths (ineffective triggering).

Task: Identify the problem and optimize ventilator settings.

Examiner Guidance / Marking Criteria:

---

OSCE Station 3: ARDS PEEP Titration Using Waveforms

Scenario: A 68-year-old with severe COVID-19 ARDS (PBW 70 kg) is on VCV with Vt 420 mL (6 mL/kg), RR 26, PEEP 10 cmH₂O, FiO₂ 0.8. Current Pplat 31 cmH₂O, ΔP 21 cmH₂O. ABG: pH 7.32, PaCO₂ 52, PaO₂ 62, HCO₃ 26. You are asked to optimize ventilator settings using waveform guidance.

Task: Optimize ventilator settings to minimize lung injury while maintaining acceptable gas exchange.

Examiner Guidance / Marking Criteria:

Patient Self-Inflicted Lung Injury (P-SILI)

Mechanism and Pathophysiology

Vigorous spontaneous breathing efforts in ARDS can paradoxically worsen lung injury through several mechanisms:

1. Excessive transpulmonary pressure:

• Transpulmonary pressure (PL) = Pairway - Ppleural
• Vigorous diaphragmatic contraction generates highly negative pleural pressure (–20 to –40 cmH₂O)
• Even with low airway pressures, PL can exceed safe limits (greater than 25 cmH₂O), causing overdistension

2. Pendelluft phenomenon:

• Air shifts from non-dependent (ventral) to dependent (dorsal) lung regions during spontaneous effort
• Occurs before ventilator delivers breath (intra-tidal gas redistribution)
• Causes regional overdistension in dependent zones despite "protective" tidal volumes [24]

3. Increased transmural vascular pressure:

• Negative pleural pressure increases pressure gradient across pulmonary capillaries
• Promotes fluid extravasation and worsens pulmonary edema [5]

4. Increased oxygen consumption and CO₂ production:

• Work of breathing by respiratory muscles increases metabolic demand
• Worsens ventilation-perfusion mismatch

Clinical Recognition

High-risk scenarios:

• ARDS patients on pressure support or spontaneous modes with high respiratory drive
• Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in severe ARDS
• Early ARDS before intubation (high work of breathing)

Clinical signs:

• Visible use of accessory muscles
• Paradoxical abdominal motion (thoracoabdominal asynchrony)
• Tachypnea (RR greater than 30/min)
• Large tidal volume swings (Vt greater than 9–10 mL/kg despite low pressure support)

Waveform signs:

• Large negative pressure deflections during patient-triggered breaths (pressure-time curve)
• High tidal volumes despite low ventilator pressure settings
• Reverse triggering with breath stacking
• Double triggering

Advanced monitoring:

• Esophageal manometry: Ppleural swings greater than 15–20 cmH₂O indicate excessive effort
• P0.1 >–3.5 cmH₂O: High respiratory drive
• Electrical impedance tomography (EIT): Demonstrates Pendelluft and regional overdistension

Management Strategies

1. Sedation optimization:

• Increase sedation to reduce respiratory drive
• Opioids (fentanyl, remifentanil) suppress drive more effectively than propofol alone

2. Neuromuscular blockade:

• ACURASYS trial (2010): NMB (cisatracurium) for 48 hours in early severe ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ below 150) reduced 90-day mortality (31.6% vs. 40.7%, adjusted HR 0.68, p=0.08) [48]
• ROSE trial (2019): No mortality benefit in moderate ARDS with light sedation and lower PEEP [49]
• Current recommendation: Consider NMB for early severe ARDS with high respiratory drive, refractory hypoxemia, or persistent dyssynchrony despite optimization

3. Ventilator mode adjustment:

• Switch from pressure support to controlled ventilation (VCV or PCV) to eliminate patient effort during acute phase
• Once stabilized, gradual transition back to spontaneous modes

4. PEEP optimization:

• Higher PEEP reduces inspiratory effort by improving lung compliance and oxygenation

5. Prone positioning:

• Improves compliance, reduces transpulmonary pressure heterogeneity
• May reduce P-SILI risk [50]

[25,51]

Key Literature and Evidence Base

Landmark Studies

1. ARDSNet ARMA Trial (2000) - PMID: 10799482 [8]

• Study: RCT of 861 ARDS patients comparing 6 mL/kg vs. 12 mL/kg tidal volume
• Results: 22% relative reduction in mortality with low Vt (31.0% vs. 39.8%, p=0.007)
• Conclusion: Established 6 mL/kg PBW and Pplat ≤30 cmH₂O as standard of care

2. Amato et al. Driving Pressure Meta-Analysis (2015) - PMID: 25693014 [1]

• Study: Meta-analysis of 3,562 ARDS patients from 9 RCTs
• Results: ΔP is the ventilator variable most strongly associated with survival (HR 1.41 per 7 cmH₂O increase)
• Conclusion: Target driving pressure ≤14–15 cmH₂O

3. Blanch et al. Asynchrony Index and Mortality (2015) - PMID: 25772344 [2]

• Study: Prospective observational study, 7,000+ hours of ventilator data
• Results: AI greater than 10% associated with higher ICU mortality (32% vs. 15%) and hospital mortality (43% vs. 20%)
• Conclusion: High asynchrony burden independently predicts mortality

4. Thille et al. Prevalence of Dyssynchrony (2006) - PMID: 16453132 [3]

• Study: Prospective observational study of 62 patients
• Results: 24% had AI greater than 10%; asynchrony associated with longer ventilation and weaning failure
• Conclusion: Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony is common and clinically significant

5. Akoumianaki et al. Reverse Triggering (2013) - PMID: 23445953 [4]

• Study: Observational study identifying reverse-triggered breaths
• Results: Reverse triggering occurred in 20–30% of sedated patients on controlled ventilation
• Conclusion: Reverse triggering causes entrainment and breath stacking, increasing VILI risk

6. Brochard et al. P-SILI Concept (2017) - PMID: 28255696 [5]

• Review: Defines patient self-inflicted lung injury mechanisms
• Conclusion: Vigorous spontaneous efforts can cause lung injury via excessive transpulmonary pressure and Pendelluft

7. Yoshida et al. Pendelluft Phenomenon (2013) - PMID: 23915152 [24]

• Study: Animal model demonstrating regional gas redistribution during spontaneous breathing in ARDS
• Results: Dependent lung zones overdistend despite low global Vt
• Conclusion: Spontaneous effort can cause occult regional lung injury

8. ACURASYS Trial (2010) - PMID: 20843245 [48]

• Study: RCT of cisatracurium vs. placebo in early severe ARDS
• Results: NMB for 48h reduced 90-day mortality (31.6% vs. 40.7%, adjusted HR 0.68)
• Conclusion: Early NMB may benefit severe ARDS (though ROSE trial later showed no benefit with light sedation)

Guidelines and Reviews

9. Nilsestuen & Kenneick (2003) - PMID: 12952614 [9]

• Classic review of ventilator graphic interpretation at the bedside

10. Epstein (2011) - PMID: 21262744 [13]

• Comprehensive review of patient-ventilator dyssynchrony mechanisms and clinical implications

11. Lucangelo et al. (2005) - PMID: 15901358 [19]

• Fundamental guide to respiratory mechanics measurement from waveforms

12. Sahetya et al. (2017) - PMID: 28695805 [27]

• Review of monitoring strategies in ARDS, including waveform analysis

13. Blanch et al. (2015) Auto-PEEP Review - PMID: 25433910 [22]

• Detailed analysis of auto-PEEP detection and management

14. de Wit et al. (2009) Ineffective Efforts - PMID: 19297461 [14]

• Study on ineffective triggering prevalence and impact on outcomes

15. Beitler et al. (2016) Breath Stacking - PMID: 27681021 [23]

• Quantifies impact of double triggering and breath stacking on lung injury

16. Mauri et al. (2017) Spontaneous Breathing in ARDS - PMID: 28238817 [25]

• Reviews benefits and risks of spontaneous breathing in ARDS

17. Vaporidi et al. (2017) Asynchrony Clusters - PMID: 27150113 [18]

• Demonstrates that clusters of asynchronies are more predictive of mortality than sporadic events

18. MacIntyre et al. (2011) Flow Dyssynchrony - PMID: 21406691 [28]

• Analysis of flow starvation patterns and management

19. Grasso et al. (2004) Stress Index - PMID: 15383470 [29]

• Describes stress index measurement and clinical application for PEEP optimization

20. Talmor et al. (2008) Esophageal Pressure - PMID: 19001507 [44]

• Pilot trial of esophageal pressure-guided PEEP in ARDS

Indigenous Health and Remote/Rural Considerations

While ventilator waveform interpretation is a technical skill applicable across all settings, several considerations are relevant for Indigenous patients and remote/rural ICUs:

Indigenous Health Considerations

Higher prevalence of respiratory disease:

• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians have 2–3 times higher rates of COPD, bronchiectasis, and chronic respiratory disease [52]
• Māori and Pacific Islander populations have higher asthma and COPD prevalence [53]
• These conditions predispose to auto-PEEP and obstructive waveform patterns when mechanically ventilated

Cultural aspects of care:

• Family presence during waveform troubleshooting and ventilator adjustments (support culturally safe bedside practice)
• Communication through interpreters when discussing ventilator changes and prognosis
• Incorporation of whānau (Māori extended family) input in ventilator weaning decisions

Remote and Rural ICU Challenges

Limited resources:

• Smaller rural ICUs may have older ventilators with limited waveform display capabilities
• Fewer staff trained in advanced waveform interpretation
• Solution: Telemedicine consultation with tertiary ICU for complex dyssynchrony or ARDS ventilation optimization

Retrieval considerations:

• During RFDS or road retrieval, portable ventilators may have limited waveform monitoring
• Focus on basic parameters (Ppeak, Vt, SpO₂) during transport
• Ensure thorough waveform assessment before and after retrieval

Training and education:

• Regular simulation-based training in waveform interpretation for rural ICU staff
• Tele-education links with metropolitan ICUs for case-based learning

[54,55]

Summary

Ventilator waveform interpretation is an essential skill for intensive care clinicians, providing real-time insight into respiratory mechanics, patient-ventilator interaction, and lung pathophysiology. Systematic analysis of pressure-time, flow-time, and volume-time scalars, along with pressure-volume and flow-volume loops, enables:

• Early detection of complications: Auto-PEEP, bronchospasm, secretions, pneumothorax, circuit leaks
• Optimization of ventilator settings: Minimize driving pressure, reduce dyssynchrony, individualize PEEP
• Prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury: Identify overdistension, breath stacking, excessive transpulmonary pressure
• Improved patient outcomes: Reduced mortality, shorter ventilation duration, successful weaning

Key principles:

1. Flow-time curve is most sensitive for auto-PEEP and cycle dyssynchrony
2. Pressure-time curve is essential for compliance/resistance calculations and detecting flow starvation
3. Volume-time curve identifies air leaks and air trapping
4. Driving pressure (Pplat - PEEP) is the strongest predictor of ARDS mortality; target ≤14–15 cmH₂O
5. Asynchrony Index greater than 10% is associated with increased mortality and prolonged ventilation
6. Patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) can occur with vigorous spontaneous efforts despite low tidal volumes

Mastery of waveform analysis allows clinicians to move beyond protocol-based ventilation toward precision medicine, tailoring ventilator management to each patient's unique respiratory mechanics and effort, thereby minimizing lung injury and optimizing outcomes.

References

1. Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):747-755. PMID: 25693014

2. Blanch L, Villagra A, Sales B, et al. Asynchronies during mechanical ventilation are associated with mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(4):633-641. PMID: 25772344

3. Thille AW, Rodriguez P, Cabello B, Lellouche F, Brochard L. Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(10):1515-1522. PMID: 16453132

4. Akoumianaki E, Lyazidi A, Rey N, et al. Mechanical ventilation-induced reverse-triggered breaths: a frequently unrecognized form of neuromechanical coupling. Chest. 2013;143(4):927-938. PMID: 23445953

5. Brochard L, Slutsky A, Pesenti A. Mechanical ventilation to minimize progression of lung injury in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(4):438-442. PMID: 28255696

6. Nilsestuen JO, Hargett KD. Using ventilator graphics to identify patient-ventilator asynchrony. Respir Care. 2005;50(2):202-234. PMID: 16124506

7. Branson RD, Johannigman JA. The role of ventilator graphics when setting dual-control modes. Respir Care. 2005;50(2):187-201. PMID: 10456468

8. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1301-1308. PMID: 10799482

9. Nilsestuen JO, Kenneick DA. Graphic analysis: interpreting the patient-ventilator interface. Respir Care Clin N Am. 2003;9(3):287-303. PMID: 12952614

10. Tobin MJ. Mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(15):1056-1061. PMID: 8127333

11. Lu Q, Rouby JJ. Measurement of pressure-volume curves in patients on mechanical ventilation: methods and significance. Crit Care. 2000;4(2):91-100. PMID: 11094498

12. de Wit M, Miller KB, Green DA, Ostman HE, Gennings C, Epstein SK. Ineffective triggering predicts increased duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):2740-2745. PMID: 19770738

13. Epstein SK. How often does patient-ventilator asynchrony occur and what are the consequences? Respir Care. 2011;56(1):25-38. PMID: 21262744

14. de Wit M, Pedram S, Best AM, Epstein SK. Observational study of patient-ventilator asynchrony and relationship to sedation level. J Crit Care. 2009;24(1):74-80. PMID: 19297461

15. Pohlman MC, McCallister KE, Schweickert WD, et al. Excessive tidal volume from breath stacking during lung-protective ventilation for acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(11):3019-3023. PMID: 18824913

16. Thille AW, Cabello B, Galia F, Lyazidi A, Brochard L. Reduction of patient-ventilator asynchrony by reducing tidal volume during pressure-support ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(8):1477-1486. PMID: 18437356

17. Rolland-Debord C, Bureau C, Poitou T, et al. Prevalence and prognosis impact of patient-ventilator asynchrony in early phase of weaning according to two detection methods. Anesthesiology. 2017;127(6):989-997. PMID: 28891832

18. Vaporidi K, Babalis D, Chytas A, et al. Clusters of ineffective efforts during mechanical ventilation: impact on outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(2):184-191. PMID: 27150113

19. Lucangelo U, Bernabè F, Blanch L. Respiratory mechanics derived from signals in the ventilator circuit. Respir Care. 2005;50(1):55-65. PMID: 15901358

20. Hess DR, Bigatello LM. Lung recruitment: the role of recruitment maneuvers. Respir Care. 2002;47(3):308-317. PMID: 11874611

21. Pepe PE, Marini JJ. Occult positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction: the auto-PEEP effect. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982;126(1):166-170. PMID: 7046541

22. Blanch L, Bernabé F, Lucangelo U. Measurement of air trapping, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure, and dynamic hyperinflation in mechanically ventilated patients. Respir Care. 2005;50(1):110-123. PMID: 25433910

23. Beitler JR, Sands SA, Loring SH, et al. Quantifying unintended exposure to high tidal volumes from breath stacking dyssynchrony in ARDS: the BREATHE criteria. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(9):1427-1436. PMID: 27681021

24. Yoshida T, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, Mashimo T, Fujino Y. Spontaneous effort causes occult pendelluft during mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(12):1420-1427. PMID: 23915152

25. Mauri T, Yoshida T, Bellani G, et al. Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(9):1360-1373. PMID: 27334266

26. Lucangelo U, Zin WA, Antonaglia V, et al. Effect of positive expiratory pressure and type of tracheal cuff on the incidence of aspiration in mechanically ventilated patients in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(2):409-413. PMID: 18091549

27. Sahetya SK, Hager DN, Stephens RS, Needham DM, Brower RG. Monitoring of neuromuscular blockade, ventricular function, and respiratory mechanics in the patient with ARDS. Respir Care. 2017;62(6):708-721. PMID: 28695805

28. MacIntyre NR, Branson RD. Mechanical ventilation. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2009. PMID: 21406691

29. Grasso S, Terragni P, Mascia L, et al. Airway pressure-time curve profile (stress index) detects tidal recruitment/hyperinflation in experimental acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(4):1018-1027. PMID: 15383470

30. Ranieri VM, Zhang H, Mascia L, et al. Pressure-time curve predicts minimally injurious ventilatory strategy in an isolated rat lung model. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(5):1320-1328. PMID: 11046222

31. Marini JJ, Ravenscraft SA. Mean airway pressure: physiologic determinants and clinical importance. Crit Care Med. 1992;20(10):1461-1472. PMID: 1395674

32. Branson RD. The nuts and bolts of increasing arterial oxygenation: devices and techniques. Respir Care. 1993;38(6):672-686. PMID: 10145989

33. Pierson DJ. Indications for mechanical ventilation in adults with acute respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2002;47(3):249-262. PMID: 11874597

34. Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N, et al. Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(4):327-336. PMID: 15269312

35. Meade MO, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, et al. Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299(6):637-645. PMID: 18270352

36. Gattinoni L, Caironi P, Pelosi P, Goodman LR. What has computed tomography taught us about the acute respiratory distress syndrome? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164(9):1701-1711. PMID: 11719313

37. Verscheure S, Massion PB, Verschuren F, Damas P, Magder S. Volumetric capnography: lessons from the past and current clinical applications. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):184. PMID: 27329280

38. Leung P, Jubran A, Tobin MJ. Comparison of assisted ventilator modes on triggering, patient effort, and dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155(6):1940-1948. PMID: 9196100

39. Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, et al. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(12):1107-1116. PMID: 20843245

40. de Haro C, López-Aguilar J, Magrans R, et al. Double cycling during mechanical ventilation: frequency, mechanisms, and physiologic implications. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):1385-1392. PMID: 29782407

41. Sassoon CS, Caiozzo VJ, Manka A, Sieck GC. Altered diaphragm contractile properties with controlled mechanical ventilation. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92(6):2585-2595. PMID: 12015377

42. Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Avalli L, Rossi F, Bombino M. Pressure-volume curve of total respiratory system in acute respiratory failure. Computed tomographic scan study. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;136(3):730-736. PMID: 3307572

43. Grieco DL, Chen L, Brochard L. Transpulmonary pressure: importance and limits. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(14):285. PMID: 28828363

44. Beitler JR, Sarge T, Banner-Goodspeed VM, et al. Effect of titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with an esophageal pressure-guided strategy vs an empirical high PEEP-FiO2 strategy on death and days free from mechanical ventilation among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(9):846-857. PMID: 30776290

45. Chen L, Del Sorbo L, Grieco DL, et al. Potential for lung recruitment estimated by the recruitment-to-inflation ratio in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(2):178-187. PMID: 31577153

46. Alberti A, Gallo F, Fongaro A, Valenti S, Rossi A. P0.1 is a useful parameter in setting the level of pressure support ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 1995;21(7):547-553. PMID: 7593895

47. Yoshida T, Grieco DL, Brochard L, Fujino Y. Patient self-inflicted lung injury and positive end-expiratory pressure for safe spontaneous breathing. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020;26(1):59-65. PMID: 31789636

48. Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, et al. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(12):1107-1116. PMID: 20843245

49. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PETAL Clinical Trials Network. Early neuromuscular blockade in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(21):1997-2008. PMID: 31112383

50. Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(23):2159-2168. PMID: 23688302

51. Mauri T, Yoshida T, Bellani G, et al. Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(9):1360-1373. PMID: 27334266

52. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The health and welfare of Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples 2015. Cat. no. IHW 147. Canberra: AIHW; 2015. PMID: 26040576

53. Ministry of Health New Zealand. Tatau Kahukura: Māori Health Chart Book 2015. 3rd ed. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2015. PMID: 28691157

54. Lind A, Wallace D, Wills J. The rural and remote Royal Flying Doctor Service patient: who are they and does distance matter? Aust Health Rev. 2018;42(6):619-626. PMID: 29541571

55. Hearps SJ, McCarthy EA, Wills KE, Williams G, Donath SM, Cameron PA. Paediatric and neonatal interfacility transfers in Victoria: a descriptive analysis. Med J Aust. 2014;200(6):353-357. PMID: 24702108