Chondromalacia Patellae (Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome)

1. Overview

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is one of the most common causes of anterior knee pain, particularly affecting adolescents and young adults. The term "chondromalacia patellae" specifically refers to the pathological softening and degeneration of the articular cartilage on the undersurface of the patella, which represents the end-stage structural finding in chronic PFPS. [1,2]

PFPS is characterized by retropatellar or peripatellar pain that intensifies during activities involving knee flexion under load, such as squatting, stair climbing (particularly descent), running, prolonged sitting, and kneeling. The condition affects 3-6% of the general population annually in the United States, with a lifetime prevalence of approximately 25% in physically active individuals younger than 40 years. [1,3,4]

The fundamental pathophysiology involves patellar maltracking, where the patella fails to glide smoothly within the trochlear groove during knee flexion and extension. This maltracking results from an imbalance between medial and lateral stabilizing forces, typically manifesting as lateral displacement and tilting of the patella. The consequent abnormal contact pressures and shear forces lead to cartilage stress, subchondral bone changes, synovial inflammation, and the eventual development of chondromalacia. [5,6]

Management is overwhelmingly conservative, centered on structured exercise therapy targeting hip and knee musculature. Surgery is reserved as a last resort for refractory cases with demonstrable structural abnormalities. The prognosis is generally favorable with appropriate rehabilitation, though symptoms can persist or recur in a significant proportion of patients. [7,8,9]

Key Clinical Points

Epidemiology: PFPS accounts for 25-40% of all knee disorders presenting to sports medicine clinics. It predominantly affects young, physically active females (female:male ratio 2:1), with peak incidence in the 15-35 year age group. [4,10,11]

Natural History: Without intervention, symptoms may persist for years. Studies demonstrate that 70-90% of patients show improvement with structured exercise therapy over 3-6 months, though 25-40% continue to experience symptoms beyond 12 months. [8,12]

Impact: PFPS significantly restricts participation in physical activity, sports, and occupational activities. It can progress to patellofemoral osteoarthritis in 10-20% of cases over 5-8 years if maltracking persists uncorrected. [13,14]

---

2. Epidemiology

Incidence and Prevalence

Demographics

Age: The condition primarily affects adolescents and young adults aged 15-35 years. Onset before age 10 or after age 60 is unusual and warrants investigation for alternative diagnoses. [1,18]

Sex: Females are affected approximately twice as frequently as males (ratio 2:1). This sex difference is attributed to anatomical and biomechanical factors including wider pelvis, increased Q-angle, greater femoral anteversion, and potentially different neuromuscular control patterns. [3,19,20]

Activity Level: PFPS is most common in physically active individuals, particularly those engaged in running, jumping sports (basketball, volleyball), cycling, and military training. However, it also occurs in sedentary individuals, especially those with occupational demands involving prolonged sitting or stair climbing. [11,21]

Risk Factors

Modifiable Risk Factors:

• Quadriceps weakness, particularly when normalized for body mass index (-0.69 SMD in military recruits) [16]
• Hip muscle weakness (abductor and extensor groups in some populations) [20,22]
• Vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) atrophy or delayed activation [10,23]
• Iliotibial band (ITB) and hamstring tightness [6,24]
• Pes planus (flat feet) and abnormal foot pronation [25]
• Training errors: rapid increase in intensity, volume, or change in running surface [11]

Non-modifiable Risk Factors:

• Increased Q-angle (weighted mean difference +2.08° in PFPS patients vs controls) [20]
• Trochlear dysplasia (shallow or flat trochlear groove) [26]
• Patella alta (high-riding patella) [26]
• Increased patellar tilt angle (+4.34° in PFPS) [20]
• Increased sulcus angle (+1.66° in PFPS) [20]
• Generalized ligamentous laxity [27]

Note: Body mass index, body fat percentage, height, weight, and static Q-angle (when not measured with standardized protocol) have NOT been consistently demonstrated as independent risk factors in prospective studies. [16]

---

3. Aetiology & Pathophysiology

Multifactorial Aetiology

PFPS is a multifactorial condition arising from a complex interplay of biomechanical, neuromuscular, and tissue homeostasis factors. No single causative factor has been identified; rather, a variable mosaic of contributing elements exists in individual patients. [5,6,28]

Biomechanical Factors

Patellar Maltracking: The central mechanism is abnormal patellofemoral kinematics, typically manifesting as excessive lateral displacement, lateral tilt, and/or rotation of the patella during knee flexion-extension. [6,29]

Patellofemoral Joint Reaction Force (PFJRF): The compressive force between patella and femur increases exponentially with knee flexion:

• 0.5× body weight at 30° flexion
• 3.3× body weight at 90° flexion
• Up to 7-8× body weight during deep squatting (> 90°) [30,31]

Maltracking concentrates these forces on smaller contact areas (particularly lateral facet), dramatically increasing peak contact stress and predisposing to cartilage damage. [30,32]

Dynamic Valgus: Many PFPS patients demonstrate dynamic knee valgus during functional activities (single-leg squat, landing from jump). This pattern involves hip adduction, hip internal rotation, and knee abduction, which displaces the patella laterally relative to the trochlea. [6,19,33]

Static Stabilizers (Passive Restraints)

Bony Architecture:

• Trochlear groove morphology: Shallow or dysplastic groove provides insufficient lateral constraint [26,34]
• Patella alta: High-riding patella engages trochlea later in flexion, reducing stability in early flexion range [26]
• Increased Q-angle: Creates larger lateral vector force on patella [20]

Soft Tissue Restraints:

• Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL): Primary soft tissue restraint to lateral patellar displacement (contributes 50-60% of restraining force in terminal extension) [35]
• Medial patellotibial and patellomeniscal ligaments: Secondary medial stabilizers [35]
• Lateral retinaculum: Can become pathologically tight, pulling patella laterally [36]

Dynamic Stabilizers (Active Muscular Control)

Quadriceps Muscle Balance:

• Vastus medialis obliquus (VMO): Inserts at 50-55° angle, pulls patella medially and inferiorly. Often demonstrates atrophy, delayed activation, or reduced force output in PFPS. [10,23,37]
• Vastus lateralis (VL): Pulls superolaterally. May be relatively overactive compared to VMO. [6]
• Vastus intermedius and rectus femoris: Provide central alignment. [6]

Hip Musculature:

• Hip abductors (gluteus medius/minimus): Weakness permits femoral adduction and internal rotation (dynamic valgus), indirectly causing relative lateral patellar displacement. [19,22,33]
• Hip extensors (gluteus maximus): Contribute to lower limb control during weight-bearing. [22]

Foot and Ankle:

• Excessive or prolonged foot pronation during gait can cause internal tibial rotation, which may influence patellofemoral mechanics through the kinetic chain. [25,38]

Tissue Homeostasis Perspective

Dye's tissue homeostasis model proposes that PFPS results from loss of homeostasis in multiple patellofemoral joint tissues when subjected to supraphysiologic loads or inadequately conditioned for applied loads. [5]

Affected Tissues:

• Synovium and fat pad: Inflammation from mechanical irritation contributes to pain [5]
• Retinaculum: Development of neuromas in chronically stressed lateral retinaculum [5]
• Subchondral bone: Increased intraosseous pressure, bone marrow edema, and increased metabolic activity on MRI and bone scan [5,39]
• Articular cartilage: Progressive softening (chondromalacia) through Outerbridge grades [40]

This model explains why structural factors (mild chondromalacia, increased Q-angle, lateral tilt) may be present asymptomatically; symptoms arise only when tissue homeostasis is disrupted by overload. [5]

Outerbridge Classification of Chondromalacia

The Outerbridge classification grades articular cartilage damage arthroscopically:

Clinical Relevance: Chondromalacia is found in up to 50% of asymptomatic individuals on arthroscopy or MRI. Its presence does NOT correlate strongly with symptom severity. Conversely, many symptomatic PFPS patients have minimal or no visible cartilage damage. [40,41] Therefore, PFPS is primarily a clinical diagnosis based on symptoms and functional impairment, not on imaging findings of chondromalacia.

---

4. Clinical Presentation

Symptoms

Pain Characteristics:

• Location: Retropatellar (behind kneecap) or peripatellar (around kneecap). Patients often indicate diffuse anterior knee pain by circling the patella with their hand (the "circle sign"). [1,42]
• Quality: Aching, dull, occasionally sharp with specific movements
• Onset: Typically insidious over weeks to months, though may be acutely precipitated by change in training regime or specific overuse event [1,8]

Aggravating Factors:

• Stairs: Descending stairs typically more painful than ascending (greater eccentric quadriceps load and higher PFJRF) [1,43]
• Prolonged sitting with knees flexed: "Theatre sign" or "Moviegoer's sign" – pain after sitting in cinema, classroom, or car with knees bent at 90°+ for extended periods. Pain relieved by standing and extending knee. [1,42]
• Squatting and kneeling: Deep knee flexion maximizes PFJRF (91% sensitivity, 50% specificity for PFPS diagnosis) [3,31]
• Running: Particularly downhill running or on cambered surfaces [11]
• Jumping and landing activities [3]

Relieving Factors:

• Rest from aggravating activities
• Knee extension (unloading patellofemoral joint)
• Activity modification to avoid deep knee flexion [1]

Associated Symptoms:

• Crepitus: Grinding, crunching, or popping sensation/sound during knee flexion-extension (particularly during squats or stair climbing). Present in majority of PFPS patients. [10,44]
• Pseudo-locking or catching: Sensation of knee "catching" or transiently "giving way" (differs from true mechanical locking of meniscal tear) [1]
• Swelling: Minimal effusion may occur; large effusion suggests alternative diagnosis [1,42]
• Stiffness: Mild, particularly after prolonged sitting [1]

Symptom Duration: By definition, PFPS symptoms should be present for at least 6 weeks and exclude recent trauma. [8,17]

Signs

Inspection:

• VMO atrophy: Visible wasting of the oblique fibers of vastus medialis (the "teardrop" muscle belly on medial distal thigh). Compare side-to-side. [10,23]
• Patellar position: Assess for patella alta, lateral displacement, or "squinting" (inward facing) patellae suggesting increased femoral anteversion [42,45]
• Lower limb alignment: Assess for genu valgum (knock knees), tibial torsion, foot posture (pes planus) [25,42]
• Effusion: Usually absent or minimal. Moderate to large effusion suggests alternative diagnosis. [42]

Palpation:

• Tenderness: Medial and/or lateral patellar facets (palpate with knee in slight flexion and patella displaced medially then laterally) [10,42]
• Patellar mobility: Assess mediolateral glide and tilt. Tightness on lateral structures vs hypermobility. [42,46]

Special Tests:

Functional Assessment:

• Quadriceps strength: Manual muscle testing or dynamometry often reveals weakness, particularly when normalized to body weight (-37.47 Nm peak torque vs controls) [20]
• Hip abductor strength: Weakness common (-3.30 Nm vs controls) [20,22]
• Hip external rotator strength: Weakness demonstrated in many PFPS patients (-1.43 Nm vs controls) [20,22]
• Hamstring and ITB flexibility: Tightness frequently present [24,49]

Q-Angle Measurement: The Q-angle (quadriceps angle) represents the vector of quadriceps pull relative to patellar tendon axis. Measured as angle formed by:

1. Line from anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to center of patella
2. Line from center of patella to tibial tubercle

Normal values:

• Males: 14° (range 8-17°)
• Females: 17° (range 15-20°) [20,50]

PFPS patients: Increased Q-angle (+2.08° WMD) compared to controls. However, measurement reliability is poor unless performed with standardized protocol (supine, knee fully extended, quadriceps relaxed, neutral foot position). Clinical utility is limited. [10,20,51]

Important Note on Clarke's Test: This test is controversial and should be performed gently if at all. It produces pain in many healthy knees (high false positive rate) and is distressing to patients. It is NOT recommended for routine diagnostic use. [1,10,52]

---

5. Differential Diagnosis

Anterior knee pain has a broad differential diagnosis. A systematic approach is essential.

Primary Differentials

Must-Not-Miss Diagnoses

Osteosarcoma: Night pain, unremitting pain, constitutional symptoms, mass. Most common location: distal femur. Require urgent radiographs and MRI. [53]

Septic Arthritis: Acute onset, fever, hot swollen joint, inability to weight-bear. Requires joint aspiration and urgent treatment. [54]

Inflammatory Arthropathy: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis or other inflammatory conditions. Look for systemic features, morning stiffness > 30 minutes, multiple joint involvement. [54]

Stress Fracture (Patella/Femur): History of overuse, point tenderness, pain with hopping. MRI diagnostic. [55]

---

6. Investigations

PFPS is predominantly a clinical diagnosis based on history and physical examination. Investigations are used to exclude alternative diagnoses, particularly when conservative management fails or red flags are present. [1,8,17]

First-Line Investigations

Not routinely indicated for typical PFPS. Consider if:

• History of trauma
• Age > 50 years (to exclude osteoarthritis)
• Suspicion of structural pathology
• Failure to improve with 3-6 months conservative treatment [1,56]

Radiography

Views:

• Anteroposterior (AP) and Lateral: Usually normal in PFPS. Useful to exclude fracture, tumor, osteoarthritis. [1,42]
• Skyline (Merchant) View: Axial patellofemoral view taken at 30-45° knee flexion. Most useful for assessing patellofemoral joint. [42,56]

Skyline View Findings in PFPS:

• Lateral patellar tilt (lateral facet closer to femur than medial facet)
• Lateral patellar subluxation (lateral displacement of patella relative to trochlear groove)
• Trochlear dysplasia (shallow or flat trochlear groove, crossing sign)
• Patellofemoral joint space narrowing (in advanced cases with OA)
• Patellar morphology variants [42,56,57]

Insall-Salvati Ratio: Measured on lateral radiograph to assess for patella alta (high-riding patella):

• Ratio = patellar tendon length / patellar length
• Normal: 0.8-1.2
• Patella alta: > 1.2 [57]

MRI

Indications:

• Failed conservative treatment
• Atypical presentation
• Suspicion of alternative diagnosis (OCD, meniscal tear, MPFL injury, tumor)
• Pre-operative planning [42,56]

MRI Findings in PFPS:

• Cartilage changes: Chondromalacia (grades I-IV). Remember: often poor correlation with symptoms. [39,41]
• Bone marrow edema: Subchondral signal changes in patella or lateral femoral condyle [39]
• Patellar tilt and subluxation: Can be quantified [56]
• Trochlear morphology: Assessment of dysplasia [56,58]
• MPFL integrity: Assess for tear or attenuation (relevant for instability) [58]
• Lateral retinacular tightness: Indirect signs [56]
• Alternative pathology: Plica, Hoffa's fat pad edema, meniscal tear, OCD lesion [56]

Quantitative Parameters on MRI:

• Lateral patellar tilt angle
• Lateral patellar displacement (mm)
• Trochlear sulcus angle (normal less than 145°)
• TT-TG distance (tibial tubercle to trochlear groove): measures rotational malalignment; > 20mm abnormal [58]

CT Scan

Role: Limited. May be used for precise bony assessment (trochlear dysplasia, tibial tubercle position) in pre-operative surgical planning for refractory cases. [56,58]

Bone Scan

Role: Not routinely performed. May show increased uptake in patella or subchondral bone in PFPS. Non-specific. Useful if concerned about stress fracture or tumor. [5,39]

Ultrasound (Musculoskeletal)

Emerging Role: Recent studies demonstrate utility in PFPS assessment: [10,59]

• VMO volume: Decreased in PFPS patients
• Gluteus medius thickness: Asymmetry associated with PFPS
• Intra-articular effusion: Presence suggests alternative diagnosis
• Tendon thickness: Quadriceps and patellar tendon changes
• Dynamic assessment: Real-time evaluation of patellar tracking during movement
• Cartilage assessment: Limited compared to MRI but improving

Advantages: Point-of-care, dynamic examination, cost-effective. [10,59]

Laboratory Tests

Not indicated for typical PFPS. Consider if suspected inflammatory arthropathy:

• ESR, CRP (elevated in inflammation/infection)
• Rheumatoid factor, anti-CCP, ANA (if inflammatory arthritis suspected)
• Joint aspiration and culture (if septic arthritis suspected) [54]

---

7. Classification/Staging

Wiberg Classification of Patellar Morphology

Based on lateral radiograph configuration of patellar articular surface:

Dejour Classification of Trochlear Dysplasia

Based on lateral radiograph and CT/MRI:

Types C and D are associated with higher rates of patellar instability and may require surgical correction if symptomatic. [26,58]

Merchant Classification of Patellar Subluxation

Based on congruence angle measured on skyline radiograph at 45° flexion:

• Normal: -6° to +6°
• Lateral subluxation: >+8°
• Medial subluxation: < -8° [57]

---

8. Management

The cornerstone of PFPS management is structured exercise therapy targeting hip and knee musculature. Surgery is considered only after failure of comprehensive rehabilitation (minimum 3-6 months). [7,8,9,60]

General Principles

1. Education: Explain condition, expected timeline (3-6 months improvement), importance of adherence [8,60]
2. Activity modification: Avoid/modify pain-provoking activities (deep squats, prolonged sitting, excessive stair climbing) during acute phase [1,60]
3. Load management: Gradual progressive loading within pain tolerance [8,60]
4. Multidisciplinary approach: Physiotherapy-led, may involve sports medicine physician, orthopaedic surgeon, podiatrist [8,17]

Conservative Management

1. Exercise Therapy (GOLD STANDARD)

Evidence: Cochrane review (2015) of 31 RCTs (1690 participants) demonstrated exercise therapy significantly reduces pain and improves function compared to control (no treatment). [7]

• Pain during activity (short-term): MD -1.46 (95% CI -2.39 to -0.54) on 0-10 VAS - clinically important reduction
• Functional ability (short-term): SMD 1.10 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.63) - clinically important improvement
• Recovery (long-term, 12 months): 88 more per 1000 participants recovered vs control [7]

Hip + Knee Exercises vs Knee Alone: Moderate evidence that combined hip and knee strengthening is superior to knee exercises alone. [7,22,61]

• Pain reduction: MD -2.20 (95% CI -3.80 to -0.60) favoring hip+knee [7]

Specific Exercise Components:

A. Quadriceps Strengthening (particularly VMO):

• Short-arc quadriceps exercises (0-30° flexion): Terminal knee extension to minimize PFJRF while strengthening [1,60]
• Straight leg raises: Four-way (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction) with isometric quadriceps contraction [60]
• Closed kinetic chain exercises: Partial squats (0-45°), step-ups/step-downs (low height initially), leg press (limited range 0-60°) [7,60,62]

Note: Avoid open kinetic chain knee extension 90°→0° (leg extension machine) and deep squats (> 60°) initially due to high PFJRF (up to 7× body weight at 90°). [30,31,63]

B. Hip Strengthening:

• Hip abductors: Side-lying hip abduction, clamshells, resistance band abduction, side-planks [22,61]
• Hip external rotators: Clamshells, resistance band external rotation [22,61]
• Hip extensors: Bridging progressions, single-leg bridges, squats [22,61]

C. Core/Trunk Stability: Planks, side-planks, bird-dogs [61]

D. Flexibility/Stretching:

• Quadriceps stretching
• Hamstring stretching (tightness common in PFPS) [24,49]
• ITB stretching [49]
• Gastrocnemius/soleus stretching [60]

E. Neuromuscular Training:

• Balance and proprioception exercises (single-leg stance, wobble board)
• Gait retraining (addressing dynamic valgus, cadence, stride length)
• Plyometric progression (when appropriate for athletes) [33,61]

Dosage: Systematic reviews indicate exercise programs should be:

• Duration: Minimum 6 weeks, ideally 6-12 weeks [7,8]
• Frequency: 3-4 times per week [7,60]
• Supervised initially, progressing to home-based with monitoring [7]

2. Patellar Taping

McConnell Taping: Rigid tape applied to pull patella medially, correct tilt, and offload lateral facet. [64,65]

Evidence: Short-term pain relief during exercise. May enhance VMO activation. Effect size small to moderate. [64,65]

• Pain reduction: Some studies show clinically significant short-term benefit
• Function: Minimal to moderate improvement
• Not effective as sole treatment; adjunct to exercise [64,65]

Kinesiotaping: Elastic tape applied in various patterns.

• Evidence: Insufficient to support routine use. May provide short-term placebo benefit. [1,60]

3. Patellar Bracing/Sleeves

Evidence: Limited and conflicting. Some studies show short-term pain reduction during activity. [66]

• May improve proprioception and provide psychological reassurance
• Can be used adjunctively during return to sport
• Not recommended as sole treatment [60,66]

Note: Ensure brace does not increase lateral patellar tracking (some designs may worsen maltracking). [66]

4. Foot Orthoses

Indication: Patients with pes planus (flat feet) or excessive foot pronation. [25,38,67]

Evidence: Moderate evidence for pain reduction and functional improvement when combined with exercise therapy in selected patients with foot posture abnormalities. [38,67]

• Prefabricated orthoses appear as effective as custom-molded for PFPS [67]
• Mechanism: Reduce excessive pronation, may influence tibial rotation and patellofemoral mechanics [38]

5. Manual Therapy

Techniques: Soft tissue mobilization, patellar mobilization (medial glide, superior/inferior glide), joint mobilization. [60]

Evidence: Limited evidence as standalone treatment. May provide short-term benefit when added to exercise program. [60,68]

6. Pharmacological Management

NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs):

• Role: Short-term pain relief (7-14 days) during acute exacerbation [1,17]
• Evidence: Limited evidence; no high-quality RCTs demonstrating benefit specifically for PFPS [1,60]
• Recommendation: Short course (≤2 weeks) if needed for symptom control to enable participation in exercise therapy. Not recommended long-term. [1,17]
• Dose example: Ibuprofen 400mg TDS or Naproxen 500mg BD (with food; consider gastroprotection if risk factors)

Paracetamol (Acetaminophen): May provide mild analgesia. Limited evidence. [60]

Topical NSAIDs: May be considered as alternative to oral NSAIDs. Less systemic side effects. [60]

Corticosteroid Injection: NOT recommended. No evidence of benefit. Risk of patellar tendon rupture. [60]

7. Other Modalities

Dry Needling/Acupuncture: Insufficient evidence. [60]

Electrotherapy (TENS, Ultrasound, Electrical Stimulation): Insufficient evidence for routine use. [60]

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy: One RCT showed benefit when combined with exercise (-33.0, 95% CI -45.2 to -20.8), but limited evidence overall. [69]

Ice: May provide symptomatic relief post-exercise. No evidence for effect on outcome. [60]

Surgical Management

Indication: Failure of comprehensive conservative management (minimum 6 months, preferably 12 months) AND demonstrable structural pathology amenable to correction. [1,56,70]

Important: Surgery has limited role in PFPS. Randomized controlled trial showed arthroscopy is NOT superior to exercise therapy for PFPS without structural changes. [6,71]

Surgical Options

1. Arthroscopic Lateral Retinacular Release:

• Indication: Documented tight lateral retinaculum causing patellar tilt (rare as isolated indication)
• Technique: Arthroscopic division of lateral retinaculum to release lateral tethering
• Historical Note: Previously common; now rarely performed in isolation
• Controversy: Risk of iatrogenic medial instability; does not address underlying Q-angle or trochlear dysplasia; high failure rate. [36,70,72]
• Outcome: Variable; up to 50% continue to have symptoms [70]

2. Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy (TTO):

• Indication: Persistent PFPS with documented lateral maltracking, elevated TT-TG distance (> 20mm), failed conservative management [70,73]
• Technique: Osteotomy of tibial tubercle with repositioning to alter patellofemoral mechanics
  • "Anteromedialization (Fulkerson): Moves tubercle anteriorly (unloads joint) and medially (corrects Q-angle). Most common for PFPS. [73]"
  • "Medialization: Addresses rotational malalignment"
  • "Anteriorization (Maquet): Unloads patellofemoral joint; rarely performed (creates anterior prominence)"
• Outcome: 60-85% good/excellent results in appropriately selected patients [73,74]
• Complications: Non-union, compartment syndrome, altered aesthetics, knee stiffness [73]

3. Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) Reconstruction:

• Indication: PFPS associated with patellar instability/recurrent dislocation; positive apprehension sign; documented MPFL insufficiency [35,75]
• Technique: Reconstruction using hamstring autograft or allograft
• Outcome: Excellent for instability; variable for pain alone [35,75]

4. Trochleoplasty:

• Indication: Severe trochlear dysplasia (Dejour Type B/D) with recurrent instability or severe PFPS; usually combined with other procedures [58,76]
• Technique: Reshaping of trochlear groove to improve patellar constraint
• Outcome: Technically demanding; reserved for severe cases [76]

5. Cartilage Restoration Procedures:

• Indication: Focal full-thickness chondral defects (Outerbridge IV) in young patients [77]
• Techniques: Microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), osteochondral autograft/allograft
• Note: Diffuse chondromalacia (common in PFPS) is NOT an indication [40,77]

6. Patellofemoral Arthroplasty (PFA):

• Indication: Isolated patellofemoral arthritis in older patients (> 50y) with failed conservative management [78]
• Outcome: 80-90% satisfactory at 5-10 years; risk of progression to tibiofemoral OA requiring conversion to TKR [78]

7. Total Knee Replacement (TKR):

• Indication: End-stage patellofemoral arthritis with tibiofemoral involvement; typically age > 60-65y [78]

Note on Arthroscopy: Diagnostic arthroscopy with chondroplasty (shaving of chondromalacia) is NOT recommended for PFPS. RCT by Moseley et al. and others demonstrated no benefit over sham surgery or exercise therapy. [71,79]

---

9. Complications

Complications of the Condition

Persistent/Chronic Pain: 25-40% of PFPS patients continue to have symptoms beyond 12 months despite treatment. [8,12]

Recurrent Symptoms: High recurrence rate, particularly with return to high-impact activities without adequate rehabilitation. [8]

Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis: Long-term consequence in 10-20% of patients with untreated or refractory maltracking over 5-8 years. Manifests as progressive cartilage loss, joint space narrowing, osteophyte formation, and subchondral sclerosis. [13,14]

Psychosocial Impact: Chronic pain, activity limitation, and reduced quality of life. May lead to deconditioning, weight gain, anxiety, and depression. [8,80]

Patellar Instability: In subset of patients with severe maltracking or generalized ligamentous laxity, progression to recurrent patellar subluxation or dislocation. [27,47]

Complications of Treatment

Conservative Treatment: Generally safe. Potential issues:

• Exercise-induced pain flare (usually settles with modification)
• Tape allergy/skin irritation (10-15% with prolonged McConnell taping) [64]

Surgical Complications:

---

10. Prognosis

Natural History

Untreated: Symptoms may persist for years. Some patients experience spontaneous improvement, particularly if they naturally modify activities and reduce patellofemoral loading. However, many develop chronic pain and secondary osteoarthritis. [12,13]

With Conservative Treatment

Short-term (3-6 months): 70-90% of patients report clinically important improvement in pain and function with structured exercise therapy. [7,8,9]

Medium-term (12 months):

• 60-75% good outcomes (asymptomatic or mild symptoms)
• 25-40% continue to have moderate to severe symptoms [8,12]

Long-term (> 2 years):

• Variable outcomes
• Many patients experience fluctuating symptoms
• Return to full activity possible in majority of compliant patients with appropriate rehabilitation [12,81]

Prognostic Factors

Favorable Prognosis:

• Younger age (less than 25 years)
• Shorter symptom duration (less than 6 months) at presentation
• No structural abnormalities (normal trochlear morphology, Q-angle)
• High adherence to exercise program
• Addressing modifiable risk factors (strengthening, flexibility, training errors) [12,81]

Poor Prognosis:

• Longer symptom duration (> 12 months)
• Severe baseline pain and functional limitation
• Presence of structural abnormalities (trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, increased TT-TG)
• Advanced chondromalacia (Outerbridge III-IV)
• Concurrent psychological factors (catastrophizing, fear-avoidance)
• Poor adherence to rehabilitation [12,81,82]

With Surgical Treatment

Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy: 60-85% good/excellent results in appropriately selected patients at 2-5 years. Results decline with longer follow-up. [73,74]

Lateral Release: Historically poor outcomes; 30-50% persistent pain. No longer recommended as isolated procedure. [70,72]

MPFL Reconstruction (for instability): > 90% elimination of instability; variable effect on pain (50-70% pain improvement). [35,75]

Important Caveat: Surgery should be considered salvage. Best outcomes occur in patients with clearly defined structural pathology amenable to correction AND who have exhausted conservative options. [56,70]

---

11. Prevention & Screening

Primary Prevention

Target Population: Athletes, military recruits, individuals initiating running/jumping programs.

Strategies:

1. Neuromuscular Training Programs: Preseason programs focusing on hip/knee strengthening, core stability, and movement retraining reduce PFPS incidence by up to 50% in some studies. [83,84]
2. Training Load Management:
   • Gradual progression in volume, intensity, frequency (10% rule: increase less than 10% per week)
   • Adequate recovery between sessions
   • Avoid sudden changes in training surface or footwear [11,21]
3. Strength and Conditioning:
   • Maintain quadriceps, hip abductor, and hip extensor strength
   • Flexibility programs (quadriceps, hamstrings, ITB) [60,83]
4. Biomechanical Screening: Identify at-risk individuals (poor movement patterns, dynamic valgus, muscle weakness) and provide targeted interventions [33,83]
5. Appropriate Footwear: Replace running shoes every 400-600 km; consider gait assessment and orthoses if excessive pronation [38,67]

Secondary Prevention (Preventing Recurrence)

1. Complete Rehabilitation: Ensure full strength and movement quality restoration before return to sport [60]
2. Gradual Return to Activity: Phased return-to-sport protocol [60,81]
3. Ongoing Maintenance Exercises: Continue hip/knee strengthening 2-3×/week indefinitely [60,81]
4. Activity Modification: Long-term avoidance or modification of high-risk activities (deep squatting, excessive downhill running, prolonged sitting) [1,60]
5. Monitoring: Regular reassessment of strength, flexibility, movement patterns [60]

Screening Programs

Military Populations: Some programs implement pre-training screening and preventive strengthening programs, with variable success in reducing PFPS incidence. [16,84]

School-Age Athletes: Limited evidence for population-level screening. Consider targeted screening in high-risk sports (basketball, volleyball, running) with provision of preventive neuromuscular training. [83,84]

General Population: No role for population-wide screening. Focus on education regarding activity progression and symptom recognition. [60]

---

12. Key Guidelines

International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat Consensus (2016)

Diagnosis: PFPS is a clinical diagnosis of exclusion. Patients typically present with insidious onset anterior knee pain aggravated by activities that load the patellofemoral joint during weight-bearing on a flexed knee. [17]

Key Recommendations:

• Diagnosis based on clinical presentation (no specific diagnostic test)
• Exclude other knee pathologies through history and examination
• Imaging not routinely required [17]

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Clinical Practice Guidelines (2019)

Strongest Recommendations: [8]

1. Exercise Therapy: Clinicians should prescribe exercise therapy including both hip and knee strengthening for patients with PFPS (Strong recommendation, Moderate quality evidence).

2. Foot Orthoses: Clinicians may use foot orthoses (prefabricated or custom) in combination with exercise therapy for short-term reduction in pain for patients with PFPS and foot pronation (Moderate recommendation, Moderate quality evidence).

3. Patellar Taping: Clinicians may use patellar taping in combination with exercise therapy for short-term pain reduction in patients with PFPS (Weak recommendation, Low quality evidence).

4. Not Recommended:

   • Manual therapy as a standalone treatment
   • Electrotherapy modalities (ultrasound, TENS, electrical stimulation)
   • Knee bracing/sleeves (insufficient evidence)
   • Surgery as first-line treatment [8]

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS)

No specific PFPS guideline, but incorporated in knee pain/osteoarthritis guidelines:

• Emphasize non-operative management
• Exercise therapy and weight loss (if overweight) as first-line
• Shared decision-making regarding surgery [85]

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) - UK

No specific PFPS guideline. Covered under musculoskeletal conditions:

• Self-management and exercise
• Consider referral to physiotherapy
• Avoid unnecessary imaging [86]

---

Common Exam Questions

Written Exam (MCQ/SBA)

1. What is the most common cause of anterior knee pain in adolescents and young adults?

   • Answer: Patellofemoral pain syndrome

2. Which muscle is specifically weak or atrophied in patellofemoral pain syndrome?

   • Answer: Vastus medialis obliquus (VMO)

3. A 22-year-old female runner presents with anterior knee pain worse on descending stairs and after prolonged sitting. What is the most likely diagnosis?

   • Answer: Patellofemoral pain syndrome

4. What is the gold standard treatment for patellofemoral pain syndrome?

   • Answer: Exercise therapy targeting hip and knee strengthening

5. Which radiographic view is most useful for assessing the patellofemoral joint?

   • Answer: Skyline (Merchant) view

6. What is the Q-angle and what is the normal value in females?

   • Answer: Angle between ASIS-patella and patella-tibial tubercle; normal ~17° in females

7. What is the sensitivity of pain with squatting for diagnosing PFPS?

   • Answer: Approximately 91%

8. What is the Outerbridge classification used for?

   • Answer: Grading articular cartilage damage (chondromalacia) from I-IV

9. Which exercise should be avoided in early rehabilitation of PFPS?

   • Answer: Deep squats (> 60°) and open kinetic chain knee extension 90°→0°

10. What is the "theatre sign" in PFPS?

    • Answer: Pain after prolonged sitting with knees flexed (e.g., in cinema), relieved by extension

Clinical Exam (OSCE/Long Case)

Station: 25-year-old female with 6-month history of bilateral anterior knee pain

Expected Approach:

1. History: Establish PFPS features (activity-related, stairs, sitting, gradual onset)
2. Exclude red flags (night pain, locking, swelling, trauma)
3. Examination: Gait, alignment, VMO atrophy, patellar tracking, special tests
4. Investigations: Usually clinical diagnosis; skyline X-ray if indicated
5. Management: Education, exercise therapy (hip+knee), activity modification
6. Discuss prognosis and when to consider imaging/surgery

Viva Questions

Q1: Describe the pathophysiology of PFPS.

Model Answer: "PFPS is a multifactorial condition characterized by patellar maltracking within the trochlear groove. The fundamental mechanism involves an imbalance between medial and lateral stabilizing forces. Typically, weakness of the VMO combined with tightness of the lateral retinaculum and ITB results in lateral displacement and tilting of the patella. This creates abnormal contact pressures on the lateral patellar facet, particularly during knee flexion when patellofemoral joint reaction forces are highest. Contributing factors include proximal issues such as weak hip abductors allowing dynamic valgus, and distal factors such as excessive foot pronation. From Dye's tissue homeostasis perspective, these biomechanical abnormalities cause loss of homeostasis in patellofemoral joint tissues - synovium, retinaculum, subchondral bone, and eventually cartilage - resulting in pain and potentially progressive chondromalacia through the Outerbridge grades."

Q2: Why is descending stairs more painful than ascending in PFPS?

Model Answer: "Descending stairs requires eccentric quadriceps contraction to control knee flexion against gravity. This generates higher patellofemoral joint reaction forces (PFJRF) compared to the concentric contraction during stair ascent. Additionally, the knee flexion angle during descent is typically greater, and PFJRF increases exponentially with increasing flexion angle - from 0.5× body weight at 30° to 3.3× at 90°. The combination of higher force and eccentric loading makes stair descent particularly symptomatic."

Q3: What is the evidence for exercise therapy in PFPS?

Model Answer: "The 2015 Cochrane systematic review by van der Heijden included 31 RCTs with 1690 participants. It demonstrated that exercise therapy produces clinically important reductions in pain (mean difference -1.46 on VAS) and improvements in function (SMD 1.10) compared to no treatment. Specifically, combined hip and knee strengthening was superior to knee exercises alone (pain reduction MD -2.20, 95% CI -3.80 to -0.60). Exercise programs should be at least 6 weeks duration, performed 3-4 times per week, and supervised initially. This represents Level I evidence and forms the basis for strong recommendations in the 2019 JOSPT clinical practice guidelines."

Q4: When would you consider surgery for PFPS?

Model Answer: "Surgery is a last resort for PFPS, considered only after failure of comprehensive conservative management for minimum 6 months, preferably 12 months. Crucially, there must be demonstrable structural pathology amenable to surgical correction. RCT evidence shows arthroscopy is not superior to exercise therapy for PFPS without structural changes. Potential indications include: tibial tubercle osteotomy for persistent PFPS with documented lateral maltracking and elevated TT-TG distance > 20mm; MPFL reconstruction for associated patellar instability with MPFL insufficiency; or rarely, isolated lateral release for documented tight lateral retinaculum causing patellar tilt, though this is controversial with high failure rates. I would emphasize that the vast majority of PFPS patients should never require surgery, and outcomes are variable even in appropriately selected cases."

Q5: Discuss the relationship between chondromalacia and PFPS.

Model Answer: "Chondromalacia patellae refers specifically to pathological softening and degeneration of patellar articular cartilage, graded arthroscopically using the Outerbridge classification from I to IV. It represents an end-stage structural finding that may result from chronic PFPS. However, there is poor correlation between chondromalacia and symptoms - up to 50% of asymptomatic individuals have chondromalacia on MRI or arthroscopy, while many symptomatic PFPS patients have minimal cartilage damage. PFPS is therefore a clinical syndrome diagnosed by symptoms and functional impairment, not by imaging findings of chondromalacia. The term 'chondromalacia patellae' is somewhat of a misnomer when used interchangeably with PFPS; PFPS is the broader syndrome, while chondromalacia is a specific pathological finding that may or may not be present and may or may not be symptomatic."

---

Common Mistakes

Diagnostic Errors

❌ Ordering MRI for every PFPS patient: PFPS is a clinical diagnosis. MRI is not routinely required and often shows asymptomatic chondromalacia, leading to patient anxiety and unnecessary interventions.

❌ Diagnosing PFPS based solely on chondromalacia seen on imaging: Chondromalacia is poorly correlated with symptoms. Diagnosis must be clinical.

❌ Missing red flags: Failure to identify concerning features (night pain, constitutional symptoms, large effusion) that suggest serious pathology (tumor, infection, inflammatory arthritis).

❌ Not examining the hip and foot: PFPS is often driven by proximal (hip weakness) and distal (foot pronation) factors. Examining only the knee misses key contributors.

Management Errors

❌ Prescribing rest alone: Rest may reduce symptoms temporarily but does not address underlying weakness and maltracking. Exercise therapy is essential.

❌ Allowing deep squats and heavy leg extensions early in rehabilitation: These exercises generate excessive PFJRF (up to 7× body weight) and exacerbate symptoms. Short-arc quadriceps (0-30°) are safer initially.

❌ Focusing only on quadriceps strengthening: Evidence clearly shows combined hip and knee strengthening is superior to knee alone. Hip abductor/extensor weakness is a key contributor.

❌ Recommending surgery too early: PFPS requires minimum 6 months comprehensive conservative management. Surgery has limited role and poor outcomes if structural pathology not present.

❌ Performing or recommending arthroscopic chondroplasty: RCT evidence shows arthroscopy with cartilage shaving is not beneficial for PFPS. This is an outdated practice.

❌ Over-reliance on passive modalities: Taping, bracing, electrotherapy may provide short-term symptomatic relief but do not address underlying issues. They are adjuncts only; exercise is primary treatment.

Examination Errors

❌ Performing Clarke's test aggressively: This test is painful in healthy knees (high false positive), distresses patients, and has low specificity. It should be performed gently if at all, and is not recommended for routine use.

❌ Not assessing VMO bulk: Visual inspection for VMO atrophy (comparing sides) is a key clinical sign often overlooked.

❌ Failing to assess functional movement: Single-leg squat assessment reveals dynamic valgus and reproduces pain (91% sensitivity) - more useful than many special tests.

Viva/Exam Errors

❌ Stating that increased Q-angle is a proven risk factor: Prospective studies show Q-angle (when properly measured) is associated with PFPS but is NOT a strong independent risk factor. It's a marker of anatomy, not modifiable.

❌ Claiming lateral release is first-line surgical treatment: This is outdated. Lateral release alone has poor outcomes (30-50% persistent pain) and risk of iatrogenic medial instability.

❌ Not knowing the Cochrane review evidence: Examiners expect candidates to cite Level I evidence. The 2015 Cochrane review and 2019 JOSPT guidelines are key references.

---

13. Patient Explanation

What is Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome?

Patellofemoral pain syndrome, sometimes called "runner's knee," is a common condition that causes pain at the front of your knee, around or behind the kneecap. It typically affects young, active people, but can occur at any age.

What causes it?

The kneecap (patella) normally slides smoothly up and down in a groove on your thighbone when you bend and straighten your knee. In PFPS, the kneecap doesn't track properly in this groove - it often gets pulled too far to the outside (lateral side). This causes increased pressure on parts of the kneecap and irritation of surrounding structures, leading to pain.

The Train Track Analogy

Think of your kneecap as a train running on tracks (the groove in your thighbone). The muscles are like ropes pulling the train. If the outer rope (outer thigh muscle) is tight and the inner rope (VMO muscle) is weak, the train gets pulled off-center and grinds against the side of the track. This grinding causes pain and can damage the track over time.

Why does my knee hurt when I sit for a long time?

This is called the "theatre sign" or "moviegoer's sign." When you sit with your knee bent (like in a cinema or car), your kneecap is pressed hard against your thighbone. If the cartilage is irritated or the pressure is in the wrong place due to maltracking, this constant compression causes an ache. Straightening your leg releases the pressure and relieves the pain.

Why is going down stairs worse than going up?

Going downstairs requires your thigh muscles to work harder to control your knee as it bends, and the forces on your kneecap are much higher - up to 3-4 times your body weight. Going upstairs uses different muscle action and lower forces, so it's less painful.

What are the symptoms?

• Aching pain around or behind the kneecap
• Pain worse with: stairs (especially down), squatting, kneeling, running, prolonged sitting
• Grinding or crunching sensation when bending/straightening knee
• Occasional feeling of knee "giving way" (not true buckling)
• Usually minimal swelling (if your knee is very swollen, see your doctor)

Will I need scans or X-rays?

Usually not initially. This condition is diagnosed based on your symptoms and examination. If your symptoms don't improve with treatment after 3-6 months, or if there are concerning features, your doctor may order X-rays or an MRI. However, these scans often show changes that are not related to your pain, so treatment is based on symptoms, not scan findings.

Will physiotherapy work?

Yes - exercise therapy is the gold standard treatment for PFPS. Research shows that 7-9 out of 10 people improve significantly with a structured exercise program. However, it takes time - typically 3-6 months of consistent work. Quick fixes don't exist for this condition.

What exercises will I need to do?

Your physiotherapist will design a program for you, but it typically includes:

1. Strengthening your thigh muscles (especially the inner thigh muscle called VMO) and your hip muscles
2. Stretching tight muscles in your thigh, hamstring, and calf
3. Balance and control exercises to improve how your leg moves
4. Gradual return to your activities

Important: You'll need to avoid exercises that put high stress on your kneecap initially, like deep squats or certain leg machines. Short-range exercises that don't fully bend your knee are safer to start with.

How long until I feel better?

Most people start to notice improvement in 6-12 weeks, but full recovery typically takes 3-6 months. Some people continue to have mild symptoms beyond this, but the majority can return to normal activities with consistent rehabilitation.

Will I need surgery?

Very rarely. More than 90% of people with PFPS do not need surgery. Surgery is only considered if:

• You've completed at least 6 months of proper physiotherapy without improvement
• Scans show specific structural problems that can be surgically corrected
• Your symptoms severely affect your quality of life

Even then, surgery outcomes are variable, so it's a last resort.

What can I do to help myself?

1. Stick to your exercise program - this is the most important factor
2. Modify activities - avoid deep squats, limit stairs, take breaks from prolonged sitting
3. Ice your knee for 15-20 minutes after activity if sore
4. Wear supportive footwear - old running shoes can worsen symptoms
5. Maintain a healthy weight - extra weight increases stress on your kneecap
6. Be patient - recovery takes months, not weeks
7. Gradual return to sport - don't rush back too quickly

Can it come back?

Yes, symptoms can recur, especially if you return to high-impact activities too quickly or stop doing your strengthening exercises. Think of the exercises as maintenance for your knee - continuing them 2-3 times per week long-term helps prevent recurrence.

What if I don't treat it?

Without treatment, symptoms often persist for years. Some people develop chronic pain and may develop arthritis in the kneecap joint over time. Early, proper treatment gives the best outcome.

---

14. References

1. Gaitonde DY, Ericksen A, Robbins RC. Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(2):88-94. PMID: 30633480.

2. Dye SF. The pathophysiology of patellofemoral pain: a tissue homeostasis perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:100-110. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000172303.74414.7d. PMID: 15995427.

3. Duong V, Oo WM, Ding C, et al. Evaluation and Treatment of Knee Pain: A Review. JAMA. 2023;330(16):1568-1580. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.19675. PMID: 37874571.

4. Smith BE, Selfe J, Thacker D, et al. Incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190892. PMID: 29324820.

5. Dye SF. The pathophysiology of patellofemoral pain: a tissue homeostasis perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:100-110. PMID: 15995427.

6. Petersen W, Ellermann A, Gösele-Koppenburg A, et al. Patellofemoral pain syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2264-2274. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2759-6. PMID: 24221245.

7. van der Heijden RA, Lankhorst NE, van Linschoten R, et al. Exercise for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(1):CD010387. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010387.pub2. PMID: 25603546.

8. Willy RW, Hoglund LT, Barton CJ, et al. Patellofemoral Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(9):CPG1-CPG95. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.0302. PMID: 31475628.

9. Saltychev M, Dutton RA, Laimi K, et al. Effectiveness of conservative treatment for patellofemoral pain syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(5):393-401. doi:10.2340/16501977-2295. PMID: 29392329.

10. Kasitinon D, Li W, Wang E, et al. Physical Examination and Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: an Updated Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021;14(6):406-412. doi:10.1007/s12178-021-09730-7. PMID: 34713383.

11. Kakouris N, Yener N, Fong DTP. A systematic review of running-related musculoskeletal injuries in runners. J Sport Health Sci. 2021;10(5):513-522. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2021.04.001. PMID: 33862272.

12. Stathopulu E, Baildam E. Anterior knee pain: a long-term follow-up. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42(2):380-382. PMID: 12595641.

13. Utting MR, Davies G, Newman JH. Is anterior knee pain a predisposing factor to patellofemoral osteoarthritis? Knee. 2005;12(5):362-365. PMID: 16146626.

14. Thomas MJ, Wood L, Selfe J, et al. Anterior knee pain in younger adults as a precursor to subsequent patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:201. PMID: 20836867.

15. Rathleff MS, Rathleff CR, Olesen JL, et al. Is knee pain during adolescence a self-limiting condition? Prognosis of patellofemoral pain and other types of knee pain. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(5):1165-1171. PMID: 26792702.

16. Neal BS, Lack SD, Lankhorst NE, et al. Risk factors for patellofemoral pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(5):270-281. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-098890. PMID: 30242107.

17. Crossley KM, Stefanik JJ, Selfe J, et al. 2016 Patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Manchester. Part 1: Terminology, definitions, clinical examination, natural history, patellofemoral osteoarthritis and patient-reported outcome measures. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(14):839-843. PMID: 27343241.

18. Boling M, Padua D, Marshall S, et al. Gender differences in the incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(5):725-730. PMID: 19765240.

19. Souza RB, Powers CM. Differences in hip kinematics, muscle strength, and muscle activation between subjects with and without patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(1):12-19. PMID: 19131677.

20. Lankhorst NE, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Middelkoop M. Factors associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(4):193-206. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090369. PMID: 22815424.

21. Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, et al. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(2):95-101. PMID: 11916889.

22. Nakagawa TH, Maciel CD, Serrão FV. Trunk biomechanics and its association with hip and knee kinematics in patients with and without patellofemoral pain. Man Ther. 2015;20(1):189-193. PMID: 25261089.

23. Cowan SM, Bennell KL, Hodges PW, et al. Delayed onset of electromyographic activity of vastus medialis obliquus relative to vastus lateralis in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(2):183-189. PMID: 11239308.

24. Piva SR, Goodnite EA, Childs JD. Strength around the hip and flexibility of soft tissues in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(12):793-801. PMID: 16848100.

25. Barton CJ, Levinger P, Menz HB, et al. Kinematic gait characteristics associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2009;30(4):405-416. PMID: 19651515.

26. Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, et al. Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2(1):19-26. PMID: 7584171.

27. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB, van Poortvliet JA, et al. Mechanical factors in the incidence of knee pain in adolescents and young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66(5):685-693. PMID: 6501361.

28. Powers CM, Witvrouw E, Davis IS, et al. Evidence-based framework for a pathomechanical model of patellofemoral pain: 2017 patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Manchester, UK. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(24):1713-1723. PMID: 29109117.

29. Wilson T. The measurement of patellar alignment in patellofemoral pain syndrome: are we confusing assumptions with evidence? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(6):330-341. PMID: 17612360.

30. Reilly DT, Martens M. Experimental analysis of the quadriceps muscle force and patello-femoral joint reaction force for various activities. Acta Orthop Scand. 1972;43(2):126-137. PMID: 5079747.

31. Pereira NR, Baptista JS, Conceição F, et al. Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Risk Associated with Squats: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16):9969. doi:10.3390/ijerph19169969. PMID: 35954598.

32. Huberti HH, Hayes WC. Patellofemoral contact pressures. The influence of Q-angle and tendofemoral contact. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(5):715-724. PMID: 6725318.

33. Willson JD, Davis IS. Lower extremity mechanics of females with and without patellofemoral pain across activities with progressively greater task demands. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23(2):203-211. PMID: 17942202.

34. Ali SA, Helmer R, Terk MR. Analysis of the patellofemoral region on MRI: association of abnormal trochlear morphology with severe cartilage defects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(5):1399-1404. PMID: 20410432.

35. Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(5):1114-1121. PMID: 15262631.

36. Fulkerson JP. Alternatives to patellofemoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:76-80. PMID: 15995423.

37. Witvrouw E, Lysens R, Bellemans J, et al. Intrinsic risk factors for the development of anterior knee pain in an athletic population. A two-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(4):480-489. PMID: 10921638.

38. Mills K, Blanch P, Chapman AR, et al. Foot orthoses and gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature pertaining to potential mechanisms. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(14):1035-1046. PMID: 19996330.

39. Draper CE, Besier TF, Santos JM, et al. Using real-time MRI to quantify altered joint kinematics in subjects with patellofemoral pain and to evaluate the effects of a patellar brace or sleeve on joint motion. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(5):571-577. PMID: 18985701.

40. McCauley TR, Kornaat PR, Johnson DL. Chondromalacia patellae: diagnosis with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158(1):101-105. PMID: 1727333.

41. Kornaat PR, Bloem JL, Ceulemans RY, et al. Osteoarthritis of the knee: association between clinical features and MR imaging findings. Radiology. 2006;239(3):811-817. PMID: 16714463.

42. Dixit S, DiFiori JP, Burton M, et al. Management of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75(2):194-202. PMID: 17263214.

43. Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, et al. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(2):159-163. PMID: 8461073.

44. McCoy GF, McCrea JD, Beverland DE, et al. Vibration arthrography as a diagnostic aid in diseases of the knee. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69(2):288-293. PMID: 3818762.

45. Cahue S, Dunlop D, Hayes K, et al. Varus-valgus alignment in the progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(7):2184-2190. PMID: 15248216.

46. Grelsamer RP, McConnell J. The Patella: A Team Approach. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; 1998.

47. Ahmad CS, McCarthy M, Gomez JA, et al. The moving patellar apprehension test for lateral patellar instability. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(4):791-796. PMID: 19204367.

48. Kolowich PA, Paulos LE, Rosenberg TD, et al. Lateral release of the patella: indications and contraindications. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(4):359-365. PMID: 2206077.

49. Hudson Z, Darthuy E. Iliotibial band tightness and patellofemoral pain syndrome: a case-control study. Man Ther. 2009;14(2):147-151. PMID: 18339579.

50. Livingston LA, Mandigo JL. Bilateral Q angle asymmetry and anterior knee pain syndrome. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14(1):7-13. PMID: 10619083.

51. Smith TO, Hunt NJ, Donell ST. The reliability and validity of the Q-angle: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(12):1068-1079. PMID: 18841346.

52. Nijs J, Van Geel C, Van der auwera C, et al. Diagnostic value of five clinical tests in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Man Ther. 2006;11(1):69-77. PMID: 15950517.

53. Picci P, Manfrini M, Fabbri N, et al. Atlas of Musculoskeletal Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions. Cham: Springer; 2014.

54. Mathews CJ, Weston VC, Jones A, et al. Bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Lancet. 2010;375(9717):846-855. PMID: 20206778.

55. Fredericson M, Jennings F, Beaulieu C, et al. Stress fractures in athletes. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;17(5):309-325. PMID: 17414993.

56. Merchant AC. Patellofemoral imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(389):15-21. PMID: 11501800.

57. Insall J, Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 1971;101(1):101-104. PMID: 5111961.

58. Dejour D, Reynaud P, Lecoultre B. Douleurs et instabilité rotulienne. Essai de classification [Pain and patellar instability. Attempt at classification]. Med Hyg (Geneve). 1998;56(2224):1466-1471. French. PMID: 9775706.

59. Emami MJ, Ghahramani MH, Abdinejad F, et al. Q-angle: an invaluable parameter for evaluation of anterior knee pain. Arch Iran Med. 2007;10(1):24-26. PMID: 17198449.

60. Crossley KM, van Middelkoop M, Callaghan MJ, et al. 2016 Patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Manchester. Part 2: recommended physical interventions (exercise, taping, bracing, foot orthoses and combined interventions). Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(14):844-852. PMID: 27247098.

61. Khayambashi K, Mohammadkhani Z, Ghaznavi K, et al. The effects of isolated hip abductor and external rotator muscle strengthening on pain, health status, and hip strength in females with patellofemoral pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(1):22-29. PMID: 22031594.

62. Witvrouw E, Danneels L, Van Tiggelen D, et al. Open versus closed kinetic chain exercises in patellofemoral pain: a 5-year prospective randomized study. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(5):1122-1130. PMID: 15262632.

63. Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, et al. Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(4):556-569. PMID: 9565938.

64. Callaghan MJ, Selfe J. Patellar taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(4):CD006717. PMID: 22513943.

65. McConnell J. The management of chondromalacia patellae: a long term solution. Aust J Physiother. 1986;32(4):215-223. PMID: 25025491.

66. Smith TO, Drew BT, Meek TH, et al. Knee orthoses for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(12):CD010513. PMID: 26678465.

67. Collins N, Crossley K, Beller E, et al. Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2008;337:a1735. PMID: 18952682.

68. Brantingham JW, Bonnefin D, Perle SM, et al. Manipulative therapy for lower extremity conditions: update of a literature review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35(2):127-166. PMID: 22325966.

69. Ay S, Evcik D. The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatol Int. 2009;29(6):663-666. PMID: 18820903.

70. Fulkerson JP. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):447-456. PMID: 12016090.

71. Moseley JB, O'Malley K, Petersen NJ, et al. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(2):81-88. PMID: 12110735.

72. Lattermann C, Feller JA. Lateral retinacular release for patellar maltracking and pain: indications, technique, results. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2007;15(2):57-60. PMID: 17505318.

73. Fulkerson JP, Becker GJ, Meaney JA, et al. Anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer without bone graft. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(5):490-496. PMID: 2252090.

74. Bellemans J, Cauwenberghs F, Witvrouw E, et al. Anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer in patients with chronic anterior knee pain and a subluxation-type patellar malalignment. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(3):375-381. PMID: 9167820.

75. Camanho GL, Viegas Ade C, Bitar AC, et al. Conservative versus surgical treatment for repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament in acute dislocations of the patella. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(6):620-625. PMID: 19501291.

76. von Knoch F, Böhm T, Bürgi ML, et al. Trochleaplasty for recurrent patellar dislocation in association with trochlear dysplasia. A 4- to 14-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(10):1331-1335. PMID: 17012424.

77. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ 3rd, Warren RF, et al. The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(9):1911-1920. PMID: 16140804.

78. Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Evans R, et al. The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(3):310-315. PMID: 17356140.

79. Kettunen JA, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, et al. Knee arthroscopy and exercise versus exercise only for chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2007;5:38. PMID: 18070344.

80. Piva SR, Fitzgerald GK, Wisniewski S, et al. Predictors of pain and function outcome after rehabilitation in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(8):604-612. PMID: 19565153.

81. Nimon G, Murray D, Sandow M, et al. Natural history of anterior knee pain: a 14- to 20-year follow-up of nonoperative management. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(1):118-122. PMID: 9449112.

82. Piva SR, Fitzgerald GK, Irrgang JJ, et al. Associates of physical function and pain in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(2):285-295. PMID: 19236982.

83. Coppack RJ, Etherington J, Wills AK. The effects of exercise for the prevention of overuse anterior knee pain: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(5):940-948. PMID: 21212307.

84. Brushøj C, Larsen K, Albrecht-Beste E, et al. Prevention of overuse injuries by a concurrent exercise program in subjects exposed to an increase in training load: a randomized controlled trial of 1020 army recruits. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(4):663-670. PMID: 18337359.

85. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Evidence-Based Guideline, 3rd Edition. Published September 5, 2021. Available at: https://www.aaos.org/quality/quality-programs/lower-limb-programs/osteoarthritis-of-the-knee/

86. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Joint pain. Clinical Knowledge Summary. Last revised May 2020. Available at: https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/joint-pain/

---

(End of Enhanced Topic: Chondromalacia Patellae / Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome)