Colonic Polyps
Summary
Colonic polyps are abnormal tissue growths that protrude from the colonic mucosa. They are extremely common, found in 30-50% of individuals over age 50 undergoing colonoscopy. Most polyps are benign, but adenomatous polyps are premalignant and follow the adenoma-carcinoma sequence to colorectal cancer. Polyp risk stratification depends on histology (adenomatous vs hyperplastic), size (>1 cm higher risk), number, and presence of villous features or high-grade dysplasia. Polypectomy during colonoscopy is both diagnostic and therapeutic. Post-polypectomy surveillance intervals are determined by polyp characteristics according to BSG/ESGE guidelines. Polyposis syndromes (FAP, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers) require intensive surveillance and often prophylactic surgery.
Key Facts
- Prevalence: 30-50% of individuals >50 years have polyps
- Adenoma-carcinoma sequence: Adenomas can progress to cancer over 10-15 years
- Adenomatous polyps: Tubular (70%), Tubulovillous (20%), Villous (10%)
- Villous = High risk: Larger size, more dysplasia, higher malignant potential
- Hyperplastic polyps: Generally low risk (except right-sided serrated)
- Serrated polyps: Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are high-risk; alternative pathway to cancer
- Polypectomy: Snare polypectomy is standard; EMR/ESD for large lesions
- Surveillance: Based on BSG guidelines; high-risk = 3 years; low-risk = routine screening
- FAP: APC gene mutation; thousands of polyps; 100% cancer risk without surgery
- Lynch syndrome: MMR gene mutations; 50-80% lifetime CRC risk
Clinical Pearls
"All Adenomas Are Premalignant": Even small tubular adenomas have malignant potential. Polypectomy removes this risk. Surveillance is based on adenoma characteristics.
"Villous = Vicious": Villous adenomas have the highest malignant potential. Size, villous features, and high-grade dysplasia are key risk factors for progression.
"Right-Sided Serrated Lesions Are Dangerous": Sessile serrated lesions (formerly sessile serrated adenomas) in the right colon can be flat, difficult to see, and are precursors to serrated pathway cancers. They are often missed on colonoscopy.
"FAP = Prophylactic Colectomy": Familial adenomatous polyposis leads to 100% risk of colorectal cancer by age 40-50. Prophylactic proctocolectomy or colectomy with IRA is required.
"Lynch Syndrome = MSI-H Cancers": Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is caused by MMR gene mutations. Cancers are MSI-H and respond to immunotherapy.
Why This Matters Clinically
Colonic polyps are the precursor to most colorectal cancers. Identifying and removing adenomas through colonoscopy and surveillance is the cornerstone of colorectal cancer prevention. Understanding polyp histology, risk stratification, and surveillance intervals is essential for all clinicians.[1,2]
Incidence & Prevalence
| Parameter | Data |
|---|---|
| Prevalence (>50 years) | 30-50% have polyps on screening colonoscopy |
| Adenoma prevalence | 20-30% |
| CRC risk from adenoma | ~5% over 10-15 years (size/histology dependent) |
Risk Factors
| Factor | Notes |
|---|---|
| Age >50 | Major risk factor |
| Male sex | Higher adenoma prevalence |
| Family history of CRC | 2-4x increased risk |
| FAP | APC mutation; 100% risk |
| Lynch syndrome | MMR mutations; 50-80% risk |
| Diet | Red/processed meat; low fibre |
| Obesity | Increased risk |
| Smoking | Increased risk |
| IBD | Dysplasia-associated lesions |
Adenoma-Carcinoma Sequence (Vogelstein Model)
Step 1: Normal Epithelium
- Normal colonic mucosa
Step 2: APC Mutation → Early Adenoma
- Loss of APC tumour suppressor (gatekeeper)
- Aberrant crypt foci develop
- Small adenoma forms
Step 3: KRAS Mutation → Intermediate Adenoma
- Oncogene activation
- Adenoma growth
Step 4: SMAD4/DCC Loss → Late Adenoma
- Loss of further tumour suppressors
- Increasing dysplasia
Step 5: p53 Mutation → Carcinoma
- Loss of p53 (guardian of genome)
- Transition to invasive carcinoma
Timeline: 10-15 years from adenoma to cancer
Serrated Pathway (Alternative)
| Step | Feature |
|---|---|
| 1 | BRAF mutation (or KRAS) |
| 2 | MLH1 promoter hypermethylation |
| 3 | Sessile serrated lesion (SSL) |
| 4 | SSL with dysplasia |
| 5 | MSI-H colorectal cancer |
Polyp Classification
| Type | Histology | Cancer Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Tubular adenoma | <25% villous | Low (small); Moderate (large) |
| Tubulovillous adenoma | 25-75% villous | Moderate-High |
| Villous adenoma | >75% villous | High (especially if large) |
| Hyperplastic polyp | Non-neoplastic | Very low (left-sided); SSL pathway risk (right) |
| Sessile serrated lesion (SSL) | Serrated; dysplasia may be present | High (esp. proximal) |
| Traditional serrated adenoma | Serrated neoplastic | Moderate-High |
Symptoms
Most colonic polyps are asymptomatic — detected on screening.
| Symptom | Frequency | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Asymptomatic | 80-90% | Detected on screening or incidentally |
| Rectal bleeding | 10-20% | More common with large polyps |
| Mucus per rectum | Variable | Villous adenomas secrete mucus |
| Change in bowel habit | Rare | Large polyps only |
| Hypokalaemia | Rare | Large villous adenomas (mucous hypersecretion) |
Signs
| Sign | Notes |
|---|---|
| Usually normal | Most polyps cause no physical findings |
| Palpable rectal polyp | On DRE if low rectal |
| Anaemia | Chronic occult blood loss (rare) |
Red Flags
[!CAUTION] Red Flags — Urgent Investigation:
- Rectal bleeding with change in bowel habit (2WW referral)
- Iron deficiency anaemia
- Family history suggestive of polyposis syndrome
- Multiple polyps on colonoscopy (consider FAP)
- High-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma in polyp
Physical Examination
- Usually normal
- Perform DRE (digital rectal examination) — may palpate low rectal polyp
- Assess for signs of anaemia (pallor)
- Abdominal examination usually unremarkable
Polyposis Syndrome Features
| Syndrome | Extra-Colonic Features |
|---|---|
| FAP | Osteomas, epidermoid cysts, desmoid tumours, CHRPE |
| Gardner syndrome | FAP + prominent extraintestinal manifestations |
| Peutz-Jeghers | Mucocutaneous pigmentation (lips, buccal mucosa) |
| Lynch syndrome | Associated cancers (endometrial, ovarian, urological) |
Colonoscopy
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Gold standard | Direct visualisation + polypectomy |
| Complete to caecum | Ensure complete examination |
| Polyp detection | Size, location, morphology (Paris classification) |
| Polypectomy | Snare; hot or cold; EMR for large sessile |
| Histology | Essential for risk stratification |
Paris Classification (Morphology)
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| 0-Ip | Pedunculated (on a stalk) |
| 0-Is | Sessile (broad-based) |
| 0-IIa | Flat elevated |
| 0-IIb | Completely flat |
| 0-IIc | Slightly depressed |
Histology Reporting
| Feature | Significance |
|---|---|
| Adenoma type | Tubular, tubulovillous, villous |
| Dysplasia grade | Low-grade or high-grade |
| Size | >10 mm = higher risk |
| Completeness of excision | Clear margins |
| Invasive carcinoma | If present → pT staging needed |
Investigations for Polyposis Syndromes
| Test | Indication |
|---|---|
| Genetic testing | APC (FAP), MMR genes (Lynch), STK11 (PJS) |
| Family history | Amsterdam criteria (Lynch) |
| Upper GI endoscopy | FAP surveillance (duodenal adenomas) |
| Gynaecological surveillance | Lynch syndrome (endometrial cancer) |
Management Algorithm
COLONIC POLYP MANAGEMENT
↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ POLYPECTOMY │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ PEDUNCULATED (0-Ip): │
│ ➤ Snare polypectomy (hot snare with diathermy) │
│ │
│ SESSILE <10mm: │
│ ➤ Cold snare polypectomy (preferred for small) │
│ │
│ SESSILE 10-20mm: │
│ ➤ Piecemeal EMR (endoscopic mucosal resection) │
│ │
│ LARGE SESSILE >20mm: │
│ ➤ ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection) — specialist │
│ ➤ Consider surgical resection if not amenable to EMR/ESD │
│ │
│ SEND ALL POLYPS FOR HISTOLOGY │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HISTOLOGY RESULT │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ NON-NEOPLASTIC (Hyperplastic): │
│ ➤ No surveillance (unless large/proximal) │
│ │
│ LOW-RISK ADENOMA: │
│ ➤ 1-2 adenomas, all <10mm, tubular, LGD │
│ ➤ Return to routine screening (no surveillance colonoscopy)│
│ │
│ INTERMEDIATE-RISK ADENOMA: │
│ ➤ 3-4 small adenomas OR 1+ adenoma 10-20mm │
│ ➤ Surveillance colonoscopy at 3 years │
│ │
│ HIGH-RISK ADENOMA: │
│ ➤ ≥5 adenomas OR ≥1 adenoma ≥20mm OR HGD │
│ ➤ Surveillance colonoscopy at 1 year │
│ │
│ SERRATED LESIONS (BSG 2020): │
│ ➤ SSL <10mm without dysplasia: 3 years │
│ ➤ SSL ≥10mm or with dysplasia: 1 year │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MALIGNANT POLYP (Carcinoma in Polyp) │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ASSESS RISK (Haggitt / Kikuchi staging): │
│ │
│ LOW-RISK (Complete polypectomy may suffice): │
│ ➤ Well/mod differentiated │
│ ➤ No lymphovascular invasion │
│ ➤ Clear margins (≥1mm) │
│ ➤ Sm1 invasion (if sessile) │
│ │
│ HIGH-RISK (Surgical resection needed): │
│ ➤ Poorly differentiated │
│ ➤ Lymphovascular invasion │
│ ➤ Involved/close margins │
│ ➤ Sm2/Sm3 invasion (if sessile) │
│ ➤ Budding │
│ │
│ ➤ MDT discussion essential │
│ ➤ Surgical resection (segmental colectomy) if high-risk │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
BSG Surveillance Guidelines (2020)
| Risk Category | Polyp Characteristics | Surveillance |
|---|---|---|
| Low-risk | 1-2 adenomas, <10mm, tubular, LGD | No surveillance; return to screening |
| Intermediate-risk | 3-4 small adenomas OR 1+ 10-20mm | Colonoscopy at 3 years |
| High-risk | ≥5 adenomas OR ≥1 ≥20mm OR HGD | Colonoscopy at 1 year |
Complications of Polyps
| Complication | Notes |
|---|---|
| Malignant transformation | Main concern; adenoma-carcinoma sequence |
| Bleeding | Large polyps; may present as iron deficiency anaemia |
| Obstruction | Rare; very large polyps |
| Hypokalaemia | Large villous adenomas (mucous secretion) |
Complications of Polypectomy
| Complication | Incidence | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Bleeding (immediate) | 1-2% | Endoscopic haemostasis (clips, adrenaline) |
| Bleeding (delayed) | 1% | Usually self-limiting; repeat colonoscopy if persistent |
| Perforation | 0.1-0.5% | Small: Clips + conservative; large: Surgery |
| Post-polypectomy syndrome | Rare | Transmural burn without perforation; antibiotics + bowel rest |
| Incomplete excision | Variable | Repeat endoscopy; surgery if recurrent |
Progression Risk
| Factor | Higher Risk |
|---|---|
| Size | >10mm (especially >20mm) |
| Histology | Villous > Tubulovillous > Tubular |
| Dysplasia | High-grade dysplasia |
| Number | Multiple adenomas |
| Location | Proximal (may be harder to detect) |
Surveillance Outcomes
| Scenario | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Complete polypectomy + surveillance | Reduces CRC incidence by 76-90% |
| Missed polyps | Risk of interval cancers |
| High-quality colonoscopy | ADR (adenoma detection rate) >25% associated with lower CRC risk |
Key Guidelines
| Guideline | Organisation | Year | Key Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| BSG Post-Polypectomy Surveillance | BSG | 2020 | Risk stratification; surveillance intervals |
| ESGE Polypectomy | ESGE | 2017 | Polypectomy techniques |
Key Evidence
Winawer et al. (National Polyp Study)
- Colonoscopic polypectomy reduces CRC incidence by 76-90%
- Landmark evidence for polypectomy as cancer prevention
- PMID: 7848710
What are colonic polyps?
Polyps are small growths on the lining of the bowel (colon). They are very common, especially as you get older. Most polyps are harmless, but some types (called adenomas) can slowly turn into bowel cancer over many years if not removed.
How are they found?
Polyps are usually found during a colonoscopy — a camera test to look inside your bowel. Many polyps cause no symptoms.
How are they treated?
Polyps are removed during the colonoscopy using a wire loop (snare). This is painless and prevents any risk of cancer developing from that polyp.
Do I need follow-up?
It depends on the type, size, and number of polyps:
- Low-risk polyps: No extra check-ups needed; return to normal bowel screening
- Higher-risk polyps: Follow-up colonoscopy in 1-3 years to check for new polyps
What about family history?
If you have many polyps or a strong family history of bowel cancer, you may need genetic testing and more frequent colonoscopies.
Guidelines
- Rutter MD, East J, Rees CJ, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines. Gut. 2020;69(2):201-223. PMID: 31776230
Key Studies
- Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(27):1977-1981. PMID: 7848710
High-Yield Exam Topics
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Adenoma-carcinoma sequence | APC → KRAS → p53; 10-15 years |
| Adenoma types | Tubular (low), Tubulovillous, Villous (high risk) |
| Serrated pathway | SSL → BRAF → MSI-H cancer |
| FAP | APC gene; thousands of polyps; 100% CRC risk |
| Lynch syndrome | MMR genes; HNPCC; MSI-H |
| Surveillance intervals | Low = no surveillance; Intermediate = 3 years; High = 1 year |
Sample Viva Questions
Q1: How do you risk-stratify adenomas for surveillance?
Model Answer: According to BSG 2020 guidelines:
- Low-risk: 1-2 adenomas, all <10mm, tubular, low-grade dysplasia → Return to normal screening; no surveillance
- Intermediate-risk: 3-4 small adenomas OR at least one 10-20mm → Surveillance colonoscopy at 3 years
- High-risk: ≥5 adenomas OR at least one ≥20mm OR high-grade dysplasia → Surveillance colonoscopy at 1 year Sessile serrated lesions ≥10mm or with dysplasia are high-risk (1-year surveillance).
Q2: What is the adenoma-carcinoma sequence?
Model Answer: The adenoma-carcinoma sequence describes the stepwise genetic progression from normal colonic epithelium to adenoma to invasive carcinoma:
- APC mutation (adenoma initiation)
- KRAS mutation (adenoma growth)
- SMAD4/DCC loss (late adenoma)
- p53 mutation (transition to carcinoma) This process takes 10-15 years, which is the rationale for colonoscopic surveillance intervals. An alternative pathway is the serrated pathway (BRAF → MLH1 methylation → MSI-H cancer).
Q3: A colonoscopy shows >100 colorectal polyps. What is the diagnosis and management?
Model Answer: >100 polyps strongly suggests familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), caused by germline APC mutation. Untreated, there is 100% risk of colorectal cancer by age 40-50. Management: Confirm with genetic testing (APC mutation). Prophylactic surgery is required — either proctocolectomy with IPAA (ileal pouch-anal anastomosis) or colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) if rectum is relatively spared. Upper GI surveillance (duodenal adenomas). Screen first-degree relatives. Lifelong surveillance of pouch/rectum.
Common Exam Errors
| Error | Correct Approach |
|---|---|
| Treating all polyps equally | Must know histology; villous >> tubular risk |
| Not knowing surveillance intervals | BSG 2020: Low = none; Intermediate = 3 yrs; High = 1 yr |
| Forgetting serrated lesions | SSLs are high-risk; alternative cancer pathway |
| Missing FAP diagnosis | >100 polyps = FAP until proven otherwise |
Last Reviewed: 2025-12-24 | MedVellum Editorial Team
Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference. Clinical decisions should account for individual patient circumstances. Always consult appropriate specialists.