MedVellum
MedVellum
Back to Library
Gastroenterology
General Surgery
Colorectal Surgery

Colonic Polyps

High EvidenceUpdated: 2025-12-24

On This Page

Red Flags

  • FAP (Familial Adenomatous Polyposis) — 100% cancer risk
  • Large villous adenoma (high malignant potential)
  • High-grade dysplasia on histology
  • Lynch syndrome (HNPCC)
  • Invasive carcinoma within polyp
Overview

Colonic Polyps

1. Clinical Overview

Summary

Colonic polyps are abnormal tissue growths that protrude from the colonic mucosa. They are extremely common, found in 30-50% of individuals over age 50 undergoing colonoscopy. Most polyps are benign, but adenomatous polyps are premalignant and follow the adenoma-carcinoma sequence to colorectal cancer. Polyp risk stratification depends on histology (adenomatous vs hyperplastic), size (>1 cm higher risk), number, and presence of villous features or high-grade dysplasia. Polypectomy during colonoscopy is both diagnostic and therapeutic. Post-polypectomy surveillance intervals are determined by polyp characteristics according to BSG/ESGE guidelines. Polyposis syndromes (FAP, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers) require intensive surveillance and often prophylactic surgery.

Key Facts

  • Prevalence: 30-50% of individuals >50 years have polyps
  • Adenoma-carcinoma sequence: Adenomas can progress to cancer over 10-15 years
  • Adenomatous polyps: Tubular (70%), Tubulovillous (20%), Villous (10%)
  • Villous = High risk: Larger size, more dysplasia, higher malignant potential
  • Hyperplastic polyps: Generally low risk (except right-sided serrated)
  • Serrated polyps: Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are high-risk; alternative pathway to cancer
  • Polypectomy: Snare polypectomy is standard; EMR/ESD for large lesions
  • Surveillance: Based on BSG guidelines; high-risk = 3 years; low-risk = routine screening
  • FAP: APC gene mutation; thousands of polyps; 100% cancer risk without surgery
  • Lynch syndrome: MMR gene mutations; 50-80% lifetime CRC risk

Clinical Pearls

"All Adenomas Are Premalignant": Even small tubular adenomas have malignant potential. Polypectomy removes this risk. Surveillance is based on adenoma characteristics.

"Villous = Vicious": Villous adenomas have the highest malignant potential. Size, villous features, and high-grade dysplasia are key risk factors for progression.

"Right-Sided Serrated Lesions Are Dangerous": Sessile serrated lesions (formerly sessile serrated adenomas) in the right colon can be flat, difficult to see, and are precursors to serrated pathway cancers. They are often missed on colonoscopy.

"FAP = Prophylactic Colectomy": Familial adenomatous polyposis leads to 100% risk of colorectal cancer by age 40-50. Prophylactic proctocolectomy or colectomy with IRA is required.

"Lynch Syndrome = MSI-H Cancers": Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is caused by MMR gene mutations. Cancers are MSI-H and respond to immunotherapy.

Why This Matters Clinically

Colonic polyps are the precursor to most colorectal cancers. Identifying and removing adenomas through colonoscopy and surveillance is the cornerstone of colorectal cancer prevention. Understanding polyp histology, risk stratification, and surveillance intervals is essential for all clinicians.[1,2]


2. Epidemiology

Incidence & Prevalence

ParameterData
Prevalence (>50 years)30-50% have polyps on screening colonoscopy
Adenoma prevalence20-30%
CRC risk from adenoma~5% over 10-15 years (size/histology dependent)

Risk Factors

FactorNotes
Age >50Major risk factor
Male sexHigher adenoma prevalence
Family history of CRC2-4x increased risk
FAPAPC mutation; 100% risk
Lynch syndromeMMR mutations; 50-80% risk
DietRed/processed meat; low fibre
ObesityIncreased risk
SmokingIncreased risk
IBDDysplasia-associated lesions

3. Pathophysiology

Adenoma-Carcinoma Sequence (Vogelstein Model)

Step 1: Normal Epithelium

  • Normal colonic mucosa

Step 2: APC Mutation → Early Adenoma

  • Loss of APC tumour suppressor (gatekeeper)
  • Aberrant crypt foci develop
  • Small adenoma forms

Step 3: KRAS Mutation → Intermediate Adenoma

  • Oncogene activation
  • Adenoma growth

Step 4: SMAD4/DCC Loss → Late Adenoma

  • Loss of further tumour suppressors
  • Increasing dysplasia

Step 5: p53 Mutation → Carcinoma

  • Loss of p53 (guardian of genome)
  • Transition to invasive carcinoma

Timeline: 10-15 years from adenoma to cancer

Serrated Pathway (Alternative)

StepFeature
1BRAF mutation (or KRAS)
2MLH1 promoter hypermethylation
3Sessile serrated lesion (SSL)
4SSL with dysplasia
5MSI-H colorectal cancer

Polyp Classification

TypeHistologyCancer Risk
Tubular adenoma<25% villousLow (small); Moderate (large)
Tubulovillous adenoma25-75% villousModerate-High
Villous adenoma>75% villousHigh (especially if large)
Hyperplastic polypNon-neoplasticVery low (left-sided); SSL pathway risk (right)
Sessile serrated lesion (SSL)Serrated; dysplasia may be presentHigh (esp. proximal)
Traditional serrated adenomaSerrated neoplasticModerate-High

4. Clinical Presentation

Symptoms

Most colonic polyps are asymptomatic — detected on screening.

SymptomFrequencyNotes
Asymptomatic80-90%Detected on screening or incidentally
Rectal bleeding10-20%More common with large polyps
Mucus per rectumVariableVillous adenomas secrete mucus
Change in bowel habitRareLarge polyps only
HypokalaemiaRareLarge villous adenomas (mucous hypersecretion)

Signs

SignNotes
Usually normalMost polyps cause no physical findings
Palpable rectal polypOn DRE if low rectal
AnaemiaChronic occult blood loss (rare)

Red Flags

[!CAUTION] Red Flags — Urgent Investigation:

  • Rectal bleeding with change in bowel habit (2WW referral)
  • Iron deficiency anaemia
  • Family history suggestive of polyposis syndrome
  • Multiple polyps on colonoscopy (consider FAP)
  • High-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma in polyp

5. Clinical Examination

Physical Examination

  • Usually normal
  • Perform DRE (digital rectal examination) — may palpate low rectal polyp
  • Assess for signs of anaemia (pallor)
  • Abdominal examination usually unremarkable

Polyposis Syndrome Features

SyndromeExtra-Colonic Features
FAPOsteomas, epidermoid cysts, desmoid tumours, CHRPE
Gardner syndromeFAP + prominent extraintestinal manifestations
Peutz-JeghersMucocutaneous pigmentation (lips, buccal mucosa)
Lynch syndromeAssociated cancers (endometrial, ovarian, urological)

6. Investigations

Colonoscopy

FeatureDetails
Gold standardDirect visualisation + polypectomy
Complete to caecumEnsure complete examination
Polyp detectionSize, location, morphology (Paris classification)
PolypectomySnare; hot or cold; EMR for large sessile
HistologyEssential for risk stratification

Paris Classification (Morphology)

TypeDescription
0-IpPedunculated (on a stalk)
0-IsSessile (broad-based)
0-IIaFlat elevated
0-IIbCompletely flat
0-IIcSlightly depressed

Histology Reporting

FeatureSignificance
Adenoma typeTubular, tubulovillous, villous
Dysplasia gradeLow-grade or high-grade
Size>10 mm = higher risk
Completeness of excisionClear margins
Invasive carcinomaIf present → pT staging needed

Investigations for Polyposis Syndromes

TestIndication
Genetic testingAPC (FAP), MMR genes (Lynch), STK11 (PJS)
Family historyAmsterdam criteria (Lynch)
Upper GI endoscopyFAP surveillance (duodenal adenomas)
Gynaecological surveillanceLynch syndrome (endometrial cancer)

7. Management

Management Algorithm

              COLONIC POLYP MANAGEMENT
                        ↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                   POLYPECTOMY                               │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  PEDUNCULATED (0-Ip):                                       │
│  ➤ Snare polypectomy (hot snare with diathermy)            │
│                                                             │
│  SESSILE &lt;10mm:                                              │
│  ➤ Cold snare polypectomy (preferred for small)            │
│                                                             │
│  SESSILE 10-20mm:                                            │
│  ➤ Piecemeal EMR (endoscopic mucosal resection)            │
│                                                             │
│  LARGE SESSILE &gt;20mm:                                        │
│  ➤ ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection) — specialist     │
│  ➤ Consider surgical resection if not amenable to EMR/ESD  │
│                                                             │
│  SEND ALL POLYPS FOR HISTOLOGY                              │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│            HISTOLOGY RESULT                                  │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  NON-NEOPLASTIC (Hyperplastic):                              │
│  ➤ No surveillance (unless large/proximal)                 │
│                                                             │
│  LOW-RISK ADENOMA:                                           │
│  ➤ 1-2 adenomas, all &lt;10mm, tubular, LGD                   │
│  ➤ Return to routine screening (no surveillance colonoscopy)│
│                                                             │
│  INTERMEDIATE-RISK ADENOMA:                                  │
│  ➤ 3-4 small adenomas OR 1+ adenoma 10-20mm                │
│  ➤ Surveillance colonoscopy at 3 years                     │
│                                                             │
│  HIGH-RISK ADENOMA:                                          │
│  ➤ ≥5 adenomas OR ≥1 adenoma ≥20mm OR HGD                  │
│  ➤ Surveillance colonoscopy at 1 year                      │
│                                                             │
│  SERRATED LESIONS (BSG 2020):                               │
│  ➤ SSL &lt;10mm without dysplasia: 3 years                    │
│  ➤ SSL ≥10mm or with dysplasia: 1 year                     │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│           MALIGNANT POLYP (Carcinoma in Polyp)              │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  ASSESS RISK (Haggitt / Kikuchi staging):                   │
│                                                             │
│  LOW-RISK (Complete polypectomy may suffice):              │
│  ➤ Well/mod differentiated                                 │
│  ➤ No lymphovascular invasion                              │
│  ➤ Clear margins (≥1mm)                                    │
│  ➤ Sm1 invasion (if sessile)                               │
│                                                             │
│  HIGH-RISK (Surgical resection needed):                     │
│  ➤ Poorly differentiated                                   │
│  ➤ Lymphovascular invasion                                 │
│  ➤ Involved/close margins                                  │
│  ➤ Sm2/Sm3 invasion (if sessile)                           │
│  ➤ Budding                                                 │
│                                                             │
│  ➤ MDT discussion essential                                │
│  ➤ Surgical resection (segmental colectomy) if high-risk  │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

BSG Surveillance Guidelines (2020)

Risk CategoryPolyp CharacteristicsSurveillance
Low-risk1-2 adenomas, <10mm, tubular, LGDNo surveillance; return to screening
Intermediate-risk3-4 small adenomas OR 1+ 10-20mmColonoscopy at 3 years
High-risk≥5 adenomas OR ≥1 ≥20mm OR HGDColonoscopy at 1 year

8. Complications

Complications of Polyps

ComplicationNotes
Malignant transformationMain concern; adenoma-carcinoma sequence
BleedingLarge polyps; may present as iron deficiency anaemia
ObstructionRare; very large polyps
HypokalaemiaLarge villous adenomas (mucous secretion)

Complications of Polypectomy

ComplicationIncidenceManagement
Bleeding (immediate)1-2%Endoscopic haemostasis (clips, adrenaline)
Bleeding (delayed)1%Usually self-limiting; repeat colonoscopy if persistent
Perforation0.1-0.5%Small: Clips + conservative; large: Surgery
Post-polypectomy syndromeRareTransmural burn without perforation; antibiotics + bowel rest
Incomplete excisionVariableRepeat endoscopy; surgery if recurrent

9. Prognosis & Outcomes

Progression Risk

FactorHigher Risk
Size>10mm (especially >20mm)
HistologyVillous > Tubulovillous > Tubular
DysplasiaHigh-grade dysplasia
NumberMultiple adenomas
LocationProximal (may be harder to detect)

Surveillance Outcomes

ScenarioOutcome
Complete polypectomy + surveillanceReduces CRC incidence by 76-90%
Missed polypsRisk of interval cancers
High-quality colonoscopyADR (adenoma detection rate) >25% associated with lower CRC risk

10. Evidence & Guidelines

Key Guidelines

GuidelineOrganisationYearKey Points
BSG Post-Polypectomy SurveillanceBSG2020Risk stratification; surveillance intervals
ESGE PolypectomyESGE2017Polypectomy techniques

Key Evidence

Winawer et al. (National Polyp Study)

  • Colonoscopic polypectomy reduces CRC incidence by 76-90%
  • Landmark evidence for polypectomy as cancer prevention
  • PMID: 7848710

11. Patient/Layperson Explanation

What are colonic polyps?

Polyps are small growths on the lining of the bowel (colon). They are very common, especially as you get older. Most polyps are harmless, but some types (called adenomas) can slowly turn into bowel cancer over many years if not removed.

How are they found?

Polyps are usually found during a colonoscopy — a camera test to look inside your bowel. Many polyps cause no symptoms.

How are they treated?

Polyps are removed during the colonoscopy using a wire loop (snare). This is painless and prevents any risk of cancer developing from that polyp.

Do I need follow-up?

It depends on the type, size, and number of polyps:

  • Low-risk polyps: No extra check-ups needed; return to normal bowel screening
  • Higher-risk polyps: Follow-up colonoscopy in 1-3 years to check for new polyps

What about family history?

If you have many polyps or a strong family history of bowel cancer, you may need genetic testing and more frequent colonoscopies.


12. References

Guidelines

  1. Rutter MD, East J, Rees CJ, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines. Gut. 2020;69(2):201-223. PMID: 31776230

Key Studies

  1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(27):1977-1981. PMID: 7848710

13. Examination Focus

High-Yield Exam Topics

TopicKey Points
Adenoma-carcinoma sequenceAPC → KRAS → p53; 10-15 years
Adenoma typesTubular (low), Tubulovillous, Villous (high risk)
Serrated pathwaySSL → BRAF → MSI-H cancer
FAPAPC gene; thousands of polyps; 100% CRC risk
Lynch syndromeMMR genes; HNPCC; MSI-H
Surveillance intervalsLow = no surveillance; Intermediate = 3 years; High = 1 year

Sample Viva Questions

Q1: How do you risk-stratify adenomas for surveillance?

Model Answer: According to BSG 2020 guidelines:

  • Low-risk: 1-2 adenomas, all <10mm, tubular, low-grade dysplasia → Return to normal screening; no surveillance
  • Intermediate-risk: 3-4 small adenomas OR at least one 10-20mm → Surveillance colonoscopy at 3 years
  • High-risk: ≥5 adenomas OR at least one ≥20mm OR high-grade dysplasia → Surveillance colonoscopy at 1 year Sessile serrated lesions ≥10mm or with dysplasia are high-risk (1-year surveillance).

Q2: What is the adenoma-carcinoma sequence?

Model Answer: The adenoma-carcinoma sequence describes the stepwise genetic progression from normal colonic epithelium to adenoma to invasive carcinoma:

  1. APC mutation (adenoma initiation)
  2. KRAS mutation (adenoma growth)
  3. SMAD4/DCC loss (late adenoma)
  4. p53 mutation (transition to carcinoma) This process takes 10-15 years, which is the rationale for colonoscopic surveillance intervals. An alternative pathway is the serrated pathway (BRAF → MLH1 methylation → MSI-H cancer).

Q3: A colonoscopy shows >100 colorectal polyps. What is the diagnosis and management?

Model Answer: >100 polyps strongly suggests familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), caused by germline APC mutation. Untreated, there is 100% risk of colorectal cancer by age 40-50. Management: Confirm with genetic testing (APC mutation). Prophylactic surgery is required — either proctocolectomy with IPAA (ileal pouch-anal anastomosis) or colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) if rectum is relatively spared. Upper GI surveillance (duodenal adenomas). Screen first-degree relatives. Lifelong surveillance of pouch/rectum.

Common Exam Errors

ErrorCorrect Approach
Treating all polyps equallyMust know histology; villous >> tubular risk
Not knowing surveillance intervalsBSG 2020: Low = none; Intermediate = 3 yrs; High = 1 yr
Forgetting serrated lesionsSSLs are high-risk; alternative cancer pathway
Missing FAP diagnosis>100 polyps = FAP until proven otherwise

Last Reviewed: 2025-12-24 | MedVellum Editorial Team


Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference. Clinical decisions should account for individual patient circumstances. Always consult appropriate specialists.

Last updated: 2025-12-24

At a Glance

EvidenceHigh
Last Updated2025-12-24

Red Flags

  • FAP (Familial Adenomatous Polyposis) — 100% cancer risk
  • Large villous adenoma (high malignant potential)
  • High-grade dysplasia on histology
  • Lynch syndrome (HNPCC)
  • Invasive carcinoma within polyp

Clinical Pearls

  • **"All Adenomas Are Premalignant"**: Even small tubular adenomas have malignant potential. Polypectomy removes this risk. Surveillance is based on adenoma characteristics.
  • **"Villous = Vicious"**: Villous adenomas have the highest malignant potential. Size, villous features, and high-grade dysplasia are key risk factors for progression.
  • **"FAP = Prophylactic Colectomy"**: Familial adenomatous polyposis leads to 100% risk of colorectal cancer by age 40-50. Prophylactic proctocolectomy or colectomy with IRA is required.
  • **"Lynch Syndrome = MSI-H Cancers"**: Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is caused by MMR gene mutations. Cancers are MSI-H and respond to immunotherapy.
  • **Red Flags — Urgent Investigation:**

Guidelines

  • NICE Guidelines
  • BTS Guidelines
  • RCUK Guidelines