Contact Dermatitis
Comprehensive evidence-based guide to contact dermatitis: allergic and irritant mechanisms, diagnosis, patch testing, and management
Clinical board
A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.
Exam focus
Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.
- MRCP, FRACP, Dermatology Boards
Linked comparisons
Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Cellulitis
Editorial and exam context
Reviewed by MedVellum Editorial Team · MedVellum Medical Education Platform
Credentials: MBBS, MRCP, Board Certified
Contact Dermatitis
Quick Reference
Critical Alerts
- Type IV hypersensitivity reaction: Delayed onset 24-72 hours, T-cell mediated
- Differentiate ICD from ACD: 80% irritant (immediate), 20% allergic (delayed)
- Distinguish from cellulitis: Pruritic (not tender), well-demarcated, geometric patterns
- Patch testing is gold standard: Identifies specific allergens in ACD
- Occupational disease: Leading cause of occupational skin disease (> 40% of cases)
- Chronic hand eczema: Most common anatomical site, significant disability
- Systemic steroids require taper: 2-3 weeks to prevent rebound dermatitis
- Secondary infection risk: Monitor for impetiginization and cellulitis
Irritant vs Allergic Contact Dermatitis
| Feature | Irritant Contact Dermatitis (ICD) | Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Direct cytotoxic damage, non-immunological | Type IV delayed hypersensitivity (T-cell mediated) |
| Onset | Immediate to hours | 24-72 hours after re-exposure |
| Prior sensitization | Not required | Required (sensitization phase 10-14 days) |
| Distribution | Strictly limited to contact area | May spread beyond contact site |
| Morphology | Scaling, fissuring, hyperkeratosis | Vesicles, bullae, weeping |
| Dose-response | Yes (concentration-dependent) | No (can occur with minute amounts) |
| Frequency | 80% of contact dermatitis | 20% of contact dermatitis |
| Common causes | Soaps, detergents, solvents, water | Nickel, fragrances, preservatives, rubber |
| Patch testing | Negative | Positive to specific allergen |
Common Contact Allergens by Category
| Category | Allergen | Common Sources | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metals | Nickel sulfate | Jewelry, belt buckles, coins, zippers | 15-30% |
| Cobalt chloride | Metal alloys, cement, tools | 10-20% | |
| Potassium dichromate | Leather, cement, detergents | 5-10% | |
| Fragrances | Fragrance mix I & II | Cosmetics, toiletries, cleaning products | 10-15% |
| Balsam of Peru | Fragrances, flavoring, topical medications | 10-18% | |
| Preservatives | Methylisothiazolinone (MI) | Cosmetics, household products | 8-12% |
| Formaldehyde | Cosmetics, textiles, resins | 5-8% | |
| Parabens | Cosmetics, pharmaceuticals | 3-5% | |
| Rubber | Thiuram mix | Gloves, shoes, rubber products | 5-8% |
| Carba mix | Rubber accelerators | 4-6% | |
| Topical antibiotics | Neomycin | Triple antibiotic ointment | 5-10% |
| Bacitracin | Topical antibiotics | 3-8% | |
| Plants | Urushiol (Toxicodendron) | Poison ivy, oak, sumac | Variable |
| Acrylates | Methacrylates | Nail products, dental materials, adhesives | 3-6% |
Emergency Treatments
| Severity | Clinical Features | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Mild/Localized | less than 10% BSA, minimal symptoms | Topical corticosteroid (triamcinolone 0.1% BID × 2 weeks) + emollients |
| Moderate | 10-30% BSA, significant pruritus | Medium-high potency topical steroid + oral antihistamine + emollients |
| Severe/Widespread | > 30% BSA, bullae, intense pruritus | Prednisone 40-60 mg daily × 2-3 weeks (taper) + topical therapy |
| Facial/Genital | Sensitive areas | Low-potency steroid (hydrocortisone 1-2.5%) + avoidance |
| Secondary infection | Honey crusting, purulence | Add antibiotics (cephalexin 500mg QID or mupirocin topically) |
Definition
Overview
Contact dermatitis is an inflammatory eczematous skin reaction caused by direct contact with external substances. It represents a major public health burden, accounting for over 40% of all occupational skin diseases and affecting approximately 15-20% of the general population. Contact dermatitis is classified into two principal types based on pathophysiology: irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), caused by direct cytotoxic damage to keratinocytes without immunological sensitization, and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), a T-cell-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction requiring prior sensitization. [1,2,3]
Classification
By Mechanism:
| Type | Mechanism | Immunology | Time Course |
|---|---|---|---|
| Irritant Contact Dermatitis (ICD) | Direct cytotoxic damage to skin | Non-immunological, innate immune activation | Immediate to hours |
| Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) | Type IV delayed hypersensitivity | Adaptive immunity, hapten-specific T cells | 24-72 hours (elicitation) |
| Photocontact Dermatitis | Photoactivation of allergen | Type IV hypersensitivity + UV exposure | 24-72 hours post-sun exposure |
| Systemic Contact Dermatitis | Systemic exposure to contact allergen | Generalized dermatitis from oral/IV route | Variable |
| Protein Contact Dermatitis | Immediate + delayed reaction | Mixed Type I and Type IV | Minutes to hours |
By Clinical Pattern:
| Pattern | Description |
|---|---|
| Acute | Erythema, edema, vesicles, bullae, weeping |
| Subacute | Erythema, scaling, crusting |
| Chronic | Lichenification, hyperkeratosis, fissuring |
Epidemiology
- Prevalence: 15-20% lifetime prevalence in general population [4]
- Incidence: 5.7 per 1,000 person-years
- ICD vs ACD ratio: 80% ICD, 20% ACD [1]
- Sex distribution: Females > males (2:1) due to higher exposure to cosmetics and jewelry
- Age: Can occur at any age; ACD prevalence increases with age and cumulative exposure
- Occupational: Leading cause of occupational skin disease
- Accounts for 40-50% of all occupational diseases [5]
- 70% affects hands (occupational hand dermatitis)
- "High-risk occupations: healthcare workers, hairdressers, construction workers, food handlers, metalworkers, cleaners"
- Geographic variation: Nickel allergy higher in Europe (piercing practices), chromate allergy higher in construction workers
- Economic burden: Significant costs from lost work time, disability claims, healthcare utilization
Etiology
Irritant Contact Dermatitis Causes:
| Category | Examples | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Soaps and detergents | Sodium lauryl sulfate, hand soaps | Lipid extraction, protein denaturation |
| Solvents | Alcohol, acetone, toluene | Stratum corneum disruption |
| Acids | Hydrochloric acid, acetic acid | Protein denaturation, corrosion |
| Alkalis | Sodium hydroxide, bleach | Saponification of lipids |
| Water | Prolonged wet work | Maceration, barrier dysfunction |
| Friction | Repeated rubbing | Physical barrier disruption |
| Occupational | Cutting fluids, adhesives, disinfectants | Multiple mechanisms |
Allergic Contact Dermatitis Allergens:
| Category | Specific Allergen | Common Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Metals | Nickel sulfate | Jewelry, coins, belt buckles, zippers, eyeglass frames, mobile phones |
| Cobalt chloride | Metal alloys (co-sensitizer with nickel), cement, vitamin B12 | |
| Potassium dichromate | Leather tanning, cement, matches, tattoos | |
| Gold sodium thiosulfate | Jewelry, dental work | |
| Fragrances | Fragrance mix I (8 fragrances) | Perfumes, cosmetics, soaps, detergents, air fresheners |
| Fragrance mix II (6 fragrances) | Personal care products | |
| Balsam of Peru (Myroxylon pereirae) | Fragrances, flavoring agents, topical medications, dental products | |
| Preservatives | Methylisothiazolinone (MI) | Cosmetics, shampoos, household cleaners, paints |
| Methylchloroisothiazolinone/MI (MCI/MI) | Cosmetics, industrial products | |
| Formaldehyde | Cosmetics, textiles, resins, disinfectants | |
| Parabens | Cosmetics, pharmaceuticals | |
| Quaternium-15 | Cosmetics, lotions (formaldehyde-releaser) | |
| Rubber accelerators | Thiuram mix | Rubber gloves, shoes, elastic |
| Carba mix | Rubber products | |
| Mercaptobenzothiazole | Rubber, adhesives | |
| Black rubber mix | Rubber products, tires | |
| Topical medications | Neomycin sulfate | Triple antibiotic ointment |
| Bacitracin | Topical antibiotics | |
| Benzocaine | Topical anesthetics | |
| Corticosteroids | Topical steroids (tixocortol pivalate, budesonide) | |
| Plants | Urushiol (Toxicodendron spp.) | Poison ivy, poison oak, poison sumac |
| Sesquiterpene lactones | Compositae family (chrysanthemums, daisies) | |
| Acrylates | 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate | Nail products, dental materials, bone cement |
| Ethyl cyanoacrylate | Adhesives (superglue), artificial nails | |
| Hair dye | Para-phenylenediamine (PPD) | Permanent hair dyes, henna tattoos |
| Cosmetic ingredients | Propylene glycol | Moisturizers, medications, foods |
| Cocamidopropyl betaine | "No-tears" shampoos, cleansers |
Pathophysiology
Irritant Contact Dermatitis: Non-Immunological Pathway
Barrier Disruption and Innate Immunity:
Irritant contact dermatitis results from direct chemical or physical damage to the skin barrier without requiring prior sensitization or adaptive immune memory. The pathophysiology involves multiple overlapping mechanisms [6,7]:
-
Stratum Corneum Disruption:
- Lipid extraction and protein denaturation
- Disruption of tight junctions between keratinocytes
- Increased transepidermal water loss (TEWL)
- Impaired barrier function allows deeper penetration of irritants
-
Keratinocyte Activation:
- Direct cytotoxic damage triggers keratinocyte stress response
- Release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs)
- Activation of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs)
- Production of pro-inflammatory cytokines: IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8
-
Innate Immune Activation:
- Cytokine cascade recruits innate immune cells
- Neutrophil infiltration (early phase)
- Macrophage activation
- Natural killer (NK) cell recruitment
- NO adaptive immune response or immunological memory
-
Cumulative Insult Dermatitis:
- Repeated subclinical exposures prevent barrier recovery
- Progressive barrier dysfunction
- Chronic inflammation
- Common in occupational settings ("wet work")
Clinical Correlate: ICD severity correlates with irritant concentration, exposure duration, and baseline barrier integrity. Individuals with filaggrin mutations or atopic dermatitis have increased susceptibility due to impaired barrier function. [8]
Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Type IV Hypersensitivity
Allergic contact dermatitis is a classic example of Type IV delayed-type hypersensitivity mediated by hapten-specific T lymphocytes. The process occurs in two distinct immunological phases [9,10,11]:
Phase 1: Sensitization (Afferent Phase)
Duration: 10-14 days (first exposure)
-
Hapten Penetration and Protein Binding:
- Most contact allergens are small lipophilic molecules (less than 500 Da) called haptens
- Haptens are incomplete antigens that cannot elicit immune response alone
- Penetrate stratum corneum and covalently bind to self-proteins (carrier proteins)
- Formation of hapten-protein conjugates creates immunogenic complexes
- Pro-haptens: activated by skin metabolism (e.g., fragrance terpenes)
- Pre-haptens: require oxidation (e.g., linalool in fragrances)
-
Innate Immune Activation and "Danger Signals":
- Keratinocytes respond to hapten-induced stress
- Release of IL-1β, TNF-α, and GM-CSF
- These cytokines activate resident Langerhans cells (LCs) and dermal dendritic cells (DCs)
- Expression of co-stimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86) on DCs
- Without concurrent "danger signals," haptens may induce tolerance rather than sensitization
-
Dendritic Cell Maturation and Migration:
- Langerhans cells in epidermis capture hapten-protein conjugates
- Maturation process: upregulation of MHC class I and II, CD80, CD86, CCR7
- Migration via afferent lymphatics to regional lymph nodes (24-48 hours)
- Driven by chemokine gradients (CCL19, CCL21)
-
T Cell Priming in Lymph Nodes:
- DCs present processed hapten-peptide complexes on MHC molecules
- MHC Class I pathway: Presentation to CD8+ T cells (cytotoxic effectors)
- MHC Class II pathway: Presentation to CD4+ T helper cells
- CD1 molecules: Non-classical presentation pathway for lipophilic haptens
- T cell activation requires three signals:
- Signal 1: TCR recognition of MHC-peptide complex
- Signal 2: Co-stimulation (CD28-CD80/86)
- Signal 3: Cytokine milieu (IL-12, IL-18)
- Clonal expansion of hapten-specific T cells (10³-10⁵ fold expansion)
- Differentiation into effector and memory T cells
-
Effector T Cell Phenotypes:
- CD8+ Type 1 T cells: Primary effectors in most ACD
- Produce IFN-γ (Type IVc reaction)
- Cytotoxic mechanisms: perforin, granzyme B, Fas-FasL
- CD4+ Th1 cells: Amplify inflammation (Type IVa)
- Produce IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2
- Activate macrophages
- CD4+ Th2 cells: In some allergens (Type IVb)
- Produce IL-4, IL-5, IL-13
- Eosinophil recruitment
- Th17 cells: Neutrophilic inflammation (Type IVd)
- Produce IL-17, IL-22
- Seen in pustular reactions
- CD8+ Type 1 T cells: Primary effectors in most ACD
-
Memory Phase:
- Generation of tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM)
- TRM persist in skin at site of sensitization
- Express CD69 (retention marker) and CD103 (epithelial adhesion)
- Rapid recall response upon re-exposure [12]
Phase 2: Elicitation (Efferent Phase)
Duration: 24-72 hours (upon re-exposure)
-
Re-exposure and Antigen Recognition:
- Hapten re-enters skin and binds proteins
- Presented by local keratinocytes (MHC I), Langerhans cells, dermal DCs
- Recognition by circulating memory T cells and skin-resident TRM
-
Rapid T Cell Activation:
- TRM provide immediate local response (within hours)
- Circulating memory T cells recruited from blood
- Expression of cutaneous lymphocyte antigen (CLA) for skin homing
- Chemokine receptors (CCR4, CCR10) guide migration
-
Effector Mechanisms:
Cytotoxicity (CD8+ T cells):
- Direct killing of hapten-bearing keratinocytes
- Perforin/granzyme-mediated apoptosis
- Fas-FasL pathway activation
- Results in spongiosis and vesicle formation
Cytokine-Mediated Inflammation (CD4+ and CD8+):
- IFN-γ: Keratinocyte activation, adhesion molecule upregulation (ICAM-1, VCAM-1)
- TNF-α: Endothelial activation, leukocyte recruitment
- IL-2: T cell proliferation
- IL-17: Neutrophil recruitment (in pustular variants)
-
Amplification Cascade:
- Keratinocyte production of IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α
- Chemokine production (CXCL9, CXCL10, CCL20) recruits more T cells
- Endothelial adhesion molecule expression (E-selectin, ICAM-1)
- Leukocyte infiltration: T cells, macrophages, eosinophils
-
Clinical Manifestation:
- Spongiosis: Intercellular edema in epidermis from cytokine-induced fluid accumulation
- Vesicle formation: Coalescence of spongiotic foci
- Acanthosis: Epidermal thickening from keratinocyte proliferation
- Dermal inflammation: Perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate
- Symptoms: Pruritus (from histamine, tryptase, neuropeptides), erythema, vesiculation
-
Resolution and Regulatory Mechanisms:
- Regulatory T cells (Tregs): CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ suppress effector T cells
- IL-10 production by Tregs inhibits DC activation
- Apoptosis of activated effector T cells
- Barrier repair and inflammation resolution
- Persistence of TRM maintains capacity for flare-ups [13]
Skin Barrier Role in Contact Dermatitis
The skin barrier is both target and modulator of contact dermatitis [14]:
- Barrier dysfunction increases penetration: Filaggrin mutations, atopic dermatitis, irritant pre-exposure
- Barrier disruption provides danger signals: Required for sensitization in ACD
- Occupational exposure: Repeated barrier disruption increases both ICD and ACD risk
- Preventive strategies: Barrier protection (gloves, emollients) reduces incidence
Genetic Susceptibility
- Filaggrin mutations: Increased risk of hand eczema and occupational dermatitis
- HLA associations: Certain HLA alleles linked to specific allergen sensitivities
- "HLA-DR4: Nickel allergy"
- "HLA-DRB1*0101: Chromate allergy"
- Metabolic enzyme polymorphisms: Affect pro-hapten activation
Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
| Symptom | Description | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Pruritus | Most prominent symptom, often severe | Hallmark; differentiates from cellulitis (pain) |
| Burning/Stinging | More common in ICD | Suggests irritant reaction |
| Pain | Uncommon unless fissured or infected | Red flag for infection if new onset |
| Erythema | Red, inflamed appearance | Severity correlates with inflammation degree |
| Vesiculation/Bullae | Fluid-filled blisters | More typical of acute ACD |
| Weeping/Oozing | Clear fluid from ruptured vesicles | Acute phase |
| Scaling | Dry, flaky skin | Subacute to chronic phase |
| Lichenification | Thickened, leathery skin with exaggerated markings | Chronic phase from scratching |
| Fissuring | Painful cracks | Chronic hand eczema, occupational |
History: Key Questions
Exposure History:
- "What products do you use on your skin?" (soaps, lotions, cosmetics)
- "Have you started any new products recently?" (temporal relationship)
- "What is your occupation?" (occupational exposures)
- "Do you work with chemicals, water, or wear gloves frequently?" (occupational ICD/ACD)
- "Do you wear jewelry?" (nickel, cobalt)
- "Have you been outdoors in wooded areas?" (poison ivy/oak/sumac)
- "Do you use hair dyes or cosmetics?" (PPD, fragrances, preservatives)
Temporal Pattern:
- "When did the rash start in relation to exposure?" (immediate vs. delayed)
- "Does it improve when away from work or on vacation?" (occupational)
- "Does it recur in the same location?" (suggests local contactant)
- "Have you had similar episodes before?" (recurrent ACD)
Distribution Pattern:
- "Where did it start and how has it spread?"
- "Does it correspond to areas of contact with specific items?"
Previous Medical History:
- Personal or family history of atopy (atopic dermatitis, asthma, allergic rhinitis)
- Previous episodes of contact dermatitis
- Known contact allergies (from prior patch testing)
- Occupational skin disease claims
Physical Examination
Distribution Patterns and Diagnostic Clues
| Anatomical Site | Suggested Allergen/Irritant | Clinical Clues |
|---|---|---|
| Hands | Occupational exposures, soaps, detergents, gloves | Most common site; ICD from wet work; ACD from rubber gloves |
| Palms/Dorsal hands | Nickel, chromate, rubber | Spares web spaces in nickel (jewelry contact); dorsal worse in chromate |
| Fingers/Finger tips | Acrylates, rubber, occupational chemicals | Fingertip dermatitis: acrylates (nail technicians, dentists) |
| Wrists | Watch band, jewelry (nickel, chromate) | Circumferential pattern under watch/bracelet |
| Face | Cosmetics, fragrances, airborne contactants, preservatives | Eyelids very sensitive; perioral from toothpaste/foods |
| Eyelids | Nail polish, eye cosmetics, ophthalmologic medications | Eyelids most sensitive facial skin; often from hand transfer (nail polish) |
| Perioral | Toothpaste, lipstick, foods, chewing gum | Circumoral pattern; PPD from dental products |
| Ears | Earrings (nickel), hearing aids, earphones | Earlobe from earrings; ear canal from hearing aids |
| Neck | Necklaces (nickel), fragrances, hair products | Necklace distribution; photocontact if sun-exposed areas |
| Axillae | Deodorants, fragrances, preservatives, clothing dyes | Well-demarcated to application area |
| Trunk | Clothing (formaldehyde, dyes), elastic (rubber), nickel (belt buckles) | Belt-line from nickel buckle; clothing contact spares flexures |
| Feet | Shoe materials (rubber, chromate, adhesives) | Dorsal feet from shoe contact; spares interdigital spaces initially |
| Anogenital | Hygiene products, topical medications, condoms | Intimate area; rubber (condoms), fragrances (wipes) |
| Linear streaks | Plant contact (poison ivy, oak, sumac) | Classic for urushiol; from brushing against plant or scratching |
| Geometric/Well-demarcated | External contactant | Suggests exogenous cause; sharp borders |
| Photoexposed areas | Photocontact dermatitis | Face, V-neck, dorsal hands; spares under chin, behind ears |
Morphology by Phase
Acute Contact Dermatitis:
- Bright erythema
- Edema (may be pronounced on eyelids, genitals)
- Vesicles and bullae (more common in ACD)
- Weeping and oozing from ruptured vesicles
- Well-demarcated borders
- Linear configuration (poison ivy)
Subacute Contact Dermatitis:
- Erythema (less intense)
- Scaling
- Crusting
- Mild lichenification
Chronic Contact Dermatitis:
- Lichenification (thickened, leathery skin)
- Hyperkeratosis
- Fissuring (painful cracks, especially hands)
- Hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation
- Less distinct borders
- Chronic hand eczema appearance
Specific Clinical Syndromes
Occupational Hand Dermatitis
- Most common presentation of occupational contact dermatitis (70% of cases)
- Affects healthcare workers, food handlers, hairdressers, cleaners, metalworkers
- ICD more common than ACD in occupational setting (but often coexist)
- Chronic, relapsing course
- Significant functional impairment and disability
- Fissuring on palms and fingertips particularly painful
Poison Ivy/Oak/Sumac Dermatitis (Toxicodendron)
- Caused by urushiol oleoresin
- Highly allergenic; up to 50-75% of population can sensitize
- Classic linear streaks: From brushing against plant or scratching
- Vesicles and bullae common
- Face, hands, arms most commonly affected
- Urushiol persists on clothing, tools, pet fur → can cause dermatitis without direct plant contact
- "Black dot sign": Oxidized urushiol appears as black dots on skin
- Severe reactions may require systemic corticosteroids for 2-3 weeks
Nickel Dermatitis
- Most common contact allergen worldwide (15-30% prevalence in patch-tested populations)
- More common in females (jewelry, piercings)
- Typical sites: Earlobes (earrings), wrists (watches), periumbilical (belt buckles), hands (coins, keys)
- "Dimple sign": Dermatitis precisely at site of metal contact
- Cross-reactivity with cobalt and chromate common
- Systemically absorbed nickel can cause systemic contact dermatitis (pompholyx, dyshidrotic eczema)
Fragrance Dermatitis
- Fragrance mix I and II among top allergens
- Fragrances ubiquitous: personal care products, household cleaners, air fresheners
- Balsam of Peru (Myroxylon pereirae) common; cross-reacts with fragrances, spices, citrus
- Often facial involvement (cosmetics)
- Difficult to avoid due to ubiquitous exposure
- "Fragrance-free" vs. "unscented" labeling important
Preservative Dermatitis
- Methylisothiazolinone (MI) epidemic in recent years due to increased cosmetic use
- MCI/MI (Kathon CG) also common
- Formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasers (quaternium-15, DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea)
- Widespread use in cosmetics, household products, industrial applications
Rubber/Glove Dermatitis
- Thiuram, carba mix, mercaptobenzothiazole (rubber accelerators)
- Occupational: healthcare workers, food handlers, hairdressers
- Often hand dermatitis mimicking ICD from wet work
- Type IV (ACD to accelerators) vs. Type I (IgE-mediated latex allergy)
- Patch testing distinguishes ACD from ICD or latex allergy
Cosmetic Dermatitis
- Fragrances, preservatives, PPD (hair dye), propylene glycol, cocamidopropyl betaine
- Facial involvement common
- Eyelid dermatitis from nail polish (indirect transfer)
- Hair dye (PPD) can cause severe facial and scalp swelling
Red Flags
Severe Reactions Requiring Urgent Intervention
| Finding | Concern | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Facial/Periorbital edema | Airway compromise risk (especially PPD from hair dye) | Systemic corticosteroids, monitor airway, consider ED referral |
| Widespread bullous reaction | Extensive skin barrier loss, fluid/electrolyte imbalance | Systemic corticosteroids, wound care, consider admission |
| Erythroderma | > 90% BSA involvement, systemic toxicity | Hospital admission, systemic steroids, supportive care |
| Fever, systemic symptoms | Infection, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), drug reaction | Rule out SJS/TEN, bacterial infection; urgent dermatology consult |
Secondary Infection
| Finding | Concern | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Honey-crusted lesions | Impetiginization (Staphylococcus/Streptococcus) | Topical (mupirocin) or oral antibiotics (cephalexin, dicloxacillin) |
| Purulent drainage | Bacterial superinfection | Oral antibiotics, wound culture if severe |
| Increasing pain, warmth, spreading erythema | Cellulitis | Oral or IV antibiotics depending on severity |
| Lymphangitis, lymphadenopathy | Spreading bacterial infection | Systemic antibiotics, consider admission |
Atypical Features Suggesting Alternative Diagnosis
| Finding | Consider |
|---|---|
| Fever, mucous membrane involvement | Stevens-Johnson syndrome, drug reaction, erythema multiforme |
| Nikolsky sign | Bullous disease, SJS/TEN |
| Dermatomal distribution | Herpes zoster |
| Target lesions | Erythema multiforme |
| Painful rather than pruritic | Cellulitis, herpes simplex, herpes zoster |
| Annular scale | Tinea corporis |
| Silvery scale, nail pitting | Psoriasis |
Differential Diagnosis
Eczematous Dermatoses
| Diagnosis | Distinguishing Features | Diagnostic Test |
|---|---|---|
| Atopic dermatitis | Chronic, relapsing; flexural distribution; personal/family atopy; early childhood onset; elevated IgE | Clinical; elevated IgE, eosinophilia in blood |
| Nummular dermatitis | Coin-shaped plaques; often on extensor extremities; less relationship to contactants | Clinical; no specific test |
| Dyshidrotic eczema (pompholyx) | Recurrent vesicles on palms/soles; intensely pruritic; may be ACD (nickel) or idiopathic | Patch testing to rule out systemic contact dermatitis |
| Seborrheic dermatitis | Greasy scale; scalp, face (nasolabial, eyebrows), chest; Malassezia-associated | Clinical; responds to antifungals |
| Stasis dermatitis | Lower legs; chronic venous insufficiency; hemosiderin deposition; lipodermatosclerosis | Venous duplex ultrasound |
| Asteatotic eczema (xerotic) | Dry skin, "cracked porcelain" appearance; elderly; winter; lower legs | Clinical |
Infectious Causes
| Diagnosis | Distinguishing Features | Diagnostic Test |
|---|---|---|
| Cellulitis | Painful (not pruritic), tender, warm; spreading erythema; fever; less well-demarcated | Clinical; elevated WBC, blood cultures if systemic |
| Impetigo | Honey-colored crusts; contagious; children; bullous variant (S. aureus) | Bacterial culture (usually S. aureus or Strep pyogenes) |
| Tinea corporis/pedis | Annular plaques; raised, scaly border; central clearing; KOH positive | KOH prep, fungal culture |
| Herpes simplex | Grouped vesicles on erythematous base; painful; recurrent at same site | Tzanck smear, PCR, viral culture |
| Herpes zoster | Dermatomal distribution; painful; vesicles; unilateral | Clinical; PCR or DFA if uncertain |
| Scabies | Intense pruritus (worse at night); burrows; interdigital, wrists, genitals; household contacts | Dermoscopy, skin scraping |
Other Inflammatory Dermatoses
| Diagnosis | Distinguishing Features | Diagnostic Test |
|---|---|---|
| Psoriasis | Well-demarcated erythematous plaques; silvery scale; extensor surfaces; nail pitting; Auspitz sign | Clinical; biopsy if uncertain |
| Lichen planus | Purple, polygonal, pruritic papules; Wickham striae; flexor wrists, ankles, genitals; oral involvement | Biopsy showing band-like lymphocytic infiltrate |
| Dermatophytid reaction (id reaction) | Generalized eczematous eruption distant from primary fungal infection | Identify and treat primary tinea infection |
| Drug eruption | Temporal relationship to medication; widespread; may have mucosal involvement | Clinical history; withdrawal of drug |
Immunobullous Disorders (if bullous)
| Diagnosis | Distinguishing Features | Diagnostic Test |
|---|---|---|
| Bullous pemphigoid | Tense bullae on urticarial base; elderly; oral involvement uncommon; Nikolsky negative | Biopsy with DIF; serum anti-BP180/BP230 |
| Pemphigus vulgaris | Flaccid bullae; mucosal involvement; Nikolsky positive | Biopsy with DIF; serum anti-desmoglein 3/1 |
Diagnostic Approach
Clinical Diagnosis
Contact dermatitis is primarily a clinical diagnosis based on:
- History: Exposure to potential irritant or allergen
- Temporal relationship: Onset in relation to exposure; improvement with avoidance
- Distribution: Corresponds to contact pattern
- Morphology: Eczematous dermatitis (acute, subacute, or chronic)
Key Principle: The combination of exposure history + characteristic distribution + eczematous morphology establishes the diagnosis of contact dermatitis.
Patch Testing: Gold Standard for ACD
Patch testing is the reference standard for identifying specific allergens in allergic contact dermatitis. [15,16]
Indications for Patch Testing
- Suspected allergic contact dermatitis (especially chronic or recurrent)
- Chronic hand dermatitis (high yield for identifying allergens)
- Occupational dermatitis
- Facial dermatitis (cosmetics, fragrances)
- Dermatitis unresponsive to treatment
- Recurrent dermatitis after apparent resolution
- Uncertain diagnosis (distinguish ACD from other eczematous dermatoses)
Patch Testing Procedure
Preparation:
- Discontinue systemic corticosteroids ≥2 weeks, topical corticosteroids to back ≥1 week (to avoid false negatives)
- Avoid antihistamines if possible (do not affect patch test but may reduce itch)
- Test during quiescent phase (active dermatitis can cause false positives)
- Back should be free of active dermatitis
Standard Panels:
- North American Standard Series: 80+ allergens (most common in North America)
- European Standard Series: Slightly different composition
- Specialized panels: Cosmetics, fragrances, metals, rubber, acrylates, topical medications, dental, occupational
Application:
- Allergens applied in Finn chambers or similar devices
- Applied to upper back (standard location)
- Kept in place for 48 hours (intact, avoid sweating/bathing)
Reading Schedule:
- First reading: 48 hours (at removal)
- Second reading: 96 hours (day 4) or 72-120 hours
- Some allergens require late readings (day 7) due to delayed reactions (e.g., corticosteroids, neomycin)
Interpretation (ICDRG Scale):
| Grade | Description |
|---|---|
| Negative (−) | No reaction |
| Irritant (IR) | Faint erythema without infiltration |
| Doubtful (+/−) | Faint erythema with minimal infiltration |
| Weak positive (+) | Erythema, infiltration, possibly papules |
| Strong positive (++) | Erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles |
| Extreme positive (+++) | Intense erythema, infiltration, coalescing vesicles, bullae |
Relevance Assessment:
Positive patch test must be correlated with clinical history to determine relevance:
- Current relevance: Allergen explains current dermatitis
- Past relevance: Explained past episode but not current
- Possible relevance: Uncertain relationship
- Not relevant: Positive test but no clinical correlation
Only relevant positive reactions guide avoidance recommendations.
Pitfalls in Patch Testing
- False negatives: Corticosteroid use, insufficient allergen concentration, testing during flare
- False positives: Irritant reactions, "angry back" (generalized hyperreactivity), tape reactions
- Delayed reactions: Some allergens (corticosteroids, neomycin) require late readings
- Active sensitization: Patch testing can rarely induce new sensitization (especially strong sensitizers)
Laboratory/Imaging
Generally Not Required: Contact dermatitis is a clinical and patch test diagnosis. Laboratory tests are not routinely indicated unless considering alternative diagnoses or complications.
Specific Tests (When Indicated):
| Test | Indication | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| KOH preparation | Suspected tinea (annular lesions, scale) | Fungal hyphae |
| Bacterial culture | Suspected secondary infection | S. aureus, Streptococcus |
| Tzanck smear or viral PCR | Suspected herpes simplex/zoster | Multinucleated giant cells, positive HSV/VZV PCR |
| Skin biopsy | Atypical features, diagnosis uncertain | Spongiosis, perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in contact dermatitis |
| Complete blood count | Suspected cellulitis, systemic infection | Leukocytosis |
| Specific IgE (serum or skin prick test) | Suspected Type I latex allergy (vs. Type IV rubber accelerator ACD) | Elevated latex-specific IgE |
| Blood cultures | Fever, systemic signs | Positive in bacteremia |
Histopathology (if biopsy performed):
- Acute: Spongiosis (intercellular edema), vesicle formation, perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate
- Chronic: Acanthosis (epidermal thickening), hyperkeratosis, lichenification, less spongiosis
- ACD vs. ICD: Histology generally cannot reliably distinguish; diagnosis is clinical
Treatment
General Principles
- Identify and remove offending agent: Most critical step; resolution impossible with continued exposure
- Restore skin barrier: Emollients, avoid irritants, gentle cleansers
- Reduce inflammation: Topical corticosteroids (first-line), systemic if severe
- Symptomatic relief: Antihistamines for pruritus, cool compresses
- Treat secondary infection: Antibiotics if impetiginized or cellulitis
- Prevention: Patient education, avoidance strategies, occupational modifications, protective equipment
Remove Offending Agent
Immediate Actions:
- Wash skin: Soap and water immediately after suspected contact (especially plant exposure)
- Urushiol can be removed if washed within 10-15 minutes
- After 30 minutes, most has penetrated skin
- Remove contaminated clothing: Wash in hot water with detergent
- Clean objects that may carry allergen: Tools, pet fur, gardening equipment (urushiol persists)
- Identify and avoid re-exposure: Based on history or patch testing results
Avoidance Strategies (after allergen identification):
- Nickel: Avoid costume jewelry, use hypoallergenic metals (titanium, surgical steel, gold > 18K), coat metal objects with clear nail polish
- Fragrances: Use fragrance-free products; "unscented" may contain masking fragrances
- Preservatives (MI/MCI): Read product labels, use preservative-free alternatives
- Rubber: Use vinyl or nitrile gloves instead of latex/rubber
- Cosmetics: Hypoallergenic, fragrance-free, preservative-free products
- Occupational: Barrier protection (gloves), job modification, industrial hygiene measures
Topical Corticosteroids
Topical corticosteroids are first-line treatment for contact dermatitis. Potency should be matched to site and severity. [17]
Potency Classification
| Potency | Agent | Formulation | Indication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low (Class 6-7) | Hydrocortisone 1-2.5% | Cream, ointment, lotion | Face, eyelids, genitals, intertriginous areas, children |
| Desonide 0.05% | Cream, ointment, lotion | Sensitive areas | |
| Medium (Class 4-5) | Triamcinolone 0.1% | Cream, ointment, lotion | Body, arms, legs (first-line for most contact dermatitis) |
| Fluocinolone 0.025% | Cream, ointment | Body | |
| Mometasone 0.1% | Cream, ointment, lotion | Body | |
| High (Class 2-3) | Betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% | Cream, ointment | Severe dermatitis, hands, feet, lichenified areas |
| Fluocinonide 0.05% | Cream, ointment, gel | Severe dermatitis, thick skin | |
| Desoximetasone 0.25% | Cream, ointment, gel | Severe dermatitis | |
| Super-high (Class 1) | Clobetasol propionate 0.05% | Cream, ointment, foam | Palms, soles, very severe dermatitis (short-term only) |
| Halobetasol 0.05% | Cream, ointment | Severe, recalcitrant dermatitis |
Application Guidelines
- Frequency: Typically BID (twice daily) until improvement, then taper
- Duration: 2-4 weeks for most cases; avoid prolonged super-high potency (max 2 weeks)
- Amount: Fingertip unit (FTU) = 0.5 grams; one FTU covers two adult palms
- Vehicle:
- "Ointments: More occlusive, more potent, better for dry/chronic/lichenified dermatitis"
- "Creams: Less greasy, better for acute/weeping dermatitis"
- "Lotions/solutions: For scalp, hairy areas"
- "Gels: For hairy areas"
- Taper: Step down potency or reduce frequency as improvement occurs
Adverse Effects
- Local: Skin atrophy, striae, telangiectasia, acne, rosacea, perioral dermatitis (especially face)
- Systemic (rare with topical use): HPA axis suppression with prolonged super-high potency over large BSA
- Steroid allergy: Paradoxical—contact allergy to topical corticosteroid (patch test to corticosteroid panel if suspected)
Systemic Corticosteroids
Indicated for severe, widespread, or bullous contact dermatitis. [18]
Indications
- Moderate-severe poison ivy/oak/sumac (widespread, facial involvement)
- > 10-20% BSA involvement
- Severe symptoms (intense pruritus, pain, functional impairment)
- Bullous reactions
- Facial/periorbital involvement causing significant swelling
- Failed topical therapy
Regimens
Prednisone (most common):
| Regimen | Duration | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Standard taper | Prednisone 40-60 mg PO daily × 5-7 days, then taper by 5-10 mg every 2-3 days over 2-3 weeks (total 14-21 days) | Gold standard; prevents rebound |
| Alternative | Prednisone 1 mg/kg/day × 7 days, then 0.5 mg/kg × 7 days, then stop | Shorter taper |
| Short course (NOT recommended) | Prednisone 40 mg × 5 days | HIGH RISK of rebound dermatitis when stopped; avoid |
Critical Point: Short courses (less than 10-14 days) of systemic corticosteroids are associated with high rates of rebound dermatitis. A 2-3 week taper is required for severe ACD, especially poison ivy/oak/sumac. [18]
Methylprednisolone dose pack (6-day taper): Generally NOT recommended for contact dermatitis due to insufficient duration and high rebound rate.
IM corticosteroids:
- Triamcinolone acetonide 40-80 mg IM (single dose)
- May be used for non-compliant patients
- Longer duration but cannot adjust dose if side effects; less preferred
Contraindications/Precautions
- Active infection (relative)
- Diabetes (monitor glucose)
- Hypertension
- Peptic ulcer disease
- Psychiatric disease
- Pregnancy (Category C; use if benefits outweigh risks)
Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory alternatives to corticosteroids.
| Agent | Strength | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Tacrolimus | 0.03%, 0.1% ointment | Second-line for facial/sensitive areas; steroid-sparing |
| Pimecrolimus | 1% cream | Second-line for facial/sensitive areas; steroid-sparing |
Indications:
- Facial dermatitis (avoid steroid atrophy)
- Chronic dermatitis requiring long-term therapy
- Steroid-refractory dermatitis
Advantages: No skin atrophy, safe for long-term use on face
Disadvantages: Burning/stinging on application (especially if applied to inflamed skin), less effective than moderate-potent corticosteroids, more expensive
Black box warning: Theoretical increased lymphoma risk (not confirmed in humans); avoid in children less than 2 years
Antihistamines
Antihistamines provide symptomatic relief of pruritus but do not treat the underlying inflammation.
| Agent | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Diphenhydramine | 25-50 mg PO q6h PRN | Sedating; useful at bedtime |
| Hydroxyzine | 25-50 mg PO q6h PRN | Sedating; anxiolytic properties |
| Cetirizine | 10 mg PO daily | Non-sedating (or mildly sedating) |
| Loratadine | 10 mg PO daily | Non-sedating |
| Fexofenadine | 180 mg PO daily | Non-sedating |
Efficacy: Modest benefit for itch; sedating antihistamines may help via sedative effect rather than antihistamine effect (since histamine is not primary mediator in ACD)
Soothing/Supportive Measures
| Intervention | Details | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Cool compresses | Cool tap water on clean cloth, 10-15 min TID-QID | Reduces inflammation, itch, weeping |
| Calamine lotion | Apply to affected areas PRN | Soothing, drying (for acute weeping) |
| Colloidal oatmeal baths | Lukewarm bath with colloidal oatmeal (Aveeno) | Soothing, antipruritic |
| Emollients/Moisturizers | Apply liberally BID and after washing; fragrance-free, dye-free | Restores skin barrier, prevents TEWL, reduces inflammation |
| Ceramide-containing (CeraVe, Cetaphil) preferred | Restores lipid barrier | |
| Avoid irritants | Harsh soaps, hot water, excessive washing | Prevents further barrier damage |
| Gentle cleansers | Fragrance-free, soap-free (Cetaphil, CeraVe) | Minimizes irritation |
Antibiotics (for Secondary Infection)
| Indication | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Localized impetiginization | Mupirocin 2% ointment TID × 5-7 days |
| Widespread impetiginization | Cephalexin 500 mg PO QID × 7 days, OR |
| Dicloxacillin 500 mg PO QID × 7 days | |
| MRSA risk | Doxycycline 100 mg PO BID × 7-10 days, OR |
| TMP-SMX DS PO BID × 7-10 days, OR | |
| Clindamycin 300 mg PO TID × 7-10 days | |
| Cellulitis | Cephalexin 500 mg PO QID × 10 days (if oral), OR |
| Cefazolin 1-2 g IV q8h (if IV) |
Clinical Pearls:
- Honey-colored crusting → impetiginization (Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus)
- Increasing pain, warmth, spreading erythema, fever → cellulitis
- MRSA consideration in recurrent infections, healthcare workers, injection drug users
Emerging/Alternative Therapies
| Therapy | Indication | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Phototherapy (UVB, PUVA) | Chronic hand dermatitis refractory to topical therapy | Moderate evidence; adjunct [19] |
| Oral cyclosporine | Severe chronic hand dermatitis unresponsive to standard therapy | Off-label; case series |
| Dupilumab (IL-4Rα inhibitor) | Severe chronic hand eczema (approved indication) | Randomized trial evidence; expensive [20] |
| Alitretinoin (oral retinoid) | Severe chronic hand eczema (approved in Europe, not US) | RCT evidence; teratogenic |
Disposition
Discharge Criteria (Outpatient Management)
Most patients with contact dermatitis can be managed in outpatient setting:
- Diagnosis established
- Appropriate topical or systemic therapy prescribed
- Allergen/irritant avoidance counseling provided
- Adequate analgesia/antipruritic therapy
- Follow-up arranged (2-4 weeks or sooner if not improving)
- Return precautions reviewed
Follow-Up:
- Reassess in 2-4 weeks
- If not improving: reconsider diagnosis, assess compliance, consider patch testing
- If recurrent: patch testing indicated
- Occupational cases: may require Workers' Compensation evaluation, job modification
Admission Criteria (Rare)
- Severe bullous reaction with extensive skin barrier loss, fluid/electrolyte imbalance, risk of infection
- Erythroderma (> 90% BSA)
- Airway compromise (severe facial/oropharyngeal edema from hair dye or other severe ACD)
- Severe cellulitis requiring IV antibiotics
- Unable to care for self at home
- Failed outpatient management with severe symptoms
Referral
| Indication | Referral to |
|---|---|
| Chronic/recurrent dermatitis | Dermatology for patch testing |
| Occupational dermatitis | Dermatology + Occupational Medicine |
| Uncertain diagnosis | Dermatology |
| Failed standard therapy | Dermatology |
| Need for patch testing | Dermatology or allergy (with patch testing capability) |
| Severe bullous or erythrodermic | Dermatology (urgent) |
| Systemic contact dermatitis | Dermatology |
Patient Education
Condition Explanation
"Contact dermatitis is a skin rash caused by direct contact with a substance that either irritates your skin or triggers an allergic reaction. There are two main types:
-
Irritant contact dermatitis: Your skin is directly damaged by a harsh substance like soap, detergent, or chemicals. This is more common.
-
Allergic contact dermatitis: Your immune system reacts to a substance you're allergic to, like nickel in jewelry, fragrances in cosmetics, or poison ivy. The rash usually appears 1-3 days after contact.
The key to treatment is identifying what caused the rash and avoiding it. Medications like steroid creams or pills help reduce inflammation and itch while your skin heals."
Avoidance Strategies
General:
- Identify and avoid the substance that caused the rash
- Read product labels carefully
- Choose fragrance-free, hypoallergenic products when possible
- Wear protective gloves when handling potential irritants
- Apply barrier creams before exposure if avoidance impossible
Specific Allergens:
Nickel:
- Avoid costume jewelry; use hypoallergenic metals (titanium, surgical stainless steel, gold > 18K, platinum)
- Cover metal buttons, belt buckles, zippers with cloth or coat with clear nail polish
- Avoid handling coins, keys for prolonged periods
- Dietary nickel restriction may help systemically absorbed nickel allergy (controversial)
Fragrances:
- Use fragrance-free (not just "unscented") products
- Avoid perfumes, scented lotions, air fresheners
- Check ingredient lists: "fragrance," "parfum," "essential oils"
Preservatives (MI/MCI):
- Read product labels
- Avoid products containing methylisothiazolinone, methylchloroisothiazolinone
- Choose preservative-free alternatives
Poison Ivy/Oak/Sumac:
- Learn to identify plants: "Leaves of three, let it be"
- Wear long sleeves, pants, gloves when hiking/gardening in areas with these plants
- If exposed: wash skin with soap and water immediately (within 10-15 minutes)
- Wash clothing and tools that may have contacted plant
- Urushiol can remain on pet fur, garden tools—wash these as well
Rubber (gloves):
- If allergic to rubber accelerators: use vinyl or nitrile gloves
- If latex allergy (Type I): use non-latex gloves
Occupational:
- Discuss exposures with employer
- Use protective equipment (gloves, aprons)
- Improve ventilation, industrial hygiene
- Consider job modification if severe
Skin Care Recommendations
- Moisturize: Apply fragrance-free, dye-free moisturizer liberally at least twice daily and after hand washing
- Gentle cleansers: Use mild, soap-free cleansers (Cetaphil, CeraVe)
- Avoid hot water: Use lukewarm water; hot water worsens dryness and inflammation
- Pat dry: Gently pat skin dry; avoid vigorous rubbing
- Short showers: Limit bathing time to 5-10 minutes
- Protect hands: Wear gloves when washing dishes, cleaning (use vinyl/nitrile if rubber allergy)
Medication Instructions
Topical Corticosteroids:
- Apply a thin layer to affected areas twice daily (or as prescribed)
- Gently rub in until absorbed
- Avoid face unless specifically prescribed low-potency steroid
- Do not use on open sores or infected skin
- Taper as instructed (do not stop abruptly if using potent steroids)
Systemic Corticosteroids (Prednisone):
- Take with food to reduce stomach upset
- Complete the full course even if symptoms improve (prevents rebound)
- Do not stop early—rebound dermatitis can occur
- Side effects: Increased appetite, mood changes, trouble sleeping, elevated blood sugar
- Notify provider if signs of infection develop
Warning Signs to Return
Seek medical attention if:
- No improvement after 1-2 weeks of treatment
- Worsening despite treatment
- Fever (temperature > 100.4°F/38°C)
- Increasing pain, warmth, redness (suggests infection)
- Pus or honey-colored crusting (suggests infection)
- Spreading rash to new areas
- Facial or throat swelling (especially if difficulty breathing—call 911)
- Signs of systemic illness (fever, chills, malaise)
Special Populations
Children
- Contact dermatitis less common in young infants (limited exposure), increases with age
- Nickel allergy common in adolescent females (ear piercing)
- Topical antibiotics (neomycin), fragrances, preservatives, rubber also common
- Treatment: Same principles as adults
- Use low-potency steroids on face, diaper area
- Avoid super-high potency steroids
- "Systemic steroids if severe (weight-based dosing: 1 mg/kg/day prednisone)"
- Patch testing can be performed (same as adults) [21]
Occupational Contact Dermatitis
-
Definition: Contact dermatitis caused or exacerbated by workplace exposures
-
Epidemiology: Most common occupational skin disease (40-50% of occupational diseases)
-
High-risk occupations:
- Healthcare workers (gloves, disinfectants, medications)
- Hairdressers (hair dye [PPD], bleach, shampoos)
- Construction workers (chromate in cement, resins)
- Food handlers (wet work, food allergens)
- Metalworkers (cutting fluids, metal allergens)
- Cleaners (detergents, disinfectants)
- Mechanics (oils, greases, rubber)
-
Diagnosis: Often mixed ICD and ACD; patch testing essential
-
Management:
- Identify workplace exposures
- Protective equipment (gloves—but gloves themselves can cause rubber ACD)
- Industrial hygiene measures
- Job modification or retraining if severe
- Workers' Compensation evaluation
- Barrier creams (limited efficacy; not substitute for gloves)
-
Prognosis: Often chronic; early intervention improves outcome; poor prognosis if continue in same occupation without modification [5]
Pregnancy
- Safety of Topical Corticosteroids:
- "Low-medium potency topical steroids: Safe (Category C)"
- "Super-high potency or prolonged use over large areas: Avoid (theoretical HPA axis suppression)"
- Use lowest potency for shortest duration
- Systemic Corticosteroids:
- "Prednisone: Category C"
- Use if benefits outweigh risks (severe widespread dermatitis, facial involvement)
- Short courses generally considered safe
- Avoid first trimester if possible (theoretical increased cleft palate risk—controversial)
- Antihistamines:
- "First-generation (diphenhydramine, chlorpheniramine): Category B—safe"
- "Second-generation (cetirizine, loratadine): Category B—safe"
- Patch testing: Generally avoided during pregnancy (theoretical risk of active sensitization); defer to postpartum unless essential
Elderly
- Increased risk of irritant contact dermatitis due to:
- Impaired barrier function (decreased lipids, slower barrier repair)
- Decreased immune function
- Multiple medications (polypharmacy)
- Stasis dermatitis common on lower legs (often misdiagnosed as contact dermatitis)
- Contact allergy to topical medications (neomycin, corticosteroids, preservatives in creams)
- Treatment considerations:
- Avoid super-high potency steroids (skin atrophy, fragility)
- Emphasize barrier repair (emollients)
- Review all topical medications (potential allergens)
Chronic Hand Eczema
- Most common and debilitating form of contact dermatitis
- Affects 10% of population at some point
- High impact on quality of life and occupational disability
- Often multifactorial: ICD + ACD + atopic predisposition
- Clinical patterns:
- Hyperkeratotic (palmar)
- Vesicular/pompholyx (sides of fingers, palms)
- Fingertip dermatitis
- Fissured
- Evaluation: Patch testing essential (identifies allergen in 20-50%)
- Treatment:
- Identify and avoid allergens/irritants
- "Strict hand care regimen: gentle cleansers, frequent emollients, cotton gloves under vinyl gloves"
- High-potency topical steroids (ointments)
- "Systemic therapy if severe: prednisone burst, phototherapy, alitretinoin (Europe), dupilumab [20]"
- Prognosis: Chronic, relapsing; good compliance with avoidance and hand care improves prognosis [22]
Quality Metrics
Performance Indicators
| Metric | Target | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Trigger/allergen identification attempt | 100% | Key to prevention and treatment |
| Systemic steroids appropriately tapered (≥14 days) | 100% | Prevent rebound dermatitis |
| Differentiated from cellulitis | 100% | Avoid unnecessary antibiotics |
| Patch testing referral for chronic/recurrent dermatitis | > 80% | Identify specific allergens for avoidance |
| Occupational dermatitis reported (if applicable) | 100% | Legal/Workers' Comp requirement |
| Patient education on avoidance provided | 100% | Essential for long-term management |
Documentation Requirements
- Suspected trigger: Document exposure history
- Distribution and morphology: Body site(s), acute vs. chronic features
- Vesiculation: Presence suggests ACD
- Secondary infection: Honey crusting, purulence
- Treatment plan: Specific medications, potency of steroids, duration
- Avoidance counseling: Documented discussion
- Follow-up plan: When and under what circumstances to return
- Occupational: If work-related, document for Workers' Compensation
Key Clinical Pearls
Diagnostic Pearls
- Pruritus is the hallmark: Intense itch differentiates from cellulitis (pain/tenderness)
- Linear streaks = plant contact: Classic for poison ivy/oak/sumac (urushiol)
- Geometric/well-demarcated = external cause: Sharp borders suggest contactant
- "Dimple sign": Dermatitis precisely at site of metal contact (nickel under watch, belt buckle)
- Eyelid dermatitis often from hands: Nail polish transferred to eyelids by rubbing eyes
- Delayed onset (24-72 hrs) = ACD: Immediate onset = ICD
- Patch testing is gold standard: For identifying allergens in ACD; requires 2 weeks off systemic steroids
- ICD accounts for 80%: But ACD is more memorable and requires patch testing
- Occupational clue: Improves on weekends/vacations, worsens at work
- Spares certain areas: Interdigital web spaces often spared in nickel dermatitis (no contact)
- Cross-reactivity common: Nickel + cobalt + chromate; fragrances + Balsam of Peru
- "Angry back" syndrome: Generalized patch test reactivity from testing during flare
Treatment Pearls
- Wash immediately after plant exposure: Removes urushiol if within 10-15 minutes (soap and water)
- Topical steroids: potency matters: Match potency to site (low for face, high for palms/soles)
- Ointments > creams for chronic: Ointments more occlusive, better for dry/lichenified skin
- Systemic steroids: 2-3 week taper required: Short courses (less than 10-14 days) cause rebound dermatitis
- Methylprednisolone dose pack not recommended: Insufficient duration for contact dermatitis
- Antihistamines help itch but don't treat inflammation: Modest benefit; sedating types may help via sedation
- Emollients are cornerstone: Barrier repair; apply liberally and frequently
- Treat secondary infection: Honey crusts = impetiginization; add antibiotics
- Calcineurin inhibitors for face: Avoid steroid atrophy; tacrolimus/pimecrolimus
- Steroid allergy is real: Paradoxical worsening on topical steroid → patch test to corticosteroid
Disposition Pearls
- Most discharged with topical ± systemic therapy: Outpatient management
- Refer for patch testing: Chronic, recurrent, occupational, uncertain diagnosis
- Educate on avoidance: Critical for long-term success
- Return precautions: Fever, spreading redness/warmth (infection), no improvement in 1-2 weeks
- Occupational cases: Workers' Comp, job modification, industrial hygiene consult
- Admission rare: Severe bullous, erythroderma, airway compromise, severe cellulitis
Prevention Pearls
- Barrier protection: Gloves (but beware rubber ACD), barrier creams (limited efficacy)
- Emollients: Prevent barrier dysfunction; apply before and after exposure
- Avoid irritants: Harsh soaps, hot water, excessive hand washing
- Product selection: Fragrance-free, hypoallergenic, preservative-free when possible
- Occupational hygiene: Ventilation, protective equipment, reduce exposure time
- Early intervention: Treat early dermatitis promptly to prevent chronicity
References
-
Fonacier L, Noor I. Contact dermatitis and patch testing for the allergist. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;120(6):592-598. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2018.02.010
-
Brites GS, Ferreira I, Sebastião AI, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis: From pathophysiology to development of new preventive strategies. Pharmacol Res. 2020;162:105282. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105282
-
Fonacier L, Uter W, Johansen JD. Recognizing and Managing Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Focus on Major Allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024;12(6):1406-1418. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2024.03.033
-
Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menné T, Johansen JD. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population—prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57(5):287-299. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01220.x
-
Jakasa I, Thyssen JP, Kezic S. The role of skin barrier in occupational contact dermatitis. Exp Dermatol. 2018;27(8):909-914. doi:10.1111/exd.13704
-
Esser PR, Martin SF. Pathomechanisms of Contact Sensitization. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017;17(12):83. doi:10.1007/s11882-017-0752-8
-
Engebretsen KA, Thyssen JP. Skin Barrier Function and Allergens. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2016;49:90-102. doi:10.1159/000441550
-
Irvine AD, McLean WH, Leung DY. Filaggrin mutations associated with skin and allergic diseases. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(14):1315-1327. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1011040
-
Saint-Mezard P, Berard F, Dubois B, Kaiserlian D, Nicolas JF. The role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol. 2004;14(3):131-138. PMID: 15246935
-
Vocanson M, Hennino A, Chavagnac C, et al. Contribution of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cells in contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2005;1(1):75-86. doi:10.1586/1744666X.1.1.75
-
Girolomoni G, Gisondi P, Ottaviani C, Cavani A. Immunoregulation of allergic contact dermatitis. J Dermatol. 2004;31(4):264-270. doi:10.1111/j.1346-8138.2004.tb00663.x
-
Lefevre MA, Vocanson M, Nosbaum A. Role of tissue-resident memory T cells in the pathophysiology of allergic contact dermatitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;21(4):326-333. doi:10.1097/ACI.0000000000000756
-
Albanesi C. Keratinocytes in allergic skin diseases. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;10(5):452-456. doi:10.1097/ACI.0b013e32833e08ae
-
Jakasa I, Thyssen JP, Kezic S. The role of skin barrier in occupational contact dermatitis. Exp Dermatol. 2018;27(8):909-914. doi:10.1111/exd.13704
-
Mowad CM, Anderson B, Scheinman P, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis: Patient diagnosis and evaluation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(6):1029-1040. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1139
-
Fonacier L, Bernstein DI, Pacheco K, et al. Contact dermatitis: A practice parameter—Third update. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015;3(3 Suppl):S1-S39. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2015.02.009
-
Usatine RP, Riojas M. Diagnosis and Management of Contact Dermatitis. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82(3):249-255. PMID: 20672788
-
Gladman AC. Toxicodendron dermatitis: Poison ivy, oak, and sumac. Wilderness Environ Med. 2006;17(2):120-128. doi:10.1580/PR31-05.1
-
Schram ME, Roekevisch E, Leeflang MM, et al. A randomized trial of methotrexate versus azathioprine for severe atopic eczema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128(2):353-359. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.03.024
-
Worm M, Bauer A, Elsner P, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical delgocitinib in patients with chronic hand eczema: data from a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase IIa study. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(5):1103-1110. doi:10.1111/bjd.18469
-
Zug KA, McGinley-Smith D, Warshaw EM, et al. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(10):1329-1336. doi:10.1001/archderm.144.10.1329
-
Agner T, Elsner P. Hand eczema: epidemiology, prognosis and prevention. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34 Suppl 1:4-12. doi:10.1111/jdv.16061
Learning map
Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.
Prerequisites
Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.
- Cutaneous Immunology
- Type IV Hypersensitivity
Differentials
Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Cellulitis
Consequences
Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.
- Chronic Hand Eczema
- Occupational Skin Disease