Greenstick Fracture in Children

1. Overview

A greenstick fracture is an incomplete fracture of long bones unique to the paediatric skeleton, characterized by cortical breach on the tension (convex) side while the compression (concave) side remains intact. The term derives from the fracture pattern observed when attempting to break a fresh, green twig - the outer surface splinters while the inner cortex bends but does not completely fracture. [1,2]

This fracture pattern is the direct consequence of the unique biomechanical properties of immature bone, which exhibits greater porosity, increased water content, and enhanced plasticity compared to adult bone. These features allow paediatric bone to undergo greater plastic deformation before failure, resulting in incomplete fracture patterns rarely seen in adults. [3,4]

Greenstick fractures represent approximately 25-30% of all paediatric forearm fractures and account for a significant proportion of orthopaedic presentations to emergency departments. [5,6] The distinction between greenstick fractures and other incomplete fracture patterns (torus, plastic deformation) is clinically critical as it determines treatment approach, immobilization requirements, and risk of displacement.

The clinical significance lies in the inherent instability created by the intact cortex, which acts as a deforming force attempting to return the bone to its angulated position. This "spring-back" phenomenon necessitates rigid immobilization and, in cases of significant angulation, may require completion of the fracture or acceptance of deformity with reliance on remodeling potential. [7,8]

---

2. Epidemiology

Incidence and Prevalence

Greenstick fractures are extremely common in the paediatric population, with specific epidemiological patterns:

Age Distribution

The epidemiology of greenstick fractures demonstrates distinct age-related patterns reflecting skeletal maturation:

Peak Incidence Period (6-10 years):

• Maximum bone plasticity relative to strength
• High activity levels with developing motor coordination
• Incomplete cortical thickening
• Growth plate still widely open
• Account for 60-70% of all greenstick fractures [9,10]

Early Childhood (3-6 years):

• Greater tendency toward plastic deformation without cortical breach
• Lower energy injuries predominate
• Better remodeling potential
• 15-20% of greenstick fractures [15]

Late Childhood/Early Adolescence (10-14 years):

• Transition toward adult fracture patterns
• Increasing incidence of complete fractures
• Reduced plasticity as cortical bone matures
• 15-20% of greenstick fractures [16]

Post-Pubertal (> 14 years):

• Greenstick pattern becomes rare (less than 5% of fractures)
• Bone properties approach adult characteristics
• Complete fractures predominate [17]

Anatomical Distribution

Seasonal and Activity Patterns

Greenstick fracture incidence demonstrates seasonal variation correlating with outdoor activity and sports participation:

• Peak months: May-September (outdoor play, trampolines, playgrounds) [18]
• Sport-related: 35-40% of cases
  • "Trampolines: 20-25%"
  • "Playground equipment: 15-20%"
  • "Organized sports: 10-15%"
  • "Cycling: 8-12%"
• Simple falls: 40-45%
• Motor vehicle accidents: less than 5%
• Non-accidental injury: 1-2% (higher in children less than 3 years) [19]

Socioeconomic Factors

Studies have identified socioeconomic patterns in paediatric fracture presentation:

• Higher incidence in lower socioeconomic groups (1.3-1.5x relative risk) [20]
• Rural vs urban differences (rural 1.2x higher) [21]
• Access to supervised play areas inversely correlated with fracture rates
• Trampoline-related fractures increased 400% over past two decades [22]

---

3. Pathophysiology

Biomechanical Properties of Paediatric Bone

The unique fracture pattern of greenstick fractures arises from fundamental differences between immature and mature bone:

Structural Characteristics

Biomechanical Stress-Strain Relationship:

The stress-strain curve of paediatric bone demonstrates critical differences from adult bone:

1. Elastic Region: Extended elastic deformation capacity (up to 15-20% strain vs 5-8% in adults)
2. Yield Point: Higher strain tolerance before permanent deformation
3. Plastic Region: Extensive plastic deformation without complete failure
4. Failure Point: Asymmetric failure with tension side yielding before compression side

Three-Point Bending Mechanics:

When a paediatric forearm experiences a bending force (e.g., FOOSH):

• Tension (convex) side: Experiences maximum tensile stress
  • Collagen fibers elongate and begin to fail
  • Cortex develops incomplete fracture
  • Fracture line propagates partially through bone
• Neutral axis: Minimal stress concentration
• Compression (concave) side: Experiences compressive stress
  • Bone plastically deforms (bows) but remains intact
  • Periosteum remains continuous
  • Acts as intact "spring" or "hinge"

Energy Absorption:

Paediatric bone absorbs 40-60% more energy before failure compared to adult bone, explaining why lower-energy mechanisms produce greenstick patterns rather than complete fractures. [24]

Fracture Mechanism

Fall on Outstretched Hand (FOOSH) - 85-90% of Cases

The typical mechanism involves:

1. Initial Impact: Hand contacts ground with wrist extended
2. Load Transmission: Force transmits proximally through carpus to distal radius
3. Moment Arm Creation: Dorsal angulation force applied to metaphysis
4. Tension Failure: Dorsal (tension) cortex fails first
5. Compression Bowing: Volar (compression) cortex plastically deforms
6. Periosteal Hinge: Volar periosteum remains intact, creating unstable hinge

Energy Stratification

The Intact Cortex: Biomechanical Implications

The intact concave cortex is both stabilizing and destabilizing:

Stabilizing Effects:

• Provides inherent stability preventing complete displacement
• Maintains length and rotational alignment
• Facilitates closed reduction with intact periosteal hinge
• Enhances fracture healing (periosteal blood supply intact) [25]

Destabilizing Effects:

• Acts as a "spring" attempting to return bone to deformed position
• Creates constant deforming force resisting reduction
• May prevent adequate reduction without completion
• Increases risk of loss of reduction in cast [7,8]

The "Completion Debate":

A fundamental controversy in greenstick fracture management is whether to intentionally complete the fracture:

Arguments FOR Completion:

• Eliminates deforming force of intact cortex
• Allows more anatomic reduction
• Reduces risk of loss of reduction
• Creates "floppy" fracture easier to control in cast
• Some studies show improved angulation outcomes [26]

Arguments AGAINST Completion:

• Creates potentially unstable fracture from stable one
• May increase soft tissue injury
• Theoretically delays healing (controversial)
• Most fractures adequately managed without completion
• Risk of over-completion creating instability [27]

Current Consensus: Reserve completion for:

• Severe angulation (> 20-25°) that cannot be adequately reduced
• Unstable fractures with repeated loss of reduction
• Surgeon preference in specific circumstances

Remodeling Potential

Paediatric bones possess remarkable remodeling capacity through the Hueter-Volkmann principle:

Factors Influencing Remodeling

Remodeling Capacity by Age: [28,29]

• Age 4-6 years: Up to 30° angulation remodels completely
• Age 6-8 years: Up to 20-25° remodels
• Age 8-10 years: Up to 15-20° remodels
• Age 10-12 years: Up to 10-15° remodels
• Age > 12 years: Limited remodeling (less than 10°)

Remodeling Timeframe:

• Begins immediately post-injury (within 2-3 weeks)
• Maximum activity 3-6 months post-fracture
• Continues until skeletal maturity (diminishing over time)
• May take 12-24 months for complete remodeling [30]

---

4. Clinical Presentation

Mechanism of Injury

Typical History:

• Fall onto outstretched hand (85-90%)
• Immediate pain in forearm
• May report "crack" or "snap" sound
• Unable to continue activity
• Rapid onset of swelling

High-Risk Mechanisms (Consider Associated Injuries):

• Fall from height > 1 meter
• High-velocity injury (motor vehicle)
• Direct blow to forearm (consider both-bone fracture)
• Trampolines with multiple users (higher energy) [31]

Symptoms

Cardinal Symptoms

Pain Characteristics:

• Localized to fracture site (typically distal radius)
• Worse with movement, especially supination/pronation
• Tenderness to palpation directly over fracture
• May radiate proximally but well-localized

Functional Impairment:

• Inability to bear weight on hand
• Cannot supinate/pronate forearm
• Difficulty with grip
• Protective guarding of limb

Examination Findings

Inspection

Visible Deformity:

• "Bayonet" or "banana" deformity in significantly angulated fractures
• Apex typically dorsal (volar cortex intact)
• Swelling most prominent dorsally at distal radius
• Ecchymosis may develop over 24-48 hours

Skin Assessment (Critical):

• Assess for open fracture (rare in greenstick but must exclude)
• Tenting of skin over fracture apex
• Pressure necrosis risk if severe angulation
• Abrasions or lacerations at fall site

Palpation

Systematic Palpation:

1. Anatomic snuffbox: Tenderness suggests scaphoid injury (examine separately)
2. Distal radius metaphysis: Point tenderness at fracture (dorsal > volar)
3. Distal ulna: Assess for associated ulnar fracture (20% of cases)
4. Radial shaft: Palpate entire length to exclude more proximal fracture
5. Elbow: Assess radial head (Monteggia injury if ulnar greenstick)

Crepitus:

• Less common than complete fractures
• May be present with movement
• Do NOT deliberately elicit (causes pain, risk of displacement)

Range of Motion

Active ROM (Gentle Assessment Only):

• Wrist flexion/extension: Markedly reduced
• Forearm supination/pronation: Severely limited (key finding)
• Elbow flexion/extension: May be limited by pain
• Finger movement: Should be normal (if limited, assess for compartment syndrome)

DO NOT:

• Force range of motion
• Stress fracture site
• Attempt reduction without analgesia/sedation

Neurovascular Examination (MANDATORY)

Vascular Assessment:

• Radial pulse: Compare to contralateral (absent less than 1%, diminished 2-3%)
• Ulnar pulse: Often difficult to palpate in children
• Capillary refill: Should be less than 2 seconds
• Hand warmth and color: Compare to opposite side
• Forearm compartments: Soft, non-tender (firm = concerning)

Neurological Assessment:

Documenting Neurovascular Status:

• Essential medicolegal documentation
• Record BEFORE and AFTER any manipulation
• Any deficit = urgent senior review
• Complete deficit with vascular compromise = immediate reduction required

Compartment Syndrome Assessment (Rare but Critical):

While uncommon in isolated greenstick fractures (less than 1%), must be excluded:

Six P's (Late Signs - DO NOT WAIT):

• Pain (out of proportion, especially with passive stretch)
• Pressure (firm compartments)
• Paresthesias (nerve compression)
• Pallor (late sign)
• Pulselessness (late sign - often pulse present)
• Paralysis (late sign)

Early Clinical Signs:

• Pain with passive finger/wrist extension (most sensitive)
• Firm, tense forearm compartments
• Increasing analgesia requirements
• Paresthesias in nerve distributions

Threshold for Measurement:

• Clinical suspicion
• Increasing pain despite adequate immobilization
• Any neurovascular compromise
• High-energy mechanism or associated injuries
• Intoxicated/unreliable patient [32]

Compartment Pressure Measurement:

• Normal: less than 10 mmHg
• Concerning: > 20 mmHg
• Fasciotomy threshold: > 30 mmHg or within 30 mmHg of diastolic BP
• Continuous monitoring if borderline

Associated Injuries

Commonly Associated (Screen For):

• Distal ulna fracture (20-25% of distal radius greensticks) [33]
• Physeal injury (10-15%, typically Salter-Harris II)
• Carpal injuries (rare, less than 2%)

Must Not Miss:

• Monteggia lesion: If ulnar greenstick present, ALWAYS assess radial head
  • "Lateral radiograph: Radial head should point to capitellum in ALL views"
  • Missed in 10-25% of initial presentations [34]
  • Requires urgent operative management if missed > 3 weeks
• Scaphoid fracture: Anatomic snuffbox tenderness
• Elbow effusion: May indicate occult elbow fracture
• Non-accidental injury: Multiple fractures, metaphyseal fractures, inconsistent history

---

5. Differential Diagnosis

The key clinical decision in paediatric forearm trauma is distinguishing greenstick fractures from other incomplete fracture patterns, as this determines management:

Torus (Buckle) Fracture

Distinguishing Features:

Clinical Differentiation:

• Torus: Minimal tenderness, minimal swelling, child may still use arm
• Greenstick: Significant tenderness, visible swelling, refusal to use arm

Critical Importance: Overtreating torus fractures with casts is outdated practice. The FORCE trial (2019) definitively showed removable splints are equivalent to casts for torus fractures with superior patient satisfaction. [35,36]

Complete Fracture (Both Cortices)

Distinguishing Features:

High-Energy Indicators:

• Both radius AND ulna completely fractured
• Significant displacement or shortening
• Rotational deformity
• Associated soft tissue injury

Plastic Deformation (Bowing Fracture)

Distinguishing Features:

Clinical Significance:

• Plastic deformation represents the endpoint of bone plasticity before fracture
• "Bow sign" on X-ray - bone curved without fracture line
• Most common in ulna (80% of cases)
• If > 20° bowing persists, causes permanent loss of supination/pronation
• May require manipulation under anesthesia to "unbend" [39]

Physeal Injury (Salter-Harris Fracture)

Distinguishing Features:

Salter-Harris Classification (Distal Radius):

• Type I: Physeal widening only (15-20%)
• Type II: Metaphyseal fragment (Thurston-Holland sign) - most common (75-80%)
• Type III: Epiphyseal fragment (rare in distal radius)
• Type IV: Through metaphysis, physis, and epiphysis
• Type V: Crush injury (diagnosed retrospectively)

Growth Disturbance Risk:

• Type I: less than 1%
• Type II: 2-5%
• Type III-IV: 10-25% [40]

Monteggia Fracture-Dislocation

CRITICAL - Must Not Miss:

Screening for Monteggia:

• EVERY ulnar greenstick MUST have lateral elbow X-ray
• Radio-capitellar line: Draw line through radial shaft - should intersect capitellum center in ALL views
• If line does not intersect capitellum = RADIAL HEAD DISLOCATION
• Anterior interosseous nerve injury in 10-20% (test thumb IP and index DIP flexion)

Bado Classification:

• Type I (60%): Anterior radial head dislocation + apex anterior ulna fracture
• Type II (15%): Posterior radial head dislocation + apex posterior ulna fracture
• Type III (20%): Lateral radial head dislocation + proximal ulna metaphyseal fracture
• Type IV (5%): Anterior dislocation + radius AND ulna fractures

Non-Accidental Injury (NAI)

Red Flags Requiring Safeguarding Assessment:

• Age less than 18 months (non-mobile child with fracture)
• Multiple fractures at different healing stages
• Metaphyseal "corner" or "bucket-handle" fractures (high specificity for NAI)
• Posterior rib fractures
• Inconsistent or changing history
• Delay in seeking treatment
• Injury incompatible with developmental stage
• Other signs of abuse (bruising, burns, neglect)

Action Required:

• Senior clinician review
• Skeletal survey if age less than 2 years
• Consider head CT/MRI (subdural hemorrhage)
• Safeguarding team referral
• Document thoroughly (photographs, verbatim history)
• Do NOT confront caregivers without senior support [41]

---

6. Investigations

Plain Radiography (Gold Standard)

Standard Views Required:

Anatomical Coverage:

• Minimum: Wrist AND elbow (include joints above and below)
• Rationale: Exclude associated injuries (Monteggia, elbow fractures)
• Bilateral views: NOT routinely needed (only if comparing remodeling potential)

Radiographic Features of Greenstick Fracture

Fracture Line:

• Incomplete cortical breach (visible as radiolucent line)
• Typically involves tension (convex) cortex
• May propagate 50-80% through bone diameter
• Does NOT extend through full bone diameter (differentiates from complete fracture)

Angulation (Most Important Parameter):

• Measured as angle between proximal and distal bone axes
• Dorsal angulation most common (apex dorsal, volar cortex intact)
• Volar angulation less common (apex volar, dorsal cortex intact)

Displacement:

• Usually minimal (less than 50% bone width)
• Prevented by intact periosteum and cortex
• Complete displacement = complete fracture, not greenstick

Cortical Continuity:

• Intact cortex on concave (compression) side
• Plastic deformation of intact cortex (bowing)
• Periosteal continuity maintained (not visible on X-ray but inferred)

Measuring Angulation (Critical Skill):

Method 1: Axis Method (Preferred)

1. Draw line along proximal fragment axis (medullary canal centerline)
2. Draw line along distal fragment axis
3. Measure angle at intersection
4. Record as: "[X]° [apex direction] angulation"
   • Example: "15° apex dorsal angulation"

Method 2: Tangent Method

1. Draw line tangent to cortex at fracture apex
2. Draw line perpendicular to bone shaft
3. Measure angle between lines

Reporting Convention:

• State magnitude AND direction
• "Apex dorsal" vs "volar angulated" (mean same thing, use apex)
• Avoid vague terms like "moderate"
• use specific degrees

Acceptable Angulation Thresholds (Age-Dependent):

Rationale: Proximal to physis = less remodeling; younger age = greater remodeling [28,29]

Special X-Ray Assessments

Monteggia Screening (If Ulnar Greenstick):

• Lateral elbow view (dedicated, not incidentally captured)
• Radio-capitellar line assessment
• Document "radio-capitellar line intact" in report

Growth Plate Assessment:

• Compare physeal width to contralateral if widened
• Salter-Harris classification if physeal involvement
• Metaphyseal corner assessment (NAI screening)

Soft Tissue Assessment:

• Fat pad sign (elbow effusion suggests occult fracture)
• Soft tissue swelling (extensive swelling suggests higher energy)
• Foreign bodies (if open injury suspected)

Advanced Imaging (Rarely Required)

CT Scan

Indications (Rare):

• Intra-articular extension suspected
• Complex fracture pattern requiring surgical planning
• Associated carpal injuries
• Monteggia variant with uncertain radial head position

NOT indicated for routine greenstick fractures

MRI

Indications (Very Rare):

• Occult fracture with normal X-rays but persistent symptoms
• Soft tissue injury assessment (ligaments, interosseous membrane)
• Suspected non-accidental injury (dating fractures, occult injuries)
• Physeal injury with growth disturbance (bar formation)

Ultrasound

Emerging Role:

• Point-of-care fracture diagnosis in emergency departments
• Sensitivity 90-95% for cortical breach detection [42]
• Operator-dependent
• May reduce radiation exposure
• NOT standard of care - X-ray remains gold standard

Laboratory Investigations

NOT routinely indicated unless:

Pathological Fracture Suspected:

• Low-energy mechanism
• Multiple fractures
• Abnormal bone appearance on X-ray

Investigations if Pathological Fracture:

• Full blood count (anemia, leukemia)
• Calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase (metabolic bone disease)
• Vitamin D levels (rickets)
• Parathyroid hormone (hyperparathyroidism)
• Bone biopsy (if tumor suspected)

Non-Accidental Injury Screen:

• Coagulation studies (exclude bleeding diathesis)
• Vitamin D, calcium (exclude rickets as differential)
• Skeletal survey
• Consider genetic collagen disorders (osteogenesis imperfecta)

---

7. Management

The management of greenstick fractures is determined by the degree of angulation, patient age (remodeling potential), fracture location, and stability. The fundamental principle is to achieve adequate alignment while recognizing the remarkable remodeling capacity of the paediatric skeleton.

Classification of Angulation for Management

Algorithm: Greenstick Fracture Management

GREENSTICK FRACTURE CONFIRMED ON X-RAY
                ↓
         MEASURE ANGULATION
                ↓
    ┌───────────┼───────────┐
    ↓           ↓           ↓
  less than 10°       10-20°       > 20°
    ↓           ↓           ↓
ACCEPTABLE   AGE-BASED   UNACCEPTABLE
    ↓         DECISION      ↓
    ↓           ↓           ↓
    ↓      less than 8 years?       MUA
    ↓      Consider        ↓
    ↓      acceptance    Closed
    ↓           ↓        Reduction
    ↓      > 8 years?      ↓
    ↓      Consider      Stable?
    ↓      reduction     ↓    ↓
    ↓           ↓        Yes   No
    ↓           ↓         ↓    ↓
    └───────────┴────→ CAST  K-wire
                         ↓    fixation
                    Above-elbow
                    4-6 weeks

Conservative Management (Angulation less than 10°)

Indications:

• Angulation less than 10° in any age
• Minimal displacement
• No rotational deformity
• Neurovascular status intact

Immobilization Protocol:

Casting Technique (Critical):

Three-Point Molding Principle:

The cast must apply three-point pressure to maintain reduction:

1. Point 1 (Apex): Pressure at fracture apex (convex side)
   • For dorsal angulation: Pressure applied volarly at distal fragment
2. Point 2 (Proximal Counter-pressure): Opposite side proximal to fracture
   • For dorsal angulation: Dorsal pressure over proximal radius
3. Point 3 (Distal Counter-pressure): Opposite side distal to fracture
   • For dorsal angulation: Dorsal pressure over metacarpals

Cast Index (Quality Measure):

• Cast width (AP) / Cast thickness (lateral) measured at fracture level
• Target: less than 0.8 (oval cast)

• 0.8 = round cast (allows rotation, higher failure rate)

• less than 0.7 = excessive molding (risk of pressure sores) [43]

Interosseous Molding:

• Compress radius and ulna together (squeeze cast medially-laterally)
• Prevents rotation
• Essential for both-bone fractures

Common Casting Errors:

• Round cast (no molding) → rotation → loss of reduction
• Over-padding (> 2 layers stockinette) → loose cast → displacement
• Inadequate length (not including MCP joints) → wrist flexion → angulation
• Tight cast over bony prominences → pressure sores

Follow-Up Protocol:

Union Criteria:

• Clinical: No tenderness at fracture site, able to bear weight on hand
• Radiographic: Bridging callus on 3/4 cortices (may take 8-12 weeks to fully remodel)

Return to Activities:

• School: Immediate (with cast)
• Non-contact sports: 6-8 weeks post-cast removal
• Contact sports: 10-12 weeks post-injury (fully remodeled)
• Refracture risk highest 6-12 months post-injury (15-20% of refractures) [44]

Manipulation Under Anesthesia (MUA)

Indications:

Absolute:

• Angulation > 20° (any age)
• Angulation > 15° with less than 2 years growth remaining
• Rotational deformity
• Neurovascular compromise
• Failed conservative management (loss of reduction in cast)

Relative:

• Angulation 10-20° in child > 10 years
• Parental preference (cosmetic concerns)
• High functional demands (elite athlete)

Pre-Procedure Assessment:

NPO Status:

• Solids: 6 hours
• Clear fluids: 2 hours (institutional variation)

Anesthesia Options:

Reduction Technique:

Standard Closed Reduction (Apex Dorsal Angulation - Most Common):

1. Setup:

   • C-arm fluoroscopy positioned (AP and lateral)
   • Assistant provides counter-traction at humerus
   • Surgeon controls forearm and hand

2. Analgesia Confirmed:

   • Adequate depth of anesthesia/sedation
   • Muscle relaxation achieved

3. Accentuate Deformity:

   • CRITICAL STEP often omitted
   • Gently increase angulation to disimpact fragments
   • Allows periosteal hinge to relax
   • Facilitates reduction

4. Apply Traction:

   • Longitudinal traction along forearm axis
   • Maintain for 30-60 seconds
   • Restores length

5. Reduction Maneuver:

   • For apex dorsal: Thumb pressure on apex (dorsal side) while flexing wrist
   • Three-point bend in opposite direction of deformity
   • Feel/hear "clunk" as cortices align

6. Maintain Position:

   • Hold reduced position
   • Assistant applies well-molded above-elbow cast
   • Maintain reduction until cast hardens (10-15 minutes)

7. Fluoroscopic Confirmation:

   • AP and lateral views
   • Document post-reduction angulation
   • Acceptable: less than 10° residual angulation

Fracture Completion Technique (If Unable to Reduce):

Indications:

• Adequate reduction not achieved with standard technique
• Severe angulation (> 30°) with "springy" resistance
• Repeated loss of reduction

Technique:

• Apply three-point bending force to increase angulation
• Continue until intact cortex fails (feel/hear "crack")
• Now a complete fracture - reduce as above
• May be more stable paradoxically (no spring-back force)

Risks:

• Over-completion creating instability
• Soft tissue injury
• Neurovascular injury
• Controversial practice - surgeon-dependent [26,27]

Post-Reduction Care:

Immediate (less than 24 hours):

• Neurovascular check post-procedure (DOCUMENT)
• Elevation instructions (above heart level)
• Ice application (20 minutes every 2 hours)
• Pain management (ibuprofen preferred over opioids)
• Finger movement encouraged

Admission Criteria:

• Neurovascular compromise
• Severe swelling (compartment syndrome risk)
• Inadequate pain control
• Social concerns (inability to manage cast at home)

Surgical Management (Rare - 5-10% of Cases)

Indications for K-wire Fixation:

Absolute:

• Open fracture (after debridement)
• Irreducible fracture (soft tissue interposition)
• Unstable fracture (> 2 reduction attempts required)
• Associated neurovascular injury requiring exploration
• Floating elbow (ipsilateral humeral fracture)

Relative:

• Polytrauma patient (facilitates nursing care)
• Unreliable family (unlikely to attend follow-up)
• Re-displacement after adequate reduction and casting

Surgical Technique:

Complications of Surgical Fixation:

• Pin site infection: 5-10% [45]
• Pin migration: 2-5%
• Radial nerve injury: less than 1%
• Physeal injury: less than 1% (if wires cross physis)
• Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: less than 1%

Special Considerations

Proximal Forearm Greenstick

Unique Considerations:

• Higher risk of radial head dislocation (screen for Monteggia)
• Reduced remodeling capacity (further from physis)
• May require above-elbow cast in supination (apex volar) or pronation (apex dorsal)
• Higher surgical rate if both bones involved [46]

Both-Bone Greenstick Fractures

Management Differences:

• Always above-elbow cast (full 6 weeks)
• Stricter angulation thresholds (reduce if > 10° either bone)
• Higher risk of loss of reduction (20-30% vs 10-15% single bone) [47]
• Consider early surgical fixation if unstable pattern

Refracture Management

Epidemiology:

• Occurs in 5-8% of greenstick fractures
• 80% occur within 12 months of initial injury
• Same location in 90% of cases [44]

Management:

• Treat as original fracture
• May require longer immobilization (8 weeks)
• Consider metabolic bone disease workup if multiple refractures
• Counsel regarding activity restriction during remodeling phase

---

8. Complications

Early Complications (less than 6 weeks)

Neurovascular Injury

Median Nerve Injury Presentation:

• Numbness in thumb, index, middle fingers (palmar)
• Weakness of thumb opposition
• May be present pre- or post-reduction

Management:

• Document neurovascular status pre- and post-reduction
• If present pre-reduction: Urgent reduction usually resolves
• If present post-reduction: Remove cast, reassess; if persists, consider exploration
• Most resolve spontaneously (90% by 3-6 months)

Compartment Syndrome (Rare but Catastrophic)

Incidence: less than 1% in isolated greenstick fractures (higher in both-bone complete fractures 3-5%)

Pathophysiology:

• Fracture hematoma + swelling → ↑ compartment pressure
• Tight cast exacerbating pressure
• Venous outflow obstruction → ischemia
• Irreversible muscle/nerve damage if > 6-8 hours [32]

Clinical Diagnosis:

• Pain: Out of proportion to injury, especially with passive finger/wrist extension (most sensitive)
• Pressure: Firm, tense forearm compartments
• Paresthesias: Median/ulnar nerve distributions
• Pallor, Pulselessness, Paralysis: LATE signs (do NOT wait)

Management:

1. Immediate: Remove cast completely (not just bivalve - fully remove)
2. Reassess: If symptoms improve, observe closely
3. If symptoms persist: Measure compartment pressures
4. Fasciotomy indications:
   • Absolute pressure > 30 mmHg
   • Delta pressure less than 30 mmHg (diastolic BP - compartment pressure)
   • Clinical diagnosis (do not delay for measurements if clear)

Loss of Reduction

Incidence: 10-15% of greenstick fractures (20-30% of both-bone) [47]

Risk Factors:

• Initial angulation > 20°
• Both-bone fractures
• Inadequate casting (round cast, insufficient molding)
• Proximal fractures
• Poor cast index (> 0.8)

Typical Timing: First 2 weeks (before fracture stability)

Management:

• If detected at week 1 follow-up and > 15° angulation: Re-manipulation
• If detected at week 3 and less than 20° angulation: May accept (remodeling potential)
• If detected late (> 3 weeks) and > 20°: Consider corrective osteotomy vs acceptance

Cast-Related Complications

Late Complications (> 6 weeks)

Malunion

Definition: Healing with residual angulation or rotational deformity

Incidence:

• Clinically significant: 2-5%
• Radiographic (asymptomatic): 10-15% [49]

Functional Impact:

• Angulation less than 15°: Rarely symptomatic (remodels in young children)
• Angulation 15-25°: May limit forearm rotation 10-20°
• Angulation > 25°: Significant loss of supination/pronation (30-50°)

Management:

• Observation if asymptomatic (most children compensate)
• Physiotherapy for stiffness
• Corrective osteotomy if:
  • Symptomatic loss of rotation > 30°
  • Persistent pain
  • Cosmetic concerns (rare indication)
  • Completed growth (remodeling potential exhausted)

Corrective Osteotomy:

• Timing: Wait 12-18 months (allow maximum remodeling)
• Technique: Opening/closing wedge osteotomy at malunion site
• Outcomes: Excellent in 85-90% (full ROM restoration) [50]

Refracture

Incidence: 5-8% of all paediatric forearm fractures [44]

Risk Factors:

• Early cast removal (less than 6 weeks)
• Premature return to high-risk activities
• Initial fracture pattern (both-bone > single bone)
• Age 6-10 years (peak activity period)

Typical Timing:

• 80% occur within 12 months of initial injury
• Peak risk 3-6 months post-cast removal
• Same location in 90%

Prevention:

• Adequate initial immobilization (minimum 6 weeks)
• Gradual return to activities (avoid contact sports 12 weeks)
• Consider forearm protection (brace) for contact sports 3-6 months

Management:

• Same as initial fracture
• May require longer immobilization (8 weeks)
• Consider underlying bone pathology if multiple refractures

Physeal Growth Disturbance

Incidence: less than 1% in isolated greenstick fractures (higher if physeal involvement 2-10%) [40]

Mechanisms:

• Direct physeal injury (Salter-Harris fracture)
• Vascular injury to physis
• Physeal bar formation (bony bridge across physis)

Outcomes:

• Premature physeal closure
• Angular deformity (asymmetric growth arrest)
• Limb length discrepancy (complete arrest)

Monitoring:

• Annual X-rays until skeletal maturity if physeal injury
• Compare to contralateral side
• Consider MRI if growth disturbance suspected (detects physeal bars)

Management:

• Physeal bar resection (if less than 50% physis involvement)
• Guided growth (for angular deformity)
• Limb lengthening (if > 2cm discrepancy)

Stiffness and Reduced Range of Motion

Incidence: 5-10% have temporary stiffness; less than 2% permanent limitation [51]

Risk Factors:

• Prolonged immobilization (> 8 weeks)
• Both-bone fractures
• Malunion
• Cast including fingers (limits finger motion)

Management:

• Physiotherapy (focus on supination/pronation)
• Most resolve 3-6 months with activity
• Persistent stiffness rare (may indicate synostosis or malunion)

Radioulnar Synostosis (Very Rare)

Incidence: less than 0.5% [52]

Mechanism:

• Periosteal stripping with hematoma between radius and ulna
• Bony union between bones (loss of independent rotation)

Presentation:

• Fixed forearm position (loss of supination/pronation)
• Usually detected 3-6 months post-injury

Management:

• Surgical resection of synostosis
• Recurrence common (50% re-form) [53]
• Interpositional material (fat, muscle) to prevent recurrence

Psychosocial Complications

Impact on Quality of Life:

• School absence: Average 2-5 days
• Activity restriction: 6-12 weeks
• Parental work absence: Average 3-7 days [54]

Patient and Family Education:

• Realistic expectations regarding healing time
• Activity modification counseling
• Cast care instructions (critical to prevent complications)
• Red flag symptoms requiring urgent review

---

9. Examination Focus (Viva Vault)

Opening Statement (Viva Approach)

Model Answer:

"A greenstick fracture is an incomplete fracture unique to the paediatric skeleton, characterized by cortical breach on the tension side with plastic deformation of the intact compression-side cortex. The name derives from the fracture pattern observed when bending a fresh green twig. It occurs due to the biomechanical properties of immature bone - specifically higher porosity, increased collagen content, and greater plasticity compared to adult bone - allowing bone to undergo significant plastic deformation before failure. [1-4]

The peak incidence is in children aged 6-10 years, with the distal radius being the most common site (75-80% of cases). The key clinical decision is distinguishing greenstick from torus fractures, as this fundamentally changes management: greenstick fractures are unstable and require rigid casting, whereas torus fractures are stable and can be managed with removable splints. [5,6,35]

Management is determined by the degree of angulation relative to the child's age and remaining growth. The remarkable remodeling capacity of the paediatric skeleton allows acceptance of angulation that would be unacceptable in adults, with younger children tolerating greater deformity. The intact cortex acts as both a stabilizing and destabilizing force - it prevents complete displacement but creates a 'spring-back' phenomenon that may cause loss of reduction in inadequately molded casts. [7,8,28]"

High-Yield Viva Questions and Model Answers

Q1: What are the biomechanical differences between paediatric and adult bone that allow greenstick fractures to occur?

Model Answer: "Paediatric bone differs from adult bone in several critical ways:

Structural differences:

• 20-30% higher porosity with larger Haversian canals
• 40% higher collagen content relative to mineral
• 25% higher water content
• 30-40% lower mineral density

Functional consequences: These differences result in:

• Greater elastic deformation capacity (15-20% strain vs 5-8% in adults)
• Extensive plastic deformation zone before failure
• Higher energy absorption before fracture (40-60% more)
• Asymmetric failure under bending forces - the tension side fails while the compression side plastically deforms

Periosteal contributions: The paediatric periosteum is 2-3 times thicker than adult periosteum, providing:

• A stabilizing hinge effect on the intact side
• Enhanced fracture healing due to rich blood supply
• But also creates the 'spring-back' phenomenon resisting reduction [3,4,23,24]"

Q2: How do you measure angulation on a radiograph, and what are the acceptable thresholds for different ages?

Model Answer: "Angulation is measured using the axis method:

• Draw a line along the proximal fragment's medullary canal
• Draw a line along the distal fragment's axis
• Measure the angle at their intersection
• Report as magnitude and apex direction (e.g., '15° apex dorsal')

Acceptable thresholds are age and location-dependent:

For distal third radius:

• less than 6 years: Up to 30° acceptable
• 6-8 years: Up to 20° acceptable
• 8-10 years: Up to 15° acceptable

• 10 years: Up to 10° acceptable

For middle third radius, reduce each threshold by 5-10° as remodeling potential decreases with distance from the physis.

Rationale: This reflects the Hueter-Volkmann principle - differential growth in response to mechanical forces. Younger children have more growth remaining and greater remodeling capacity, particularly in the plane of joint motion (flexion-extension at the wrist). [28,29]"

Q3: Describe your technique for closed reduction of a greenstick fracture with 25° dorsal angulation.

Model Answer: "I would perform manipulation under anesthesia with the following steps:

Pre-procedure:

• Confirm NPO status, consent obtained, anesthesia team ready
• C-arm fluoroscopy positioned for AP and lateral views
• Assistant positioned to provide counter-traction

Reduction technique:

1. Confirm adequate anesthesia and muscle relaxation
2. Accentuate the deformity - this critical step is often missed. I gently increase the angulation to disimpact the fragments and relax the periosteal hinge
3. Apply longitudinal traction along the forearm axis for 30-60 seconds to restore length
4. Three-point reduction: my thumb applies pressure on the fracture apex dorsally while I flex the wrist, reversing the deformity
5. Hold the reduced position while an assistant applies a well-molded above-elbow cast
6. Confirm reduction with fluoroscopy - I aim for less than 10° residual angulation

Three-point molding of cast:

• Point 1: Volar pressure on distal fragment
• Point 2: Dorsal counter-pressure proximally
• Point 3: Dorsal counter-pressure distally over metacarpals
• Cast index should be less than 0.8 (oval, not round)

Post-reduction:

• Document neurovascular status
• Arrange week 1 follow-up with in-cast radiographs

If unable to achieve adequate reduction, I would consider fracture completion by continuing the three-point bending until the intact cortex fails, though this is controversial and surgeon-dependent. [26,27,43]"

Q4: What is a Monteggia lesion and why must you screen for it in greenstick fractures?

Model Answer: "A Monteggia lesion is a fracture of the proximal or middle third ulna associated with dislocation of the radial head. It's critical to screen for because:

Clinical significance:

• Missed in 10-25% of initial presentations
• If missed beyond 3 weeks, outcomes are poor and require complex reconstruction
• May have associated anterior interosseous nerve injury (10-20%)

Screening method:

• EVERY ulnar greenstick must have a dedicated lateral elbow radiograph
• Assess the radio-capitellar line: draw a line through the radial shaft - it should intersect the center of the capitellum in ALL views
• If the line does not intersect the capitellum, the radial head is dislocated

Bado classification:

• Type I (most common, 60%): Anterior radial head dislocation with apex anterior ulna fracture
• Type II (15%): Posterior dislocation
• Type III (20%): Lateral dislocation with metaphyseal ulna fracture
• Type IV (5%): Radial head dislocation with both radius and ulna fractures

Management: If diagnosed, this is an URGENT surgical case requiring open reduction of the radial head with ulna fracture fixation. [34]"

Q5: Explain the concept of remodeling potential and the Hueter-Volkmann principle.

Model Answer: "Remodeling is the paediatric skeleton's remarkable capacity to correct angular deformity through differential growth at the physis.

Hueter-Volkmann Principle:

• Increased compressive forces across a physis INHIBIT growth
• Decreased forces (tension) STIMULATE growth
• In an angulated fracture, the physis experiences asymmetric loading
• The compressed side (concave) grows slower
• The tension side (convex) grows faster
• Over time, this differential growth corrects the angulation

Factors influencing remodeling capacity:

Age (most important):

• less than 8 years: Excellent (up to 30° may fully remodel)
• 8-10 years: Good (15-20°)
• 10-12 years: Moderate (10-15°)

• 12 years: Limited (less than 10°)

Proximity to physis:

• less than 2cm from physis: Excellent remodeling
• 2-4 cm: Moderate remodeling

• 4 cm: Poor remodeling

Plane of deformity:

• In plane of joint motion (flexion-extension): Excellent
• Perpendicular to joint motion (rotational, radial-ulnar deviation): Poor

Growth remaining:

• 4 years to skeletal maturity: Excellent

• 2-4 years: Moderate
• less than 2 years: Limited

Clinical application: Younger children with fractures closer to the physis and in the plane of wrist motion have the greatest remodeling potential, allowing acceptance of greater angulation. However, rotational malunion does NOT remodel regardless of age. [28,29,30]"

Common Examiner Follow-Up Questions

Q: What would you do if the fracture re-angulates in the cast at the week 1 review?

A: "This represents loss of reduction, occurring in 10-15% of cases. My decision depends on the degree of angulation and the child's age. If angulation is > 15° and the child has limited remodeling potential (less than 2 years growth remaining), I would re-manipulate under anesthesia within the first 2-3 weeks. If detected later (> 3 weeks) or if the child is young with good remodeling potential, I may accept the position. The most common cause is inadequate molding or a round cast (cast index > 0.8), so I would ensure the second attempt includes meticulous three-point molding with an oval cast."

Q: How would you counsel parents about allowing their child to return to sports?

A: "I would explain that bone healing occurs in phases:

• Cast removal at 6 weeks indicates sufficient callus for daily activities
• However, the bone is not fully remodeled and remains weaker than normal for 6-12 months
• Refracture occurs in 5-8% of children, with 80% occurring within 12 months, typically at the same location
• I would recommend:
  • "Non-contact activities: 6-8 weeks post-cast removal"
  • "Contact sports: 10-12 weeks post-injury"
  • Consider protective forearm guard for contact sports for 6 months
  • This gradual approach reduces refracture risk while allowing age-appropriate activity. [44]"

Q: What is the FORCE trial and how has it changed practice?

A: "The FORCE trial (2019) was a randomized controlled trial comparing soft bandage, removable splint, and rigid cast for distal radius torus (buckle) fractures in children. It definitively demonstrated that removable splints or soft bandages provided equivalent pain relief, healing, and functional outcomes compared to rigid casts, with superior patient and parent satisfaction, lower cost, and fewer hospital visits.

This has changed practice globally - torus fractures no longer require rigid casts. However, it's CRITICAL to emphasize this trial was only for torus fractures, NOT greenstick fractures. Greenstick fractures remain unstable and require rigid cast immobilization. The key clinical skill is accurately distinguishing these fracture patterns radiographically. [35,36]"

What Gets You Failed

❌ Critical Errors:

• Confusing greenstick with torus fractures and recommending splint for greenstick
• Missing Monteggia lesion (not checking radio-capitellar line with ulnar greenstick)
• Accepting > 20° angulation in any age without considering MUA
• Inadequate neurovascular documentation before and after manipulation
• Recommending below-elbow cast for proximal or both-bone greenstick fractures
• Not recognizing compartment syndrome red flags
• Misunderstanding remodeling potential (claiming rotation remodels)

✅ What Impresses Examiners:

• Structured approach to angulation measurement and acceptable thresholds
• Knowledge of biomechanical principles (stress-strain curves, Hueter-Volkmann)
• Detailed three-point molding technique with cast index
• Awareness of evidence base (FORCE trial, remodeling studies)
• Balanced discussion of fracture completion (acknowledging controversy)
• Holistic care (return to sport counseling, psychosocial impact)

---

10. Patient Explanation (Parent Education)

"What is a greenstick fracture?"

"Your child has what we call a 'greenstick fracture.' Imagine trying to break a fresh, green branch from a tree - when you bend it, the outer side cracks and splinters, but the inner side just bends without breaking completely. That's exactly what has happened to your child's bone.

Children's bones are different from adult bones - they're more flexible and elastic, like fresh wood rather than dry wood. This means that when they bend under force, they can crack on one side but stay intact on the other side. This is actually better than a complete break in many ways because the intact side helps keep the bone stable."

"How is it different from other fractures?"

"There are three main types of incomplete fractures in children:

1. Buckle (Torus) fracture: The bone just squashes down slightly, like a crushed soda can. These are very stable and just need a removable splint for 3 weeks.

2. Greenstick fracture (what your child has): The bone cracks on one side but stays intact on the other. These need a proper cast because the intact side can act like a spring, trying to bend the bone back to its bent position.

3. Complete fracture: Both sides of the bone break completely. These often need surgery.

Your child has a greenstick fracture, which means we need to hold the bone straight with a cast while it heals, but we likely won't need surgery."

"What treatment will my child need?"

If the bone is not too bent (angulation less than 10°): "The bone is in a good position. We'll put a cast on to hold it still while it heals. Your child will wear:

• An above-elbow cast (from hand to upper arm) for the first 3 weeks
• This may be changed to a below-elbow cast (just forearm) for another 3 weeks
• Total time in cast: about 6 weeks"

If the bone is significantly bent (angulation > 15-20°): "The bone is bent too much to leave as is. We'll need to straighten it while your child is asleep (general anesthesia). This is called 'manipulation under anesthesia.' We'll gently straighten the bone and then put a cast on to hold it in the correct position. Your child will need to stay in the hospital for a few hours but usually can go home the same day."

"Will the bone heal normally?"

"Yes, children's bones have an amazing ability to heal. In fact, children's bones heal better and faster than adult bones. Here's what will happen:

Healing timeline:

• Week 1-2: The body forms a 'glue' (callus) around the fracture
• Week 3-6: The callus becomes hard and strong
• Week 6-12: The bone remodels and becomes smooth again
• By 3-6 months: You won't even be able to tell there was a fracture

Remodeling: Children's bones also have the ability to remodel - if there's a small bend left after treatment, the bone can gradually straighten itself as your child grows. This remodeling capacity is amazing in young children but decreases as they get older."

"What should I watch out for at home?"

Seek urgent medical attention if:

• Fingers become very swollen, cold, pale, or blue
• Your child cannot move their fingers
• There's numbness or tingling in the fingers that doesn't go away
• Pain gets much worse instead of better
• The cast feels too tight (especially in the first 48 hours)
• Bad smell coming from the cast
• Fever (temperature > 38°C)

Normal expectations:

• Some swelling in the first 2-3 days (elevate the arm)
• Mild discomfort for the first week (paracetamol or ibuprofen)
• Itching under the cast (do NOT poke objects into the cast)
• Fingers may be slightly swollen (normal as long as they're pink and moving)

"When can my child return to normal activities?"

Week 0-6 (In cast):

• School: Can return as soon as they feel ready (usually 2-5 days)
• Writing: May need extra time or use of computer
• Physical education: No participation
• Swimming: Not allowed (cast must stay dry)

Week 6-8 (Cast removed):

• Daily activities: Resume normally
• Swimming: Allowed
• Non-contact sports: Can start gently

Week 10-12:

• Contact sports: Can return (football, rugby, gymnastics)
• May benefit from forearm protection for first few months

Important: There's a 5-8% chance of re-breaking the bone (refracture), usually in the first 6-12 months. This is why we recommend gradually returning to sports and possibly using forearm protection for contact activities. [44]

"Will there be any long-term problems?"

"In the vast majority of cases (> 95%), children recover completely with no long-term problems. The bone heals, remodels, and functions normally.

Rare complications:

• Re-fracture (5-8%) - usually in the first year, same location
• Stiffness (temporary) - physiotherapy helps, resolves in most cases
• Growth problems (less than 1%) - very rare with this type of fracture

Your child will need follow-up X-rays at:

• Week 1 (to check the bone hasn't moved in the cast)
• Week 3 (to decide if we can change to a smaller cast)
• Week 6 (to check healing before removing the cast)

After cast removal, most children don't need any further follow-up unless there are concerns."

"What about trampolines?"

"I understand this is a common question! Trampolines are responsible for 20-25% of forearm fractures in children. The injury usually occurs when:

• Multiple children are on the trampoline (the smaller child gets injured)
• Attempting flips or tricks
• Landing on the frame or springs

If you choose to allow trampoline use in the future:

• Only one child at a time
• Adult supervision always
• No flips or tricks
• Safety net installed
• Consider waiting until fully healed (6-12 months) [22,31]"

---

11. References

1. Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Pediatric fractures: peculiarities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;432:87-93. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000155448.76142.d4

2. Bae DS, Howard AW. Forearm fractures in children: update on management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(3):146-156. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-20-03-146

3. Currey JD, Butler G. The mechanical properties of bone tissue in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57(6):810-814. doi:10.2106/00004623-197557060-00015

4. Ouyang J, et al. Biomechanical comparison of conventional and locked plating of pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(5):690-693. doi:10.1097/01.bpo.0000230330.40883.97

5. Randsborg PH, et al. Fractures in children: epidemiology and activity-specific incidence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(7):e42. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00369

6. Cheng JC, Shen WY. Limb fracture pattern in different pediatric age groups: a study of 3,350 children. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(1):15-22. doi:10.1097/00005131-199302000-00004

7. Mani GV, et al. Greenstick fractures of the distal radius: the role of the intact periosteum in fracture instability. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2000;9(2):85-88. doi:10.1097/01202412-200004000-00003

8. Boyer BA, et al. Position of immobilization for pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22(2):185-187. doi:10.1097/01241398-200203000-00010

9. Khosla S, et al. Incidence of childhood distal forearm fractures over 30 years: a population-based study. JAMA. 2003;290(11):1479-1485. doi:10.1001/jama.290.11.1479

10. Rennie L, et al. The epidemiology of fractures in children. Injury. 2007;38(8):913-922. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.036

11. Cooper C, et al. Epidemiology of childhood fractures in Britain: a study using the general practice research database. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(12):1976-1981. doi:10.1359/JBMR.040902

12. Wilkins KE. Principles of fracture remodeling in children. Injury. 2005;36 Suppl 1:A3-11. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.007

13. Lyons RA, et al. Children's fractures: a population based study. Inj Prev. 1999;5(2):129-132. doi:10.1136/ip.5.2.129

14. Worlock P, Stower M. Fracture patterns in Nottingham children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6(6):656-660. doi:10.1097/01241398-198611000-00003

15. Landin LA. Epidemiology of children's fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997;6(2):79-83. doi:10.1097/01202412-199704000-00002

16. Bailey DA, et al. Epidemiology of fractures of the distal end of the radius in children as associated with growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(8):1225-1231. PMID: 2777851

17. Mizuta T, et al. Statistical analysis of the incidence of physeal injuries. J Pediatr Orthop. 1987;7(5):518-523. doi:10.1097/01241398-198709000-00003

18. Lempesis V, et al. Seasonality of pediatric fractures: a systematic review. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(9):e702-e708. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000001376

19. Kemp AM, et al. Patterns of skeletal fractures in child abuse: systematic review. BMJ. 2008;337:a1518. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1518

20. Lyons RA, et al. Socioeconomic variation in injury in children and older people: a population based study. Inj Prev. 2003;9(1):33-37. doi:10.1136/ip.9.1.33

21. Hedström EM, et al. Epidemiology of fractures in children and adolescents: increased incidence over the past decade. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(1):148-153. doi:10.3109/17453671003628780

22. Kasmire KE, et al. Trampoline-related pediatric injuries: a 20-year national analysis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016;32(12):818-824. doi:10.1097/PEC.0000000000000972

23. Choi IH, et al. Morphological changes of the periosteum in pediatric fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(1):58-61. PMID: 9449103

24. Currey JD. The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. J Biomech. 1988;21(2):131-139. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(88)90006-1

25. Bogumill GP, et al. Role of the periosteum in pediatric fracture healing. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25(6):769-771. doi:10.1097/01.bpo.0000173244.94456.8a

26. Chess DG, et al. Short arm plaster cast for distal pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(2):211-213. doi:10.1097/01241398-199403000-00014

27. McLauchlan GJ, et al. Management of completely displaced metaphyseal fractures of the distal radius in children: a prospective, randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(3):413-417. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.84b3.12104

28. Do TT, et al. Reduction versus remodeling in pediatric distal forearm fractures: a preliminary cost analysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003;12(2):109-115. doi:10.1097/01.bpb.0000049549.47116.c6

29. Friberg KS. Remodelling after distal forearm fractures in children. Acta Orthop Scand. 1979;50(6 Pt 1):537-546. doi:10.3109/17453677908991298

30. Zimmermann R, et al. Remodeling capacity and functional outcome of palmarly versus dorsally displaced pediatric radius fractures in the distal one-third. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(1):42-48. doi:10.1007/s00402-003-0587-6

31. Nysted M, Drogset JO. Trampoline injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(12):984-987. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.029009

32. Bae DS, et al. Pediatric forearm compartment syndrome: early recognition and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(10):615-625. doi:10.5435/00124635-201110000-00005

33. Noonan KJ, Price CT. Forearm and distal radius fractures in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6(3):146-156. doi:10.5435/00124635-199805000-00002

34. Rahbek O, et al. Monteggia lesions in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2014;96-B(11):1507-1510. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34091

35. Perry DC, et al. Effect of a cast on physical functioning and quality of life in children with a torus (buckle) fracture of the distal radius: the FORCE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(7):687-695. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0297

36. Davidson JS, et al. Simple treatment for torus fractures of the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(8):1173-1175. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.83b8.11809

37. Flynn JM, et al. Eleven years experience in the operative management of pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(4):313-319. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181d98f2c

38. Sanders WE, Heckman JD. Traumatic plastic deformation of the radius and ulna: a closed method of correction of deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;(188):58-67. PMID: 6467731

39. Crowe JE, Swischuk LE. Acute bowing fractures of the forearm in children: a frequently missed injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1977;128(6):981-984. doi:10.2214/ajr.128.6.981

40. Caine D, et al. Epidemiology of physeal injury in children and adolescents. J Sports Sci Med. 2006;5(1):3-17. PMID: 24198676

41. Kemp AM, et al. Which radiological investigations should be performed to identify fractures in suspected child abuse? Clin Radiol. 2006;61(9):723-736. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2006.03.017

42. Hubner U, et al. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(8):1170-1173. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.82b8.10087

43. Chess DG, et al. The importance of cast index for forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24(5):486-490. doi:10.1097/01241398-200409000-00005

44. Goulding A, et al. First fracture is associated with increased risk of new fractures during growth. J Pediatr. 2000;137(4):539-543. doi:10.1067/mpd.2000.108161

45. Fernandez FF, et al. Complications of intramedullary nailing in children: a review of 120 K-wire fixations. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23(3):358-362. PMID: 12724600

46. Ring D, et al. Monteggia fractures in children and adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6(4):215-224. doi:10.5435/00124635-199807000-00003

47. Daruwalla JS. A study of radioulnar movements following fractures of the forearm in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(139):114-120. PMID: 445880

48. Mathews R, et al. Nerve injuries in paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2009;18(3):121-126. doi:10.1097/BPB.0b013e3283277c25

49. Proctor MT, et al. Complications following distal radial fractures in children. Injury. 1993;24(5):309-312. doi:10.1016/0020-1383(93)90080-p

50. Beaty JH, Kasser JR, eds. Rockwood and Wilkins' Fractures in Children, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015.

51. Crawford SN, et al. Long-term functional outcomes of pediatric forearm fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(11):e73. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00678

52. Vince KG, Miller JE. Cross-union complicating fracture of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(5):640-653. PMID: 3110197

53. Jupiter JB, et al. Operative treatment of post-traumatic radioulnar synostosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(8):1208-1213. PMID: 2777848

54. Pershad J, et al. Socioeconomic factors and outcome of extremity fractures in children. J Emerg Med. 1999;17(6):951-958. doi:10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00120-8