Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)
Summary
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic cardiac disorder characterised by unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy (wall thickness ≥15 mm) in the absence of abnormal loading conditions. HCM is the most common inherited cardiac disease, affecting approximately 1 in 500 individuals. It is caused primarily by mutations in sarcomeric protein genes, with MYBPC3 and MYH7 accounting for most cases. HCM is the leading cause of sudden cardiac death in young athletes. Management focuses on symptom control, sudden death risk stratification, and family screening. The introduction of mavacamten represents a significant therapeutic advance for obstructive HCM.
Key Facts
- Definition: Unexplained LVH ≥15 mm (or ≥13 mm with family history)
- Prevalence: 1 in 500; most common inherited cardiac disease
- Genetic Cause: Sarcomeric gene mutations in 40-60%
- Common Genes: MYBPC3 (35%), MYH7 (25%)
- Sudden Death Risk: Main cause of SCD in young athletes
- Obstruction: LVOT gradient ≥30 mmHg in 70% at rest or with provocation
- Treatment Advance: Mavacamten (cardiac myosin inhibitor)
Clinical Pearls
High-Yield Points:
- Most patients are asymptomatic; diagnosis often incidental or after family screening
- Use ESC HCM Risk-SCD calculator for 5-year SCD risk assessment
- Exertional syncope is a red flag - requires urgent evaluation
- LVOT obstruction is dynamic: increases with Valsalva, decreases with squatting
- Mavacamten reduces LVOT gradient and improves symptoms
- Genetic testing guides family screening; cascade screening essential
- Sports participation guidelines have evolved - individualised approach
Why This Matters
HCM is unique among cardiomyopathies as patients may be asymptomatic for years before presenting with sudden cardiac death. Identifying at-risk individuals through family screening and genetic testing, combined with accurate SCD risk stratification, can prevent premature deaths. The recent approval of mavacamten offers improved symptom control for obstructive HCM.
Prevalence
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| General Population | 1 in 500 (0.2%) |
| Familial Inheritance | Autosomal dominant, 50% inheritance |
| Genetic Yield | 40-60% have identifiable mutation |
| SCD Risk | 0.5-1% per year overall |
Demographics
- Age: Can present at any age; often diagnosed in adolescence or young adulthood
- Sex: Equal prevalence, but males present earlier
- Athletes: Most common cause of SCD in young competitive athletes
Genetic Basis
HCM is primarily caused by mutations in sarcomeric protein genes:
| Gene | Protein | Frequency | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| MYBPC3 | Myosin-binding protein C | 35-40% | Variable penetrance |
| MYH7 | β-myosin heavy chain | 20-30% | Often childhood onset |
| TNNT2 | Troponin T | 5% | May have mild hypertrophy but high SCD risk |
| TNNI3 | Troponin I | 5% | Variable |
| TPM1 | α-tropomyosin | 2% | - |
Mechanism
- Sarcomeric Dysfunction: Mutations cause abnormal sarcomere function
- Myocyte Disarray: Disorganised myocyte arrangement
- Interstitial Fibrosis: Replacement of myocytes with scar
- Asymmetric Hypertrophy: Typically affects septum more than free wall
- LVOT Obstruction: Septal bulge + SAM of mitral valve causes dynamic obstruction
- Diastolic Dysfunction: Stiff ventricle impairs relaxation
Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM)
Dynamic LVOT obstruction occurs due to:
- Mitral valve anterior leaflet drawn into LVOT during systole (Venturi effect)
- Causes mitral regurgitation and worsens obstruction
- Increases with reduced preload (Valsalva, dehydration, vasodilators)
- Decreases with increased preload (squatting, fluid)
Symptoms
Many patients are asymptomatic. When present:
Signs
Provocative Manoeuvres
| Manoeuvre | Effect on Murmur | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Valsalva | ↑ Louder | ↓ Preload, ↑ obstruction |
| Standing | ↑ Louder | ↓ Preload |
| Squatting | ↓ Quieter | ↑ Preload, ↑ afterload |
| Handgrip | ↓ Quieter | ↑ Afterload |
Key Findings
Cardiovascular:
- Ejection systolic murmur (louder with Valsalva)
- Fourth heart sound (S4)
- Bifid carotid pulse
- Laterally displaced apex
Differential from Aortic Stenosis:
- Carotid pulse brisk (not slow-rising)
- Murmur increases with Valsalva (AS decreases)
- No radiation to carotids
Essential Investigations
| Investigation | Findings |
|---|---|
| ECG | LVH criteria, deep T inversions, Q waves (septal), LA enlargement |
| Echocardiography | LV wall thickness ≥15 mm, SAM, LVOT gradient, MR |
| Cardiac MRI | LVH pattern, LGE (fibrosis), risk stratification |
| Genetic Testing | Identifies mutation in 40-60% |
| Holter Monitor | NSVT detection for risk stratification |
| Exercise Testing | Functional capacity, BP response |
Echo Criteria
- Septal thickness: ≥15 mm (primary criterion)
- Septal:posterior wall ratio: >1.3 (asymmetric)
- LVOT gradient: ≥30 mmHg at rest or provoked = obstructive
- SAM of mitral valve: Present in most obstructive cases
- MR: Secondary to SAM
Cardiac MRI
- Gold standard for morphology
- LGE (late gadolinium enhancement): Marker of fibrosis and SCD risk
- Quantifies EF and regional hypertrophy
- Helpful when echo windows poor
By Obstruction
| Type | LVOT Gradient | Prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| Obstructive at rest | ≥30 mmHg at rest | 25% |
| Labile obstruction | Under 30 at rest, ≥30 with provocation | 45% |
| Non-obstructive | Under 30 at rest and provoked | 30% |
Morphological Patterns
- Asymmetric septal hypertrophy (most common)
- Apical HCM (more common in Japan; giant T inversions)
- Mid-cavity obstruction
- Concentric hypertrophy
Step 1: SCD Risk Assessment
ESC HCM Risk-SCD Calculator (5-year risk):
- Age
- Maximum wall thickness
- LA diameter
- LVOT gradient
- Family history of SCD
- NSVT on Holter
- Unexplained syncope
| 5-Year Risk | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| ≥6% (High) | ICD recommended (Class I) |
| 4-6% (Intermediate) | ICD may be considered (Class IIb) |
| Under 4% (Low) | ICD not routinely indicated |
Additional High-Risk Features:
- Massive LVH (≥30 mm)
- Extensive LGE on CMR (≥15% of LV mass)
- LV apical aneurysm
- EF under 50%
Step 2: Symptom Management (Obstructive)
First Line:
- Beta-blockers (non-vasodilating): Bisoprolol, metoprolol
- Reduce heart rate, improve diastolic filling
Second Line:
- Disopyramide: Negative inotrope, reduces SAM
- Add to beta-blocker; monitor QT
Third Line (New):
- Mavacamten: Cardiac myosin inhibitor
- Reduces LVOT gradient by 50%
- FDA/EMA approved for symptomatic obstructive HCM
- Requires echo monitoring (EF drop risk)
Non-Obstructive HCM:
- Beta-blockers or verapamil for symptoms
Step 3: Invasive Options (Refractory Obstruction)
Septal Myectomy (Surgical):
- Gold standard for drug-refractory obstructive HCM
- Mortality under 1% in experienced centres
- Durable reduction in gradient
Alcohol Septal Ablation:
- Percutaneous alternative
- Injects alcohol into septal perforator artery
- Creates controlled infarct
- Consider if surgical risk high or patient preference
Step 4: Genetic Testing and Family Screening
- Genetic testing: Offer to all HCM patients
- Cascade screening: First-degree relatives
- If mutation identified: Genetic test relatives
- If no mutation: Clinical screening with echo every 3-5 years
Step 5: Activity and Lifestyle
Updated ESC 2022 Sports Recommendations:
- Individualised approach based on risk assessment
- Low-intensity recreational exercise generally safe
- Competitive sports: Case-by-case decision with specialist
| Complication | Risk Factors | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Sudden Cardiac Death | High ESC score, massive LVH, NSVT | ICD |
| Atrial Fibrillation | LA enlargement | Anticoagulation (all HCM + AF) |
| Heart Failure | End-stage HCM (EF falls) | Standard HF therapy |
| Stroke | AF, LA thrombus | Anticoagulation |
| Infective Endocarditis | LVOT obstruction, MR | Prophylaxis if high risk |
Survival
- Annual mortality: 0.5-1% overall
- SCD risk: 0.5% per year (general HCM population)
- Post-ICD: Excellent survival with appropriate shocks
Prognostic Factors
Poor Prognosis:
- Massive LVH (≥30 mm)
- Family history of SCD
- Unexplained syncope
- NSVT
- Extensive LGE
- Reduced EF (end-stage)
Key Guidelines
| Guideline | Organisation | Year |
|---|---|---|
| ESC HCM Guidelines | ESC | 2023 |
| AHA/ACC HCM Guidelines | AHA/ACC | 2024 |
| Sports Participation | ESC | 2022 |
Key Trials
EXPLORER-HCM (2020)
- Mavacamten vs placebo in obstructive HCM
- Improved exercise capacity and LVOT gradient
VALOR-HCM (2022)
- Mavacamten reduced need for septal reduction therapy
What is HCM?
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a condition where the heart muscle becomes thickened, making it harder for the heart to pump blood. It runs in families and is usually caused by a change in your genes.
Is it dangerous?
For most people with HCM, the outlook is good with proper monitoring and treatment. However, a small number of people are at risk of dangerous heart rhythms. That's why careful assessment is important.
Do I need special treatment?
Treatment depends on your symptoms and risk level:
- Many people need no treatment beyond monitoring
- Medications can help if you have symptoms
- Some people need a device (ICD) to protect against dangerous rhythms
- Rarely, surgery may be needed
Can I exercise?
Exercise advice has become more individualised. Low-intensity activities are usually safe. Your doctor can guide you on what's appropriate for you.
Should my family be tested?
Yes, because HCM is genetic, your close relatives (parents, siblings, children) should be screened. This can identify the condition early and prevent complications.
-
Elliott PM, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(39):2733-2779. PMID: 25173338
-
Arbustini E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503-3626. PMID: 37622657
-
Olivotto I, et al. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM). Lancet. 2020;396(10253):759-769. PMID: 32871100
Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference. It does not replace professional medical judgement.