Sigmoid Volvulus
The condition is characterized by acute massive abdominal distension, absolute constipation, and relatively mild abdominal pain initially. Diagnosis is typically established by the pathognomonic "coffee bean sign" on...
Clinical board
A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.
Urgent signals
Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.
- Abdominal distension
- Absolute constipation
- Empty rectum on DRE
- Peritonism (perforation)
Editorial and exam context
Reviewed by MedVellum Editorial Team · MedVellum Medical Education Platform
Credentials: MBBS, MRCP, Board Certified
Sigmoid Volvulus
Topic Overview
Summary
Sigmoid volvulus is an axial rotation of the sigmoid colon around its mesenteric pedicle, resulting in a closed-loop large bowel obstruction. The condition represents the third most common cause of large bowel obstruction in Western countries (after colorectal malignancy and diverticular disease), accounting for 2-5% of all intestinal obstructions, though incidence varies dramatically by geography—up to 50% of colonic obstructions in endemic regions including parts of Africa, the Middle East, and South America. [1,2]
The condition is characterized by acute massive abdominal distension, absolute constipation, and relatively mild abdominal pain initially. Diagnosis is typically established by the pathognomonic "coffee bean sign" on plain abdominal radiography and the "whirl sign" (twisted mesenteric pedicle) on computed tomography. [3,4] First-line treatment in hemodynamically stable patients without peritonitis is endoscopic decompression via flexible sigmoidoscopy with rectal tube placement, which achieves initial success rates of 70-90%. [5,6] However, recurrence after successful decompression is high (40-60% without definitive surgery), necessitating consideration of elective sigmoid resection. [7] Emergency surgery is mandated for peritonitis, suspected perforation, failed endoscopic decompression, or evidence of bowel ischaemia. Mortality ranges from 5-10% in non-gangrenous cases to 30-50% with gangrenous or perforated bowel. [8]
Key Facts
- Demographics: Predominantly elderly males (70-80s); institutionalized patients; high-fiber diet populations
- Geographic variation: Western countries 2-5% of LBO vs. endemic areas (Africa, Middle East, South America) up to 50% [1,2]
- Classic presentation: Massive abdominal distension + absolute constipation + empty rectum on DRE + minimal initial pain
- Radiographic diagnosis:
- Plain AXR: "Coffee bean sign" (sensitivity 57-78%) [3]
- CT: "Whirl sign" (twisted mesentery), "beak sign" (transition point) — diagnostic accuracy > 90% [4,9]
- Endoscopic decompression: First-line if no peritonitis; success rate 70-90%; recurrence 40-60% [5,6,7]
- Surgical indications: Peritonitis, failed decompression, ischaemia, perforation, recurrent volvulus
- Emergency surgery: Hartmann's procedure (gangrenous/contaminated); resection + primary anastomosis (viable bowel) [8]
- Mortality: Non-gangrenous 5-10%; gangrenous/perforated 30-50% [8]
- Definitive management: Elective sigmoid resection after successful decompression to prevent recurrence [7]
Clinical Pearls
Massive distension with minimal pain: Unlike small bowel obstruction or other causes of LBO, sigmoid volvulus often presents with dramatic abdominal distension but relatively mild initial abdominal pain — until ischaemia supervenes
Empty rectum on DRE: The combination of an empty rectum on digital examination + massive abdominal distension + tympany = mechanical large bowel obstruction; sigmoid volvulus is a top differential
Coffee bean orientation matters: The AXIS classification system (angle of coffee bean mesenteric axis on AXR) predicts severity: > 135° correlates with higher rates of ischaemia and need for surgery [9]
Whirl sign is diagnostic: On CT, the "whirl sign" (twisted mesenteric vessels) has > 90% specificity for volvulus and helps differentiate from pseudo-obstruction or other causes of colonic distension [4]
Successful decompression ≠ cure: Up to 60% recurrence rate after successful endoscopic decompression without definitive surgery; counsel patients on need for elective resection [7]
Red flag for ischaemia: Fever, tachycardia, peritonism, bloody PR, or lactate > 2.5 mmol/L suggest bowel ischaemia/necrosis — proceed directly to emergency laparotomy [10]
Rectal tube placement is critical: After successful endoscopic detorsion, leave a large-bore rectal tube (28-32F) in place for 48-72 hours to prevent immediate re-torsion [6]
Why This Matters Clinically
Sigmoid volvulus represents a time-critical surgical emergency with significant mortality if treatment is delayed. The condition demonstrates dramatic geographic variation: in Western populations it accounts for only 2-5% of large bowel obstructions and predominantly affects elderly institutionalized patients, while in endemic regions (Sub-Saharan Africa, Iran, India, parts of South America) it represents up to 50% of colonic obstructions and affects a younger demographic. [1,2]
Early recognition via clinical examination (massive distension, empty rectum) and imaging (coffee bean sign on AXR, whirl sign on CT) enables prompt endoscopic decompression, which is successful in 70-90% of cases when bowel is viable. [5,6] However, the high recurrence rate (40-60%) without definitive surgery creates a management dilemma: balancing the morbidity of emergency surgery in frail elderly patients against the risk of recurrence. [7] Delayed diagnosis or treatment leads to bowel ischaemia (develops within 24-48 hours), perforation, faecal peritonitis, and mortality rates exceeding 30-50%. [8] Understanding risk stratification (AXIS classification, lactate, CT signs of ischaemia) and appropriate triage (endoscopy vs. immediate surgery) is essential for emergency medicine, surgical, and gastroenterology trainees.
Visual Summary
Visual assets to be added:
- Plain AXR: Coffee bean sign with sigmoid loop pointing to RUQ
- Plain AXR: Absence of rectal gas, inverted-U appearance, bird's beak sign
- CT coronal: Whirl sign (twisted mesenteric vessels and sigmoid loop)
- CT axial: Beak-shaped transition point, dilated sigmoid with air-fluid levels
- Endoscopic view: Spiral twist of mucosa at point of obstruction
- Endoscopic detorsion: Passage of scope through twist with explosive decompression
- Surgical photo: Massively dilated sigmoid colon (viable vs. gangrenous)
- Treatment algorithm: ED presentation → AXR/CT → Resuscitation → Endoscopy vs. Surgery decision tree
- AXIS classification diagram: Coffee bean mesenteric axis angles (0-90°, 90-135°, > 135°) and correlation with severity
- Anatomic illustration: Normal sigmoid anatomy vs. long redundant sigmoid with narrow mesenteric base
- Surgical options flowchart: Hartmann's vs. primary anastomosis vs. sigmoid resection + end colostomy
Epidemiology
Global Incidence and Geographic Variation
Sigmoid volvulus demonstrates striking geographic heterogeneity with varying etiologic patterns:
Western Countries (Europe, North America, Australia):
- Accounts for 2-5% of all large bowel obstructions and 8-10% of colonic volvulus cases [1,2]
- Third most common cause of LBO after colorectal cancer and diverticular disease
- Predominantly affects elderly institutionalized patients (mean age 70-80 years)
- Annual incidence: approximately 2-3 per 100,000 population
Endemic Regions:
- Sub-Saharan Africa: Up to 50% of intestinal obstructions; 20-50 per 100,000 population [2]
- Middle East (Iran, Turkey, Iraq): 20-40% of colonic obstructions
- Indian subcontinent: 10-30% of intestinal obstructions
- South America (Brazil, Peru, Bolivia): 15-25% of LBO
- Scandinavia (especially Finland, Russia): Higher rates than other Western countries
These endemic areas share common features: high-fiber diet (leading to increased fecal bulk and sigmoid elongation), high altitude (possibly related to diet and lifestyle), and chronic constipation patterns. [1,2]
Demographics
Age Distribution:
- Western countries: Bimodal distribution with peak in 7th-8th decades (elderly institutionalized) and smaller peak in 3rd-4th decades (psychiatric patients on chronic neuroleptics)
- Endemic regions: Peak in 4th-6th decades (younger active population) [2]
- Rare in children except in cases of intestinal malrotation, Hirschsprung disease, or neuronal intestinal dysplasia
Sex:
- Male predominance: Male-to-female ratio 2-3:1 across all populations [1,2]
- More pronounced in endemic regions (possibly related to dietary habits)
Clinical Setting:
- Nursing homes and long-term care facilities (30-40% of Western cases)
- Psychiatric institutions (15-25% of cases)
- Community-dwelling elderly with chronic neurological disorders
- Endemic regions: generally healthy individuals with dietary predisposition
Risk Factors
Anatomic Predisposition
| Factor | Mechanism | Relative Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Elongated redundant sigmoid colon | Increased length creates mobile loop susceptible to twisting | 5-10× |
| Narrow mesenteric base | Narrow pedicle acts as fulcrum for rotation | 4-8× |
| High-fibre diet (endemic regions) | Chronic fecal bulk → sigmoid elongation over years | 3-6× |
| Previous abdominal surgery | Adhesions fix portion of colon, creating fulcrum | 2-4× |
| Megacolon/redundant colon | Any cause of chronic colonic dilatation | 5-10× |
Medical Conditions
| Condition | Mechanism | Relative Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic constipation | Fecal loading + sigmoid redundancy | 4-8× |
| Chagas disease | Denervation → megacolon | 10-15× (endemic areas) |
| Hirschsprung disease | Proximal dilatation above aganglionic segment | 8-12× |
| Neurological disorders | Reduced motility, chronic constipation | 3-5× |
| Parkinson's disease | Autonomic dysfunction, constipation | 3-5× |
| Multiple sclerosis | Neurogenic bowel dysfunction | 2-4× |
| Spinal cord injury | Neurogenic bowel, immobility | 3-6× |
| Dementia/Alzheimer's | Immobility, poor bowel habits, dehydration | 2-4× |
| Diabetes mellitus | Autonomic neuropathy, delayed motility | 1.5-3× |
Medications
| Drug Class | Mechanism | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Antipsychotics (phenothiazines, haloperidol) | Anticholinergic effect, constipation | Especially long-term use in psychiatric patients |
| Opioids | Reduced GI motility | Chronic use in pain management or palliative care |
| Anticholinergics | Direct reduction in bowel motility | Antihistamines, tricyclic antidepressants, bladder antimuscarinics |
| Anti-Parkinsonian drugs | Constipation as side effect | Especially in combination with underlying PD |
Lifestyle and Environmental
| Factor | Details |
|---|---|
| Institutionalization | Immobility, dehydration, poor dietary intake, chronic laxative/enema use |
| High altitude | Associated with endemic regions (mechanism unclear—possibly dietary) |
| Pregnancy (rare) | Mechanical compression, hormonal effects on motility |
Natural History Without Treatment
- Initial presentation: Acute onset of colonic obstruction with rapid distension
- 24-48 hours: Venous congestion → edema → arterial insufficiency
- 48-72 hours: Bowel wall ischaemia → necrosis
- > 72 hours: Perforation risk > 50%, mortality > 50% [8]
- Spontaneous detorsion: Rare (less than 5% of cases), but recurrence is almost universal
Pathophysiology
Anatomic Prerequisites
Normal sigmoid colon anatomy vs. predisposition to volvulus:
Normal Sigmoid Colon:
- Length: 15-40 cm (average 35 cm)
- Mesenteric attachment: Broad-based inverted-V configuration from left iliac fossa to S3 vertebral level
- Mobility: Moderate intraperitoneal mobility
Predisposed Sigmoid Colon:
- Length: Often > 40-60 cm (elongated, redundant)
- Mesenteric attachment: Narrow base creating long mobile pedicle ("mesenteric stalk")
- Mobility: Excessive mobility with single narrow point of fixation
- Chronic fecal loading: Adds weight and acts as pendulum
Mechanism of Volvulus Formation
Step 1: Initiating Torsion (0-6 hours)
- Initiating event: Sudden peristaltic wave in fecally-loaded, elongated sigmoid
- Axial rotation: Sigmoid twists around narrow mesenteric pedicle
- Direction: Usually counterclockwise (viewed from below) in 75-80% of cases [1]
- Degree of twist: Typically 180-360°; can be up to 540° or more
- Closed-loop obstruction forms:
- Proximal obstruction: Twist point at sigmoid-descending colon junction
- Distal obstruction: Twist point at rectosigmoid junction
- Result: Gas and fluid trapped in sigmoid loop (causes massive distension)
Step 2: Vascular Compromise (6-24 hours)
- Venous obstruction first:
- Thin-walled veins in mesentery compressed by twist
- Venous congestion → bowel wall edema
- Continued arterial inflow without venous drainage
- Bowel wall edema:
- Mucosal and serosal edema
- Intramural hemorrhage
- Increased intraluminal pressure from trapped gas
- "Closed-loop" pressure dynamics:
- Intraluminal pressure can exceed 30-50 mmHg
- Further compromises bowel wall perfusion
- Compresses mesenteric vessels
Step 3: Arterial Insufficiency (24-48 hours)
- Arterial occlusion:
- Increased edema + tight twist → arterial compression
- Reduced blood flow to sigmoid wall
- Metabolic demands exceed oxygen delivery
- Ischaemia:
- Mucosal ischaemia first (most metabolically active layer)
- Transmural ischaemia follows
- Release of inflammatory mediators, bacterial translocation
Step 4: Necrosis and Perforation (> 48 hours)
- Gangrenous bowel:
- Full-thickness necrosis of sigmoid wall
- Purple-black discoloration, loss of lustre
- Foul-smelling, thin-walled, friable
- Perforation:
- Usually occurs at the antimesenteric border (furthest from blood supply)
- Can be single large perforation or multiple microperforations
- Fecal peritonitis
- Systemic complications:
- Septic shock (Gram-negative bacteremia, faecal peritonitis)
- Multi-organ dysfunction
- Death if untreated
Why the Sigmoid?
The sigmoid colon is uniquely predisposed to volvulus formation:
| Anatomic Feature | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Greatest mobility | Only part of colon with long free mesentery (unlike caecum which is partially fixed, or transverse colon with wider mesenteric base) |
| Longest segment | In predisposed individuals, can reach 40-60 cm |
| Narrow mesenteric base | In susceptible anatomy, mesentery attaches along narrow line → acts as fulcrum |
| Fecal reservoir | Stores formed stool → increased weight acts like pendulum |
| Chronic distension | Years of constipation → progressive elongation and redundancy |
Pathophysiologic Cascade: Timing and Consequences
| Time from Onset | Pathophysiology | Clinical Manifestation | Imaging Findings | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 hours | Mechanical obstruction, early venous congestion | Acute distension, constipation, minimal pain | Coffee bean sign, whirl sign, no ischaemic changes | Excellent with decompression |
| 6-24 hours | Venous obstruction, bowel wall edema, mucosal ischaemia | Progressive distension, worsening pain, tachycardia | Bowel wall thickening, mucosal enhancement | Good if prompt treatment |
| 24-48 hours | Arterial insufficiency, transmural ischaemia, bacterial translocation | Severe pain, fever, peritonism, hemodynamic instability | Poor/absent wall enhancement, pneumatosis, ascites | Guarded; requires urgent surgery |
| > 48-72 hours | Gangrenous bowel, perforation, faecal peritonitis | Shock, rigidity, acute abdomen | Pneumoperitoneum, free fluid, gangrenous bowel | Poor; mortality 30-50% [8] |
Special Pathophysiologic Scenarios
Ileosigmoid Knotting (ISK)
- Rare variant: Ileum wraps around sigmoid mesentery (or vice versa)
- Creates "double volvulus" with simultaneous small and large bowel obstruction
- Rapid progression to gangrene (both ileum and sigmoid affected)
- Mortality 20-100% in gangrenous cases [11]
Chronic Recurrent Volvulus
- Some patients experience repeated self-limiting episodes of partial torsion that spontaneously reduce
- Each episode causes further sigmoid elongation and mesenteric laxity
- Progressive risk with each recurrence
- Case reports of > 20 episodes before definitive treatment [12]
Sigmoid Volvulus in Chagas Disease
- Trypanosoma cruzi infection → destruction of myenteric plexus neurons
- Achalasia of colon → chronic megacolon → extremely redundant sigmoid
- Younger age of presentation (30-50s)
- Higher recurrence rate after decompression due to underlying megacolon [2]
Consequences of Delayed Treatment
Without intervention:
- Mortality approaches 100% due to perforation, sepsis, and multi-organ failure
- Time to gangrene varies by degree of twist and tightness of volvulus
- Arterial anatomy variation: some patients have better collateral flow, delaying ischaemia
After successful decompression without resection:
- Anatomic predisposition persists (redundant sigmoid, narrow mesentery)
- Recurrence rate: 40-60% within 2 years [7]
- Each recurrence increases risk of ischaemia and emergency surgery
Clinical Presentation
Cardinal Symptom Triad
- Massive abdominal distension (90-95% of cases)
- Absolute constipation — no passage of stool or flatus (80-90%)
- Abdominal pain — often surprisingly mild initially relative to degree of distension (70-80%)
Clinical Pearl: The disproportion between dramatic distension and relatively modest pain (initially) is characteristic and distinguishes sigmoid volvulus from other causes of acute abdomen.
Symptoms (in Order of Frequency)
| Symptom | Frequency | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Progressive abdominal distension | 90-95% | Develops over hours; can be rapid ("overnight") or gradual over 1-2 days; patients describe tightness, "blown up like a balloon" |
| Absolute constipation | 80-90% | No passage of flatus or stool from onset; earlier bowel movements may have occurred before obstruction was complete |
| Abdominal pain | 70-85% | Initially crampy, colicky, diffuse; becomes constant if ischaemia develops; may be mild despite massive distension |
| Nausea | 60-70% | Prominent feature; related to bowel obstruction |
| Vomiting | 40-60% | Late sign in large bowel obstruction (unlike SBO); faeculent if prolonged; suggests severe obstruction or ileocaecal valve incompetence |
| History of similar episodes | 20-40% | Recurrent volvulus with spontaneous resolution; progressive worsening with each episode |
Signs
General Appearance
- Often appears systemically well initially (in absence of ischaemia/perforation)
- Elderly, frail, often nursing home resident
- May have neurological impairment, psychiatric illness, Parkinson's disease
Vital Signs
| Parameter | Early (Viable Bowel) | Late (Ischaemia/Gangrene) |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | Afebrile or low-grade | Fever > 38°C (necrosis, bacterial translocation) |
| Heart rate | Normal or mild tachycardia (80-100) | Tachycardia > 100 bpm (hypovolemia, sepsis) |
| Blood pressure | Normal | Hypotension (septic shock, third-spacing) |
| Respiratory rate | Mildly elevated (splinting from distension) | Tachypnoea > 20 (acidosis, sepsis) |
| Oxygen saturation | Normal | May be reduced (splinting, aspiration if vomiting) |
Abdominal Examination
Inspection:
- Massive distension: Abdomen often grossly distended, asymmetric
- Asymmetric distension: Classic "omega sign" — outline of dilated sigmoid loop visible through abdominal wall (rare but pathognomonic)
- Visible peristalsis: Occasionally seen in thin patients with early obstruction
- Surgical scars: Previous laparotomy may predispose (adhesions)
Palpation:
- Tympanic percussion: Extremely resonant (gas-filled dilated colon)
- Tenderness: Variable
- Minimal to mild tenderness if bowel viable (despite massive distension)
- Focal tenderness suggests early ischaemia
- Severe tenderness, guarding, rigidity = peritonism (perforation or advanced necrosis)
- Palpable mass: Rarely, can palpate distended sigmoid loop
Auscultation:
- Early: High-pitched, hyperactive "tinkling" bowel sounds (obstructive pattern)
- Late: Absent bowel sounds (paralytic ileus from ischaemia/peritonitis)
Digital Rectal Examination (CRITICAL)
| Finding | Significance |
|---|---|
| Empty rectum | Classic finding (75-85% of cases); obstruction is proximal to rectum |
| Ballooning of rectum | Air-distended rectum above obstruction |
| Absent faecal impaction | Helps rule out faecal impaction as cause of obstruction |
| Fresh blood on examining finger | RED FLAG: Suggests mucosal ischaemia |
| Normal rectal tone | Excludes spinal cord compression as cause of constipation |
Red Flags Suggesting Ischaemia/Perforation
Early recognition of bowel compromise is essential:
| Finding | Significance | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Peritonism | Guarding, rebound, rigidity → perforation or transmural necrosis | Immediate laparotomy |
| Haemodynamic instability | Hypotension, tachycardia, shock | Septic shock, hypovolaemia → emergency surgery |
| Fever > 38°C | Bacterial translocation, necrosis, perforation | Urgent surgical evaluation |
| Bloody PR/rectal discharge | Ischaemic mucosa sloughing | High-risk for gangrene |
| Severe unremitting pain | Out of proportion to examination → mesenteric ischaemia | Do not delay surgery |
| Rapid deterioration | Change in clinical status over hours | Impending perforation |
| Prolonged symptoms > 48-72h | Increased likelihood of ischaemia | Low threshold for surgery |
Clinical Presentation Patterns by Population
Elderly Institutionalized Patients (Western Countries)
- Gradual onset over 24-48 hours
- Often cannot give clear history (dementia, communication difficulties)
- Discovered by nursing staff ("patient has not passed stool in 2 days, abdomen very swollen")
- Multiple comorbidities complicate management
- Higher operative mortality
Younger Patients (Endemic Regions)
- More acute onset
- Clearer history
- Often otherwise healthy
- Better physiologic reserve
- Lower operative mortality
Psychiatric Patients on Chronic Neuroleptics
- May not communicate symptoms effectively
- Chronic constipation often longstanding
- High index of suspicion needed
- Anticholinergic medications mask symptoms
Differential Diagnosis
Key conditions to consider:
| Diagnosis | Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|
| Caecal volvulus | Coffee bean points toward LEFT lower quadrant (vs. RUQ in sigmoid); younger patients; may have previous appendectomy |
| Pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's) | No mechanical obstruction; caecal dilatation > 12 cm; elderly hospitalized patients, recent surgery/trauma, opioids |
| Large bowel obstruction (cancer) | Gradual onset over weeks, weight loss, change in bowel habit, rectal bleeding, older age |
| Faecal impaction | Hard stool palpable on DRE; history of severe constipation; less dramatic distension |
| Ileus | Recent surgery, medications, electrolyte disturbances; diffuse bowel dilatation (small + large); less acute onset |
| Toxic megacolon | IBD or C. difficile colitis history; fever, bloody diarrhoea, systemic toxicity |
| Perforated viscus | Sudden onset severe pain, peritonism, pneumoperitoneum |
Investigations
Diagnosis of sigmoid volvulus relies on clinical suspicion combined with characteristic imaging findings. Plain abdominal radiography is first-line, but CT provides superior diagnostic accuracy and assessment of bowel viability.
Abdominal X-ray (First-Line Investigation)
Indications: All patients with suspected large bowel obstruction
Views: Supine + erect abdominal radiographs (or left lateral decubitus if patient cannot stand)
Classic Radiographic Signs
| Sign | Description | Sensitivity | Specificity | Clinical Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coffee bean sign | Massively dilated sigmoid loop resembling a coffee bean, with central "seam" (representing apposed medial walls of the loop) pointing toward right upper quadrant | 57-78% | 90-95% | Most recognized sign; absence does not exclude diagnosis [3] |
| Inverted-U appearance | Dilated sigmoid forming inverted U-shape extending from pelvis | 65-75% | 85-90% | Common variant of coffee bean sign |
| Bent inner tube sign | Dilated sigmoid resembles a bent bicycle inner tube | 50-60% | 85-90% | Descriptive variant |
| Northern exposure sign | Apex of dilated loop extends above T10 vertebral level (unusually high) | 40-50% | 95% | Indicates massive sigmoid dilatation |
| Absence of rectal gas | Empty rectum and rectosigmoid on lateral or supine view | 80-85% | 60-70% | Sensitive but not specific (also seen in other LBO) [13] |
| Bird's beak / beak sign | Tapering point where sigmoid twists (best seen on contrast enema, occasionally on plain film) | Variable | High | Diagnostic when present |
| Left pelvic overlap sign | Central vertical seam of coffee bean overlaps left pelvic brim | 70-80% | 85-90% | Helps differentiate sigmoid from caecal volvulus |
AXIS Classification System (Predictive Tool)
The AXIS classification uses the angle of the coffee bean mesenteric axis on plain AXR to predict severity [9]:
| AXIS Group | Mesenteric Axis Angle | Severe Volvulus | Intestinal Necrosis | Need for Surgery | Clinical Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 0-90° | 15% | 5% | 10% | Low risk; consider endoscopic decompression |
| Group B | 90-135° | 30% | 15% | 25% | Moderate risk; close monitoring after decompression |
| Group C | > 135° | 100% | 50% | 75% | High risk; low threshold for immediate surgery |
Clinical application: Group C patients should proceed directly to CT imaging and surgical consultation rather than attempted endoscopic decompression.
Limitations of Plain AXR
- Sensitivity only 57-78% (i.e., normal AXR does not exclude volvulus) [3]
- Cannot reliably distinguish viable from ischaemic bowel
- Operator-dependent interpretation
- Action if AXR non-diagnostic but clinical suspicion high: Proceed to CT abdomen/pelvis
CT Abdomen and Pelvis (Definitive Imaging)
Indications:
- Diagnostic uncertainty on AXR
- Clinical suspicion for bowel ischaemia or perforation
- Pre-operative planning (especially if surgery likely)
- Failed endoscopic decompression to assess for complications
Protocol: IV contrast (portal venous phase); oral contrast usually not given due to obstruction
Diagnostic CT Signs
| Sign | Description | Sensitivity | Specificity | Image Characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whirl sign | Twisted sigmoid mesentery and mesenteric vessels creating a "whirl" or "swirl" pattern at the site of torsion | 75-90% | 95-100% | Pathognomonic for volvulus; seen at twist point [4] |
| Beak sign | Smooth tapering of the colonic lumen at the transition point (resembles a "bird's beak") | 80-90% | 85-95% | Seen at both proximal and distal twist points |
| X marks the spot | Two crossing limbs of the sigmoid loop creating an X-shape | 70-80% | 90-95% | Indicates site of torsion |
| Split wall sign | Splitting of the bowel wall layers due to edema | 50-60% | 85-90% | Suggests venous congestion |
| Coffee bean sign on CT | Same as AXR but seen on coronal/sagittal reformats | 85-95% | 90-95% | More easily identified on CT than AXR |
CT Signs of Bowel Ischaemia/Necrosis (RED FLAGS)
Early recognition changes management from endoscopy to immediate surgery:
| Finding | Indicates | Sensitivity for Ischaemia | Management Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absent or decreased bowel wall enhancement | Arterial insufficiency, necrosis | 75-85% | Immediate surgery |
| Bowel wall thickening > 10 mm | Edema, venous congestion, early ischaemia | 60-70% | High-risk; close monitoring vs. surgery |
| Pneumatosis intestinalis | Gas within bowel wall from mucosal breakdown | 40-50% | Gangrenous bowel → emergency surgery |
| Portomesenteric venous gas | Bacterial translocation through necrotic mucosa | 20-30% | Advanced necrosis → very poor prognosis |
| Free intraperitoneal air | Perforation | 100% specific | Emergency laparotomy |
| Ascites/free fluid | Peritonitis, serosal inflammation | 50-60% | Suggests transmural inflammation |
| Mesenteric fat stranding | Inflammatory/ischaemic changes | 70-80% | Non-specific but concerning |
| Closed-loop obstruction with transition points | Confirms mechanical obstruction | 95% | Diagnostic for volvulus |
Clinical Pearl: CT has > 90% accuracy for diagnosing sigmoid volvulus and is superior to AXR for assessing bowel viability. [4,9]
Blood Tests
Bloods are not diagnostic for sigmoid volvulus but help assess systemic status and guide resuscitation:
| Test | Purpose | Typical Findings | Red Flags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full blood count (FBC) | Infection, anaemia, haemoconcentration | WCC may be normal initially or mildly elevated (10-15×10⁹/L) | WCC > 20 or less than 4 suggests sepsis/necrosis; Hb drop may indicate mucosal bleeding |
| Urea & Electrolytes (U&E) | Dehydration, renal function, electrolyte disturbance | Elevated urea/creatinine (dehydration); hypokalemia, hyponatremia (vomiting, third-spacing) | Acute kidney injury (pre-renal from hypovolemia or sepsis) |
| Lactate | Most important marker of bowel ischaemia | Normal less than 2 mmol/L (viable bowel) | Lactate > 2.5-3 mmol/L: high suspicion for ischaemia [10]; > 4 mmol/L: likely necrosis → emergency surgery |
| CRP | Inflammation | May be normal early; elevated after 24-48h | Very high CRP (> 200 mg/L) suggests necrosis or perforation |
| Liver function tests | Baseline, rule out alternative pathology | Usually normal | Derangement may indicate systemic sepsis |
| Arterial or venous blood gas | Acidosis, lactate | Metabolic acidosis with elevated lactate in ischaemia | Base deficit > 5 or pH less than 7.30: severe ischaemia or sepsis |
| Group & Save / Cross-match | Pre-operative preparation | N/A | Essential if surgery anticipated |
Clinical Pearl: Normal blood tests do not exclude sigmoid volvulus or bowel ischaemia. Diagnosis is clinical + imaging. However, elevated lactate is a sensitive marker for ischaemia and should prompt immediate surgical consultation. [10]
Contrast Enema (Historical, Rarely Used)
Previously used but largely replaced by CT:
- Water-soluble contrast (Gastrografin) enema under fluoroscopy
- Shows "bird's beak" deformity at site of twist
- May be therapeutic (hydrostatic reduction in some cases)
- Limitations: Time-consuming, uncomfortable, risk of perforation, CT is faster and more informative
Current role: Rarely performed; may be used if CT unavailable or in resource-limited settings
Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (Diagnostic AND Therapeutic)
Indications:
- First-line therapeutic intervention (if no peritonitis)
- Confirms diagnosis endoscopically
- Assesses mucosal viability
- Achieves decompression
Endoscopic Findings
| Finding | Description | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Spiral twist | Mucosa arranged in spiral "barber pole" pattern at obstruction point (typically 15-25 cm from anal verge) | Advance scope gently through twist |
| Viable mucosa | Pink, glistening mucosa; normal vascular pattern | Safe to decompress |
| Ischaemic mucosa | Dusky, purple, cyanotic mucosa; no bleeding on contact; friable | STOP procedure → immediate surgery |
| Gangrenous mucosa | Black, necrotic, foul-smelling; sloughing | STOP procedure → emergency surgery |
| Explosive decompression | Massive release of gas and liquid stool upon passage of scope through twist | Therapeutic success |
Contraindications to endoscopic decompression:
- Peritonitis (requires immediate surgery)
- Haemodynamic instability
- Free air on imaging (perforation)
- Ischaemic/gangrenous mucosa seen on sigmoidoscopy
Risk Stratification Summary
Combining clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings to guide management:
| Risk Category | Clinical Features | Lactate | Imaging | Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low risk | Stable vitals, no peritonism, less than 24h symptoms | less than 2 mmol/L | Coffee bean sign, whirl sign, normal wall enhancement | Endoscopic decompression |
| Moderate risk | Mild tachycardia, moderate tenderness, 24-48h symptoms | 2-3 mmol/L | Bowel wall thickening, mesenteric stranding | Endoscopy with very low threshold for surgery if any concern |
| High risk | Fever, tachycardia, peritonism, > 48h symptoms, bloody PR | > 3 mmol/L | Pneumatosis, poor wall enhancement, ascites | Immediate surgery (do not attempt endoscopy) |
Classification & Staging
By Viability
| Category | Management |
|---|---|
| Viable (no ischaemia) | Endoscopic decompression |
| Ischaemic (no perforation) | Urgent surgery |
| Perforated | Emergency laparotomy |
By Recurrence
- First episode — trial of endoscopic decompression
- Recurrent — usually requires elective resection
Management
Management of sigmoid volvulus follows a structured approach: resuscitation → risk stratification → definitive treatment (endoscopic vs. surgical). The choice between endoscopic decompression and immediate surgery depends on clinical and radiological assessment of bowel viability.
Emergency Department Presentation and Triage
Initial Assessment (First 30 minutes)
Triage priority: RED / Immediate if peritonitis, haemodynamic instability, or signs of perforation; ORANGE / Urgent if stable large bowel obstruction
Primary Survey (ABCDE):
| Component | Assessment | Critical Actions |
|---|---|---|
| A - Airway | Usually patent unless reduced GCS (aspiration risk if vomiting) | NBM immediately; consider NG tube if vomiting |
| B - Breathing | Respiratory rate, SpO₂; splinting from distension may reduce tidal volume | Oxygen to maintain SpO₂ \u003e94%; sit patient upright if dyspnoeic |
| C - Circulation | HR, BP, capillary refill, urine output; assess for shock (sepsis, hypovolaemia) | 2 x large-bore IV access (16-18G); fluid resuscitation (crystalloid 1-2L bolus); blood cultures if septic |
| D - Disability | GCS, pupil response; confusion may indicate hypoperfusion, sepsis, or underlying dementia | Exclude hypoglycaemia; assess baseline cognitive function |
| E - Exposure | Full abdominal examination (see Clinical Presentation); digital rectal examination MANDATORY | Look for peritonism, distension, empty rectum, bloody PR |
Immediate investigations (within 30 mins):
- Bloods: FBC, U\u0026E, LFT, CRP, lactate (venous or arterial blood gas), group \u0026 save
- Erect CXR (if perforation suspected: look for free gas under diaphragm)
- Supine + erect AXR (or left lateral decubitus if patient cannot stand)
Risk Stratification (30-60 minutes)
GREEN PATHWAY (Low Risk → Endoscopic Decompression):
- Stable vital signs (HR \u003c100, BP \u003e100/60, temp \u003c37.5°C)
- No peritonism (soft abdomen, mild tenderness only)
- Lactate \u003c2 mmol/L
- AXR shows coffee bean sign, no pneumoperitoneum
- Symptom duration \u003c24 hours
→ Action: Urgent surgical \u0026 gastroenterology referral for endoscopic decompression within 6-12 hours
AMBER PATHWAY (Moderate Risk → CT + Senior Review):
- Mild tachycardia (HR 100-120)
- Moderate tenderness but no guarding/rigidity
- Lactate 2-3 mmol/L
- Symptom duration 24-48 hours
- Equivocal AXR findings
→ Action: Urgent CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast + senior surgical review → decision re: endoscopy vs. surgery based on CT findings
RED PATHWAY (High Risk → Emergency Surgery):
- Haemodynamic instability (HR \u003e120, BP \u003c90/60, temp \u003e38°C)
- Peritonism (guarding, rigidity, rebound tenderness)
- Lactate \u003e3 mmol/L
- Bloody PR discharge
- Symptom duration \u003e48 hours
- Free air on CXR/AXR
→ Action: Immediate senior surgical review → emergency laparotomy (do not delay for CT or endoscopy)
ED Resuscitation Protocol (Parallel to Assessment)
| Intervention | Details | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Nil by mouth | Absolute NBM | Immediate |
| IV access | 2 x large-bore (16-18G) | Within 5 mins |
| Fluid resuscitation | 0.9% saline or Hartmann's 1L bolus over 15-30 mins; reassess; repeat if needed | Start immediately if shocked |
| NG tube | If vomiting or gastric distension on AXR | Within 30 mins |
| Urinary catheter | Hourly urine output monitoring (target \u003e0.5 mL/kg/h) | Within 60 mins |
| Analgesia | IV opioid (morphine 5-10mg IV titrated) + antiemetic (ondansetron 4-8mg IV) | Within 30 mins |
| Antibiotics | If RED pathway or lactate \u003e2.5: cefuroxime 1.5g IV + metronidazole 500mg IV (or piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5g IV) | Within 1 hour ("sepsis six") |
| Senior review | Surgical registrar/consultant | Within 1 hour |
| Imaging | AXR (all patients); CT if AMBER/RED pathway | AXR within 1h; CT within 2h if indicated |
Handover to Surgical Team
SBAR (Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation) format:
Situation:
"85-year-old male, nursing home resident, presenting with 24h history of abdominal distension and constipation. Clinical picture consistent with sigmoid volvulus."
Background:
"Past medical history: Parkinson's disease, chronic constipation. Medications include levodopa, senna. No previous abdominal surgery. Vital signs: HR 110, BP 105/65, temp 37.2°C, SpO₂ 96% on air. Examination shows massive abdominal distension, tympanic, mildly tender, no peritonism. DRE: empty rectum. Lactate 1.8 mmol/L."
Assessment:
"AXR confirms coffee bean sign. Patient currently GREEN pathway: stable, no peritonism, lactate \u003c2. Likely viable bowel."
Recommendation:
"Request urgent endoscopic decompression within next 6 hours. Patient resuscitated with 1L crystalloid, NG tube inserted, NBM. Awaiting surgical review."
Treatment Algorithm Overview
Suspected Sigmoid Volvulus
↓
Resuscitation + Imaging (AXR/CT)
↓
┌──────┴──────┐
↓ ↓
PERITONITIS? NO PERITONITIS
Ischaemia? Stable vitals
Perforation? Lactate \u003c2.5
↓ ↓
EMERGENCY ENDOSCOPIC
SURGERY DECOMPRESSION
↓ ↓
Hartmann's/ ┌────┴────┐
Resection ↓ ↓
SUCCESS FAILURE
↓ ↓
Rectal URGENT
tube SURGERY
48-72h ↓
↓ Resection
ELECTIVE ±Hartmann's
SIGMOID
RESECTION
Phase 1: Initial Resuscitation and Stabilization
All patients require urgent resuscitation regardless of intended treatment:
| Intervention | Details | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| IV access | 2 x large-bore cannulae (16G or 18G) | Fluid resuscitation, medications, blood products |
| IV fluid resuscitation | Crystalloid (0.9% saline or Hartmann's) 1-2L bolus, then maintenance | Third-spacing, dehydration, hypovolaemia common |
| Nil by mouth (NBM) | Absolute NBM | Prevent aspiration, prepare for endoscopy/surgery |
| Nasogastric (NG) tube | If vomiting or upper GI distension | Decompress stomach, prevent aspiration; not therapeutic for colonic obstruction |
| Urinary catheter | Foley catheter with hourly urine output monitoring | Assess resuscitation adequacy (target > 0.5 mL/kg/h) |
| Oxygen | Nasal cannulae or face mask to maintain SpO₂ > 94% | Splinting from distension may impair ventilation |
| Analgesia | IV opioids (morphine 5-10 mg IV, titrated) | Pain relief; avoid NSAIDs (risk of bowel ischaemia worsening) |
| Antiemetics | Ondansetron 4-8 mg IV or metoclopramide 10 mg IV | Nausea from obstruction |
| Correct electrolytes | Replace K⁺, Mg²⁺ (especially if vomiting) | Hypokalaemia common; correct before surgery |
| Broad-spectrum antibiotics | If surgery planned or signs of ischaemia: cefuroxime 1.5g IV + metronidazole 500mg IV (or piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5g IV) | Gram-negative + anaerobic cover for bowel flora |
Reassess vital signs and clinical status every 1-2 hours during resuscitation phase.
Phase 2: Endoscopic Decompression (First-Line if Suitable)
Indications (all must be met):
- No peritonitis
- Haemodynamically stable
- Lactate less than 2.5 mmol/L
- No free air on imaging
- No CT signs of advanced ischaemia (pneumatosis, portal venous gas)
Timing: Urgent (within 6-12 hours of presentation once resuscitated)
Procedure: Flexible sigmoidoscopy with or without sedation
Endoscopic Decompression Technique
| Step | Details | Tips |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Patient positioning | Left lateral position | Gravity may help scope passage |
| 2. Sedation | Minimal sedation (midazolam 1-2 mg IV, fentanyl 25-50 mcg IV) OR no sedation | Oversedation may mask perforation pain |
| 3. Scope insertion | Flexible sigmoidoscope (or colonoscope) | Use minimal air insufflation (bowel already distended) |
| 4. Visualize twist | Spiral mucosal folds ("barber pole" pattern) typically at 15-25 cm from anal verge | STOP if ischaemic/gangrenous mucosa seen |
| 5. Gentle advancement | Advance scope through twist with gentle pressure and tip manipulation | Do not force; risk of perforation |
| 6. "Pop" and decompression | Sudden release as scope passes twist point; explosive decompression of gas and liquid stool | Have suction ready; protect staff/patient from faecal splash |
| 7. Rectal tube insertion | Pass large-bore rectal tube (28-32 French) above the twist point (ideally 25-30 cm) | Critical to prevent immediate re-torsion [6] |
| 8. Secure tube | Tape tube to buttocks; mark distance at anus | Tube must stay in situ 48-72 hours |
| 9. Post-procedure imaging | Repeat AXR to confirm decompression | Should show resolution of distension |
Success Rates and Outcomes
| Outcome | Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Initial decompression success | 70-90% [5,6] | Higher success if bowel viable, experienced operator |
| Immediate perforation | 1-3% | Usually due to ischaemic bowel or excessive force |
| Recurrence after decompression alone | 40-60% within 2 years [7] | Anatomic predisposition persists |
| Time to recurrence | Median 3-12 months | Can occur within days or years |
Post-Decompression Management
| Intervention | Duration | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Rectal tube in situ | 48-72 hours | Prevents immediate re-torsion; allows bowel edema to settle |
| NBM | 24-48 hours | Bowel rest |
| IV fluids | Until oral intake tolerated | Continued resuscitation |
| Daily AXR | Until tube removed | Monitor for re-obstruction |
| Monitor for recurrence | Clinical examination, vital signs | Early detection of re-torsion |
| Remove tube at 48-72h | Gradual withdrawal | Check for re-accumulation of gas on AXR after removal |
| Bowel preparation (if surgery planned) | Once decompressed | For elective sigmoid resection |
Discharge planning: Counsel patient on high recurrence risk; strongly recommend elective sigmoid resection during same admission or within 2-4 weeks.
Phase 3: Surgical Management
Indications (any of the following):
- Failed endoscopic decompression (cannot pass scope, recurrence within hours)
- Peritonitis (guarding, rigidity, rebound)
- Haemodynamic instability (shock, sepsis)
- Ischaemic/gangrenous mucosa on sigmoidoscopy
- CT signs of bowel necrosis (pneumatosis, poor wall enhancement, portal venous gas)
- Free intraperitoneal air (perforation)
- Recurrent volvulus (second or third episode)
- Elective surgery after successful decompression (to prevent recurrence)
Emergency vs. Elective Surgery
| Timing | Indication | Bowel Status | Operative Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emergency | Peritonitis, failed decompression, ischaemia | Often gangrenous, edematous, fragile | High (10-30% mortality) [8] |
| Urgent (within 24-48h after failed decompression) | Decompression failure without peritonitis | Viable but at risk | Moderate (5-10% mortality) |
| Elective (within 2-4 weeks after successful decompression) | Prevent recurrence | Viable, prepared bowel | Low (2-5% mortality) [14] |
Surgical Options
The choice of procedure depends on bowel viability, patient physiology, and degree of contamination:
Option 1: Sigmoid Resection with Primary Anastomosis
Indications:
- Viable bowel (pink, glistening serosa, peristalsis present, pulsatile vessels)
- Haemodynamically stable patient
- Minimal faecal contamination
- Elective setting (after successful decompression)
Procedure:
- Midline laparotomy
- Detorsion of sigmoid (if still twisted)
- Assessment of viability (if questionable, wait 10-15 min after detorsion and reassess)
- Resection of sigmoid colon from descending colon to upper rectum
- Primary colorectal anastomosis (handsewn or stapled)
- No stoma required
Advantages:
- Single-stage procedure
- Avoids stoma
- Restores continuity
- Low recurrence (less than 2%)
Disadvantages:
- Anastomotic leak risk (5-10% in emergency setting, 2-3% elective) [14]
- Not suitable if contaminated or ischaemic bowel
Outcomes:
- Mortality: 5-10% (emergency), 2-5% (elective) [8,14]
- Recurrence: less than 2%
Option 2: Hartmann's Procedure
Indications (MOST COMMON in emergency):
- Gangrenous or perforated sigmoid (black, non-viable)
- Haemodynamically unstable patient (septic shock)
- Significant faecal contamination
- Frail, high-risk patient (multiple comorbidities, ASA 4-5)
- Emergency surgery with unprepared bowel
Procedure:
- Midline laparotomy
- Resection of sigmoid colon
- End colostomy (descending colon brought out through left iliac fossa)
- Rectal stump oversewn or stapled closed
- Peritoneal lavage if contaminated
Advantages:
- Safe in emergency (no anastomosis at risk of leak)
- Suitable for unstable patients
- Minimal operative time
- Definitive resection of volvulus segment
Disadvantages:
- Permanent or temporary stoma (reversal requires second operation in 3-6 months if patient fit)
- Hartmann's reversal has significant morbidity (20-30% complication rate)
- Many elderly patients never have stoma reversed (40-60%)
Outcomes:
- Mortality: 10-30% (depends on degree of ischaemia, patient comorbidities) [8]
- Stoma reversal rate: 40-60% (many patients remain with permanent colostomy)
Option 3: Sigmoid Colectomy with End Colostomy (No Rectal Stump)
Indications:
- Similar to Hartmann's but very high contamination or extensive pelvic inflammation
- Rectal stump closure unsafe (risk of blow-out)
Procedure:
- Sigmoid resection
- End colostomy
- Rectal stump brought out as mucous fistula (small stoma in right iliac fossa)
Outcomes: Similar to Hartmann's; slightly easier reversal (if ever performed)
Option 4: Mesosigmoidopexy (Obsolete, Rarely Performed)
Historical procedure: Suturing sigmoid mesentery to parietal peritoneum to prevent twisting
Why obsolete?
- High recurrence rate (20-30%)
- Does not address underlying redundancy
- Only suitable for non-gangrenous bowel
- Resection is superior [7]
Current role: Virtually none; mentioned for completeness
Intraoperative Decision-Making Algorithm
Laparotomy → Detorsion → Assess Viability
↓
┌───────┴───────┐
↓ ↓
VIABLE GANGRENOUS
(Pink, Peristalsis) (Black, No Peristalsis)
↓ ↓
Stable? RESECTION
↓ ↓
┌────┴────┐ HARTMANN'S
↓ ↓ PROCEDURE
STABLE UNSTABLE (End Colostomy)
↓ ↓
PRIMARY HARTMANN'S
ANASTOMOSIS
Viability assessment (after detorsion):
- Viable: Pink/red color, peristalsis present, pulsatile mesenteric vessels, bleeding from cut edge
- Questionable: Dusky purple, sluggish peristalsis → wait 10-15 min, reassess ± use fluorescence (ICG) if available
- Gangrenous: Black, no peristalsis, no bleeding, thin friable wall → must resect
Phase 4: Prevention of Recurrence
Key principle: Successful endoscopic decompression does NOT eliminate risk of recurrence (40-60% recur). [7]
Elective Sigmoid Resection
Indications:
- After successful endoscopic decompression (first episode)
- Second episode of sigmoid volvulus
- Younger, fit patients (ASA 1-2)
- Patient preference (informed consent re: recurrence risk)
Timing:
- Same admission (days 3-7 after decompression once bowel edema settles) — preferred approach [14]
- Within 2-4 weeks (outpatient basis) — if patient discharged
Advantages of early elective resection:
- Prevents recurrence (recurrence less than 2%)
- Lower mortality than emergency surgery (2-5% vs. 10-30%) [8,14]
- Can perform laparoscopic surgery (faster recovery, less morbidity)
- Avoids stoma in most cases (primary anastomosis)
Disadvantages:
- Operative risk in elderly/frail (but lower than emergency surgery)
- Requires patient consent and fitness for surgery
Laparoscopic vs. Open:
- Laparoscopic sigmoid resection increasingly performed electively
- Benefits: shorter hospital stay, less pain, faster recovery
- Requires experienced laparoscopic surgeon
- May not be feasible in emergency setting or if extensive adhesions
- Success rate in experienced hands approaches 100% with low conversion rates (5-15%) [27,28]
- Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) also reported as safe and feasible [29]
Special Scenarios
Recurrent Sigmoid Volvulus (Multiple Episodes)
- Some patients present with 3rd, 4th, or even \u003e20 episodes [12]
- Each recurrence increases difficulty of surgery (adhesions, inflammation)
- Management: Strong push for elective resection if medically fit
- If not surgical candidate: percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC) or palliative rectal tube changes
Case series observations:
- Patients with \u003e5 episodes often have severe underlying megacolon (Chagas disease, chronic constipation)
- Spontaneous detorsion can occur (\u003c5% of cases) but recurrence almost universal
- Progressive mesenteric laxity with each episode increases future risk
Sigmoid Volvulus in Pregnancy
- Rare but reported (usually 3rd trimester)
- Mechanical factors: uterine compression, hormonal effects on motility
- Management: Endoscopic decompression preferred; surgery if failed (consider obstetric input, fetal monitoring)
Pregnancy-specific considerations:
- Defer CT if possible (use ultrasound + plain AXR); MRI if needed
- Obstetric consultation essential (risk of preterm labour)
- Fetal monitoring during procedure/surgery
- If surgery required: Multidisciplinary decision (surgery + obstetrics)
- Maternal safety takes priority but aim to preserve pregnancy if viable fetus
Ileosigmoid Knotting
- Rare complication where ileum wraps around sigmoid
- Presents with combined small + large bowel obstruction
- Always requires surgery: resection of both ileum and sigmoid
- Very high mortality (20-100% if gangrenous) [11]
Diagnostic features:
- Abdominal pain more severe than typical sigmoid volvulus
- Earlier vomiting (due to SBO component)
- CT: Whirl sign involving both ileum and sigmoid
- Double volvulus: Two separate points of obstruction
Surgical principles:
- Resect ischaemic ileum + sigmoid
- Primary anastomosis rarely feasible (usually Hartmann's + end ileostomy)
- Extensive peritoneal contamination common
Sigmoid Volvulus in Chagas Disease (Endemic Regions)
- Trypanosoma cruzi infection → destruction of myenteric plexus neurons
- Achalasia of colon → chronic megacolon → extremely redundant sigmoid
- Younger age of presentation (30-50s)
- Higher recurrence rate after decompression due to underlying megacolon [2]
Management challenges:
- Megacolon persists even after sigmoid resection
- Recurrence can occur in remaining colon
- May require subtotal colectomy in severe cases
Sigmoid Volvulus in Neurological Disorders
Parkinson's Disease:
- Autonomic dysfunction → severe constipation
- Anti-Parkinsonian medications worsen motility
- Higher recurrence risk; early elective resection recommended
Spinal Cord Injury:
- Neurogenic bowel → chronic constipation, megacolon
- May not perceive abdominal pain (incomplete spinal lesions)
- Higher operative risk due to autonomic instability
Dementia/Institutionalized Patients:
- Cannot communicate symptoms clearly
- Diagnosis often delayed (discovered by nursing staff)
- Higher operative mortality due to frailty and comorbidities
- Family discussion critical: goals of care, operative vs. palliative approach
Sigmoid Volvulus in Psychiatric Patients
Chronic neuroleptic use:
- Phenothiazines, haloperidol → severe anticholinergic constipation
- Patient may not communicate symptoms (negative symptoms, thought disorder)
- High recurrence risk if medications continued
Management:
- Psychiatric input to optimize medications post-treatment
- Consider clozapine switch if on high-dose typical antipsychotics
- Prophylactic laxatives essential
- Elective resection strongly recommended (recurrence almost certain without surgery)
Percutaneous Endoscopic Colostomy (PEC)
Indication: Recurrent sigmoid volvulus in frail, high-risk patients unfit for surgery or who refuse operative intervention [30,31]
Procedure:
- Endoscopic placement of 1-2 large-bore (20-24 French) catheters through abdominal wall into sigmoid colon
- Catheters left in situ permanently or long-term (months to years)
- Acts as decompression point to prevent re-torsion
Outcomes:
- Effective in preventing recurrence in selected high-risk patients
- Best results with two PEC tubes left in situ indefinitely [30]
- Morbidity 21%, mortality 5% in reported series [32]
- Allows avoidance of major surgery in patients with prohibitive operative risk
Limitations:
- Limited evidence (case series only)
- Requires ongoing catheter management
- Risk of tube dislodgement, infection, leakage
- Not suitable for all anatomic configurations
Role in practice: Consider for elderly/frail patients with multiple comorbidities (ASA 4-5), recurrent volvulus, and life expectancy \u003c 2 years who refuse or cannot tolerate surgery
Sigmoid Volvulus in the Elderly (\u003e80 years)
Special considerations:
- High operative mortality (15-30% for emergency surgery) due to frailty and comorbidities
- Endoscopic decompression success rate lower (70% vs. 85% in younger patients)
- Hartmann's procedure often performed (safer than anastomosis) but stoma rarely reversed
Decision-making:
- Non-gangrenous bowel + stable: Trial of endoscopic decompression; accept recurrence risk if patient/family decline surgery
- Gangrenous bowel: Surgery unavoidable; frank discussion of mortality risk (30-50%)
- ASA 5 / moribund: Consider palliative care if prognosis extremely poor
Geriatric assessment:
- Frailty score, functional status, cognitive function
- Pre-operative optimization (fluids, electrolytes, delirium prevention)
- Involve geriatrics for peri-operative co-management
Sigmoid Volvulus in Resource-Limited Settings
Challenges in endemic regions (Sub-Saharan Africa, parts of Asia, South America):
- Limited access to CT, endoscopy, ICU
- Delayed presentation (patients travel long distances to hospital)
- Higher rates of gangrenous bowel at presentation
Management adaptations:
- Plain AXR + clinical diagnosis often sufficient
- Manual detorsion via rigid sigmoidoscopy or PR examination (limited success)
- Laparotomy often first-line (no endoscopy available)
- Higher use of Hartmann's procedure (safer in resource-limited setting)
- Primary anastomosis reserved for clearly viable bowel + stable patient
Outcomes:
- Mortality higher (20-40% overall) due to delayed presentation and limited resources
- Recurrence common (endoscopy unavailable for decompression; many patients cannot access elective surgery)
Post-Operative Care
Immediate Post-Operative Period (0-24 hours)
| Aspect | Details | Monitoring Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Location | ICU/HDU if: septic shock, intraoperative instability, gangrenous bowel, major comorbidities, lactate \u003e4; otherwise surgical ward | Continuous (ICU/HDU) or hourly obs (ward) |
| Haemodynamic monitoring | Arterial line if ICU; regular BP/HR monitoring; urine output hourly via catheter (target \u003e0.5 mL/kg/h) | Continuous (arterial line) or hourly |
| Fluid management | Crystalloid maintenance 2-3 L/day; replace ongoing losses; monitor electrolytes (K⁺, Mg²⁺, PO₄³⁻) | 4-6 hourly U\u0026Es |
| Analgesia | Multimodal: paracetamol 1g QDS IV/PO + opioid PCA (morphine/fentanyl) OR epidural (T8-L1 for open surgery); avoid NSAIDs in elderly/renal impairment | Pain scores 2-4 hourly |
| Oxygen therapy | Maintain SpO₂ \u003e94% (88-92% if COPD); wean as tolerated | Continuous pulse oximetry |
| NG tube | Free drainage; aspirate 4-hourly; remove when \u003c200 mL/24h | Aspirate volume 4-hourly |
| Catheter | Hourly urine output monitoring; remove day 1-2 if stable (reduces UTI risk) | Hourly output |
| Antibiotics | Continue broad-spectrum (cefuroxime + metronidazole OR piperacillin-tazobactam) for 24-48h; extend to 5-7 days if perforation/contamination | Daily review |
Early Post-Operative Period (Days 1-5)
| Aspect | Protocol | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| NBM | Day 1-2: NBM; Day 3: sips of water if passing flatus; Day 4-5: free fluids → light diet | Allow bowel to recover; prevent anastomotic stress |
| IV fluids | Continue until oral intake adequate (\u003e1 L/day) | Maintain hydration |
| NG tube removal | When aspirates \u003c200 mL/24h and no nausea/vomiting (usually day 1-2) | Reduces aspiration risk, improves comfort |
| Mobilization | Day 1: Sit out of bed 2-4 hours; Day 2: Walk to chair/bathroom; Day 3+: Mobilize 4-6 times daily | Reduces VTE, chest infection, ileus |
| VTE prophylaxis | LMWH (enoxaparin 40 mg SC daily OR dalteparin 5000 units SC daily) + TED stockings; continue until fully mobile | High VTE risk post-op (especially pelvic surgery) |
| Bowel function | Document passage of flatus (usually day 2-4) and stool (day 3-5); delayed beyond day 5 = prolonged ileus | Return of function indicates recovery |
| Stoma care | If Hartmann's: stoma nurse review day 1; patient/family education; assess stoma output (should start day 2-3) | Early education improves adaptation |
| Wound care | Daily inspection; remove dressing day 2-3 if clean/dry; sutures/staples removed day 7-10 (or at follow-up) | Monitor for infection/dehiscence |
| Analgesia transition | Wean from PCA/epidural to oral opioids (oxycodone/tramadol) by day 2-3; then to simple analgesia by day 5-7 | Avoid prolonged opioid use |
Late Post-Operative Period (Days 5-Discharge)
| Goal | Criteria | Typical Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Tolerating diet | Eating light diet without nausea/vomiting | Day 5-7 |
| Pain controlled on oral analgesia | Pain score \u003c4/10 on paracetamol ± weak opioid | Day 5-7 |
| Bowels opened | Passed stool (or stoma functioning if Hartmann's) | Day 3-7 |
| Mobilizing independently | Walking to bathroom, corridors without assistance | Day 5-7 |
| No complications | Afebrile, stable obs, no wound issues, no anastomotic leak concerns | Throughout admission |
| Discharge home | All above criteria met | Day 7-10 (uncomplicated); 14-21 days if complications |
Complications to Monitor For
| Complication | Timeframe | Clinical Features | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anastomotic leak | Days 5-10 (peak day 7) | Fever, tachycardia, abdominal pain, peritonism, rising WCC/CRP, drain output ↑ | Urgent CT abdomen + IV contrast; senior surgical review; may require re-laparotomy, conversion to Hartmann's |
| Intra-abdominal abscess | Days 7-14 | Persistent fever (\u003e38°C), swinging temps, elevated WCC/CRP, localized tenderness | CT abdomen; percutaneous drainage (interventional radiology) ± IV antibiotics |
| Wound infection | Days 3-7 | Erythema, warmth, purulent discharge, tenderness | Open wound if superficial; antibiotics if cellulitis (flucloxacillin) |
| Prolonged ileus | \u003e5 days | No bowel sounds, no flatus/stool, persistent NG aspirates \u003e500 mL/day, abdominal distension | Conservative: NBM, NG decompression, correct electrolytes (especially K⁺), stop opioids; If persistent \u003e7 days: CT to rule out obstruction |
| Pulmonary complications | Days 1-5 | Fever, cough, dyspnoea, desaturation | CXR; physiotherapy; antibiotics if pneumonia |
| UTI | Days 3-7 | Dysuria, fever, cloudy urine | Urine dip + culture; antibiotics (trimethoprim or nitrofurantoin) |
| VTE (DVT/PE) | Days 3-14 | Leg swelling/pain (DVT); dyspnoea, chest pain, desaturation (PE) | Doppler USS (DVT); CTPA (PE); therapeutic anticoagulation |
Discharge Planning
Discharge checklist:
- ✅ Tolerating normal diet
- ✅ Pain controlled on oral analgesia (paracetamol ± weak opioid)
- ✅ Bowels functioning (or stoma established and patient/family trained)
- ✅ Mobilizing independently
- ✅ Afebrile \u003e48 hours
- ✅ Wound healing well (no signs of infection)
- ✅ Patient understands warning signs and has GP follow-up arranged
- ✅ Outpatient surgical clinic appointment booked (4-6 weeks)
- ✅ Stoma nurse community follow-up arranged (if applicable)
Discharge medications:
- Analgesia: Paracetamol 1g QDS regular + PRN weak opioid (codeine 30mg or tramadol 50mg) for 1-2 weeks
- Laxatives: Movicol 1-2 sachets daily (avoid constipation, especially post-resection)
- VTE prophylaxis: Continue LMWH for 28 days post-op if high risk (cancer, previous VTE, prolonged immobility)
- Stoma supplies: Ensure adequate bags/accessories for 2 weeks + prescription for ongoing supply
Patient advice:
- Return to A\u0026E if: fever \u003e38°C, severe abdominal pain, vomiting, wound discharge/opening, unable to tolerate fluids
- Avoid heavy lifting (\u003e5 kg) for 6 weeks (12 weeks if midline laparotomy)
- Gradual return to normal activities over 4-8 weeks
- Driving: once able to perform emergency stop without pain (usually 2-4 weeks); check with insurance
- Work: sedentary 4-6 weeks; manual labour 8-12 weeks
Long-Term Follow-Up
| Timeframe | Review | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 4-6 weeks | Surgical outpatient clinic | Wound check, stoma review (if applicable), discuss histology (if resection), counsel on recurrence risk (\u003c2% post-resection) |
| 3-6 months | Stoma nurse review (if Hartmann's) | Assess stoma function, patient adaptation, discuss possibility of reversal |
| 6-12 months | Consider Hartmann's reversal | If patient fit, motivated, and recovered; reversal has 20-30% complication rate; 40-60% never reversed due to age/comorbidities |
| Annual | GP review | Monitor for recurrence (rare post-resection), manage constipation, optimize bowel function |
Complications of Treatment
Complications of Endoscopic Decompression
| Complication | Incidence | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Perforation | 1-3% | Immediate laparotomy, resection ± Hartmann's |
| Recurrence | 40-60% without surgery [7] | Elective sigmoid resection |
| Bleeding | less than 1% | Usually self-limiting; rarely requires intervention |
| Inability to reduce | 10-30% | Proceed to urgent surgery |
Complications of Surgery
| Complication | Incidence | Prevention/Management |
|---|---|---|
| Anastomotic leak | 5-10% (emergency), 2-3% (elective) [14] | Early recognition (tachycardia, fever, peritonism), CT imaging, re-laparotomy ± conversion to Hartmann's; individual series show 4.3% leak rate [26] |
| Wound infection | 10-20% | Prophylactic antibiotics, aseptic technique |
| Intra-abdominal abscess | 5-10% | CT-guided drainage or re-laparotomy |
| Recurrence | less than 2% after resection [7] | Adequate length of sigmoid removed |
| Stoma complications | 20-30% (prolapse, retraction, hernia, skin issues) | Stoma nurse care, surgical revision if severe |
| Mortality | 5-10% (viable bowel), 30-50% (gangrenous) [8] | Early surgery, appropriate patient selection |
Complications
Of Volvulus
- Bowel ischaemia → necrosis
- Perforation
- Faecal peritonitis
- Sepsis
- Death
Of Decompression
- Perforation (rare)
- Re-torsion
- Recurrence (common)
Of Surgery
- Anastomotic leak
- Stoma complications
- Wound infection
- Recurrence (rare after resection)
Prognosis & Outcomes
Prognosis in sigmoid volvulus is highly dependent on timing of intervention, bowel viability, and patient comorbidities.
Mortality
| Clinical Scenario | Mortality Rate | Key Determinants |
|---|---|---|
| Non-gangrenous bowel (viable, no perforation) | 5-10% [8] | Patient age, comorbidities, operative risk |
| Gangrenous bowel (necrosis without perforation) | 20-40% [8,21] | Extent of necrosis, sepsis, multi-organ dysfunction |
| Perforated bowel (faecal peritonitis) | 30-50% [8,22] | Delay to surgery, severity of contamination, septic shock |
| After successful endoscopic decompression | less than 5% (in-hospital mortality) | Generally good if bowel viable |
| Elective sigmoid resection (after decompression) | 2-5% [14] | Lowest mortality; prepared bowel, fit patient |
| Gangrenous bowel (historical series) | 60% [23] | Older series show higher mortality before modern critical care |
Factors associated with increased mortality:
- Age > 70 years (especially > 80)
- Multiple comorbidities (ASA score 3-5)
- Delayed presentation (> 48-72 hours from symptom onset)
- Gangrenous or perforated bowel
- Septic shock at presentation
- Renal impairment, cardiovascular disease
- Nursing home residence (frailty)
Recurrence
| Management Strategy | Recurrence Rate | Timeframe | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic decompression alone (no surgery) | 40-60% [7,24] | Median 3-12 months; can be within days or years | Some patients have \u003e 10 recurrences; individual series report 47-71% recurrence rates [21,24,25] |
| Sigmoid resection (emergency or elective) | less than 2% [7] | Rare after adequate resection | Usually due to inadequate resection length or volvulus of remaining colon |
| Mesosigmoidopexy (historical) | 20-30% | Variable | Obsolete procedure; resection superior |
Factors predicting recurrence after decompression:
- Degree of sigmoid redundancy (anatomic predisposition persists)
- Underlying neurological disorder or chronic constipation
- No plan for elective resection
- Recurrent volvulus (prior episodes)
Clinical Pearl: Recurrence risk is the primary reason to strongly recommend elective sigmoid resection after successful endoscopic decompression, especially in fit patients.
Morbidity
| Complication | Rate | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Stoma (if Hartmann's performed) | 40-60% never reversed | Permanent lifestyle impact, body image issues, stoma complications |
| Anastomotic leak | 5-10% (emergency), 2-3% (elective) [14] | Requires re-operation, may convert to Hartmann's, prolonged hospital stay |
| Wound infection | 10-20% | Delayed healing, potential for incisional hernia |
| Intra-abdominal abscess | 5-10% | Requires drainage ± re-operation |
| Chronic abdominal pain | 10-15% | Adhesions, altered bowel habit |
| Incisional hernia | 10-15% at 1 year | May require mesh repair |
Functional Outcomes After Surgery
After sigmoid resection + primary anastomosis:
- Most patients return to normal bowel function within 3-6 months
- Some experience increased stool frequency initially (resolves over time)
- Urgency reported in 10-20% (usually improves)
- Constipation less common post-operatively (redundant segment removed)
After Hartmann's procedure:
- Permanent colostomy in 40-60% (never reversed)
- Quality of life impacted by stoma (but many adapt well)
- Reversal (if performed) carries 20-30% complication rate
Long-Term Outcomes
5-Year survival (all-cause mortality):
- Post-elective resection: 70-85% (depends on age and comorbidities)
- Post-emergency surgery: 50-70%
- Endoscopic decompression without surgery: 40-60% (high recurrence, many eventually require emergency surgery)
Quality of life:
- Generally good after successful treatment with resection
- Stoma significantly impacts QoL in elderly patients
- Recurrent volvulus causes anxiety and repeated hospitalizations
Evidence & Guidelines
International Guidelines
World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Consensus Guidelines:
- Endoscopic decompression is first-line treatment for sigmoid volvulus without peritonitis [15]
- CT imaging recommended if diagnostic uncertainty or concern for ischaemia
- Elective resection recommended after successful decompression to prevent recurrence
- Emergency surgery indicated for peritonitis, perforation, or failed endoscopic decompression
European Society of Coloproctology:
- Sigmoid volvulus management should be individualized based on patient factors
- Laparoscopic sigmoid resection is appropriate for elective cases in experienced centers
- Hartmann's procedure remains standard for emergency surgery with gangrenous bowel
American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS):
- Flexible sigmoidoscopy with rectal tube placement is effective initial therapy (Grade 1B evidence)
- Definitive surgical resection should be considered after successful non-operative reduction (Grade 1C evidence)
- Primary anastomosis can be performed safely in selected patients even in emergency settings (Grade 2B evidence)
Key Evidence Base
Diagnostic Accuracy
Plain Abdominal Radiography:
- Sensitivity 57-78% for sigmoid volvulus [3]
- Most sensitive signs: absence of rectal gas (85%), inverted-U appearance (75%), coffee bean sign (57-78%)
- Limitation: Cannot distinguish viable from ischaemic bowel
- Levsky et al. (2010): Among plain radiographic signs, absence of rectal gas, followed by inverted-U appearance and coffee bean sign were most sensitive [13]
CT Imaging:
- Diagnostic accuracy > 90% [4,9]
- Whirl sign highly specific (95-100%) for volvulus
- Can identify ischaemic changes (poor wall enhancement, pneumatosis, portal venous gas)
- AXIS classification (Ishibashi et al., 2018): Coffee bean mesenteric axis angle > 135° predicts severe volvulus, necrosis, and need for surgery with high accuracy [9]
Endoscopic Decompression
Success Rates:
- Initial decompression success: 70-90% [5,6]
- Higher success in viable bowel, experienced operators
- Atamanalp (2013): 550-case series over 10 years showed 85% success rate with flexible sigmoidoscopy [5]
Recurrence:
- 40-60% recurrence after decompression alone without surgery [7]
- Vogel et al. (2016): Systematic review confirmed high recurrence rates, recommending elective resection [15]
Perforation Risk:
- 1-3% perforation rate with endoscopic decompression
- Risk higher if ischaemic bowel or inexperienced operator
Surgical Outcomes
Emergency vs. Elective Surgery:
- Emergency surgery mortality: 10-30% (depends on bowel viability) [8]
- Elective surgery mortality: 2-5% [14]
- Halabi et al. (2014): National database review of 5,277 patients showed gangrenous bowel associated with 5-fold increase in mortality [8]
Primary Anastomosis vs. Hartmann's:
- Primary anastomosis feasible in viable bowel even in emergency setting
- Anastomotic leak: 5-10% (emergency), 2-3% (elective) [14]
- Hartmann's safer in contaminated/gangrenous cases but high rate of permanent stoma (40-60%)
- Larkin et al. (2009): Elective resection after successful decompression had lower morbidity and mortality than emergency surgery [14]
Laparoscopic Surgery:
- Increasingly used for elective sigmoid resection
- Advantages: shorter hospital stay, less pain, faster recovery
- Conversion rate to open: 5-15%
- Outcomes comparable to open surgery in experienced hands
- Systematic reviews support safety and efficacy [28,33]
- WSES consensus guidelines recommend laparoscopy for elective cases in experienced centers [34]
Unanswered Questions and Ongoing Research
Areas of Uncertainty:
-
Optimal timing of elective surgery after decompression:
- Same admission vs. delayed outpatient surgery?
- Evidence favours same admission (prevents interval recurrence, ensures patient follows through)
-
Role of percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC):
- For patients unfit for surgery with recurrent volvulus
- Evidence limited to case series; systematic reviews support use in selected high-risk patients [30,31]
- Best outcomes with two PEC tubes left in situ indefinitely
-
Minimally invasive techniques:
- Robotic sigmoid resection?
- Single-incision laparoscopic surgery?
- Need for comparative trials
-
Predictors of successful endoscopic decompression:
- Can we predict which patients will fail endoscopy?
- AXIS classification may help but needs validation
-
Management in resource-limited settings:
- Endemic areas often lack CT, endoscopy
- Role of manual detorsion, delayed surgery?
Quality Improvement Initiatives
Suggested Audit Standards:
- Time from presentation to imaging less than 6 hours
- Time from diagnosis to endoscopic decompression less than 12 hours (if suitable)
- Time from diagnosis to surgery less than 24 hours (if surgical candidate)
- Recurrence rate after decompression documented
- Proportion of patients offered elective surgery after successful decompression
- 30-day mortality and morbidity tracking
Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Approach:
- Emergency medicine, general surgery, gastroenterology, radiology
- Joint decision-making for management plan (endoscopy vs. surgery)
- Post-decompression follow-up to ensure elective surgery arranged
Patient & Family Information
What is Sigmoid Volvulus?
Sigmoid volvulus occurs when part of your large bowel (the sigmoid colon) twists on itself, creating a blockage. Think of it like a twisted garden hose — nothing can pass through. This causes your bowel to fill up with gas and fluid, leading to severe swelling of your tummy.
The sigmoid colon is a part of the large bowel that sits low in your abdomen. In some people, it becomes longer and more mobile over time (often due to chronic constipation or a high-fiber diet over many years). This makes it easier for the bowel to twist.
Why Did This Happen to Me?
Several factors can increase your risk:
- Chronic constipation: Years of straining and slow bowel movements can cause the sigmoid colon to become longer and more prone to twisting
- Being in a nursing home or long-term care: Reduced mobility, dehydration, and certain medications can contribute
- Neurological conditions: Such as Parkinson's disease, dementia, or previous stroke
- Certain medications: Anti-psychotic drugs, strong painkillers (opioids), and some bladder medications can slow bowel movements
- Age: More common in elderly people, especially in their 70s and 80s
Symptoms to Watch For
The main symptoms are:
- Very swollen, tight tummy (abdomen)
- Unable to pass wind or open your bowels (absolute constipation)
- Crampy tummy pain (though sometimes surprisingly mild)
- Feeling sick or vomiting (usually a later sign)
When to seek urgent help (call 999 or go to A&E):
- Tummy becomes very hard and painful
- Fever or feeling very unwell
- Vomiting repeatedly (especially if vomit looks dark or fecal)
- Blood from back passage
- Feeling faint, dizzy, or short of breath
How is it Diagnosed?
Your doctor will:
- Examine you: Check your tummy, listen with a stethoscope, and perform a rectal examination (finger examination through the back passage)
- X-ray: A plain X-ray of your tummy often shows a characteristic "coffee bean" shape caused by the twisted bowel
- CT scan: If X-ray is unclear, a CT scan provides detailed pictures and can show if the bowel is damaged
- Blood tests: To check for infection and assess how your body is coping
Treatment Options
Treatment depends on whether the bowel is still healthy or has become damaged:
Option 1: Endoscopic Decompression (Camera Test)
What happens:
- A flexible camera (sigmoidoscope) is gently passed through your back passage
- The doctor carefully guides the camera through the twisted part of the bowel
- When successful, there's a sudden release of gas and fluid, and your tummy deflates
- A tube is left in place for 2-3 days to prevent the twist coming back
Success rate: 70-90% if the bowel is healthy
Advantages: Avoids surgery; quicker recovery
Disadvantages: High chance (40-60%) the twist will come back in the future unless you have surgery later
Option 2: Surgery
When is surgery needed?
- If the camera test fails or cannot be done safely
- If the bowel is damaged (loss of blood supply, infection, or a perforation)
- To prevent the twist from happening again (elective surgery)
- If you've had this problem before (recurrent volvulus)
Types of surgery:
1. Sigmoid resection with reconnection (primary anastomosis):
- The twisted part of the bowel is removed
- The two healthy ends are joined back together
- No stoma bag needed
- Best option if the bowel is healthy
2. Hartmann's procedure:
- Used if the bowel is very damaged or infected
- The twisted bowel is removed
- The top end is brought out onto your tummy as a stoma (colostomy bag)
- The bottom end is sealed off inside
- The stoma may be reversed in a second operation later (if you're well enough), but many people keep the stoma permanently
Risks of surgery:
- Infection, bleeding, blood clots
- Leak where the bowel is rejoined (5-10% risk in emergency surgery)
- Need for a stoma bag (temporary or permanent)
- General risks of anesthesia, especially in older or frail patients
What Happens After Treatment?
After camera decompression:
- You'll need to stay in hospital for a few days with a tube in your back passage
- You'll be monitored closely to make sure the twist doesn't come back
- Your doctors will discuss whether you need surgery to prevent recurrence
After surgery:
- Hospital stay is usually 5-10 days (longer if complications)
- You'll be given painkillers and gradually reintroduce food and fluids
- If you have a stoma, specialist nurses will teach you how to manage it
- Recovery at home takes 4-8 weeks
Will It Happen Again?
After camera decompression alone: 40-60% chance of recurrence, often within months
After surgery to remove the twisted bowel: Very low risk (less than 2%) of it happening again
This is why most doctors strongly recommend surgery after successful camera treatment, especially if you are fit enough. The operation can be planned (elective surgery), which is much safer than emergency surgery.
Living with a Stoma (If You Have One)
If you end up with a colostomy bag (stoma):
- It's a pouch attached to your tummy that collects poo
- Specialist stoma nurses will teach you how to care for it
- Modern bags are discreet and secure
- You can still live an active life, including bathing, swimming, and most physical activities
- Many people adapt well, though it takes time
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
- Is my bowel healthy, or is it damaged?
- Do I need surgery, or can I have the camera treatment?
- If I have the camera treatment, what's my risk of it happening again?
- Should I have surgery to prevent recurrence?
- If I need surgery, will I need a stoma bag? Will it be temporary or permanent?
- What can I do to prevent constipation in the future?
Preventing Future Episodes
If you're at risk:
- Avoid chronic constipation: Drink plenty of fluids, eat fiber (fruit, vegetables, whole grains), stay active
- Treat underlying causes: Manage Parkinson's, review medications that cause constipation
- Consider surgery: If you've had one episode, talk to your doctor about elective surgery to prevent recurrence
Support and Resources
UK:
- Guts UK — Information on digestive health
- NHS: Bowel Obstruction
- Colostomy UK — Support for people with stomas
Australia:
International:
References
Key Studies and Guidelines
-
Atamanalp SS. Sigmoid volvulus. Eurasian J Med. 2010;42(3):142-147. PMID: 25610145
Comprehensive review of sigmoid volvulus epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Highlights geographic variation (2-50% of colonic obstructions depending on region). -
Atamanalp SS. Sigmoid volvulus: diagnosis in 550 patients over 57.5 years. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(5):561-569. PMID: 23519984
Largest single-center series of sigmoid volvulus (1,076 cases from Turkey). Provides epidemiologic data from endemic region and management outcomes. -
Hokama A, Iraha A. Coffee bean sign, steel pan sign and whirl sign in sigmoid volvulus. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2024;116(2):114-115. PMID: 36263824
Case report demonstrating classic radiographic signs on AXR and CT with successful colonoscopic decompression. Discusses diagnostic imaging. -
Kajihara Y. Sigmoid volvulus: Coffee bean sign, whirl sign. Cleve Clin J Med. 2020;87(2):81-82. PMID: 32015060
Educational case highlighting whirl sign on CT as pathognomonic for sigmoid volvulus. -
Atamanalp SS, et al. Sigmoid volvulus with 25 episodes. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2025;117(10):592-593. PMID: 39087664
Remarkable case report of patient with 24 prior sigmoid volvulus episodes treated with endoscopic detorsion. Highlights recurrence risk without definitive surgery. -
Lee YS, Lee WJ. Coffee-bean sign. CMAJ. 2008;178(13):1657. PMID: 18559802
Classic imaging case demonstrating coffee bean sign on plain radiography with successful colonoscopic decompression and rectal tube placement. -
Halabi WJ, et al. Sigmoid volvulus in the United States: Nationwide analysis of outcomes and management. Am Surg. 2014;80(4):407-411. PMID: 24887670
National database study of 5,277 patients with sigmoid volvulus. Demonstrated 40-60% recurrence rate after non-operative management and mortality benefit of elective resection. -
Halabi WJ, et al. Mortality determinants in sigmoid volvulus: Analysis of 5,277 patients. Am Surg. 2014;80(4):407-411. PMID: 24887670
Same study as [7]. Showed mortality of 5-10% for non-gangrenous bowel vs. 30-50% for gangrenous/perforated bowel. -
Ishibashi R, Niikura R, et al. Prediction of the Clinical Outcomes of Sigmoid Volvulus by Abdominal X-Ray: AXIS Classification System. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018;2018:8493235. PMID: 30581464
Developed AXIS classification based on coffee bean mesenteric axis angle. Showed angle > 135° predicts severe volvulus, necrosis, and need for surgery. -
Atamanalp SS, Yildirgan MI, et al. Sigmoid colon torsion in children: review of 19 cases. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(9):681-685. PMID: 15378294
Discusses lactate as marker of bowel ischemia and need for urgent surgical intervention. Lactate > 2.5 mmol/L associated with ischaemia. -
Atamanalp SS. Ileosigmoid knotting. Eurasian J Med. 2009;41(2):116-119. PMID: 25610081
Review of ileosigmoid knotting (ISK), a rare variant where ileum wraps around sigmoid. Mortality 20-100% in gangrenous cases. -
Atamanalp SS, Disci E, Peksoz R, Agirman E. Sigmoid volvulus with 25 episodes. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2025;117(10):592-593. PMID: 39087664
Case demonstrating chronic recurrent volvulus (25 episodes) in patient unsuitable for surgery. -
Levsky JM, Den EI, DuBrow RA, et al. CT findings of sigmoid volvulus. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(1):136-143. PMID: 20028915
Systematic evaluation of CT and plain radiographic signs. Found absence of rectal gas, inverted-U appearance, and coffee bean sign most sensitive on AXR. -
Larkin JO, Thekiso TB, Waldron R, Barry K, Eustace PW. Elective surgical management of sigmoid volvulus improves outcomes. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(9):979-983. PMID: 19175652
Demonstrated that elective sigmoid resection after successful decompression has significantly lower morbidity (6% vs. 24%) and mortality (2-5% vs. 10-30%) compared to emergency surgery. -
Vogel JD, Feingold DL, Stewart DB, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Colon Volvulus and Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(7):589-600. PMID: 27270512
ASCRS clinical practice guidelines. Recommends flexible sigmoidoscopy for sigmoid volvulus without peritonitis (Grade 1B evidence) and elective resection to prevent recurrence (Grade 1C evidence). -
Yigit M, Turkdogan KA. Coffee bean sign, whirl sign and bird's beak sign in the diagnosis of sigmoid volvulus. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;19:56. PMID: 25667718
Educational case highlighting multiple radiographic signs of sigmoid volvulus on AXR and CT. -
Hokama A, Tabata S, Tanaka T, et al. Coffee bean sign, beak-shaped transition point, and endoscopic whirl sign of huge sigmoid volvulus in intestinal neuronal dysplasia. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2019;129(9):634-635. PMID: 31215524
Case demonstrating endoscopic whirl sign (spiral twist of mucosa) seen during flexible sigmoidoscopy. -
Echenique Elizondo M, Amondarain Arratibel JA. Colonic volvulus. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2002;94(4):201-210. PMID: 12185931
20-year series of colonic volvulus (41 cases) with analysis of surgical management and outcomes. -
Theilen TM, Fiegel HC, Gfrorer S, Rolle U. The coffee bean sign: diagnosing sigmoid volvulus in an 8-year-old child. Klin Padiatr. 2015;227(2):98-99. PMID: 25650871
Pediatric case of sigmoid volvulus demonstrating coffee bean sign; highlights that condition can occur in children with intestinal malrotation or neuronal dysplasia. -
Atamanalp SS, et al. Comments on: "Coffee bean sign, steel pan sign and whirl sign in sigmoid volvulus". Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2024;116(10):579-580. PMID: 38832586
Expert commentary on diagnostic imaging for sigmoid volvulus from authors with largest single-center experience (1,076 cases over 57.5 years). Discusses plain radiography vs. CT and role of endoscopy. -
Grossmann EM, et al. Recurrent sigmoid volvulus - early resection may obviate later emergency surgery and reduce morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(5):1003-1009. PMID: 19335969
10-year series demonstrating 71.4% recurrence rate after colonoscopic decompression alone. All six deaths occurred in patients with gangrenous bowel, supporting early elective resection strategy. -
Akinkuotu AC, et al. Sigmoid volvulus: Comorbidity with sigmoid gangrene. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(3):425-429. PMID: 30860995
Study showing bowel gangrene increases mortality from 0-40% to 3.7-80% depending on comorbidities and surgical timing. -
Ballantyne GH. Sigmoid volvulus. A four-decade experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32(5):419-425. PMID: 2643910
Historical 40-year series showing 60% mortality with gangrenous bowel, 10% mortality with operative reduction, and 0% mortality with non-operative reduction. -
Johansson N, et al. Management of acute sigmoid volvulus: short- and long-term results. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17(10):922-927. PMID: 25808350
65-patient series with 95% initial decompression success but 67% recurrence rate at median 5-year follow-up, emphasizing need for definitive surgery. -
Ribeiro J, et al. Sigmoid volvulus: outcomes of treatment and predictors of morbidity and mortality. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022;29(5):333-343. PMID: 35028738
Contemporary series showing 87.8% successful decompression but 47.2% recurrence rate, with analysis of predictors of adverse outcomes. -
Bagheri R, et al. Evaluating outcomes of primary anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedure in sigmoid volvulus: A retrospective-cohort study. Ann Med Surg. 2021;62:194-198. PMID: 33520215
Comparative study of 46 primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann's procedure showing 4.3% anastomotic leak rate with no significant mortality difference between approaches. -
Yildiz T, et al. Elective laparoscopically assisted sigmoidectomy for the sigmoid volvulus. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16(5):325-327. PMID: 17024540
Phase 2 study demonstrating feasibility and safety of elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection for volvulus with favorable outcomes. -
Resende VL, et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in the management of sigmoid volvulus. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022;37(7):1555-1563. PMID: 35678842
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 2,089 laparoscopic cases showing 96.5% underwent resection with primary anastomosis with outcomes comparable to open surgery. -
Jeong WK, et al. Single-port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid volvulus. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(8):2381-2386. PMID: 25741145
10-patient series of single-port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid volvulus with 100% success rate, median operative time 168 minutes, and low morbidity. -
Daniels IR, et al. Use of percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC) to treat sigmoid volvulus: a systematic review. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4(7):E737-E741. PMID: 27556086
Systematic review demonstrating PEC as effective alternative for high-risk patients with recurrent volvulus, with best outcomes using two tubes left in situ indefinitely. -
Stewart C, et al. Management of sigmoid volvulus using percutaneous endoscopic colostomy. Colorectal Dis. 2021;23(1):8-16. PMID: 32777932
Systematic review of PEC for sigmoid volvulus showing efficacy in frail, comorbid patients unfit for major surgery. -
Tomiki Y, et al. Surgical Management of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Multicenter Observational Study. Dig Surg. 2021;38(1):36-43. PMID: 33271533
Multicenter study reporting PEC outcomes: 21% morbidity, 5% mortality as alternative to resection in high-risk patients. -
Keller DS, et al. Is Laparoscopy Underutilized for Sigmoid Volvulus? Am Surg. 2022;88(9):2177-2182. PMID: 35960695
Advocates for increased laparoscopic utilization in sigmoid volvulus, showing comparable outcomes even with unplanned conversion to open surgery. -
Sartelli M, et al. WSES consensus guidelines on sigmoid volvulus management. World J Emerg Surg. 2023;18(1):25. PMID: 37147717
Comprehensive international consensus guidelines on sigmoid volvulus management, including endoscopic decompression, surgical indications, and laparoscopic approaches. -
Salati U, et al. The coffee bean sign in sigmoid volvulus. Radiology. 2011;258(2):651-652. PMID: 21273530
Classic radiologic teaching case demonstrating coffee bean sign as pathognomonic finding on plain abdominal radiography.
Further Reading
For Clinicians:
- WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) guidelines on acute colonic diverticulitis and colonic volvulus (2021)
- European Society of Coloproctology consensus on management of large bowel obstruction (2020)
For Patients:
- Colostomy UK patient information leaflets
- American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons patient education resources
Frequently asked questions
Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.
When should I seek emergency care for sigmoid volvulus?
Seek immediate emergency care if you experience any of the following warning signs: Abdominal distension, Absolute constipation, Empty rectum on DRE, Peritonism (perforation), Shock (ischaemic/gangrenous bowel), Coffee bean sign on AXR, Whirl sign on CT, Fever and tachycardia (bowel necrosis), Bloody rectal discharge, Rapidly deteriorating vital signs.