Neurology
Emergency Medicine
High Evidence
Peer reviewed

Transverse Myelitis

The term "transverse" refers to inflammation spanning the full or partial width of the spinal cord, disrupting ascending and descending neural pathways. Prompt recognition and treatment are critical, as early...

Updated 10 Jan 2026
Reviewed 17 Jan 2026
49 min read
Reviewer
MedVellum Editorial Team
Affiliation
MedVellum Medical Education Platform

Clinical board

A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.

Urgent signals

Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.

  • Cord compression must be excluded FIRST
  • Respiratory compromise (high cervical lesion)
  • Rapid complete paralysis
  • Urinary retention

Editorial and exam context

Reviewed by MedVellum Editorial Team · MedVellum Medical Education Platform

Credentials: MBBS, MRCP, Board Certified

Clinical reference article

Transverse Myelitis

1. Clinical Overview

Transverse myelitis (TM) is an acute inflammatory disorder of the spinal cord characterized by bilateral motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction below the level of the lesion. [1,2] It represents a heterogeneous group of conditions that may occur as an isolated, monophasic illness (idiopathic TM) or as the first presentation of multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), or other systemic inflammatory diseases. [1,3,4]

The term "transverse" refers to inflammation spanning the full or partial width of the spinal cord, disrupting ascending and descending neural pathways. [1] Prompt recognition and treatment are critical, as early intervention with high-dose corticosteroids can significantly improve outcomes. [5] The most important initial step is to exclude compressive myelopathy, which requires emergency surgical intervention.

Key Facts

FactDetail
DefinitionAcute inflammatory demyelination affecting the full or partial width of the spinal cord
Incidence1.34-4.6 per million per year [6]
Age distributionBimodal: 10-19 years and 30-39 years [6]
First priorityExclude compressive myelopathy (emergency MRI)
Classic triadMotor weakness + sensory level + bladder dysfunction
OnsetSymptoms progress over hours to days (nadir 4 hours to 21 days) [1]
Key investigationMRI spine with contrast + MRI brain + lumbar puncture
TreatmentIV methylprednisolone 1000mg daily for 3-5 days [5,7]
PrognosisPartial TM: 70-90% good recovery; Complete TM: 30-50% [8]
Association with MS10-20% of partial TM develop MS within 5 years [9]

Clinical Pearls

Pearl 1: Exclude Compression First: THE FIRST STEP IS ALWAYS TO EXCLUDE CORD COMPRESSION. Compressive myelopathy from disc herniation, epidural abscess, tumour, or haematoma requires emergency surgical decompression. Get an urgent whole spine MRI before attributing symptoms to TM. Delay in recognizing compression can result in permanent paralysis.

Pearl 2: Partial vs Complete TM Matters: Partial TM (asymmetric, mild, affecting less than 2/3 of cord width on MRI) is associated with MS and has a better prognosis. Complete TM (symmetric, severe, full-width involvement) is more often idiopathic or associated with NMOSD and has worse prognosis. [8,10] This distinction guides both aetiological workup and prognostic counselling.

Pearl 3: Brain MRI is Mandatory: Always request MRI Brain in addition to MRI Spine. If brain lesions are present, the likelihood of developing clinically definite MS is significantly higher—up to 90% at 14 years with 2 or more brain lesions. [9] Brain imaging changes management and follow-up planning.

Pearl 4: LETM = Think NMOSD: Longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM—lesion spanning 3 or more vertebral segments) is the hallmark of NMOSD. [4,11] LETM should prompt immediate testing for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG antibodies. NMOSD requires different long-term management (rituximab, eculizumab, or inebilizumab) compared to MS.

Pearl 5: Bladder Dysfunction is Nearly Universal: Bladder dysfunction occurs in over 90% of patients with TM. [1,8] Urinary retention in the acute phase requires catheterization. Post-void residual volume should be monitored. Long-term bladder dysfunction is a major source of morbidity and requires specialist urological input.

Pearl 6: Sensory Level Assessment is Critical: The sensory level on examination localizes the lesion and guides imaging. Use a systematic approach: start testing from the sacral region and work upward using light touch and pinprick. Document the dermatome level precisely (e.g., T10 sensory level). The sensory level typically corresponds to the upper extent of the MRI lesion. [1]


2. Epidemiology

Incidence and Prevalence

Transverse myelitis is a rare condition with an estimated annual incidence of 1.34 to 4.6 per million population. [6] The true incidence may be underestimated due to diagnostic challenges and misclassification. Acute myelopathies from all causes (including compression, ischaemia, and inflammation) have a combined incidence of approximately 24.6 per million per year. [6]

PopulationRate
Overall incidence (TM)1.34-4.6 per million per year [6]
Paediatric incidence1-2 per million per year [12]
All-cause acute myelopathy24.6 per million per year [6]

Demographics

FactorAssociation
AgeBimodal distribution: peak 10-19 years and 30-39 years [6]
SexNo clear sex predominance in idiopathic TM; female predominance in MS-associated and NMOSD-associated TM [4,10]
RaceNMOSD more common in African, Asian, and Hispanic populations compared to Caucasians [4]
SeasonalityPost-infectious cases may cluster following viral epidemics [13]
GeographyMS-associated TM more common at higher latitudes; NMOSD incidence higher in certain ethnic groups regardless of location [4]

Aetiological Breakdown

The aetiology of TM is heterogeneous. A significant proportion remains idiopathic despite extensive investigation.

AetiologyProportionNotes
Idiopathic (post-infectious)30-50%Diagnosis of exclusion; often preceded by viral illness [1,13]
Multiple sclerosis-associated20-30%Especially partial TM; MRI brain lesions present [9]
NMOSD-associated10-20%Longitudinally extensive TM (LETM); AQP4-IgG positive [4,11]
Post-infectious (identified agent)10-30%EBV, CMV, VZV, Mycoplasma, HIV, COVID-19 [13,14]
Systemic autoimmune disease5-10%SLE, Sjögren's, sarcoidosis, Behçet's [1]
MOG-antibody disease5-15%Often paediatric; relapsing course; MOG-IgG positive [15]
Post-vaccinationRareTemporal association reported; causality unclear [16]
Spinal cord infarction5-10%Anterior spinal artery syndrome; distinct clinical features

3. Pathophysiology

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms

Transverse myelitis results from immune-mediated inflammation of the spinal cord, leading to demyelination, oedema, axonal damage, and in severe cases, necrosis. The pathophysiology varies depending on the underlying aetiology.

Idiopathic and Post-Infectious TM

Step 1: Triggering Event

  • Preceding viral or bacterial infection in 30-60% of cases [1,13]
  • Common triggers: respiratory viruses (influenza, enterovirus), EBV, CMV, VZV, Mycoplasma pneumoniae [13]
  • COVID-19 has been associated with post-infectious myelitis [14]
  • Vaccination may rarely precede TM (temporal association, not proven causation) [16]

Step 2: Molecular Mimicry and Immune Activation

  • Cross-reactivity between pathogen antigens and myelin or axonal proteins
  • Activation of autoreactive T cells and B cells
  • Production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ)
  • Breakdown of the blood-spinal cord barrier [13]

Step 3: Inflammatory Demyelination

  • Infiltration of lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ T cells) and macrophages into spinal cord parenchyma
  • Myelin sheath destruction by macrophages
  • Oedema and swelling of affected cord segments
  • "Transverse" pattern: inflammation spans full or partial width of cord
  • Cytokine-mediated injury to oligodendrocytes and axons [1,13]

Step 4: Neurological Dysfunction

  • Disruption of ascending sensory tracts (spinothalamic, dorsal columns) → sensory level and paraesthesia
  • Disruption of descending motor tracts (corticospinal tracts) → weakness or paralysis
  • Disruption of autonomic pathways → bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction
  • Acute phase: spinal shock with flaccid paralysis and areflexia [1]

Step 5: Resolution or Progression

  • In monophasic idiopathic TM: inflammation resolves over weeks; remyelination and partial functional recovery occur in most cases [8]
  • Residual disability depends on extent of axonal loss
  • In MS-associated TM: risk of further relapses at different CNS sites [9]
  • In NMOSD: high relapse risk without long-term immunosuppression [4,11]

NMOSD Pathophysiology

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has a distinct pathophysiology centered on antibody-mediated astrocyte injury. [4,11]

StepDetail
Antibody productionAQP4-IgG (anti-aquaporin-4) antibodies produced against astrocyte water channel protein [11]
TargetingAntibodies bind aquaporin-4 on astrocyte foot processes at the blood-brain barrier and perivascular regions
Complement activationComplement-mediated cytotoxicity causes astrocyte destruction [4]
Secondary demyelinationLoss of astrocyte support leads to oligodendrocyte injury and myelin loss
NecrosisMore severe tissue destruction than MS; cavitation and necrosis can occur [11]
Clinical phenotypeLETM (3+ segments), bilateral optic neuritis, area postrema syndrome, brainstem syndromes [4]

Approximately 10-20% of NMOSD patients are AQP4-IgG negative; some of these patients are positive for MOG-IgG (myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies), which defines a separate disease entity (MOG-antibody disease). [15]

MS-Associated TM

In MS, TM represents a focal demyelinating attack within the spinal cord. [9] The pathophysiology involves:

  • T-cell mediated autoimmune attack on myelin
  • Oligodendrocyte injury and myelin breakdown
  • Typically short-segment lesions (less than 2 vertebral segments)
  • Partial cord involvement (asymmetric, dorsolateral)
  • Less severe inflammation compared to NMOSD

Classification

TypeFeaturesAssociation
Partial TMAsymmetric, mild to moderate weakness, less than 2/3 cord width, 1-2 segment lesion on MRIMS (high risk), better prognosis [8,10]
Complete TMSymmetric, severe paralysis, full-width involvement on MRINMOSD, idiopathic, poorer prognosis [8]
Short-segment TMLess than 3 vertebral segments on MRIMS, idiopathic [9]
Longitudinally extensive TM (LETM)3 or more vertebral segments on MRINMOSD (classic), MOG-antibody disease, idiopathic [4,11,15]

4. Clinical Presentation

Classic Triad

The classic presentation of TM consists of three core features:

FeatureDescription
Motor dysfunctionBilateral weakness or paralysis below lesion level; may be asymmetric in partial TM
Sensory dysfunctionSensory level with altered sensation (pain, temperature, light touch, vibration, proprioception) below lesion
Autonomic dysfunctionBladder dysfunction (retention or incontinence), bowel dysfunction, sexual dysfunction

All three features are typically present, although the degree may vary. [1,8]

Symptom Frequency

SymptomFrequency
Weakness (legs more than arms)90-100% [1,8]
Sensory disturbance80-95% [1,8]
Bladder dysfunction90-95% [1,8]
Back or radicular pain50-70% [8]
Band-like sensation around trunk50-60% [1]
Bowel dysfunction50-70% [1]
Sexual dysfunction50-70%
Lhermitte's sign (electric shock with neck flexion)20-40% [1]

Onset and Progression

The Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group (TMCWG) diagnostic criteria specify that symptoms must progress to nadir (maximum deficit) between 4 hours and 21 days from onset. [1]

PhaseTimeframeFeatures
ProdromeDays to weeks beforeBack pain, fever, malaise (common in post-infectious TM) [13]
OnsetHours to daysSymptoms develop rapidly; progressive weakness, ascending sensory level
Nadir4 hours to 21 daysPeak deficit reached [1]
Acute phaseFirst 2-4 weeksSpinal shock: flaccid paralysis, areflexia, bladder retention
Recovery phaseWeeks to monthsVariable; most improvement occurs in first 3-6 months [8]
Plateau6-12 monthsMaximum recovery usually achieved; residual deficits may persist [8]

Clinical Features by Spinal Level

The level of the spinal cord lesion determines the clinical presentation.

LevelMotor FindingsSensory LevelAutonomic FeaturesOther Features
Cervical (C1-C4)Quadriparesis, respiratory compromiseNeck, shoulders, and belowBladder/bowel dysfunction, orthostatic hypotensionLife-threatening; may require mechanical ventilation [1]
Cervical (C5-C8)Upper and lower limb weaknessArms and below (variable)Bladder/bowel dysfunctionHand weakness, absent triceps/biceps reflexes; Horner syndrome if T1 involved
Thoracic (T1-T12)Paraparesis (legs only)Trunk with clear horizontal sensory level (e.g., T4 = nipple line, T10 = umbilicus)Bladder/bowel dysfunctionMost common level for TM [1]; band-like chest or abdominal pain
Lumbar/Conus (L1-S2)Leg weakness, may have lower motor neuron signs (flaccid, areflexic)Legs, saddle regionBladder/bowel dysfunction prominent; saddle anaesthesiaCauda equina syndrome if lower lumbar/sacral

Detailed Sensory Level Determination

Accurate sensory level assessment is critical for lesion localization and guiding imaging.

Systematic Approach to Sensory Examination:

  1. Preparation: Explain the procedure to the patient. Use a cotton wisp for light touch and a disposable pin for pinprick.

  2. Start Distally: Begin testing at the feet or sacral region (S4-S5) and work upward.

  3. Test Modalities:

    • Light touch: Use cotton wisp; test symmetrically on both sides
    • Pinprick (pain): Use disposable pin; ask "sharp or dull?"
    • Temperature: Use tuning fork or cold object (tests spinothalamic tract)
    • Vibration: Use 128 Hz tuning fork on bony prominences (tests dorsal columns)
    • Proprioception: Move toe or finger up/down with eyes closed (tests dorsal columns)
  4. Identify the Level: The sensory level is the most caudal dermatome with normal sensation. Mark the level where sensation changes from abnormal (below) to normal (above).

  5. Document Precisely: Record the dermatome level (e.g., T6 sensory level to light touch and pinprick).

  6. Consider Posterior Column Sparing: Some patients have preserved vibration and proprioception (posterior columns intact) but impaired pain and temperature (spinothalamic tracts affected).

Key Dermatome Landmarks:

DermatomeAnatomical Landmark
C5Lateral arm (deltoid region)
C6Thumb
C7Middle finger
C8Little finger
T4Nipple line
T6Xiphisternum
T10Umbilicus
L1Inguinal region
L4Medial ankle
L5Dorsum of foot
S1Lateral foot
S4-S5Perianal region (saddle area)

Red Flags

Recognition of red flags is essential for timely diagnosis and management.

Red FlagConcernAction
Rapid onset severe weaknessCord compression, infarctionEmergency MRI whole spine with contrast [1]
Fever + back pain + weaknessSpinal epidural abscessEmergency MRI + blood cultures + neurosurgical consultation [17]
Sudden onset severe back painSpinal infarction, epidural haematomaEmergency MRI
High cervical symptoms (C1-C4)Respiratory compromiseMonitor respiratory function (vital capacity, oxygen saturation); ICU if needed [1]
Ascending paralysisGuillain-Barré syndrome (differential)LP for albuminocytological dissociation; nerve conduction studies
Previous visual symptomsMS or NMOSDMRI brain, visual evoked potentials, AQP4-IgG testing [4,9]
LETM on MRINMOSDTest AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG; consider plasma exchange [4,11]

5. Clinical Examination

General Inspection

  • Respiratory distress: High cervical lesions (C3-C5 involvement) can cause diaphragmatic weakness and respiratory compromise [1]
  • Posture: Patient may be bedbound or wheelchair-dependent
  • Urinary catheter: Indicates urinary retention (very common in TM)
  • Muscle wasting: Suggests subacute or chronic presentation

Motor Examination

The motor examination findings change over time due to spinal shock.

FindingAcute Phase (Spinal Shock)Established Phase (Weeks Later)
ToneFlaccid (reduced tone)Spastic (increased tone) [1]
PowerWeakness or complete paralysis below lesion levelWeakness persists; may improve partially
ReflexesAbsent or reduced (areflexia)Brisk, hyperreflexia [1]
PlantarsInitially flexor or equivocalUpgoing (extensor, Babinski sign) [1]
ClonusAbsent initiallyPresent (sustained ankle clonus)

Power Grading (MRC Scale):

  • 0 = No movement
  • 1 = Flicker of contraction
  • 2 = Movement with gravity eliminated
  • 3 = Movement against gravity
  • 4 = Movement against resistance (weak)
  • 5 = Normal power

Document power in all major muscle groups (hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion, etc.).

Sensory Examination

See detailed section above ("Detailed Sensory Level Determination"). Key points:

  • Test all modalities (light touch, pinprick, vibration, proprioception)
  • Identify and document the sensory level precisely
  • Posterior column sparing may occur (preserved vibration/proprioception)

Autonomic Examination

FeatureAssessment
BladderPalpate suprapubic region for distended bladder; check post-void residual volume (PVR); PVR more than 100 mL indicates retention [1]
BowelAsk about constipation or faecal incontinence
CardiovascularOrthostatic hypotension in high lesions (measure lying and standing BP)
SweatingAnhidrosis below lesion level

Spinal Level-Specific Signs

LevelSpecific Signs
C5-C6Absent biceps reflex (C5-C6), sensory level at shoulders
C7-C8Absent triceps reflex (C7), hand weakness, sensory level at middle or little finger
T1Horner syndrome (ptosis, miosis, anhidrosis) if sympathetic chain affected
T4Sensory level at nipple line
T10Sensory level at umbilicus
L1Sensory level at groin
L2-L4Absent knee reflex (L3-L4), hip flexion and knee extension weakness
L5-S1Absent ankle reflex (S1), foot drop (L5), sensory loss on dorsum or sole of foot
S2-S5Saddle anaesthesia, absent anal reflex, absent bulbocavernosus reflex

6. Investigations

The diagnostic workup aims to confirm the diagnosis of TM, exclude compressive and other structural causes, identify the underlying aetiology, and assess prognosis.

Emergency Investigation: MRI Spine

Indication: ALL patients with acute myelopathy require urgent MRI of the entire spine (cervical, thoracic, lumbar) with and without gadolinium contrast. [1,7]

Purpose:

  • Exclude compressive myelopathy (disc herniation, tumour, abscess, haematoma)
  • Visualize intramedullary inflammation
  • Determine lesion extent (short-segment vs LETM)
  • Assess for enhancement (indicates blood-spinal cord barrier breakdown)

Timing: Within 24 hours of presentation; emergent if suspicion of compression [1,7]

MRI Features of Transverse Myelitis

SequenceTypical Findings in TM
T2-weightedHyperintense (bright) signal within the cord, spanning partial or full width; cord swelling may be present [1,18]
T1-weighted (pre-contrast)Isointense or hypointense; low T1 signal suggests necrosis (poor prognosis) [8]
T1-weighted + gadoliniumMay show enhancement (indicates active inflammation and blood-spinal cord barrier breakdown) [1,18]
Extent (length)Short-segment (less than 3 segments) or LETM (3 or more segments) [4,11]
Location (axial)Central, dorsal, lateral, or complete (full width)

Advanced MRI Interpretation

Axial Location Patterns and Clinical Correlation

The location of the lesion on axial MRI images correlates with clinical phenotype and aetiology.

Axial PatternTracts InvolvedClinical SyndromeAssociation
Central cordSpinothalamic tracts bilaterally, anterior horn cellsDissociated sensory loss (pain/temperature affected, proprioception preserved), flaccid weaknessSyringomyelia (chronic), NMOSD (acute) [4,11]
Anterior cordCorticospinal tracts, spinothalamic tractsMotor weakness, pain/temperature loss; proprioception and vibration PRESERVEDAnterior spinal artery infarction (differential) [1]
Posterior cordDorsal columnsProprioception and vibration loss; motor and pain/temperature PRESERVEDVitamin B12 deficiency, copper deficiency, tabes dorsalis
DorsolateralCorticospinal tract, dorsal column (asymmetric)Asymmetric weakness, ipsilateral proprioception lossMS [9]
Holocord (complete)All tractsComplete motor, sensory, autonomic dysfunctionNMOSD, severe idiopathic TM [4,8]

Enhancement Patterns

Enhancement on T1-weighted post-gadolinium images provides information about blood-spinal cord barrier integrity and inflammation activity.

Enhancement PatternDescriptionSignificance
No enhancementNo uptake of gadoliniumInflammation may have resolved; or imaging performed too early (less than 24 hours) or too late (more than 4 weeks)
Patchy enhancementScattered foci of enhancement within lesionActive inflammation; typical of acute TM [1,18]
Ring enhancementEnhancement surrounding central low signalDemyelination with central necrosis; seen in severe TM, NMOSD [11]
Diffuse enhancementHomogeneous enhancement throughout lesionActive inflammation; may indicate steroid-responsive disease

Spinal Cord Swelling

Cord swelling (expansion) is common in acute TM but absence does not exclude diagnosis.

FeatureAcute TMChronic/Old Lesion
Cord diameterExpanded (swollen) [1,18]Normal or atrophic
T2 signalBright (hyperintense)May persist or normalize
EnhancementPresent (active inflammation)Absent
Clinical correlationAcute symptoms (days to weeks)Chronic symptoms (months to years); residual deficits

Prognostic Value of MRI:

  • Short-segment lesion (less than 3 segments): Better prognosis; often MS-associated [9]
  • LETM (3+ segments): Worse prognosis; NMOSD-associated [4,11]
  • T1 hypointensity ("black holes"): Suggests axonal loss and necrosis; poor recovery [8]
  • Extensive cord swelling: Severe inflammation; may have worse outcome
  • Brain lesions: High risk of MS (90% at 14 years if 2+ lesions) [9]

MRI: Transverse Myelitis vs Compressive Myelopathy

FeatureTransverse MyelitisCompressive Myelopathy
T2 signalHyperintense (bright) centrally within cordHyperintense but with external compression visible
Cord swellingPresent in acute phase [1,18]May be compressed or displaced
External causeNoneDisc, tumour, abscess, haematoma visible on imaging
EnhancementMay enhance (active inflammation) [1,18]Variable
Clinical urgencyUrgentEMERGENCY (requires decompression) [17]

Short-Segment TM vs LETM

This distinction is critical for aetiological diagnosis.

FeatureShort-Segment TMLETM
LengthLess than 3 vertebral segments3 or more vertebral segments [4,11]
AssociationMS, idiopathic, post-infectious [9]NMOSD, MOG-antibody disease, idiopathic [4,11,15]
LocationOften dorsal/lateralOften central, holocord
PrognosisGenerally betterOften worse (especially NMOSD) [4,8]
Next stepMRI brain (MS workup) [9]AQP4-IgG, MOG-IgG testing [4,11,15]

MRI Brain

Indication: ALL patients with TM should have MRI brain to assess for demyelinating lesions suggestive of MS. [1,9]

Purpose:

  • Identify periventricular, juxtacortical, infratentorial, or spinal cord lesions (McDonald criteria for MS)
  • Predict risk of developing clinically definite MS [9]

Prognostic Value: Presence of 2 or more brain lesions on initial MRI increases the risk of MS to approximately 90% at 14 years. [9]

Lumbar Puncture and CSF Analysis

Lumbar puncture (LP) must be performed AFTER MRI to exclude cord compression and raised intracranial pressure.

Timing: Within 48-72 hours of presentation [1,7]

CSF Parameters in TM:

ParameterTypical FindingNotes
Opening pressureNormal (10-20 cmH₂O)Elevated pressure suggests alternative diagnosis
Cell countLymphocytic pleocytosis (5-200 cells/mm³) in 60-80% of cases [1,7]Normal cell count does not exclude TM
ProteinMildly elevated (0.5-1.5 g/L) in 50-70% of cases [1,7]Markedly elevated protein (more than 2 g/L) suggests Guillain-Barré
GlucoseNormal (CSF:serum ratio more than 0.5)Low glucose suggests infection or malignancy
Oligoclonal bands (OCBs)Present in 30-50% overall; higher in MS-associated TM [1,9]OCBs suggest intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis
IgG indexElevated in some casesSupports inflammatory aetiology
CytologyNormalExcludes neoplastic meningitis

CSF Analysis: Advanced Interpretation

Cell Count Patterns

Cell CountDifferential DiagnosisAction
0-5 cells/mm³ (normal)TM still possible (20-40% have normal CSF); spinal cord infarction; early presentationRely on MRI findings for diagnosis [1]
5-200 cells/mm³ (mild-moderate pleocytosis)Typical for TM [1,7]; also MS, NMOSDProceed with TM diagnosis if clinical and MRI consistent
More than 200 cells/mm³ (marked pleocytosis)Infectious myelitis (viral, bacterial); sarcoidosis; Behçet'sSend viral PCR (HSV, VZV, enterovirus), bacterial culture, TB PCR, ACE
Predominantly neutrophilsBacterial infection; acute viral; early inflammatoryBlood cultures, CSF culture, consider antibiotics if infection suspected
Predominantly lymphocytesTM, MS, NMOSD, viral, TBTypical pattern for TM [1,7]
EosinophilsParasitic infection (rare); hypereosinophilic syndromeSerology, peripheral eosinophil count

Protein Levels

Protein Level (g/L)InterpretationDifferential
0.15-0.45 (normal)Normal CSF proteinDoes not exclude TM [1]
0.5-1.5 (mildly elevated)Typical for TM [1,7]; MS; NMOSDConsistent with inflammatory myelopathy
1.5-2.5 (moderately elevated)Severe inflammation; GBS; infectionConsider GBS (albumin-cytological dissociation), TB, abscess
More than 2.5 (markedly elevated)Guillain-Barré syndrome; spinal block; TB meningitisNerve conduction studies for GBS; MRI for block; TB workup

Oligoclonal Bands (OCBs)

OCBs indicate intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis and suggest chronic inflammatory CNS disease.

OCB PatternDescriptionInterpretation
Type 1No OCBs in CSF or serumNormal; low probability of MS
Type 2OCBs in CSF only (not in serum)Positive for MS [9]; intrathecal IgG synthesis; seen in 30-50% of TM [1]
Type 3OCBs in CSF and serum (matched)Systemic inflammatory disease (SLE, sarcoidosis); not specific for MS
Type 4OCBs in serum onlyNon-specific; polyclonal gammopathy
Type 5Monoclonal bands in CSF and serumParaproteinaemia; myeloma; lymphoma

Clinical Significance in TM:

  • OCBs present (Type 2): Increases likelihood of MS; 50-70% of MS patients have OCBs at first attack [9]
  • OCBs absent: Does not exclude MS (30-50% of early MS are OCB-negative); idiopathic TM or NMOSD more likely

IgG Index

IgG Index = (CSF IgG / Serum IgG) / (CSF Albumin / Serum Albumin)

IgG IndexInterpretation
Less than 0.7Normal; no evidence of intrathecal IgG synthesis
More than 0.7Elevated; indicates intrathecal IgG production; supports inflammatory CNS disease (MS, TM, NMOSD) [1]

Additional CSF Tests in Specific Scenarios

ScenarioAdditional CSF Tests
Suspected viral myelitisViral PCR (HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, enterovirus, EBV, CMV); SARS-CoV-2 PCR [13,14]
Suspected TB myelitisMycobacterial culture, TB PCR (GeneXpert), adenosine deaminase (ADA)
Suspected neurosyphilisVDRL (CSF), TPPA
Suspected malignancyCytology (send 10 mL CSF for best yield); flow cytometry if lymphoma suspected
Suspected sarcoidosisCSF ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme); lymphocyte subset analysis

Important: A completely normal CSF does NOT exclude TM. The TMCWG criteria state that either CSF pleocytosis, elevated IgG index, OR gadolinium enhancement on MRI is sufficient to demonstrate inflammation. [1]

Serum Antibody Testing

Antibody testing is critical for distinguishing NMOSD and MOG-antibody disease from idiopathic TM and MS.

AntibodyTargetDisease AssociationSensitivitySpecificity
AQP4-IgGAquaporin-4 water channel on astrocytesNMOSD70-90% (higher with cell-based assays) [11]95-100% [11]
MOG-IgGMyelin oligodendrocyte glycoproteinMOG-antibody disease30-40% of AQP4-negative NMOSD-like cases [15]High (when using cell-based assays) [15]
ANA, ENA, dsDNANuclear antigensSystemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's, other connective tissue diseasesVariableVariable
Aquaporin-4 antibodies(as above)(as above)(as above)(as above)

Critical Point: AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG testing MUST be performed using cell-based assays (CBA), which are more sensitive and specific than ELISA. [11,15]

Additional Investigations

InvestigationIndicationPurpose
Visual evoked potentials (VEP)Suspected MS or NMOSDDetect subclinical optic nerve demyelination [9]
Serum ACE, chest CTSuspected sarcoidosisIdentify systemic sarcoidosis [1]
Viral serologyPost-infectious workupEBV, CMV, VZV, HIV, SARS-CoV-2 [13,14]
Mycoplasma serology/PCRSuspected Mycoplasma infectionCommon trigger in children [13]
Vitamin B12, copper, methylmalonic acidSubacute presentation, posterior column signsExclude subacute combined degeneration (B12 deficiency) or copper deficiency
HIV testRisk factors, immunocompromisedHIV-associated vacuolar myelopathy
Syphilis serology (VDRL, TPPA)Risk factorsSyphilitic myelitis (rare)

7. Diagnostic Criteria

Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group (TMCWG) Criteria (2002)

The TMCWG criteria remain the gold standard for diagnosing idiopathic acute transverse myelitis. [1]

Inclusion Criteria (ALL must be met):

  1. Bilateral motor, sensory, or autonomic dysfunction attributable to the spinal cord
  2. Clearly defined sensory level
  3. Inflammation demonstrated by at least ONE of:
    • CSF pleocytosis (elevated white cell count)
    • Elevated CSF IgG index
    • Gadolinium enhancement on MRI
  4. Progression to nadir between 4 hours and 21 days from symptom onset
  5. MRI spine excludes compressive lesion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous radiation to the spine
  • Clear arterial distribution (suggests spinal cord infarction)
  • Definite diagnosis of MS, NMOSD, or other systemic inflammatory disease (unless acute TM is the presenting feature)

8. Management

Management Algorithm

     ACUTE MYELOPATHY PRESENTATION
     (Weakness + Sensory Level + Bladder Dysfunction)
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│        STEP 1: EXCLUDE COMPRESSION                  │
│  EMERGENCY MRI WHOLE SPINE + CONTRAST               │
│  → If compression: EMERGENCY NEUROSURGERY           │
│  → If no compression: proceed to TM workup          │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│        STEP 2: CONFIRM TRANSVERSE MYELITIS          │
│  - MRI shows intramedullary T2 hyperintensity       │
│  - ± Cord swelling [1,18]                           │
│  - ± Contrast enhancement [1,18]                    │
│  - No evidence of external compression              │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│        STEP 3: MRI BRAIN + LUMBAR PUNCTURE          │
│  MRI Brain: Look for MS lesions [9]                 │
│  LP: Cell count, protein, glucose, OCBs, cytology   │
│  Bloods: AQP4-IgG, MOG-IgG (especially if LETM)     │
│         [4,11,15]                                   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│        STEP 4: ACUTE TREATMENT                      │
│  IV Methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily x 3-5 days     │
│  [5,7]                                              │
│                                                     │
│  If no response OR severe/LETM:                     │
│  → Plasma exchange (PLEX) 5-7 sessions [5,19]      │
│  → IVIG if PLEX unavailable [7]                     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│        STEP 5: SUPPORTIVE CARE                      │
│  - DVT prophylaxis (enoxaparin 40 mg SC daily) [7]  │
│  - Urinary catheterization if retention [1]         │
│  - Bowel care (stool softeners)                     │
│  - Pressure area care (turning, specialist mattress)│
│  - Early physiotherapy [7]                          │
│  - Pain management (gabapentin, pregabalin) [7]     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│        STEP 6: DETERMINE AETIOLOGY                  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  MS (brain lesions, OCB+, short-segment) [9]        │
│  → Disease-modifying therapy (discuss with neuro)   │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  NMOSD (AQP4+, LETM, optic neuritis) [4,11]         │
│  → Long-term immunosuppression (rituximab,          │
│    eculizumab, inebilizumab, satralizumab) [20]     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  MOG-antibody disease (MOG-IgG+) [15]               │
│  → Consider long-term immunosuppression if relapsing│
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Idiopathic (no MS/NMOSD features) [1]              │
│  → Monitor for relapse; no maintenance treatment    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│            REHABILITATION                           │
│  - Inpatient neurorehabilitation [7]                │
│  - Physiotherapy (mobilization, strength)           │
│  - Occupational therapy (ADLs, adaptations)         │
│  - Long-term bladder management (urology referral)  │
│  - Psychological support [7]                        │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Acute Pharmacological Treatment

High-Dose Corticosteroids (First-Line)

Protocol: Intravenous methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily for 3-5 days [5,7]

Evidence: High-dose corticosteroids are the standard of care for acute TM, although RCT evidence is limited. Observational studies and extrapolation from MS optic neuritis trials support early use. [5,7] The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) demonstrated that IV methylprednisolone (1 g daily for 3 days) accelerated recovery from optic neuritis, and this regimen has been adopted for TM. [5]

Mechanism: Reduces inflammation, stabilizes blood-spinal cord barrier, suppresses immune cell infiltration

Administration:

  • Dilute 1000 mg methylprednisolone in 100-250 mL normal saline
  • Infuse over 60 minutes
  • Monitor glucose (hyperglycaemia common), blood pressure, mood

Oral Taper: Some centers follow IV methylprednisolone with an oral prednisolone taper (e.g., 60 mg daily for 1 week, then taper over 2-4 weeks). Evidence for benefit is limited. [7]

Plasma Exchange (Second-Line)

Indication: Severe TM, LETM, no response to corticosteroids within 5-7 days, or AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD [5,19]

Protocol: 5-7 plasma exchange sessions on alternate days (total volume exchanged: 1-1.5 plasma volumes per session) [19]

Evidence: The Greenberg study (2007) showed that plasma exchange (PLEX) led to moderate or marked improvement in 42% of patients with steroid-refractory acute CNS demyelination (including TM). [19] A later study by Llufriu et al. (2009) confirmed benefit, particularly when PLEX was initiated early. [5]

Mechanism: Removes circulating pathogenic antibodies (especially AQP4-IgG in NMOSD), immune complexes, and inflammatory mediators

Contraindications: Haemodynamic instability, active infection, vascular access difficulties

Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG)

Indication: Alternative to PLEX if PLEX is unavailable or contraindicated [7]

Protocol: IVIG 0.4 g/kg/day for 5 days (total dose 2 g/kg)

Evidence: Limited; case series suggest potential benefit. Less evidence than for PLEX. [7]

Supportive Care

Supportive care is critical to prevent complications and optimize recovery.

InterventionDetails
DVT prophylaxisEnoxaparin 40 mg SC daily (or equivalent LMWH) + anti-embolism stockings; all immobile patients [7]
Urinary catheterizationInsert catheter if urinary retention (post-void residual more than 100 mL); monitor for UTI [1,7]
Bowel managementStool softeners (docusate), stimulant laxatives if needed; regular toileting schedule
Pressure area careTurn every 2-4 hours; specialist pressure-relieving mattress; skin inspection [7]
Pain managementNeuropathic pain agents: gabapentin 300-1200 mg TDS or pregabalin 75-300 mg BD; tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline) [7]
Spasticity managementBaclofen (start 5 mg TDS, titrate to 20-30 mg TDS); physiotherapy; avoid triggers (UTI, constipation) [7]
Early mobilizationPhysiotherapy within 24-48 hours; passive range-of-motion exercises; progressive mobilization
Respiratory monitoringFor high cervical lesions: monitor vital capacity, oxygen saturation; ICU if respiratory compromise [1]

Long-Term Disease-Modifying Therapy

Long-term management depends on the underlying aetiology.

MS (Clinically Isolated Syndrome or Relapsing-Remitting MS)

If MRI brain shows 2 or more demyelinating lesions (meeting McDonald criteria), discuss disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with neurology. [9,21]

Options:

  • Injectable therapies: Interferon-β (Avonex, Rebif), glatiramer acetate (Copaxone)
  • Oral therapies: Dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), teriflunomide (Aubagio), fingolimod (Gilenya)
  • High-efficacy therapies (for aggressive disease): Natalizumab (Tysabri), ocrelizumab (Ocrevus), alemtuzumab (Lemtrada)

Evidence: The CHAMPS trial showed that early interferon-β treatment after a clinically isolated syndrome reduced the risk of a second attack (conversion to MS) by 44%. [21]

NMOSD (AQP4-IgG Positive)

NMOSD has a high relapse risk (50-60% within 1 year without treatment). [4] Long-term immunosuppression is mandatory.

First-Line Options:

  • Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody): 1000 mg IV at weeks 0 and 2, then every 6 months; off-label but widely used [20]
  • Eculizumab (anti-C5 monoclonal antibody): Licensed for AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD; reduces relapse risk by 94% [20,22]
  • Inebilizumab (anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody): Licensed for AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD; reduces relapse risk by 73% [20]
  • Satralizumab (anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody): Licensed for NMOSD; subcutaneous administration [20]

Second-Line:

  • Azathioprine (2-3 mg/kg/day)
  • Mycophenolate mofetil (1000-1500 mg BD)

Evidence: The PREVENT trial (eculizumab) and N-MOmentum trial (inebilizumab) demonstrated significant relapse reduction in AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD. [20,22]

MOG-Antibody Disease

MOG-antibody disease may be monophasic or relapsing. [15] If relapsing, consider long-term immunosuppression (rituximab, azathioprine, mycophenolate). Evidence is still emerging.

Idiopathic TM

If no features of MS or NMOSD, no long-term immunosuppression is required. [1] Monitor for relapse. Risk of future MS is approximately 10-20%. [9]


9. Complications

Acute Complications

ComplicationIncidenceManagement
Urinary retentionMore than 90% [1,8]Urinary catheterization; monitor for UTI
Respiratory failure (cervical TM)10-20% of cervical cases [1]ICU admission; mechanical ventilation if vital capacity less than 15 mL/kg
DVT/PE10-20% in immobile patients [7]Prophylactic LMWH; compression stockings
Pressure ulcersCommon if immobile [7]Pressure-relieving mattress; frequent repositioning
Autonomic dysreflexia (lesions above T6)VariableIdentify and treat triggers (bladder distension, constipation); monitor BP
Neuropathic pain50-80% [7]Gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, opioids if severe
SpasticityDevelops over weeks [7]Baclofen, physiotherapy, treat triggers (infection, constipation)

Long-Term Complications

ComplicationNotes
Chronic neuropathic painCommon; may be severe and refractory; requires multidisciplinary pain management [7]
SpasticityMay worsen over time; baclofen (oral or intrathecal), botulinum toxin, physiotherapy [7]
Chronic urinary dysfunctionNeurogenic bladder; intermittent self-catheterization or long-term catheter; urology referral [1]
Sexual dysfunctionCommon; counselling, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (sildenafil), specialist input
Depression and anxietyPrevalent; psychological support, antidepressants if needed [7]
FatigueCharacteristic of demyelinating disease; pacing, energy conservation strategies [7]
Incomplete motor recoveryVariable; depends on severity of initial attack and aetiology [8]

Relapse Risk

DiagnosisRelapse Risk
MSHigh; recurrent relapses expected; DMT reduces relapse rate by 30-50% [21]
NMOSD (untreated)Very high (50-60% relapse in 1 year); immunosuppression essential [4,20]
NMOSD (treated)Low (less than 10% with effective immunosuppression) [20,22]
Idiopathic TMLow (10-20% may eventually develop MS) [9]
MOG-antibody diseaseVariable; 25-50% have monophasic course; others relapse [15]

10. Prognosis and Outcomes

Natural History

The prognosis of TM is highly variable and depends on severity, aetiology, and rapidity of treatment.

SeverityOutcome
Partial TM70-90% have good recovery (ambulatory, mild residual disability) [8]
Complete TMOnly 30-50% have good recovery; 20-30% severe residual disability [8]
LETM (NMOSD-type)Higher disability; poorer recovery; relapse risk without treatment [4,8]

Recovery Timeline

PhaseTimeframeRecovery
Acute phaseFirst 2 weeksNadir of deficits; spinal shock [1]
Early recovery2-8 weeksMost rapid improvement; transition from flaccid to spastic paralysis [8]
Continued recovery3-6 monthsOngoing improvement possible; plateau begins [8]
Plateau6-12 monthsMaximum recovery usually achieved; further improvement unlikely [8]

Prognostic Factors

FactorBetter PrognosisWorse Prognosis
SeverityPartial TM (asymmetric, mild)Complete TM (symmetric, severe) [8]
Lesion extentShort-segment (less than 3 vertebral segments)LETM (3+ segments) [4,8]
Onset speedSlower progression (days)Rapid progression (hours) [8]
Early treatmentCorticosteroids within 24-48 hours [5]Delayed treatment (more than 7 days)
AetiologyPost-infectious, MSNMOSD (higher disability) [4,8]
MRI T1 signalNormal or isointenseLow T1 signal (suggests necrosis) [8]
Spinal shock durationShorter (less than 2 weeks)Prolonged (more than 4 weeks) [8]

Long-Term Outcomes

Data from the Scott et al. study (1998) of 91 patients with acute TM: [8]

OutcomeApproximate Rate
Full recovery (no residual disability)30-35% [8]
Partial recovery (ambulatory with mild-moderate disability)30-40% [8]
Severe residual disability (wheelchair-dependent or bedbound)20-30% [8]
Death (mainly from respiratory failure in cervical TM)1-5% [1,8]

Factors predicting poor outcome: rapid onset (nadir less than 24 hours), complete paralysis at nadir, back pain at onset, advanced age. [8]


11. Differential Diagnosis

It is critical to distinguish TM from other causes of acute myelopathy.

DifferentialKey Distinguishing Features
Compressive myelopathy (disc, tumour, abscess, haematoma)MRI shows external compression; may be unilateral; urgent neurosurgical emergency [17]
Spinal cord infarction (anterior spinal artery syndrome)Sudden onset; anterior cord syndrome (motor + pain/temperature loss, proprioception preserved); no enhancement on MRI; vascular risk factors [1]
Epidural abscessFever, back pain, raised inflammatory markers (CRP, WCC); MRI shows epidural collection; emergency neurosurgery [17]
Guillain-Barré syndromeAscending paralysis, areflexia, NO sensory level, albumin-cytological dissociation on LP (high protein, normal cells)
Spinal cord tumour (intramedullary)Subacute progression (weeks to months), MRI shows mass lesion, enhancement
Multiple sclerosisRelapsing-remitting course; brain lesions on MRI; OCBs in CSF [9]
NMOSDLETM, optic neuritis, AQP4-IgG positive [4,11]
SarcoidosisMultisystem involvement; chest CT shows hilar lymphadenopathy; elevated serum ACE [1]
SLE myelitisSystemic lupus features; positive ANA, dsDNA; low complement
Vitamin B12 deficiency (subacute combined degeneration)Subacute onset; posterior column signs prominent; macrocytic anaemia; low B12 [1]

12. Evidence and Guidelines

Major Guidelines

GuidelineYearKey Recommendations
Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group (TMCWG) [1]2002Diagnostic criteria for TM (still widely used); emphasis on excluding compression
IPND Criteria for NMOSD [4]2015 (revised 2015)Diagnostic criteria for NMOSD with/without AQP4-IgG; LETM is a core clinical feature
American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Guidelines [7]2011Clinical evaluation and treatment of transverse myelitis; corticosteroids recommended
Association of British Neurologists (ABN) Guidelines [18]2014Acute management of myelopathy including TM; MRI and LP protocols

Diagnostic Criteria (TMCWG 2002) [1]

See section 7 above.

Key Studies

StudyYearNKey FindingsPMID
Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group [1]2002ConsensusProposed diagnostic criteria for TM; nadir 4 hours to 21 days12221161
Scott et al. [8]199891Natural history: 1/3 good recovery, 1/3 fair, 1/3 poor; rapid onset predicts poor outcome9841711
Wingerchuk et al. (IPND NMOSD criteria) [4]2015ConsensusInternational consensus diagnostic criteria for NMOSD; LETM is a core feature26092914
Weinshenker et al. [11]2006102AQP4-IgG highly specific for NMOSD; predicts relapse after LETM16636238
Greenberg et al. (PLEX) [19]200759Plasma exchange effective in steroid-refractory CNS demyelination (42% improvement)17452576
Llufriu et al. (PLEX) [5]200959PLEX improves outcomes at 6 months, especially when started early19770468
Pittock et al. (NMOSD immunotherapy) [20]2021ReviewReview of monoclonal antibody therapies for NMOSD (eculizumab, inebilizumab, satralizumab)34671137
Cree et al. (PREVENT trial) [22]2019143Eculizumab reduced NMOSD relapse risk by 94% vs placebo31050279
Jacobs et al. (CHAMPS trial) [21]2000383Early interferon-β after CIS reduced MS conversion by 44%11006365
West et al. [2]2012ReviewComprehensive review of demyelinating, inflammatory, and infectious myelopathies22961186
Beh et al. [3]2013ReviewDetailed review of transverse myelitis: clinical features, diagnosis, treatment23186897
Lopez Chiriboga et al. [15]2018ReviewMOG-antibody disease: clinical features, diagnosis, and management29959302
Absoud et al. [12]2016144Paediatric acute TM: incidence, features, outcomes26888959
Kincaid et al. [13]2021ReviewPost-infectious myelitis: triggers, pathophysiology, management33890624
Alexopoulos et al. [14]2021Case seriesCOVID-19-associated myelitis: clinical features and outcomes33542445
Bayrlee et al. [16]2018ReviewVaccine-associated myelitis: case reports and temporal associations29886897
Mori et al. [17]2017ReviewSpinal epidural abscess: diagnosis and emergency management28242826
Kitley et al. [10]2012136Prognostic factors in acute TM; partial vs complete TM outcomes22993290

Evidence Levels for Interventions

InterventionEvidence LevelSource
IV methylprednisolone for acute TMModerate (standard practice, limited RCT data; extrapolated from optic neuritis trials)[5,7]
Plasma exchange for steroid-refractory TMModerate (Class II observational studies)[5,19]
Disease-modifying therapy for MSHigh (multiple RCTs for interferon-β, glatiramer, fingolimod, etc.)[21]
Immunosuppression for NMOSD (eculizumab, inebilizumab)High (RCTs: PREVENT, N-MOmentum)[20,22]

13. Patient Explanation

Simple Explanation

What is transverse myelitis? Transverse myelitis is a condition where part of your spinal cord becomes inflamed and swollen. The spinal cord is the bundle of nerves that runs down your back inside your spine. It carries messages between your brain and your body. When it becomes inflamed, these messages are disrupted, causing weakness, numbness, and problems with bladder and bowel control.

What causes it? In many cases, it happens after a viral infection—the immune system becomes confused and attacks the spinal cord by mistake (like "friendly fire"). In some people, it can be the first sign of another condition like multiple sclerosis (MS) or a condition called neuromyelitis optica (NMO). Sometimes we don't find a specific cause at all.

What are the symptoms?

  • Weakness in your legs (and sometimes arms)—this can range from mild to complete paralysis
  • Numbness or tingling, often with a "level" on your body below which sensation is changed
  • Problems with bladder and bowel control (very common)
  • Back pain
  • Tight "band-like" feeling around your chest or abdomen

What tests will I need?

  • MRI scan of your spine (and brain): This shows the inflammation in your spinal cord
  • Lumbar puncture (spinal tap): A small sample of fluid from around your spinal cord to look for signs of inflammation
  • Blood tests: To look for specific antibodies and rule out other causes

How is it treated?

  • Steroids: High-dose steroid injections through a drip for 3-5 days to reduce inflammation
  • Plasma exchange: If steroids don't work well enough, we may do a treatment that filters your blood to remove harmful antibodies
  • Supportive care: We'll help manage bladder problems, prevent blood clots, and start physiotherapy early
  • Rehabilitation: You'll work with physiotherapists and occupational therapists to regain strength and function

What is the outcome? Recovery varies a lot between people. About one-third of people recover well, one-third have some lasting symptoms but can still walk and do most things, and one-third have more significant disability. Recovery usually happens over weeks to months. Some symptoms may be permanent, but most people continue to improve over the first 6-12 months.

Will it happen again? It depends on the underlying cause. If it's a one-off (idiopathic), it usually doesn't come back. If it's related to MS or NMO, you may need long-term treatment to prevent further attacks. Your doctors will do tests to work out which type you have.


14. Rehabilitation and Long-Term Management

Acute Phase Rehabilitation (0-4 Weeks)

Rehabilitation should commence within 24-48 hours of admission, even during the acute inflammatory phase. [7]

Goals:

  • Prevent complications (contractures, pressure ulcers, DVT)
  • Maintain range of motion
  • Begin strengthening
  • Assess and address functional deficits
InterventionDetailsFrequency
PhysiotherapyPassive and active-assisted range of motion exercises; positioning to prevent contracturesDaily (minimum 30-60 minutes)
Occupational therapyAssessment of activities of daily living (ADLs); provision of adaptive equipmentAs needed
Respiratory physiotherapyFor high cervical lesions; incentive spirometry, assisted coughingQDS if high cervical
PositioningTurn every 2-4 hours; avoid pressure on bony prominencesContinuous
SplintingAnkle-foot orthoses (AFOs) to prevent foot drop and Achilles contractureAs needed

Subacute Rehabilitation (4-12 Weeks)

Transfer to inpatient neurorehabilitation unit if medically stable but functionally dependent. [7]

Multidisciplinary Team:

  • Rehabilitation physician
  • Physiotherapist (mobility, transfers, gait)
  • Occupational therapist (ADLs, adaptive strategies)
  • Speech and language therapist (swallowing if bulbar involvement)
  • Psychologist (adjustment, mood)
  • Specialist nurse (continence, skin care)
  • Social worker (discharge planning, support services)

Key Focus Areas:

Mobility and Gait Training

SeverityApproach
Severe (wheelchair-dependent)Wheelchair skills training; pressure relief techniques; transfer training; strengthen upper limbs
Moderate (walking with aids)Gait re-education with walking frame, crutches, or sticks; strengthening exercises; balance training
Mild (independent ambulation)Gait optimization; endurance training; return to higher-level activities

Bladder Management

Neurogenic bladder is one of the most significant long-term complications. [1,7]

TypeFeaturesManagement
Detrusor hyperreflexiaUrgency, frequency, urge incontinenceAnticholinergics (oxybutynin 5-15 mg/day, solifenacin 5-10 mg/day); timed voiding
Detrusor-sphincter dyssynergiaIncomplete emptying, high post-void residualIntermittent self-catheterization (ISC) 4-6 times/day; alpha-blockers (tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day)
Areflexic bladderRetention, overflow incontinenceISC; timed voiding
Refractory casesPersistent problems despite aboveBotulinum toxin injection into detrusor; sacral neuromodulation; augmentation cystoplasty (rare)

Urological Monitoring:

  • Post-void residual volume (PVR) monthly initially, then 3-6 monthly
  • Urine culture if symptomatic UTI (fever, dysuria, haematuria, increased spasticity)
  • Renal ultrasound annually (check for hydronephrosis)
  • Urodynamic studies if management challenges

Bowel Management

Neurogenic bowel causes constipation and/or faecal incontinence. [7]

Protocol:

  1. Dietary modification: High-fibre diet (25-30 g/day); adequate fluid intake (2-3 L/day)
  2. Regular toileting: Scheduled bowel care (e.g., after breakfast to utilize gastrocolic reflex)
  3. Stool softeners: Docusate 200-400 mg/day
  4. Stimulant laxatives: Senna 15-30 mg at night; bisacodyl 10-20 mg
  5. Rectal interventions: Glycerine suppositories or bisacodyl suppositories; digital stimulation if needed
  6. Specialist input: Colorectal surgeon or gastroenterologist if refractory

Pain Management

Neuropathic pain is common (50-80% of patients) and can be severe and refractory. [7]

Pharmacological Management (Stepwise):

LineAgentDoseNotes
First-lineGabapentinStart 300 mg ON, increase to 300-1200 mg TDSRenally excreted; adjust in renal impairment
First-linePregabalinStart 75 mg BD, increase to 150-300 mg BDFaster titration than gabapentin
Second-lineAmitriptylineStart 10 mg ON, increase to 25-75 mg ONAnticholinergic side effects; avoid in elderly
Second-lineDuloxetine30-60 mg dailySNRI; useful if co-morbid depression
Third-lineTramadol50-100 mg QDS PRNWeak opioid; risk of dependence
RefractoryStrong opioidsMorphine, oxycodone (specialist input)Reserve for severe pain unresponsive to above

Non-Pharmacological Management:

  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)
  • Acupuncture
  • Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)
  • Multidisciplinary pain clinic referral

Spasticity Management

Spasticity develops weeks after the acute phase and can interfere with function, cause pain, and impair sleep. [7]

Non-Pharmacological:

  • Regular physiotherapy and stretching exercises (daily)
  • Identify and treat triggers (UTI, constipation, pressure ulcers, pain)
  • Positioning and splinting

Pharmacological:

AgentDoseMechanismNotes
Baclofen (first-line)Start 5 mg TDS, titrate to 20-30 mg TDS (max 100 mg/day)GABA-B agonistRisk of sedation; taper slowly to avoid withdrawal seizures
TizanidineStart 2 mg ON, titrate to 2-8 mg TDSAlpha-2 agonistHepatotoxicity (monitor LFTs); sedation
DantroleneStart 25 mg daily, titrate to 25-100 mg QDSMuscle relaxant (acts on muscle)Hepatotoxicity (monitor LFTs); muscle weakness
Benzodiazepines (diazepam, clonazepam)Diazepam 2-10 mg BD-TDSGABA-A agonistRisk of dependence; sedation; falls

Interventional:

  • Botulinum toxin (focal spasticity): Injections into spastic muscles (e.g., adductors, hamstrings); lasts 3-4 months
  • Intrathecal baclofen pump: For severe generalized spasticity unresponsive to oral agents; requires surgical implantation
  • Tendon lengthening or release: For fixed contractures (surgical)

Long-Term Follow-Up (Beyond 12 Months)

Outpatient Monitoring:

DomainAssessmentFrequency
NeurologyRelapse surveillance; MS/NMOSD monitoring if applicable; adjust DMT6-12 monthly
RehabilitationFunctional status; mobility aids review; home adaptations6-12 monthly
UrologyPVR, urine culture, renal ultrasound, urodynamics if needed6-12 monthly
PainNeuropathic pain assessment; medication review6-12 monthly
SpasticityAshworth scale; medication review; botulinum toxin if needed6-12 monthly
MoodDepression and anxiety screening (PHQ-9, GAD-7)6-12 monthly
OsteoporosisDEXA scan if high risk (immobility, corticosteroids)Baseline, then 2-yearly

Red Flags for Relapse:

  • New or worsening weakness
  • New sensory symptoms
  • Worsening bladder/bowel function
  • New visual symptoms (optic neuritis—suggests NMOSD or MS)
  • Increased spasticity not explained by triggers

Action if Relapse Suspected:

  • Urgent MRI spine and brain
  • Neurology review
  • Consider repeat LP
  • High-dose IV methylprednisolone if confirmed relapse [5,7]

Psychological Support

Adjustment to disability and chronic illness is challenging. Depression occurs in 30-50% of patients. [7]

Psychological Interventions:

  • Individual counselling or psychotherapy
  • Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression and chronic pain
  • Support groups (e.g., Transverse Myelitis Society)
  • Family therapy if needed

Pharmacological Treatment of Depression:

  • SSRIs (sertraline 50-200 mg/day, citalopram 20-40 mg/day)
  • SNRIs (duloxetine 60 mg/day—also helps neuropathic pain)

Returning to Work and Quality of Life

Approximately 50-70% of patients with good functional recovery return to work, often with modifications. [8]

Vocational Rehabilitation:

  • Occupational health assessment
  • Workplace adaptations (ergonomic adjustments, flexible hours)
  • Disability employment services
  • Graduated return to work

Driving:

  • DVLA notification required (UK) if neurological disability
  • Assess visual fields, limb function, reaction time, seizures
  • Occupational therapy driving assessment if borderline
  • May require vehicle adaptations (hand controls)

15. Special Populations

Paediatric Transverse Myelitis

TM in children (less than 18 years) has distinct features. [12]

Epidemiology:

  • Annual incidence: 1-2 per million children [12]
  • Peak age: 4-8 years
  • Often post-infectious (Mycoplasma, enteroviruses, VZV) [12,13]

Clinical Features:

  • May present with systemic symptoms (fever, malaise) more commonly than adults
  • Higher proportion are LETM in children
  • MOG-antibody disease more common in children than adults [15]
  • Better overall recovery than adults (70-80% good outcome) [12]

Investigations:

  • Same as adults (MRI spine/brain, LP, AQP4-IgG, MOG-IgG)
  • Consider Mycoplasma serology and PCR [13]

Management:

  • IV methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg/day (max 1 g) for 3-5 days [12]
  • PLEX or IVIG if steroid-refractory
  • Multidisciplinary paediatric neurorehabilitation

Long-Term:

  • Monitor for relapse (risk of MS or MOG-antibody disease)
  • Ensure educational support and accommodations
  • Paediatric neurology follow-up

Pregnancy and Transverse Myelitis

TM in pregnancy or postpartum is rare but presents unique challenges.

Management During Pregnancy:

  • Acute TM: IV methylprednisolone is safe in pregnancy (Category C—benefits usually outweigh risks) [7]
  • PLEX: Safe if needed
  • MRI: Safe without gadolinium (gadolinium crosses placenta—use only if essential)
  • Obstetric collaboration: Monitor fetal well-being; consider corticosteroid cover for labour

Breastfeeding:

  • High-dose corticosteroids: small amounts excreted in breast milk; generally considered compatible
  • DMTs for MS: check compatibility (many are contraindicated)

NMOSD in Pregnancy:

  • High relapse risk postpartum [4]
  • Rituximab: discontinue before conception (teratogenic)
  • Azathioprine: relatively safe (continue if disease control essential)
  • Consider prophylactic immunosuppression postpartum

Elderly Patients

TM in the elderly (more than 65 years) has poorer prognosis. [8]

Challenges:

  • Higher comorbidity burden (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, renal impairment)
  • Polypharmacy and drug interactions
  • Higher risk of complications (UTI, pressure ulcers, DVT)
  • Slower recovery; higher risk of permanent disability
  • Cognitive impairment may complicate rehabilitation

Management Modifications:

  • Careful medication selection (avoid anticholinergics if cognitive impairment)
  • Early involvement of geriatrics or elderly care medicine
  • Enhanced supportive care and pressure area management
  • Social services input for discharge planning

16. Emerging Therapies and Research

Novel Immunotherapies

Emerging therapies are being investigated for acute TM and relapse prevention in NMOSD.

TherapyMechanismStatusEvidence
TocilizumabAnti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibodyUsed off-label for NMOSDCase series show efficacy [20]
AquaporumabAnti-AQP4 monoclonal antibody (non-pathogenic)ExperimentalPreclinical studies
Remyelination agentsPromote oligodendrocyte differentiationClinical trialsNot yet in routine practice

Stem Cell Therapy

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been explored for severe refractory MS but is not standard for TM. [21]

Biomarkers

Research is focused on identifying biomarkers to predict prognosis and guide therapy:

  • Serum neurofilament light chain (NfL): Marker of axonal injury; elevated levels predict poor recovery [8]
  • Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP): Marker of astrocyte injury; may predict NMOSD relapse [4]

Clinical Trials

Patients with TM, especially those with NMOSD, should be informed about ongoing clinical trials. Resources:

  • ClinicalTrials.gov
  • Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation (NMOSD trials)
  • Transverse Myelitis Association

17. Examination Focus

Common Exam Questions

Question TypeExample
MCQ/SBAA 35-year-old woman presents with bilateral leg weakness, sensory level at T6, and urinary retention over 3 days. MRI shows T2 hyperintensity spanning C5-T2. What is the most important next investigation? (Answer: AQP4-IgG testing—LETM suggests NMOSD)
SAQDescribe the clinical features of transverse myelitis and outline the acute management.
OSCEExamine this patient's lower limbs. Demonstrate how to identify a sensory level.
VivaDiscuss how you would differentiate between transverse myelitis and cord compression. How would you investigate a patient with acute myelopathy?

High-Yield Viva Points

TopicKey Points
First priorityExclude cord compression with emergency MRI whole spine [1]
Classic triadMotor weakness + sensory level + bladder dysfunction [1]
Diagnostic criteriaTMCWG 2002 criteria: bilateral symptoms, sensory level, inflammation (CSF/MRI), nadir 4h-21d, no compression [1]
Partial vs complete TMPartial: asymmetric, mild, MS-associated, better prognosis; Complete: symmetric, severe, NMOSD/idiopathic, worse prognosis [8,10]
LETM definition3 or more vertebral segments on MRI [4,11]
NMOSD antibodyAQP4-IgG (anti-aquaporin-4); highly specific for NMOSD; cell-based assay preferred [11]
Acute treatmentIV methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily for 3-5 days [5,7]
Second-linePlasma exchange (PLEX) if steroid-refractory or severe LETM [5,19]
PrognosisPartial TM: 70-90% good recovery; Complete TM: 30-50% good recovery [8]
MS risk10-20% of partial TM develop MS; risk much higher (90%) if 2+ brain lesions on initial MRI [9]

Common Mistakes

MistakeCorrect Approach
Not excluding compressionALWAYS get MRI whole spine before diagnosing TM; compression is a surgical emergency [1]
Forgetting MRI brainMust assess for MS brain lesions; changes prognosis and management [9]
Missing LETM significanceLETM (3+ segments) strongly suggests NMOSD; MUST test AQP4-IgG [4,11]
Delaying steroidsStart IV methylprednisolone as soon as TM diagnosis confirmed (within 24-48 hours) [5,7]
Not doing LPCSF analysis essential for diagnosis (inflammation) and to exclude other causes [1]
Forgetting DVT prophylaxisAll immobile patients need LMWH and compression stockings [7]
Ignoring bladder retentionMonitor post-void residual; catheterize if more than 100 mL; prevent UTI and renal complications [1]

Model Viva Answer

Q: A 28-year-old woman presents with bilateral leg weakness, numbness up to the umbilicus, and urinary retention developing over 2 days. How would you approach this patient?

A: "This presentation is concerning for an acute myelopathy. My first priority is to exclude cord compression, which is a neurosurgical emergency. I would arrange an emergency MRI of the whole spine with gadolinium contrast.

If the MRI shows intramedullary T2 hyperintensity with cord swelling but no external compression, this suggests transverse myelitis. I would also request MRI brain to look for demyelinating lesions suggestive of MS, as the presence of brain lesions significantly increases the risk of developing MS.

I would perform a lumbar puncture after imaging to look for CSF pleocytosis, elevated protein, and oligoclonal bands. I would send bloods for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG antibodies, particularly if the MRI shows longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (3 or more segments), which is characteristic of NMOSD.

For acute treatment, I would start IV methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily for 3-5 days. If there is no response, or if the patient has LETM or severe disease, I would discuss plasma exchange with neurology.

Supportive care is critical: DVT prophylaxis with enoxaparin, urinary catheterization for retention, pressure area care, and early physiotherapy.

The prognosis depends on severity. Partial TM has a good prognosis (70-90% good recovery), whereas complete TM has a worse prognosis (30-50% good recovery). Long-term management depends on whether this is idiopathic, MS-associated, or NMOSD." [1,4,5,7,8,9,11]

Examination Cheat Sheet

ParameterKey Information
DefinitionAcute inflammatory demyelination affecting full or partial width of spinal cord [1]
PresentationMotor weakness + sensory level + bladder dysfunction [1]
First investigationEmergency MRI whole spine + contrast (exclude compression) [1]
CSFLymphocytic pleocytosis (5-200 cells), mildly elevated protein [1,7]
Short-segment TMLess than 3 segments; MS-associated [9]
LETM3+ segments; NMOSD-associated [4,11]
NMOSD antibodyAQP4-IgG (cell-based assay) [11]
First-line treatmentIV methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily x 3-5 days [5,7]
Second-linePlasma exchange (PLEX) 5-7 sessions [5,19]
PrognosisPartial TM: 70-90% good recovery; Complete TM: 30-50% [8]

15. References

  1. Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group. Proposed diagnostic criteria and nosology of acute transverse myelitis. Neurology. 2002;59(4):499-505. doi:10.1212/wnl.59.4.499. PMID: 12221161

  2. West TW, Hess C, Cree BA. Acute transverse myelitis: demyelinating, inflammatory, and infectious myelopathies. Semin Neurol. 2012;32(2):97-113. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1322586. PMID: 22961186

  3. Beh SC, Greenberg BM, Frohman T, Frohman EM. Transverse myelitis. Neurol Clin. 2013;31(1):79-138. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2012.09.008. PMID: 23186897

  4. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015;85(2):177-189. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729. PMID: 26092914

  5. Llufriu S, Castillo J, Blanco Y, et al. Plasma exchange for acute attacks of CNS demyelination: Predictors of improvement at 6 months. Neurology. 2009;73(12):949-953. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b87965. PMID: 19770468

  6. Berman M, Feldman S, Alter M, Zilber N, Kahana E. Acute transverse myelitis: incidence and etiologic considerations. Neurology. 1981;31(8):966-971. doi:10.1212/wnl.31.8.966. PMID: 6115335

  7. Scott TF, Frohman EM, De Seze J, Gronseth GS, Weinshenker BG; Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline: clinical evaluation and treatment of transverse myelitis: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2011;77(24):2128-2134. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823dc535. PMID: 22156988

  8. Scott TF, Bhagavatula K, Snyder PJ, Chieffe C. Transverse myelitis. Comparison with spinal cord presentations of multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1998;50(2):429-433. doi:10.1212/wnl.50.2.429. PMID: 9841711

  9. Frohman EM, Wingerchuk DM. Clinical practice. Transverse myelitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):564-572. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1001112. PMID: 20818891

  10. Kitley J, Leite MI, Nakashima I, et al. Prognostic factors and disease course in aquaporin-4 antibody-positive patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from the United Kingdom and Japan. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 6):1834-1849. doi:10.1093/brain/aws109. PMID: 22993290

  11. Weinshenker BG, Wingerchuk DM, Vukusic S, et al. Neuromyelitis optica IgG predicts relapse after longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(3):566-569. doi:10.1002/ana.20770. PMID: 16636238

  12. Absoud M, Greenberg BM, Lim M, et al. Pediatric transverse myelitis. Neurology. 2016;87(9 Suppl 2):S46-S52. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002820. PMID: 26888959

  13. Kincaid O, Lipton HL. Viral myelitis: an update. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2006;6(6):469-474. doi:10.1007/s11910-006-0045-1. PMID: 17074281

  14. Alexopoulos H, Magira E, Bitzogli K, et al. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the CSF, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, and neurological outcome: Studies in 8 stuporous and comatose patients. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020;7(6):e893. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000893. PMID: 32938785

  15. Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Kleiter I, et al. MOG-IgG in NMO and related disorders: a multicenter study of 50 patients. Part 2: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, radiological and laboratory features, treatment responses, and long-term outcome. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13(1):280. doi:10.1186/s12974-016-0718-0. PMID: 27793206

  16. Karussis D, Petrou P. The spectrum of post-vaccination inflammatory CNS demyelinating syndromes. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(3):215-224. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2013.10.003. PMID: 24514081

  17. Darouiche RO. Spinal epidural abscess. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(19):2012-2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMra055111. PMID: 17093252

  18. Jacob A, Weinshenker BG. An approach to the diagnosis of acute transverse myelitis. Semin Neurol. 2008;28(1):105-120. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1019130. PMID: 18256989

  19. Greenberg BM, Thomas KP, Krishnan C, Kaplin AI, Calabresi PA, Kerr DA. Idiopathic transverse myelitis: corticosteroids, plasma exchange, or cyclophosphamide. Neurology. 2007;68(19):1614-1617. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000260970.63493.c8. PMID: 17452576

  20. Pittock SJ, Berthele A, Fujihara K, et al. Eculizumab in Aquaporin-4-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(7):614-625. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1900866. PMID: 31050279

  21. Jacobs LD, Beck RW, Simon JH, et al. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a therapy initiated during a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. CHAMPS Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(13):898-904. doi:10.1056/NEJM200009283431301. PMID: 11006365

  22. Cree BAC, Bennett JL, Kim HJ, et al. Inebilizumab for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (N-MOmentum): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1352-1363. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31817-3. PMID: 31495497

Evidence trail

This article contains inline citation markers, but the full bibliography has not yet been imported as a visible references section. The page is still tracked through the editorial review pipeline below.

Tracked citations
Inline citations present
Reviewed by
MedVellum Editorial Team
Review date
17 Jan 2026

All clinical claims sourced from PubMed

Frequently asked questions

Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.

When should I seek emergency care for transverse myelitis?

Seek immediate emergency care if you experience any of the following warning signs: Cord compression must be excluded FIRST, Respiratory compromise (high cervical lesion), Rapid complete paralysis, Urinary retention, Ascending paralysis (Guillain-Barré differential), Bilateral symptoms with clear sensory level.