Transverse Myelitis
The term "transverse" refers to inflammation spanning the full or partial width of the spinal cord, disrupting ascending and descending neural pathways. Prompt recognition and treatment are critical, as early...
Clinical board
A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.
Urgent signals
Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.
- Cord compression must be excluded FIRST
- Respiratory compromise (high cervical lesion)
- Rapid complete paralysis
- Urinary retention
Editorial and exam context
Reviewed by MedVellum Editorial Team · MedVellum Medical Education Platform
Credentials: MBBS, MRCP, Board Certified
Transverse Myelitis
1. Clinical Overview
Transverse myelitis (TM) is an acute inflammatory disorder of the spinal cord characterized by bilateral motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction below the level of the lesion. [1,2] It represents a heterogeneous group of conditions that may occur as an isolated, monophasic illness (idiopathic TM) or as the first presentation of multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), or other systemic inflammatory diseases. [1,3,4]
The term "transverse" refers to inflammation spanning the full or partial width of the spinal cord, disrupting ascending and descending neural pathways. [1] Prompt recognition and treatment are critical, as early intervention with high-dose corticosteroids can significantly improve outcomes. [5] The most important initial step is to exclude compressive myelopathy, which requires emergency surgical intervention.
Key Facts
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Definition | Acute inflammatory demyelination affecting the full or partial width of the spinal cord |
| Incidence | 1.34-4.6 per million per year [6] |
| Age distribution | Bimodal: 10-19 years and 30-39 years [6] |
| First priority | Exclude compressive myelopathy (emergency MRI) |
| Classic triad | Motor weakness + sensory level + bladder dysfunction |
| Onset | Symptoms progress over hours to days (nadir 4 hours to 21 days) [1] |
| Key investigation | MRI spine with contrast + MRI brain + lumbar puncture |
| Treatment | IV methylprednisolone 1000mg daily for 3-5 days [5,7] |
| Prognosis | Partial TM: 70-90% good recovery; Complete TM: 30-50% [8] |
| Association with MS | 10-20% of partial TM develop MS within 5 years [9] |
Clinical Pearls
Pearl 1: Exclude Compression First: THE FIRST STEP IS ALWAYS TO EXCLUDE CORD COMPRESSION. Compressive myelopathy from disc herniation, epidural abscess, tumour, or haematoma requires emergency surgical decompression. Get an urgent whole spine MRI before attributing symptoms to TM. Delay in recognizing compression can result in permanent paralysis.
Pearl 2: Partial vs Complete TM Matters: Partial TM (asymmetric, mild, affecting less than 2/3 of cord width on MRI) is associated with MS and has a better prognosis. Complete TM (symmetric, severe, full-width involvement) is more often idiopathic or associated with NMOSD and has worse prognosis. [8,10] This distinction guides both aetiological workup and prognostic counselling.
Pearl 3: Brain MRI is Mandatory: Always request MRI Brain in addition to MRI Spine. If brain lesions are present, the likelihood of developing clinically definite MS is significantly higher—up to 90% at 14 years with 2 or more brain lesions. [9] Brain imaging changes management and follow-up planning.
Pearl 4: LETM = Think NMOSD: Longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM—lesion spanning 3 or more vertebral segments) is the hallmark of NMOSD. [4,11] LETM should prompt immediate testing for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG antibodies. NMOSD requires different long-term management (rituximab, eculizumab, or inebilizumab) compared to MS.
Pearl 5: Bladder Dysfunction is Nearly Universal: Bladder dysfunction occurs in over 90% of patients with TM. [1,8] Urinary retention in the acute phase requires catheterization. Post-void residual volume should be monitored. Long-term bladder dysfunction is a major source of morbidity and requires specialist urological input.
Pearl 6: Sensory Level Assessment is Critical: The sensory level on examination localizes the lesion and guides imaging. Use a systematic approach: start testing from the sacral region and work upward using light touch and pinprick. Document the dermatome level precisely (e.g., T10 sensory level). The sensory level typically corresponds to the upper extent of the MRI lesion. [1]
2. Epidemiology
Incidence and Prevalence
Transverse myelitis is a rare condition with an estimated annual incidence of 1.34 to 4.6 per million population. [6] The true incidence may be underestimated due to diagnostic challenges and misclassification. Acute myelopathies from all causes (including compression, ischaemia, and inflammation) have a combined incidence of approximately 24.6 per million per year. [6]
| Population | Rate |
|---|---|
| Overall incidence (TM) | 1.34-4.6 per million per year [6] |
| Paediatric incidence | 1-2 per million per year [12] |
| All-cause acute myelopathy | 24.6 per million per year [6] |
Demographics
| Factor | Association |
|---|---|
| Age | Bimodal distribution: peak 10-19 years and 30-39 years [6] |
| Sex | No clear sex predominance in idiopathic TM; female predominance in MS-associated and NMOSD-associated TM [4,10] |
| Race | NMOSD more common in African, Asian, and Hispanic populations compared to Caucasians [4] |
| Seasonality | Post-infectious cases may cluster following viral epidemics [13] |
| Geography | MS-associated TM more common at higher latitudes; NMOSD incidence higher in certain ethnic groups regardless of location [4] |
Aetiological Breakdown
The aetiology of TM is heterogeneous. A significant proportion remains idiopathic despite extensive investigation.
| Aetiology | Proportion | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Idiopathic (post-infectious) | 30-50% | Diagnosis of exclusion; often preceded by viral illness [1,13] |
| Multiple sclerosis-associated | 20-30% | Especially partial TM; MRI brain lesions present [9] |
| NMOSD-associated | 10-20% | Longitudinally extensive TM (LETM); AQP4-IgG positive [4,11] |
| Post-infectious (identified agent) | 10-30% | EBV, CMV, VZV, Mycoplasma, HIV, COVID-19 [13,14] |
| Systemic autoimmune disease | 5-10% | SLE, Sjögren's, sarcoidosis, Behçet's [1] |
| MOG-antibody disease | 5-15% | Often paediatric; relapsing course; MOG-IgG positive [15] |
| Post-vaccination | Rare | Temporal association reported; causality unclear [16] |
| Spinal cord infarction | 5-10% | Anterior spinal artery syndrome; distinct clinical features |
3. Pathophysiology
Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms
Transverse myelitis results from immune-mediated inflammation of the spinal cord, leading to demyelination, oedema, axonal damage, and in severe cases, necrosis. The pathophysiology varies depending on the underlying aetiology.
Idiopathic and Post-Infectious TM
Step 1: Triggering Event
- Preceding viral or bacterial infection in 30-60% of cases [1,13]
- Common triggers: respiratory viruses (influenza, enterovirus), EBV, CMV, VZV, Mycoplasma pneumoniae [13]
- COVID-19 has been associated with post-infectious myelitis [14]
- Vaccination may rarely precede TM (temporal association, not proven causation) [16]
Step 2: Molecular Mimicry and Immune Activation
- Cross-reactivity between pathogen antigens and myelin or axonal proteins
- Activation of autoreactive T cells and B cells
- Production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ)
- Breakdown of the blood-spinal cord barrier [13]
Step 3: Inflammatory Demyelination
- Infiltration of lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ T cells) and macrophages into spinal cord parenchyma
- Myelin sheath destruction by macrophages
- Oedema and swelling of affected cord segments
- "Transverse" pattern: inflammation spans full or partial width of cord
- Cytokine-mediated injury to oligodendrocytes and axons [1,13]
Step 4: Neurological Dysfunction
- Disruption of ascending sensory tracts (spinothalamic, dorsal columns) → sensory level and paraesthesia
- Disruption of descending motor tracts (corticospinal tracts) → weakness or paralysis
- Disruption of autonomic pathways → bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction
- Acute phase: spinal shock with flaccid paralysis and areflexia [1]
Step 5: Resolution or Progression
- In monophasic idiopathic TM: inflammation resolves over weeks; remyelination and partial functional recovery occur in most cases [8]
- Residual disability depends on extent of axonal loss
- In MS-associated TM: risk of further relapses at different CNS sites [9]
- In NMOSD: high relapse risk without long-term immunosuppression [4,11]
NMOSD Pathophysiology
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has a distinct pathophysiology centered on antibody-mediated astrocyte injury. [4,11]
| Step | Detail |
|---|---|
| Antibody production | AQP4-IgG (anti-aquaporin-4) antibodies produced against astrocyte water channel protein [11] |
| Targeting | Antibodies bind aquaporin-4 on astrocyte foot processes at the blood-brain barrier and perivascular regions |
| Complement activation | Complement-mediated cytotoxicity causes astrocyte destruction [4] |
| Secondary demyelination | Loss of astrocyte support leads to oligodendrocyte injury and myelin loss |
| Necrosis | More severe tissue destruction than MS; cavitation and necrosis can occur [11] |
| Clinical phenotype | LETM (3+ segments), bilateral optic neuritis, area postrema syndrome, brainstem syndromes [4] |
Approximately 10-20% of NMOSD patients are AQP4-IgG negative; some of these patients are positive for MOG-IgG (myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies), which defines a separate disease entity (MOG-antibody disease). [15]
MS-Associated TM
In MS, TM represents a focal demyelinating attack within the spinal cord. [9] The pathophysiology involves:
- T-cell mediated autoimmune attack on myelin
- Oligodendrocyte injury and myelin breakdown
- Typically short-segment lesions (less than 2 vertebral segments)
- Partial cord involvement (asymmetric, dorsolateral)
- Less severe inflammation compared to NMOSD
Classification
| Type | Features | Association |
|---|---|---|
| Partial TM | Asymmetric, mild to moderate weakness, less than 2/3 cord width, 1-2 segment lesion on MRI | MS (high risk), better prognosis [8,10] |
| Complete TM | Symmetric, severe paralysis, full-width involvement on MRI | NMOSD, idiopathic, poorer prognosis [8] |
| Short-segment TM | Less than 3 vertebral segments on MRI | MS, idiopathic [9] |
| Longitudinally extensive TM (LETM) | 3 or more vertebral segments on MRI | NMOSD (classic), MOG-antibody disease, idiopathic [4,11,15] |
4. Clinical Presentation
Classic Triad
The classic presentation of TM consists of three core features:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Motor dysfunction | Bilateral weakness or paralysis below lesion level; may be asymmetric in partial TM |
| Sensory dysfunction | Sensory level with altered sensation (pain, temperature, light touch, vibration, proprioception) below lesion |
| Autonomic dysfunction | Bladder dysfunction (retention or incontinence), bowel dysfunction, sexual dysfunction |
All three features are typically present, although the degree may vary. [1,8]
Symptom Frequency
| Symptom | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Weakness (legs more than arms) | 90-100% [1,8] |
| Sensory disturbance | 80-95% [1,8] |
| Bladder dysfunction | 90-95% [1,8] |
| Back or radicular pain | 50-70% [8] |
| Band-like sensation around trunk | 50-60% [1] |
| Bowel dysfunction | 50-70% [1] |
| Sexual dysfunction | 50-70% |
| Lhermitte's sign (electric shock with neck flexion) | 20-40% [1] |
Onset and Progression
The Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group (TMCWG) diagnostic criteria specify that symptoms must progress to nadir (maximum deficit) between 4 hours and 21 days from onset. [1]
| Phase | Timeframe | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Prodrome | Days to weeks before | Back pain, fever, malaise (common in post-infectious TM) [13] |
| Onset | Hours to days | Symptoms develop rapidly; progressive weakness, ascending sensory level |
| Nadir | 4 hours to 21 days | Peak deficit reached [1] |
| Acute phase | First 2-4 weeks | Spinal shock: flaccid paralysis, areflexia, bladder retention |
| Recovery phase | Weeks to months | Variable; most improvement occurs in first 3-6 months [8] |
| Plateau | 6-12 months | Maximum recovery usually achieved; residual deficits may persist [8] |
Clinical Features by Spinal Level
The level of the spinal cord lesion determines the clinical presentation.
| Level | Motor Findings | Sensory Level | Autonomic Features | Other Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical (C1-C4) | Quadriparesis, respiratory compromise | Neck, shoulders, and below | Bladder/bowel dysfunction, orthostatic hypotension | Life-threatening; may require mechanical ventilation [1] |
| Cervical (C5-C8) | Upper and lower limb weakness | Arms and below (variable) | Bladder/bowel dysfunction | Hand weakness, absent triceps/biceps reflexes; Horner syndrome if T1 involved |
| Thoracic (T1-T12) | Paraparesis (legs only) | Trunk with clear horizontal sensory level (e.g., T4 = nipple line, T10 = umbilicus) | Bladder/bowel dysfunction | Most common level for TM [1]; band-like chest or abdominal pain |
| Lumbar/Conus (L1-S2) | Leg weakness, may have lower motor neuron signs (flaccid, areflexic) | Legs, saddle region | Bladder/bowel dysfunction prominent; saddle anaesthesia | Cauda equina syndrome if lower lumbar/sacral |
Detailed Sensory Level Determination
Accurate sensory level assessment is critical for lesion localization and guiding imaging.
Systematic Approach to Sensory Examination:
-
Preparation: Explain the procedure to the patient. Use a cotton wisp for light touch and a disposable pin for pinprick.
-
Start Distally: Begin testing at the feet or sacral region (S4-S5) and work upward.
-
Test Modalities:
- Light touch: Use cotton wisp; test symmetrically on both sides
- Pinprick (pain): Use disposable pin; ask "sharp or dull?"
- Temperature: Use tuning fork or cold object (tests spinothalamic tract)
- Vibration: Use 128 Hz tuning fork on bony prominences (tests dorsal columns)
- Proprioception: Move toe or finger up/down with eyes closed (tests dorsal columns)
-
Identify the Level: The sensory level is the most caudal dermatome with normal sensation. Mark the level where sensation changes from abnormal (below) to normal (above).
-
Document Precisely: Record the dermatome level (e.g., T6 sensory level to light touch and pinprick).
-
Consider Posterior Column Sparing: Some patients have preserved vibration and proprioception (posterior columns intact) but impaired pain and temperature (spinothalamic tracts affected).
Key Dermatome Landmarks:
| Dermatome | Anatomical Landmark |
|---|---|
| C5 | Lateral arm (deltoid region) |
| C6 | Thumb |
| C7 | Middle finger |
| C8 | Little finger |
| T4 | Nipple line |
| T6 | Xiphisternum |
| T10 | Umbilicus |
| L1 | Inguinal region |
| L4 | Medial ankle |
| L5 | Dorsum of foot |
| S1 | Lateral foot |
| S4-S5 | Perianal region (saddle area) |
Red Flags
Recognition of red flags is essential for timely diagnosis and management.
| Red Flag | Concern | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid onset severe weakness | Cord compression, infarction | Emergency MRI whole spine with contrast [1] |
| Fever + back pain + weakness | Spinal epidural abscess | Emergency MRI + blood cultures + neurosurgical consultation [17] |
| Sudden onset severe back pain | Spinal infarction, epidural haematoma | Emergency MRI |
| High cervical symptoms (C1-C4) | Respiratory compromise | Monitor respiratory function (vital capacity, oxygen saturation); ICU if needed [1] |
| Ascending paralysis | Guillain-Barré syndrome (differential) | LP for albuminocytological dissociation; nerve conduction studies |
| Previous visual symptoms | MS or NMOSD | MRI brain, visual evoked potentials, AQP4-IgG testing [4,9] |
| LETM on MRI | NMOSD | Test AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG; consider plasma exchange [4,11] |
5. Clinical Examination
General Inspection
- Respiratory distress: High cervical lesions (C3-C5 involvement) can cause diaphragmatic weakness and respiratory compromise [1]
- Posture: Patient may be bedbound or wheelchair-dependent
- Urinary catheter: Indicates urinary retention (very common in TM)
- Muscle wasting: Suggests subacute or chronic presentation
Motor Examination
The motor examination findings change over time due to spinal shock.
| Finding | Acute Phase (Spinal Shock) | Established Phase (Weeks Later) |
|---|---|---|
| Tone | Flaccid (reduced tone) | Spastic (increased tone) [1] |
| Power | Weakness or complete paralysis below lesion level | Weakness persists; may improve partially |
| Reflexes | Absent or reduced (areflexia) | Brisk, hyperreflexia [1] |
| Plantars | Initially flexor or equivocal | Upgoing (extensor, Babinski sign) [1] |
| Clonus | Absent initially | Present (sustained ankle clonus) |
Power Grading (MRC Scale):
- 0 = No movement
- 1 = Flicker of contraction
- 2 = Movement with gravity eliminated
- 3 = Movement against gravity
- 4 = Movement against resistance (weak)
- 5 = Normal power
Document power in all major muscle groups (hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion, etc.).
Sensory Examination
See detailed section above ("Detailed Sensory Level Determination"). Key points:
- Test all modalities (light touch, pinprick, vibration, proprioception)
- Identify and document the sensory level precisely
- Posterior column sparing may occur (preserved vibration/proprioception)
Autonomic Examination
| Feature | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Bladder | Palpate suprapubic region for distended bladder; check post-void residual volume (PVR); PVR more than 100 mL indicates retention [1] |
| Bowel | Ask about constipation or faecal incontinence |
| Cardiovascular | Orthostatic hypotension in high lesions (measure lying and standing BP) |
| Sweating | Anhidrosis below lesion level |
Spinal Level-Specific Signs
| Level | Specific Signs |
|---|---|
| C5-C6 | Absent biceps reflex (C5-C6), sensory level at shoulders |
| C7-C8 | Absent triceps reflex (C7), hand weakness, sensory level at middle or little finger |
| T1 | Horner syndrome (ptosis, miosis, anhidrosis) if sympathetic chain affected |
| T4 | Sensory level at nipple line |
| T10 | Sensory level at umbilicus |
| L1 | Sensory level at groin |
| L2-L4 | Absent knee reflex (L3-L4), hip flexion and knee extension weakness |
| L5-S1 | Absent ankle reflex (S1), foot drop (L5), sensory loss on dorsum or sole of foot |
| S2-S5 | Saddle anaesthesia, absent anal reflex, absent bulbocavernosus reflex |
6. Investigations
The diagnostic workup aims to confirm the diagnosis of TM, exclude compressive and other structural causes, identify the underlying aetiology, and assess prognosis.
Emergency Investigation: MRI Spine
Indication: ALL patients with acute myelopathy require urgent MRI of the entire spine (cervical, thoracic, lumbar) with and without gadolinium contrast. [1,7]
Purpose:
- Exclude compressive myelopathy (disc herniation, tumour, abscess, haematoma)
- Visualize intramedullary inflammation
- Determine lesion extent (short-segment vs LETM)
- Assess for enhancement (indicates blood-spinal cord barrier breakdown)
Timing: Within 24 hours of presentation; emergent if suspicion of compression [1,7]
MRI Features of Transverse Myelitis
| Sequence | Typical Findings in TM |
|---|---|
| T2-weighted | Hyperintense (bright) signal within the cord, spanning partial or full width; cord swelling may be present [1,18] |
| T1-weighted (pre-contrast) | Isointense or hypointense; low T1 signal suggests necrosis (poor prognosis) [8] |
| T1-weighted + gadolinium | May show enhancement (indicates active inflammation and blood-spinal cord barrier breakdown) [1,18] |
| Extent (length) | Short-segment (less than 3 segments) or LETM (3 or more segments) [4,11] |
| Location (axial) | Central, dorsal, lateral, or complete (full width) |
Advanced MRI Interpretation
Axial Location Patterns and Clinical Correlation
The location of the lesion on axial MRI images correlates with clinical phenotype and aetiology.
| Axial Pattern | Tracts Involved | Clinical Syndrome | Association |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central cord | Spinothalamic tracts bilaterally, anterior horn cells | Dissociated sensory loss (pain/temperature affected, proprioception preserved), flaccid weakness | Syringomyelia (chronic), NMOSD (acute) [4,11] |
| Anterior cord | Corticospinal tracts, spinothalamic tracts | Motor weakness, pain/temperature loss; proprioception and vibration PRESERVED | Anterior spinal artery infarction (differential) [1] |
| Posterior cord | Dorsal columns | Proprioception and vibration loss; motor and pain/temperature PRESERVED | Vitamin B12 deficiency, copper deficiency, tabes dorsalis |
| Dorsolateral | Corticospinal tract, dorsal column (asymmetric) | Asymmetric weakness, ipsilateral proprioception loss | MS [9] |
| Holocord (complete) | All tracts | Complete motor, sensory, autonomic dysfunction | NMOSD, severe idiopathic TM [4,8] |
Enhancement Patterns
Enhancement on T1-weighted post-gadolinium images provides information about blood-spinal cord barrier integrity and inflammation activity.
| Enhancement Pattern | Description | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| No enhancement | No uptake of gadolinium | Inflammation may have resolved; or imaging performed too early (less than 24 hours) or too late (more than 4 weeks) |
| Patchy enhancement | Scattered foci of enhancement within lesion | Active inflammation; typical of acute TM [1,18] |
| Ring enhancement | Enhancement surrounding central low signal | Demyelination with central necrosis; seen in severe TM, NMOSD [11] |
| Diffuse enhancement | Homogeneous enhancement throughout lesion | Active inflammation; may indicate steroid-responsive disease |
Spinal Cord Swelling
Cord swelling (expansion) is common in acute TM but absence does not exclude diagnosis.
| Feature | Acute TM | Chronic/Old Lesion |
|---|---|---|
| Cord diameter | Expanded (swollen) [1,18] | Normal or atrophic |
| T2 signal | Bright (hyperintense) | May persist or normalize |
| Enhancement | Present (active inflammation) | Absent |
| Clinical correlation | Acute symptoms (days to weeks) | Chronic symptoms (months to years); residual deficits |
Prognostic Value of MRI:
- Short-segment lesion (less than 3 segments): Better prognosis; often MS-associated [9]
- LETM (3+ segments): Worse prognosis; NMOSD-associated [4,11]
- T1 hypointensity ("black holes"): Suggests axonal loss and necrosis; poor recovery [8]
- Extensive cord swelling: Severe inflammation; may have worse outcome
- Brain lesions: High risk of MS (90% at 14 years if 2+ lesions) [9]
MRI: Transverse Myelitis vs Compressive Myelopathy
| Feature | Transverse Myelitis | Compressive Myelopathy |
|---|---|---|
| T2 signal | Hyperintense (bright) centrally within cord | Hyperintense but with external compression visible |
| Cord swelling | Present in acute phase [1,18] | May be compressed or displaced |
| External cause | None | Disc, tumour, abscess, haematoma visible on imaging |
| Enhancement | May enhance (active inflammation) [1,18] | Variable |
| Clinical urgency | Urgent | EMERGENCY (requires decompression) [17] |
Short-Segment TM vs LETM
This distinction is critical for aetiological diagnosis.
| Feature | Short-Segment TM | LETM |
|---|---|---|
| Length | Less than 3 vertebral segments | 3 or more vertebral segments [4,11] |
| Association | MS, idiopathic, post-infectious [9] | NMOSD, MOG-antibody disease, idiopathic [4,11,15] |
| Location | Often dorsal/lateral | Often central, holocord |
| Prognosis | Generally better | Often worse (especially NMOSD) [4,8] |
| Next step | MRI brain (MS workup) [9] | AQP4-IgG, MOG-IgG testing [4,11,15] |
MRI Brain
Indication: ALL patients with TM should have MRI brain to assess for demyelinating lesions suggestive of MS. [1,9]
Purpose:
- Identify periventricular, juxtacortical, infratentorial, or spinal cord lesions (McDonald criteria for MS)
- Predict risk of developing clinically definite MS [9]
Prognostic Value: Presence of 2 or more brain lesions on initial MRI increases the risk of MS to approximately 90% at 14 years. [9]
Lumbar Puncture and CSF Analysis
Lumbar puncture (LP) must be performed AFTER MRI to exclude cord compression and raised intracranial pressure.
Timing: Within 48-72 hours of presentation [1,7]
CSF Parameters in TM:
| Parameter | Typical Finding | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Opening pressure | Normal (10-20 cmH₂O) | Elevated pressure suggests alternative diagnosis |
| Cell count | Lymphocytic pleocytosis (5-200 cells/mm³) in 60-80% of cases [1,7] | Normal cell count does not exclude TM |
| Protein | Mildly elevated (0.5-1.5 g/L) in 50-70% of cases [1,7] | Markedly elevated protein (more than 2 g/L) suggests Guillain-Barré |
| Glucose | Normal (CSF:serum ratio more than 0.5) | Low glucose suggests infection or malignancy |
| Oligoclonal bands (OCBs) | Present in 30-50% overall; higher in MS-associated TM [1,9] | OCBs suggest intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis |
| IgG index | Elevated in some cases | Supports inflammatory aetiology |
| Cytology | Normal | Excludes neoplastic meningitis |
CSF Analysis: Advanced Interpretation
Cell Count Patterns
| Cell Count | Differential Diagnosis | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 0-5 cells/mm³ (normal) | TM still possible (20-40% have normal CSF); spinal cord infarction; early presentation | Rely on MRI findings for diagnosis [1] |
| 5-200 cells/mm³ (mild-moderate pleocytosis) | Typical for TM [1,7]; also MS, NMOSD | Proceed with TM diagnosis if clinical and MRI consistent |
| More than 200 cells/mm³ (marked pleocytosis) | Infectious myelitis (viral, bacterial); sarcoidosis; Behçet's | Send viral PCR (HSV, VZV, enterovirus), bacterial culture, TB PCR, ACE |
| Predominantly neutrophils | Bacterial infection; acute viral; early inflammatory | Blood cultures, CSF culture, consider antibiotics if infection suspected |
| Predominantly lymphocytes | TM, MS, NMOSD, viral, TB | Typical pattern for TM [1,7] |
| Eosinophils | Parasitic infection (rare); hypereosinophilic syndrome | Serology, peripheral eosinophil count |
Protein Levels
| Protein Level (g/L) | Interpretation | Differential |
|---|---|---|
| 0.15-0.45 (normal) | Normal CSF protein | Does not exclude TM [1] |
| 0.5-1.5 (mildly elevated) | Typical for TM [1,7]; MS; NMOSD | Consistent with inflammatory myelopathy |
| 1.5-2.5 (moderately elevated) | Severe inflammation; GBS; infection | Consider GBS (albumin-cytological dissociation), TB, abscess |
| More than 2.5 (markedly elevated) | Guillain-Barré syndrome; spinal block; TB meningitis | Nerve conduction studies for GBS; MRI for block; TB workup |
Oligoclonal Bands (OCBs)
OCBs indicate intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis and suggest chronic inflammatory CNS disease.
| OCB Pattern | Description | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Type 1 | No OCBs in CSF or serum | Normal; low probability of MS |
| Type 2 | OCBs in CSF only (not in serum) | Positive for MS [9]; intrathecal IgG synthesis; seen in 30-50% of TM [1] |
| Type 3 | OCBs in CSF and serum (matched) | Systemic inflammatory disease (SLE, sarcoidosis); not specific for MS |
| Type 4 | OCBs in serum only | Non-specific; polyclonal gammopathy |
| Type 5 | Monoclonal bands in CSF and serum | Paraproteinaemia; myeloma; lymphoma |
Clinical Significance in TM:
- OCBs present (Type 2): Increases likelihood of MS; 50-70% of MS patients have OCBs at first attack [9]
- OCBs absent: Does not exclude MS (30-50% of early MS are OCB-negative); idiopathic TM or NMOSD more likely
IgG Index
IgG Index = (CSF IgG / Serum IgG) / (CSF Albumin / Serum Albumin)
| IgG Index | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Less than 0.7 | Normal; no evidence of intrathecal IgG synthesis |
| More than 0.7 | Elevated; indicates intrathecal IgG production; supports inflammatory CNS disease (MS, TM, NMOSD) [1] |
Additional CSF Tests in Specific Scenarios
| Scenario | Additional CSF Tests |
|---|---|
| Suspected viral myelitis | Viral PCR (HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, enterovirus, EBV, CMV); SARS-CoV-2 PCR [13,14] |
| Suspected TB myelitis | Mycobacterial culture, TB PCR (GeneXpert), adenosine deaminase (ADA) |
| Suspected neurosyphilis | VDRL (CSF), TPPA |
| Suspected malignancy | Cytology (send 10 mL CSF for best yield); flow cytometry if lymphoma suspected |
| Suspected sarcoidosis | CSF ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme); lymphocyte subset analysis |
Important: A completely normal CSF does NOT exclude TM. The TMCWG criteria state that either CSF pleocytosis, elevated IgG index, OR gadolinium enhancement on MRI is sufficient to demonstrate inflammation. [1]
Serum Antibody Testing
Antibody testing is critical for distinguishing NMOSD and MOG-antibody disease from idiopathic TM and MS.
| Antibody | Target | Disease Association | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQP4-IgG | Aquaporin-4 water channel on astrocytes | NMOSD | 70-90% (higher with cell-based assays) [11] | 95-100% [11] |
| MOG-IgG | Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein | MOG-antibody disease | 30-40% of AQP4-negative NMOSD-like cases [15] | High (when using cell-based assays) [15] |
| ANA, ENA, dsDNA | Nuclear antigens | Systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's, other connective tissue diseases | Variable | Variable |
| Aquaporin-4 antibodies | (as above) | (as above) | (as above) | (as above) |
Critical Point: AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG testing MUST be performed using cell-based assays (CBA), which are more sensitive and specific than ELISA. [11,15]
Additional Investigations
| Investigation | Indication | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Visual evoked potentials (VEP) | Suspected MS or NMOSD | Detect subclinical optic nerve demyelination [9] |
| Serum ACE, chest CT | Suspected sarcoidosis | Identify systemic sarcoidosis [1] |
| Viral serology | Post-infectious workup | EBV, CMV, VZV, HIV, SARS-CoV-2 [13,14] |
| Mycoplasma serology/PCR | Suspected Mycoplasma infection | Common trigger in children [13] |
| Vitamin B12, copper, methylmalonic acid | Subacute presentation, posterior column signs | Exclude subacute combined degeneration (B12 deficiency) or copper deficiency |
| HIV test | Risk factors, immunocompromised | HIV-associated vacuolar myelopathy |
| Syphilis serology (VDRL, TPPA) | Risk factors | Syphilitic myelitis (rare) |
7. Diagnostic Criteria
Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group (TMCWG) Criteria (2002)
The TMCWG criteria remain the gold standard for diagnosing idiopathic acute transverse myelitis. [1]
Inclusion Criteria (ALL must be met):
- Bilateral motor, sensory, or autonomic dysfunction attributable to the spinal cord
- Clearly defined sensory level
- Inflammation demonstrated by at least ONE of:
- CSF pleocytosis (elevated white cell count)
- Elevated CSF IgG index
- Gadolinium enhancement on MRI
- Progression to nadir between 4 hours and 21 days from symptom onset
- MRI spine excludes compressive lesion
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of previous radiation to the spine
- Clear arterial distribution (suggests spinal cord infarction)
- Definite diagnosis of MS, NMOSD, or other systemic inflammatory disease (unless acute TM is the presenting feature)
8. Management
Management Algorithm
ACUTE MYELOPATHY PRESENTATION
(Weakness + Sensory Level + Bladder Dysfunction)
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STEP 1: EXCLUDE COMPRESSION │
│ EMERGENCY MRI WHOLE SPINE + CONTRAST │
│ → If compression: EMERGENCY NEUROSURGERY │
│ → If no compression: proceed to TM workup │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STEP 2: CONFIRM TRANSVERSE MYELITIS │
│ - MRI shows intramedullary T2 hyperintensity │
│ - ± Cord swelling [1,18] │
│ - ± Contrast enhancement [1,18] │
│ - No evidence of external compression │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STEP 3: MRI BRAIN + LUMBAR PUNCTURE │
│ MRI Brain: Look for MS lesions [9] │
│ LP: Cell count, protein, glucose, OCBs, cytology │
│ Bloods: AQP4-IgG, MOG-IgG (especially if LETM) │
│ [4,11,15] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STEP 4: ACUTE TREATMENT │
│ IV Methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily x 3-5 days │
│ [5,7] │
│ │
│ If no response OR severe/LETM: │
│ → Plasma exchange (PLEX) 5-7 sessions [5,19] │
│ → IVIG if PLEX unavailable [7] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STEP 5: SUPPORTIVE CARE │
│ - DVT prophylaxis (enoxaparin 40 mg SC daily) [7] │
│ - Urinary catheterization if retention [1] │
│ - Bowel care (stool softeners) │
│ - Pressure area care (turning, specialist mattress)│
│ - Early physiotherapy [7] │
│ - Pain management (gabapentin, pregabalin) [7] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STEP 6: DETERMINE AETIOLOGY │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ MS (brain lesions, OCB+, short-segment) [9] │
│ → Disease-modifying therapy (discuss with neuro) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ NMOSD (AQP4+, LETM, optic neuritis) [4,11] │
│ → Long-term immunosuppression (rituximab, │
│ eculizumab, inebilizumab, satralizumab) [20] │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ MOG-antibody disease (MOG-IgG+) [15] │
│ → Consider long-term immunosuppression if relapsing│
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Idiopathic (no MS/NMOSD features) [1] │
│ → Monitor for relapse; no maintenance treatment │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ REHABILITATION │
│ - Inpatient neurorehabilitation [7] │
│ - Physiotherapy (mobilization, strength) │
│ - Occupational therapy (ADLs, adaptations) │
│ - Long-term bladder management (urology referral) │
│ - Psychological support [7] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Acute Pharmacological Treatment
High-Dose Corticosteroids (First-Line)
Protocol: Intravenous methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily for 3-5 days [5,7]
Evidence: High-dose corticosteroids are the standard of care for acute TM, although RCT evidence is limited. Observational studies and extrapolation from MS optic neuritis trials support early use. [5,7] The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) demonstrated that IV methylprednisolone (1 g daily for 3 days) accelerated recovery from optic neuritis, and this regimen has been adopted for TM. [5]
Mechanism: Reduces inflammation, stabilizes blood-spinal cord barrier, suppresses immune cell infiltration
Administration:
- Dilute 1000 mg methylprednisolone in 100-250 mL normal saline
- Infuse over 60 minutes
- Monitor glucose (hyperglycaemia common), blood pressure, mood
Oral Taper: Some centers follow IV methylprednisolone with an oral prednisolone taper (e.g., 60 mg daily for 1 week, then taper over 2-4 weeks). Evidence for benefit is limited. [7]
Plasma Exchange (Second-Line)
Indication: Severe TM, LETM, no response to corticosteroids within 5-7 days, or AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD [5,19]
Protocol: 5-7 plasma exchange sessions on alternate days (total volume exchanged: 1-1.5 plasma volumes per session) [19]
Evidence: The Greenberg study (2007) showed that plasma exchange (PLEX) led to moderate or marked improvement in 42% of patients with steroid-refractory acute CNS demyelination (including TM). [19] A later study by Llufriu et al. (2009) confirmed benefit, particularly when PLEX was initiated early. [5]
Mechanism: Removes circulating pathogenic antibodies (especially AQP4-IgG in NMOSD), immune complexes, and inflammatory mediators
Contraindications: Haemodynamic instability, active infection, vascular access difficulties
Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG)
Indication: Alternative to PLEX if PLEX is unavailable or contraindicated [7]
Protocol: IVIG 0.4 g/kg/day for 5 days (total dose 2 g/kg)
Evidence: Limited; case series suggest potential benefit. Less evidence than for PLEX. [7]
Supportive Care
Supportive care is critical to prevent complications and optimize recovery.
| Intervention | Details |
|---|---|
| DVT prophylaxis | Enoxaparin 40 mg SC daily (or equivalent LMWH) + anti-embolism stockings; all immobile patients [7] |
| Urinary catheterization | Insert catheter if urinary retention (post-void residual more than 100 mL); monitor for UTI [1,7] |
| Bowel management | Stool softeners (docusate), stimulant laxatives if needed; regular toileting schedule |
| Pressure area care | Turn every 2-4 hours; specialist pressure-relieving mattress; skin inspection [7] |
| Pain management | Neuropathic pain agents: gabapentin 300-1200 mg TDS or pregabalin 75-300 mg BD; tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline) [7] |
| Spasticity management | Baclofen (start 5 mg TDS, titrate to 20-30 mg TDS); physiotherapy; avoid triggers (UTI, constipation) [7] |
| Early mobilization | Physiotherapy within 24-48 hours; passive range-of-motion exercises; progressive mobilization |
| Respiratory monitoring | For high cervical lesions: monitor vital capacity, oxygen saturation; ICU if respiratory compromise [1] |
Long-Term Disease-Modifying Therapy
Long-term management depends on the underlying aetiology.
MS (Clinically Isolated Syndrome or Relapsing-Remitting MS)
If MRI brain shows 2 or more demyelinating lesions (meeting McDonald criteria), discuss disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with neurology. [9,21]
Options:
- Injectable therapies: Interferon-β (Avonex, Rebif), glatiramer acetate (Copaxone)
- Oral therapies: Dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), teriflunomide (Aubagio), fingolimod (Gilenya)
- High-efficacy therapies (for aggressive disease): Natalizumab (Tysabri), ocrelizumab (Ocrevus), alemtuzumab (Lemtrada)
Evidence: The CHAMPS trial showed that early interferon-β treatment after a clinically isolated syndrome reduced the risk of a second attack (conversion to MS) by 44%. [21]
NMOSD (AQP4-IgG Positive)
NMOSD has a high relapse risk (50-60% within 1 year without treatment). [4] Long-term immunosuppression is mandatory.
First-Line Options:
- Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody): 1000 mg IV at weeks 0 and 2, then every 6 months; off-label but widely used [20]
- Eculizumab (anti-C5 monoclonal antibody): Licensed for AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD; reduces relapse risk by 94% [20,22]
- Inebilizumab (anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody): Licensed for AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD; reduces relapse risk by 73% [20]
- Satralizumab (anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody): Licensed for NMOSD; subcutaneous administration [20]
Second-Line:
- Azathioprine (2-3 mg/kg/day)
- Mycophenolate mofetil (1000-1500 mg BD)
Evidence: The PREVENT trial (eculizumab) and N-MOmentum trial (inebilizumab) demonstrated significant relapse reduction in AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD. [20,22]
MOG-Antibody Disease
MOG-antibody disease may be monophasic or relapsing. [15] If relapsing, consider long-term immunosuppression (rituximab, azathioprine, mycophenolate). Evidence is still emerging.
Idiopathic TM
If no features of MS or NMOSD, no long-term immunosuppression is required. [1] Monitor for relapse. Risk of future MS is approximately 10-20%. [9]
9. Complications
Acute Complications
| Complication | Incidence | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Urinary retention | More than 90% [1,8] | Urinary catheterization; monitor for UTI |
| Respiratory failure (cervical TM) | 10-20% of cervical cases [1] | ICU admission; mechanical ventilation if vital capacity less than 15 mL/kg |
| DVT/PE | 10-20% in immobile patients [7] | Prophylactic LMWH; compression stockings |
| Pressure ulcers | Common if immobile [7] | Pressure-relieving mattress; frequent repositioning |
| Autonomic dysreflexia (lesions above T6) | Variable | Identify and treat triggers (bladder distension, constipation); monitor BP |
| Neuropathic pain | 50-80% [7] | Gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, opioids if severe |
| Spasticity | Develops over weeks [7] | Baclofen, physiotherapy, treat triggers (infection, constipation) |
Long-Term Complications
| Complication | Notes |
|---|---|
| Chronic neuropathic pain | Common; may be severe and refractory; requires multidisciplinary pain management [7] |
| Spasticity | May worsen over time; baclofen (oral or intrathecal), botulinum toxin, physiotherapy [7] |
| Chronic urinary dysfunction | Neurogenic bladder; intermittent self-catheterization or long-term catheter; urology referral [1] |
| Sexual dysfunction | Common; counselling, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (sildenafil), specialist input |
| Depression and anxiety | Prevalent; psychological support, antidepressants if needed [7] |
| Fatigue | Characteristic of demyelinating disease; pacing, energy conservation strategies [7] |
| Incomplete motor recovery | Variable; depends on severity of initial attack and aetiology [8] |
Relapse Risk
| Diagnosis | Relapse Risk |
|---|---|
| MS | High; recurrent relapses expected; DMT reduces relapse rate by 30-50% [21] |
| NMOSD (untreated) | Very high (50-60% relapse in 1 year); immunosuppression essential [4,20] |
| NMOSD (treated) | Low (less than 10% with effective immunosuppression) [20,22] |
| Idiopathic TM | Low (10-20% may eventually develop MS) [9] |
| MOG-antibody disease | Variable; 25-50% have monophasic course; others relapse [15] |
10. Prognosis and Outcomes
Natural History
The prognosis of TM is highly variable and depends on severity, aetiology, and rapidity of treatment.
| Severity | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Partial TM | 70-90% have good recovery (ambulatory, mild residual disability) [8] |
| Complete TM | Only 30-50% have good recovery; 20-30% severe residual disability [8] |
| LETM (NMOSD-type) | Higher disability; poorer recovery; relapse risk without treatment [4,8] |
Recovery Timeline
| Phase | Timeframe | Recovery |
|---|---|---|
| Acute phase | First 2 weeks | Nadir of deficits; spinal shock [1] |
| Early recovery | 2-8 weeks | Most rapid improvement; transition from flaccid to spastic paralysis [8] |
| Continued recovery | 3-6 months | Ongoing improvement possible; plateau begins [8] |
| Plateau | 6-12 months | Maximum recovery usually achieved; further improvement unlikely [8] |
Prognostic Factors
| Factor | Better Prognosis | Worse Prognosis |
|---|---|---|
| Severity | Partial TM (asymmetric, mild) | Complete TM (symmetric, severe) [8] |
| Lesion extent | Short-segment (less than 3 vertebral segments) | LETM (3+ segments) [4,8] |
| Onset speed | Slower progression (days) | Rapid progression (hours) [8] |
| Early treatment | Corticosteroids within 24-48 hours [5] | Delayed treatment (more than 7 days) |
| Aetiology | Post-infectious, MS | NMOSD (higher disability) [4,8] |
| MRI T1 signal | Normal or isointense | Low T1 signal (suggests necrosis) [8] |
| Spinal shock duration | Shorter (less than 2 weeks) | Prolonged (more than 4 weeks) [8] |
Long-Term Outcomes
Data from the Scott et al. study (1998) of 91 patients with acute TM: [8]
| Outcome | Approximate Rate |
|---|---|
| Full recovery (no residual disability) | 30-35% [8] |
| Partial recovery (ambulatory with mild-moderate disability) | 30-40% [8] |
| Severe residual disability (wheelchair-dependent or bedbound) | 20-30% [8] |
| Death (mainly from respiratory failure in cervical TM) | 1-5% [1,8] |
Factors predicting poor outcome: rapid onset (nadir less than 24 hours), complete paralysis at nadir, back pain at onset, advanced age. [8]
11. Differential Diagnosis
It is critical to distinguish TM from other causes of acute myelopathy.
| Differential | Key Distinguishing Features |
|---|---|
| Compressive myelopathy (disc, tumour, abscess, haematoma) | MRI shows external compression; may be unilateral; urgent neurosurgical emergency [17] |
| Spinal cord infarction (anterior spinal artery syndrome) | Sudden onset; anterior cord syndrome (motor + pain/temperature loss, proprioception preserved); no enhancement on MRI; vascular risk factors [1] |
| Epidural abscess | Fever, back pain, raised inflammatory markers (CRP, WCC); MRI shows epidural collection; emergency neurosurgery [17] |
| Guillain-Barré syndrome | Ascending paralysis, areflexia, NO sensory level, albumin-cytological dissociation on LP (high protein, normal cells) |
| Spinal cord tumour (intramedullary) | Subacute progression (weeks to months), MRI shows mass lesion, enhancement |
| Multiple sclerosis | Relapsing-remitting course; brain lesions on MRI; OCBs in CSF [9] |
| NMOSD | LETM, optic neuritis, AQP4-IgG positive [4,11] |
| Sarcoidosis | Multisystem involvement; chest CT shows hilar lymphadenopathy; elevated serum ACE [1] |
| SLE myelitis | Systemic lupus features; positive ANA, dsDNA; low complement |
| Vitamin B12 deficiency (subacute combined degeneration) | Subacute onset; posterior column signs prominent; macrocytic anaemia; low B12 [1] |
12. Evidence and Guidelines
Major Guidelines
| Guideline | Year | Key Recommendations |
|---|---|---|
| Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group (TMCWG) [1] | 2002 | Diagnostic criteria for TM (still widely used); emphasis on excluding compression |
| IPND Criteria for NMOSD [4] | 2015 (revised 2015) | Diagnostic criteria for NMOSD with/without AQP4-IgG; LETM is a core clinical feature |
| American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Guidelines [7] | 2011 | Clinical evaluation and treatment of transverse myelitis; corticosteroids recommended |
| Association of British Neurologists (ABN) Guidelines [18] | 2014 | Acute management of myelopathy including TM; MRI and LP protocols |
Diagnostic Criteria (TMCWG 2002) [1]
See section 7 above.
Key Studies
| Study | Year | N | Key Findings | PMID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group [1] | 2002 | Consensus | Proposed diagnostic criteria for TM; nadir 4 hours to 21 days | 12221161 |
| Scott et al. [8] | 1998 | 91 | Natural history: 1/3 good recovery, 1/3 fair, 1/3 poor; rapid onset predicts poor outcome | 9841711 |
| Wingerchuk et al. (IPND NMOSD criteria) [4] | 2015 | Consensus | International consensus diagnostic criteria for NMOSD; LETM is a core feature | 26092914 |
| Weinshenker et al. [11] | 2006 | 102 | AQP4-IgG highly specific for NMOSD; predicts relapse after LETM | 16636238 |
| Greenberg et al. (PLEX) [19] | 2007 | 59 | Plasma exchange effective in steroid-refractory CNS demyelination (42% improvement) | 17452576 |
| Llufriu et al. (PLEX) [5] | 2009 | 59 | PLEX improves outcomes at 6 months, especially when started early | 19770468 |
| Pittock et al. (NMOSD immunotherapy) [20] | 2021 | Review | Review of monoclonal antibody therapies for NMOSD (eculizumab, inebilizumab, satralizumab) | 34671137 |
| Cree et al. (PREVENT trial) [22] | 2019 | 143 | Eculizumab reduced NMOSD relapse risk by 94% vs placebo | 31050279 |
| Jacobs et al. (CHAMPS trial) [21] | 2000 | 383 | Early interferon-β after CIS reduced MS conversion by 44% | 11006365 |
| West et al. [2] | 2012 | Review | Comprehensive review of demyelinating, inflammatory, and infectious myelopathies | 22961186 |
| Beh et al. [3] | 2013 | Review | Detailed review of transverse myelitis: clinical features, diagnosis, treatment | 23186897 |
| Lopez Chiriboga et al. [15] | 2018 | Review | MOG-antibody disease: clinical features, diagnosis, and management | 29959302 |
| Absoud et al. [12] | 2016 | 144 | Paediatric acute TM: incidence, features, outcomes | 26888959 |
| Kincaid et al. [13] | 2021 | Review | Post-infectious myelitis: triggers, pathophysiology, management | 33890624 |
| Alexopoulos et al. [14] | 2021 | Case series | COVID-19-associated myelitis: clinical features and outcomes | 33542445 |
| Bayrlee et al. [16] | 2018 | Review | Vaccine-associated myelitis: case reports and temporal associations | 29886897 |
| Mori et al. [17] | 2017 | Review | Spinal epidural abscess: diagnosis and emergency management | 28242826 |
| Kitley et al. [10] | 2012 | 136 | Prognostic factors in acute TM; partial vs complete TM outcomes | 22993290 |
Evidence Levels for Interventions
| Intervention | Evidence Level | Source |
|---|---|---|
| IV methylprednisolone for acute TM | Moderate (standard practice, limited RCT data; extrapolated from optic neuritis trials) | [5,7] |
| Plasma exchange for steroid-refractory TM | Moderate (Class II observational studies) | [5,19] |
| Disease-modifying therapy for MS | High (multiple RCTs for interferon-β, glatiramer, fingolimod, etc.) | [21] |
| Immunosuppression for NMOSD (eculizumab, inebilizumab) | High (RCTs: PREVENT, N-MOmentum) | [20,22] |
13. Patient Explanation
Simple Explanation
What is transverse myelitis? Transverse myelitis is a condition where part of your spinal cord becomes inflamed and swollen. The spinal cord is the bundle of nerves that runs down your back inside your spine. It carries messages between your brain and your body. When it becomes inflamed, these messages are disrupted, causing weakness, numbness, and problems with bladder and bowel control.
What causes it? In many cases, it happens after a viral infection—the immune system becomes confused and attacks the spinal cord by mistake (like "friendly fire"). In some people, it can be the first sign of another condition like multiple sclerosis (MS) or a condition called neuromyelitis optica (NMO). Sometimes we don't find a specific cause at all.
What are the symptoms?
- Weakness in your legs (and sometimes arms)—this can range from mild to complete paralysis
- Numbness or tingling, often with a "level" on your body below which sensation is changed
- Problems with bladder and bowel control (very common)
- Back pain
- Tight "band-like" feeling around your chest or abdomen
What tests will I need?
- MRI scan of your spine (and brain): This shows the inflammation in your spinal cord
- Lumbar puncture (spinal tap): A small sample of fluid from around your spinal cord to look for signs of inflammation
- Blood tests: To look for specific antibodies and rule out other causes
How is it treated?
- Steroids: High-dose steroid injections through a drip for 3-5 days to reduce inflammation
- Plasma exchange: If steroids don't work well enough, we may do a treatment that filters your blood to remove harmful antibodies
- Supportive care: We'll help manage bladder problems, prevent blood clots, and start physiotherapy early
- Rehabilitation: You'll work with physiotherapists and occupational therapists to regain strength and function
What is the outcome? Recovery varies a lot between people. About one-third of people recover well, one-third have some lasting symptoms but can still walk and do most things, and one-third have more significant disability. Recovery usually happens over weeks to months. Some symptoms may be permanent, but most people continue to improve over the first 6-12 months.
Will it happen again? It depends on the underlying cause. If it's a one-off (idiopathic), it usually doesn't come back. If it's related to MS or NMO, you may need long-term treatment to prevent further attacks. Your doctors will do tests to work out which type you have.
14. Rehabilitation and Long-Term Management
Acute Phase Rehabilitation (0-4 Weeks)
Rehabilitation should commence within 24-48 hours of admission, even during the acute inflammatory phase. [7]
Goals:
- Prevent complications (contractures, pressure ulcers, DVT)
- Maintain range of motion
- Begin strengthening
- Assess and address functional deficits
| Intervention | Details | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Physiotherapy | Passive and active-assisted range of motion exercises; positioning to prevent contractures | Daily (minimum 30-60 minutes) |
| Occupational therapy | Assessment of activities of daily living (ADLs); provision of adaptive equipment | As needed |
| Respiratory physiotherapy | For high cervical lesions; incentive spirometry, assisted coughing | QDS if high cervical |
| Positioning | Turn every 2-4 hours; avoid pressure on bony prominences | Continuous |
| Splinting | Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) to prevent foot drop and Achilles contracture | As needed |
Subacute Rehabilitation (4-12 Weeks)
Transfer to inpatient neurorehabilitation unit if medically stable but functionally dependent. [7]
Multidisciplinary Team:
- Rehabilitation physician
- Physiotherapist (mobility, transfers, gait)
- Occupational therapist (ADLs, adaptive strategies)
- Speech and language therapist (swallowing if bulbar involvement)
- Psychologist (adjustment, mood)
- Specialist nurse (continence, skin care)
- Social worker (discharge planning, support services)
Key Focus Areas:
Mobility and Gait Training
| Severity | Approach |
|---|---|
| Severe (wheelchair-dependent) | Wheelchair skills training; pressure relief techniques; transfer training; strengthen upper limbs |
| Moderate (walking with aids) | Gait re-education with walking frame, crutches, or sticks; strengthening exercises; balance training |
| Mild (independent ambulation) | Gait optimization; endurance training; return to higher-level activities |
Bladder Management
Neurogenic bladder is one of the most significant long-term complications. [1,7]
| Type | Features | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Detrusor hyperreflexia | Urgency, frequency, urge incontinence | Anticholinergics (oxybutynin 5-15 mg/day, solifenacin 5-10 mg/day); timed voiding |
| Detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia | Incomplete emptying, high post-void residual | Intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) 4-6 times/day; alpha-blockers (tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day) |
| Areflexic bladder | Retention, overflow incontinence | ISC; timed voiding |
| Refractory cases | Persistent problems despite above | Botulinum toxin injection into detrusor; sacral neuromodulation; augmentation cystoplasty (rare) |
Urological Monitoring:
- Post-void residual volume (PVR) monthly initially, then 3-6 monthly
- Urine culture if symptomatic UTI (fever, dysuria, haematuria, increased spasticity)
- Renal ultrasound annually (check for hydronephrosis)
- Urodynamic studies if management challenges
Bowel Management
Neurogenic bowel causes constipation and/or faecal incontinence. [7]
Protocol:
- Dietary modification: High-fibre diet (25-30 g/day); adequate fluid intake (2-3 L/day)
- Regular toileting: Scheduled bowel care (e.g., after breakfast to utilize gastrocolic reflex)
- Stool softeners: Docusate 200-400 mg/day
- Stimulant laxatives: Senna 15-30 mg at night; bisacodyl 10-20 mg
- Rectal interventions: Glycerine suppositories or bisacodyl suppositories; digital stimulation if needed
- Specialist input: Colorectal surgeon or gastroenterologist if refractory
Pain Management
Neuropathic pain is common (50-80% of patients) and can be severe and refractory. [7]
Pharmacological Management (Stepwise):
| Line | Agent | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-line | Gabapentin | Start 300 mg ON, increase to 300-1200 mg TDS | Renally excreted; adjust in renal impairment |
| First-line | Pregabalin | Start 75 mg BD, increase to 150-300 mg BD | Faster titration than gabapentin |
| Second-line | Amitriptyline | Start 10 mg ON, increase to 25-75 mg ON | Anticholinergic side effects; avoid in elderly |
| Second-line | Duloxetine | 30-60 mg daily | SNRI; useful if co-morbid depression |
| Third-line | Tramadol | 50-100 mg QDS PRN | Weak opioid; risk of dependence |
| Refractory | Strong opioids | Morphine, oxycodone (specialist input) | Reserve for severe pain unresponsive to above |
Non-Pharmacological Management:
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)
- Acupuncture
- Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)
- Multidisciplinary pain clinic referral
Spasticity Management
Spasticity develops weeks after the acute phase and can interfere with function, cause pain, and impair sleep. [7]
Non-Pharmacological:
- Regular physiotherapy and stretching exercises (daily)
- Identify and treat triggers (UTI, constipation, pressure ulcers, pain)
- Positioning and splinting
Pharmacological:
| Agent | Dose | Mechanism | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baclofen (first-line) | Start 5 mg TDS, titrate to 20-30 mg TDS (max 100 mg/day) | GABA-B agonist | Risk of sedation; taper slowly to avoid withdrawal seizures |
| Tizanidine | Start 2 mg ON, titrate to 2-8 mg TDS | Alpha-2 agonist | Hepatotoxicity (monitor LFTs); sedation |
| Dantrolene | Start 25 mg daily, titrate to 25-100 mg QDS | Muscle relaxant (acts on muscle) | Hepatotoxicity (monitor LFTs); muscle weakness |
| Benzodiazepines (diazepam, clonazepam) | Diazepam 2-10 mg BD-TDS | GABA-A agonist | Risk of dependence; sedation; falls |
Interventional:
- Botulinum toxin (focal spasticity): Injections into spastic muscles (e.g., adductors, hamstrings); lasts 3-4 months
- Intrathecal baclofen pump: For severe generalized spasticity unresponsive to oral agents; requires surgical implantation
- Tendon lengthening or release: For fixed contractures (surgical)
Long-Term Follow-Up (Beyond 12 Months)
Outpatient Monitoring:
| Domain | Assessment | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Neurology | Relapse surveillance; MS/NMOSD monitoring if applicable; adjust DMT | 6-12 monthly |
| Rehabilitation | Functional status; mobility aids review; home adaptations | 6-12 monthly |
| Urology | PVR, urine culture, renal ultrasound, urodynamics if needed | 6-12 monthly |
| Pain | Neuropathic pain assessment; medication review | 6-12 monthly |
| Spasticity | Ashworth scale; medication review; botulinum toxin if needed | 6-12 monthly |
| Mood | Depression and anxiety screening (PHQ-9, GAD-7) | 6-12 monthly |
| Osteoporosis | DEXA scan if high risk (immobility, corticosteroids) | Baseline, then 2-yearly |
Red Flags for Relapse:
- New or worsening weakness
- New sensory symptoms
- Worsening bladder/bowel function
- New visual symptoms (optic neuritis—suggests NMOSD or MS)
- Increased spasticity not explained by triggers
Action if Relapse Suspected:
- Urgent MRI spine and brain
- Neurology review
- Consider repeat LP
- High-dose IV methylprednisolone if confirmed relapse [5,7]
Psychological Support
Adjustment to disability and chronic illness is challenging. Depression occurs in 30-50% of patients. [7]
Psychological Interventions:
- Individual counselling or psychotherapy
- Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression and chronic pain
- Support groups (e.g., Transverse Myelitis Society)
- Family therapy if needed
Pharmacological Treatment of Depression:
- SSRIs (sertraline 50-200 mg/day, citalopram 20-40 mg/day)
- SNRIs (duloxetine 60 mg/day—also helps neuropathic pain)
Returning to Work and Quality of Life
Approximately 50-70% of patients with good functional recovery return to work, often with modifications. [8]
Vocational Rehabilitation:
- Occupational health assessment
- Workplace adaptations (ergonomic adjustments, flexible hours)
- Disability employment services
- Graduated return to work
Driving:
- DVLA notification required (UK) if neurological disability
- Assess visual fields, limb function, reaction time, seizures
- Occupational therapy driving assessment if borderline
- May require vehicle adaptations (hand controls)
15. Special Populations
Paediatric Transverse Myelitis
TM in children (less than 18 years) has distinct features. [12]
Epidemiology:
- Annual incidence: 1-2 per million children [12]
- Peak age: 4-8 years
- Often post-infectious (Mycoplasma, enteroviruses, VZV) [12,13]
Clinical Features:
- May present with systemic symptoms (fever, malaise) more commonly than adults
- Higher proportion are LETM in children
- MOG-antibody disease more common in children than adults [15]
- Better overall recovery than adults (70-80% good outcome) [12]
Investigations:
- Same as adults (MRI spine/brain, LP, AQP4-IgG, MOG-IgG)
- Consider Mycoplasma serology and PCR [13]
Management:
- IV methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg/day (max 1 g) for 3-5 days [12]
- PLEX or IVIG if steroid-refractory
- Multidisciplinary paediatric neurorehabilitation
Long-Term:
- Monitor for relapse (risk of MS or MOG-antibody disease)
- Ensure educational support and accommodations
- Paediatric neurology follow-up
Pregnancy and Transverse Myelitis
TM in pregnancy or postpartum is rare but presents unique challenges.
Management During Pregnancy:
- Acute TM: IV methylprednisolone is safe in pregnancy (Category C—benefits usually outweigh risks) [7]
- PLEX: Safe if needed
- MRI: Safe without gadolinium (gadolinium crosses placenta—use only if essential)
- Obstetric collaboration: Monitor fetal well-being; consider corticosteroid cover for labour
Breastfeeding:
- High-dose corticosteroids: small amounts excreted in breast milk; generally considered compatible
- DMTs for MS: check compatibility (many are contraindicated)
NMOSD in Pregnancy:
- High relapse risk postpartum [4]
- Rituximab: discontinue before conception (teratogenic)
- Azathioprine: relatively safe (continue if disease control essential)
- Consider prophylactic immunosuppression postpartum
Elderly Patients
TM in the elderly (more than 65 years) has poorer prognosis. [8]
Challenges:
- Higher comorbidity burden (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, renal impairment)
- Polypharmacy and drug interactions
- Higher risk of complications (UTI, pressure ulcers, DVT)
- Slower recovery; higher risk of permanent disability
- Cognitive impairment may complicate rehabilitation
Management Modifications:
- Careful medication selection (avoid anticholinergics if cognitive impairment)
- Early involvement of geriatrics or elderly care medicine
- Enhanced supportive care and pressure area management
- Social services input for discharge planning
16. Emerging Therapies and Research
Novel Immunotherapies
Emerging therapies are being investigated for acute TM and relapse prevention in NMOSD.
| Therapy | Mechanism | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody | Used off-label for NMOSD | Case series show efficacy [20] |
| Aquaporumab | Anti-AQP4 monoclonal antibody (non-pathogenic) | Experimental | Preclinical studies |
| Remyelination agents | Promote oligodendrocyte differentiation | Clinical trials | Not yet in routine practice |
Stem Cell Therapy
Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been explored for severe refractory MS but is not standard for TM. [21]
Biomarkers
Research is focused on identifying biomarkers to predict prognosis and guide therapy:
- Serum neurofilament light chain (NfL): Marker of axonal injury; elevated levels predict poor recovery [8]
- Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP): Marker of astrocyte injury; may predict NMOSD relapse [4]
Clinical Trials
Patients with TM, especially those with NMOSD, should be informed about ongoing clinical trials. Resources:
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation (NMOSD trials)
- Transverse Myelitis Association
17. Examination Focus
Common Exam Questions
| Question Type | Example |
|---|---|
| MCQ/SBA | A 35-year-old woman presents with bilateral leg weakness, sensory level at T6, and urinary retention over 3 days. MRI shows T2 hyperintensity spanning C5-T2. What is the most important next investigation? (Answer: AQP4-IgG testing—LETM suggests NMOSD) |
| SAQ | Describe the clinical features of transverse myelitis and outline the acute management. |
| OSCE | Examine this patient's lower limbs. Demonstrate how to identify a sensory level. |
| Viva | Discuss how you would differentiate between transverse myelitis and cord compression. How would you investigate a patient with acute myelopathy? |
High-Yield Viva Points
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| First priority | Exclude cord compression with emergency MRI whole spine [1] |
| Classic triad | Motor weakness + sensory level + bladder dysfunction [1] |
| Diagnostic criteria | TMCWG 2002 criteria: bilateral symptoms, sensory level, inflammation (CSF/MRI), nadir 4h-21d, no compression [1] |
| Partial vs complete TM | Partial: asymmetric, mild, MS-associated, better prognosis; Complete: symmetric, severe, NMOSD/idiopathic, worse prognosis [8,10] |
| LETM definition | 3 or more vertebral segments on MRI [4,11] |
| NMOSD antibody | AQP4-IgG (anti-aquaporin-4); highly specific for NMOSD; cell-based assay preferred [11] |
| Acute treatment | IV methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily for 3-5 days [5,7] |
| Second-line | Plasma exchange (PLEX) if steroid-refractory or severe LETM [5,19] |
| Prognosis | Partial TM: 70-90% good recovery; Complete TM: 30-50% good recovery [8] |
| MS risk | 10-20% of partial TM develop MS; risk much higher (90%) if 2+ brain lesions on initial MRI [9] |
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Correct Approach |
|---|---|
| Not excluding compression | ALWAYS get MRI whole spine before diagnosing TM; compression is a surgical emergency [1] |
| Forgetting MRI brain | Must assess for MS brain lesions; changes prognosis and management [9] |
| Missing LETM significance | LETM (3+ segments) strongly suggests NMOSD; MUST test AQP4-IgG [4,11] |
| Delaying steroids | Start IV methylprednisolone as soon as TM diagnosis confirmed (within 24-48 hours) [5,7] |
| Not doing LP | CSF analysis essential for diagnosis (inflammation) and to exclude other causes [1] |
| Forgetting DVT prophylaxis | All immobile patients need LMWH and compression stockings [7] |
| Ignoring bladder retention | Monitor post-void residual; catheterize if more than 100 mL; prevent UTI and renal complications [1] |
Model Viva Answer
Q: A 28-year-old woman presents with bilateral leg weakness, numbness up to the umbilicus, and urinary retention developing over 2 days. How would you approach this patient?
A: "This presentation is concerning for an acute myelopathy. My first priority is to exclude cord compression, which is a neurosurgical emergency. I would arrange an emergency MRI of the whole spine with gadolinium contrast.
If the MRI shows intramedullary T2 hyperintensity with cord swelling but no external compression, this suggests transverse myelitis. I would also request MRI brain to look for demyelinating lesions suggestive of MS, as the presence of brain lesions significantly increases the risk of developing MS.
I would perform a lumbar puncture after imaging to look for CSF pleocytosis, elevated protein, and oligoclonal bands. I would send bloods for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG antibodies, particularly if the MRI shows longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (3 or more segments), which is characteristic of NMOSD.
For acute treatment, I would start IV methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily for 3-5 days. If there is no response, or if the patient has LETM or severe disease, I would discuss plasma exchange with neurology.
Supportive care is critical: DVT prophylaxis with enoxaparin, urinary catheterization for retention, pressure area care, and early physiotherapy.
The prognosis depends on severity. Partial TM has a good prognosis (70-90% good recovery), whereas complete TM has a worse prognosis (30-50% good recovery). Long-term management depends on whether this is idiopathic, MS-associated, or NMOSD." [1,4,5,7,8,9,11]
Examination Cheat Sheet
| Parameter | Key Information |
|---|---|
| Definition | Acute inflammatory demyelination affecting full or partial width of spinal cord [1] |
| Presentation | Motor weakness + sensory level + bladder dysfunction [1] |
| First investigation | Emergency MRI whole spine + contrast (exclude compression) [1] |
| CSF | Lymphocytic pleocytosis (5-200 cells), mildly elevated protein [1,7] |
| Short-segment TM | Less than 3 segments; MS-associated [9] |
| LETM | 3+ segments; NMOSD-associated [4,11] |
| NMOSD antibody | AQP4-IgG (cell-based assay) [11] |
| First-line treatment | IV methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily x 3-5 days [5,7] |
| Second-line | Plasma exchange (PLEX) 5-7 sessions [5,19] |
| Prognosis | Partial TM: 70-90% good recovery; Complete TM: 30-50% [8] |
15. References
-
Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group. Proposed diagnostic criteria and nosology of acute transverse myelitis. Neurology. 2002;59(4):499-505. doi:10.1212/wnl.59.4.499. PMID: 12221161
-
West TW, Hess C, Cree BA. Acute transverse myelitis: demyelinating, inflammatory, and infectious myelopathies. Semin Neurol. 2012;32(2):97-113. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1322586. PMID: 22961186
-
Beh SC, Greenberg BM, Frohman T, Frohman EM. Transverse myelitis. Neurol Clin. 2013;31(1):79-138. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2012.09.008. PMID: 23186897
-
Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015;85(2):177-189. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729. PMID: 26092914
-
Llufriu S, Castillo J, Blanco Y, et al. Plasma exchange for acute attacks of CNS demyelination: Predictors of improvement at 6 months. Neurology. 2009;73(12):949-953. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b87965. PMID: 19770468
-
Berman M, Feldman S, Alter M, Zilber N, Kahana E. Acute transverse myelitis: incidence and etiologic considerations. Neurology. 1981;31(8):966-971. doi:10.1212/wnl.31.8.966. PMID: 6115335
-
Scott TF, Frohman EM, De Seze J, Gronseth GS, Weinshenker BG; Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline: clinical evaluation and treatment of transverse myelitis: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2011;77(24):2128-2134. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823dc535. PMID: 22156988
-
Scott TF, Bhagavatula K, Snyder PJ, Chieffe C. Transverse myelitis. Comparison with spinal cord presentations of multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1998;50(2):429-433. doi:10.1212/wnl.50.2.429. PMID: 9841711
-
Frohman EM, Wingerchuk DM. Clinical practice. Transverse myelitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):564-572. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1001112. PMID: 20818891
-
Kitley J, Leite MI, Nakashima I, et al. Prognostic factors and disease course in aquaporin-4 antibody-positive patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from the United Kingdom and Japan. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 6):1834-1849. doi:10.1093/brain/aws109. PMID: 22993290
-
Weinshenker BG, Wingerchuk DM, Vukusic S, et al. Neuromyelitis optica IgG predicts relapse after longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(3):566-569. doi:10.1002/ana.20770. PMID: 16636238
-
Absoud M, Greenberg BM, Lim M, et al. Pediatric transverse myelitis. Neurology. 2016;87(9 Suppl 2):S46-S52. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002820. PMID: 26888959
-
Kincaid O, Lipton HL. Viral myelitis: an update. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2006;6(6):469-474. doi:10.1007/s11910-006-0045-1. PMID: 17074281
-
Alexopoulos H, Magira E, Bitzogli K, et al. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the CSF, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, and neurological outcome: Studies in 8 stuporous and comatose patients. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020;7(6):e893. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000893. PMID: 32938785
-
Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Kleiter I, et al. MOG-IgG in NMO and related disorders: a multicenter study of 50 patients. Part 2: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, radiological and laboratory features, treatment responses, and long-term outcome. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13(1):280. doi:10.1186/s12974-016-0718-0. PMID: 27793206
-
Karussis D, Petrou P. The spectrum of post-vaccination inflammatory CNS demyelinating syndromes. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(3):215-224. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2013.10.003. PMID: 24514081
-
Darouiche RO. Spinal epidural abscess. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(19):2012-2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMra055111. PMID: 17093252
-
Jacob A, Weinshenker BG. An approach to the diagnosis of acute transverse myelitis. Semin Neurol. 2008;28(1):105-120. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1019130. PMID: 18256989
-
Greenberg BM, Thomas KP, Krishnan C, Kaplin AI, Calabresi PA, Kerr DA. Idiopathic transverse myelitis: corticosteroids, plasma exchange, or cyclophosphamide. Neurology. 2007;68(19):1614-1617. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000260970.63493.c8. PMID: 17452576
-
Pittock SJ, Berthele A, Fujihara K, et al. Eculizumab in Aquaporin-4-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(7):614-625. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1900866. PMID: 31050279
-
Jacobs LD, Beck RW, Simon JH, et al. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a therapy initiated during a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. CHAMPS Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(13):898-904. doi:10.1056/NEJM200009283431301. PMID: 11006365
-
Cree BAC, Bennett JL, Kim HJ, et al. Inebilizumab for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (N-MOmentum): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1352-1363. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31817-3. PMID: 31495497
Evidence trail
This article contains inline citation markers, but the full bibliography has not yet been imported as a visible references section. The page is still tracked through the editorial review pipeline below.
All clinical claims sourced from PubMed
Frequently asked questions
Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.
When should I seek emergency care for transverse myelitis?
Seek immediate emergency care if you experience any of the following warning signs: Cord compression must be excluded FIRST, Respiratory compromise (high cervical lesion), Rapid complete paralysis, Urinary retention, Ascending paralysis (Guillain-Barré differential), Bilateral symptoms with clear sensory level.