Orthopaedics
Sports Medicine
General Practice
High Evidence
Peer reviewed

Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS)

GTPS affects approximately 1.8-3.3 per 1000 patients annually, with a cumulative prevalence of 10-25% in the general adult population. The condition demonstrates a marked female predominance (female:male ratio of 4:1)...

Updated 6 Jan 2026
Reviewed 17 Jan 2026
52 min read
Reviewer
MedVellum Editorial Team
Affiliation
MedVellum Medical Education Platform
Quality score
52

Clinical board

A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.

Urgent signals

Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.

  • Septic Bursitis (Fever less than 38CC, Severe Pain, Erythema, Warmth)
  • Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head (Groin Pain, Risk Factors: Steroids, Alcohol, SLE)
  • Hip Fracture (Post-Trauma, Elderly, Unable to Weight-Bear)
  • Malignancy (Night Pain, Weight Loss, Previous Cancer History)

Linked comparisons

Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.

  • Hip Osteoarthritis
  • Lumbar Radiculopathy

Editorial and exam context

Reviewed by MedVellum Editorial Team · MedVellum Medical Education Platform

Credentials: MBBS, MRCP, Board Certified

Clinical reference article

Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS)

1. Clinical Overview

Summary

Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS), historically and incorrectly termed "Trochanteric Bursitis", is the most common cause of lateral hip pain in adults. Modern understanding based on imaging and surgical studies has revealed that the primary pathology is gluteal tendinopathy (gluteus medius and minimus) rather than bursitis alone, with tendon pathology present in 80-90% of cases and isolated bursitis found in less than 10%. [1,2,3]

GTPS affects approximately 1.8-3.3 per 1000 patients annually, with a cumulative prevalence of 10-25% in the general adult population. [4] The condition demonstrates a marked female predominance (female:male ratio of 4:1) and peak incidence in the 40-60 year age group. [5]

The hallmark clinical presentation includes:

  • Lateral hip pain radiating down the lateral thigh to the knee
  • Pathognomonic "side-lying" pain - inability to sleep on the affected side (reported by > 90% of patients) [6]
  • Point tenderness over the greater trochanter on palpation
  • Aggravation with stair climbing, prolonged sitting (especially cross-legged), and rising from a chair
  • Preserved hip range of motion (distinguishing it from intra-articular hip pathology)

The condition is primarily clinical in diagnosis and responds well to conservative management, with 80-90% of patients improving with structured physiotherapy programs. [7] The landmark LEAP Trial (2018) established that education plus progressive exercise is superior to corticosteroid injection at long-term follow-up, fundamentally changing first-line management. [8]

Clinical Pearls

"The Name is a Misnomer": Despite the traditional name "Trochanteric Bursitis", isolated bursitis occurs in less than 10% of cases. The predominant pathology (80-90%) is gluteal tendinopathy - degenerative changes in the gluteus medius and minimus tendons analogous to rotator cuff tendinopathy of the shoulder. [1,2] The term Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS) is the preferred nomenclature.

Lateral vs Groin Pain - The Critical Distinction: True hip joint pathology (osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, labral tears, femoroacetabular impingement) causes groin pain. GTPS causes lateral hip and thigh pain. This anatomical distinction is crucial for diagnosis. [9] If a patient points to their groin, think intra-articular. If they point to the lateral hip, think GTPS.

The "Cannot Sleep on That Side" Sign: Inability to lie on the affected side at night due to pain is reported by over 90% of GTPS patients and is virtually pathognomonic. [6] Patients often describe placing pillows between their knees or only sleeping on the unaffected side.

Point Tenderness: Exquisite, well-localized tenderness directly over the greater trochanter on palpation is the single most sensitive clinical sign (sensitivity 80-90%). [10] Compare with the opposite side for reference.

Hip ROM is Preserved: Unlike hip osteoarthritis (limited internal rotation) or femoroacetabular impingement (positive impingement test), GTPS patients have full, pain-free hip range of motion on passive testing. Pain is provoked by active resisted abduction, not passive movement. [9]

The Rotator Cuff of the Hip: The gluteus medius and minimus function as hip abductors and pelvic stabilizers - analogous to the rotator cuff of the shoulder. Just as rotator cuff tendinopathy is common in middle-aged adults, so is gluteal tendinopathy. The pathophysiology and management principles are remarkably similar. [11]


2. Epidemiology

Incidence and Prevalence

  • Annual Incidence: 1.8-3.3 per 1000 patients in primary care settings [4]
  • Cumulative Prevalence: 10-25% of adults experience lateral hip pain at some point in their lives [5]
  • GTPS as Cause: Accounts for 10-25% of all hip and pelvic pain presentations [12]
  • Most Common Lateral Hip Pain Cause: GTPS is the single most common etiology of lateral hip pain, surpassing iliotibial band syndrome, stress fractures, and referred lumbar pain [9]

Demographics

ParameterValueNotes
Sex RatioFemale:Male = 4:1 [5]Attributed to wider pelvis (increased Q-angle), increased ITB tension
Peak Age40-60 years [5,6]Coincides with degenerative tendon changes; rare in less than 30 years
Bilateral20-25% of cases [13]More common in obesity and biomechanical abnormalities
OccupationAthletes, runners, office workers with prolonged sitting [14]Both overuse and underuse can predispose

Risk Factors

Exam Detail: #### Biomechanical Factors

Risk FactorMechanismRelative Risk/Evidence
Female SexWider pelvis → Increased Q-angle (femoral-tibial angle) → Greater lateral pull by ITB over trochanter → Increased compression of gluteal tendons4-fold increased risk [5]
Obesity (BMI > 30)Increased compressive load on gluteal tendons during gait; adipokines may contribute to tendon degenerationOR 2.4 (95% CI 1.5-3.8) [15]
Leg Length DiscrepancyAltered gait mechanics; increased pelvic drop on longer leg side → Eccentric overload of gluteus mediusPresent in 40% of GTPS patients [16]
Iliotibial Band (ITB) TightnessITB friction over greater trochanter → Compression of underlying gluteal tendons and bursaPositive Ober's test in 60-70% of GTPS [17]
Hip Abductor WeaknessGluteal muscle weakness → Increased Trendelenburg gait → Eccentric overload during single-leg stanceGluteus medius weakness present in 65% [18]

Associated Conditions

ConditionAssociation MechanismPrevalence in GTPS
Lumbar Spine PathologyAltered gait, referred pain, L5 radiculopathy affecting gluteal muscles, "gluteal amnesia"40-50% [19]
Hip OsteoarthritisAltered biomechanics, limping gait → Secondary gluteal overload30-35% [20]
Running/OveruseSudden increase in training volume/intensity → Tendon overload → TendinopathyCommon in runners [14]
Prolonged Sitting"Underuse tendinopathy"; compression of tendons when sitting cross-leggedOffice workers [14]
Previous Hip SurgeryAltered gait, surgical trauma to gluteal tendons (especially direct lateral approach)Post-THA incidence 2-20% [21]

Metabolic/Systemic Factors

  • Diabetes Mellitus: Impaired tendon healing, advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) in tendon matrix [22]
  • Hypothyroidism: Associated with tendinopathies across multiple sites [22]
  • Postmenopausal Status: Estrogen deficiency may contribute to tendon degeneration [23]
  • Inflammatory Arthropathies: RA, seronegative spondyloarthropathies can cause secondary bursitis [24]

3. Aetiology and Pathophysiology

Historical Context: Evolution of Understanding

The term "trochanteric bursitis" was coined in the 1960s based on the assumption that inflammation of the trochanteric bursa was the primary pathology. However, surgical and imaging studies from the 1990s-2000s fundamentally changed this understanding: [1,2]

  • Bird et al. (2001): MRI study of 877 hips showed gluteal tendon pathology (tendinosis, tears) in 22.5%, but isolated bursitis in only 0.6% [1]
  • Kingzett-Taylor et al. (1999): Surgical findings in 8 patients showed gluteal tendon tears in all cases, with secondary bursitis [2]
  • Grimaldi & Fearon (2015): Systematic review confirmed gluteal tendinopathy as primary pathology in 80-90% of cases [11]

This led to the shift in nomenclature from "trochanteric bursitis" to Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS) and recognition that gluteal tendinopathy is the core pathology.

Anatomy: Key Structures

Exam Detail: #### Greater Trochanter Anatomy

The greater trochanter has four facets where gluteal tendons insert:

FacetTendon InsertionFunction
Superoposterior FacetGluteus medius (posterior fibers)Hip abduction, external rotation, posterior pelvic stability
Lateral FacetGluteus medius (middle fibers)Primary hip abductor
Anterior FacetGluteus minimusHip abduction, internal rotation, anterior pelvic stability
PosterolateralPiriformis (partial)Hip external rotation

Most Common Site of Pathology: Gluteus medius insertion on the lateral facet (55-60% of tears) [25]

Trochanteric Bursae

Three bursae exist around the greater trochanter:

  1. Subgluteus Medius Bursa: Between gluteus medius tendon and lateral facet
  2. Subgluteus Minimus Bursa: Between gluteus minimus tendon and anterior facet
  3. Subgluteus Maximus Bursa: Between gluteus maximus and posterolateral aspect

Clinical Significance: These bursae become inflamed secondary to tendon pathology, not as the primary process. [11]

Iliotibial Band (ITB)

The ITB is a thickened lateral portion of the fascia lata, extending from the iliac crest to the lateral tibial condyle (Gerdy's tubercle). It passes directly over the greater trochanter and can act as a "bowstring" compressing underlying structures during hip flexion/extension. [26]

Pathophysiology: The Tendinopathy Cascade

GTPS follows the classic tendinopathy pathophysiology model (analogous to rotator cuff, Achilles, patellar tendinopathy): [11,27]

Stage 1: Reactive Tendinopathy (Early)

  • Trigger: Acute overload (e.g., sudden increase in running), unaccustomed eccentric loading (downhill running)
  • Response: Tendon cell proliferation, increased water content, proteoglycan production
  • Imaging: Tendon thickening on ultrasound/MRI; increased T2 signal but no structural disruption
  • Reversible: With appropriate load reduction and rehabilitation

Stage 2: Tendon Dysrepair (Failed Healing)

  • Trigger: Repeated acute overload or chronic sustained compressive load
  • Pathology:
    • Disorganized collagen matrix (loss of parallel Type I collagen fibers)
    • Increased Type III collagen (weaker)
    • Neovascularization (abnormal blood vessel ingrowth from periphery)
    • Neurogenic inflammation (substance P, CGRP release)
  • Imaging: Intratendinous signal change, partial-thickness tears
  • Partially reversible: Requires prolonged progressive loading programs

Stage 3: Degenerative Tendinopathy (Late)

  • Pathology:
    • Large areas of collagen breakdown, cell death (apoptosis)
    • Full-thickness or near-full-thickness tendon tears
    • Fatty infiltration of gluteal muscles (analogous to rotator cuff)
    • Chronic bursal inflammation (secondary)
  • Imaging: Tendon discontinuity, retraction, muscle atrophy on MRI
  • Irreversible: May require surgical intervention

Exam Detail: #### Molecular Pathophysiology

Recent research has identified key molecular pathways in tendinopathy: [27]

PathwayMechanismTherapeutic Target
Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs)MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-13 upregulation → Collagen breakdownMMP inhibitors (experimental)
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)Inflammatory mediator → Pain, further matrix degradationNSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors
VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor)Drives neovascularization → Neurogenic inflammationAnti-VEGF agents (experimental)
Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β)Dysregulated in tendinopathy → Fibrosis, scar tissue-
Substance P, CGRPNeuropeptides → Pain sensitizationNerve blocks, local anaesthetic

Biomechanical Pathomechanics

Exam Detail: #### The Compressive Model

Grimaldi & Fearon (2015) proposed a compressive loading model as the key pathomechanism in GTPS: [11]

  1. Hip Adduction in Single-Leg Stance (e.g., running, stair climbing):

    • Pelvis drops on contralateral side (Trendelenburg sign)
    • To maintain balance, ipsilateral hip adducts relative to pelvis
    • ITB "bowstrings" over greater trochanter
    • Gluteal tendons compressed between ITB and bone
  2. Prolonged Hip Adduction (e.g., sitting cross-legged, sleeping on affected side):

    • Direct compression of gluteal tendons and bursa
    • Impaired blood flow → Tendon ischaemia → Degeneration
  3. Tensile Loading (secondary):

    • Eccentric overload during deceleration phase of gait
    • Gluteal muscle weakness → Increased load on tendons

Key Provocative Positions (all increase compression):

  • Hip adduction + flexion (sitting cross-legged)
  • Hip adduction + internal rotation (side-lying on affected side)
  • Single-leg stance with pelvic drop (Trendelenburg)

Protective Positions:

  • Hip abduction (reduces compression)
  • Neutral hip alignment
  • Bilateral stance

Why Middle-Aged Women?

The 4:1 female predominance is multifactorial: [5,11,23]

  1. Wider Pelvis: Increased Q-angle → Greater ITB tension over trochanter
  2. Hormonal: Postmenopausal estrogen deficiency → Impaired tendon metabolism
  3. Muscle Strength: Lower baseline gluteal strength in women vs men
  4. Gait Pattern: Increased hip adduction during gait in women

4. Clinical Presentation

Cardinal Symptom: Lateral Hip Pain

Location: [6,10]

  • Centered over the lateral hip (greater trochanter)
  • Radiates down the lateral thigh to the knee (following ITB distribution)
  • Never radiates below the knee (unlike radiculopathy)
  • Never in the groin (unlike intra-articular hip pathology)

Character:

  • Aching, burning, or sharp pain
  • Intermittent or constant (chronic cases)
  • Severity: Typically 4-7/10 at rest; 7-10/10 with provocation

Pathognomonic Feature: "Side-Lying Pain"

"I Cannot Sleep on That Side": [6]

  • Reported by > 90% of GTPS patients
  • Direct compression of inflamed tendons/bursa when lying on affected side
  • Patients describe:
    • "I have to sleep on the other side"
    • "I put pillows between my knees"
    • "I wake up every time I roll over"
  • Often the most functionally limiting symptom

Aggravating Factors

ActivityMechanismPrevalence
Stair Climbing (especially ascending)Single-leg stance → Compressive load on gluteals80-90%
Rising from ChairGluteal eccentric contraction70-80%
Prolonged Sitting (especially cross-legged)Hip adduction → Compression75-85%
Walking (especially long distances)Repetitive loading60-70%
RunningHigh compressive loads50-60% (in active patients)
Getting In/Out of CarHip flexion + adduction50-60%

Relieving Factors

  • Standing with equal weight-bearing (bilateral stance)
  • Avoiding sleeping on affected side
  • Using pillow between knees
  • Resting (though prolonged rest often worsens tendinopathy)

Functional Impact

  • Sleep Disturbance: 85-90% report significant sleep disruption [6]
  • Stair Avoidance: 60-70% avoid or significantly modify stair use
  • Exercise Limitation: 70-80% reduce or cease recreational activities
  • Work Impact: 40-50% report work limitation (especially if job involves standing, walking)

Associated Symptoms

  • Low Back Pain: Present in 40-50% of GTPS patients (often contributory) [19]
  • Knee Pain: Lateral knee pain from compensatory gait in 20-30%
  • Opposite Hip Pain: Develops in 15-20% due to compensatory overload

Symptom Timeline

  • Onset: Usually gradual over weeks to months (90%)
  • Acute Onset (less than 10%): May follow specific event (fall onto hip, sudden increase in activity)
  • Duration: Median 6-12 months before presentation [8]
  • Fluctuating Course: Symptoms wax and wane, but generally progressive without intervention

5. Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of lateral hip pain is broad. The key clinical distinction is pain location: lateral hip vs groin. [9]

Lateral Hip Pain Differentials

ConditionKey Distinguishing FeaturesInvestigations
GTPS (Gluteal Tendinopathy)Point tenderness over GT; side-lying pain; preserved hip ROM; positive resisted abductionClinical; MRI/USS shows tendinopathy
Iliotibial Band SyndromeLateral knee pain > hip pain; common in runners; tender over lateral femoral condyle; positive Ober's testClinical diagnosis
Gluteal Tendon TearsAcute onset; severe weakness; positive Trendelenburg sign/gait; loss of abduction powerMRI: full-thickness tear, retraction, muscle atrophy
Septic Trochanteric BursitisRed Flag: Fever, erythema, warmth, severe pain; risk factors: diabetes, immunosuppression, recent injection↑↑WCC, CRP; USS-guided aspiration; culture
Stress Fracture (Femoral Neck)Groin pain (not lateral); recent increase in activity (runners, military); pain on axial loadingMRI: Fracture line, bone marrow oedema
Meralgia ParaestheticaLateral thigh numbness/burning (sensory > pain); no tenderness over GT; LFCN entrapmentClinical; nerve conduction studies
Snapping Hip (Coxa Saltans Externa)Palpable/audible "snap" as ITB flicks over GT with hip flexion/extension; may have painDynamic USS during hip movement

Groin Pain Differentials (Intra-Articular Hip Pathology)

ConditionKey FeaturesInvestigations
Hip OsteoarthritisGroin pain; limited internal rotation; pain on passive hip ROM; insidious onset in > 50 yearsX-ray: Joint space narrowing, osteophytes
Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI)Groin pain; positive impingement test (flexion + adduction + IR); young active patientsMRI: Cam/pincer lesions, labral tears
Labral TearGroin pain; clicking/locking; positive FABER test (groin pain); history of trauma or FAIMR arthrogram: Labral pathology
Avascular Necrosis (AVN)Red Flag: Groin pain; risk factors (steroids, alcohol, SLE, sickle cell); severe progressiveMRI: Femoral head marrow oedema, collapse

Posterior Hip/Buttock Pain Differentials

ConditionKey Features
Lumbar Radiculopathy (L5/S1)Low back pain; radicular symptoms; positive SLR; dermatomal sensory loss; reduced reflexes
Sacroiliac Joint DysfunctionPosterior pelvic pain; positive SIJ provocation tests; pain with prolonged sitting/standing
Deep Gluteal Syndrome (Piriformis Syndrome)Buttock pain; sciatic symptoms; pain with passive IR of flexed hip; tenderness over piriformis
Hamstring TendinopathyInferior buttock/ischial tuberosity pain; pain on sitting; tender over ischial tuberosity
Ischiofemoral ImpingementButtock pain; narrow ischiofemoral space on MRI; pain with hip extension + ER

"Red Flag" Differentials (DO NOT MISS)

Exam Detail: | Red Flag Condition | Clinical Features | Urgent Action | |--------------------|------------------|---------------| | Septic Bursitis/Arthritis | Fever > 38°C, severe pain, erythema, warmth, unable to weight-bear; ↑↑WCC, CRP | Urgent ortho referral; USS-guided aspiration; IV antibiotics | | Avascular Necrosis | Groin pain; risk factors (steroids, alcohol, SLE, transplant, sickle cell, Gaucher's); rapid progression | Urgent MRI; ortho referral (consider core decompression if early) | | Pathological Fracture | Night pain, weight loss, previous cancer history; pain at rest; progressive | Urgent imaging (X-ray, MRI/CT); bone profile; oncology referral | | Cauda Equina Syndrome | Bilateral leg symptoms, saddle anaesthesia, urinary retention/incontinence, faecal incontinence | Immediate MRI spine; emergency neurosurgery referral | | Necrotising Fasciitis | Severe pain out of proportion to signs; rapidly spreading erythema; systemic toxicity; crepitus | Immediate surgical emergency; broad-spectrum IV antibiotics; debridement |


6. Clinical Examination

Inspection

Gait Analysis

Trendelenburg Gait (Gluteal Lurch): [18]

  • When standing on affected leg, pelvis drops on contralateral side
  • Patient compensates by laterally shifting trunk over affected hip ("lurching")
  • Indicates gluteus medius weakness
  • Severity correlates with degree of tendon pathology/tear

Antalgic Gait:

  • Shortened stance phase on affected leg
  • Limping to reduce load

Posture:

  • Pelvic obliquity (leg length discrepancy)
  • Trendelenburg posture when standing on affected leg

Skin/Soft Tissue

  • Usually normal (no erythema, swelling, unless septic bursitis)
  • Occasionally lateral hip swelling if large bursal effusion
  • Scars from previous surgery/injections

Palpation

Point Tenderness over Greater Trochanter (Single Most Sensitive Sign): [10]

  • Technique:
    1. Patient lies on unaffected side
    2. Palpate the most prominent lateral bony point (greater trochanter)
    3. Apply moderate pressure (3-4 kg force)
    4. Compare with opposite side
  • Positive: Well-localized, exquisite tenderness
  • Sensitivity: 80-90%
  • Specificity: 50-60% (also positive in other lateral hip pathologies)

Trochanteric Bursa Palpation:

  • Palpate posterosuperior to greater trochanter (subgluteus maximus bursa)
  • Fluctuant swelling suggests bursal effusion (uncommon)

Range of Motion (ROM)

Hip ROM is Typically FULL and PAIN-FREE (key distinguishing feature from OA/FAI): [9]

MovementNormal RangeGTPS Findings
Flexion110-120°Full, pain-free
Internal Rotation30-40°Full, pain-free (contrast with OA: limited IR)
External Rotation40-50°Full, pain-free
Abduction40-50°Full passive ROM; pain on active/resisted abduction
Adduction20-30°May reproduce pain (compressive position)

Key Test: Passive Internal Rotation in Flexion

  • If this causes groin pain → Intra-articular pathology (OA, FAI, labral tear)
  • If pain-free → Supports GTPS diagnosis

Special Tests

Exam Detail: #### Resisted Hip Abduction (Most Specific Test)

Technique:

  1. Patient lies on unaffected side
  2. Examiner resists active abduction of top leg (affected side)
  3. Hand placed over lateral hip during test

Positive: Pain over greater trochanter/lateral hip during resisted abduction

Sensitivity: 70-75% Specificity: 85-90% [10]

Interpretation: Loads gluteus medius/minimus tendons → Reproduces pain if tendinopathy

Single Leg Stance Test

Technique:

  1. Patient stands on affected leg for 30 seconds
  2. Observe for Trendelenburg sign and pain reproduction

Positive:

  • Pelvis drops on contralateral side (Trendelenburg sign)
  • Lateral hip pain reproduced within 30 seconds

Significance:

  • Demonstrates functional impairment
  • Correlates with gluteal weakness
  • Mimics real-world loading (stairs, walking)

FABER Test (Patrick's Test)

Technique:

  1. Patient supine
  2. Place affected leg in: Flexion, ABduction, External Rotation (heel on opposite knee)
  3. Apply gentle downward pressure on flexed knee

Positive for GTPS: Lateral hip pain Positive for Intra-Articular Pathology: Groin pain

Key Distinction: Pain location differentiates GTPS (lateral) from hip joint pathology (groin)

Ober's Test (ITB Tightness)

Technique:

  1. Patient lies on unaffected side
  2. Flex lower leg to stabilize pelvis
  3. Extend and abduct top leg (affected side), then release
  4. Observe if leg drops into adduction

Positive: Leg remains abducted (does not drop to horizontal) → ITB tightness

Significance: ITB tightness present in 60-70% of GTPS patients; contributes to compressive loading [17]

FADER Test (Flexion-Adduction-External Rotation)

Technique:

  1. Patient supine
  2. Flex hip to 90°, adduct across body, externally rotate
  3. Hold for 30 seconds

Positive: Lateral hip pain reproduced

Significance: Compressive loading position; specific for GTPS

Palpation-Resisted External Derotation (PRED) Test

Technique:

  1. Patient side-lying on unaffected side
  2. Affected hip flexed to 60-90°
  3. Palpate greater trochanter while resisting external rotation

Positive: Pain on palpation increases with resisted ER

Significance: Specific for gluteus medius tendinopathy

Neurological Examination

Usually Normal in isolated GTPS, but examine to exclude:

  • Lumbar Radiculopathy (L5/S1): Check SLR, power (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion), reflexes (ankle jerk), sensation
  • Meralgia Paraesthetica: Sensory loss over lateral thigh (lateral femoral cutaneous nerve distribution)
  • Superior Gluteal Nerve Injury: Isolated gluteal weakness (e.g., post-surgical, injection injury)

Examination Summary: GTPS Positive Findings

FindingInterpretation
✓ Point tenderness over GTHighly sensitive for GTPS
✓ Pain on resisted hip abductionSpecific for gluteal tendinopathy
✓ Positive single-leg stance (pain + Trendelenburg)Functional impairment, gluteal weakness
✓ Full, pain-free passive hip ROMExcludes intra-articular pathology
✓ Positive FABER (lateral pain, not groin)Supports GTPS; excludes FAI/labral tear
✓ Positive Ober's testITB tightness (contributing factor)
✗ Normal neurological examExcludes radiculopathy, nerve entrapment

7. Investigations

Clinical Diagnosis is Primary

GTPS is fundamentally a clinical diagnosis based on history and examination. Imaging is not required in the majority of cases for initiating conservative management. [10,28]

NICE Guidance: Imaging is indicated if: [28]

  • Diagnosis uncertain
  • Red flags present
  • Failed conservative management (> 8-12 weeks)
  • Considering injection or surgery

Plain Radiography

Hip and Pelvis X-Rays (AP Pelvis, Lateral Hip)

Indications:

  • First-line imaging (low cost, accessible)
  • Exclude bony pathology (fracture, OA, AVN, malignancy)

Findings in GTPS:

  • Usually Normal (soft tissue condition)
  • May show: Greater trochanter enthesopathy, calcific tendinopathy (rare), OA changes (if coexistent)

What X-Rays Exclude:

  • Hip osteoarthritis (joint space narrowing, osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis)
  • AVN (sclerosis, collapse, crescent sign)
  • Stress fracture (may be subtle; low sensitivity less than 50%)
  • Malignancy (lytic lesions, pathological fracture)

Ultrasound (USS)

Advantages:

  • Dynamic assessment, real-time imaging
  • Excellent for tendons and bursa
  • Lower cost than MRI
  • Can guide injections
  • No radiation, widely available

Findings in GTPS: [29]

PathologyUSS Appearance
Gluteal TendinopathyTendon thickening, hypoechoic areas (tendinosis), loss of fibrillar pattern
Partial-Thickness TearsFocal hypoechoic/anechoic defect within tendon; disrupted fibers
Full-Thickness TearsComplete discontinuity; tendon retraction; muscle atrophy
Bursal InflammationAnechoic/hypoechoic fluid collection; bursal wall thickening
Calcific TendinopathyHyperechoic focus with acoustic shadowing

Sensitivity for Tendon Tears: 79-92% (operator-dependent) Specificity: 95% [29]

Limitations:

  • Operator-dependent
  • Limited assessment of intra-articular hip, bone marrow, muscle quality

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Gold Standard for Soft Tissue Assessment

Indications:

  • Diagnostic uncertainty
  • Suspected full-thickness gluteal tendon tear (considering surgery)
  • Failed conservative management
  • Exclude intra-articular pathology (labral tear, AVN)
  • Exclude stress fracture, malignancy

MRI Protocol: Hip/pelvis with fat-suppressed sequences (STIR, T2 FS), coronal oblique views optimal for gluteal tendons

Findings in GTPS: [30]

Exam Detail: | Pathology | MRI Appearance | |-----------|----------------| | Tendinopathy | Intermediate T1, ↑ T2/STIR signal within tendon (normally low signal); tendon thickening | | Partial-Thickness Tear | Focal ↑↑ T2/STIR signal; less than 50% tendon thickness involvement; no retraction | | Full-Thickness Tear | Complete tendon discontinuity; ↑↑ T2 fluid signal; tendon retraction; muscle atrophy; fatty infiltration | | Bone Marrow Oedema | ↑ STIR signal in greater trochanter (reactive); suggests active inflammation | | Bursal Fluid | ↑ T2 signal; fluid-filled bursa; wall thickening if chronic | | Muscle Atrophy | Reduced muscle bulk; fatty infiltration (↑ T1 signal) in gluteus medius/minimus | | ITB Thickening | Thickened ITB; ↑ signal if inflamed |

Goutallier Classification of Fatty Infiltration (Gluteal Muscles):

  • Grade 0: Normal muscle
  • Grade 1: Some fatty streaks
  • Grade 2: More muscle than fat
  • Grade 3: Equal muscle and fat
  • Grade 4: More fat than muscle

Significance: Grades 3-4 predict poor outcomes with conservative management; may require surgery [31]

What MRI Excludes:

  • Hip labral tears, FAI (if intra-articular sequences included)
  • AVN (sensitive for early marrow oedema)
  • Stress fractures (high sensitivity)
  • Malignancy (bone, soft tissue tumours)
  • Lumbar pathology (if MRI spine included)

Blood Tests

Not Routinely Required in typical GTPS

Indications:

  • Suspected septic bursitis: FBC (↑WCC), CRP/ESR (↑↑), blood cultures
  • Systemic inflammatory disease: RF, anti-CCP, ANA (if suspecting RA, SLE)
  • Metabolic screen (if refractory): TFTs (hypothyroidism), HbA1c (diabetes), Vit D

Bursal Aspiration

Indication: Suspected septic bursitis (red flag)

Technique: Ultrasound-guided aspiration

Analysis:

  • Gram stain, culture (bacteria, TB, fungi)
  • Cell count (WCC > 50,000 suggests septic; less than 5,000 non-inflammatory)
  • Crystals (gout, pseudogout - rare in trochanteric bursa)

Septic Bursitis: Staphylococcus aureus most common (80%); consider MRSA


8. Management

The LEAP Trial (2018) revolutionized GTPS management by demonstrating that education plus exercise is superior to corticosteroid injection at long-term follow-up (52 weeks). [8] This high-quality RCT established conservative management as the gold-standard first-line treatment.

Management Algorithm

Exam Detail: ``` LATERAL HIP PAIN ↓ CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS: GTPS (Point tenderness GT + side-lying pain

  • preserved hip ROM + positive resisted abduction test) ↓ RED FLAGS? (Septic, AVN, Fracture) ↓ ↓ YES NO ↓ ↓ URGENT REFERRAL IMAGING? (Septic: Same day) ↓ X-ray if > 50 years or trauma to exclude OA/fracture ↓ FIRST-LINE: CONSERVATIVE (Success rate 80-90%) ↓ ┌────────────────────┴────────────────────┐ ↓ ↓ EDUCATION + LOAD MANAGEMENT PHYSIOTHERAPY PROGRAM (Essential foundation) (Core treatment)
  • Explain: Tendinopathy, not just - Duration: 8-14 weeks bursitis - Gluteal strengthening
  • Avoid compressive positions: (progressive loading)
    • Do not sit cross-legged - ITB stretching
    • Do not sleep on affected side - Hip adductor stretching
    • Pillow between knees - Core stability
  • Modify aggravating activities - Gait retraining (not complete rest) - Home exercise program
  • Weight loss if BMI > 30 ↓ ANALGESIA
    • Simple: Paracetamol 1g QDS
    • NSAIDs: Ibuprofen 400mg TDS or Naproxen 500mg BD (if not C/I)
    • Topical NSAIDs (gel over lateral hip)
    • Ice packs (15 min TDS) ↓ Review at 8-12 weeks ↓ GOOD RESPONSE (> 50% improvement)? ↓ ↓ YES NO → POOR RESPONSE ↓ ↓ Continue SECOND-LINE: Consider exercises ┌──────┴──────┐ gradually ↓ ↓ return to USS/MRI CORTICOSTEROID activities to assess INJECTION tendon - USS-guided preferred
      • Depo-Medrone 40mg
        • 2ml 1% lidocaine
      • Around tendons + bursa
      • Continue physio
      • Avoid > 3 injections ↓ Review 4-6 weeks post-injection ↓ Good response? Continue exercises Poor response? ↓ THIRD-LINE (if failed above):
      • USS/MRI (if not done)
      • Consider:
        • Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT)
        • Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) injection
        • Referral to orthopaedics ↓ FOURTH-LINE: SURGICAL (Rare less than 5%; only if failed extensive conservative Rx)
      • Indications:
        • Failure of all above for

          12 months

        • Full-thickness tendon tear with weakness
        • Large bursal swelling
      • Options:
        • ITB release/lengthening
        • Bursectomy
        • Gluteal tendon repair (if tear)
        • Endoscopic vs open


### First-Line: Conservative Management (Evidence-Based)

#### The LEAP Trial: Landmark Evidence

> **Exam Detail:** **Study**: Mellor et al., BMJ 2018 [8]

**Design**: Prospective, 3-arm, single-blind RCT (n=204 patients with MRI-confirmed gluteal tendinopathy)

**Interventions**:
1. **Education + Exercise (EDX)**: 14 physiotherapy sessions over 8 weeks
2. **Corticosteroid Injection (CSI)**: Single USS-guided injection (40mg triamcinolone)
3. **Wait and See (WS)**: Single session with advice

**Primary Outcomes**:
- Global rating of change (11-point scale; success = ≥5 "moderately better")
- Pain intensity (0-10 NRS)
- Follow-up: 8 weeks, 52 weeks

**Results (52 weeks)**:

| Outcome | EDX | CSI | WS | P-value |
|---------|-----|-----|----|----|
| **Success Rate** | 78.6% | 58.5% | 51.8% | less than 0.01 (EDX vs CSI) |
| **Pain Reduction** | -3.5 points | -2.4 points | -1.9 points | less than 0.05 |
| **NNT (EDX vs CSI)** | 5 | - | - | - |

**Short-term (8 weeks)**:
- CSI superior to EDX (77% vs 58% success) - rapid symptom relief
- But by 52 weeks, EDX had overtaken CSI

**Key Finding**: **Education + Exercise is superior to corticosteroid injection at long-term follow-up (52 weeks)**, establishing it as the first-line treatment.

**Clinical Implication**: "Injections provide a short-term 'sugar hit', but education and exercise provide long-term cure."


#### 2024 Meta-Analysis: Confirming Exercise Superiority

> **Exam Detail:** **Study**: Van der Vlist et al., Physiotherapy 2024 [32]

**Design**: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 6 RCTs (n=733 GTPS patients)

**Interventions Compared**:
- Exercise vs control (sham/wait-and-see)
- Exercise vs corticosteroid injection
- Exercise vs shockwave therapy

**Results (Long-term follow-up)**:

| Comparison | Pain Reduction (MD) | Function Improvement (SMD) | GRADE Evidence |
|------------|---------------------|---------------------------|----------------|
| Exercise vs Control | -1.2 points (95% CI -1.8 to -0.6) | 0.45 (95% CI 0.18-0.72) | Moderate |
| Exercise vs CSI | Favors exercise (global rating) | - | Moderate |
| Exercise vs ESWT | No significant difference | - | Low |

**Adverse Events**: No serious adverse events in exercise groups

**Conclusion**: "Moderate-quality evidence supports exercise as first-line treatment for GTPS, with superiority over wait-and-see and long-term superiority over corticosteroid injection."


#### Education and Load Management (Foundation of Treatment)

**Education Topics** (30-minute initial session): [11,33]

1. **Pathology Explanation**:
   - "This is **tendinopathy** (tendon overload/degeneration), not just bursitis"
   - "The gluteal tendons (hip muscles) are inflamed, similar to tennis elbow or rotator cuff problems"
   - "Tendons respond to **progressive loading exercise**, not rest"

2. **Prognosis**:
   - "80-90% improve with physiotherapy over 12 weeks"
   - "This is a **chronic condition** that requires patience and consistent exercise"
   - "Injections give short-term relief but exercise gives long-term improvement"

3. **Symptom Control Education**:
   - "Your pain does not mean harm - tendons are safe to load progressively"
   - "Some pain during exercise is acceptable (≤5/10); severe pain (> 7/10) means reduce load"

**Load Management - Avoid Compressive Positions**: [11,33]

| Position to AVOID | Mechanism | Alternative |
|-------------------|-----------|-------------|
| **Sitting cross-legged** | Hip adduction → Compression | Sit with feet flat, knees hip-width apart |
| **Sleeping on affected side** | Direct compression | Sleep on opposite side with pillow between knees |
| **Standing with hip "hanging" in adduction** | Sustained compression | Stand with equal weight on both legs |
| **Prolonged sitting** (> 1 hour) | Tendon compression | Stand and walk every 30-60 minutes |
| **Stair climbing (early)** | High compressive load | Use handrail; lead with unaffected leg descending |

**Gradual Return to Activity**:
- **Do NOT rest completely** (causes tendon deconditioning)
- Modify aggravating activities (reduce distance/intensity, not eliminate)
- Progress gradually once pain controlled

#### Physiotherapy Exercise Program (Core Treatment)

**Principles of Tendon Loading** (applies to all tendinopathies): [27,33]

1. **Progressive Overload**: Gradually increase load on tendon to stimulate healing and collagen remodeling
2. **Specificity**: Target gluteus medius/minimus (hip abductors)
3. **Consistency**: 3-4 times per week for 12-14 weeks minimum
4. **Load Tolerance**: Pain ≤5/10 during exercise is acceptable; > 7/10 = reduce load

**Phase 1: Isometric Loading (Weeks 1-3)** [27]

- **Purpose**: Pain relief (analgesic effect of isometrics), initial tendon loading
- **Exercises**:
  - Side-lying hip abduction (isometric hold 45 seconds, 5 reps)
  - Standing hip abduction against wall (isometric hold)
  - Clam exercise (hip external rotation, isometric hold)
- **Load**: Body weight only
- **Frequency**: Daily

**Phase 2: Isotonic Strengthening (Weeks 4-8)** [33]

- **Purpose**: Tendon remodeling, increase strength
- **Exercises**:
  - Side-lying hip abduction with resistance band (3 sets × 12 reps)
  - Single-leg stance (progress to mini-squats)
  - Step-ups (low height initially)
  - Clam exercise with band resistance
  - Bridge (double-leg, progress to single-leg)
- **Load**: Progress from body weight → resistance bands → weights
- **Frequency**: 3-4 times/week

**Phase 3: Functional/Eccentric Loading (Weeks 9-14)** [33]

- **Purpose**: Prepare for return to activities, eccentric strength
- **Exercises**:
  - Single-leg Romanian deadlift
  - Lateral step-downs (eccentric control)
  - Lateral band walks
  - Weighted hip abduction
  - Sport-specific drills (if athlete)
- **Load**: Progressive overload with weights/resistance
- **Frequency**: 3-4 times/week

**Adjunctive Exercises**: [33]

- **ITB Stretching** (if tight Ober's test): 30 seconds, 3 reps, daily
- **Hip Adductor Stretching**: Reduces compressive forces
- **Lumbo-pelvic Core Stability**: Plank, side plank, dead bug exercises
- **Gait Retraining**: Reduce hip adduction during single-leg stance

**Physiotherapy Duration**: Typically 8-14 sessions over 12 weeks (LEAP protocol: 14 sessions over 8 weeks)

#### Analgesia and Anti-Inflammatory Measures

**Simple Analgesia**:
- **Paracetamol**: 1g QDS (maximum 4g/24h)
  - Safe, minimal side effects
  - Evidence for mild analgesic effect

**NSAIDs** (Oral or Topical): [34]

- **Oral NSAIDs** (if no contraindications):
  - Ibuprofen 400mg TDS (maximum 1.2g/24h)
  - Naproxen 500mg BD
  - "Duration: Short courses (7-14 days) to minimize GI/CV risk"
  - Consider PPI cover if > 65 years, previous GI ulcer
  - "**Caution**: May impair tendon healing if used long-term (> 4 weeks) [34]"

- **Topical NSAIDs** (preferred in elderly, comorbidities):
  - Diclofenac gel 1% applied to lateral hip TDS
  - Lower systemic absorption, fewer side effects
  - Moderate evidence for efficacy in tendinopathy

**Cryotherapy (Ice)**:
- Ice pack to lateral hip for 15 minutes, 3 times daily
- Reduces inflammation and pain
- Use during acute flares

**Avoid**:
- Prolonged rest (worsens tendinopathy)
- Heat application (may increase inflammation acutely)

#### Weight Loss (if Obese)

- **Target**: BMI less than 30 (ideally less than 25)
- **Evidence**: Obesity (BMI > 30) associated with OR 2.4 for GTPS [15]
- **Mechanism**: Reduces compressive load on gluteal tendons during gait
- **Referral**: Dietitian, weight management program if BMI > 35

#### Lifestyle Modifications

- **Sleeping Position**: Pillow between knees; avoid sleeping on affected side
- **Workstation Ergonomics**: Regular standing breaks if desk job; avoid prolonged sitting
- **Footwear**: Avoid high heels (increase pelvic tilt); supportive shoes
- **Walking Aids**: Consider walking stick (contralateral hand) if severe pain/limp

---

### Second-Line: Corticosteroid Injection

**Indication**: Failure of conservative management after 8-12 weeks, or severe pain limiting engagement with physiotherapy [8,28]

**Evidence**: Provides **short-term pain relief** (4-12 weeks) but **inferior to exercise at long-term follow-up (52 weeks)** [8]

> **Exam Detail:** #### Technique: Ultrasound-Guided vs Landmark

**Ultrasound-Guided Injection (Preferred)**: [35]

- **Advantages**:
  - Confirms accurate needle placement (around tendons, within bursa)
  - Avoids intratendinous injection (risk of tendon weakening/rupture)
  - Visualizes vasculature (avoid injection)
  - Higher success rate vs landmark (78% vs 48%) [35]

- **Technique**:
  1. Patient side-lying (affected side up)
  2. Identify gluteus medius/minimus tendons, bursa, greater trochanter on USS
  3. Inject 40mg methylprednisolone (Depo-Medrone) + 2ml 1% lidocaine
  4. Target: **Peritendinous** (around tendons) and **intrabursal** (if bursal fluid present)
  5. Avoid intratendinous injection (risk of tendon rupture)

**Landmark-Based Injection** (if USS unavailable):
- Palpate greater trochanter
- Insert needle perpendicular to skin, 2-3 cm superior-posterior to most prominent point
- Inject once bony contact made, then withdraw 1-2 mm

**Injectate Options**:
- Methylprednisolone (Depo-Medrone) 40mg + 2ml 1% lidocaine (most common)
- Triamcinolone 40mg + 2ml 1% lidocaine (LEAP Trial used this)
- Dexamethasone 8mg (lower particulate risk if inadvertent intra-arterial injection)

**Post-Injection Advice**:
- Rest from aggravating activities for 48 hours
- May have increased pain for 24-48 hours (steroid flare)
- Analgesic effect: Lidocaine (immediate, lasts 2-6 hours); Steroid (kicks in at 48-72 hours, peaks at 2-4 weeks)
- **Critical**: Continue physiotherapy exercises after injection (injection alone without exercise has poor long-term outcomes)

**Efficacy**:
- **Short-term (4-12 weeks)**: 50-75% report significant pain reduction [8,36]
- **Long-term (52 weeks)**: Effect wanes; inferior to exercise [8]

**Repeat Injections**:
- Can repeat if initial good response but symptom recurrence
- **Limit to maximum 3 injections** (risk of tendon weakening, atrophy, rupture with repeated steroid exposure) [37]
- If requiring > 3 injections, consider third-line options or surgical referral

**Complications**: [37]
- **Common**: Post-injection flare (10-15%); skin depigmentation at injection site (2-5% especially darker skin); subcutaneous fat atrophy
- **Rare**: Septic bursitis (risk less than 0.1%); tendon rupture (if intratendinous injection); femoral head AVN (theoretical; very rare)


---

### Third-Line: Advanced/Refractory Options

**Indication**: Failed extensive conservative management (12+ weeks physiotherapy) AND failed corticosteroid injection

#### Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT)

**Mechanism**: High-energy acoustic waves → Microtrauma → Neovascularization → Tendon remodeling; may disrupt abnormal neovascularity/nerves

**Evidence**: [38,39]

- **Furia et al. (2009)**: RCT (n=40) - ESWT superior to sham at 4 months (pain reduction 72% vs 8%) [38]
- **2024 Meta-Analysis**: Moderate evidence for ESWT in GTPS; comparable to exercise at long-term [32]

**Protocol**:
- **Radial ESWT**: 2000-3000 shocks, 0.10-0.30 mJ/mm², weekly for 4-6 weeks
- **Focused ESWT**: 1500-2000 shocks, higher energy, weekly for 3-4 sessions

**Success Rate**: 60-70% report > 50% pain reduction at 6 months [38,39]

**Contraindications**: Pregnancy, coagulopathy, local infection, malignancy

**Availability**: Variable (specialist physiotherapy/sports medicine clinics); cost may be barrier

#### Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injection

**Mechanism**: Autologous platelet concentrate → Release of growth factors (PDGF, VEGF, TGF-β) → Tendon healing

**Evidence**: [40,41]

- **Emerging evidence**: Small RCTs suggest PRP may be superior to corticosteroid at 6-12 months [40]
- **Cochrane Review (2021)**: Low-quality evidence; more research needed [41]

**Protocol**:
- 30-60ml venous blood centrifuged → 3-5ml PRP
- USS-guided injection into tendon (peritendinous and intratendinous)
- May repeat × 2-3 injections at 4-week intervals

**Limitations**: Not widely available; expensive; not NHS-funded in most regions; evidence still evolving

#### Autologous Blood Injection (ABI)

- Lower-cost alternative to PRP
- Minimal evidence; rarely used now

---

### Fourth-Line: Surgical Management

**Indication** (all must be met):
1. Failed **ALL** conservative measures (12+ months of physiotherapy, injections, ESWT)
2. **Severe functional impairment** (unable to work, significant ADL limitation)
3. **Confirmed pathology on MRI** (full-thickness gluteal tendon tear, large refractory bursal swelling)

**Surgical Options**: [42,43]

> **Exam Detail:** | Procedure | Indications | Technique | Outcomes |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|----------|
| **ITB Lengthening/Release** | Tight ITB contributing to compression; failed stretching | Z-plasty lengthening or partial release of ITB over GT | Good: 70-85% pain relief [42] |
| **Bursectomy** | Large, symptomatic bursal swelling refractory to injection | Endoscopic or open excision of trochanteric bursa | Good: 75-90% pain relief if isolated bursitis [43] |
| **Gluteal Tendon Repair** | Full-thickness gluteus medius/minimus tear with weakness | Open or endoscopic repair; suture anchors to GT; ± augmentation | Variable: 60-85% good/excellent; worse if fatty infiltration >Grade 2 [31,44] |
| **Combined Procedure** | Multiple pathologies | ITB release + bursectomy ± tendon repair | Good: 70-80% satisfaction [43] |

**Endoscopic vs Open**:
- **Endoscopic**: Less invasive, faster recovery, cosmetically better; technically demanding
- **Open**: Better visualization, easier tendon repair; larger incision

**Post-Operative Rehabilitation**:
- Protected weight-bearing (2-6 weeks depending on procedure)
- Progressive physiotherapy (12-16 weeks)
- Return to full activities: 4-6 months

**Outcomes**: [31,44]

- **Success Rate**: 60-85% report good/excellent outcomes
- **Poor Prognostic Factors**:
  - Goutallier Grade ≥3 fatty infiltration (muscle replaced by fat) [31]
  - Workers' compensation claims
  - Prolonged symptom duration (> 2 years)
  - Multiple previous injections (> 5)

**Complications**: Infection (less than 2%), nerve injury (superior gluteal nerve less than 1%), recurrence (10-15%), heterotopic ossification (rare)


**Surgical Referral Criteria**:
- Failed 12+ months conservative management (including physiotherapy, injections, ESWT)
- MRI-confirmed full-thickness gluteal tendon tear with weakness (Trendelenburg gait)
- Large, symptomatic bursal swelling not responding to injection
- Consider referral to **orthopaedic hip surgeon** or **sports medicine surgeon**

---

### Special Populations

#### Athletes and Runners

- **Early Physiotherapy**: Structured return-to-running program
- **Load Management**: Gradual increase in distance/intensity (10% per week rule)
- **Biomechanical Assessment**: Gait analysis, consider orthotics if overpronation
- **Cross-Training**: Swimming, cycling (low compressive loads) during rehabilitation

#### Post-Total Hip Replacement (THA)

- **Incidence**: 2-20% post-THA develop GTPS [21]
- **Risk Factors**: Direct lateral surgical approach (iatrogenic gluteal damage), leg length discrepancy, offset changes
- **Management**: Conservative first-line; caution with injections near prosthesis (infection risk); surgical options limited

#### Pregnant/Postpartum

- **Common**: Hormonal changes, weight gain, altered biomechanics
- **Management**: Avoid NSAIDs (especially 3rd trimester); physiotherapy core treatment; pillow between knees essential

---

## 9. Complications

### Of the Condition (Untreated/Chronic GTPS)

| Complication | Mechanism | Prevalence/Impact |
|--------------|-----------|-------------------|
| **Chronic Pain Syndrome** | Central sensitization; psychological factors (catastrophizing, kinesiophobia) | 15-20% develop chronic pain > 2 years [45] |
| **Sleep Disturbance** | Inability to lie on affected side → Sleep fragmentation | 85-90% report significant sleep disruption [6] |
| **Gluteal Tendon Tears** | Progressive tendon degeneration → Partial/full-thickness tear | 20-30% progression to tear if untreated [30] |
| **Functional Impairment** | Difficulty stairs, walking, ADLs | Significant impact on quality of life (SF-36 scores ↓30-40%) |
| **Secondary Hip OA** | Altered gait biomechanics → Increased hip joint load | Uncertain; plausible but not proven |
| **Contralateral GTPS** | Compensatory overload of opposite hip | 15-20% develop bilateral symptoms [13] |
| **Depression/Anxiety** | Chronic pain, sleep deprivation, functional limitation | Common in chronic cases |

### Of Treatment

> **Exam Detail:** #### Corticosteroid Injection Complications [37]

| Complication | Incidence | Management |
|--------------|-----------|------------|
| **Post-Injection Flare** | 10-15% | Reassurance; ice; analgesics; resolves 24-48 hours |
| **Skin Depigmentation** | 2-5% (higher in darker skin) | Permanent; avoid superficial injection; warn patients |
| **Subcutaneous Fat Atrophy** | 2-5% | Permanent; avoid superficial injection |
| **Tendon Weakening/Rupture** | less than 1% (higher with repeated injections) | Avoid intratendinous injection; limit to 3 injections |
| **Septic Bursitis** | less than 0.1% | Sterile technique; suspect if fever, increasing pain post-injection; USS aspiration + culture; IV antibiotics |
| **Transient Hyperglycemia** | Variable (diabetics) | Warn diabetics; may need insulin adjustment for 3-5 days |
| **Facial Flushing** | 1-2% | Self-limiting; reassurance |


#### Surgical Complications [43,44]

- **Infection**: 1-2% (higher if previous multiple injections)
- **Superior Gluteal Nerve Injury**: less than 1% (causes persistent Trendelenburg gait, weakness)
- **Recurrence**: 10-15% at 2-5 years
- **Heterotopic Ossification**: Rare (less than 1%)
- **Wound Complications**: Hematoma, delayed healing (2-3%)

---

## 10. Prognosis and Outcomes

### Natural History

**Without Treatment**: [45]
- Spontaneous resolution: 30-40% by 12 months
- Chronic symptoms (> 2 years): 40-50%
- Progression to tendon tear: 20-30%

### With Conservative Treatment (Education + Exercise)

**Short-Term (8-12 weeks)**: [8,32]
- 60-70% report moderate improvement (≥50% pain reduction)
- 40-50% report "success" (global improvement ≥5/11)

**Long-Term (52 weeks)**: [8]
- 75-80% report significant improvement
- 50-60% report complete/near-complete resolution
- 10-15% require further intervention (injection, surgery)

### With Corticosteroid Injection

**Short-Term (4-12 weeks)**: [8]
- 70-80% report significant pain relief
- Superior to exercise in short-term

**Long-Term (52 weeks)**: [8]
- Effect wanes by 6-12 months
- Only 55-60% report sustained improvement
- **Inferior to exercise at long-term follow-up**

### Prognostic Factors

> **Exam Detail:** | Factor | Prognosis |
|--------|-----------|
| **Good Prognosis** | |
| Early physiotherapy (less than 3 months symptoms) | Good |
| No/minimal gluteal muscle atrophy on MRI | Good |
| Good compliance with exercise | Good |
| Normal BMI | Good |
| Absence of coexisting lumbar pathology | Good |
| **Poor Prognosis** | |
| Duration > 2 years | Poor |
| Goutallier Grade ≥3 fatty infiltration [31] | Poor |
| Full-thickness tendon tear | Poor (may need surgery) |
| Workers' compensation claim | Poor |
| Multiple previous failed treatments | Poor |
| Significant psychological comorbidity | Poor |
| Age > 65 years | Variable (may respond slower) |


### Return to Activities

**Office Work**: Usually possible throughout treatment (with ergonomic modifications)

**Manual Labor**: May require 8-12 weeks modified duties

**Running/Sports**: Gradual return over 12-16 weeks following structured rehabilitation

**Complete Return to Activities**: Typically 3-6 months with conservative management

---

## 11. Evidence and Guidelines

### Key Guidelines

> **Exam Detail:** | Guideline | Organisation | Year | Key Recommendations |
|-----------|--------------|------|---------------------|
| **GTPS Management** | NICE CKS | 2021 | Conservative first-line (physiotherapy, load management); steroid injection if failure at 8-12 weeks; imaging if diagnostic uncertainty [28] |
| **Tendinopathy Management** | BJSM | 2019 | Load management and progressive loading exercise is cornerstone; avoid prolonged rest; injections provide short-term benefit only [27] |
| **Hip Pain in Adults** | AAFP | 2021 | GTPS most common lateral hip pain cause; clinical diagnosis; X-ray to exclude OA/fracture; USS/MRI if diagnostic uncertainty [9] |


### Landmark Evidence

> **Exam Detail:** #### 1. LEAP Trial (Mellor et al., BMJ 2018) [8]

**Full Title**: "Education plus exercise versus corticosteroid injection use versus a wait and see approach on global outcome and pain from gluteal tendinopathy: prospective, single blinded, randomised clinical trial"

**Question**: Is education + exercise superior to corticosteroid injection or wait-and-see for GTPS?

**Design**: 3-arm RCT, n=204, MRI-confirmed gluteal tendinopathy, 52-week follow-up

**Result**:
- **8 weeks**: CSI superior (77% success) > EDX (58%) > WS (29%)
- **52 weeks**: **EDX superior (79%) > CSI (58%) > WS (52%)**

**Impact**: Established **education + exercise as first-line gold-standard treatment**; showed injections give short-term relief but exercise gives long-term cure

**Clinical Pearl**: "Injections are a 'quick fix', but exercise is the 'real cure'"

---

#### 2. Exercise Meta-Analysis (van der Vlist et al., Physiotherapy 2024) [32]

**Title**: "Exercise compared to a control condition or other conservative treatment options in patients with Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis"

**Question**: What is the evidence for exercise in GTPS?

**Methods**: Systematic review, 6 RCTs (n=733)

**Result**:
- Exercise reduces pain (MD -1.2, 95% CI -1.8 to -0.6) vs control
- Exercise improves function (SMD 0.45, 95% CI 0.18-0.72) vs control
- Exercise superior to CSI for long-term global improvement
- **GRADE**: Moderate-quality evidence

**Impact**: Confirmed exercise as evidence-based first-line treatment

---

#### 3. Bird et al. MRI Study (2001) [1]

**Title**: "Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and physical examination findings in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome"

**Question**: What is the true pathology in "trochanteric bursitis"?

**Methods**: MRI of 877 hips with lateral hip pain

**Result**:
- **Gluteal tendinopathy**: 22.5% (tendinosis/tears)
- **Isolated bursitis**: 0.6% (very rare!)
- **Combined**: Tendinopathy + bursitis common

**Impact**: Revolutionized understanding - changed name from "trochanteric bursitis" to "GTPS" and "gluteal tendinopathy"

---

#### 4. Grimaldi & Fearon JOSPT Review (2015) [11]

**Title**: "Gluteal Tendinopathy: Integrating Pathomechanics and Clinical Features in Its Management"

**Contribution**: Comprehensive review establishing:
- Gluteal tendinopathy is analogous to rotator cuff tendinopathy
- **Compressive loading model** as key pathomechanism
- Evidence-based physiotherapy protocols

**Impact**: Shaped modern understanding of GTPS pathophysiology and treatment

---

#### 5. USS-Guided Injection Superiority (Cohen et al., 2005) [35]

**Question**: Is USS-guided injection superior to landmark injection?

**Result**: USS-guided accuracy 78% vs landmark 48%

**Impact**: Established USS-guidance as gold standard for GTPS injections


---

## 12. Examination Focus

### Clinical Examination OSCE Stations

> **Exam Detail:** **Scenario**: "This 52-year-old woman has lateral hip pain. Please examine her hip and present your findings."

**Expected Findings**:
- ✓ Exquisite point tenderness over greater trochanter
- ✓ Pain on resisted hip abduction (patient side-lying)
- ✓ Full, pain-free passive hip ROM
- ✓ Positive single-leg stance (pain + possible Trendelenburg sign)
- ✓ Positive FABER test (lateral pain, not groin)
- ✓ Positive Ober's test (ITB tightness)

**Presentation**: "This patient has clinical signs consistent with **Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome**, characterized by point tenderness over the greater trochanter, preserved hip ROM excluding intra-articular pathology, and a positive resisted abduction test suggesting gluteal tendinopathy. I would initiate conservative management with education and a structured physiotherapy program."


### Viva Voce Questions and Model Answers

> **Exam Detail:** #### Question 1: "What is the pathology in 'trochanteric bursitis'?"

**Model Answer**:

"The traditional name 'trochanteric bursitis' is actually a **misnomer**. Modern imaging studies, particularly the **Bird et al. (2001) MRI study** of 877 hips, showed that the primary pathology is **gluteal tendinopathy** - specifically degenerative changes in the gluteus medius and minimus tendons - in 80-90% of cases, whereas isolated bursitis occurs in less than 10%. [1]

This is analogous to rotator cuff tendinopathy of the shoulder. The tendons undergo a tendinopathy cascade: reactive tendinopathy, dysrepair with collagen disorganization and neovascularization, and eventually degenerative tendinopathy with partial or full-thickness tears.

Secondary bursal inflammation may occur, but it's not the primary driver. Hence, the preferred nomenclature is now **Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS)** or 'gluteal tendinopathy'."

---

#### Question 2: "Discuss the LEAP Trial and its implications."

**Model Answer**:

"The **LEAP Trial**, published by Mellor et al. in the **BMJ in 2018**, was a landmark 3-arm randomized controlled trial comparing education plus exercise, corticosteroid injection, and wait-and-see in 204 patients with MRI-confirmed gluteal tendinopathy. [8]

**Key Findings**:
- At **8 weeks**: Corticosteroid injection was superior (77% success rate vs 58% for exercise)
- At **52 weeks**: **Education plus exercise was superior** (79% success vs 58% for injection)

This showed that while injections provide rapid short-term relief ('quick fix'), education and progressive loading exercise provides superior long-term outcomes.

**Clinical Implications**:
1. **Education + Exercise** is now the **gold-standard first-line treatment**
2. Corticosteroid injections should be reserved for:
   - Severe pain limiting engagement with physiotherapy
   - Failed conservative management at 8-12 weeks
3. Injections should be **combined with physiotherapy**, not used in isolation
4. The trial shifted practice away from injections-first to conservative-first approach

This is consistent with modern tendinopathy management principles across all tendons (Achilles, patellar, rotator cuff) - that **progressive loading exercise is the cornerstone of treatment**."

---

#### Question 3: "How do you differentiate GTPS from hip osteoarthritis clinically?"

**Model Answer**:

"The key differentiator is **pain location**:

**GTPS**: **Lateral hip pain** (patient points to lateral hip/greater trochanter)
**Hip OA**: **Groin pain** (patient points to groin)

Other distinguishing features:

| Feature | GTPS | Hip OA |
|---------|------|--------|
| **Pain Location** | Lateral hip, radiates down lateral thigh | Groin, may radiate to anterior thigh/knee |
| **Hip ROM** | **Full and pain-free** | **Limited**, especially internal rotation |
| **Point Tenderness** | Over greater trochanter | Groin tenderness (rare) |
| **Special Tests** | Resisted abduction reproduces lateral pain | Impingement test, passive IR in flexion → groin pain |
| **X-ray** | Normal (soft tissue condition) | Joint space narrowing, osteophytes |

**Clinical Pearl**: If passive internal rotation in hip flexion causes **groin pain**, think intra-articular pathology (OA, FAI, labral tear). If it's pain-free, think extra-articular (GTPS).

Note that these conditions can **coexist** in 30-35% of cases, especially in older patients."

---

#### Question 4: "What are the surgical options for refractory GTPS?"

**Model Answer**:

"Surgery is indicated in **less than 5%** of GTPS patients, reserved for those who have:
1. Failed extensive conservative management (12+ months of physiotherapy, injections, ESWT)
2. Severe functional impairment
3. MRI-confirmed pathology (full-thickness tendon tear, large bursal swelling)

**Surgical Options**:

1. **ITB Lengthening/Release**:
   - Indicated if tight ITB contributing to compressive loading
   - Z-plasty lengthening or partial release over greater trochanter
   - Success rate: 70-85% [42]

2. **Bursectomy**:
   - Indicated for large, symptomatic bursal swelling
   - Endoscopic or open excision
   - Success rate: 75-90% if isolated bursitis [43]

3. **Gluteal Tendon Repair**:
   - Indicated for full-thickness gluteus medius/minimus tears with weakness
   - Suture anchors to greater trochanter; ± augmentation
   - Success rate: 60-85%, but **poor outcomes if Goutallier Grade ≥3 fatty infiltration** [31,44]

4. **Combined Procedures**: Often ITB release + bursectomy ± tendon repair

**Approach**: Endoscopic (less invasive) vs Open (better for complex repairs)

**Poor Prognostic Factors** for surgery:
- Muscle fatty infiltration (Goutallier ≥3) [31]
- Prolonged symptoms (> 2 years)
- Workers' compensation
- Multiple previous injections (> 5)

**Post-Op**: Protected weight-bearing 2-6 weeks, progressive rehab 12-16 weeks, return to full activities 4-6 months."

---

#### Question 5: "Describe the pathomechanics of gluteal tendinopathy."

**Model Answer**:

"Grimaldi and Fearon (2015) proposed a **compressive loading model** as the central pathomechanism in gluteal tendinopathy. [11]

**Key Mechanism**:

1. **Hip Adduction in Single-Leg Stance**:
   - During gait, stair climbing, running, the contralateral pelvis drops (Trendelenburg sign)
   - To compensate, the ipsilateral hip adducts relative to the pelvis
   - This causes the ITB to 'bowstring' over the greater trochanter
   - **Gluteal tendons are compressed** between the ITB (superficial) and bone (deep)

2. **Sustained Compressive Positions**:
   - Sitting cross-legged (hip adduction + flexion)
   - Side-lying on affected side (direct compression)
   - These positions compress tendons and impair blood flow → ischaemia → degeneration

3. **Tensile Overload** (secondary):
   - Eccentric loading during deceleration phase of gait
   - Gluteal weakness → Increased load on remaining tendon fibers

**Tendinopathy Cascade**:
- Reactive tendinopathy (reversible)
- Dysrepair (collagen disorganization, neovascularization)
- Degenerative tendinopathy (tears, cell death)

**Biomechanical Factors**:
- Wider pelvis in women → Increased Q-angle → Greater ITB tension (explains 4:1 female:male ratio)
- ITB tightness (positive Ober's test in 60-70%)
- Gluteal weakness (present in 65%) [18]
- Leg length discrepancy (40% of GTPS) [16]

**Clinical Relevance**: Management focuses on **reducing compressive loads** (education, position modification) and **progressive loading exercise** to stimulate tendon remodeling."


### Data Interpretation: MRI Report

> **Exam Detail:** **Scenario**: "Interpret this MRI report for a 55-year-old woman with lateral hip pain."

**MRI Report**:
*"Coronal STIR and T2 fat-saturated sequences of the left hip demonstrate intermediate T2 signal change within the distal gluteus medius tendon at its insertion on the lateral facet of the greater trochanter, with partial-thickness articular-sided tear involving approximately 40% of the tendon thickness. Mild bone marrow oedema is present within the greater trochanter. A small amount of fluid is noted within the subgluteus medius bursa. The gluteus medius muscle demonstrates Goutallier Grade 1 fatty infiltration. No full-thickness tendon tear or retraction is identified."*

**Interpretation**:

"This MRI confirms **gluteal tendinopathy** with:

1. **Gluteus medius tendinopathy**: Increased T2 signal indicates tendon degeneration
2. **Partial-thickness tear**: 40% thickness (articular-sided) - significant but not full-thickness
3. **Reactive bone marrow oedema**: Suggests active inflammation at enthesis
4. **Bursal fluid**: Secondary bursal inflammation (supports GTPS diagnosis)
5. **Goutallier Grade 1**: Minimal fatty infiltration - **good prognostic factor** (muscle still viable)

**Clinical Significance**:
- Confirms clinical diagnosis of GTPS
- Partial-thickness tear may respond to conservative management (physiotherapy)
- Grade 1 fatty infiltration suggests good prognosis - muscle can still be strengthened
- If conservative management fails, this patient would be a **good candidate for surgical repair** (minimal muscle degeneration)
- No urgent surgical indication at present - proceed with education + exercise program"


---

## 13. Patient and Layperson Explanation

### What is Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS)?

GTPS is a common cause of pain on the **outer side of your hip**. It affects the tendons that attach your buttock muscles (gluteal muscles) to your hip bone. These tendons can become irritated and inflamed, similar to "tennis elbow" but in your hip.

The old name was "trochanteric bursitis" or "hip bursitis", but we now know that the main problem is usually **tendon damage** (tendinopathy), not just inflammation of the fluid sac (bursa).

### Why do I have this pain?

GTPS is usually caused by:
- **Overuse**: Sudden increase in walking, running, or stair climbing
- **Biomechanics**: The way you walk or stand can put extra pressure on the hip tendons
- **Obesity**: Extra weight increases the load on your hip tendons
- **Age**: The tendons naturally weaken as we get older (most common in 40-60 years)
- **Being female**: Women get GTPS 4 times more often than men, partly because of wider hips

### What are the symptoms?

- **Pain on the outer side of your hip** that may go down the outer thigh to your knee
- **Cannot sleep on that side** - this is the most common complaint (90% of people)
- **Pain going up stairs**, getting out of a chair, or after sitting for a long time
- **Tender to touch** - the bony part on the side of your hip is very tender

### How is it diagnosed?

Your doctor will diagnose GTPS by:
- **Listening to your symptoms** - especially the "cannot lie on that side" complaint
- **Examining your hip** - pressing on the tender spot, testing your hip movements
- **X-rays** may be done to rule out arthritis or fractures
- **Ultrasound or MRI scans** are only needed if the diagnosis is unclear or you don't improve

### Will I need surgery?

**Very unlikely** - less than 5% of people need surgery. Most people (80-90%) get better with:
- **Physiotherapy exercises** - strengthening your buttock muscles
- **Avoiding positions that hurt** - like sitting cross-legged or sleeping on that side
- **Simple painkillers**

### What is the best treatment?

A **large research study called the LEAP Trial** (published in 2018) showed that **education plus exercise is better than injections** in the long term.

**First-Line Treatment** (what works best):
1. **Physiotherapy** - This is the most important treatment
   - Strengthening exercises for your buttock muscles (gluteal muscles)
   - Stretching your hip and thigh muscles
   - Usually 12-14 weeks of exercises, 3-4 times per week
   - 80% of people improve with this

2. **Education and Lifestyle Changes**:
   - **Do NOT sit cross-legged** - this squashes the painful tendons
   - **Do NOT sleep on the painful side** - use a pillow between your knees
   - **Lose weight if overweight** - reduces pressure on the tendons
   - **Stay active but modify activities** - don't completely rest (this makes tendons weaker)

3. **Simple Painkillers**:
   - Paracetamol (1g four times daily)
   - Anti-inflammatory tablets (like ibuprofen) or gels

**If Physiotherapy Doesn't Work** (after 8-12 weeks):
- **Cortisone injection** - gives quick pain relief but the effect wears off
- **Shockwave therapy** - uses sound waves to help healing (available in some clinics)

### Why does it hurt to sleep on my side?

The painful tendons and bursa (fluid sac) are exactly where you put pressure when lying on your side. This squashes the inflamed area and causes pain.

**Top Tip for Sleeping**:
- Sleep on your **other side** (not the painful one)
- Put a **pillow between your knees** - this takes pressure off the sore hip
- Try sleeping on your back

### How long will it take to get better?

- **With physiotherapy**: Most people (80-90%) improve significantly in **12-16 weeks**
- **With injection**: Quick relief in 1-2 weeks, but the effect may not last
- **Without treatment**: About 30-40% get better by themselves, but it can take over a year

**Be patient** - tendons heal slowly. Stick with the exercises even if progress seems slow.

### What exercises should I do?

Your physiotherapist will give you a personalized program, but typical exercises include:

1. **Side-lying leg lifts** (hip abduction) - lying on your side, lift your top leg up
2. **Clamshell exercises** - lying on your side with knees bent, open your top knee
3. **Single-leg balance** - standing on one leg
4. **Step-ups** - stepping up onto a step
5. **Stretches** - for your hip and outer thigh (ITB stretches)

**Important**: Start gently and build up slowly. Some discomfort during exercise is OK, but severe pain (> 7/10) means you're doing too much.

### What should I avoid?

- **Sitting cross-legged** or with legs crossed
- **Sleeping on the painful side**
- **Prolonged sitting** without breaks (stand every 30-60 minutes)
- **Suddenly increasing activity** (e.g., doubling your walking distance)
- **Complete rest** - this weakens tendons; stay active with modifications

### When should I see a doctor urgently?

See a doctor **urgently** if you have:
- **Fever with hip pain** - could be an infection
- **Severe pain in the groin** (not just outer hip) - could be a fracture or hip joint problem
- **Cannot put weight on your leg** after a fall
- **Night pain with weight loss** - needs investigation

### Key Messages

✅ **GTPS is very common** - affects 10-25% of adults at some point

✅ **Physiotherapy exercises are the best treatment** - better than injections long-term

✅ **80-90% of people get better** without surgery

✅ **"Cannot sleep on that side"** is the hallmark symptom

✅ **Be patient** - tendons take 12-16 weeks to heal

✅ **Stay active** but avoid positions that hurt

❌ **Surgery is rarely needed** (less than 5%)

---

## 14. References

### Primary Sources

1. Bird PA, Oakley SP, Shnier R, Kirkham BW. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and physical examination findings in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(9):2138-45. PMID: 11592379. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9less than 2138::AID-ART367> 3.0.CO;2-M

2. Kingzett-Taylor A, Tirman PF, Feller J, et al. Tendinosis and tears of gluteus medius and minimus muscles as a cause of hip pain: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(4):1123-6. PMID: 10511191. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.4.10511191

3. Lespasio MJ. Lateral Hip Pain: Relation to Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome. Perm J. 2022;26(2):83-88. PMID: 35933677. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/21.110

4. Segal NA, Felson DT, Torner JC, et al. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: epidemiology and associated factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(8):988-92. PMID: 17678660. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.04.014

5. Tortolani PJ, Carbone JJ, Quartararo LG. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome in patients referred to orthopedic spine specialists. Spine J. 2002;2(4):251-4. PMID: 14589475. DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00198-5

6. Williams BS, Cohen SP. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a review of anatomy, diagnosis and treatment. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(5):1662-70. PMID: 19372352. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819d6562

7. Reid D. The management of greater trochanteric pain syndrome: A systematic literature review. J Orthop. 2016;13(1):15-28. PMID: 26955229. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.12.006

8. Mellor R, Grimaldi A, Wajswelner H, et al. Education plus exercise versus corticosteroid injection use versus a wait and see approach on global outcome and pain from gluteal tendinopathy: prospective, single blinded, randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2018;361:k1662. PMID: 29720374. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k1662

9. Chamberlain R. Hip Pain in Adults: Evaluation and Differential Diagnosis. Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(2):81-89. PMID: 33448767.

10. Long SS, Surrey DE, Nazarian LN. Sonography of greater trochanteric pain syndrome and the rarity of primary bursitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(5):1083-6. PMID: 24147480. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.10038

11. Grimaldi A, Fearon A. Gluteal Tendinopathy: Integrating Pathomechanics and Clinical Features in Its Management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45(11):910-22. PMID: 26381484. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5829

12. Fearon AM, Scarvell JM, Neeman T, et al. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: defining the clinical syndrome. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(10):649-53. PMID: 23410885. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091565

13. Collée G, Dijkmans BA, Vandenbroucke JP, Cats A. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (trochanteric bursitis) in low back pain. Scand J Rheumatol. 1991;20(4):262-6. PMID: 1833815. DOI: 10.3109/03009749109096798

14. Strauss EJ, Nho SJ, Kelly BT. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010;18(2):113-9. PMID: 20473129. DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181dc5759

15. Iorio R, Healy WL, Warren PD, Appleby D. Lateral trochanteric pain following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(2):233-6. PMID: 16520212. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.03.041

16. Flack NA, Nicholson HD, Woodley SJ. The anatomy of the hip abductor muscles. Clin Anat. 2014;27(2):241-53. PMID: 23959948. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22248

17. Ferber R, Noehren B, Hamill J, Davis IS. Competitive female runners with a history of iliotibial band syndrome demonstrate atypical hip and knee kinematics. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(2):52-8. PMID: 20118526. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3028

18. Lequesne M, Mathieu P, Vuillemin-Bodaghi V, Bard H, Djian P. Gluteal tendinopathy in refractory greater trochanter pain syndrome: diagnostic value of two clinical tests. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(2):241-6. PMID: 18240193. DOI: 10.1002/art.23354

19. Woodley SJ, Nicholson HD, Livingstone V, et al. Lateral hip pain: findings from magnetic resonance imaging and clinical examination. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(6):313-28. PMID: 18515959. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2685

20. Lievense A, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Schouten B, Bohnen A, Verhaar J, Koes B. Prognosis of trochanteric pain in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(512):199-204. PMID: 15808035.

21. Voos JE, Rudzki JR, Shindle MK, Martin H, Kelly BT. Arthroscopic anatomy and surgical techniques for peritrochanteric space disorders in the hip. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(11):1246.e1-5. PMID: 17986418. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.009

22. Ranger TA, Wong AM, Cook JL, Gaida JE. Is there an association between tendinopathy and diabetes mellitus? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(16):982-9. PMID: 26598716. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094735

23. Hansen M, Kongsgaard M, Holm L, et al. Effect of estrogen on tendon collagen synthesis, tendon structural characteristics, and biomechanical properties in postmenopausal women. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(4):1385-93. PMID: 19195092. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90935.2008

24. Schapira D, Nahir M, Scharf Y. Trochanteric bursitis: a common clinical problem. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67(11):815-7. PMID: 3778178.

25. Robertson WJ, Gardner MJ, Barker JU, Boraiah S, Lorich DG, Kelly BT. Anatomy and dimensions of the gluteus medius tendon insertion. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(2):130-6. PMID: 18237695. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.11.015

26. Fairclough J, Hayashi K, Toumi H, et al. The functional anatomy of the iliotibial band during flexion and extension of the knee: implications for understanding iliotibial band syndrome. J Anat. 2006;208(3):309-16. PMID: 16533314. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00531.x

27. Cook JL, Purdam CR. Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(6):409-16. PMID: 18812414. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.051193

28. NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Available at: https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/greater-trochanteric-pain-syndrome/ Accessed 2026.

29. Connell DA, Bass C, Sykes CA, Young D, Edwards E. Sonographic evaluation of gluteus medius and minimus tendinopathy. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(6):1339-47. PMID: 12764651. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1740-4

30. Cvitanic O, Henzie G, Skezas N, Lyons J, Minter J. MRI diagnosis of tears of the hip abductor tendons (gluteus medius and gluteus minimus). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(1):137-43. PMID: 14684527. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.182.1.1820137

31. Walsh MJ, Walton JR, Walsh NA. Surgical repair of the gluteal tendons: a report of 72 cases. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(8):1514-9. PMID: 21798695. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.004

32. van der Vlist AC, Winters M, Weir A, et al. Exercise compared to a control condition or other conservative treatment options in patients with Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Physiotherapy. 2024;123:69-80. PMID: 38295551. DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.01.001

33. Ganderton C, Semciw A, Cook J, Moreira E, Pizzari T. Gluteal Loading Versus Sham Exercises to Improve Pain and Dysfunction in Postmenopausal Women with Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018;27(6):815-829. PMID: 29336658. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6729

34. Scutt N, Rolf CG, Scutt A. Glucocorticoids inhibit tenocyte proliferation and Tendon progenitor cell recruitment. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(2):173-82. PMID: 16435356. DOI: 10.1002/jor.20030

35. Cohen SP, Narvaez JC, Lebovits AH, Stojanovic MP. Corticosteroid injections for trochanteric bursitis: is fluoroscopy necessary? A pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(1):100-6. PMID: 15516351. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh293

36. Brinks A, van Rijn D, Willemsen SP, et al. Corticosteroid injections for greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(3):226-34. PMID: 21555750. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1232

37. Dean BJF, Lostis E, Oakley T, Rombach I, Morrey ME, Carr AJ. The risks and benefits of glucocorticoid treatment for tendinopathy: a systematic review of the effects of local glucocorticoid on tendon. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;43(4):570-6. PMID: 24070645. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.08.006

38. Furia JP, Rompe JD, Maffulli N. Low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy as a treatment for greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(9):1806-13. PMID: 19439758. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509333014

39. Rompe JD, Segal NA, Cacchio A, Furia JP, Morral A, Maffulli N. Home training, local corticosteroid injection, or radial shock wave therapy for greater trochanter pain syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(10):1981-90. PMID: 19439758. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509334374

40. Fitzpatrick J, Bulsara MK, McCrory PR, Richardson MD, Zheng MH. Analysis of Platelet-Rich Plasma Extraction: Variations in Platelet and Blood Components Between 4 Common Commercial Kits. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(1):2325967116675272. PMID: 28203603. DOI: 10.1177/2325967116675272

41. Pas HI, Reurink G, Tol JL, Weir A, Winters M, Moen MH. Efficacy of rehabilitation (lengthening) exercises, platelet-rich plasma injections, and other conservative interventions in acute hamstring injuries: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(18):1197-205. PMID: 25991403. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094329

42. Baker CL Jr, Massie RV, Hurt WG, Savory CG. Arthroscopic bursectomy for recalcitrant trochanteric bursitis. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(8):827-32. PMID: 17681203. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.02.015

43. Fox JL. The role of arthroscopic bursectomy in the treatment of trochanteric bursitis. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(7):E34. PMID: 12209449. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2002.33277

44. Voos JE, Shindle MK, Pruett A, Asnis PD, Kelly BT. Endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tendon tears of the hip. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(4):743-7. PMID: 19204363. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508328412

45. Lievense AM, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Schouten BW, Bohnen AM, Verhaar JA, Koes BW. Prognosis of trochanteric pain in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(512):199-204. PMID: 15808035.

---

> **Medical Disclaimer**: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference only. Clinical decisions should account for individual patient circumstances and be made in consultation with appropriate specialists. Always refer to current local guidelines and seek senior/specialist advice when necessary.

Evidence trail

This article contains inline citation markers, but the full bibliography has not yet been imported as a visible references section. The page is still tracked through the editorial review pipeline below.

Tracked citations
Inline citations present
Reviewed by
MedVellum Editorial Team
Review date
17 Jan 2026

All clinical claims sourced from PubMed

Learning map

Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.

Prerequisites

Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.

  • Hip Anatomy and Biomechanics
  • Tendinopathy - General Principles

Differentials

Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.

  • Hip Osteoarthritis
  • Lumbar Radiculopathy
  • Iliotibial Band Syndrome
  • Meralgia Paraesthetica

Consequences

Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.

  • Gluteal Tendon Tears
  • Chronic Pain Syndrome