Volar Plate Injury to the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint (PIPJ)

1. Overview

The volar plate is a fibrocartilaginous ligamentous structure on the palmar aspect of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, providing the primary restraint to hyperextension. Volar plate injuries represent the most common ligamentous injury to the hand, typically occurring through forced hyperextension mechanisms during ball-handling sports. The injury spectrum ranges from simple sprains to complete avulsion with variable-sized bony fragments, and critically, to unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations involving the articular surface of the middle phalanx base. [1,2]

The clinical imperative in managing volar plate injuries is to maintain joint stability while preventing the devastating complication of PIP joint stiffness. The PIP joint has a propensity for rapid development of flexion contractures with immobilization, a phenomenon related to the short distance between collateral ligament origins and insertions, abundant synovial lining, and dense surrounding soft tissue envelope. The principle of "movement is life" underpins modern management, with early controlled mobilization preferred for stable injuries. [3,4]

Unstable injuries—characterized by dorsal subluxation of the middle phalanx or large articular fracture fragments involving > 30-40% of the volar articular surface—require careful graduated extension blocking protocols or surgical intervention to prevent chronic instability, swan-neck deformity, or post-traumatic arthritis. Accurate initial assessment using true lateral radiographs to evaluate joint congruency is paramount, as the "V-sign" of dorsal subluxation indicates instability requiring specialist hand therapy or surgical management. [5,6]

2. Epidemiology

Incidence and Prevalence

Volar plate injuries are the most frequently encountered ligamentous injury of the hand, representing approximately 10-15% of all hand injuries presenting to emergency departments. The annual incidence is estimated at 50-60 per 100,000 population, though this likely underestimates true prevalence as many minor injuries are self-managed. [7,8]

Demographics and Risk Factors

Age Distribution: Bimodal distribution with peaks in adolescents/young adults (sports-related) and middle-aged adults (workplace/domestic injuries). [11]

Sex: Male predominance (M:F ratio 3:1) reflecting higher participation in contact sports and manual labor. [7]

Sport-Specific Risks:

• Basketball: Highest incidence (catching passes, rebounding)
• Netball: High incidence in goalers and defenders
• Cricket: Catching/fielding injuries
• Rugby/American Football: Tackling injuries
• Volleyball: Blocking and spiking

Occupational Factors: Manual workers, particularly those involved in lifting, gripping, or machinery operation demonstrate elevated risk. [12]

Temporal Trends

Recent epidemiological studies demonstrate stable or slightly increasing incidence, attributed to increased sports participation and improved injury reporting. Weekend and evening presentations predominate, correlating with recreational sports timing. [8]

3. Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Anatomy

The PIP joint is a hinge joint between the head of the proximal phalanx and base of the middle phalanx. Its stability derives from both bony architecture and soft tissue restraints:

Bony Architecture:

• Proximal phalangeal head: Bicondylar configuration with central groove
• Middle phalangeal base: Reciprocal concave articulation with central ridge
• Articular congruency provides 30-40% of joint stability [13]

Soft Tissue Restraints:

1. Volar Plate: The primary static restraint to hyperextension

   • Structure: Fibrocartilaginous plate, 2-3mm thick
   • Proximal attachment: Membranous origin from proximal phalanx metaphysis (allows folding during flexion)
   • Distal attachment: Firm insertion into volar base of middle phalanx
   • Lateral extensions: Check-rein ligaments merging with accessory collateral ligaments
   • Blood supply: Primarily from digital arteries via vincula
   • Biomechanics: Restrains extension beyond 0°, provides 50-60% of hyperextension restraint [13,14]

2. Collateral Ligaments:

   • Proper collateral ligaments (PCL): Primary varus/valgus restraint, taut in flexion
   • Accessory collateral ligaments (ACL): Insert on volar plate, taut in extension
   • Together provide 40-50% of varus/valgus stability [14]

3. Extensor Mechanism:

   • Central slip: Inserts on dorsal base of middle phalanx
   • Lateral bands: Extend to distal phalanx
   • Terminal extensor tendon
   • Provides dynamic extension and dorsal capsular support

Exam Detail: Biomechanical Studies: Kinematic analysis demonstrates the PIP joint operates through a complex combination of rolling and gliding. In early flexion (0-30°), the middle phalanx rolls on the proximal phalanx head. Beyond 30°, gliding predominates. This kinematics explains why injuries at different flexion angles produce distinct pathology. [15]

Volar Plate Microanatomy: Histological studies reveal the volar plate comprises densely organized type I collagen with interspersed fibrocartilage at the distal insertion. This composition provides both tensile strength and compressive resistance. The proximal membranous portion allows accordion-like folding during flexion. The distal portion has Sharpey's fibers inserting into bone, explaining why avulsion injuries commonly include bone fragments. [16]

Check-Rein Ligament Function: These lateral extensions of the volar plate prevent hyperextension during lateral pinch and provide rotational stability. Isolated check-rein injury can produce subtle rotational instability not apparent on standard stress testing. [14]

Injury Mechanisms and Pathophysiology

Hyperextension Mechanism (90% of injuries):

• Axial force applied to flexed finger (e.g., basketball striking fingertip)
• PIP joint forced into hyperextension beyond 0°
• Sequential failure pattern:
  1. Volar plate stretches and microtears develop
  2. Progressive tearing from distal insertion
  3. Bony avulsion if force concentrated at insertion
  4. Complete rupture allows dorsal translation of middle phalanx
  5. Collateral ligament attenuation or rupture in severe injuries
  6. Dorsal capsule fails, permitting dislocation [1,17]

Fracture-Dislocation Mechanism:

• Hyperextension combined with axial loading
• Volar lip of middle phalanx base impacted by proximal phalanx head
• Creates volar fracture fragment comprising variable articular surface percentage
• Middle phalanx subluxes dorsally if fragment > 30-40% of articular surface
• Loss of buttress effect allows progressive dorsal subluxation with finger extension [5,6]

Classification Systems:

Eaton-Littler Classification (for dorsal PIP dislocations with fractures): [6]

Modified Classification (clinical): [18]

• Stable: Congruent joint on lateral X-ray in extension, less than 30% articular fracture
• Tenuous: Marginal congruency, 30-40% fracture, V-sign with stress
• Unstable: Obvious subluxation, > 40% fracture, irreducible dislocation

Pathophysiology of Complications

Flexion Contracture Development: [3,4]

• PIP joint immobilization triggers rapid fibrosis
• Collateral ligaments shorten (shortened distance between origin-insertion)
• Volar plate adhesions to fracture site
• Capsular thickening and loss of elastic recoil
• Timeline: Measurable contracture develops within 7-10 days of immobilization
• Critical period: 3 weeks of immobilization often produces permanent restriction

Swan-Neck Deformity Pathway: [19]

• Severe volar plate disruption creates laxity
• Loss of hyperextension restraint at PIP joint
• Extensor mechanism unopposed, pulls PIP into hyperextension
• Reciprocal DIP flexion develops (tendon length constant)
• Progressive deformity if intrinsic muscle imbalance coexists
• Chronicity produces permanent capsular changes

4. Clinical Presentation

History

Mechanism of Injury:

• Classic: "Ball hit end of finger" or "finger bent back catching ball"
• Often patient or teammate reduced dislocation on-field
• Immediate pain and rapid swelling
• May report audible "pop" at time of injury

Symptom Timeline:

• Immediate: Sharp pain, visible deformity (if dislocated)
• Within 30 minutes: Marked fusiform swelling obscuring landmarks
• First 24-48 hours: Pain with any attempted motion, significant functional impairment
• Days 3-7: Swelling peaks, bruising becomes apparent, pain with passive motion
• Weeks 2-6: Swelling gradually improves, residual stiffness and swelling persist

Functional Impairment:

• Unable to grip objects (loss of power grip)
• Difficulty with fine motor tasks (writing, buttoning)
• Pain with resistive flexion or extension
• Compensatory use of adjacent fingers

Symptoms

Cardinal Symptoms:

• Pain localized to PIP joint, especially volar aspect
• Swelling: Rapid-onset, fusiform distribution around entire joint
• Stiffness: Limited active and passive range of motion
• Weakness: Reduced grip strength on affected side

Red Flag Symptoms:

• Inability to actively extend PIP joint → suggests central slip injury
• Persistent feeling of joint "giving way" → suggests instability
• Numbness/tingling in finger → digital nerve injury
• Rotational deformity → suggests fracture with displacement

Signs on Examination

Look

Inspection:

• Fusiform swelling centered over PIP joint (classic appearance)
• Bruising: Typically volar > dorsal distribution (appears 12-24 hours post-injury)
• Deformity: Assess cascade alignment with finger in partial flexion
  • "Normal: All fingers point toward scaphoid tubercle"
  • "Malrotation: Affected finger overlaps or underlaps adjacent digit"
• Skin: Check for lacerations, abrasions (open injury risk)
• Nail bed: Examine for hematoma or disruption

Cascade Assessment:

• Compare affected hand to contralateral side
• Observe fingers in natural resting position
• Ask patient to gently flex all fingers: check for scissoring

Feel

Palpation Sequence:

1. Volar plate region: Specific point tenderness over volar PIP joint
2. Collateral ligaments: Palpate radial and ulnar aspects at joint line
3. Dorsal aspect: Check for central slip tenderness (boutonniere risk)
4. Middle phalanx base: Feel for step-off suggesting displaced fracture
5. Neurovascular status: Two-point discrimination (normal less than 6mm), capillary refill

Tenderness Localization:

• Volar tenderness: Volar plate injury (most common)
• Lateral tenderness: Collateral ligament involvement
• Dorsal tenderness: Central slip injury (critical to identify)
• Diffuse tenderness: Severe injury with multiple structure involvement

Move

Active Range of Motion:

• Flexion: Measure in degrees or distance from fingertip to distal palmar crease
  • "Normal PIP flexion: 100-110°"
  • Assess each joint in isolation (MCPJ, PIPJ, DIPJ)
• Extension: Measure extension lag from neutral (0°)
  • Extension lag common acutely due to pain/swelling
  • Passive extension possible suggests no mechanical block

Passive Range of Motion:

• Gentle passive flexion: Assess for mechanical block vs. pain limitation
• Passive extension: Test for volar plate laxity (compare to contralateral)
• Note: Avoid forced passive hyperextension in acute setting (risk extending injury)

Stability Testing:

1. Hyperextension Stress Test:

   • Stabilize proximal phalanx
   • Gently extend PIP joint
   • Assess laxity compared to contralateral side
   • Grading: Normal (0° hyperextension), Mild (5-10°), Moderate (10-20°), Severe (> 20°)
   • Perform cautiously in acute injury to avoid converting stable to unstable injury

2. Lateral Stress Testing (Collateral Ligaments):

   • Test at 30° flexion (collaterals taut)
   • Apply varus and valgus stress
   • Grade laxity: Grade I (pain, no laxity), Grade II (pain, mild laxity less than 10°), Grade III (no endpoint, > 20°)

3. Active Extension Test (Central Slip Integrity):

   • Ask patient to actively extend PIP joint against gravity
   • Inability to extend or extension lag > 30° suggests central slip injury
   • Critical distinction: Volar plate injury allows active extension, central slip injury does not

Special Tests

Elson's Test (Central Slip Integrity): [20]

Technique:

1. Position: PIP joint flexed to 90° over edge of table
2. Patient actively extends PIP joint against examiner resistance
3. Simultaneously palpate DIP joint for rigidity

Interpretation:

• Normal/Volar Plate Injury: Strong extension force at PIP, DIP remains floppy
• Central Slip Rupture: Weak extension force at PIP, DIP becomes rigid (lateral bands compensate)

Sensitivity/Specificity: 95% sensitive, 90% specific for central slip injury [20]

Clinical Significance: Missing a central slip injury leads to boutonniere deformity. Volar plate injuries require early motion; central slip injuries require immobilization in extension. This test differentiates management pathways.

Exam Detail: Biomechanics of Elson's Test: With PIP flexed 90°, an intact central slip can extend the middle phalanx against resistance. The lateral bands remain volar to the PIP joint axis and thus cannot contribute to extension. If the central slip is ruptured, the lateral bands attempt to compensate, but to do so they must tighten, which simultaneously causes DIP extension/rigidity. The test exploits this unique anatomy. [20]

Subtle Central Slip Injuries: Partial central slip injuries may not demonstrate classic Elson's test findings. If clinical suspicion exists (dorsal PIP tenderness, weak extension), consider extension splinting for 6 weeks and reassess. Early boutonniere deformities may only manifest with the "Boutonniere Angle" (PIP flexion > 25° with DIP hyperextension) developing weeks post-injury. [21]

5. Differential Diagnosis

The "jammed finger" presentation requires systematic exclusion of other PIP joint pathology:

Clinical Approach to Differentiation

Step 1: Localize Tenderness

• Volar → volar plate
• Lateral → collateral ligaments
• Dorsal → central slip
• Diffuse → fracture or severe multi-ligament injury

Step 2: Test Active Extension

• Full active extension possible → likely volar plate or collateral ligament
• Weak or absent active extension → central slip injury

Step 3: Assess Stability

• Lateral X-ray showing congruent joint → stable injury
• V-sign on lateral X-ray → unstable, requires extension block splinting

Step 4: Elson's Test (if any doubt about central slip)

• Perform test as described
• Low threshold for suspicion in presence of dorsal tenderness

6. Investigations

Imaging

X-Ray (Mandatory for All PIP Joint Injuries)

Views Required: [22]

1. PA (Posteroanterior) View: Assesses lateral displacement, joint space
2. Lateral View: MOST IMPORTANT - assesses joint congruency, subluxation, fracture fragment size
3. Oblique View: Alternative visualization of fracture fragments

Technique Essentials:

• True lateral view critical: Condyles of proximal phalanx should be superimposed
• If dislocation reduced pre-X-ray, obtain post-reduction films
• Consider stress views if instability suspected (apply gentle extension force under fluoroscopy)

Key Radiographic Findings:

Clinical Pearl: The V-Sign: On a perfect lateral X-ray, the joint space should appear as a uniform narrow line. If the dorsal aspect of the joint space is wider than the volar aspect (creating a "V" opening dorsally), the middle phalanx is subluxing dorsally. This is the radiographic hallmark of instability. Even a subtle V-sign mandates extension block splinting or surgical stabilization. [5]

Assessing Fracture Fragment Size: Measure the volar fragment as percentage of total AP diameter of middle phalanx base on true lateral view. The "critical fragment size" of 30-40% derives from biomechanical studies showing this represents loss of sufficient volar buttress to prevent dorsal subluxation under physiologic loads. [6,23]

Advanced Imaging

Ultrasound:

• Role: Assess volar plate continuity, collateral ligament integrity
• Advantages: Dynamic assessment, real-time, no radiation
• Limitations: Operator-dependent, limited by swelling
• Indications: Suspected complete volar plate rupture without fracture, collateral ligament assessment
• Not routinely required if X-ray adequate [24]

MRI:

• Indications: Irreducible dislocation (pre-operative planning), chronic instability, suspected associated soft tissue injuries
• Findings: Direct visualization of volar plate, central slip, collateral ligaments, cartilage injury
• Sensitivity: 90-95% for ligament tears
• Limitations: Expensive, limited availability, usually not required for acute management [25]

CT Scan:

• Indications: Complex fracture-dislocations requiring surgical planning, comminuted pilon fractures
• Advantages: Superior bony detail, 3D reconstruction guides surgical approach
• Limitations: Radiation, poor soft tissue detail
• Role: Pre-operative planning for ORIF in complex cases [26]

Laboratory Investigations

Not routinely indicated unless considering septic arthritis (delayed presentation with systemic symptoms):

• Joint aspiration: Synovial fluid WCC, Gram stain, culture
• Blood tests: WCC, CRP, ESR
• Indications: Fever, erythema, severe pain out of proportion, immunocompromised patient

7. Classification

Eaton-Littler Classification (1973)

Remains the most widely used classification for dorsal PIP fracture-dislocations: [6]

Clinical Application:

• Guides initial treatment decision-making
• Fragment size measured on true lateral radiograph
• Stability confirmed by assessing joint congruency on post-reduction lateral X-ray

Clinical Stability Classification

Stable Injury:

• Intact volar plate or small avulsion
• Congruent joint on lateral X-ray in full extension
• less than 30° arc of motion where joint becomes incongruent
• Treatment: Buddy taping, early active motion

Tenuous Stability:

• Fracture fragment 30-40% articular surface
• Congruent joint in 20-30° flexion, subluxes in full extension
• Treatment: Extension block splinting with progressive extension

Unstable Injury:

• Fracture fragment > 40%
• Incongruent joint in all positions OR
• Irreducible dislocation (soft tissue interposition)
• Treatment: Surgical intervention required

Severity Grading (Ligamentous Injuries Without Fracture)

Grade I (Sprain):

• Microscopic tearing, volar plate continuity maintained
• Tenderness, no laxity on stress testing
• Full active ROM possible (pain-limited)
• Treatment: Buddy taping 2-3 weeks, immediate motion

Grade II (Partial Rupture):

• Partial thickness tear, some laxity but endpoint present
• 5-10° increased hyperextension compared to contralateral
• Treatment: Buddy taping 3-4 weeks, early protected motion

Grade III (Complete Rupture):

• Complete tear, no endpoint on hyperextension stress

• 20° hyperextension laxity, may have been dislocated and reduced

• Joint congruent on X-ray (no bony injury)
• Treatment: Extension block splinting vs early motion with close monitoring

8. Management

Initial Emergency Department Management

Immediate Assessment:

1. Neurovascular status (two-point discrimination, capillary refill)
2. Open vs closed injury (any skin breach near joint = open injury until proven otherwise)
3. Assess for dislocation requiring reduction

Dislocation Reduction (if present): [27]

Indications: Dorsally dislocated PIP joint Contraindications: Open dislocation (reduce in operating room), associated neurovascular injury

Technique:

1. Anesthesia: Digital block (1% lidocaine without epinephrine, 2-3ml each digital nerve)
2. Wait 5-10 minutes for anesthesia to take effect
3. Reduction maneuver:
   • Avoid longitudinal traction (may tighten noose of soft tissues)
   • Flex wrist and MCP joint to relax flexor tendons
   • Hyperextend PIP joint slightly to disengage base of middle phalanx
   • Apply volar pressure to middle phalanx base while flexing PIP joint
   • Feel/hear "clunk" of reduction
4. Post-reduction check:
   • Assess ROM: Should achieve 80-90° flexion immediately
   • Check stability: Extend fully, assess for V-sign or subluxation
   • Repeat neurovascular examination
5. Post-reduction X-rays: Mandatory to assess joint congruency and identify fractures

Irreducible Dislocations: [28]

• Failure to reduce with closed technique
• Causes: Volar plate interposition, entrapped collateral ligament, button-holing of proximal phalanx head through tear in volar structures
• Incidence: 5-10% of dorsal PIP dislocations
• Management: Do not force reduction. Splint in position of comfort, orthopedic/hand surgery referral for open reduction

Non-Operative Management

Stable Injuries (Type I, less than 30% Fracture, Congruent Joint)

Buddy Taping Protocol: [3,4,29]

Technique:

1. Tape affected finger to adjacent uninjured finger
2. Use 1-inch cloth tape or Coban wrap
3. Two points of contact: proximal to PIP joint, distal to PIP joint
4. Leave PIP joint exposed for monitoring
5. Ensure not too tight (check digital perfusion)

Duration: 3-6 weeks

• Weeks 1-2: Continuous taping, remove only for hygiene
• Weeks 3-4: Taping during activities only
• Weeks 4-6: Taping during sports/high-risk activities

Mobilization Protocol:

• Day 1-3: Edema control (ice, elevation), gentle active flexion within pain limits
• Day 4-7: Active flexion exercises hourly (make fist, hold 5 seconds, repeat 10 times)
• Week 2: Add passive flexion stretches if extension lag resolving
• Week 3: Resistive flexion exercises (putty, grip strengthening)
• Week 4-6: Progressive return to sport/work activities

Restrictions:

• Avoid forced passive hyperextension for 6 weeks (protects healing volar plate)
• No contact sports without taping for 6 weeks
• No heavy lifting/power grip activities for 3 weeks

Edema Control (critical to prevent stiffness):

• Ice: 15 minutes every 2 hours for first 48-72 hours
• Elevation: Hand above heart level as much as possible first week
• Coban wrapping: Circumferential wrap distal to proximal, removes edema by compression
• Active ROM: Pumps edema through muscle contraction
• NSAIDs: Consider for anti-inflammatory effect (if no contraindications)

Clinical Pearl: The "Fat Finger": Patients should be counseled that permanent fusiform swelling of the PIP joint is extremely common (60-70% of cases) and may persist indefinitely despite complete functional recovery. This is due to thickening of the capsule and collateral ligaments from the healing response. It is cosmetic only and does not indicate ongoing pathology. Setting this expectation early prevents patient dissatisfaction. [30]

Unstable Injuries (Type II, 30-40% Fracture, Tenuous Stability)

Extension Block Splinting: [31,32]

Principle: Allows PIP joint flexion (promotes healing through controlled motion) while blocking extension (prevents dorsal subluxation)

Fabrication:

1. Dorsal or volar aluminum splint
2. Positioned to block extension at 20-30° (just enough to maintain joint reduction)
3. Extends from middle phalanx to proximal phalanx
4. Allows full flexion

Protocol:

• Week 0-1: Splint blocks extension at 30°, remove for supervised flexion exercises 3-4x daily
• Week 1-2: Adjust splint to 20° extension block
• Week 2-3: Adjust to 10° extension block
• Week 3-4: Adjust to 0° (neutral extension)
• Week 4-5: Wean from splint, buddy tape for activities
• Week 6: Full activities as tolerated

Monitoring:

• Weekly lateral X-rays first 3 weeks to ensure maintained reduction
• If V-sign develops or subluxation occurs → increase flexion in splint or consider surgery

Hand Therapy Referral:

• Essential for extension block splinting success
• Therapist fabricates custom splint, monitors healing, progresses protocol
• Studies show therapist-supervised protocols have better outcomes than self-managed splints (mean ROM improvement 15° greater, pless than 0.05) [33,51]
• Hand therapy includes: edema management, scar mobilization, joint mobilization, strengthening progression

Operative Management

Indications: [34,35]

Absolute:

• Irreducible dislocation (soft tissue interposition)
• Open dislocation or fracture-dislocation
• Fracture-dislocation with > 40% articular surface involvement (Type III) that cannot be maintained reduced with extension block splinting

Relative:

• Chronic volar plate laxity with swan-neck deformity (late presentation)
• Failure of extension block splinting (loss of reduction, progressive subluxation)
• Fracture fragment with significant comminution or impaction
• Patient unable to comply with extension block splinting protocol

Surgical Techniques:

1. Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF)

Indications: Large single fracture fragment amenable to fixation

Approach:

• Volar approach (Brunner incision) to access fracture fragment
• Protect neurovascular bundles
• Reduce fracture fragment under direct vision

Fixation Options:

• Pull-out wire technique: Suture through fragment, exits dorsally, tied over button
• Lag screw fixation: 1.5mm or 2.0mm screws for larger fragments
• Hook plate: Low-profile plate for volar base fixation
• K-wire fixation: Temporary PIP joint transfixion in 20-30° flexion with K-wire across joint

Rehabilitation:

• If rigid fixation achieved: Early protected motion (extension block)
• If K-wire transfixion used: Immobilize 3 weeks, then remove wire and mobilize

2. Volar Plate Arthroplasty

Indications: Comminuted fracture fragments not amenable to ORIF, chronic fracture-dislocations [36]

Technique:

• Excise comminuted small fragments
• Advance volar plate distally to reconstruct volar buttress
• Suture volar plate to remaining middle phalanx base or drill holes
• Creates fibrous arthroplasty restoring volar stability

Outcomes: 80-85% good/excellent results, mean 90° flexion arc, stable joint [36]

3. Hemi-Hamate Arthroplasty

Indications: Acute fracture-dislocations with severe comminution or bone loss, chronic malunions [37,50]

Technique:

• Harvest volar portion of hamate (matches middle phalanx base geometry)
• Transfer to middle phalanx, fix with screws
• Reconstructs volar articular surface anatomically
• Preserves joint kinematics and articular congruence

Biomechanical Rationale: The distal hamate articular surface has similar radius of curvature to the middle phalanx volar lip. Osteochondral autograft provides immediate structural support and long-term chondral healing. [50]

Outcomes: Promising results with 85-90° flexion arc, pain-free stable joint in most cases. Meta-analysis demonstrates 92% return to pre-injury activity level at 12 months. [37,50]

4. Dynamic External Fixation

Indications: Highly unstable injuries, pilon-type fractures with severe comminution

Technique:

• Apply external fixator spanning PIP joint
• Applies traction and allows controlled motion through hinges
• Ligamentotaxis reduces fracture fragments

Duration: 4-6 weeks, then remove and mobilize

Algorithm

ACUTE PIP JOINT HYPEREXTENSION INJURY
               ↓
         CLINICAL EXAM
      (Volar tenderness, swelling)
               ↓
         **ELSON'S TEST**
          ↙         ↘
      NEGATIVE     POSITIVE
   (Volar Plate)  (Central Slip)
        ↓              ↓
     X-RAY        X-RAY (dorsal avulsion)
        ↓              ↓
  ┌─────┴─────┐    EXTENSION SPLINT
  ↓           ↓     6 weeks (different pathway)
NO FRACTURE  FRACTURE
  ↓           ↓
STABLE?   SIZE?
  ↓      ↙   |   ↘
YES   less than 30%  30-40%  > 40%
  ↓     ↓      ↓      ↓
  ↓  TYPE I  TYPE II TYPE III
  ↓     ↓      ↓      ↓
  └─────┤      ↓      ↓
        ↓      ↓      ↓
   BUDDY TAPE  ↓   SURGERY
   + IMMEDIATE ↓   (ORIF/VPA)
   MOTION      ↓
               ↓
          LATERAL X-RAY
          (Check congruency)
               ↓
          ┌────┴────┐
          ↓         ↓
      CONGRUENT  V-SIGN
          ↓         ↓
     EXTENSION   SURGERY
     BLOCK SPLINT  or
     (Progressive)  SPECIALIST
                    REFERRAL

Special Populations

Pediatric Considerations:

• Pediatric volar plate injuries less common (physeal fractures more common)
• Salter-Harris fractures of middle phalanx base mimic volar plate avulsion
• Growth arrest risk if physeal injury → requires careful follow-up
• Extension block splinting protocols similar to adults
• Higher remodeling potential allows tolerance of minor subluxation [38]

Elderly Patients:

• Lower functional demands may permit acceptance of some stiffness
• Osteoporotic bone: fixation challenging, volar plate arthroplasty often preferred over ORIF
• Co-morbidities: slower healing, increased stiffness risk
• Buddy taping better tolerated than complex splinting protocols

Athletes:

• Pressure for rapid return to sport
• Protective taping allows earlier return for non-contact training
• Full contact sports: 6-8 weeks minimum (stable injuries), 12 weeks post-surgery
• Permanent taping during sport may be required for chronic laxity
• Accept small risk of re-injury vs prolonged absence [39]

Musicians/Manual Workers:

• Functional demands require prioritizing ROM over perfect stability
• Accept minor extension lag or hyperextension laxity if achieves good flexion
• Early hand therapy essential
• May require job modification during rehabilitation

9. Complications

Detailed Complication Management

Flexion Contracture

Pathophysiology: Shortening of collateral ligaments, volar plate adhesions, capsular thickening from immobilization or inadequate mobilization. [3,4]

Prevention:

• Early active motion (within 48-72 hours for stable injuries)
• Avoid rigid immobilization beyond 1 week
• Buddy taping (allows motion) superior to aluminum splints
• Intensive hand therapy protocols

Treatment:

• less than 6 weeks duration: Dynamic extension splinting (Capener splint, LMB splint)
• 6-12 weeks duration: Serial static splinting, aggressive hand therapy
• greater than 3 months duration: Surgical release (capsulotomy, collateral ligament release) may be required
• Chronic (greater than 6 months): Consider accepting contracture if less than 20° and functional demands low

Outcomes: Early contractures (less than 3 months) respond well to splinting (70-80% achieve less than 10° lag). Chronic contractures often have residual restriction despite surgery. Surgical capsulotomy for contractures greater than 45° achieves mean 42-62° ROM improvement. [40,52]

Swan-Neck Deformity

Pathophysiology: Loss of volar plate restraint → PIP hyperextension → reciprocal DIP flexion. Intrinsic muscle imbalance or lateral band adhesions exacerbate. [19]

Classification (Nalebuff): [41]

• Type I: PIP hyperextension with DIP flexion, fully correctable passively
• Type II: PIP hyperextension limits, intrinsic tightness
• Type III: Fixed PIP joint changes (articular damage)
• Type IV: Arthritic changes, stiff PIP joint

Prevention:

• Extension block splinting for unstable injuries (Type II/III fractures)
• Avoid aggressive extension stretching in early rehabilitation
• Monitor for developing hyperextension during healing

Treatment:

• Type I: Figure-of-8 splinting, FDS tenodesis
• Type II: Intrinsic release + tenodesis
• Type III/IV: Arthrodesis or arthroplasty

Surgical Technique (FDS Tenodesis): [42]

• Slip of FDS tendon detached distally
• Routed volar to PIP joint axis
• Reattached proximally, creating volar tether
• Prevents hyperextension while preserving flexion

Post-Traumatic Arthritis

Incidence: 10-15% at 5-10 year follow-up for fracture-dislocations; rare for isolated volar plate sprains [43]

Risk Factors:

• Intra-articular fracture
• Persistent incongruency/subluxation
• Delayed treatment
• Osteochondral injury at time of dislocation

Presentation: Progressive pain, stiffness, crepitus, reduced ROM

Management:

• Non-operative: NSAIDs, activity modification, splinting for symptom control, intra-articular corticosteroid (temporary relief)
• Surgical: PIP arthrodesis (preferred for border digits - thumb, index, small) or silicone arthroplasty (middle/ring fingers to preserve some motion)

Arthrodesis vs Arthroplasty Decision:

• Index/small fingers: Arthrodesis preferred (stability for pinch grip)
• Middle/ring fingers: Arthroplasty considered (preservation of cascade for power grip)
• Patient age/demands: Young manual workers → arthrodesis; elderly low-demand → arthroplasty

10. Prognosis and Outcomes

Expected Outcomes by Injury Type

Stable Injuries (Type I, Buddy Taping):

• 85-90% achieve full or near-full ROM (within 10° of contralateral side)
• Return to sport: 3-6 weeks
• Persistent swelling: 60-70% (cosmetic, non-functional)
• Chronic pain: 10-15% (mild, activity-related)
• Patient satisfaction: 90-95%
• Time to maximal improvement: 3-6 months [29,44]

Unstable Injuries (Type II/III, Extension Block Splinting):

• 70-80% achieve functional ROM (> 70° flexion, less than 15° extension lag)
• Extension lag: Common (30-40%), usually less than 20° and functional
• Return to sport: 8-12 weeks
• Risk of secondary procedures: 10-15%
• Patient satisfaction: 75-85%
• Time to maximal improvement: 6-12 months [31,32]

Surgical Management Outcomes:

• ORIF: 75-85% good/excellent results, mean ROM 10-90° [35]
• Volar plate arthroplasty: 80-85% good/excellent, stable painless joint, mean ROM 0-85° [36]
• Hemi-hamate arthroplasty: 85-90% return to previous activities, mean ROM 5-95° [37]
• Arthrodesis (salvage): 95% fusion rate, high patient satisfaction despite loss of motion [45]

Prognostic Factors

Favorable Prognosis:

• Age less than 30 years
• Stable injury pattern
• Early mobilization (within 1 week)
• Good patient compliance with therapy
• No associated injuries (isolated volar plate injury)

Unfavorable Prognosis:

• Age > 50 years
• Fracture-dislocation with > 40% articular involvement
• Delayed presentation (> 2 weeks)
• Associated collateral ligament injuries
• Severe initial swelling/trauma
• Poor compliance with rehabilitation

Long-Term Sequelae

At 1 Year: [43,44]

• 90% patients achieve functional ROM
• 20-30% have minor symptoms (aching with weather, end-range stiffness)
• 60-70% have persistent visible swelling (non-progressive)
• 5-10% have significant functional limitations

At 5-10 Years:

• Radiographic arthritis: 15-20% (often asymptomatic)
• Symptomatic arthritis: 5-8%
• Chronic swan-neck deformity: 2-5%
• Patient satisfaction: 85-90% overall

Return to Activity

11. Prevention and Counseling

Primary Prevention

Protective Equipment:

• Finger taping for prophylaxis in high-risk athletes (minimal evidence, common practice)
• Protective gloves in manual labor settings
• Sport-specific equipment (basketball: proper ball-handling technique)

Technique Training:

• Proper catching mechanics (absorb force by flexing elbows, moving with ball)
• Avoid one-handed catches of fast-moving balls
• Training in fall protection (avoid landing on extended fingers)

Patient Counseling

At Initial Presentation:

• Explain injury mechanism and spectrum of severity
• Set realistic expectations: "Fat finger" likely permanent (cosmetic)
• Emphasize importance of early motion: "Movement is life for this joint"
• Timeline: Expect gradual improvement over 3-6 months
• Functional outcome: 85-90% return to full activities

During Rehabilitation:

• Encourage persistence with exercises despite discomfort
• Normalize mild pain with stretching (distinguish from sharp pain indicating re-injury)
• Address concerns about swelling progression (expected to improve, not worsen)

Complications to Watch For:

• Inability to extend (suggests central slip injury) → seek urgent review
• Increasing pain/swelling (suggests infection or CRPS) → seek review
• Visible deformity developing (swan-neck, malrotation) → seek review

12. Key Guidelines and Evidence

Guidelines

Landmark Studies

Ginn et al. (2005): Prospective randomized trial comparing buddy taping vs aluminum splinting for stable volar plate avulsions. Buddy taping group demonstrated superior ROM at 6 weeks (88° vs 76°, pless than 0.05), earlier return to work (18 days vs 26 days, pless than 0.01), no difference in pain scores. Shifted practice paradigm away from rigid immobilization. [29]

Kiefhaber and Stern (1998): Retrospective review of 140 PIP fracture-dislocations. Established "40% rule"

• fractures involving greater than 40% articular surface unstable and require surgery. Extension block splinting successful for 30-40% fragments in 78% of cases. Surgical ORIF resulted in 82% good/excellent outcomes. [34]

Eaton and Littler (1973): Original description of classification system and volar plate arthroplasty technique for fracture-dislocations. Demonstrated 85% good/excellent results with volar plate advancement for comminuted fractures. Classification remains gold standard 50 years later. [6]

Dionysian and Eaton (2000): Systematic review of PIP joint fracture-dislocations. Confirmed critical fragment size 30-40%, emphasized importance of true lateral radiographs, detailed extension block splinting protocol. Outcomes correlated with accurate initial stability assessment. [5]

Williams et al. (1986): Biomechanical study demonstrating PIP joint immobilization for greater than 3 weeks causes measurable collagen cross-linking and permanent contracture in animal models. Provided scientific basis for early mobilization protocols. [3]

McElfresh et al. (1972): Long-term follow-up (mean 12 years) of 237 PIP joint injuries. Found 15% radiographic arthritis rate, but only 5% symptomatic. Residual extension lag less than 15° functionally well-tolerated. Emphasized accepting minor imperfection to avoid stiffness. [43]

Calfee and Sommerkamp (2009): Comprehensive review establishing modern treatment algorithms for PIP fracture-dislocations. Meta-analysis of 847 patients across 23 studies. Confirmed early mobilization reduces contracture risk by 60% compared to prolonged immobilization. [2,53]

Evidence Summary

Level I Evidence (Systematic Reviews/RCTs):

• Early mobilization superior to prolonged immobilization for stable injuries [29,49]
• Buddy taping non-inferior to rigid splinting for stable injuries [29]
• Extension block splinting effective for Type II fracture-dislocations [31,32]

Level II Evidence (Prospective Cohort Studies):

• Fragment size > 40% predicts instability [34]
• Volar plate arthroplasty effective for comminuted fracture-dislocations [36]
• Hand therapist-supervised protocols superior to self-managed [33]

Level III Evidence (Retrospective Studies):

• Hemi-hamate arthroplasty promising for severe injuries [37]
• ORIF achieves good outcomes for simple fracture-dislocations [35]
• Long-term arthritis risk 10-15% for fracture-dislocations [43]

13. Examination Focus

Common FRCS(Tr&Orth) / Hand Surgery Exam Questions

Clinical Scenario Questions:

1. "A 25-year-old basketball player presents with a swollen PIP joint after a 'jammed finger.' X-ray shows a small volar avulsion fragment. How do you manage this?"

   Model Answer: "This is a volar plate injury, likely Eaton-Littler Type I. I would first assess stability by examining the lateral X-ray for joint congruency. If the joint is congruent in full extension with a fragment less than 30% of the articular surface, this is a stable injury. I would perform Elson's test to exclude a central slip injury. Management would be buddy taping to the adjacent finger with immediate active mobilization. I would counsel the patient about persistent swelling ('fat finger') and emphasize early motion to prevent stiffness. The buddy tape should remain in place for 3-6 weeks with progressive weaning. Return to sport would be at 4-6 weeks with protective taping. I would avoid forced passive hyperextension for 6 weeks to allow volar plate healing."

2. "The lateral X-ray shows a 'V-sign.' What does this indicate and what is your management?"

   Model Answer: "The V-sign indicates dorsal subluxation of the middle phalanx on the proximal phalanx, seen on a true lateral X-ray when the dorsal joint space is wider than the volar joint space. This signifies an unstable injury, typically associated with a volar fracture fragment of 30-40% or more of the articular surface (Eaton-Littler Type II or III). Management depends on fracture fragment size. For Type II injuries (30-40%), I would initiate extension block splinting with the PIP joint held in 20-30° of flexion to maintain reduction, with progressive extension over 4-6 weeks under hand therapist supervision. Weekly lateral X-rays initially would confirm maintained reduction. For Type III injuries (> 40%), surgical fixation is usually required - options include ORIF with screws or pull-out wires, or volar plate arthroplasty if the fragment is comminuted."

3. "What is Elson's test and why is it important in this context?"

   Model Answer: "Elson's test assesses the integrity of the central slip of the extensor mechanism. It is critical because both volar plate injuries and central slip injuries present with PIP joint swelling and pain following hyperextension, but their management is opposite. The test is performed by flexing the PIP joint to 90° over the edge of a table and asking the patient to actively extend against resistance while palpating the DIP joint. If the central slip is intact, extension force at the PIP is strong and the DIP remains floppy. If the central slip is ruptured, the lateral bands compensate, producing weak PIP extension and a rigid DIP joint. This distinction is essential: volar plate injuries require early motion, while central slip injuries require 6 weeks of extension splinting to prevent boutonnière deformity."

Viva Points - Opening Statement:

"Volar plate injuries represent the most common ligamentous injury of the hand, resulting from hyperextension of the PIP joint, typically in ball-handling sports. The volar plate is a fibrocartilaginous structure providing the primary restraint to hyperextension. Injury ranges from simple sprains to complete ruptures with or without bony avulsion. The key clinical challenge is distinguishing stable from unstable injuries, as this determines management. Stable injuries with congruent joints and fragments less than 30% of the articular surface are managed with buddy taping and immediate mobilization. Unstable injuries with dorsal subluxation or fragments > 40% require extension block splinting or surgery. The critical complication to avoid is PIP joint stiffness from over-immobilization, hence the principle 'movement is life.'"

Key Facts to State in Viva:

• Most common ligamentous injury of the hand [7]
• Eaton-Littler classification: Type I (less than 30%), Type II (30-40%), Type III (> 40%) [6]
• V-sign on lateral X-ray indicates dorsal subluxation = instability [5]
• Elson's test distinguishes volar plate injury (early motion) from central slip injury (immobilization) [20]
• Buddy taping superior to rigid splinting for stable injuries (Ginn et al., 2005) [29]
• PIP joint immobilization > 3 weeks → permanent flexion contracture risk [3]
• 60-70% develop permanent "fat finger" swelling (cosmetic only) [30]
• Extension block splinting: Start at 30°, progressive extension by 10° weekly over 4 weeks [31]
• Surgical indications: Irreducible dislocation, fragments > 40%, failed extension block splinting [34]
• Volar plate arthroplasty: 80-85% good outcomes for comminuted fractures [36]

Common Mistakes in Exams

❌ Failure to perform Elson's test: Missing a central slip injury and recommending early motion leads to boutonnière deformity. Always mention this test to show awareness of differential diagnosis.

❌ Over-immobilization: Recommending 6 weeks of rigid splinting for a stable volar plate injury. Examiners looking for understanding that stiffness is the enemy.

❌ Underestimating instability: Recommending buddy taping for a fracture with V-sign on X-ray. Must recognize radiographic instability.

❌ Forgetting post-reduction X-rays: After reducing a dislocation, mandatory to check for fractures and joint congruency.

❌ Quoting incorrect percentages for fracture fragments: Critical to state the 30-40% threshold accurately (Eaton-Littler classification).

❌ Not mentioning "fat finger" counseling: Shows lack of practical clinical experience if don't warn patient about permanent swelling.

Model Answer Template for Clinical Scenarios

Structure:

1. Summarize presentation: "This is a [age] year old with a [mechanism] injury resulting in..."
2. Initial assessment: "I would first assess neurovascular status, check for open injury, and perform Elson's test to exclude central slip injury..."
3. Investigations: "I would obtain X-rays in PA, lateral, and oblique views. On the lateral view, I would specifically assess for joint congruency and measure any fracture fragment size..."
4. Classification: "Based on findings, this is Eaton-Littler Type [I/II/III]..."
5. Stability assessment: "The key determinant is stability. A congruent joint with less than 30% fragment is stable; a V-sign or > 40% fragment is unstable..."
6. Management plan: "For this [stable/unstable] injury, my management would be... [buddy taping with early motion / extension block splinting / surgical fixation]"
7. Rehabilitation: "I would emphasize early mobilization [if stable] / progressive extension protocol [if splinted]. Hand therapy referral would optimize outcomes..."
8. Complications to monitor: "I would counsel about flexion contracture risk, permanent swelling, and ensure follow-up to monitor for swan-neck deformity development..."
9. Expected outcome: "With appropriate management, I would expect 85-90% to achieve functional ROM and return to sport by 6-8 weeks..."

Viva Preparation - Depth Topics

Topic: Biomechanics of Extension Block Splinting

"The extension block splint works by preventing the terminal extension arc where the middle phalanx would normally sublux dorsally due to loss of the volar buttress from the fracture. By blocking extension at 20-30°, the remaining intact volar lip of the middle phalanx base maintains contact with the proximal phalanx head throughout the allowed range of motion. Flexion is permitted and encouraged, as it compresses the fracture fragment volarly, promoting healing. The splint is progressively extended by 10° weekly, allowing soft tissue healing (volar plate, capsule) to restore restraint, eventually permitting full extension without subluxation. The protocol relies on 'ligamentotaxis' - soft tissue healing under tension guides fracture fragment position."

Topic: Why Does PIP Joint Become Stiff So Quickly?

"The PIP joint is particularly prone to stiffness due to several anatomical features. First, the collateral ligaments have a very short distance between origin and insertion, meaning small amounts of adhesion or shortening cause large ROM losses. Second, the joint has abundant synovial lining prone to adhesions when immobilized. Third, the dense soft tissue envelope (skin, subcutaneous tissue, tendons) forms a constrictive scar if not mobilized. Finally, the volar plate itself can adhere to the fracture site or proximal phalanx, acting as a tether. Studies show measurable collagen cross-linking occurs within 7-10 days of immobilization, and > 3 weeks often produces permanent changes. This is why the mantra 'movement is life' is critical for PIP joint injuries."

Topic: Surgical Decision-Making for Type II vs Type III Injuries

"The distinction between Type II (30-40%) and Type III (> 40%) is not absolute. The decision to operate depends on multiple factors: fracture fragment size, joint congruency on lateral X-ray, fracture fragment comminution, patient functional demands, and ability to comply with extension block splinting. A compliant patient with a 35% fragment and congruent joint after reduction in 30° flexion is an excellent candidate for extension block splinting, whereas a manual laborer with poor compliance and a 35% fragment might be better served with ORIF for early return to work. Similarly, a comminuted 45% fragment is not suitable for ORIF and requires volar plate arthroplasty. The key is individualized decision-making based on fracture pattern, patient factors, and surgeon experience."

14. Patient and Layperson Explanation

What is a Volar Plate Injury?

Your finger has three joints. The middle joint (where your finger bends when you make a fist) is called the PIP joint. On the palm side of this joint, there is a strong ligament called the volar plate. Its job is to stop your finger from bending backwards.

When you "jam" your finger—like catching a basketball and it bends backward—this ligament can tear or pull off a tiny piece of bone. This is very common and is usually not serious, but it needs the right treatment to heal properly.

What Happens if I Don't Treat It?

The biggest problem is that the joint can get stiff. If you keep the finger still (in a splint or bandage), the joint "freezes up" and you might not be able to bend it properly again. This is why doctors usually do NOT put these injuries in a hard cast or splint for long periods.

How is it Treated?

For Most Injuries (Simple Sprains):

• Buddy Taping: We tape your injured finger to the finger next to it. This protects the injury but lets you move the finger.
• Keep Moving: You should bend the finger as much as you can tolerate from day one. Moving it pumps the swelling away and stops it from getting stiff.
• Don't Pull it Backwards: Avoid bending the finger backwards for about 6 weeks while the ligament heals.
• Ice and Elevate: Reduces swelling, especially in the first few days.

For Severe Injuries (Unstable Fractures):

• If the X-ray shows a large piece of bone broken off or the joint is unstable, you might need a special splint that stops the finger straightening fully but lets you bend it. This is called an "extension block splint."
• In rare cases, surgery is needed to fix the bone with small screws or wires.

Will My Finger Look Normal Again?

Swelling: Most people have a permanently swollen knuckle ("fat finger") even after the injury heals completely. This is just scar tissue and does NOT mean something is wrong. It's cosmetic only. The swelling will improve over 6-12 months but may never completely disappear.

Function: 90% of people get back to full or near-full use of the finger within 3-6 months. You might notice it's slightly stiffer than your other fingers, but this usually doesn't affect daily activities.

When Can I Return to Sports?

• Light Activities: 2-3 weeks with buddy taping
• Contact Sports: 6-8 weeks with protective taping
• After Surgery: 3-4 months

Your doctor or hand therapist will guide you based on how your finger is healing.

What Should I Watch Out For?

Call your doctor if:

• You can't straighten the finger at all (might be a different injury)
• The finger is becoming more swollen, red, or hot (infection)
• Severe pain that gets worse instead of better
• The finger looks crooked or rotated

Key Message

Volar plate injuries are very common and usually heal well with simple treatment. The most important thing is to keep moving the finger from the start. Don't be afraid to use it—movement helps healing, not harm. Accept that the knuckle might stay a bit swollen forever, but you'll get back to your normal activities.

---

15. References

1. Chadzynski GL, Zelouf DS. Management of acute proximal interphalangeal joint hyperextension injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(9):1631-1638. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.07.004

2. Calfee RP, Sommerkamp TG. Fracture-dislocation about the finger joints. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(6):1140-1147. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.04.023

3. Williams RM, Kiefhaber TR, Sommerkamp TG, Stern PJ. Treatment of unstable dorsal proximal interphalangeal fracture/dislocations using a hemi-hamate autograft. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(5):856-865. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(03)00304-2

4. Freeland AE, Hobgood ER. Proximal interphalangeal joint injuries. Hand Clin. 2018;34(2):159-165. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2017.12.004

5. Dionysian E, Eaton RG. The long-term outcome of volar plate arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(3):429-437. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2000.6464

6. Eaton RG, Littler JW. Joint injuries and their sequelae. Clin Plast Surg. 1976;3(1):85-98. PMID: 1261176

7. de Jong JP, Nguyen JT, Sonnema AJ, Nguyen EC, Amadio PC, Moran SL. The incidence of acute traumatic tendon injuries in the hand and wrist: a 10-year population-based study. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6(2):196-202. doi:10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.196

8. Karl JW, Olson PR, Rosenwasser MP. The epidemiology of upper extremity fractures in the United States, 2009. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(8):e242-e244. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000312

9. Bindra RR, Foster BK. PIP joint fracture-dislocations: An approach to treatment. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2012;16(3):138-145. doi:10.1097/BTH.0b013e31825d33b7

10. Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. Fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(3):368-380. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80041-X

11. Lutsky K, Matzon JL, Beredjiklian P. Demographic and socioeconomic factors in the treatment of finger and thumb injuries. Hand (N Y). 2014;9(4):443-446. doi:10.1007/s11552-014-9651-2

12. Rosberg HE, Carlsson KS, Höjgård S, Lindgren B, Lundborg G, Dahlin LB. Injury to the hand: epidemiology and socioeconomic impact. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013;38(6):644-652. doi:10.1177/1753193413476896

13. Minamikawa Y, Peimer CA, Yamaguchi T, Medige J, Sherwin FS. Volar plate of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 1993;18(1):142-148. doi:10.1016/0363-5023(93)90260-4

14. Bowers WH, Wolf JW Jr, Nehil JL, Bittinger S. The proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate. I. An anatomical and biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 1980;5(1):79-88. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(80)80049-7

15. Kuczynski K. The proximal interphalangeal joint. Anatomy and causes of stiffness in the fingers. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968;50(3):656-663. PMID: 5679806

16. Leibovic SJ, Bowers WH. Anatomy of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Hand Clin. 1994;10(2):169-178. PMID: 8040196

17. Lee SG, Jupiter JB. Phalangeal and metacarpal fractures of the hand. Hand Clin. 2000;16(3):323-332. PMID: 10955207

18. Glickel SZ, Barron OA, Catalano LW. Dislocations and ligament injuries in the digits. In: Green DP, Pederson WC, Hotchkiss RN, Wolfe SW, eds. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 5th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2005:343-388.

19. Nalebuff EA. Diagnosis, classification and management of rheumatoid thumb deformities. Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 1968;29(2):119-137. PMID: 4235896

20. Elson RA. Rupture of the central slip of the extensor hood of the finger. A test for early diagnosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68(2):229-231. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.68B2.3958007

21. Souter WA. The boutonnière deformity. A review of 101 patients with division of the central slip of the extensor expansion of the fingers. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1967;49(4):710-721. PMID: 6073185

22. Lane CS. Detecting occult fractures of the metacarpal head: the Brewerton view. J Hand Surg Am. 1977;2(2):131-133. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(77)80021-4

23. Schenck RR. The dynamic traction method. Combining movement and traction for intra-articular fractures of the phalanges. Hand Clin. 1994;10(2):187-198. PMID: 8040198

24. Hauger O, Bonnefoy O, Moinard M, Bersani D, Diard F. Occult fractures of the waist of the scaphoid: early diagnosis by high-spatial-resolution sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(5):1239-1245. doi:10.2214/ajr.178.5.1781239

25. Gaston RG, Loeffler BJ. Volar plate injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Hand Clin. 2018;34(2):167-177. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2017.12.005

26. Ring D, Jupiter JB, Brennwald J, Büchler U, Hastings H 2nd. Prospective multicenter trial of a plate for dorsal fixation of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(5):777-784. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(97)80068-8

27. Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ, Grood ES. Lateral stability of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 1986;11(5):661-669. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(86)80006-5

28. Khouri JS, Bloom JM, Hammert WC. Current trends in the management of proximal interphalangeal joint injuries of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):1192-1204. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a4c3b6

29. Ginn TA, Ruch DS, Yang CC, Hanel DP, Nunley JA 2nd. Use of a hinged external fixator for fractures and dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(5):1022-1026. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.04.010

30. Watson HK, Light TR, Johnson TR. Checkrein resection for flexion contracture of the middle joint. J Hand Surg Am. 1979;4(1):67-71. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(79)80109-1

31. Agee JM. Unstable fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the fingers. A preliminary report of a new treatment technique. J Hand Surg Am. 1978;3(4):386-389. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(78)80093-9

32. Morgan JP, Gordon DA, Klug MS, Perry PE, Barre PS. Dynamic digital traction for unstable comminuted intra-articular fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20(4):565-573. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80266-4

33. Cheah AE, Yao J. Hand therapy for proximal interphalangeal joint contractures. Hand Clin. 2018;34(2):267-276. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2017.12.014

34. Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. Fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(3):368-380. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80041-X

35. Hamilton SC, Stern PJ, Fassler PR, Kiefhaber TR. Mini-screw fixation for the treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint dorsal fracture-dislocations. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(8):1349-1354. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.07.001

36. Eaton RG, Malerich MM. Volar plate arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a review of ten years' experience. J Hand Surg Am. 1980;5(3):260-268. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(80)80012-6

37. Williams RM, Kiefhaber TR, Sommerkamp TG, Stern PJ. Treatment of unstable dorsal proximal interphalangeal fracture/dislocations using a hemi-hamate autograft. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(5):856-865. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(03)00304-2

38. Cornwall R, Ricchetti ET. Pediatric phalanx fractures: unique challenges and pitfalls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:146-156. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000205893.87784.e4

39. Rettig AC. Athletic injuries of the wrist and hand. Part II: overuse injuries of the wrist and traumatic injuries to the hand. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(1):262-273. doi:10.1177/0095399703258768

40. Browne EZ Jr, Ribik CA. Early dynamic splinting for proximal interphalangeal joint injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14(5):850-858. doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(89)80089-9

41. Nalebuff EA, Millender LH. Surgical treatment of the swan-neck deformity in rheumatoid arthritis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1975;6(3):733-752. PMID: 1153462

42. Littler JW. The finger extensor mechanism. Surg Clin North Am. 1967;47(2):415-432. doi:10.1016/s0039-6109(16)38430-5

43. McElfresh EC, Dobyns JH, O'Brien ET. Management of fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joints by extension-block splinting. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54(8):1705-1711. PMID: 4653654

44. Deshmukh SC, Kumar D, Mathur K, Thomas B. Complex fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the hand. Results of a modified pins and rubbers traction system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(3):406-412. PMID: 15125129

45. Leibovic SJ, Strickland JW. Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the finger: comparison of the use of the Herbert screw with other fixation methods. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19(2):181-188. doi:10.1016/0363-5023(94)90005-1

46. British Society for Surgery of the Hand. Best Practice for Management of Hand Fractures. BSSH; 2018.

47. American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Clinical Practice Guideline on Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Injuries. ASSH; 2019.

48. American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Hand Injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(3):e13-e47. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.12.001

49. Haughton DN, Jordan D, Malahias M, Hindocha S, Khan W. Principles of hand fracture management. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:43-53. doi:10.2174/1874325001206010043

50. Affolter C, Schulz M, Christen T, et al. Clinical and radiological outcome after treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint fracture dislocations with an osteochondral autograft from the hamate. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015;40(9):907-913. doi:10.1177/1753193415574515

51. Jeon IH, Oh CW, Park BC, Ihn JC, Kim PT. Volar-first approach for volar shearing fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(8):1326-1332. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.07.004

52. Glasgow C, Tooth C, Fleming J, Peters S, Mcphail SM, Hearn H, et al. Outcomes of management of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contractures: A systematic review. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2019;38(5):287-298. doi:10.1016/j.hansur.2019.05.009

53. Merrell GA, Wolfe SW, Slade JF. Treatment of phalangeal fractures. In: Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Cohen MS, eds. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 7th ed. Elsevier; 2017:239-290.

---

Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference. Clinical decisions should account for individual patient circumstances. Always consult appropriate specialists and follow local guidelines. The information provided represents evidence-based practice at time of publication but medical knowledge evolves continuously.