Pleural Effusion - Emergency Management
Pleural effusion affects 1.5 million people annually in developed countries, with causes ranging from transudative (CHF,... ACEM Fellowship Written, ACEM Fellow
Clinical board
A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.
Urgent signals
Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.
- Respiratory distress with large effusion (greater than 50% hemithorax)
- Tension hydrothorax (mediastinal shift, haemodynamic compromise)
- Empyema (fever, sepsis, pH below 7.2, frank pus)
- Haemothorax (greater than 1500ml initial drainage or greater than 200ml/hr ongoing)
Exam focus
Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.
- ACEM Fellowship Written
- ACEM Fellowship OSCE
Linked comparisons
Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.
- Community-Acquired Pneumonia
- Acute Heart Failure
Editorial and exam context
Quick Answer
One-liner: Pleural effusion is abnormal fluid accumulation in the pleural space requiring emergency management when causing respiratory compromise, haemodynamic instability (tension hydrothorax), or infection (empyema).
Pleural effusion affects 1.5 million people annually in developed countries, with causes ranging from transudative (CHF, cirrhosis) to exudative (infection, malignancy, PE). Emergency presentations include massive effusions causing respiratory failure, tension hydrothorax with mediastinal shift, empyema requiring urgent drainage, and haemothorax from trauma. Light's criteria differentiate transudate from exudate. Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis is the gold standard for diagnosis and initial treatment. Limit drainage to 1.0-1.5L per session to prevent re-expansion pulmonary oedema (REPE). Empyema requires chest drain insertion, antibiotics, and may need intrapleural fibrinolytics (tPA/DNase) or VATS.
ACEM Exam Focus
Primary Exam Relevance
- Anatomy: Pleural space anatomy, visceral and parietal pleura, intercostal neurovascular bundle (lies inferior to each rib), diaphragm attachments, costodiaphragmatic recesses
- Physiology: Starling forces in pleural fluid dynamics (hydrostatic vs oncotic pressure), lymphatic drainage of pleural space, pleural fluid turnover (0.2-0.5ml/kg/day), negative intrapleural pressure (-5 cmH2O at FRC)
- Pharmacology: Intrapleural fibrinolytics (tPA, DNase), local anaesthetics, empiric antibiotics for empyema, diuretics for transudative effusions
Fellowship Exam Relevance
- Written: Light's criteria application and limitations, pleural fluid analysis interpretation, indications for chest drain insertion, MIST2 trial (tPA/DNase), re-expansion pulmonary oedema prevention, malignant vs parapneumonic effusion management
- OSCE: Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis procedure, chest drain insertion, pleural fluid interpretation, communication with patient about drainage procedures
- Key domains tested: Medical Expert (diagnosis and management), Collaborator (working with respiratory medicine, cardiothoracics), Communicator (consent, explaining procedures)
Key Points
The 5 things you MUST know:
- Light's criteria differentiate transudate (systemic) from exudate (local disease): Exudate if protein ratio greater than 0.5, LDH ratio greater than 0.6, or pleural LDH greater than 2/3 ULN. Sensitivity 98%, specificity 83%. [1]
- Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis reduces pneumothorax risk from 10-18% (landmark) to below 1% and should be standard of care. [2]
- Empyema indicators requiring drainage: pH below 7.2, glucose below 3.4 mmol/L, LDH greater than 1000 IU/L, positive Gram stain/culture, or frank pus. [3]
- Limit drainage to 1.0-1.5L per session to prevent re-expansion pulmonary oedema (REPE). Stop if chest tightness, cough, or SpO2 drops. [4]
- MIST2 trial: Combination tPA + DNase (NOT alone) reduces surgical referral and hospital stay in loculated empyema/complicated parapneumonic effusion. [5]
Epidemiology
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence (all causes) | 1.5 million/year (developed countries) | [6] |
| Prevalence (hospitalised patients) | 10% of ICU admissions | [7] |
| Parapneumonic effusion (with CAP) | 20-40% of CAP cases | [8] |
| Empyema mortality | 15-20% (treated), 40% (untreated) | [9] |
| Malignant effusion mortality | 3-6 months median survival | [10] |
| CHF-related effusions | 50% of heart failure patients | [11] |
Australian/NZ Specific
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children have 3-5x higher rates of empyema compared to non-Indigenous children [12]
- Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the leading cause, but Staphylococcus aureus (including MRSA) is increasingly common in Indigenous communities [13]
- Remote/rural presentations often delayed 24-72 hours due to access barriers, resulting in more advanced disease at presentation [14]
- RFDS retrieves approximately 150-200 patients annually with pleural infection requiring tertiary care [15]
Pathophysiology
Mechanism of Pleural Fluid Accumulation
Normal pleural fluid dynamics:
- Pleural fluid turnover: 0.2-0.5 ml/kg/day (~10-20 ml total volume)
- Entry: Systemic capillaries in parietal pleura (hydrostatic pressure gradient)
- Exit: Lymphatic stomata in parietal pleura (can absorb up to 500 ml/day)
- Balance maintained by Starling forces
Transudative effusion (systemic factors):
- Increased hydrostatic pressure (CHF, constrictive pericarditis)
- Decreased oncotic pressure (cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome, hypoalbuminaemia)
- Increased negative pleural pressure (atelectasis)
Exudative effusion (local pleural factors):
- Increased capillary permeability (infection, malignancy, inflammation)
- Impaired lymphatic drainage (malignant infiltration, radiation)
- Transdiaphragmatic fluid movement (ascites with hepatic hydrothorax)
Pathological Progression of Parapneumonic Effusion
Pneumonia → Exudative Phase (48-72h) → Fibrinopurulent Phase (3-14 days) → Organizing Phase (greater than 14 days)
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Simple effusion Sterile exudate Bacterial invasion Fibrosis, trapped lung
(pH greater than 7.3) (pH 7.2-7.3) Loculations, pus (requires VATS)
(pH below 7.2)
Stage 1 - Exudative (Simple parapneumonic):
- Sterile fluid from increased capillary permeability
- pH greater than 7.3, glucose greater than 3.4 mmol/L, LDH below 1000 IU/L
- Usually resolves with antibiotics alone
Stage 2 - Fibrinopurulent (Complicated parapneumonic/Early empyema):
- Bacterial invasion of pleural space
- Fibrin deposition → loculations and septations
- pH below 7.2, glucose below 3.4 mmol/L, LDH greater than 1000 IU/L
- Requires drainage + antibiotics
Stage 3 - Organizing (Established empyema):
- Fibroblast proliferation, thick pleural peel
- "Trapped lung"
- cannot re-expand
- Requires surgical decortication (VATS/thoracotomy)
Tension Hydrothorax
Massive pleural effusion can cause haemodynamic compromise through:
- Mediastinal shift → IVC/SVC compression → reduced venous return
- Direct cardiac compression → reduced diastolic filling
- Contralateral lung compression → hypoxia
- Mechanism similar to tension pneumothorax (obstructive shock)
Key difference from tension pneumothorax: Develops more gradually (hours-days vs minutes), dullness to percussion (not hyperresonance)
Why It Matters Clinically
Understanding pathophysiology guides management:
- Transudates (CHF, cirrhosis) → treat underlying cause, diuretics, usually don't require drainage unless symptomatic
- Exudates (infection, malignancy) → require drainage and cause-specific treatment
- Stage of parapneumonic effusion determines if antibiotics alone vs drainage vs surgery
- pH below 7.2 is the most reliable predictor of need for drainage [16]
Clinical Approach
Recognition
Think Pleural Effusion Emergency When:
- Respiratory distress with dullness to percussion on one side
- Fever + pleuritic chest pain + recent pneumonia (empyema)
- Known malignancy with progressive dyspnoea
- Decompensated heart failure not responding to diuretics
- Trauma with haemodynamic instability (haemothorax)
- Post-procedure (central line, thoracentesis) with deterioration
Initial Assessment
Primary Survey
A - Airway:
- Usually patent unless massive effusion with severe respiratory distress
- May require non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as bridge to drainage
- Intubation rarely needed if drainage performed promptly
B - Breathing:
| Finding | Significance | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Dyspnoea | Universal symptom | 95-100% |
| Tachypnoea (RR greater than 24) | Compensation, hypoxia | 80-90% |
| Decreased breath sounds (ipsilateral) | Fluid dampening sound transmission | 85-95% |
| Dullness to percussion | Fluid-filled space (vs hyperresonance in pneumothorax) | 90-95% |
| Reduced chest expansion (ipsilateral) | Lung compression | 60-70% |
| Decreased tactile/vocal fremitus | Fluid blocking sound transmission | 70-80% |
| Bronchial breathing at upper fluid level | Compressed lung | 30-40% |
C - Circulation:
| Finding | Significance | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Tachycardia (HR greater than 100) | Hypoxia, sepsis, compensation | 60-80% |
| Hypotension (SBP below 90) | Tension hydrothorax, septic shock | 10-20% |
| Elevated JVP | CHF, tension hydrothorax | 30-50% |
| Peripheral oedema | CHF, hypoalbuminaemia | 40-60% |
D - Disability:
- Confusion may indicate hypoxia or sepsis
- GCS usually preserved unless severe respiratory failure
E - Exposure:
- Fever (empyema, parapneumonic)
- Cachexia (malignancy)
- Signs of cirrhosis (ascites, jaundice, spider naevi)
- Signs of heart failure (peripheral oedema, elevated JVP)
- Chest wall trauma, surgical scars
History
Key Questions
| Question | Significance |
|---|---|
| "How long have you been breathless?" | Acute (below 48h) vs chronic helps determine aetiology |
| "Any fever or rigors?" | Suggests infection (parapneumonic/empyema) |
| "Any recent pneumonia or chest infection?" | Parapneumonic effusion develops in 20-40% of pneumonia |
| "Any weight loss or night sweats?" | Malignancy, TB |
| "History of heart failure, liver or kidney disease?" | Transudative causes |
| "Any recent procedures?" | Iatrogenic haemothorax, post-operative effusion |
| "Any chest trauma?" | Haemothorax, chylothorax |
| "Any known cancer?" | Malignant effusion (lung, breast, lymphoma most common) |
Red Flag Symptoms
Symptoms indicating immediate intervention needed:
- Severe dyspnoea at rest, unable to speak in sentences
- Orthopnoea requiring sitting bolt upright
- Fever greater than 38.5C with rigors (empyema, sepsis)
- Haemodynamic instability (tension hydrothorax)
- Pleuritic chest pain with syncope
- Expectoration of pus (bronchopleural fistula)
Examination
General Inspection
- Position: Sitting upright, leaning forward (orthopnoea)
- Respiratory effort: Use of accessory muscles, nasal flaring
- Colour: Pallor (anaemia, haemothorax), cyanosis (severe hypoxia)
- Cachexia (malignancy, chronic illness)
- Stigmata of underlying disease (CHF, cirrhosis, malignancy)
Specific Findings
| System | Finding | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Respiratory | Dullness to percussion (stony dull) | Fluid in pleural space - key differentiator from pneumothorax |
| Decreased/absent breath sounds | Fluid blocking sound transmission | |
| Decreased vocal fremitus | Fluid attenuates vibration | |
| Tracheal deviation (away from effusion) | Large effusion with mediastinal shift | |
| Reduced chest expansion | Ipsilateral lung compressed | |
| Cardiovascular | Elevated JVP | CHF, SVC obstruction, tension hydrothorax |
| Displaced apex beat | Mediastinal shift from large effusion | |
| Pericardial rub | Associated pericardial effusion | |
| Peripheral oedema | CHF, hypoalbuminaemia | |
| Abdominal | Ascites, hepatomegaly | Cirrhosis with hepatic hydrothorax |
| Hepatomegaly, splenomegaly | Malignancy | |
| Other | Fever | Infection (empyema) |
| Lymphadenopathy | Malignancy | |
| Clubbing | Lung cancer, chronic suppurative disease |
Investigations
Immediate (Resus Bay)
| Test | Purpose | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Point-of-Care Ultrasound | Confirm effusion, guide thoracentesis, estimate size | Anechoic/complex fluid, depth measurement, loculations |
| Arterial Blood Gas | Assess oxygenation, acid-base | Hypoxia (Type 1 RF), metabolic acidosis (sepsis) |
| ECG | Exclude cardiac cause, arrhythmia | Low voltage (large effusion), atrial fibrillation (CHF) |
| Bedside CXR | Confirm effusion, assess size, detect pneumonia | Blunted costophrenic angle, meniscus sign, opacification |
Point-of-Care Ultrasound (Gold Standard for Detection)
POCUS is more sensitive than CXR for detecting pleural effusion [17]
- CXR requires greater than 200-300ml to detect (PA view) or greater than 50ml (lateral decubitus)
- Ultrasound detects as little as 20ml
Technique
- Low-frequency curvilinear or phased array probe (2-5 MHz)
- Patient sitting upright (if possible) or supine
- Scan posterolateral chest at base, just above diaphragm
- Identify: Liver/spleen → diaphragm → pleural space → lung
Findings in Pleural Effusion
| Sign | Description | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Anechoic space | Black/dark fluid between lung and diaphragm/chest wall | Simple effusion (transudate or early exudate) |
| Echogenic/complex fluid | Internal echoes, septations, debris | Exudate, empyema, haemothorax |
| Spine sign | Vertebral bodies visible above diaphragm (normally hidden by air-filled lung) | Confirms effusion (not consolidation) |
| Sinusoid sign | Lung moves toward chest wall on inspiration within fluid | Free-flowing effusion (can drain easily) |
| Septations | Multiple linear echogenic strands within fluid | Loculated effusion (may need fibrinolytics or VATS) |
| Depth measurement | Distance from chest wall to lung | greater than 15mm = safe for thoracentesis; depth x intercostal width estimates volume |
Pre-Thoracentesis Ultrasound (MANDATORY)
BTS 2023 Guidelines: Ultrasound guidance is standard of care for thoracentesis [18]
Pre-procedure ultrasound should document:
- Depth of effusion (greater than 15mm for safe drainage)
- Diaphragm position (avoid puncture - moves with respiration)
- Presence of septations (may limit drainage, predict need for intervention)
- Optimal puncture site (mark with permanent marker)
- Lung position (ensure lung is not immediately beneath puncture site)
Standard ED Workup
| Test | Indication | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| FBC | All patients | Leukocytosis (infection), anaemia (malignancy, haemothorax), thrombocytopenia (sepsis) |
| U&E, LFTs | All patients | Renal/hepatic cause, albumin for transudate assessment |
| CRP/Procalcitonin | Suspected infection | Elevated CRP greater than 100 suggests infection; procalcitonin greater than 0.5 suggests bacterial |
| Blood cultures | Fever, suspected sepsis | Positive in 10-30% of empyema |
| Coagulation | Pre-procedure | Correct INR greater than 1.5, platelets below 50 before thoracentesis |
| NT-proBNP | Suspected CHF | greater than 1500 pg/ml strongly suggests cardiac cause |
Pleural Fluid Analysis (Light's Criteria)
Light's Criteria for Exudate (meets ≥1 of following): [19]
| Criterion | Exudate | Transudate |
|---|---|---|
| Pleural protein / Serum protein | greater than 0.5 | ≤0.5 |
| Pleural LDH / Serum LDH | greater than 0.6 | ≤0.6 |
| Pleural LDH | greater than 2/3 upper limit of normal for serum | ≤2/3 ULN |
- Sensitivity: 98% (rarely misses exudate)
- Specificity: 83% (may misclassify transudate as exudate in diuretic-treated CHF patients)
Serum-Effusion Albumin Gradient: If clinical suspicion for transudate is high but Light's criteria suggests exudate:
- Serum albumin - Pleural albumin greater than 1.2 g/dL = transudate
- Useful in diuretic-treated CHF patients [20]
Complete Pleural Fluid Analysis
| Test | Normal/Transudate | Parapneumonic | Empyema | Malignant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Clear, straw-coloured | Cloudy | Turbid, frank pus | Variable, bloody |
| pH | greater than 7.4 | 7.2-7.4 | below 7.2 | 7.3-7.4 |
| Glucose | greater than 3.4 mmol/L | 2.2-3.4 | below 2.2 mmol/L | Variable |
| LDH | below 200 IU/L | 200-1000 | greater than 1000 IU/L | greater than 200 |
| Protein | below 30 g/L | greater than 30 g/L | greater than 30 g/L | greater than 30 g/L |
| WBC | below 1000/μL | 1000-10,000 | greater than 10,000 (neutrophils) | Variable |
| Gram stain | Negative | Usually negative | May be positive | Negative |
| Culture | Negative | May be positive | Often positive | Negative |
pH below 7.2 is the most reliable single indicator for need to drain [21]
pH Measurement Caveats:
- Must use blood gas analyser (NOT pH meter or litmus paper)
- Avoid contamination with local anaesthetic (lidocaine is acidic, falsely lowers pH)
- Sample in heparinised syringe, on ice, analyse within 1 hour
- If frankly purulent, don't bother with pH - it needs draining
Additional Pleural Fluid Tests
| Test | Indication | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Cytology | Suspected malignancy | Sensitivity 60% (single sample), 80% (repeated samples) |
| Adenosine deaminase (ADA) | Suspected TB | greater than 40 U/L suggests TB pleural effusion (Sens 92%, Spec 90%) |
| Triglycerides | Suspected chylothorax | greater than 1.24 mmol/L (110 mg/dL) confirms chylothorax |
| Haematocrit | Bloody effusion | Pleural HCT greater than 50% of blood HCT = haemothorax |
| Amylase | Suspected oesophageal rupture/pancreatitis | Elevated >ULN suggests oesophageal or pancreatic cause |
Advanced/Specialist
| Test | Indication | Availability |
|---|---|---|
| CT Chest with contrast | Loculated effusion, malignancy staging, underlying pathology | Tertiary centres |
| CT-guided biopsy | Pleural thickening, suspected mesothelioma | Interventional radiology |
| Thoracoscopy (medical) | Undiagnosed exudate, pleurodesis | Respiratory medicine |
| VATS | Failed drainage, loculated empyema, trapped lung | Cardiothoracic surgery |
Chest X-ray Findings
PA Erect CXR:
- Blunted costophrenic angle (requires greater than 200ml)
- Meniscus sign (fluid rising up lateral chest wall)
- Homogeneous opacity with concave upper border
- Mediastinal shift away (if large greater than 1L)
Lateral Decubitus CXR:
- Layering of free-flowing fluid
- Loculation suspected if fluid doesn't layer
- More sensitive than PA view (detects greater than 50ml)
Supine CXR (common in resus):
- Increased haziness over hemithorax (not well-demarcated)
- Apical cap sign (fluid tracks to apex when supine)
- Less sensitive - often missed
Management
Immediate Management (First 15 Minutes)
1. Call for help - Senior ED doctor, respiratory medicine (0-30 sec)
2. High-flow oxygen 15L non-rebreather (target SpO2 greater than 94%) (30-60 sec)
3. IV access x2, bloods including VBG, coagulation (1-2 min)
4. Cardiac monitoring, SpO2 continuous (1-2 min)
5. POCUS to confirm effusion, estimate size, mark drainage site (3-5 min)
6. Decision: Urgent thoracentesis vs chest drain vs supportive care (5-10 min)
7. Prepare for procedure: Consent, position, equipment (10-15 min)
Decision Framework: Who Needs Drainage?
| Presentation | Management |
|---|---|
| Tension hydrothorax (hypotension, mediastinal shift) | Immediate therapeutic thoracentesis or chest drain |
| Massive effusion with respiratory failure | Urgent therapeutic thoracentesis (drain 1-1.5L) |
| Empyema (pH below 7.2, pus, positive culture) | Chest drain insertion + IV antibiotics |
| Haemothorax (trauma) | Large bore chest drain (28-32F) |
| Moderate symptomatic effusion | Diagnostic thoracentesis, await results |
| Small/asymptomatic effusion | Diagnostic thoracentesis if exudate suspected |
| Transudative effusion (CHF) | Treat underlying cause (diuretics), no drainage unless refractory |
Ultrasound-Guided Thoracentesis
Indications:
- Diagnostic: Any new effusion of unknown aetiology
- Therapeutic: Symptomatic relief of large effusion (dyspnoea)
- Emergency: Tension hydrothorax, massive effusion with respiratory failure
Contraindications (relative):
- Coagulopathy (INR greater than 1.5, platelets below 50) - correct first if possible
- Small effusion (below 10mm depth on ultrasound)
- Uncooperative patient
- Overlying cellulitis
Procedure: [22]
1. Position patient:
- Sitting upright, leaning forward over bedside table (optimal)
- Lateral decubitus with affected side up (alternative)
- Supine with head elevated 30-45° (if unable to sit)
2. Ultrasound localisation:
- Mark site of maximal fluid depth (greater than 15mm)
- Mark diaphragm position
- Note lung position
- Mark puncture site with permanent marker
3. Prepare equipment:
- Sterile drape, gloves, gown
- Chlorhexidine skin prep
- Lignocaine 1% (10-20ml)
- 22G needle for local anaesthetic
- 16-18G thoracentesis needle or catheter
- 50ml syringe, three-way tap
- Drainage bag or vacuum bottles
4. Anaesthetise:
- Local anaesthetic to skin, subcutaneous tissue, intercostal muscles
- Infiltrate down to parietal pleura
- Advance needle OVER the TOP of the rib (neurovascular bundle runs inferior)
5. Insert thoracentesis needle:
- Perpendicular to chest wall, just above rib
- Advance while aspirating
- "Pop" and fluid return confirms pleural space entry
6. Drain fluid:
- Diagnostic: 50-100ml into specimen tubes
- Therapeutic: Maximum 1.0-1.5L (prevent REPE)
- Stop if: chest tightness, cough, SpO2 drops, resistance to drainage
7. Send samples:
- Biochemistry: Protein, LDH, glucose, pH
- Microbiology: Gram stain, culture (aerobic, anaerobic), AFB
- Cytology: If malignancy suspected
8. Post-procedure:
- No routine CXR needed if ultrasound-guided and patient asymptomatic [23]
- CXR if symptoms develop, multiple needle passes, or suspicion of pneumothorax
- Monitor SpO2 for 1-2 hours
Preventing Re-expansion Pulmonary Oedema (REPE):
- Occurs in 0.5-1% of thoracentesis, but can be fatal
- Risk factors: Large effusion (greater than 3L), chronic effusion (greater than 72 hours), young age, rapid drainage
- Prevention: Limit drainage to 1.0-1.5L per session
- Stop immediately if: chest tightness, persistent cough, SpO2 drops
- Treatment: Supportive (oxygen, NIV), usually resolves in 24-48h
- Mortality: 20% historically, but better with modern management [24]
Chest Drain Insertion (Tube Thoracostomy)
Indications for Chest Drain (NOT just thoracentesis):
- Empyema: pH below 7.2, frank pus, positive Gram stain/culture
- Complicated parapneumonic effusion: pH 7.0-7.2, glucose below 3.4, LDH greater than 1000
- Haemothorax: Traumatic or iatrogenic
- Recurrent malignant effusion: (for pleurodesis or indwelling catheter)
- Large symptomatic effusion requiring repeated drainage
Drain Size Selection:
| Indication | Size | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Simple effusion (transudative) | 12-14F pigtail | Adequate for thin fluid |
| Parapneumonic/early empyema | 12-14F pigtail | Small bore equally effective as large bore [25] |
| Frank pus/thick debris | 16-20F | May need larger for viscous fluid |
| Haemothorax | 28-32F | Large bore for blood and clot evacuation |
| Tension hydrothorax | 24-28F | Rapid drainage needed |
Site: Triangle of safety (same as pneumothorax)
- 5th intercostal space, mid-axillary line
- Superior to 5th rib (avoid neurovascular bundle)
Technique: Seldinger (preferred for small bore) or open (for large bore)
Post-insertion Management:
- Connect to underwater seal drainage (UWSD)
- Low-pressure suction if needed (-10 to -20 cmH2O)
- CXR to confirm position and lung re-expansion
- Monitor drainage output (record hourly initially)
- Flushing: 20ml saline every 6 hours prevents blockage (BTS 2023) [18]
- Daily CXR while drain in situ
Empyema Management
Initial Management (ED):
- Chest drain insertion (10-14F small bore adequate in most cases)
- IV antibiotics: Empiric broad-spectrum (cover streptococci, staphylococci, anaerobes)
- Australian Therapeutic Guidelines: Ceftriaxone 2g IV daily + Metronidazole 500mg IV 8-hourly
- OR Piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5g IV 8-hourly (if severe/ICU)
- Add vancomycin if MRSA suspected (Indigenous communities, recent hospitalisation)
- Resuscitation: Fluid if hypotensive, oxygen if hypoxic
- Analgesia: Adequate pain control (fentanyl/morphine)
Intrapleural Fibrinolytic Therapy (MIST2 Trial): [5]
- Indicated for: Loculated effusion, inadequate drainage despite chest drain
- Regimen: tPA 10mg + DNase 5mg instilled twice daily for 3 days
- Outcomes: Reduced surgical referral (4% vs 16%), reduced hospital stay
- Note: tPA alone or DNase alone is NOT effective - must use combination
Surgical Referral:
- Persistent sepsis despite drainage and antibiotics
- Loculated effusion not responding to fibrinolytics
- Trapped lung (thick pleural peel preventing re-expansion)
- Options: VATS (preferred), thoracotomy with decortication
Malignant Pleural Effusion
ED Management:
- Therapeutic thoracentesis for symptom relief (dyspnoea)
- Limit to 1-1.5L to prevent REPE
- Refer to respiratory medicine/oncology for definitive management
Definitive Options (not ED decisions):
- Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC): Home drainage, repeated aspiration
- Talc pleurodesis: Chemical adhesion of pleura to prevent recurrence
- Repeat thoracentesis: For patients with poor prognosis
Medications
| Drug | Dose | Route | Timing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ceftriaxone | 2g | IV | Daily | Empiric for parapneumonic/empyema |
| Metronidazole | 500mg | IV | 8-hourly | Anaerobic cover |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 4.5g | IV | 8-hourly | Severe/ICU cases |
| Vancomycin | 25-30mg/kg load then 15-20mg/kg | IV | 12-hourly | MRSA coverage if indicated |
| Lignocaine 1% | 10-20ml | Local | Pre-procedure | Max 3mg/kg plain |
| Fentanyl | 25-50 mcg | IV | As needed | Analgesia for procedure |
| tPA (alteplase) | 10mg in 30ml saline | Intrapleural | BD x 3 days | Combined with DNase (MIST2) |
| DNase (dornase alfa) | 5mg in 30ml saline | Intrapleural | BD x 3 days | Combined with tPA (MIST2) |
Paediatric Dosing
| Drug | Dose | Max | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceftriaxone | 50mg/kg | 2g | Once daily |
| Metronidazole | 7.5mg/kg | 500mg | 8-hourly |
| Lignocaine 1% | 0.5-1ml/kg | 3mg/kg | Local anaesthetic |
| Fentanyl | 0.5-1 mcg/kg | 50 mcg | Procedural analgesia |
| tPA | 0.1mg/kg | 4mg | Intrapleural fibrinolysis |
| DNase | 0.1mg/kg | 5mg | Intrapleural (with tPA) |
Ongoing Management
Monitoring:
- Vital signs: Temperature (resolving fever indicates treatment response)
- Drain output: Record volume and character (purulent → serous = improvement)
- CXR: Daily to monitor re-expansion, detect pneumothorax
- Inflammatory markers: CRP trending down indicates response
Drain Removal Criteria:
- Lung fully re-expanded on CXR
- Drain output below 200ml/24 hours
- Fluid non-purulent (serous)
- Patient afebrile for 24-48 hours
- No air leak (if pneumothorax component)
Definitive Care
Respiratory Medicine Referral:
- All exudative effusions (need definitive diagnosis)
- Recurrent effusions (need investigation)
- Malignant effusions (IPC, pleurodesis decisions)
- Complex parapneumonic effusions
Cardiothoracic Surgery Referral:
- Failed medical management (persistent sepsis, loculations)
- Trapped lung requiring decortication
- Haemothorax with ongoing bleeding (greater than 200ml/hr for 3 hours or greater than 1500ml initially)
- Bronchopleural fistula
Disposition
Admission Criteria
All patients with the following require admission:
- Empyema or complicated parapneumonic effusion
- Chest drain in situ
- Haemothorax
- Respiratory failure (requiring oxygen)
- Tension hydrothorax (even after stabilisation)
- Malignant effusion requiring further investigation/management
- Sepsis or haemodynamic instability
ICU/HDU Criteria
- Respiratory failure requiring NIV or intubation
- Septic shock requiring vasopressors
- Tension hydrothorax with haemodynamic instability
- Massive haemothorax with ongoing bleeding
- Multi-organ dysfunction
Discharge Criteria
Consider discharge if ALL of the following:
- Simple transudative effusion (e.g., CHF) with known cause
- Small effusion with minimal symptoms
- No hypoxia (SpO2 greater than 94% on room air)
- No signs of infection (afebrile, normal WCC, low CRP)
- Reliable patient with clear safety-netting
Discharge NOT appropriate for:
- Any chest drain in situ
- Empyema or complicated parapneumonic effusion
- Undiagnosed exudative effusion
- Symptomatic effusion not adequately drained
Follow-up
- GP follow-up: 3-5 days post-discharge (check for recurrence)
- Respiratory outpatient: 2-4 weeks (all exudative effusions)
- Repeat CXR: 4-6 weeks to confirm resolution
- CT chest: If malignancy suspected, recurrent effusion, or incomplete resolution
- Smoking cessation: Offer support (reduces infection recurrence)
Special Populations
Paediatric Considerations
Epidemiology:
- Empyema most common age 1-4 years
- Streptococcus pneumoniae most common cause (but serotype replacement post-vaccine) [26]
- Staphylococcus aureus causes more necrotising pneumonia with empyema
- Indigenous children: 3-5x higher incidence [12]
Management Differences:
- Lower threshold for drainage (children tolerate effusions poorly)
- Ultrasound-guided pigtail catheters (10-14F) equally effective as large bore
- Early use of intrapleural fibrinolytics reduces need for VATS [27]
- Children recover faster than adults (often discharged with oral antibiotics)
Pregnancy
Unique Considerations:
- Physiological pleural fluid may increase slightly in pregnancy
- Massive effusion rare, usually indicates significant pathology
- Most common causes: CHF (peripartum cardiomyopathy), PE, infection
Management Modifications:
- Thoracentesis is safe in pregnancy
- Left lateral tilt during procedure (avoid IVC compression)
- Limit drainage to prevent hypotension (fetal compromise)
- Antibiotic choice: Avoid fluoroquinolones; ceftriaxone/metronidazole safe
- CT chest: Shield abdomen, avoid unless essential
Elderly
Specific Considerations:
- Higher incidence of malignant effusions
- Increased mortality from empyema (25-30% vs 15% in younger adults)
- More comorbidities (CHF, cirrhosis) causing transudates
- May not mount fever response (empyema may be "cold")
- Higher risk of REPE (limit drainage carefully)
- DVT prophylaxis essential during admission
Indigenous Health
Important Note: Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, and Maori Considerations:
Epidemiology:
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children have 3-5x higher rates of empyema compared to non-Indigenous children [12]
- Higher rates of underlying risk factors: overcrowded housing, nutritional deficiencies, chronic suppurative lung disease, bronchiectasis
- Staphylococcus aureus (including MRSA) more prevalent in Indigenous communities [13]
- Maori have 2-3x higher respiratory infection hospitalisation rates [28]
Microbiology Differences:
- Higher rates of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) - consider empiric vancomycin
- Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A Strep) causes severe pleuropulmonary infections
- Polymicrobial infections more common (underlying bronchiectasis)
Barriers to Care:
- Geographic remoteness: Delayed presentation (24-72 hours common in remote areas)
- Limited primary care access: Pneumonia progresses to empyema before treatment
- Distrust of healthcare system: May minimise symptoms, leave before treatment complete
- Language barriers: Use qualified interpreters for consent and education
Cultural Safety:
- Involve Aboriginal Liaison Officers / Maori Health Workers early
- Explain procedures clearly using visual aids
- Allow whanau (family) presence during procedures and discussions
- Respect cultural beliefs around invasive procedures
- Acknowledge historical trauma and work to build trust
- Consider discharge planning early (may need extended admission if remote)
Remote/Rural Specific:
- Limited ultrasound and procedural expertise in remote clinics
- May need to perform landmark-guided thoracentesis if no ultrasound
- Early RFDS/retrieval consultation for empyema
- Oral antibiotic completion may be challenging (medication supply, compliance)
- Close follow-up essential but often difficult to achieve
Remote/Rural Considerations
Pre-Hospital
Ambulance/First Responders:
- Recognise respiratory distress pattern (dullness, decreased breath sounds)
- High-flow oxygen, monitor SpO2
- Alert receiving hospital (may need to activate RFDS retrieval)
- Position: Upright if tolerated (improves ventilation)
Resource-Limited Setting
Minimum Equipment for Thoracentesis:
- 16-18G IV cannula (if no thoracentesis kit)
- 50ml syringe, three-way tap
- Sterile drape, antiseptic
- Lignocaine 1%
- Specimen containers
Modified Approach:
- If no ultrasound: Use clinical landmarks (posterior axillary line, 2 intercostal spaces below upper fluid level on percussion)
- Pneumothorax risk increases without ultrasound (3-10% vs below 1%)
- Lower threshold for chest drain if cannot perform serial thoracentesis
- Consider empiric antibiotics if empyema suspected (even before drainage)
Improvised Underwater Seal Drain:
1. Insert chest drain (or large IV cannula as temporising measure)
2. Attach to IV tubing
3. Place end in sterile water bottle (500ml)
4. Submerge tubing 2-3cm below water surface
5. Observe for bubbling (air) or fluid drainage
6. Keep bottle below patient level
Retrieval
RFDS Retrieval Criteria:
- Empyema with sepsis
- Respiratory failure requiring ICU care
- Haemothorax
- Failed local management
- Need for cardiothoracic input
Pre-Retrieval Checklist:
- Chest drain in situ and functioning (if empyema/haemothorax)
- Antibiotics commenced
- Adequate analgesia for flight
- IV access secured
- Documentation complete (fluid analysis, imaging)
- Handover to retrieval team
During Air Retrieval:
- Monitor SpO2 (altitude effects on oxygenation)
- Ensure chest drain is patent (may need clamping during altitude changes)
- Have thoracentesis equipment available for emergencies
- Pressurised aircraft preferred
Telemedicine
When to Consult:
- Uncertain diagnosis (differentiate causes)
- Guidance on thoracentesis technique
- Pleural fluid interpretation
- Disposition decisions (who needs retrieval urgently)
- Troubleshooting (drain not draining)
What to Have Ready:
- Vital signs, clinical findings
- CXR/ultrasound images (can transmit via smartphone)
- Pleural fluid results
- Questions prepared
Pitfalls & Pearls
Clinical Pearls:
-
"Light's criteria misclassifies 25% of diuretic-treated CHF patients as exudates": Use serum-effusion albumin gradient (greater than 1.2 g/dL = transudate) when clinical picture suggests heart failure but Light's says exudate. [20]
-
"pH is the single best predictor of need to drain": pH below 7.2 has better predictive value than glucose or LDH for identifying complicated parapneumonic effusions requiring drainage. [21]
-
"Always use ultrasound for thoracentesis": Reduces pneumothorax from 10-18% to below 1%. BTS 2023 states this is now standard of care. No excuse for landmark-guided thoracentesis in most settings. [18]
-
"Small bore drains work just as well as large bore for empyema": MIST trials showed 12-14F pigtails with regular flushing are equivalent to 24-32F drains. Less painful, fewer complications. [25]
-
"tPA without DNase doesn't work": MIST2 showed tPA alone or DNase alone are no better than placebo. Must use combination therapy. [5]
-
"Stop draining if patient coughs or feels chest tightness": This prevents re-expansion pulmonary oedema. Limit to 1.0-1.5L per session for large/chronic effusions. [24]
-
"The spine sign confirms effusion": On ultrasound, if you can see vertebral bodies above the diaphragm, there is fluid present (not consolidation). Normal air-filled lung obscures the spine.
-
"Bloody pleural fluid doesn't always mean haemothorax": Pleural fluid HCT must be greater than 50% of blood HCT to diagnose true haemothorax. Malignant and PE-related effusions are often blood-stained.
-
"Frank pus doesn't need pH measurement": If you see thick, turbid, foul-smelling fluid - it's empyema. Don't waste time measuring pH. Drain it.
-
"Transudates rarely need drainage": Treat the underlying cause (diuretics for CHF, albumin for hypoalbuminaemia). Only drain if massive/symptomatic and refractory to medical management.
Pitfalls to Avoid:
-
Not using ultrasound: Landmark-guided thoracentesis has 10-18% pneumothorax rate. Always use ultrasound - it's standard of care.
-
Draining too much too fast: Removing greater than 1.5L in one session risks re-expansion pulmonary oedema. This can be fatal. Stop if patient coughs or develops chest tightness.
-
Sending pleural pH to the lab in a plastic syringe: CO2 diffuses through plastic, falsely elevating pH. Use heparinised blood gas syringe, keep on ice, analyse within 1 hour.
-
Missing empyema because patient is afebrile: Elderly and immunocompromised patients may not mount fever. Low pH (below 7.2) and elevated LDH (greater than 1000) should trigger drainage even without fever.
-
Using tPA alone for loculated effusion: tPA alone doesn't work. MIST2 proved you need tPA + DNase combination.
-
Waiting too long for culture results: If pleural fluid is purulent or pH below 7.2, insert chest drain immediately. Don't wait 48-72 hours for culture results.
-
Using huge chest drains for empyema: 10-14F pigtails are equally effective and less painful. Save 28-32F drains for haemothorax.
-
Forgetting to flush small bore drains: Small bore drains block easily with debris. Flush with 20ml saline every 6 hours (BTS 2023 guideline).
-
Misinterpreting transudate as exudate in CHF on diuretics: Diuretics concentrate pleural fluid proteins. If you suspect CHF but Light's says exudate, use albumin gradient.
-
Sending patient home with "small effusion" without follow-up: Even small exudative effusions need investigation. Arrange respiratory follow-up and repeat imaging.
Viva Practice
Stem: A 3-year-old Aboriginal boy is transferred from a remote community clinic 400km from your regional hospital. He has had a cough and fever for 5 days. Mother reports he has become increasingly lethargic. Temperature 39.5°C, HR 160, RR 55, SpO2 88% on room air. Examination reveals dullness and decreased breath sounds over the right chest. CXR shows right-sided opacification with loss of costophrenic angle.
Opening Question: What is your assessment and immediate management?
Model Answer: This is a critically unwell child with likely empyema or complicated parapneumonic effusion complicating pneumonia. The delayed presentation (5 days), high fever, tachycardia, tachypnoea, and hypoxia indicate severe infection. Indigenous children have 3-5x higher rates of empyema.
Immediate priorities:
- Resuscitation: High-flow oxygen (15L via mask or HFNC), IV access x2, 20ml/kg normal saline bolus if poor perfusion
- Investigations: Blood cultures, FBC, CRP, U&E, VBG, blood group (in case of haemothorax)
- POCUS: Confirm effusion, assess size and complexity (septations), identify optimal drainage site
- Antibiotics: Ceftriaxone 50mg/kg IV + consider adding vancomycin 15mg/kg if CA-MRSA risk (common in Indigenous communities)
- Prepare for drainage: Small bore chest drain (10-14F pigtail) insertion under sedation
Specific Indigenous considerations:
- Involve Aboriginal Liaison Officer to support family
- Higher CA-MRSA risk - empiric vancomycin indicated
- Prepare for retrieval to tertiary centre if condition deteriorates
- Consider cultural needs (allow extended family, explain procedures clearly)
Follow-up Questions:
-
The ultrasound shows a large complex effusion with multiple septations. What is your approach?
- Model answer: Complex septated effusion suggests Stage 2 (fibrinopurulent) disease. Initial management: Insert 10-14F pigtail drain, start IV antibiotics, consider early intrapleural fibrinolytics (tPA 0.1mg/kg max 4mg + DNase 0.1mg/kg max 5mg) to break down loculations. Monitor drainage output. If fails to respond (ongoing fever, inadequate drainage, persistent loculations), discuss with paediatric surgery for VATS. Children generally have excellent outcomes with early fibrinolytics - reduces need for surgery.
-
What organisms are you most concerned about?
- Model answer: In this Indigenous child with delayed presentation:
- Streptococcus pneumoniae: Most common overall, but serotype replacement post-vaccination is seen
- Staphylococcus aureus: Including CA-MRSA - causes more necrotising disease with rapid progression
- Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS): Significant cause of severe pleuropulmonary infection in Indigenous populations
- Polymicrobial: If underlying bronchiectasis (more common in Indigenous children) My antibiotic choice of ceftriaxone + vancomycin covers all these while awaiting culture results.
- Model answer: In this Indigenous child with delayed presentation:
-
Retrieval has a 4-hour wait. What do you do in the meantime?
- Model answer: While awaiting retrieval:
- Continue resuscitation: Fluid boluses PRN, oxygen to maintain SpO2 greater than 94%
- Insert chest drain: Don't delay - get pus out
- Antibiotics: Ensure first dose given (ceftriaxone + vancomycin)
- Monitor: Continuous SpO2, cardiac monitoring, hourly observations
- Prepare for deterioration: Have RSI drugs ready if respiratory failure worsens
- Telemedicine: Contact tertiary paediatric ICU for advice
- Documentation: Clear handover notes for retrieval team
- Family: Keep mother informed, ensure transport can accommodate her
- Model answer: While awaiting retrieval:
Discussion Points:
- Epidemiology of paediatric empyema in Indigenous communities (3-5x higher rates)
- CA-MRSA prevalence and empiric antibiotic choice
- Role of intrapleural fibrinolytics in paediatric empyema (early use reduces surgical intervention)
- Cultural safety in emergency care of Indigenous children
- Retrieval medicine considerations (RFDS protocols)
Stem: A 78-year-old woman presents with progressive dyspnoea over 3 weeks. She has a 40 pack-year smoking history. Vital signs: BP 130/80, HR 95, RR 26, SpO2 91% on room air. Examination reveals cachexia, clubbing, dullness to percussion and decreased breath sounds on the right with a large pleural effusion on CXR.
Opening Question: What is your differential diagnosis and approach?
Model Answer: This elderly woman with significant smoking history, cachexia, clubbing, and large unilateral pleural effusion has malignant pleural effusion until proven otherwise. The most likely primary is lung cancer given the smoking history.
Differential diagnosis:
- Malignant effusion (most likely): Lung cancer, mesothelioma, breast cancer, lymphoma
- Parapneumonic effusion: Though no fever reported
- Pulmonary embolism with effusion: Smoker, potential malignancy = high VTE risk
- Tuberculous effusion: Less likely in Australia, but consider in endemic populations
- Transudative: CHF (less likely given unilateral effusion and cachexia)
Immediate management:
- High-flow oxygen (target SpO2 greater than 94%)
- IV access, bloods including FBC, U&E, LFTs, coagulation, tumour markers (CEA, CA-125)
- POCUS to confirm effusion, assess for loculations
- Diagnostic and therapeutic thoracentesis (drain up to 1-1.5L for symptom relief)
- Send pleural fluid: Biochemistry, cytology (CRITICAL), cultures, pH
Follow-up Questions:
-
Pleural fluid analysis shows: Protein 48 g/L (serum 62), LDH 280 IU/L (serum 200), pH 7.38, glucose 4.2. How do you interpret this?
- Model answer: Applying Light's criteria:
- Protein ratio: 48/62 = 0.77 (greater than 0.5 = exudate criterion met)
- LDH ratio: 280/200 = 1.4 (greater than 0.6 = exudate criterion met) This is an exudate. Normal pH and glucose argue against empyema. The exudative nature with this clinical picture is highly suspicious for malignant effusion. Cytology is essential - sensitivity is 60% for single sample, 80% for repeated samples. I would also arrange CT chest with contrast for staging and to look for a primary lung lesion.
- Model answer: Applying Light's criteria:
-
The patient asks you if she has cancer. How do you respond?
- Model answer: I would use a patient-centred communication approach:
- Assess what she already knows/suspects: "What do you understand about what's happening?"
- Give a warning shot: "I'm concerned about what we've found..."
- Explain: "The fluid around your lung appears to be caused by a more serious condition. We need more tests to know exactly what it is, but I want to be honest that we're worried about the possibility of cancer."
- Respond to emotion: Allow time for reaction, provide tissues, pause
- Check understanding and offer support
- Arrange appropriate follow-up (respiratory/oncology rapid access) I would not give a definitive cancer diagnosis without histological confirmation, but I would not be falsely reassuring either.
- Model answer: I would use a patient-centred communication approach:
-
She asks if she can go home. What is your disposition plan?
-
Model answer: This patient should be admitted for:
- Monitoring after therapeutic thoracentesis (REPE risk in elderly)
- Further investigation (CT chest, bronchoscopy if lung primary suspected)
- Respiratory/oncology review
- Symptom management and social work input
Discharge would only be appropriate if:
- Symptoms adequately relieved
- Clear outpatient pathway arranged (urgent respiratory clinic within 48-72h)
- Good social support
- Safety-netting provided
Given her age, symptom severity, and likely diagnosis, I would favour admission for expedited workup and MDT input.
-
Discussion Points:
- Causes of malignant pleural effusion (lung 35%, breast 25%, lymphoma 10%, mesothelioma 5%)
- Light's criteria interpretation and limitations
- Cytology sensitivity for malignant effusion (repeat sampling increases yield)
- Indwelling pleural catheters vs pleurodesis for recurrent malignant effusions
- Breaking bad news (SPIKES framework)
- Palliative care integration
Stem: You have just performed a therapeutic thoracentesis on a 55-year-old man with a massive left-sided pleural effusion (estimated 3L on CT). He has had progressive dyspnoea for 4 weeks. You have drained 1.8L of straw-coloured fluid. He now develops sudden cough, chest tightness, and his SpO2 has dropped from 96% to 85% on 2L nasal prongs.
Opening Question: What has happened and how will you manage it?
Model Answer: This is classic presentation of re-expansion pulmonary oedema (REPE). Risk factors present: large chronic effusion (4 weeks, 3L), and drained greater than 1.5L. REPE occurs when rapidly re-expanding lung develops increased permeability oedema.
Immediate management:
- Stop drainage immediately - clamp drain/remove needle
- High-flow oxygen 15L non-rebreather (this is NOT a contraindication like in paraquat)
- Position: Sitting upright
- Consider NIV: BiPAP 10/5 if not improving with oxygen alone
- Monitoring: Continuous SpO2, cardiac monitoring
- Investigations: ABG (will show hypoxia), CXR (ipsilateral pulmonary oedema - ground glass/consolidation in re-expanded lung)
- Supportive care: Diuretics are NOT effective (this is non-cardiogenic oedema)
Severity assessment:
- Mild: Cough, mild hypoxia (SpO2 90-94%) - respond to oxygen
- Moderate: Significant hypoxia (SpO2 85-90%), dyspnoea - may need NIV
- Severe: SpO2 below 85%, respiratory failure - may need intubation
Follow-up Questions:
-
What are the risk factors for REPE?
- Model answer: Risk factors include:
- Duration of lung collapse: greater than 72 hours significantly increases risk
- Volume drained: Risk increases with greater than 1.5L; I should have stopped at 1.5L
- Rate of drainage: Rapid drainage higher risk than slow
- Young age: Paradoxically higher risk in younger patients
- Low pleural pressure: Elastance below 14.5 cmH2O/L suggests trapped lung (stop if chest tightness develops)
- First thoracentesis of large effusion: Higher risk than repeat procedures Prevention: Limit to 1.0-1.5L per session, stop if patient develops cough/chest tightness/falling SpO2
- Model answer: Risk factors include:
-
Will you use diuretics?
-
Model answer: No. REPE is non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema caused by increased capillary permeability in the re-expanded lung. It is NOT hydrostatic oedema. The mechanism is:
- Lung collapse → hypoxia-reoxygenation injury on re-expansion
- Release of inflammatory mediators
- Increased alveolar-capillary membrane permeability
Diuretics are ineffective and may cause hypovolaemia. Treatment is supportive: oxygen, NIV if needed, time (usually resolves in 24-48 hours).
-
-
His SpO2 remains 82% despite 15L oxygen. What now?
- Model answer: Severe REPE with refractory hypoxia. Escalation pathway:
- NIV trial: BiPAP with high IPAP/EPAP (e.g., 15/10) and FiO2 100%
- If NIV failing (no improvement in 30-60 minutes, worsening work of breathing):
- Intubation and mechanical ventilation
- Lung-protective ventilation (6-8 ml/kg IBW, PEEP 10-15, FiO2 to maintain SpO2 greater than 90%)
- ICU admission for all severe REPE
- Continue supportive care, monitor for improvement (usually 24-48 hours) Mortality of severe REPE is significant (historically 20%, but lower with modern management). This complication reinforces the importance of prevention (limiting drainage volume).
- Model answer: Severe REPE with refractory hypoxia. Escalation pathway:
Discussion Points:
- Pathophysiology of REPE (hypoxia-reoxygenation injury, inflammatory mediators, increased permeability)
- Prevention strategies (limit 1.0-1.5L, stop if symptoms develop, measure pleural elastance)
- Difference from cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (treatment differs)
- Role of NIV in REPE
- Prognosis (usually resolves 24-48 hours with supportive care)
Stem: A 35-year-old man is brought to ED after a stabbing to the left chest. Vital signs: BP 90/60, HR 125, RR 30, SpO2 92% on room air. Primary survey reveals a 3cm wound in the left 5th intercostal space anteriorly. Decreased breath sounds on the left with dullness to percussion. FAST positive for left haemothorax.
Opening Question: What is your management approach?
Model Answer: This is a haemodynamically unstable patient with penetrating chest trauma and haemothorax. This is a life-threatening emergency requiring simultaneous resuscitation and source control.
Immediate management (first 5 minutes):
- Trauma team activation + call cardiothoracics/surgery
- Massive transfusion protocol activation (hypotensive with haemothorax)
- High-flow oxygen 15L non-rebreather
- Large bore IV access x2 (antecubital) + start O-negative blood if available
- Cover wound with three-sided occlusive dressing (prevents tension from air entry, allows blood drainage)
- Prepare for immediate tube thoracostomy
Chest drain insertion:
- Site: 5th ICS anterior/mid-axillary line (triangle of safety) - NOT through wound
- Size: 28-32F (large bore for blood evacuation)
- Technique: Open (blunt dissection)
- Connect to underwater seal, document initial output
Decision points based on initial drainage:
| Initial Output | Action |
|---|---|
| below 500ml | Stabilise, monitor, may not need surgery |
| 500-1000ml | Close monitoring, ongoing resuscitation |
| greater than 1000ml initial OR greater than 200ml/hr for 3+ hours | Prepare for thoracotomy |
| greater than 1500ml initial | Immediate thoracotomy indicated |
Follow-up Questions:
-
The drain puts out 1800ml of blood immediately. What are your next steps?
- Model answer: This patient requires immediate thoracotomy. Output greater than 1500ml initial meets criteria for surgical intervention (likely significant vascular injury).
- Call cardiothoracic surgeon urgently (or trauma surgeon)
- Continue massive transfusion (target 1:1:1 ratio PRBCs:FFP:platelets)
- Permissive hypotension (SBP 80-90 mmHg) until surgical control
- TXA 1g IV if within 3 hours of injury (CRASH-2)
- Autotransfusion if available (collect chest drain blood for reinfusion)
- Prepare for OR transfer
- If patient arrests before OR: ED thoracotomy (resuscitative thoracotomy)
- Model answer: This patient requires immediate thoracotomy. Output greater than 1500ml initial meets criteria for surgical intervention (likely significant vascular injury).
-
What structures might have been injured?
- Model answer: With a stab wound to the left 5th ICS anteriorly, concerning structures include:
- Heart/pericardium: 5th ICS is at the level of the cardiac apex
- Internal mammary artery: Runs parasternally
- Intercostal vessels: Along inferior rib border
- Left lung: Parenchymal laceration
- Great vessels: Less likely with anterior wound, but left subclavian possible
- Diaphragm: If wound is lower than expected The massive haemothorax suggests either great vessel, intercostal, or internal mammary injury. Cardiac injury with tamponade is possible if there's also pericardial involvement.
- Model answer: With a stab wound to the left 5th ICS anteriorly, concerning structures include:
-
What is the role of ED thoracotomy here?
-
Model answer: Resuscitative (ED) thoracotomy indications in penetrating trauma:
- Cardiac arrest in ED or within 15 minutes of arrival
- Profound refractory shock (SBP below 60) not responding to resuscitation
This patient currently has output (SBP 90/60) so is not yet a candidate. If he arrests or becomes profoundly hypotensive despite resuscitation, ED thoracotomy would be indicated.
Goals of ED thoracotomy:
- Relieve cardiac tamponade (open pericardium)
- Control cardiac bleeding (digital pressure, staples, suture)
- Cross-clamp aorta (increase coronary/cerebral perfusion)
- Internal cardiac massage
Survival for penetrating cardiac injuries with ED thoracotomy: 10-30% (much better than blunt trauma).
-
Discussion Points:
- Indications for thoracotomy in haemothorax (greater than 1500ml initial or greater than 200ml/hr ongoing)
- Damage control resuscitation principles
- Massive transfusion protocols
- Role of autotransfusion
- ED thoracotomy indications and technique
- Permissive hypotension in trauma
OSCE Scenarios
Station 1: Ultrasound-Guided Thoracentesis
Format: Procedural station Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED procedure room with manikin/phantom
Candidate Instructions:
A 65-year-old man has a large right-sided pleural effusion causing dyspnoea. You are asked to perform ultrasound-guided diagnostic and therapeutic thoracentesis. Demonstrate your technique on the model provided. An assistant is available.
Examiner Instructions: Candidate should demonstrate systematic approach to ultrasound-guided thoracentesis including preparation, ultrasound localisation, procedure technique, and sample handling.
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Preparation | Introduces self, confirms patient identity, checks consent | /1 |
| Gathers appropriate equipment (sterile drape, antiseptic, LA, thoracentesis kit, specimen containers) | /1 | |
| Positions patient appropriately (sitting upright, leaning forward over table) | /1 | |
| Ultrasound | Selects appropriate probe (curvilinear/phased array) | /0.5 |
| Identifies diaphragm, effusion, and collapsed lung | /1 | |
| Measures depth of effusion (confirms greater than 15mm) | /0.5 | |
| Identifies optimal puncture site and marks with pen | /1 | |
| Sterile Technique | Dons sterile gloves and prepares sterile field | /1 |
| Cleans skin with antiseptic (chlorhexidine) | /0.5 | |
| Procedure | Infiltrates local anaesthetic (skin to pleura) | /1 |
| Inserts needle OVER TOP of rib (avoids neurovascular bundle) | /1 | |
| Advances while aspirating until fluid obtained | /0.5 | |
| Withdraws appropriate volume (states would limit to 1-1.5L therapeutically) | /1 | |
| Sends samples to: Biochemistry (protein, LDH, glucose, pH), Micro (Gram stain, culture), Cytology | /1 | |
| Post-procedure | States would observe patient, not routinely need CXR if US-guided | /0.5 |
| Recognises when to stop (cough, chest tightness, falling SpO2) | /0.5 | |
| Documents procedure | /0.5 | |
| Communication | Explains procedure to patient throughout | /0.5 |
| Responds appropriately to patient concerns | /0.5 | |
| Total | /14 |
Expected Standard:
- Pass: ≥8/14
- Key discriminators: Correct ultrasound localisation, sterile technique, needle insertion over rib, limiting volume to prevent REPE
Station 2: Pleural Fluid Interpretation
Format: Data interpretation station Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED workstation with lab results
Candidate Instructions:
You are presented with pleural fluid results from two patients. Interpret the results, determine the likely aetiology, and outline your management plan for each.
Data provided:
Patient A: 55-year-old with progressive dyspnoea, bilateral ankle swelling, on furosemide for heart failure
- Pleural fluid: Protein 22 g/L, LDH 120 IU/L, pH 7.45, Glucose 5.2 mmol/L, WCC 200/μL (lymphocytes)
- Serum: Protein 65 g/L, LDH 200 IU/L, Albumin 32 g/L
Patient B: 48-year-old with fever 38.5°C, productive cough, right-sided pleuritic pain for 4 days
- Pleural fluid: Protein 55 g/L, LDH 2500 IU/L, pH 6.9, Glucose 1.8 mmol/L, WCC 45,000/μL (95% neutrophils)
- Serum: Protein 70 g/L, LDH 250 IU/L
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Light's Criteria - Patient A | Correctly calculates protein ratio (22/65 = 0.34, below 0.5) | /1 |
| Correctly calculates LDH ratio (120/200 = 0.6, ≤0.6) | /1 | |
| Correctly identifies as TRANSUDATE | /1 | |
| Patient A Management | Identifies CHF as likely cause | /1 |
| States treat underlying cause (diuretics) not drainage | /1 | |
| Light's Criteria - Patient B | Correctly identifies as EXUDATE (protein ratio 0.78, LDH ratio 10) | /1 |
| pH/Glucose Interpretation | Recognises pH below 7.2 indicates need for drainage | /1 |
| Recognises glucose below 2.2 indicates complicated effusion/empyema | /1 | |
| Patient B Diagnosis | Correctly identifies as EMPYEMA | /1 |
| Patient B Management | States chest drain insertion required | /1 |
| States IV antibiotics (appropriate choice) | /1 | |
| Mentions may need fibrinolytics if loculated | /0.5 | |
| Mentions surgical referral if fails to respond | /0.5 | |
| Understanding | Explains why pH is most reliable predictor | /1 |
| Discusses when Light's criteria can mislead (diuretic-treated CHF) | /1 | |
| Total | /14 |
Expected Standard:
- Pass: ≥8/14
- Key discriminators: Correct application of Light's criteria, recognising pH below 7.2 mandates drainage, appropriate management plans
Station 3: Breaking Bad News - Malignant Effusion
Format: Communication station Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED relatives room
Candidate Instructions:
You are the ED registrar. Mrs Smith, a 72-year-old, had a pleural effusion drained yesterday. Cytology has returned showing malignant cells consistent with lung adenocarcinoma. She has no known cancer history. She has been told to expect her results today. Please speak with her.
Actor/Patient Brief:
- You are worried but hoping for good news
- When told about cancer, become tearful and ask "How long do I have?"
- Ask if it can be cured
- Ask about telling your husband (who has dementia)
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Introduces self, confirms patient identity | /0.5 |
| Ensures privacy, invites support person if desired | /0.5 | |
| Assessment | Asks what patient understands about situation | /1 |
| Assesses how much information patient wants | /0.5 | |
| Breaking News | Gives warning shot ("I'm afraid the news is not what we were hoping for") | /1 |
| Delivers diagnosis clearly but sensitively | /1 | |
| Allows time for reaction, responds to emotion | /1 | |
| Does not rush, tolerates silence | /0.5 | |
| Information | Explains honestly about prognosis when asked (without false hope, without removing all hope) | /1 |
| Discusses next steps (oncology referral, staging, treatment options) | /1 | |
| Avoids medical jargon | /0.5 | |
| Support | Acknowledges difficulty of telling husband | /1 |
| Offers to involve social worker/support services | /0.5 | |
| Offers to speak with family if patient wishes | /0.5 | |
| Closing | Summarises plan | /0.5 |
| Checks understanding | /0.5 | |
| Provides contact for questions | /0.5 | |
| Arranges appropriate follow-up | /0.5 | |
| Global | Empathetic, patient-centred approach | /1 |
| Total | /13 |
Expected Standard:
- Pass: ≥7/13
- Key discriminators: Warning shot before diagnosis, responding to emotion, honest but compassionate prognosis discussion, offering practical support
SAQ Practice
Question 1 (8 marks)
Stem: A 58-year-old man presents with dyspnoea and right-sided pleuritic chest pain. He has a history of alcoholic liver cirrhosis. CXR shows a moderate right-sided pleural effusion.
Question: a) List 4 features of pleural fluid analysis that would differentiate a transudative from an exudative effusion using Light's criteria. (4 marks) b) What additional test would you perform if the fluid appears to be an exudate but you clinically suspect a transudate (e.g., hepatic hydrothorax)? Explain why. (2 marks) c) List 2 other causes of transudative pleural effusion besides cirrhosis. (2 marks)
Model Answer:
a) Light's Criteria features (1 mark each, max 4):
- Pleural protein / Serum protein ratio greater than 0.5 (exudate)
- Pleural LDH / Serum LDH ratio greater than 0.6 (exudate)
- Pleural LDH greater than 2/3 upper limit of normal for serum LDH (exudate)
- Fluid is exudate if ANY ONE criterion is met
- Sensitivity 98%, specificity 83% for exudates
b) Additional test (2 marks):
- Serum-effusion albumin gradient (1 mark)
- If serum albumin minus pleural albumin greater than 1.2 g/dL = transudate (1 mark)
- Rationale: Light's criteria misclassifies up to 25% of transudates as exudates, particularly in patients on diuretics (concentrates pleural proteins). The albumin gradient is unaffected by diuretics and helps correctly reclassify these cases.
c) Other causes of transudate (1 mark each, max 2):
- Congestive heart failure (most common)
- Nephrotic syndrome
- Constrictive pericarditis
- Hypoalbuminaemia (any cause)
- Peritoneal dialysis
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Correct application of each Light's criterion
- Do not accept: Describing Light's criteria incorrectly, listing exudate causes instead of transudate
Question 2 (6 marks)
Stem: A 45-year-old woman has a complicated parapneumonic effusion with a chest drain in situ for 3 days. Despite appropriate antibiotics, she remains febrile with ongoing purulent drainage. CT shows a loculated effusion.
Question: a) Describe the intrapleural fibrinolytic regimen recommended by the MIST2 trial. (3 marks) b) What were the key outcomes demonstrated by this trial? (2 marks) c) List 2 indications for surgical referral in empyema. (1 mark)
Model Answer:
a) MIST2 regimen (3 marks):
- tPA (tissue plasminogen activator) 10mg + DNase (dornase alfa) 5mg (1 mark)
- Each diluted in 30ml normal saline, instilled intrapleurally (0.5 mark)
- Dwell time 1 hour (clamp drain) then release (0.5 mark)
- Given twice daily for 3 days (total 6 doses) (1 mark)
- Note: tPA alone or DNase alone is NOT effective - must use combination
b) Key MIST2 outcomes (1 mark each, max 2):
- Reduced need for surgical referral (4% vs 16% in placebo group)
- Reduced hospital length of stay (approximately 6 days shorter)
- Improved radiographic resolution
- No significant increase in bleeding complications
c) Surgical referral indications (0.5 mark each, max 1):
- Persistent sepsis despite adequate drainage and antibiotics
- Failure of intrapleural fibrinolytics
- Trapped lung (thick pleural peel preventing re-expansion)
- Loculated effusion not responding to medical management
- Bronchopleural fistula
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Correct doses and regimen for MIST2
- Do not accept: Using tPA alone, incorrect dosing, describing medical management for surgical indications
Question 3 (6 marks)
Stem: A 55-year-old man develops sudden cough, chest tightness, and falling SpO2 during therapeutic thoracentesis for a massive pleural effusion present for 3 weeks. You have drained 2L.
Question: a) What complication has occurred? (1 mark) b) List 4 risk factors for this complication. (2 marks) c) Outline your immediate management (4 steps). (2 marks) d) Why are diuretics NOT indicated? (1 mark)
Model Answer:
a) Diagnosis (1 mark):
- Re-expansion pulmonary oedema (REPE)
b) Risk factors (0.5 mark each, max 2):
- Duration of lung collapse greater than 72 hours (3 weeks in this case)
- Volume drained greater than 1.5L (2L in this case)
- Rapid rate of drainage
- Large initial effusion (greater than 3L)
- Young patient age
- First thoracentesis for the effusion
- Low pleural elastance (trapped lung)
c) Immediate management (0.5 mark each, max 2):
- Stop drainage immediately (clamp/remove needle)
- High-flow oxygen 15L via non-rebreather
- Position upright if tolerated
- Consider NIV (BiPAP) if not responding to oxygen
- Monitor SpO2 continuously
- Prepare for intubation if severe
- Supportive care (usually resolves 24-48 hours)
d) Why diuretics NOT indicated (1 mark):
- REPE is non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema caused by increased capillary permeability (NOT hydrostatic overload)
- Mechanism is hypoxia-reoxygenation injury and inflammatory mediator release
- Diuretics are ineffective and may cause harmful hypovolaemia
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Clear recognition of REPE, appropriate risk factors, supportive management approach
- Do not accept: Suggesting diuretics, failing to recognise the complication
Question 4 (6 marks)
Stem: A 3-year-old Aboriginal child from a remote community presents with a 5-day history of cough, fever, and respiratory distress. Ultrasound confirms a large right-sided empyema with septations.
Question: a) What organisms are particularly important to consider in this population? (2 marks) b) What is your empiric antibiotic regimen and why? (2 marks) c) List 2 social/health system factors that may contribute to delayed presentation and more severe disease in Indigenous children. (2 marks)
Model Answer:
a) Important organisms (1 mark each, max 2):
- Streptococcus pneumoniae (most common, but serotype replacement post-vaccination)
- Staphylococcus aureus including CA-MRSA (community-associated MRSA more prevalent)
- Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A Strep) - causes severe pleuropulmonary infections
- Polymicrobial infections (if underlying bronchiectasis)
b) Antibiotic regimen (2 marks):
- Ceftriaxone 50mg/kg IV daily (covers S. pneumoniae, GAS, most respiratory pathogens) (1 mark)
- PLUS Vancomycin 15mg/kg IV 6-hourly (covers CA-MRSA, which is more prevalent in Indigenous communities) (1 mark)
- Rationale: Higher CA-MRSA prevalence in Aboriginal communities means empiric coverage is warranted until cultures return
c) Social/health system factors (1 mark each, max 2):
- Geographic remoteness - limited access to primary healthcare, long distances to hospitals
- Overcrowded housing - increased respiratory pathogen transmission
- Reduced access to primary care - delays in initial antibiotic treatment for pneumonia
- Nutritional deficiencies - impaired immune function
- Distrust of healthcare system - historical trauma leading to delayed presentation
- Language/cultural barriers - difficulty communicating symptoms
- Limited local resources - no ultrasound, limited procedural expertise
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Recognition of CA-MRSA risk, appropriate antibiotic choice with rationale
- Do not accept: Failing to add vancomycin, not recognising Indigenous-specific epidemiology
Australian Guidelines
ARC/ANZCOR
- ANZCOR Guideline 11.5: Reversible causes of cardiac arrest (4Hs and 4Ts) - tension hydrothorax as a T (Tension)
- Key point: Massive pleural effusion can cause obstructive shock similar to tension pneumothorax
Therapeutic Guidelines Australia
- Antibiotic Expert Group: Empiric antibiotics for empyema
- "Adults: Ceftriaxone 2g IV daily + Metronidazole 500mg IV 8-hourly"
- Add vancomycin if MRSA suspected
- "Duration: IV for minimum 10-14 days, then oral to complete 4-6 weeks total"
- Consider local resistance patterns in Indigenous communities
British Thoracic Society Guidelines 2023 [18]
- Ultrasound guidance for thoracentesis is standard of care
- Small-bore drains (10-14F) are as effective as large-bore for empyema
- Regular flushing (20ml saline every 6 hours) prevents drain blockage
- Early use of intrapleural fibrinolytics (tPA + DNase) for loculated effusions
- Surgical referral if fails to respond within 5-7 days
State-Specific
- NSW Clinical Guidelines: Retrieval criteria for pleural infection
- QLD Health: Paediatric empyema management pathway
- RFDS protocols: Chest drain mandatory before air retrieval of pleural effusion
References
Guidelines
- Light RW. Clinical practice. Pleural effusion. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(25):1971-1977. PMID: 12075059
- Havelock T, Teoh R, Laws D, Gleeson F. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65 Suppl 2:ii61-76. PMID: 20696688
Key Evidence
- Davies HE, Davies RJ, Davies CW. Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65 Suppl 2:ii41-53. PMID: 20696693
- Feller-Kopman D, Berkowitz D, Boiselle P, Ernst A. Large-volume thoracentesis and the risk of reexpansion pulmonary edema. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(5):1656-1661. PMID: 17954079
- Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, et al. Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(6):518-526. PMID: 21830966
- Marel M, Zrustova M, Stasny B, Light RW. The incidence of pleural effusion in a well-defined region. Chest. 1993;104(5):1486-1489. PMID: 8222812
- Mattison LE, Coppage L, Alderman DF, Herlong JO, Sahn SA. Pleural effusions in the medical ICU. Chest. 1997;111(4):1018-1023. PMID: 9106583
- Light RW. Parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3(1):75-80. PMID: 16493154
- Maskell NA, Batt S, Hedley EL, Davies CW, Gillespie SH, Davies RJ. The bacteriology of pleural infection by genetic and standard methods and its mortality significance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(7):817-823. PMID: 16840746
- Roberts ME, Neville E, Berrisford RG, Antunes G, Ali NJ. Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65 Suppl 2:ii32-40. PMID: 20696691
- Porcel JM, Vives M, Cao G, Esquerda A, Rubio M, Rivas MC. Measurement of pro-brain natriuretic peptide in pleural fluid for the diagnosis of pleural effusions due to heart failure. Am J Med. 2004;116(6):417-420. PMID: 15006592
- O'Grady KA, Torzillo PJ, Chang AB. Hospitalisation of Indigenous children in the Northern Territory for lower respiratory illness in the first year of life. Med J Aust. 2010;192(10):586-590. PMID: 20477734
- Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG Jr. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):603-661. PMID: 26016486
- Zhao Y, Thomas SL, Guthridge SL, Wakerman J. Better health outcomes at lower costs: the benefits of primary care utilisation for chronic disease management in remote Indigenous communities in Australia's Northern Territory. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:463. PMID: 25288391
- Gardiner FW, Bishop L, Gale L, Ranson D, Burdon R. The Royal Flying Doctor Service 2018 annual report on aeromedical retrievals. Emerg Med Australas. 2020;32(1):82-89. PMID: 31729163
- Heffner JE, Brown LK, Barbieri C, DeLeo JM. Pleural fluid chemical analysis in parapneumonic effusions. A meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151(6):1700-1708. PMID: 7767510
- Diacon AH, Brutsche MH, Solèr M. Accuracy of pleural puncture sites: a prospective comparison of clinical examination with ultrasound. Chest. 2003;123(2):436-441. PMID: 12576363
- Psallidas I, Helm EJ, Maskell NA, Yarmus L, Thomas R, Rahman NM. BTS Clinical Statement on pleural procedures. Thorax. 2023;78(Suppl 3):s1-s42. PMID: 37339846
- Light RW, Macgregor MI, Luchsinger PC, Ball WC Jr. Pleural effusions: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med. 1972;77(4):507-513. PMID: 4642731
- Roth BJ, O'Meara TF, Cragun WH. The serum-effusion albumin gradient in the evaluation of pleural effusions. Chest. 1990;98(3):546-549. PMID: 2394139
- Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, et al. Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions: an evidence-based guideline. Chest. 2000;118(4):1158-1171. PMID: 11035692
- Gordon CE, Feller-Kopman D, Balk EM, Smetana GW. Pneumothorax following thoracentesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(4):332-339. PMID: 20177035
- Petersen S, Freitag M, Albert W, Tempel S, Lehmann T, Eichfeld U. Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis is associated with low rate of complications. Ultraschall Med. 2014;35(2):149-152. PMID: 24327513
- Mahfood S, Hix WR, Aaron BL, Blaes P, Watson DC. Reexpansion pulmonary edema. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;45(3):340-345. PMID: 3348708
- Rahman NM, Maskell NA, Davies CW, et al. The relationship between chest tube size and clinical outcome in pleural infection. Chest. 2010;137(3):536-543. PMID: 19820073
- Spencer DA, Iqbal SM, Hasan A, Hamilton L. Empyema thoracis is still increasing in UK children. BMJ. 2006;332(7553):1333. PMID: 16740556
- Thomson AH, Hull J, Kumar MR, Wallis C, Balfour Lynn IM. Randomised trial of intrapleural urokinase in the treatment of childhood empyema. Thorax. 2002;57(4):343-347. PMID: 11923554
- Ministry of Health New Zealand. Tatau Kahukura: Maori Health Chart Book 2015. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2015.
- Sahn SA. Diagnosis and management of parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(11):1480-1486. PMID: 17990232
- Villena Garrido V, Cases Viedma E, Fernández Villar A, et al. Recommendations of diagnosis and treatment of pleural effusion. Update. Arch Bronconeumol. 2014;50(6):235-249. PMID: 24698396
- Hooper C, Lee YC, Maskell N. Investigation of a unilateral pleural effusion in adults: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65 Suppl 2:ii4-17. PMID: 20696690
- Porcel JM. Chest tube drainage of the pleural space: a concise review for pulmonologists. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2018;81(2):106-115. PMID: 29617100
- Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: an American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement. Chest. 2001;119(2):590-602. PMID: 11171742
- Brims FJ, Lansley SM, Waterer GW, Lee YC. Empyema thoracis: new insights into an old disease. Eur Respir Rev. 2010;19(117):220-228. PMID: 20956197
- Ahmed RA, Marrie TJ, Huang JQ. Thoracic empyema in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med. 2006;119(10):877-883. PMID: 17000221
- Wait MA, Sharma S, Hohn J, Dal Nogare A. A randomized trial of empyema therapy. Chest. 1997;111(6):1548-1551. PMID: 9187172
- Piccolo F, Popowicz N, Wong D, Lee YC. Pleural tissue plasminogen activator and deoxyribonuclease therapy for pleural infection. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(6):999-1008. PMID: 26150912
- Grijalva CG, Nuorti JP, Zhu Y, Griffin MR. Increasing incidence of empyema complicating childhood community-acquired pneumonia in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(6):805-813. PMID: 20166818
Frequently asked questions
Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.
When should I drain a pleural effusion emergently?
Respiratory distress with large effusion, tension hydrothorax, empyema (pH below 7.2, frank pus, positive culture), and haemothorax require immediate drainage.
How much fluid can I safely drain at once?
Limit to 1.0-1.5L per session to prevent re-expansion pulmonary oedema. Stop if patient develops chest tightness, cough, or SpO2 drops.
What is the best way to differentiate transudate from exudate?
Light's criteria: Exudate if protein ratio greater than 0.5, LDH ratio greater than 0.6, or pleural LDH greater than 2/3 upper limit of normal. Sensitivity 98%, specificity 83%.
Learning map
Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.
Prerequisites
Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.
Differentials
Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.