Post-Resuscitation Care
Post-resuscitation care is the critical phase between ROSC and definitive outcome, determining whether a patient survive... ACEM Primary Written, ACEM Primary V
Clinical board
A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.
Urgent signals
Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.
- Hypotension (MAP below 65 mmHg or SBP below 100 mmHg) requires immediate vasopressor support
- Hypoxaemia (SpO2 below 94%) and hyperoxia (PaO2 greater than 300 mmHg) both worsen neurological outcome
- Fever greater than 37.5C associated with increased mortality - actively prevent
- STEMI on post-ROSC ECG requires immediate coronary angiography regardless of coma
Exam focus
Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.
- ACEM Primary Written
- ACEM Primary Viva
- ACEM Fellowship Written
- ACEM Fellowship OSCE
Linked comparisons
Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.
- Coma - Adult
- Status Epilepticus
Editorial and exam context
Quick Answer
Critical: Post-resuscitation care begins immediately after ROSC and focuses on preventing secondary brain injury through optimised oxygenation (SpO2 94-98%), normocapnia (PaCO2 35-45 mmHg), haemodynamic support (MAP ≥65 mmHg), temperature control (≤37.5°C), and urgent treatment of the precipitating cause including immediate coronary angiography for STEMI.
Post-resuscitation care is the critical phase between ROSC and definitive outcome, determining whether a patient survives with good neurological function [1]. The Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome (PCAS) comprises brain injury, myocardial dysfunction, systemic ischaemia-reperfusion response, and persistent precipitating pathology [2]. Australian data shows 25-40% of OHCA patients achieve ROSC, but only 11.7% survive to hospital discharge with 6-9% achieving favourable neurological outcome [3]. The first 72 hours are critical—aggressive prevention of secondary brain injury and early identification of treatable causes significantly improves outcomes. ANZCOR Guidelines 11.7 and 11.8 provide the evidence-based framework for post-resuscitation management in Australia and New Zealand [4,5].
ACEM Exam Focus
Primary Exam Relevance
- Physiology: Cerebral autoregulation failure, ischaemia-reperfusion injury, mitochondrial dysfunction, excitotoxicity cascade, coronary perfusion pressure requirements, oxygen-haemoglobin dissociation curve, carbon dioxide and cerebral blood flow relationship
- Pharmacology: Catecholamine pharmacodynamics (noradrenaline alpha-1 effects, dobutamine beta-1 effects), amiodarone maintenance infusion, antiepileptic drug mechanisms (levetiracetam, valproate), sedative pharmacokinetics for neuroprognostication timing
- Anatomy: Selective brain vulnerability (hippocampus, basal ganglia, Purkinje cells), coronary anatomy for STEMI recognition, central line anatomy for vasopressor administration
Fellowship Exam Relevance
- Written SAQ Topics: Post-ROSC ABCDE priorities, oxygenation and ventilation targets (with evidence), temperature control controversies (TTM1 vs TTM2), neuroprognostication timing and multimodal approach, coronary angiography indications
- OSCE: Post-ROSC management station requiring systematic approach to comatose patient, communication station discussing prognosis with family (timing, uncertainty, multimodal approach)
- Key domains tested: Medical Expert (evidence-based targets), Leader (ICU team coordination), Communicator (sensitive family discussions about prognosis)
High-Yield Exam Points
ACEM Exam Must-Know Points:
- Oxygenation: SpO2 94-98%, avoid hyperoxia (PaO2 greater than 300 mmHg) - associated with worse neurological outcomes
- Ventilation: Target normocapnia PaCO2 35-45 mmHg - avoid hypocapnia (cerebral vasoconstriction)
- Haemodynamics: MAP ≥65 mmHg (may need higher for chronic hypertensives) - noradrenaline first-line
- Temperature: Prevent fever greater than 37.5°C for at least 72 hours - uncertain benefit of hypothermia 32-34°C post-TTM2
- ECG: STEMI = immediate coronary angiography regardless of neurological status
- Neuroprognostication: ≥72 hours post-ROSC, multimodal approach, allow sedation to clear (≥5 half-lives)
- Glucose: Target 7.8-10 mmol/L, avoid hypoglycaemia (below 4 mmol/L) and severe hyperglycaemia (above 10 mmol/L)
Key Points
The 7 things you MUST know for ACEM exams:
- Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome has four components: brain injury, myocardial dysfunction, systemic ischaemia-reperfusion, and persistent precipitating pathology [2]
- Oxygenation targets are SpO2 94-98% - both hypoxaemia and hyperoxia worsen outcomes [6,7]
- Ventilation targets are normocapnia (PaCO2 35-45 mmHg) - hypocapnia causes cerebral vasoconstriction [8]
- Haemodynamic targets are MAP ≥65 mmHg initially, individualised to patient's premorbid BP [4]
- Temperature control should target ≤37.5°C with active fever prevention for at least 72 hours [5,9]
- STEMI on post-ROSC ECG mandates immediate coronary angiography - coma is NOT a contraindication [10,11]
- Neuroprognostication requires ≥72 hours post-ROSC, multimodal testing, and clearance of sedatives [12,13]
Epidemiology
Australian and New Zealand Data
| Metric | Australia | New Zealand | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| OHCA incidence | 53 per 100,000/year | 46 per 100,000/year | [3,14] |
| ROSC achieved (OHCA) | 25-40% | 30-35% | [3] |
| Survival to discharge (OHCA) | 11.7% | 13.4% | [3,14] |
| Favourable neurological outcome | 6-9% | 8-10% | [3] |
| VF/pVT survival | 23-35% | 25-30% | [15] |
| PEA/Asystole survival | 5-8% | 6-8% | [15] |
| IHCA survival to discharge | 23.8% | ~25% | [16] |
Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome Components
Post-arrest myocardial dysfunction [17]:
- Occurs in 50-70% of post-ROSC patients
- Peaks at 6-8 hours post-ROSC
- Usually reversible within 48-72 hours
- Left ventricular ejection fraction may decrease to 20-30%
- Contributes to early haemodynamic instability
Post-arrest brain injury [18]:
- Primary injury: ischaemia during no-flow/low-flow period
- Secondary injury: reperfusion injury, cerebral oedema, seizures, fever
- Severity determines long-term neurological outcome
- Selective vulnerability: hippocampus, basal ganglia, cerebellum
Systemic ischaemia-reperfusion response [2]:
- Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)
- Coagulopathy (both pro-thrombotic and bleeding)
- Adrenal insufficiency (relative)
- Impaired vasoregulation
- Increased susceptibility to infection
Indigenous Health Disparities
Important Note: Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, and Māori Considerations:
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians experience cardiac arrest at significantly younger ages with higher rates of underlying cardiovascular disease [19]:
- Earlier onset: Mean age of cardiac arrest 10-15 years younger than non-Indigenous Australians
- Higher risk factor prevalence: Smoking (41% vs 13%), diabetes (12% vs 5%), rheumatic heart disease (8-fold higher)
- Geographic barriers: Remote communities may have EMS response times over 60 minutes
- Lower bystander CPR rates: Due to geographic isolation and fewer trained community members
- Challenges in post-arrest care: Remote locations may delay access to coronary angiography and ICU
- Cultural considerations: Family-centred decision making, involvement of Aboriginal Health Workers in prognosis discussions
- Māori in New Zealand: Similar disparities with 2-3 times higher cardiovascular mortality, importance of whanau involvement
Implications for post-resuscitation care:
- Lower threshold for transfer to cardiac arrest centre
- Involve Aboriginal Health Workers/Māori Health Workers in family discussions
- Consider cultural beliefs about life support and prognostication
- Coordinate with retrieval services early (RFDS, helicopter services)
Pathophysiology
Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome (PCAS)
The Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome describes the unique pathophysiological state following ROSC [2]. Understanding this syndrome is essential for rational post-resuscitation therapy.
Cardiac Arrest
↓
Global Ischaemia (No-flow)
↓
CPR (Low-flow: 25-30% normal cardiac output)
↓
ROSC
↓
Reperfusion Injury → POST-CARDIAC ARREST SYNDROME
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Brain Injury │ 2. Myocardial │ 3. Systemic │
│ - Excitotoxicity│ Dysfunction │ Response │
│ - Free radicals │ - Stunning │ - SIRS │
│ - Oedema │ - Low CO │ - Coagulopathy│
│ - Seizures │ - Arrhythmias │ - Infection │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
4. Persistent Precipitating Pathology (ACS, PE, sepsis, toxins)
Mechanisms of Post-Cardiac Arrest Brain Injury
Primary brain injury (during arrest) [18,20]:
- No-flow period: Complete cessation of cerebral perfusion
- Low-flow period: CPR provides 25-30% of normal cerebral blood flow
- Neuronal injury begins after 4-5 minutes of complete ischaemia
- Selective vulnerability: hippocampus (memory), cerebellum, basal ganglia
- ATP depletion → failure of Na/K-ATPase → cellular swelling
Secondary brain injury (post-ROSC) [21,22]:
- Excitotoxicity: Glutamate release → NMDA receptor activation → calcium influx → neuronal death
- Oxidative stress: Free radical formation during reperfusion → lipid peroxidation, DNA damage
- Inflammation: Cytokine release (IL-6, TNF-α), blood-brain barrier disruption, microglial activation
- Cerebral oedema: Cytotoxic (cellular swelling) and vasogenic (BBB breakdown) → raised ICP
- Microcirculatory dysfunction: No-reflow phenomenon, endothelial dysfunction, microthrombi
- Seizures: Occur in 10-40% post-ROSC, worsen secondary injury through increased metabolic demand
- Fever: Each 1°C rise above 37°C associated with 2.26× increased odds of poor outcome [23]
Post-Cardiac Arrest Myocardial Dysfunction
Mechanisms [17,24]:
- Global myocardial stunning from ischaemia-reperfusion
- Catecholamine surge during resuscitation → myocardial injury
- Inflammatory mediators (IL-6, TNF-α) cause direct myocardial depression
- Underlying acute coronary syndrome in 40-60% of OHCA
- CPR-related myocardial contusion
Haemodynamic profile:
- Reduced cardiac output (may drop to 2-3 L/min)
- Increased systemic vascular resistance initially
- Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (may fall to 20-30%)
- Elevated filling pressures
- Usually reversible within 48-72 hours with supportive care
Rationale for Therapeutic Targets
| Target | Pathophysiological Rationale |
|---|---|
| SpO2 94-98% | Avoid hypoxic injury; hyperoxia increases free radical formation |
| PaCO2 35-45 mmHg | Hypocapnia → cerebral vasoconstriction → worsened ischaemia |
| MAP ≥65 mmHg | Cerebral autoregulation impaired; needs adequate perfusion pressure |
| Temperature ≤37.5°C | Fever increases metabolic demand, worsens secondary injury |
| Glucose 7.8-10 mmol/L | Hypoglycaemia → neuronal injury; hyperglycaemia → anaerobic metabolism |
Clinical Approach
Recognition of ROSC
Signs of ROSC [4]:
- Palpable pulse (carotid, femoral)
- Measurable blood pressure
- Sudden sustained rise in end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) to 35-45 mmHg
- Evidence of spontaneous breathing (may be agonal initially)
- Improvement in oxygen saturation
- Purposeful movement or response to stimuli
A sudden sustained rise in ETCO2 to 35-40 mmHg during CPR is often the earliest indicator of ROSC, occurring before palpable pulse returns [25]. Continue high-quality compressions while confirming ROSC with pulse check.
Immediate Post-ROSC Assessment (ABCDE)
Use a structured ABCDE approach immediately following ROSC [4]:
A - Airway
Indications for intubation post-ROSC:
- GCS ≤8 (comatose) - most common scenario
- Inability to protect airway (absent gag/cough reflexes)
- Respiratory failure despite supplemental oxygen
- Anticipated deterioration (transfer, procedures)
- Need for controlled ventilation
If intubation required:
- Use waveform capnography to confirm tube placement
- Target ETCO2 35-45 mmHg
- Secure tube and document depth at teeth/gums
- Chest X-ray to confirm position (2 cm above carina)
If patient breathing spontaneously with protected airway:
- High-flow oxygen initially
- Wean FiO2 to target SpO2 94-98% as soon as reliable monitoring available
B - Breathing
Oxygenation targets [6,7]:
- Avoid hypoxaemia: SpO2 ≥94%, PaO2 ≥60 mmHg
- Avoid hyperoxia: PaO2 below 300 mmHg, ideally 100-150 mmHg
- Rationale: Hyperoxia increases free radical formation during reperfusion
- Action: Wean FiO2 as soon as SpO2 monitoring reliable - target 94-98%
Ventilation targets [8]:
- Normocapnia: PaCO2 35-45 mmHg (4.7-6.0 kPa)
- Avoid hypocapnia: PaCO2 below 35 mmHg causes cerebral vasoconstriction
- Avoid hypercapnia: PaCO2 over 45 mmHg may worsen cerebral oedema
- Rationale: Impaired cerebral autoregulation means CO2 directly affects cerebral blood flow
Ventilator settings (if intubated):
- Mode: Volume control or pressure control
- Tidal volume: 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight (lung-protective)
- PEEP: 5-8 cmH2O (adjust for oxygenation, monitor for hypotension)
- Respiratory rate: Adjust to maintain PaCO2 35-45 mmHg
- FiO2: Start at 1.0 then titrate down to SpO2 94-98%
Both hyperoxia (PaO2 above 300 mmHg) and hypocapnia (PaCO2 below 35 mmHg) worsen neurological outcomes. Obtain ABG within 10 minutes of ROSC and adjust ventilation accordingly. Do not leave patient on FiO2 1.0 indefinitely [6-8].
C - Circulation
Blood pressure targets [4,26]:
- Mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mmHg - ANZCOR recommendation
- Consider higher targets (MAP 70-80 mmHg) if chronic hypertension
- Avoid hypotension: SBP below 100 mmHg associated with increased mortality
- Individualise targets based on premorbid blood pressure
Haemodynamic optimisation strategy:
Hypotension post-ROSC (MAP below 65 mmHg)
↓
1. Fluid bolus 250-500 mL crystalloid
Assess volume responsiveness (PLR, SVV)
↓
2. If still hypotensive → Noradrenaline 0.05-0.5 μg/kg/min
(First-line vasopressor per ANZCOR)
Peripheral access acceptable initially
↓
3. If low cardiac output (cold peripheries, high lactate, low ScvO2)
→ Add Dobutamine 2.5-10 μg/kg/min
→ Consider bedside echocardiography
↓
4. Refractory shock → Advanced monitoring
Arterial line, central line, consider cardiac output monitoring
ICU consultation, consider mechanical circulatory support
Monitoring:
- Continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring (arterial line - ASAP)
- Central venous access for vasopressor administration
- Consider advanced monitoring (ScvO2, cardiac output) if refractory shock
- Serial lactate measurements (clearance indicates improved perfusion)
12-Lead ECG - CRITICAL [10,11]:
- Obtain immediately post-ROSC
- STEMI present → Immediate coronary angiography (within 2 hours)
- LBBB (new) → Treat as STEMI equivalent
- Non-diagnostic ECG but suspected cardiac cause → Early angiography (within 24 hours)
- Long QT, Brugada pattern → Avoid QT-prolonging drugs, cardiology consultation
- Coma is NOT a contraindication to angiography
STEMI on post-ROSC ECG is an ABSOLUTE indication for immediate coronary angiography regardless of neurological status. Do not delay PCI for neuroprognostication - revascularisation improves both survival and neurological outcomes [10,11].
Arrhythmia management:
- Recurrent VF/VT → Amiodarone infusion 0.6 mg/kg/hour (approximately 900 mg over 24 hours)
- Or lignocaine 2-4 mg/min infusion if amiodarone used during arrest
- Correct electrolytes (K+ 4.0-4.5 mmol/L, Mg2+ over 1.0 mmol/L)
- Bradycardia requiring treatment → Temporary pacing
D - Disability (Neurological)
Initial neurological assessment:
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) - document fully (E_V_M_)
- Pupillary light reflexes (size, reactivity - both eyes)
- Motor response (spontaneous movements, response to pain)
- Brainstem reflexes (corneal, gag) if safe to assess
Neurological findings post-ROSC:
| Finding | Frequency | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Coma (GCS ≤8) | 80-90% immediately | Most common, requires airway protection |
| Myoclonus | 10-25% | Does NOT always indicate poor prognosis |
| Seizures | 10-40% | Treat actively, worsen secondary injury |
| Decorticate/decerebrate posturing | 20-40% | May improve over 24-72 hours |
| Absent brainstem reflexes | Variable | May recover - do NOT prognosticate early |
Seizure management [27]:
- Clinical seizures: Lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg (typically 4-8 mg) IV, repeat once if needed
- Status epilepticus: Follow status epilepticus protocol
- Lorazepam → Levetiracetam 60 mg/kg (max 4.5g) OR Phenytoin 20 mg/kg
- Myoclonus: May be benign or malignant - do NOT prognosticate based on myoclonus alone
- Consider continuous EEG monitoring if available
- Seizure prophylaxis NOT recommended - treat seizures when they occur [4]
Sedation strategy:
- Light sedation only (RASS -2 to 0) unless clinically required
- Avoid deep sedation unless: seizures, severe agitation, ventilator dyssynchrony
- Agents: Propofol or midazolam ± fentanyl/remifentanil
- Daily sedation holds once stable to assess neurological function
- Document sedation doses for neuroprognostication timing
CRITICAL: Do NOT prognosticate neurological outcome before 72 hours post-ROSC, and allow ≥5 half-lives for sedative drugs to clear. Early myoclonus, absent reflexes, or GCS 3 may improve with time. Premature WLST is a preventable cause of death [12,13].
E - Exposure and Temperature
Temperature management [5,9]:
- Check core temperature immediately post-ROSC
- Target: ≤37.5°C (actively prevent fever)
- Duration: At least 72 hours
Current ANZCOR recommendations (post-TTM2):
| Strategy | Target | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Fever prevention (recommended) | ≤37.5°C for ≥72 hours | Strong recommendation [5] |
| Hypothermia (uncertain benefit) | 32-34°C for 24 hours | Uncertain if subpopulations benefit |
| Pre-hospital cooling | NOT recommended | Increased re-arrest, pulmonary oedema [28] |
| Passive rewarming | Do not actively warm | Mild hypothermia after ROSC may be protective |
Methods for temperature control:
- Paracetamol 1g IV/PO q6h (pharmacological)
- Surface cooling devices (cooling blankets, ice packs)
- Endovascular cooling catheters (most precise)
- Cold IV saline boluses (up to 30 mL/kg) for induction only
If institutional protocol mandates hypothermia (32-34°C):
- Induction: Initiate within 6 hours of ROSC, cold saline, surface/endovascular cooling
- Maintenance: 24 hours at target (±0.5°C), manage shivering
- Rewarming: 0.25-0.5°C per hour, monitor for hyperkalaemia
- Normothermia maintenance: Prevent fever for ≥72 hours post-rewarming
Shivering management:
- Magnesium sulphate 2g IV loading dose
- Adequate sedation (propofol, opioids)
- Buspirone 30 mg TDS via NG
- Neuromuscular blockade if refractory (risk: masks seizures)
Investigations
Immediate Investigations (First 30 Minutes)
| Investigation | Timing | Purpose | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12-lead ECG | Immediately | STEMI identification | ST-elevation → immediate angiography |
| Arterial blood gas | Within 5-10 min | O2, CO2, pH, lactate, K+ | Guide ventilation, identify hyperoxia |
| Bedside glucose | Within 5 min | Exclude hypoglycaemia | Treat if below 4 mmol/L, control if above 10 mmol/L |
| Chest X-ray | Within 15 min | ETT position, complications | Confirm ETT 2cm above carina, exclude PTX |
| Portable echocardiography | Within 30 min | LV function, RWMA | Guide inotrope use, identify PE/tamponade |
Laboratory Investigations
Blood tests (immediate):
- Full blood count (anaemia, infection)
- Urea, creatinine, eGFR (baseline renal function)
- Electrolytes: Na, K, Mg, Ca, PO4 (arrhythmia risk)
- Troponin (elevated in over 90% regardless of cause)
- Lactate (trend more important than absolute value)
- Glucose
- Coagulation profile (PT, APTT, INR)
- Blood cultures if sepsis suspected
Serial monitoring:
- Troponin q6-12h (peak identifies myocardial injury extent)
- Lactate q4-6h (clearance = improving perfusion)
- Electrolytes q6-12h (especially K, Mg during temperature control)
- ABG q4-6h initially (oxygenation, ventilation, pH)
Neurological Investigations
Timing: Most investigations delayed until ≥72 hours post-ROSC (or ≥72 hours after rewarming if hypothermia used) [12,13]
Electroencephalography (EEG) [29]:
| Pattern | Timing | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous EEG monitoring | Within 24 hours | Detect seizures, assess background |
| Continuous/nearly continuous background | ≥72 hours | Favourable prognostic sign |
| Suppressed background (below 10 μV) | ≥72 hours | Poor prognostic sign (with other findings) |
| Burst suppression | ≥72 hours, off sedation | Poor prognosis if persistent |
| Seizure activity | Any time | Treat, poor prognosis if status |
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP) [30]:
- Timing: ≥72 hours post-ROSC, off sedation/NMB
- Method: Median nerve stimulation, cortical recording
- Interpretation: Bilateral absent N20 responses = highly specific for poor outcome (98-100% specificity)
- Limitations: Requires technical expertise, affected by sedation
Brain imaging:
| Modality | Timing | Findings Indicating Poor Prognosis |
|---|---|---|
| CT head (non-contrast) | Within 2 hours if focal signs | Exclude ICH, mass, herniation |
| CT head (GWR assessment) | 24-48 hours | Reduced grey-white matter ratio |
| MRI brain (DWI) | 2-7 days | Extensive cortical/deep grey diffusion restriction |
| MRI brain (ADC) | 2-7 days | Low ADC values in multiple territories |
Serum biomarkers [31]:
- Neuron-specific enolase (NSE):
- Normal NSE below 17 μg/L at 48-72 hours suggests better prognosis
- greater than 60 μg/L at 48-72 hours associated with poor prognosis
- "False elevations: haemolysis, neuroendocrine tumours"
- Neurofilament light chain (NfL): Research use, not yet recommended for clinical practice [4]
Management
Immediate Post-ROSC Care Bundle (First Hour)
IMMEDIATE POST-ROSC PRIORITIES (First 60 Minutes)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ A - AIRWAY │
│ □ Intubate if GCS ≤8 or unable to protect airway │
│ □ Confirm ETT with waveform capnography │
│ □ CXR for tube position │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ B - BREATHING │
│ □ FiO2 1.0 initially, wean to SpO2 94-98% │
│ □ ABG within 10 minutes │
│ □ Target PaCO2 35-45 mmHg (normocapnia) │
│ □ Avoid hyperoxia (PaO2 greater than 300 mmHg) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ C - CIRCULATION │
│ □ 12-lead ECG IMMEDIATELY - look for STEMI │
│ □ Arterial line for continuous BP monitoring │
│ □ Target MAP ≥65 mmHg (SBP greater than 100 mmHg) │
│ □ Noradrenaline if hypotensive despite fluid bolus │
│ □ Bedside echo if available │
│ □ STEMI → immediate coronary angiography │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ D - DISABILITY │
│ □ Check glucose (treat hypo/hyperglycaemia) │
│ □ Document GCS, pupils, motor response │
│ □ Light sedation only unless clinically indicated │
│ □ Treat seizures (do not prophylax) │
│ □ DO NOT PROGNOSTICATE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ E - EXPOSURE/ENVIRONMENT │
│ □ Core temperature measurement │
│ □ Initiate temperature control (target ≤37.5°C) │
│ □ Prevent fever for at least 72 hours │
│ □ Do NOT actively warm mild hypothermia │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Medications
Vasopressors and Inotropes
| Drug | Indication | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noradrenaline | Hypotension (first-line) | 0.05-0.5 μg/kg/min | Alpha-1 predominant, maintains MAP |
| Adrenaline | Profound hypotension | 0.01-0.1 μg/kg/min | Reserve for refractory shock |
| Dobutamine | Low cardiac output | 2.5-10 μg/kg/min | Add if cold/mottled with adequate MAP |
| Vasopressin | Vasodilatory shock | 0.01-0.04 units/min | Second-line, catecholamine-sparing |
Antiarrhythmics
| Drug | Indication | Dose | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amiodarone | Recurrent VF/VT | 0.6 mg/kg/hour (900 mg over 24h) | 12-24 hours |
| Lignocaine | Alternative to amiodarone | 2-4 mg/min infusion | 12-24 hours |
| Magnesium | Torsades, hypomagnesaemia | 2g IV over 10-15 min | Monitor levels |
Sedation and Analgesia
| Drug | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Propofol | 1-4 mg/kg/hour | Short half-life, predictable offset |
| Midazolam | 0.05-0.15 mg/kg/hour | Longer half-life, accumulates |
| Fentanyl | 25-100 μg/hour | Analgesia, synergy with sedatives |
| Remifentanil | 0.05-0.2 μg/kg/min | Ultra-short, allows rapid neuro assessment |
Antiepileptic Drugs
| Drug | Loading Dose | Maintenance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lorazepam | 0.1 mg/kg (max 8 mg) | As needed | First-line for seizures |
| Levetiracetam | 60 mg/kg (max 4.5 g) | 500-1500 mg BD | Preferred maintenance |
| Valproate | 40 mg/kg (max 3 g) | 10-15 mg/kg BD | Alternative maintenance |
| Phenytoin | 20 mg/kg | 5 mg/kg/day | Monitor levels, avoid if hypotension |
Glucose Management
| Blood Glucose | Action |
|---|---|
| Less than 4 mmol/L | 50 mL 50% dextrose IV, recheck 15 min |
| 4-7.8 mmol/L | Monitor hourly |
| 7.8-10 mmol/L | Target range, no action needed |
| Greater than 10 mmol/L | Insulin infusion, avoid tight control |
| Greater than 15 mmol/L | Insulin infusion, investigate cause |
Coronary Angiography
Immediate coronary angiography (within 2 hours) [10,11]:
Absolute indications:
- STEMI on post-ROSC ECG
- New LBBB with suspected ACS
- Cardiogenic shock despite adequate resuscitation
Strong indications (consider immediate):
- Suspected ACS as arrest cause (chest pain pre-arrest, cardiac risk factors)
- Shockable initial rhythm (VF/pVT) without obvious non-cardiac cause
- Haemodynamic instability despite treatment
Early angiography (within 24 hours):
- No STEMI but elevated troponin (over 99th percentile)
- Presumed cardiac cause without alternative explanation
- No obvious non-cardiac cause identified
Relative contraindications:
- Unwitnessed arrest with prolonged downtime (over 30 minutes no-flow)
- Known terminal illness or poor baseline functional status
- Obvious non-cardiac cause (drowning, hanging, trauma, massive PE, ICH)
Coma is NOT a contraindication to coronary angiography. The TOMAHAWK and COACT trials showed no benefit from immediate vs delayed angiography in patients WITHOUT STEMI, but STEMI remains an absolute indication for immediate PCI regardless of neurological status [10,11,32].
Temperature Control Protocol
ANZCOR-Recommended Approach (Post-TTM2) [5,9]:
TEMPERATURE CONTROL PROTOCOL
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ RECOMMENDED: FEVER PREVENTION STRATEGY │
│ │
│ Target: ≤37.5°C │
│ Duration: At least 72 hours │
│ │
│ Methods: │
│ • Paracetamol 1g IV/PO q6h │
│ • Surface cooling (blankets, ice packs to axillae/groin) │
│ • Cooling devices with feedback loop │
│ • Lower ambient temperature │
│ • Avoid active warming of mild hypothermia │
│ │
│ Monitoring: │
│ • Core temperature (oesophageal, bladder, or rectal) │
│ • Continuous or q1h during active cooling │
│ │
│ Management of fever episodes: │
│ • Escalate cooling measures │
│ • Investigate for infection if persistent │
│ • Continue for minimum 72 hours │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
If institutional protocol mandates hypothermia (32-34°C):
| Phase | Duration | Target | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction | 0-4 hours | Reach 33°C | Cold saline 30 mL/kg, cooling devices |
| Maintenance | 24 hours | 33°C ±0.5°C | Continuous temperature feedback, manage shivering |
| Rewarming | 8-16 hours | 0.25-0.5°C/hour | Slow rewarming, monitor K+ |
| Normothermia | ≥72 hours | ≤37.5°C | Prevent fever, active cooling if needed |
Complications of temperature control:
- Shivering (increases metabolic demand - treat aggressively)
- Electrolyte shifts (hypokalaemia during cooling, hyperkalaemia during rewarming)
- Coagulopathy (impaired platelet function, prolonged coagulation)
- Hyperglycaemia
- Immune suppression and infection risk
- Arrhythmias (QT prolongation, bradycardia)
Neuroprognostication
Timing and Approach [12,13]:
CRITICAL RULES FOR NEUROPROGNOSTICATION:
- Timing: ≥72 hours after ROSC (or ≥72 hours after rewarming if TTM used)
- Sedation: Allow ≥5 half-lives for sedative drugs to clear
- Multimodal: Use MULTIPLE concordant tests - no single test is sufficient
- Confounders: Rule out metabolic derangements, hypothermia, organ failure
- Expertise: Involve neurology, neurophysiology, critical care specialists
- Documentation: Record all findings for MDT discussion
Multimodal Neuroprognostication Algorithm:
≥72 HOURS POST-ROSC (or post-rewarming)
↓
Confirm sedation cleared (≥5 half-lives)
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CLINICAL EXAMINATION │
│ • GCS motor score (≤2 vs greater than 3) │
│ • Pupillary light reflex (bilateral absent = poor sign) │
│ • Corneal reflex (bilateral absent = poor sign) │
│ • Myoclonus (requires EEG to characterise) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY │
│ • EEG: Look for continuous background, reactivity (good) │
│ Burst suppression, suppressed background (poor) │
│ • SSEP: Bilateral absent N20 = highly specific for poor outcome │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ BIOMARKERS │
│ • NSE at 48-72 hours │
│ - below 17 μg/L: suggests better prognosis │
│ - greater than 60 μg/L: associated with poor prognosis │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ IMAGING │
│ • CT: Grey-white matter ratio at 24-48h │
│ • MRI DWI: Extensive diffusion restriction at 2-7 days │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM DISCUSSION
Only determine poor prognosis if MULTIPLE concordant poor prognostic indicators
Indicators of GOOD prognosis [4,12]:
- Early awakening (within 24-48 hours)
- GCS motor score over 3 within first 4 days
- Preserved pupillary and corneal reflexes at 72 hours
- Continuous/nearly continuous EEG background with reactivity
- Normal NSE (below 17 μg/L) at 48-72 hours
- Absence of diffusion restriction on MRI at 2-7 days
Indicators of POOR prognosis (need multiple) [4,12,13]:
- Bilateral absent pupillary light reflexes at ≥72 hours
- Bilateral absent corneal reflexes at ≥72 hours
- Bilateral absent N20 SSEP responses (most specific)
- Suppressed/burst suppression EEG pattern (off sedation)
- Extensive cortical diffusion restriction on MRI
- Marked reduced grey-white matter ratio on CT
- NSE over 60 μg/L at 48-72 hours
Common pitfalls:
- Prognosticating too early (before 72 hours)
- Relying on a single test
- Not accounting for sedation effects
- Assuming myoclonus = poor prognosis (it may be Lance-Adams syndrome)
- Self-fulfilling prophecy from early WLST
Disposition
Admission Criteria
All patients with ROSC after cardiac arrest require admission to ICU or high-dependency unit with:
- Continuous cardiac monitoring
- Invasive blood pressure monitoring capability
- Temperature control capability
- Ventilator support if needed
- Access to emergency angiography
Transfer to Cardiac Arrest Centre
ANZCOR recommends transfer to a cardiac arrest centre where available [4]:
- 24/7 coronary angiography and PCI capability
- ICU with post-cardiac arrest care experience
- Targeted temperature management protocols
- Neuroprognostication expertise (EEG, SSEP, MRI)
- Neurointensive care capability
Consider retrieval/transfer if:
- Rural/regional hospital without coronary angiography
- Lack of TTM/temperature control capability
- Limited neurological prognostication resources
- Complex cases requiring specialist input
Remote/Rural Considerations
Important Note: Remote and Rural Emergency Medicine:
- Early retrieval activation: Contact retrieval services (RFDS, helicopter) immediately post-ROSC
- Telemedicine: Establish video link with receiving ICU/cardiac catheterisation lab
- Stabilisation priorities: ABCDE optimisation, temperature control initiation even in ED
- Limited resources: May need to prioritise targets (oxygenation, BP) with available monitoring
- Transfer logistics: Coordinate with retrieval team, anticipate flight/road times
- Communication: Early family discussion about need for transfer and prognosis uncertainty
Pitfalls & Pearls
Clinical Pearls:
- ROSC is not the end - it's the beginning of post-cardiac arrest syndrome management
- Hyperoxia kills - titrate FiO2 down as soon as SpO2 monitoring is reliable
- Hypocapnia kills - cerebral vasoconstriction worsens secondary brain injury
- STEMI = cath lab - regardless of neurological status or TTM protocol
- Fever is the enemy - even 0.5°C above 37.5°C worsens outcomes
- Myoclonus ≠ death sentence - Lance-Adams syndrome is compatible with good recovery
- Time is brain (again) - early haemodynamic optimisation prevents secondary injury
Pitfalls to Avoid:
- Prognosticating too early - NEVER before 72 hours, NEVER on a single test
- Leaving FiO2 at 1.0 - causes hyperoxia and increased free radical injury
- Aggressive hyperventilation - hypocapnia causes cerebral ischaemia
- Delaying angiography for TTM - STEMI won't wait, PCI during TTM is safe
- Over-sedation - masks neurological recovery, delays prognostication
- Assuming myoclonus = poor prognosis - always get EEG, may be Lance-Adams
- Self-fulfilling prophecy - premature WLST based on early findings
- Forgetting the cause - must identify and treat precipitating pathology
Viva Practice
Stem: A 52-year-old man has just achieved ROSC after 12 minutes of CPR for witnessed VF cardiac arrest in the ED. He is intubated, GCS 3, BP 80/50, HR 110, SpO2 88% on FiO2 1.0.
Opening Question: What are your immediate priorities?
Model Answer: "This patient has just achieved ROSC after prolonged cardiac arrest and is critically unstable. I'll use a systematic ABCDE approach following ANZCOR guidelines.
Airway: He's intubated - I need to confirm correct placement with waveform capnography and get a chest X-ray for position. I'm targeting ETCO2 35-45 mmHg.
Breathing: His SpO2 of 88% on FiO2 1.0 is concerning for hypoxaemia. I'll increase PEEP, obtain an ABG immediately, and troubleshoot ventilator issues (ETT position, pneumothorax, aspiration). Once SpO2 improves, I'll wean FiO2 to target 94-98% to avoid hyperoxia.
Circulation: He's hypotensive with MAP approximately 60 mmHg. Critical first step is a 12-lead ECG to look for STEMI. I'll give a 250 mL crystalloid bolus and start noradrenaline via peripheral IV initially, targeting MAP ≥65 mmHg. I need arterial line access urgently and bedside echo to assess LV function.
Disability: GCS 3 is expected immediately post-ROSC. I'll check glucose, document pupils and motor response, and use light sedation only. I will NOT attempt prognostication at this stage.
Exposure: I'll check core temperature and initiate fever prevention targeting ≤37.5°C."
Follow-up Questions:
-
The ECG shows 4mm ST elevation in V1-V4. What changes?
- Model answer: "This is anterior STEMI - an absolute indication for immediate coronary angiography regardless of his coma. I'll contact cardiology to activate the cath lab, continue haemodynamic support, give aspirin 300mg via NG, and prepare for urgent transfer. Temperature control can continue during/after PCI."
-
What oxygenation and ventilation targets would you aim for and why?
- Model answer: "I target SpO2 94-98% and PaO2 100-150 mmHg. Both hypoxaemia and hyperoxia worsen neurological outcomes - hyperoxia increases free radical formation during reperfusion. For ventilation, I target normocapnia PaCO2 35-45 mmHg. Hypocapnia causes cerebral vasoconstriction and worsens brain ischaemia, while hypercapnia may worsen cerebral oedema."
-
The temperature is 35.2°C. What do you do?
- Model answer: "This mild hypothermia after ROSC is not harmful and should NOT be actively warmed to achieve normothermia per ANZCOR guidelines. I'll ensure the patient is monitored for further temperature drop and prevent fever greater than 37.5°C for at least 72 hours."
Discussion Points:
- TTM1 vs TTM2 trial implications
- Importance of multimodal approach to prognostication
- Role of ECMO in refractory cardiogenic shock
Stem: A 65-year-old woman is in ICU day 3 following ROSC from OHCA VF arrest. She received 24 hours of TTM at 33°C and has been normothermic for 48 hours. She remains comatose (GCS 3) with absent pupillary reflexes bilaterally. The family asks about her prognosis.
Opening Question: How do you approach this situation?
Model Answer: "At 72 hours post-ROSC (and 48 hours post-rewarming), this is the earliest appropriate time to begin formal neuroprognostication, but I need several pieces of information before discussing prognosis with the family.
First, I need to confirm sedation has cleared - I'd want to know what sedatives were used and ensure at least 5 half-lives have elapsed. For propofol that's about 5-10 hours, but for midazolam it could be 24-48 hours.
I would arrange multimodal testing:
- SSEP - looking for bilateral absent N20 responses (most specific for poor outcome)
- Continuous EEG - assessing for background activity, reactivity, seizures
- NSE levels at 48 and 72 hours - greater than 60 μg/L associated with poor prognosis
- MRI brain if available - looking for extent of diffusion restriction
No single test is sufficient - I need multiple concordant findings to predict poor outcome."
Follow-up Questions:
-
The SSEP shows bilateral absent N20 responses. Can you now tell the family she won't recover?
- Model answer: "Bilateral absent N20 is highly specific for poor outcome (98-100%), but even this finding should not be used in isolation. I need to correlate with EEG findings, clinical examination, biomarkers, and imaging. I would discuss with the family that this is a concerning finding but we need to complete our assessment and have a multidisciplinary discussion before making any decisions about treatment."
-
She has intermittent myoclonic jerking. Does this change your assessment?
- Model answer: "Myoclonus after cardiac arrest is common but does NOT automatically indicate poor prognosis. Lance-Adams syndrome (post-hypoxic myoclonus) is compatible with good neurological recovery. I would obtain an EEG to characterise the myoclonus - if associated with burst suppression on EEG it's a poorer sign than isolated myoclonus without EEG correlate."
-
The family asks if she will 'wake up'. How do you counsel them?
- Model answer: "I would say: 'We are still gathering important information to understand how her brain is recovering. The tests we're doing look at different aspects of brain function, and we need all the results before we can give you a clearer picture. Some patients who look very unwell in the first few days can still make good recoveries, which is why we wait at least 72 hours and use multiple tests. We will keep you informed as results come in and will have a meeting with our specialist team to discuss what this all means for your mother.'"
Discussion Points:
- Self-fulfilling prophecy from early WLST
- Role of EEG patterns (continuous background vs burst suppression)
- Cultural considerations in prognostication discussions
Stem: A 48-year-old man achieved ROSC after 8 minutes of CPR for VF arrest. Despite 2L crystalloid and noradrenaline 0.3 μg/kg/min, his BP remains 75/45 mmHg. HR 120, peripheries cold, lactate 8 mmol/L. 12-lead ECG shows no ST elevation.
Opening Question: What is your differential diagnosis and management approach?
Model Answer: "This patient has refractory shock post-ROSC with evidence of poor peripheral perfusion. My differential diagnosis includes:
- Post-cardiac arrest myocardial dysfunction - global stunning affecting 50-70% of post-ROSC patients
- Ongoing ACS - NSTEMI/ACS without ST elevation can cause cardiogenic shock
- Massive pulmonary embolism - may have been the precipitant of the arrest
- Sepsis/distributive shock - if infection was the underlying cause
- Tension pneumothorax - iatrogenic from CPR or line insertion
- Cardiac tamponade - rare, but CPR-related haemopericardium possible
- Adrenal insufficiency - relative adrenal insufficiency post-arrest
My immediate management:
- Bedside echocardiography - assess LV function, RV strain (PE), pericardial effusion
- Continue noradrenaline - escalate if needed
- Add dobutamine 5 μg/kg/min if echo shows poor LV function
- Repeat ABG - assess oxygenation, lactate trend, electrolytes
- Consider early coronary angiography even without STEMI if ACS suspected
- Discuss with ICU and cardiology regarding mechanical circulatory support options"
Follow-up Questions:
-
Bedside echo shows severely reduced LV function (EF 15%) with global hypokinesis. What now?
- Model answer: "This is severe post-cardiac arrest myocardial dysfunction, likely to be reversible over 48-72 hours. I'll add dobutamine starting at 5 μg/kg/min and titrate to effect, continue noradrenaline for MAP support, consider early coronary angiography even without STEMI (40-60% of OHCA have underlying ACS), and if unresponsive, discuss with cardiology regarding IABP or VA-ECMO. This degree of dysfunction usually improves with supportive care."
-
What if echo showed severe RV dilatation and D-sign?
- Model answer: "This suggests massive pulmonary embolism as the cause of arrest. I would administer systemic thrombolysis (alteplase 100mg over 2 hours) if there are no absolute contraindications, as PE is a potentially reversible cause. Alternatives include catheter-directed thrombolysis or surgical embolectomy depending on local expertise. CPR is not a contraindication to thrombolysis when PE is the cause of arrest."
Discussion Points:
- Indications for mechanical circulatory support (IABP, Impella, ECMO)
- Role of coronary angiography in patients without STEMI
- When to consider ECPR
OSCE Scenarios
Station 1: Post-ROSC Management
Format: Resuscitation leadership Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED resuscitation bay
Candidate Instructions:
A 60-year-old woman has just achieved ROSC after 10 minutes of CPR for VF cardiac arrest. She is intubated and sedated. An IV cannula and arterial line are in place. You are the team leader. Manage the immediate post-ROSC period.
Examiner Instructions:
- Patient is intubated, GCS 3T
- Initial vitals: BP 95/60, HR 105 sinus rhythm, SpO2 96% on FiO2 1.0
- Provide 12-lead ECG when requested showing 3mm ST elevation in II, III, aVF (inferior STEMI)
- Have nursing staff available to follow instructions
Expected Actions:
- Confirm ROSC - check pulse, BP, ETCO2
- Systematic ABCDE assessment
- Request immediate 12-lead ECG
- Recognise STEMI and call for urgent coronary angiography
- Optimise oxygenation (wean FiO2 to SpO2 94-98%)
- Target MAP ≥65 mmHg with vasopressors if needed
- Initiate temperature control
- NOT prognosticate - too early
- Communicate with team using closed-loop communication
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Systematic approach | Uses ABCDE, confirms ROSC | /2 |
| ECG recognition | Requests ECG, recognises STEMI | /2 |
| Action on STEMI | Calls for immediate coronary angiography | /2 |
| Oxygenation | Weans FiO2 to avoid hyperoxia | /1 |
| Haemodynamics | Targets MAP ≥65 mmHg appropriately | /1 |
| Temperature | Initiates fever prevention | /1 |
| Communication | Clear, closed-loop communication | /1 |
| Avoids pitfalls | Does NOT prognosticate early | /1 |
| Total | /11 |
Expected Standard:
- Pass: ≥6/11
- Key discriminators: Recognition of STEMI and appropriate action, avoidance of hyperoxia
Station 2: Family Communication - Prognosis Discussion
Format: Communication Time: 11 minutes Setting: ICU relatives room
Candidate Instructions:
You are the ICU registrar. Mr Thompson (68 years) was admitted 4 days ago following ROSC from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. He underwent TTM at 33°C for 24 hours. He remains comatose (GCS 3). His wife is asking about his prognosis. The results show: bilateral absent pupillary reflexes, bilateral absent N20 on SSEP, burst suppression on EEG, NSE 85 μg/L, and extensive cortical diffusion restriction on MRI. The team has discussed and feels the prognosis is poor. Discuss with Mrs Thompson.
Actor Brief (Mrs Thompson):
- 65-year-old wife, been at bedside continuously
- Anxious, tearful, wants honest information
- Will ask: "Will he wake up?"
- "Should we stop treatment?"
- "Did we do everything?"
- If approached sensitively, will express understanding
- If approached poorly, will become defensive or distressed
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Introduces self, checks understanding | /1 |
| Setting | Ensures privacy, offers seating | /1 |
| Warning shot | Prepares for serious discussion | /1 |
| Explains process | Describes multimodal prognostication | /2 |
| Delivers information | Clear, jargon-free, honest | /2 |
| Responds to emotion | Empathic, allows silence, tissues | /2 |
| Next steps | Offers MDT meeting, time to decide | /1 |
| Questions | Checks for questions, clarifies | /1 |
| Total | /11 |
Expected Standard:
- Pass: ≥6/11
- Key discriminators: Empathy while delivering difficult news, explaining multimodal approach, allowing time for questions
SAQ Practice
Question 1 (8 marks)
Stem: A 55-year-old man achieves ROSC after 15 minutes of CPR for out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest. He is intubated and transferred to your ED. His initial arterial blood gas on FiO2 1.0 shows: pH 7.18, PaO2 485 mmHg, PaCO2 28 mmHg, lactate 9 mmol/L.
Question: Outline your management priorities and physiological targets in the first 60 minutes post-ROSC. (8 marks)
Model Answer:
-
Airway/Breathing (2 marks):
- Wean FiO2 to target SpO2 94-98% (1 mark) - PaO2 485 mmHg is hyperoxic, associated with worse neurological outcomes
- Increase respiratory rate to target PaCO2 35-45 mmHg (1 mark) - current PaCO2 28 mmHg is hypocapnic, causes cerebral vasoconstriction
-
Circulation (2 marks):
- Immediate 12-lead ECG to identify STEMI (1 mark) - if STEMI present, immediate coronary angiography
- Target MAP ≥65 mmHg using vasopressors if needed (1 mark) - noradrenaline first-line
-
Disability (2 marks):
- Check blood glucose and treat hypo/hyperglycaemia (1 mark) - target 7.8-10 mmol/L
- Document GCS, pupils, motor response (1 mark) - light sedation only, do NOT prognosticate early
-
Temperature control (2 marks):
- Measure core temperature and initiate fever prevention (1 mark) - target ≤37.5°C
- Continue fever prevention for at least 72 hours (1 mark)
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Mention of ANZCOR guidelines, specific drug names for vasopressors
- Do not accept: TTM 32-34°C as mandatory (uncertain benefit post-TTM2), aggressive hyperventilation
Question 2 (6 marks)
Stem: A 62-year-old woman is day 4 post-cardiac arrest. She remains comatose (GCS 3) with absent pupillary light reflexes bilaterally. The family asks about prognosis.
Question: List the components of a multimodal neuroprognostication assessment according to current guidelines. (6 marks)
Model Answer:
- Clinical examination (1 mark): Pupillary light reflex, corneal reflex, GCS motor score, myoclonus assessment at ≥72 hours post-ROSC
- Electrophysiology - SSEP (1 mark): Bilateral absent N20 cortical responses highly specific for poor outcome
- Electrophysiology - EEG (1 mark): Continuous background (good) vs burst suppression/suppressed background (poor)
- Biomarkers (1 mark): Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) at 48-72 hours - over 60 μg/L associated with poor prognosis
- Imaging (1 mark): CT (grey-white matter ratio at 24-48h), MRI DWI (diffusion restriction at 2-7 days)
- Timing/confounders (1 mark): Assessment at ≥72 hours post-ROSC, ensure sedation cleared (≥5 half-lives)
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Mention of multimodal approach, need for multiple concordant findings
- Do not accept: Single test as sufficient, prognostication before 72 hours
Question 3 (6 marks)
Stem: A 50-year-old man achieves ROSC after VF cardiac arrest. His post-ROSC 12-lead ECG shows 4mm ST elevation in leads V1-V4.
Question: Outline the indications for immediate coronary angiography in this patient and the key points regarding timing and TTM interaction. (6 marks)
Model Answer:
-
Indication in this patient (2 marks): STEMI (anterior) on post-ROSC ECG is an absolute indication for immediate coronary angiography (within 2 hours) regardless of neurological status or coma
-
Coma is NOT a contraindication (1 mark): Revascularisation improves both survival and neurological outcomes - do not delay for neurological assessment
-
Other indications (2 marks):
- New LBBB with suspected ACS
- Cardiogenic shock despite adequate resuscitation
- Strong suspicion of ACS as arrest cause (shockable rhythm, cardiac risk factors)
- Non-STEMI with elevated troponin - early angiography within 24 hours reasonable
-
TTM interaction (1 mark): PCI during temperature control is feasible and safe - TTM should not delay coronary angiography for STEMI
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Reference to TOMAHAWK/COACT trials for non-STEMI
- Do not accept: Delaying angiography for TTM initiation or neurological assessment in STEMI
Australian/ANZCOR Guidelines Summary
ANZCOR Guideline 11.7 - Post-resuscitation Therapy [4]
Haemodynamics:
- Target MAP ≥60-65 mmHg initially (may need higher for chronic hypertensives)
- Vasopressors and fluids as part of post-resuscitation care bundle
- No specific BP target proven superior
Oxygenation/Ventilation:
- Use 100% O2 initially until SpO2 reliably monitored
- Then titrate to SpO2 94-98% (avoid hypoxaemia and hyperoxia)
- Target normocapnia (PaCO2 35-45 mmHg)
Glucose:
- Monitor frequently, treat hyperglycaemia over 10 mmol/L
- Avoid hypoglycaemia
Seizures:
- Do NOT give seizure prophylaxis
- DO treat seizures when they occur
Coronary angiography:
- STEMI: immediate coronary angiography
- No STEMI: early (2-6 hours) or delayed (within 24 hours) both reasonable
Neuroprognostication:
- Multimodal approach mandatory
- ≥72 hours post-ROSC (or post-rewarming)
- No single test sufficient
ANZCOR Guideline 11.8 - Temperature Control [5]
Recommended approach (post-TTM2):
- Actively prevent fever by targeting temperature ≤37.5°C
- Duration: at least 72 hours in comatose patients
- Uncertain if hypothermia (32-34°C) benefits subpopulations
Methods:
- Surface or endovascular cooling techniques
- Cooling devices with feedback system preferred
- Cold IV saline (up to 30 mL/kg) for induction only - not maintenance
Pre-hospital cooling:
- NOT recommended (increased re-arrest and pulmonary oedema)
Mild hypothermia after ROSC:
- Do NOT actively warm to normothermia
Key Differences from AHA/ERC
| Element | ANZCOR | AHA | ERC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature target | ≤37.5°C (fever prevention) | 32-36°C for 24h | 32-36°C for 24h |
| Oxygenation | SpO2 94-98% | SpO2 92-98% | 94-98% |
| Pre-hospital cooling | NOT recommended | NOT recommended | NOT recommended |
| Coronary angiography (no STEMI) | Early or delayed both reasonable | Early reasonable | Early or delayed |
Remote/Rural Considerations
Pre-Hospital and Retrieval
Rural/remote challenges:
- Prolonged transport times to definitive care
- Limited monitoring capabilities
- Variable access to coronary angiography
- Delayed access to neurological prognostication tools
Stabilisation priorities before retrieval:
- Confirm airway secure with capnography
- Optimise oxygenation and ventilation (portable ABG if available)
- Establish haemodynamic stability (noradrenaline infusion if needed)
- Initiate temperature control (ice packs, paracetamol)
- Obtain and transmit 12-lead ECG to receiving centre
Retrieval considerations:
- Early activation of retrieval services (RFDS, helicopter)
- Establish telemedicine link with receiving ICU/cardiac catheter lab
- Prepare for in-flight complications (arrhythmias, hypotension)
- Document all interventions and findings for handover
Telemedicine Support
- Video link to specialist for ECG interpretation
- Remote guidance for post-ROSC management
- Assistance with family communication regarding prognosis
- Coordination of transfer timing and destination
Additional Viva Scenarios
Stem: A colleague asks you about the evidence for targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest. They recently attended a conference where speakers disagreed about optimal targets.
Opening Question: Summarise the current evidence and ANZCOR recommendations for temperature control post-ROSC.
Model Answer: "Temperature control after cardiac arrest has evolved significantly over the past two decades. Let me outline the key evidence:
Historical context: The 2002 HACA trial showed improved neurological outcomes with hypothermia 32-34°C vs no temperature control in VF arrest patients. This became standard of care for over a decade.
TTM1 Trial (2013): Compared 33°C vs 36°C for 24 hours. Found NO difference in mortality or neurological outcome. This showed that strict hypothermia wasn't necessary - what mattered was avoiding fever.
TTM2 Trial (2021): The largest and most rigorous trial. Compared hypothermia 33°C vs normothermia with fever prevention (target ≤37.5°C). Again, NO difference in outcomes. Importantly, both groups had active temperature control.
Current ANZCOR recommendations:
- Actively prevent fever by targeting ≤37.5°C for at least 72 hours
- Do NOT actively warm patients with mild hypothermia after ROSC
- Do NOT use pre-hospital cooling with cold IV fluids (associated with increased re-arrest)
- Whether subpopulations benefit from hypothermia 32-34°C remains uncertain
My practice: I implement fever prevention for all comatose post-ROSC patients. If my institution has a hypothermia protocol for specific populations (e.g., witnessed VF arrest with short downtime), I follow that, but fever prevention is the minimum standard for all patients."
Follow-up Questions:
-
A patient has a temperature of 39°C at 24 hours post-ROSC. How do you manage this?
- Model answer: "This is a concerning finding. Fever greater than 37.5°C is associated with worse neurological outcomes and needs aggressive treatment. I would give paracetamol 1g IV, use surface cooling measures (cooling blanket, ice packs to axillae and groin), lower ambient temperature, and consider endovascular cooling if refractory. I would also investigate for infection - obtain blood and urine cultures, consider chest imaging, but avoid routine prophylactic antibiotics per ANZCOR guidelines."
-
What about pre-hospital cooling?
- Model answer: "Pre-hospital cooling with rapid cold IV saline infusion is NOT recommended. The RINSE and CIRC trials showed no benefit and potential harm including increased re-arrest rates and pulmonary oedema. However, this doesn't mean we should actively warm patients who have mild spontaneous hypothermia - we leave them in that state and prevent fever."
Discussion Points:
- Different populations may respond differently (shockable vs non-shockable)
- Knowledge gaps remain for IHCA and ECPR populations
- Importance of implementing any complex protocol with education and quality improvement
Stem: You are asked to present a post-resuscitation care bundle to your ICU team. A consultant asks you to justify each element with evidence.
Opening Question: What are the key components of an evidence-based post-resuscitation care bundle?
Model Answer: "An evidence-based post-resuscitation care bundle includes several key components, each with supporting evidence:
1. Oxygenation targets (SpO2 94-98%)
- Evidence: Kilgannon 2010 showed hyperoxia (PaO2 over 300 mmHg) associated with increased mortality
- Roberts 2018 confirmed association with worse neurological outcomes
- Rationale: Hyperoxia increases free radical formation during reperfusion
2. Ventilation targets (PaCO2 35-45 mmHg)
- Evidence: Roberts 2013 showed both hypocapnia and hypercapnia associated with worse outcomes
- Rationale: Hypocapnia causes cerebral vasoconstriction; hypercapnia may worsen cerebral oedema
3. Haemodynamic targets (MAP ≥65 mmHg)
- Evidence: Observational data shows hypotension associated with worse outcomes
- Neuroprotect trial and JAMA trials suggest targeting higher MAP (70-80) may improve cerebral oxygenation
- Rationale: Cerebral autoregulation is impaired after arrest
4. Temperature control (≤37.5°C for ≥72 hours)
- Evidence: TTM2 trial showed fever prevention equivalent to hypothermia
- Zeiner 2001 showed each degree of fever increases odds of poor outcome by 2.26
- Rationale: Fever increases metabolic demand and worsens secondary injury
5. Glucose control (7.8-10 mmol/L)
- Evidence: NICE-SUGAR trial showed tight control increases hypoglycaemia without benefit
- Rationale: Avoid hypoglycaemia (neuronal injury) and severe hyperglycaemia (anaerobic metabolism)
6. Seizure treatment (not prophylaxis)
- Evidence: No benefit to prophylaxis; seizures worsen secondary brain injury
- Rationale: Treat seizures promptly but avoid unnecessary drug exposure
7. Early coronary angiography for STEMI
- Evidence: Strong observational data; COACT/TOMAHAWK showed no benefit for non-STEMI
- Rationale: STEMI treatment improves both survival and neurological outcomes
8. Multimodal neuroprognostication at ≥72 hours
- Evidence: ERC/ESICM 2021 guidelines, multiple prognostication studies
- Rationale: Avoid self-fulfilling prophecy from premature WLST"
Discussion Points:
- Implementation strategies for complex bundles
- Quality improvement and audit
- Role of cardiac arrest centres
Additional OSCE Station
Station 3: Post-ROSC ABG Interpretation and Management
Format: Clinical reasoning/data interpretation Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED resuscitation bay
Candidate Instructions:
A 55-year-old man achieved ROSC 20 minutes ago after 14 minutes of CPR for VF cardiac arrest. He is intubated and ventilated on the following settings: FiO2 1.0, TV 500 mL, RR 16, PEEP 5 cmH2O. His arterial blood gas shows:
- pH 7.12
- PaO2 520 mmHg
- PaCO2 28 mmHg
- HCO3 11 mmol/L
- Lactate 12 mmol/L
- K+ 5.8 mmol/L
- Glucose 14 mmol/L
Interpret this ABG and outline your immediate management priorities.
Expected Answer Structure:
-
ABG interpretation:
- Severe metabolic acidosis (low pH, low HCO3, elevated lactate)
- Respiratory alkalosis (low PaCO2) - patient is being over-ventilated
- Hyperoxia (PaO2 520 mmHg on FiO2 1.0) - excessive oxygen administration
- Hyperkalaemia (K+ 5.8) - risk of arrhythmias
- Hyperglycaemia (glucose 14) - requires treatment
-
Management priorities:
- Reduce FiO2: Wean to achieve SpO2 94-98%, avoid hyperoxia
- Reduce respiratory rate: Target normocapnia (PaCO2 35-45 mmHg)
- Treat hyperkalaemia: Calcium gluconate 10 mL of 10% IV, insulin/dextrose if persistent
- Treat hyperglycaemia: Insulin infusion if glucose greater than 10 mmol/L
- Monitor lactate trend: Indicates perfusion status
- Do NOT over-correct acidosis: Will improve with perfusion
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Interpretation | Correctly identifies metabolic acidosis | /1 |
| Interpretation | Identifies inappropriate hyperventilation | /1 |
| Interpretation | Identifies hyperoxia as harmful | /1 |
| Interpretation | Identifies hyperkalaemia and hyperglycaemia | /1 |
| Management | Plans to reduce FiO2 appropriately | /2 |
| Management | Plans to reduce RR to normalise PaCO2 | /2 |
| Management | Treats hyperkalaemia appropriately | /1 |
| Management | Initiates insulin for hyperglycaemia | /1 |
| Understanding | Explains rationale for avoiding hyperoxia/hypocapnia | /1 |
| Total | /11 |
Additional SAQ Practice
Question 4 (6 marks)
Stem: A 70-year-old man with no significant past history achieves ROSC after 8 minutes of CPR for witnessed VF arrest at a shopping centre. He is intubated, sedated with propofol, and transferred to your ED. He remains comatose (GCS 3T).
Question: Describe the key components of the ANZCOR-recommended temperature control strategy for this patient. (6 marks)
Model Answer:
- Target temperature: ≤37.5°C (actively prevent fever) (1 mark)
- Duration: Maintain for at least 72 hours while patient remains comatose (1 mark)
- Methods: Surface cooling devices, endovascular cooling catheters, paracetamol, environmental cooling - devices with feedback systems preferred (1 mark)
- Avoid pre-hospital cold IV fluids: Associated with increased re-arrest and pulmonary oedema (1 mark)
- Mild spontaneous hypothermia: Do NOT actively warm to normothermia (1 mark)
- Monitoring: Core temperature measurement (oesophageal, bladder, or rectal probe), continuous or hourly during active cooling (1 mark)
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Mention of TTM2 trial influencing current practice
- Accept: Noting uncertainty about hypothermia 32-34°C for subpopulations
- Do not accept: Mandating hypothermia 32-34°C as standard of care
Question 5 (8 marks)
Stem: A 58-year-old woman is day 5 post-cardiac arrest. She received TTM at 33°C for 24 hours and has been normothermic for 4 days. She remains comatose with the following findings:
- GCS 3 (no eye opening, no verbal, no motor response to pain)
- Bilateral absent pupillary light reflexes
- Bilateral absent corneal reflexes
- SSEP: Bilateral absent N20 cortical responses
- EEG: Suppressed background, no reactivity
- MRI: Extensive cortical and deep grey matter diffusion restriction
- NSE at 72 hours: 95 μg/L
Question: Discuss how you would use this information to prognosticate and what you would tell the family. (8 marks)
Model Answer:
- Multimodal approach (2 marks): Multiple concordant poor prognostic indicators are present - this satisfies the requirement for multimodal assessment before determining poor prognosis
- Timing appropriateness (1 mark): Day 5 post-arrest (and over 72 hours post-rewarming) is appropriate for prognostication. Sedation has cleared (propofol half-life allows clearance by this time)
- Clinical findings (1 mark): Bilateral absent pupillary and corneal reflexes at ≥72 hours are poor prognostic signs (high specificity for poor outcome)
- SSEP findings (1 mark): Bilateral absent N20 is the most specific test (98-100% specificity) for poor neurological outcome
- EEG findings (1 mark): Suppressed background without reactivity, when combined with other tests, supports poor prognosis
- Imaging and biomarkers (1 mark): Extensive diffusion restriction on MRI and NSE over 60 μg/L both support poor prognosis
- Family communication (1 mark): Would explain that multiple independent tests all point to the same conclusion - that meaningful recovery is very unlikely. Would offer MDT meeting, give time for other family members to arrive, discuss withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment when family ready
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: Emphasis on involving neurology, palliative care, ethics if needed
- Accept: Discussion of organ donation if appropriate
- Do not accept: Prognostication based on single test alone
Long-Term Outcomes and Rehabilitation
Survival and Functional Outcomes
Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) Scale [37]:
| CPC | Description | Functional Status |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Good cerebral performance | Normal life, may have minor deficits |
| 2 | Moderate cerebral disability | Independent ADLs, may work in sheltered environment |
| 3 | Severe cerebral disability | Conscious but dependent for daily support |
| 4 | Coma or vegetative state | Unaware of surroundings |
| 5 | Brain death |
Favourable neurological outcome = CPC 1-2
Long-Term Survivor Outcomes
Physical function:
- 60-80% of CPC 1-2 survivors return to pre-arrest physical function within 6-12 months
- Fatigue is common, affecting 50-70% of survivors
- Cardiac rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and quality of life
Cognitive function [37]:
- 30-50% of survivors with good CPC have measurable cognitive deficits
- Memory impairment most common (hippocampal vulnerability)
- Executive dysfunction affects work and complex tasks
- May improve over 6-12 months but some deficits persist
Psychological outcomes:
- Anxiety: 25-40% of survivors
- Depression: 15-30% of survivors
- PTSD: 15-25% of survivors
- Screen all survivors using validated tools (PHQ-9, GAD-7, PCL-5)
Return to work:
- 40-60% of survivors return to work within 6-12 months
- May require modified duties or reduced hours initially
- Neuropsychological assessment helpful for workplace planning
Follow-Up Care
Recommended follow-up structure:
| Timepoint | Focus |
|---|---|
| 2-4 weeks | Cardiac review, ICD discussion, driving restrictions |
| 3 months | Cognitive screening, psychological assessment, cardiac rehab |
| 6 months | Neuropsychological testing if concerns, return to work planning |
| 12 months | Long-term outcomes assessment, ongoing rehabilitation needs |
Cardiac secondary prevention:
- ICD assessment (if VF/VT without reversible cause, LVEF ≤35%)
- Optimisation of cardiac risk factors
- Cardiac rehabilitation program
- Review of medications (beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, statins)
Driving restrictions (Australian guidelines):
- Private vehicle: Typically 6 months minimum post-arrest
- Commercial vehicle: Usually permanent restriction
- Individual assessment by cardiologist/neurologist required
- Must be seizure-free and cognitively competent
Quality of Life
Factors associated with better quality of life:
- Shorter downtime
- VF/VT as initial rhythm
- Early ROSC
- Younger age
- Good cognitive recovery
- Strong social support
Survivor support:
- Cardiac arrest survivor support groups
- Peer mentoring programs
- Psychological therapy (CBT, trauma-focused therapy)
- Family/carer support and education
Complications
Early Complications (0-72 Hours)
| Complication | Incidence | Recognition | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recurrent cardiac arrest | 10-15% | Monitoring | ACLS protocol, treat underlying cause |
| Cardiogenic shock | 30-50% | Hypotension, cold peripheries | Vasopressors, inotropes, MCS |
| Acute kidney injury | 40-50% | Rising creatinine, oliguria | Avoid nephrotoxins, RRT if severe |
| Seizures | 10-40% | Clinical or EEG | Antiepileptic drugs |
| Aspiration pneumonia | 30-50% | CXR infiltrates, fever | Antibiotics if clinical pneumonia |
| Coagulopathy | 20-40% | Abnormal coagulation | Blood products as indicated |
| Multi-organ failure | 20-40% | Multiple organ dysfunction | Organ support |
Late Complications (greater than 72 Hours)
Post-intensive care syndrome:
- Cognitive impairment persisting after discharge
- Psychological sequelae (anxiety, depression, PTSD)
- Physical weakness and deconditioning
- Sleep disturbance
Seizure disorders:
- Post-hypoxic epilepsy develops in 10-15% of survivors
- Lance-Adams syndrome (action myoclonus) in 1-5%
- Requires ongoing neurological follow-up
Cardiac complications:
- Heart failure (from underlying disease or post-arrest cardiomyopathy)
- Recurrent arrhythmias
- May require ICD implantation
References
ARC/ANZCOR Guidelines
- ANZCOR. Guideline 11.7 – Post-resuscitation Therapy in Adult Advanced Life Support. 2024. Available from: https://anzcor.org
- Neumar RW, Nolan JP, Adrie C, et al. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. Circulation. 2008;118(23):2452-2483. PMID: 19004177
- Bray JE, Stub D, Bernard S, Smith K. Exploring variations in outcomes in the Australian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry. Resuscitation. 2019;135:156-161. PMID: 30590128
- ANZCOR. Guideline 11.7 – Post-resuscitation Therapy in Adult Advanced Life Support. 2024. Available from: https://anzcor.org
- ANZCOR. Guideline 11.8 – Temperature Control after Cardiac Arrest. 2024. Available from: https://anzcor.org
Key Evidence - Oxygenation and Ventilation
- Kilgannon JH, Jones AE, Shapiro NI, et al. Association between arterial hyperoxia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest and in-hospital mortality. JAMA. 2010;303(21):2165-2171. PMID: 20516417
- Roberts BW, Kilgannon JH, Hunter BR, et al. Association between early hyperoxia exposure after resuscitation from cardiac arrest and neurological disability. Circulation. 2018;137(20):2114-2124. PMID: 29700121
- Roberts BW, Kilgannon JH, Chansky ME, et al. Association between postresuscitation partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide and neurological outcome. Circulation. 2013;127(21):2107-2113. PMID: 23613256
Key Evidence - Temperature Management
- Dankiewicz J, Cronberg T, Lilja G, et al. Hypothermia versus Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(24):2283-2294. PMID: 34133859
- Lemkes JS, Janssens GN, van der Hoeven NW, et al. Coronary Angiography after Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(15):1397-1407. PMID: 30883057
- Desch S, Freund A, Akin I, et al. Angiography after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(27):2544-2553. PMID: 34459570
Key Evidence - Neuroprognostication
- Nolan JP, Sandroni C, Böttiger BW, et al. European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(4):369-421. PMID: 33765189
- Sandroni C, Cariou A, Cavallaro F, et al. Prognostication in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: an advisory statement. Resuscitation. 2014;85(12):1779-1789. PMID: 25447032
- Dicker B, Davey P, Todd VF, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry methodology and results for a New Zealand regional database. Resuscitation. 2019;140:159-166. PMID: 31096029
Epidemiology and Outcomes
- Girotra S, Nallamothu BK, Spertus JA, et al. Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(20):1912-1920. PMID: 23150959
- Andersen LW, Holmberg MJ, Berg KM, et al. In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review. JAMA. 2019;321(12):1200-1210. PMID: 30912843
- Laurent I, Monchi M, Chiche JD, et al. Reversible myocardial dysfunction in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(12):2110-2116. PMID: 12505221
- Sekhon MS, Ainslie PN, Griesdale DE. Clinical pathophysiology of hypoxic ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(4):651-659. PMID: 28350643
Indigenous Health
- Brown A, Walsh W, Wheatley V, Jerrgensen M. Cardiovascular disease in Indigenous Australians. Aust Health Rev. 2018;42(5):473-475. PMID: 30208824
Pathophysiology
- Geocadin RG, Callaway CW, Fink EL, et al. Standards for Studies of Neurological Prognostication in Comatose Survivors of Cardiac Arrest. Resuscitation. 2019;140:130-140. PMID: 31075369
- Elmer J, Torres C, Guyette FX, et al. Association of early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived neurological prognosis with mortality after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;102:127-135. PMID: 27068662
- Adrie C, Adib-Conquy M, Laurent I, et al. Successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest as a "sepsis-like" syndrome. Circulation. 2002;106(5):562-568. PMID: 12147537
- Zeiner A, Holzer M, Sterz F, et al. Hyperthermia after cardiac arrest is associated with an unfavorable neurologic outcome. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(16):2007-2012. PMID: 11525703
- Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Rhee KH, et al. Myocardial dysfunction after resuscitation from cardiac arrest: an example of global myocardial stunning. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(1):232-240. PMID: 8752819
ROSC Recognition and Monitoring
- Levine RL, Wayne MA, Miller CC. End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(5):301-306. PMID: 9233867
- Ameloot K, De Deyne C, Eertmans W, et al. Early goal-directed haemodynamic optimization of cerebral oxygenation in comatose survivors after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2019;135:145-152. PMID: 30576777
Seizures
- Rossetti AO, Rabinstein AA, Oddo M. Neurological prognostication of outcome in patients in coma after cardiac arrest. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(6):597-609. PMID: 27017070
Pre-Hospital Cooling
- Kim F, Nichol G, Maynard C, et al. Effect of prehospital induction of mild hypothermia on survival and neurological status among adults with cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2014;311(1):45-52. PMID: 24240712
Electrophysiology
- Westhall E, Rossetti AO, van Rootselaar AF, et al. Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest. Neurology. 2016;86(16):1482-1490. PMID: 27009259
- Zandbergen EG, Hijdra A, Koelman JH, et al. Prediction of poor outcome within the first 3 days of postanoxic coma. Neurology. 2006;66(1):62-68. PMID: 16401847
Biomarkers
- Stammet P, Collignon O, Hassager C, et al. Neuron-Specific Enolase as a Predictor of Death or Poor Neurological Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. 2015;131(5):427-435. PMID: 25472913
Coronary Angiography Trials
- Desch S, Freund A, Akin I, et al. Angiography after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation (TOMAHAWK). N Engl J Med. 2021;385(27):2544-2553. PMID: 34459570
TTM Trials
- Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(8):549-556. PMID: 11856793
- Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T, et al. Targeted temperature management at 33°C versus 36°C after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(23):2197-2206. PMID: 24237006
Imaging
- Wijman CA, Mlynash M, Caulfield AF, et al. Prognostic value of brain diffusion-weighted imaging after cardiac arrest. Ann Neurol. 2009;65(4):394-402. PMID: 19399889
Quality and Outcomes
- Cronberg T, Rundgren M, Westhall E, et al. Neuron-specific enolase correlates with other prognostic markers after cardiac arrest. Neurology. 2011;77(7):623-630. PMID: 21775732
- Moulaert VR, Verbunt JA, van Heugten CM, et al. Cognitive impairments in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2009;80(3):297-305. PMID: 19131171
Additional ILCOR Evidence
- Soar J, Berg KM, Andersen LW, et al. Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2020;156:A80-A119. PMID: 33098917
- Berg KM, Bray JE, Ng KC, et al. 2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2023;194:109992. PMID: 37963835
- Granfeldt A, Holmberg MJ, Nolan JP, et al. Targeted Temperature Management in Adult Cardiac Arrest: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Resuscitation. 2021;167:160-172. PMID: 34508820
Australian Data
- Aus-ROC Steering Committee. Australian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (Aus-ROC) Epistry Annual Report 2022. Melbourne: Aus-ROC; 2023.
- Straney LD, Bray JE, Beck B, et al. Regions of high out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and low bystander CPR rates in Victoria, Australia. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0139776. PMID: 26523747
Frequently asked questions
Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.
What are the oxygenation targets after ROSC?
Target SpO2 94-98%. Avoid both hypoxaemia (below 94%) and hyperoxia (PaO2 greater than 300 mmHg). Titrate FiO2 down once SpO2 can be reliably monitored.
When should neuroprognostication be performed?
At least 72 hours after ROSC (or 72 hours after rewarming if TTM used). Multimodal approach required - no single test is sufficient.
What is the current temperature target after cardiac arrest?
ANZCOR recommends actively preventing fever by targeting temperature ≤37.5C. Whether hypothermia (32-34C) benefits subpopulations remains uncertain.
Learning map
Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.
Prerequisites
Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.
- Cardiac Arrest - Adult
- Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support
Differentials
Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.
- Coma - Adult
- Status Epilepticus
- Cardiogenic Shock
Consequences
Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.
- Hypoxic-Ischaemic Encephalopathy
- Post-Cardiac Arrest Myocardial Dysfunction
- Multi-Organ Failure