Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma
Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma (AACG), also termed Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC), is an ophthalmic emergency characte... FRCOphth, MRCGP exam preparation.
Clinical board
A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.
Urgent signals
Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.
- Severe eye pain with nausea/vomiting
- Fixed mid-dilated pupil (4-6mm)
- Reduced visual acuity
- Hazy/cloudy cornea
Exam focus
Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.
- FRCOphth
- MRCGP
- USMLE
- PLAB
Linked comparisons
Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.
- Acute Iritis/Uveitis
- Acute Conjunctivitis
Editorial and exam context
Reviewed by MedVellum Editorial Team · MedVellum Medical Education Platform
Credentials: MBBS, MRCP, Board Certified
Topic family
This concept exists in multiple MedVellum libraries. Use the primary page for the broadest reference view and the others for exam-specific framing.
The rapid IOP spike (often 50-70 mmHg) leads to ischaemic damage to the optic nerve, retina, and corneal endothelium. Treatment is a time-critical hierarchy: immediate medical reduction of IOP followed by definitive...
Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma (AACG), also termed Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC), is an ophthalmic emergency characte... FRCOphth, MRCGP exam preparation.
Acute angle-closure glaucoma (AACG) is a vision-threatening condition caused by sudden blockage of aqueous humor outflow... ACEM Fellowship Written, ACEM Fellow
Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma
1. Clinical Overview
Summary
Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma (AACG), also termed Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC), is an ophthalmic emergency characterised by rapid obstruction of aqueous humour outflow leading to a precipitous rise in intraocular pressure (IOP), typically exceeding 40-60 mmHg. [1,2] The condition arises when the peripheral iris apposes the trabecular meshwork, mechanically blocking the drainage of aqueous humour from the anterior chamber. This results in acute elevation of IOP that can cause irreversible optic nerve damage within hours if untreated. [3]
The classical presentation includes severe unilateral eye pain of acute onset, frontal or periorbital headache, nausea and vomiting (due to intense vagal stimulation), and visual disturbance including haloes around lights and markedly reduced visual acuity. [4] The pathognomonic examination findings include a red eye with ciliary injection, hazy oedematous cornea, fixed mid-dilated pupil (4-6mm) that does not react to light, and a characteristically "rock-hard" or "stony" eye on digital palpation. [5]
AACG represents a true sight-threatening emergency requiring immediate treatment. The management algorithm involves positioning the patient supine, administering intravenous acetazolamide 500mg, applying topical pressure-lowering agents (timolol, brimonidine), topical pilocarpine 2% to constrict the pupil once IOP begins to fall, and topical corticosteroids to reduce inflammation. [6,7] Definitive treatment is laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI), which must be performed on both eyes given the high risk to the anatomically similar fellow eye. [8] Recent evidence from the EAGLE trial supports early clear lens extraction as an alternative definitive treatment in patients over 50 years. [9]
Key Facts
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Definition | Acute obstruction of aqueous outflow due to iridotrabecular contact with rapid IOP rise |
| Emergency Classification | Sight-threatening; permanent visual loss possible within hours |
| Typical IOP | Greater than 40 mmHg (often 50-80 mmHg) |
| Classic Triad | Severe eye pain + reduced vision + nausea/vomiting |
| Pathognomonic Sign | Fixed, mid-dilated pupil (4-6mm), oval or irregular, unreactive |
| Key Risk Factors | Hypermetropia, Asian ethnicity, female sex, age > 60, family history |
| First-Line Treatment | IV acetazolamide 500mg + topical timolol + brimonidine + pilocarpine |
| Definitive Treatment | Laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) to BOTH eyes |
Clinical Pearls
"Vomiting + Red Eye = Think AACG": The intense vagal stimulation in severe AACG causes profound nausea and vomiting. A patient presenting with a red eye and vomiting should NOT be diagnosed with gastroenteritis or migraine until AACG is excluded. The systemic symptoms can dominate the presentation. [4]
The Mid-Dilated Pupil is Pathognomonic: Unlike other causes of acute red eye, AACG produces a fixed, mid-dilated pupil (4-6mm) that does not react to light. This finding, combined with a hazy cornea and rock-hard eye, is virtually diagnostic. The mid-dilation reflects iris sphincter ischaemia. [5]
Always Treat the Fellow Eye: The fellow eye shares the same anatomical predisposition (shallow anterior chamber, narrow angle) and carries a 50-75% risk of AACG over the following years if left untreated. Prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy should be performed on BOTH eyes. [8,10]
Pilocarpine Timing is Critical: Pilocarpine is ineffective when IOP is very high (> 50-60 mmHg) because the iris sphincter muscle becomes ischaemic and paralysed. Administer pilocarpine only after IOP begins to fall with systemic treatment, or it will not work. [6]
Why This Matters Clinically
AACG is frequently misdiagnosed in emergency departments as migraine, gastroenteritis, sinusitis, or even acute abdomen due to the prominence of systemic symptoms (headache, vomiting, abdominal discomfort). [4,11] The diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion and recognition of the cardinal ocular signs. The global burden of angle-closure glaucoma is substantial, with an estimated 20 million people affected worldwide and angle closure responsible for approximately 50% of glaucoma-related blindness despite accounting for only about 26% of glaucoma cases. [12] This disproportionate visual morbidity highlights the more aggressive nature of angle-closure disease and the critical importance of prompt recognition and treatment.
2. Epidemiology
Incidence & Prevalence
Global epidemiological data demonstrate significant ethnic and geographic variation in the prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) and acute angle-closure attacks. [12,13]
| Parameter | Value | Population/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Global PACG prevalence | 0.5% (95% CI: 0.3-0.7%) | Estimated 20 million affected worldwide [12] |
| Incidence of acute attacks | 4-22 per 100,000 per year | Varies by ethnicity; highest in East Asian populations [13,14] |
| Prevalence in East Asians | 1.0-1.4% | Singaporean Chinese, Mongolian populations [14,15] |
| Prevalence in Caucasians | 0.1-0.4% | European, North American populations [13] |
| Prevalence in Inuit | 2.1-2.9% | Highest worldwide prevalence [13] |
| Projected 2040 burden | 32.04 million | 45% increase from 2013 [12] |
Demographics
| Factor | Details | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Age | Risk increases sharply after age 40; peak incidence > 60 years | Lens thickens with age, reducing anterior chamber depth [16] |
| Sex | Female:Male ratio 3-4:1 | Shorter axial length, shallower anterior chamber in females [13] |
| Ethnicity | Highest: Inuit, East Asian (Chinese, Vietnamese, Mongolian); Lowest: African, Caribbean | Genetic and anatomical factors [12,14] |
| Refractive error | Strong association with hypermetropia | Hypermetropic eyes are smaller with shallower chambers [16] |
| Laterality | Unilateral initially; fellow eye at 50-75% risk | Bilateral anatomical predisposition [10] |
Risk Factors
Non-Modifiable Risk Factors
| Risk Factor | Mechanism | Relative Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Age > 60 years | Progressive lens thickening, anterior lens displacement | Increases exponentially [13] |
| Female sex | Shallower anterior chamber, shorter axial length | 3-4× increased risk [13] |
| Asian/Inuit ethnicity | Anatomical: smaller eyes, shallow AC, plateau iris more common | 5-8× vs Caucasians [12] |
| Hypermetropia | Short axial length, shallow anterior chamber | 2-3× increased risk [16] |
| Positive family history | First-degree relatives: 6× risk | Genetic predisposition [17] |
| Nanophthalmos | Very short axial length (less than 20mm) | Very high risk [16] |
| Short stature | Associated with smaller ocular dimensions | Modest increase [13] |
Modifiable/Precipitating Factors
| Factor | Mechanism | Clinical Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Dim lighting | Pupil dilation (mydriasis) increases iridotrabecular contact | Common precipitant; "cinema sign" [4] |
| Pharmacological mydriasis | Tropicamide, phenylephrine, atropine dilate pupil | Avoid in shallow AC; warn patients [18] |
| Anticholinergic medications | Systemic drugs cause pupil dilation | Many drug classes implicated [18,19] |
| Sympathomimetics | Adrenaline, pseudoephedrine, decongestants | Case reports of acute attacks [19] |
| Prone positioning | Anterior displacement of lens-iris diaphragm | Postoperative risk [4] |
| Stress/emotional upset | Sympathetic activation causing mydriasis | Anecdotal association [4] |
| Dark rooms, evening hours | Natural pupil dilation | Peak attack incidence in evening [4] |
Medications That Can Precipitate AACG
[!WARNING] High-Risk Medications in Angle-Closure Suspects:
Anticholinergics: Atropine, hyoscine, glycopyrrolate, oxybutynin, tolterodine, tricyclic antidepressants, antihistamines (diphenhydramine), antipsychotics (chlorpromazine)
Sympathomimetics: Pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine, adrenaline/epinephrine
Sulphonamide derivatives: Topiramate (unique mechanism: uveal effusion causing angle closure)
Others: Botulinum toxin (if inadvertently into iris), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (rare) [18,19]
3. Pathophysiology
Aqueous Humour Dynamics
Understanding normal aqueous humour physiology is essential for comprehending the mechanism of angle-closure glaucoma.
Normal Aqueous Production and Drainage:
- Aqueous humour is produced by the ciliary body epithelium at a rate of approximately 2-3 μL/minute [20]
- Flows from posterior chamber through pupil into anterior chamber
- Drains primarily via the trabecular meshwork (conventional pathway, 80-90%) in the iridocorneal angle
- Secondary uveoscleral (unconventional) pathway accounts for 10-20% of outflow
- Normal IOP: 10-21 mmHg (mean approximately 15 mmHg) [20]
Mechanism of Angle Closure
Step 1: Anatomical Predisposition
Certain eyes are anatomically prone to angle closure due to structural features:
| Anatomical Feature | Normal Value | At-Risk Eye | Clinical Measurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior chamber depth | 3.0-3.5 mm | less than 2.5 mm | Slit-lamp, AS-OCT |
| Axial length | 22-24 mm | less than 22 mm | Ultrasound biometry |
| Lens thickness | 4.0-4.5 mm | > 4.5 mm (age-related) | Ultrasound |
| Lens position | Central | Anteriorly displaced | UBM |
| Iridocorneal angle | > 20 degrees (open) | less than 20 degrees (narrow) | Gonioscopy |
| Iris curvature | Flat or mildly convex | Markedly convex (bombé) | AS-OCT, gonioscopy |
Step 2: Pupillary Block
The most common mechanism of angle closure (> 90% of cases):
- Lens-iris contact zone increases with age and in predisposed eyes
- Resistance to aqueous flow through pupil creates relative pupillary block
- Aqueous accumulates in posterior chamber, creating pressure gradient
- Peripheral iris bows forward (iris bombé configuration)
- Maximum iris-lens contact occurs at mid-dilation (3-5mm pupil) — explains why dim lighting triggers attacks
Step 3: Iridotrabecular Contact
- Forward-bowed peripheral iris apposes trabecular meshwork
- Aqueous drainage is mechanically blocked
- Initially appositional (reversible with treatment)
- Prolonged contact leads to peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) — permanent adhesions
Step 4: Acute IOP Elevation
- With drainage blocked, aqueous accumulates rapidly
- IOP rises from normal (10-21 mmHg) to 40-80+ mmHg within hours
- Corneal endothelium decompensates → corneal oedema (hazy cornea) [21]
- Optic nerve head perfusion compromised → ischaemic damage
- Iris sphincter ischaemia → mid-dilated, unreactive pupil
- Ciliary body stimulation + IOP → intense pain, vagal response (nausea, vomiting)
Alternative Mechanisms of Angle Closure
Plateau Iris Syndrome:
- Abnormally anterior insertion of iris root at ciliary body
- Iris bunches in angle on dilation even without pupillary block
- LPI alone may be insufficient; laser peripheral iridoplasty may be needed
- Prevalence: 20-30% of angle-closure patients [22]
Lens-Induced Mechanisms:
- Phacomorphic: Large/swollen lens pushes iris forward
- Lens subluxation: Anterior displacement closes angle
- Intumescent cataract: Lens swelling precipitates closure
Secondary Angle Closure:
- Neovascular glaucoma: Fibrovascular membrane zips angle closed
- Uveitis: Posterior synechiae cause pupillary block
- Tumours: Ciliary body mass displaces iris
- Suprachoroidal haemorrhage/effusion: Pushes lens-iris forward
- Topiramate-induced: Ciliary body oedema and rotation
Classification of Primary Angle Closure Disease
| Stage | Definition | IOP | Optic Nerve | Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Angle Closure Suspect (PACS) | ≥180° of iridotrabecular contact on gonioscopy | Normal | Normal | Observation vs prophylactic LPI [22] |
| Primary Angle Closure (PAC) | Angle closure + elevated IOP or PAS | Often elevated | Normal | LPI + IOP-lowering if needed |
| Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (PACG) | Angle closure + glaucomatous optic neuropathy | Variable | Cupped, damaged | LPI + medical ± surgical IOP control |
| Acute Angle Closure Crisis | Symptomatic acute attack | > 40 mmHg usually | May become damaged | Emergency treatment → LPI |
4. Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
Cardinal Symptoms of Acute Attack
| Symptom | Description | Frequency | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Severe eye pain | Described as "worst pain ever," deep, boring | > 95% | Corneal oedema, iris ischaemia, ciliary spasm |
| Headache | Frontal, periorbital, or hemicranial | 80-90% | Referred pain; mimics migraine, cluster headache |
| Nausea and vomiting | Can be severe and dominant symptom | 70-85% | Vagal stimulation from ciliary pain fibres |
| Reduced visual acuity | Blurred vision, often severe (CF or worse) | > 95% | Corneal oedema, corneal surface irregularity |
| Haloes around lights | Coloured rings around light sources | 80-90% | Light diffraction by oedematous cornea |
| Photophobia | Light sensitivity | 60-70% | Iritis component |
| Lacrimation | Excessive tearing | 60-70% | Corneal irritation reflex |
Systemic Symptoms (Often Dominant)
- Abdominal pain: Vagal-mediated; can mimic acute abdomen
- Bradycardia: Parasympathetic activation
- Diaphoresis: Autonomic response to severe pain
- Prostration: Patient appears systemically unwell
[!CAUTION] Diagnostic Pitfall: Systemic symptoms (vomiting, abdominal pain, headache) may dominate the presentation, leading to misdiagnosis as migraine, gastroenteritis, acute abdomen, or even stroke. Always examine the eyes in patients with headache and vomiting. [4,11]
Prodromal Symptoms (Subacute Attacks)
Some patients experience intermittent, self-resolving episodes before a full attack:
- Transient blurred vision
- Intermittent haloes around lights (especially in evening/dim light)
- Mild brow ache or headache
- Resolution with sleep or bright light (pupil constriction opens angle)
Signs
Affected Eye Examination Findings
| Sign | Description | Sensitivity | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ciliary injection | Circumcorneal erythema (ring around cornea) | > 95% | Distinguishes from conjunctivitis (diffuse injection) |
| Corneal oedema | Hazy, steamy, cloudy cornea | > 95% | Endothelial decompensation from high IOP; causes haloes |
| Fixed mid-dilated pupil | 4-6mm, oval or irregular, non-reactive | > 95% | Iris sphincter ischaemia; PATHOGNOMONIC |
| Shallow anterior chamber | Narrow space between cornea and iris | > 95% | Anatomical predisposition; confirms mechanism |
| Elevated IOP | > 40 mmHg (often 50-80 mmHg) | > 95% | Diagnostic criterion; measure with tonometry |
| Rock-hard eye | Very firm on digital palpation | 90% | Useful bedside test when tonometer unavailable |
| Glaukomflecken | Grey-white anterior lens opacities | 20-30% | Lens epithelium necrosis; indicates prior attack |
| Iris atrophy | Sector iris thinning, irregular pupil | After resolved attack | Ischaemic damage; permanent sign |
Fellow Eye Examination
- Shallow anterior chamber: Same anatomical predisposition
- Normal pupil reactions: Unless bilateral attack (rare)
- Normal IOP: Typically unaffected
- Narrow angle on gonioscopy: Confirms bilateral risk
The "Van Herick" Technique (Peripheral Anterior Chamber Depth Assessment)
A simple slit-lamp technique to assess anterior chamber depth:
| Grade | AC Depth Ratio | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 4 | AC depth ≥ corneal thickness | Open angle |
| Grade 3 | AC depth = 1/4 to 1/2 corneal thickness | Probably open |
| Grade 2 | AC depth = 1/4 corneal thickness | Possibly narrow (20°) |
| Grade 1 | AC depth less than 1/4 corneal thickness | Narrow angle (10°) |
| Grade 0 | Iris-cornea contact | Closed angle |
Red Flags
[!DANGER] Red Flags — Immediate Ophthalmology Referral Required:
- Severe eye pain with fixed, mid-dilated pupil
- Sudden visual loss with red eye
- "Rock-hard" or "stony" eye on palpation
- Nausea/vomiting with headache and red eye
- Haloes around lights with acutely reduced vision
- IOP greater than 40 mmHg on measurement
- Hazy/cloudy cornea with unreactive pupil
- Headache with red eye in patient over 50 years
5. Differential Diagnosis
Critical Differential Diagnoses
| Diagnosis | Key Distinguishing Features | IOP | Pupil | Cornea |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma | Shallow AC, fixed mid-dilated pupil, rock-hard eye | > 40 mmHg | Fixed, mid-dilated | Hazy/oedematous |
| Acute Anterior Uveitis/Iritis | Photophobia, deep aching, cells/flare in AC | Normal-low | Small (miotic), may be irregular | Usually clear |
| Acute Conjunctivitis | Discharge, gritty feeling, bilateral | Normal | Normal, reactive | Clear |
| Corneal Abrasion/Foreign Body | History of trauma, positive fluorescein staining | Normal | Normal, reactive | Localised defect |
| Scleritis/Episcleritis | Sector injection, deep boring pain (scleritis) | Normal | Normal | Clear |
| Neovascular Glaucoma | History of diabetes/CRVO, rubeosis iridis | Elevated | May be irregular | May be clear initially |
| Phacomorphic Glaucoma | Advanced cataract, lens swelling visible | Elevated | May be irregular | May be hazy |
"Do Not Miss" Diagnoses
| Condition | Why Commonly Confused | How to Distinguish |
|---|---|---|
| Migraine | Headache, nausea, photophobia | NO red eye, reactive pupil, normal IOP |
| Cluster Headache | Unilateral severe headache, lacrimation, rhinorrhoea | Pupil small (miotic) not mid-dilated; eye may be red but cornea clear |
| Stroke/TIA | Headache, visual symptoms | Neurological signs; no red eye; pupil normal |
| Gastroenteritis | Vomiting dominates presentation | Examine eyes! No red eye |
| Acute Sinusitis | Facial pain, headache | No red eye, reactive pupil |
| Acute Abdomen | Abdominal pain with vomiting (vagal) | Examine eyes; no peritonism |
Systematic Approach to Acute Red Eye
Step 1: Assess Visual Acuity
- Significantly reduced → AACG, uveitis, keratitis, endophthalmitis
Step 2: Examine Pupil
- Fixed, mid-dilated → AACG (pathognomonic)
- Small (miotic) → Uveitis, cluster headache
- Normal, reactive → Conjunctivitis, episcleritis, scleritis
Step 3: Assess Cornea
- Hazy/cloudy → AACG, corneal infection
- Clear → Uveitis, scleritis, conjunctivitis
Step 4: Palpate Globe
- Rock-hard → AACG, neovascular glaucoma
- Normal tension → Other causes
Step 5: Measure IOP
-
40 mmHg → AACG (or other acute glaucoma)
6. Clinical Examination
Structured Ophthalmic Examination
General Inspection
- Patient appears distressed, pale, diaphoretic
- May be actively vomiting
- May have hand over affected eye
- Appears systemically unwell (vs conjunctivitis patient appears comfortable)
Visual Acuity Assessment
- Test both eyes with patient's distance correction
- Often severely reduced: 6/60 or worse, counting fingers (CF), hand movements (HM)
- Record accurately; documents severity and provides baseline for recovery
External Eye Examination
| Structure | Normal Finding | AACG Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Lids | Normal position | May be swollen from rubbing |
| Conjunctiva | White | Ciliary flush (circumcorneal injection) |
| Cornea | Clear, bright reflex | Hazy, oedematous, "steamy" |
| Anterior chamber | Deep, clear | Shallow, may show cells |
| Pupil | Round, reactive, 3-4mm | Fixed, mid-dilated (4-6mm), oval |
| Red reflex | Bright | Dull or absent (corneal haze) |
Pupil Assessment
- Size: Measure in mm; typically 4-6mm in AACG
- Shape: Often oval or irregular (not round)
- Direct response: Absent or minimal
- Consensual response: Absent in affected eye
- Compare with fellow eye: Fellow eye has normal reactions
Anterior Chamber Depth Assessment
Flashlight (Oblique Illumination) Test:
- Shine penlight from temporal side, parallel to iris plane
- Observe illumination of nasal iris
| Finding | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Entire iris illuminated | Deep AC, open angle |
| Shadow on nasal iris | Shallow AC, narrow angle |
| Marked shadow | Very shallow AC, at-risk eye |
Van Herick Method (see Section 4)
Intraocular Pressure Measurement
Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (Gold Standard):
- Requires slit lamp, fluorescein, topical anaesthetic
- Normal: 10-21 mmHg
- AACG: Typically > 40 mmHg, often 50-80 mmHg
Portable/Handheld Tonometry:
- Tonopen, iCare: Useful in ED/primary care
- Acceptable accuracy for diagnosis
Digital Palpation (When Tonometry Unavailable):
- Compare tension of affected vs fellow eye
- "Rock-hard" vs normal = highly suggestive
- Sensitivity approximately 80% for IOP > 40 mmHg
Fundoscopy
- May be difficult due to corneal haze
- Look for optic disc cupping if view possible
- Assess for previous glaucomatous damage
Specialist Examination
Gonioscopy
Direct visualisation of the iridocorneal angle using a gonioscopy lens:
Shaffer Grading System:
| Grade | Angle Width | Trabecular Meshwork Visible | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 35-45° | Full TM, ciliary body | Open, no risk |
| 3 | 25-35° | TM visible | Open |
| 2 | 20° | TM partially visible | Narrow, possible closure |
| 1 | 10° | Only Schwalbe's line | Very narrow, high risk |
| 0 | 0° | No structures visible | Closed |
In acute attack: Grade 0 angle (closed) due to iridotrabecular apposition
Anterior Segment OCT (AS-OCT)
- Non-contact imaging of angle anatomy
- Quantifies anterior chamber depth, angle opening distance
- Useful for screening and follow-up
- Can image through mild corneal oedema [23]
Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM)
- High-frequency ultrasound (35-50 MHz)
- Visualises structures posterior to iris (ciliary body, lens zonules)
- Essential for diagnosing plateau iris syndrome
- Can be performed through severe corneal oedema [22]
7. Investigations
First-Line Investigations (Emergency Department)
| Investigation | Purpose | Expected Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Visual acuity | Baseline; severity assessment | Reduced (6/60 or worse) |
| Tonometry | Confirms elevated IOP | > 40 mmHg (diagnostic) |
| Pupil examination | Pathognomonic finding | Fixed, mid-dilated, unreactive |
| Slit-lamp examination | Corneal oedema, AC assessment | Hazy cornea, shallow AC, cells |
| Fundoscopy | Optic disc assessment | May show cupping if prior damage |
Laboratory Investigations
| Test | Indication | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Usually NOT required | Diagnosis is clinical | - |
| Urea & Electrolytes | If IV mannitol planned | Baseline renal function |
| Blood glucose | If diabetic | Baseline; mannitol affects glucose |
| Full blood count | If systemically unwell | Exclude other pathology |
| ECG | Before IV mannitol (elderly) | Exclude arrhythmia; mannitol can cause fluid shifts |
Specialist Imaging
| Modality | Findings in AACG | Indications |
|---|---|---|
| Gonioscopy | Closed angle (Grade 0); PAS after chronic closure | Gold standard for angle assessment |
| Anterior Segment OCT | Narrow/closed angle, iris-cornea apposition | Non-contact; screening; mild oedema |
| Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM) | Closed angle, plateau iris, lens position | Severe oedema; plateau iris diagnosis |
| A-scan biometry | Short axial length (less than 22mm) | Assess anatomical risk factors |
| B-scan ultrasound | Posterior segment assessment | If posterior pathology suspected |
Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Angle Closure
Clinical Diagnosis Requires:
-
Symptoms: At least 2 of:
- Ocular pain
- Headache
- Nausea and/or vomiting
- Blurred vision
- Haloes
-
Signs: All of:
- IOP > 21 mmHg (usually > 40 mmHg)
- Corneal oedema
- Fixed, mid-dilated pupil
- Shallow anterior chamber
-
Confirmation (specialist): Gonioscopy showing closed angle
8. Management
Emergency Management Algorithm
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SUSPECTED ACUTE ANGLE CLOSURE │
│ (Severe eye pain + red eye + mid-dilated pupil) │
└────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ IMMEDIATE ACTIONS (First 15 minutes) │
│ 1. Position patient SUPINE (lens falls back) │
│ 2. Confirm diagnosis: VA, pupil, cornea, IOP │
│ 3. URGENT OPHTHALMOLOGY REFERRAL │
└────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MEDICAL TREATMENT (Start immediately) │
│ │
│ SYSTEMIC: │
│ • Acetazolamide 500mg IV stat (or 250mg IV + 250mg PO)│
│ • Antiemetic: Ondansetron 4mg IV or Cyclizine 50mg IM │
│ • Analgesia: Paracetamol 1g IV; opioids if severe │
│ │
│ TOPICAL (to affected eye): │
│ • Timolol 0.5% - 1 drop │
│ • Brimonidine 0.2% - 1 drop │
│ • Prednisolone 1% - 1 drop (reduces inflammation) │
│ │
│ HOLD PILOCARPINE until IOP falling │
└────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ RE-ASSESS IOP after 30-60 minutes │
└──────────────┬────────────────────────┬─────────────────┘
│ │
IOP improving IOP not responding
│ │
▼ ▼
┌──────────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────────┐
│ ADD PILOCARPINE │ │ ESCALATE TREATMENT │
│ 2% - 1 drop q15min × 4 │ │ • IV Mannitol 1-2 g/kg │
│ │ │ over 45-60 min │
│ (Iris sphincter now │ │ • Cardiac monitoring │
│ responsive as IOP ↓) │ │ • Avoid in HF/renal imp│
│ │ │ • Consider anterior │
│ │ │ chamber paracentesis │
└──────────────┬───────────┘ └──────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DEFINITIVE TREATMENT (within 24-48 hours) │
│ │
│ LASER PERIPHERAL IRIDOTOMY (LPI) │
│ • Performed once IOP controlled & cornea clearing │
│ • Creates bypass for aqueous (relieves pupillary block)│
│ • BOTH EYES must be treated │
│ │
│ OR │
│ CLEAR LENS EXTRACTION (patients > 50 with cataract) │
│ • Evidence from EAGLE trial supports this approach │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Pharmacological Treatment Details
Systemic Agents
| Drug | Dose | Mechanism | Onset | Cautions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetazolamide | 500mg IV stat | Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor; reduces aqueous production by 40-60% | 2-5 min IV | Sulphonamide allergy; renal impairment; hypokalaemia; metabolic acidosis [6] |
| Mannitol | 1-2 g/kg IV over 45-60 min (20% solution) | Osmotic diuretic; reduces vitreous volume, creates osmotic gradient | 30-60 min | Heart failure, renal failure, pulmonary oedema; requires monitoring [7] |
| Glycerol | 1-1.5 g/kg PO | Osmotic agent (oral alternative) | 30-60 min | Nausea; avoid in diabetics (metabolised to glucose) |
Topical Agents
| Drug | Dose | Mechanism | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timolol 0.5% | 1 drop stat, then BD | Beta-blocker; reduces aqueous production | Avoid in asthma, bradycardia, heart block |
| Brimonidine 0.2% | 1 drop stat, then BD | Alpha-2 agonist; reduces aqueous production | Avoid in children; drowsiness |
| Apraclonidine 1% | 1 drop stat | Alpha-2 agonist; reduces aqueous production | Alternative to brimonidine |
| Pilocarpine 2% | 1 drop q15min × 4 (after IOP ↓) | Miotic; constricts pupil, opens angle | ONLY after IOP falling; ineffective with very high IOP; causes ciliary spasm [6] |
| Prednisolone 1% | 1 drop q1h initially | Reduces inflammation | Start after acute treatment initiated |
| Dorzolamide 2% | 1 drop TDS | Topical CAI | Additive effect with systemic acetazolamide |
Symptom Control
| Symptom | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Nausea/Vomiting | Ondansetron 4mg IV/PO; Cyclizine 50mg IM; Metoclopramide 10mg IV |
| Pain | Paracetamol 1g IV/PO; Opioids (morphine 5-10mg IV) if severe |
| Anxiety | Reassurance; benzodiazepines rarely needed |
Definitive Treatment
Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI)
Mechanism: Creates a full-thickness hole in the peripheral iris, allowing aqueous to bypass the pupillary block and flow directly from posterior to anterior chamber.
Procedure:
- Topical anaesthesia
- Miotic (pilocarpine) to thin peripheral iris
- Nd:YAG or argon laser application to peripheral iris (usually superior)
- Multiple pulses to create patent opening
- Post-procedure: Topical steroid, IOP check at 1 hour
Success Rate: > 95% for relieving pupillary block
Complications:
- IOP spike (10-15%)
- Bleeding from iris
- Dysphotopsia (glare, visual symptoms) — less common with superior placement
- Closure requiring retreatment (5-10%)
Critical Point: LPI must be performed on BOTH eyes. The fellow eye has 50-75% risk of acute attack within 5-10 years if untreated. [8,10]
Timing: Ideally within 24-48 hours of attack, once IOP controlled and cornea sufficiently clear.
Early Clear Lens Extraction (EAGLE Trial Evidence)
The EAGLE (Effectiveness of Early Lens Extraction) trial demonstrated that in patients aged > 50 with primary angle closure (PAC) or PACG and cataract, early clear lens extraction was more effective than LPI for long-term IOP control and had better quality of life outcomes at 36 months. [9]
Indications for Early Lens Extraction:
- Age > 50 years
- PAC or PACG (not just PACS)
- Coexisting cataract
- Failed LPI
- Plateau iris (LPI alone insufficient)
- Persistent elevated IOP after LPI
Advantages over LPI:
- Eliminates lens-related component of angle closure
- Deepens anterior chamber permanently
- Reduces long-term medication requirement
- Addresses visual impairment from cataract
Surgical Iridectomy
Reserved for cases where LPI not possible:
- Persistent corneal oedema preventing laser
- Inadequate pupil dilation
- Laser equipment unavailable
Post-Attack Management
| Timeframe | Assessment | Management |
|---|---|---|
| 24-48 hours | Corneal clarity, IOP, angle assessment | LPI when possible |
| 1 week | IOP, LPI patency, angle status | Continue topical steroids; taper |
| 1 month | Gonioscopy, IOP, optic disc | Long-term IOP-lowering if needed |
| 3 months | Visual field, OCT RNFL | Assess for glaucomatous damage |
| Ongoing | Annual review | Monitor for chronic angle closure, glaucoma progression |
Long-Term IOP-Lowering Requirements
30-50% of patients require ongoing topical IOP-lowering medication after acute attack due to:
- Trabecular meshwork damage
- Peripheral anterior synechiae
- Pre-existing glaucoma
First-line options: Prostaglandin analogues (latanoprost), beta-blockers (timolol)
Surgical Options for Refractory Cases
| Procedure | Indication | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Trabeculectomy | Uncontrolled IOP despite maximal medical + laser | Filtered bleb creates alternative drainage |
| Tube shunt (GDD) | Failed trabeculectomy; complex glaucoma | Ahmed, Baerveldt devices |
| Laser iridoplasty | Plateau iris syndrome | Laser shrinks peripheral iris |
| Phacoemulsification | Combined procedure with cataract | Deepens AC; often curative |
9. Complications
Immediate Complications (Hours)
| Complication | Incidence | Mechanism | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permanent vision loss | 10-20% if > 24h delay | Optic nerve ischaemia | Prevention: rapid IOP reduction |
| Optic nerve infarction | Hours to days | Compromised optic disc perfusion | Emergency IOP lowering |
| Corneal decompensation | 5-15% | Endothelial cell loss from high IOP | May require corneal transplant [21] |
| Iris ischaemia | Common | Iris vessel compression | Permanent sector atrophy |
| Lens opacity (glaukomflecken) | 20-30% | Lens epithelium necrosis | Permanent finding; indicates prior attack |
Early Complications (Days to Weeks)
| Complication | Incidence | Presentation | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Persistent elevated IOP | 30-50% | IOP not controlled after LPI | Topical medications; consider lens extraction |
| Peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) | 50-70% | Permanent angle adhesions | Reduces outflow; may progress to chronic closure |
| Inflammation (anterior uveitis) | Common | Cells, flare in AC | Topical steroids |
| LPI closure | 5-10% | IOP rises, attack recurs | Re-treatment with laser |
| Cataract acceleration | Variable | Progressive lens opacity | Lens extraction |
Late Complications (Months to Years)
| Complication | Incidence | Presentation | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic angle closure glaucoma | 20-40% | Progressive visual field loss, disc cupping | IOP-lowering; surgery if needed |
| Fellow eye AACG | 50-75% without LPI | Contralateral acute attack | Prevented by prophylactic LPI |
| Recurrent acute attacks | 5-10% | Angle closure despite LPI | Plateau iris; consider lens extraction |
| Corneal graft requirement | 2-5% | Bullous keratopathy | Penetrating/endothelial keratoplasty |
| Legal blindness | 5-10% | Bilateral visual loss | Vision rehabilitation |
Corneal Endothelial Damage
AACG causes significant corneal endothelial cell loss, proportional to duration and severity of attack. [21] Endothelial cell density may be reduced by 10-30% compared to normal eyes. This may affect:
- Long-term corneal clarity
- Future cataract surgery outcomes
- Risk of corneal decompensation
10. Prognosis & Outcomes
Natural History (Untreated)
- Sustained IOP > 50 mmHg causes optic nerve damage within 2-24 hours
- Complete, permanent visual loss possible within 24-72 hours
- Corneal decompensation may occur
- Spontaneous resolution is RARE (unlike intermittent subacute attacks)
Outcomes with Treatment
| Variable | Outcome | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Visual recovery (treatment less than 6 hours) | 85-95% good outcome | Early treatment critical |
| Visual recovery (treatment 6-24 hours) | 70-85% good outcome | Worse prognosis |
| Visual recovery (treatment > 24 hours) | 50-70% good outcome | High risk of permanent loss |
| Permanent severe visual loss | 10-25% overall | Higher if presentation delayed |
| LPI success rate | > 95% | For relieving pupillary block |
| Need for ongoing IOP therapy | 30-50% | Trabecular damage persists |
| Fellow eye attack (without prophylactic LPI) | 50-75% over 5-10 years | Justifies bilateral treatment |
| Chronic glaucoma development | 20-40% | Requires long-term monitoring |
Prognostic Factors
Good Prognosis
- Rapid recognition and treatment (less than 6 hours)
- IOP reduced to less than 25 mmHg within 4 hours
- Successful LPI to both eyes
- No pre-existing optic nerve damage
- Good baseline visual acuity before attack
- Young age
Poor Prognosis
- Delayed presentation (> 24-48 hours)
- Very high IOP (> 60 mmHg)
- Pre-existing glaucomatous optic neuropathy
- Significant corneal damage at presentation
- Failed initial medical treatment
- Recurrent attacks
- Advanced age with comorbidities
Long-Term Follow-Up Requirements
All patients require lifelong ophthalmology follow-up:
| Interval | Assessments |
|---|---|
| 1 week | IOP, LPI patency, corneal status |
| 1 month | IOP, gonioscopy, anterior segment |
| 3 months | Visual field, OCT RNFL, IOP |
| 6-12 months | Comprehensive glaucoma review |
| Annual | Visual field, OCT, IOP, disc assessment |
11. Prevention & Screening
Primary Prevention
Identifying At-Risk Individuals
Routine eye examinations should assess anterior chamber depth, particularly in:
- Patients over 40 years
- Hypermetropic patients
- Asian, Inuit, or Chinese ethnicity
- Family history of angle closure glaucoma
- Before administering mydriatic drops
Prophylactic Laser Peripheral Iridotomy
Indications:
- Primary angle closure suspect (PACS) with very narrow angles
- Fellow eye after unilateral AACG (mandatory)
- Primary angle closure (PAC) diagnosed on routine examination
- Before cataract surgery in narrow-angle eyes
Evidence for Prophylactic LPI:
The ZAP (Zhongshan Angle-Closure Prevention) Trial randomised Chinese subjects with bilateral PACS to LPI in one eye. At 6-year and 14-year follow-up: [8]
- AACG attack rate was very low in both groups (less than 1%)
- LPI did not significantly reduce progression to PAC
- Conclusion: Routine prophylactic LPI for PACS may not be necessary in all cases; close observation is an alternative
Current Recommendations:
- Prophylactic LPI is ALWAYS indicated for the fellow eye after AACG
- LPI for PACS remains controversial; individualise based on risk factors
- LPI recommended for PAC (elevated IOP or PAS even without acute attack) [22]
Secondary Prevention
Medication Counselling
Patients with narrow angles or prior AACG should:
- Carry a warning card about their condition
- Inform all healthcare providers before any medication
- Avoid over-the-counter anticholinergics and decongestants
- Seek urgent review if experiencing prodromal symptoms
Patient Education
Teach patients to recognise warning symptoms:
- Blurred vision in dim lighting
- Haloes around lights
- Brow ache or mild eye pain
- Seek immediate attention if symptoms worsen
12. Evidence & Guidelines
Key Clinical Guidelines
| Organisation | Guideline | Year | Key Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|
| European Glaucoma Society (EGS) | Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5th Ed | 2020 | Classification, treatment algorithms, LPI indications |
| American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) | PPP: Primary Angle Closure | 2020 | Emergency management, prophylactic treatment |
| Royal College of Ophthalmologists | Glaucoma Guidelines | 2017 | UK-specific pathways, referral criteria |
| NICE NG81 | Glaucoma: Diagnosis and Management | 2022 | Focus on POAG but mentions angle closure |
| Asia-Pacific Glaucoma Society | APGS Guidelines | 2016 | Asia-specific epidemiology and management |
Landmark Trials
EAGLE Trial (Azuara-Blanco et al., 2016) [9]
- Design: Multicentre RCT; 419 patients with PAC/PACG (age > 50)
- Comparison: Clear lens extraction vs LPI
- Primary Outcome: IOP and quality of life at 36 months
- Key Finding: Clear lens extraction was more effective than LPI for long-term IOP control; better health-related quality of life
- Impact: Supports early lens extraction in PAC/PACG patients > 50 with coexisting cataract
ZAP Trial (He et al., 2019) [8]
- Design: Single-centre RCT; 889 Chinese subjects with bilateral PACS
- Comparison: Prophylactic LPI to one eye vs observation
- Primary Outcome: Development of PAC or AACG at 6 years (extended to 14 years)
- Key Finding: Very low progression rate in both groups; LPI did not significantly reduce conversion to PAC
- Impact: Questions routine prophylactic LPI in all PACS; close observation may be reasonable
Fellow Eye Studies (Ang et al., 2000) [10]
- Design: Prospective cohort; 75 fellow eyes after unilateral AACG
- Intervention: Prophylactic LPI to fellow eye
- Follow-up: Mean 6.4 years
- Key Finding: No cases of AACG in prophylactically treated fellow eyes; untreated historical controls had 50-75% attack rate
- Impact: Established mandatory prophylactic LPI to fellow eye
Evidence Strength for Key Interventions
| Intervention | Level of Evidence | Recommendation Grade | Key Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| IV Acetazolamide for acute attack | 4 (expert consensus) | Strong (clinical practice) | Longstanding use; no RCTs |
| Topical IOP-lowering agents | 4 | Strong | Established practice |
| Pilocarpine (after IOP ↓) | 4 | Strong | Mechanistic rationale; clinical practice |
| Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) | 1b | Strong | EAGLE, ZAP trials |
| Prophylactic LPI to fellow eye | 2a | Strong | Ang et al; cohort studies |
| Clear lens extraction | 1b | Moderate | EAGLE trial |
| IV Mannitol for refractory cases | 4 | Moderate | Case series; clinical practice |
13. Exam-Focused Section
Common Viva Questions
Opening Question
Q: "Tell me about acute angle closure glaucoma."
Model Answer: "Acute angle closure glaucoma is an ophthalmic emergency characterised by rapid obstruction of aqueous humour outflow due to apposition of the peripheral iris to the trabecular meshwork, causing acute elevation of intraocular pressure typically above 40 mmHg.
The condition predominantly affects females over 60 years old, those of Asian ethnicity, and hypermetropic individuals — all related to anatomical predisposition including shallow anterior chamber and narrow drainage angle.
The classic presentation is the triad of severe unilateral eye pain, reduced vision, and nausea with vomiting. Pathognomonic signs include a fixed mid-dilated pupil, hazy cornea due to oedema, ciliary flush, and a rock-hard eye on palpation.
Emergency treatment involves positioning supine, intravenous acetazolamide 500mg, topical timolol and brimonidine, with pilocarpine added once IOP begins to fall. Definitive treatment is laser peripheral iridotomy, which must be performed on both eyes given the high risk to the fellow eye."
Follow-Up Questions
Q: "Why is pilocarpine only effective after IOP starts to fall?"
A: "When IOP exceeds 50-60 mmHg, the iris sphincter muscle becomes ischaemic and paralysed. Pilocarpine acts by stimulating the sphincter to constrict the pupil and pull the peripheral iris away from the trabecular meshwork. An ischaemic sphincter cannot respond to cholinergic stimulation. Only when IOP falls with systemic acetazolamide does iris perfusion improve sufficiently for pilocarpine to work."
Q: "What is the mechanism of pupillary block?"
A: "Pupillary block is the most common mechanism of angle closure, accounting for over 90% of cases. The lens and iris are in contact at the pupillary margin. Aqueous, produced by the ciliary body in the posterior chamber, cannot easily flow through this contact zone. This creates a pressure gradient with higher pressure in the posterior chamber, causing the peripheral iris to bow forward (iris bombé). The forward-bowed iris then apposes the trabecular meshwork, blocking drainage completely. The block is maximum at mid-dilation (3-5mm pupil), explaining why dim lighting precipitates attacks."
Q: "What is plateau iris syndrome and how is it managed differently?"
A: "Plateau iris syndrome occurs when the iris root is abnormally anteriorly inserted at the ciliary body. The central anterior chamber may appear normal in depth, but the peripheral angle is narrow due to the anatomical position of the iris root. On pupil dilation, the peripheral iris bunches up and occludes the angle even though there is no pupillary block. LPI alone is insufficient because the mechanism is not pupillary block. Laser peripheral iridoplasty (applying laser burns to the peripheral iris to shrink and thin it) is often required, or lens extraction which deepens the entire anterior chamber."
Q: "Describe the EAGLE trial and its implications."
A: "The EAGLE trial was a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing clear lens extraction with laser peripheral iridotomy in 419 patients over 50 years with primary angle closure or primary angle closure glaucoma. At 36-month follow-up, clear lens extraction demonstrated superior IOP control and better health-related quality of life compared to LPI alone. The clinical implication is that early lens extraction should be considered as primary treatment in PAC/PACG patients over 50, particularly those with coexisting cataract, rather than LPI with subsequent cataract surgery if needed."
Common Mistakes That Fail Candidates
| Mistake | Correction |
|---|---|
| ❌ Describing pupil as "small and reactive" | ✓ Pupil is MID-DILATED (4-6mm) and FIXED |
| ❌ Giving pilocarpine as first-line treatment | ✓ Pilocarpine only after IOP falling; IV acetazolamide first |
| ❌ Forgetting to treat the fellow eye | ✓ ALWAYS mention prophylactic LPI to fellow eye |
| ❌ Confusing with acute uveitis | ✓ Uveitis has SMALL pupil, clear cornea, cells/flare |
| ❌ Missing systemic symptoms | ✓ Nausea/vomiting often dominant; vagal stimulation |
| ❌ Not mentioning emergency referral | ✓ Same-day ophthalmology review is essential |
| ❌ Recommending dilating drops | ✓ Mydriatics are CONTRAINDICATED (precipitate/worsen attack) |
High-Yield Exam Facts
-
Epidemiology: Global PACG prevalence 0.5%; 20 million affected; responsible for 50% of glaucoma blindness despite being 26% of cases [12]
-
Demographics: Female:Male 3-4:1; peak > 60 years; highest in Inuit/Asian populations [12,13]
-
IOP Values: Normal 10-21 mmHg; AACG typically > 40 mmHg (often 50-80 mmHg)
-
Pupil Size: Mid-dilated = 4-6mm (not small like uveitis, not large like pharmacological mydriasis)
-
Fellow Eye Risk: 50-75% attack rate over 5-10 years without prophylactic LPI [10]
-
ZAP Trial: Showed very low progression from PACS to PAC/AACG; prophylactic LPI for PACS is now questioned [8]
-
EAGLE Trial: Clear lens extraction superior to LPI for PAC/PACG in patients > 50 years [9]
-
Medication Triggers: Anticholinergics (antipsychotics, tricyclics, antihistamines), sympathomimetics (pseudoephedrine), topiramate [18,19]
14. Special Populations
Elderly Patients
- Higher risk of AACG due to lens thickening with age
- More likely to have comorbidities affecting treatment choice
- Mannitol requires careful use (cardiac, renal function)
- May have difficulty with postoperative care
- Higher risk of falls due to impaired vision
- Early lens extraction often preferred (addresses cataract simultaneously)
Asian Populations
- Higher prevalence of AACG (1.0-1.4% vs 0.1-0.4% in Caucasians) [12,14]
- Plateau iris more common
- May require more aggressive screening
- Lower threshold for prophylactic LPI in high-risk individuals
Patients with Cognitive Impairment
- May not report symptoms accurately
- Carers must be educated about warning signs
- Consider prophylactic LPI if narrow angles identified
- May need modified postoperative management
Medication-Related AACG
- Review all medications in patients with narrow angles
- Particular caution with:
- Anticholinergics (oxybutynin, antihistamines)
- Tricyclic antidepressants
- "Topiramate (unique mechanism: ciliary body oedema)"
- Perioperative anticholinergics
- Consider alternative medications where possible
15. Patient/Layperson Explanation
What is Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma?
Acute angle closure glaucoma is a serious eye emergency that happens when the pressure inside your eye rises very suddenly. This can damage the nerve at the back of your eye (optic nerve) and cause permanent loss of vision if not treated quickly.
What Causes It?
Inside your eye, a clear fluid called aqueous humour is constantly being made and drained away. The drain is located at the "angle" where the coloured part of your eye (iris) meets the clear front part (cornea). In some people, this angle is very narrow. When the angle closes completely, the fluid cannot drain, pressure builds up rapidly, and this causes the symptoms.
Am I at Risk?
You are more likely to have this condition if you:
- Are over 60 years old
- Are female
- Are of Asian, Chinese, or Inuit descent
- Are long-sighted (wear "plus" glasses for distance)
- Have a family member who has had this condition
- Have been told you have "narrow angles"
Certain medications can trigger an attack in people at risk, including some cold and allergy medicines, some bladder medications, and some antidepressants. Always tell your doctor or pharmacist if you have been told you have narrow angles.
What are the Warning Signs?
Seek emergency help immediately if you experience:
- Sudden, severe pain in one eye
- Blurred vision that comes on quickly
- Seeing rainbow-coloured haloes around lights
- Red eye with severe pain
- Headache with nausea and vomiting (especially with a red eye)
- The eye feeling very hard when you press on it gently
These symptoms are an emergency. Do not wait — go to your nearest Emergency Department or call for an ambulance.
How is it Treated?
Emergency Treatment:
- Medicines are given immediately to lower the pressure (eye drops and an injection)
- You may be asked to lie flat
- Medicine to stop sickness and pain will also be given
Laser Treatment (Iridotomy):
- Once the pressure is controlled, a laser is used to make a tiny hole in the coloured part of your eye
- This creates a new pathway for the fluid to drain
- It is done on BOTH eyes because the other eye is also at risk
Sometimes Surgery:
- In some cases, removing the lens of the eye (like a cataract operation) is the best treatment
What to Expect After Treatment
- Most people recover good vision if treated within a few hours
- You will need regular check-ups with an eye doctor for the rest of your life
- You may need to use eye drops long-term
- You should carry a card or wear a bracelet alerting medical staff to your condition
How Can I Prevent Future Attacks?
- Attend all your eye appointments
- Use your medications as prescribed
- Avoid medications that can trigger attacks (ask your doctor or pharmacist)
- Tell all your doctors about your eye condition
- Seek urgent help if you experience any warning symptoms
17. References
-
Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014;311(18):1901-1911. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3192
-
European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. 5th ed. Savona, Italy: PubliComm; 2020.
-
Wright C, Tawfik MA, Waisbourd M, Katz LJ. Primary angle-closure glaucoma: an update. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(3):217-225. doi:10.1111/aos.12784
-
Chan PP, Pang JC, Tham CC. Acute primary angle closure-treatment strategies, evidences and economical considerations. Eye (Lond). 2019;33(1):110-119. doi:10.1038/s41433-018-0271-0 [PMID: 30467424]
-
Lowe RF. Aetiology of the anatomical basis for primary angle-closure glaucoma. Biometrical comparisons between normal eyes and eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1970;54(3):161-169. doi:10.1136/bjo.54.3.161
-
Saw SM, Gazzard G, Friedman DS. Interventions for angle-closure glaucoma: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(10):1869-1878. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00540-9
-
Chen PP. Blindness in patients with treated open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(4):726-733. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01974-7
-
He M, Jiang Y, Huang S, et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy for the prevention of angle closure: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10181):1609-1618. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32607-2 [PMID: 30878226]
-
Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J, Ramsay C, et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10052):1389-1397. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30956-4 [PMID: 27707498]
-
Ang LP, Aung T, Chew PT. Acute primary angle closure in an Asian population: long-term outcome of the fellow eye after prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(11):2092-2096. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00449-1 [PMID: 11054339]
-
Gupta D, Chen PP. Glaucoma. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(8):668-674. [PMID: 27175839]
-
Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081-2090. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 [PMID: 24974815]
-
Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262-267. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224 [PMID: 16488940]
-
Foster PJ, Oen FT, Machin D, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey of the Tanjong Pagar district. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(8):1105-1111. doi:10.1001/archopht.118.8.1105
-
He M, Foster PJ, Ge J, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese: a population-based study in Liwan District, Guangzhou. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(7):2782-2788. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0051
-
Bourne RR, Sukudom P, Foster PJ, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in Thailand: a population based survey in Rom Klao District, Bangkok. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(9):1069-1074. doi:10.1136/bjo.87.9.1069
-
Lowe RF. Primary angle-closure glaucoma: family histories and anterior chamber depths. Br J Ophthalmol. 1964;48(4):191-195. doi:10.1136/bjo.48.4.191
-
Lachkar Y, Bouassida W. Drug-induced acute angle closure glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18(2):129-133. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32808738d5
-
Huff ML, Liu CA, Dhillon N, et al. Acute angle closure glaucoma precipitated by homeopathic eyedrops containing Atropa belladonna. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;54:288.e5-288.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2021.10.006 [PMID: 34776281]
-
Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet. 2004;363(9422):1711-1720. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16257-0
-
Yeom H, Lee SU, Lee SB. Corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification in eyes with a prior acute angle-closure attack. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020;34(6):470-476. doi:10.3341/kjo.2020.0078 [PMID: 33307602]
-
Filippopoulos T, Thau A, Bhai H. Rethinking Prophylactic Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle-Closure Suspects: A Review. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023;6(6):542-554. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2023.05.002 [PMID: 37321374]
-
Nongpiur ME, Gong T, Lee HK, et al. Subgrouping of primary angle-closure suspects based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography parameters. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2525-2531. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.028
Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference. Acute angle closure glaucoma is an ophthalmic emergency. If you have sudden eye pain with visual symptoms, seek immediate medical attention. Do not delay treatment. Call emergency services or attend your nearest Emergency Department immediately.
Evidence trail
This article contains inline citation markers, but the full bibliography has not yet been imported as a visible references section. The page is still tracked through the editorial review pipeline below.
All clinical claims sourced from PubMed
Frequently asked questions
Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.
When should I seek emergency care for acute angle closure glaucoma?
Seek immediate emergency care if you experience any of the following warning signs: Severe eye pain with nausea/vomiting, Fixed mid-dilated pupil (4-6mm), Reduced visual acuity, Hazy/cloudy cornea, IOP greater than 40 mmHg, Headache mistaken for migraine or stroke, Rock-hard eye on palpation.
Learning map
Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.
Prerequisites
Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.
- Ocular Anatomy
- Aqueous Humor Dynamics
Differentials
Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.
- Acute Iritis/Uveitis
- Acute Conjunctivitis
- Cluster Headache
Consequences
Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.
- Chronic Angle Closure Glaucoma
- Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy