MedVellum
MedVellum
Back to Library
Neurology
Emergency Medicine
Neurosurgery

Intracerebral Haemorrhage

Updated: 2025-12-27

On This Page

Red Flags

  • Decreasing GCS - indicates haematoma expansion or raised ICP
  • Cushing's triad (bradycardia, hypertension, irregular breathing)
  • Fixed dilated pupil - uncal herniation
  • New focal neurological deficit
  • Coagulopathy with ongoing bleeding
  • Anticoagulant-related ICH
  • Signs of herniation
1. Clinical Overview

Summary

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is bleeding directly into the brain parenchyma, accounting for 10-15% of all strokes but 40-50% of stroke mortality. It is a neurological emergency requiring immediate blood pressure control, reversal of anticoagulation, and neurosurgical evaluation. Primary ICH results from hypertensive arteriopathy or cerebral amyloid angiopathy, while secondary ICH has identifiable structural causes. Mortality is 40% at 30 days, with only 20% achieving functional independence at 6 months. [1,2]

Key Facts

FactDetailExam Relevance
Incidence10-30 per 100,000/yearKnow UK/global epidemiology
Mortality40% at 30 days; 54% at 1 yearQuote in viva scenarios
Primary causesHypertension (50-70%), CAA (20-30%)Common exam question
LocationBasal ganglia (50%), lobar (35%), cerebellum (10%), brainstem (5%)Correlate with aetiology
BP targetSBP 130-140 mmHg within 1 hourINTERACT2 evidence
Haematoma expansion30-40% expand in first 24 hoursExplains early deterioration
INR reversalTarget <1.5 within 4 hoursCritical for anticoagulated patients
Surgical indicationsCerebellar ICH >3cm, hydrocephalus, herniationKnow surgical criteria
ICH scorePredicts 30-day mortality (0-6)Must know components
Functional outcomeOnly 20% independent at 6 monthsImportant for prognosis discussions

Clinical Pearls

High-Yield Fact: Haematoma volume is the strongest predictor of outcome. Every 1mL increase in volume increases mortality by 5%.

Exam Tip: Lobar ICH in elderly without hypertension suggests cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) - presents with recurrent lobar bleeds and associated dementia.

Clinical Pearl: The "spot sign" on CT angiography (contrast extravasation into haematoma) predicts haematoma expansion with 91% specificity.

Pitfall Warning: Do NOT attribute altered consciousness to "stroke" alone - check for hydrocephalus, midline shift, or herniation requiring urgent intervention.

Mnemonic: ICH Score components: GCS, Age, Volume, IVH, Infratentorial - each scores 0-1 (age/volume/GCS can score 2).

Why This Matters Clinically

ICH is the deadliest stroke subtype with limited treatment options. Early aggressive blood pressure control and anticoagulant reversal are the only proven interventions to reduce haematoma expansion. Neurosurgical decompression is life-saving for posterior fossa bleeds. For examinations, ICH tests knowledge of stroke classification, BP management evidence, reversal agents, and prognostic scoring. Medico-legally, failure to reverse anticoagulation rapidly or delayed neurosurgical referral for posterior fossa bleeds are significant issues. [3,4]


2. Epidemiology

Incidence & Prevalence

  • Incidence: 10-30 per 100,000 population per year (varies by region) [PMID: 20413592]
  • Proportion of stroke: 10-15% of all strokes (higher in Asian populations: 20-30%)
  • Trend: Increasing due to aging population and anticoagulant use
  • Geographic variation: Higher in East Asia (Japan, China) - 2-3x Western rates
  • Seasonal variation: Higher incidence in winter months (BP fluctuation)
  • Economic burden: Higher than ischaemic stroke due to severe disability

Demographics

FactorDetailsClinical Significance
AgeIncidence doubles each decade >55 yearsMedian age 65-70 years
SexMale:Female ~1.3:1Males have higher incidence
Ethnicity2x higher in Black and Asian populationsGenetic and BP control factors
HypertensionPresent in 70-80% of ICH patientsMost important modifiable risk
Anticoagulation12-20% of ICH is anticoagulant-relatedRising with DOAC prescribing
SocioeconomicHigher in lower socioeconomic groupsAccess to healthcare, BP control

Risk Factors

Non-Modifiable Risk Factors:

FactorRelative Risk (95% CI)Mechanism
Age >55 yearsRR 2.0 per decadeArteriopathy, amyloid deposition
Male sexRR 1.3 (1.1-1.6)Hormonal, lifestyle factors
Black ethnicityRR 2.0-2.5Higher BP, genetic factors
Asian ethnicityRR 1.5-2.0Genetic, dietary factors
Prior ICHRR 2.1 (1.5-3.0)Underlying arteriopathy persists
Family history strokeRR 1.5 (1.2-1.9)Genetic predisposition

Modifiable Risk Factors:

Risk FactorRelative Risk (95% CI)Evidence LevelIntervention Impact
HypertensionRR 3-5Level 1aBP control reduces risk 50%
Anticoagulation (warfarin)RR 5-10Level 1bINR monitoring critical
DOACsRR 0.5 vs warfarin for ICHLevel 1aLower ICH risk than warfarin
Antiplatelet therapyRR 1.5-2.0Level 1bSmaller effect than anticoagulants
Heavy alcohol (>2 drinks/day)RR 2.0-4.0Level 2aAbstinence reduces risk
Cocaine/amphetaminesRR 5-10Level 2bAcute hypertensive crisis
SmokingRR 1.5 (1.2-1.8)Level 2aCessation reduces risk
Low cholesterolRR 1.2-1.5Level 2bControversial; benefit of statins outweighs

3. Pathophysiology

Mechanism

Step 1: Vascular Pathology Development (Years)

  • Hypertensive arteriopathy: Chronic hypertension causes lipohyalinosis and fibrinoid necrosis of small penetrating arteries (lenticulostriate, thalamoperforating)
  • Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA): Beta-amyloid deposition in cortical and leptomeningeal vessel walls causing fragility
  • Microaneurysm formation: Charcot-Bouchard aneurysms develop at bifurcation points
  • Vessel wall weakening: Progressive structural damage predisposes to rupture

Step 2: Vessel Rupture (Seconds)

  • Initiating event: Acute BP surge or minor trauma in weakened vessel
  • Arterial bleeding: High-pressure arterial blood extravasates into brain parenchyma
  • Initial haematoma: Blood dissects along white matter tracts, path of least resistance
  • Mass effect begins: Immediate compression of adjacent brain tissue

Step 3: Haematoma Expansion (Minutes to Hours)

  • Active bleeding continues: 30-40% of haematomas expand in first 24 hours, mostly within 6 hours
  • Multiple bleeding points: Satellite haemorrhages develop around primary bleed
  • Coagulopathy contribution: Anticoagulation prevents clot formation, allows expansion
  • Volume increase: Each 10% volume increase associated with 5% mortality increase

Step 4: Secondary Brain Injury (Hours to Days)

  • Mass effect: Rising ICP, midline shift, herniation risk
  • Perihematomal oedema: Cytotoxic and vasogenic oedema peaks at 3-7 days
  • Blood breakdown products: Iron, haemoglobin degradation causes oxidative damage
  • Inflammation: Microglial activation, cytokine release, BBB disruption
  • Neuronal death: Combination of mechanical damage, ischaemia, and neurotoxicity

Step 5: Resolution or Progression (Days to Weeks)

  • Clot organisation: Macrophage infiltration begins clearing haematoma
  • Cavity formation: Residual hemosiderin-lined cavity in chronic phase
  • Functional recovery: Depends on location, volume, and perilesional plasticity
  • Complications: Hydrocephalus (from IVH), seizures, infections

Classification

By Aetiology:

TypePrevalenceKey Features
Primary - Hypertensive50-70%Deep structures (basal ganglia, thalamus, pons), associated with chronic HTN
Primary - CAA20-30%Lobar location, elderly, recurrent, associated dementia
Secondary - Vascular malformation5-10%AVM, cavernoma, aneurysm, younger patients
Secondary - Tumour2-5%Metastases (melanoma, RCC, lung), primary brain tumours
Secondary - Coagulopathy5-10%Anticoagulation, thrombocytopenia, DIC
Secondary - Drug-related2-5%Cocaine, amphetamines, sympathomimetics
Secondary - Venous1-2%Cerebral venous thrombosis with haemorrhagic conversion

By Location:

LocationProportionTypical AetiologyClinical Features
Basal ganglia/Putamen35-50%HypertensionContralateral hemiparesis, sensory loss
Thalamus10-15%HypertensionSensory loss, vertical gaze palsy, small pupil
Lobar20-35%CAA, tumour, AVMDepends on lobe; headache prominent
Cerebellum5-10%HypertensionAtaxia, vertigo, rapid deterioration
Brainstem/Pons5-10%HypertensionQuadriparesis, coma, poor prognosis

4. Clinical Presentation

Symptoms

Cardinal Symptoms (Onset):

SymptomFrequencyCharacteristics
Headache40-50%Sudden, severe ("worst headache"); more common than ischaemic stroke
Focal weakness70-80%Contralateral hemiparesis; face, arm, leg
Speech disturbance30-40%Dysarthria or aphasia depending on location
Visual disturbance20-30%Hemianopia, gaze deviation toward lesion
Altered consciousness30-50%Drowsiness to coma; correlates with volume/IVH
Vomiting40-50%Due to raised ICP; more common than ischaemic stroke
Seizures10-15%At onset or within first 24 hours

Differentiating Features from Ischaemic Stroke:

Red Flags

Red FlagSignificanceImmediate Action
Decreasing GCSHaematoma expansion, raised ICP, herniationRepeat CT, neurosurgery review
Cushing's triadCritically raised ICPOsmotherapy, emergency decompression
Fixed dilated pupilUncal herniationEmergency neurosurgery
Bilateral fixed pupilsBrainstem compressionUsually terminal
Anticoagulated patientRisk of ongoing bleedingImmediate reversal protocol
Posterior fossa signsRisk of rapid deterioration and hydrocephalusUrgent neurosurgery

More likely to have headache at onset (40-50% vs 15-20%)
Common presentation.
More likely to have vomiting (40-50% vs 10-15%)
Common presentation.
More likely to have decreased consciousness at presentation
Common presentation.
Progressive neurological deterioration (haematoma expansion)
Common presentation.
Cannot reliably distinguish clinically - imaging mandatory
Common presentation.
5. Clinical Examination

Examination Approach

Structured Neurological Examination:

  1. General observation: GCS, posturing, pupil size/reactivity
  2. Eye movements: Gaze deviation (toward lesion), vertical gaze palsy (thalamic)
  3. Motor examination: Hemiparesis pattern, pronator drift
  4. Sensory examination: If patient conscious
  5. Cerebellar signs: Ataxia (cerebellar ICH)
  6. Signs of raised ICP: Papilloedema, Cushing's response

Key Examination Findings

FindingInterpretationLocation Indication
Gaze deviation toward lesionFrontal eye field involvementSupratentorial
Wrong-way eyesGaze away from lesionThalamic haemorrhage
Vertical gaze palsyMidbrain/thalamic involvementThalamic ICH
Pinpoint pupilsPontine haemorrhageBrainstem
Ipsilateral dilated pupilUncal herniationLarge supratentorial with mass effect
Bilateral dilated fixedSevere brainstem involvementTerminal sign
Contralateral hemiparesisMotor pathway involvementAny supratentorial location
QuadriparesisBilateral or brainstem involvementPontine ICH
Ataxia + vertigoCerebellar involvementCerebellar ICH

Detailed Examination by Location

Putaminal/Basal Ganglia ICH:

  • Contralateral hemiparesis (face, arm, leg)
  • Conjugate gaze deviation toward the lesion (away from hemiparesis)
  • Contralateral hemisensory loss
  • Homonymous hemianopia (if extends posteriorly)
  • Dysarthria
  • Large lesions: Decreased consciousness, transtentorial herniation signs

Thalamic ICH:

  • Contralateral hemisensory loss (prominent feature)
  • Contralateral hemiparesis (milder than sensory findings)
  • Downgaze palsy ("setting sun" appearance)
  • Small reactive pupils (miosis)
  • Wrong-way eyes (gaze toward hemiparesis - unique feature)
  • Extension into third ventricle common → hydrocephalus

Lobar ICH:

  • Deficits depend on lobe affected:
    • Frontal: Contralateral leg weakness, personality change, expressive aphasia (dominant)
    • Parietal: Contralateral sensory loss, neglect (non-dominant), receptive aphasia (dominant)
    • Temporal: Wernicke's aphasia (dominant), memory impairment
    • Occipital: Contralateral homonymous hemianopia
  • Headache often prominent
  • Seizures more common (cortical involvement)

Cerebellar ICH:

  • Acute onset vertigo, vomiting, headache
  • Truncal ataxia, dysmetria
  • Gaze palsies (sixth nerve, horizontal gaze)
  • Neck stiffness (irritation of meninges)
  • CRITICAL: Can deteriorate rapidly
  • Fourth ventricle compression → hydrocephalus
  • Brainstem compression signs: Decreasing GCS, posturing

Pontine ICH:

  • Quadriparesis (bilateral motor involvement)
  • Bilateral pinpoint pupils (sympathetic pathway disruption)
  • Internuclear ophthalmoplegia
  • Ocular bobbing
  • Hyperthermia
  • Decerebrate/decorticate posturing
  • Coma
  • Very poor prognosis

Glasgow Coma Scale Assessment

GCS Components (Total 3-15):

ComponentResponseScore
Eye OpeningSpontaneous4
To voice3
To pain2
None1
Verbal ResponseOriented5
Confused4
Inappropriate words3
Incomprehensible sounds2
None1
Motor ResponseObeys commands6
Localises pain5
Withdraws from pain4
Abnormal flexion (decorticate)3
Extension (decerebrate)2
None1

GCS Interpretation in ICH:

  • GCS 13-15: Mild impairment - may deteriorate
  • GCS 9-12: Moderate impairment - close monitoring
  • GCS 3-8: Severe - consider intubation, ICU
  • Trend more important than single value
  • Motor score most predictive of outcome

Pupillary Assessment

Systematic Pupil Examination:

  1. Size (measure in mm)
  2. Shape (round, irregular, ovoid)
  3. Reactivity to light (direct and consensual)
  4. Symmetry (compare both sides)

Pupillary Signs by Location:

Pupil FindingLesion LocationMechanism
Unilateral fixed dilatedIpsilateral third nerve (uncal herniation)CN III compression
Bilateral pinpointPons (pontine ICH)Sympathetic pathway disruption
Small reactiveThalamusHorner's-like (ipsilateral)
Bilateral mid-fixedMidbrain (tectal)Aqueduct/tectal compression
Bilateral dilated fixedSevere bilateral or terminalComplete loss of function

Herniation Syndromes

Types of Herniation:

TypeMechanismClinical Signs
Uncal (transtentorial)Temporal lobe through tentoriumIpsilateral pupil dilation, contralateral hemiparesis, then bilateral signs
Central (transtentorial)Diencephalon through tentoriumBilateral pupil changes, bilateral posturing, Cushing's triad
SubfalcineCingulate gyrus under falxContralateral leg weakness (ACA territory)
TonsillarCerebellar tonsils through foramen magnumSudden respiratory arrest, neck stiffness
UpwardCerebellum through tentorial notchMidbrain signs, bilateral pupil dilation

Cushing's Triad (Late Sign of Raised ICP):

  1. Hypertension (widened pulse pressure)
  2. Bradycardia
  3. Irregular/agonal respiration
  • Indicates impending brainstem herniation
  • Emergency intervention required

6. Investigations

Laboratory Investigations

InvestigationKey FindingsClinical Significance
FBCPlatelet countThrombocytopenia increases bleeding risk
CoagulationPT/INR, APTTIdentify anticoagulation, guide reversal
U&EBaseline renal functionFor contrast, osmotherapy
GlucoseHypo/hyperglycaemiaAffects outcome, requires treatment
TroponinCardiac injuryStress cardiomyopathy common
ToxicologyCocaine, amphetaminesYoung patient with unexplained ICH

Comprehensive Blood Panel:

TestRationaleAction if Abnormal
Full blood countAnaemia, thrombocytopeniaTransfuse if indicated
PT/INRWarfarin monitoringReverse with PCC + Vitamin K
APTTHeparin effectProtamine if on heparin
FibrinogenCoagulopathy assessmentCryoprecipitate if <1.5g/L
Thrombin timeDOAC detectionSuggests dabigatran if prolonged
Anti-Xa levelQuantify Xa inhibitorGuide andexanet dosing
CreatinineRenal functionCaution with contrast, osmotherapy
ElectrolytesSodium for osmotherapy monitoringTarget sodium 145-155 if using HTS
GlucoseGlycaemic controlTarget 6-10 mmol/L
Liver functionSynthetic functionMay affect coagulation factor production
TroponinCardiac injuryECG, cardiology if elevated
LactateShock, hypoperfusionIndicates severity
Arterial blood gasOxygenation, pH, CO2Guide ventilation

Point-of-Care Testing:

  • Thromboelastography (TEG) or ROTEM: Real-time coagulation assessment in massive haemorrhage
  • INR point-of-care: Rapid warfarin reversal guidance
  • i-STAT: Rapid haemoglobin, electrolytes, gases

Imaging

CT Head (Non-contrast) - FIRST LINE:

  • Hyperdense (white) lesion in acute phase
  • Assess location, volume, midline shift
  • Intraventricular extension (IVH)
  • Hydrocephalus
  • Volume calculation: ABC/2 method (A x B x C / 2 in cm = mL)

CT Interpretation Details:

FindingDescriptionSignificance
Hyperdensity60-90 HU in acute phaseFresh blood
LocationDeep vs lobarSuggests aetiology
VolumeABC/2 formula>30mL associated with poor outcome
ShapeRound vs irregularIrregular suggests expansion
Surrounding hypodensityOedemaPeaks 3-7 days
Midline shift>5mm concerningMay need surgery
IVHBlood in ventriclesAdds 1 point to ICH score
HydrocephalusDilated ventriclesMay need EVD
Mass effectEffacement of sulci, cisternsIndicates raised ICP

Volume Calculation (ABC/2 Method):

  • A = Maximum haematoma diameter on largest slice (cm)
  • B = Diameter perpendicular to A on same slice (cm)
  • C = Number of CT slices with blood × slice thickness (cm)
    • (Count slices where blood is >50% of largest area)
  • Volume (mL) = A × B × C ÷ 2
  • Example: A=4cm, B=3cm, C=4cm → Volume = 24mL

CT Angiography:

  • "Spot sign" - contrast extravasation predicting expansion
  • Identify underlying vascular lesion (AVM, aneurysm)
  • Venous imaging if CVT suspected

Spot Sign Details:

  • Definition: Focal enhancement within haematoma on CTA source images
  • Sensitivity 51%, Specificity 85% for haematoma expansion
  • Associated with:
    • 3x increased risk of haematoma expansion
    • 2x increased mortality
    • 6x increased risk of poor outcome
  • Multiple spot signs indicate higher risk
  • Used in clinical trial selection for haemostatic agents

When to Perform CTA:

  • All patients with ICH (to detect spot sign and underlying lesion)
  • Especially if:
    • Lobar location
    • No history of hypertension
    • Age <45 years
    • Unusual location
    • SAH component

MRI Brain:

  • More sensitive for underlying lesion (tumour, cavernoma)
  • Gradient echo (GRE) or SWI shows microbleeds (CAA marker)
  • Not first-line in acute setting

MRI Sequences and Findings:

SequenceAcute (<12h)Subacute (2-14d)Chronic (>14d)
T1IsointenseHyperintense (peripheral then central)Hypointense
T2Hypointense (rim)HyperintenseHypointense (hemosiderin rim)
FLAIRVariableHyperintenseVariable
GRE/SWIHypointense (bloom)HypointenseHypointense (hemosiderin)
DWIVariableHyperintense ringVariable

Microbleed Pattern (SWI/GRE) and Aetiology:

  • Strictly lobar: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (Boston criteria)
  • Deep/infratentorial: Hypertensive arteriopathy
  • Mixed: Either or both pathologies
  • Lobar microbleeds predict future lobar ICH recurrence

Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA):

  • Gold standard for vascular malformations
  • Indications:
    • CTA/MRA negative but high clinical suspicion
    • Young patient with lobar ICH
    • Unusual location or multiple haemorrhages
    • Planning for intervention
  • Can perform embolisation if AVM/aneurysm identified

Prognostic Scoring

ICH Score (Hemphill):

ComponentCriteriaPoints
GCS 3-4Yes2
GCS 5-12Yes1
GCS 13-15Yes0
ICH volume ≥30mLYes1
IVH presentYes1
Infratentorial originYes1
Age ≥80 yearsYes1
Total0-6

30-Day Mortality by ICH Score:

  • Score 0: 0%
  • Score 1: 13%
  • Score 2: 26%
  • Score 3: 72%
  • Score 4: 97%
  • Score 5-6: 100%

Other Prognostic Scores:

ScoreComponentsUse
FUNC ScoreAge, ICH volume, location, GCS, pre-ICH cognitive impairmentPredicts functional independence at 90 days
ICH-GSGCS, volume, IVH, hydrocephalusPredicts 30-day mortality
max-ICHAge, NIHSS, IVH, blood glucoseMortality prediction
BRAIN ScoreICH volume, age, GCS, glucoseFunctional outcome

FUNC Score for Functional Independence:

ComponentCriteriaPoints
ICH volume<30mL4
30-60mL2
>60mL0
Age<702
70-791
≥800
LocationLobar2
Deep1
Infratentorial0
GCS≥92
<90
Pre-ICH cognitive impairmentNo1
Yes0
Total0-11

FUNC Score Interpretation:

  • Score 0-4: 0% chance of functional independence
  • Score 5-7: 1-13%
  • Score 8-10: 29-82%
  • Score 11: 82-100%

7. Management

Management Algorithm

           SUSPECTED ICH Presentation
                    ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│         IMMEDIATE ACTIONS               │
│  - ABC assessment, GCS monitoring       │
│  - IV access, bloods (FBC, coag, G&S)   │
│  - Urgent CT head within 1 hour         │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                    ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│         ICH CONFIRMED ON CT             │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ → Blood pressure control immediately    │
│ → Reverse anticoagulation if applicable │
│ → Neurosurgery referral                 │
│ → ICU/HASU admission                    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                    ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│       BLOOD PRESSURE MANAGEMENT         │
│  Target SBP 130-140 mmHg within 1 hour  │
│  IV labetalol or nicardipine infusion   │
│  Avoid rapid drops and hypotension      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                    ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│      ANTICOAGULATION REVERSAL           │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Warfarin: IV Vit K + PCC (target INR&lt;1.5│
│ Dabigatran: Idarucizumab 5g IV          │
│ Xa inhibitors: Andexanet or PCC         │
│ Heparin: Protamine sulfate              │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                    ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│       NEUROSURGICAL DECISION            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Cerebellar ICH >3cm: SURGERY            │
│ Hydrocephalus: EVD                      │
│ Lobar ICH &lt;1cm from surface: Consider   │
│ Deep ICH: Usually conservative          │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
                    ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│         ONGOING MANAGEMENT              │
│  - Neurocritical care monitoring        │
│  - ICP management if required           │
│  - DVT prophylaxis (timing considered)  │
│  - Rehabilitation planning              │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Medical Management

Blood Pressure Control:

  • Target: SBP 130-140 mmHg within 1 hour (INTERACT2 evidence)
  • First-line: IV labetalol 10-20mg bolus, then infusion
  • Alternative: IV nicardipine 5mg/hr, titrate by 2.5mg/hr
  • Avoid: Rapid BP drops (>60mmHg/hr), hypotension (SBP <110)
  • Duration: Maintain for at least 7 days

Antihypertensive Drug Details:

DrugClassDoseOnsetAdvantagesDisadvantages
LabetalolAlpha/beta blocker10-20mg bolus, then 1-2mg/min5-10 minWidely available, titratableBradycardia, bronchoconstriction
NicardipineCCB (dihydropyridine)5mg/hr, titrate 2.5mg/hr q5-15min5-15 minNo reflex tachycardiaRequires infusion pump
ClevidipineCCB (ultrashort)1-2mg/hr, double q90sec2-4 minRapid offset, precise controlLipid emulsion formulation
GTNNitrate5-100mcg/min1-2 minRapid onsetICP concern (venodilator)
Sodium nitroprussideDirect vasodilator0.5-10mcg/kg/minImmediatePowerfulCyanide toxicity, ICP concern
HydralazineDirect vasodilator10-20mg IV q4-6h10-20 minAlternative if others unavailableReflex tachycardia, unpredictable

BP Monitoring Protocol:

  • Arterial line placement recommended for continuous monitoring
  • Target SBP 130-140 mmHg (not <130 per ATACH-2)
  • Avoid MAP <70 mmHg (risk of cerebral hypoperfusion)
  • Reassess if patient deteriorates neurologically
  • Continue intensive BP management for 7 days minimum

Anticoagulation Reversal:

AnticoagulantReversal AgentDoseTarget
WarfarinIV Vitamin K + 4-factor PCCVit K 10mg IV + PCC 25-50 u/kgINR <1.5 in 4 hours
DabigatranIdarucizumab5g IVComplete reversal
Rivaroxaban/ApixabanAndexanet alfa OR PCCAndexanet or PCC 50 u/kgStop anticoagulant effect
HeparinProtamine sulfate1mg per 100 units heparinNormalise APTT
LMWHProtamine (partial)1mg per 1mg enoxaparin60% reversal

Warfarin Reversal Protocol:

  1. Stop warfarin immediately
  2. IV Vitamin K 10mg (slow infusion over 10-20 minutes)
  3. 4-factor PCC: Dose based on INR and weight
    • INR 2-4: 25 units/kg
    • INR 4-6: 35 units/kg
    • INR >6: 50 units/kg
  4. Recheck INR at 30 minutes and 4 hours
  5. Target INR <1.5
  6. FFP only if PCC unavailable (slower, volume overload risk)

DOAC Reversal Protocol:

  • Dabigatran: Idarucizumab 5g IV (two 2.5g vials)
    • Immediate reversal, lasts 24 hours
    • Can redose if needed
  • Factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban):
    • Andexanet alfa (if available): High-dose or low-dose based on time since last dose and specific drug
    • 4-factor PCC 50 units/kg if andexanet unavailable
    • No specific reversal agent for all Xa inhibitors

General Supportive Care:

  • Head of bed 30° elevation
  • Avoid hyperthermia (target normothermia)
  • Glycaemic control (target glucose 6-10 mmol/L)
  • Seizure management if seizures occur (no prophylactic anticonvulsants routinely)
  • DVT prophylaxis (IPC immediately, pharmacological 24-48 hours if stable)
  • Nutrition assessment and support
  • Stress ulcer prophylaxis if ventilated

Surgical Management

Indications for Surgery:

  • Cerebellar haemorrhage >3cm diameter or causing brainstem compression
  • Cerebellar haemorrhage with hydrocephalus
  • Lobar ICH >30mL and <1cm from cortical surface with deterioration
  • Hydrocephalus requiring EVD

Surgical Options:

  • Craniotomy and haematoma evacuation
  • Minimally invasive surgery (endoscopic, stereotactic)
  • EVD for hydrocephalus
  • Decompressive craniectomy (limited evidence)

Craniotomy Technique:

  • Open surgical evacuation via bone flap
  • Best for accessible lobar haematomas
  • Allows direct visualisation and haemostasis
  • Higher morbidity than minimally invasive approaches
  • Evidence: STICH I and II showed no overall benefit vs conservative

Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS):

  • Stereotactic aspiration with thrombolysis (rtPA)
  • Endoscopic evacuation
  • Smaller incision, less tissue disruption
  • May improve outcomes (MISTIE III showed trend to benefit)
  • Emerging as preferred technique in selected patients

EVD Placement:

  • Indication: Obstructive hydrocephalus from IVH
  • Usually Kocher's point (frontal) approach
  • Allows CSF drainage and ICP monitoring
  • Intraventricular thrombolysis (rtPA) can be given to clear IVH
  • Risk: Ventriculitis (5-10%), haemorrhage

Decision Algorithm for Surgery:

ScenarioRecommendation
Cerebellar ICH >3cm, deterioratingEmergency craniotomy
Cerebellar ICH with hydrocephalusEVD +/- craniotomy
Lobar ICH <1cm from surface, deterioratingConsider craniotomy
Deep basal ganglia ICHUsually conservative
Pontine ICHConservative (surgery not beneficial)
IVH with hydrocephalusEVD +/- intraventricular thrombolysis

8. Complications

Immediate Complications (0-24 hours)

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Haematoma expansion30-40%BP control, reversal, INTERACT2
Raised ICP/herniation20-30%Osmotherapy, surgery
Hydrocephalus15-20% (with IVH)EVD
Seizures10-15%Antiepileptics if occur
Aspiration20-30%Swallow assessment, NBM

Early Complications (1-7 days)

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Perihematomal oedemaPeak 3-7 daysMonitor, osmotherapy if severe
Hospital-acquired pneumonia20-30%Aspiration precautions
DVT/PE10-20%Prophylaxis timing controversial
Fever30-40%Antipyretics, infection screen

Late Complications

ComplicationIncidenceManagement
Post-stroke epilepsy5-10%Long-term AEDs
Depression30-50%Screening, treatment
Recurrent ICH2-4% per yearBP control, avoid anticoagulation
Cognitive impairment50%+Rehabilitation, support

9. Prognosis & Outcomes

Mortality

  • 30-day mortality: 40% (range 30-50%)
  • 1-year mortality: 54%
  • Factors: Volume, GCS, IVH, age, location

Functional Outcomes

  • Independent at 6 months (mRS 0-2): 20%
  • Dependent (mRS 3-5): 40%
  • Dead: 40%

Predictors of Poor Outcome

  • Large haematoma volume (>30mL)
  • Low GCS at presentation
  • Intraventricular extension
  • Infratentorial location
  • Older age
  • Anticoagulation-related ICH
  • Haematoma expansion

10. Evidence & Guidelines

Key Guidelines

AHA/ASA Guidelines (2022):

  • Target SBP 130-140 mmHg (Class IIa, Level B)
  • Rapid reversal of anticoagulation (Class I, Level C)
  • Cerebellar haematoma >3cm: surgical evacuation (Class I)
  • VTE prophylaxis with IPC immediately, pharmacological 1-4 days

NICE Guidelines (2022):

  • Immediate BP lowering for SBP 150-220 mmHg
  • Imaging within 1 hour of presentation
  • Admission to stroke unit
  • Reverse anticoagulation urgently

Landmark Trials

INTERACT2 (2013):

  • Population: n=2,839, ICH within 6 hours
  • Intervention: Intensive BP lowering (SBP <140) vs guideline (<180)
  • Result: Trend to reduced death/disability (OR 0.87); improved functional outcomes
  • Impact: Changed practice to target SBP 130-140 mmHg
  • PMID: 23713578

ATACH-2 (2016):

  • Population: n=1,000, ICH with SBP >180
  • Intervention: SBP 110-139 vs 140-179 mmHg
  • Result: No difference in outcome; more renal AE in intensive arm
  • Impact: Avoid target SBP <130 mmHg
  • PMID: 27276234

STICH I (2005) and STICH II (2013):

  • Population: Supratentorial ICH
  • Intervention: Early surgery vs initial conservative
  • Result: No overall benefit from early surgery
  • Impact: Surgery reserved for specific indications
  • PMID: 15680007 / PMID: 23245604

11. Patient/Layperson Explanation

Explanation

"You have had a bleed inside your brain, called an intracerebral haemorrhage. This happens when a blood vessel in the brain bursts and blood spills into the brain tissue. The most common cause is high blood pressure over many years, which weakens the small blood vessels. The blood pressing on the brain causes the symptoms you are experiencing like weakness on one side or difficulty speaking. We need to control your blood pressure very carefully to try to stop the bleeding getting bigger. If you were on blood thinners, we need to reverse those quickly. Some people need an operation if the bleed is in a dangerous location or causing too much pressure. The first few days are critical because the bleeding can get worse. Recovery takes many months and involves rehabilitation to regain as much function as possible."


12. References
  1. van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, et al. Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(2):167-176. PMID: 20056489

  2. Qureshi AI, Mendelow AD, Hanley DF. Intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet. 2009;373(9675):1632-1644. PMID: 19427958

  3. Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2015;46(7):2032-2060. PMID: 26022637

  4. Greenberg SM, Ziai WC, Cordonnier C, et al. 2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2022;53(7):e282-e361. PMID: 35579034

  5. Anderson CS, Heeley E, Huang Y, et al. Rapid blood-pressure lowering in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(25):2355-2365. PMID: 23713578

  6. Qureshi AI, Palesch YY, Barsan WG, et al. Intensive Blood-Pressure Lowering in Patients with Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(11):1033-1043. PMID: 27276234

  7. Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Fernandes HM, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas (STICH). Lancet. 2005;365(9457):387-397. PMID: 15680007

  8. Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Rowan EN, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II). Lancet. 2013;382(9890):397-408. PMID: 23726393

  9. Hemphill JC 3rd, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, et al. The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32(4):891-897. PMID: 11283388

  10. Goldstein JN, Fazen LE, Snider R, et al. Contrast extravasation on CT angiography predicts hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2007;68(12):889-894. PMID: 17372123

  11. Pollack CV Jr, Reilly PA, van Ryn J, et al. Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal - Full Cohort Analysis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(5):431-441. PMID: 28693366

  12. Connolly SJ, Crowther M, Eikelboom JW, et al. Full Study Report of Andexanet Alfa for Bleeding Associated with Factor Xa Inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(14):1326-1335. PMID: 30730782

  13. Viswanathan A, Greenberg SM. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy in the elderly. Ann Neurol. 2011;70(6):871-880. PMID: 22190361

  14. Davis SM, Broderick J, Hennerici M, et al. Hematoma growth is a determinant of mortality and poor outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006;66(8):1175-1181. PMID: 16636233

  15. Steiner T, Al-Shahi Salman R, Beer R, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(7):840-855. PMID: 25156220

  16. Frontera JA, Lewin JJ 3rd, Rabinstein AA, et al. Guideline for Reversal of Antithrombotics in Intracranial Hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24(1):6-46. PMID: 26714677

  17. Sprigg N, Flaherty K, Appleton JP, et al. Tranexamic acid for hyperacute primary IntraCerebral Haemorrhage (TICH-2). Lancet. 2018;391(10135):2107-2115. PMID: 29778325

  18. Al-Shahi Salman R, Frantzias J, Lee RJ, et al. Absolute risk and predictors of the growth of acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. Brain. 2018;141(10):2857-2865. PMID: 30192917


13. Examination Focus

Common Exam Questions

Questions that frequently appear in examinations:

  1. MRCP Part 1: "A 72-year-old man on warfarin (INR 3.8) presents with sudden left-sided weakness and headache. CT shows right basal ganglia haemorrhage. What is the most appropriate reversal strategy?"

  2. MRCP Part 2/PACES: "Describe the ICH score and how it predicts mortality."

  3. FRCS Neurosurgery: "What are the indications for surgical intervention in spontaneous ICH?"

  4. Emergency Medicine: "A patient with cerebellar haemorrhage is deteriorating rapidly. Describe your immediate management."

  5. Viva: "Compare the evidence for blood pressure targets in acute ICH - discuss INTERACT2 and ATACH-2."

Viva Points

Opening Statement:

"Intracerebral haemorrhage accounts for 10-15% of strokes but has the highest mortality at 40% at 30 days. It is classified as primary (hypertensive or CAA) or secondary (vascular malformation, tumour, anticoagulation). Management priorities are BP control to target 130-140 mmHg within 1 hour (INTERACT2 evidence), anticoagulation reversal, and neurosurgical evaluation - with cerebellar ICH >3cm being an indication for emergency surgery."

Key Facts to Mention:

  • Mortality 40% at 30 days; only 20% functionally independent at 6 months
  • ICH Score predicts mortality (GCS, volume, IVH, infratentorial, age)
  • Haematoma expansion occurs in 30-40% within 24 hours
  • BP target: SBP 130-140 mmHg (not <130 - ATACH-2)
  • Spot sign on CTA predicts expansion

Classification to Quote:

  • "Primary ICH includes hypertensive (deep, basal ganglia) and CAA (lobar, elderly)"
  • "ICH Score: 0-6 points; score of 3 = 72% 30-day mortality"

Evidence to Cite:

  • "INTERACT2 showed intensive BP lowering (target <140) improved functional outcomes"
  • "ATACH-2 showed no benefit and potential harm from targeting SBP <130"
  • "STICH trials showed no overall benefit from early surgery for supratentorial ICH"

Common Mistakes

What fails candidates:

  • ❌ Not knowing BP targets (too high or too low)
  • ❌ Forgetting reversal agents for specific anticoagulants
  • ❌ Not knowing surgical indications (especially cerebellar >3cm)
  • ❌ Confusing ICH with SAH management
  • ❌ Not knowing ICH score components

Dangerous Errors to Avoid:

  • ⚠️ Delaying anticoagulant reversal
  • ⚠️ Over-aggressive BP lowering (SBP <130)
  • ⚠️ Missing posterior fossa ICH needing urgent surgery
  • ⚠️ Attributing GCS drop to "stroke" without considering herniation

MCQ Practice Questions

Question 1: According to INTERACT2, what is the target systolic blood pressure for acute ICH? A. <120 mmHg B. 130-140 mmHg C. 140-160 mmHg D. <180 mmHg E. No BP lowering needed Answer: B - INTERACT2 showed improved functional outcomes with target SBP <140 mmHg within 1 hour. ATACH-2 showed harm with <130 mmHg.

Question 2: A 75-year-old on dabigatran presents with acute ICH. What is the specific reversal agent? A. Vitamin K B. Fresh frozen plasma C. Idarucizumab D. Protamine sulfate E. Tranexamic acid Answer: C - Idarucizumab (Praxbind) is the monoclonal antibody specific for dabigatran reversal. Dose is 5g IV.

Question 3: Which ICH location is most strongly associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy? A. Basal ganglia B. Thalamus C. Lobar (cortical) D. Pons E. Cerebellum Answer: C - CAA causes lobar haemorrhages due to amyloid deposition in cortical vessels. Recurrent lobar bleeds in elderly without hypertension is classic.

Question 4: An ICH patient has GCS 5, haematoma volume 45mL, IVH present, located in cerebellum, age 82. What is their ICH score? A. 3 B. 4 C. 5 D. 6 E. 7 Answer: C - GCS 5 (1 point), volume ≥30mL (1 point), IVH (1 point), infratentorial (1 point), age ≥80 (1 point) = 5 points. 30-day mortality approaches 100%.

Question 5: A patient with a 4cm cerebellar haemorrhage and decreasing GCS. What is the most appropriate next step? A. IV mannitol and observe B. Emergency surgical evacuation C. Repeat CT in 6 hours D. Start tranexamic acid E. Transfer to stroke unit Answer: B - Cerebellar haemorrhage >3cm with clinical deterioration is an indication for emergency surgical evacuation due to risk of brainstem compression.

OSCE Station Guidance

Station: Acute ICH Management (8 minutes)

Scenario: You are the medical registrar. A 68-year-old man on warfarin for AF presents with sudden severe headache and right-sided weakness. GCS 12, BP 195/110. CT confirms left basal ganglia ICH with INR 4.2.

Expected Actions:

  1. Recognise anticoagulant-related ICH requiring urgent reversal
  2. Order IV Vitamin K 10mg AND 4-factor PCC 25-50 units/kg
  3. State INR target <1.5 within 4 hours
  4. Lower BP to target SBP 130-140 (IV labetalol)
  5. Contact neurosurgery for review
  6. Explain need for repeat CT to monitor for expansion
  7. Discuss prognosis sensitively with family

Differential Diagnosis

Conditions Mimicking ICH:

ConditionDistinguishing FeaturesKey Investigation
Ischaemic strokeLess headache/vomiting, CT initially normal or hypodenseCT/MRI - no blood
Subarachnoid haemorrhageThunderclap headache, meningism, blood in subarachnoid spaceCT - basal cistern blood
Subdural haematomaCrescent-shaped collection, history of traumaCT - extra-axial blood
Epidural haematomaBiconvex shape, lucid interval historyCT - lens-shaped
Brain tumour with haemorrhageMay have preceding symptoms, ring enhancementMRI with contrast
Cerebral venous thrombosisHeadache, seizures, young women, postpartumCT/MR venography
Hypertensive encephalopathyPRES pattern on MRI, reversibleMRI - posterior white matter

Secondary Causes to Exclude:

CauseRed Flag FeaturesInvestigation
AVMYoung patient, lobar locationCT/MR angiography, DSA
CavernomaMultiple bleeds, family historyMRI with GRE/SWI
AneurysmSAH component, suprasellarCT angiography
TumourGradual symptoms, surrounding oedemaMRI with contrast
CoagulopathyKnown anticoagulation, liver diseaseCoagulation screen
Cocaine/amphetaminesYoung patient, drug historyToxicology screen

Special Populations

Anticoagulant-Related ICH:

  • Higher mortality (50-67% vs 35% for non-anticoagulated)
  • Larger haematomas, more expansion
  • Urgent reversal is critical intervention
  • Warfarin: INR-guided PCC + IV vitamin K
  • DOACs: Specific reversal agents available
  • Resume anticoagulation timing: individualised decision (often 4-8 weeks if high thrombotic risk)
  • Consider left atrial appendage occlusion for AF patients with prior ICH

Pregnancy and ICH:

  • Rare but devastating (incidence ~5-10 per 100,000 pregnancies)
  • Causes: Eclampsia, HELLP, AVM rupture, CVT
  • Management similar but multidisciplinary
  • Foetal monitoring essential
  • Delivery decision based on gestational age and maternal stability
  • Eclampsia: Magnesium sulfate, delivery

Elderly Patients:

  • Higher mortality at any given ICH score
  • More likely CAA-related (lobar)
  • Frailty and premorbid function important
  • Goals of care discussion critical
  • Avoid nihilistic approach - treatment still beneficial
  • Age alone not contraindication to intervention

Young Patients (<45 years):

  • Higher suspicion for secondary causes (AVM, aneurysm, coagulopathy)
  • Drug use (cocaine, amphetamines) common cause
  • Better recovery potential
  • More aggressive investigation warranted
  • Consider DSA if no cause on CTA

ICP Management

Indications for ICP Monitoring:

  • GCS ≤8 and concern for raised ICP
  • Intraventricular haemorrhage with hydrocephalus
  • Post-operative monitoring after evacuation

ICP Management Steps:

InterventionThresholdDetails
Head elevationICP any30° head-up, neutral position
SedationICP >20Propofol, midazolam
OsmotherapyICP >20Mannitol 0.5-1g/kg or hypertonic saline 23.4% 30mL
HyperventilationICP >25 emergencyTarget PaCO2 30-35 (temporary only)
CSF drainageICP >20 with EVDContinuous or intermittent drainage
Neuromuscular blockadeRefractoryParalysis reduces ICP
Decompressive surgeryRefractoryLast resort

Osmotherapy Comparison:

AgentDoseOnsetDurationConsiderations
Mannitol 20%0.5-1g/kg IV15-30 min2-6 hoursMay cause AKI, monitor osmolar gap
Hypertonic saline 23.4%30mL bolus5-10 min2-4 hoursRequires central line, check sodium
Hypertonic saline 3%250mL bolus15-30 min2-4 hoursCan use peripheral, less effective

Rehabilitation and Recovery

Acute Rehabilitation:

  • Swallow assessment within 24 hours
  • Physiotherapy and occupational therapy early
  • Speech therapy if dysphasia/dysarthria
  • Positioning to prevent contractures
  • DVT prophylaxis (IPC, then pharmacological when safe)

Long-term Rehabilitation:

  • Inpatient rehabilitation if potential for recovery
  • Community rehabilitation and support
  • Spasticity management (botox, baclofen)
  • Cognitive rehabilitation
  • Mood assessment and treatment
  • Return to work/driving assessment

Prognosis by Location:

LocationMortalityGood Recovery (mRS 0-2)Key Determinants
Putaminal30-40%25-35%Volume, IVH
Thalamic40-50%15-25%IVH common, hydrocephalus
Lobar25-35%30-40%Better if superficial
Cerebellar30-40%40-50%Surgery if >3cm
Pontine60-80%5-10%Very poor prognosis

Prevention

Secondary Prevention:

  • Blood pressure control (target <130/80 mmHg)
  • Avoid anticoagulation if possible (LAA occlusion for AF)
  • Reduce alcohol intake
  • Smoking cessation
  • Statin therapy (CAA concern theoretically but benefit outweighs)
  • Control modifiable risk factors

BP Target Post-ICH:

  • Long-term: SBP <130 mmHg (PROGRESS trial)
  • Reduces recurrence by 50-70%
  • All major guidelines recommend aggressive BP control

Ethical Considerations

Prognostication:

  • ICH score is guideline, not absolute
  • Early withdrawal of care may be self-fulfilling prophecy
  • Recommend aggressive early treatment for at least 24-48 hours
  • Involve palliative care early for comfort measures discussions
  • Family meetings crucial for shared decision-making

Goals of Care:

  • Discuss DNAR status appropriately
  • Consider premorbid function and patient wishes
  • Advance directive relevant if available
  • Time-limited trial of treatment reasonable approach
  • Avoid both therapeutic nihilism and futile intervention

Quality Indicators

Hospital Metrics:

  • Time to CT (<1 hour from presentation)
  • Time to anticoagulation reversal (<4 hours for INR <1.5)
  • BP control within 1 hour
  • Stroke unit admission rate
  • Neurosurgery referral for surgical indications
  • DVT prophylaxis within 24-48 hours
  • Swallow screen within 24 hours
  • Rehabilitation referral

Outcome Metrics:

  • 30-day mortality
  • 90-day functional outcome (mRS)
  • Length of stay
  • Discharge destination
  • Readmission rate
  • Recurrent ICH rate

Comparison with Other Stroke Types

FeatureICHIschaemic StrokeSAH
Proportion of stroke10-15%80-85%3-5%
Mortality (30-day)40%10-15%30-40%
Headache at onset40-50%15-20%90%+
Vomiting40-50%10-15%70%+
Decreased consciousness30-50%10-20%30-50%
CT appearance (acute)HyperdenseNormal/hypodenseSubarachnoid blood
Key treatmentBP control, reversalThrombolysis, thrombectomyAneurysm securing

Historical Perspective

Evolution of ICH Management:

  • 1960s-70s: Surgical evacuation primary treatment
  • 1980s: Medical management emerged
  • 1990s: Risk factor identification
  • 2000s: STICH trials changed surgical practice
  • 2010s: INTERACT changed BP management
  • 2020s: Focus on reversal agents, MIS

Key Historical Figures:

  • Charcot and Bouchard: Described microaneurysms (1868)
  • Cushing: Described Cushing response
  • Hemphill: Developed ICH score (2001)
  • Anderson: INTERACT trials changing BP targets

Future Directions

Research Areas:

  • Minimally invasive surgery (MISTIE, ENRICH trials)
  • Novel haemostatic agents
  • Neuroprotection strategies
  • Biomarkers for expansion prediction
  • Precision medicine approach
  • AI-assisted prognostication
  • Gene therapy for CAA

Emerging Therapies:

  • Tranexamic acid (TICH-2 negative, but role debated)
  • Deferoxamine (iron chelation, neuroprotection)
  • Anti-inflammatory agents
  • Stem cell therapy (experimental)
  • Blood pressure targets refinement

Extended MCQ Practice

Question 6: A 58-year-old man with no significant past medical history presents with sudden onset headache and left arm weakness. CT shows a 2cm lobar haemorrhage in the right parietal lobe. What investigation should be performed next? A. Lumbar puncture B. CT angiography C. Transthoracic echocardiogram D. 24-hour tape E. Carotid Doppler Answer: B - Young patient with lobar ICH and no hypertension needs investigation for secondary causes. CT angiography can identify AVM, aneurysm, or other vascular malformation.

Question 7: A 78-year-old woman with known AF on apixaban (last dose 6 hours ago) presents with acute ICH. What is the most appropriate reversal strategy? A. Vitamin K 10mg IV B. FFP 15mL/kg C. 4-factor PCC 25-50 units/kg D. Andexanet alfa E. Tranexamic acid Answer: D - Andexanet alfa is the specific reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, rivaroxaban). If unavailable, 4-factor PCC (C) is an alternative.

Question 8: Which of the following imaging findings is most predictive of haematoma expansion? A. Midline shift >5mm B. Intraventricular extension C. Spot sign on CT angiography D. Surrounding oedema E. Volume >30mL Answer: C - The "spot sign" represents active contrast extravasation into the haematoma and predicts expansion with 91% specificity. This has implications for prognosis and potential trial eligibility.

Question 9: A patient with a 4.5cm pontine haemorrhage is in coma with bilateral pinpoint pupils. The family asks about prognosis. What is the approximate 30-day mortality for this presentation? A. 10-20% B. 30-40% C. 50-60% D. 70-80% E. >90% Answer: D or E - Pontine haemorrhage has the worst prognosis of all ICH locations, with mortality 60-80% and functional independence extremely rare. Large volume with coma suggests prognosis at the worse end.

Question 10: A 65-year-old with ICH and IVH has decreasing consciousness. CT shows hydrocephalus. What is the most appropriate immediate intervention? A. IV mannitol B. External ventricular drain C. Decompressive craniectomy D. Lumbar puncture E. High-dose methylprednisolone Answer: B - Obstructive hydrocephalus from IVH requires CSF diversion. EVD allows drainage and ICP monitoring. Mannitol may help temporarily but doesn't address the obstruction.

Additional Viva Scenarios

Scenario 1: Young Patient with ICH

"A 32-year-old man presents with sudden severe headache and right-sided weakness. CT shows left frontal lobar haemorrhage. No history of hypertension. How do you approach this case?"

Model Answer:

  1. "This is atypical ICH - young patient, lobar location, no hypertension. I am suspicious of secondary cause."
  2. "Initial management: ABC, secure IV access, urgent bloods including toxicology screen"
  3. "Blood pressure control to <140 systolic"
  4. "Investigations for underlying cause: CT angiography urgently to look for AVM, aneurysm, or DAVF. Consider MRI with contrast for tumour."
  5. "If CTA negative and clinical suspicion high, would consider DSA (gold standard for vascular malformations)"
  6. "Ask about drug use - cocaine and amphetamines are important causes in young patients"
  7. "Discuss with neurosurgery for possible intervention if vascular malformation found"

Scenario 2: Posterior Fossa ICH

"A 70-year-old man with hypertension presents with acute onset vertigo, vomiting, and ataxia. CT shows a 3.5cm cerebellar haemorrhage with early hydrocephalus. GCS is 13. What is your management?"

Model Answer:

  1. "This is a surgical emergency. Cerebellar haemorrhage >3cm with hydrocephalus and neurological symptoms requires urgent intervention."
  2. "Immediate actions: Airway protection if GCS deteriorates, IV access, bloods"
  3. "Blood pressure control to SBP 130-140"
  4. "Urgent neurosurgical referral for posterior fossa decompression and haematoma evacuation"
  5. "May need EVD for hydrocephalus"
  6. "Close monitoring for deterioration - can deteriorate rapidly from brainstem compression"
  7. "Surgery is life-saving in this scenario - studies show improved outcomes vs conservative management"

Scenario 3: Anticoagulated Patient

"A 75-year-old woman on rivaroxaban for AF presents with acute left hemiparesis. CT confirms right basal ganglia ICH. Her CHA2DS2-VASc is 5. Discuss your management and long-term anticoagulation strategy."

Model Answer:

  1. "Anticoagulant-related ICH is a medical emergency with higher mortality"
  2. "Immediate: Andexanet alfa if available, otherwise 4-factor PCC 50 units/kg. Stop rivaroxaban."
  3. "Blood pressure control to 130-140 systolic"
  4. "Neurosurgery referral for consideration of intervention"
  5. "Long-term anticoagulation decision: Complex - high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc 5) but now history of ICH"
  6. "Options: Left atrial appendage occlusion (Watchman device), antiplatelet therapy alone, or cautious re-anticoagulation after 4-8 weeks with DOAC (lower ICH risk than warfarin)"
  7. "Multidisciplinary decision involving stroke, cardiology, and patient preferences"

Last Reviewed: 2025-12-27 | MedVellum Editorial Team


Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference. Clinical decisions should account for individual patient circumstances. Always consult appropriate specialists and current guidelines.

Last updated: 2025-12-27

At a Glance

EvidenceStandard
Last Updated2025-12-27

Red Flags

  • Decreasing GCS - indicates haematoma expansion or raised ICP
  • Cushing's triad (bradycardia, hypertension, irregular breathing)
  • Fixed dilated pupil - uncal herniation
  • New focal neurological deficit
  • Coagulopathy with ongoing bleeding
  • Anticoagulant-related ICH

Clinical Pearls

  • 3cm, hydrocephalus, herniation | Know surgical criteria |
  • **High-Yield Fact**: Haematoma volume is the strongest predictor of outcome. Every 1mL increase in volume increases mortality by 5%.
  • **Exam Tip**: Lobar ICH in elderly without hypertension suggests cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) - presents with recurrent lobar bleeds and associated dementia.
  • **Clinical Pearl**: The "spot sign" on CT angiography (contrast extravasation into haematoma) predicts haematoma expansion with 91% specificity.
  • **Pitfall Warning**: Do NOT attribute altered consciousness to "stroke" alone - check for hydrocephalus, midline shift, or herniation requiring urgent intervention.

Guidelines

  • NICE Guidelines
  • BTS Guidelines
  • RCUK Guidelines