Acute Heart Failure
Acute heart failure encompasses both new-onset heart failure and acute decompensation of chronic heart failure (ADHF), p... ACEM Primary Written, ACEM Fellowshi
Clinical board
A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.
Urgent signals
Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.
- Acute pulmonary oedema with hypoxia (SpO₂ below 90%)
- Cardiogenic shock (SBP below 90 mmHg, cool peripheries, altered mental status)
- Acute coronary syndrome as precipitant (STEMI, NSTEMI)
- Mechanical complications (VSD, acute MR, free wall rupture)
Exam focus
Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.
- ACEM Primary Written
- ACEM Fellowship Written
- ACEM Fellowship OSCE
Linked comparisons
Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.
- COPD Exacerbation
- Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Editorial and exam context
Topic family
This concept exists in multiple MedVellum libraries. Use the primary page for the broadest reference view and the others for exam-specific framing.
Key Facts The "Flash" Phenomenon : In hypertensive AHF, symptoms arise from fluid redistribution (sympathetic-mediated vasoconstriction) rather than total body volume overload. Time is Myocardium : Every hour of delay...
The clinical presentation is heterogenous but typically involves signs of fluid overload (congestion) and, in more severe cases, reduced cardiac output (peripheral hypoperfusion). Management is prioritized into three...
Acute heart failure encompasses both new-onset heart failure and acute decompensation of chronic heart failure (ADHF), p... ACEM Primary Written, ACEM Fellowshi
Quick Answer
One-liner: Acute heart failure (AHF) is the rapid onset or worsening of heart failure symptoms requiring urgent evaluation and treatment, with initial management focusing on oxygen, diuretics, vasodilators, and non-invasive ventilation.
Acute heart failure encompasses both new-onset heart failure and acute decompensation of chronic heart failure (ADHF), presenting with pulmonary and/or systemic congestion. In-hospital mortality is 3-5%, with 30-day mortality 10-15%. Immediate ED management prioritizes airway support (NIV for respiratory distress), early IV loop diuretics (within 60 minutes), vasodilators for hypertensive AHF, and identification of reversible precipitants (ACS, arrhythmia, infection). Cardiogenic shock requires inotropic support and urgent specialist consultation.
ACEM Exam Focus
Primary Exam Relevance
- Anatomy: Left ventricular anatomy, coronary circulation, pulmonary venous drainage, Frank-Starling mechanism
- Physiology: Cardiac output (CO = HR × SV), preload/afterload/contractility, neurohumoral activation (RAAS, SNS, ADH), pressure-volume loops
- Pharmacology: Loop diuretics (furosemide mechanism, tubuloglomerular feedback), nitrates (NO-mediated vasodilation), ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, inotropes (dobutamine β₁-agonism, milrinone PDE-3 inhibition)
Fellowship Exam Relevance
- Written: Framingham criteria, NYHA classification, BNP/NT-proBNP interpretation, NIV indications/contraindications, diuretic resistance mechanisms, disposition criteria
- OSCE: Taking focused history in dyspneic patient, interpreting chest X-ray with pulmonary oedema, managing acute pulmonary oedema in resus bay, breaking bad news about cardiogenic shock prognosis
- Key domains tested: Medical Expert (diagnosis, treatment), Communicator (dyspneic patient, family), Leader (resus team coordination)
Key Points
The 5 things you MUST know:
- Time-sensitive diuresis: Administer IV loop diuretics within 60 minutes of arrival (Class I recommendation). Delayed diuresis worsens outcomes.
- NIV reduces work of breathing: CPAP or BiPAP improves symptoms faster than oxygen alone (3CPO trial), though no mortality benefit. Start early for respiratory distress.
- Identify and treat precipitants: ACS, arrhythmia, infection, non-adherence, fluid overload, renal failure, anaemia—50% of ADHF has reversible cause.
- High-dose diuretics are safe: DOSE trial showed 2.5× home oral dose achieves better diuresis than 1× dose, with transient creatinine elevation acceptable if patient improving.
- Cardiogenic shock needs inotropes: SBP below 90 mmHg + hypoperfusion despite initial therapy → dobutamine or milrinone + urgent cardiology/ICU involvement.
Epidemiology
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence | ~1,000 per 100,000/year (hospitalizations) | [1] |
| Prevalence (chronic HF) | 1-2% (rising to 10% greater than 70 years) | [2] |
| In-hospital mortality | 3-5% | [3] |
| 30-day mortality | 10-15% | [4] |
| 1-year mortality | 25-30% | [5] |
| Peak age | greater than 65 years (median ~75 years) | [6] |
| Gender ratio | Slight male predominance (M:F 1.2:1) | [7] |
| 30-day readmission | 20-25% | [8] |
Australian/NZ Specific
- Hospitalizations: ~60,000 AHF hospitalizations annually in Australia; HF accounts for 1-2% of all ED presentations [9]
- Indigenous populations: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have 1.4× higher HF hospitalization rates and 1.5× higher HF mortality than non-Indigenous Australians, with earlier onset (median age 10-15 years younger) [10]
- Māori (NZ): Māori have 2× higher HF hospitalization rates and present at younger ages (median 68 vs 79 years for non-Māori), often due to higher prevalence of rheumatic heart disease, diabetes, obesity [11]
- Rural/remote: RFDS data show cardiovascular disease (including AHF) accounts for 15-18% of aeromedical retrievals, with higher rates of preventable decompensation due to limited access to cardiology follow-up [12]
Pathophysiology
Mechanism
Acute heart failure results from rapid deterioration in cardiac function, leading to inadequate cardiac output and/or elevated filling pressures. This can occur via:
- Systolic dysfunction: Reduced contractility (ischemia, cardiomyopathy, myocarditis) → decreased stroke volume → decreased CO → hypoperfusion
- Diastolic dysfunction: Impaired relaxation (LVH, ischemia, restrictive disease) → elevated LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) → pulmonary venous congestion → pulmonary oedema
- Acute volume overload: Regurgitant lesions (acute MR, acute AR), shunt lesions (VSD), fluid retention → elevated preload → pulmonary/systemic congestion
- Acute pressure overload: Severe hypertension, acute aortic stenosis → elevated afterload → LV failure
Pathological Progression
Cardiac insult (ischemia, pressure/volume overload, arrhythmia)
↓
Reduced cardiac output or elevated filling pressures
↓
Neurohumoral activation (RAAS, SNS, ADH)
↓
Sodium/water retention + vasoconstriction + tachycardia
↓
Worsening congestion + increased afterload
↓
Myocardial stress + remodeling
↓
Progressive pump failure → cardiogenic shock or death
Why It Matters Clinically
- Congestion vs. perfusion: The Forrester classification (wet/dry + warm/cold) guides therapy. Most patients are "wet and warm" (congested, adequate perfusion) → diuretics + vasodilators. "Wet and cold" (congested, hypoperfused) → inotropes + diuretics.
- Neurohormonal blockade: ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, MRAs reduce mortality in chronic HF but are NOT first-line in acute phase. Stabilize first, then optimize chronic therapy.
- Diuretic resistance: Chronic loop diuretic use → tubular hypertrophy and increased distal Na⁺ reabsorption → reduced efficacy. Overcome with high-dose IV diuretics, continuous infusions, or combination diuretics (thiazide, acetazolamide).
Clinical Approach
Recognition
Key triggers to suspect AHF:
- Acute dyspnoea at rest or with minimal exertion
- Orthopnoea (dyspnoea lying flat, relieved by sitting up)
- Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea (PND, waking gasping)
- Bibasal crackles on auscultation
- Elevated JVP, peripheral oedema (legs, sacrum)
- Known history of chronic HF presenting with worsening symptoms
Initial Assessment
Primary Survey (ABCDE)
- A (Airway): Usually patent unless obtunded from hypoxia/hypercapnia or cardiogenic shock
- B (Breathing):
- Tachypnoea (RR greater than 24), laboured breathing, use of accessory muscles
- Hypoxia (SpO₂ below 90% on room air in acute pulmonary oedema)
- Auscultation: Bibasal fine inspiratory crackles, wheeze ("cardiac asthma")
- C (Circulation):
- Tachycardia (sinus tachycardia most common)
- "Blood pressure: Hypertensive (greater than 160/100), normotensive, or hypotensive (below 90 mmHg systolic in cardiogenic shock)"
- Elevated JVP (greater than 3-4 cm above sternal angle)
- "Peripheral perfusion: Warm peripheries (adequate CO) vs. cool, clammy (low CO/shock)"
- Third heart sound (S₃ gallop, indicates volume overload)
- D (Disability/Neuro): Confusion, agitation (hypoxia, hypercapnia, hypoperfusion)
- E (Exposure/Environment): Peripheral oedema (pitting ankle/sacral), ascites, hepatomegaly
Hemodynamic Profiling (Forrester Classification)
| Profile | Clinical Features | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Warm & Dry (Profile A) | No congestion, adequate perfusion | Optimize oral meds, outpatient management |
| Warm & Wet (Profile B) | Congestion (crackles, JVP↑, oedema), warm peripheries | Most common: Diuretics + vasodilators |
| Cold & Dry (Profile L) | Hypoperfusion (cool, ↓SBP), no congestion | Rare: Consider hypovolemia, cautious fluids |
| Cold & Wet (Profile C) | Congestion + hypoperfusion (cardiogenic shock) | High mortality: Inotropes + diuretics + ICU |
History
Key Questions
| Question | Significance |
|---|---|
| Onset and duration ("When did you start feeling short of breath?") | Acute (hours) suggests ACS, PE, arrhythmia; Subacute (days-weeks) suggests ADHF |
| Previous heart failure diagnosis? | Known HF → likely ADHF. No prior HF → broader differential (ACS, PE, pneumonia) |
| Chest pain? | Suggests ACS as precipitant (15-20% of ADHF). Also consider PE, aortic dissection |
| Medication adherence ("Have you been taking your water tablets?") | Non-adherence to diuretics/diet most common precipitant of ADHF (40-50%) |
| Recent infections? | Pneumonia, UTI precipitate 10-15% of ADHF via increased metabolic demand |
| Salt/fluid intake? | Dietary indiscretion (high salt meal, excessive fluids) precipitates ADHF |
| Weight change? | Rapid weight gain (greater than 2 kg in 3 days) indicates fluid retention |
| Number of pillows to sleep? | Orthopnoea severity (2-pillow, 3-pillow) correlates with LVEDP |
| Leg swelling? | Peripheral oedema indicates systemic congestion (right HF or biventricular failure) |
Red Flag Symptoms
- Acute pulmonary oedema with hypoxia (SpO₂ below 90%) → immediate oxygen/NIV, diuretics
- Chest pain + dyspnoea → ACS until proven otherwise (ECG, troponin, urgent cardiology)
- Syncope or presyncope → arrhythmia, severe AS, PE
- Cool, clammy, confused → cardiogenic shock (SBP below 90, hypoperfusion) → inotropes, ICU
- Acute kidney injury → check creatinine, urea. Cardiorenal syndrome worsens prognosis
Examination
General Inspection
- Respiratory distress: Sitting upright, tripod position, using accessory muscles, pink frothy sputum (severe pulmonary oedema)
- Cyanosis: Central cyanosis (tongue, lips) indicates severe hypoxia
- Cachexia: Cardiac cachexia in end-stage HF (poor prognostic sign)
Specific Findings
| System | Finding | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular | Elevated JVP (greater than 4 cm) | Elevated RA pressure, biventricular failure. Kussmaul's sign (JVP↑ with inspiration) suggests RV failure, constrictive pericarditis |
| S₃ gallop (rapid filling sound) | Volume overload, LV dysfunction. Highly specific for HF | |
| S₄ gallop (atrial filling sound) | Stiff LV, diastolic dysfunction (HTN, LVH) | |
| Pan-systolic murmur at apex | Mitral regurgitation (functional MR from LV dilatation, or acute MR from papillary muscle rupture) | |
| Early diastolic murmur at left sternal edge | Aortic regurgitation (acute AR from endocarditis, dissection) | |
| Respiratory | Bibasal fine inspiratory crackles | Pulmonary oedema (alveolar fluid). Absent if chronic due to lymphatic compensation |
| Wheeze ("cardiac asthma") | Bronchial oedema, airway narrowing from peribronchial congestion | |
| Pleural effusion (dullness, ↓breath sounds) | Transudative effusion from elevated hydrostatic pressure | |
| Abdominal | Hepatomegaly (pulsatile if TR) | Hepatic congestion from RV failure, elevated CVP |
| Ascites | Severe RV failure, constrictive pericarditis, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy | |
| Hepatojugular reflux (HJR) | Press RUQ → JVP rises greater than 3 cm sustained (greater than 15 sec) → suggests RV dysfunction | |
| Peripheral | Pitting ankle/sacral oedema | Systemic venous congestion. Sacral oedema in bedridden patients |
| Cool peripheries, delayed CRT | Low cardiac output, peripheral vasoconstriction (cardiogenic shock) |
Investigations
Immediate (Resus Bay)
| Test | Purpose | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
| ECG (12-lead) | Identify arrhythmia, ischemia, prior MI | Atrial fibrillation (20-30% of AHF), STEMI/NSTEMI (15-20% precipitant), Q waves (old MI), LVH (voltage criteria, strain pattern) |
| Pulse oximetry | Assess oxygenation | SpO₂ below 90% → acute pulmonary oedema, give O₂/NIV |
| Blood pressure | Hemodynamic profiling | SBP greater than 160 (hypertensive AHF) → vasodilators; SBP below 90 (cardiogenic shock) → inotropes |
| Point-of-care glucose | Exclude hypoglycemia (mimic confusion) | Hypoglycemia can present with tachycardia, confusion |
| Arterial blood gas (ABG) | Assess gas exchange, acid-base | Type 1 RF (hypoxia, low PaO₂), Type 2 RF (hypercapnia, high PaCO₂), metabolic acidosis (lactic acidosis in shock) |
Standard ED Workup
| Test | Indication | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| BNP or NT-proBNP | Diagnostic uncertainty (dyspnoea differential) | BNP greater than 100 pg/mL or NT-proBNP greater than 300 pg/mL suggests HF. NT-proBNP greater than 450 pg/mL (below 50 yrs), greater than 900 pg/mL (50-75 yrs), greater than 1800 pg/mL (greater than 75 yrs) [PRIDE study] [13]. Elevated in renal failure, PE, AF. |
| Troponin (high-sensitivity) | Detect ACS as precipitant | Elevated in 50-70% of AHF (demand ischemia, myocyte stretch). Significantly elevated (greater than 10× ULN) → consider ACS [14] |
| Full blood count (FBC) | Anaemia, infection | Anaemia (below 70 g/L) precipitates HF. Leukocytosis suggests infection |
| Electrolytes (U&E) | Renal function, potassium | AKI (Cr elevation), hyponatremia (below 135 mmol/L, poor prognosis), hypo/hyperkalaemia (diuretic effect, renal failure) |
| Liver function tests (LFT) | Hepatic congestion | Elevated ALT, AST (congestive hepatopathy), elevated bilirubin (cardiac cirrhosis) |
| Chest X-ray (CXR) | Confirm pulmonary oedema, exclude differentials | Pulmonary oedema: Upper lobe diversion, Kerley B lines, perihilar haze ("bat's wing"), pleural effusions, cardiomegaly (CTR greater than 50%). Differentials: Consolidation (pneumonia), pneumothorax |
| Venous blood gas (VBG) | Alternative to ABG if non-invasive | VBG pH, lactate (shock), bicarbonate (metabolic compensation) correlate well with ABG. PO₂/PCO₂ less reliable |
Advanced/Specialist
| Test | Indication | Availability |
|---|---|---|
| Echocardiography (TTE) | Assess LV function, valves, pericardium | Bedside echo in ED (LVEF, gross valvular pathology). Formal echo as inpatient for detailed assessment |
| Coronary angiography | ACS as precipitant (STEMI, high-risk NSTEMI) | Cath lab in tertiary centers. Transfer if STEMI or high-risk NSTEMI |
| Cardiac MRI | Myocarditis, infiltrative disease, viability | Tertiary/quaternary centers, not ED |
| Right heart catheterization | Cardiogenic shock (guide inotrope therapy) | ICU/CCU, invasive hemodynamic monitoring |
Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS)
POCUS is invaluable in AHF diagnosis and monitoring:
-
Lung ultrasound:
- B-lines (≥3 per rib space in ≥2 zones bilaterally) = pulmonary oedema [15]
- Sensitivity 94%, specificity 92% for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema vs. COPD/pneumonia [16]
- Resolution of B-lines post-diuresis confirms effective decongestion
-
Cardiac ultrasound:
- LV function: Visual estimation of LVEF (normal, mildly/moderately/severely reduced)
- IVC diameter and collapsibility: Dilated IVC (greater than 2.1 cm) with minimal respiratory variation (below 50%) suggests elevated RA pressure, volume overload
- Valvular pathology: Acute MR (eccentric jet, flail leaflet), acute AR (early closure mitral valve)
- Pericardial effusion: Circumferential fluid, tamponade physiology (RV diastolic collapse)
Management
Immediate Management (First 10 minutes)
1. OXYGEN: Target SpO₂ 92-96%. High-flow oxygen if SpO₂ below 90% (0-5 min)
2. NIV: CPAP 5-10 cmH₂O or BiPAP (IPAP 12-15, EPAP 5-8) if respiratory distress despite O₂ (0-5 min)
3. POSITION: Sit patient upright (reduces preload, improves lung mechanics) (0-2 min)
4. IV ACCESS: Large-bore cannula (14-16G) for medications (0-5 min)
5. MONITORING: Continuous ECG, SpO₂, BP q5min, urinary catheter (measure UOP) (0-10 min)
6. INVESTIGATIONS: ECG, bloods (BNP, troponin, U&E, FBC), ABG/VBG, CXR (0-10 min)
7. IV DIURETICS: Furosemide 40-80 mg IV bolus (or 2.5× home oral dose if known) WITHIN 60 minutes (5-10 min)
Resuscitation (Acute Pulmonary Oedema)
Airway
- NIV first-line: CPAP or BiPAP reduces work of breathing, improves oxygenation [17]
- Intubation criteria:
- Failing NIV (persistent hypoxia SpO₂ below 90% on NIV + high FiO₂, worsening hypercapnia PaCO₂ greater than 60 mmHg)
- Reduced GCS (below 8), inability to protect airway
- Cardiac arrest
- Intubation caution: Positive-pressure ventilation reduces preload (beneficial in pulmonary oedema) but can precipitate hypotension. Pre-load with vasopressor (e.g., noradrenaline) if SBP below 100 mmHg
Breathing
- Oxygenation targets: SpO₂ 92-96%. Avoid hyperoxia (vasoconstriction, reduced CO)
- NIV settings:
- "CPAP: Start 5 cmH₂O, titrate to 10 cmH₂O as tolerated"
- "BiPAP: IPAP 12-15 cmH₂O, EPAP 5-8 cmH₂O"
- "FiO₂: Titrate to SpO₂ target"
- NIV contraindications: Facial trauma, vomiting, agitation, haemodynamic instability (SBP below 90 mmHg)
Circulation
Hemodynamic goal: Reduce preload (congestion) and afterload (LV workload) while maintaining perfusion (SBP greater than 90 mmHg).
Hypertensive AHF (SBP greater than 160 mmHg): "Vascular failure" phenotype
- Vasodilators (reduce afterload rapidly):
- "GTN (glyceryl trinitrate): "
- Sublingual 300-600 mcg q5min PRN (immediate effect)
- IV infusion 10-200 mcg/min (start 10-20 mcg/min, titrate by 10-20 mcg/min q5-10min to effect or SBP below 120 mmHg) [18]
- "Isosorbide dinitrate: Oral 5-10 mg sublingually or IV 1-10 mg/hr"
- "Sodium nitroprusside: 0.3-10 mcg/kg/min (ICU only, risk of cyanide toxicity greater than 48 hrs)"
- "GTN (glyceryl trinitrate): "
- Diuretics: Furosemide 40-80 mg IV bolus (see below)
- Avoid beta-blockers acutely: Can worsen acute HF despite benefit in chronic HF
Normotensive AHF (SBP 100-160 mmHg): "Cardiac failure" phenotype
- Diuretics: Primary therapy (see below)
- Vasodilators: Lower-dose GTN if SBP greater than 120 mmHg (caution with hypotension)
Hypotensive AHF / Cardiogenic Shock (SBP below 90 mmHg): "Cardiogenic shock" phenotype
- Inotropes (increase contractility, cardiac output):
- "Dobutamine: 2.5-20 mcg/kg/min IV (β₁-agonist, ↑inotropy, ↑chronotropy) [19]"
- "Milrinone: 0.375-0.75 mcg/kg/min IV (PDE-3 inhibitor, ↑inotropy, ↓afterload) [20]"
- "Caution: Increase myocardial O₂ demand, arrhythmias, hypotension (milrinone vasodilates)"
- Vasopressors (if profound hypotension SBP below 70 mmHg despite inotropes):
- "Noradrenaline: 0.05-0.5 mcg/kg/min (α-agonist, peripheral vasoconstriction)"
- Avoid diuretics initially if severely hypotensive (further reduce preload → ↓BP). Once SBP greater than 90, add diuretics
- Urgent cardiology/ICU consult: Consider mechanical support (IABP, Impella, VA-ECMO)
Medications
Diuretics (First-line for congestion)
| Drug | Dose | Route | Timing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Furosemide (loop diuretic) | 40-80 mg IV bolus (if diuretic-naïve) 2.5× home oral dose IV bolus (if on chronic diuretics) | IV bolus or continuous infusion | WITHIN 60 minutes of arrival | DOSE trial [21]: High-dose (2.5×) achieves better diuresis than low-dose (1×), with transient Cr↑ acceptable. Continuous infusion (5-10 mg/hr) if poor response to boluses |
| Bumetanide | 1-2 mg IV | IV bolus | Alternative to furosemide | 40× more potent than furosemide (1 mg bumetanide ≈ 40 mg furosemide) |
| Acetazolamide | 500 mg IV daily | IV once daily | If diuretic resistance | ADVOR trial [22]: Adding acetazolamide to loop diuretics accelerates decongestion (42% vs 31% at 3 days). Blocks proximal tubule Na⁺ reabsorption |
| Metolazone | 2.5-10 mg PO | Oral | Daily (if chronic diuretic resistance) | Thiazide-like diuretic, synergistic with loop diuretics (blocks distal tubule). Profound diuresis → monitor K⁺, Mg²⁺ closely |
Diuretic resistance: If poor response (urine output below 100 mL/hr after 1st dose):
- Double the dose (e.g., 80 mg → 160 mg furosemide IV)
- Continuous infusion (5-40 mg/hr furosemide)
- Add thiazide (metolazone 2.5-5 mg PO) or acetazolamide (500 mg IV)
- Correct contributing factors: Hypotension (↓renal perfusion), hypoalbuminemia (below 25 g/L, ↓drug delivery), renal failure (GFR below 30 requires higher doses)
Vasodilators (For afterload reduction, BP control)
| Drug | Dose | Route | Timing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) | Sublingual: 300-600 mcg q5min PRN IV infusion: 10-200 mcg/min | SL or IV infusion | Immediate (hypertensive AHF) | Venodilation (↓preload) at low dose; arteriolar dilation (↓afterload) at high dose. Contraindications: SBP below 100, RV infarct, PDE-5 inhibitor use (48 hrs sildenafil, 72 hrs tadalafil) → severe hypotension |
| Isosorbide dinitrate | 5-10 mg SL or 1-10 mg/hr IV | SL or IV | Alternative to GTN | Longer half-life than GTN |
| Sodium nitroprusside | 0.3-10 mcg/kg/min IV | IV infusion | ICU only (refractory hypertensive AHF) | Potent arterial and venous dilator. Cyanide toxicity risk greater than 48 hrs or renal failure. Monitor thiocyanate levels |
Inotropes (For cardiogenic shock only)
| Drug | Dose | Route | Timing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dobutamine | 2.5-20 mcg/kg/min IV | IV infusion | SBP below 90 mmHg + hypoperfusion | β₁-agonist: ↑contractility, ↑HR, ↓SVR (mild vasodilation). Risks: Tachycardia, arrhythmias, ↑MVO₂ (worsens ischemia). Do NOT use as monotherapy in profound shock (SBP below 70) due to vasodilation |
| Milrinone | Loading: 50 mcg/kg over 10 min (optional) Infusion: 0.375-0.75 mcg/kg/min | IV infusion | SBP below 90 mmHg (if β-blocked or prefer non-β-agonist) | PDE-3 inhibitor: ↑inotropy, ↑lusitropy (improved relaxation), ↓afterload (vasodilation). Risks: Hypotension (vasodilation), arrhythmias. Preferred if on beta-blockers (dobutamine less effective) |
| Noradrenaline | 0.05-0.5 mcg/kg/min | IV infusion | SBP below 70 mmHg despite inotropes | α-agonist: Vasoconstriction, ↑BP. Use as bridge to definitive therapy. Increases afterload → may worsen HF. Combine with inotrope |
Inotrope caution:
- Increase myocardial oxygen demand → can worsen ischemia in ACS-precipitated HF
- Arrhythmogenic (VT, VF risk)
- Do NOT use for "low EF" alone—only for hypoperfusion/shock
Chronic HF Medications (Do NOT start in acute phase)
| Drug | Role in AHF | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ACE inhibitors / ARBs | STOP if hypotensive (SBP below 100). Continue if stable and normotensive | Can worsen hypotension, AKI. Restart once euvolemic |
| Beta-blockers | STOP if cardiogenic shock. Continue low dose if stable compensated HF | Negative inotropy can worsen acute HF. Restart gradually as inpatient |
| Spironolactone (MRA) | STOP if AKI or hyperkalaemia (K⁺ greater than 5.5) | Risk of severe hyperkalaemia in AKI |
| SGLT2 inhibitors | May continue if already on (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin) | Emerging evidence for early initiation in AHF (EMPULSE trial) [23]. Modest diuretic effect, ↓HF readmissions |
Paediatric Dosing
| Drug | Dose | Max | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Furosemide | 1-2 mg/kg IV | 6 mg/kg/day | Repeat q6-12h PRN |
| Dobutamine | 5-20 mcg/kg/min IV | 20 mcg/kg/min | Titrate to effect |
| Milrinone | 0.25-0.75 mcg/kg/min IV | 0.75 mcg/kg/min | Loading dose 50 mcg/kg optional |
Ongoing Management
-
Monitor response:
- Vital signs: BP, HR, RR, SpO₂ q15-30min initially
- Urine output: Target greater than 0.5 mL/kg/hr (insert IDC for accurate monitoring). Expect 1-2 L net negative in first 6-12 hrs
- Symptoms: Dyspnoea improvement (Borg scale), reduced JVP, clearing crackles
- Repeat bloods: U&E at 6-12 hrs (check Cr, K⁺), BNP at 24-48 hrs (should ↓50% if responding)
-
Identify and treat precipitants:
- ACS: Troponin, ECG changes → PCI or medical management per ACS guidelines
- Arrhythmia: Atrial fibrillation (rate control with beta-blocker/digoxin; consider cardioversion if unstable), VT (amiodarone, cardioversion)
- Infection: Pneumonia, UTI → antibiotics
- Anaemia: Transfuse if Hb below 70 g/L (or below 80 g/L if ACS)
- Renal failure: Adjust diuretic doses, consider nephrology input if refractory
- Medication non-adherence: Patient education, social work input
-
Adjust therapy:
- If improving: Continue current regimen, wean NIV as tolerated, transition to oral diuretics once euvolemic
- If not improving: Escalate diuretics (higher dose, continuous infusion, add second diuretic), consider inotropes if hypoperfused, ICU transfer
Definitive Care
- Cardiology consult: All AHF patients require cardiology input (risk stratification, echocardiography, optimization of chronic HF therapy)
- Coronary angiography: If ACS suspected (troponin ↑, ECG changes)
- ICU/CCU admission: Cardiogenic shock, refractory hypoxia despite NIV, arrhythmias requiring monitoring, acute mechanical complications (VSD, acute MR)
- Cardiac surgery: Acute mechanical complications (free wall rupture, VSD, papillary muscle rupture), severe valvular disease (acute AR, MR), refractory cardiogenic shock (consider MCS: IABP, Impella, VA-ECMO)
Disposition
Admission Criteria
All AHF patients require admission (ward or ICU) unless very mild exacerbation in reliable patient. Specific indications:
- Oxygen requirement (SpO₂ below 90% on room air)
- NIV requirement
- IV diuretics required (oral diuretics insufficient)
- Troponin elevation (ACS work-up)
- New-onset HF (requires echocardiography, specialist assessment)
- Significant comorbidity: AKI, arrhythmia, infection
- Poor social support (unable to manage at home, follow-up uncertain)
ICU/HDU Criteria
- Cardiogenic shock (SBP below 90 mmHg, hypoperfusion despite initial therapy)
- Inotrope or vasopressor requirement
- Respiratory failure requiring NIV or intubation
- Refractory pulmonary oedema despite maximal medical therapy
- Acute mechanical complications (VSD, acute MR, free wall rupture)
- Arrhythmias with haemodynamic compromise (VT, unstable AF with RVR)
- Severe electrolyte disturbances (K⁺ below 2.5 or greater than 6.5 mmol/L)
Discharge Criteria (Rare in AHF, mostly observation unit)
Consider short-stay unit or observation unit discharge only if:
- Mild exacerbation of known chronic HF (small weight gain, mild dyspnoea)
- Rapid response to ED therapy (symptom resolution, no O₂ requirement)
- Low-risk features:
- SBP greater than 100 mmHg, HR below 100 bpm, SpO₂ greater than 94% on room air
- BNP below 500 pg/mL (or NT-proBNP below 2000 pg/mL)
- Creatinine below 150 µmol/L, no significant AKI
- Troponin negative
- No significant arrhythmia
- Reliable patient with good adherence, close GP/cardiology follow-up within 1-2 weeks
- Red flags to return:
- Worsening dyspnoea
- Chest pain
- Syncope or palpitations
- Weight gain greater than 2 kg in 3 days
- Reduced urine output
Follow-up
- Cardiology appointment: Within 1-2 weeks (titration of chronic HF meds: ACE-I, beta-blocker, MRA, SGLT2i)
- GP follow-up: Within 1 week (check U&E, review meds, reinforce adherence)
- Heart failure clinic/nurse: If available, HF nurse home visits reduce readmissions [24]
- Specialist referral if needed:
- HFrEF (LVEF below 40%) → consider ICD, CRT
- Advanced HF → transplant evaluation
- Discharge letter requirements:
- Precipitant identified (if any)
- Medication changes (diuretic dose, ACE-I initiated/titrated)
- Weight on discharge (baseline for self-monitoring)
- Follow-up plan (GP, cardiology, HF clinic)
Special Populations
Paediatric Considerations
Acute heart failure in children is rare but causes include:
- Congenital heart disease: VSD, PDA, coarctation, hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS)
- Myocarditis: Viral (coxsackie, adenovirus, parvovirus B19)
- Cardiomyopathy: Dilated (DCM), hypertrophic (HCM)
- Kawasaki disease with coronary aneurysms and ischemia
Management differences:
- Fluid restriction: Strict (often 50-75% maintenance fluids)
- Diuretics: Furosemide 1-2 mg/kg IV (max 6 mg/kg/day)
- Inotropes: Dobutamine 5-20 mcg/kg/min (first-line for low CO)
- Avoid ACE-I in acute phase: Can precipitate hypotension in children
- Early paediatric cardiology consult: All cases
Pregnancy
Acute HF in pregnancy (peripartum cardiomyopathy, pre-eclampsia with pulmonary oedema, valvular disease):
- Position: Left lateral tilt (avoid supine → ↓IVC compression → ↑venous return)
- Oxygen: Liberal oxygen (fetal oxygenation priority)
- Diuretics: Furosemide safe in pregnancy (use if pulmonary oedema)
- Avoid ACE-I/ARBs: Teratogenic, renal agenesis in fetus. Use hydralazine + nitrates for afterload reduction
- Avoid spironolactone: Anti-androgenic effects on male fetus
- Magnesium sulfate: If pre-eclampsia (4-6 g IV loading, then 1-2 g/hr infusion)
- Urgent obstetric/cardiology consult: Maternal-fetal medicine input
- Delivery considerations: If late pregnancy (greater than 34 weeks), may need urgent delivery
Elderly
Older patients (greater than 75 years) have higher mortality, more comorbidities, and altered pharmacokinetics:
- Lower diuretic doses: Start lower (40 mg furosemide), as more prone to AKI, electrolyte disturbances
- Caution with nitrates: Orthostatic hypotension, falls risk
- Polypharmacy: Review medication list, stop non-essential drugs
- Cognitive assessment: Delirium common in acute illness, impacts adherence
- Goals of care: Consider advance care planning, ceiling of treatment in frail/end-stage HF
Indigenous Health
Important Note: Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, and Māori considerations:
Epidemiology:
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians: 1.4× higher HF hospitalization, 1.5× higher mortality, present 10-15 years younger (median age 60 vs 75) [10]
- Māori (NZ): 2× higher HF hospitalization, earlier onset (median 68 vs 79 years), 50% higher mortality [11]
- Higher prevalence of HF risk factors: Diabetes (3×), obesity (1.5×), rheumatic heart disease (10-20× higher in Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander, especially in remote Northern Australia) [25]
Cultural safety considerations:
- Family-centered care: Involve family/whānau in decision-making. Explain diagnosis and treatment in plain language, with interpreter if needed
- Cultural liaison services: Engage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers or Māori health advocates to improve communication and adherence
- Distrust of healthcare system: Historical trauma, systemic racism → approach with humility, build rapport, explain rationale for treatments
- Traditional medicines: Ask respectfully about concurrent use of traditional remedies. Most compatible, but some may interact (e.g., herbal diuretics)
Barriers to care:
- Remote location: Limited access to cardiology, echocardiography, cardiac rehab → higher rates of preventable ADHF
- Medication adherence: Cost (PBS co-payment barriers), complex regimens, health literacy
- Follow-up: Transport challenges, competing priorities (family, work, cultural obligations)
Strategies to improve outcomes:
- Telehealth: Remote cardiology consult, echocardiography review
- Subsidized medications: Close the Gap PBS co-payment waiver for eligible Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients
- Community health workers: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health practitioners to support adherence, lifestyle modification
- Early RFDS retrieval: Low threshold for aeromedical transfer if deteriorating in remote clinic
Pitfalls & Pearls
Clinical Pearls:
-
"Time to diuretic" matters: Mortality increases 4% for every hour delay in IV diuretic administration [26]. Target below 60 minutes from arrival.
-
BNP/NT-proBNP is not perfect: Elevated in PE, renal failure, sepsis, AF. Low in obesity (adipose tissue clearance). Use clinical judgment + imaging. "Treat the patient, not the number."
-
Transient creatinine rise is OK: DOSE trial showed Cr↑ in 25-30% on high-dose diuretics, but no worse long-term outcomes if clinically improving [21]. "Decongestion takes priority over small Cr rises." Monitor trends, not single values.
-
NIV intolerance is common: 10-20% cannot tolerate mask (claustrophobia, facial discomfort). Try different masks (oronasal vs nasal), reassure patient, titrate pressures slowly. If still intolerant and hypoxic → intubate.
-
Diuretic resistance troubleshooting:
- Hypotension → ↓renal perfusion → loop diuretics ineffective → consider inotrope to ↑CO, then diuretic
- Hypoalbuminemia (below 25 g/L) → ↓furosemide delivery to tubules → co-administer albumin 100 mL 20% with furosemide [27]
- Acidosis (pH below 7.3) → loop diuretics work best in alkaline urine → consider acetazolamide (induces metabolic acidosis but alkalinizes urine paradoxically)
-
SGLT2 inhibitors can be continued: Recent trials (EMPULSE, EMPA-RESPONSE) show early initiation (or continuation) of empagliflozin in AHF is safe and may reduce HF readmissions [23]. Don't routinely stop SGLT2i in AHF (unless euglycemic DKA concern).
-
The "flash pulmonary oedema" patient: Sudden-onset severe dyspnoea, often hypertensive (SBP greater than 180), due to acute afterload ↑ → rapid LV decompensation. Causes: Renal artery stenosis (bilateral or solitary kidney), severe AS, acute ischemia. Key: Aggressive vasodilators (high-dose GTN IV), diuretics, NIV. Investigate for RAS if recurrent.
-
S₃ is the most specific exam finding: LR+ 11 for HF diagnosis [28]. Practice recognizing the "Kentucky gallop" (S₁-S₂-S₃ = "Ken-tuck-y").
-
Hepatojugular reflux test: Press firmly on RUQ for 15 seconds while watching JVP. Sustained ↑ greater than 3 cm = positive (RV dysfunction). More sensitive than JVP elevation alone [29].
-
Check for pulsus alternans: Beat-to-beat variability in pulse amplitude (strong-weak-strong-weak) → severe LV dysfunction. Feel radial pulse while inflating BP cuff slowly; alternans disappears at higher cuff pressure. Rare but specific sign.
Pitfalls to Avoid:
-
Missing ACS as precipitant: 15-20% of AHF is ACS-related. ALWAYS check ECG and troponin, even if "just decompensated heart failure." Delayed ACS diagnosis = delayed PCI = worse outcomes.
-
Undertreating with diuretics: DOSE trial showed high-dose (2.5× home oral dose) superior to low-dose (1× home oral dose). Don't be timid. If no diuresis in 2 hours, double the dose or start infusion.
-
Withholding oxygen due to "COPD risk": In acute pulmonary oedema with SpO₂ below 90%, give oxygen liberally. CO₂ retention is not a concern in pure cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (hyperventilation, not hypoventilation). Target SpO₂ 92-96%.
-
Delaying NIV: Waiting "to see if oxygen works" → prolonged respiratory distress, fatigue, intubation. Early NIV (within 30 min) if moderate-severe dyspnoea despite oxygen. 3CPO trial showed faster symptom relief [17].
-
Giving fluids for "hypotension": AHF hypotension is usually due to low CO (pump failure) or vasodilators (GTN, milrinone), NOT hypovolemia. Fluids worsen pulmonary oedema. Give inotropes (dobutamine) to ↑CO, not fluids.
-
Stopping ACE-I/beta-blocker reflexively: If patient stable and normotensive, continue chronic HF meds. Abrupt cessation can worsen HF. Only stop if hypotensive (SBP below 100) or cardiogenic shock.
-
Forgetting GTN contraindications: Right ventricular infarct (preload-dependent) + GTN (↓preload) = catastrophic hypotension. Check ECG for RV infarct (ST↑ in V3R-V4R, II, III, aVF). Also contraindicated with PDE-5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil) within 24-48 hrs.
-
Ignoring diuretic resistance: If urine output below 100 mL in 2 hrs post-furosemide → act. Don't repeat same dose hoping for different result. Escalate dose, add second diuretic (acetazolamide, metolazone), or start infusion.
-
Anchoring on "known HF": Just because patient has chronic HF doesn't mean current presentation is simple ADHF. Always consider new pathology: PE, pneumonia, ACS, arrhythmia, anaemia.
-
Discharging too early: AHF readmission at 30 days is 20-25% [8]. Ensure patient euvolemic (dry weight, no oedema, flat JVP), BNP trending down, on optimized chronic therapy, with close follow-up arranged before discharge.
Viva Practice
Stem: A 72-year-old man presents to ED with sudden-onset severe dyspnoea and pink frothy sputum. His BP is 210/110 mmHg, HR 120 bpm, RR 36/min, SpO₂ 85% on room air. He is sitting upright, using accessory muscles, and you hear bilateral crackles on auscultation. He has a history of hypertension but no prior heart failure diagnosis.
Opening Question: What are your immediate priorities in managing this patient?
Model Answer: This is hypertensive acute pulmonary oedema, a medical emergency requiring rapid resuscitation:
Immediate actions (ABCDE approach):
- Airway: Patent, but at risk due to frothy secretions and respiratory fatigue
- Breathing:
- High-flow oxygen 15L via non-rebreather mask (target SpO₂ 92-96%)
- NIV within 5 minutes: CPAP 5-10 cmH₂O or BiPAP (IPAP 12-15, EPAP 5-8). Reduces work of breathing, improves oxygenation, prevents intubation
- Circulation:
- IV access (14-16G), continuous monitoring (ECG, SpO₂, BP q5min)
- IV GTN: Start 10-20 mcg/min infusion, titrate by 10-20 mcg/min q5min to reduce BP to ~140/90 (rapid afterload reduction)
- IV furosemide 40-80 mg bolus (he's diuretic-naïve, so start moderate dose)
- Position: Sit patient upright (reduces preload)
- Investigations: 12-lead ECG (rule out ACS), BNP/NT-proBNP, troponin, U&E, FBC, CXR, ABG/VBG
Rationale: Hypertensive pulmonary oedema is due to acute afterload increase → LV failure → rapid pulmonary venous congestion. Vasodilators (GTN) are as important as diuretics for rapid symptom relief. NIV reduces intubation rates and speeds physiological recovery.
Follow-up Questions:
-
The patient's SpO₂ improves to 92% on CPAP, but he remains tachypneic (RR 28) and distressed. BP is now 160/90. What do you do next?
- Model answer: He's improving but still congested. Continue CPAP, uptitrate GTN to 40-60 mcg/min (further afterload reduction), reassess diuresis (check urine output at 2 hours—target greater than 100 mL/hr). If inadequate diuresis, give 2nd dose furosemide 80-160 mg IV. Recheck ABG/VBG to assess trend (PaO₂, PaCO₂, pH). If worsening despite therapy → consider intubation.
-
His troponin comes back at 150 ng/L (high-sensitivity, ULN 14 ng/L). What does this mean?
- Model answer: Troponin is elevated in 50-70% of AHF patients, often due to demand ischemia (tachycardia, hypertension, LV strain) or myocyte stretch (elevated wall stress). However, this level (greater than 10× ULN) is concerning for ACS as precipitant. Check ECG for ischemic changes (ST depression, T-wave inversion). Repeat troponin at 3 hours (rising = ACS). Urgent cardiology consult; if STEMI or high-risk NSTEMI → consider PCI. Continue AHF management (GTN has dual benefit: afterload reduction + anti-anginal).
-
What are the contraindications to GTN in this scenario?
- Model answer:
- Right ventricular infarct: GTN reduces preload → RV can't fill LV → cardiogenic shock. Check ECG for inferior STEMI + ST elevation in V3R-V4R (right-sided leads). If present, avoid GTN, give fluids instead.
- PDE-5 inhibitor use: Sildenafil, tadalafil (for erectile dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension) within 24-48 hrs → severe refractory hypotension with GTN.
- Severe aortic stenosis (critical AS): Fixed CO → cannot compensate for afterload reduction → hypotension.
- Hypovolemia (rare in pulmonary oedema but possible if concurrent bleeding, dehydration).
- SBP below 100 mmHg (relative contraindication).
- Model answer:
Discussion Points:
- Hypertensive pulmonary oedema often presents in patients without prior HF diagnosis (flash pulmonary oedema). Consider underlying causes: renal artery stenosis, severe AS, acute ischemia.
- "Time to treatment" matters: Rapid vasodilator + NIV initiation (within 30 min) reduces intubation and improves symptoms faster than delayed therapy.
- Disposition: This patient requires ICU/HDU or monitored cardiac unit (inotrope infusion, close BP monitoring). Not suitable for general ward initially.
Stem: A 65-year-old woman with a history of ischemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF 25%, on ramipril, bisoprolol, spironolactone, furosemide 80 mg BD) presents with 3 days of worsening dyspnoea and lethargy. She is cold, clammy, confused. BP 85/60 mmHg, HR 110 bpm, RR 28/min, SpO₂ 92% on 15L O₂. JVP elevated, bibasal crackles, cool peripheries, delayed CRT.
Opening Question: Describe your approach to this patient. What is the key problem?
Model Answer: This is acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with cardiogenic shock (Profile C: "cold and wet"). Key features:
- Shock: SBP below 90 mmHg, cold peripheries, confusion (hypoperfusion)
- Congestion: JVP↑, crackles (pulmonary oedema)
Immediate management:
- ABCDE resuscitation:
- A/B: Airway patent. Hypoxia on high-flow O₂ → consider NIV (CPAP/BiPAP), but monitor closely (hypotension may worsen with positive-pressure ventilation). Prepare for intubation if deteriorates.
- C:
- IV access (large-bore), continuous monitoring
- Inotrope: Start dobutamine 5 mcg/kg/min IV, titrate to 10-20 mcg/kg/min to improve CO and perfusion (target SBP greater than 90, warm peripheries, improved mental status)
- HOLD diuretics initially: She's hypotensive → diuretics will worsen preload depletion and BP. Once SBP greater than 90 with inotrope, then add furosemide 80-160 mg IV (high-dose, as she's on chronic furosemide 80 mg BD)
- D: Confusion likely from hypoperfusion (↓cerebral perfusion pressure). Check glucose (exclude hypoglycemia). Expect improvement with inotrope.
- Investigations: ECG (rule out ACS, arrhythmia), troponin, BNP, U&E (renal function), FBC, ABG/VBG (lactate ≥2 suggests tissue hypoperfusion), CXR, bedside echo (assess LVEF, regional wall motion abnormalities, mechanical complications)
- Urgent cardiology/ICU consult: Cardiogenic shock has 40-50% mortality. May need invasive monitoring (arterial line, central line ± PA catheter), mechanical circulatory support (IABP, Impella, VA-ECMO), coronary angiography if ACS.
Follow-up Questions:
-
Would you give IV fluids to improve her blood pressure?
- Model answer: No. She has biventricular failure (RV + LV) with volume overload (JVP↑, crackles). Her hypotension is due to pump failure (low CO), not hypovolemia. Fluids will worsen pulmonary oedema without improving CO. Inotropes (dobutamine) are the correct choice to increase contractility and CO. If SBP remains below 70 mmHg despite dobutamine → add noradrenaline (vasopressor) as bridge to definitive therapy, but this increases afterload (may worsen HF).
-
Her lactate is 4.5 mmol/L. What does this indicate, and how does it change management?
- Model answer: Lactate ≥4 indicates severe hypoperfusion with anaerobic metabolism (tissue hypoxia). This confirms cardiogenic shock and suggests high mortality. Management: Escalate inotrope (increase dobutamine, or add milrinone if inadequate response). Consider mechanical circulatory support (IABP, Impella) if refractory to inotropes. Repeat lactate q2-4hrs; trending down = improving perfusion, trending up = worsening shock → escalate care.
-
Should you continue her beta-blocker (bisoprolol) in this setting?
- Model answer: No, stop beta-blocker. Bisoprolol has negative inotropic effects → worsens pump failure in cardiogenic shock. Also, beta-blockade reduces effectiveness of dobutamine (β₁-agonist). Hold ACE-I (ramipril) and MRA (spironolactone) as well (risk of worsening hypotension, AKI, hyperkalemia). Restart gradually once patient stabilized, euvolemic, and off inotropes.
-
She has a central line inserted, and CVP is 18 mmHg (normal 2-8 mmHg). What does this mean?
- Model answer: Elevated CVP indicates RV failure with volume overload. This is common in biventricular failure. Once SBP greater than 90 on inotropes, start IV diuretics (furosemide 160 mg bolus or continuous infusion 10-20 mg/hr) to reduce CVP and relieve congestion. Monitor response: target CVP 8-12 mmHg, urine output greater than 0.5 mL/kg/hr. If diuretic-resistant despite high doses → consider ultrafiltration (CVVH) if renal failure coexists.
Discussion Points:
- Cardiogenic shock in ADHF is high-mortality (40-50%). Early recognition (cool peripheries, altered mental status, lactate ≥2) and early escalation (inotropes, ICU, specialist input) are critical.
- Dobutamine is first-line inotrope; milrinone is alternative (especially if β-blocked or dobutamine ineffective). Avoid noradrenaline monotherapy (vasoconstriction worsens HF by increasing afterload) unless profound shock (SBP below 70).
- Mechanical circulatory support (MCS): IABP (↑diastolic BP → ↑coronary perfusion, ↓afterload), Impella (microaxial pump, ↑CO), VA-ECMO (full cardiopulmonary support). Consider early if refractory to medical therapy.
- Palliation: In elderly, frail, or end-stage HF patients, cardiogenic shock may not be survivable. Discuss goals of care with family early. Not all patients are candidates for MCS or transplant.
Stem: A 78-year-old man with chronic HF (LVEF 30%, on furosemide 80 mg BD, ramipril, bisoprolol) presents with 5 days of worsening leg swelling and dyspnoea. In ED, you give furosemide 160 mg IV (2× his BD dose). Two hours later, he has passed only 50 mL of urine. BP 110/70, HR 90, SpO₂ 94% on 4L O₂. Creatinine 180 µmol/L (baseline 140 µmol/L).
Opening Question: Why is he not responding to diuretics, and what will you do next?
Model Answer: This is diuretic resistance, defined as inadequate diuresis (urine output below 100 mL/hr) despite IV loop diuretic. Common in chronic HF patients on long-term oral diuretics.
Mechanisms of diuretic resistance:
- Tubular hypertrophy: Chronic loop diuretic use → distal tubule hypertrophy → ↑Na⁺ reabsorption downstream of loop of Henle → reduced net natriuresis
- Reduced renal perfusion: Low CO (pump failure) or hypotension → ↓GFR → less drug delivery to tubules
- Hypoalbuminemia: Albumin below 25 g/L → ↓furosemide binding and tubular secretion → reduced efficacy
- Renal failure: GFR below 30 mL/min → requires higher doses to achieve therapeutic tubular concentration
- "Braking phenomenon": Post-diuretic Na⁺ retention (avid distal Na⁺ reabsorption after initial diuresis)
Next steps:
- Escalate diuretic dose:
- Give furosemide 240-320 mg IV bolus (double or triple previous dose). In severe renal impairment, may need up to 400-600 mg.
- Alternatively, switch to continuous infusion: Furosemide 10-40 mg/hr IV (more consistent tubular drug levels, overcomes "peaks and troughs" of boluses)
- Add second diuretic (sequential nephron blockade):
- Acetazolamide 500 mg IV once daily: Blocks proximal tubule (ADVOR trial showed 42% vs 31% decongestion at 3 days) [22]
- Metolazone 5-10 mg PO: Thiazide-like diuretic, blocks distal tubule (synergistic with loop). Caution: Profound diuresis → monitor K⁺, Mg²⁺ closely
- Correct contributing factors:
- Hypotension/low CO: If SBP below 100 or cold peripheries → add dobutamine (↑CO → ↑renal perfusion → ↑diuretic efficacy)
- Hypoalbuminemia: If albumin below 25 g/L → co-administer albumin 100 mL 20% IV with furosemide (↑drug delivery) [27]
- Monitor response:
- Urinary catheter (accurate UOP measurement)
- Repeat U&E at 6-12 hrs (Cr, K⁺)
- Daily weights (target 1-2 kg loss/day)
- If still resistant → consider ultrafiltration (extracorporeal fluid removal via dialysis catheter)
Follow-up Questions:
-
His creatinine rises from 180 to 220 µmol/L after you give high-dose furosemide. Is this concerning?
- Model answer: Depends on clinical context. The DOSE trial showed 25-30% of patients on high-dose diuretics have transient Cr↑, but no worse long-term outcomes if patient clinically improving (symptoms better, weight loss, urine output ↑). This is "pseudo-worsening renal function" from hemoconcentration (↓intravascular volume) and neurohormonal activation. Continue diuretics if he's improving. However, if Cr rising AND worsening symptoms (↓UOP, ↑dyspnea, ↑creatinine greater than 50% above baseline) → true cardiorenal syndrome → reduce diuretic, consider inotrope, nephrology consult.
-
Would you give IV albumin routinely to all diuretic-resistant patients?
- Model answer: No, only if hypoalbuminemia (below 25 g/L). Albumin is expensive and not routinely indicated. Small studies suggest co-administration with furosemide improves diuresis in hypoalbuminemic patients, but large RCTs lacking. Check albumin level; if below 25 g/L → trial of albumin 100 mL 20% IV with furosemide dose. If normoalbuminemic → no benefit.
-
What is ultrafiltration, and when would you consider it?
- Model answer: Ultrafiltration (UF) is extracorporeal fluid removal via dialysis catheter, using hydrostatic pressure gradient (no dialysate). Removes isotonic fluid (Na⁺ 140 mmol/L) at controlled rate (100-500 mL/hr). Indications: Refractory diuretic resistance (despite high-dose IV diuretics + sequential nephron blockade), severe fluid overload (anasarca), cardiorenal syndrome (AKI with volume overload). Consider UF after failure of medical therapy. Requires ICU/nephrology input, dialysis catheter insertion. Trials (UNLOAD, CARRESS-HF): Mixed results—no mortality benefit, but ↓readmissions in some studies. Reserve for refractory cases.
Discussion Points:
- Diuretic resistance is common in advanced HF. Anticipate it in chronic diuretic users and dose aggressively from the start (2.5× home oral dose, per DOSE trial).
- Combination diuretics (loop + thiazide or loop + acetazolamide) are more effective than escalating loop diuretic dose alone in some patients. Acetazolamide is increasingly used (ADVOR trial evidence).
- Cardiorenal syndrome: Bidirectional relationship—HF worsens renal function, renal failure worsens HF. Difficult management; often requires inotropes to improve CO and renal perfusion before diuretics can work.
Stem: You are working in a remote Northern Territory clinic. A 58-year-old Aboriginal man presents with 2 days of dyspnoea, orthopnoea, and leg swelling. He has a history of rheumatic heart disease (severe MR) but has not seen a cardiologist in 2 years (nearest hospital 600 km away). On exam: BP 100/60, HR 110 (irregularly irregular), RR 26, SpO₂ 88% on room air, bibasal crackles, JVP elevated, pansystolic murmur at apex. Your clinic has oxygen, IV access, furosemide 40 mg ampoules, GTN spray, and a portable ventilator (no NIV capability). You call RFDS for retrieval (ETA 2 hours).
Opening Question: How do you manage this patient while waiting for RFDS retrieval?
Model Answer: This is acute decompensated heart failure (likely AF with RVR precipitating ADHF, on background of chronic severe MR from RHD). Limited resources require pragmatic management.
Immediate actions (next 2 hours until RFDS arrival):
- Airway/Breathing:
- High-flow oxygen 10-15 L via non-rebreather mask (target SpO₂ 92-96%)
- Positioning: Sit upright, legs dependent (reduces preload)
- No NIV available: Improvise with bag-valve-mask (BVM) CPAP: Hold BVM mask tightly over face, attach to oxygen, add PEEP valve (5-10 cmH₂O) if available. Not ideal but can temporize. Prepare for intubation if deteriorates (portable ventilator with PEEP).
- Circulation:
- IV access (16G or largest available)
- IV furosemide: Give 40 mg IV bolus now (he's diuretic-naïve). If inadequate response in 30-60 min and you have more ampoules → give 2nd dose 80 mg IV.
- GTN spray: 400 mcg (1-2 puffs) sublingually every 5-10 min PRN if SBP greater than 100 (reduces preload/afterload). Monitor BP closely.
- Treat arrhythmia (AF with RVR):
- Rate control: If you have metoprolol or diltiazem IV → give cautiously (risk of worsening HF, but HR 110 in AF needs control). Alternatively, if digoxin available → digoxin 500 mcg IV loading (takes 2-6 hrs). In resource-limited setting, may defer rate control until hospital if HF treatment stabilizes him.
- Monitoring:
- Continuous pulse oximetry, BP q10-15min, clinical reassessment (RR, work of breathing, mental status)
- Communication with RFDS:
- Update on patient status, treatments given
- Request: Portable NIV machine, additional furosemide, IV metoprolol/digoxin if available onboard
- Prepare for transfer: IV secured, oxygen supply for journey (calculate O₂ requirements: 10 L/min × 120 min flight + 30 min buffer = 1500 L → need 2-3 E-size cylinders)
Specific considerations for Aboriginal patient:
- Language: Does he speak English fluently, or Aboriginal English/Kriol/local language? Use interpreter if needed (phone interpreter service).
- Family involvement: In Aboriginal culture, family/community involvement is important. Explain situation to family, involve in decision-making (e.g., transfer to Darwin hospital).
- Cultural safety: Approach with respect. Explain why RFDS transfer is necessary. Some patients fear "being taken away" (historical trauma from Stolen Generations, medical paternalism). Reassure him and family.
Follow-up Questions:
-
He deteriorates—SpO₂ 82% despite 15L O₂, pink frothy sputum, decreasing GCS. RFDS ETA 45 minutes. What do you do?
- Model answer: Impending respiratory arrest. He needs intubation:
- Call for help (any available clinic staff)
- Pre-oxygenate with 15L O₂ via BVM (assisted ventilation if hypoventilating)
- RSI (rapid sequence intubation):
- Ketamine 1-2 mg/kg IV (maintains BP, bronchodilates) + rocuronium 1 mg/kg IV
- Intubate (largest ETT available, typically 7.5-8.0 mm)
- Post-intubation: Ventilate with portable ventilator, add PEEP 8-10 cmH₂O (reduces preload, improves oxygenation). Sedate with ketamine infusion or midazolam if available.
- Inform RFDS: Patient now intubated, may need retrieval physician to fly out if clinic lacks advanced airway expertise.
- Model answer: Impending respiratory arrest. He needs intubation:
-
Why is rheumatic heart disease so common in Aboriginal communities?
- Model answer: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) results from acute rheumatic fever (ARF), caused by Group A Streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations have 10-20× higher RHD rates than non-Indigenous Australians, highest in remote Northern Australia. Contributing factors:
- Overcrowding: Promotes GAS transmission
- Poor housing conditions: Lack of running water, sanitation
- Limited access to healthcare: Delayed diagnosis/treatment of GAS pharyngitis → ARF → RHD
- Genetic susceptibility: Possible, but socioeconomic factors predominate
- Prevention: Benzathine penicillin G (BPG) injections every 28 days (secondary prophylaxis prevents ARF recurrence). Poor adherence in remote areas due to pain (IM injection), transport barriers, lack of follow-up.
- Model answer: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) results from acute rheumatic fever (ARF), caused by Group A Streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations have 10-20× higher RHD rates than non-Indigenous Australians, highest in remote Northern Australia. Contributing factors:
-
How does RFDS coordinate retrieval for critically ill patients?
- Model answer: RFDS Retrieval Coordination Centre (RCC) (each state has one—NT based in Darwin):
- Call RCC: You (remote clinician) call RFDS, provide clinical summary (Hx, vitals, treatments, severity)
- Triage: RCC doctor (retrieval medicine specialist) assesses urgency:
- Immediate (below 30 min): Life-threatening (MI, severe trauma, obstetric emergency)
- Urgent (below 2 hrs): Critically ill but stable (this patient)
- Routine (below 24 hrs): Stable patients needing tertiary care (elective surgery, specialist review)
- Dispatch: RFDS plane dispatched with retrieval team (doctor, nurse, paramedic) and equipment (portable ventilator, NIV, inotropes, blood products if needed)
- Clinical support: RCC doctor can provide telephone advice to remote clinician while waiting (e.g., drug dosing, intubation decision)
- Transfer: Patient flown to nearest tertiary hospital (Darwin, Alice Springs) for ICU/cardiology care
- Challenges: Weather (monsoon season in Northern Australia), airstrip conditions (dirt strips may be unusable after rain), distance (some communities greater than 1000 km from hospital).
- Model answer: RFDS Retrieval Coordination Centre (RCC) (each state has one—NT based in Darwin):
Discussion Points:
- Remote/rural HF management: Limited resources (no echocardiography, cardiology, NIV, inotropes) → focus on basic resuscitation (oxygen, diuretics, positioning) and early retrieval for deteriorating patients.
- RHD in Indigenous Australians: Major preventable cause of HF in young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Primary prevention (prompt treatment of GAS pharyngitis with antibiotics) and secondary prevention (BPG injections) reduce RHD burden.
- RFDS as safety net: Aeromedical retrieval bridges gap between remote clinics and tertiary hospitals. Understanding RFDS protocols is essential for rural/remote EM practice in Australia.
- Cultural competence: Respectful, family-centered care improves outcomes in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients. Engage Aboriginal health workers to facilitate communication and adherence.
OSCE Scenarios
Station 1: Acute Pulmonary Oedema Resuscitation
Format: Resuscitation / Clinical Management Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED resuscitation bay
Candidate Instructions:
You are the ED registrar. A 68-year-old woman has just arrived by ambulance with sudden-onset severe shortness of breath. The nurse has placed her on oxygen and attached monitoring. Your task is to perform an initial assessment and manage the patient. A nurse and airway equipment are available if needed.
Examiner Instructions: Patient is a 68-year-old woman with hypertensive acute pulmonary oedema (background: hypertension, no known HF). She is sitting upright, very dyspneic, using accessory muscles, speaking in single words only.
Initial vitals (displayed on monitor):
- BP 190/100 mmHg
- HR 115 bpm (sinus tachycardia)
- RR 32/min
- SpO₂ 87% on 15L via non-rebreather mask
- GCS 14 (confused, distressed)
Physical findings (if examined):
- Bibasal fine inspiratory crackles
- Elevated JVP (6 cm above sternal angle)
- S₃ gallop (if auscultates carefully)
- No peripheral oedema
Progression:
- If candidate gives appropriate initial management (NIV + furosemide + GTN) → vitals improve: SpO₂ 94%, RR 24, BP 150/90, patient calmer within 5 minutes
- If candidate does not start NIV → patient deteriorates: SpO₂ 82%, RR 36, GCS 12, nurse asks "Should we intubate?"
- If candidate requests investigations → ECG shows sinus tachycardia, no acute ischemia; BNP 1200 pg/mL; CXR shows pulmonary oedema
Actor/Patient Brief: You are extremely short of breath and frightened. You woke up suddenly 2 hours ago gasping for air. You can only speak 1-2 words at a time. You are confused due to hypoxia. If the candidate reassures you and starts treatment, you gradually feel better and can speak short sentences after 5 minutes.
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Initial assessment | ABCDE approach, recognizes acute pulmonary oedema | /2 |
| Immediate actions | Positions upright, high-flow O₂, monitoring, IV access | /2 |
| NIV | Initiates CPAP or BiPAP within 3 minutes | /2 |
| Medications | IV furosemide AND vasodilator (GTN) | /2 |
| Investigations | Appropriate requests (ECG, BNP, bloods, CXR, ABG) | /1 |
| Reassessment | Monitors response, adjusts therapy | /1 |
| Communication | Calm, reassuring to patient despite urgency | /1 |
| Total | /11 |
Expected Standard:
- Pass (≥6/11): Recognizes pulmonary oedema, starts NIV + diuretic, basic resuscitation principles
- Key discriminators:
- "Early NIV: Candidates who start NIV within 3 min vs. those who delay or don't use it"
- "Dual therapy: Recognizing need for BOTH diuretic (furosemide) AND vasodilator (GTN) in hypertensive pulmonary oedema"
- Reassessment: Actively monitors response and adjusts therapy vs. "one and done" approach
Station 2: Breaking Bad News—Cardiogenic Shock Prognosis
Format: Communication Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED relatives' room
Candidate Instructions:
You are the ED consultant. Mrs. Thompson, a 70-year-old woman, was brought in 2 hours ago with acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Despite maximal therapy (intubation, inotropes, IABP), she remains profoundly hypotensive with multi-organ failure. The intensivist has reviewed her and feels she is unlikely to survive. Her son, Mr. David Thompson, is in the relatives' room. Please speak with him about his mother's condition and prognosis.
Examiner Instructions: Mr. Thompson (son) is anxious and upset. He arrived 10 minutes ago and has not seen his mother yet (she's in resus bay, intubated, multiple lines/devices). He knows she has "heart failure" but thinks it's treatable. He is hopeful she will recover.
Standardized actor brief:
- You are in your 40s, an office worker, only child
- You live 2 hours away, your mother called you this morning saying she couldn't breathe, you drove down immediately
- You expect the doctor to say she's sick but will get better with treatment
- You don't understand medical jargon—ask for clarification if the doctor uses complex terms
- If the doctor mentions death/dying, you become tearful but want to know details (suffering? timescale? what happens next?)
- You want to see her
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Introduces self, confirms relationship, appropriate setting | /1 |
| Establishes baseline | Asks what he knows already ("What have you been told?") | /1 |
| Warning shot | Gives warning ("I'm afraid I have some serious news") | /1 |
| Delivers news | Clear, honest explanation: "She is critically ill and unlikely to survive" (avoids euphemisms like "not doing well") | /2 |
| Empathy | Acknowledges emotions, pauses, allows silence, uses empathic statements ("I can see this is very difficult") | /2 |
| Information | Explains what's happening (shock, multi-organ failure), what's been done (treatments), why prognosis poor (not responding) | /2 |
| Next steps | Discusses: seeing her, palliation/comfort care, involving other family, time with her | /1 |
| Summarizes & offers support | Summarizes key points, offers to answer questions, arranges follow-up (can speak to consultant again, social work support) | /1 |
| Total | /11 |
Expected Standard:
- Pass (≥6/11): Delivers bad news clearly (no euphemisms), shows empathy, addresses son's questions
- Key discriminators:
- Honesty vs. false hope: Clear statement of poor prognosis vs. vague "we'll see how she goes"
- "Empathy: Genuine emotional attunement (pauses, acknowledges distress) vs. rushed, clinical delivery"
- "Practical next steps: Offers to take him to see her, discusses palliation, involves family vs. ending conversation abruptly"
Station 3: Focused History—Dyspneic Patient with Heart Failure
Format: History Taking Time: 11 minutes Setting: ED cubicle
Candidate Instructions:
You are the ED registrar. Mr. James, a 75-year-old man, presents with 3 days of worsening shortness of breath. Please take a focused history to determine the cause and severity of his dyspnoea. You do not need to examine the patient.
Examiner Instructions: Patient has acute decompensation of chronic heart failure (ischemic cardiomyopathy, LVEF 30%). Precipitant is medication non-adherence (ran out of furosemide 2 weeks ago, couldn't afford prescription refill).
Actor/Patient Brief: You are a 75-year-old retired plumber. You've had heart failure for 5 years (after a heart attack). You take several medications (ramipril, bisoprolol, furosemide, atorvastatin) but ran out of furosemide ("water tablets") 2 weeks ago because you couldn't afford the prescription ($15 co-payment). You didn't tell anyone.
Symptoms:
- 3 days ago: Noticed legs swelling, a bit puffy
- 2 days ago: Started feeling short of breath walking to the shops (normally can walk 200m)
- 1 day ago: Woke up at 3am gasping for air (PND), had to sleep sitting in chair
- Today: Can't lie flat, breathless at rest, very worried
Other information (if asked):
- No chest pain, palpitations, syncope
- No cough, fever, sputum (rules out pneumonia)
- No leg pain, recent travel (rules out PE)
- Medications: Ramipril 10 mg, bisoprolol 5 mg, furosemide 40 mg BD (but haven't taken for 2 weeks), atorvastatin 40 mg
- Adherence: Usually good, but financial stress (pension only, $15 co-payment is a lot for you)
- Diet: Ate fish and chips 4 days ago (high salt) because it was cheap
- PMHx: MI 2012, PCI to LAD, HF (LVEF 30%), hypertension, hyperlipidemia
- Social: Lives alone (wife died 3 years ago), daughter visits weekly, doesn't smoke, no alcohol
- Allergies: Nil
If candidate asks about red flags:
- No chest pain (denies ACS)
- No syncope (denies arrhythmia)
- No sudden onset (denies PE)
Marking Criteria:
| Domain | Criterion | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Introduces self, confirms identity, explains purpose, gains consent | /1 |
| Presenting complaint | Explores dyspnoea: onset, duration, progression, severity (NYHA class, activity limitation) | /2 |
| HF-specific symptoms | Asks about orthopnoea, PND, peripheral oedema, weight gain | /2 |
| Red flags | Screens for chest pain (ACS), palpitations/syncope (arrhythmia), fever/cough (infection) | /1 |
| Medications | Identifies current HF medications, asks about adherence (discovers non-adherence to furosemide) | /2 |
| Precipitants | Explores potential causes: dietary indiscretion (salt), infection, ischemia, non-adherence | /1 |
| Past medical history | Asks about previous HF, IHD, LVEF if known, previous admissions | /1 |
| Social history | Living situation, support, barriers to adherence (financial, health literacy) | /1 |
| Total | /11 |
Expected Standard:
- Pass (≥6/11): Takes structured dyspnoea history, identifies HF symptoms (orthopnoea, PND), asks about medications
- Key discriminators:
- "Medication adherence: Actively explores adherence vs. assumes patient is compliant"
- Precipitants: Systematically asks about common ADHF precipitants vs. generic "breathlessness" history
- "Social barriers: Identifies financial barrier to medication adherence vs. misses it"
SAQ Practice
Question 1 (8 marks)
Stem: A 62-year-old man presents to ED with acute dyspnoea. His BP is 200/110 mmHg, HR 120 bpm, RR 32/min, SpO₂ 86% on room air. He has bibasal crackles and pink frothy sputum. You diagnose hypertensive acute pulmonary oedema.
Question: Outline your immediate management of this patient in the first 15 minutes. (8 marks)
Model Answer:
- Positioning: Sit patient upright, legs dependent (reduces preload) (1 mark)
- Oxygen: High-flow oxygen 15L via non-rebreather mask, target SpO₂ 92-96% (1 mark)
- Non-invasive ventilation (NIV):
- CPAP 5-10 cmH₂O OR BiPAP (IPAP 12-15, EPAP 5-8 cmH₂O)
- Reduces work of breathing, improves oxygenation (1 mark)
- IV access: Large-bore cannula (14-16G), continuous monitoring (ECG, SpO₂, BP q5min) (0.5 marks)
- IV furosemide: 40-80 mg IV bolus (reduces preload, diuresis) (1 mark)
- IV glyceryl trinitrate (GTN):
- Start 10-20 mcg/min IV infusion, titrate by 10-20 mcg/min q5min to reduce BP to ~140/90
- OR sublingual GTN 400-600 mcg q5min PRN (1 mark)
- Investigations:
- 12-lead ECG (rule out ACS, arrhythmia)
- Bloods: BNP/NT-proBNP, troponin, U&E, FBC
- Arterial blood gas (assess oxygenation, acid-base)
- Chest X-ray (confirm pulmonary oedema) (1 mark)
- Urinary catheter: Insert IDC to monitor urine output (target greater than 0.5 mL/kg/hr) (0.5 marks)
- Reassess frequently: Check vitals q5-10min, clinical response (dyspnoea, SpO₂, work of breathing). Prepare for intubation if deteriorates despite therapy (1 mark)
Examiner Notes:
- Accept: High-dose GTN IV (up to 200 mcg/min), sodium nitroprusside (ICU only), bumetanide instead of furosemide, VBG instead of ABG
- Do not accept: Fluid bolus (worsens pulmonary oedema), morphine (not recommended—respiratory depression, no mortality benefit), ACE-I acutely (delayed onset, hypotension risk)
- Bonus: Mentioning GTN contraindications (RV infarct, PDE-5 inhibitor use, SBP below 100) or bedside POCUS (B-lines, LV function) earns examiner goodwill but not extra marks (question is 8 marks total).
Question 2 (6 marks)
Stem: You are managing a patient with acute decompensated heart failure. After giving IV furosemide 80 mg, the patient has passed only 50 mL of urine in 2 hours.
Question: List SIX strategies to overcome diuretic resistance in this patient. (6 marks, 1 mark each)
Model Answer:
- Increase furosemide dose: Double or triple the dose (e.g., 160-240 mg IV bolus). Higher doses overcome reduced renal perfusion and tubular secretion. (1 mark)
- Switch to continuous infusion: Furosemide 10-40 mg/hr IV continuous infusion. Maintains consistent tubular drug levels, more effective than intermittent boluses. (1 mark)
- Add acetazolamide: 500 mg IV once daily. Blocks proximal tubule Na⁺ reabsorption (ADVOR trial: 42% vs 31% decongestion). (1 mark)
- Add thiazide diuretic: Metolazone 2.5-10 mg PO daily. Blocks distal convoluted tubule, synergistic with loop diuretics ("sequential nephron blockade"). (1 mark)
- Optimize hemodynamics: If hypotensive or low cardiac output (cool peripheries) → add inotrope (dobutamine 5-20 mcg/kg/min) to increase renal perfusion and GFR. (1 mark)
- Correct hypoalbuminemia: If serum albumin below 25 g/L → co-administer IV albumin 100 mL 20% with furosemide dose (improves drug delivery to tubules). (1 mark)
Alternative acceptable answers (examiner discretion):
- Switch loop diuretic: Bumetanide 2-4 mg IV instead of furosemide (different bioavailability, may overcome resistance)
- Ultrafiltration (CVVH): Extracorporeal fluid removal if refractory to all medical therapy (ICU/nephrology input required)
- Correct acidosis: If metabolic acidosis (pH below 7.3), loop diuretics less effective; consider bicarbonate infusion (controversial)
Examiner Notes:
- Do not accept: "Give more fluids" (worsens volume overload), "Stop diuretics" (does not address resistance)
- Award 1 mark per strategy, max 6 marks. If candidate lists greater than 6 strategies, mark first 6 only.
Question 3 (6 marks)
Stem: A 58-year-old Aboriginal man from a remote Northern Territory community presents with acute heart failure secondary to rheumatic heart disease (severe mitral regurgitation). You are arranging RFDS retrieval to Darwin.
Question: List THREE specific challenges in managing heart failure in remote/rural Aboriginal communities AND THREE strategies to improve outcomes. (6 marks: 3 for challenges, 3 for strategies)
Model Answer:
Challenges (3 marks, 1 mark each):
- Limited access to specialist care: No cardiologists, echocardiography, or advanced HF services in remote clinics. Delays in diagnosis, monitoring, and optimization of therapy. (1 mark)
- Medication adherence barriers: High cost of medications (PBS co-payments), complex regimens, limited health literacy, cultural beliefs about Western medicine, transport difficulties for clinic follow-up. (1 mark)
- High burden of rheumatic heart disease (RHD): Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations have 10-20× higher RHD rates due to overcrowding, poor housing, delayed GAS pharyngitis treatment. RHD causes premature HF (median age 10-15 years younger than non-Indigenous). (1 mark)
Strategies to improve outcomes (3 marks, 1 mark each):
- Telemedicine and RFDS: Remote cardiology consultations via telehealth, portable echocardiography with store-and-forward imaging. Early RFDS aeromedical retrieval for deteriorating patients. (1 mark)
- Cultural safety and engagement: Involve Aboriginal health workers in care, use interpreters (Aboriginal languages, Kriol), family-centered decision-making, respect for cultural protocols. Builds trust and improves adherence. (1 mark)
- RHD prevention programs: Primary prevention (early GAS pharyngitis treatment with antibiotics), secondary prevention (benzathine penicillin G injections every 28 days to prevent ARF recurrence). RHD Australia programs (NT, FNQ) have reduced ARF incidence. (1 mark)
Alternative acceptable answers:
- Challenges: Distance to hospitals (600-1000 km), environmental factors (heat exacerbates HF), workforce shortages (GP turnover in remote areas), social determinants (poverty, food insecurity, diabetes/obesity comorbidities)
- Strategies: Subsidized medications (Close the Gap PBS co-payment waiver), HF nurse outreach visits, simplified medication regimens (once-daily dosing), community education (self-monitoring weight, recognizing symptoms), addressing social determinants (housing, nutrition programs)
Examiner Notes:
- Award 1 mark per challenge (max 3), 1 mark per strategy (max 3)
- Accept: Any evidence-based challenge or strategy related to remote/rural/Indigenous HF care
- Do not accept: Generic statements not specific to remote/Indigenous context (e.g., "patient doesn't take medications"—too vague, must mention WHY: cost, distance, literacy, etc.)
Question 4 (8 marks)
Stem: A 70-year-old woman with known heart failure (LVEF 25%) presents with cardiogenic shock (BP 80/50 mmHg, HR 110 bpm, cold peripheries, altered mental status). You have started dobutamine 10 mcg/kg/min, but her BP remains 85/55 mmHg after 30 minutes.
Question: (a) List FOUR additional immediate management strategies. (4 marks) (b) List FOUR complications of inotrope therapy you need to monitor for. (4 marks)
Model Answer:
(a) Additional immediate management strategies (4 marks, 1 mark each):
- Increase dobutamine dose: Titrate to 15-20 mcg/kg/min (maximum dose). May improve cardiac output and perfusion further. (1 mark)
- Add vasopressor: Start noradrenaline 0.05-0.2 mcg/kg/min IV if SBP remains below 70-80 mmHg. Increases BP via peripheral vasoconstriction. (Caution: increases afterload, may worsen HF—use as bridge to definitive therapy.) (1 mark)
- Alternative inotrope: Switch to or add milrinone 0.375-0.75 mcg/kg/min IV (PDE-3 inhibitor, different mechanism from dobutamine). Particularly if patient on chronic beta-blockers (dobutamine less effective). (1 mark)
- Mechanical circulatory support (MCS): Urgent cardiology/ICU consult for IABP (intra-aortic balloon pump), Impella (microaxial pump), or VA-ECMO. Required if refractory to maximal inotrope/vasopressor therapy. (1 mark)
Alternative acceptable answers:
- Invasive monitoring: Arterial line (continuous BP monitoring), central venous line (CVP measurement), consider PA catheter (measure cardiac output, guide therapy)
- Optimize preload: If CVP low (below 8 mmHg) and patient dry → cautious 250 mL bolus crystalloid (uncommon in HF but possible if over-diuresed). If CVP high (greater than 18 mmHg) → add IV furosemide once SBP greater than 90 mmHg
- Identify and treat reversible causes: ACS (coronary angiography, PCI), mechanical complication (acute MR, VSD—needs urgent echo and cardiac surgery), arrhythmia (cardiovert unstable AF/VT), tamponade (pericardiocentesis)
- Reduce afterload: If SBP 80-90 mmHg and peripheries warming → cautious trial of vasodilator (low-dose nitroprusside or nitroglycerin IV) to reduce LV workload (ICU setting only, invasive monitoring required)
(b) Complications of inotrope therapy (4 marks, 1 mark each):
- Arrhythmias: Ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), atrial fibrillation. Inotropes increase myocardial automaticity and triggered activity. Monitor continuous ECG. (1 mark)
- Myocardial ischemia: Inotropes increase myocardial oxygen demand (MVO₂) via ↑contractility, ↑heart rate. Can precipitate ACS or worsen existing ischemia. Monitor for chest pain, ECG changes, troponin rise. (1 mark)
- Hypotension (especially milrinone): Milrinone causes vasodilation (PDE-3 inhibition) → may worsen hypotension despite improved contractility. Monitor BP closely. (1 mark)
- Tachycardia: Dobutamine stimulates β₁-receptors → ↑HR. Excessive tachycardia (HR greater than 120-130) reduces diastolic filling time → ↓CO paradoxically. May need to reduce dose or switch to milrinone. (1 mark)
Alternative acceptable answers:
- Thrombocytopenia (milrinone): Rare, below 1%, but monitor platelet count
- Extravasation injury: Inotropes are vesicants (tissue necrosis if IV line infiltrates). Use central line ideally. Monitor IV site.
- Tolerance: Prolonged inotrope use (greater than 72 hrs) → downregulation of β-receptors → reduced efficacy (dobutamine)
Examiner Notes:
- Award 1 mark per strategy/complication, max 4 marks each section.
- Accept: Any evidence-based strategy or complication.
- Do not accept in part (a): "Give fluids" without specifying indication (CVP low, euvolemic) or "Wait and see" (not active management).
Australian Guidelines
ARC/ANZCOR
-
ANZCOR Guideline 11.7 - Acute Coronary Syndromes: Relevant to AHF precipitated by ACS. Recommends early reperfusion (PCI for STEMI within 90 min), dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor), anticoagulation (heparin or fondaparinux), and medical therapy (beta-blockers, ACE-I, statins). Specific to Australia/NZ context (not AHA/ERC). [30]
-
Key differences from AHA/ERC:
- "Nicorandil: Not available in Australia (used in UK/Europe for ACS). Use GTN or isosorbide dinitrate instead."
- "Fondaparinux: Preferred anticoagulant for NSTEMI in ANZCOR (lower bleeding risk than enoxaparin). AHA uses enoxaparin or UFH."
- "Prasugrel: Less commonly used in Australia (ticagrelor preferred for P2Y12 inhibition in ACS). AHA endorses both equally."
Therapeutic Guidelines Australia
-
Cardiovascular Expert Group - Heart Failure:
- "Acute HF management: Recommends IV loop diuretics (furosemide 40-80 mg IV bolus, titrate to response), vasodilators (GTN IV 10-200 mcg/min for hypertensive AHF), NIV (CPAP/BiPAP for respiratory distress), and oxygen (target SpO₂ 92-96%)."
- Chronic HF optimization: "Triple therapy" with ACE-I (or ARB if intolerant) + beta-blocker (carvedilol, metoprolol, bisoprolol) + MRA (spironolactone) for HFrEF (LVEF below 40%). Add SGLT2 inhibitor (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin) for further mortality reduction (EMPEROR-Reduced, DAPA-HF trials).
- "Diuretic resistance: Recommends sequential nephron blockade (add metolazone 2.5-10 mg PO to furosemide) or continuous furosemide infusion (5-40 mg/hr)."
-
PBS (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme):
- "Subsidized HF medications: ACE-I, ARBs, beta-blockers, MRAs, SGLT2 inhibitors (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin for HFrEF LVEF ≤40%), sacubitril-valsartan (Entresto, for HFrEF if symptomatic despite ACE-I/ARB + beta-blocker)."
- ""Close the Gap" co-payment waiver: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients eligible for free or reduced-cost PBS medications (removes $7.70 co-payment barrier)."
State-Specific
-
NSW Health - Acute Heart Failure Pathway: Recommends "time to diuretic" below 60 min from ED arrival, early BNP measurement, risk stratification (EHMRG score for ED disposition), and cardiology referral for all new-onset HF or high-risk ADHF. [31]
-
Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR): Tracks HF outcomes statewide. Data shows 30-day readmission 22%, 1-year mortality 28% for AHF admissions. Worse outcomes in rural/regional areas (delayed access to cardiology, fewer HF nurse services).
-
Queensland Cardiac Outcomes Registry: Similar data. Indigenous Queenslanders have 1.6× higher HF hospitalization and 1.7× higher HF mortality than non-Indigenous.
Remote/Rural Considerations
Pre-Hospital
Ambulance/Paramedic Management:
- Basic Life Support (BLS): Positioning (sit upright), oxygen (non-rebreather mask 15L), reassurance, rapid transport
- Advanced Life Support (ALS):
- IV access en route
- "GTN spray: 400 mcg sublingual q5min PRN (if SBP greater than 100 mmHg)"
- "CPAP: Some paramedic services (e.g., NSW Ambulance, Ambulance Victoria) carry portable CPAP devices for acute pulmonary oedema. Initiate pre-hospital if severe respiratory distress (RR greater than 30, SpO₂ below 90%)."
- "Furosemide 40 mg IV: Some protocols allow paramedic administration (standing order or phone medical control)"
- "Pre-notification: Alert ED to prepare resus bay, NIV, medications"
Extended Care Paramedics (ECP): In remote areas (Northern Territory, Western Australia, rural Queensland), ECPs can provide advanced care (IV medications, clinical decision-making) when nearest hospital is hours away.
Resource-Limited Setting
Modified approach when resources limited (small rural hospital, remote clinic):
| Resource | Limitation | Workaround |
|---|---|---|
| NIV | No CPAP/BiPAP machine | Improvise BVM-CPAP (bag-valve-mask with PEEP valve 5-10 cmH₂O, hold mask tightly). Not ideal but temporizes until retrieval or intubation. |
| IV GTN | No infusion pump | Use GTN spray 400 mcg sublingual q5-10min PRN (not as titratable but provides vasodilation). |
| IV furosemide | Limited supply | Use oral furosemide 80-120 mg PO if mild-moderate AHF and IV not available (slower onset but effective). |
| Monitoring | No arterial line, CVP | Use serial non-invasive BP, clinical assessment (CRT, UOP, mental status), VBG for lactate/pH trends. |
| Investigations | No BNP, echo | Rely on clinical diagnosis (Framingham criteria), CXR if available. Transfer for definitive workup. |
Retrieval (RFDS Considerations)
Criteria for retrieval (transfer to tertiary center):
- Cardiogenic shock (SBP below 90, inotrope requirement, multi-organ failure) → ICU bed required
- Refractory hypoxia (SpO₂ below 90% despite NIV, intubated) → mechanical ventilation, specialist input
- Suspected ACS precipitant → PCI capability needed (cath lab at tertiary hospital)
- Mechanical complications (acute MR, VSD, free wall rupture) → cardiac surgery required
- No cardiology access at local hospital → transfer for echocardiography, specialist optimization
RFDS capabilities:
- Equipment: Portable ventilators, NIV (CPAP), infusion pumps (inotropes, vasopressors), blood products (O-neg, O-pos in fridge onboard), point-of-care testing (i-STAT for blood gases, electrolytes), defibrillator/monitor
- Personnel: Retrieval doctor (often emergency or intensive care specialist), flight nurse, paramedic
- Clinical support: Telephone advice from RFDS Retrieval Coordination Centre (RCC) to remote clinician pre-arrival
Retrieval challenges:
- Distance: Some communities greater than 1000 km from tertiary hospital (2-3 hour flight)
- Weather: Monsoons (Northern Australia Oct-Apr), dust storms (Central Australia) can delay or prevent flight
- Airstrip conditions: Dirt airstrips may be unusable after rain (plane can't land → road ambulance to nearby sealed strip, or wait for conditions to improve)
- Altitude: Commercial RFDS planes fly at 10,000-15,000 feet (unpressurized or partially pressurized) → hypoxia worsens at altitude. Pre-oxygenate well, increase FiO₂ during flight. Pneumothorax risk (air expands at altitude—exclude PTX before flight, consider chest drain prophylactically if rib fractures).
RFDS contact: Each state has a dedicated number:
- Northern Territory: 08 8944 8555
- Queensland: 07 3630 5000
- NSW: 1300 363 726
- Western Australia: 08 9417 0555
- South Australia: 08 8238 3333
- Victoria: SAMU (retrieval service) 1300 368 661
Telemedicine
Remote consultation approach:
- Cardiology telehealth: Many tertiary hospitals offer real-time video consult for remote EDs. Present case, share ECG/CXR images (via secure platform), discuss management.
- Store-and-forward echocardiography: Some remote clinics have portable echo devices (e.g., Butterfly iQ, Philips Lumify). Non-cardiologists perform basic views (PLAX, A4C), images uploaded to cloud, reviewed by cardiologist within 24 hrs.
- Clinical decision support: RFDS Medical Chest (online handbook) provides protocols for managing HF, ACS, arrhythmias in remote settings. Updated annually.
References
Guidelines
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Heart failure in Australia. Cat. no. CVD 88. Canberra: AIHW, 2023. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/heart-stroke-vascular-diseases/heart-failure
- National Heart Foundation of Australia. Chronic Heart Failure Guidelines. 2018 Update. Available from: https://www.heartfoundation.org.au/
- McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3627-3639. PMID: 37622666
- Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. Circulation. 2022;145(18):e895-e1032. PMID: 35363499
- Mebazaa A, Yilmaz MB, Levy P, et al. Recommendations on pre-hospital & early hospital management of acute heart failure: a consensus paper from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the European Society of Emergency Medicine and the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17(6):544-558. PMID: 25999021
- Australian Resuscitation Council and New Zealand Resuscitation Council. ANZCOR Guideline 11.7 - Acute Coronary Syndromes. 2021. Available from: https://resus.org.au/guidelines/
Key Evidence
Epidemiology: 7. Savarese G, Lund LH. Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure. Card Fail Rev. 2017;3(1):7-11. PMID: 28785469 8. Clark RA, Mcalister FA, Eurich DT, et al. The effect of comorbidities on the competing risk of death in acute decompensated heart failure. Med J Aust. 2010;192(6):310-313. PMID: 20230346 9. Teng TK, Finn J, Hung J, et al. A validation of the Hospital Admissions Risk Profile (HARP) model for 30-day hospital readmissions using multicentre data. Int J Cardiol. 2016;220:743-747. PMID: 27393862 10. Azzopardi S, Baldwin L, Schutze H, et al. Heart failure in Indigenous Australians. Heart Lung Circ. 2018;27(11):1328-1333. PMID: 29478858 11. Grey C, Jackson R, Wells S, et al. Ethnic differences in the management of heart failure in New Zealand. Heart. 2006;92(4):511-515. PMID: 16159977 12. Royal Flying Doctor Service. Best for the Bush: 2019-20 Annual Report. Available from: https://www.flyingdoctor.org.au/
Diagnosis: 13. Januzzi JL, Camargo CA, Anwaruddin S, et al. The N-terminal Pro-BNP investigation of dyspnea in the emergency department (PRIDE) study. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(8):948-954. PMID: 15820160 14. Peacock WF, De Marco T, Fonarow GC, et al. Cardiac troponin and outcome in acute heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(20):2117-2126. PMID: 18480204 15. Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest. 2008;134(1):117-125. PMID: 18403664 16. Al Deeb M, Barbic S, Featherstone R, et al. Point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema in patients presenting with acute dyspnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(8):843-852. PMID: 25176151
NIV: 17. Gray A, Goodacre S, Newby DE, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(2):142-151. PMID: 18184957 (3CPO trial) 18. Cotter G, Metzkor E, Kaluski E, et al. Randomised trial of high-dose isosorbide dinitrate plus low-dose furosemide versus high-dose furosemide plus low-dose isosorbide dinitrate in severe pulmonary oedema. Lancet. 1998;351(9100):389-393. PMID: 9482291
Inotropes: 19. Tacon CL, McCaffrey J, Delaney A. Dobutamine for patients with severe heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(3):359-367. PMID: 22183416 20. Felker GM, Benza RL, Chandler AB, et al. Heart failure etiology and response to milrinone in decompensated heart failure: results from the OPTIME-CHF study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(6):997-1003. PMID: 12651048
Diuretics: 21. Felker GM, Lee KL, Bull DA, et al. Diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (DOSE trial). N Engl J Med. 2011;364(9):797-805. PMID: 21345100 22. Mullens W, Dauw J, Martens P, et al. Acetazolamide in acute decompensated heart failure with volume overload (ADVOR trial). N Engl J Med. 2022;387(13):1185-1195. PMID: 36027559
SGLT2 inhibitors: 23. Voors AA, Angermann CE, Teerlink JR, et al. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: a multinational randomized trial (EMPULSE). Nat Med. 2022;28(3):568-574. PMID: 35165448
HF Disease Management: 24. Stewart S, Vandenbroek AJ, Pearson S, et al. Prolonged beneficial effects of a home-based intervention on unplanned readmissions and mortality among patients with congestive heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(3):257-261. PMID: 9989537 25. Carapetis JR, Beaton A, Cunningham MW, et al. Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:15084. PMID: 27188830
Time to Treatment: 26. Maisel A, Xue Y, Shah K, et al. Increased 90-day mortality in patients with acute heart failure with elevated troponin: prevalence and clinical outcome in the URGENT dyspnea study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;15(2):196-204. PMID: 22968732
Albumin + Furosemide: 27. Fliser D, Zurbrüggen I, Mutschler E, et al. Coadministration of albumin and furosemide in patients with the nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int. 1999;55(2):629-634. PMID: 9987087
Examination Findings: 28. Wang CS, FitzGerald JM, Schulzer M, et al. Does this dyspneic patient in the emergency department have congestive heart failure? JAMA. 2005;294(15):1944-1956. PMID: 16234501 29. Butman SM, Ewy GA, Standen JR, et al. Bedside cardiovascular examination in patients with severe chronic heart failure: importance of rest or inducible jugular venous distension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(4):968-974. PMID: 8409069
Australian-Specific: 30. Chew DP, Scott IA, Cullen L, et al. National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2016. Med J Aust. 2016;205(3):128-133. PMID: 27465769 31. NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation. Acute Heart Failure Clinical Pathway. 2020. Available from: https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/
Systematic Reviews
- Weng CL, Zhao YT, Liu QH, et al. Meta-analysis: noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(9):590-600. PMID: 20439577
- Vital FM, Ladeira MT, Atallah AN. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(5):CD005351. PMID: 23728654
- Faris RF, Flather M, Purcell H, et al. Diuretics for heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD003838. PMID: 22336796
Landmark Studies
- The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med. 1987;316(23):1429-1435. PMID: 2883575
- Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (COPERNICUS trial). N Engl J Med. 2001;344(22):1651-1658. PMID: 11386263
- Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure (RALES trial). N Engl J Med. 1999;341(10):709-717. PMID: 10471456
- McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (DAPA-HF trial). N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):1995-2008. PMID: 31535829
- Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure (EMPEROR-Reduced trial). N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1413-1424. PMID: 32865377
- Velazquez EJ, Morrow DA, DeVore AD, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(6):539-548. PMID: 30415601 (PIONEER-HF trial)
Frequently asked questions
Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.
What is the difference between acute heart failure and acute decompensated heart failure?
Acute heart failure (AHF) is an umbrella term encompassing new-onset HF and acute decompensation of chronic HF (ADHF). ADHF refers specifically to worsening of pre-existing chronic heart failure.
Should I use high-dose or low-dose furosemide in the ED?
The DOSE trial showed high-dose IV furosemide (2.5× home oral dose) achieves greater diuresis and symptom relief than low-dose (1× home oral dose), with acceptable transient creatinine elevation. Use high-dose unless contraindicated.
Is BiPAP better than CPAP for acute pulmonary oedema?
The 3CPO trial found no difference in mortality or intubation between CPAP and BiPAP. Both improve symptoms faster than oxygen alone. Use whichever is available and tolerated.
When should I start inotropes in acute heart failure?
Inotropes are reserved for cardiogenic shock (SBP below 90 mmHg despite fluids, hypoperfusion signs). They increase myocardial oxygen demand and arrhythmia risk. Not for routine AHF.
Learning map
Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.
Prerequisites
Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.
Differentials
Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.
Consequences
Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.
- Cardiogenic Shock
- Acute Kidney Injury
- Ventricular Arrhythmias