Acute Cholangitis
Acute cholangitis is a life-threatening systemic infection arising from bacterial contamination of an obstructed biliary... MRCP, FRACS exam preparation.
Clinical board
A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.
Urgent signals
Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.
- Septic shock (Reynolds' pentad)
- Multi-organ failure
- Altered mental status or confusion
- Persistent hypotension despite fluid resuscitation
Exam focus
Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.
- MRCP
- FRACS
- FRCS
- USMLE
Linked comparisons
Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.
- Acute Cholecystitis
- Acute Pancreatitis
Editorial and exam context
Reviewed by MedVellum Editorial Team · MedVellum Medical Education Platform
Credentials: MBBS, MRCP, Board Certified
Acute Cholangitis
1. Clinical Overview
Summary
Acute cholangitis is a life-threatening systemic infection arising from bacterial contamination of an obstructed biliary tree. It represents a true medical emergency requiring prompt recognition, resuscitation, antimicrobial therapy, and urgent biliary decompression to prevent progression to septic shock, multi-organ failure, and death. [1,2]
The classic clinical presentation is Charcot's triad: fever with rigors, right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain, and jaundice. However, this complete triad is present in only 50-70% of patients. [3] Severe cholangitis manifests as Reynolds' pentad, with the addition of hypotension and altered mental status, indicating septic shock with mortality rates approaching 30% without urgent intervention. [4]
The most common aetiology is choledocholithiasis (common bile duct stones), accounting for 50-70% of cases. [5] Other causes include benign and malignant biliary strictures, post-procedural complications (particularly post-ERCP), biliary stent occlusion, and parasitic infections in endemic regions. [6]
The Tokyo Guidelines (TG18/TG21) provide an internationally accepted framework for diagnosis, severity assessment, and management, stratifying patients into mild (Grade I), moderate (Grade II), and severe (Grade III) categories based on the presence of organ dysfunction. [1,7] This severity grading directly determines the urgency of biliary drainage and the need for intensive care admission.
Key management principles include early recognition, adherence to sepsis bundles, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics covering Gram-negative enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes, and timely biliary drainage—preferably via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). [8,9] Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) serves as the primary alternative when ERCP is unsuccessful or anatomically inaccessible. [10]
Key Facts
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Definition | Bacterial infection of the biliary tree due to obstruction |
| Charcot's Triad | Fever + RUQ pain + Jaundice (50-70% sensitivity) |
| Reynolds' Pentad | Charcot's triad + Hypotension + Altered mental status |
| Most Common Cause | Choledocholithiasis (50-70%) |
| Other Causes | Strictures (benign/malignant), stent occlusion, post-ERCP, parasites |
| Common Organisms | E. coli (25-50%), Klebsiella (15-20%), Enterococcus (10-20%), Pseudomonas, Bacteroides |
| Overall Mortality | 2.5-10% with treatment; up to 30% in severe untreated cases |
| Tokyo Severity | Grade I (mild), Grade II (moderate), Grade III (severe with organ dysfunction) |
| First-Line Drainage | ERCP with sphincterotomy (90-95% success rate) |
| Drainage Timing | Urgent (less than 24h) for Grade III; Early (24-48h) for Grade II |
| Key Antibiotics | Piperacillin-tazobactam OR Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole |
| Duration | 4-7 days post-source control; longer if inadequate drainage |
Clinical Pearls
"Charcot's Is Only Half the Story": The classic triad is absent in 30-50% of cases. Maintain a high index of suspicion in any patient with unexplained sepsis, jaundice, or RUQ discomfort—especially the elderly or immunosuppressed who may present atypically. [3,11]
"Reynolds' Pentad = Immediate Action": Hypotension and confusion added to Charcot's triad indicates severe cholangitis with high mortality. This constitutes a surgical/endoscopic emergency requiring ICU admission, aggressive resuscitation, and urgent biliary drainage within 12-24 hours. [4]
"Stone Disease Dominates, But Think Wider": CBD stones cause the majority of cases, but always consider post-ERCP complications, biliary stent occlusion in malignancy patients, benign strictures (PSC, chronic pancreatitis), and parasites (Ascaris, Clonorchis, Opisthorchis) in endemic regions. [5,6]
"Drain the Bile, Save the Life": Antibiotics alone are insufficient. The obstructed, infected biliary system must be decompressed. ERCP is first-line; PTC if ERCP fails or is anatomically inaccessible (e.g., post-Roux-en-Y, duodenal obstruction). [8,9,10]
"TG18 Severity = Timing": Tokyo Guidelines Grade III (organ dysfunction) requires drainage within 24 hours and often immediate (within 12 hours); Grade II (moderate) within 24-48 hours; Grade I (mild) can be semi-elective once stabilised on antibiotics. [1,7]
"Blood Cultures Before Antibiotics—But Don't Delay": Obtain cultures promptly, but initiation of antibiotics should not wait. Target administration within 1 hour of recognition, as per sepsis guidelines. Positive blood cultures in 40-80% guide subsequent therapy. [12,13]
"Biliary Penetration Matters": Choose antibiotics with good biliary penetration. Piperacillin-tazobactam achieves excellent concentrations; aminoglycosides penetrate poorly in obstruction. De-escalate based on culture sensitivities. [14]
Why This Matters Clinically
Acute cholangitis carries significant morbidity and mortality, particularly when recognition or intervention is delayed. Early studies reported mortality rates exceeding 50% with conservative management alone, which dramatically decreased to under 10% with the advent of interventional biliary drainage. [2,8] The Tokyo Guidelines have standardised diagnosis and management, improving outcomes through consistent severity-based algorithms. [1]
Every clinician—from emergency physicians to intensivists to surgeons—must recognise Charcot's triad, initiate the sepsis pathway, and urgently involve gastroenterology or hepatobiliary surgery for drainage. Understanding the Tokyo severity criteria allows appropriate triage: mild cases can be stabilised and drained semi-electively, while severe cases require immediate ICU transfer and emergency ERCP or PTC. [7,9]
2. Epidemiology
Incidence and Prevalence
Acute cholangitis is a common biliary emergency, though precise incidence data vary due to differences in definition and reporting. It occurs in approximately 1-2% of patients with symptomatic choledocholithiasis. [5]
| Parameter | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence | 1-2% of patients with CBD stones | Higher in elderly, post-procedural settings |
| Hospital Admissions | Common cause of biliary emergency | Represents 6-9% of biliary-related admissions |
| Age Distribution | Peak 50-70 years | Increases with age |
| Sex | Female predominance (2:1) | Reflects gallstone epidemiology |
| Mortality (Overall) | 2.5-10% | With appropriate treatment |
| Mortality (Severe) | 15-30% | Grade III without urgent drainage |
| Recurrence | 10-25% if underlying cause not addressed | Higher with retained stones, strictures |
Demographics
| Factor | Details |
|---|---|
| Age | Incidence increases with age; peak in 6th-7th decade |
| Sex | Female:Male ratio approximately 2:1 (gallstone predominance) |
| Geography | Higher in regions with high gallstone prevalence (Western, Latin American populations); parasitic causes more common in East/Southeast Asia |
| Ethnicity | Native American, Hispanic, and Northern European populations have higher gallstone rates |
| Socioeconomic | Limited access to elective cholecystectomy increases risk of complicated gallstone disease |
Risk Factors
| Risk Factor | Mechanism/Notes | Relative Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Cholelithiasis | CBD stone migration causes obstruction | High |
| Previous biliary surgery | Choledochojejunostomy, sphincteroplasty alter anatomy | Moderate-High |
| Biliary stent in situ | Stent occlusion, biofilm formation | High (especially > 3 months) |
| Malignant biliary obstruction | Pancreatic head, cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary tumours | Moderate |
| Benign strictures | Primary sclerosing cholangitis, chronic pancreatitis, post-surgical | Moderate |
| Previous ERCP | Iatrogenic cholangitis, incomplete stone clearance | Moderate |
| Parasitic infection | Ascaris lumbricoides, Clonorchis sinensis, Opisthorchis viverrini | High (endemic areas) |
| Choledochal cysts | Structural abnormality with bile stasis | Moderate |
| Immunosuppression | Impaired immune response, atypical organisms | Moderate-High |
| Diabetes mellitus | Impaired immunity, increased gallstone risk | Moderate |
| Advanced age (> 75 years) | Comorbidities, atypical presentation, reduced reserve | Moderate |
| Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis | Endemic in East Asia; intrahepatic stone disease | High |
Temporal Trends
The incidence of cholangitis has evolved with changing patterns of biliary intervention:
- Increased ERCP-related cholangitis as endoscopic procedures have become more common [15]
- Decreased post-cholecystectomy cholangitis with improved surgical techniques and intraoperative cholangiography
- Rising incidence in the elderly due to demographic ageing and increased comorbidities
- Increased stent-related cholangitis with wider use of biliary stenting for palliation of malignant obstruction [6]
3. Aetiology
Primary Causes
Acute cholangitis requires two conditions: biliary obstruction and bacterial contamination of the biliary tree. [1]
| Cause | Frequency | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Choledocholithiasis | 50-70% | CBD stone causes complete or partial obstruction |
| Malignant stricture | 10-20% | Pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary carcinoma |
| Benign stricture | 5-15% | PSC, chronic pancreatitis, post-surgical, post-radiation |
| Biliary stent occlusion | 5-15% | Biofilm, sludge, tumour ingrowth |
| Post-ERCP/Post-procedural | 1-5% | Inadequate drainage, contamination during procedure |
| Parasitic | Variable | Ascaris, liver flukes (endemic regions) |
| Choledochal cyst | Rare | Congenital biliary dilatation |
| Mirizzi syndrome | Rare | Extrinsic compression by impacted cystic duct stone |
| Papillary stenosis | Rare | Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction |
| Haemobilia | Rare | Blood clot obstruction |
| Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis | Regional | Intrahepatic stones, oriental cholangiohepatitis |
Choledocholithiasis (CBD Stones)
CBD stones are the predominant cause worldwide. [5] They may be:
- Primary: Form within the bile ducts (brown pigment stones, associated with infection/stasis)
- Secondary: Migrate from the gallbladder (cholesterol or black pigment stones)
Risk factors for CBD stones include advanced age, larger gallstones, longer cystic duct, and concurrent gallbladder disease.
Malignant Causes
Biliary obstruction from malignancy predisposes to cholangitis, particularly:
- Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (head of pancreas)
- Cholangiocarcinoma (hilar/Klatskin, distal, intrahepatic)
- Ampullary carcinoma
- Gallbladder carcinoma with CBD invasion
- Metastatic disease (porta hepatis lymphadenopathy)
Patients with malignant obstruction and biliary stents are at particularly high risk due to stent occlusion and tumour progression. [6]
Benign Strictures
| Aetiology | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) | Diffuse intrahepatic and extrahepatic strictures; IBD association |
| Chronic Pancreatitis | Distal CBD stricture from fibrosis |
| Post-Surgical | Bile duct injury, anastomotic stricture |
| Post-Radiation | Fibrosis from hepatic/pancreatic radiotherapy |
| IgG4-Related Disease | Autoimmune cholangiopathy |
| Ischaemic Cholangiopathy | Post-transplant, hepatic artery thrombosis |
Post-Procedural Cholangitis
Cholangitis following biliary interventions is a recognised complication: [15]
- Post-ERCP: Incidence 0.5-3%; higher with incomplete stone clearance, contrast injection into obstructed ducts
- Post-PTC: Risk of bile leak and infection
- Post-Cholecystectomy: Retained CBD stones, bile duct injury
Parasitic Causes
Common in East and Southeast Asia: [6]
- Ascaris lumbricoides: Roundworm migration into biliary tree
- Clonorchis sinensis: Chinese liver fluke
- Opisthorchis viverrini: Southeast Asian liver fluke
- Fasciola hepatica: Sheep liver fluke (less common)
These cause recurrent cholangitis, intrahepatic stone formation, and predispose to cholangiocarcinoma.
4. Pathophysiology
Mechanism of Disease
The development of acute cholangitis requires the combination of biliary obstruction and bacterial presence in the bile ducts. [1,16]
Step 1: Biliary Obstruction
- Mechanical obstruction (stone, stricture, tumour, stent occlusion)
- Increased intraductal pressure (normal: 7-14 cmH2O; in obstruction: 25-30+ cmH2O)
- Bile stasis creates a favourable environment for bacterial proliferation
- Impaired biliary flow prevents washout of bacteria
Step 2: Bacterial Colonisation
Normal bile is sterile. Bacteria enter the biliary tree via: [16]
- Ascending route (most common): Bacteria from duodenum ascend through the sphincter of Oddi
- Portal venous route: Translocation from intestinal flora
- Lymphatic route: Less common
- Haematogenous route: Rarely, from distant infection
Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, prior sphincterotomy, and biliary-enteric anastomoses increase ascending infection risk.
Step 3: Infection and Inflammation
- Bacterial multiplication in obstructed bile
- Inflammatory response in bile duct wall (acute cholangitis)
- Purulent bile accumulation (suppurative cholangitis in severe cases)
- Release of bacterial endotoxins (lipopolysaccharide from Gram-negatives)
Step 4: Cholangio-Venous and Cholangio-Lymphatic Reflux
- Critical step: Elevated biliary pressure (> 25 cmH2O) causes reflux of infected bile into:
- Hepatic venous sinusoids (cholangio-venous reflux)
- Peribiliary lymphatics (cholangio-lymphatic reflux)
- Systemic bacteraemia and endotoxaemia
- Blood culture positivity in 40-80% of patients [12,13]
Step 5: Systemic Inflammatory Response
- SIRS → Sepsis → Severe Sepsis → Septic Shock
- Cytokine storm (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-alpha)
- Endothelial dysfunction and capillary leak
- Vasodilation and hypotension
- Tissue hypoperfusion and organ dysfunction
Step 6: Organ Failure (Severe/Grade III)
Without intervention, progression to: [4]
- Cardiovascular: Distributive shock requiring vasopressors
- Neurological: Encephalopathy from sepsis and hepatic dysfunction
- Respiratory: ARDS
- Renal: Acute kidney injury from hypoperfusion
- Hepatic: Worsening jaundice, coagulopathy
- Haematological: DIC, thrombocytopenia
- Death: Multi-organ failure
Key Pathophysiological Concepts
| Concept | Significance |
|---|---|
| Biliary Pressure Threshold | Reflux occurs at > 25 cmH2O; normal is 7-14 cmH2O |
| Cholangio-Venous Reflux | Mechanism of systemic bacteraemia; explains high blood culture positivity |
| Endotoxaemia | Gram-negative LPS triggers inflammatory cascade |
| Suppurative Cholangitis | Pus-filled bile ducts; highest mortality subset |
| Hepatic Abscess Risk | Complication of uncontrolled cholangitis; may require drainage |
Common Organisms
The microbiology of acute cholangitis reflects the enteric origin of bacteria: [12,14,16]
| Organism | Frequency | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Escherichia coli | 25-50% | Most common; Gram-negative |
| Klebsiella spp. | 15-20% | Gram-negative; often MDR strains |
| Enterococcus spp. | 10-20% | Gram-positive; associated with prior antibiotics, healthcare exposure |
| Enterobacter spp. | 5-10% | Gram-negative |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 5-10% | Associated with prior instrumentation, stents |
| Bacteroides fragilis | 5-15% | Anaerobe; mixed infections common |
| Clostridium spp. | 3-5% | Anaerobe |
| Streptococcus spp. | 2-5% | Viridans group streptococci |
| Citrobacter spp. | 2-5% | Gram-negative |
| Proteus spp. | 2-5% | Gram-negative |
Polymicrobial infection is common (30-50% of cases), particularly in healthcare-associated cholangitis and patients with biliary stents. [14]
Antibiotic resistance is increasing, especially:
- Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae
- Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE)
- Multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas (healthcare-associated)
5. Clinical Presentation
Symptoms
| Symptom | Frequency | Clinical Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fever with rigors | 80-95% | High spiking fevers, often with shaking chills; may be blunted in elderly/immunosuppressed |
| Right upper quadrant pain | 60-80% | Biliary colic character; may radiate to back or right shoulder |
| Jaundice | 60-80% | Scleral icterus; may be subtle initially or in dark-skinned patients |
| Nausea and vomiting | 40-60% | Non-specific; common in biliary disease |
| Dark urine | 40-50% | Bilirubinuria from conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia |
| Pale stools | 30-40% | Acholic stools from biliary obstruction |
| Pruritus | 20-30% | From cholestasis; may precede jaundice |
| Confusion/Altered mental status | 10-20% | Indicates severe cholangitis (Reynolds' pentad) |
| Anorexia | 30-50% | Non-specific |
| Malaise | 40-60% | Systemic illness |
Signs
| Sign | Frequency | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Pyrexia (> 38.0°C) | 80-95% | Often high-grade (> 39°C); rigors common |
| RUQ tenderness | 60-80% | May be mild or severe; guarding suggests peritonism |
| Jaundice (scleral icterus) | 60-80% | Best assessed in natural light |
| Tachycardia | 60-80% | Sepsis response |
| Hypotension (SBP less than 90) | 10-20% | Severe cholangitis; Reynolds' pentad |
| Tachypnoea | 20-40% | Sepsis; compensatory for metabolic acidosis |
| Murphy's sign | Variable | May be positive if concurrent cholecystitis |
| Hepatomegaly | 10-20% | Suggests hepatic congestion or abscess |
| Confusion/Encephalopathy | 10-20% | Severe cholangitis; poor prognostic sign |
| Signs of chronic liver disease | Variable | Spider naevi, palmar erythema if underlying cirrhosis |
| Scratch marks | 10-20% | Pruritus from chronic cholestasis |
Charcot's Triad vs Reynolds' Pentad
| Finding | Charcot's Triad (1877) | Reynolds' Pentad (1959) |
|---|---|---|
| Fever | Present | Present |
| RUQ Pain | Present | Present |
| Jaundice | Present | Present |
| Hypotension | — | Present |
| Altered Mental Status | — | Present |
| Sensitivity | 50-70% | 3.5-14% |
| Clinical Significance | Classic presentation | Severe/suppurative cholangitis |
| Mortality if Present | 5-10% | 20-30% without urgent drainage |
| Management Implication | Urgent work-up and treatment | Emergency drainage, ICU care |
Atypical Presentations
Be vigilant for atypical presentations in: [3,11]
- Elderly patients: May present with confusion, falls, or functional decline without classic triad
- Immunosuppressed patients: Blunted fever response, subtle signs
- Patients on corticosteroids: Suppressed inflammatory response
- Patients with malignancy: May have gradual onset due to progressive obstruction
- Post-procedure patients: May develop cholangitis 24-72 hours after ERCP
Red Flags — Severe Cholangitis (Tokyo Grade III)
[!CAUTION] Emergency Features Requiring Immediate Escalation:
- Cardiovascular dysfunction: Hypotension requiring vasopressor support (dopamine > 5 mcg/kg/min or any noradrenaline)
- Neurological dysfunction: Altered consciousness, confusion, GCS less than 15
- Respiratory dysfunction: PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than 300, requiring high-flow oxygen or ventilatory support
- Renal dysfunction: Oliguria (less than 0.5 mL/kg/hr), creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL (> 177 μmol/L)
- Hepatic dysfunction: INR > 1.5, PT prolongation not responding to vitamin K
- Haematological dysfunction: Platelets less than 100,000/mm3
- Lactate > 2 mmol/L: Tissue hypoperfusion
6. Clinical Examination
Initial Assessment (ABCDE Approach)
Airway
- Patent and maintained
- Consider protection if GCS reduced
Breathing
- Respiratory rate, oxygen saturation
- Signs of respiratory distress or ARDS
- Auscultation: basal crackles may indicate early ARDS
Circulation
- Blood pressure (hypotension indicates severity)
- Heart rate (tachycardia in sepsis)
- Capillary refill time (> 2 seconds suggests hypoperfusion)
- Peripheral perfusion and temperature
- ECG if cardiac comorbidities or severe sepsis
Disability
- Glasgow Coma Scale
- Pupil examination
- Blood glucose (hypoglycaemia in severe sepsis)
Exposure
- Temperature measurement
- Full abdominal examination
- Skin: jaundice, rashes, petechiae (DIC)
Abdominal Examination
| Component | Findings |
|---|---|
| Inspection | Jaundice, surgical scars (previous cholecystectomy), distension |
| Palpation | RUQ tenderness, guarding, hepatomegaly, palpable gallbladder (Courvoisier's sign suggests malignancy) |
| Percussion | Liver span, shifting dullness (ascites in malignancy/cirrhosis) |
| Auscultation | Bowel sounds (absent in ileus from sepsis) |
| Murphy's Sign | Positive if concurrent cholecystitis |
| Rovsing's Sign | Negative (helps exclude appendicitis) |
Skin and General Examination
| Finding | Significance |
|---|---|
| Scleral icterus | Best indicator of jaundice; examine in natural light |
| Skin jaundice | More obvious in light-skinned individuals |
| Scratch marks | Chronic cholestasis with pruritus |
| Spider naevi, palmar erythema | Chronic liver disease |
| Petechiae, purpura | Coagulopathy, DIC |
| Koilonychia | Chronic iron deficiency (if recurrent bleeding) |
Severity Assessment: Tokyo Guidelines (TG18/TG21)
The Tokyo Guidelines provide standardised severity grading that directly informs management timing: [1,7]
Grade I (Mild)
Definition: Acute cholangitis that does not meet Grade II or III criteria
Characteristics:
- Responds to initial medical treatment (antibiotics + supportive care)
- No organ dysfunction
- No features of moderate severity
Management:
- Antibiotic therapy
- Biliary drainage can be delayed until workup complete
- Semi-elective ERCP (within 48-72 hours if responding)
Grade II (Moderate)
Definition: Presence of any TWO of the following:
| Criterion | Threshold |
|---|---|
| WCC | > 12,000/mm3 or less than 4,000/mm3 |
| Fever | > 39°C (102.2°F) |
| Age | ≥75 years |
| Bilirubin | ≥5 mg/dL (85 μmol/L) |
| Albumin | less than 0.7 × lower limit of normal |
Characteristics:
- Does not respond rapidly to initial treatment
- Requires early biliary drainage
- Higher risk of progression to severe
Management:
- Biliary drainage within 24-48 hours
- May need HDU/enhanced monitoring
- Early involvement of endoscopy/IR
Grade III (Severe)
Definition: Presence of organ dysfunction in ANY ONE system:
| System | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Cardiovascular | Hypotension requiring dopamine ≥5 mcg/kg/min OR any dose of noradrenaline |
| Neurological | Altered consciousness, confusion |
| Respiratory | PaO2/FiO2 less than 300 |
| Renal | Oliguria, creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL (> 177 μmol/L) |
| Hepatic | INR > 1.5, PT > 1.5× control |
| Haematological | Platelets less than 100,000/mm3 |
Characteristics:
- Life-threatening
- Requires ICU admission
- Emergency biliary drainage
Management:
- ICU admission with organ support
- Urgent biliary drainage (within 24 hours; ideally within 12 hours)
- Vasopressor support as needed
- May require mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy
Quick Severity Assessment Algorithm
SUSPECTED CHOLANGITIS
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ ANY ORGAN DYSFUNCTION? │
│ (CV, Neuro, Resp, Renal, │
│ Hepatic, Haematological) │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
↓ YES ↓ NO
┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────────────┐
│ GRADE III │ │ ANY 2 of: │
│ (SEVERE) │ │ WCC > 12/less than 4 │
│ │ │ Fever > 39°C │
│ ICU + Urgent │ │ Age ≥75 │
│ ERCP less than 24h │ │ Bili ≥5mg/dL │
└───────────────┘ │ Albumin low │
└───────────────────┘
↓ YES ↓ NO
┌─────────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ GRADE II │ │ GRADE I │
│ (MODERATE) │ │ (MILD) │
│ │ │ │
│ ERCP 24-48h │ │ ERCP when │
│ │ │ available │
└─────────────┘ └───────────┘
7. Investigations
Tokyo Guidelines Diagnostic Criteria (TG18)
Definite diagnosis requires items from ALL THREE categories: Suspected diagnosis requires items from any TWO categories
| Category | Criteria |
|---|---|
| A. Systemic Inflammation | Fever (> 38°C) and/or shaking chills; OR Laboratory evidence: WCC abnormal (less than 4,000 or > 10,000/mm3), CRP ≥1 mg/dL |
| B. Cholestasis | Jaundice (total bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL); OR Abnormal LFTs (ALP, GGT, AST, ALT > 1.5× upper normal) |
| C. Imaging | Biliary dilatation; OR Evidence of aetiology (stone, stent, stricture) |
Laboratory Investigations
First-Line Blood Tests
| Investigation | Typical Findings | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| FBC | Leukocytosis (> 12,000/mm3) or leukopenia (less than 4,000/mm3 in severe sepsis); may see left shift | Infection, severity marker |
| CRP | Elevated (often > 100 mg/L) | Inflammatory marker; correlates with severity |
| Procalcitonin | Elevated (> 0.5 ng/mL suggests bacterial infection) | May help distinguish bacterial from other causes |
| Bilirubin | Elevated (conjugated > unconjugated) | Cholestasis; severity marker if > 5 mg/dL |
| ALP | Elevated (often 3-10× upper normal) | Cholestatic pattern |
| GGT | Elevated | Cholestatic pattern; sensitive but less specific |
| ALT/AST | Mildly-moderately elevated (usually less than 5× upper normal) | Hepatocellular injury; may be high with acute stone impaction |
| Albumin | Low (less than 35 g/L) | Chronic disease, severity marker |
| Amylase/Lipase | May be mildly elevated | Rule out concurrent pancreatitis; lipase more specific |
Severity Assessment Tests
| Investigation | Finding | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Lactate | > 2 mmol/L | Tissue hypoperfusion; mortality predictor |
| Coagulation (INR, PT, APTT) | Prolonged | Hepatic dysfunction, vitamin K malabsorption, DIC |
| Creatinine | > 2 mg/dL (177 μmol/L) | Renal dysfunction; Grade III criterion |
| Platelet count | less than 100,000/mm3 | Haematological dysfunction; DIC |
| Blood gas (ABG/VBG) | Metabolic acidosis, hypoxia | Severity; ARDS if PaO2/FiO2 less than 300 |
| Blood glucose | Hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia | Severe sepsis |
Microbiological Investigations
| Investigation | Yield | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Blood cultures (x2 sets) | Positive in 40-80% | Obtain BEFORE antibiotics but do not delay treatment; aerobic + anaerobic bottles |
| Bile culture | Positive in 80-100% | Obtained at ERCP/PTC; highest yield |
| Urine culture | Variable | Exclude concurrent UTI; may seed bile via portal circulation |
Imaging Investigations
First-Line: Transabdominal Ultrasound (USS)
| Finding | Sensitivity | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CBD dilatation | 77-95% | > 6mm (> 10mm post-cholecystectomy) |
| Gallstones | 95% | Identifies cholelithiasis |
| CBD stones | 25-70% | Limited sensitivity; stones often obscured by gas |
| Intrahepatic duct dilatation | Variable | Suggests obstruction level |
| Cholecystitis features | Variable | Wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid |
| Liver abscess | Variable | Complication detection |
Advantages: Non-invasive, bedside availability, no radiation, low cost Limitations: Operator-dependent, CBD stones often missed, gas obscures distal CBD
CT Abdomen with Contrast
| Finding | Sensitivity | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CBD dilatation | 85-95% | Accurate measurement |
| CBD stones | 65-85% | Better than USS for distal CBD |
| Level of obstruction | High | Can identify malignant cause |
| Complications | High | Abscess, perforation, malignancy |
| Vascular involvement | High | If malignant cause |
Indications:
- USS inconclusive
- Suspected malignant obstruction
- Suspected complications (abscess, perforation)
- Pre-operative planning
MRCP (Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography)
| Finding | Sensitivity | Specificity | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| CBD stones | 92-97% | 98% | Excellent for choledocholithiasis |
| Strictures | 90-95% | 95% | Characterises benign vs malignant |
| Biliary anatomy | High | High | Pre-procedural planning |
Indications:
- Intermediate probability of CBD stones
- Characterisation of strictures
- When ERCP may be avoided
- Pre-operative planning for complex cases
Advantages: Non-invasive, no radiation, high accuracy for stones Limitations: Cost, availability, cannot be therapeutic
ERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography)
ERCP is both diagnostic AND therapeutic and remains the gold standard intervention: [8,9]
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| Cholangiography | Direct visualisation of biliary tree with contrast |
| Stone extraction | Basket, balloon retrieval; mechanical lithotripsy for large stones |
| Sphincterotomy | Division of sphincter of Oddi for stone passage |
| Stent insertion | Biliary drainage if complete stone clearance not possible |
| Stricture dilation | Balloon dilation of strictures |
| Tissue sampling | Brush cytology, biopsies for malignancy |
| Bile aspiration | Culture collection |
Success rate: 90-95% for biliary cannulation and drainage Complications: Pancreatitis (3-5%), bleeding (1-2%), perforation (less than 1%), cholangitis (1-3%)
EUS (Endoscopic Ultrasound)
| Finding | Sensitivity | Specificity | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| CBD stones | 94-98% | 97% | Superior to transabdominal USS |
| Small stones (less than 5mm) | High | High | Better than MRCP for small stones |
| Malignancy | 85-90% | 80-90% | FNA possible |
Indications:
- Intermediate probability CBD stones when MRCP unavailable
- FNA for suspected malignancy
- Before planned ERCP to confirm indication
Diagnostic Algorithm
SUSPECTED CHOLANGITIS
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ IMMEDIATE: Bloods (FBC, LFTs, CRP, │
│ Lactate, Coag, U&E, Blood cultures x2) │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ URGENT ABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND │
│ Look for: CBD dilatation, gallstones, │
│ CBD stones, abscess │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────┴──────────────┐
↓ ↓
┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────────────┐
│ DEFINITE │ │ SUSPECTED BUT │
│ CHOLANGITIS │ │ IMAGING UNCLEAR │
│ │ │ │
│ Proceed to │ │ Consider: │
│ severity │ │ - CT abdomen │
│ grading and │ │ - MRCP │
│ ERCP │ │ - EUS │
└───────────────┘ └───────────────────┘
8. Differential Diagnosis
Primary Differentials
| Condition | Distinguishing Features | Key Investigations |
|---|---|---|
| Acute Cholecystitis | Murphy's sign positive, tenderness localised to GB, USS shows GB wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid; bilirubin usually normal unless Mirizzi | USS: GB inflammation; HIDA scan if unclear |
| Acute Pancreatitis | Epigastric pain radiating to back, elevated lipase (> 3× normal), less prominent jaundice unless stone impacted | Lipase, CT with contrast |
| Hepatitis (Viral/Alcoholic) | Transaminases markedly elevated (> 10×), history of alcohol/risk factors, hepatomegaly | Viral serology, AST:ALT ratio |
| Liver Abscess | More indolent onset, may lack jaundice, RUQ mass/tenderness, swinging fever | USS/CT: focal hepatic lesion |
| Peptic Ulcer Disease | Epigastric pain, relationship to meals, may have GI bleeding | OGD |
| Right Lower Lobe Pneumonia | Referred RUQ pain, cough, respiratory symptoms, chest signs | CXR |
| Ascending Pyelonephritis | Flank pain, dysuria, pyuria, costovertebral angle tenderness | Urinalysis, urine culture |
| Hepatic Malignancy | Weight loss, hepatomegaly, elevated AFP (if HCC), gradual onset | CT/MRI, tumour markers |
Must Not Miss
[!WARNING] Conditions that present similarly but require different management:
- Perforated peptic ulcer: Free air on erect CXR/CT
- Ruptured AAA: Pulsatile mass, hypotension, back pain
- Mesenteric ischaemia: Pain out of proportion, metabolic acidosis, raised lactate
- Acute pancreatitis with biliary sepsis: May coexist; manage both
Overlap Syndromes
Common clinical scenarios with overlapping features:
- Cholangitis + Cholecystitis: CBD stone with concurrent GB inflammation
- Cholangitis + Pancreatitis: Stone impacted at ampulla causing both
- Cholangitis + Liver Abscess: Complication of untreated/undertreated cholangitis
9. Management
Emergency Management Algorithm
ACUTE CHOLANGITIS
↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ RESUSCITATION (SEPSIS-6 BUNDLE) │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. HIGH-FLOW OXYGEN (target SpO2 94-98%) │
│ 2. BLOOD CULTURES (x2 sets, before antibiotics) │
│ 3. IV BROAD-SPECTRUM ANTIBIOTICS (within 1 hour) │
│ 4. IV FLUID RESUSCITATION (crystalloid 30 mL/kg if hypotensive) │
│ 5. CHECK SERUM LACTATE │
│ 6. MONITOR URINE OUTPUT (catheterise if oliguric/severe) │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SEVERITY ASSESSMENT (TG18) │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ GRADE III (Severe): Any organ dysfunction → ICU + Urgent ERCP │
│ GRADE II (Moderate): 2+ risk factors → HDU + Early ERCP │
│ GRADE I (Mild): Stable → Ward + Semi-elective ERCP │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ BILIARY DRAINAGE │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ FIRST-LINE: ERCP │
│ ➤ Sphincterotomy + stone extraction │
│ ➤ Biliary stent if complete clearance not possible │
│ ➤ Nasobiliary drain for severe/pus drainage │
│ │
│ SECOND-LINE: Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC) │
│ ➤ If ERCP fails/inaccessible (altered anatomy, duodenal │
│ obstruction, failed cannulation) │
│ ➤ External biliary drain placement │
│ │
│ THIRD-LINE: EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage │
│ ➤ Emerging technique if ERCP/PTC not feasible │
│ │
│ FOURTH-LINE: Surgical Drainage │
│ ➤ Last resort; T-tube, choledochotomy │
│ ➤ High morbidity/mortality in acute setting │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Initial Resuscitation
Sepsis-6 Bundle (to be completed within 1 hour): [12,17]
| Action | Details |
|---|---|
| Oxygen | Target SpO2 94-98%; high-flow if hypoxic |
| Blood cultures | 2 sets (4 bottles) from separate sites; BEFORE antibiotics |
| IV Antibiotics | Broad-spectrum; cover Gram-negatives and anaerobes |
| IV Fluids | Crystalloid (Hartmann's or 0.9% saline); 30 mL/kg bolus if hypotensive/lactate > 2 |
| Lactate | Measure and repeat in 2-4 hours if elevated |
| Urine output | Monitor hourly; catheterise if less than 0.5 mL/kg/hr or severe sepsis |
Additional Resuscitation Measures:
- Correct coagulopathy with vitamin K (IV 10mg) and consider FFP if bleeding or urgent procedure
- Vasopressors (noradrenaline first-line) if hypotension persists despite fluid resuscitation
- Central venous access for monitoring and vasopressor administration if Grade III
Antibiotic Therapy
Empirical Antibiotic Regimens
FIRST-LINE OPTIONS: [14,18]
| Regimen | Dose | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam | 4.5g IV TDS (every 8 hours) | Broad Gram-negative, Gram-positive, and anaerobic |
| Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole | 2g IV OD + 500mg IV TDS | Gram-negatives + anaerobes; good biliary penetration |
| Amoxicillin-Clavulanate + Gentamicin | 1.2g IV TDS + 5-7mg/kg OD | Alternative; caution with gentamicin in renal impairment |
SEVERE/GRADE III or HEALTHCARE-ASSOCIATED:
| Regimen | Dose | Indication |
|---|---|---|
| Meropenem | 1g IV TDS | Suspected ESBL; severe sepsis; prior antibiotic exposure |
| Meropenem + Vancomycin | 1g TDS + 15-20mg/kg BD | Suspected VRE/MRSA; healthcare-associated |
| Piperacillin-Tazobactam + Vancomycin | 4.5g TDS + 15-20mg/kg BD | As above |
PENICILLIN ALLERGY:
| Allergy Type | Regimen |
|---|---|
| Non-severe (rash) | Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole |
| Severe (anaphylaxis) | Ciprofloxacin 400mg IV BD + Metronidazole 500mg IV TDS |
| Severe with MDR risk | Aztreonam 2g IV TDS + Vancomycin + Metronidazole |
Antibiotic Duration
| Scenario | Duration | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Successful source control (ERCP/PTC) | 4-7 days | Shorter course adequate with effective drainage |
| Uncomplicated, rapid response | 4-5 days | Tokyo guidelines recommend 4-7 days |
| Bacteraemia | 7-10 days | Extended course |
| Inadequate source control | Continued until drainage achieved | Review drainage options |
| Hepatic abscess | 4-6 weeks | Prolonged treatment; may need drainage |
De-escalation
- Review blood/bile culture results at 48-72 hours
- Narrow spectrum based on sensitivities
- Consider IV-to-oral switch when clinically stable, tolerating oral intake, and no ongoing sepsis
- Oral options: Ciprofloxacin 500mg BD + Metronidazole 400mg TDS; Amoxicillin-Clavulanate 625mg TDS
Biliary Drainage
ERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography)
First-line drainage modality with 90-95% success rate: [8,9]
| Component | Details |
|---|---|
| Timing | Grade III: less than 24h (ideally less than 12h); Grade II: 24-48h; Grade I: semi-elective |
| Sphincterotomy | Division of sphincter of Oddi to allow stone passage |
| Stone extraction | Balloon/basket retrieval; large stones may require lithotripsy |
| Biliary stent | 7-10 Fr plastic stent if complete clearance not achieved; allows drainage |
| Nasobiliary drain | For severe/suppurative cholangitis; allows ongoing drainage and irrigation |
| Bile sampling | Culture for microbiological guidance |
Contraindications to ERCP:
- Absolute: Duodenal obstruction, significant coagulopathy (unless corrected)
- Relative: Altered anatomy (Roux-en-Y, Billroth II—may need device-assisted ERCP)
Complications of ERCP:
- Post-ERCP pancreatitis (3-5%): Risk reduced by rectal NSAIDs, pancreatic stent
- Bleeding (1-2%): Usually post-sphincterotomy; managed endoscopically
- Perforation (less than 1%): May require surgical repair
- Cholangitis (1-3%): Paradoxically, incomplete drainage can worsen infection
Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC)
Second-line when ERCP fails or is inaccessible: [10]
| Indication | Details |
|---|---|
| Failed ERCP cannulation | ~5-10% of cases |
| Altered surgical anatomy | Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Whipple procedure, Billroth II |
| Duodenal obstruction | Tumour, stricture preventing scope passage |
| Hilar obstruction | Better access to intrahepatic ducts |
| Patient factors | Too unstable for endoscopy |
Procedure:
- Ultrasound/fluoroscopy-guided puncture of intrahepatic bile duct
- External drain placement for decompression
- May be internalised to stent later
Success rate: 80-90% Complications: Bleeding (2-5%), bile leak (2-3%), sepsis, catheter dislodgement
EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage
Emerging technique for failed ERCP/PTC: [19]
| Approach | Details |
|---|---|
| EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy | Direct puncture CBD from duodenum |
| EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy | Left hepatic duct to stomach |
| Rendezvous technique | EUS-guided access followed by antegrade ERCP |
Success rate: 80-90% in expert centres Complications: Similar to ERCP plus peritonitis risk
Surgical Drainage
Last resort with high morbidity in acute setting:
| Procedure | Indication |
|---|---|
| Laparoscopic CBD exploration | Failed endoscopic/percutaneous; stable patient |
| Open choledochotomy with T-tube | Emergency when other options failed |
| Cholecystectomy with IOC and CBD exploration | Concurrent cholecystitis |
Mortality: Significantly higher (10-20%) compared to endoscopic/percutaneous approaches in acute cholangitis
Drainage Timing by Severity
| Grade | Timing | Setting |
|---|---|---|
| Grade III (Severe) | Urgent: less than 24 hours (ideally less than 12 hours) | ICU; organ support |
| Grade II (Moderate) | Early: 24-48 hours | HDU or ward with close monitoring |
| Grade I (Mild) | Semi-elective: 48-72 hours or when clinically appropriate | Ward |
Supportive Care
| Intervention | Details |
|---|---|
| IV Fluids | Maintenance after resuscitation; monitor fluid balance |
| Analgesia | Paracetamol, opioids (morphine/fentanyl); avoid NSAIDs in renal impairment |
| Antiemetics | Ondansetron, cyclizine |
| Vitamin K | 10mg IV if coagulopathy from cholestasis |
| Glucose monitoring | Sepsis can cause hypo- or hyperglycaemia |
| VTE prophylaxis | LMWH once coagulation stable and no active bleeding |
| Nutrition | NBM initially; early enteral nutrition when stable |
Definitive Management of Underlying Cause
After acute episode resolution:
| Cause | Definitive Management |
|---|---|
| Choledocholithiasis | Cholecystectomy (laparoscopic) to prevent recurrence; ideally within same admission or within 2 weeks |
| Malignant obstruction | Metal stent for palliation; surgical resection if operable |
| Benign stricture | Serial dilation ± stenting; surgical bypass if refractory |
| Stent occlusion | Stent exchange (every 3 months for plastic; metal if life expectancy > 6 months) |
| PSC | Endoscopic management of dominant strictures; consider transplant referral |
| Parasitic | Anthelmintic therapy (albendazole, praziquantel); ERCP for obstruction |
10. Complications
Early Complications
| Complication | Frequency | Prevention | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Septic shock | 10-20% of severe cases | Early recognition, antibiotics, drainage | ICU; vasopressors; aggressive resuscitation |
| Multi-organ failure | 5-15% | Timely drainage; sepsis bundles | Organ support; urgent source control |
| Hepatic abscess | 2-5% | Adequate drainage | Percutaneous or surgical drainage; prolonged antibiotics (4-6 weeks) |
| Pancreatitis | 3-5% (post-ERCP) | Rectal NSAIDs; pancreatic stent in high-risk | Supportive care; aggressive fluids |
| Bleeding (post-sphincterotomy) | 1-2% | Correct coagulopathy; adrenaline injection | Endoscopic haemostasis; rarely embolisation |
| Perforation | less than 1% | Careful technique | Surgical repair; conservative if contained |
| Acute kidney injury | 10-20% in severe | Fluid resuscitation; avoid nephrotoxins | Fluid management; may need RRT |
| ARDS | 5-10% in severe | Sepsis management | Lung-protective ventilation |
| DIC | 5-10% | Early treatment of sepsis | Treat underlying cause; blood products |
Late Complications
| Complication | Frequency | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Recurrent cholangitis | 10-25% | If stones not fully cleared or underlying cause not addressed |
| Biliary stricture | 2-5% | Post-inflammatory; post-procedural |
| Secondary biliary cirrhosis | Rare | Chronic or recurrent obstruction |
| Cholangiocarcinoma | Rare | Increased risk with recurrent cholangitis, PSC, parasites |
| Biliary-enteric fistula | Rare | Complication of severe inflammation |
| Chronic pain | Variable | Post-cholecystectomy syndrome |
Mortality Predictors
| Factor | Impact |
|---|---|
| Advanced age (> 75) | 2-3× increased mortality |
| Delay to drainage (> 48h) | Significantly increased mortality |
| Organ failure | Each failing organ increases mortality |
| Malignant obstruction | Higher mortality than benign causes |
| Healthcare-associated infection | MDR organisms; worse outcomes |
| Coagulopathy | Limits intervention options; bleeding risk |
| Renal failure requiring RRT | Poor prognostic sign |
11. Prognosis and Outcomes
Mortality Rates
| Category | Mortality Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall (with treatment) | 2.5-10% | Improved with Tokyo Guidelines adherence |
| Grade I (Mild) | less than 1% | Excellent prognosis |
| Grade II (Moderate) | 2-5% | Good with appropriate drainage |
| Grade III (Severe) | 10-30% | Depends on timing of intervention |
| Severe without drainage | > 30% | Historical; now rare |
| Suppurative cholangitis | 15-40% | Highest mortality subset |
Prognostic Factors
| Good Prognosis | Poor Prognosis |
|---|---|
| Young age (less than 65) | Elderly (> 75) |
| Early presentation | Delayed presentation (> 48h symptoms) |
| Mild disease (Grade I) | Severe disease (Grade III) |
| Stone disease (treatable cause) | Malignant obstruction |
| Successful early drainage | Failed or delayed drainage |
| No organ dysfunction | Multi-organ failure |
| Community-acquired | Healthcare-associated (MDR organisms) |
| Immunocompetent | Immunosuppressed |
| Normal renal function | Acute kidney injury |
Long-Term Outcomes
| Outcome | Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Complete recovery | 85-95% | With appropriate treatment |
| Recurrence (stone-related) | 5-15% | Lower after cholecystectomy |
| Recurrence (stricture-related) | 20-40% | May need repeated interventions |
| Chronic biliary symptoms | 10-20% | Post-procedural pain, sphincter dysfunction |
| Need for repeat ERCP | 10-25% | Retained stones, stent exchange |
Timing of Cholecystectomy
For patients with choledocholithiasis: [20]
- Index admission cholecystectomy (within same hospital stay) reduces recurrent biliary events
- Early cholecystectomy (within 2 weeks) preferred over delayed (6+ weeks)
- Reduces risk of recurrent cholangitis, pancreatitis, and cholecystitis
12. Prevention and Screening
Primary Prevention
| Strategy | Details |
|---|---|
| Cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones | Prevents CBD stone migration |
| Lifestyle modification | Weight management; low-fat diet |
| Ursodeoxycholic acid | May prevent stones during rapid weight loss |
Secondary Prevention
| Strategy | Details |
|---|---|
| Complete stone clearance at ERCP | Reduces recurrence |
| Timely cholecystectomy | Within same admission or 2 weeks |
| Stent surveillance | Regular exchange (every 3 months for plastic stents) |
| PSC monitoring | Regular MRCP; screening for cholangiocarcinoma |
Post-ERCP Cholangitis Prevention
| Measure | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Prophylactic antibiotics | Recommended if complete drainage uncertain |
| Adequate drainage | Stent if complete stone clearance not achieved |
| Avoid contrast injection | Into undrained segments |
13. Evidence and Guidelines
Key Guidelines
| Guideline | Organisation | Year | Key Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokyo Guidelines (TG18/TG21) | Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery | 2018/2021 | Diagnostic criteria, severity grading, flowcharts for management |
| ESGE Guidelines | European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2019 | ERCP indications, techniques, and management of complications |
| NICE Gallstone Disease | National Institute for Health and Care Excellence | 2014 (updated 2017) | Gallstone disease pathway including cholangitis |
| ASGE Guidelines | American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2019 | Role of endoscopy in biliary disease |
| Surviving Sepsis Campaign | SCCM/ESICM | 2021 | Sepsis management bundles applicable to biliary sepsis |
Landmark Studies and Evidence
Tokyo Guidelines Development and Validation: [1,7]
- Established internationally accepted diagnostic criteria and severity grading
- TG18/TG21 updates refined criteria based on validation studies
- Improved outcomes when guidelines followed (reduced mortality, LOS)
Early vs Delayed Drainage: [9]
- Systematic reviews demonstrate reduced morbidity with early biliary drainage
- Severe cholangitis: drainage within 24 hours improves survival
- Moderate cholangitis: drainage within 48 hours recommended
ERCP vs Conservative Management:
- Historical studies showed > 50% mortality with antibiotics alone
- ERCP reduced mortality to less than 10% in non-severe cases
- Emergency ERCP for severe cholangitis is now standard of care
Antibiotic Duration: [18]
- Short-course (4-7 days) antibiotics adequate with successful source control
- Non-inferior to longer courses in terms of clinical cure
- Reduces antibiotic resistance and adverse effects
Level of Evidence Summary
| Intervention | Evidence Level | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Early ERCP for severe cholangitis | Level 1b | Strongly recommended |
| Broad-spectrum antibiotics | Level 1a | Strongly recommended |
| Tokyo severity grading | Level 2a | Recommended |
| PTC when ERCP fails | Level 2b | Recommended |
| Short-course antibiotics with source control | Level 1b | Recommended |
| Cholecystectomy within index admission | Level 1b | Recommended |
14. Patient and Layperson Explanation
What is Acute Cholangitis?
Acute cholangitis is a serious infection of the bile ducts—the tubes that carry bile from your liver to your intestine. It usually happens when something blocks the bile duct (most commonly a gallstone), which allows bacteria to build up and cause infection.
What Causes It?
The most common cause is a gallstone that has moved from the gallbladder into the main bile duct and become stuck. Other causes include:
- Narrowing of the bile duct (strictures)
- Blockage from cancer
- Problems with tubes (stents) placed in the bile duct
- Parasites (in some parts of the world)
What Are the Symptoms?
The classic symptoms are:
- High fever with shaking chills (rigors)
- Pain in the upper right side of your tummy (under the ribs)
- Yellow skin and eyes (jaundice)
In severe cases, you may also develop:
- Low blood pressure (feeling faint or dizzy)
- Confusion
If you have these severe symptoms, call emergency services immediately—this is a medical emergency.
How Is It Diagnosed?
Doctors will:
- Take blood tests to check for infection and liver function
- Perform an ultrasound scan of your tummy
- Sometimes do a CT scan or MRI
- Take blood samples to find what bacteria is causing the infection
How Is It Treated?
Cholangitis requires urgent treatment in hospital:
- Fluids through a drip to support your blood pressure
- Strong antibiotics through a drip to fight the infection
- A procedure to clear the blockage—usually an ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography):
- A flexible camera is passed through your mouth into your stomach and intestine
- Special instruments are used to remove stones or place a tube (stent) to drain bile
- Intensive care if you are very unwell
What Happens If It's Not Treated?
Without prompt treatment, the infection can spread to your bloodstream (sepsis), cause organ failure, and be life-threatening. However, with early treatment, most people recover well.
Recovery and Follow-Up
After treatment for cholangitis:
- You will usually stay in hospital for several days
- If gallstones caused the problem, you may need surgery to remove your gallbladder (cholecystectomy) during the same admission or within a few weeks
- If you have a stent, it may need to be changed every few months
When to Seek Help
See a doctor urgently if you have:
- Fever with yellowing of your skin or eyes
- Severe upper abdominal pain
- Shaking chills
- Confusion or feeling very unwell
15. Examination Focus
High-Yield Exam Topics
| Topic | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Charcot's Triad | Fever + RUQ pain + Jaundice (present in only 50-70%) |
| Reynolds' Pentad | Charcot's + Hypotension + Altered mental status = SEVERE/EMERGENCY |
| Common Cause | Choledocholithiasis (50-70%); also strictures, malignancy, stents |
| Common Organisms | E. coli (most common), Klebsiella, Enterococcus, Bacteroides |
| Tokyo Guidelines | Diagnostic criteria; Grade I/II/III severity; drainage timing |
| First-Line Drainage | ERCP with sphincterotomy and stone extraction (90-95% success) |
| Alternative Drainage | PTC if ERCP fails/inaccessible; EUS-guided; surgical last resort |
| Antibiotics | Piperacillin-tazobactam OR Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole |
| Duration | 4-7 days with source control; longer if bacteraemia/abscess |
| Cholecystectomy Timing | Index admission or within 2 weeks to prevent recurrence |
Sample Viva Questions and Model Answers
Q1: A 68-year-old woman presents with fever, jaundice, and right upper quadrant pain. How would you manage her?
Model Answer:
"This presentation describes Charcot's triad, which is highly suggestive of acute cholangitis. My immediate priorities are resuscitation and establishing the diagnosis and severity.
Initial management (Sepsis-6 bundle):
- High-flow oxygen targeting SpO2 94-98%
- IV access and take blood cultures (2 sets before antibiotics)
- Commence IV broad-spectrum antibiotics within 1 hour—I would give piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5g IV or ceftriaxone 2g with metronidazole 500mg
- IV crystalloid fluid bolus if hypotensive or lactate elevated
- Check serum lactate
- Monitor urine output; catheterise if oliguric
Investigations:
- Bloods: FBC, CRP, LFTs, amylase, coagulation, renal function, lactate
- Blood cultures x2
- Urgent abdominal ultrasound looking for CBD dilatation and stones
Severity grading using Tokyo Guidelines (TG18):
- Assess for organ dysfunction (Grade III markers)
- Grade I = mild; Grade II = moderate; Grade III = severe
Definitive management:
- Urgent referral to gastroenterology/GI surgery for biliary drainage
- ERCP is first-line, with timing dependent on severity:
- "Grade III: within 24 hours (ideally within 12 hours)"
- "Grade II: within 24-48 hours"
- "Grade I: semi-elective"
- If ERCP fails or is contraindicated, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) is the alternative
- ICU admission if Grade III with organ support as required
Follow-up:
- Once stabilised, cholecystectomy (if gallstone cause) during same admission or within 2 weeks to prevent recurrence"
Q2: What are the Tokyo Guidelines for acute cholangitis?
Model Answer:
"The Tokyo Guidelines (TG18/TG21) are internationally accepted criteria for the diagnosis, severity grading, and management of acute cholangitis.
Diagnosis requires:
- Systemic inflammation: Fever > 38°C OR shaking chills OR laboratory evidence (WCC abnormal, CRP elevated)
- Cholestasis: Jaundice OR abnormal LFTs (bilirubin, ALP, GGT elevated)
- Imaging: Biliary dilatation OR evidence of aetiology (stone, stricture, stent)
- Definite diagnosis: All 3 categories
- Suspected diagnosis: Any 2 categories
Severity Grading:
Grade I (Mild):
- Does not meet Grade II or III criteria
- Responds to initial treatment
- Management: Antibiotics, semi-elective drainage
Grade II (Moderate):
- Any 2 of: WCC > 12,000 or less than 4,000; Fever > 39°C; Age ≥75; Bilirubin ≥5 mg/dL; Low albumin
- Does not have organ dysfunction
- Management: Early drainage within 24-48 hours
Grade III (Severe):
- Any organ dysfunction:
- "Cardiovascular: Hypotension requiring vasopressors"
- "Neurological: Altered consciousness"
- "Respiratory: PaO2/FiO2 less than 300"
- "Renal: Creatinine > 2 mg/dL"
- "Hepatic: INR > 1.5"
- "Haematological: Platelets less than 100,000"
- Management: ICU admission, urgent drainage within 24 hours (ideally 12 hours)
The guidelines have been validated and shown to improve outcomes when followed."
Q3: When would you consider PTC instead of ERCP?
Model Answer:
"Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC) is considered when ERCP is unsuccessful or technically not feasible.
Indications for PTC:
- Failed ERCP cannulation (occurs in 5-10% of cases)
- Altered surgical anatomy preventing endoscopic access:
- Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or hepaticojejunostomy
- Whipple procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy)
- Billroth II gastrectomy (can attempt device-assisted ERCP first)
- Duodenal obstruction:
- Tumour infiltration
- Severe duodenal stenosis
- Hilar biliary obstruction:
- Klatskin tumour—PTC may provide better access to intrahepatic ducts
- Patient factors:
- Too unstable for prolonged endoscopy
- Contraindication to sedation/general anaesthesia
Procedure:
- Performed by interventional radiology
- Ultrasound or fluoroscopy-guided puncture of dilated intrahepatic bile duct
- Placement of external biliary drain for decompression
- Can be converted to internal-external drain or stent later
Success rate: 80-90%
Complications:
- Bleeding (2-5%)
- Bile leak and biliary peritonitis (2-3%)
- Sepsis
- Catheter dislodgement
- Pleural complications if right-sided approach
PTC is complementary to ERCP, and having access to both techniques is essential for comprehensive management of biliary disease."
Common Exam Errors
| Error | Correct Approach |
|---|---|
| Relying solely on Charcot's triad for diagnosis | Triad present in only 50-70%; maintain high suspicion in any patient with sepsis + jaundice or RUQ pain |
| Delaying antibiotics for imaging or ERCP | Start antibiotics within 1 hour of recognition; imaging and ERCP come after initial resuscitation |
| Not recognising Reynolds' pentad | Hypotension + confusion = severe cholangitis requiring urgent ERCP and ICU admission |
| Forgetting PTC as alternative | Essential when ERCP fails or altered anatomy (Roux-en-Y, Whipple) |
| Wrong antibiotic choice | Need Gram-negative AND anaerobic cover: piperacillin-tazobactam OR ceftriaxone + metronidazole |
| Not grading severity using Tokyo | Severity determines drainage timing—must assess |
| Discharging without addressing underlying cause | Cholecystectomy needed within same admission or 2 weeks to prevent recurrence |
| Not obtaining blood cultures before antibiotics | Cultures guide therapy; positive in 40-80% |
Clinical Pearls for Examiners
-
"Cholangitis without jaundice": Can occur early or in partial obstruction; high index of suspicion required
-
"The stone may have passed": CBD may not be dilated if stone recently passed; LFTs may still be deranged
-
"Elderly may present atypically": Confusion, falls, or general deterioration without classic triad
-
"Post-ERCP fever": Distinguish post-procedural bacteraemia from unsuccessful drainage or pancreatitis
-
"Malignant cholangitis has worse outcomes": Higher mortality, often requires metal stent, may need repeated interventions
16. References
-
Miura F, Okamoto K, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):17-30. doi:10.1002/jhbp.512 [PMID: 29032610]
-
Lee JG. Diagnosis and management of acute cholangitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(9):533-541. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2009.126 [PMID: 19652653]
-
Kiriyama S, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20(1):24-34. doi:10.1007/s00534-012-0561-3 [PMID: 23307001]
-
Reynolds BM, Dargan EL. Acute obstructive cholangitis; a distinct clinical syndrome. Ann Surg. 1959;150(2):299-303. doi:10.1097/00000658-195908000-00013 [PMID: 13670595]
-
Tazuma S, Unno M, Igarashi Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52(3):276-300. doi:10.1007/s00535-016-1289-7 [PMID: 27942871]
-
Attasaranya S, Fogel EL, Lehman GA. Choledocholithiasis, ascending cholangitis, and gallstone pancreatitis. Med Clin North Am. 2008;92(4):925-960. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2008.03.001 [PMID: 18570948]
-
Kiriyama S, Kozaka K, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021;28(8):674-684. doi:10.1002/jhbp.877 [PMID: 34232559]
-
Lai EC, Mok FP, Tan ES, et al. Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(24):1582-1586. doi:10.1056/NEJM199206113262401 [PMID: 1584258]
-
Tan M, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB, Laursen SB. Association between early ERCP and mortality in patients with acute cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(1):185-192. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.009 [PMID: 28433614]
-
Weber A, Gaa J, Rosca B, et al. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with dilated and nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72(3):412-417. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.08.012 [PMID: 18842373]
-
Yeom DH, Oh HJ, Son YW, Kim TH. What are the risk factors for acute suppurative cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones? Gut Liver. 2010;4(3):363-367. doi:10.5009/gnl.2010.4.3.363 [PMID: 20981214]
-
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304-377. doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 [PMID: 28101605]
-
Melzer M, Toner R, Lacey S, Bettany E, Rait G. Biliary tract infection and bacteraemia: presentation, structural abnormalities, causative organisms and clinical outcomes. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(986):773-776. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2007.064683 [PMID: 18057177]
-
Gomi H, Solomkin JS, Schlossberg D, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: antimicrobial therapy for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):3-16. doi:10.1002/jhbp.518 [PMID: 29090866]
-
Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(8):1781-1788. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x [PMID: 17509029]
-
Sung JY, Costerton JW, Shaffer EA. Defense system in the biliary tract against bacterial infection. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37(5):689-696. doi:10.1007/BF01296423 [PMID: 1563308]
-
Daniels R, Nutbeam T, et al. The Sepsis Manual. 4th ed. UK Sepsis Trust. 2017.
-
van Lent AU, Bartelsman JF, Tytgat GN, Speelman P, Prins JM. Duration of antibiotic therapy for cholangitis after successful endoscopic drainage of the biliary tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55(4):518-522. doi:10.1067/mge.2002.122334 [PMID: 11923764]
-
Khan MA, Akbar A, Baron TH, et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61(3):684-703. doi:10.1007/s10620-015-3933-0 [PMID: 26518134]
-
Friis C, Rothwell J, Weber DG, et al. Timing of cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2023;173(2):368-380. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2022.09.028 [PMID: 36333170]
Last Reviewed: 2026-01-09 | MedVellum Editorial Team
Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference. Clinical decisions should account for individual patient circumstances, local guidelines, and institutional protocols. Always consult appropriate specialists and verify drug doses with current formularies.
Evidence trail
This article contains inline citation markers, but the full bibliography has not yet been imported as a visible references section. The page is still tracked through the editorial review pipeline below.
All clinical claims sourced from PubMed
Frequently asked questions
Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.
When should I seek emergency care for acute cholangitis?
Seek immediate emergency care if you experience any of the following warning signs: Septic shock (Reynolds' pentad), Multi-organ failure, Altered mental status or confusion, Persistent hypotension despite fluid resuscitation, Failure to respond to antibiotics within 24-48 hours, Suspected suppurative cholangitis with pus in biliary tree, Cardiovascular dysfunction requiring vasopressors, Respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 less than 300), Acute kidney injury (creatinine less than 2 mg/dL), Coagulopathy (INR less than 1.5, platelets less than 100,000).
Learning map
Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.
Prerequisites
Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.
- Biliary Anatomy and Physiology
- Cholelithiasis and Gallstone Disease
Differentials
Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.
- Acute Cholecystitis
- Acute Pancreatitis
- Hepatitis
- Liver Abscess
Consequences
Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.
- Septic Shock
- Multi-Organ Dysfunction Syndrome
- Hepatic Abscess