Gastroenterology
Emergency Medicine
Hepatobiliary Surgery
High Evidence
Peer reviewed

Acute Cholangitis

Acute cholangitis is a life-threatening systemic infection arising from bacterial contamination of an obstructed biliary... MRCP, FRACS exam preparation.

Updated 9 Jan 2026
Reviewed 17 Jan 2026
42 min read
Reviewer
MedVellum Editorial Team
Affiliation
MedVellum Medical Education Platform

Clinical board

A visual summary of the highest-yield teaching signals on this page.

Urgent signals

Safety-critical features pulled from the topic metadata.

  • Septic shock (Reynolds' pentad)
  • Multi-organ failure
  • Altered mental status or confusion
  • Persistent hypotension despite fluid resuscitation

Exam focus

Current exam surfaces linked to this topic.

  • MRCP
  • FRACS
  • FRCS
  • USMLE

Linked comparisons

Differentials and adjacent topics worth opening next.

  • Acute Cholecystitis
  • Acute Pancreatitis

Editorial and exam context

Reviewed by MedVellum Editorial Team · MedVellum Medical Education Platform

Credentials: MBBS, MRCP, Board Certified

MRCP
FRACS
FRCS
USMLE
Clinical reference article

Acute Cholangitis

1. Clinical Overview

Summary

Acute cholangitis is a life-threatening systemic infection arising from bacterial contamination of an obstructed biliary tree. It represents a true medical emergency requiring prompt recognition, resuscitation, antimicrobial therapy, and urgent biliary decompression to prevent progression to septic shock, multi-organ failure, and death. [1,2]

The classic clinical presentation is Charcot's triad: fever with rigors, right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain, and jaundice. However, this complete triad is present in only 50-70% of patients. [3] Severe cholangitis manifests as Reynolds' pentad, with the addition of hypotension and altered mental status, indicating septic shock with mortality rates approaching 30% without urgent intervention. [4]

The most common aetiology is choledocholithiasis (common bile duct stones), accounting for 50-70% of cases. [5] Other causes include benign and malignant biliary strictures, post-procedural complications (particularly post-ERCP), biliary stent occlusion, and parasitic infections in endemic regions. [6]

The Tokyo Guidelines (TG18/TG21) provide an internationally accepted framework for diagnosis, severity assessment, and management, stratifying patients into mild (Grade I), moderate (Grade II), and severe (Grade III) categories based on the presence of organ dysfunction. [1,7] This severity grading directly determines the urgency of biliary drainage and the need for intensive care admission.

Key management principles include early recognition, adherence to sepsis bundles, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics covering Gram-negative enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes, and timely biliary drainage—preferably via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). [8,9] Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) serves as the primary alternative when ERCP is unsuccessful or anatomically inaccessible. [10]

Key Facts

ParameterDetails
DefinitionBacterial infection of the biliary tree due to obstruction
Charcot's TriadFever + RUQ pain + Jaundice (50-70% sensitivity)
Reynolds' PentadCharcot's triad + Hypotension + Altered mental status
Most Common CauseCholedocholithiasis (50-70%)
Other CausesStrictures (benign/malignant), stent occlusion, post-ERCP, parasites
Common OrganismsE. coli (25-50%), Klebsiella (15-20%), Enterococcus (10-20%), Pseudomonas, Bacteroides
Overall Mortality2.5-10% with treatment; up to 30% in severe untreated cases
Tokyo SeverityGrade I (mild), Grade II (moderate), Grade III (severe with organ dysfunction)
First-Line DrainageERCP with sphincterotomy (90-95% success rate)
Drainage TimingUrgent (less than 24h) for Grade III; Early (24-48h) for Grade II
Key AntibioticsPiperacillin-tazobactam OR Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole
Duration4-7 days post-source control; longer if inadequate drainage

Clinical Pearls

"Charcot's Is Only Half the Story": The classic triad is absent in 30-50% of cases. Maintain a high index of suspicion in any patient with unexplained sepsis, jaundice, or RUQ discomfort—especially the elderly or immunosuppressed who may present atypically. [3,11]

"Reynolds' Pentad = Immediate Action": Hypotension and confusion added to Charcot's triad indicates severe cholangitis with high mortality. This constitutes a surgical/endoscopic emergency requiring ICU admission, aggressive resuscitation, and urgent biliary drainage within 12-24 hours. [4]

"Stone Disease Dominates, But Think Wider": CBD stones cause the majority of cases, but always consider post-ERCP complications, biliary stent occlusion in malignancy patients, benign strictures (PSC, chronic pancreatitis), and parasites (Ascaris, Clonorchis, Opisthorchis) in endemic regions. [5,6]

"Drain the Bile, Save the Life": Antibiotics alone are insufficient. The obstructed, infected biliary system must be decompressed. ERCP is first-line; PTC if ERCP fails or is anatomically inaccessible (e.g., post-Roux-en-Y, duodenal obstruction). [8,9,10]

"TG18 Severity = Timing": Tokyo Guidelines Grade III (organ dysfunction) requires drainage within 24 hours and often immediate (within 12 hours); Grade II (moderate) within 24-48 hours; Grade I (mild) can be semi-elective once stabilised on antibiotics. [1,7]

"Blood Cultures Before Antibiotics—But Don't Delay": Obtain cultures promptly, but initiation of antibiotics should not wait. Target administration within 1 hour of recognition, as per sepsis guidelines. Positive blood cultures in 40-80% guide subsequent therapy. [12,13]

"Biliary Penetration Matters": Choose antibiotics with good biliary penetration. Piperacillin-tazobactam achieves excellent concentrations; aminoglycosides penetrate poorly in obstruction. De-escalate based on culture sensitivities. [14]

Why This Matters Clinically

Acute cholangitis carries significant morbidity and mortality, particularly when recognition or intervention is delayed. Early studies reported mortality rates exceeding 50% with conservative management alone, which dramatically decreased to under 10% with the advent of interventional biliary drainage. [2,8] The Tokyo Guidelines have standardised diagnosis and management, improving outcomes through consistent severity-based algorithms. [1]

Every clinician—from emergency physicians to intensivists to surgeons—must recognise Charcot's triad, initiate the sepsis pathway, and urgently involve gastroenterology or hepatobiliary surgery for drainage. Understanding the Tokyo severity criteria allows appropriate triage: mild cases can be stabilised and drained semi-electively, while severe cases require immediate ICU transfer and emergency ERCP or PTC. [7,9]


2. Epidemiology

Incidence and Prevalence

Acute cholangitis is a common biliary emergency, though precise incidence data vary due to differences in definition and reporting. It occurs in approximately 1-2% of patients with symptomatic choledocholithiasis. [5]

ParameterValueNotes
Incidence1-2% of patients with CBD stonesHigher in elderly, post-procedural settings
Hospital AdmissionsCommon cause of biliary emergencyRepresents 6-9% of biliary-related admissions
Age DistributionPeak 50-70 yearsIncreases with age
SexFemale predominance (2:1)Reflects gallstone epidemiology
Mortality (Overall)2.5-10%With appropriate treatment
Mortality (Severe)15-30%Grade III without urgent drainage
Recurrence10-25% if underlying cause not addressedHigher with retained stones, strictures

Demographics

FactorDetails
AgeIncidence increases with age; peak in 6th-7th decade
SexFemale:Male ratio approximately 2:1 (gallstone predominance)
GeographyHigher in regions with high gallstone prevalence (Western, Latin American populations); parasitic causes more common in East/Southeast Asia
EthnicityNative American, Hispanic, and Northern European populations have higher gallstone rates
SocioeconomicLimited access to elective cholecystectomy increases risk of complicated gallstone disease

Risk Factors

Risk FactorMechanism/NotesRelative Risk
CholelithiasisCBD stone migration causes obstructionHigh
Previous biliary surgeryCholedochojejunostomy, sphincteroplasty alter anatomyModerate-High
Biliary stent in situStent occlusion, biofilm formationHigh (especially > 3 months)
Malignant biliary obstructionPancreatic head, cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary tumoursModerate
Benign stricturesPrimary sclerosing cholangitis, chronic pancreatitis, post-surgicalModerate
Previous ERCPIatrogenic cholangitis, incomplete stone clearanceModerate
Parasitic infectionAscaris lumbricoides, Clonorchis sinensis, Opisthorchis viverriniHigh (endemic areas)
Choledochal cystsStructural abnormality with bile stasisModerate
ImmunosuppressionImpaired immune response, atypical organismsModerate-High
Diabetes mellitusImpaired immunity, increased gallstone riskModerate
Advanced age (> 75 years)Comorbidities, atypical presentation, reduced reserveModerate
Recurrent pyogenic cholangitisEndemic in East Asia; intrahepatic stone diseaseHigh

The incidence of cholangitis has evolved with changing patterns of biliary intervention:

  • Increased ERCP-related cholangitis as endoscopic procedures have become more common [15]
  • Decreased post-cholecystectomy cholangitis with improved surgical techniques and intraoperative cholangiography
  • Rising incidence in the elderly due to demographic ageing and increased comorbidities
  • Increased stent-related cholangitis with wider use of biliary stenting for palliation of malignant obstruction [6]

3. Aetiology

Primary Causes

Acute cholangitis requires two conditions: biliary obstruction and bacterial contamination of the biliary tree. [1]

CauseFrequencyMechanism
Choledocholithiasis50-70%CBD stone causes complete or partial obstruction
Malignant stricture10-20%Pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary carcinoma
Benign stricture5-15%PSC, chronic pancreatitis, post-surgical, post-radiation
Biliary stent occlusion5-15%Biofilm, sludge, tumour ingrowth
Post-ERCP/Post-procedural1-5%Inadequate drainage, contamination during procedure
ParasiticVariableAscaris, liver flukes (endemic regions)
Choledochal cystRareCongenital biliary dilatation
Mirizzi syndromeRareExtrinsic compression by impacted cystic duct stone
Papillary stenosisRareSphincter of Oddi dysfunction
HaemobiliaRareBlood clot obstruction
Recurrent pyogenic cholangitisRegionalIntrahepatic stones, oriental cholangiohepatitis

Choledocholithiasis (CBD Stones)

CBD stones are the predominant cause worldwide. [5] They may be:

  • Primary: Form within the bile ducts (brown pigment stones, associated with infection/stasis)
  • Secondary: Migrate from the gallbladder (cholesterol or black pigment stones)

Risk factors for CBD stones include advanced age, larger gallstones, longer cystic duct, and concurrent gallbladder disease.

Malignant Causes

Biliary obstruction from malignancy predisposes to cholangitis, particularly:

  • Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (head of pancreas)
  • Cholangiocarcinoma (hilar/Klatskin, distal, intrahepatic)
  • Ampullary carcinoma
  • Gallbladder carcinoma with CBD invasion
  • Metastatic disease (porta hepatis lymphadenopathy)

Patients with malignant obstruction and biliary stents are at particularly high risk due to stent occlusion and tumour progression. [6]

Benign Strictures

AetiologyCharacteristics
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)Diffuse intrahepatic and extrahepatic strictures; IBD association
Chronic PancreatitisDistal CBD stricture from fibrosis
Post-SurgicalBile duct injury, anastomotic stricture
Post-RadiationFibrosis from hepatic/pancreatic radiotherapy
IgG4-Related DiseaseAutoimmune cholangiopathy
Ischaemic CholangiopathyPost-transplant, hepatic artery thrombosis

Post-Procedural Cholangitis

Cholangitis following biliary interventions is a recognised complication: [15]

  • Post-ERCP: Incidence 0.5-3%; higher with incomplete stone clearance, contrast injection into obstructed ducts
  • Post-PTC: Risk of bile leak and infection
  • Post-Cholecystectomy: Retained CBD stones, bile duct injury

Parasitic Causes

Common in East and Southeast Asia: [6]

  • Ascaris lumbricoides: Roundworm migration into biliary tree
  • Clonorchis sinensis: Chinese liver fluke
  • Opisthorchis viverrini: Southeast Asian liver fluke
  • Fasciola hepatica: Sheep liver fluke (less common)

These cause recurrent cholangitis, intrahepatic stone formation, and predispose to cholangiocarcinoma.


4. Pathophysiology

Mechanism of Disease

The development of acute cholangitis requires the combination of biliary obstruction and bacterial presence in the bile ducts. [1,16]

Step 1: Biliary Obstruction

  • Mechanical obstruction (stone, stricture, tumour, stent occlusion)
  • Increased intraductal pressure (normal: 7-14 cmH2O; in obstruction: 25-30+ cmH2O)
  • Bile stasis creates a favourable environment for bacterial proliferation
  • Impaired biliary flow prevents washout of bacteria

Step 2: Bacterial Colonisation

Normal bile is sterile. Bacteria enter the biliary tree via: [16]

  • Ascending route (most common): Bacteria from duodenum ascend through the sphincter of Oddi
  • Portal venous route: Translocation from intestinal flora
  • Lymphatic route: Less common
  • Haematogenous route: Rarely, from distant infection

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, prior sphincterotomy, and biliary-enteric anastomoses increase ascending infection risk.

Step 3: Infection and Inflammation

  • Bacterial multiplication in obstructed bile
  • Inflammatory response in bile duct wall (acute cholangitis)
  • Purulent bile accumulation (suppurative cholangitis in severe cases)
  • Release of bacterial endotoxins (lipopolysaccharide from Gram-negatives)

Step 4: Cholangio-Venous and Cholangio-Lymphatic Reflux

  • Critical step: Elevated biliary pressure (> 25 cmH2O) causes reflux of infected bile into:
    • Hepatic venous sinusoids (cholangio-venous reflux)
    • Peribiliary lymphatics (cholangio-lymphatic reflux)
  • Systemic bacteraemia and endotoxaemia
  • Blood culture positivity in 40-80% of patients [12,13]

Step 5: Systemic Inflammatory Response

  • SIRS → Sepsis → Severe Sepsis → Septic Shock
  • Cytokine storm (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-alpha)
  • Endothelial dysfunction and capillary leak
  • Vasodilation and hypotension
  • Tissue hypoperfusion and organ dysfunction

Step 6: Organ Failure (Severe/Grade III)

Without intervention, progression to: [4]

  • Cardiovascular: Distributive shock requiring vasopressors
  • Neurological: Encephalopathy from sepsis and hepatic dysfunction
  • Respiratory: ARDS
  • Renal: Acute kidney injury from hypoperfusion
  • Hepatic: Worsening jaundice, coagulopathy
  • Haematological: DIC, thrombocytopenia
  • Death: Multi-organ failure

Key Pathophysiological Concepts

ConceptSignificance
Biliary Pressure ThresholdReflux occurs at > 25 cmH2O; normal is 7-14 cmH2O
Cholangio-Venous RefluxMechanism of systemic bacteraemia; explains high blood culture positivity
EndotoxaemiaGram-negative LPS triggers inflammatory cascade
Suppurative CholangitisPus-filled bile ducts; highest mortality subset
Hepatic Abscess RiskComplication of uncontrolled cholangitis; may require drainage

Common Organisms

The microbiology of acute cholangitis reflects the enteric origin of bacteria: [12,14,16]

OrganismFrequencyNotes
Escherichia coli25-50%Most common; Gram-negative
Klebsiella spp.15-20%Gram-negative; often MDR strains
Enterococcus spp.10-20%Gram-positive; associated with prior antibiotics, healthcare exposure
Enterobacter spp.5-10%Gram-negative
Pseudomonas aeruginosa5-10%Associated with prior instrumentation, stents
Bacteroides fragilis5-15%Anaerobe; mixed infections common
Clostridium spp.3-5%Anaerobe
Streptococcus spp.2-5%Viridans group streptococci
Citrobacter spp.2-5%Gram-negative
Proteus spp.2-5%Gram-negative

Polymicrobial infection is common (30-50% of cases), particularly in healthcare-associated cholangitis and patients with biliary stents. [14]

Antibiotic resistance is increasing, especially:

  • Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae
  • Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE)
  • Multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas (healthcare-associated)

5. Clinical Presentation

Symptoms

SymptomFrequencyClinical Notes
Fever with rigors80-95%High spiking fevers, often with shaking chills; may be blunted in elderly/immunosuppressed
Right upper quadrant pain60-80%Biliary colic character; may radiate to back or right shoulder
Jaundice60-80%Scleral icterus; may be subtle initially or in dark-skinned patients
Nausea and vomiting40-60%Non-specific; common in biliary disease
Dark urine40-50%Bilirubinuria from conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia
Pale stools30-40%Acholic stools from biliary obstruction
Pruritus20-30%From cholestasis; may precede jaundice
Confusion/Altered mental status10-20%Indicates severe cholangitis (Reynolds' pentad)
Anorexia30-50%Non-specific
Malaise40-60%Systemic illness

Signs

SignFrequencySignificance
Pyrexia (> 38.0°C)80-95%Often high-grade (> 39°C); rigors common
RUQ tenderness60-80%May be mild or severe; guarding suggests peritonism
Jaundice (scleral icterus)60-80%Best assessed in natural light
Tachycardia60-80%Sepsis response
Hypotension (SBP less than 90)10-20%Severe cholangitis; Reynolds' pentad
Tachypnoea20-40%Sepsis; compensatory for metabolic acidosis
Murphy's signVariableMay be positive if concurrent cholecystitis
Hepatomegaly10-20%Suggests hepatic congestion or abscess
Confusion/Encephalopathy10-20%Severe cholangitis; poor prognostic sign
Signs of chronic liver diseaseVariableSpider naevi, palmar erythema if underlying cirrhosis
Scratch marks10-20%Pruritus from chronic cholestasis

Charcot's Triad vs Reynolds' Pentad

FindingCharcot's Triad (1877)Reynolds' Pentad (1959)
FeverPresentPresent
RUQ PainPresentPresent
JaundicePresentPresent
HypotensionPresent
Altered Mental StatusPresent
Sensitivity50-70%3.5-14%
Clinical SignificanceClassic presentationSevere/suppurative cholangitis
Mortality if Present5-10%20-30% without urgent drainage
Management ImplicationUrgent work-up and treatmentEmergency drainage, ICU care

Atypical Presentations

Be vigilant for atypical presentations in: [3,11]

  • Elderly patients: May present with confusion, falls, or functional decline without classic triad
  • Immunosuppressed patients: Blunted fever response, subtle signs
  • Patients on corticosteroids: Suppressed inflammatory response
  • Patients with malignancy: May have gradual onset due to progressive obstruction
  • Post-procedure patients: May develop cholangitis 24-72 hours after ERCP

Red Flags — Severe Cholangitis (Tokyo Grade III)

[!CAUTION] Emergency Features Requiring Immediate Escalation:

  • Cardiovascular dysfunction: Hypotension requiring vasopressor support (dopamine > 5 mcg/kg/min or any noradrenaline)
  • Neurological dysfunction: Altered consciousness, confusion, GCS less than 15
  • Respiratory dysfunction: PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than 300, requiring high-flow oxygen or ventilatory support
  • Renal dysfunction: Oliguria (less than 0.5 mL/kg/hr), creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL (> 177 μmol/L)
  • Hepatic dysfunction: INR > 1.5, PT prolongation not responding to vitamin K
  • Haematological dysfunction: Platelets less than 100,000/mm3
  • Lactate > 2 mmol/L: Tissue hypoperfusion

6. Clinical Examination

Initial Assessment (ABCDE Approach)

Airway

  • Patent and maintained
  • Consider protection if GCS reduced

Breathing

  • Respiratory rate, oxygen saturation
  • Signs of respiratory distress or ARDS
  • Auscultation: basal crackles may indicate early ARDS

Circulation

  • Blood pressure (hypotension indicates severity)
  • Heart rate (tachycardia in sepsis)
  • Capillary refill time (> 2 seconds suggests hypoperfusion)
  • Peripheral perfusion and temperature
  • ECG if cardiac comorbidities or severe sepsis

Disability

  • Glasgow Coma Scale
  • Pupil examination
  • Blood glucose (hypoglycaemia in severe sepsis)

Exposure

  • Temperature measurement
  • Full abdominal examination
  • Skin: jaundice, rashes, petechiae (DIC)

Abdominal Examination

ComponentFindings
InspectionJaundice, surgical scars (previous cholecystectomy), distension
PalpationRUQ tenderness, guarding, hepatomegaly, palpable gallbladder (Courvoisier's sign suggests malignancy)
PercussionLiver span, shifting dullness (ascites in malignancy/cirrhosis)
AuscultationBowel sounds (absent in ileus from sepsis)
Murphy's SignPositive if concurrent cholecystitis
Rovsing's SignNegative (helps exclude appendicitis)

Skin and General Examination

FindingSignificance
Scleral icterusBest indicator of jaundice; examine in natural light
Skin jaundiceMore obvious in light-skinned individuals
Scratch marksChronic cholestasis with pruritus
Spider naevi, palmar erythemaChronic liver disease
Petechiae, purpuraCoagulopathy, DIC
KoilonychiaChronic iron deficiency (if recurrent bleeding)

Severity Assessment: Tokyo Guidelines (TG18/TG21)

The Tokyo Guidelines provide standardised severity grading that directly informs management timing: [1,7]

Grade I (Mild)

Definition: Acute cholangitis that does not meet Grade II or III criteria

Characteristics:

  • Responds to initial medical treatment (antibiotics + supportive care)
  • No organ dysfunction
  • No features of moderate severity

Management:

  • Antibiotic therapy
  • Biliary drainage can be delayed until workup complete
  • Semi-elective ERCP (within 48-72 hours if responding)

Grade II (Moderate)

Definition: Presence of any TWO of the following:

CriterionThreshold
WCC> 12,000/mm3 or less than 4,000/mm3
Fever> 39°C (102.2°F)
Age≥75 years
Bilirubin≥5 mg/dL (85 μmol/L)
Albuminless than 0.7 × lower limit of normal

Characteristics:

  • Does not respond rapidly to initial treatment
  • Requires early biliary drainage
  • Higher risk of progression to severe

Management:

  • Biliary drainage within 24-48 hours
  • May need HDU/enhanced monitoring
  • Early involvement of endoscopy/IR

Grade III (Severe)

Definition: Presence of organ dysfunction in ANY ONE system:

SystemCriteria
CardiovascularHypotension requiring dopamine ≥5 mcg/kg/min OR any dose of noradrenaline
NeurologicalAltered consciousness, confusion
RespiratoryPaO2/FiO2 less than 300
RenalOliguria, creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL (> 177 μmol/L)
HepaticINR > 1.5, PT > 1.5× control
HaematologicalPlatelets less than 100,000/mm3

Characteristics:

  • Life-threatening
  • Requires ICU admission
  • Emergency biliary drainage

Management:

  • ICU admission with organ support
  • Urgent biliary drainage (within 24 hours; ideally within 12 hours)
  • Vasopressor support as needed
  • May require mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy

Quick Severity Assessment Algorithm

                    SUSPECTED CHOLANGITIS
                           ↓
            ┌─────────────────────────────────┐
            │    ANY ORGAN DYSFUNCTION?        │
            │  (CV, Neuro, Resp, Renal,        │
            │   Hepatic, Haematological)       │
            └─────────────────────────────────┘
                    ↓ YES              ↓ NO
            ┌───────────────┐    ┌───────────────────┐
            │   GRADE III   │    │ ANY 2 of:         │
            │    (SEVERE)   │    │ WCC > 12/less than 4        │
            │               │    │ Fever > 39°C       │
            │ ICU + Urgent  │    │ Age ≥75           │
            │ ERCP less than 24h     │    │ Bili ≥5mg/dL      │
            └───────────────┘    │ Albumin low       │
                                 └───────────────────┘
                                   ↓ YES      ↓ NO
                           ┌─────────────┐ ┌───────────┐
                           │  GRADE II   │ │ GRADE I   │
                           │ (MODERATE)  │ │  (MILD)   │
                           │             │ │           │
                           │ ERCP 24-48h │ │ ERCP when │
                           │             │ │ available │
                           └─────────────┘ └───────────┘

7. Investigations

Tokyo Guidelines Diagnostic Criteria (TG18)

Definite diagnosis requires items from ALL THREE categories: Suspected diagnosis requires items from any TWO categories

CategoryCriteria
A. Systemic InflammationFever (> 38°C) and/or shaking chills; OR Laboratory evidence: WCC abnormal (less than 4,000 or > 10,000/mm3), CRP ≥1 mg/dL
B. CholestasisJaundice (total bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL); OR Abnormal LFTs (ALP, GGT, AST, ALT > 1.5× upper normal)
C. ImagingBiliary dilatation; OR Evidence of aetiology (stone, stent, stricture)

Laboratory Investigations

First-Line Blood Tests

InvestigationTypical FindingsSignificance
FBCLeukocytosis (> 12,000/mm3) or leukopenia (less than 4,000/mm3 in severe sepsis); may see left shiftInfection, severity marker
CRPElevated (often > 100 mg/L)Inflammatory marker; correlates with severity
ProcalcitoninElevated (> 0.5 ng/mL suggests bacterial infection)May help distinguish bacterial from other causes
BilirubinElevated (conjugated > unconjugated)Cholestasis; severity marker if > 5 mg/dL
ALPElevated (often 3-10× upper normal)Cholestatic pattern
GGTElevatedCholestatic pattern; sensitive but less specific
ALT/ASTMildly-moderately elevated (usually less than 5× upper normal)Hepatocellular injury; may be high with acute stone impaction
AlbuminLow (less than 35 g/L)Chronic disease, severity marker
Amylase/LipaseMay be mildly elevatedRule out concurrent pancreatitis; lipase more specific

Severity Assessment Tests

InvestigationFindingSignificance
Lactate> 2 mmol/LTissue hypoperfusion; mortality predictor
Coagulation (INR, PT, APTT)ProlongedHepatic dysfunction, vitamin K malabsorption, DIC
Creatinine> 2 mg/dL (177 μmol/L)Renal dysfunction; Grade III criterion
Platelet countless than 100,000/mm3Haematological dysfunction; DIC
Blood gas (ABG/VBG)Metabolic acidosis, hypoxiaSeverity; ARDS if PaO2/FiO2 less than 300
Blood glucoseHypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemiaSevere sepsis

Microbiological Investigations

InvestigationYieldNotes
Blood cultures (x2 sets)Positive in 40-80%Obtain BEFORE antibiotics but do not delay treatment; aerobic + anaerobic bottles
Bile culturePositive in 80-100%Obtained at ERCP/PTC; highest yield
Urine cultureVariableExclude concurrent UTI; may seed bile via portal circulation

Imaging Investigations

First-Line: Transabdominal Ultrasound (USS)

FindingSensitivityNotes
CBD dilatation77-95%> 6mm (> 10mm post-cholecystectomy)
Gallstones95%Identifies cholelithiasis
CBD stones25-70%Limited sensitivity; stones often obscured by gas
Intrahepatic duct dilatationVariableSuggests obstruction level
Cholecystitis featuresVariableWall thickening, pericholecystic fluid
Liver abscessVariableComplication detection

Advantages: Non-invasive, bedside availability, no radiation, low cost Limitations: Operator-dependent, CBD stones often missed, gas obscures distal CBD

CT Abdomen with Contrast

FindingSensitivityNotes
CBD dilatation85-95%Accurate measurement
CBD stones65-85%Better than USS for distal CBD
Level of obstructionHighCan identify malignant cause
ComplicationsHighAbscess, perforation, malignancy
Vascular involvementHighIf malignant cause

Indications:

  • USS inconclusive
  • Suspected malignant obstruction
  • Suspected complications (abscess, perforation)
  • Pre-operative planning

MRCP (Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography)

FindingSensitivitySpecificityNotes
CBD stones92-97%98%Excellent for choledocholithiasis
Strictures90-95%95%Characterises benign vs malignant
Biliary anatomyHighHighPre-procedural planning

Indications:

  • Intermediate probability of CBD stones
  • Characterisation of strictures
  • When ERCP may be avoided
  • Pre-operative planning for complex cases

Advantages: Non-invasive, no radiation, high accuracy for stones Limitations: Cost, availability, cannot be therapeutic

ERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography)

ERCP is both diagnostic AND therapeutic and remains the gold standard intervention: [8,9]

CapabilityDetails
CholangiographyDirect visualisation of biliary tree with contrast
Stone extractionBasket, balloon retrieval; mechanical lithotripsy for large stones
SphincterotomyDivision of sphincter of Oddi for stone passage
Stent insertionBiliary drainage if complete stone clearance not possible
Stricture dilationBalloon dilation of strictures
Tissue samplingBrush cytology, biopsies for malignancy
Bile aspirationCulture collection

Success rate: 90-95% for biliary cannulation and drainage Complications: Pancreatitis (3-5%), bleeding (1-2%), perforation (less than 1%), cholangitis (1-3%)

EUS (Endoscopic Ultrasound)

FindingSensitivitySpecificityNotes
CBD stones94-98%97%Superior to transabdominal USS
Small stones (less than 5mm)HighHighBetter than MRCP for small stones
Malignancy85-90%80-90%FNA possible

Indications:

  • Intermediate probability CBD stones when MRCP unavailable
  • FNA for suspected malignancy
  • Before planned ERCP to confirm indication

Diagnostic Algorithm

                    SUSPECTED CHOLANGITIS
                           ↓
        ┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
        │  IMMEDIATE: Bloods (FBC, LFTs, CRP,      │
        │  Lactate, Coag, U&E, Blood cultures x2)  │
        └──────────────────────────────────────────┘
                           ↓
        ┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
        │        URGENT ABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND       │
        │  Look for: CBD dilatation, gallstones,   │
        │  CBD stones, abscess                     │
        └──────────────────────────────────────────┘
                           ↓
            ┌──────────────┴──────────────┐
            ↓                             ↓
    ┌───────────────┐            ┌───────────────────┐
    │ DEFINITE      │            │ SUSPECTED BUT     │
    │ CHOLANGITIS   │            │ IMAGING UNCLEAR   │
    │               │            │                   │
    │ Proceed to    │            │ Consider:         │
    │ severity      │            │ - CT abdomen      │
    │ grading and   │            │ - MRCP            │
    │ ERCP          │            │ - EUS             │
    └───────────────┘            └───────────────────┘

8. Differential Diagnosis

Primary Differentials

ConditionDistinguishing FeaturesKey Investigations
Acute CholecystitisMurphy's sign positive, tenderness localised to GB, USS shows GB wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid; bilirubin usually normal unless MirizziUSS: GB inflammation; HIDA scan if unclear
Acute PancreatitisEpigastric pain radiating to back, elevated lipase (> 3× normal), less prominent jaundice unless stone impactedLipase, CT with contrast
Hepatitis (Viral/Alcoholic)Transaminases markedly elevated (> 10×), history of alcohol/risk factors, hepatomegalyViral serology, AST:ALT ratio
Liver AbscessMore indolent onset, may lack jaundice, RUQ mass/tenderness, swinging feverUSS/CT: focal hepatic lesion
Peptic Ulcer DiseaseEpigastric pain, relationship to meals, may have GI bleedingOGD
Right Lower Lobe PneumoniaReferred RUQ pain, cough, respiratory symptoms, chest signsCXR
Ascending PyelonephritisFlank pain, dysuria, pyuria, costovertebral angle tendernessUrinalysis, urine culture
Hepatic MalignancyWeight loss, hepatomegaly, elevated AFP (if HCC), gradual onsetCT/MRI, tumour markers

Must Not Miss

[!WARNING] Conditions that present similarly but require different management:

  • Perforated peptic ulcer: Free air on erect CXR/CT
  • Ruptured AAA: Pulsatile mass, hypotension, back pain
  • Mesenteric ischaemia: Pain out of proportion, metabolic acidosis, raised lactate
  • Acute pancreatitis with biliary sepsis: May coexist; manage both

Overlap Syndromes

Common clinical scenarios with overlapping features:

  • Cholangitis + Cholecystitis: CBD stone with concurrent GB inflammation
  • Cholangitis + Pancreatitis: Stone impacted at ampulla causing both
  • Cholangitis + Liver Abscess: Complication of untreated/undertreated cholangitis

9. Management

Emergency Management Algorithm

                         ACUTE CHOLANGITIS
                              ↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    RESUSCITATION (SEPSIS-6 BUNDLE)                  │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  1. HIGH-FLOW OXYGEN (target SpO2 94-98%)                          │
│  2. BLOOD CULTURES (x2 sets, before antibiotics)                   │
│  3. IV BROAD-SPECTRUM ANTIBIOTICS (within 1 hour)                  │
│  4. IV FLUID RESUSCITATION (crystalloid 30 mL/kg if hypotensive)   │
│  5. CHECK SERUM LACTATE                                            │
│  6. MONITOR URINE OUTPUT (catheterise if oliguric/severe)          │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                              ↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    SEVERITY ASSESSMENT (TG18)                       │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  GRADE III (Severe): Any organ dysfunction → ICU + Urgent ERCP     │
│  GRADE II (Moderate): 2+ risk factors → HDU + Early ERCP           │
│  GRADE I (Mild): Stable → Ward + Semi-elective ERCP                │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                              ↓
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                       BILIARY DRAINAGE                              │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  FIRST-LINE: ERCP                                                   │
│  ➤ Sphincterotomy + stone extraction                               │
│  ➤ Biliary stent if complete clearance not possible                │
│  ➤ Nasobiliary drain for severe/pus drainage                       │
│                                                                     │
│  SECOND-LINE: Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC)      │
│  ➤ If ERCP fails/inaccessible (altered anatomy, duodenal           │
│    obstruction, failed cannulation)                                │
│  ➤ External biliary drain placement                                │
│                                                                     │
│  THIRD-LINE: EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage                           │
│  ➤ Emerging technique if ERCP/PTC not feasible                     │
│                                                                     │
│  FOURTH-LINE: Surgical Drainage                                     │
│  ➤ Last resort; T-tube, choledochotomy                             │
│  ➤ High morbidity/mortality in acute setting                       │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Initial Resuscitation

Sepsis-6 Bundle (to be completed within 1 hour): [12,17]

ActionDetails
OxygenTarget SpO2 94-98%; high-flow if hypoxic
Blood cultures2 sets (4 bottles) from separate sites; BEFORE antibiotics
IV AntibioticsBroad-spectrum; cover Gram-negatives and anaerobes
IV FluidsCrystalloid (Hartmann's or 0.9% saline); 30 mL/kg bolus if hypotensive/lactate > 2
LactateMeasure and repeat in 2-4 hours if elevated
Urine outputMonitor hourly; catheterise if less than 0.5 mL/kg/hr or severe sepsis

Additional Resuscitation Measures:

  • Correct coagulopathy with vitamin K (IV 10mg) and consider FFP if bleeding or urgent procedure
  • Vasopressors (noradrenaline first-line) if hypotension persists despite fluid resuscitation
  • Central venous access for monitoring and vasopressor administration if Grade III

Antibiotic Therapy

Empirical Antibiotic Regimens

FIRST-LINE OPTIONS: [14,18]

RegimenDoseCoverage
Piperacillin-Tazobactam4.5g IV TDS (every 8 hours)Broad Gram-negative, Gram-positive, and anaerobic
Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole2g IV OD + 500mg IV TDSGram-negatives + anaerobes; good biliary penetration
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate + Gentamicin1.2g IV TDS + 5-7mg/kg ODAlternative; caution with gentamicin in renal impairment

SEVERE/GRADE III or HEALTHCARE-ASSOCIATED:

RegimenDoseIndication
Meropenem1g IV TDSSuspected ESBL; severe sepsis; prior antibiotic exposure
Meropenem + Vancomycin1g TDS + 15-20mg/kg BDSuspected VRE/MRSA; healthcare-associated
Piperacillin-Tazobactam + Vancomycin4.5g TDS + 15-20mg/kg BDAs above

PENICILLIN ALLERGY:

Allergy TypeRegimen
Non-severe (rash)Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole
Severe (anaphylaxis)Ciprofloxacin 400mg IV BD + Metronidazole 500mg IV TDS
Severe with MDR riskAztreonam 2g IV TDS + Vancomycin + Metronidazole

Antibiotic Duration

ScenarioDurationNotes
Successful source control (ERCP/PTC)4-7 daysShorter course adequate with effective drainage
Uncomplicated, rapid response4-5 daysTokyo guidelines recommend 4-7 days
Bacteraemia7-10 daysExtended course
Inadequate source controlContinued until drainage achievedReview drainage options
Hepatic abscess4-6 weeksProlonged treatment; may need drainage

De-escalation

  • Review blood/bile culture results at 48-72 hours
  • Narrow spectrum based on sensitivities
  • Consider IV-to-oral switch when clinically stable, tolerating oral intake, and no ongoing sepsis
  • Oral options: Ciprofloxacin 500mg BD + Metronidazole 400mg TDS; Amoxicillin-Clavulanate 625mg TDS

Biliary Drainage

ERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography)

First-line drainage modality with 90-95% success rate: [8,9]

ComponentDetails
TimingGrade III: less than 24h (ideally less than 12h); Grade II: 24-48h; Grade I: semi-elective
SphincterotomyDivision of sphincter of Oddi to allow stone passage
Stone extractionBalloon/basket retrieval; large stones may require lithotripsy
Biliary stent7-10 Fr plastic stent if complete clearance not achieved; allows drainage
Nasobiliary drainFor severe/suppurative cholangitis; allows ongoing drainage and irrigation
Bile samplingCulture for microbiological guidance

Contraindications to ERCP:

  • Absolute: Duodenal obstruction, significant coagulopathy (unless corrected)
  • Relative: Altered anatomy (Roux-en-Y, Billroth II—may need device-assisted ERCP)

Complications of ERCP:

  • Post-ERCP pancreatitis (3-5%): Risk reduced by rectal NSAIDs, pancreatic stent
  • Bleeding (1-2%): Usually post-sphincterotomy; managed endoscopically
  • Perforation (less than 1%): May require surgical repair
  • Cholangitis (1-3%): Paradoxically, incomplete drainage can worsen infection

Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC)

Second-line when ERCP fails or is inaccessible: [10]

IndicationDetails
Failed ERCP cannulation~5-10% of cases
Altered surgical anatomyRoux-en-Y gastric bypass, Whipple procedure, Billroth II
Duodenal obstructionTumour, stricture preventing scope passage
Hilar obstructionBetter access to intrahepatic ducts
Patient factorsToo unstable for endoscopy

Procedure:

  • Ultrasound/fluoroscopy-guided puncture of intrahepatic bile duct
  • External drain placement for decompression
  • May be internalised to stent later

Success rate: 80-90% Complications: Bleeding (2-5%), bile leak (2-3%), sepsis, catheter dislodgement

EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage

Emerging technique for failed ERCP/PTC: [19]

ApproachDetails
EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomyDirect puncture CBD from duodenum
EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomyLeft hepatic duct to stomach
Rendezvous techniqueEUS-guided access followed by antegrade ERCP

Success rate: 80-90% in expert centres Complications: Similar to ERCP plus peritonitis risk

Surgical Drainage

Last resort with high morbidity in acute setting:

ProcedureIndication
Laparoscopic CBD explorationFailed endoscopic/percutaneous; stable patient
Open choledochotomy with T-tubeEmergency when other options failed
Cholecystectomy with IOC and CBD explorationConcurrent cholecystitis

Mortality: Significantly higher (10-20%) compared to endoscopic/percutaneous approaches in acute cholangitis

Drainage Timing by Severity

GradeTimingSetting
Grade III (Severe)Urgent: less than 24 hours (ideally less than 12 hours)ICU; organ support
Grade II (Moderate)Early: 24-48 hoursHDU or ward with close monitoring
Grade I (Mild)Semi-elective: 48-72 hours or when clinically appropriateWard

Supportive Care

InterventionDetails
IV FluidsMaintenance after resuscitation; monitor fluid balance
AnalgesiaParacetamol, opioids (morphine/fentanyl); avoid NSAIDs in renal impairment
AntiemeticsOndansetron, cyclizine
Vitamin K10mg IV if coagulopathy from cholestasis
Glucose monitoringSepsis can cause hypo- or hyperglycaemia
VTE prophylaxisLMWH once coagulation stable and no active bleeding
NutritionNBM initially; early enteral nutrition when stable

Definitive Management of Underlying Cause

After acute episode resolution:

CauseDefinitive Management
CholedocholithiasisCholecystectomy (laparoscopic) to prevent recurrence; ideally within same admission or within 2 weeks
Malignant obstructionMetal stent for palliation; surgical resection if operable
Benign strictureSerial dilation ± stenting; surgical bypass if refractory
Stent occlusionStent exchange (every 3 months for plastic; metal if life expectancy > 6 months)
PSCEndoscopic management of dominant strictures; consider transplant referral
ParasiticAnthelmintic therapy (albendazole, praziquantel); ERCP for obstruction

10. Complications

Early Complications

ComplicationFrequencyPreventionManagement
Septic shock10-20% of severe casesEarly recognition, antibiotics, drainageICU; vasopressors; aggressive resuscitation
Multi-organ failure5-15%Timely drainage; sepsis bundlesOrgan support; urgent source control
Hepatic abscess2-5%Adequate drainagePercutaneous or surgical drainage; prolonged antibiotics (4-6 weeks)
Pancreatitis3-5% (post-ERCP)Rectal NSAIDs; pancreatic stent in high-riskSupportive care; aggressive fluids
Bleeding (post-sphincterotomy)1-2%Correct coagulopathy; adrenaline injectionEndoscopic haemostasis; rarely embolisation
Perforationless than 1%Careful techniqueSurgical repair; conservative if contained
Acute kidney injury10-20% in severeFluid resuscitation; avoid nephrotoxinsFluid management; may need RRT
ARDS5-10% in severeSepsis managementLung-protective ventilation
DIC5-10%Early treatment of sepsisTreat underlying cause; blood products

Late Complications

ComplicationFrequencyNotes
Recurrent cholangitis10-25%If stones not fully cleared or underlying cause not addressed
Biliary stricture2-5%Post-inflammatory; post-procedural
Secondary biliary cirrhosisRareChronic or recurrent obstruction
CholangiocarcinomaRareIncreased risk with recurrent cholangitis, PSC, parasites
Biliary-enteric fistulaRareComplication of severe inflammation
Chronic painVariablePost-cholecystectomy syndrome

Mortality Predictors

FactorImpact
Advanced age (> 75)2-3× increased mortality
Delay to drainage (> 48h)Significantly increased mortality
Organ failureEach failing organ increases mortality
Malignant obstructionHigher mortality than benign causes
Healthcare-associated infectionMDR organisms; worse outcomes
CoagulopathyLimits intervention options; bleeding risk
Renal failure requiring RRTPoor prognostic sign

11. Prognosis and Outcomes

Mortality Rates

CategoryMortality RateNotes
Overall (with treatment)2.5-10%Improved with Tokyo Guidelines adherence
Grade I (Mild)less than 1%Excellent prognosis
Grade II (Moderate)2-5%Good with appropriate drainage
Grade III (Severe)10-30%Depends on timing of intervention
Severe without drainage> 30%Historical; now rare
Suppurative cholangitis15-40%Highest mortality subset

Prognostic Factors

Good PrognosisPoor Prognosis
Young age (less than 65)Elderly (> 75)
Early presentationDelayed presentation (> 48h symptoms)
Mild disease (Grade I)Severe disease (Grade III)
Stone disease (treatable cause)Malignant obstruction
Successful early drainageFailed or delayed drainage
No organ dysfunctionMulti-organ failure
Community-acquiredHealthcare-associated (MDR organisms)
ImmunocompetentImmunosuppressed
Normal renal functionAcute kidney injury

Long-Term Outcomes

OutcomeRateNotes
Complete recovery85-95%With appropriate treatment
Recurrence (stone-related)5-15%Lower after cholecystectomy
Recurrence (stricture-related)20-40%May need repeated interventions
Chronic biliary symptoms10-20%Post-procedural pain, sphincter dysfunction
Need for repeat ERCP10-25%Retained stones, stent exchange

Timing of Cholecystectomy

For patients with choledocholithiasis: [20]

  • Index admission cholecystectomy (within same hospital stay) reduces recurrent biliary events
  • Early cholecystectomy (within 2 weeks) preferred over delayed (6+ weeks)
  • Reduces risk of recurrent cholangitis, pancreatitis, and cholecystitis

12. Prevention and Screening

Primary Prevention

StrategyDetails
Cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstonesPrevents CBD stone migration
Lifestyle modificationWeight management; low-fat diet
Ursodeoxycholic acidMay prevent stones during rapid weight loss

Secondary Prevention

StrategyDetails
Complete stone clearance at ERCPReduces recurrence
Timely cholecystectomyWithin same admission or 2 weeks
Stent surveillanceRegular exchange (every 3 months for plastic stents)
PSC monitoringRegular MRCP; screening for cholangiocarcinoma

Post-ERCP Cholangitis Prevention

MeasureEvidence
Prophylactic antibioticsRecommended if complete drainage uncertain
Adequate drainageStent if complete stone clearance not achieved
Avoid contrast injectionInto undrained segments

13. Evidence and Guidelines

Key Guidelines

GuidelineOrganisationYearKey Recommendations
Tokyo Guidelines (TG18/TG21)Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery2018/2021Diagnostic criteria, severity grading, flowcharts for management
ESGE GuidelinesEuropean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2019ERCP indications, techniques, and management of complications
NICE Gallstone DiseaseNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence2014 (updated 2017)Gallstone disease pathway including cholangitis
ASGE GuidelinesAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2019Role of endoscopy in biliary disease
Surviving Sepsis CampaignSCCM/ESICM2021Sepsis management bundles applicable to biliary sepsis

Landmark Studies and Evidence

Tokyo Guidelines Development and Validation: [1,7]

  • Established internationally accepted diagnostic criteria and severity grading
  • TG18/TG21 updates refined criteria based on validation studies
  • Improved outcomes when guidelines followed (reduced mortality, LOS)

Early vs Delayed Drainage: [9]

  • Systematic reviews demonstrate reduced morbidity with early biliary drainage
  • Severe cholangitis: drainage within 24 hours improves survival
  • Moderate cholangitis: drainage within 48 hours recommended

ERCP vs Conservative Management:

  • Historical studies showed > 50% mortality with antibiotics alone
  • ERCP reduced mortality to less than 10% in non-severe cases
  • Emergency ERCP for severe cholangitis is now standard of care

Antibiotic Duration: [18]

  • Short-course (4-7 days) antibiotics adequate with successful source control
  • Non-inferior to longer courses in terms of clinical cure
  • Reduces antibiotic resistance and adverse effects

Level of Evidence Summary

InterventionEvidence LevelRecommendation
Early ERCP for severe cholangitisLevel 1bStrongly recommended
Broad-spectrum antibioticsLevel 1aStrongly recommended
Tokyo severity gradingLevel 2aRecommended
PTC when ERCP failsLevel 2bRecommended
Short-course antibiotics with source controlLevel 1bRecommended
Cholecystectomy within index admissionLevel 1bRecommended

14. Patient and Layperson Explanation

What is Acute Cholangitis?

Acute cholangitis is a serious infection of the bile ducts—the tubes that carry bile from your liver to your intestine. It usually happens when something blocks the bile duct (most commonly a gallstone), which allows bacteria to build up and cause infection.

What Causes It?

The most common cause is a gallstone that has moved from the gallbladder into the main bile duct and become stuck. Other causes include:

  • Narrowing of the bile duct (strictures)
  • Blockage from cancer
  • Problems with tubes (stents) placed in the bile duct
  • Parasites (in some parts of the world)

What Are the Symptoms?

The classic symptoms are:

  1. High fever with shaking chills (rigors)
  2. Pain in the upper right side of your tummy (under the ribs)
  3. Yellow skin and eyes (jaundice)

In severe cases, you may also develop:

  • Low blood pressure (feeling faint or dizzy)
  • Confusion

If you have these severe symptoms, call emergency services immediately—this is a medical emergency.

How Is It Diagnosed?

Doctors will:

  • Take blood tests to check for infection and liver function
  • Perform an ultrasound scan of your tummy
  • Sometimes do a CT scan or MRI
  • Take blood samples to find what bacteria is causing the infection

How Is It Treated?

Cholangitis requires urgent treatment in hospital:

  1. Fluids through a drip to support your blood pressure
  2. Strong antibiotics through a drip to fight the infection
  3. A procedure to clear the blockage—usually an ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography):
    • A flexible camera is passed through your mouth into your stomach and intestine
    • Special instruments are used to remove stones or place a tube (stent) to drain bile
  4. Intensive care if you are very unwell

What Happens If It's Not Treated?

Without prompt treatment, the infection can spread to your bloodstream (sepsis), cause organ failure, and be life-threatening. However, with early treatment, most people recover well.

Recovery and Follow-Up

After treatment for cholangitis:

  • You will usually stay in hospital for several days
  • If gallstones caused the problem, you may need surgery to remove your gallbladder (cholecystectomy) during the same admission or within a few weeks
  • If you have a stent, it may need to be changed every few months

When to Seek Help

See a doctor urgently if you have:

  • Fever with yellowing of your skin or eyes
  • Severe upper abdominal pain
  • Shaking chills
  • Confusion or feeling very unwell

15. Examination Focus

High-Yield Exam Topics

TopicKey Points
Charcot's TriadFever + RUQ pain + Jaundice (present in only 50-70%)
Reynolds' PentadCharcot's + Hypotension + Altered mental status = SEVERE/EMERGENCY
Common CauseCholedocholithiasis (50-70%); also strictures, malignancy, stents
Common OrganismsE. coli (most common), Klebsiella, Enterococcus, Bacteroides
Tokyo GuidelinesDiagnostic criteria; Grade I/II/III severity; drainage timing
First-Line DrainageERCP with sphincterotomy and stone extraction (90-95% success)
Alternative DrainagePTC if ERCP fails/inaccessible; EUS-guided; surgical last resort
AntibioticsPiperacillin-tazobactam OR Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole
Duration4-7 days with source control; longer if bacteraemia/abscess
Cholecystectomy TimingIndex admission or within 2 weeks to prevent recurrence

Sample Viva Questions and Model Answers

Q1: A 68-year-old woman presents with fever, jaundice, and right upper quadrant pain. How would you manage her?

Model Answer:

"This presentation describes Charcot's triad, which is highly suggestive of acute cholangitis. My immediate priorities are resuscitation and establishing the diagnosis and severity.

Initial management (Sepsis-6 bundle):

  • High-flow oxygen targeting SpO2 94-98%
  • IV access and take blood cultures (2 sets before antibiotics)
  • Commence IV broad-spectrum antibiotics within 1 hour—I would give piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5g IV or ceftriaxone 2g with metronidazole 500mg
  • IV crystalloid fluid bolus if hypotensive or lactate elevated
  • Check serum lactate
  • Monitor urine output; catheterise if oliguric

Investigations:

  • Bloods: FBC, CRP, LFTs, amylase, coagulation, renal function, lactate
  • Blood cultures x2
  • Urgent abdominal ultrasound looking for CBD dilatation and stones

Severity grading using Tokyo Guidelines (TG18):

  • Assess for organ dysfunction (Grade III markers)
  • Grade I = mild; Grade II = moderate; Grade III = severe

Definitive management:

  • Urgent referral to gastroenterology/GI surgery for biliary drainage
  • ERCP is first-line, with timing dependent on severity:
    • "Grade III: within 24 hours (ideally within 12 hours)"
    • "Grade II: within 24-48 hours"
    • "Grade I: semi-elective"
  • If ERCP fails or is contraindicated, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) is the alternative
  • ICU admission if Grade III with organ support as required

Follow-up:

  • Once stabilised, cholecystectomy (if gallstone cause) during same admission or within 2 weeks to prevent recurrence"

Q2: What are the Tokyo Guidelines for acute cholangitis?

Model Answer:

"The Tokyo Guidelines (TG18/TG21) are internationally accepted criteria for the diagnosis, severity grading, and management of acute cholangitis.

Diagnosis requires:

  1. Systemic inflammation: Fever > 38°C OR shaking chills OR laboratory evidence (WCC abnormal, CRP elevated)
  2. Cholestasis: Jaundice OR abnormal LFTs (bilirubin, ALP, GGT elevated)
  3. Imaging: Biliary dilatation OR evidence of aetiology (stone, stricture, stent)
  • Definite diagnosis: All 3 categories
  • Suspected diagnosis: Any 2 categories

Severity Grading:

Grade I (Mild):

  • Does not meet Grade II or III criteria
  • Responds to initial treatment
  • Management: Antibiotics, semi-elective drainage

Grade II (Moderate):

  • Any 2 of: WCC > 12,000 or less than 4,000; Fever > 39°C; Age ≥75; Bilirubin ≥5 mg/dL; Low albumin
  • Does not have organ dysfunction
  • Management: Early drainage within 24-48 hours

Grade III (Severe):

  • Any organ dysfunction:
    • "Cardiovascular: Hypotension requiring vasopressors"
    • "Neurological: Altered consciousness"
    • "Respiratory: PaO2/FiO2 less than 300"
    • "Renal: Creatinine > 2 mg/dL"
    • "Hepatic: INR > 1.5"
    • "Haematological: Platelets less than 100,000"
  • Management: ICU admission, urgent drainage within 24 hours (ideally 12 hours)

The guidelines have been validated and shown to improve outcomes when followed."

Q3: When would you consider PTC instead of ERCP?

Model Answer:

"Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC) is considered when ERCP is unsuccessful or technically not feasible.

Indications for PTC:

  1. Failed ERCP cannulation (occurs in 5-10% of cases)
  2. Altered surgical anatomy preventing endoscopic access:
    • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or hepaticojejunostomy
    • Whipple procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy)
    • Billroth II gastrectomy (can attempt device-assisted ERCP first)
  3. Duodenal obstruction:
    • Tumour infiltration
    • Severe duodenal stenosis
  4. Hilar biliary obstruction:
    • Klatskin tumour—PTC may provide better access to intrahepatic ducts
  5. Patient factors:
    • Too unstable for prolonged endoscopy
    • Contraindication to sedation/general anaesthesia

Procedure:

  • Performed by interventional radiology
  • Ultrasound or fluoroscopy-guided puncture of dilated intrahepatic bile duct
  • Placement of external biliary drain for decompression
  • Can be converted to internal-external drain or stent later

Success rate: 80-90%

Complications:

  • Bleeding (2-5%)
  • Bile leak and biliary peritonitis (2-3%)
  • Sepsis
  • Catheter dislodgement
  • Pleural complications if right-sided approach

PTC is complementary to ERCP, and having access to both techniques is essential for comprehensive management of biliary disease."

Common Exam Errors

ErrorCorrect Approach
Relying solely on Charcot's triad for diagnosisTriad present in only 50-70%; maintain high suspicion in any patient with sepsis + jaundice or RUQ pain
Delaying antibiotics for imaging or ERCPStart antibiotics within 1 hour of recognition; imaging and ERCP come after initial resuscitation
Not recognising Reynolds' pentadHypotension + confusion = severe cholangitis requiring urgent ERCP and ICU admission
Forgetting PTC as alternativeEssential when ERCP fails or altered anatomy (Roux-en-Y, Whipple)
Wrong antibiotic choiceNeed Gram-negative AND anaerobic cover: piperacillin-tazobactam OR ceftriaxone + metronidazole
Not grading severity using TokyoSeverity determines drainage timing—must assess
Discharging without addressing underlying causeCholecystectomy needed within same admission or 2 weeks to prevent recurrence
Not obtaining blood cultures before antibioticsCultures guide therapy; positive in 40-80%

Clinical Pearls for Examiners

  1. "Cholangitis without jaundice": Can occur early or in partial obstruction; high index of suspicion required

  2. "The stone may have passed": CBD may not be dilated if stone recently passed; LFTs may still be deranged

  3. "Elderly may present atypically": Confusion, falls, or general deterioration without classic triad

  4. "Post-ERCP fever": Distinguish post-procedural bacteraemia from unsuccessful drainage or pancreatitis

  5. "Malignant cholangitis has worse outcomes": Higher mortality, often requires metal stent, may need repeated interventions


16. References

  1. Miura F, Okamoto K, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):17-30. doi:10.1002/jhbp.512 [PMID: 29032610]

  2. Lee JG. Diagnosis and management of acute cholangitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(9):533-541. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2009.126 [PMID: 19652653]

  3. Kiriyama S, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20(1):24-34. doi:10.1007/s00534-012-0561-3 [PMID: 23307001]

  4. Reynolds BM, Dargan EL. Acute obstructive cholangitis; a distinct clinical syndrome. Ann Surg. 1959;150(2):299-303. doi:10.1097/00000658-195908000-00013 [PMID: 13670595]

  5. Tazuma S, Unno M, Igarashi Y, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52(3):276-300. doi:10.1007/s00535-016-1289-7 [PMID: 27942871]

  6. Attasaranya S, Fogel EL, Lehman GA. Choledocholithiasis, ascending cholangitis, and gallstone pancreatitis. Med Clin North Am. 2008;92(4):925-960. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2008.03.001 [PMID: 18570948]

  7. Kiriyama S, Kozaka K, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021;28(8):674-684. doi:10.1002/jhbp.877 [PMID: 34232559]

  8. Lai EC, Mok FP, Tan ES, et al. Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(24):1582-1586. doi:10.1056/NEJM199206113262401 [PMID: 1584258]

  9. Tan M, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB, Laursen SB. Association between early ERCP and mortality in patients with acute cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(1):185-192. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.009 [PMID: 28433614]

  10. Weber A, Gaa J, Rosca B, et al. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with dilated and nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72(3):412-417. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.08.012 [PMID: 18842373]

  11. Yeom DH, Oh HJ, Son YW, Kim TH. What are the risk factors for acute suppurative cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones? Gut Liver. 2010;4(3):363-367. doi:10.5009/gnl.2010.4.3.363 [PMID: 20981214]

  12. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304-377. doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 [PMID: 28101605]

  13. Melzer M, Toner R, Lacey S, Bettany E, Rait G. Biliary tract infection and bacteraemia: presentation, structural abnormalities, causative organisms and clinical outcomes. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(986):773-776. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2007.064683 [PMID: 18057177]

  14. Gomi H, Solomkin JS, Schlossberg D, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: antimicrobial therapy for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):3-16. doi:10.1002/jhbp.518 [PMID: 29090866]

  15. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(8):1781-1788. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x [PMID: 17509029]

  16. Sung JY, Costerton JW, Shaffer EA. Defense system in the biliary tract against bacterial infection. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37(5):689-696. doi:10.1007/BF01296423 [PMID: 1563308]

  17. Daniels R, Nutbeam T, et al. The Sepsis Manual. 4th ed. UK Sepsis Trust. 2017.

  18. van Lent AU, Bartelsman JF, Tytgat GN, Speelman P, Prins JM. Duration of antibiotic therapy for cholangitis after successful endoscopic drainage of the biliary tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55(4):518-522. doi:10.1067/mge.2002.122334 [PMID: 11923764]

  19. Khan MA, Akbar A, Baron TH, et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61(3):684-703. doi:10.1007/s10620-015-3933-0 [PMID: 26518134]

  20. Friis C, Rothwell J, Weber DG, et al. Timing of cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2023;173(2):368-380. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2022.09.028 [PMID: 36333170]


Last Reviewed: 2026-01-09 | MedVellum Editorial Team


Medical Disclaimer: MedVellum content is for educational purposes and clinical reference. Clinical decisions should account for individual patient circumstances, local guidelines, and institutional protocols. Always consult appropriate specialists and verify drug doses with current formularies.

Evidence trail

This article contains inline citation markers, but the full bibliography has not yet been imported as a visible references section. The page is still tracked through the editorial review pipeline below.

Tracked citations
Inline citations present
Reviewed by
MedVellum Editorial Team
Review date
17 Jan 2026

All clinical claims sourced from PubMed

Frequently asked questions

Quick clarifications for common clinical and exam-facing questions.

When should I seek emergency care for acute cholangitis?

Seek immediate emergency care if you experience any of the following warning signs: Septic shock (Reynolds' pentad), Multi-organ failure, Altered mental status or confusion, Persistent hypotension despite fluid resuscitation, Failure to respond to antibiotics within 24-48 hours, Suspected suppurative cholangitis with pus in biliary tree, Cardiovascular dysfunction requiring vasopressors, Respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 less than 300), Acute kidney injury (creatinine less than 2 mg/dL), Coagulopathy (INR less than 1.5, platelets less than 100,000).

Learning map

Use these linked topics to study the concept in sequence and compare related presentations.

Prerequisites

Start here if you need the foundation before this topic.

  • Biliary Anatomy and Physiology
  • Cholelithiasis and Gallstone Disease

Differentials

Competing diagnoses and look-alikes to compare.

Consequences

Complications and downstream problems to keep in mind.

  • Septic Shock
  • Multi-Organ Dysfunction Syndrome
  • Hepatic Abscess